Choice of management strategy for colorectal cancer based on a diagnostic immunohistochemical test for defective mismatch repair

Distinct immune regulatory receptor profiles linked to altered monocyte subsets in sarcoidosis

Background

In sarcoidosis, blood monocytes, circulating precursors of granuloma macrophages, display enhanced inflammatory cytokine production, reduced expression of the regulatory (inhibitory) receptor CD200R, and altered subsets defined by CD14 and CD16. Regulatory receptors serve to dampen monocyte and macrophage inflammatory responses. We investigated the relationship between monocyte subsets and regulatory receptor expression in sarcoidosis.

Methods

Multiparameter flow cytometry was used to perform detailed analyses of cell surface regulatory molecules on freshly isolated blood immune cells from patients with chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis and age-matched healthy controls.

Results

25 patients with chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis (median duration of disease 22 months) who were not taking oral corticosteroids or other immunomodulators were recruited. Nonclassical monocytes were expanded in sarcoidosis and exhibited significantly lower expression of regulatory receptors CD200R, signal regulatory protein-α and CD47 than classical or intermediate monocytes. In sarcoidosis, all three monocyte subsets had significantly reduced CD200R and CD47 expression compared with healthy controls. A dichotomous distribution of CD200R was seen on classical and intermediate monocytes in the sarcoidosis population, with 14 out of 25 (56%) sarcoidosis patients having a CD200R^low phenotype and 11 out of 25 (44%) having a CD200R^high phenotype. These distinct sarcoidosis monocyte phenotypes remained consistent over time.

Conclusions

Nonclassical monocytes, which are expanded in sarcoidosis, express very low levels of regulatory receptors. Two distinct and persistent phenotypes of CD200R expression in classical and intermediate monocytes could be evaluated as sarcoidosis biomarkers.

Nonclassical monocytes, which are expanded in sarcoidosis, express very low levels of regulatory receptors. Two distinct and persistent phenotypes of CD200R expression in classical and intermediate monocytes could be evaluated as sarcoidosis biomarkers.https://bit.ly/2W0idAX

The Investigation of Lipoxygenases as Therapeutic Targets in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has an extremely poor prognosis with limited chemotherapy options, therefore the identification of new therapeutic targets would aid in disease management. Arachidonic acid is metabolised by cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase enzymes. The lipoxygenase isoenzymes 5-LOX and 12-LOX have been implicated in carcinogenesis. We aimed to examine 5-LOX and 12-LOX protein expression in a large retrospective series of mesothelioma samples. Further to this, the in vitro cytotoxic effects of lipoxygenase pathway inhibitors were investigated in mesothelioma cells. Archival samples from 83 patients with MPM were examined by immunohistochemistry for expression of the 5-LOX and 12-LOX proteins. The MTS assay was used to assess cell viability following 72 h treatment with the lipoxygenase pathway inhibitors baicalein, licofelone, MK-886 and zileuton in the MPM cell lines NCI-H2052, NCI-H2452 and MSTO-211H. Positive 12-LOX protein expression was recorded in 69/83 (83%) and positive 5-LOX expression was observed in 56/77 (73%) of MPM tissue samples. Co-expression of 5-LOX with 12-LOX was seen in 46/78 (58%) of MPM samples. Positive expression of 5-LOX, 12-LOX and COX-2 proteins was identified in the NCI-H2052, NCI-H2452 and MSTO-211H MPM cell lines. Baicalein (12-LOX and 15-LOX inhibitor) was effective in 3/3 MPM cell lines at low concentrations with an IC50 range of 9.6 μM to 20.7 μM. We have demonstrated that the 5-LOX and 12-LOX proteins are expressed in a significant proportion of MPM samples (73% and 83% respectively) and may represent novel therapeutic targets in this disease. We have demonstrated that the inhibition of the LOX pathway using baicalein may be effective as a novel treatment for MPM, however further human pharmacokinetic studies are required in order to establish whether the concentration used in vitro is clinically achievable.

Prognostic Value of Mismatch Repair Genes for Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Meta-Analysis

DNA mismatch repair was proposed to play a pivotal role in the development and prognosis of colorectal cancer. However, the prognostic value of mismatch repair on colorectal cancer is still unknown. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched. The articles about mismatch repair (including hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH3, hMSH6, hPMSH1, and hPMSH2) deficiency for the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer were included in the study. The hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval were used to measure the impact of mismatch repair deficiency on survival time. Twenty-one articles were included. The combined hazard ratio for mismatch repair deficiency on overall survival was 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.69) and that on disease-free survival was 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.75). In subgroup analysis, there were a significant association between overall survival and mismatch repair deficiency in Asian studies (hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.91) and Western studies (hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.67). For disease-free survival, the hazard ratios in Asian studies and Western studies were 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.38-0.81) and 0.62 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.78), respectively. Our meta-analysis indicated that mismatch repair could be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.

Assessing colorectal cancer mismatch repair status in the modern era: a survey of current practices and re-evaluation of the role of microsatellite instability testing

Results of DNA mismatch repair testing are used to detect Lynch syndrome and have prognostic and therapeutic implications among patients with sporadic colorectal carcinomas. Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) and PCR for microsatellite instability are two established methods for assessing mismatch repair function. Older literature suggested a discordance rate of approximately 5% between these assays, leading some institutions to perform dual testing on all cases. Although universal mismatch repair testing is now recommended by multiple professional organizations, none provide guidelines regarding preferred assays. We surveyed 96 academic and nonacademic institutions to assess Lynch syndrome screening practices and evaluated discordance rates between immunohistochemistry and PCR among 809 colorectal cancers tested in our own institution. Our survey demonstrated no significant differences between academic and nonacademic practices with respect to testing strategies. Eighty six percent performed universal screening, and usually (76%) employed immunohistochemistry on initial biopsy samples. Only 20% employed PCR; these were mostly academic practices that used both immunohistochemistry and PCR (p < 0.01 compared with the nonacademic groups). Loss of MLH1/PMS2 staining was often (90%) followed by either BRAF mutational analysis or MLH1 methylation assays. Only 24% adhered to WHO recommendations to assign histologic grade based on mismatch repair status. We found only 3 cases (0.4%) with discordant immunohistochemistry and PCR results in our own practice: 1 reflected decreased MSH-6 staining in a neoadjuvantly treated microsatellite stable tumor, 1 MLH1-deficient tumor showed diminished MLH1/PMS2 in the tumor compared with internal control, and 1 case reflected an error in the molecular laboratory. Overall, our results showed extremely low discordance between methods assessing mismatch repair status and would suggest immunohistochemistry as the preferred single screening test. PCR can be reserved for cases that show equivocal immunostaining patterns.

Altered Expression of the Dna Mismatch Repair Proteins Hmlh1 and Hmsh2 in Cutaneous Dysplastic Nevi and Malignant Melanoma

Molecular alterations in the mismatch repair system suggest that this mechanism may be important in the evolution of cutaneous melanoma. Our current study evaluated the expression of two mismatch repair proteins, hMLH1 and hMSH2, in dysplastic nevi (DN) and cutaneous melanoma (CM). Immunohistochemical staining of these proteins was performed on 55 CM and 30 DN specimens. The staining results were divided into three groups: negative, partially positive and strongly positive. Normal adjacent skin cells served as an internal control for positive immunostaining. Altered immunoreactivity of one of the proteins was found in four (13.4%) DN and seven (12.7%) CM. Lack of staining for hMLH1 was observed in two (6.7%) cases of DN and five (9.1%) cases of CM; staining for hMSH2 was absent in two (6.7%) of the DN and two (3.6%) of the CM specimens. Partially positive staining was found in 33.3% and 53.3% for hMLH1 and hMSH2, respectively, in DN, and in 54.5% and 69.1%, respectively, in CMM. Our study shows that complete or partial loss of MMR protein expression occurs in a subset of both DN and CM and may represent a distinct pathway in the development of some DN and CM.

