Late results of the Royal Free Hospital prospective controlled trial of prednisolone therapy in hepatitis B surface antigen negative chronic active hepatitis

What is the optimal first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials and comparative cohort studies

OBJECTIVES

Uncertainty remains about many aspects of first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

DESIGN

Systemic review with meta-analysis (MA).

DATA SOURCES

Bespoke AIH Endnote Library, updated to 30 June 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative cohort studies including adult patients with AIH, reporting death/transplantation, biochemical response (BR) and/or adverse effects (AEs).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data pooled in MA as relative risk (RR) under random effects. Risk of bias (ROB) assessed using Cochrane ROB-2 and ROBINS-1 tools.

RESULTS

From seven RCTs (five with low and two with some ROB) and 18 cohort studies (12 moderate ROB, six high for death/transplant), we found lower death/transplantation rates in (a) patients receiving pred+/-aza (vs no pred): overall (RR 0.38 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.74)), in patients without symptoms (0.38 (0.19-0.75)), without cirrhosis (0.30 (0.14-0.65)), and with decompensated cirrhosis (RR 0.38 (0.23-0.61)), and (b) patients receiving pred+aza (vs pred alone) (0.38 (0.22-0.65)). Patients receiving higher (vs lower) initial pred doses had similar BR rates (RR 1.07 (0.92-1.24)) and mortality (0.71 (0.25-2.05)) but more AEs (1.73 (1.17-2.55)). Patients receiving bud (vs pred) had similar BR rates (RR 0.99 (0.71-1.39)), with fewer cosmetic AEs (0.46 (0.34-0.62)). Patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (vs aza) had similar BR rates (RR 1.32 (0.73-2.38)) and fewer AEs requiring drug cessation (0.20 (0.09-0.43)).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality is lower in pred-treated (vs untreated) patients, overall and in several subgroups, and in those receiving pred+aza (vs pred). Higher initial pred doses confer no clear benefit and cause more AEs. Bud (vs pred) achieves similar BR rates, with fewer cosmetic AEs. MMF (vs aza) achieves similar BR rates, with fewer serious AEs.

Evolution of Therapy in Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated liver disease characterized by a spectrum of clinical manifestations, ranging from asymptomatic liver enzyme abnormalities to fulminant liver failure. Despite significant achievements, the backbone of first-line AIH treatment, including corticosteroids and azathioprine, has remained nearly unchanged for 5 decades. However, up to 20% of patients experience insufficient response, loss of response, or treatment intolerance. For patients intolerant to first-line therapy, second-line options include mercaptopurine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), with recent debates regarding MMF's potential role in first-line treatment. A significant advancement has been the tailoring of azathioprine doses and manipulating blood levels with the addition of low-dose allopurinol by using therapeutic metabolite monitoring for patients with insufficient or lost biochemical response. Increasing experience with calcineurin inhibitors and biologic agents, particularly rituximab and infliximab, has demonstrated their efficacy as third-line options. Notably, B-cell activating factor blockade emerges as a promising future treatment. This article delves into the chronological evolution of AIH treatment, focusing on recent advances.

External validation of the IAIHG autoimmune hepatitis response criteria in a multicentric real-world cohort

Background & Aims

The goal of treatment in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is induction of remission to prevent the development of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and its related complications. Various definitions of treatment response and remission have been used. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) recently defined consensus criteria for treatment response. We aimed to validate the IAIHG response criteria in our cohort and establish correlations with survival endpoints.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, multicentric cohort study in one tertiary and seven secondary care centres in Belgium. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age at data collection and were diagnosed with AIH by a simplified IAIHG score of ≥6. Complete biochemical response (CBR) was defined according to the IAIHG consensus criteria as normalisation of transaminases and serum IgG within the first 6 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was liver-related survival - defined as freedom from liver-related death or liver transplantation. Secondary endpoints were overall mortality and transplant-free survival. Outcomes were compared between patients attaining CBR and those with insufficient response.

Results

Biochemical response status could be determined in 200 patients with AIH: CBR was achieved in 128 (64.0%) individuals. Patients not achieving CBR more frequently presented with cirrhosis on initial histology (22.2% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.036). Liver-related mortality or liver transplantation as a primary outcome occurred in 26 patients (13.0%). Patients achieving CBR exhibited superior liver-related (hazard ratio 0.118; 95% CI 0.052-0.267; p <0.0001) and overall (hazard ratio 0.253; 95% CI 0.111-0.572; p = 0.0003) survival.

Conclusions

We externally validated the IAIHG consensus criteria for CBR and confirmed their correlation with survival endpoints in a multicentric, real-world cohort. Patients with AIH achieving CBR as an intermediate endpoint have significantly superior liver-related and overall survival.

Impacts and Implications

Corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of treatment to induce remission of disease activity in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and the majority of patients require long-term corticosteroid treatment to achieve sustained remission. Definitions of response to treatment have varied over the years, and consistently used intermediate endpoints are needed to facilitate advancements in non-corticosteroid treatment for autoimmune hepatitis. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) defined consensus criteria on endpoints in the treatment of AIH, for which further external validation is needed. Here, we demonstrate the usefulness of the IAIHG consensus criteria and corroborate their correlation to primary endpoints, such as liver-related survival and native liver survival in a multicentric, real-world setting. The design of future studies can rely on the IAIHG consensus criteria as intermediate endpoints.

[Treatment of autoimmune hepatitis-First-line, second-line and third-line treatment]

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare autoimmune inflammation of the liver mostly with a chronic course, which can also be acutely manifested up to acute liver failure. It affects women 3-4 times more frequently than men and can be diagnosed in all age groups. In one third of the patients a liver cirrhosis is present at the time of diagnosis. It is characterized by a hepatic inflammation pattern, a polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia of immunoglobulin G and the detection of autoantibodies. A liver biopsy is necessary to make the diagnosis. The AIH is histologically characterized in particular by a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate in the portal fields. In cases with a relevant disease activity, AIH is typically treated by immunosuppression. The immunosuppressive treatment is associated with a prevention of disease progression to liver cirrhosis and a better survival. The success of treatment is measured by achieving biochemical remission, i.e., normalization of the transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels as a good noninvasive predictor of a histological remission. Another treatment target is an improvement of the symptoms of the patient. The first-line treatment consists of a glucocorticoid, mostly prednisolone or in cases without advanced fibrosis budesonide, and azothioprine. For reduction of steroid-specific treatment side effects the maintenance treatment should be carried out steroid-free whenever possible. In cases of insufficient response to azothioprine or side effects a treatment attempt using antimetabolites, such as 6‑mercaptopurine or mycophenolate mofetil is primarily carried out as second-line treatment. For patients who do not achieve biochemical remission through first-line or second-line treatment, a variety of medications are available for third-line treatment, e.g., rituximab, calcineurin inhibitors or antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) antibodies. Third-line treatment should be carried out in expert centers and registered in the European Reference Network for Rare Liver Diseases in order to improve the currently sparse database for these forms of treatment in the future.

