Assessing molecular subtypes of gastric cancer: microsatellite unstable and Epstein-Barr virus subtypes. Methods for detection and clinical and pathological implications

Potent therapeutic strategy in gastric cancer with microsatellite instability-high and/or deficient mismatch repair

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common malignancy that presents challenges in patient care worldwide. The mismatch repair (MMR) system is a highly conserved DNA repair mechanism that protects genome integrity during replication. Deficient MMR (dMMR) results in an increased accumulation of genetic errors in microsatellite sequences, leading to the development of a microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype. Most MSI-H/dMMR GCs arise sporadically, mainly due to MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) epigenetic silencing. Unlike microsatellite-stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) GCs, MSI-H/dMMR GCs are relatively rare and represent a distinct subtype with genomic instability, a high somatic mutational burden, favorable immunogenicity, different responses to treatment, and prognosis. dMMR/MSI-H status is a robust predictive biomarker for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) due to high neoantigen load, prominent tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) overexpression. However, a subset of MSI-H/dMMR GC patients does not benefit from immunotherapy, highlighting the need for further research into predictive biomarkers and resistance mechanisms. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical, molecular, immunogenic, and therapeutic aspects of MSI-H/dMMR GC, with a focus on the impact of ICIs in immunotherapy and their potential as neoadjuvant therapies. Understanding the complexity and diversity of the molecular and immunological profiles of MSI-H/dMMR GC will drive the development of more effective therapeutic strategies and molecular targets for future precision medicine.

Molecular classification and intratumoral heterogeneity of gastric adenocarcinoma

Gastric cancers frequently harbor striking histological complexity and diversity between lesions as well as within single lesions, known as inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, respectively. The latest World Health Organization Classification of Tumors designated more than 30 histological subtypes for gastric epithelial tumors, assigning 12 subtypes for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAD). Meanwhile, recent advances in genome-wide analyses have provided molecular aspects to the histological classification of GAD, and consequently revealed different molecular traits underlying these histological subtypes. Moreover, accumulating knowledge of comprehensive molecular profiles has led to establishing molecular classifications of GAD, which are often associated with clinical biomarkers for therapeutics and prognosis. However, most of our knowledge of GAD molecular profiles is based on inter-tumoral heterogeneity, and the molecular profiles underlying intratumoral heterogeneity are yet to be determined. In this review, recently established molecular classifications of GAD are introduced in the aspect of pathological diagnosis and are discussed in the context of intratumoral heterogeneity.

Investigating the relationship between Epstein-Barr virus infection and gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aims

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common cancer type worldwide, and various factors can be involved in its occurrence. One of these factors is Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. In this regard, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to achieve a better understanding of the EBV prevalence in GC samples.

Methods

English databases were searched and studies that reported the prevalence and etiological factors of EBV related to GC from July 2007 to November 2022 were retrieved. The reported data were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of EBV infection with 95% confidence intervals was calculated. Quality assessment, heterogeneity testing, and publication bias assessment were also performed. The literature search showed 953 studies, of which 87 studies met our inclusion criteria and were used for meta-analysis.

Results

The pooled prevalence of EBV infection related to GC was estimated to be 9.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.2%-11%) in the general population. The prevalence of EBV infection related to GC by gender was 13.5% (95% CI: 11.1%-16.3%) in males and 7.6% (95% CI: 5.4%-10.6%) in females. No significant differences were observed in terms of geographical region. Out of the 87 studies included in the meta-analysis, the most common diagnostic test was in situ hybridization (58 cases).

Conclusions

Altogether, the results indicated that EBV infection is one of the important factors in the development of GC. However, this does not necessarily mean that EBV infection directly causes GC since other factors may also be involved in the development of GC. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct extensive epidemiological studies on various aspects of the relationship between this virus and GC, which can provide valuable information for understanding the relationship between EBV and GC.

Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Early and Advanced Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) persists as the fourth most prevalent cause of global cancer-related mortality, presenting a challenge due to the scarcity of available therapeutic strategies. Precision medicine is crucial not only in the treatment but also in the management of GC. We performed gene panel sequencing with Oncomine focus assay comprising 52 cancer-associated genes and MSI analysis in 100 case-matched gastric cancer cases. A comprehensive analysis of clinical and genetic characteristics was conducted on these genetic results and clinicopathological findings. Upon comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, significant differences between early gastric cancer (EGC) and advanced gastric cancer (AGC) were observed in tumor location (p = 0.003), Lauren classification (p = 0.015), T stage (p = 0.000), and N stage (p = 0.015). The six most frequently mutated genes were PIK3CA (29%, 10/35), ERBB2 (17%, 6/35), KRAS (14%, 5/35), ALK (6%, 2/35), ESR1 (6%, 2/35), and FGFR3 (6%, 2/35). Regarding genetic variation, there was a tendency for the N stage to be higher in GC patients with mutated genes (p = 0.014). The frequency of mutations in GC patients was statistically significantly higher in AGC (n = 24) compared to EGC (n = 11) (odds ratio, 2.792; 95% confidence interval, 1.113 to 7.007; p = 0.026). Six of the ten GC patients carrying mutated genes and exhibiting MSI were classified into intestinal-type and undifferentiated GC, with the location of the tumor being in the lower-third. Among these patients, five harbored mutated PIK3CA, while the remaining patient had a mutation in ALK. Conclusions: AGC patients more frequently exhibited alterations of PIK3CA, KRAS, and ERBB2 as somatic oncogenic drivers, and displayed a higher prevalence of cumulative genetic events, including increased rates of PIK3CA mutations, enhanced detection of immunotherapy biomarkers, and mutations of the ESR1 gene.