Investigation of correlation between mutational status in key EGFR signaling genes and prognosis of stage II colorectal cancer

Aim: To investigate the relationship between mutations of key genes in the EGFR signaling pathway and the prognosis of stage II colorectal cancer patients without chemotherapy. Materials & methods: The incidence of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations and deficient DNA mismatch repair were assessed in 160 stage II colorectal cancer patients who had been treated by radical operation without adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: Mutations in KRAS, BRAF or PIK3CA were associated with poor prognosis, while the deficient DNA mismatch repair status was not associated with the prognosis. Combining these three markers, the sensitivity of the predicted value for poor progression-free survival and overall survival reached 0.645 (p = 0.002) and 0.709 (p = 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Knowing the mutation status of KRAS, BRAF or PIK3CA in stage II colorectal cancer can significantly improve the accuracy of prognoses.

Associations of defect mismatch repair genes with prognosis and heredity in sporadic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability arises due to defect mismatch repair (MMR) and occurs in 10-20% of sporadic colorectal cancer. The purpose was to investigate correlations between defect MMR, prognosis and heredity for colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Tumour tissues from 318 patients consecutively operated for colorectal cancer were analysed for immunohistochemical expression of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 on tissue microarrays. Information on KRAS and BRAF mutation status was available for selected cases.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (15%) tumours displayed MSI. No correlation was seen between patients exhibiting MSI in the tumour and heredity (p = 0.789). Patients with proximal colon cancer and MSI had an improved cancer-specific survival (p = 0.006) and prolonged time to recurrence (p = 0.037). In a multivariate analysis including MSI status, gender, CEA, vascular and neural invasion, patients with MSS and proximal colon cancer had an impaired cancer-specific survival compared with patients with MSI (HR, 4.32; CI, 1.46-12.78). The same prognostic information was also seen in distal colon cancer; no recurrences seen in the eight patients with stages II and III distal colon cancer and MSI, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

No correlation between MSI and heredity for colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives was seen. Patients with MSI tumours had improved survival.

Immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability analysis in molecular subtyping of colorectal carcinoma based on mismatch repair competency

Mismatch repair defective (MMRd) colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a distinct molecular phenotype of colorectal cancer, including 12% of sporadic CRC and 3% of Lynch Syndrome. In order to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of MMRd colorectal carcinoma, and to find the most effective method for preliminary screening, 296 CRC fulfilled revised Bethesda Guideline (RB) were selected from 1450 CRCs to perform both IHC staining for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and MSI analysis. Sixty-eight tumors were classified as MSI-H by MSI test. Colorectal carcinomas with MSI-H were prone to be proximal located, poorly differentiated, and relatively early staged, with infrequent metastasis to lymph node as well as to distant organs, compared with MSS ones. All of the 68 MMRd CRCs presented abnormal expression of at least one mismatch repair protein (MMRP), with 48 concurrent negative of MLH1 and PMS2, 14 concurrent negative of MSH2 and MSH6, 4 isolated negative of MSH6, 1 isolated negative of PMS2, and 1 concurrent negative of 4 MMRPs. All of the MLH1 negative tumors also showed abnormal expression of PMS2. All of the MSH2 negative cases also presented negative expression of MSH6. The sensitivity and specificity of the 2-antibody IHC test contained only PMS2 and MSH6 for screening for MMRd CRC were 100% and 98.2% respectively, exactly the same as that of the 4-antibody IHC test with all of the 4 MMRPs. The diagnostic accordance rate of the 2-antibody approach and MSI analysis was 98.6%. In conclusion, MMRd CRC has characteristic clinicopathological features different from MSS CRCs. The 2-antibody IHC approach containing MSH6 and PMS2 is the most easy and effective way to detecting MMR deficiency in CRC.

Clinical response to primary letrozole therapy in elderly patients with early breast cancer: possible role for p53 as a biomarker

Primary tamoxifen therapy has been widely used to treat elderly women with ER-positive breast cancer in the past. Aromatase inhibitors may be more beneficial than tamoxifen when used as primary endocrine therapy in elderly patients. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate a series of elderly women with ER-positive breast cancer treated with primary letrozole therapy as sole therapy with a minimum of 5 years follow up. To identify possible predictive biomarkers a pilot immunohistochemical analysis was performed to assess the expression of PR, HER2, EGFR, BCL2 and p53. A total of 45 women, aged more than 70 years with a diagnosis of ER-positive breast cancer that was treated with primary letrozole therapy were identified. A case note review was undertaken to obtain clinical information. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumour tissue from diagnostic core biopsies was available for all patients. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to establish the protein expression status of p53, PR, HER2, EGFR and BCL2. The mean age of the 45 patients was 87 years (range 70-101). Clinical benefit was seen in 60% of the patients. Median progression free survival was 53 months (95% CI - 34-72) and the median time to progression was 43 months (95% CI - 22-64). BCL2 was expressed in 45/45 (100%); PR in 38/45 (84%); EGFR in 13/45 (28%); HER2 in 9/45 (20%) and p53 in 5/45 (11%) of tissue samples. Positive expression of p53 was associated with poor progression free survival (p = 0.03) in this pilot study. This study demonstrates that letrozole as sole treatment appears to be a suitable treatment option for elderly patients with ER-positive breast cancer who are not fit for, or decline, surgery. The analysis of p53 in a larger study is warranted in order to assess its role as a biomarker in this patient group.

Mismatch repair deficiency screening via immunohistochemical staining in young Asians with colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

The incidence of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer (CRC) in young people remains unknown in Asians. The present study assessed the clinicopathological features and efficacy of immunohistochemistry screening for Lynch syndrome in young Asian CRC patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review conducted in Singapore General Hospital between January 2006 and December 2010 of 240 unrelated patients under the age of 50. All patients had immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for mismatch repair proteins in resected CRC specimen data retrieved from a prospective computerized database.

RESULTS

A total of 21 % (n = 51) of the patients had abnormal IHC staining. Loss of staining for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 proteins was observed in 10, 4, 6, and 13 % of tumors, respectively. Of the 22 patients who had abnormal staining of MLH1, 13 had concomitant abnormal staining for PMS2. One tumor specimen had abnormal staining in all four proteins. If the Amsterdam criteria alone were to be used, 86 % (n = 44) of the cohort would have not been detected for mismatch repair gene defects.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall burden of germline mismatch repair deficiency in the Singapore population may be as high as 21 %. The Amsterdam criteria alone are inadequate to detect Lynch syndrome patients. The use of IHC staining of at least four mismatch repair proteins is a useful screening strategy for Lynch syndrome diagnosis. Routine screening of mismatch repair deficiency may be recommended for all young Asian CRC patients.

Histopathological work-up of resection specimens, local excisions and biopsies in colorectal cancer

The pathological examination of material removed from patients with colorectal neoplasia is important. It provides a wide range of information on, for example, the quality and completeness of excision, the stage and biological aggressiveness, the need for further therapy, and response to therapy. Molecular testing adds valuable information on genetic risk and is required before treatment with anti-EGF-r antibodies. This article highlights the value derived from macroscopic inspection of surgical specimens, careful microscopy and excellent reporting according to national guidelines. Increasing use of a number of preoperative therapies and combinations in rectal cancer change the pathological features found and a standardised approach to the diagnosis of complete response is required. It touches upon the issues with frequent changes in TNM staging and the difficulties these changes are causing. The widespread introduction of bowel cancer screening is changing the stage of presentation of colorectal cancer leading to increasing numbers of local excisions and polyp cancers.

Proteomic identification of predictive biomarkers of resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal breast cancer: a possible role for 14-3-3 theta/tau and tBID?