YouTube® in Spanish as an information source for patients with autoimmune hepatitis

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

A large number of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AH) seek information about their disease on the Internet. The reliability, comprehensiveness, and quality of said information in Spanish has not been studied. Our aim was to describe the characteristics of the information about AH on YouTube®.

METHODS

An analytic observational study evaluated videos in Spanish about AH available on YouTube®, describing their general characteristics, viewer engagement, and information sources. Standardized tools were utilized to analyze reliability (DISCERN), comprehensiveness, and overall quality (Global Quality Score [GQS]).

RESULTS

One hundred videos were included, 93% of which provided information from healthcare professionals (group 1), and 7% of which reflected patient opinions (group 2). There were differences in the median reliability (DISCERN 4 vs 2, p ≤ 0.05) and comprehensiveness (4 vs 2, p ≤ 0.05) scores between groups, but equal overall quality (GQS 3 vs 2, p = 0.2). Reliability (DISCERN 4; RIC 3-4) and comprehensiveness (4.5; IQR 3-5) were higher in videos by professional organizations, compared with those by independent users, healthcare information websites, and for-profit organizations (DISCERN 3; IQR 2.5-3.5) (p < 0.001). Reliability (DISCERN 2; IQR 1.5-3), comprehensiveness (2; IQR 1.5-2.5), and quality (GQS 2.5; IQR 1.5-3.5) were lower for videos made by for-profit organizations.

CONCLUSION

The majority of videos about AH in Spanish on YouTube® have good reliability, comprehensiveness, and quality. Videos created by academic organizations had higher scores, thus their collaboration, with respect to patient opinion videos, is suggested.

[Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis]

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease, characterized by elevated levels of transaminases, immunoglobulin G, and positive autoantibodies. The disease course is dynamic and presents heterogeneous disease manifestations at diagnosis. This review summarizes the issues regarding the treatment and monitoring of AIH in adult patients. Glucocorticoids and azathioprine are the first line of treatment. Alternative first-line treatments include budesonide or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Although no randomized controlled trials have been performed, MMF, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, allopurinol, sirolimus, everolimus, infliximab, or rituximab have been attempted in patients not responding to or intolerant to first-line treatments. Most patients require life-long special monitoring, with or without maintenance treatment.

Type 2 autoimmune hepatitis: Genetic susceptibility

Two types of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are recognized; AIH-1 is characterized by the presence of anti-nuclear and/or anti-smooth muscle autoantibodies, while AIH-2 is associated with the presence of anti-Liver kidney microsome and/or anti-Liver Cytosol antibodies. The autoantigens targeted by AIH-2 autoantibodies are the cytochrome P450 2D6 and Formiminotransferase-cyclodeaminase for anti-LKM1 and anti-LC1 respectively. Both autoantigens are expressed in hepatocytes at higher levels than in any other cell type. Therefore, compared to AIH-1, the autoantigens targeted in AIH-2 are predominantly tissue-specific. Distinct clinical features are specific to AIH-2 compared to AIH-1, including diagnosis in younger patients (mean age 6.6 years), onset as fulminant hepatitis in very young patients (3 years of age or less), higher frequency in children than in adults and is frequently associated with extrahepatic T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases. AIH-2 is also often diagnosed in patients with primary immunodeficiency. AIH-2 is associated with specific HLA class II susceptibility alleles; DQB1*0201 is considered the main determinant of susceptibility while DRB1*07/DRB1*03 is associated with the type of autoantibody present. HLA DQB1*0201 is in strong linkage disequilibrium with both HLA DRB1*03 and DRB1*07. Interestingly, as in humans, MHC and non-MHC genes strongly influence the development of the disease in an animal model of AIH-2. Altogether, these findings suggest that AIH-2 incidence is likely dependent on specific genetic susceptibility factors combined with distinct environmental triggers.

Autoimmune Hepatitis with Acute Presentation: Clinical, Biochemical, and Histological Features of 126 Patients

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease with a relevant inflammatory component and an unknown etiology. Evidence for clinical characteristics and risk factors in large cohorts of patients with acute AIH (AAIH) is lacking. We clinically characterized patients with AAIH, the prevalence of a combined adverse outcome (death or liver transplantation (LT)), and its risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective study of adult patients diagnosed with AAIH at three centers (Santiago, Chile; 2000-2018) was conducted. Clinical and laboratory characteristics were obtained. A liver biopsy was performed for all patients. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were admitted; 77% were female, 33 (26.2%) had a severe presentation, and 14 (11.1%) had a fulminant presentation. Overall, 24 patients (19.0%) lacked typical autoantibodies, and 26.2% had immunoglobulin G levels in the normal range. The most frequent histological findings were plasma cells (86.5%), interface hepatitis (81.7%), and chronic hepatitis (81.0%). Rosettes were uncommon (35.6%). Advanced fibrosis was present in 27% of patients. Combined adverse outcomes occurred in 7.9% of cases, all fulminant with histological cholestasis. Alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and prothrombin less than 50% were independent risk factors for in-hospital death or LT (p value <0.05). Although corticosteroid treatment was associated with better outcomes (OR 0.095, p value = 0.013), more severe patients were less likely to receive this therapy. Discussion. In this large cohort of patients with AAIH, clinical characteristics differ from those reported in patients with chronic AIH. Fulminant hepatitis, histological cholestasis, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and prothrombin were associated with death/LT.

