1
|
Nishida N, Sakai D, Satoh T. Treatment strategy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer: salvage-line strategy for advanced gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:1237-1243. [PMID: 38733489 PMCID: PMC11347465 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02500-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
After immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) comes into third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, the therapeutic strategy has been dramatically changed. Recent first-line regimen, which consists of ICI and chemotherapeutic agents, prolonged progression-free survival, and subsequent treatment options enabled continuous treatment beyond second-line therapy. Moreover, the advent of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agents including angiogenesis inhibitors and TKIs provides an opportunity of considering the interaction between ICI and anti-VEGF agents, and facilitating novel treatment proposal. Although clinical benefit of prolonged VEGF blockade after disease progression has not been confirmed in gastric cancer, combination therapy of cytotoxic agents and anti-VEGF agent, such as irinotecan plus ramucirumab demonstrated favorable objective response rate and progression-free survival in third- or later-line setting. In this review, we discuss recent progress and future directions of later-line treatments of HER2-negative advancer gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naohiro Nishida
- Center for Cancer Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Daisuke Sakai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Taroh Satoh
- Center for Cancer Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang F, Shen L, Guo W, Liu T, Li J, Qin S, Bai Y, Chen Z, Wang J, Pan Y, Shu Y, Zhao F, Cheng Y, Ye F, Gu K, Zhang T, Pan H, Zhong H, Zhou F, Qin Y, Yang L, Mao W, Li Q, Dai W, Li W, Wang S, Tang Y, Ma D, Yin X, Deng Y, Yuan Y, Li M, Hu W, Chen D, Li G, Liu Q, Tan P, Fan S, Shi M, Su W, Xu RH. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized phase 3 FRUTIGA trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:2189-2198. [PMID: 38824242 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02989-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
The vascular endothelial growth factor pathway plays a key role in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. In the multicenter, double-blind phase 3 FRUTIGA trial, 703 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who progressed on fluorouracil- and platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive fruquintinib (an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1/2/3; 4 mg orally, once daily) or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off, plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1/8/15 per cycle). The study results were positive as one of the dual primary endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS), was met (median PFS, 5.6 months in the fruquintinib arm versus 2.7 months in the placebo arm; hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.68; P < 0.0001). The other dual primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not met (median OS, 9.6 months versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.13; P = 0.6064). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel as a second-line treatment significantly improved PFS, but not OS, in Chinese patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and could potentially be another treatment option for these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03223376 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Wang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin Shen
- Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China
| | - Weijian Guo
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianshu Liu
- Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Li
- Tongji University Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Nanjing Tianyinshan Cancer Hospital of China Pharmaceutical University (CPU), Nanjing, China
| | - Yuxian Bai
- Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Zhendong Chen
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | | | | | - Yongqian Shu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital), Nanjing, China
| | - Fuyou Zhao
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China
| | | | - Feng Ye
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Kangsheng Gu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hongming Pan
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | | | - Fuxiang Zhou
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yanru Qin
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lei Yang
- Nantong Tumor Hospital, Nantong, China
| | | | - Qiu Li
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenxiang Dai
- The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Wei Li
- The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Shubin Wang
- Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yong Tang
- Xinjiang Medical University Cancer Hospital, Urumqi Municipality, China
| | - Dong Ma
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Yanhong Deng
- The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Man Li
- The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Wenwei Hu
- The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, China
| | - Donghui Chen
- Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoxin Li
- Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiqi Liu
- HUTCHMED Limited, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Masetti M, Al-Batran SE, Goetze TO, Thuss-Patience P, Knorrenschild JR, Goekkurt E, Folprecht G, Ettrich TJ, Lindig U, Luley KB, Pink D, Dechow T, Sookthai D, Junge S, Loose M, Pauligk C, Lorenzen S. Efficacy of ramucirumab combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:2142-2150. [PMID: 38447003 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
FOLFOX plus nivolumab represents a standard of care for first-line therapy of advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) with positive PD-L1 expression. The efficacy of second-line VEGFR-2 inhibition with ramucirumab (RAM) plus chemotherapy after progression to immunochemotherapy remains unclear. Medical records of patients with aGEC enrolled in the randomized phase II AIO-STO-0417 trial after treatment failure to first-line FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on second-line therapy: RAM plus chemotherapy (RAM group) or treatment without RAM (control group). Eighty three patients were included. In the overall population, progression-free survival (PFS) in the RAM group was superior to the control (4.5 vs 2.9 months). Responders (CR/PR) to first-line immunochemotherapy receiving RAM containing second-line therapy had prolonged OS from start of first-line therapy (28.9 vs 16.5 months), as well as second-line OS (9.6 vs 7.5 months), PFS (5.6 vs 2.9 months) and DCR (53% vs 29%) compared to the control. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was 42% and 44% for the RAM and the control, respectively. Patients with CPS ≥1 in the RAM group showed better tumor control (ORR 25% vs 10%) and improved survival (total OS 11.5 vs 8.0 months; second-line OS 6.5 vs 3.9 months; PFS 4.5 vs 1.6 months) compared to the control. Prior exposure to first-line FOLFOX plus dual checkpoint inhibition followed by RAM plus chemotherapy shows favorable response and survival rates especially in patients with initial response and positive PD-L1 expression and has the potential to advance the treatment paradigm in aGEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Masetti
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Munich, Germany
| | - Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany and Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Thorsten O Goetze
