Relationship of proctitis and rectal capacity in Crohn's disease

Functional Anorectal Disorders

This report defines criteria and reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of common anorectal disorders: fecal incontinence (FI), functional anorectal pain and functional defecation disorders. FI is defined as the recurrent uncontrolled passage of fecal material for at least 3 months. The clinical features of FI are useful for guiding diagnostic testing and therapy. Anorectal manometry and imaging are useful for evaluating anal and pelvic floor structure and function. Education, antidiarrheals and biofeedback therapy are the mainstay of management; surgery may be useful in refractory cases. Functional anorectal pain syndromes are defined by clinical features and categorized into three subtypes. In proctalgia fugax, the pain is typically fleeting and lasts for seconds to minutes. In levator ani syndrome (LAS) and unspecified anorectal pain the pain lasts more than 30 minutes, but in LAS there is puborectalis tenderness. Functional defecation disorders are defined by >2 symptoms of chronic constipation or irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, and with >2 features of impaired evacuation i.e., abnormal evacuation pattern on manometry, abnormal balloon expulsion test or impaired rectal evacuation by imaging. It includes two subtypes; dyssynergic defecation and inadequate defecatory propulsion. Pelvic floor biofeedback therapy is effective for treating LAS and defecatory disorders.

Functional Anorectal Disorders

This report defines criteria and reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of common anorectal disorders: fecal incontinence (FI), functional anorectal pain and functional defecation disorders. FI is defined as the recurrent uncontrolled passage of fecal material for at least 3 months. The clinical features of FI are useful for guiding diagnostic testing and therapy. Anorectal manometry and imaging are useful for evaluating anal and pelvic floor structure and function. Education, antidiarrheals and biofeedback therapy are the mainstay of management; surgery may be useful in refractory cases. Functional anorectal pain syndromes are defined by clinical features and categorized into three subtypes. In proctalgia fugax, the pain is typically fleeting and lasts for seconds to minutes. In levator ani syndrome (LAS) and unspecified anorectal pain the pain lasts more than 30 minutes, but in LAS there is puborectalis tenderness. Functional defecation disorders are defined by >2 symptoms of chronic constipation or irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, and with >2 features of impaired evacuation i.e., abnormal evacuation pattern on manometry, abnormal balloon expulsion test or impaired rectal evacuation by imaging. It includes two subtypes; dyssynergic defecation and inadequate defecatory propulsion. Pelvic floor biofeedback therapy is effective for treating LAS and defecatory disorders.

Anorectal complications and function in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease: a series of patients with long-term follow-up

AIM

The aim of this study is to describe the long-term course of anorectal complains and function in a single centre cohort patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with perianal lesions.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2000, 56 IBD patients (43 Crohn's disease and 13 ulcerative colitis) with perianal complaints underwent anorectal function evaluation (AFE) (baseline). For follow-up, they were approached between 2010 and 2012 by sending questionnaires including Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (IBDQ), Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI), faecal incontinence scale (Vaizey) and an invitation for AFE.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 46 patients (82 %) were available, 9 (16 %) were lost and 1 (2 %) had died. Thirty patients returned the questionnaires of which 17 also underwent AFE. The remaining 16 patients were interviewed by phone and were only willing to mention their anorectal complaints. Median follow-up was 14 year. In 25 of the 46 patients (54 %), perianal complaints persisted faecal incontinence (n = 7); soiling (n = 13) and active fistula (n = 5). Eighteen (39 %) patients had an active fistula at baseline and three persisted at follow-up. Two developed a new fistula. Mean IBDQ, Vaizey and PDAI were 178 (SD 29), 7 (SD 5) and 4.2 (SD 3.0), respectively. In 17 patients, who underwent AFE, anal endosonography showed healing in nine of the ten fistulas. Anal pressures as well as rectal capacity remained unaltered in the individual patient, but showed a large range within the group.

CONCLUSION

After 14 years, 54 % of the IBD patients with perianal lesions still have mild complaints. The quality of life remained moderate over a long period, which is concerning.

Dyssynergic defecation: a treatable cause of persistent symptoms when inflammatory bowel disease is in remission

BACKGROUND

Introduction of biologic agents in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has increased the likelihood of disease remission. Despite resolution of active inflammation, a subset of IBD patients report persistent defecatory symptoms.

