Inherited predisposition to pancreatic cancer

Genetic Alterations Featuring Biological Models to Tailor Clinical Management of Pancreatic Cancer Patients

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. This high mortality rate is due to the disease's lack of symptoms, resulting in a late diagnosis. Biomarkers and treatment options for pancreatic cancer are also limited. In order to overcome this, new research models and novel approaches to discovering PDAC biomarkers are required. In this review, we outline the hereditary and somatic causes of PDAC and provide an overview of the recent genome wide association studies (GWAS) and pathway analysis studies. We also provide a summary of some of the systems used to study PDAC, including established and primary cell lines, patient-derived xenografts (PDX), and newer models such as organoids and organ-on-chip. These ex vitro laboratory systems allow for critical research into the development and progression of PDAC.

Inhibitory effect of RNA-mediated knockdown of zinc finger protein 91 pseudogene on pancreatic cancer cell growth and invasion

Worldwide, human pancreatic cancer is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are known to have a crucial role in cancer occurrence and progression; however, the role of pseudogene-expressed lncRNAs, a major type of lncRNA, have not been thoroughly analyzed in cancer. Therefore, the present study focused on zinc finger protein 91 pseudogene (ZFP91-P). ZFP91-P expression was initially detected in two pancreatic cancer cell lines by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and the highest expression of ZFP91-P was found in the BXPC-3-H cell line. Subsequently, BXPC-3-H cells were transfected with ZFP91-P short hairpin RNA (shRNA) using a plasmid vector and termed shZFP91-P. Cells transfected with negative control plasmid vector were termed shCon. MTT and Transwell assays were performed to analyze the proliferation and migration of BXPC-3-H cells, respectively, and western blotting was used to detect epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers, including vimentin and β-catenin. The present study showed that depletion of ZFP91-P markedly decreased pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and inhibited cell migration capacity. In addition, the expression of β-catenin increased while vimentin expression decreased. The current findings suggest that high expression of ZFP91-P promotes the migration of BXPC-3-H cells and may be a novel marker for early diagnosis for pancreatic cancer.

Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein associated polypeptide N accelerates cell proliferation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The spliceosome, the large RNA‑protein molecular complex, is crucial for pre‑mRNA splicing. Several antitumor drugs have been found to tightly bind to the components of the spliceosome and mutations in the spliceosome have been reported in several types of cancer. However, the involvement of the spliceosome in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains unclear. In the present study, small nuclear ribonucleoprotein associated polypeptide N (SNRPN), a key constituent of spliceosomes, was disrupted in BxPC‑3 pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells using lentivirus‑mediated RNA interference (RNAi). It was found that knockdown of SNRPN reduced the proliferation ability of BxPC‑3 cells, as determined by an MTT assay. Furthermore, cell colony formation was impaired in SNRPN depleted adenocarcinoma cells and cell cycle analysis showed that depletion of SNRPN led to S phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. These results suggest that SNRPN is a key player in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell growth, and targeted loss of SNRPN may be a potential therapeutic method for pancreatic cancer.

Epigenetic changes associated with neoplasms of the exocrine and endocrine pancreas

Early detection and multi-modality curative treatment for pancreatic cancer remain unsatisfactory due to the insufficient understanding of the mechanisms underlying tumor progression. Epigenetic events, including aberrant methylation of tumor suppressor gene promoter regions, may contribute to tumorigenesis involving both the exocrine and endocrine pancreas. Methylation changes of specific gene promoter regions were examined in 48 resected neoplasms of the exocrine and endocrine pancreas, which were obtained as paraffin-embedded tissue samples. The pancreatic neoplasms included acinar cell carcinoma (n=12), adenocarcinoma (n=18), and islet cell tumors (n=18). DNA methylation was determined with a nested methylation-specific PCR (MSP) technique incorporating an initial bisulfite modification of tumor DNA for the promoter regions associated with 14 tumor suppressor genes. In decreasing order, the 6 most frequently methylated genes were: APC 50%, BRCA1 46%, p16INK4a 35%, p15INK4b 35%, RARβ 35%, and p73 33%. Overall, 94% of the tumors had methylation of at least one gene, and methylation of two or more genes was present in 69% of pancreatic tumors. Pancreatic adenocarcinomas had patterns of gene methylation that differed from pancreatic endocrine tumors. These differences were most notable for the APC and hMLH1 genes.