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany and Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Haematologisch-Onkologische Praxis Eppendorf, Universitäres Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gunnar Folprecht
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Udo Lindig
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Kim Barbara Luley
- UKSH Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Daniel Pink
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin C, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Transplantationszentrum, Palliativmedizin, Universität Greifswald and Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin-Sarkomzentrum, HELIOS Klinikum Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | | | - Disorn Sookthai
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sabine Junge
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Maria Loose
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claudia Pauligk
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sylvie Lorenzen
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang X, Zhou L, Zhou C, Shen L. Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Ramucirumab as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in Japan and South Korea: A Systematic Literature Review. Adv Ther 2024; 41:2112-2132. [PMID: 38619719 PMCID: PMC11133076 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02838-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastric cancer has the highest incidence and mortality in Eastern Asia. The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab (RAM) monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel (PTX) for patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA) have been established in clinical trials. To assess the effectiveness and safety of RAM or RAM-based therapy as a second-line treatment in real-world clinical practice in Eastern Asia and to pave the way for future research, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted. METHODS Studies published between January 2014 and December 2021 were identified in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and CBM databases. RESULTS This SLR included 23 studies from Japan and South Korea, of which 22 were retrospective and 11 were full-text articles. Most studies investigated RAM + PTX (range of median overall survival [mOS] 7.4-12.2 months; median progression-free survival [mPFS] 3.35-7.0 months). Data were limited for RAM, RAM + albumin-bound paclitaxel, and RAM + taxane. RAM + PTX was associated with longer survival (mOS 9.3-12.2 months vs. 5.2-9.7 months; mPFS 4.1-5.1 months vs. 3.0-4.1 months) than PTX. Patients with prior anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) exposure experienced longer mPFS (4.8 vs. 3.4 months) from RAM + taxane than those without prior anti-PD-1 exposure. Few patients (3.3-6.3%) discontinued RAM or RAM-based therapy because of adverse events (AEs). Hematological toxicities were most frequently occurring AEs and no new safety signals were identified compared to clinical trials. CONCLUSION RAM + PTX as a second-line treatment is effective and associated with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEA in real-world settings of Japan and South Korea. More studies are recommended to further evaluate effectiveness and safety of RAM or RAM-based therapy, especially after anti-PD-1 therapy, in a wider Eastern Asian population. TRIAL REGISTRATION INPLASY registration number INPLASY2022120023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaotian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Li Zhou
- Eli Lilly and Company, Shanghai, China
| | - Chan Zhou
- Eli Lilly and Company, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jeon Y, Lim SH, Lee J, Kang WK, Jang JY, Jeong SY, Choi D, Kim ST. The role of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy after failure of nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14:2346-2353. [PMID: 38196521 PMCID: PMC10772697 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Adding nivolumab to fluoropyrimidines and platinum agents has been considered a new standard first-line treatment in previously untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, there were few data on the role of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line treatment after failure of nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy. Herein, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of second-line ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in AGC patients refractory to nivolumab plus chemotherapy. Methods This analysis included AGC patients with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy after failing to respond to nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy [capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) or 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)] at Samsung Medical Center, Korea. Twenty patients who progressed on nivolumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy were treated with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel between December 2021 and September 2022. Results The median age was 56 (range, 24-76) years, and 13 (65.0%) were men. Of the 20 patients, 15 (75.0%) patients received nivolumab plus capecitabine, and oxaliplatin, while 5 (25.0%) patients received nivolumab plus 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin. Two showed a partial response (PR) to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel, a response rate of 10%. Patients with stable disease (SD) accounted for a disease control rate (DCR) of 55.0%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel was 2.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-3.7]. Subgroup analysis showed that responders (n=7) to first-line therapy had a PFS of 6.9 months compared to 2.3 months in non-responders (n=13) to first-line therapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.5-8.3), representing 6.9 months (95% CI: not calculated) in responders and 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.7-8.9) in non-responders (P=0.401). Conclusions This analysis suggested that ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy might be further studied in AGC patients after failure of nivolumab plus chemotherapy. A new second-line therapy is needed in AGC patients after nivolumab plus chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngkyung Jeon
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Sung Hee Lim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeeyun Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Ki Kang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Yeon Jang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Young Jeong
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Daeho Choi
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Tae Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang Y, Yang Z, Zhang L. Polyphenol Supplementation Enhances the Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Against Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies. Nutr Cancer 2023; 76:17-30. [PMID: 37930032 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2023.2277477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the combined effects of polyphenols and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. METHODS Relevant studies were collected from electronic databases. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) or hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by Stata 15.0 software. RESULTS Sixteen preclinical studies were included. The overall meta-analysis showed that, compared to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 alone, polyphenol combined therapy significantly reduced the tumor volume (SMD = -3.28), weight (SMD = -2.18), number (SMD = -2.17), and prolonged the survival (HR = 0.45) of mice (all P < 0.001). Pooled analysis of mechanism studies indicated polyphenol combined therapy could increase the number of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (SMD = 3.88; P < 0.001), IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cells (SMD = 2.38; P < 0.001), decrease the number of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (SMD = -2.52; P = 0.044) and Treg cells (SMD = -4.00; P = 0.004) and suppress PD-L1 expression in tumors (SMD = -13.41; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated curcuminoids, flavonoids, and stilbene changed the tumor volume, the percentage of CD8+ T cells, IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells, and PD-L1 expression. CONCLUSION Polyphenol supplementation may be a promising combined strategy for patients with poor response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Huang