AIM

To evaluate a group of patients with inflammatory bowel disease with suspected functional defecatory disorders, by use of anorectal manometric testing and subsequent biofeedback therapy.

METHODS

A group of IBD patients with persistent defecatory problems despite clinical improvement were included in this study. These patients had no evidence of left-sided disease. Endoscopic and radiographic study findings and timing in relation to the manometry study were recorded. Anorectal manometry was performed by the standard protocol and included rectal sensory assessment, ability to expel a balloon, and pressure dynamics with simulated defecation.

RESULTS

Thirty IBD patients (Crohn's 23 patients; ulcerative colitis six patients) presented with defecatory disorders including constipation (67%) increased stooling (10%), and rectal urgency and/or incontinence and rectal pain (6%). All but one patient had anorectal manometric criteria of dyssynergia (presence of anismus motor pattern and inability to expel the balloon). Of the patients who completed biofeedback therapy, 30% had a clinically significant (≥7-point) improvement in SIBDQ score, with a reduction in health-care utilization after a six-month period (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite remission, some inflammatory bowel disease patients have persistent defecatory symptoms. Defecatory symptoms may not be predictive of an underlying inflammatory disorder. Lack of inflammatory activity and absence of left-sided disease should prompt investigation of functional disorders. Anorectal manometric testing and biofeedback therapy for patients with a diagnosis of dyssynergia may be a useful therapy.

Increased anal resting pressure and rectal sensitivity in Crohn's disease

PURPOSE

Anal pathology occurs in 20 to 80 percent of patients with Crohn's disease in which abscesses, fistulas, and fissures account for considerable morbidity. The etiology is not clearly defined, but altered anorectal pressures may play a role. This study was designed to investigate anorectal physiologic conditions in patients with Crohn's disease compared with healthy controls.

METHODS

Twenty patients with Crohn's disease located in the ileum (n = 9) or the colon (n = 11) without macroscopic proctitis or perianal disease were included. All were subjected to rectal examination, anorectal manometry, manovolumetry, and rectoscopy. Comparison was made with a reference group of 173 healthy controls of whom 128 underwent anorectal manometry, 29 manovolumetry, and 16 both examinations.

RESULTS

Maximum resting pressure and resting pressure area were higher in patients than in controls (P = 0.017 and P = 0.011, respectively), whereas maximum squeeze pressure and squeeze pressure area were similar. Rectal sensitivity was increased in patients expressed as lower values both for volume and pressure for urge (P = 0.013 and P = 0.014, respectively) as well as maximum tolerable pressure (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates how patients with Crohn's disease without macroscopic proctitis have increased anal pressures in conjunction with increased rectal sensitivity. This may contribute to later development of anal pathology, because increased intra-anal pressures may compromise anal circulation, causing fissures, and also discharging of fecal matter into the perirectal tracts, which may have a role in infection and fistula development.

Anorectal functional disorders in the absence of anorectal inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Histological alterations in the enteric nervous system (ENS) have been described in patients suffering from Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with CD without rectal inflammation have abnormal anorectal function compared with healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients with CD and 26 healthy volunteers were examined by anorectal manometry and answered a standardized questionnaire. No patient had active CD in the rectum as determined by endoscopy.

RESULTS

Maximum anal resting and squeeze pressures did not differ between patients and healthy volunteers. The rectoanal inhibitory reflex was absent in 24 of 54 patients and two of 26 healthy volunteers (P < 0.05). The first sensation to distension of the rectal balloon was reported at mean(s.e.m.) 57.9(4.4) ml by patients and 37.5(2.2) ml by healthy volunteers (P < 0.01). The standardized interview revealed additional disorders of anorectal function in patients with CD.

CONCLUSION

Anorectal function appears to be altered in many patients with CD even in the absence of macroscopic anorectal disease. This may be due to a disorder of the ENS.

Rectoanal motility in Crohn's disease patients

PURPOSE

It has been documented that Crohn's disease affects anorectal function when anorectal manifestations of the disease are present. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the presence of histologic lesions in rectal biopsy affected anorectal motility in patients with Crohn's disease but no evidence of macroscopic anorectal involvement.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with documented Crohn's disease were included in the study. Twenty-one of them had no endoscopic or histologic lesions in the rectum, and 20 patients had a positive histology for Crohn's disease on rectal biopsy, with or without macroscopic or endoscopic involvement of the anorectum. All patients underwent a standard anorectal manometry, with an eight-channel, water-perfused catheter.