Autoantibodies Associated with Autoimmune Liver Diseases in a Healthy Population: Evaluation of a Commercial Immunoblot Test

Autoantibodies constitute important tools for diagnosing the autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cholangitis. The EUROLINE immunoblot assay, detecting multiple specificities, is widely used, but the clinical importance of weakly positive findings is unclear. The manufacturer’s recommended cut-off was evaluated by investigating AILD-associated autoantibodies in 825 blood donors and 60 confirmed AILD cases. Positive findings were followed up with immunofluorescence microscopy on rat tissue, anti-M2-ELISA, alternative immunoblot assay, and liver function tests. Thirty-six (4.4%) blood donors were positive with EUROLINE. The most common specificities were LC-1 (1.6%), gp210 (1.3%), and AMA-M2 (1.1%). In general, the positive results were higher in patients than in blood donors, whereas anti-LC-1 was higher in blood donors. The liver function tests were slightly elevated in 2 of the 36 immunoblot positive blood donors. The majority of the positive EUROLINE findings could not be confirmed with the follow-up tests. The EUROLINE-Autoimmune Liver Diseases-(IgG) immunoblot detected autoantibodies in 4.4% of blood donors without signs of AILD. Our findings indicate that the recommended cut-off can be raised for most specificities without loss of diagnostic sensitivity. The prevalence of anti-LC-1 among blood donors indicates a problem with the antigen source.

Role of Corticosteroids in Drug-Induced Liver Injury. A Systematic Review

Introduction: Apart from cessation of the implicated agent leading to drug-induced liver injury (DILI), there is no standard therapy for DILI. Corticosteroids have been used in DILI, although their efficacy is unclear. Published data showed either beneficial effects or no improvement associated with steroid therapy. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review of the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of DILI.

Methods: A search was performed in PubMed, searching for the terms: “corticosteroids” and “drug-induced liver injury”. Observation studies were included, but case reports excluded.

Results: A total of 24 papers were retrieved. Most of these were observational studies on the effects of corticosteroids in moderate/severe DILI (n = 8), reports on the corticosteroid treatment in patients with drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DI-AIH) (n = 5), and effects of corticosteroids in drug-induced fulminant acute liver failure (ALF, n = 2). Furthermore, treatment of corticosteroids in patients with liver injury due to check point inhibitors (CPIs) was addressed in nine studies. In moderate/severe DILI, six out of eight studies suggested steroid treatment to be beneficial, whereas two studies showed negative results. All five observational studies on the effects of corticosteroids in DI-AIH showed good therapeutic response with rapid and long lasting effects after discontinuation of corticosteroids and without evidence of relapse. Steroid therapy was not associated with improved overall survival in patients with drug-induced fulminant ALF. CPIs-induced liver injury was found to improve spontaneously in 33–50% without corticosteroids, and the rate of patients who were treated responded to steroids in 33–100% (mean 72%).

Conclusions: The majority of studies analyzing the effects of corticosteroids in moderate/severe DILI have demonstrated beneficial effects. However, this was not the case in drug-induced fulminant ALF. Patients with DI-AIH had an excellent response to corticosteroids. The majority of those with CPIs-induced liver injury responded to corticosteroids; however, patients without treatment usually recovered spontaneously. The observational design and comparison with historical controls in these studies makes it very difficult to draw conclusions on the efficacy of corticosteroids in DILI. Therefore, there is a strong need for a randomized controlled trial to properly assess the role of corticosteroids in DILI.

First Results From a Propensity Matching Trial of Mycophenolate Mofetil vs. Azathioprine in Treatment-Naive AIH Patients

Background/Aims

As previous real-world studies and meta-analyses have shown that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) might have better efficacy than azathioprine (AZA) in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), we conducted a propensity matching study to assess the efficacy and safety of MMF vs. AZA.

Methods

All 126 consecutive treatment-naive adult AIH patients, diagnosed and followed in our department since 2016, were included. Patients received prednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day plus either AZA 1-2 mg/kg/day or 1.5-2 g/day MMF. The tapering of prednisolone was identical between groups.

Results

After propensity matching score and adjustment for known factors affecting response to treatment and outcome, 64 patients were included in the study (MMF = 32 and AZA = 32). Rates of non-response, complete biochemical response (CBR) at 6 and 12 months, and prednisolone withdrawal (6 months, 12 months, and end of follow-up) were identical between groups. However, MMF treatment was significantly associated with CBR at the end of follow-up [odds ratio (OR) 11.259; 95% CI: 1.3-97.4, p = 0.028]. AZA patients were more prone to stop treatment due to AZA intolerance/insufficient response (p = 0.0001). At the end of follow-up, the overall efficacy of each schedule was also significantly higher in the MMF group compared to the AZA group (p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

We showed for the first time in a propensity matching study that MMF can be used as first-line therapy in AIH as attested by the significantly higher CBR at end of follow-up compared to AZA. Whether this better efficacy is also associated with higher histological remission rates and sustained CBR off immunosuppression needs further evaluation.

Autoimmune hepatitis: from immunopathogenesis to diagnostic and therapeutic innovation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To understand the pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment options that have improved lately. We summarize the latest research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Concerning pathogenesis of AIH, different groups have identified pieces of the puzzle that fit together well: An altered microbiome in the gut results in a proinflammatory response in the liver. This response is built by type II natural killer cells and CD4 T cells with an inflammatory phenotype and marked tumor necrosis factor production. When looking specifically at autoantigenic CD4 T cells, these have a B-helper phenotype on transcriptomic analysis. This explains not only elevation of immunoglobulins in AIH, but also mechanistically the effect of anti-B-cell substances in treatment. Diagnosis is now facilitated by an improved diagnostic score for AIH also recognizing modern techniques for autoantibody detection. Treatment in the future will increasingly be focused on reducing dosage and duration of steroid exposition. In addition, B-cell-targeted treatments have been evaluated with considerable success.

SUMMARY

Research in the past 18 months has improved the understanding of pathogenesis and thereby opened a number of possible treatment options. In addition, steroid use is cautioned by the recent findings.

