Influence of sex and Helicobacter pylori on development and healing of gastroduodenal lesions in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users

Sex difference in the associations among hyperuricemia with self-reported peptic ulcer disease in a large Taiwanese population study

Background

Hyperuricemia may play a role in various systemic diseases. However, few studies have investigated the relationship between hyperuricemia and the risk of peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Therefore, in this population-based study, we enrolled over 120,000 participants from the Taiwan Biobank (TWB) and examined the risk factors for self-reported PUD. In addition, we investigated sex differences in the association between hyperuricemia and self-reported PUD.

Methods

Data of 121,583 participants were obtained from the TWB. Male participants with a serum uric acid level >7 mg/dl and female participants with a serum uric acid level >6 mg/dl were classified as having hyperuricemia. Details of self-reported PUD were obtained by questionnaire. The association between hyperuricemia and self-reported PUD in the male and female participants was examined using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

The overall prevalence of self-reported PUD was 14.6%, with a higher incidence in males (16.5%) compared to females (13.5%). After multivariable adjustment, male sex [vs. female sex; odds ratio (OR) = 1.139; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.084-1.198; p < 0.001], and hyperuricemia (OR = 0.919; 95% CI = 0.879-0.961; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with self-reported PUD. Further, a significant interaction was found between sex and hyperuricemia on self-reported PUD (p = 0.004). Hyperuricemia was associated with a low risk of self-reported PUD in males (OR = 0.890; 95% CI = 0.837-0.947; p < 0.001) but not in females (p = 0.139).

Conclusion

The prevalence of self-reported PUD was higher in the male participants than in the female participants. Hyperuricemia was associated with low prevalence of self-reported PUD in males, but not in females. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms behind these observations and verify the potential protective role of hyperuricemia on the development of self-reported PUD.

Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and serum thyroid stimulating hormone in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2000

OBJECTIVE

Current evidence on the associations between plasma thyroid stimulating hormone and Helicobacter pylori infection is conflicting. Therefore, our study aimed to examine TSH in relation to H. pylori infection.

METHODS

Based on the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2000, a cross-sectional study was conducted with 948 participants aged 30 to 85 years. The associations between H. pylori seropositivity and TSH were evaluated using binary logistic regression models. A subgroup analysis stratified by sex, age, and body mass index was conducted.

RESULTS

A higher serum TSH level was found in subjects with H. pylori seropositive than in subjects with H. pylori seronegative. A significant positive association was found between H. pylori seropositivity and TSH with increasing quartiles of hormonal levels in univariate regression models (Q4 vs Q1: OR = 1.659; 95% CI, 1.152-2.389) and in multivariate regression models (Q4 vs Q1: OR = 1.604; 95% CI, 1.087-2.367). In stratified analyses, the adjusted association of serum TSH with H. pylori seropositivity was statistically significant in male (Q4 vs Q1: OR = 1.894; 95% CI, 1.109-3.235), normal BMI (Q4 vs Q1: OR = 1.894; 95% CI, 1.109-3.235), overweight (Q4 vs Q1: OR = 2.124; 95% CI, 1.047-4.308);, obese (Q4 vs Q1: OR = 0.429; 95% CI, 0.220-0.837), and age over 60 years (Q4 vs Q1: OR = 1.999; 95% CI, 1.118-3.575).

CONCLUSION

High TSH levels were associated with H. pylori infection, especially among male, overweight and elderly adults.

Impact of Different Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapies on Gastrointestinal Symptoms

Background and Objectives: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection impairs quality of life. However, whether eradication therapy ameliorates gastrointestinal symptoms remains questionable. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of H. pylori eradication therapy on gastrointestinal symptoms. Materials and Methods: A total of 140 patients, 59 women and 81 men, with a mean age of 61 and suffering from H. pylori infection in the University Hospital of Split, Croatia, were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either concomitant or hybrid therapies. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire was completed by patients prior to and after the eradication therapy. Results: In both groups, the total GSRS score improved significantly after therapy. In the concomitant group, the abdominal pain score, reflux symptoms score and indigestion score decreased significantly after therapy. In the group with hybrid therapy, all five groups of symptoms (abdominal pain, reflux symptoms, indigestion, diarrhea and constipation) significantly decreased after therapy. Patients with adverse events had significantly higher total GSRS scores after eradication therapy. Conclusions: H. pylori eradication therapy could alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms regardless of the treatment used, but the favorable effect seemed to be more pronounced after hybrid therapy.

The clinical and endoscopic aspects of peptic ulcers secondary to the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs of various origins

Introduction

currently, the non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs constitute a veritable object of auto medication throughout the world. The goal of this study was to evaluate the endoscopic and clinical aspects of gastro-duodenal ulcer secondary to taking of non-steroid anti-inflammatory of various sources.

Methods

this was a cross-sectional study which was conducted between July 2016 and December 2017. All adult patients admitted to hospital for clinical symptoms suggestive of gastroduodenal involvement after taking anti-inflammatory drugs and having undergone upper digestive endoscopy were included in this study. Data analysis was done with Epi-info version 7 Software.

