Gastric acid and pancreatic polypeptide responses to modified sham feeding. Effects of truncal and parietal cell vagotomy

Role of vagal activation in postprandial glucose metabolism after gastric bypass in individuals with and without hypoglycaemia

Patients who have undergone gastric bypass surgery (GB) have enhanced postprandial hyperinsulinaemia and a greater incretin effect is apparent. In the present study, we sought to determine the effect of vagal activation, a neural component of the enteroinsular axis, on postprandial glucose metabolism in patients with and without hypoglycaemia after GB. Seven patients with documented post-GB hypoglycaemia, seven asymptomatic patients without hypoglycaemia post-GB, and 10 weight-matched non-surgical controls with normal glucose tolerance were recruited. Blood glucose, and islet hormone and incretin secretion were compared during mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTs) with and without prior sham-feeding on two separate days. Sham feeding preceding the MMT caused a more rapid increase in prandial blood glucose levels but lowered overall glycaemia in all three groups (P < 0.05). Sham feeding had a similar effect to increase early (P < 0.05), but not overall, meal-induced insulin secretion in the three groups. Prandial glucagon concentrations were significantly greater in the GB groups, and sham feeding accentuated this response (P < 0.05). The effect of vagal activation on prandial glucose and islet-cell function is preserved in patients who have undergone GB, in those both with and without hypoglycaemia.

Abnormal ghrelin and pancreatic polypeptide responses in gastroparesis

Vagal nerve dysfunction has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic gastroparesis, but its role in idiopathic gastroparesis remains uncertain. The increase in pancreatic polypeptide with sham feeding is often used as a measure of vagal integrity. Ghrelin has been suggested to function as an appetite-stimulating hormone from the gut to the brain acting through vagal afferent pathways. Systemic ghrelin also rises in part due to vagal efferent pathways. Alterations in ghrelin and its effects on appetite could play a role in gastroparesis. In this study we aimed [1] to investigate the presence of vagal nerve dysfunction in patients with idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis and [2] to determine if alterations in ghrelin concentrations occur in gastroparesis. Normal subjects and patients with diabetic, idiopathic, or postsurgical gastroparesis underwent a sham feeding protocol. Serial blood samples were obtained for plasma ghrelin and pancreatic polypeptide. Sham feeding was characterized by an increase in pancreatic polypeptide and ghrelin in normal controls and patients with idiopathic gastroparesis. The changes in pancreatic polypeptide and ghrelin levels in diabetic and postsurgical gastroparesis were significantly less than those in normal subjects. Vagal nerve dysfunction, as evidenced by an impaired pancreatic polypeptide response with sham feeding, is present in diabetic gastroparesis but not idiopathic gastroparesis. Systemic ghrelin concentrations increased with sham feeding in normal subjects and patients with idiopathic gastroparesis but not in diabetic or postsurgical gastroparesis. Vagal function and regulation of ghrelin levels are impaired in diabetic gastroparesis.

Gastrointestinal hormones regulating appetite

The role of gastrointestinal hormones in the regulation of appetite is reviewed. The gastrointestinal tract is the largest endocrine organ in the body. Gut hormones function to optimize the process of digestion and absorption of nutrients by the gut. In this capacity, their local effects on gastrointestinal motility and secretion have been well characterized. By altering the rate at which nutrients are delivered to compartments of the alimentary canal, the control of food intake arguably constitutes another point at which intervention may promote efficient digestion and nutrient uptake. In recent decades, gut hormones have come to occupy a central place in the complex neuroendocrine interactions that underlie the regulation of energy balance. Many gut peptides have been shown to influence energy intake. The most well studied in this regard are cholecystokinin (CCK), pancreatic polypeptide, peptide YY, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), oxyntomodulin and ghrelin. With the exception of ghrelin, these hormones act to increase satiety and decrease food intake. The mechanisms by which gut hormones modify feeding are the subject of ongoing investigation. Local effects such as the inhibition of gastric emptying might contribute to the decrease in energy intake. Activation of mechanoreceptors as a result of gastric distension may inhibit further food intake via neural reflex arcs. Circulating gut hormones have also been shown to act directly on neurons in hypothalamic and brainstem centres of appetite control. The median eminence and area postrema are characterized by a deficiency of the blood-brain barrier. Some investigators argue that this renders neighbouring structures, such as the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus and the nucleus of the tractus solitarius in the brainstem, susceptible to influence by circulating factors. Extensive reciprocal connections exist between these areas and the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and other energy-regulating centres of the central nervous system. In this way, hormonal signals from the gut may be translated into the subjective sensation of satiety. Moreover, the importance of the brain-gut axis in the control of food intake is reflected in the dual role exhibited by many gut peptides as both hormones and neurotransmitters. Peptides such as CCK and GLP-1 are expressed in neurons projecting both into and out of areas of the central nervous system critical to energy balance. The global increase in the incidence of obesity and the associated burden of morbidity has imparted greater urgency to understanding the processes of appetite control. Appetite regulation offers an integrated model of a brain-gut axis comprising both endocrine and neurological systems. As physiological mediators of satiety, gut hormones offer an attractive therapeutic target in the treatment of obesity.