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Zhenhua Yang
- School Health Department, West Coast New Area Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Takahashi N, Hara H, Nagashima K, Hirata K, Masuishi T, Matsumoto T, Kawakami H, Yamazaki K, Hironaka S, Boku N, Muro K. Randomised phase II trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus ramucirumab (RAM) versus trifluridine/tipiracil for previously treated patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (RETRIEVE study, WJOG15822G). BMC Cancer 2023; 23:726. [PMID: 37543568 PMCID: PMC10403909 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11199-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) prolongs survival in the third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC), esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma, and colorectal cancer. While single-arm phase II trials showed promising outcomes of FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab (RAM) as third- or later-line treatments for advanced GC or EGJ cancer, there have been no clinical trials to directly compare FTD/TPI plus RAM with FTD/TPI monotherapy. Therefore, we have started a randomised phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus RAM compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy as third- or later-line treatments in patients with advanced GC and EGJ adenocarcinoma. METHODS This RETREVE trial (WJOG15822G) is a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre phase II trial comparing FTD/TPI plus RAM versus FTD/TPI monotherapy in a third- or later-line setting. Eligibility criteria include age of > 20 years; performance status of 0 or 1; unresectable or recurrent gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma; confirmed HER2 status; refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, taxane or irinotecan; refractory to RAM (not intolerant); and at least a measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1. FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily, evening of day 1 to morning of day 6 and evening of day 8 to morning of day 13) was administered orally every 4 weeks, and RAM (8 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety. The expected hazard ratio of PFS is set as 0.7, assuming 4-month PFS rate of 27% in FTD/TPI monotherapy and 40% in FTD/TPI plus RAM. The number of subjects was 110, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.10 and power of 0.70. DISCUSSION This study will clarify the additional effect of RAM continuation beyond disease progression on FTD/TPI in the third- or later-line setting for patients with advanced GC or EGJ cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION jRCTs041220120.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, 780 Komuro, Ina-Machi, Kita-Adachi-Gun, Saitama, 362-0807, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Hara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, 780 Komuro, Ina-Machi, Kita-Adachi-Gun, Saitama, 362-0807, Japan
| | - Kengo Nagashima
- Biostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Kenro Hirata
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Toshiki Masuishi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-Ku Nagoya 464-8681, Aichi, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Matsumoto
- Cancer Treatment Center, Kansai Medical University, 2-3-1 Hirakatashinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan
| | - Hisato Kawakami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Kentaro Yamazaki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-Cho, Sunto-Gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Shuichi Hironaka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan
| | - Narikazu Boku
- Department of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shiroganedai, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan
| | - Kei Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-Ku Nagoya 464-8681, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lorenzen S, Schwarz A, Pauligk C, Goekkurt E, Stocker G, Knorrenschild JR, Illerhaus G, Dechow T, Moehler M, Moulin JC, Pink D, Stahl M, Schaaf M, Goetze TO, Al-Batran SE. Ramucirumab plus irinotecan / leucovorin / 5-FU versus ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction, who failed one prior line of palliative chemotherapy: the phase II/III RAMIRIS study (AIO-STO-0415). BMC Cancer 2023; 23:561. [PMID: 37337155 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11004-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paclitaxel in combination with ramucirumab is the standard of care second-line therapy in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). As the number of taxane pretreated patients in the perioperative or first-line setting is increasing, it is unknown whether these patients benefit from re-applying a taxane in using the combination of paclitaxel and ramucirumab. Furthermore, the rates of neurotoxicity with first-line FOLFOX or FLOT range from 30%-70%, making second-line taxane-containing therapy less suitable to a meaningful portion of patients. This patient group is likely to benefit from a taxane-free second-line chemotherapy regimen, such as FOLFIRI and ramucirumab (FOLFIRI-Ram). Therefore, the RAMIRIS phase III trial evaluates the effects of the regimen of FOLFIRI-Ram in the second-line treatment after a taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced GEA. METHODS The RAMIRIS trial is a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II/III study comparing treatment of FOLFIRI-Ram (arm A) with paclitaxel and ramucirumab (arm B). The Phase II is already closed with 111 enrolled patients. In the phase III, 318 taxane-pretreated patients with advanced GEA will be recruited and randomized 1:1 to FOLFIRI (5-FU 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h i.v., irinotecan 180 mg/m2 i.v.; 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus; leucovorin 400 mg/m2 i.v.; on day 1 and 15, q28) with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every two weeks (Arm A) or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15, q28) with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every two weeks (Arm B). The primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and objective overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate and safety and quality of life as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. DISCUSSION The already completed RAMIRIS phase II demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of FOLFIRI-Ram. Especially docetaxel-pretreated patients seemed to markedly benefit from FOLFIRI-Ram, with favorable response- and PFS rates and lower toxicity. This offers a rationale for the phase III trial. If the RAMIRIS III trial transfers and confirms the results, they will affect the current treatment guidelines, recommending the combination therapy of FOLFIRI-Ram for taxane-pretreated patients with advanced GEA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03081143 Date of registration: 13.11.2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Lorenzen
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, München, Germany.