Demographics and epidemiology of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer affects 44,000 Americans and at least 250,000 individuals worldwide annually. The incidence is slowly increasing after a recent period of decline. Cases are predicted to increase globally because of increased longevity and the widespread adoption of cancer-causing behaviors, such as cigarette smoking, dietary indiscretion, and a global increase in diabetes. Well-known risk factors for pancreatic cancer are advancing age, tobacco smoking, obesity, certain inherited familial disorders, second-hand smoke exposure, chronic pancreatitis, and diabetes. Associations with human immunodeficiency virus, ABO blood group, hepatitis B virus, human immunodeficiency virus, and Helicobacter pylori have also been identified.

The complexities of epidemiology and prevention of gastrointestinal cancers

Cancer epidemiology and prevention is one of the most well studied fields today. The more we can understand about the incidence and pathogenesis of this disease, the better we will be able to prevent it. Effective prevention strategies can decrease the mortality rate of cancer significantly; this is why it is important to delineate the underlying causes. It has been well recognized that genetic mutations, sporadic or hereditary, may lead to increased chance of tumorigenesis. Detecting genetic mutations can lead to the identification of high-risk individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes, which may assist in devising prevention strategies. Further, environmental factors are known to play important roles in epidemiology and suggest prevention tools that could be implemented to reduce cancer incidence and subsequent cancer-associated morbidity and mortality. Chemoprevention has been tried in colon cancer and is finding new advancements in other carcinomas as well. Out of many environmental cancer preventive agents, the most notable developments are the identification of the role of vitamins E, vitamin D and folic acid. Increased consumption of these vitamins has shown to be inversely correlated with cancer risk. This review will highlight important aspects of cancer epidemiology in the most aggressive carcinomas of the gastrointestinal system focusing on colorectal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Additionally, some of the well-known and evolving aspects of epidemiology of colorectal and pancreatic cancer along with current and new prevention strategies will also be reviewed.

Early onset pancreatic cancer: a controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents the fourth cause of death in cancer with a 5-year survival rate of less than 1-2%. Early onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC), i.e. patients below 50 years of age, is infrequently described. The present study aimed to determine the epidemiology, demographic incidence and prognosis of EOPC and to identify the characteristics that might distinguish EOPC.

METHODS

576 consecutive patients with PDAC diagnosed from January 1993 to December 2008 at the University Hospital of Lund, Sweden. 65 different parameters were compared with a historic cohort of pancreatic cancer patients as well as with matched controls.

RESULTS

33 patients (5.7%) with PDAC were 50 years or younger. The overall survival was 170 days compared to 240 days for matched controls (p=n.s.). Patients with EOPC were diagnosed at a significantly more advanced stage, i.e. distant metastasis, (52%) as compared to matched controls (30%; p=0.04). EOPC-patients received more treatment than the compared PDAC-cohort.

CONCLUSION

EOPC constituted 5.7 % of all PDAC, presenting at an advanced stage with frequent metastases and poor survival. The role of genetic alterations and the potential influence of environmental factors for EOPC are to be further investigated.

[The epidemiology of pancreatic cancer]

Pancreatic cancer is a relatively uncommon tumor, but even with early diagnosis, mortality rates are high, explaining why this form of cancer has now become a common cause of cancer mortality. There are no screening tests for early detection of pancreatic cancer. It is more common in men than women and is predominantly a disease of elderly people. There is wide variation in the incidence of pancreatic cancer around the world, suggesting that environmental factors are important in the pathogenesis. Smoking is the major known risk factor for pancreatic cancer, while dietary factors seem to be less important. Other possible risk factors include chronic pancreatitis, obesity and type 2 diabetes. Numerous inherited germ line mutations are associated with pancreatic cancer. Of these, hereditary pancreatitis confers the greatest risk, while BRCA2 mutations are the commonest inherited disorder. Polymorphisms in genes that control detoxification of environmental carcinogens and metabolic pathways may alter the risk of pancreatic cancer.