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy resistance is a major obstacle in effective neoadjuvant treatment for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. The ability to predict tumour response would allow chemotherapy administration to be directed towards only those patients who would benefit, thus maximising treatment efficiency. We aimed to identify putative protein biomarkers associated with chemotherapy resistance, using fresh tumour samples with antibody microarray analysis and then to perform pilot clinical validation experiments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy resistant and chemotherapy sensitive tumour samples were collected from breast cancer patients who had received anthracycline based neoadjuvant therapy consisting of epirubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel. A total of 5 comparative proteomics experiments were performed using invasive ductal carcinomas which demonstrated estrogen receptor positivity (luminal subtype). Protein expression was compared between chemotherapy resistant and chemotherapy sensitive tumour samples using the Panorama XPRESS Profiler725 antibody microarray containing 725 antibodies from a wide variety of cell signalling and apoptosis pathways. A pilot series of archival samples was used for clinical validation of putative predictive biomarkers.

RESULTS

AbMA analysis revealed 38 differentially expressed proteins which demonstrated at least 1.8 fold difference in expression in chemotherapy resistant tumours and 7 of these proteins (Zyxin, 14-3-3 theta/tau, tBID, Pinin, Bcl-xL, RIP and MyD88) were found in at least 2 experiments. Clinical validation in a pilot series of archival samples revealed 14-3-3 theta/tau and tBID to be significantly associated with chemotherapy resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, antibody microarrays have been used to identify proteins associated with chemotherapy resistance using fresh breast cancer tissue. We propose a potential role for 14-3-3 theta/tau and tBID as predictive biomarkers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy resistance in breast cancer. Further validation in a larger sample series is now required.

Validation study of a quantitative multigene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for assessment of recurrence risk in patients with stage II colon cancer

PURPOSE

We developed quantitative gene expression assays to assess recurrence risk and benefits from chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We sought validation by using RNA extracted from fixed paraffin-embedded primary colon tumor blocks from 1,436 patients with stage II colon cancer in the QUASAR (Quick and Simple and Reliable) study of adjuvant fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy versus surgery alone. A recurrence score (RS) and a treatment score (TS) were calculated from gene expression levels of 13 cancer-related genes (n = 7 recurrence genes and n = 6 treatment benefit genes) and from five reference genes with prespecified algorithms. Cox proportional hazards regression models and log-rank methods were used to analyze the relationship between the RS and risk of recurrence in patients treated with surgery alone and between TS and benefits of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Risk of recurrence was significantly associated with RS (hazard ratio [HR] per interquartile range, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.74; P = .004). Recurrence risks at 3 years were 12%, 18%, and 22% for predefined low, intermediate, and high recurrence risk groups, respectively. T stage (HR, 1.94; P < .001) and mismatch repair (MMR) status (HR, 0.31; P < .001) were the strongest histopathologic prognostic factors. The continuous RS was associated with risk of recurrence (P = .006) beyond these and other covariates. There was no trend for increased benefit from chemotherapy at higher TS (P = .95).

CONCLUSION

The continuous 12-gene RS has been validated in a prospective study for assessment of recurrence risk in patients with stage II colon cancer after surgery and provides prognostic value that complements T stage and MMR. The TS was not predictive of chemotherapy benefit.

Lower gastrointestinal tract cancer predisposition syndromes

Although inherited predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC) has been suspected for more than 100 years, definitive proof of Mendelian syndromes had to await maturation of molecular genetic technologies. Since the l980s, the genetics of several clinically distinct entities has been revealed. Five disorders that share a hereditary predisposition to CRC are reviewed in this article.

Clinicopathological staging of colorectal cancer: Evolution and consensus-an Australian perspective

In 1991 this journal published the report of an international working party to the World Congress of Gastroenterology regarding the clinicopathological staging of colorectal cancer. Since that time staging has continued to evolve as further prognostic factors in colorectal cancer have been elucidated in studies of increasingly large databases in several countries. This review summarizes several of the key issues that have arisen during this evolutionary process and raises matters which still remain controversial in staging at the present time.

Prognostic values of chromosome 18q microsatellite alterations in stage II colonic carcinoma

AIM: To investigate the prognostic value of chromosome 18q microsatellite alterations (MA) in stage II colon cancer.

METHODS: One hundred and six patients with sporadic stage II colon cancer were enrolled in this study. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor and adjacent normal mucosal tissue samples. MA, including loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability (MSI), was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction, polyacrylamide gel-electrophoresis and DNA sequencing at 5 microsatellite loci on chromosome 18q (D18S474, D18S55, D18S58, D18S61 and D18S64).

RESULTS: Among the 102 patients eligible for MA information, the overall frequencies of LOH, high and low frequency MSI/microsatellite stable were 49.0%, 17.6% and 82.4%, respectively. The high frequency of 18q-LOH was significantly associated with the poor 5-year overall survival (OS) (P = 0.008) and disease free survival (P = 0.006). High levels of MSI were significantly associated with a longer 5-year OS (P = 0.045) while the higher frequency of 18q-LOH at the loci of D18S474 and D18S61 was significantly associated with a poorer 5-year OS (P = 0.010 and 0.005, respectively). But multivariate analysis showed that only the frequency of 18q-LOH was significantly associated with the prognosis of the disease.

CONCLUSION: High frequency of 18q-LOH is an independent prognostic factor indicating poor prognosis of the patients with stage II colon cancer.

Mismatch repair protein expression is an independent prognostic factor in sporadic colorectal cancer

Abstract Background. Mismatch repair (MMR) status has been reported as a prognostic and predictive factor in sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic and predictive value of MMR protein expression in the adjuvant setting. Patients and methods. The MMR status in the primary tumor was retrospectively assessed on paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed samples from 1 006 patients with sporadic CRC (488 stage II and 518 stage III) using immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) of MLH1 and MSH2 expression. The patients were included in adjuvant Nordic trials between 1991 and 1996 randomly assigned to surgery alone or surgery plus adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. Data was censored at 120 months after surgery. Results. One hundred fifty-seven patients (15.6%) showed a loss of MMR protein expression (139 MLH1 negative, 15 MSH2 negative and 3 MLH1 and MSH2 negative) and were classified as MMR protein negative. A normal MMR protein expression was found in 849 patients who were defined as MMR protein positive. MMR protein expression was a significant prognostic marker in the entire study group with a better overall survival (OS) among patients with MMR protein negative tumors compared to patients with MMR protein positive tumors (p=0.01). In a multivariate analysis the MMR protein expression was significantly associated with OS, (HR 0.70 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.99]; p=0.01). The MMR status did not predict survival benefit from adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Conclusion. This study reveals that IHC of MLH1 and MSH2 expression can yield important prognostic information but is not a predictive factor for adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy in sporadic CRC.

Absence of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression as a stage-dependent prognostic factor in sporadic colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

The predictive role of mismatch repair (MMR) status for survival after sporadic colorectal cancer remains a point of controversy. This study was designed to test the prognostic value of MMR status in sporadic colorectal cancers.

METHODS

The study included 318 patients with sporadic colorectal cancer who underwent primary tumor resection. MMR status was determined by the immunohistochemical analysis of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression.

RESULTS

Thirty-six carcinomas (11.3%) showed abnormal MMR protein expression (22 hMLH1 negative and 14 hMSH2 negative) and were classified as MMR-defective tumors. An MMR defect was strongly associated with a reduced likelihood of lymph node (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.13-0.75) or distant organ metastases at diagnosis (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.62), independent of the clinicopathological features. Overall survival was significantly better in patients with MMR-defective tumors than in those with MMR-intact tumors (P = 0.013). In the subgroup analysis by stage, adjusted for other potential confounding variables, MMR status was not a statistically significant prognostic factor in stage I and II patients, while the MMR defect predicted a significantly better overall survival in stage III and IV patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.97; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

At initial diagnosis, metastases were found at lower rates in MMR-defective tumors. MMR status may be a stage-dependent prognostic factor in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer.