| | - Alix Schwarz
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, München, Germany
| | - Claudia Pauligk
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Eray Goekkurt
- Hämatologisch-Onkologische Praxis Eppendorf (HOPE), und Universitäres Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gertraud Stocker
- Universitäres Krebszentrum Leipzig (UCCL), Klinik und Poliklinik für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Infektiologie - Bereich Onkologie Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jorge Riera Knorrenschild
- Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Hämatologie, Onkologie und Immunologie, Marburg, Germany
| | - Gerald Illerhaus
- Klinikum Stuttgart, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Tobias Dechow
- Studienzentrum Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Markus Moehler
- I. Department of Internal Medicine, University Cancer Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jean-Charles Moulin
- Ortenau Klinikum Lahr, Medizinische Klinik, Sektion Hämatologie/Onkologie, Lahr, Germany
| | - Daniel Pink
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin C, Hämatologie und Onkologie, Transplantationszentrum, Palliativmedizin, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, and Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Sarkomzentrum Berlin-Brandenburg, HELIOS Klinikum Bad-Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Michael Stahl
- Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Internistische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Essen, Germany
| | - Marina Schaaf
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Thorsten Oliver Goetze
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Institut für Klinisch-Onkologische Forschung, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Institut für Klinisch-Onkologische Forschung, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shitara K, George B, Taieb J, Sundar R, Fakih MG, Makris L, Benhadji KA, Ghidini M. Effects of prior therapies on outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer in a randomized phase III trial (TAGS). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04813-z. [PMID: 37213030 PMCID: PMC10374776 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04813-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase III TAGS trial, trifluridine/tipiracil showed survival benefit versus placebo in patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer and ≥ 2 prior chemotherapies. This post hoc exploratory analysis assessed the impact of prior therapy type on outcomes. METHODS Based on prior treatment, patients in TAGS (N = 507) were categorized into overlapping subgroups: ramucirumab ± other agents (n = 169), no ramucirumab (n = 338), paclitaxel but no ramucirumab (n = 136), ramucirumab + paclitaxel sequentially or in combination (n = 154), neither paclitaxel nor ramucirumab (n = 202), irinotecan (n = 281), and no irinotecan (n = 226). Overall and progression-free survival, time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2, and safety were assessed. RESULTS Baseline characteristics and prior therapy patterns were generally well balanced between trifluridine/tipiracil and placebo arms across subgroups. Trifluridine/tipiracil was associated with survival benefits versus placebo regardless of prior treatment: across subgroups, median overall survival was 4.6-6.1 versus 3.0-3.8 months (hazard ratios, 0.47-0.88), median progression-free survival was 1.9-2.3 versus 1.7-1.8 months (hazard ratios, 0.49-0.67), and median time to ECOG PS ≥ 2 was 4.0-4.7 versus 1.9-2.5 months (hazard ratios, 0.56-0.88). Among trifluridine/tipiracil-randomized patients, median overall and progression-free survival trended longer in those who had not received ramucirumab, paclitaxel and ramucirumab, or irinotecan (6.0-6.1 and 2.1-2.3 months, respectively) than in those who previously received these agents (4.6-5.7 and 1.9 months). The trifluridine/tipiracil safety profile was consistent across subgroups, with similar overall incidences of grade ≥ 3 adverse events. Minor variations in hematologic toxicities were noted. CONCLUSIONS In TAGS, third- or later-line trifluridine/tipiracil treatment demonstrated overall and progression-free survival and functioning benefits versus placebo and a consistent safety profile in patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer, regardless of prior treatment type. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov NCT02500043.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Shitara
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa-Shi, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
| | - Ben George
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Julien Taieb
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris-Cité, SIRIC CARPEM, Paris, France
| | - Raghav Sundar
- National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marwan G Fakih
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chin K, Yamamoto S, Takahashi M, Kadowaki S, Kubota Y, Amanuma Y, Okada M, Kanda M, Kimura Y, Nogi Y, Arimitsu Y, Kitagawa Y. Effectiveness of taxanes following nivolumab in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective chart review of patients in ATTRACTION-3. Esophagus 2023; 20:302-308. [PMID: 36564602 PMCID: PMC10024664 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-022-00972-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The phase III ATTRACTION-3 study showed that second-line nivolumab monotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma prolonged overall survival (OS) but did not improve progression-free survival (PFS). Subsequent systemic therapy after discontinuing nivolumab may affect these outcomes. To test this possibility, we evaluated the outcomes of treatment with taxanes after nivolumab in ATTRACTION-3. METHODS We reviewed the charts of Japanese patients who had discontinued second-line nivolumab in ATTRACTION-3 and started subsequent third-line taxanes between January 7, 2016, and November 12, 2018. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) to third-line taxanes. RESULTS Of the 75 patients included in this study, 54 (72%), 18 (24%), and 3 (4%) patients received either paclitaxel, docetaxel, or combination therapy comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil, respectively. The ORR in the overall, paclitaxel, and docetaxel groups was 29.6%, 36.5%, and 12.5%, respectively; these numbers were comparable to those (20-44%) in patients receiving taxanes as first- and second-line therapy. The median OS in the overall, paclitaxel, and docetaxel groups was 9.9, 9.9, and 9.3 months, respectively, whereas the corresponding median PFS was 4.9, 4.7 and 6.5 months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 65 (87%) patients, of which grade 3-4 occurred in 37 (49%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Favorable effectiveness and safety profile of taxanes following second-line nivolumab was observed in Japanese patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. When a patient with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab becomes refractory or intolerant, subsequent taxane treatment may be a promising option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisho Chin
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Shun Yamamoto
- Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanobu Takahashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shigenori Kadowaki
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yutaro Kubota
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Amanuma
- Department of Clinical Trial Promotion, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Morihito Okada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mitsuro Kanda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yasue Kimura
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yuhiko Nogi
- Oncology Clinical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Arimitsu