Results

a total of 114 patients were included, the mean age was 47.18±26 years with a male predominance (64.9%). Among the patients, only 1.75% had taken a non-steroid anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs) from pharmacy. The NSAIDs used were of different types: diclofenac, aceclofenac, aspirin and non-selective NSAIDs. For each drug used, more than half were derived from the streets. Clinically we noted: the dyspepsia (38.58%), hemorrhages (11.40%), the ulcerous syndrome (77.19%), haematemesis (19.29%), haematemesis associated with melena (37.71%), and the rectorrhagia in 6.14 of cases. The specific endoscopic lesions were bulbar ulcer (45.61%), gastric ulcers (20.17%), antral ulcerations (5.26%) and acute gastritis (9.64%), esophagitis (7.89%), esophageal varices (6.14%), and uncomplicated hiatal hernia in 7.01% of cases.

Conclusion

the serious gastroduodenal lesions observed in this study and due to use of NSAIDs are mainly attributable to unauthorized molecules due to safety concerns. It would be necessary to conduct sensitization days at the community level and in each health facility.

Is the new potent acid-inhibitory drug vonoprazan effective for healing idiopathic peptic ulcers? A multicenter observational study in Akita Prefecture, Japan

BACKGROUND

The incidence of peptic ulcers unrelated to H. pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), termed idiopathic peptic ulcers (IPUs), has increased worldwide. We recently reported that IPUs were refractory to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. Vonoprazan, which was recently developed in Japan, has shown a more potent acid-inhibitory effect than ordinary PPIs. In the present study, we compared the healing rates among peptic ulcers of different etiologies following treatment with vonoprazan.

METHOD

A multicenter observational study was performed at six participating hospitals in Akita Prefecture, Japan. Consecutive patients who had endoscopically confirmed gastro-duodenal ulcers were enrolled between August 2016 and March 2018. For each patient, the Helicobacter pylori infection status and NSAID use, including aspirin, were checked, and 20 mg vonoprazan was administered for 6 weeks for duodenal ulcers and 8 weeks for gastric ulcers. The healing status was checked by endoscopy at the end of vonoprazan treatment. Patients were divided into four subgroups according to the H. pylori status and NSAID usage.

RESULTS

The proportion of IPUs was 18.2%. A total of 162 patients completed the study protocol. The healing rate of IPUs was marginally lower than that of simple H. pylori-associated ulcers (81.2% vs. 93.5%, P = 0.05). Similarly, the healing rate of NSAID-related ulcers, irrespective of concomitant H. pylori infection, was significantly lower than that of simple H. pylori-associated ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

Six- or 8-week vonoprazan treatment still seems to be insufficient for healing IPUs. Longer-term vonoprazan or another treatment option may be required to heal potentially refractory peptic ulcers.

Helicobacter pylori eradication in dyspepsia: New evidence for symptomatic benefit

A causal relationship between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and functional dyspepsia (FD) is well established in a subset of infected patients. In the Kyoto and Maastricht/Florence consensus reports H. pylori-associated dyspepsia is defined as an independent entity distinct from FD. H. pylori eradication is therefore the most cost-effective approach for infected patients with dyspeptic symptoms and superior to other medical therapies, such as Proton Pump Inhibitors. The therapeutic gain of H.pylori eradication for symptom relief compared to other therapeutic options is significant with the number needed to benefit of 12. Furthermore H.pylori cures chronic gastritis except in severe cases of atrophic gastritis and may prevent severe complications attributable to the infection. Several pathophysiological mechanisms are suggested for the generation of symptoms and are related to the distinct topographic expression and degree of gastric inflammation as well as changes of gastric acid secretion, gastrointestinal motility and visceral hypersensitivity.

Statins and gastroduodenal endoscopic lesions: A case-control study

Experimental studies showed a dose-dependent gastroprotective effect of statins on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced endoscopic lesions, modulated by increasing endogenous nitric oxide and prostaglandin production.We investigated the influence of chronic treatment with statins on the occurrence of endoscopic lesions in patients referred for endoscopic evaluation, adjusted for the most important etiologic and risk factors for peptic ulcer disease and its complications.A consecutive series of 564 patients who underwent upper digestive endoscopy, stratified according to the severity of endoscopic lesions were recruited. Patients with statin therapy were included in the study group (n = 220), while patients without statins in the control group (n = 344). We correlate the influence of chronic statin therapy (at least 6 months) with factors including age up to 50 years, Helicobacter pylori infection, smoking and drinking habits, ulcer history, gastrotoxic drug consumption (low-dose aspirin [ASA], anticoagulants), and comorbidities.H pylori infection was more frequent in patients with mild/severe endoscopic lesions vs. no lesions, in both groups, but the difference was not statistically significant (P >.05). Male gender represented a risk factor (P <.01) for mild/severe endoscopic lesions only in the statin group. The estimated risk for developing mild/severe endoscopic lesions with ASA intake decreased from 6.26 to 3.40 (P <.01) when statin therapy was associated. Patients without statins and ischemic coronary artery disease (P <.01; odds ratio [OR] = 2.99; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.88-4.73), heart failure (P = .01; OR = 2.13; 95% CI:1.36-3.34), systemic atherosclerosis (P = .04; OR = 2.30; 95% CI:1.44-3.67) had a statistically significant increased risk for developing mild/severe endoscopic lesions in comparison with patients in the statin group. In multivariate regression analysis models, smoking (P <.01; OR = 2.69; 95% CI:1.73-4.16), ASA (P <.01; OR = 4.54; 95% CI:2.83-7.16), and coronary artery diseases (P = .01; OR = 1.80; 95% CI:1.15-2.82) were independent risk factors for mild/severe endoscopic lesions, while chronic statin therapy (P <.01; OR = 0.31; 95% CI:0.19-0.51) was associated with a protective effect in all models.The results of the present study support a certain protective role of chronic therapy with statins against endoscopic lesions, especially in ASA consumers or patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Clinical Risk Factors for Gastroduodenal Ulcer in Romanian Low-Dose Aspirin Consumers