RESULTS

Patients with positive rectal biopsy but no evidence of endoscopic rectal involvement had lower anal resting and squeeze pressures (76 +/- 16 standard deviation vs. 86 +/- 19 standard deviation P = 0.002; 152 +/- 56 standard deviation vs. 192 +/- 52 standard deviation P < 0.001, respectively), and a lower sphincter and high-pressure zone length (2.8 +/- 0.8 standard deviation vs. 3.2 +/- 0.8 standard deviation P = 0.006; 1.7 +/- 0.6 standard deviation vs. 2 +/- 0.6 standard deviation P = 0.005, respectively) compared with patients with negative rectal histology. Also, slow and ultra slow wave amplitude and ultra slow wave frequency were significantly lower (10 +/- 6 standard deviation vs. 13 +/- 7 standard deviation P = 0.04; 17 +/- 16 standard deviation vs. 34 +/- 24 SD P = 0.004; 0.9 +/- 0.8 standard deviation vs. 1.3 +/- 0.6 standard deviation P = 0.05, respectively), rectal sensation more affected, and rectal compliance significantly reduced (7.4 +/- 1 standard deviation vs. 11.1 +/- 2.2 standard deviation P<0.001) in the former group of patients. Simultaneous presence of endoscopic and histologic lesions in the rectum was associated with further impairment of the anorectal function.

CONCLUSION

Microscopic presence alone of Crohn's disease in the rectum appears to induce anorectal motility disorders. The synchronous presence of endoscopic rectal and macroscopic anal involvement is associated with further deterioration of anorectal function.

Rectal compliance as a routine measurement: extreme volumes have direct clinical impact and normal volumes exclude rectum as a problem

PURPOSE

The clinical impact of rectal compliance and sensitivity measurement is not clear. The aim of this study was to measure the rectal compliance in different patient groups compared with controls and to establish the clinical effect of rectal compliance.

METHODS

Anorectal function tests were performed in 974 consecutive patients (284 men). Normal values were obtained from 24 controls. Rectal compliance measurement was performed by filling a latex rectal balloon with water at a rate of 60 ml per minute. Volume and intraballoon pressure were measured. Volume and pressure at three sensitivity thresholds were recorded for analysis: first sensation, urge, and maximal toleration. At maximal toleration, the rectal compliance (volume/pressure) was calculated. Proctoscopy, anal manometry, anal mucosal sensitivity, and anal endosonography were also performed as part of our anorectal function tests.

RESULTS

No effect of age or gender was observed in either controls or patients. Patients with fecal incontinence had a higher volume at first sensation and a higher pressure at maximal toleration (P = 0.03), the presence of a sphincter defect or low or normal anal pressures made no difference. Patients with constipation had a larger volume at first sensation and urge (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.01). Patients with a rectocele had a larger volume at first sensation (P = 0.004). Patients with rectal prolapse did not differ from controls; after rectopexy, rectal compliance decreased (P < 0.0003). Patients with inflammatory bowel disease had a lower rectal compliance, most pronounced in active proctitis (P = 0.003). Patients with ileoanal pouches also had a lower compliance (P < 0.0001). In the 17 patients where a maximal toleration volume < 60 ml was found, 11 had complaints of fecal incontinence, and 6 had a stoma. In 31 patients a maximal toleration volume between 60 and 100 ml was found; 12 patients had complaints of fecal incontinence, and 6 had a stoma. Proctitis or pouchitis was the main cause for a small compliance. All 29 patients who had a maximal toleration volume > 500 ml had complaints of constipation. No correlation between rectal and anal mucosal sensitivity was found.

CONCLUSION

Rectal compliance measurement with a latex balloon is easily feasible. In this series of 974 patients, some patient groups showed an abnormal rectal visceral sensitivity and compliance, but there was an overlap with controls. Rectal compliance measurement gave a good clinical impression about the contribution of the rectum to the anorectal problem. Patients with proctitis and pouchitis had the smallest rectal compliance. A maximal toleration volume < 60 ml always led to fecal incontinence, and stomas should be considered for such patients. A maximal toleration volume > 500 ml was only seen in constipated patients, and therapy should be given to prevent further damage to the pelvic floor. Values close to or within the normal range rule out the rectum as an important factor in the anorectal problem of the patient.