Role of brainstem TRH/TRH-R1 receptors in the vagal gastric cholinergic response to various stimuli including sham-feeding

Pavlov's pioneering work established that sham-feeding induced by sight or smell of food or feeding in dogs with permanent esophagostomy stimulates gastric acid secretion through vagal pathways. Brain circuitries and transmitters involved in the central vagal regulation of gastric function have recently been unraveled. Neurons in the dorsal vagal complex including the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMN) express thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor and are innervated by TRH fibers originating from TRH synthesizing neurons in the raphe pallidus, raphe obscurus and the parapyramidal regions. TRH injected into the DMN or cisterna magna increases the firing of DMN neurons and gastric vagal efferent discharge, activates cholinergic neurons in gastric submucosal and myenteric plexuses, and induces a vagal-dependent, atropine-sensitive stimulation of gastric secretory (acid, pepsin) and motor functions. TRH antibody or TRH-R1 receptor oligodeoxynucleotide antisense pretreatment in the cisterna magna or DMN abolished vagal-dependent gastric secretory and motor responses to sham-feeding, 2-deoxy-D-glucose, cold exposure and chemical activation of cell bodies in medullary raphe nuclei. TRH excitatory action in the DMN is potentiated by co-released prepro-TRH-(160-169) flanking peptide, Ps4 and 5-HT, and inhibited by a number of peptides involved in the stress/immune response and inhibition of food-intake. These neuroanatomical, electrophysiological and neuropharmacological data are consistent with a physiological role of brainstem TRH in the central vagal stimulation of gastric myenteric cholinergic neurons in response to several vagal dependent stimuli including sham-feeding.

Cephalic phase of acid secretion involves activation of medullary TRH receptor subtype 1 in rats

Mechanisms involved in the cephalic phase of gastric acid secretion were studied in awake fasted rats with chronic gastric fistula and exposed to the sight and smell of chow for 30 min. Acid secretion was monitored using constant intragastric perfusion and automatic titration. Sham feeding induced a peak acid response reaching 82 +/- 7 micromol/10 min within 20 min compared with the average 22 +/- 2 micromol/10 min in controls. The sham-feeding response was abolished by intracisternal pretreatment with the TRH(1)-receptor antisense oligodeoxynucleotides or subcutaneous injection of atropine, whereas TRH(1) mismatch oligodeoxynucleotides had no effect. Serum gastrin was not altered by the sham feeding and increased by refeeding. Gastrin antibody did not block the rise in acid during sham feeding, although the net acid response was reduced by 47% compared with the control group. Glycine-gastrin antibody, indomethacin and nitro-l-arginine methyl ester had no effect. Atropine and gastrin antibody decreased basal acid secretion by 98 and 75%, respectively, whereas all other pretreatments did not. These results indicate that the cholinergic-dependent acid response to sham feeding is mediated by brain medullary TRH(1) receptors in rats.

Vagal-sparing esophagectomy: a more physiologic alternative

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the function of the vagal nerves and the gastric reservoir after vagal-sparing esophagectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Esophagectomy as currently performed includes division of the vagal nerves and surgical alteration of the stomach, with attendant postoperative dumping, diarrhea, reduced meal capacity, and weight loss. Vagal-sparing esophagectomy has been introduced as a technique for removal of the esophagus while preserving the vagal nerves and gastric reservoir. The procedure is touted as having a low morbidity and is applicable to patients with end-stage benign or early malignant disease.