Background. Aspirin use for cardiovascular or cancer prevention is limited due to its gastrointestinal side effects. Objective. Our prospective, observational case-control study aims to identify the predictive factors for ulcers in low-dose aspirin consumers (75-325 mg/day). Methods. The study included patients who underwent an upper digestive endoscopy and took low-dose aspirin treatment. Results. We recruited 51 patients with ulcer (ulcer group) and 108 patients with no mucosal lesions (control group). In univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with ulcers were male gender (p = 0.001), anticoagulants (p = 0.029), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (p = 0.013), heart failure (p = 0.007), liver (p = 0.011) or cerebrovascular disease (p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.043), ulcer history (p = 0.044), and alcohol consumption (p = 0.018), but not Helicobacter pylori infection (p = 0.2). According to our multivariate regression analysis results, history of peptic ulcer (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.06-8.86), cotreatment with NSAIDs (OR 8, 95% CI 2.09-30.58) or anticoagulants (OR 4.85, 95% CI 1.33-17.68), male gender (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.77-15.34), and stroke (OR 7.27, 95% CI 1.40-37.74) remained predictors for ulcer on endoscopy. Conclusions. Concomitant use of NSAIDs or anticoagulants, comorbidities (cerebrovascular disease), and male gender are the most important independent risk factors for ulcer on endoscopy in low-dose aspirin consumers, in a population with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection.

Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis

OBJECTIVE

To present results of the Kyoto Global Consensus Meeting, which was convened to develop global consensus on (1) classification of chronic gastritis and duodenitis, (2) clinical distinction of dyspepsia caused by Helicobacter pylori from functional dyspepsia, (3) appropriate diagnostic assessment of gastritis and (4) when, whom and how to treat H. pylori gastritis.

DESIGN

Twenty-three clinical questions addressing the above-mentioned four domains were drafted for which expert panels were asked to formulate relevant statements. A Delphi method using an anonymous electronic system was adopted to develop the consensus, the level of which was predefined as ≥80%. Final modifications of clinical questions and consensus were achieved at the face-to-face meeting in Kyoto.

RESULTS

All 24 statements for 22 clinical questions after extensive modifications and omission of one clinical question were achieved with a consensus level of >80%. To better organise classification of gastritis and duodenitis based on aetiology, a new classification of gastritis and duodenitis is recommended for the 11th international classification. A new category of H. pylori-associated dyspepsia together with a diagnostic algorithm was proposed. The adoption of grading systems for gastric cancer risk stratification, and modern image-enhancing endoscopy for the diagnosis of gastritis, were recommended. Treatment to eradicate H. pylori infection before preneoplastic changes develop, if feasible, was recommended to minimise the risk of more serious complications of the infection.

CONCLUSIONS

A global consensus for gastritis was developed for the first time, which will be the basis for an international classification system and for further research on the subject.

Impact of concomitant low-dose aspirin on the safety and tolerability of naproxen and esomeprazole magnesium delayed-release tablets in patients requiring chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy: an analysis from 5 Phase III studies

