The diagnostic and economic impact of contrast imaging techniques in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis

Dual-tracer PET/CT in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background & Aims

Combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 11C-acetate (dual-tracer) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is being increasingly performed for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although its role is not well defined. Therefore, we evaluated its effectiveness in (i) staging, (ii) characterization of indeterminate lesions on conventional imaging, and (iii) detection of HCC in patients with unexplained elevations in serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed 525 consecutive patients from three tertiary centers between 2014 and 2020. For staging, we recorded new lesion detection rates, changes in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, and treatment allocation due to dual-tracer PET/CT. To characterize indeterminate lesions and unexplained elevation of serum AFP levels, the sensitivity and specificity of dual-tracer PET/CT in diagnosing HCC were evaluated. A multidisciplinary external review and a cost-benefit analysis of patients for metastatic screening were also performed.

Results

Dual-tracer PET/CT identified new lesions in 14.3% of 273 staging patients, resulting in BCLC upstaging in 11.7% and treatment modifications in 7.7%. It upstaged 8.1% of 260 patients undergoing metastatic screening, with estimated savings of US$495 per patient. It had a sensitivity and specificity of 80.7% (95% CI 71.2-88.6%) and 94.8% (95% CI 90.4-98.6%), respectively, for diagnosing HCC in 201 indeterminate lesions. It detected HCC in 45.1% of 51 patients with unexplained elevations in serum AFP concentrations. External review revealed substantial agreement between local and external image interpretation and patient assessment (n = 273, κ = 0.822; 95% CI 0.803-0.864).

Conclusions

Dual-tracer PET/CT provides added value beyond conventional imaging in patients with HCC by improving staging, confirming HCC diagnosis with high accuracy in patients with indeterminate lesions, and detecting HCC in patients with unexplained elevation of serum AFP.

Impact and implications

Compared to CT or MRI, dual-tracer positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) led to upstaging in 12% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing staging, resulting in treatment modification in 8% of cases and a cost saving of US$495 per patient. It also accurately detected HCC in high-risk cases where CT or MRI were equivocal or normal. Dual-tracer PET/CT provides added value beyond conventional imaging in patients with HCC by improving staging, confirming HCC diagnosis with high accuracy in patients with indeterminate lesions, and detecting HCC in patients with unexplained elevation of serum AFP.

US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the performance of US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) after curative treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study enrolled 644 patients between January 2018 and August 2018 as a derivation cohort, and 397 patients from September 2018 to December 2018 as a validation cohort. The US surveillance after HCC curative treatment was performed. The US LI-RADS observation categories and visualization scores were analyzed. Four criteria using US LI-RADS or Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as the surveillance algorithm were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 212 (32.9%) patients in derivation cohort and 158 (39.8%) patients in validation cohort were detected to have RHCCs. The criterion of US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L had higher sensitivity (derivation, 96.7% vs 92.9% vs 81.1% vs 90.6%; validation, 96.2% vs 90.5% vs 80.4% vs 89.9%) and NPV (derivation, 95.7% vs 93.3% vs 88.0% vs 91.8%; validation, 94.6% vs 89.4% vs 83.6% vs 89.0%), but lower specificity (derivation, 35.9% vs 48.2% vs 67.6% vs 51.9%; validation, 43.5% vs 52.7% vs 66.1% vs 54.0%) than criterion of US-2/3, US-3, and US-3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L. Analysis of the visualization score subgroups confirmed that the sensitivity (89.2-97.6% vs 81.0-83.3%) and NPV(88.4-98.0% vs 80.0-83.3%) of score A and score B groups were higher than score C group in criterion of US-2/3 in both two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In the surveillance for RHCC, US LI-RADS with AFP had a high sensitivity and NPV when US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L was considered a criterion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The criterion of US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L improves sensitivity and NPV for RHCC surveillance, which provides a valuable reference for patients in RHCC surveillance after curative treatment.

KEY POINTS

• US LI-RADS with AFP had high sensitivity and NPV in surveillance for RHCC when considering US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L as a criterion. • After US with AFP surveillance, patients with US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L should perform enhanced imaging for confirmative diagnosis. Patients with US-1 or AFP < 20 µg/L continue to repeat US with AFP surveillance. • Patients with risk factors for poor visualization scores limited the sensitivity of US surveillance in RHCC.

Beyond radiologist-level liver lesion detection on multi-phase contrast-enhanced CT images by deep learning

Accurate detection of liver lesions from multi-phase contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans is a fundamental step for precise liver diagnosis and treatment. However, the analysis of multi-phase contexts is heavily challenged by the misalignment caused by respiration coupled with the movement of organs. Here, we proposed an AI system for multi-phase liver lesion segmentation (named MULLET) for precise and fully automatic segmentation of real-patient CECT images. MULLET enables effectively embedding the important ROIs of CECT images and exploring multi-phase contexts by introducing a transformer-based attention mechanism. Evaluated on 1,229 CECT scans from 1,197 patients, MULLET demonstrated significant performance gains in terms of Dice, Recall, and F2 score, which are 5.80%, 6.57%, and 5.87% higher than state of the arts, respectively. MULLET has been successfully deployed in real-world settings. The deployed AI web server provides a powerful system to boost clinical workflows of liver lesion diagnosis and could be straightforwardly extended to general CECT analyses.

Efficacy of TACE Combined with Lenvatinib Plus Sintilimab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombus in the Inferior Vena Cava and/or Right Atrium

Purpose

To validate the safety and effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combination with lenvatinib and sintilimab in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) and/or right atrium (RA) tumor thrombosis (TT).

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed HCC patients with IVC and/or RA TT treated with TACE combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated to evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were analyzed to assess the safety profiles.

Results

A total of 58 patients were screened for eligibility between March 2019 and May 2022. At the time of data collection, 48.2% of patients were still receiving treatment. The median follow-up was 23.5 months. The ORR was 48.3%, the DCR was 91.4%, the median OS was 17.3 months, and the median PFS was 13.0 months. The ORR for IVC/RA TT was 62.1%, DCR was 94.9%, and the median PFS was 14.3 months. 56.9% of patients experienced ≥ grade 3 TRAEs, such as hypertension (10.3%) and elevated liver enzymes (13.8%). No new safety signals were identified. Participants with low levels of serum PCT value had satisfactory prognoses.

Conclusion

TACE combination with lenvatinib plus sintilimab is effective in treating HCC with IVC and/or RA TT. The toxicities were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals. The baseline levels of serum PCT might be the predictive biomarkers for the triple combination therapy.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Lenvatinib Plus Humanized Programmed Death Receptor-1 in Patients with High-Risk Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Study

Purpose

The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with high-risk features (Vp4, and/or tumor occupancy≥50%) has not been standardized and has poor outcomes. The present study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and prognostic impact of lenvatinib, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), and humanized programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) in treating high-risk patients and to explore the biomarkers that may predict the efficacy.

Methods

HCC patients with high-risk features treated with lenvatinib, HAIC, and PD-1 were analyzed retrospectively. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated to evaluate the antitumor efficacy. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were analyzed to assess the safety profiles.