Current status of molecular markers for early detection of sporadic pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal malignancy with near 100% mortality. This is in part due to the fact that most patients present with metastatic or locally advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Significantly, in nearly 95% of PC patients there is neither an associated family history of PC nor of diseases known to be associated with an increased risk of PC. These groups of patients who comprise the bulk of PC cases are termed as "sporadic PC" in contrast to the familial PC cases that comprise only about 5% of all PCs. Given the insidious onset of the malignancy and its extreme resistance to chemo and radiotherapy, an abundance of research in recent years has focused on identifying biomarkers for the early detection of PC, specifically aiming at the sporadic PC cohort. However, while several studies have established that asymptomatic individuals with a positive family history of PC and those with certain heritable syndromes are candidates for PC screening, the role of screening in identifying sporadic PC is still an unsettled question. The present review attempts to assess this critical question by investigating the recent advances made in molecular markers with potential use in the early diagnosis of sporadic PC - the largest cohort of PC cases worldwide. It also outlines a novel yet simple risk factor based stratification system that could be potentially employed by clinicians to identify those individuals who are at an elevated risk for the development of sporadic PC and therefore candidates for screening.

Atypical familial presentation of FAMMM syndrome with a high incidence of pancreatic cancer: case finding of asymptomatic individuals by EUS surveillance

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death in Western countries. An increased risk for PC is known in a number of hereditary tumor syndromes. In selected individuals at high risk of developing PC, surveillance of the pancreas might be able to detect premalignant lesions and early invasive cancers, and probably improve survival.

METHODS

In a Dutch family with atypical phenotypic presentation of the familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome with high incidence of PC related to a mutation in the CDKN2A gene, pancreatic surveillance was offered to asymptomatic gene mutation carriers.

RESULTS

Three individuals underwent their first screening with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging at an age of 76, 58, and 51 years. In a mother and a daughter, mass lesions were found by EUS in the tail and body of the pancreas. The smallest lesion was not visualized on subsequent computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. After surgical resection histologic examination revealed adenocarcinomas in both cases. The patient with the larger lesion was found to have N1 disease. Side branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasias were found in the third patient.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings illustrate the potential of the surveillance of high-risk individuals for PC by EUS. Awareness of clinicians of the existence of hereditary syndromes with increased risk for PC may improve identification of high-risk individuals who could benefit from surveillance. Whether screening improves survival remains to be investigated, as is the optimal interval for screening. Side branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasias in these patients may serve as a precancerous marker lesion for early intervention to improve survival.

A clinical and radiologic review of uncommon types and causes of pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common conditions for which emergent imaging is indicated. Alcohol consumption and cholelithiasis are the most common causes of acute pancreatitis in adults, whereas the majority of cases in children are idiopathic or secondary to trauma. A wide variety of structural and biochemical abnormalities may also cause pancreatitis. Although in some cases it is difficult to identify the specific cause of the disease radiologically, certain uncommon types of acute or chronic pancreatitis may have unique imaging features that can help the radiologist make an accurate diagnosis. These unusual types include autoimmune pancreatitis, groove pancreatitis, tropical pancreatitis, hereditary pancreatitis, and pancreatitis in ectopic or heterotopic pancreatic tissue. Pancreatitis may occasionally be seen in association with cystic fibrosis or pancreas divisum, or secondary to worm infestation of the pancreaticobiliary tree (eg, by Ascaris lumbricoides). In addition, primary pancreatic and duodenal masses may occasionally manifest as acute or recurrent acute pancreatitis. Knowledge of the classic imaging findings of these entities allows prompt recognition of the relevant pathologic condition, thereby preventing misdiagnosis and subsequent inappropriate or delayed management.

Past medical conditions and K-ras mutations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a hypothesis-generating study

BACKGROUND

In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) evidence on the etiopathogenic role of past medical conditions in the occurrence and persistence of K-ras mutations is scant.

METHODS

Incident cases of PDA were interviewed face-to-face about past medical history and other factors. Logistic regression was used to compare PDA cases (n = 120) with wild-type and mutated K-ras tumors (case-case study).