Anorectal function investigations in incontinent and continent patients. Differences and discriminatory value

Anal manometry, rectal capacity measurement, and the saline-infusion test were performed in 350 patients, 178 of whom had fecal incontinence and 172 of whom were continent. Anal manometry was also performed in 80 control subjects, whose results were compared with the patients. Women and older patients exhibited lower pressures. Compared with continent patients, incontinent patients had lower anal sphincter pressures at rest and during squeeze, a smaller rectal capacity, and leaked earlier and more with the saline infusion test. Differentiation between incontinent and continent patients was not possible with a single test because there was complete overlap. The maximum squeeze pressure showed the best discrimination. Combining the three tests did not show better discrimination than any individual test. Anal pressure and rectal capacity below the normal range only were found in very few incontinent patients. The authors' study demonstrates that no prediction can be made about continence with anorectal function tests. Therefore, in the individual patient, an abnormal result in one test must be interpreted with caution and only in relationship with other tests, especially when therapeutic surgery is considered.

Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders. Which findings are clinically relevant?

To evaluate the results and clinical impact of defecography in patients with anorectal disorders, 100 results of defecographic examinations from 92 patients were reviewed. The defecographic results were screened for the anorectal angle, defined both at rest and during straining, perineal descent, and abnormalities of the rectal configuration during straining. Anal manometry, saline infusion test, rectal capacity measurement, and anal electromyography (EMG) were also performed. There was a significant difference (P less than 0.001) both at rest (22 degrees) and during straining (12 degrees) between the two anorectal angle measurements. Incontinent patients had a larger anorectal angle, both at rest and during straining, than continent patients (P less than 0.04), but with a large overlap. The anorectal angle was not influenced by gender or age. An abnormal rectal configuration was found in 62 defecographic examinations. From the 8 patients with rectopexy performed for a large rectocele or intussusception, incontinent patients with an intussusception had the best results. In four patients, anal EMG showed an increased activity of the external sphincter during straining. Two of these four patients had abnormal defecograhic results. No correlations were found between anorectal angle and the other function tests. In conclusion, the anorectal angle lacks clinical relevance. In patients with defecation problems, defecography may be indicated whenever other investigations (physical examination, anal manometry, anal EMG) have excluded local pathology or a spastic pelvic floor syndrome. In these situations, defecography could detect an intussusception, which could easily be treated with rectopexy.

Clinical indications for anorectal function investigations

Interest in anorectal function investigation tests has increased, and new investigation techniques have been introduced, gaining new insight in the pathogenesis of fecal incontinence and constipation. Normal values in anorectal function tests have shown a large overlap between controls and patients with fecal incontinence or constipation. Therefore, the pure clinical indications for the individual anorectal function tests are small, and the strength comes from combining these test results. When the patient is not eligible for surgery or biofeedback, there is no indication to perform anorectal function tests. Guidelines for selective use of anorectal function tests are given. In patients with fecal incontinence, the clinical consequence of demonstrating severe pudendal neuropathy is not yet clear. Defecography is important to demonstrate an intussusception as a treatable cause of incontinence. In patients with constipation an anal EMG (of defecography) can diagnose the spastic pelvic floor syndrome, which should be treated with relaxation exercises or biofeedback. Patients with other anorectal diseases, patients receiving a stoma, and patients considered for reanastomosis operation after (partial) colectomy may benefit from anorectal function tests.

Investigation of anorectal function

Anorectal function tests were performed in 280 consecutive patients, who were referred for evaluation of different anorectal disorders. The relationship between the estimated anal sphincter pressure on digital palpation and the measured pressure on anal manometry was investigated and the interrelationship between anal manometry, rectal capacity and the saline infusion test was defined. A significant correlation (P less than 0.001) was found between digitally and manometrically measured anal sphincter pressure. Considering the relationship between the three specific anorectal function tests, only manometry and the saline infusion test correlated to some extent (P less than 0.01). This study shows that digital palpation is helpful in anorectal function investigation, but to establish the exact anal pressures, anal manometry is mandatory. Furthermore, the poor correlation observed indicates that single tests represent different aspects of anorectal function and therefore they need to be performed together.