Assessment of the reliability of MSI status and dMMR proteins deficiency screening on endoscopic biopsy material in esophagus and gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a negative predictive factor for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable oesogastric adenocarcinoma and a crucial determinant for immunotherapy. We aimed to evaluate reliability of dMMR/MSI status screening performed on preoperative endoscopic biopsies.

METHODS

Paired pathological samples from biopsies and surgical specimen of oesogastric adenocarcinoma were retrospectively collected between 2009 and 2019. We compared dMMR status obtained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MSI status by PCR. dMMR/MSI status on surgical specimen was considered as reference.

RESULTS

PCR and IHC were conclusive on biopsies respectively for 53 (96.4%) and 47 (85.5%) of the 55 patients enrolled. IHC was not contributive for 1 surgical specimen. A third reading of IHC was carried out for 3 biopsies. MSI status was observed in 7 (12.5%) surgical specimens. When analyses were contributive, sensitivity and specificity of biopsies for dMMR/MSI were respectively 85% and 98% for PCR vs. 86% and 98% for IHC. Concordance rate between biopsies and surgical specimen was 96.2% for PCR and 97.8% for IHC.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic biopsies are a suitable source of tissue for dMMR/MSI status determination in oesogastric adenocarcinoma which should be routinely performed at diagnosis to better adapt neoadjuvant treatment.

MINIABSTRACT

By comparison of dMMR phenotype obtained by immunohistochemistry and MSI status by PCR between match-paired samples of oesogastric cancer's endoscopic biopsies and surgical specimen, we observed that biopsies are a suitable source of tissue for dMMR/MSI status determination.

Does Epstein-Barr virus-positive gastric cancer establish a significant relationship with the multiple genes related to gastric carcinogenesis?

Gastric cancer has been categorized into molecular subtypes including Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive tumors, which provide clinicopathological and prognostic information. In this study, we investigated the EBV infection status of patients with gastric cancer and its correlation with the clinicopathological characteristics and multiple genes related to gastric carcinogenesis. The data of 460 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection between January 2017 and February 2022 were analyzed. The clinicopathological features and prognosis of the patients with EBV-positive gastric cancers were compared with those of EBV-negative gastric cancers. Immunohistochemistry for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), C-erb B2, Ki-67, and p53 was performed. Additionally, in situ hybridization was conducted to detect EBV, and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis was used to assess the deficiency in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. EBV-positivity and MSI were identified in 10.4% and 37.3% of gastric cancer patients, respectively. EBV positivity was associated with male gender (P = 0.001), proximal location (P = 0.004), poorly differentiated histological type (P = 0.048), moderate to severe lymphoid stroma (P = 0.006), high Ki-67 expression (P = 0.02), and a shorter resection margin. EGFR was more often expressed in EBV-negative gastric cancers (P < 0.001). MSI tumors were associated with older age (P = 0.01), the presence of lymphatic invasion (P = 0.02), less perineural invasion (P = 0.05), and the presence of H. pylori infection (P = 0.05). EBV positive gastric cancer is associated with increased Ki-67 and decreased EGFR expression and a shorter resection margin due to the prominent lymphoid stroma. However, MMR deficiency is not associated with EBV status even though MSI gastric cancer is related to H. pylori status.

Survival of Locally Advanced MSI-high Gastric Cancer Patients Treated With Perioperative Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND

Although MSI-high gastric cancer is associated with a superior prognosis, recent studies question the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy in this population.

METHODS

Locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who either underwent surgery alone or also received neoadjuvant, perioperative, or adjuvant chemotherapy between 2000 and 2018 were eligible. MSI status, determined by next-generation sequencing or mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry, was determined in 535 patients. Associations among MSI status, chemotherapy administration, overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival were assessed.

RESULTS

In 535 patients, 82 (15.3%) had an MSI-high tumor and ∼20% better OS, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival. Grade 1 (90%-100%) pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was found in 0 of 40 (0%) MSI-high tumors versus 43 of 274 (16%) MSS. In the MSI-high group, the 3-year OS rate was 79% with chemotherapy versus 88% with surgery alone ( P =0.48). In the MSS group, this was 61% versus 59%, respectively ( P =0.96). After multivariable interaction analyses, patients with MSI-high tumors had superior survival compared with patients with MSS tumors whether given chemotherapy (hazard ratio=0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.99) or treated with surgery alone (hazard ratio=0.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.02-1.17).

CONCLUSIONS

MSI-high locally advanced gastric cancer was associated with superior survival compared with MSS overall, despite worse pathological chemotherapy response. In patients with MSI-high gastric cancer who received chemotherapy, the survival rate was ∼9% worse compared with surgery alone, but chemotherapy was not significantly associated with survival.

Prognostic Implication of EBV Infection in Gastric Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and objectives: This study aims to elucidate the prognostic implications of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in gastric carcinomas (GCs) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: In total, 57 eligible studies and 22,943 patients were included in this meta-analysis. We compared the prognoses of EBV-infected and non-infected GC patients. The subgroup analysis was performed based on the study location, molecular classification, and Lauren's classification. This study was checked according to the PRISMA 2020. The meta-analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software package. Results: EBV infection was found in 10.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.082-0.131) of GC patients. The EBV-infected GC patients had a better overall survival compared with the EBV-non-infected GC patients (hazard ratio (HR) 0.890, 95% CI 0.816-0.970). In the subgroup analysis based on molecular classification, no significant differences were found between EBV+ and microsatellite instability and microsatellite stable (MSS)/EBV- subgroups (HR 1.099, 95% CI 0.885-1.364 and HR 0.954, 95% CI 0.872-1.044, respectively). In the diffuse type of Lauren's classification, EBV-infected GCs have a better prognosis compared with the EBV-non-infected GCs (HR 0.400, 95% CI 0.300-0.534). The prognostic impact of EBV infection was found in the Asian and American subgroups but not in the European subgroup (HR 0.880, 95% CI 0.782-0.991, HR 0.840, 95% CI 0.750-0.941, and HR 0.915, 95% CI 0.814-1.028). Conclusions: EBV infection is a favorable survival factor for GCs. However, the prognostic implications of EBV infection in the new molecular classification are not clear.