Preliminary Results of Mismatch Repair Deficiency Screening via Immunohistochemical Staining in Young Asian Colorectal Cancers

Background:

The incidence of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in young colorectal cancers (CRC) remains unknown in Asians. This preliminary study assessed the clinicopathological features and efficacy of screening for MMR protein deficiency in young Asian CRC patients.

Methods:

From January 2006 to October 2009, patients under the age of 50 with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for MMR proteins in resected CRC specimens were retrieved from a prospective computerised database.

Results:

Eighty unrelated patients comprising predominantly 80% Chinese (n = 64), with median age of diagnosis at 41 years (range 22–50 years) had IHC performed. Twenty-three per cent (n=18) of the patients had abnormal IHC staining. Loss of staining for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins were observed in 18%, 2% and 6% of tumours respectively. Of the 15 patients who had abnormal staining of MLH1, three had concomitant equivocal staining for MSH6. One tumour specimen had abnormal staining in all 3 proteins. Multivariate analysis revealed that family history was the only significant predictive factor for defective MMR detection (OR 8.06, 95% CI 1.69–38.35, p=0.002). However if Amsterdam criteria alone were to be used, 72% (n=12) of the cohort would have not been detected for MMR gene defects.

Conclusion:

The overall burden of germline MMR deficiency in the Singapore population may be as high as 23%. Amsterdam criteria alone are insufficient to detect hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) related patients. The use of IHC staining of at least 3 MMR proteins is a useful screening strategy for HNPCC diagnosis and routine screening of mismatch repair deficiency may be recommended for all young Asian CRC patients.

Proteomic identification of putative biomarkers of radiotherapy resistance: a possible role for the 26S proteasome?

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify putative predictive protein biomarkers of radioresistance.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Three breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, MDA-MB-231, and T47D) were used as in vitro models to study radioresistance. Inherent radiosensitivities were examined using a clonogenic survival assay. It was revealed that each cell line differed in their response to radiotherapy. These parental breast cancer cell lines were used to establish novel derivatives (MCF7RR, MDA-MB-231RR, and T47DRR) displaying significant resistance to ionizing radiation. Derivative cells were compared with parental cells to identify putative biomarkers associated with the radioresistant phenotype. To identify these biomarkers, complementary proteomic screening approaches were exploited encompassing two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in combination with mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ technology.

RESULTS

A large number of potential biomarkers were identified, and several of these were confirmed using Western blot analysis. In particular, a decrease in the expression of the 26S proteasome was found in all radioresistant derivatives when compared with the respective parent cells. Decreased expression of this target was also found to be associated with radioresistant laryngeal tumors (P = .05) in a small pilot immunohistochemical study.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the 26S proteasome may provide a general predictive biomarker for radiotherapy outcome.

Colorectal cancer in Iran: immunohistochemical profiles of four mismatch repair proteins

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to determine the profile of mismatch repair (MMR) defects in Iranian colorectal cancer patients by using immunohistochemical staining for products of four MMR genes: MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6.

METHODS

Tissue samples of 343 patients were immunostained for MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6. Clinical and family history and survival data were compared between normal and abnormal staining patterns.

RESULTS

Fourteen percent of the patients had abnormal nuclear staining for MMR proteins. MLH1 was absent in four, MLH1/PMS2 in 15, PMS2 in five, MSH2 in 12, and MSH2/MSH6 in 12 patients. These tumors were more proximal, had a nonsignificant better survival, and were more associated with positive family history. Estimation of this study of prevalence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in Iran was 5.5% of the total colorectal cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Along with the recommendations of the National Institute of Cancer, we recommend immunohistochemistry staining for MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6 for determining the eligibility of patients for mutation analysis of MMR genes.

KRAS and BRAF mutations in advanced colorectal cancer are associated with poor prognosis but do not preclude benefit from oxaliplatin or irinotecan: results from the MRC FOCUS trial

PURPOSE

Activating mutation of the KRAS oncogene is an established predictive biomarker for resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapies in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). We wanted to determine whether KRAS and/or BRAF mutation is also a predictive biomarker for other aCRC therapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Medical Research Council Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS) trial compared treatment sequences including first-line fluorouracil (FU), FU/irinotecan or FU/oxaliplatin in aCRC. Tumor blocks were obtained from 711 consenting patients. DNA was extracted and KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 and BRAF codon 600 were assessed by pyrosequencing. Mutation (mut) status was assessed first as a prognostic factor and then as a predictive biomarker for the benefit of adding irinotecan or oxaliplatin to FU. The association of BRAF-mut with loss of MLH1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Three hundred eight (43.3%) of 711 patients had KRAS-mut and 56 (7.9%) of 711 had BRAF-mut. Mutation of KRAS, BRAF, or both was present in 360 (50.6%) of 711 patients. Mutation in either KRAS or BRAF was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.65; P < .0001) but had minimal impact on progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.36; P = .05). Mutation status did not affect the impact of irinotecan or oxaliplatin on PFS or OS. BRAF-mut was weakly associated with loss of MLH1 staining (P = .012).

CONCLUSION

KRAS/BRAF mutation is associated with poor prognosis but is not a predictive biomarker for irinotecan or oxaliplatin. There is no evidence that patients with KRAS/BRAF mutated tumors are less likely to benefit from these standard chemotherapy agents.

Oestrogen and progesterone receptor status of individual foci in multifocal invasive ductal breast cancer

Widespread acceptance of breast conserving surgery for early breast cancer has led to renewed interest in multifocality, which is seen in 13-63% of breast cancers. According to current guidelines, oestrogen/progesterone receptor status is assessed on the sample obtained at initial core biopsy or the main tumour focus in multifocal breast cancer (more than one distinct tumour focus in a quadrant). We assessed receptor status of individual foci in multifocal breast cancer. Mastectomy specimens for 18 cases of multifocal breast cancer were identified. Immunohistochemical staining for oestrogen and progesterone receptors was performed on all tumour foci. On histological examination 11 patients demonstrated two independent tumour foci, three demonstrated three foci and four demonstrated four foci. Minor differences in oestrogen receptor score were seen between foci (attributed to the subjective nature of the scoring system), which did not affect the overall positive/negative classification. Sixteen patients (88%) were oestrogen receptor-positive. Progesterone receptor staining showed more variability between foci in two patients but, since the tumours were oestrogen receptor-positive this would not have affected clinical decision-making. No major differences in oestrogen receptor status between multiple tumour foci in the same quadrant were found in this pilot study.

Mismatch repair, p53 and chromosomal aberrations in primary colorectal carcinomas

Colorectal carcinoma progresses via at least two genetic pathways. Microsatellite instability, due to defective mismatch repair genes, characterizes one pathway and gross chromosomal instability another. The involvement of p53 and mismatch repair gene abnormalities within these pathways has not been fully explored. We aimed to investigate the relationships of p53 and mismatch repair gene defects on gross chromosomal aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization in 49 colorectal carcinomas. Tumours demonstrating loss of expression for hMLH1 or hMSH2 proteins demonstrated a highly significant attenuation in the number of gross chromosomal aberrations (p = 0.007) and were less likely to show p53 overexpression (p = 0.02). Within the mismatch repair normal tumours, p53 status did not affect the total number of chromosomal aberrations but p53 overexpression was significantly associated with a higher frequency of amplifications at 8q22-ter and at 13q21-22. Colorectal cancer demonstrates distinct molecular phenotypes and should be sub-classified accordingly.

Altered DNA mismatch repair expression in synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It is not clear what proportion of synchronous or metachronous colorectal cancers (CRCs) are associated with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) alterations or unsuspected Lynch syndrome. On the basis of tissue analyses, the aims were to evaluate DNA MMR expression in metachronous, synchronous, and isolated sporadic CRCs and to assess within-patient concordance of MMR expression in metachronous and synchronous CRCs.