Current Trends and Characteristics of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Autoimmune Liver Diseases

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the commonest among liver cancers, is one of the leading causes of mortality among malignancies worldwide. Several reports demonstrate autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs), including autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) to confer increased risk of hepatobiliary malignancies, albeit at lower frequencies compared to other liver diseases. Several parameters have been recognized as risk factors for HCC development in AIH and PBC, including demographics such as older age and male sex, clinical features, the most decisive being cirrhosis and other co-existing factors, such as alcohol consumption. Moreover, biochemical activity and treatment response have been increasingly recognized as prognostic factors for HCC development in AIH and PBC. As available treatment modalities are effective only when HCC diagnosis is established early, surveillance has been proven essential for HCC prognosis. Considering that the risk for HCC is not uniform between and within disease groups, refinement of screening strategies according to prevailing demographic, clinical, and molecular risk factors is mandated in AILDs patients, as personalized HCC risk prediction will offer significant advantage in patients at high and/or medium risk. Furthermore, future investigations should draw attention to whether modification of immunosuppression could benefit AIH patients after HCC diagnosis.

Second-line and third-line therapy for autoimmune hepatitis: A position statement from the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group

Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis respond well to standard immunosuppressive therapy with steroids and azathioprine, and while untreated disease is usually fatal, patients who respond well to therapy have an excellent prognosis. However, insufficient response to standard therapy or intolerable side effects requiring dose adaptions or treatment changes occur in 10-20% of patients. While there is fairly good agreement on second-line treatment options, there is very wide variation in the indication and use of possible third-line therapies. Herein, the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER) and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) outline a treatment algorithm for both children and adults that should help to standardise treatment approaches, in order to improve patient care and to enable the comparison of treatment results between scientific publications.

Approach to the patient with acute severe autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is associated with varied clinical presentations and natural history, as well as somewhat unpredictable treatment responses. Understanding how to stratify patients who require further escalation of therapy will help clinicians manage these patients. The presentation of acute severe autoimmune hepatitis (AS-AIH) is relatively uncommon, although its prevalence is potentially greater than currently perceived. Previous studies consist of small retrospective single-centre series and are not directly comparable due to the diversity of presentations, disease definitions and non-standardised treatment regimens. We define AS-AIH as those who present acutely with AIH and are icteric with an international normalised ratio ≥1.5 and no evidence of hepatic encephalopathy. Those with hepatic encephalopathy should be defined as having AS-AIH with acute liver failure. In this review, we provide a structured practical approach for diagnosing and managing this unique group of patients.

Liver involvement in rheumatic diseases

Liver involvement in rheumatic diseases may occur as a primary liver disease, primary rheumatic disease with hepatic manifestations or antirheumatic drug-induced liver disease. The aim of our article is to underline the importance of monitoring and control of the level of aminotransferases and cholestatic enzymes in rheumatic disorders. Some of the rheumatic diseases with constantly elevated liver enzymes need to be investigated in consideration of concomitant primary autoimmune liver disease (such as autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis) or drug hepatotoxicity. Also, we should be aware of hepatitis B reactivation or hepatitis C flare when immunosuppressants are used.

The Gut Barrier, Intestinal Microbiota, and Liver Disease: Molecular Mechanisms and Strategies to Manage

Liver disease encompasses pathologies as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, alcohol liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, viral hepatitis, and autoimmune hepatitis. Nowadays, underlying mechanisms associating gut permeability and liver disease development are not well understood, although evidence points to the involvement of intestinal microbiota and their metabolites. Animal studies have shown alterations in Toll-like receptor signaling related to the leaky gut syndrome by the action of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. In humans, modifications of the intestinal microbiota in intestinal permeability have also been related to liver disease. Some of these changes were observed in bacterial species belonging Roseburia, Streptococcus, and Rothia. Currently, numerous strategies to treat liver disease are being assessed. This review summarizes and discusses studies addressed to determine mechanisms associated with the microbiota able to alter the intestinal barrier complementing the progress and advancement of liver disease, as well as the main strategies under development to manage these pathologies. We highlight those approaches that have shown improvement in intestinal microbiota and barrier function, namely lifestyle changes (diet and physical activity) and probiotics intervention. Nevertheless, knowledge about how such modifications are beneficial is still limited and specific mechanisms involved are not clear. Thus, further in-vitro, animal, and human studies are needed.

Histopathological analysis of autoimmune hepatitis with "acute" presentation: Differentiation from drug-induced liver injury

AIM

Presently, no standardized definition or acceptable diagnostic criteria have been established for acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis (AP-AIH), making it difficult to differentiate that condition from drug-induced liver injury (DILI). This study aimed to characterize clinical and histological features for distinguishing between AP-AIH and DILI.

METHODS

Clinical, biochemical, and histological characteristics of AP-AIH and DILI in clinically well-characterized cases were compared in a standardized manner to clarify differences.

RESULTS

In clinical evaluations, immunoglobulin G level and rate of anti-nuclear antibody positivity were greater in AP-AIH than DILI cases. As for diagnosis of each condition, significant (P < 0.01) differences were found for 10 features: lobular necrosis/inflammation, cobblestone appearance of hepatocytes, plasma cell infiltration in liver parenchyma, centrilobular fibrosis, hepatic rosette formation in areas with cobblestone appearance, portal inflammation, interface hepatitis, prominent plasma cells in portal areas, bile duct injury, and hepatic rosette formation in periportal areas. The area under the curve and cut-off values for the combination of these 10 features were 0.95 and 9 (sensitivity 86%, specificity 90%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Combinations of histological features were found to be helpful for differentiating AP-AIH from DILI, but we were not able to statistically identify an individual feature as definitive.

Bootstrap and permutation rank tests for proportional hazards under right censoring

We address the testing problem of proportional hazards in the two-sample survival setting allowing right censoring, i.e., we check whether the famous Cox model is underlying. Although there are many test proposals for this problem, only a few papers suggest how to improve the performance for small sample sizes. In this paper, we do exactly this by carrying out our test as a permutation as well as a wild bootstrap test. The asymptotic properties of our test, namely asymptotic exactness under the null and consistency, can be transferred to both resampling versions. Various simulations for small sample sizes reveal an actual improvement of the empirical size and a reasonable power performance when using the resampling versions. Moreover, the resampling tests perform better than the existing tests of Gill and Schumacher and Grambsch and Therneau . The tests' practical applicability is illustrated by discussing real data examples.