METHODS

A random sample of 15 patients at a median of 20 months after a vagal-sparing esophagectomy was compared to 23 asymptomatic normal subjects; 10 randomly selected patients, 29 months after esophagogastrectomy with colon interposition; and 10 randomly selected patients, 47 months after standard esophagectomy with gastric pull-up. Gastric mucosal acidification was tested with Congo red staining. Vagal secretory function was measured by gastric acid output and pancreatic polypeptide response to sham feeding. Vagal motor function was assessed by a technetium gastric emptying scan and a questionnaire to evaluate dumping and diarrhea. Gastric reservoir function was evaluated by measuring meal capacity and postoperative changes in body mass index.

RESULTS

Vagal-sparing esophagectomy preserved the function of the vagi, as evident by an increase in gastric acid output, a rise in serum pancreatic polypeptide following sham feeding, and preservation of normal postoperative gastric emptying in 70% of the patients. After vagal-sparing esophagectomy, patients were free of dumping and diarrhea and were analogous to normal subjects in meal capacity but had a slight reduction in the speed of eating.

CONCLUSIONS

Vagal-sparing esophagectomy preserves gastric secretory, motor, and reservoir function. Postoperatively, patients have normal alimentation, bowel regulation, and no weight loss. It is an ideal procedure for patients with end-stage benign disease, Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia, or esophageal carcinoma limited to the lamina propria.

Gallbladder responses to modified sham feeding: effects of the composition of a meal

Changes in gallbladder contraction and plasma cholecystokinin release were studied following modified sham feeding of 3 different isocaloric meals rich in either fat, protein or carbohydrates in healthy volunteers, and results were compared with those following real feeding of comparable meals. In contrast to carbohydrate-rich meals (8 +/- 19 ml/120 min), fat- (-412 +/- 46 ml/120 min) and protein-rich meals (-352 +/- 42 ml/120 min) reduced integrated gallbladder volume (P < 0.05) in response to modified sham feeding. Plasma cholecystokinin levels were not significantly influenced by modified sham feeding of fat, protein or carbohydrates. Real feeding of a carbohydrate-rich meal also failed to significantly reduce gallbladder volume and to stimulate cholecystokinin release (-45 +/- 40 ml/120 min and 51 +/- 11 pmol/120 min, respectively), while real feeding of both fat- and protein-rich meals distinctly reduced gallbladder volume (-679 +/- 76 and -564 +/- 53 ml/120 min, respectively; P < 0.05) and increased cholecystokinin release (651 +/- 72 and 504 +/- 43 pmol/120 min, respectively; P < 0.05). This study demonstrates that gallbladder contraction during the cephalic phase of meal stimulation is dependent on the fat, protein and carbohydrate percentages of a meal, and is activated by different mechanisms than the intestinal phase of a meal.

Vagal effects on acid and pepsin secretion and serum gastrin in duodenal ulcer and controls

To study whether the vagus sustains basal secretion and stimulates acid and pepsin differently in duodenal ulcer (DU) and non-DU, we tested 144 patients with DU and 92 nonulcer controls, using 1-hr basal secretion followed by 15 min of modified sham feeding (MSF) and after 1 hr followed by a reference maximum elicited by 6 micrograms/kg pentagastrin given subcutaneously and observed for another 1 hr. Of all subjects, 97.5% responded to MSF by raising basal acid output (BAO) at least 15%. MSF added amounts of acid equal to 26-30% of peak acid output and 30-43% of peak pepsin output, regardless of diagnosis or level of basal secretion (including hypersecretors). Speed and duration of responses were similar in DU and controls. MSF did not substantially alter serum gastrin. Males secreted more acid and pepsin than females under all conditions, differences that persisted in DU but not in controls when outputs were corrected for body weight. Male DU but not female DU patients secreted more than corresponding controls. Sham feeding is an effective stimulus with similar characteristics in controls and DU patients. There was no evidence for saturation of vagal pathways in basal hypersecretors. MSF stimulation does not appear to involve gastrin. Hypersecretion in DU derives largely from responses in male DU.