METHODS

Tissue was evaluated from 34 patients with metachronous CRC, 34 matched solitary CRC patients, and 40 patients with synchronous CRCs. Subjects with known hereditary CRC were excluded. Immunohistochemical staining for MLH1 and MSH2 was performed on all tissues.

RESULTS

Absent MLH1 or MSH2 staining of the initial metachronous tumor was observed in 27% compared with 21% of control CRCs, P = .58. The odds of metachronicity with absent immunostaining were 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.46-3.84). Loss of MMR expression was observed in at least one cancer in 30% of patients with synchronous CRC. MMR expression loss was discordant in 70% of metachronous CRCs and 50% of synchronous CRCs. Lynch syndrome was subsequently diagnosed in 2 patients with synchronous CRCs, both with concordant tumor MMR loss but in no patient with metachronous CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Among those without known Lynch syndrome, development of multiple primary CRCs appears to be due largely to somatic events and often occurs via different molecular pathways within the same patient. Altered MMR expression in sporadic CRC has low predictive value for metachronicity. MMR expression analysis in cases of multiple primary CRC might identify a small number of patients with unsuspected Lynch syndrome.

Familial adenomatous polyposis: analysis of genetic instability of microsatellites Loci and genetic alternations of tumor suppressor genes

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant illness with the highest risk for appearance of colorectal cancer's disease. In our study, we have used Bethesda criteria that define colorectal cancers which can be tested on microsatellite instability. The aim of our study is make an analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI), appearance of RER+ phenotype, genetic alteration of tumor suppressor genes as like as one of responsible factor for genesis of adenomatous polyposis. The base for this study were shown families with clinical diagnosed FAP. In this study two families with clinical diagnosed adenomatous polyposis were involved. Our study of both families showed that three tumor tissues belonged to RER negative phenotype, but only one belonged to RER positive phenotype. Microsatellite analysis showed instability of mononucleotide marker Bat 40 at 4 samples and Bat 26 at 2 samples, but Bat 25 and in 1 sample. Dinucleotide marker TP 53 did no show any microsatellite alterations. Genetic alteration of tumor suppressor gene APC appeared at 4 samples, p53 at 3 samples, RB1 at 2 samples and NM23 only at 1 sample, but tumor suppressor genes DCC1 and DCC2 were homozygote. Our results are agree with results of earlier studies and also the got results confirm the fact that loss of heterozygosity of tumor suppressor gene APC and p53 are responsible for genesis of adenomatous polypose and it also represents the characteristic of genetic changes FAP's patients in our region.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer depends on the mismatch repair status

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate if mismatch repair (MMR) defective colorectal cancer has a different response to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy in a cohort of patients prospectively followed during 5 years.

METHODS

The cohort included 754 surgically treated patients with colorectal cancer. MMR status was diagnosed by MLH1 and MSH2 immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability analysis. Median follow-up was 49.2 months (range 1-73). At inclusion, 505 patients were diagnosed as TNM II or III stage, analysis of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy was made on this population. Adjuvant chemotherapy was applied to 248 patients (98.2% 5-FU based).

RESULTS

MMR deficiency was found in 76 patients (10.1%). No differences were found in overall survival (log-rank p=0.3) or disease-free survival (log-rank p=0.3) regarding MMR status. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients in the II or III stage, but this improvement is only evident in patients with MMR-competent tumours (log-rank p=0.00001). Survival of patients with MMR-defective tumours does not improve with adjuvant chemotherapy (log-rank p=0.7). A multivariate analysis showed an independent effect of the interaction between MMR status and adjuvant chemotherapy (Hazard ratio 2.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.42-2.93).

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of colorectal cancer patients, those with MMR-deficient tumours seem not to benefit from 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Predictive biomarkers of chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer: results from the UK MRC FOCUS trial

PURPOSE

Candidate predictive biomarkers for irinotecan and oxaliplatin were assessed in 1,628 patients in Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, CPT-11: Use and Sequencing (FOCUS), a large randomized trial of fluorouracil alone compared with fluorouracil and irinotecan and compared with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The candidate biomarkers were: tumor immunohistochemistry for MLH1/MSH2, p53, topoisomerase-1 (Topo1), excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1), O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltranserase (MGMT), and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2); germline DNA polymorphisms in GSTP1, ABCB1, XRCC1, ERCC2, and UGT1A1. These were screened in more than 750 patients for interaction with benefit from irinotecan or oxaliplatin; two markers (Topo1 and MLH1/MSH2) met criteria to be taken forward for analysis in the full population. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred thirteen patients (81%) were assessable for Topo1 immunohistochemistry (low, < 10%; moderate, 10% to 50%; or high, > 50% tumor nuclei). In patients with low Topo1, PFS was not improved by the addition of either irinotecan (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.22) or oxaliplatin (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.07); conversely, patients with moderate/high Topo1 benefited from the addition of either drug (HR, 0.48 to 0.70 in all categories; interaction P = .005; overall, P = .001 for irinotecan; P = .05 for oxaliplatin). High Topo1 was associated with a major overall survival benefit with first-line combination chemotherapy (HR, 0.60; median benefit, 5.3 months); patients with moderate or low Topo1 did not benefit (HR, 0.92 and 1.09, respectively; interaction P = .005). MLH1/MSH2 did not show significant interaction with treatment, although the low rate of loss (4.4%) limits the power of the study for this biomarker.

CONCLUSION

Topo1 immunohistochemistry identified subpopulations that did or did not benefit from irinotecan, and possibly also from oxaliplatin. If verified independently, this information will contribute to the individualization of treatment for colorectal cancer.

Lumboaortic and iliac lymphadenectomy for lymph node recurrence of colorectal cancer: prognostic value of the MSI phenotype

BACKGROUND

Some patients have isolated lumboaortic and/or iliac lymph node recurrences (ILNR) of colorectal cancer. Current guidelines recommend the use of chemotherapy. The aim of our study was to assess the carcinological results of lymphadenectomy for ILNR and to identify prognostic factors that may be used to select patients for this aggressive surgical approach.

METHODS

Medical notes, pathological findings, and surgical procedure of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy for ILNR of colorectal cancer between 1998 and 2005 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ten patients (four women) underwent lymphadenectomy for ILNR. Lymphadenectomy was performed after a mean of 37 +/- 16.6 months after colon or rectal resection. Two patients developed a postoperative complication. Mean number of lymph nodes removed was 5.7 +/- 3.3. After a median follow-up of 30.7 months, four patients were alive, including two patients without recurrence at 95 and 96 months after colectomy and two with local and distant recurrences at 114 and 70 months. Among the three patients with microsatellite-unstable (MSI) tumors, two were free of disease at 61 and 81 months, respectively, and one died of recurrent disease 20 months after lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSION

Lymphadenectomy for ILNR of colorectal cancer is a feasible therapeutic option for selected patients. These preliminary results suggest that resection should be proposed for MSI patients because cure is possible, but to be confirmed, the findings require larger studies.

Prognostic significance of DNA repair proteins MLH1, MSH2 and MGMT expression in non-small-cell lung cancer and precursor lesions

Aims

To investigate the role of DNA repair proteins and their prognostic significance in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods and results

A retrospective analysis of 108 cases of stage I–II NSCLC was undertaken. Immunohistochemical expression of DNA repair proteins MLH1, MSH2 and MGMT was assessed using tissue microarrays of paraffin-embedded samples of invasive carcinoma and precursor lesions. Results were analysed in relation to clinicopathological parameters and patient survival. Reduced expression of MLH1 was found in 58.5% of tumours and occurred less frequently in poorly differentiated tumours (P = 0.044) and large cell carcinomas (P = 0.004). MSH2 and MGMT expression was reduced in 18.1% and 77.8% of cases, respectively. There was an inverse relationship between MLH1 and MSH2 expression (P = 0.012). Normal expression of MLH1, MSH2 and MGMT was found in all cases of squamous metaplasia and squamous dysplasia. Only a single case of carcinoma in situ (12.5%) showed reduced MLH1, none showed reduced MSH2 and 25% showed reduced MGMT. Survival analyses showed no prognostic significance based on expression of MLH1 (P = 0.92), MSH2 (P = 0.78) or MGMT (P = 0.57).