Patients receiving chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and concomitant low-dose aspirin (LDA) are at increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. A fixed-dose combination of enteric-coated (EC) naproxen and immediate-release esomeprazole magnesium (NAP/ESO) has been designed to deliver a proton-pump inhibitor followed by an NSAID in a single tablet. To examine safety data from 5 Phase III studies of NAP/ESO in LDA users (≤ 325 mg daily, administered at any time during the study), and LDA non-users, data were analyzed from 6-month studies assessing NAP/ESO versus EC naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis (n = 2), 3-month studies assessing NAP/ESO vs celecoxib or placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis (n = 2), and a 12-month, open-label, safety study of NAP/ESO (n = 1). In an analysis of two studies, incidences of endoscopically confirmed gastric ulcers (GUs) and duodenal ulcers (DUs) were summarized by LDA subgroups. In the pooled analysis from all five studies, incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) (including prespecified NSAID-associated upper GI AEs and cardiovascular AEs), serious AEs, and AE-related discontinuations were stratified by LDA subgroups. Overall, 2,317 patients received treatment; 1,157 patients received NAP/ESO and, of these, 298 received LDA. The cumulative incidence of GUs and DUs in the two studies with 6-month follow-up was lower for NAP/ESO vs EC naproxen in both LDA subgroups [GUs: 3.0 vs 27.9%, respectively, for LDA users, 6.4 vs 22.4%, respectively, for LDA non-users (both P < 0.001); DUs: 1.0 vs 5.8% for LDA users, 0.6 vs 5.3% for LDA non-users]. The incidence of erosive gastritis was lower in NAP/ESO- vs EC naproxen-treated patients for both LDA users [18.2 vs 36.5%, respectively (P = 0.004)] and LDA non-users [19.8 vs 38.5%, respectively (P < 0.001)]. Among LDA users, incidences of NSAID-associated upper GI AEs were: NAP/ESO, 16.1%; EC naproxen, 31.7%; celecoxib, 22.1%; placebo, 23.2%. Among LDA non-users, incidences of NSAID-associated upper GI AEs were: NAP/ESO, 20. %; EC naproxen, 36.6%; celecoxib, 18.5%; placebo, 18.9%. For LDA users, incidences of cardiovascular AEs were: NAP/ESO, 3.0%; EC naproxen, 1.0%; celecoxib, 0%; placebo, 0%. For LDA non-users, incidences of cardiovascular AEs were: NAP/ESO, 1.0%; EC naproxen, 0.6%; celecoxib, 0.3%; placebo, 0%. NAP/ESO appears to be well-tolerated in patients receiving concomitant LDA. For LDA users, AE incidence was less than that observed for EC naproxen. For most AE categories, incidences were similar among NAP/ESO, celecoxib and placebo groups. The safety of NAP/ESO appeared similar regardless of LDA use.

Interaction between Helicobacter pylori infection, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or low-dose aspirin use: Old question new insights

Previous reports clearly demonstrated that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) or low dose aspirin (ASA) use significantly and independently increased the risk for the development of peptic ulcer disease. Today, the presence of H. pylori infection associated with low dose ASA and/or NSAID use in the same patient is becoming more frequent and therefore the potential interaction between these factors and the consequences of it has important implications. Whether NSAID intake in the presence of H. pylori infection may further increase the risk of peptic ulcer carried by the presence of only one risk factor is still a matter of debate. Studies on the interaction between the two risk factors yielded conflicting data and no consensus has been reached in the last years. In addition, the interaction between H. pylori infection and low-dose ASA remains even more controversial. In real clinical practice, we can find different clinical scenarios involving these three factors associated with the presence of different gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk factors. These huge variety of possible combinations greatly hinder the decision making process of physicians.

Interaction of Helicobacter pylori infection and low-dose aspirin in the upper gastrointestinal tract: implications for clinical practice

Low-dose aspirin has been shown to increase the risk of upper gastrointestinal tract injury. Risk factors in upper gastrointestinal complications in low-dose aspirin users are less well defined than in other NSAID users, and there are enough intrinsic differences in the two agents to discuss them separately. In particularly, the role of Helicobacter pylori and the benefit of its eradication in decreasing the risk of upper gastrointestinal tract injury in low-dose ASA users remains controversial. Various consensus groups have recommended H. pylori testing and eradication in low-dose ASA users with a prior history of peptic ulcer or ulcer bleeding. The basis of this recommendation is derived from a limited, albeit expanding evidence on the role of H. pylori in upper gastrointestinal tract injury in low-dose ASA users and on the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication in reducing the risk of complications such as rebleeding in high-risk patients.

Gastric acid secretion level modulates the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and low-dose aspirin-induced gastropathy

BACKGROUND

The relative contribution of gastric acid secretion and Helicobacter pylori infection to low-dose aspirin-induced gastropathy remains to be clarified. This is partly because the capability of the infection to modify gastric acid secretion complicates the interaction. The aim of this study was to estimate the association of aspirin-induced mucosal injury, as well as H. pylori infection, with gastric acid output.

METHODS

A total of 186 male outpatients, comprising 60 aspirin takers, on 100 mg of enteric-coated aspirin daily and 126 non-aspirin takers were prospectively enrolled in this study. Gastrin-stimulated acid output was estimated by the endoscopic gastrin test. The grade of gastric mucosal injury was assessed endoscopically according to the modified Lanza score. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The gastric acid secretion level, with an odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 10.5 (3.0-36.9) and aspirin administration, with an OR (95% CI) of 7.4 (3.0-18.3) were independently associated with gastric mucosal injury, and the co-existence of both factors greatly elevated the risk of mucosal injury, with an OR (95% CI) of 77.0 (13.5-440.0). H. pylori infection, itself, did not show any significant effect on the aspirin-induced mucosal injury after adjusting for gastric acid secretion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that aspirin-induced gastropathy is directly associated with gastric acid secretion. In addition, it also suggested that the gastric acid secretion level modulates the association between H. pylori infection and aspirin-induced gastropathy.