The PNPLA3 rs738409 GG genotype is associated with poorer prognosis in 239 patients with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Fibrosis progression in autoimmune hepatitis can be attenuated by immunosuppressive treatment; however, some patients progress despite therapy. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) such as PNPLA3-rs738409, TM6SF2-rs58542926 and MBOAT7-rs641738 are associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and fibrosis progression, whereas a splice variant in HSD17B13-rs72613567:TA has been shown to be protective.

AIM

To analyse the impact of different SNPs on the long-term outcome of patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

METHODS

We included 239 patients into this study who had been treated between 1983 and 2018 for autoimmune hepatitis. Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood and SNPs were determined by PCR analysis. Liver biopsies were available for 215/239 patients (90%). Clinical and laboratory patient data were assessed by chart review.

RESULTS

Mean age at baseline was 42.1 years with 74.1% being female. The median follow-up was 9.4 years (IQR 3.5-15.0), 11.7% of the patients (n = 28) died or required liver transplantation. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis of the combined endpoint time to liver transplantation or death, we observed that patients with the PNPLA3-rs738409 GG variant met more frequently the primary endpoint (P = 0.005). In Cox regression analysis PNPLA3-rs738409 GG as well as liver cirrhosis were identified as strong predictors for time to liver transplantation or death (HR 4.5 [CI 1.48-13.72], P = 0.008 and HR 9.24 [CI 2.11-40.44], P = 0.003, respectively). Neither steatosis, diabetes mellitus nor obesity were associated with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

PNPLA3-rs738409 variant GG is a predictor for time to liver transplantation or death and may help to identify autoimmune hepatitis patients at risk for disease progression.

CLIF-C Organ Failure Score and Liver Volume Predict Prognosis in Steroid-Treated Severe Acute Autoimmune Hepatitis

Controversies and debates remain regarding the best management of severe acute‐onset autoimmune hepatitis (SA‐AIH) due to the lack of useful outcome or complication prediction systems. We conducted this clinical practice‐based observational study to clarify whether Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Organ Failure scores (CLIF‐C OFs) and the computed tomography–derived liver volume to standard liver volume (CTLV/SLV) ratio at admission to a tertiary transplant center can predict outcomes and complications due to infection. Thirty‐four consecutive corticosteroid‐treated patients with SA‐AIH from 2007 to 2018 were included. Severe hepatitis was defined as an international normalized ratio (of prothrombin time) over 1.3 any time before admission. Of the 34 corticosteroid‐treated patients with SA‐AIH inclusive of 25 (73.5%) acute liver failure cases, transplant‐free survival was observed in 24 patients (70.6%). Any infection was noticed in 10 patients (29.4%). CLIF‐C OFs, at the cutoff of 9, significantly predicted survival (P = 0.0002, log‐rank test), outperformed the Model for End‐stage Liver Disease system in predicting outcome (P = 0.0325), and significantly discriminated between liver transplant and death in a competing risk analysis. SA‐AIH was characterized as having decreased CTLV/SLV, which was also predictive of survival (P < 0.0001). Interestingly, CLIF‐C OFs, especially the subscores for respiratory dysfunction, also predicted infection (P = 0.007). Conclusion: In corticosteroid‐treated patients with SA‐AIH, CLIF‐C OFs and CTLV/SLV ratios predicted both survival outcome and complications due to infection. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether making decisions based on CLIF‐C OFs or CTLV/SLV ratios is useful.

Efficacy of rituximab in difficult-to-manage autoimmune hepatitis: Results from the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group

Treatment options remain limited for patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), while there are still concerns over the consequences of long-term corticosteroid use. A few studies have suggested a role for B cell-driven autoimmune liver injury in AIH. This multicentre, international retrospective cohort study from the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of rituximab in difficult-to-manage AIH.

METHODS

Clinical data from 22 patients who received rituximab between 2007 and 2017 were collected from centres in the United Kingdom, Germany and Canada. Clinical response was assessed using changes in biochemical and immunological parameters up to 24 months post-rituximab infusion. In addition, we compared the doses of prednisolone used 3 months before and 12 months after treatment, and assessed freedom from AIH flares over the post-treatment period.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with type-1 AIH were included, with a median age of 40 years at diagnosis (range 19-79); 15/22 (68%) were female and 18/22 (82%) were Caucasian. The median period from diagnosis to the end of follow-up in these patients was 11 years (range 3-28). Values of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and albumin improved significantly following rituximab therapy, and were sustained for up to 2 years (all p ≪0.001). Prednisolone doses were significantly reduced by 12 months post-treatment (p = 0.003), with 13/21 (62%) patients having a dose reduction. Over a median post-treatment follow-up period of 6 years (range 1-10), 5 patients developed AIH flares at a median of 22 months post-treatment, giving an estimated 71% freedom from AIH flare at 2 years. Four of these patients received a second course of treatment, of whom 2 had subsequent further flares. No serious adverse events attributable to rituximab were recorded.

CONCLUSION

In patients with difficult-to-manage AIH, rituximab appears to be clinically effective and well tolerated. Rituximab was associated with sustained improvements in serum liver tests, an absence of clinical disease flares, and a reduction in prednisolone dose. Controlled trials are warranted to further evaluate B cell-targeting therapies in patients with AIH.

LAY SUMMARY

Autoimmune hepatitis is an autoimmune condition of the liver, usually treated with medications that suppress the immune system, such as steroids. However, some patients do not respond to this treatment. We analysed the safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients who were not responding to first- or second-line therapies. Rituximab was safe and improved liver blood tests in 70% of patients over a 2-year follow-up period, while enabling steroid doses to be reduced in two-thirds of patients, which is a very positive clinical outcome.