Results

Between February 2020 and July 2022, 97 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The median follow-up time was 447 days. During analysis, 65 patients had disease progression, and 39 patients died. The median PFS and OS were 295 and 579 days, respectively. According to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, the ORR was 64.9% and 78.3%, respectively, and the DCR was 92.8%. The median and intrahepatic DOR was 363 and 462 days, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 64 (65.9%) patients, and the most common adverse events were hypertension (9.3%), thrombocytopenia (7.2%), and elevated aspartate transaminase (7.2%). Participants with low levels of serum procalcitonin (PCT) had satisfactory prognosis.

Conclusion

Lenvatinib, HAIC, and PD-1 were safe and showed promising antitumor activity against HCC with high-risk features. The initial levels of procalcitonin might be the predictive biomarkers for the combined treatment.

Diagnostic accuracy of serum derived exosomes for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Early and non-invasive detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is usually asymptomatic, can improve overall survival outcomes. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum-derived exosomes for diagnosing HCC.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies up to April 2023. The quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 checklist, and data were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed on 18 studies from 3,993 records, and a diagnostic meta-analysis was conducted. Biomarkers were categorized into four groups based on their type (exosomal miRNAs, exosomal RNAs, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and exosomal RNAs+AFP panel), and a meta-analysis was conducted for each category separately.

RESULTS

The highest pooled sensitivity was 0.86 for exosomal miRNAs, and exosomal RNAs+AFP had the highest pooled specificity; (0.89). Furthermore, exosomal RNAs+AFP had the highest pooled positive likelihood ratio; (7.55), the highest pooled diagnostic odds ratio (35.96) and the highest pooled area under the curve (0.93). Exosomal miRNAs had the lowest pooled negative likelihood ratio; (0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of exosomal biomarkers is superior to that of AFP, and combining the two in a panel yields the better results.

Multidisciplinary Taiwan consensus for the use of conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment

Developed in early 1980s, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with Lipiodol was adopted globally after large-scale randomized control trials and meta-analyses proving its effectiveness were completed. Also known as "conventional TACE" (cTACE), TACE is currently the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and delivers both ischemic and cytotoxic effects to targeted tumors. Although new technology and clinical studies have contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of when and how to apply this widely-adopted therapeutic modality, some of these new findings and techniques have yet to be incorporated into a guideline appropriate for Taiwan. In addition, differences in the underlying liver pathologies and treatment practices for transcatheter embolization between Taiwan and other Asian or Western populations have not been adequately addressed, with significant variations in the cTACE protocols adopted in different parts of the world. These mainly revolve around the amount and type of chemotherapeutic agents used, the type of embolic materials, reliance on Lipiodol, and the degree of selectiveness in catheter positioning. Subsequently, interpreting and comparing results obtained from different centers in a systematic fashion remain difficult, even for experienced practitioners. To address these concerns, we convened a panel of experts specializing in different aspects of HCC treatment to devise modernized recommendations that reflect recent clinical experiences, as well as cTACE protocols which are tailored for use in Taiwan. The conclusions of this expert panel are described herein.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Nomograms including the controlling nutritional status score in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolisation for prediction survival: a retrospective analysis

This retrospective study investigated the predictive value of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Nomograms were developed to predict progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). The medical data of 228 patients with HCC and treated with TACE were collected. The patients were apportioned to 2 groups according to CONUT score: low or high (<4, ≥4). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox regression for OS and PFS. OS and PFS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve and compared with the log-rank test. Nomograms were constructed to predict patient OS and PFS. The nomograms were evaluated for accuracy, discrimination, and efficiency. The cut-off value of CONUT score was 4. The higher the CONUT score, the worse the survival; Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in OS and PFS between the low and high CONUT score groups (P = 0·033, 0·047). The nomograms including CONUT, based on the prognostic factors determined by the univariate and multivariate analyses, to predict survival in HCC after TACE were generated. The CONUT score is an important prognostic factor for both OS and PFS for patients with intermediate HCC who underwent TACE. The cut-off value of the CONUT score was 4. A high CONUT score suggests poor survival outcomes. Nomograms generated based on the CONUT score were good models to predict patient OS and PFS.

MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: prospective intraindividual head-to-head comparison of the contrast agents gadoxetic acid and gadoteric acid

The routine use of dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the liver using hepatocyte-specific contrast agent (HSCA) as the standard of care for the study of focal liver lesions is not widely accepted and opponents invoke the risk of a loss in near 100% specificity of extracellular contrast agents (ECA) and the need for prospective head-to-head comparative studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of both contrast agents. The Purpose of this prospective intraindividual study was to conduct a quantitative and qualitative head-to-head comparison of DCE-MRI using HSCA and ECA in patients with liver cirrhosis and HCC. Twenty-three patients with liver cirrhosis and proven HCC underwent two 3 T-MR examinations, one with ECA (gadoteric acid) and the other with HSCA (gadoxetic acid). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), wash-in, wash-out, image quality, artifacts, lesion conspicuity, and major imaging features of LI-RADS v2018 were evaluated. Wash-in and wash-out were significantly stronger with ECA compared to HSCA (P < 0.001 and 0.006, respectively). During the late arterial phase (LAP), CNR was significantly lower with ECA (P = 0.005), while SNR did not differ significantly (P = 0.39). In qualitative analysis, ECA produced a better overall image quality during the portal venous phase (PVP) and delayed phase (DP) compared to HSCA (P = 0.041 and 0.008), showed less artifacts in the LAP and PVP (P = 0.003 and 0.034) and a higher lesion conspicuity in the LAP and PVP (P = 0.004 and 0.037). There was no significant difference in overall image quality during the LAP (P = 1), in artifacts and lesion conspicuity during the DP (P = 0.078 and 0.073) or in the frequency of the three major LI-RADS v2018 imaging features. In conclusion, ECA provides superior contrast of HCC-especially hypervascular HCC lesions-in DCE-MR in terms of better perceptibility of early enhancement and a stronger washout.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease. Worldwide, it ranks sixth in terms of incidence of cancer, and fourth in terms of cancer-related deaths. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is used as an add-on test to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma after prior diagnostic tests such as abdominal ultrasound or measurement of alpha-foetoprotein, or both. According to guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging investigation, with either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may show the typical hepatocellular carcinoma hallmarks in people with cirrhosis, which will be sufficient to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas show atypical imaging features, and therefore, are missed at imaging. Dynamic CEUS images are obtained similarly to CT and MRI images. CEUS differentiates between arterial and portal venous phases, in which sonographic hepatocellular carcinoma hallmarks, such as arterial hyperenhancement and subsequent washout appearance, are investigated. The advantages of CEUS over CT and MRI include real-time imaging, use of contrast agents that do not contain iodine and are not nephrotoxic, and quick image acquisition. Despite the advantages, the use of CEUS in the diagnostic algorithm for HCC remains controversial, with disagreement on relevant guidelines. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival as the conflicting results can be a consequence of an inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Therefore, assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of CEUS for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is needed for either diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma or ruling it out in people with chronic liver disease who are not included in surveillance programmes.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease, in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting. 2. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in people with chronic liver disease and identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the results.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The last date of search was 5 November 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver, and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods to screen studies, extract data, and assess the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We used the bivariate model and provided estimates of summary sensitivity and specificity. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We presented uncertainty-of-the-accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 23 studies with 6546 participants. Studies were published between 2001 and 2021. We judged all 23 studies at high-risk of bias in at least one domain, and 13/23 studies at high concern for applicability. Most studies used different reference standards to exclude the presence of the target condition. The time interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. We also had major concerns on their applicability due to the characteristics of the participants. - CEUS for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 77.8% (95% CI 69.4% to 84.4%) and specificity 93.8% (95% CI 89.1% to 96.6%) (23 studies, 6546 participants; very low-certainty evidence). - CEUS for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 77.5% (95% CI 62.9% to 87.6%) and specificity 92.7% (95% CI 86.8% to 96.1%) (13 studies, 1257 participants; low-certainty evidence). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, including only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted with no knowledge of the results about the index test, showed no differences in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that by using CEUS, as an add-on test following abdominal ultrasound, to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 22% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 6% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would unnecessarily undergo further testing or inappropriate treatment. As to resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 23% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would incorrectly be unresected, while 8% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo further inappropriate testing or treatment. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias of the included studies, heterogeneity, and imprecision of the results and concerns on their applicability limit our ability to draw confident conclusions.