Estimating the Global Burden of Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Evidence suggests that a fraction of new gastric cancer cases may be etiologically associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a known carcinogenic agent. We aimed to systematically explore the proportion of EBV-positive gastric cancer.

METHODS

We did a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020164473) from January 1990 to August 2021. For each country and geographical region with available data, pooled prevalence and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of EBV in gastric tumors were calculated for 3 subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma (conventional adenocarcinoma, lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma, and remnant/stump carcinoma). For conventional adenocarcinoma, prevalence ratios (PRs) were presented for sex, Lauren's classification, gastric cancer stage, and anatomical location of the stomach.

RESULTS

In 220 eligible studies including over 68,000 cases of conventional gastric adenocarcinoma, EBV prevalence in tumor cells was 7.5% (95% CI, 6.9%-8.1%) and was higher in men compared with women (PR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.9-2.4), in diffuse type compared with intestinal type (PR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5), and in the proximal region compared with the distal region (PR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.0-3.1). There was no difference in EBV prevalence by gastric cancer stage. EBV prevalence was 75.9% (95% CI, 62.8%-85.5%) among lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma and 26.3% (95% CI, 22.2%-32.0%) among remnant or stump carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Assuming a causal association between EBV and gastric cancer, our findings, when applied to the GLOBOCAN 2020 gastric cancer incidence, suggest that primary prevention such as the development of an effective EBV vaccine might prevent 81,000 EBV-associated gastric cancer cases worldwide annually.

Microsatellite instability profiles of gastrointestinal cancers: comparison between non-colorectal and colorectal origin

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a major carcinogenic pathway with prognostic and predictive implications. The validity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based MSI testing is well established in colorectal cancer; however, the data are limited in non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers. The aim of this study is to clarify the detailed MSI profiles of non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers and to investigate the differences from those of colorectal cancers. MSI testing was performed using paired tumour/normal tissues of 123 mismatch repair-deficient cancers detected by immunohistochemistry including 80 non-colorectal cancers (eight oesophagogastric junction (EGJ), 57 gastric and 15 small intestine) and 43 colorectal cancers. Fragment size analysis revealed that the mean nucleotide shifts of five markers (Promega panel) were the highest in the stomach (6.4), followed by colorectum (5.7), small intestine (5.0) and EGJ cancers (mean = 4.0; P = 0.015, versus stomach). All cases showed ≥ 1 nucleotide shift in ≥ 2 markers and were considered as MSI-high. However, when the cut-off was set to ≥ 3 nucleotide shifts in ≥ 2 markers, three EGJ (37.5%), two small intestine (13.3%) and two gastric (3.5%) cancers showed false-negative results. In addition, cases with isolated loss of MSH6 or PMS2 showed smaller nucleotide shifts than those in others. MSI testing is applicable to non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers; however, a subset can yield false-negative results due to subtle nucleotide shift in multiple markers. Analysis of paired tumour/normal tissues and careful interpretation is necessary to avoid false-negative results and ensure appropriate treatment.

Clinical Significance of Molecular Subtypes in Western Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Experience

In recent years, the molecular subtyping of gastric cancer has led to the identification of novel clinically relevant biomarkers as well as promising therapeutic targets. In parallel, the advent of checkpoint inhibitors has expanded treatment options beyond conventional chemotherapy. Compelling evidence has shown unprecedented efficacy results for anti-PD1-based therapies in the molecular subgroups of dMMR/MSI-h, EBV+ and PD-L1 CPS+ patients, to the point that these are granted approval for gastric cancer adenocarcinoma (AGC) in several countries. Despite this, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the only treatment choice for the considerable proportion of biomarkers-negative patients. In this context, little is known about the association between subtypes-defining biomarkers (HER2, MMR/MSI, PD-L1, and EBV) and the efficacy of standard chemotherapy in non-Asian AGC. Here, we aimed to investigate the prevalence, the clinic-pathologic features, and the impact on treatment outcome of clinical molecular subtypes in a new-diagnosed Western cohort of AGC.

EBV and MSI Status in Gastric Cancer: Does It Matter?

We investigated the impactof microsatellite instability (MSI) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status in gastric cancer (GC), regarding response to perioperative chemotherapy (POPChT), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). We included 137 cases of operated GC, 51 of which were submitted to POPChT. MSI status was determined by multiplex PCR and EBV status by EBV-encoded RNA in situ hybridization. Thirty-seven (27%) cases presented as MSI-high, and seven (5.1%) were EBV+. Concerning tumor regression after POPChT, no differences were observed between the molecular subtypes, but females were more likely to respond (p = 0.062). No significant differences were found in OS or PFS between different subtypes. In multivariate analysis, age (HR 1.02, IC 95% 1.002-1.056, p = 0.033) and positive lymph nodes (HR 1.82, IC 95% 1.034-3.211, p = 0.038) were the only prognostic factors for OS. However, females with MSI-high tumors treated with POPChT demonstrated a significantly increased OS compared to females with MSS tumors (p = 0.031). In conclusion, we found a high proportion of MSI-high cases. MSI and EBV status did not influence OS or PFS either in patients submitted to POPChT or surgery alone. However, superior survival of females with MSI-high tumors suggests that sex disparities and molecular classification may influence treatment options in GC.