Predniso(lo)ne Dosage and Chance of Remission in Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) commonly receive induction therapy with predniso(lo)ne followed by maintenance therapy with azathioprine. European Association for Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines advise a predniso(lo)ne dose range of 0.50-1 mg/kg/day, which leaves room for practice variation. We performed a multicenter study to determine the efficacy of different dose ranges of predniso(lo)ne induction therapy in a large European cohort of patients with AIH.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using a comparative effectiveness design. We collected data from 451 adults with AIH who began treatment from 1978 through 2017 at 9 centers in 5 European countries. We assigned patients to a high-dose group (initial predniso(lo)ne dose ≥0.50 mg/kg/day; n = 281) or a low-dose group (<0.50 mg/kg/day; n = 170). Logistic regression was performed to determine difference in outcomes between the groups. The primary outcome was normal serum levels of transaminases at 6 months after initiation of therapy.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in rates of normalization of transaminases between the high-dose predniso(lo)ne group and the low-dose group (70.5% vs 64.7%; P = .20). After multivariable logistic regression with correction for confounders, there was no difference in the likelihood of normalization of transaminases between the groups (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.78-1.87; P = .38). Patients given an initial high dose of predniso(lo)ne received more predniso(lo)ne over time than patients started on a lower dose (median doses over 6 months: 3780 mg vs 2573 mg) (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective study of patients with AIH in Europe, we found that the dose of predniso(lo)ne to induce remission in patients with AIH is less relevant than assumed. An initial predniso(lo)ne dose below 0.50 mg/kg/day substantially decreases unnecessary exposure to predniso(lo)ne in patients with AIH.

Clinical management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is a rare and chronic liver disease that is characterised by increased serum transaminases and immunoglobulin G, inflammatory liver histology and presence of circulating autoantibodies. An autoimmune hepatitis diagnosis justifies life-long treatment in most patients in order to prevent development of cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. The cornerstone of treatment is steroid induction therapy followed by maintenance therapy with azathioprine, which is effective in most cases. For patients who do not respond to standard treatment, second-line treatment with other immunosuppressants can be effective. Treatment should be aimed at biochemical remission of the disease, which is defined as normalization of transaminases and immunoglobulin G. Patients should be monitored intensively during the first months of treatment in order to monitor side-effects, assess symptoms and individualise treatment. Specialist consultation should be sought in difficult-to-treat patients. Future studies and networking initiatives should result in optimization of current treatment strategies in autoimmune hepatitis.

Acute Severe Autoimmune Hepatitis: Corticosteroids or Liver Transplantation?

Acute severe presentations of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) represent a challenge for the transplant community. As a disease, it is poorly characterized, and there is a weak evidence base to guide diagnosis and treatment. Early identification of acute severe AIH is key because it determines the initiation of corticosteroids, which can be lifesaving. However, their use in this setting remains controversial. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, severity of coagulopathy, and grade of encephalopathy may be predictors of outcome with corticosteroid therapy. The optimal timing of liver transplantation (LT) can be difficult to determine and, as such, the decision to proceed to transplantation should not be delayed by protracted courses of corticosteroids. The aim of this review is to better characterize this subset of patients; to differentiate them clinically, serologically, and histologically from chronic AIH and other causes of acute liver failure; and to present the role, predictors, and optimal timings of corticosteroid therapy and LT. Although this review is specific to adults, many principles hold true for the pediatric population.

Stopping immunosuppressive treatment in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH): Is it justified (and in whom and when)?

BACKGROUND

Initial treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) with prednisolone ± azathioprine is based on randomised controlled trials. Many patients receive long-term immunosuppressive treatment to prevent disease relapse; this strategy has a weaker evidence base.

AIM

To consider whether immunosuppressive treatment (IST) withdrawal in AIH is justified and to develop a rationale for patient selection.

METHODS

We reviewed published papers between 1972 and 2018, which addressed the outcomes of IST withdrawal and/or complications of IST in AIH.

RESULTS

(1) AIH relapse rates after withdrawal of IST vary between 25% and 100%. There is heterogeneity in these studies regarding relapse definition, IST duration prior to withdrawal and criteria for biochemical and histological remission prior to withdrawal. (2) Factors associated with relapse following IST withdrawal include: (a) absence of an identifiable initial disease trigger, (b) presence of other autoimmune diseases, (c) longer time to biochemical remission and (d) elevated serum transaminases on treatment withdrawal. Reports of associations between relapse and age, IST duration and failure of histological remission have been inconsistent. (3) Continued IST reduces risk of AIH relapse over at least 5 years. However, there is no evidence that routine (as opposed to selective) long-term IST improves disease outcome. (4) Patients with AIH have an increased risk of extrahepatic cancer, notably non-melanoma skin cancer, to which long-term IST may contribute. Long-term corticosteroid therapy is associated with weight gain, low-trauma fractures, diabetes and possibly vascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

While further studies are needed, evidence supports a strategy of IST withdrawal in some patients with AIH who have achieved remission.

Hellenic Association for the Study of the Liver Clinical Practice Guidelines: Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively rare acute or chronic liver disease of unknown etiology characterized by large heterogeneity. Its distribution is global, covering all ages, both sexes and all ethnic groups. The aim of the present Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) of the Hellenic Association for the Study of the Liver was to provide updated guidance and help to gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners for AIH diagnosis and management. AIH diagnosis is based on clinicopathological characteristics: namely, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, particularly of immunoglobulin G (IgG), circulating autoantibodies, interface hepatitis on liver histology, absence of viral hepatitis, and a favorable response to immunosuppression. Clinical manifestations at disease onset are variable, ranging from asymptomatic to the acute/severe form. Aminotransferase and bilirubin levels vary, while the presence of hepatitis at the histological level is a prerequisite for diagnosis. Autoantibodies are the hallmark for AIH diagnosis; therefore, the CPG describe the appropriate serological algorithm for their detection. AIH therapy should aim to achieve complete biochemical (normalization of IgG and aminotransferases) and histological remission. All patients who have active disease, even those with cirrhosis, should be treated with individualized and response-guided induction therapy using prednisolone in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil as first-line therapy. Immunosuppression should be given for at least 3 years and for at least 2 years after the achievement of complete biochemical response, while a liver biopsy should be recommended before treatment discontinuation. Current CPG are also provided for several specific conditions and difficult-to-treat patients.

A review of the utility of tacrolimus in the management of adults with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

There is paucity of data on alternative drug therapies for patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Tacrolimus (TAC) is a promising salvage agent. We present a review of TAC therapy in AIH patients.

METHODS

A search for studies with keywords 'autoimmune hepatitis' and 'tacrolimus' was performed. Reviews, studies of AIH post-transplant and AIH in children were excluded. Diagnosis of AIH was based on criteria established by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. Complete biochemical response was defined as normalisation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST <45) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT <50). No biochemical response was defined as failure to return to normalisation at the end of follow-up. Demographic information and details of pre- and post-treatment liver biopsy were collected.