The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT versus extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis

To compare the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) with extracellular contrast agent-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ECA-MRI) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched (1/5/2021) for studies comparing contrast-enhanced CT with ECA-MRI in patients suspected of HCC. Studies without head-to-head comparison were excluded. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and summary area under the curve (sAUC) of contrast-enhanced CT and ECA-MRI in detecting HCC was calculated based on bivariate random effects model. Heterogeneity test included threshold effect analysis and meta-regression. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to lesion size (< 20 mm or ≥ 20 mm). Overall, 10 articles containing 1333 patients were deemed suitable for inclusion in this meta-analysis. ECA-MRI displayed increased sensitivity to contrast-enhanced CT in detecting HCC (0.77 vs. 0.63, P < 0.01). The difference in specificity between ECA-MRI and contrast-enhanced CT was not statistically significant (0.93 vs. 0.94, P = 0.25). ECA-MRI yielded higher diagnostic accuracy (sAUCs = 0.88 vs. 0.80, P < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis with a lesion size < 20 mm, ECA-MRI allowed significant gains of accuracy compared to contrast-enhanced CT (0.79 vs. 0.72, P = 0.02). ECA-MRI also outperformed contrast-enhanced CT in patients with lesion size ≥ 20 mm (sAUCs = 0.96 vs. 0.93, P = 0.04). ECA-MRI provided higher sensitivity and accuracy than contrast-enhanced CT in detecting HCC, especially lesions size < 20 mm.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and third in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-fetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study (computed tomography (CT) or MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is considered valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. The detection of hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to surgical resection could improve the prognosis. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma may, therefore, be missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of MRI in people with chronic liver disease who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, and to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the results.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Diagnostic Test of Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and three other databases to 9 November 2021. We manually searched articles retrieved, contacted experts, handsearched abstract books from meetings held during the last 10 years, and searched for literature in OpenGrey (9 November 2021). Further information was requested by e-mails, but no additional information was provided. No data was obtained through correspondence with investigators. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and we tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 34 studies, with 4841 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability, we judged 15% (5/34) of studies to be at low concern and 85% (29/34) of studies to be at high concern mostly owing to characteristics of the participants, most of whom were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation, and due to pathology of the explanted liver being the only reference standard. MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 84.4% (95% CI 80.1% to 87.9%) and specificity 93.8% (95% CI 90.1% to 96.1%) (34 studies, 4841 participants; low-certainty evidence). MRI for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 84.3% (95% CI 77.6% to 89.3%) and specificity 92.9% (95% CI 88.3% to 95.9%) (16 studies, 2150 participants; low-certainty evidence). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that using MRI as a second-line imaging modality to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 16% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 6% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 16% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

GPC3-targeted immunoPET imaging of hepatocellular carcinomas

PURPOSE

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a clinical challenge. Glypican 3 (GPC3) is a proteoglycan highly specific for HCC and is a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target for HCC. This work aims to develop GPC3-targeted immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET) imaging strategies and to assess the diagnostic values in preclinical HCC models.

METHODS

Flow cytometry was used to screen GPC3-positive HCC cell lines. The expression of GPC3 in HCCs was detected by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray. A novel GPC3-specific single domain antibody (sdAb) was produced and labeled with gallium-68 (⁶⁸Ga, T_1/2 = 1.1 h) and fluorine-18 (¹⁸F, T_1/2 = 1.8 h) to develop radiotracers with different half-lives. The diagnostic efficacies of the developed probes (i.e., [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-NOTA-G2, [¹⁸F]F-G2, and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-NOTA-ABDG2) were interrogated in preclinical HCC models bearing varying GPC3 levels.

RESULTS

GPC3 was strongly expressed on HCC cell lines and patients with poorly differentiated HCC. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-NOTA-G2 immunoPET imaging specifically delineated the subcutaneous HCC lesions, outperforming the traditional ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET and the nonspecific [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-NOTA-NbGFP immunoPET. ImmunoPET imaging with [¹⁸F]F-G2 also efficiently diagnosed the tumors with clarity. Moreover, the fusion of G2 to an albumin-binding domain (ABD) significantly increased the tumor uptake and decreased kidney accumulation of the radiotracer when compared to [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-NOTA-G2.

CONCLUSIONS

In the work, we successfully developed sdAb-derived GPC3-targeted immunoPET imaging strategies and characterized the superior diagnostic accuracies in preclinical HCC models. Furthermore, we synthesized a fusion protein ABDG2 with improved targeting and pharmacokinetic properties, serving as a promising candidate for developing radioimmunotherapy agents.

The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B

PURPOSE

To explore the diagnostic value of American College of Radiology Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-CEUS-LI-RADS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

A total of 205 patients at high risk of HCC with solitary hepatic nodule were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed. All patients were over 18 years old and had a single lesion with a diameter < 50 mm. Lesions were categorized according to size and contrast enhancement patterns in the arterial, portal venous and late phases. Diagnostic efficacy of CEUS LI-RADS for HCC, and the rate of non-HCC malignancies in the LR-M class were compared between patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis B.

RESULTS

Of all 205 nodules (median nodule size was 34 mm), 142 (69.3%) were HCC. Of the 127 (61.9%) LR-5 category nodules, 95.8% (92/96) nodules were corresponded to HCC in cirrhosis, while 61.3% (19/31) nodules were corresponded to HCC in chronic hepatitis B (P = 0.000). Positive predictive value (PPV) of LR-5 category for HCC was 95.8% in cirrhosis and 61.3% in chronic hepatitis B (P = 0.000). More category of LR-4 nodules were proved to be HCC in patients with cirrhosis than chronic hepatitis B (80.0% vs 8.3%, P = 0.000). Of 41 LR-M category nodules, more non-HCC malignancies were found in chronic hepatitis B (76.0%) than that in cirrhosis (25.0%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The LR-5 category is highly specific for the diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. However, LR-5 category nodules require further CT or MRI examination or histological confirmation in patients with chronic hepatitis B for its unsatisfactory PPV for HCC.

Deep Learning Model With Convolutional Neural Network for Detecting and Segmenting Hepatocellular Carcinoma in CT: A Preliminary Study

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies in the world. Early detection and accurate diagnosis of HCC play an important role in patient management. This study aimed to develop a convolutional neural network-based model to identify and segment HCC lesions utilizing dynamic contrast agent-enhanced computed tomography (CT).