Integrative immune transcriptomic classification improves patient selection for precision immunotherapy in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer (GEA) treatment has been improved by the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), yet identifying predictive biomarkers remains a priority, particularly in patients with a combined positive score (CPS) < 5, where the benefit is less clear. Our study assesses certain immune microenvironment features related to sensitivity or resistance to CPIs with the aim of implementing a personalised approach across CPS < 5 GEA.

DESIGN

Through integrative transcriptomic and clinicopathological analyses, we studied in both a retrospective and a prospective cohort, the immune tumour microenvironment features. We analysed the cell types composing the immune infiltrate highlighting their functional activity.

RESULTS

This integrative study allowed the identification of four different groups across our patients. Among them, we identified a cluster whose tumours expressed the most gene signatures related to immunomodulatory pathways and immunotherapy response. These tumours presented an enriched immune infiltrate showing high immune function activity that could potentially achieve the best benefit from CPIs. Finally, our findings were proven in an external CPI-exposed population, where the use of our transcriptomic results combined with CPS helped better identify those patients who could benefit from immunotherapy than using CPS alone (p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

This transcriptomic classification could improve precision immunotherapy for GEA.

Does immunotherapy change the treatment paradigm in metastatic gastric cancer?

Gastric cancer represents one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Even if the last decade has witnessed an improvement in surgical and systemic treatments, with an increase of overall life expectancy, survival rates still remain unsatisfactory, especially for patients with metastatic disease. Systemic therapies represent the gold standard in the management of stage IV gastric cancer. In this scenario, the availability of effective second and third lines has represented for a long time the only hope to offer an overall survival improvement to these patients. Recently, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has involved also gastric cancer with encouraging efficacy data in the metastatic setting, becoming integral part of the management of selected patients.

CT-based radiomic nomogram for preoperative prediction of DNA mismatch repair deficiency in gastric cancer

Background

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency has attracted considerable attention as a predictor of the immunotherapy efficacy of solid tumors, including gastric cancer. We aimed to develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic nomogram for the preoperative prediction of MMR deficiency in gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, 225 and 91 GC patients from two distinct hospital cohorts were included. Cohort 1 was randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 176) and an internal validation cohort (n = 76), whereas cohort 2 was considered an external validation cohort. Based on repeatable radiomic features, a radiomic signature was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. We employed multivariable logistic regression analysis to build a radiomics-based model based on radiomic features and preoperative clinical characteristics. Furthermore, this prediction model was presented as a radiomic nomogram, which was evaluated in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts.

Results

The radiomic signature composed of 15 robust features showed a significant association with MMR protein status in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts (both P-values &lt;0.001). A radiomic nomogram incorporating a radiomic signature and two clinical characteristics (age and CT-reported N stage) represented good discrimination in the training cohort with an AUC of 0.902 (95% CI: 0.853–0.951), in the internal validation cohort with an AUC of 0.972 (95% CI: 0.945–1.000) and in the external validation cohort with an AUC of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.825–0.958).

Conclusion

The CT-based radiomic nomogram showed good performance for preoperative prediction of MMR protein status in GC. Furthermore, this model was a noninvasive tool to predict MMR protein status and guide neoadjuvant therapy.

Increasing frequency of gene copy number aberrations is associated with immunosuppression and predicts poor prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with Epstein-Barr virus-positive gastric cancers or those with microsatellite instability appear to have a favourable prognosis. However, the prognostic value of the chromosomal status (chromosome-stable (CS) versus chromosomal instable (CIN)) remains unclear in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Gene copy number aberrations (CNAs) were determined in 16 CIN-associated genes in a retrospective study including test and validation cohorts of patients with gastric cancer. Patients were stratified into CS (no CNA), CINlow (1-2 CNAs) or CINhigh (3 or more CNAs). The relationship between chromosomal status, clinicopathological variables, and overall survival (OS) was analysed. The relationship between chromosomal status, p53 expression, and tumour infiltrating immune cells was also assessed and validated externally.

RESULTS

The test and validation cohorts included 206 and 748 patients, respectively. CINlow and CINhigh were seen in 35.0 and 15.0 per cent of patients, respectively, in the test cohort, and 48.5 and 20.7 per cent in the validation cohort. Patients with CINhigh gastric cancer had the poorest OS in the test and validation cohorts. In multivariable analysis, CINlow, CINhigh and pTNM stage III-IV (P < 0.001) were independently associated with poor OS. CIN was associated with high p53 expression and low immune cell infiltration.

CONCLUSION

CIN may be a potential new prognostic biomarker independent of pTNM stage in gastric cancer. Patients with gastric cancer demonstrating CIN appear to be immunosuppressed, which might represent one of the underlying mechanisms explaining the poor survival and may help guide future therapeutic decisions.

Deep Learning based on hematoxylin-eosin staining outperforms immunohistochemistry in predicting molecular subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma

In gastric cancer (GC), there are four molecular subclasses that indicate whether patients respond to chemotherapy or immunotherapy, according to the TCGA. In clinical practice, however, not every patient undergoes molecular testing. Many laboratories have used well-implemented in situ techniques (IHC and EBER-ISH) to determine the subclasses in their cohorts. Although multiple stains are used, we show that a staining approach is unable to correctly discriminate all subclasses. As an alternative, we trained an ensemble convolutional neuronal network using bagging that can predict the molecular subclass directly from hematoxylin-eosin histology. We also identified patients with predicted intra-tumoral heterogeneity or with features from multiple subclasses, which challenges the postulated TCGA-based decision tree for GC subtyping. In the future, Deep Learning may enable targeted testing for molecular subtypes and targeted therapy for a broader group of GC patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in molecular subtypes of resectable gastric cancer: a post hoc analysis of the D1/D2 and CRITICS trials

BACKGROUND

Epstein-Barr virus positivity (EBV+) and microsatellite instability (MSI-high) are positive prognostic factors for survival in resectable gastric cancer (GC). However, benefit of perioperative treatment in patients with MSI-high tumors remains topic of discussion. Here, we present the clinicopathological outcomes of patients with EBV+, MSI-high, and EBV-/MSS GCs who received either surgery only or perioperative treatment.