NSAID-induced gastrointestinal and cardiovascular injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent publications related to NSAID-induced adverse effects on the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular systems.

RECENT FINDINGS

This paper explores novel mechanisms of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal injury, highlights new composite endpoints evaluating adverse events of NSAIDs in the entire gastrointestinal tract, and combines published data to establish evidence-based guidance on the best use of NSAIDs to achieve optimal clinical outcomes whilst minimizing cardiovascular and gastrointestinal injuries.

SUMMARY

NSAIDs can induce peptic ulcers via epithelial cell membrane disruption and the renin angiotensin system, independent of the cyclooxygenase (COX) pathways, whereas mast cells and bile acid sensors may have a protective effect on NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage. Patients with arthritis treated with a COX-2 inhibitor are less likely to develop upper and lower gastrointestinal complications than those who are treated with diclofenac plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). PPI therapy is recommended in patients receiving dual antiplatelet treatment but observational studies show that clopidogrel users taking PPIs have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Until further reliable controlled data are available, this potential, but currently unproven, clinical interaction can be minimized by widely separating the dosing of clopidogrel and PPI. Histamine-2 antagonists may be an alternative to PPI for the prevention of peptic ulcers in patients taking low-dose aspirin.

Role of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastroduodenal damage in patients starting NSAID therapy: 4 Months follow-up study

AIMS

We aimed to determine differences in gastroduodenal damage related to the presence of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) in patients starting long-term NSAID therapy. Seventy-one candidates for chronic NSAIDs therapy (33 Hp negative and 38 Hp positive) entered the study and underwent upper GI endoscopy before, and 8 and 16 weeks after, continuous NSAID therapy.

RESULTS

Lanza score increased in both Hp positive and negative patients in the course of NSAID therapy (P < 0.001), being significantly higher in Hp positive than Hp negative (4.31 ± 1.33 vs 3.15 ± 1.95, P < 0.05) after 16 weeks of follow-up. In gastric mucosa, no significant difference in mean Lanza score was observed between the two groups. Duodenal ulcer was diagnosed in 18 (36.8%) Hp positive and 1 (3%) Hp negative patient (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Hp is more closely related to duodenal than gastric mucosal injury in NSAID users. Risk for duodenal ulcer in Hp-infected individual increases after 4 months of NSAID therapy.

Predictors of gastroduodenal erosions in patients taking low-dose aspirin

BACKGROUND

Gastroduodenal ulcers are common in patients taking low-dose aspirin. However, the factors predisposing to mucosal erosions, the precursor lesions, are not well known.

AIMS

To examine the potential risk factors for the development of erosions in patients chronically taking low-dose aspirin.

METHODS

Patients included were taking aspirin 75-325 mg daily for >28 days. Exclusion criteria included use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and ulcer-healing drugs. Demographic data were collected at baseline, prior to endoscopy to determine the frequency and number of erosions and Helicobacter pylori status. In those without ulcer or other exclusions, endoscopy was repeated at 3 months.

RESULTS

Fewer patients had gastric erosions if they were H. pylori +ve (48.5% vs. 66.4% in H. pylori-ve patients at baseline, P = 0.17; 40.0% vs. 64.1% at 3 months, P = 0.029). If gastric erosions were present, they were also less numerous in H. pylori +ve patients (3.61 +/- 0.83 vs. 4.90 +/- 0.53 at baseline, P = 0.026; 2.17 +/- 0.68 vs. 5.68 +/- 0.86 at 3 months, P = 0.029). There was a trend (0.1 > P > 0.05) for more gastric erosions in those taking >100 mg/day aspirin. Males had more duodenal erosions at baseline (25.2% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.016). Patient age did not affect the presence or number of erosions. H. Pylori was not significantly associated with duodenal erosion numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

Helicobacter pylori infection may partially protect against low-dose aspirin-induced gastric erosions; damage to the stomach appears weakly dose-related; and older age does not increase the risk of erosions.

Prevalence of peptic ulcer in dyspeptic patients and the influence of age, sex, and Helicobacter pylori infection

We investigated the prevalence of peptic ulcer in dyspeptic patients in China to analyze the influence of age, sex, and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. The results showed that the prevalence of gastric and duodenal ulcer increased with age. In patients under 60 years old, the prevalence of duodenal and gastric ulcers in females was markedly lower than that in males, especially the prevalence of duodenal ulcer. The prevalence of duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer in H. pylori-infected patients was markedly higher than in patients without H. pylori infection. In the patients under 60 years old, sex differences were still seen in both H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients. The prevalence of gastric and duodenal ulcers was markedly increased with age in both H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, male sex, and H. pylori infection were three independent risk factors for gastric and duodenal ulcers.