RESULTS

Patients with wild-type K-ras tumors were more likely to have a prior diagnosis of pancreatitis (Odds ratio [OR] = 6.11, p = 0.041). Diabetes mellitus (DM) was non-significantly more common among cases with a K-ras wild-type tumor, and the OR for DM of >6 years of duration was 4.54 (p = 0.39). Patients with wild-type K-ras were significantly more likely to have had a surgically treated peptic ulcer (OR = 9.03, p = 0.027). The probability of having a K-ras wild-type tumor increased with the number of medical conditions (p for trend = 0.012); the corresponding OR for two or more medical conditions was 4.46 (95% CI: 1.37-14.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Results raise the hypothesis that pancreatitis and possibly peptic ulcer might influence pancreatic carcinogenesis through pathways independent of K-ras mutation, perhaps related to growth factors or mediators of the inflammatory response. Large unselected studies should be conducted to refute or replicate our findings.

Early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis using infrared spectroscopy of serum

BACKGROUND

One of the main problems in the management of acute pancreatitis (AP) is the scarcity of accurate predictors of disease severity.

METHODS

In a prospective design, we compared APACHE II score, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and infrared (IR) spectral absorption of serum (wavelength 940 nm) in 167 consecutive patients with AP, 34 with predicted severe and 133 with mild form.

RESULTS

The IR spectral absorption levels on admission and at 24 h after admission were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in patients with severe AP. On admission, the sensitivity was 74, 56, and 44%; the specificity was 82, 83, and 81%; the positive predictive value was 51, 45, and 37%, and the negative predictive value was 92, 88, and 85%, for IR spectroscopy, APACHE II, and CRP, respectively. At 24 h, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 82, 74, 44, and 94%; 65, 72, 37, and 89%; 68, 73, 39, and 90%, for IR spectroscopy, CRP, and APACHE II, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IR spectroscopy seems to be useful for early detection of severe AP and, in turn, for identifying patients requiring treatment in the intensive care unit and who can benefit from novel therapies.

Genetics and prevention of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Hereditary factors have been reported in up to 10% of cases of pancreatic cancer. The clinical characteristics and genetic abnormalities have been identified for a proportion of this high-risk group, and the development of preventive strategies for these individuals is now a primary goal of cancer clinicians.

METHODS

A review of the current literature regarding the genetics, screening, and prevention of pancreatic cancer and its precursor lesions was undertaken.

RESULTS

Risk factors for pancreatic cancer include smoking, chronic pancreatitis, and a genetic predisposition. The role of diabetes or a diet high in fat or meat remains unclear. The genetic mutations that accompany pancreatic cancer appear to occur in a temporal sequence, beginning in the earliest of precursor lesions. These mutations are detectable in pancreatic juice and, in conjunction with imaging, form the basis of screening programs for high-risk individuals. Not all precursor lesions will undergo malignant transformation, and testing is currently limited in its ability to determine which lesions will undergo transformation.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoiding tobacco smoking and minimizing risk factors associated with chronic pancreatitis are recommended to reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer. Individuals with a high-risk genetic background require counseling, genetic testing if appropriate (BRCA2 mutation or p16INK4A inactivity) and secondary screening for pancreatic cancer in specialist centers. Risk stratification will improve as more genetic abnormalities causing pancreatic cancer are defined.

Update on pancreatic cancer and alcohol-associated risk

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is characterized by extremely aggressive behavior, with an overall 5-year survival of <4%. Because conventional and specifically tailored therapeutic regimens have little impact on patient survival, epidemiological and molecular research aims at identifying and reducing risk factors. Cigarette smoking, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and chronic pancreatitis are amenable to medical prevention or therapy. Heavy alcohol consumption is an inconsistent single risk factor for pancreatic cancer but may promote carcinogenesis by increasing the risk of diabetes mellitus or chronic pancreatitis. For various agents, the key carcinogenic effect is probably an inflammatory response in the pancreatic tissue. On the molecular level, mutations of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, as well as various epigenetic alterations, such as overexpression of growth factors and their receptors, are important in tumorigenesis. Complete and safe surgical resection, together with adjuvant therapy, offers prolonged survival, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 25%. However, for unresectable or disseminated disease, which constitutes the vast majority of cases, treatment is palliative. Despite increasing knowledge about the molecular pathology of pancreatic cancer and despite advances in treatment, the overall course of the disease is dismal, and reinforced efforts to reduce incidence and improve outcome are needed desperately.