Cholecystokinin in the regulation of gastric acid and endocrine pancreatic secretion in humans

In this study, a selective antagonist of cholecystokinin (CCK)-A receptors, loxiglumide, was used to evaluate the role of CCK in the control of the release of gastrin and pancreatic hormones (insulin, glucagon, pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and somatostatin) after stimulation with exogenous CCK and ingestion of a standard liquid mixed meal in healthy humans. Exogenous CCK-8, which induced a small but significant increase in gastric acid secretion, resulted in dose-dependent increments in plasma PP levels without significant changes in plasma levels of insulin, glucagon, or somatostatin. Pretreatment with loxiglumide resulted in a marked increase in CCK-induced gastric acid secretion and abolished the increments in plasma PP without alteration of plasma insulin, glucagon, or somatostatin levels. Ingestion of the liquid meal resulted in an immediate rise in intragastric pH from basal values of about 2 to pH6 lasting 90-120 min, and this was accompanied by significant increments in plasma gastrin, insulin, glucagon, PP, and somatostatin. Administration of loxiglumide (1200 mg orally) caused a reduction in the postprandial intragastric pH and the two- to three-fold increase in plasma gastrin. Plasma insulin and glucagon levels in tests with loxiglumide tended to increase, probably owing to accelerated gastric emptying, whereas plasma PP and somatostatin were significantly reduced. This study provides evidence that CCK exerts an inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion and plasma gastrin release as well as a stimulatory influence on the release of PP and somatostatin via CCK-A receptors but does not influence directly insulin or glucagon secretion in man.

Gastric acid response to modified sham feeding in patients with duodenal ulcer: is increased vagal tone the cause of basal acid hypersecretion?

In order to test the hypothesis that increased basal vagal tone causes basal acid hypersecretion in duodenal ulcer (DU), the effect of sham feeding on gastric acid secretion was studied in 26 patients with DU and 20 healthy controls. Basal acid output (BAO), sham feeding-stimulated acid output (SAO) and peak histamine-stimulated acid output (PAO) were significantly higher in DU patients compared with healthy controls (P less than 0.01). The BAO/PAO ratio in DU patients (0.28 +/- 0.03) was not significantly different from that of healthy subjects (0.19 +/- 0.03), indicating that the higher BAO in DU patients group, as a whole, was due to a higher parietal cell mass. The basal subtracted response to sham feeding expressed as a fraction of secretory capacity [(SAO-BAO)/PAO], which correlates inversely with the basal vagal tone, was not significantly different in the patients and control subjects (0.27 +/- 0.03 versus 0.3 +/- 0.03; P greater than 0.05). Based on the data from the healthy controls, a ratio of BAO/PAO greater than 0.44 was defined as abnormal (using 95% confidence limits) and it indicated marked basal acid hypersecretion. Four of 26 DU patients had basal acid hypersecretion (that is, BAO/PAO greater than 0.44), but only two of them did not show an increase over their basal rate of secretion in response to sham feeding. All other DU patients, including two with marked basal acid hypersecretion, and all healthy controls showed an appreciable increase in their acid secretion in response to sham feeding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Current status of proximal gastric vagotomy

Proximal gastric vagotomy is nearing its twentieth year in clinical use as an operation for peptic ulcer disease. No other acid-reducing operation has undergone as much scrutiny or study. At this time, the evidence of such studies and long-term follow-up strongly supports the use of proximal gastric vagotomy as the treatment of choice for chronic duodenal ulcer in patients who have failed medical therapy. Its application in treating the complications of peptic ulcer disease, which recently have come to represent an increasingly greater percentage of all operations done for peptic ulcer disease, is well-tested. However, initial series suggest that it should probably occupy a prominent role in treating some of these complications, particularly in selected patients, in the future. The operation has the well-documented ability to reduce gastric acid production, not inhibit gastric bicarbonate production, and also minimally inhibit gastric motility. The combination of these physiologic results after proximal gastric vagotomy, along with preservation of the normal antropyloroduodenal mechanism of gastrointestinal control, serve to allow patients with proximal gastric vagotomy the improved benefits of significantly fewer severe gastrointestinal side effects than are seen after other operations for peptic ulcer disease.