Conclusions

Reduction in expression of DNA repair proteins MLH1, MSH2 and MGMT is relatively common in NSCLC, appears to be a late event in the development of invasive malignancy and does not influence survival in this patient cohort.

Cooper W A, Kohonen-Corish M R J, Chan C, Kwun S Y, McCaughan B, Kennedy C, Sutherland R L & Lee C-S (2008) Histopathology52, 613–622

Prognostic significance of DNA repair proteins MLH1, MSH2 and MGMT expression in non-small-cell lung cancer and precursor lesions

Mismatch repair protein expression in Amsterdam II criteria-positive patients in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is characterized genetically by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has high sensitivity and specificity for identifying MMR-deficient tumours. This study investigated the clinical presentations and frequency of HNPCC in Taiwan by combined Amsterdam II criteria (AC-II) and IHC.

METHODS

In 1995-2003, 7108 patients with primary colorectal cancer registered in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital's Colorectal Cancer Registry were screened using AC-II. Tumour specimens were analysed for MMR protein expression by IHC, and relevant clinicopathological details were documented.

RESULTS

Some 83 patients fulfilled the AC-II. Clinicopathologically, 43 patients (52 per cent) had proximal tumours, ten (12 per cent) had poorly differentiated cancers, 17 (20 per cent) had mucinous adenocarcinoma and 51 (61 per cent) had stage I-II tumours. Seventeen patients developed second primary colonic and extracolonic cancers over a mean 7.2-year follow-up. Immunohistochemically, 58 patients were MMR protein deficient. They had a significantly earlier age of onset (P < 0.001), more proximal tumour location (P = 0.002), less advanced tumour stage (P = 0.008) and more second primary cancers (P = 0.017) compared with MMR-competent patients.

CONCLUSION

These data show significant differences in clinical features between MMR protein-deficient and MMR competent subgroups.

Left-Sided microsatellite unstable colorectal cancers show less frequent methylation of hMLH1 and CpG island methylator phenotype than right-sided ones

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

We compared the methylation status of several loci between right-sided and left-sided colorectal cancers (CRCs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first to report that left-sided CRCs show significantly less frequent methylation at several loci and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) than right-sided ones.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

MSI CRC occurs in 10-20% of unselected series of patients with CRC. Somatic hMLH1 promoter methylation is reported to cause MSI in sporadic cases. Many researchers report that MSI CRCs are more frequently located in the right-side colon than MSS CRCs. Though the number is very small, some MSI CRCs are located in the left-side colorectum. We focused on the existence of left-sided MSI CRCs and investigated whether they arise through hMLH1 methylation as they do in right-sided ones.

METHODS

Thirty-eight sporadic MSI CRCs were included in the study. The methylation status of the promoter of hMLH1, p16, MINT1, 2 and 31 were examined and the proportions of methylated samples for each locus were compared.

RESULTS

The left-sided group showed significantly less frequent methylation in hMLH1, p16, MINT1, 2 and 31. The frequency of CIMP+ samples in the left-sided group was significantly lower than the right-sided group.

CONCLUSIONS

Left-sided MSI CRCs show significantly less frequent methylation of hMLH1. They also showed significantly less frequent occurrence of CIMP+ than right-sided ones. It is possible that left-sided MSI CRCs differ from the right-sided ones in the way of acquiring MSI.

Immunohistochemical staining for mismatch repair proteins, and its relevance in the diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) arises mostly from germline mutations of the mismatch repair genes MSH2 and MLH1. The diagnosis of HNPCC is based on a set of clinical criteria that may be too restrictive to identify all affected patients. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for the mismatch repair proteins, MutS homologue 2 (MSH2) and MutL homologue 1 (MLH1), reliably identifies the microsatellite instability phenotype. This study evaluated the ability of IHC to detect germline mutations in an unselected group of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

All patients with CRC operated on between July 2000 and March 2003, and demonstrating a loss of protein, were contacted. Following informed consent, searchs for germline mutation and methylation of the promoter were performed on normal and tumoral DNA.

RESULTS

Thirty patients agreed to participate, four of whom fulfilled the Amsterdam II criteria. Loss of expression of MLH1 was found in 20 patients, and loss of expression of MSH2 in ten patients. Four of the MLH1-deficient patients had a germline MLH1 point mutation (positive predictive value (PPV) 20 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 2 to 38 per cent) and 11 had promoter methylation. Seven of the MSH2-deficient patients had a germline MSH2 point mutation (PPV 70 (95 per cent c.i. 54 to 96 per cent), and none showed promoter methylation.

CONCLUSION

MLH1-deficient patients who are young or have a positive family history of cancer should be referred for genetic testing and counselling, whereas MSH2-deficient patients should be counselled in the same way as patients with HNPCC.

Importance of MutL homologue MLH1 and MutS homologue MSH2 expression in Turkish patients with sporadic colorectal cancer

AIM: To assess the incidence of MLH1 (the human MutL homologue) and MSH2 (the human MutS homologue) protein expression in Turkish patients with sporadic colorectal cancers and to compare their survival and clinicopathological features.

METHODS: We validated the tissue microarray technology in 77 colorectal carcinomas by analyzing the immunohistochemical expression of proteins involved in two main pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis: p53 protein for loss of heterozygosity tumors; MLH1 and MSH2 proteins for microsatellite instability (MSI).

RESULTS: Our analysis showed that 29 (39.2%) had loss of MLH1 expression, 5 (6.8%) had loss of MSH2 expression and 2 cases had loss of expression of both proteins. We found that 60% of MSH2-negative tumors were located in the right side of the colon; all MSH2-negative cases were women. In addition, the loss of MSH2 expression was correlated with low p53 expression. Neither MLH1 nor MSH2 expressions were associated with prognosis, although there seemed a tendency of longer survival (71.7 ± 8.65 mo vs 47.08 ± 5.26 mo) for the patients with MLH1-negative versus MLH1-positive carcinomas. There were not significant differences in overall and recurrence-free survival among MLH1/MSH2-positive and -negative cases.

CONCLUSION: Our data supports that Turkish patients with MLH1- and MSH2-defective tumors have some distinct features from each other. Although prognostic importance remains controversial, immunohistochemical analysis of mismatch repair genes may be used as a routine histopathological examination of sporadic colorectal carcinomas.

Mismatch Repair Status Is a Predictive Factor of Tumour Response to 5-Fluorouracil and Irinotecan Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To determine the association between DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression and response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Using immunohistochemistry, tumour expression of 2 MMR genes, hMLH1 and hMSH2, was assessed in 86 patients with advanced CRC, who were treated with either irinotecan alone or in combination with 5-flurouracil/folinic acid.

RESULTS

Weak/negative staining in the tumours was associated with the presence of metastases at diagnosis (p = 0.026) and with the time for metastases to appear (p = 0.0001). An objective response to treatment was observed in 32/56 (57%) patients who had tumours with negative/weak MMR protein expression (p = 0.001), compared to 17% of patients with tumours with moderate/strong expression. Those who had tumours with weak/absent expression of either hMLH1 or hMSH2 who received the combination therapy were more likely to show an objective response (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Advanced CRC patients whose tumours have deficient MMR demonstrate a shorter time to metastasis than those with normal hMLH1/hMSH2 expression. Patients with MMR-deficient tumours are also more likely to benefit from combination chemotherapy (irinotecan plus 5-flurouracil/folinic acid).