Methods

This retrospective study used CT image sets of histopathology-confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma over three phases (arterial, venous, and delayed). The proposed convolutional neural network (CNN) segmentation method was based on the U-Net architecture and trained using the domain adaptation technique. The proposed method was evaluated using 115 liver masses of 110 patients (87 men and 23 women; mean age, 56.9 years ± 11.9 (SD); mean mass size, 6.0 cm ± 3.6). The sensitivity for identifying HCC of the model and Dice score for segmentation of liver masses between radiologists and the CNN model were calculated for the test set.

Results

The sensitivity for HCC identification of the model was 100%. The median Dice score for HCC segmenting between radiologists and the CNN model was 0.81 for the test set.

Conclusion

Deep learning with CNN had high performance in the identification and segmentation of HCC on dynamic CT.

Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5)

The American College of Radiology (ACR) released the Liver Imaging Report and Data System (LI-RADS) scheme, which categorizes hepatic nodules in risk classes from LR-1 to LR-5 (according to the degree of risk to be HCC) and LR-M (probable malignancy not specific for HCC). The aim of this study was to test whether HCC with different LR patterns on CEUS have different overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). We retrospectively enrolled 167 patients with the first definitive diagnosis of single HCC (by using CT/MRI or histological techniques if CT/MRI were inconclusive) for whom CEUS examination was available. The median size of HCC lesions was 2.2 cm (range 1.0-7.2 cm). According to CEUS LI-RADS classification, 28 patients were in LR-3, 48 in LR-4, 83 in LR-5, and 8 in LR-M. Patient liver function and nodule characteristics were not statistically different between CEUS LI-RADS classes. Using univariate analysis, CEUS LI-RADS class was not found to be a predictor of survival (p = 0.347). In conclusion, HCC showing the CEUS LI-RADS classes LR-3 and LR-4 have no better clinical outcome than typical HCC. Such data support the EASL policy, aimed at conclusive diagnostic investigations of indeterminate nodules up to obtaining histological proof to avoid leaving aggressive HCC not timely treated.

The Efficacy of TACE Combined With Lenvatinib Plus Sintilimab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and Methods

The data of patients with unresectable HCC administered a combination therapy with TACE and lenvatinib plus sintilimab were retrospectively assessed. Patients received lenvatinib orally once daily 2 weeks before TACE, followed by sintilimab administration at 200 mg intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day therapeutic cycle after TACE. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by the modified RECIST criteria.

Results

Median duration of follow-up was 12.5 months (95%CI 9.1 to 14.8 months). ORR was 46.7% (28/60). Median DOR in confirmed responders was 10.0 months (95%CI 9.0-11.0 months). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.3 months (95%CI 11.9-14.7 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 23.6 months (95%CI 22.2-25.0 months).

Conclusions

TACE combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab is a promising therapeutic regimen in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Costs and Utilization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients Treated at a Large Referral Center in Washington State 2007-2018

Introduction

Though the treatment landscape for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved significantly with the refinement of liver-directed therapy techniques and the introduction of new drugs, few studies have investigated the impact of the changing treatment landscape on lifetime treatment costs, particularly in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease. We sought to investigate real-world clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare costs in a cohort of HCC patients treated at a single high-volume institution in Washington (WA) state.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with HCC between 2007 and 2018 using abstracted electronic medical record (EMR) data linked to cancer registry data and health claims from commercial plans, Medicare, and Medicaid. We described clinical and treatment characteristics, including BCLC stage and Child Pugh score. We investigated median survival and mean lifetime treatment costs by BCLC stage using Kaplan-Meier cost estimator methods. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate factors associated with overall survival.

Results

The final cohort included 215 patients, the majority of whom were white (71%), male (68%), and with underlying hepatitis C (61%). Mean per patient lifetime costs were highest in BCLC A and BCLC C patients. Mean lifetime costs in BCLC A patients ($292,134) was driven by surgery, hospital, pharmacy, imaging, and outpatient costs. Chemotherapy costs were highest in BCLC C patients, though not the predominant area of spending. Median survival was highest in patients with BCLC 0 and A disease; BCLC stage C and higher area deprivation index (ADI) were associated with poorer survival.

Conclusion

In a cohort of WA state HCC patients, mean lifetime costs were highest in patients with BCLC A disease, attributable to surgery and hospital costs. As increased utilization of newer and less toxic therapies improves survival in BCLC C patients, mean lifetime costs in this group may also rise.

Value of perfusion parameters histogram analysis of triphasic CT in differentiating intrahepatic mass forming cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma

We aim to gain further insight into identifying differential perfusion parameters and corresponding histogram parameters of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) from hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on triphasic computed tomography (CT) scans. 90 patients with pathologically confirmed HCCs (n = 54) and IMCCs (n = 36) who underwent triple-phase enhanced CT imaging were included. Quantitative analysis of CT images derived from triphasic CT scans were evaluated to generate liver perfusion and histogram parameters. The differential performances, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity were assessed. The mean value, and all thepercentiles of the arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) were significantly higher in HCCs than in IMCCs. The difference in hepatic arterial blood supply perfusion (HAP) and AEF (ΔHAP = HAP_tumor− HAP_liver, ΔAEF = AEF_tumor− AEF_liver) for the mean perfusion parameters and all percentile parameters between tumor and peripheral normal liver were significantly higher in HCCs than in IMCCs. The relative AEF (rAEF = ΔAEF/AEF_liver), including the mean value and all corresponding percentile parameters were statistically significant between HCCs and IMCCs. The 10th percentiles of the ΔAEF and rAEF had the highest AUC of 0.788 for differentiating IMCC from HCC, with sensitivities and specificities of 87.0%, 83.3%, and 61.8%, 64.7%, respectively. Among all parameters, the mean value of ∆AEF, the 75th percentiles of ∆AEF and rAEF, and the 25th percentile of HF_tumor exhibited the highest sensitivities of 94.4%, while the 50th percentile of rAEF had the highest specificity of 82.4%. AEF (including ΔAEF and rAEF) and the corresponding histogram parameters derived from triphasic CT scans provided useful value and facilitated the accurate discrimination between IMCCs and HCCs.

Personalized circulating tumor DNA in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Mutational analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can potentially be used for early detection of recurrence after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Mutations from tumor may be identified in plasma as an early sign of recurrence. We conducted a pilot study investigating if somatic mutations could be detected in plasma in patients undergoing liver resection for HCC and in patients with advanced non-resectable HCC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively included patients undergoing curative liver resection for HCC. Tumor tissue was investigated with whole exome sequencing and preoperative blood samples were evaluated for ctDNA using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) with TruSight Oncology 500 including 523 cancer-associated genes. Subsequently, the method was evaluated in patients with advanced HCC. We included eight patients curatively resected for HCC, where tumor tissue mutations were identified in seven patients. However, only in one patient tumor specific mutations were found in the preoperative blood sample. In all three patients with advanced HCC, tumor mutations were detected in the blood.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable HCC, ctDNA could not be reliably detected using the applied targeted NGS method. In contrast, ctDNA was detected in all patients with advanced HCC. Small tumors, tumor heterogeneity and limited sequencing coverage may explain the lack of detectable ctDNA.

Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and fourth in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, computed tomography (CT) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-foetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma is, therefore, missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of CT in people with chronic liver disease, who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector, multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease, either in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Trials Register, Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Diagnostic-Test-Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science until 4 May 2021. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 21 studies, with a total of 3101 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time-interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability in the patient selection domain, we judged 14% (3/21) of studies to be at low concern and 86% (18/21) of studies to be at high concern owing to characteristics of the participants who were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation. CT for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 77.5% (95% CI 70.9% to 82.9%) and specificity 91.3% (95% CI 86.5% to 94.5%) (21 studies, 3101 participants; low-certainty evidence). CT for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 71.4% (95% CI 60.3% to 80.4%) and specificity 92.0% (95% CI 86.3% to 95.5%) (10 studies, 1854 participants; low-certainty evidence). In the three studies at low concern for applicability (861 participants), we found sensitivity 76.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 91.5%) and specificity 89.2% (95% CI 57.0% to 98.1%). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the clinical pathway for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, CT has roles as a confirmatory test for hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, and for staging assessment. We found that using CT in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 22.5% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 8.7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 28.6% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 8% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

Artificial intelligence assists identifying malignant versus benign liver lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study aims to construct a strategy that uses assistance from artificial intelligence (AI) to assist radiologists in the identification of malignant versus benign focal liver lesions (FLLs) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHODS

A training set (patients = 363) and a testing set (patients = 211) were collected from our institute. On four-phase CEUS images in the training set, a composite deep learning architecture was trained and tuned for differentiating malignant and benign FLLs. In the test dataset, AI performance was evaluated by comparison with radiologists with varied levels of experience. Based on the comparison, an AI assistance strategy was constructed, and its usefulness in reducing CEUS interobserver heterogeneity was further tested.

RESULTS

In the test set, to identify malignant versus benign FLLs, AI achieved an area under the curve of 0.934 (95% CI 0.890-0.978) with an accuracy of 91.0%. Comparing with radiologists reviewing videos along with complementary patient information, AI outperformed residents (82.9-84.4%, P = 0.038) and matched the performance of experts (87.2-88.2%, P = 0.438). Due to the higher positive predictive value (PPV) (AI: 95.6% vs residents: 88.6-89.7%, P = 0.056), an AI strategy was defined to improve the malignant diagnosis. With the assistance of AI, radiologists exhibited a sensitivity improvement of 97.0-99.4% (P < 0.05) and an accuracy of 91.0-92.9% (P = 0.008-0.189), which was comparable with that of the experts (P = 0.904).

CONCLUSIONS

The CEUS-based AI strategy improved the performance of residents and reduced CEUS's interobserver heterogeneity in the differentiation of benign and malignant FLLs.

A Radiomics Approach to Predict the Emergence of New Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Computed Tomography for High-Risk Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Liver cirrhosis poses a major risk for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective study investigated to what extent radiomic features allow the prediction of emerging HCC in patients with cirrhosis in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). A total of 51 patients with liver cirrhosis and newly detected HCC lesions (n = 82) during follow-up (FU-CT) after local tumor therapy were included. These lesions were not to have been detected by the radiologist in the chronologically prior CECT (PRE-CT). For training purposes, segmentations of 22 patients with liver cirrhosis but without HCC-recurrence were added. A total of 186 areas (82 HCCs and 104 cirrhotic liver areas without HCC) were analyzed. Using univariate analysis, four independent features were identified, and a multivariate logistic regression model was trained to classify the outlined regions as "HCC probable" or "HCC improbable". In total, 60/82 (73%) of segmentations with later detected HCC and 84/104 (81%) segmentations without HCC were classified correctly (AUC of 81%, 95% CI 74-87%), yielding a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI 57-83%) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI 76-96%). In conclusion, the model predicted the occurrence of new HCCs within segmented areas with an acceptable sensitivity and specificity in cirrhotic liver tissue in CECT.

Spectral CT Hybrid Images in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Hypervascular Abdominal Tumors-Potential Advantages in Clinical Routine

Background: This study aimed to investigate the use of spectral computed tomography (SCT) hybrid images combining virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) and iodine maps (IMs) as a potentially efficient search series for routine clinical imaging in patients with hypervascular abdominal tumors. Methods: A total of 69 patients with hypervascular abdominal tumors including neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs, n = 48), renal cell carcinoma (RCC, n = 10), and primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n = 11) were analyzed retrospectively. Two radiological readers (blinded to clinical data) read three CT image sets (1st a reference set with 70 keV; 2nd a 50:50 hybrid 140 keV/40 keV set; 3rd a 50:50 hybrid 140 keV/IM set). They assessed images subjectively by rating several parameters including image contrast, visibility of suspicious lesions, and diagnostic confidence on five-point Likert scales. In addition, reading time was estimated. Results: Median subjective Likert scores were highest for the 1st set, except for image contrast, for which the 2nd set was rated highest. Scores for diagnostic confidence, artifacts, noise, and visibility of suspicious lesions or small structures were significantly higher for the 1st set than for the 2nd or 3rd set (p < 0.001). Regarding image contrast, the 2nd set was rated significantly higher than the 3rd set (p < 0.001), while the median did not differ significantly compared with the 1st set. Agreement between the two readers was high for all sets. Estimated potential reading time was the same for hybrid and reference sets. Conclusions: Hybrid images have the potential to efficiently exploit the additional information provided by SCT in patients with hypervascular abdominal tumors. However, the use of rigid weighting did not significantly improve diagnostic performance in this study.

Current Opinion about Hepatocellular Carcinoma <10 mm

BACKGROUND

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is important. Advances in liver imaging techniques have facilitated the detection of HCC at an early stage. However, there is a controversial discussion on how to diagnose very small HCC by imaging. The aim of the current review is to present current published data on HCC ≤10 mm and discuss on how to best diagnose and treat such lesions.

SUMMARY

It is still challenging, however, to accurately characterize HCC <10 mm. The accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be critical for early treatment decisions for cancer patients, particularly when CECT and/or CEMRI are inconclusive. Key Messages: The characterization of focal liver lesions <10 mm is frequently delayed until a follow-up imaging procedure demonstrates growth or stability. A repetition of ultrasound examination after 3 months for new nodules <1 cm should be recommended.

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Comprehensive Guide: MR Imaging Edition

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the lexicon, technique, interpretation, reporting, and data collection of liver imaging. Developed specifically for assessment of liver observations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), LI-RADS classifies hepatic observations on the basis of the probability of their being HCC, from LR-1 (definitely benign) to LR-5 (definitely HCC). This article discusses the technical requirements, major features, and ancillary features of and a systematic approach for using the LI-RADS diagnostic algorithm, with special emphasis on MR imaging.