METHODS

EBV and MSI status were determined on tumor samples collected from 447 patients treated with surgery only in the D1/D2 trial, and from 451 patients treated perioperatively in the CRITICS trial. Results were correlated to histopathological response, morphological tumor characteristics, and survival.

RESULTS

In the D1/D2 trial, 5-year cancer-related survival was 65.2% in 47 patients with EBV+, 56.7% in 47 patients with MSI-high, and 47.6% in 353 patients with EBV-/MSS tumors. In the CRITICS trial, 5-year cancer-related survival was 69.8% in 25 patients with EBV+, 51.7% in 27 patients with MSI-high, and 38.6% in 402 patients with EBV-/MSS tumors. Interestingly, all three MSI-high tumors with moderate to complete histopathological response (3/27, 11.1%) had substantial mucinous differentiation. No EBV+ tumors had a mucinous phenotype. 115/402 (28.6%) of EBV-/MSS tumors had moderate to complete histopathological response, of which 23/115 (20.0%) had a mucinous phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

In resectable GC, MSI-high had favorable outcome compared to EBV-/MSS, both in patients treated with surgery only, and in those treated with perioperative chemo(radio)therapy. Substantial histopathological response was restricted to mucinous MSI-high tumors. The mucinous phenotype might be a relevant parameter in future clinical trials for MSI-high patients.

Detecting immunotherapy-sensitive subtype in gastric cancer using histologic image-based deep learning

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is widely used but effective only in a subset of gastric cancers. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-positive and microsatellite instability (MSI) / mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumors have been reported to be highly responsive to ICIs. However, detecting these subtypes requires costly techniques, such as immunohistochemistry and molecular testing. In the present study, we constructed a histology-based deep learning model that aimed to screen this immunotherapy-sensitive subgroup efficiently. We processed whole slide images of 408 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma, including 108 EBV, 58 MSI/dMMR, and 242 other subtypes. Many images generated by data augmentation of the learning set were used for training convolutional neural networks to establish an automatic detection platform for EBV and MSI/dMMR subtypes, and the test sets of images were used to verify the learning outcome. Our model detected the subgroup (EBV + MSI/dMMR tumors) with high accuracy in test cases with an area under the curve of 0.947 (0.901–0.992). This result was slightly better than when EBV and MSI/dMMR tumors were detected separately. In an external validation cohort including 244 gastric cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, our model showed a favorable result for detecting the “EBV + MSI/dMMR” subgroup with an AUC of 0.870 (0.809–0.931). In addition, a visualization of the trained neural network highlighted intraepithelial lymphocytosis as the ground for prediction, suggesting that this feature is a discriminative characteristic shared by EBV and MSI/dMMR tumors. Histology-based deep learning models are expected to be used for detecting EBV and MSI/dMMR gastric cancers as economical and less time-consuming alternatives, which may help to effectively stratify patients who respond to ICIs.

[Update on gastric cancer. New molecular classifications]

Gastric cancer (GC) is an aggressive tumor, which is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage and shows high mortality rates. Several GC classifications have been published, based on features such as tumor location, endoscopic features or microscopic architecture. However, TNM stage remains the mainstay of GC management and treatment. In the last years, technical advances have allowed us to investigate the biological heterogeneity of GC and develop new molecular classifications. This knowledge may enhance current classifications, and has the potential to refine GC management and aid in the identification of new molecular targets. In this literature review we have summarized the main findings in epidemiology, screening, classification systems and treatment of GC, focusing on the molecular alterations and new molecular classifications published in the last years.

Amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene is associated with a microsatellite stable status in Chinese gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. However, little is known about the combination of HER2 amplification and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in GC. This study aimed to analyze the correlation of HER2 amplification with microsatellite instability (MSI) status, clinical characteristics, and the tumor mutational burden (TMB) of patients.

METHODS

A total of 192 gastric cancer (GC) patients were enrolled in this cohort. To analyze genomic alterations (GAs), deep sequencing was performed on 450 target cancer genes. TMB was measured by an in-house algorithm. MSI status was inferred based on the MANTIS (Microsatellite Analysis for Normal-Tumor InStability) score.

RESULTS

The most frequently amplified genes in the GC patients included cyclin E1 (CCNE1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), cyclin D1 (CCND1), fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19), fibroblast growth factor 3 (FGF3), and fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF4). The frequency of HER2 amplification was 9.38% (18/192). HER2 amplification was higher in females than in males (14.52% vs. 6.92%, respectively, P=0.091), however, MSI was higher in males compared to females (7.69% vs. 4.84%, respectively, P=0.46). HER2 amplification was higher in metastatic loci compared to primary lesions (23.08% vs. 8.38%, respectively, P=0.079) and was lower in patients with high TMB (TMB-H) compared to those with low TMB (TMB-L) (4.0% vs. 11.35%, respectively, P=0.12). While the frequency of MSI in metastatic foci was higher than that in primary lesions (15.38% vs. 6.15%, respectively, P=0.48), MSI status was highly associated with TMB-H (20% vs. 0%, respectively, P=3.66×10-7). Furthermore, HER2 amplification was negatively correlated with MSI status in Chinese GC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 amplification was negatively correlated with TMB-H and MSI status, and MSI status was significantly associated with TMB-H in Chinese GC patients. These data suggested that HER2 amplification might be a negative indicator for GC immunotherapy.