ASCO 2006 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Purpose

To update the recommendations for the use of tumor marker tests in the prevention, screening, treatment, and surveillance of gastrointestinal cancers.

Methods

For the 2006 update, an update committee composed of members from the full Panel was formed to complete the review and analysis of data published since 1999. Computerized literature searches of Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library were performed. The Update Committee's literature review focused attention on available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of published tumor marker studies.

Recommendations and Conclusion

For colorectal cancer, it is recommended that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) be ordered preoperatively, if it would assist in staging and surgical planning. Postoperative CEA levels should be performed every 3 months for stage II and III disease for at least 3 years if the patient is a potential candidate for surgery or chemotherapy of metastatic disease. CEA is the marker of choice for monitoring the response of metastatic disease to systemic therapy. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine use of p53, ras, thymidine synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidine phosphorylase, microsatellite instability, 18q loss of heterozygosity, or deleted in colon cancer (DCC) protein in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. For pancreatic cancer, CA 19-9 can be measured every 1 to 3 months for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease receiving active therapy. Elevations in serial CA 19-9 determinations suggest progressive disease but confirmation with other studies should be sought. New markers and new evidence to support the use of the currently reviewed markers will be evaluated in future updates of these guidelines.

Expression of bcl-2 family members in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Little is known about the Bcl-2 family members in mesothelioma. These proteins are involved in the control of apoptosis, carrying out both pro- and anti- apoptotic functions. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine the expression of p53 and Bcl-2 family members in 54 archival mesothelioma samples (39 epithelial, 15 sarcomatoid tumours). Overexpression of p53 was observed in 81% (44/54). For anti-apoptotic proteins, overexpression was recorded as follows: Bcl-2 40% (22/54), Bcl-XL 24% (13/54), Mcl-1 92% (50/54). For pro-apoptotic proteins, loss of expression was recorded as follows: Bad 25% (14/54), Bak 24% (13/54), Bax 42% (23/54), Bid 37% (20/54), Bim 18% (10/54). Statistically significant differences between epithelial and sarcomatoid tumours were observed for Bid (p < 0.001), Bad (p = 0.012) and Bcl-XL (p = 0.03). Significant differences in abnormal expression of apoptosis proteins were found between epithelial and sarcomatoid subtypes but histological subtype was the only factor with significant association to patient prognosis.

Immunohistochemical staining of hMLH1 and hMSH2 reflects microsatellite instability status in ovarian carcinoma

Microsatellite instability is due to defects in the family of DNA repair genes, primarily hMLH1 and hMSH2, which can be detected by immunohistochemical staining. However, it is unclear whether immunohistochemical staining can accurately predict microsatellite instability status. We sought here to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of immunostaining for the expression of the DNA mismatch-repair genes hMLH1 or hMSH2 in predicting microsatellite instability in ovarian carcinoma. Tissue microarrays with specimens from 322 women with primary ovarian carcinoma were stained with antibodies to hMLH1 and hMSH2; cases in which either hMLH1 or hMSH2 were negative were analyzed for microsatellite instability with the five-marker panel recommended by the National Cancer Institute (BAT26, BAT25, D5S346, D2S123, and D17S250). Microsatellite instability was also analyzed in another 19 cases selected at random in which both hMLH1 and hMSH2 were positive. Tumors with instability at two or more of the five NCI markers were considered to have a high level of microsatellite instability; tumors showing instability at only one marker were considered microsatellite instability-low; and tumors in which no markers exhibited microsatellite instability were considered microsatellite stable. We found that negative staining for hMLH1 protein (five cases) or hMSH2 protein (two cases) was associated with high level of microsatellite instability. The sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical staining for hMLH1 were 62 and 100% and those of hMSH2 alone were 25 and 100%. Combining loss of expression of both hMLH1 and hMSH2 led to sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 87, 100, 100, and 95%. These results suggest that use of a two-molecule panel (hMLH1 and hMSH2) can accurately determine the microsatellite instability status of patients with ovarian cancer.

Frequency of immunohistochemical loss of mismatch repair protein in double primary cancers of the colorectum and stomach in Japan

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer and gastric cancer are the two most commonly associated malignancies in Japan. We examined mismatch repair deficiency in the tumors of patients with primary colorectal and gastric cancers retrospectively.

METHODS

In 103 cases and 102 healthy control subjects, surgical specimens of colorectal and gastric cancer underwent immunohistochemical analysis of mismatch repair proteins (hMLH1 and hMSH2) and microsatellite instability testing.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical and microsatellite instability testing produced similar results. High microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer was found in 23 of 103 cases (23 percent) with colorectal and gastric cancers, and in 8 of 102 healthy control subjects (8 percent). Twelve (12 percent) had mismatch repair deficiency in both colorectal and gastric cancers, and both tumors had loss of the same mismatch repair protein (hMLH1, n = 5; hMSH2, n = 7). They had the first cancer at a younger age, with a higher frequency of familial colorectal cancer than the others. Seventeen had mismatch repair deficiency in either tumor, which showed loss of expression of hMLH1. Multiple cancers and right-sided colon cancers developed more frequently in patients with mismatch repair deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with both colorectal and gastric cancers are more likely to have phenotypic evidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer than patients with colorectal cancer only. Among patients with double tumors, 12 percent showed a common deficiency in the same mismatch repair protein in both tumors by immunohistochemistry, and they should undergo genetic counseling for germline mutational analysis. Immunohistochemistry was effective in detecting mismatch repair deficiency of colorectal and gastric cancer as well as microsatellite instability testing, and may be more practical to perform phenotypic analysis of tumors because of its cost-effectiveness.

Do MSI-L Sporadic Colorectal Tumors Develop Through “Mild Mutator Pathway”?

BACKGROUND

The mutator pathway implied in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) is characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI tumors can be subdivided according to the level of instability: MSI-H (high), MSI-L (low) or stable MSS. MSI-H CRC displays a well described distinct phenotype, but the true biologic significance of MSI-L is still uncertain. The objective of this study was to further clarify if the MSI-L phenotype could reflect a distinct pathway of tumor development with a different clinical behavior.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinicopathological and genetic variables of 156 patients with sporadic CRC in relation with the level of MSI of the tumors.

RESULTS

We have found that MSI-L tumors are someway in the middle of MSI-H and MSS CRC, as they share some features with each of the other 2 subgroups: left side location, lower incidence of LOH at MSH2 as MSS and Dukes B (stage II TNM) like MSI-H. Moreover, MSI-L tumors show higher incidence of KRAS mutations.

CONCLUSION

We believe that MSI-L tumors could be considered a distinct phenotype that develops through a "mild mutator pathway."

Mismatch repair system (MMR) status correlates with response and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

Pre-clinical data suggested a relationship between inactivation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 and resistance to drugs like cisplatin and carboplatin, but not oxaliplatin. We then hypothesised that NSCLC showing loss of expression of the mismatch repair system (MMR), could be refractory to cisplatin-based, but not to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 was analysed on tumour samples from 93 advanced NSCLC, receiving chemotherapy with either cisplatin or oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine. Patients showing loss of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression in > or = 50% of tumour cells were deemed MMR-negative (Group A), whereas cases with a normal hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression in > 50% of the tumour cells were defined MMR-positive (Group B). No differences in the response and progression rate were found in the whole patients population and in the gemcitabine/cisplatin group for both hMLH1 and hMSH2. In the gemcitabine/oxaliplatin group response rate was 38% and 0% (p=0.04) for patients with or without loss of hMSH2 expression. Median survival according to MMR status in Groups A and B, respectively was: 17 months versus 9 months for hMLH1 (p=0.031) and 10 months versus 9 months for hMSH2 (p=0.8330). Both the difference in response rate and in median survival observed according to MMR status seem to confirm what has been suggested by preclinical studies.