Addressing the worldwide hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, prevention and management

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world with rising incidence. Globally, there has been substantial variation in prevalence of risk factors for HCC over years, like control of viral hepatitis in developing countries but growing epidemic of fatty liver disease in developed world. Changing epidemiology of HCC is related to trends in these risk factors. HCC remains asymptomatic until it is very advanced which makes early detection by surveillance important in reducing HCC related mortality. Management of HCC. depends on stage of the tumor and severity of underlying liver disease. At present, resection and transplant are still the best curative options for small HCC, but recent advances in locoregional therapy and molecular targeted systemic therapy has changed the management for HCC at intermediate and advanced stages. This review is overview of global epidemiology, prevention, surveillance and emerging therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Impact of Obesity and Heavy Alcohol Consumption on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development after HCV Eradication with Antivirals

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It remains unclear whether obesity increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis C who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) with antiviral therapy.

METHODS

In this multicenter cohort study, we enrolled patients with chronic hepatitis C who achieved SVR with interferon (IFN)-based therapy (IFN group) or direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy (DAA group) between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2018. The patients underwent regular surveillance for HCC. Cumulative incidence of and the risk factors for HCC development after SVR were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 2,055 patients (840 in the IFN group and 1,215 in the DAA group), 75 developed HCC (41 in the IFN group and 34 in the DAA group) during the mean observation period of 4.1 years. The incidence rates of HCC at 1, 2, and 3 years were 1.2, 1.9, and 3.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that in addition to older age, lower albumin level, lower platelet count, higher alpha-fetoprotein level, and absence of dyslipidemia, obesity (body mass index ≥25 kg/m²) and heavy alcohol consumption (≥60 g/day) were independent risk factors for HCC development, with adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51-4.25) and 2.56 (95% CI: 1.14-5.75), respectively. The adjusted HR was not significant between the 2 groups (DAA vs. IFN; HR 1.19, 95% CI: 0.61-2.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity and heavy alcohol consumption increased the risk of HCC development after SVR.

Highly sensitive Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of α-fetoprotein is a predictive marker for hepatocarcinogenesis in long-term observation of patients with chronic liver disease

Highly sensitive Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of α-fetoprotein (hs-AFP-L3) is a specific marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has been reliable in cases with a low serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) level. However, the biomarkers that contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis during the long-term observation are not yet clear. The present study reported the clinical utility of hs-AFP-L3 in the long-term observation of patients with chronic liver disease. The subjects were 106 patients with chronic liver disease without HCC or a history of HCC treatment and who had been followed for >12 months. hs-AFP-L3 was measured using cryopreserved serum. The factors contributing to hepatocarcinogenesis were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. The median observation period was 88 months (15-132 months). The cumulative incidence of HCC was 10.5% at 5 years and 19.6% at 10 years. The univariate analysis revealed that age ≥55 years old, platelet count ≤13.1x10⁴/µl, hyaluronic acid ≥80.8 ng/ml, alanine transaminase ≥47 U/l, AFP ≥6.3 ng/ml, hs-AFP-L3 ≥3.5% and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) ≥25 mAU/ml were significant factors. In the multivariate analysis, platelet count ≤13.1x10⁴/µl [hazard ratio (HR), 4.966; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.597-15.437; P=0.006] and hs-AFP-L3 ≥3.5% (HR, 5.450; 95% CI, 1.522-19.512; P=0.009) were extracted as significant factors contributing to hepatocarcinogenesis. In addition, for cases with AFP <20 ng/ml, a multivariate analysis revealed that hs-AFP-L3 ≥4.9% (HR, 11.608; 95% CI, 2.422-55.629; P=0.002) and DCP ≥25 mAU/ml (HR, 3.936; 95% CI, 1.088-14.231; P=0.037) were significant factors contributing to hepatocarcinogenesis. hs-AFP-L3 is a useful marker for predicting hepatocarcinogenesis in the long-term observation of patients with chronic liver disease.

An Optimized Integrin α6-Targeted Magnetic Resonance Probe for Molecular Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Mice

Introduction

Integrin α6 is an attractive diagnostic biomarker for molecular imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as it has an extremely high positive rate (approximately 94%) in clinical early-stage HCC. In this study, based on our previously identified integrin α6-targeted peptide, we developed an optimized integrin α6-targeted magnetic resonance (MR) probe dubbed DOTA(Gd)-ANADYWR for MR imaging of HCC in mice.

Materials and Methods

The longitudinal (R₁) relaxivity of DOTA(Gd)-ANADYWR was measured on a 3.0 T MR system . The specific tumor enhancement of the agent was investigated in four distinct mouse models, including subcutaneous, orthotopic, genetically engineered and chemically induced HCC mice.

Results

The R₁ relaxivity value of DOTA(Gd)-ANADYWR is 5.11 mM⁻¹s⁻¹ at 3.0 T, which is similar to that of the nonspecific clinical agent Gadoteridol. DOTA(Gd)-ANADYWR generated superior enhanced MR signal in HCC lesions and provided complementary enhancement MR signals to the clinically available hepatobiliary MR contrast agent gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA). Importantly, DOTA(Gd)-ANADYWR could efficiently visualize small HCC lesion (approximately 1 mm) which was hardly detected by the clinical Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Conclusion

These findings suggest the potential application of this integrin α6-targeted MR probe for the detection of HCC, particularly for small HCC.

Nomogram Based on Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio to Predict Recurrence in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Radiofrequency Ablation

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prognostic value of pre-procedure neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and construct a nomogram to predict disease-free survival (DFS) in patients receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria.

METHODS

The data of 515 patients of HCC within Milan criteria receiving RFA were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups: the training group (n = 382) and the validation group (n = 133). Several preprocedural variables were analyzed in the two groups to determine the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median DFS time of the training and validation group was 28.4 months and 24.5 months, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that number of lesions, alpha-feto protein levels, NLR and PLR were independent risk factors of DFS. According to the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (t-ROC), the optimal cutoff value of the NLR and PLR was 1.55 and 75.30, respectively, with sensitivity of 0.737 and 0.648 and specificity of 0.541 and 0.508, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) of the t-ROC curves for the NLR was 0.662 and PLR was 0.597. The DFS was significantly higher in the NLR ≤ 1.55 group compared to NLR > 1.55 group and the PLR ≤ 75.30 group compared to PLR > 75.30 group in both training and validation datasets. Nomogram was developed based on the prognostic factors indicated by the Cox regression to predict 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year DFS probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

The cutoff value of the NLR and PLR was 1.55 and 75.30. This new nomogram based on NLR and PLR may provide good and individualized prediction of recurrence for HCC patients within Milan criteria after RFA.

Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Update of the consensus document of the AEEH, AEC, SEOM, SERAM, SERVEI, and SETH

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver neoplasm and one of the most common causes of death in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. In parallel, with recognition of the clinical relevance of this cancer, major new developments have recently appeared in its diagnosis, prognostic assessment and in particular, in its treatment. Therefore, the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) has driven the need to update the clinical practice guidelines, once again inviting all the societies involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease to participate in the drafting and approval of the document: Spanish Society for Liver Transplantation (SETH), Spanish Society of Diagnostic Radiology (SERAM), Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI), Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) and Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). The clinical practice guidelines published in 2016 and accepted as National Health System Clinical Practice Guidelines were taken as the reference documents, incorporating the most important recent advances. The scientific evidence and the strength of the recommendation is based on the GRADE system.

CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 vs. CEUS LI-RADS v2017-Can Things Be Put Together?