RESULTS

Seven articles achieved the inclusion criteria and reported data for a total of 162 adult patients. The majority of studies reported average ages approximately 35 years old. Treatment duration ranged from 1 to 136 months. Indications for therapy were mostly AIH refractory to steroid treatment or inability to tolerate standard steroid treatment. Eighty-three patients (51.2%) were reported to have pre-therapy liver biopsy. Of 49 patients for whom stage was reported, 6 patients were stage 1, 16 were stage 2, 14 were stage 3 and 13 were stage 4. Of 40 patients for whom grade was reported, 1 patient was grade 0, 3 were grade 1, 9 were grade 2, 14 were grade 3 and 13 were grade 4. Dosing regimens were between 1 and 8 mg/day. Target trough TAC serum concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 10.7 ng/mL TAC was discontinued in 28 (17.3%) patients for various reasons. Renal function remained stable in most patients. One hundred and twenty-one patients (74.7%) demonstrated complete biochemical response to treatment. Post-therapy liver biopsy was obtained for 30 (18.5%) patients, and 25 (15.4%) of these patients were noted to have histological remission according to the grade of inflammation or stage of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

TAC is relatively effective in the treatment of AIH refractory to traditional therapy. It appears that liver function can be enhanced at a minimal cost to renal function. Key Points There is a cohort of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) who do not respond to standard therapy. Alternative treatment options for these patients have been explored, but outcomes have not been comprehensively examined. We report the use and efficacy of tacrolimus (TAC) in patients with AIH. We found that TAC can be safely and effectively used in patients with AIH with minimal side effects. TAC can be a potential treatment option for patients with AIH refractory to standard therapy.

Autoimmune hepatitis: Appraisal of current treatment guidelines

Autoimmune hepatitis affects patients of all ages and gender, across all geographic regions. Although still rare, its incidence and prevalence are increasing. Genetic predisposition conveyed by human leucocyte antigen is a strong risk factor for the disease and may be responsible in part for the wide variation in presentation in different geographic regions. Our understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms is evolving and may lead to development of more targeted immunotherapies. Diagnosis is based on elevated levels of serum aminotransferases, gamma globulins, autoantibodies and characteristic findings on histology. Exclusion of other causes of chronic hepatitis is important. Although undiagnosed disease is associated with poor outcomes, it is readily treatable with timely immunosuppressive therapy in the majority of patients. International guidelines are available to guide management but there exists a disparity in the standard treatment regimens. This minireview aims to review the available guidelines and summarize the key recommendations involved in management of this complex autoimmune disease.

Autoimmune Liver Diseases in Children

Autoimmune liver disease remains difficult to diagnose, and distinguishing the various causes is difficult as well. In children, it can present with wide variation, including autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and the "overlap syndrome" of AIH/PSC, also known as autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis. These liver disorders are thought to be immune-mediated, but their etiology remains unclear. They are not secondary to inherited or acquired diseases and they are not associated with any drugs, so they can only be diagnosed if these other diseases or conditions are excluded. Because there is considerable commonality in the clinical presentation of these diseases but differences in their management, appropriate treatment may be delayed, increasing the risk for liver transplantation. Further education for general pediatricians and trainees is needed. This article reviews the differences between AIH and PSC, as well as the newly recognized overlap syndrome of both of these diseases. [Pediatr Ann. 2018;47(11):e452-e457.].

Inequity of care provision and outcome disparity in autoimmune hepatitis in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Treatment paradigms in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have remained largely unchanged for decades. Studies report ≤20% of patients have sub-optimal treatment response with most requiring long-term therapy.

AIM

The United Kingdom Autoimmune Hepatitis (UK-AIH) study was established to evaluate current treatment practice and outcomes, determine the unmet needs of patients, and develop and implement improved treatment approaches.

METHODS

The United Kingdom Autoimmune Hepatitis study is a cross-sectional cohort study examining secondary care management of prevalent adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Enrolment began in March 2014. Prevalent cases were defined as having been diagnosed and treated for >1 year. Demographic data, biochemistry, treatment history and response, and care location were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 1249 patients were recruited; 635 were cared for in transplant units and 614 in non-transplant centres (81% female with median age at diagnosis 50 years). Overall, 29 treatment regimens were reported and biochemical remission rate was 59%. Remission rates were significantly higher in transplant compared to non-transplant centres (62 vs 55%, P = 0.028). 55% have ongoing corticosteroid exposure; 9% are receiving prednisolone monotherapy. Those aged ≤20 years at diagnosis were more likely to develop cirrhosis and place of care was associated with an aggressive disease phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant discrepancies in the care received by patients with autoimmune hepatitis in the UK. A high proportion remains on corticosteroids and there is significant treatment variability. Patients receiving care in transplant centres were more likely to achieve and maintain remission. Overall poor remission rates suggest that there are significant unmet therapeutic needs for patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

[Autoimmune hepatitis-standard and second-line therapy]

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare chronic inflammatory liver disease. Like other autoimmune diseases, the incidence continues to rise and, if left untreated, it has a detrimental natural course.

AIM

Description of the current etiology, diagnosis and management of AIH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Summary of current national as well as international guidelines and highlighting recently published studies.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In addition to autoantibody testing and liver histology, the diagnosis of AIH is based on the exclusion of other relevant liver diseases. The standard of care with prednisolone ± azathioprine, which has been well established for decades, significantly improves long-term survival. The therapeutic aim is the complete normalization of aminotransferases and immunoglobulin G. Budesonide, an alternative topical steroid with fewer systemic side effects, was approved for AIH therapy in non-cirrhotic patients in 2011. The therapeutic goal of complete biochemical remission is achieved in about 80% of patients and liver transplantation is rarely necessary. The majority of patients require life-long immunosuppressive therapy because of high relapse rates after discontinuation of immunosuppressants. Currently used second-line therapies are based on uncontrolled monocentric studies with single substances. Therefore, clear recommendations from international expert groups are lacking. These second-line therapies are not approved by the regulatory authorities such as the Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a severe liver disease that affects children and adults worldwide. The diagnosis of AIH relies on increased serum transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels, presence of autoantibodies and interface hepatitis on liver histology. AIH arises in genetically predisposed individuals when a trigger, such as exposure to a virus, leads to a T cell-mediated autoimmune response directed against liver autoantigens; this immune response is permitted by inadequate regulatory immune control leading to a loss of tolerance. AIH responds favourably to immunosuppressive treatment, which should be started as soon as the diagnosis is made. Standard regimens include fairly high initial doses of corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone), which are tapered gradually as azathioprine is introduced. For those patients who do not respond to standard treatment, second-line drugs should be considered, including mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors, mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and biologic agents, which should be administered only in specialized hepatology centres. Liver transplantation is a life-saving option for those who progress to end-stage liver disease, although AIH can recur or develop de novo after transplantation. In-depth investigation of immune pathways and analysis of changes to the intestinal microbiota should advance our knowledge of the pathogenesis of AIH and lead to novel, tailored and better tolerated therapies.