Immunohistochemical test for MLH1 and MSH2 expression predicts clinical outcome in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status in a large series of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients. The relationship among MMR status, adjuvant chemotherapy, and clinical outcome was also investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 718 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (393 stage II and 325 stage III) who underwent curative surgical resection. MMR status was determined by immunohistochemical analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 expression. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was assessed in 363 patients using mononucleotide and dinucleotide markers.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen (15.9%) carcinomas showed abnormal MMR protein (MMRP) expression (96 MLH1 negative and 18 MSH2 negative) and were classified as MMRP negative, whereas 604 tumors demonstrated normal MLH1/MSH2 immunoreactivity (MMRP positive). MLH1/MSH2 expression was closely related to MSI status (P < .001) and several clinicopathologic features. Patients with MMRP-negative carcinomas demonstrated a marked reduction in the risk of cancer-related death with respect to patients with MMRP-positive tumors (hazard ratio, 0.2579; 95% CI, 0.1289 to 0.5159). A better clinical outcome for patients with MMRP-negative tumors was observed in both stage II (P = .0006) and stage III (P = .0052) disease. In stage III disease, the survival advantage conferred by MMRP-negative tumors was more evident among patients treated with surgery alone than among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. A nonsignificant trend for survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was observed among patients with MMRP-positive carcinomas but not among those with MMRP-negative carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemical testing for MLH1/MSH2 expression provides useful prognostic information for the management of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients.

Immunohistochemistry detects mismatch repair gene defects in colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

The clinical management of colorectal malignancies that arise via the mismatch repair gene pathway may differ from those that arise from the more common loss of heterozygosity pathway. They respond differently to chemotherapy, have a different prognosis and are associated with a raised incidence of metachronous lesions if a germline mutation is present. Established methods of detecting mismatch repair gene defects require the testing for microsatellite instability. This is expensive and requires specialized molecular biological resources and staff. An immunohistochemical method is attractive because it is far cheaper, and can be performed by most anatomical pathology laboratories. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of mismatch repair gene defects using immunohistochemistry in a group of patients who were aged < or = 45 years at the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer and to compare the patient survival and pathological features of tumours with and without mismatch repair gene defects.

METHODS

One hundred and four patients with colorectal cancer, diagnosed at 45 years or younger between January 1983 and December 2001, who had been managed at Groote Schuur Hospital, were identified from clinical records. Demographic and clinical data was collected from the clinical notes. The pathological reports were reviewed and the original histopathological slides retrieved. New tissue sections were cut from the original paraffin embedded tissue blocks to obtain both normal colonic mucosa and tumour on the same slide. There was insufficient tissue available or poor staining in 11 patients so 93 were available for the study.

RESULTS

The mismatch repair status was detected by antibodies to hMLH1 and hMSH2 gene product using a standard immunohistochemical technique. Fifty-six (60%) of 93 tumours demonstrated normal expression of both hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein. Twenty-five (27%) tumours did not express hMLH1 and 12 (13%) hMSH2 proteins. Comparison of the histopathological features revealed that a greater proportion of tumours with absence of either the hMLH1 or hMSH2 product were right sided, mucinous and poorly differentiated when compared to those that expressed the gene product. There was no detectable difference in overall survival or in survival of patients with Duke's C carcinoma when the groups were separated by the presence or absence of gene product.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that 40% of patients who were < or = 45 years of age at the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer seen at Groote Schuur Hospital have tumours which are related to the absence of expression of either hMLH1 or hMSH2 genes.

[Identification and management of HNPCC syndrome (hereditary non polyposis colon cancer), hereditary predisposition to colorectal and endometrial adenocarcinomas]

BACKGROUND

The HNPCC syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer) is an inherited condition defined by clinical and genealogical information, known as Amsterdam criteria. In about 70% of cases, HNPCC syndrome is caused by germline mutations in MMR genes, leading to microsatellite instability of tumor DNA (MSI phenotype). Patients affected by the disease are at high risk for colorectal and endometrial carcinomas, but also for small intestine, urothelial, ovary, stomach and biliary tract carcinomas. HNPCC syndrome is responsible for 5% of colorectal cancers. Identification and management of this disease are part of a multidisciplinary procedure.

METHODS

Twelve experts have been mandated by the French Health Ministry to analyze and synthesize their consensus position, and the resulting document has been reviewed by an additional group of 4 independent experts.

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS

The lack of sensitivity of Amsterdam criteria in recognizing patients carrying a MMR germline mutation led to an enlargement of these criteria for the recruitment of possible HNPCC patients, and to a 2-steps strategy, asking first for a tumor characterization according to MSI phenotype, especially in case of early-onset sporadic cases. The identification of germline MMR mutations has no major consequence on the cancer treatments, but influences markedly the long-term follow-up and the management of at-risk relatives. Gene carriers will enter a follow-up program regarding their colorectal and endometrial cancer risks, but other organs being at low lifetime risk, no specific surveillance will be proposed.

Optimization of antibodies for detection of the mismatch repair proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 using a biotin-free visualization system

Testing for microsatellite instability (MSI) has become an important step in the planning of therapeutic and follow-up procedures for patients with colorectal cancer, both as a prognostic marker and as a screening tool for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Today the gold standard for MSI testing is based on the polymerase chain reaction. Immunohistochemistry may represent an alternative or complement to molecular MSI testing. Antibodies against the protein products of the most commonly affected mismatch repair genes (hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, and hPMS2) have been available for some time now. However, the quality of the primary antibody and optimization of the antigen retrieval methods are essential to get reproducible results. The aim of the present study was to test and optimize a panel of antibodies against the mismatch repair proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 using biotin-free, polymer-based visualization systems. The antibodies were tested on multitissue blocks containing normal tissue and tumor tissue from patients with known microsatellite-stable and microsatellite-instable tumors. For all four antibody groups, the chosen clones gave specific and reproducible staining. Furthermore, with the PowerVision+ detection system, the influence of endogenous biotin was eliminated, the incubation time with the primary antibody was significantly reduced, and the primary antibody could be further diluted. The authors found that immunohistochemistry may provide a cost-effective and time-saving complement to the molecular MSI analysis, and using the PowerVision+ detection system has greatly decreased the turnaround time as well as reduced the cost of immunohistochemistry in the authors' laboratory.

Implication of the BRCA2 and Putative “BRCA3” Genes in Dukes’ Stage C, Replication Error–Negative Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although BRCA genes have been implicated in certain tumors, particularly breast tumors, their role in colon tumorigenesis has not been fully explored. We aimed to investigate the association of the BRCA2 and putative "BRCA3" genes in a homogeneous series of right-sided colon cancer specimens.

METHODS

Twenty-three Dukes' stage C, replication error-negative carcinomas were selected from patients with right-sided colon cancer. After histological examination and microdissection, DNA was extracted from normal colon and carcinoma from each patient. Five microsatellite markers spanning the region of BRCA2 and BRCA3 on chromosome 13 (D13S218, D13S219, D13S165, D13S156, and D13S160) and two markers intragenic to BRCA2 and BRCA3 (D13S171 and D13S1308, respectively) were used. Polymerase chain reaction products were analyzed by using a fluorescent allele imbalance assay.

RESULTS

Markers demonstrating the highest allelic imbalance were D13S1308 (53%), D13S171 (33%), and D13S160 (37%).

CONCLUSIONS

The intragenic markers D13S1308 (BRCA3) and D13S171 (BRCA2) on chromosome 13 demonstrated a high frequency of allelic imbalance in primary colon carcinoma. This suggests an involvement of BRCA2 and putative BRCA3 in colon tumorigenesis in right-sided, replication error-negative, Dukes' stage C cancers. Further studies are needed to confirm the precise role of these genes, and any prognostic significance, in colon cancer.