Gender-specific protection of estrogen against gastric acid-induced duodenal injury: stimulation of duodenal mucosal bicarbonate secretion

Because human duodenal mucosal bicarbonate secretion (DMBS) protects duodenum against acid-peptic injury, we hypothesize that estrogen stimulates DMBS, thereby attributing to the clinically observed lower incidence of duodenal ulcer in premenopausal women than the age-matched men. We found that basal and acid-stimulated DMBS responses were 1.5 and 2.4-fold higher in female than male mice in vivo, respectively. Acid-stimulated DMBS in both genders was abolished by ICI 182,780 and tamoxifen. Estradiol-17beta (E2) and the selective estrogen receptor (ER) agonists of ERalpha [1,3,5-Tris(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-propyl-1H-pyrazole] and ERbeta [2,3-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionitrile], but not progesterone, rapidly stimulated ER-dependent murine DMBS in vivo. E2 dose dependently stimulated murine DMBS, which was attenuated by a Cl(-)/HCO3(-) anion exchanger inhibitor 4,4'-didsothio- cyanostilbene-2, 2'-disulfonic acid, removal of extracellular Cl(-), and in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator knockout female mice. E2 stimulated murine DMBS in vitro in both genders with significantly greater response in female than male mice (female to male ratio = 4.3). ERalpha and ERbeta mRNAs and proteins were detected in murine duodenal epithelium of both genders; however, neither ERalpha nor ERbeta mRNA and protein expression levels differed according to gender. E2 rapidly mobilized intracellular calcium in a duodenal epithelial SCBN cell line that expresses ERalpha and ERbeta, whereas BAPTA-AM abolished E2-stimulated murine DMBS. Thus, our data show that E2 stimulates DMBS via ER dependent mechanisms linked to intracellular calcium, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, and Cl(-)/HCO3(-) anion exchanger. Gender-associated differences in basal, acid- and E2-stimulated DMBS may have offered a reasonable explanation for the clinically observed lower incidence of duodenal ulcer in premenopausal women than age-matched men.

Systematic review: ulcer definition in NSAID ulcer prevention trials

BACKGROUND

In clinical trials of peptic ulcer prevention, the most appropriate definition of an ulcer remains challenging.

AIMS

To evaluate the ulcer definitions used in clinical trials of ulcer prevention among non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users and to determine whether any specific definition is preferred.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Medline and EMBASE databases was conducted. Results were limited to full papers published in English from June 1987 to June 2007 that met the following criteria: randomized, controlled non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug trials of > or =8 weeks' duration, with a primary end point of ulcer upon endoscopy.

RESULTS

Forty five publications met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Overall, an ulcer diameter of > or =3 mm was used in 25 publications and most included a description of ulcer depth. Of the remainder, ulcer was defined as any lesion with unequivocal/observable depth (with no lower limit for ulcer diameter; five publications) or an excavated mucosal break >3 mm (one publication), whereas nine defined a minimum ulcer size of > or =5 or >5 mm. Ulcer definition was unclear in the remaining five publications.

CONCLUSION

In clinical trials of ulcer prevention among non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users, a gastric or duodenal lesion > or =3 mm in diameter with significant depth is the preferred definition.

[Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and use of NSAIDs in the etiopathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding]

INTRODUCTION

Non-steroid antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection are two most important independent risk factors involved in the etiopathogenesis of gastroduodenal mucosal injury with a clear and critical role in both uncomplicated and complicated peptic ulcer disease. It is estimated that upto 90% of all peptic ulcers result from the effect of one or both of these factors.

AIM

To determine the frequency of NSAIDs use and Hp infection in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study evaluated data from 500 patients in whom esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed following presentation in emergency unit with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Anamnestic data was collected together with detailed information on previous salicilates and/or NSAIDs use. Hp status was determined and anatomic localisation of bleeding lesion was also registered.

RESULTS

Acute upper GIT bleading was caused solely by NSAIDs in 55 (11%), by aspirin in 66 (13.2%), while combined NSAID/aspirin therapy was identified in 19 (3.8%) of patients. In total NSAID and/or aspirin use were diagnosed in 139 (27.8%). while in 122 (24.4%) only Hp infection was diagnosed. Both risk factors were identified in 144 (28.8%) patients (Hp+NSAIDs in 12.2%, Hp+aspirin in 10.8% and Hp+aspirin+NSAIDs in 5.8%). In 19.8% of the cases (14% of males and 27% of females) neither NSAID/aspirin use nor presence of Hp infection was noted. Out of 500 patients enrolled, 63% were mails. In females, bleeding lesion was most frequently localized in gastric mucosa, while males had equal chance of bleeding from either gastric or duodenal mucosa. Fortunatelly, only 5 to 7% of patients were bleeding from both gastric and duodenal lesion.

CONCLUSION

Prevention of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding can be achieved trough strict and limited use of aspirin and NSAIDs, eradication of Hp infection and use of gastroprotective therapy in well-defined risk patients that need chronic NSAIDs and/or aspirin therapy. In all patients starting long-term NSAID and/or aspirin therapy and all patients already on long-term aspirin therapy test and treat strategy for Hp infection should be used. On the other hand, only in high risk patients (more than 65 years, history of peptic ulcer disease, concomitant corticosteroid, aspirin, clopidogrel or warfarin therapy) already on chronic NSAID therapy long-term PPI therapy should be prescribed after testing and treating of Hp infection.