Epidemiology and risk factors for pancreatic cancer

Pancreas cancer is considered an 'orphan' cancer because of its relative low incidence. Unfortunately even with early diagnosis, mortality rates are high, explaining why, despite the low incidence, it ranks eighth in a world listing of cancer mortality. International incidence rates vary in different countries, implying that environmental factors are important. Of these factors, smoking is the most well documented etiologic agent, explaining about 25% of all cases. Dietary factors may be important, but it has been difficult to define specific items which either increase or decrease the risk of pancreatic cancer. Since the incidence of pancreas cancer is so strongly age-dependent, we can anticipate an increasing number of patients as the population of most Western countries ages.

The inherited genetics of pancreatic cancer and prospects for secondary screening

It is estimated that pancreatic cancer has a familial component in approximately 5-10% of cases. Some of these cases are part of a defined cancer syndrome with a known gene mutation but in the remaining the causative gene remains unknown. In recent years, a better understanding of the molecular events that occur in the progression model of pancreatic cancer has lead to the development of secondary screening programmes with the aim of identifying early precursor lesions or pre-invasive cancer at a stage amenable to curative resection. High-risk groups who have an inherited predisposition for pancreatic cancer form the ideal group to study in developing a robust screening programme. Multimodality screening using computed tomography and endoluminal ultrasound in combination with molecular analysis of pancreatic juice are proving promising as diagnostics tools or at least serving as predictors of risk over a defined period.

Management strategies for patients with hereditary pancreatic cancer

It is likely that hereditary factors play a role in 17% or more of pancreatic cancers. Ten percent of patients have a familial history that causes disease. Another 7% have a history of apparently "sporadic" pancreatic cancer patients carry a genetic mutation that causes the disease. Kindreds, with two or more family members who have been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and who are first-degree relatives, are considered to have familial pancreatic cancer (FPC). The inheritance pattern for FPC is usually autosomal dominant; however, the penetrance (whether a gene carrier gets the disease) is variable. The lifetime cancer risk for a gene-carrying individual from a FPC kindred can range from 5% to 100%, depending upon the gene inherited and environment-gene interactions. Smoking is the chief environmental risk factor that influences penetrance of pancreatic cancer in these kindreds. Smoking increases the risk of cancer by more than threefold and decreases the age of onset by approximately 10 years. The precursor lesion to pancreatic cancer is pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), which is graded I to III depending upon the severity of the neoplastic change. Surveillance for the early detection of cancer or intraepithelial neoplasia is possible in high-risk individuals and should be performed in centers with expertise. Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography can help identify those patients who have intraepithelial neoplasia and thus may warrant a tissue diagnosis. Patients who have PanIN III (carcinoma in situ) can consider the option of pancreatectomy. The widespread and multifocal nature of PanIN changes throughout the entire pancreas in high-risk patients would make a total pancreatectomy preferable over a partial surgery. Careful selection of patients, the timing of the operation, and an experienced team of gastroenterologists, pancreatic surgeons, pathologists, and diabetologists are the keys to a good surveillance program and good outcomes for the patient.

Management of Patients at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer

Because pancreatic cancer patients seldom exhibit disease-specific symptoms until the cancer is at an advanced stage, its diagnosis is a virtual death sentence. Therefore, to make a significant impact on long-term survival for subjects with pancreatic cancer, asymptomatic individuals would have to be screened for premalignant precursors of pancreatic cancer or for asymptomatic pancreatic cancer. A number of formidable obstacles limit the ability of healthcare providers to screen for early neoplastic changes and to make a very early and specific diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. These include lack of a high-risk population for sporadic pancreatic cancer and lack of a simple, noninvasive test sensitive enough to detect small cancers. However, progress is being made in defining various high-risk groups for pancreatic cancer, and improvements in imaging modalities make detection of premalignant lesions and small cancers possible in such individuals. The protocols currently being studied, including use of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to detect precancerous lesions and small pancreatic cancer in high-risk patients, are still in the research arena and not yet ready for clinical practice.

Increased expression of alpha-1-antitrypsin, glutathione S-transferase pi and vascular endothelial growth factor in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to investigate abnormalities in gene expression in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas using cDNA arrays.

METHODS

Gene expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was compared with normal pancreatic tissue controls. Specimens from 5 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were taken fresh at operation and analyzed using commercially prepared cDNA arrays evaluating approximately 2,000 genes. Immunohistochemical staining was used to confirm protein expression of selected genes.