Clinicopathological characteristics of Epstein-Barr virus and microsatellite instability subtypes of early gastric neoplasms classified by the Japanese and the World Health Organization criteria

Gastric cancer is a heterogenous disease with different phenotypes, genotypes, and clinical outcomes, including sensitivity to treatments and prognoses. Recent medical advances have enabled the classification of this heterogenous disease into several groups and the consequent analysis of their clinicopathological characteristics. Gastric cancer associated with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and microsatellite‐unstable tumors are considered to be the two major subtypes as they are clearly defined by well‐established methodologies, such as in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction‐based analyses, respectively. However, discrepancies in the histological diagnosis of gastric neoplasms remain problematic, and international harmonization should be performed to improve our understanding of gastric carcinogenesis. We re‐evaluated Japanese cases of early gastric cancer according to the current World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and classified them into genomic subtypes based on microsatellite instability (MSI) and EBV positivity to determine the initial genetic events in gastric carcinogenesis. A total of 113 Japanese early gastric cancers (including low‐ and high‐grade dysplasias) treated with endoscopic resection over 5 years were archived in our hospital. A histological re‐evaluation according to the WHO criteria revealed 54 adenocarcinomas, which were divided into 6 EBV‐positive (11.1%), 7 MSI‐high (MSI‐H, 13.0%), and 41 microsatellite stable cases (75.9%). MSI‐H adenocarcinoma was confirmed by an immunohistochemistry assay of mismatch repair proteins. Programmed death‐ligand 1 immunostaining with two antibodies (E1L3N and SP263) was positive in tumor cells of one MSI‐H adenocarcinoma case (1/7, 14.3%). The proportion of stained cells was higher with clone SP263 than with E1L3N. Histologically, EBV‐positive carcinomas were poorly differentiated (83.8%), and MSI‐H cancers were frequent in well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (85.7%), indicating that the EBV‐positive subtype presented with high‐grade morphology even when an early lesion. Our study indicates that the WHO criteria are useful for subdividing Japanese early gastric cancers, and this subdivision may be useful for comparative analysis of precursor lesions and early carcinoma.

Beyond the Guidelines: The Grey Zones of the Management of Gastric Cancer. Consensus Statements from the Gastric Cancer Italian Network (GAIN)

BACKGROUND

Management of gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains challenging, because of the heterogeneity in tumor biology within the upper gastrointestinal tract. Daily clinical practice is full of grey areas regarding the complexity of diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic procedures. The aim of this paper is to provide a guide for clinicians facing challenging situations in routine practice, taking a multidisciplinary consensus approach based on available literature.

METHODS

The GAIN (GAstric cancer Italian Network) group was established with the aims of reviewing literature evidence, discussing key issues in prevention, diagnosis, and management of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma, and offering a summary of statements. A Delphi consensus method was used to obtain opinions from the expert panel of specialists.

RESULTS

Forty-nine clinical questions were identified in six areas of interest: role of multidisciplinary team; risk factors; diagnosis; management of early gastric cancer and multimodal approach to localized gastric cancer; treatment of elderly patients with locally advanced resectable disease; and treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The statements presented may guide clinicians in practical management of this disease.

Microsatellite instability in Gastric Cancer: Between lights and shadows

Gastric cancer (GC) represents an important contributor to the global burden of cancer, being one of the most common and deadly malignancies worldwide. According to TCGA and ACRG classifications, the microsatellite instable (MSI) group represents a significant subset of GCs and is currently in the limelight of many researches due to its favorable survival outcome in resectable stages compared to microsatellite stable tumors. MSI GCs hypermutated phenotype triggers immunosurveillance, making this molecular subgroup a promising candidate for immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment. Conversely, conflicting outcomes have been reported in chemotherapy settings. Due to the clinical relevance of these observations, in this review we report and discuss the molecular, pathological, prognostic, and predictive features of MSI gastric tumors.

Deep Targeted Sequencing and Its Potential Implication for Cancer Therapy in Chinese Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) has a high incidence and mortality rate, especially in East Asians, and about 90% of GCs are adenocarcinomas. Histological and etiological heterogeneity and ethnic diversity make molecular subtyping of GC complicated, thus making it difficult to determine molecular division systems and standard treatment modalities. Limited cohorts from South Korea, Singapore, Australia, and Japan have been studied; however, the mutational landscape of gastric adenocarcinomas in Chinese patients is still unknown.

METHODS

We performed a targeted sequencing panel focusing on cancer-related genes and tumor-associated microorganisms of 529 gastric adenocarcinoma samples with matched blood controls. We identified 449 clinically relevant gene mutations.

RESULTS

Approximately 47.1% of Chinese patients with GC harbored at least one actionable mutation. The top somatic mutations were TP53, ARID1A, LRP1B, PIK3CA, ERBB2, CDH1, KRAS, FAT4, CCNE1, and KMT2D. Truncation mutations of ARID1A, KMT2D, RNF43, TGFBR2, and CIC occurred in patients with high tumor mutational burden. Gene amplifications of ERBB2, CCNE1, CDK12, and CCND1 were detected in patients with low tumor mutational burden. Pathway analysis revealed common gene alterations in the Wnt and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways. The ratio of patients with high microsatellite instability was significantly lower than other cohorts, and high microsatellite instability and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive features seemed mutually inclusive in Chinese patients with GC. In 44 (8.3%) patients, 45 germline mutations were identified, among which SPINK1 mutations, all SPINK1 c.194 + 2T > C, were present in 15.9% (7/44) of patients. Microorganisms found in Chinese patients with GC included Helicobacter pylori, EBV, hepatitis B virus, and human papillomavirus types 16 and 18.