Simple Summary

The LI-RADS system is nowadays the mainstream system used in classifying liver nodules in cirrhotic liver according to their risk of malignancy. Two main LI-RADS documents have been released—the CEUS LI-RADS v2017 document, and the CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 document. In some circumstances, a nodule can be differently classified when using CEUS versus when using CT or MRI. In this paper, we also focus on the existing similitudes between the two documents but, essentially, on the differences between the two main documents and the complementarities between imaging techniques in characterizing liver nodules in cirrhotic livers. Awareness of the complementarity of imaging techniques may lead to an improvement in the characterization and classification of liver nodules and will reduce the number of liver biopsies. This paper proposes practical solutions in order to better classify and manage observations or nodules detected in cirrhotic livers.

Abstract

Different LI-RADS core documents were released for CEUS and for CT/MRI. Both documents rely on major and ancillary diagnostic criteria. The present paper offers an exhaustive comparison of the two documents focusing on the similarities, but especially on the differences, complementarity, and added value of imaging techniques in classifying liver nodules in cirrhotic livers. The major diagnostic criteria are defined, and the sensitivity and specificity of each major diagnostic criteria are presented according to the literature. The existing differences between techniques in assessing the major diagnostic features can be then exploited in order to ensure a better classification and a better clinical management of liver nodules in cirrhotic livers. Ancillary features depend on the imaging technique used, and their presence can upgrade or downgrade the LI-RADS score of an observation, but only as far as LI-RADS 4. MRI is the imaging technique that provides the greatest number of ancillary features, whereas CEUS has fewer ancillary features than other imaging techniques. In the final part of the manuscript, some recommendations are made by the authors in order to guidephysicians as to when adding another imaging technique can be helpful in managing liver nodules in cirrhotic livers.

Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gallbladder cancer, and cancer of the bile ducts (intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). Due to the multiple modalities that can be used to treat the disease and the complications that can arise from comorbid liver dysfunction, a multidisciplinary evaluation is essential for determining an optimal treatment strategy. A multidisciplinary team should include hepatologists, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, and pathologists with hepatobiliary cancer expertise. In addition to surgery, transplant, and intra-arterial therapies, there have been great advances in the systemic treatment of HCC. Until recently, sorafenib was the only systemic therapy option for patients with advanced HCC. In 2020, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab became the first regimen to show superior survival to sorafenib, gaining it FDA approval as a new frontline standard regimen for unresectable or metastatic HCC. This article discusses the NCCN Guidelines recommendations for HCC.

Characteristics and outcome of incidental hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: a cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Despite advances in imaging diagnostic modalities, hepatocellular carcinoma is sometimes incidentally diagnosed on histological examination of the liver explant. Our objectives were: 1) To compare the characteristics between incidental and known hepatocellular carcinoma and 2) To estimate survival and tumor recurrence after liver transplantation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective, single-center study. The inclusion criteria were 1) cirrhotic patients, age≥18 years, 2) Liver transplantation between 1998 and 2018, and 3) hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed on the histopathologic examination of the explanted liver. Cholangiocarcinoma and patients with early retransplantation were excluded. Multivariate analysis was performed using binomial logistic regression to assess the factors associated incidental hepatocellular carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to explore the impact on overall survival and recurrence free survival.

RESULTS

269 patients were enrolled. The prevalence of incidental hepatocellular carcinoma was 4.18% (95% CI: 2.89-6.01%) of all liver transplants performed in cirrhotic patients. The median diameter of the main nodule was smaller in incidental hepatocellular carcinoma (20 vs 27 mm, p=0.004) although they were more likely to be beyond the Up-to-Seven criteria on explant examination (22.2% vs 7.5%, p=0.001), showing no differences in any other histological features. No differences were found in overall survival rates (incidental 70.2% vs 70.4%, p=0.87) nor recurrence-free survival (incidental 100% vs 83.8%, p=0.07) at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Incidental hepatocellular carcinoma has a smaller size and is more frequently found to be beyond the Up-to-Seven criteria. However, no differences were found in overall survival rates nor recurrence-free survival, although there was no tumor recurrence in incidental hepatocellular carcinoma group.

Comparison of LI-RADS with other non-invasive liver MRI criteria and radiological opinion for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers using gadoxetic acid with histopathological explant correlation

AIM

To establish the diagnostic accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compare its performance to that of international criteria from European Assofor the Study of the Liver (EASL), Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH), Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), and to the reporting radiologist's overall opinion regarding the probability of a nodule being a HCC by correlating with a histological diagnosis from whole liver explants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present single-centre, retrospective review selected participants based on the following criteria: adults (≥18 years) listed for liver transplantation in 2014/2015, with liver cirrhosis at the time of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with hepatocyte specific contrast agent, and at least one liver lesion ≥10 mm on MRI with histology from subsequent liver explant for comparison. Each lesion was assessed against international criteria and given a "radiologist opinion" score of 1-5 (1 = definitely benign, 5 = definitely HCC).

RESULTS

Total 268 patient records were reviewed, with 105 eligible lesions identified from 47 patients. Median lesion size was 15.5 mm (range 10-68 mm). Sensitivity (%), specificity (%), and positive predictive value (PPV; %) for LI-RADS LR5 was 45, 89, and 89, for LI-RADS LR4+5 + TIV was 61, 80, and 86, for EASL was 44, 86 and 86, for JSH/APASL was 64, 81, and 87, for OPTN was 36, 90, and 88, and for "radiologist impression" of probably or definitely HCC was 79, 79, and 88 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI has moderate sensitivity and good specificity for the diagnosis of HCC with considerable variation depending on criteria used. OPTN criteria have the best specificity, but low sensitivity. "Radiologist opinion" gives highest overall accuracy with increases in sensitivity and reduction in specificity when compared to the imaging criteria.

Evaluation of LI-RADS 3 category by magnetic resonance in US-detected nodules ≤ 2 cm in cirrhotic patients

OBJECTIVES

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis in high-risk patients is a dynamic system, which was lastly updated in 2018. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy for HCC diagnosis of LI-RADS v2018 with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with extracellular contrast for solitary nodules ≤ 20 mm detected during ultrasound (US) surveillance in cirrhotic patients, with particular interest in those observations categorized as LI-RADS 3.

METHODS

Between November 2003 and February 2017, we included 262 consecutive cirrhotic patients with a newly US-detected solitary ≤ 20-mm nodule. A LI-RADS (LR) v2018 category was retrospectively assigned. The diagnostic accuracy for each LR category was described, and the main MRI findings associated with HCC diagnosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

Final diagnoses were as follows: 197 HCC (75.2%), 5 cholangiocarcinoma (1.9%), 2 metastasis (0.8%), and 58 benign lesions (22.1%); 0/15 (0%) LR-1, 6/26 (23.1%) LR-2, 51/74 (68.9%) LR-3, 11/12 (91.7%) LR-4, 126/127 (99.2%) LR-5, and 3/8 (37.5%) LR-M were HCC. LR-5 category displayed a sensitivity and specificity of 64% (95% CI, 56.8-70.7) and 98.5% (95% CI, 91.7-100), respectively. Considering also LR-4 as diagnostic for HCC, the sensitivity slightly increased to 69.5% (95% CI, 62.6-75.9) with minor impact on specificity (96.2%; 95% CI, 89.3-99.6). Regarding LR-3 observations, 51 out of 74 were HCC, 2 were non-HCC malignancies, and 20 out of 21 LR-3 nodules > 15 mm (95.2%) were finally categorized as HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

The high probability of HCC in US-detected LR-3 observations (68.9%) justifies triggering an active diagnostic work-up if intended to diagnose HCC at a very early stage.