RESULTS

Alpha-1-antitrypsin (A1AT) and glutathione S-transferase pi (GSTP) were significantly up-regulated in all 5 tumors. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was up-regulated in 4 of the 5 patients. Immunohistochemical staining verified the overexpression of each of these genes.

CONCLUSIONS

A1AT, GSTP, and VEGF are overexpressed in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens taken fresh at operation. To our knowledge, this is the first study of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma demonstrating the up-regulation of these genes using gene expression arrays.

Molecular diagnosis of early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in high-risk patients

The prevalence of pancreatic cancer in the general population is too low--even in high-prevalence areas such as Northern Europe and North America (8-12 per 10(5) population)--relative to the diagnostic accuracy of present detection methods to permit primary screening in the asymptomatic adult population. The recognition that the lifetime risk of developing pancreatic cancer for patients with hereditary pancreatitis (HP) is extremely high (20% by the age of 60 years and 40% by the age of 70 years) poses considerable challenges and opportunities for secondary screening in those patients without any clinical features of pancreatic cancer. Even for secondary screening, the detection of cancer at a biological stage that would be amenable to cure by surgery (total pancreatectomy) still requires diagnostic modalities with a very high sensitivity and specificity. Conventional radiological imaging methods such as endoluminal ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, which have proved to be valuable in the early detection of early neoplastic lesions in patients with familial pancreatic cancer, may well be applicable to patients with HP but only in those without gross morphological features of chronic pancreatitis (other than parenchymal atrophy). Unfortunately, most cases of HP also have associated gross features of chronic pancreatitis that are likely to seriously undermine the diagnostic value of these conventional imaging modalities. Pre-malignant molecular changes can be detected in the pancreatic juice of patients. Thus, the application of molecular screening in patients with HP is potentially the most powerful method of detection of early pancreatic cancer. Although mutant (mt) K-ras can be detected in the pancreatic juice of most patients with pancreatic cancer, it is also present in patients with non-inherited chronic pancreatitis who do not progress to pancreatic cancer (at least in the short to medium term), as well as increasingly in the older population without pancreatic disease. Nevertheless, the presence of mt-K-ras may identify a genuinely higher-risk group, enabling additional diagnostic imaging and molecular resources to be focussed on such a group. What is clear is that prospective multi-centre studies, such as that being pursued by the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer (EUROPAC), are essential for the development of an effective secondary screening programme for these patients.

Inherited pancreatic cancer: surveillance and treatment strategies for affected families

BACKGROUND

Nearly 10% of pancreatic cancers are hereditary in origin, and in some individuals, the risk of pancreatic cancer approaches 50%. A number of defined syndromes can predispose families to pancreatic cancer, although many of the mechanisms that result in familial pancreatic cancers are unknown. This article reviews current knowledge regarding familial pancreatic cancers and highlights the rationale for screening and surveillance. Methods for screening and surveillance of these high-risk individuals are described that allow the detection of pancreatic dysplasia, the precursor to pancreatic cancer. We also describe a single-center experience with the management and surveillance of familial pancreatic cancer kindreds.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients from 13 familial pancreatic cancer kindreds underwent screening and/or surveillance. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the initial test of choice. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is reserved for symptomatic individuals or to investigate abnormal findings on EUS. In the proper clinical setting, patients with abnormal findings on both EUS and ERCP are candidates for total pancreatectomy.

RESULTS

Twelve of 35 patients were noted to have abnormal findings on EUS and ERCP. All of these individuals underwent pancreatectomy, 10 total and 2 partial. The patients who underwent partial pancreatectomy are currently awaiting resection of the pancreatic remnant. Histopathologic examination of all 12 specimens demonstrated pancreatic dysplasia (the precursor lesion to pancreatic cancer). These specimens had no evidence of pancreatic cancer; nor were any of the resected pancreata normal. Follow-up of the 35 high-risk patients at present varies from 1 to 48 months, and none of the patients under surveillance have developed pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSION

The screening and surveillance of high-risk members of familial pancreatic cancer kindreds using EUS and ERCP is an effective method for identifying individuals with pancreatic dysplasia prior to the onset of invasive pancreatic cancer. The surveillance needs to be performed by a team of specialists who have experience in dealing with pancreatic cancer and its precursors.