The coming of age of a young subspecialty: paediatric hepatology

Paediatric hepatology dates from the 1970s and it is the youngest of the organ-specific subspecialties. As then there have been impressive achievements in the fields of anatomical, metabolic, immunological and neoplastic diseases, and the advent of modern molecular biology has resulted in a marked increase in exact diagnoses. Liver transplants provided enormous stimulus for the discipline. Due to changing morbidity patterns, the discipline faces new challenges, such as environment- and lifestyle-induced liver diseases, but different forms of chronic viral hepatitis are diminishing.

CONCLUSION

High levels of competence require good clinical research, optimal results and a high degree of centralisation.

The use of immunosuppression in autoimmune hepatitis: A current literature review

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an organ specific autoimmune condition which can manifest at any age of life. The heterogeneous nature of this condition means that great variation can be seen in severity, progression of disease and response to treatment within this patient group. Since the 1980s prednisolone and azathioprine have been used for induction and remission of the disease and remain the mainstay of treatment. Other immunosuppressive agents have been employed in difficult to treat cases. While there is less published data regarding these agents compared with the conventional treatments of steroid and azathioprine, there is mounting evidence to support the use of mycophenolate mofetil as a second-line agent. The calcineurin inhibitors, though less studied, additionally show promise. More data is needed on the use of biological agents in refractory disease. This review focuses on our centre’s approach to treatment of AIH in the context of a contemporary review of the literature.

Predictive factors of poor response to therapy in Autoimmune Hepatitis

AIM

To evaluate "ex ante" the predictive factors of incomplete/absent response to the standard therapy in a well characterized series of Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) patients from Italy.

METHODS

Of 282 AIH patients screened from our database 166 (59%) had a sustained response and 116 (41%) had an incomplete/absent response to the therapy; all patients were analyzed for the clinical, serological and histological parameters at diagnosis.

RESULTS

The patients with incomplete/absent response were characterized by significantly younger age (30 aa vs 42 aa p=0.001) and a significantly higher frequency of cirrhosis at diagnosis than patients who had a complete response to therapy (26% vs 3% p<0.0001); furthermore, patients with incomplete/absent response were distinguished from those with a complete response for significantly lower serum levels of both AST (7.9×upper normal limit [unl] vs 13×unl p<0.005) and ALT (10.9×unl vs 18×unl p=0.002) at diagnosis, and by an increase in IgG serum levels (1.43×unl vs 1.27×unl p=0.009). After stepwise logistic regression, cirrhosis at diagnosis (p=0.003, OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.49) and younger age (p=0.001, OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) represent two independent variables of incomplete/absent response.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger age and cirrhosis are predictive of lack of response to the standard therapy in AIH patients.

A real-world study focused on the long-term efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil as first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Front-line therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has shown high on-treatment remission rates.

AIM

To study prospectively in a real-world fashion the long-term outcome of a large group of consecutive treatment-naïve AIH patients.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2014, 158 patients were recruited but only 131 were eligible for treatment (109 MMF/prednisolone; 22 prednisolone ± azathioprine). Long-term data on outcome after drug withdrawal were evaluated. Patients stopped treatment after having achieved complete response (normal transaminases and IgG) for at least the last 2 years.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, 31.6% of patients had cirrhosis and 72.8% insidious presentation. A total of 102 of 109 (93.6%) responded initially to MMF within 2 (1-18) months. A total of 78 of 109 (71.6%) had complete response on treatment and 61 of 78 (78.2%) maintained remission off prednisolone. MMF-treated patients had increased probability of complete response compared to those receiving azathioprine (P = 0.03). Independent predictors of complete response were lower ALT at 6 months (P = 0.001) and acute presentation (P = 0.03). So far, treatment withdrawal was feasible in 40/109 patients and 30 (75%) are still in remission after 24 (2-129) months. Remission maintenance was associated with longer MMF treatment (P = 0.005), higher baseline ALT (P < 0.02), lower IgG on 6 months (P = 0.004) and histological improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Mycophenolate mofetil proved to be an efficient first-line treatment for AIH, achieving so far the highest rates of remission maintenance off treatment (75%) ever published for at least a median of 2 years, although the remission criteria used were strict. However, the risk of potential bias and overestimation of intervention benefits from MMF cannot be completely excluded as this is a real world and not a randomised controlled trial.

The clinical phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis: A comprehensive review

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) fulfills the generally accepted contemporary criteria of an autoimmune liver disease: the presence of autoantibodies and autoreactive T cells, a female gender bias, association with other autoimmune diseases, response to immunosuppressive therapy and strong associations with the major histocompatibility complex HLA loci. It occurs worldwide in both children and adults and is marked by both etiopathogenic and clinical heterogeneity, differing from the other putative autoimmune liver diseases, primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), albeit occasionally presenting with overlapping features of PBC or PSC. Although diagnostic criteria have been established and validated, there are still major issues to be clarified due to its variability, such as autoantibody-negative AIH, drug-induced AIH, AIH sharing features with PBC or PSC, and post-transplant de novo AIH. In view of the diverse presentations and courses, including classical chronic onset, acute and acute severe onset, cirrhosis and decompensated cirrhosis, individualized management of patients is indicated. Each patient should receive a personalized analysis of the benefits and side effect risks of drugs. Herein we describe a comprehensive review of the clinical phenotypes of AIH underscoring its clinical heterogeneity.