- Department of Oncology, ONO Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kato K, Doki Y, Ogata T, Motoyama S, Kawakami H, Ueno M, Kojima T, Shirakawa Y, Okada M, Ishihara R, Kubota Y, Amaya-Chanaga C, Chen T, Matsumura Y, Kitagawa Y. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Japanese subgroup analysis of open-label, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 648/ONO-4538-50). Esophagus 2023; 20:291-301. [PMID: 36401133 PMCID: PMC10024660 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-022-00970-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-based treatments are approved for several cancers. CheckMate 648, a global, phase 3 trial, showed that first-line nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) or nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NIVO + Chemo) significantly increased survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) without new safety signals versus chemotherapy alone (Chemo). METHODS We evaluated the Japanese subpopulation of CheckMate 648 (n = 394/970), randomized to receive first-line NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, or Chemo. Efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in Japanese patients with tumor-cell programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% and in all randomized Japanese patients. RESULTS In the Japanese population, 131, 126, and 137 patients were treated with NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo, and 66, 62, and 65 patients had tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, respectively. In patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 ≥ 1%, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (20.2 months; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.46 [0.30-0.71]) and NIVO + Chemo (17.3 months; 0.53 [0.35-0.82]) versus Chemo (9.0 months). In all randomized patients, median OS was numerically longer with NIVO + IPI (17.6 months; 0.68 [0.51-0.92]) and NIVO + Chemo (15.5 months; 0.73 [0.54-0.99]) versus Chemo (11.0 months). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 37%, 49%, and 36% of all patients in the NIVO + IPI, NIVO + Chemo, and Chemo arms, respectively. CONCLUSION Survival benefits with acceptable tolerability observed for NIVO + IPI and NIVO + Chemo treatments strongly support their use as a new standard first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced ESCC. CLINICALTRIALS GOV ID NCT03143153.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Kato
- Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo City, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogata
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Satoru Motoyama
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Hisato Kawakami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Japan
| | - Masaki Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kojima
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shirakawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Morihito Okada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ryu Ishihara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaro Kubota
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Tian Chen
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Serpico AF, Pisauro C, Grieco D. cGAS-dependent proinflammatory and immune homeostatic effects of the microtubule-targeting agent paclitaxel. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1127623. [PMID: 36960066 PMCID: PMC10028148 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1127623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Taxanes are Microtubule-Targeting Agents (MTAs) that exert potent anticancer activity by directly killing cancer cells. However, recent evidence suggests that they may also stimulate inflammation and anticancer adaptive immunity and that these actions strongly contribute to their therapeutic efficacy. Details on how Taxanes may modulate inflammation and anticancer immunity are, nevertheless, still missing. We show here that at very low doses the Taxane Paclitaxel (Pxl) indeed induces a potent proinflammatory response in various cancer cell types in a cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS)- and Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING)-dependent manner, leading to interferon (IFN) signaling. However, we find that Pxl treatment also strongly upregulates the expression of the immune checkpoint protein Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) in cancer cells, therefore, inducing an inhibitory response to adaptive immunity potentially attenuating anticancer immunity and therapeutic success. These observations provide a mechanistic explanation of why clinical benefit may derive from the combination of Pxl with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) and suggest that more accurately tailoring dosage and schedule of this combination therapy may provide benefit in the management of a larger number of cancer types and stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Flavia Serpico
- 1CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate Franco Salvatore, Naples, Italy
- 2Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche (DMMBM), University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Domenico Grieco
- 1CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate Franco Salvatore, Naples, Italy
- 2Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche (DMMBM), University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
- *Correspondence: Domenico Grieco,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shechter O, Sausen DG, Gallo ES, Dahari H, Borenstein R. Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Epithelial Associated Malignancies: Exploring Pathologies and Current Treatments. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:14389. [PMID: 36430864 PMCID: PMC9699474 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232214389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is one of eight known herpesviruses with the potential to infect humans. Globally, it is estimated that between 90-95% of the population has been infected with EBV. EBV is an oncogenic virus that has been strongly linked to various epithelial malignancies such as nasopharyngeal and gastric cancer. Recent evidence suggests a link between EBV and breast cancer. Additionally, there are other, rarer cancers with weaker evidence linking them to EBV. In this review, we discuss the currently known epithelial malignancies associated with EBV. Additionally, we discuss and establish which treatments and therapies are most recommended for each cancer associated with EBV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oren Shechter
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23501, USA
| | - Daniel G. Sausen
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23501, USA
| | - Elisa S. Gallo
- Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Division of Dermatology, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - Harel Dahari
- The Program for Experimental and Theoretical Modeling, Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| | - Ronen Borenstein
- The Program for Experimental and Theoretical Modeling, Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Valcarcel S, Gallego J, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Diez M, de Castro EM, Hernandez R, Arrazubi V, Custodio A, Cano JM, Montes AF, Macias I, Visa L, Calvo A, Tocino RV, Lago NM, Limón ML, Granja M, Gil M, Pimentel P, Macia-Rivas L, Pérez CH, Mangas M, Carnicero AM, Cerdà P, Gonzalez LG, Navalon FG, Rambla MDM, Richard MM, Carmona-Bayonas A. Does HER2 status influence in the benefit of ramucirumab and paclitaxel as second line treatment of advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04294-6. [PMID: 36042046 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04294-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy in second-line (2L) advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) based on HER2 status and analyze prognostic factors. METHODS The study includes patients from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry with aGEC and known HER2 status who received 2L between 2016 and 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and multivariable Cox regression analysis was done to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS Of the 552 patients who met the selection criteria, 149 (26.9%) had HER2-positive aGEC, 89 were treated with chemotherapy, and 60 with ramucirumab-paclitaxel, and 403 had an HER2-negative aGEC, 259 were treated with chemotherapy, and 144 with ramucirumab-paclitaxel. In the whole sample, 2L PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.8-3.2), 2L OS, 5.7 months (5.2-6.3), and ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was associated with increased PFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.78, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR 0.68, 0.55-0.83, p = 0.0002). Median PFS of ramucirumab- paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was 3.5 vs 2.8 months (HR 0.67, 0.54-0.83, p = 0.0004) in HER2-negative, and 4.7 vs 2.7 months (HR 0.57, 0.40-0.82, p = 0.0031) in HER2-positive aGEC, respectively. Median OS for ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was 6.6 vs 5 months (HR 0.67, 0.53-0.85, p = 0.0007) in HER2-negative, and 7.4 vs 5.6 months (HR 0.70, 0.53-1.04, p = 0.083) in HER2-positive aGEC, respectively. ECOG-PS, tumor burden, Lauren subtype, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS In patients with an aGEC from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, 2L treatment with ramucirumab-paclitaxel was superior to chemotherapy in PFS, OS and response rate, independent of HER2 status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sena Valcarcel
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Avenida Roma Sn., CP 33011, Oviedo, Spain.