KEY POINTS

• In cirrhotic patients with nodules ≤ 20 mm detected during US surveillance, 51 out of 74 (68.9%) of LR-3 nodules by MRI corresponded to an HCC. • In LR-3 nodules, HCC diagnosis was closely related to baseline tumor size. All 5 nodules smaller than 1 cm were diagnosed as benign. Oppositely, 20 out of 21 LR-3 observations > 15 mm (95.2%) were diagnosed as HCC. • The high probability of HCC in US-detected LR-3 observations justifies triggering an active diagnostic work-up if intended to diagnose HCC at a very early stage.

Follow-up after Direct-acting Antiviral Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: Most Patients Are Followed Appropriately

Objective Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection carries a residual risk of hepatocarcinogenesis even after viral elimination, so appropriate follow-up is necessary. The present study investigated the current hospital visits and hepatocarcinogenesis status of patients who received daclatasvir plus asunaprevir treatment (DCV+ASV) to determine whether or not appropriate follow-up was being performed. Methods We retrospectively analyzed hepatocarcinogenesis, the overall survival, and the length of hospital visits in 442 patients who applied for the medical expense subsidy system for viral hepatitis and received DCV+ASV treatment in Gunma Prefecture between October 2014 and December 2015. This also included 61 patients who had a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Results Among 442 patients, 388 achieved a sustained viral response (SVR) by DCV+ASV therapy (87.8%), and 95.9% achieved an SVR if additional treatment was included. HCC was found in 75 cases (17.0%). A history of HCC, the FIB-4 index and the treatment effect SVR were determined to be factors affecting the incidence of HCC. Regarding the follow-up rate, 89.9% of patients continued to regularly visit the hospital after 5 years of treatment. However, patients ≤60 years old had significantly lower persistence rates than older patients. The persistence rate of hospital visits to the same institution was 67.7% over a 5-year period, which was significantly better in small and medium-sized institutions than in large, specialized institutions (71.7% vs. 63.9%, p=0.039). Conclusion Patients with direct-acting antiviral treatment generally received adequate follow-up, but younger patients had a slightly higher rate of follow-up interruption and were considered to need support.

Updates on the Diagnosis and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction

Globally, the incidence, as well as mortality, related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is on the rise, owing to relatively few curative options. Underlying cirrhosis is the most common etiology leading to HCC, but risk factors of cirrhosis show great regional variability. Over the years, there has been a steady development in the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of HCC, including the availability of a wide range of systemic chemotherapeutic agents. We aim to review the recent advancements in the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for HCC.

Methodology

The literature search was done using databases PubMed, Cochrane, and Science Direct, and the latest relevant articles were reviewed.

Findings

Screening of HCC is a pivotal step in the early diagnosis of the disease. Current guidelines recommend using ultrasound and alfa fetoprotein but various new biomarkers are under active research that might aid in diagnosing very small tumors, not picked up by the current screening methods. Treatment options are decided based upon the overall performance of the patient and the extent of the disease, as per the Barcelona classification. There are very few options that offer a cure for the disease, ranging from liver resection and transplantation to tumor ablation. Downstaging has proven to have a significant role in the course of the disease. An attempt to control the disease can be made via radiological interventions, such as transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, or radiation therapy. For advanced disease, sorafenib used to be the only option until a couple of years ago. Recently, many other systemic agents have received approval as first-line and second-line therapies for HCC. Genomics is an area of active clinical research as understanding the mutations and genomics involved in the evolution of HCC might lead to a breakthrough therapy.

How to cite this article

Raees A, Kamran M, Özkan H, et al. Updates on the Diagnosis and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2021;11(1):32–40.

Enhancement patterns of small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 30 mm) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics

PURPOSE

To analyze the correlation between enhancement patterns of small hepatic carcinomas (HCCs; ≤ 30 mm) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and the clinicopathologic characteristics.

METHODS

The retrospective study included 346 inpatients (288 males and 58 females) with 372 pathologically confirmed small HCCs between January 2017 and December 2018. All patients underwent CEUS examination before pathological examination. Statistical analysis was used to determine the correlation between enhancement patterns of small HCCs on CEUS and clinicopathologic characteristics including serum alpha-feto-protein level, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) level, primary or recurrent HCC condition, tumor number, tumor differentiation, tumor size, liver background and microvascular invasion (MVI).

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-seven out of 372 (93.3 %) HCCs manifested arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE). The arterial enhancement patterns were correlated with the tumor differentiation (odds ratio = 10.336, P = 0.000). Moderately- or poorly-differentiated HCCs were more likely to display APHE than well-differentiated HCCs (96.2 % vs 58.6 %, P < 0.001). Two hundred ninety-five of 372 (79.3 %) HCCs showed washout in the portal venous/late phase. Washout was correlated with serum PIVKA-II level, tumor size, tumor differentiation, and MVI on univariate analysis (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that only tumor size was significantly associated with washout of small HCCs (odds ratio = 2.335, P = 0.006). Large HCCs (20-30 mm) displayed a higher proportion of washout compared with that of HCCs ≤ 20 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhancement patterns of small HCCs on CEUS were significantly correlated with tumor size and tumor differentiation among all clinicopathologic characteristics.

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver - Update 2020 - WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB). The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications.The 2012 guideline requires updating as previously the differences of the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as well as the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective.These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications. The 2012 guideline requires updating as, previously, the differences in the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective. These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCAs in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: can hypointensity on the late portal venous phase be used as an alternative to washout?

PURPOSE

To investigate the added value of considering hypointensity on late portal venous phase (LPVP) images as washout for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 97 patients at high risk for HCC who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI including unenhanced, multi-arterial phase, conventional portal venous phase (CPVP, 60 s), and LPVP (mean, 99.9 ± 9.1 s; range, 90-119 s) images. A total of 115 hepatic lesions were identified by histopathological or clinical diagnosis. Three independent radiologists assessed the MRI images by consensus. Diagnosis of HCC was made using criteria of arterial hyperenhancement and hypointensity relative to the surrounding liver parenchyma (1) on CPVP or (2) on CPVP and/or LPVP images. The generalized estimating equation was used to compare diagnostic performance for HCC between Criterion 1 and 2.

RESULTS

In 82 HCCs, the frequency of hypointensity differed significantly between the CPVP and LPVP images (64.6% [53/82] vs. 84.1% [69/82], P < 0.001). Among 33 non-HCCs, two cHCC-CCs showed additional hypointensity on LPVP than CPVP images (33.3% [11/33] vs. 39.4% [13/33], P = 0.500). Criterion 2 provided significantly greater sensitivity for diagnosing HCC than Criterion 1 (54.9% [45/82] vs. 74.4% [61/82], P < 0.001), with relatively little reduction in specificity (90.9% [30/33] vs. 84.8% [28/33], P = 0.145).

CONCLUSION

Additional use of LPVP hypointensity as washout could significantly improve sensitivity for HCC diagnosis when utilizing Gd-EOB-MRI in patients with CLD, without a significant decrease in specificity.