Measurement of rectal capacity in the assessment of patients for colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in Crohn's colitis

A group of 38 patients with Crohn's colitis underwent measurement of rectal capacity prior to colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. Median values for constant and maximum tolerated volumes were significantly higher in patients who still possessed a satisfactorily functioning ileorectal anastomosis at a mean follow-up of 6.8 years, and measurement of these sensory parameters of rectal capacity was of prognostic value in predicting the likely outcome of ileorectal anastomosis.

Rectal, bladder and sexual function after mucosal proctectomy with and without a pelvic reservoir for colitis and polyposis

Sexual, bladder and rectal function have been assessed prospectively in a group of patients undergoing mucosal proctectomy, primarily for ulcerative colitis. The function of the rectum and ‘neo-rectum’ was studied before and 3 months (on average) after operation in 18 patients. Intestinal continuity was restored by means of ileo-anal anastomosis; in addition to ileo-anal anastomosis, a pelvic reservoir (MP + RES) was constructed in 10 patients, while ileo-anal anastomosis alone (MP + IAA) was used in the remaining 8 patients. Thirteen of these patients have been studied for a minimum of 4 months after closure of the defunctioning ileostomy.

No evidence of impotence or of bladder dysfunction due to trauma to pelvic autonomic nerves was noted. Evidence of impairment of function of the internal anal sphincter was observed soon after operation in 16 of the 18 patients (P &lt; 0·05). However, reflex function of the external anal sphincter could still be elicited in over 70 per cent of patients who were tested 3 months after operation. The functional results of patients after MP + RES were significantly better than those of patients who had undergone MP + IAA. Thirteen months (on average) after closure of the ileostomy, the maximum capacity and compliance of the ‘neo-rectum’ in patients after MP + RES (423 ± 87 ml and 14 ± 7 ml/cm H2O respectively) were significantly greater than in patients after MP + IAA (181 ± 103 ml and 4 ± 3 ml/cm H2O respectively; P &lt; 0·05). A significant correlation between the capacity of the ‘neo-rectum’ and the frequency of defecation was noted. The results of the present study support the suggestion that a pelvic reservoir should be fashioned in adults undergoing mucosal proctectomy and ileo-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease.

Assessment of anorectal function in selection of patients for ileorectal anastomosis in Crohn's colitis

Anorectal function has been assessed in 53 patients with Crohn's disease by measurement of resting and squeeze anal canal pressures and the maximum volume tolerated during distension of a balloon in the rectum. Radiographs of the rectum from barium enema examination were also reviewed to assess rectal capacity. Thirty-three patients have had a colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for Crohn's colitis of whom 13 now have a stoma because they either required a protectomy (n=9) or where closure of a loop ileostomy had not been possible (n=4) because of severe anorectal disease. The maximum tolerated volume was less than 150 ml in 12 of 13 patients who now have a stoma compared with none of the 20 patients who have a functioning anastomosis. Although the correlation between a radiological assessment of rectal capacity and the maximum tolerated volume was poor, a severely contracted rectum was associated with the need for a stoma in six of seven patients compared with only two of 13 patients who did not have radiological signs of a narrow rectum.

Is the rectum usually empty?--A quantitative study in subjects with and without diarrhea

The authors have investigated the frequency with which the rectum contains feces by recording the presence or absence of fecal contamination of the membrane or of discoloration by feces of the contents of dialysis bags placed in the unprepared rectum for one hour. Feces were present in the rectum in 31 per cent of 32 studies in normal control subjects, in 49 per cent of 80 studies in obese subjects (P less than 0.05 from controls), in 36 per cent of 28 studies in patients with the irritable bowel syndrome, and in 31 per cent of 103 studies in patients with ulcerative proctocolitis, whether or not they had diarrhea. Fecal staining of the bag and its contents occurred much more frequently in 27 studies in subjects with various other diarrheal diseases (67 per cent, P less than 0.02 from controls), including eight with steatorrhea (87 per cent, P less than 0.02 from controls). The frequency with which feces were present was unaffected by age, sex, or time of day of the study. These results provide quantitative support for the assertion that in subjects without diarrhea the rectum is usually empty. In patients with diarrhea or steatorrhea and no distal large intestinal inflammation, however, the rectum usually does contain fecal material.