| | - Javier Gallego
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Marc Diez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Martínez de Castro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Raquel Hernandez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Virginia Arrazubi
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ana Custodio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERONC CB16/12/00398, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juana María Cano
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández Montes
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Orense, Spain
| | - Ismael Macias
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Laura Visa
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario El Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aitana Calvo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosario Vidal Tocino
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca - IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Nieves Martínez Lago
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, Coruña, Spain
| | - María Luisa Limón
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Mónica Granja
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mireia Gil
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Ciberonc CB16/12/0035, Valencia, Spain
| | - Paola Pimentel
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain
| | - Lola Macia-Rivas
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Carolina Hernández Pérez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de La Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Montserrat Mangas
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao-Usansolo, Spain
| | | | - Paula Cerdà
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lucía Gomez Gonzalez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | - Marta Martin Richard
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), L'Hospitalet, Spain
| | - Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, University of Murcia, IMIB, CP13/00126, PI17/0050 (ISCIII& FEDER), Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Guo X, Yang B, He L, Sun Y, Song Y, Qu X. PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A network meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2022; 13:905651. [PMID: 36003374 PMCID: PMC9393421 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.905651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Currently, there has been no direct comparison between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus different chemotherapy regimens in first-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin- or cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Methods PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register were used to seek a series of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying on first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy and phase III RCTs comparing first-line oxaliplatin and cisplatin-based chemotherapy for AGC to perform NMA. The main outcome was overall survival (OS) and other outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results Eight eligible RCTs involving 5723 patients were included. Compared with PD-1 inhibitors plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy could prolong the OS without statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82, 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.63-1.06). However, for patients with combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1, PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly prolonged the OS (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.99). PFS in PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was significantly longer than that in PD-1 inhibitors plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53-0.99). Regarding safety, the incidence of ≥ 3 TRAEs was similar between PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.66-1.12). The surface under the cumulative ranking area curve (SUCRA) indicated that PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy ranked first for OS (97.7%), PFS (99.3%), and ORR (89.0%). For oxaliplatin-based regimens, there was no significant difference between nivolumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and sintilimab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in terms of OS, PFS, ORR, and ≥3 TRAEs. Conclusion Compared with PD-1 inhibitors plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS. Considering both efficacy and safety, PD-1 inhibitors plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy might be a better option in the first-line treatment for AGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Bowen Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Lingzi He
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yiting Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yujia Song
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiujuan Qu
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anticancer Drugs and Biotherapy of Liaoning Province, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Liaoning Province Clinical Research Center for Cancer, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Clinical Cancer Research Center of Shenyang, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Xiujuan Qu,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kawamoto Y, Yuki S, Sawada K, Nakamura M, Muto O, Sogabe S, Shindo Y, Ishiguro A, Sato A, Tsuji Y, Dazai M, Okuda H, Meguro T, Harada K, Sekiguchi M, Okada K, Ito YM, Sakata Y, Sakamoto N, Komatsu Y. Phase II Study of Ramucirumab Plus Irinotecan Combination Therapy as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: HGCSG1603. Oncologist 2022; 27:e642-e649. [PMID: 35579511 PMCID: PMC9355819 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ramucirumab is a human IgG1 monoclonal vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody that inhibits tumor cell growth and affects the tumor cell microenvironment. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus irinotecan combination therapy as second-line treatment in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory or intolerant to primary chemotherapy were included. Ramucirumab 8 mg/kg plus irinotecan 150 mg/m2 combination therapy was administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months and secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and dose intensity for each drug. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled between January 2018 and September 2019. The progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 26.5% [95%CI, 13.2%-41.8%, P = .1353)]. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 4.2 months (95%CI, 2.5-5.4 months) and 9.6 months (95%CI, 6.4-16.6 months), respectively. The overall response rate was 25.9% (95%CI, 11.1-36.3%) and disease control rate was 85.2% (95%CI, 66.3-95.8%). Grade ≥3 adverse events that occurred in >10% of patients included neutropenia, leucopenia, anemia, anorexia, and febrile neutropenia. No death or new safety signals with a causal relation to the study treatment were observed. CONCLUSION Although the primary endpoint was not achieved statistically, combination therapy of ramucirumab plus irinotecan showed anticancer activity and a manageable safety profile for second-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuyuki Kawamoto
- Division of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yuki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Sawada
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Japan
| | - Michio Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Osamu Muto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | - Susumu Sogabe
- Department of Medical Oncology, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Shindo
- Department of Surgery, Nakadori General Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ishiguro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Sato
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yasushi Tsuji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Dazai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okuda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takashi Meguro
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hokkaido Gastroenterology Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Mari Sekiguchi
- Data Center, Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazufumi Okada
- Data Science Center, Promotion Unit, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoichi M Ito
- Data Science Center, Promotion Unit, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Naoya Sakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshito Komatsu