Pancreatitis as a risk for pancreatic cancer

Chronic pancreatitis clearly predisposes to pancreatic cancer, with early onset-long duration chronic pancreatitis from cystic fibrosis, TP, and HP conferring the highest risk. Chronic pancreatitis is not a critical step, however, but rather one of several conditions that accelerate the accumulation of critical genetic mutations and chromosomal losses necessary for carcinogenesis. Indeed, other germline mutations, environmental factors such as tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption, or dietary factors may also accelerate the pathway to carcinogenesis, and may be synergistic with the conditions created by chronic pancreatitis. Because patients with chronic pancreatitis are at high risk of pancreatic cancer, the physician is faced with decisions on how to manage this risk. Discontinuing smoking and alcohol consumption, and perhaps dietary modification are obvious recommendations for risk reduction. If, however, the patient is older and already in a very high-risk category (e.g., long-standing HP), then screening for cancers must be considered. Inclusion in multicenter trials is recommended, and information on ongoing studies can be obtained through the office of Dr. Whitcomb, or as posted on www.pancreas.org.

Family history of cancer and germline BRCA2 mutations in sporadic exocrine pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Hereditary factors have been reported in 5-10% of cases with exocrine pancreatic cancer and recent data support a role for BRCA2.

AIMS

We have studied the prevalence of germline BRCA2 mutations in two groups of patients with exocrine pancreatic cancer from an unselected series in Spain: group A included 24 cases showing familial aggregation of cancer and group B included 54 age, sex, and hospital matched cases without such evidence.

METHODS

Information was obtained by interview of patients and was validated by a telephone interview with a structured questionnaire. In patients from group A, >80% of the coding sequence of BRCA2 was analysed; in patients from group B, the regions in which germline BRCA2 mutations have been described to be associated with pancreatic cancer were screened.

RESULTS

Telephone interviews led to reclassification of 7/54 cases (13%). Familial aggregation of cancer was found in 24/165 cases (14.5%); six patients had a first degree relative with pancreatic cancer (3.6%) and nine patients had relatives with breast cancer. Germline BRCA2 mutations were not identified in any patient from group A (0/23). Among group B cases, one germline variant (T5868G>Asn1880Lys) was found in a 59 year old male without a family history of cancer. The 6174delT mutation was not found in any of the 71 cases analysed.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall prevalence of BRCA2 mutations among patients with pancreatic cancer in Spain is low and the 6174delT mutation appears to be very infrequent. Our data do not support screening patients with cancer of the pancreas for germline BRCA2 mutations to identify relatives at high risk of developing this tumour.

A new susceptibility locus for autosomal dominant pancreatic cancer maps to chromosome 4q32-34

Pancreatic cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Nearly every person diagnosed with pancreatic cancer will die from it, usually in <6 mo. Familial clustering of pancreatic cancers is commonly recognized, with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern in approximately 10% of all cases. However, the late age at disease onset and rapid demise of affected individuals markedly hamper collection of biological samples. We report a genetic linkage scan of family X with an autosomal dominant pancreatic cancer with early onset and high penetrance. For the study of this family, we have developed an endoscopic surveillance program that allows the early detection of cancer and its precursor, before family members have died of the disease. In a genomewide screening of 373 microsatellite markers, we found significant linkage (maximum LOD score 4.56 in two-point analysis and 5.36 in three-point analysis) on chromosome 4q32-34, providing evidence for a major locus for pancreatic cancer.

Epidemiologic and etiologic factors of pancreatic cancer

Ranking fourth as a cause of death from cancer for men and women in the United States, pancreatic cancer represents a significant challenge for physicians and surgeons. In addition to the elderly, high-risk groups include blacks, men, smokers, and patients with certain preexisting diseases such as pancreatitis and long-standing diabetes. Various inherited genetic disorders cause approximately 5% to 10% of the total cases of pancreatic cancer. Smoking doubles the risk of pancreatic cancer. Control of smoking offers the best available strategy for reducing the incidence of this disease. Dietary measures to reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer include maintenance of normal body weight and consumption of a well balanced diet with adequate amounts of fruits and vegetables. Chronic pancreatitis caused by heavy alcohol consumption or, rarely, by an underlying inherited disorder is another strong risk factor, but because this benign disease is uncommon, elimination of this underlying cause would have minimal impact on the frequency of pancreatic cancer.