Effect of risk factors on complicated and uncomplicated ulcers in the TARGET lumiracoxib outcomes study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors were developed to reduce the gastrointestinal risk associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial was the largest study to evaluate primarily the gastrointestinal safety outcomes of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Data from the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial were used to identify risk factors and investigate the safety of lumiracoxib in subgroups.

METHODS

Patients with osteoarthritis (age, >or=50 y) were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily, naproxen 500 mg twice daily, or ibuprofen 800 mg 3 times daily for 12 months. Events were categorized by a blinded adjudication committee. The primary end point was all definite or probable ulcer complications.

RESULTS

For patients taking NSAIDs, factors associated with an increased risk of ulcer complications were age 65 years or older (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-3.59), previous history of gastrointestinal bleed or ulcer (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.86-7.00), non-Caucasian racial origin (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.35-3.27), and male sex (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.08-2.68). With lumiracoxib, significant risk factors were age 65 years or older (HR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.40-7.20), male sex (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.25-5.40), non-Caucasian racial origin (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.02-4.59), and concomitant aspirin use (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.40-5.97). Increased risks in patients age 65 years and older were increased further if other risk factors were present. Lumiracoxib maintained an advantage over NSAIDs across all subgroups except aspirin use.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumiracoxib was associated with a reduced risk of ulcer complications compared with NSAIDs in all significant subgroups except aspirin users.

Contribution of sensory neurons to sex difference in the development of stress-induced gastric mucosal injury in mice

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Sensory neurons play a critical role in reducing stress-induced gastric mucosal injury by releasing calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) through an increase in gastric mucosal levels of prostacyclin (PGI(2)). Because estrogen enhances nerve growth factor-mediated CGRP production in sensory neurons, we hypothesized that stress-induced gastric mucosal injury occurs less in females than in males.

METHODS

Gastric ulcer index, gastric myeloperoxidase activity, and gastric tissue levels of CGRP and 6-keto-PGF(1alpha), a stable metabolite of PGI(2), were determined in male and female wild-type (CGRP(+/+)) mice and CGRP knockout (CGRP(-/-)) mice subjected to water-immersion restraint stress.

RESULTS

In CGRP(+/+) mice, ulcer index and myeloperoxidase activities were lower and gastric tissue levels of CGRP and 6-keto-PGF(1alpha) were higher in female mice than in male mice, but there were no such sex differences in CGRP(-/-)mice. Sex differences in CGRP(+/+) mice were eliminated by pretreatment with SB366791 (500 microg/kg intraperitoneally), a vanilloid receptor antagonist, and by ovariectomy. Reversal of sex differences by ovariectomy was not observed in female CGRP(+/+) mice with estradiol replacement (1 mg . kg(-1). wk(-1) for 3 weeks). Levels of CGRP messenger RNA in dorsal root ganglion neurons isolated from female CGRP(+/+) mice were decreased by ovariectomy, and these decreases were reversed by estradiol replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Estrogen-mediated increases in CGRP levels in sensory neurons might contribute to reduce stress-induced gastric mucosal injury by attenuating inflammatory responses. This might at least partly explain the sex difference observed in the development of stress-induced gastric mucosal injury in mice.

Gastroprotective properties of 11-deoxymisoprostol (prostaglandin E1 analog) and its effect on the level of sialic acids in gastric tissue of rats with peptic ulcer

11-Deoxymisoprostol (prostaglandin E1 analog) exhibited a pronounced gastroprotective effect on various models of experimental ulcers induced by nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs. A relationship between high resistance of the gastroduodenal mucosa under the effect of 11-deoxymisoprostol and changes in the level of sialic acid was detected.

Gastrointestinal adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

NSAIDs are used extensively worldwide at a cost of billions of dollars annu-ally. Adverse side effects, especially in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, are uncommon but cause a substantial burden of illness because of the volume of use. Important upper GI complications include dyspepsia, gastric erosions and peptic ulcers and complications such as bleeding, perforation or gastric outlet obstruction. Dyspeptic symptoms may occur without correlation to endoscopic findings. Topical injury and COX-1 inhibition resulting in gastric prostaglandin suppression are two commonly postulated mechanisms of gastroduodenal damage. Advanced age, previous peptic ulcers or ulcer complications, concomitant use of glucocorticoids or anticoagulants, and high-dose or prolonged NSAID administration are known risk factors. Prevention of adverse GI events involves use of safer NSAIDs including COX-2 inhibitors, and co-prescription of gastroprotective agents. NSAID-induced ulcers heal with proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol. The role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in NSAID ulcer prophylaxis and management is controversial. Choice of NSAIDs and gastroprotective agents should be guided by risk/benefit and cost-effectiveness assessment.