- Division of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Okada M, Kato K, Cho BC, Takahashi M, Lin CY, Chin K, Kadowaki S, Ahn MJ, Hamamoto Y, Doki Y, Yen CC, Kubota Y, Kim SB, Hsu CH, Holtved E, Xynos I, Matsumura Y, Takazawa A, Kitagawa Y. Three-Year Follow-Up and Response-Survival Relationship of Nivolumab in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ATTRACTION-3). Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3277-3286. [PMID: 35294546 PMCID: PMC9662935 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Limited long-term data are available on immune checkpoint inhibitor use in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We report 3-year follow-up data from our study of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (paclitaxel or docetaxel) in patients with previously treated ESCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS ATTRACTION-3 was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial. Overall survival (OS), time from randomization to death from any cause, was the primary endpoint. An exploratory subanalysis assessed OS according to the best overall response (BOR) with and without landmark at 4 months. RESULTS Of the enrolled patients, 210 received nivolumab and 209 received chemotherapy. With a minimum follow-up of 36.0 months, OS was longer in the nivolumab versus the chemotherapy group (median, 10.9 vs. 8.5 months; HR, 0.79; P = 0.0264), with 3-year OS rates of 15.3% and 8.7%, respectively. The median OS was longer with nivolumab versus chemotherapy irrespective of the BOR (complete response/partial response: 19.9 vs. 15.4 months; stable disease: 17.4 vs. 8.8 months; and progressive disease: 7.6 vs. 4.2 months). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were reported in 40 patients (19.1%) in the nivolumab group and 133 patients (63.9%) in the chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab as second-line therapy demonstrated clinically meaningful long-term improvement in OS compared with chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced ESCC. The OS was consistently improved in the nivolumab group compared with the chemotherapy group regardless of BOR. Nivolumab was well tolerated over the 3-year follow-up. See related commentary by Yoon et al., p. 3173.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morihito Okada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.,Corresponding Author: Morihito Okada, Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan. Phone: 81 82 257 5869; Fax: 81 82 255 7109; E-mail:
| | - Ken Kato
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Byoung Chul Cho
- Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Masanobu Takahashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Chen-Yuan Lin
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, China Medical University Hospital and School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Keisho Chin
- Gastroenterological Chemotherapy Department, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigenori Kadowaki
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yasuo Hamamoto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Keio Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Surgery, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Chueh-Chuan Yen
- Division of Clinical Research, Department of Medical Research and Division of Medical Oncology, Center for Immuno-oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yutaro Kubota
- Department of Oncology, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chih-Hung Hsu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Eva Holtved
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ioannis Xynos
- Oncology Clinical Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - Yasuhiro Matsumura
- Oncology Clinical Development, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Takazawa
- Data Science, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Iwasa S, Bando H, Piao Y, Yoshizawa K, Yamaguchi K. The clinical position of ramucirumab-containing regimens for advanced gastric cancer: a review of clinical trial data. Future Oncol 2022; 18:2709-2721. [PMID: 35703103 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, the prognosis for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains poor and more effective treatment options are needed. Ramucirumab is an established and recommended second-line treatment for AGC. In recently completed and ongoing clinical trials, ramucirumab has been investigated in combination with new therapeutics and in new clinical settings to address the unmet treatment needs of AGC. In this review, the findings of recent clinical trials are discussed. The aims of this review are to present the current picture of ramucirumab-containing regimens in AGC and offer practical guidance on the clinical position and target populations of ramucirumab-containing regimens in light of emerging therapeutic developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoru Iwasa
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Hideaki Bando
- Department of Gastroenterology & Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, 277-0882, Japan
| | - Yongzhe Piao
- Medicines Development Unit-Japan, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, 651-0086, Japan
| | | | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, 135-0063, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bui QL, Mas L, Hollebecque A, Tougeron D, de la Fouchardière C, Pudlarz T, Alouani E, Guimbaud R, Taieb J, André T, Colle R, Cohen R. Treatments after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with dMMR/MSI Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020406. [PMID: 35053568 PMCID: PMC8774125 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Several studies suggested an enhanced efficacy of conventional treatments (CT, i.e., chemotherapy +/− targeted therapy) administered after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in certain tumor types, but no data are available concerning metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients harboring mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI). The aim of our study was to assess the outcomes of dMMR/MSI mCRC patients receiving CT after ICI failure. We retrospectively collected clinical data from a multicentric cohort of 31 patients. Although limited by the small number of patients, our results did not suggest improved outcomes with CT in our population, and no significant association with previous ICI efficacy or with anti-VEGF agents was evidenced. However, prolonged disease control was observed in several cases, suggesting that some patients might derive an unexpected benefit from post-ICI treatments. With ICI becoming the standard of care in patients newly diagnosed with dMMR/MSI mCRC, these results might help to inform clinical decision-making and to guide future therapeutic strategies for these patients. Abstract Background: Several studies reported improved outcomes with conventional treatments (CT, i.e., chemotherapy ± targeted therapy) administered after immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) in certain tumor types. No data are available concerning patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI). We aimed to assess the outcomes of dMMR/MSI mCRC pts receiving CT after ICI failure. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study investigating the outcomes of all dMMR/MSI mCRC pts who received post-ICI CT between 2015 and 2020. Results: 31 pts (male 61%, median age 56 years) were included. ICI was an anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy in 71% of pts, and 61% received >2 lines before post-ICI CT. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 13% and 45%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival of 2.9 and 7.4 months, respectively. No association of the outcomes with either ICI efficacy or anti-angiogenic agents was observed. Prolonged PFS (range 16.1–21.3 months) was observed in 4 pts (13%). Conclusions: Although conducted on a limited number of patients, our results do not support an association of previous ICI treatment with an enhanced efficacy of CT in dMMR/MSI mCRC. However, prolonged disease control was observed in several cases, suggesting that some pts might derive an unexpected benefit from post-ICI treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quang Loc Bui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
- The Nuclear Medicine and Oncology Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi 116300, Vietnam
- School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 123105, Vietnam
| | - Léo Mas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
| | - Antoine Hollebecque
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Saclay University of Paris, 94800 Villejuif, France;
| | - David Tougeron
- Department of Gastroenterology, Poitiers University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France;
| | | | - Thomas Pudlarz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
| | - Emily Alouani
- Digestive Medical Oncology Department, CHU Toulouse—IUCT Rangueil-Larrey, 31059 Toulouse, France; (E.A.); (R.G.)
| | - Rosine Guimbaud
- Digestive Medical Oncology Department, CHU Toulouse—IUCT Rangueil-Larrey, 31059 Toulouse, France; (E.A.); (R.G.)
| | - Julien Taieb
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75004 Paris, France;
| | - Thierry André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
- Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, Equipe Labellisée par la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Raphaël Colle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
| | - Romain Cohen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France; (Q.L.B.); (L.M.); (T.P.); (T.A.); (R.C.)
- Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, Equipe Labellisée par la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhu PF, Chen YW, Wang MX, Deng YY, Pan SY, Chen ZL, Yang L. Tumor-mutation burden as a marker for immunotherapy of pancreatic cancer: the case report and literature review. Anticancer Drugs 2022; 33:e822-e827. [PMID: 34459462 PMCID: PMC8670360 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000001232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is digestive cancer with limited therapeutic options and a poor outcome. Pancreatic cancer has a high mortality rate, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. The median survival after metastasis of the disease is less than 6 months. Studies have revealed that the standard treatment, including palliative chemotherapy or immunotherapy, is not significantly effective for pancreatic cancer. Herein, we report a case of pancreatic cancer who benefited from a combination of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng-Fei Zhu
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui Province
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang
| | - Yun-Wang Chen
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang
- The Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ming-Xing Wang
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui Province
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang
| | - Ya-Ya Deng
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang
- The Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shuang-Yue Pan
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang
| | - Zhe-Ling Chen
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang
| | - Liu Yang
- Graduate School of Clinical Medicine, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui Province
- Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kankeu Fonkoua LA, Yoon HH. Rapidly Evolving Treatment Landscape for Metastatic Esophagogastric Carcinoma: Review of Recent Data. Onco Targets Ther 2021; 14:4361-4381. [PMID: 34385820 PMCID: PMC8352646 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s216047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophagogastric cancer (EGC) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that collectively represent the 2nd leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. While surgery in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy represents the primary curative treatment for early stage disease, survival outcomes for the majority of patients with later-stage disease remain poor. Cytotoxic chemotherapy with platinum doublets such as 5-FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin is the mainstay of treatment with incremental benefits provided by targeted therapy (trastuzumab, trastuzumab deruxtecan, ramucirumab) and immunotherapy (pembrolizumab, nivolumab). In this article, we provide an updated review and perspectives on the management of advanced EGC. We examine the distinct epidemiological, etiological and molecular features of each disease entity comprising EGC. After reviewing the critical studies that established conventional systemic cytotoxic and targeted therapeutics, we elaborate on recent promising and complex data with immune checkpoint inhibition focusing on implications of tumor histology and PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment. We also highlight novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to build on these recent advances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Aurelien Kankeu Fonkoua
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Harry H Yoon
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fonkoua LAK, Chakrabarti S, Sonbol MB, Kasi PM, Starr JS, Liu AJ, Nevala WK, Maus RL, Bois MC, Pitot HC, Chandrasekharan C, Ross HJ, Wu TT, Graham RP, Villasboas JC, Weiss M, Foster NR, Markovic SN, Dong H, Yoon HH. Outcomes on anti-VEGFR-2/paclitaxel treatment after progression on immune checkpoint inhibition in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:378-386. [PMID: 33739449 PMCID: PMC8488901 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Through our involvement in KEYNOTE-059, we unexpectedly observed durable responses in two patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEA) who received ramucirumab (anti-VEGFR-2)/paclitaxel after immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). To assess the reproducibility of this observation, we piloted an approach to administer ramucirumab/paclitaxel after ICI in more patients, and explored changes in the immune microenvironment. Nineteen consecutive patients with mGEA received ICI followed by ramucirumab/paclitaxel. Most (95%) did not respond to ICI, yet after irRECIST-defined progression on ICI, all patients experienced tumor size reduction on ramucirumab/paclitaxel. The objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) on ramucirumab/paclitaxel after ICI were higher than on the last chemotherapy before ICI in the same group of patients (ORR, 58.8% vs 11.8%; PFS 12.2 vs 3.0 months; respectively). Paired tumor biopsies examined by imaging mass cytometry showed a median 5.5-fold (range 4-121) lower frequency of immunosuppressive forkhead box P3+ regulatory T cells with relatively preserved CD8+ T cells, post-treatment versus pre-treatment (n = 5 pairs). We then compared the outcomes of these 19 patients with a separate group who received ramucirumab/paclitaxel without preceding ICI (n = 68). Median overall survival on ramucirumab/paclitaxel was longer with (vs without) immediately preceding ICI (14.8 vs 7.4 months) including after multivariate analysis, as was PFS. In our small clinical series, outcomes appeared improved on anti-VEGFR-2/paclitaxel treatment when preceded by ICI, in association with alterations in the immune microenvironment. However, further investigation is needed to determine the generalizability of these data. Prospective clinical trials to evaluate sequential treatment with ICI followed by anti-VEGF(R)/taxane are underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel A. Kankeu Fonkoua
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sakti Chakrabarti
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
| | | | - Pashtoon M. Kasi
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
- Department of Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Jason S. Starr
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Alex J. Liu
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Rachel L. Maus
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Melanie C. Bois
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Henry C. Pitot
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Helen J. Ross
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Tsung-Teh Wu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rondell P. Graham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jose C. Villasboas
- Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Immune Monitoring Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Nathan R. Foster
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Svetomir N. Markovic
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Haidong Dong
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Harry H. Yoon
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|