CONCLUSION

Identification of varied molecular features by targeted next-generation sequencing provides more insight into patient stratification and offers more possibilities for both targeted therapies and immunotherapies of Chinese patients with GC.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study investigated the genomic alteration profile of 529 Chinese patients with gastric adenocarcinoma by deep targeting sequencing, which might be the largest Chinese cohort on the genomic research of gastric adenocarcinoma up to now.

Biomarkers for Precision Treatment in Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide. Although GC was historically considered a single entity within the organ of origin, nowadays it is acknowledged that GC represents a heterogeneous disease. Nevertheless, in this field there is still a lack of biomarkers able to guide the choice of the best treatment options for each patient. This review aims to summarize the prognostic and predictive biomarkers evaluated in GC and their role as a guide for treatment for precision medicine.

SUMMARY

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression represents the only predictive molecular biomarker validated in GC, while its prognostic role is still controversial. Microsatellite instability and Epstein-Barr virus status are promising for prediction of the response to immunotherapy. The role of other biomarkers (ctDNA, programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1], and TMB), as well as the practical application of molecular classifications, requires further evaluation before use in clinical practice. 18-FDG-PET scan could be useful as a predictive tool in non-metastatic GC patients receiving a perioperative approach. Finally, the tumor microenvironment may have an evolving role in the future.

KEY MESSAGES

GC is a heterogeneous disease and targeted approaches are needed. The finding of prognostic and predictive factors is a hot topic in the field of GC personalized medicine.

Clinicopathological Significance of EBV-Infected Gastric Carcinomas: A Meta-Analysis

Background and objectives: The present study aims to elucidate the clinicopathologic significance of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in gastric carcinomas (GCs) through a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Sixty-one eligible studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The included patients, with and without EBV infection, were 2063 and 17,684, respectively. We investigated the clinicopathologic characteristics and various biomarkers, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Results: The estimated EBV-infected rate of GCs was 0.113 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.088-0.143). The EBV infection rates in GC cells were 0.138 (95% CI: 0.096-0.194), 0.103 (95% CI: 0.077-0.137), 0.080 (95% CI: 0.061-0.106), and 0.042 (95% CI: 0.016-0.106) in the population of Asia, America, Europe, and Africa, respectively. There was a significant difference between EBV-infected and noninfected GCs in the male: female ratio, but not other clinicopathological characteristics. EBV infection rates were higher in GC with lymphoid stroma (0.573, 95% CI: 0.428-0.706) than other histologic types of GCs. There were significant differences in high AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A) and PD-L1 expressions, and high CD8+ TILs between EBV-infected and noninfected GCs. Conclusions: Our results showed that EBV infection of GCs was frequently found in male patients and GCs with lymphoid stroma. EBV infection was significantly correlated with ARID1A and PD-L1 expressions and CD8+ TILs in GCs.

Association between Epstein-Barr virus infection and gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies conducted over the past 30 years have pointed to the presence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in gastric cancer samples. This study was aimed to provide a meta-analytic review of the prevalence of EBV in gastric cancer patients, and to clarify the relationship between EBV infection and gastric cancer.

METHODS

A literature search was performed electronically using online databases for English language publications until July 1, 2019. The pooled EBV prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model. To determine the association between EBV and gastric cancer, pooled odds ratio (OR) and its 95% CI were computed for case-control studies. Two separate analyses were performed on data from case-control studies with matched and non-match pairs designs to calculate the pooled estimates of ORs.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of EBV in 20,361 gastric cancer patients was 8.77% (95% CI: 7.73-9.92%; I² = 83.2%). There were 20 studies with matched pairs design, including tumor and tumor-adjacent normal tissue pairs from 4116 gastric cancer patients. The pooled ORs were 18.56 (95% CI: 15.68-21.97; I² = 55.4%) for studies with matched pairs design and 3.31 (95% CI: 0.95-11.54; I² = 55.0%) for studies with non-matched pairs design. The proportion of EBV-associated gastric cancer among male cases was significantly higher than among female cases (10.83%, vs. 5.72%) (P < 0.0001). However, the pooled OR estimate for EBV-associated gastric cancer was significantly higher among females (21.47; 95% CI: 15.55-29.63; I² = 0%) than in males (14.07; 95% CI: 10.46-18.93; I² = 49.0%) (P = 0.06). EBV was more prevalent in the cardia (12.47%) and the body (11.68%) compared to the antrum (6.29%) (P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

EBV infection is associated with more than 18 times increase the risk of gastric cancer. Although the prevalence of EBV was higher in male patients than in female patients with gastric cancer, women are more likely than men to develop EBV-associated gastric cancer. Our findings showed that using tumor-adjacent normal tissues as the control group provides more robust and accurate results regarding the relationship between EBV infection and gastric cancer.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of TCGA and ACRG classification in gastric cancer among the Chinese population

Molecular classifications of gastric cancer (GC) by the Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) and The Cancer Genome Atlas Consortium (TCGA) are useful for diagnosis and treatment of GC. However, their clinical significance is unknown. The present study aims to explore the associations between subtypes of GC and prognosis of patients with GC. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used in the ACRG molecular classification of GC, while next‑generation sequencing technology was used in TCGA molecular classification. The results indicated that, out of a total of 65 cases of GC, some were classified as Epstein‑Barr virus positive type (9.2%, 6 of 65), some as microsatellite instability (MSI) type (23.1%, 15 of 65), some as gene stable type (21.5%, 14 of 65) and some as chromosome instability type (46.2%, 30 of 65) according to TCGA typing standard. Of the total 65 GC cases, some were classified as MSI (21.5%, 14 of 65), some as microsatellite stable/epithelial‑mesenchymal transition (MSS/EMT; 20.0%, 13 of 65), some as MSS/tumor protein 53 active (TP53+; 15.4%, 10 of 65) and some as MSS/TP53 inactive (43.1%, 28 of 65) according to ACRG typing standard. ARCG molecular subtype (P=0.010) and Lauren classification (P=0.011) were independently correlated with the overall survival of patients with GC. In conclusion, TCGA classification based on a Chinese population is the same as TCGA typing based on a European population in terms of proportion and clinical characteristics, but there are differences in gene amplification and gene mutation. ACRG molecular classification could be performed by IHC analysis and may be a valuable independent prognostic marker for patients with GC.

The importance of Epstein-Barr virus infection in the systemic treatment of patients with gastric cancer

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) may directly cause the development of EBV-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC). The prevalence of EBVaGC ranges from 4% to 18%, with a 2-fold higher frequency in males, and in tumors arising in the gastric cardia or corpus and 4 times higher frequency in gastric stump carcinoma. The vast majority of EBVaGC are lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas. Despite extensive nodal involvement and distant metastases at initial diagnosis, EBVaGC seems to be a distinct etiologic entity with a favorable prognosis. However, the lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas subtype in EBVaGC cannot be recognized in the current molecular classifications. Neither is there an association between EBV positivity and survival of patients after curative gastrectomy if they received standard adjuvant chemotherapy, nor EBV positivity and prediction of response to neoadjuvant platinum/5-FU-based chemotherapy. Alterations in chemokines and PD-L1 provide theoretical justification for clinical evaluation of immune checkpoint therapy in EBVaGC. Moreover, a higher degree of host immune response was demonstrated in EBVaGC. The current histologic and molecular GC classification does not influence clinical practice. Further research is expected to find convenient methods to assess gastric subtypes in day-to-day practice and to tailor therapy to improve overall survival.

[Localized MSI/dMMR gastric cancer patients, perioperative immunotherapy instead of chemotherapy: The GERCOR NEONIPIGA phase II study is opened to recruitment]

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard strategy for localized gastric cancers. Nevertheless, this strategy seems to be inefficient, if not deleterious, for patients with tumors harboring microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), a tumor phenotype predictive for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICKi).

AIM

The GERCOR NEONIPIGA single-arm phase II study (NCT04006262; EUDRACT 2018-004712-22) aims at evaluating the efficacy of a peri-operative strategy with nivolumab and ipilimumab in neoadjuvant setting, then nivolumab alone after surgery for patients with resectable MSI/dMMR gastric cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Main inclusion criteria are: gastric and oesogastric junction adenocarcinoma (GOA), T2-T4, all N stage and M0, MSI/dMMR. Patients will be treated with nivolumab 240mg Q2W, 6 infusions, and ipilimumab 1mg/kg Q6W, 2 infusions in neoadjuvant setting. Following surgery, patients with TRG 1-2-3 (Mandard tumor regression grade), acceptable tolerance of neoadjuvant treatment and postoperative ECOG performance status 0-1, will be treated with adjuvant nivolumab 480mg Q4W, 9 infusions.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint is pathological complete response rate (pCR-R). Based on a Fleming design, with α=5% and β=20%, 27 patients have to be evaluated (H0=5%; H1=20%). Secondary endpoints include disease-free survival, overall survival and safety.

CONCLUSION

This study is planned to include 32 patients to evaluate the pCR-R with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in neoadjuvant setting for MSI/dMMR localized GOA. The MSI/MMR status should be systematically assessed on diagnostic biopsies of all GOA. If it meets its primary endpoint, the GERCOR NEONIPIGA study might mark a turning point in the management of localized MSI/dMMR GOA patients.

Molecular Classification of Gastric Cancer among Alaska Native People

Gastric cancer is an aggressive and heterogeneous malignancy that often varies in presentation and disease among racial and ethnic groups. The Alaska Native (AN) people have the highest incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer in North America. This study examines molecular markers in solid tumor samples from eighty-five AN gastric adenocarcinoma patients using next-generation sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization analysis. AN patients have a low mutation burden with fewer somatic gene mutations in their tumors compared to other populations, with the most common mutation being TP53. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was associated with 20% of AN gastric cancers, which is higher than the world average of 10%. The inflammation marker, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), is highly expressed in patients with the lowest survival rates. Mismatch repair deficiency was present in 10% of AN patients and was associated with patients who were female, 50 years or older, gene mutations, and tumors in the distal stomach. Program death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was expressed in 14% of AN patients who were more likely to have MMR deficiency, EBV-associated gastric cancers, and mutations in the PIK3CA gene, all of which have been linked to clinical response to PD-1 inhibitors. These studies suggest a portion of AN gastric cancer patients could be candidates for immunotherapy. Overall, this study highlights future avenues of investigation for clinical and translational studies, so that we can improve early detection and develop more effective treatments for AN patients.

Novel Biomarkers for Prediction of Response to Preoperative Systemic Therapies in Gastric Cancer

Preoperative chemo- and radiotherapeutic strategies followed by surgery are currently a standard approach for treating locally advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer in Western countries. However, in a large number of cases, the tumor is extremely resistant to these treatments and the patients are exposed to unnecessary toxicity and delayed surgical therapy. The current clinical trials evaluating the combination of preoperative systemic therapies with modern targeted and immunotherapeutic agents represent a unique opportunity for identifying predictive biomarkers of response to select patients that would benefit the most from these treatments. However, it is of utmost importance that these potential biomarkers are corroborated by extensive preclinical and translational research. The aim of this review article is to present the most promising biomarkers of response to classic chemotherapeutic, anti-HER2, antiangiogenic, and immunotherapeutic agents that can be potentially useful for personalized preoperative systemic therapies in gastric cancer patients.