Evidence-Based Recommendations for Older Adults With Helicobacter pylori or Those Using Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

Currently, about half the world's population is infected with Helicobacter pylori. This organism is known to cause peptic ulcers and places patients at higher risk for gastric cancer. Older adults are more susceptible to the negative effects of Helicobacter pylori infection. In addition, this population consumes large amounts of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and typically demonstrates a high incidence of atrophic gastritis, both of which place them at even higher risk for gastrointestinal disease. Consequently, older adults should be carefully assessed for gastrointestinal irritation, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer. Age-specific therapy can result in improved outcomes related to a lower incidence of nonadherence with medications, decreasing hospital admissions, lowering costs of care, and increasing quality of life.

Oral and nasal administration of chicken type II collagen suppresses adjuvant arthritis in rats with intestinal lesions induced by meloxicam

AIM

To investigate the curative effects of oral and nasal administration of chicken type II collagen (CII) on adjuvant arthritis (AA) in rats with meloxicam-induced intestinal lesions.

METHODS

AA model in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats with or without intestinal lesions induced by meloxicam was established and those rats were divided randomly into six groups which included AA model, AA model+meloxicam, AA model+oral CII, AA model+nasal CII, AA model+ meloxicam+oral C II and AA model+meloxicam+nasal CII (n = 12). Rats was treated with meloxicam intragastrically for 7 d from d 14 after immunization with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), and then treated with chicken CII intragastrically or nasally for 7 d. Histological changes of right hind knees were examined. Hind paw secondary swelling and intestinal lesions were evaluated. Synoviocyte proliferation was measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H tetrazolium bromide (MTT) method. Activities of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and diamine oxidase (DAO) from supernatants of intestinal homogenates were assayed by spectrophotometric analysis.

RESULTS

Intragastrical administration of meloxicam (1.5 mg/kg) induced multiple intestinal lesions in AA rats. There was a significant decrease of intestinal DAO activities in AA+meloxicam group (P<0.01) and AA model group (P<0.01) compared with normal group. DAO activities of intestinal homogenates in AA+meloxicam group were significantly less than those in AA rats (P<0.01). There was a significant increase of intestinal MPO activities in AA+meloxicam group compared with normal control (P<0.01). Oral or nasal administration of CII (20 microg/kg) could suppress the secondary hind paw swelling(P<0.05 for oral CII; P<0.01 for nasal CII), synoviocyte proliferation (P<0.01) and histopathological degradation in AA rats, but they had no significant effects on DAO and MPO changes. However, oral administration of CII (20 microg/kg) showed the limited efficacy on arthritis in AA+meloxicam model and the curative effects of nasal CII (20 microg/kg) were shown to be more efficient than that of oral CII (20 microg/kg) both in AA model and in AA+meloxicam model (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Oral administration of CII shows the limited efficacy on arthritis in AA rats with intestinal lesions, and nasal administration of CII is more efficient than oral administration of CII to induce mucosal tolerance in AA rats.

Épidémiologie des complications gastro-duodénales associées aux anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) are among the most widely prescribed drugs worldwide. In France, about 25% of individuals aged 40 years or older are treated with NSAIDs at least one week in the year. Although the therapeutic benefits of these drugs are substantial, their use is limited by their gastroduodenal toxicity. Dyspepsia occurs in about 30% of patients receiving NSAIDs, an approximately two-fold enhancement of risk compared with control subjects. Asymptomatic endoscopic lesions are observed in 20 to 80% of patients, depending on population characteristics, individual NSAIDs and definitions of endoscopic lesions. The risk of symptomatic ulcer, complicated ulcer (haemorrhage, perforation, stenosis) and death related to ulcer complication is multiplied by 4 in patients treated with NSAIDs. Established risk factors for NSAID-induced gastroduodenal complications are age, ulcer history, heavy alcohol consumption, individual NSAIDs, dose, association with corticoid or aspirin or anticoagulants (ulcer haemorrhage) while the role of treatment duration and Helicobacter pylori infection are controversial.

Impact de l’infection à Helicobacter pylori sur le risque de complications gastro-duodénales des traitements anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens

The interaction of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the development of gastro-duodenal ulcers and their complications is complex and controversial. From a clinical point of view, the question is whether or not H. pylori infection should be tested and eradicated in patients treated or about to be treated by NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin. Contradictory results have been reported in epidemiological studies. Recent data suggest that H. pylori-NSAID interaction may be different depending on the type of treatment, non aspirin NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin, the gastric or duodenal localization of ulcer and the strains of H. pylori. Controlled randomized studies suggest that eradication of H. pylori may be beneficial in NSAID-naïve patients but not in those already on long term NSAID therapy. Recommendations are proposed for different subgroups of patients. In NSAID users presenting with gastro-duodenal ulcer or complications, H. pylori screening and eradication are indicated. In patients treated or about to be treated by NSAIDs, the "test and treat" H. pylori strategy is recommended if there is a history of gastroduodenal ulcer or complications. Whether this strategy should be generalized preventively in patients without ulcer history is still controversial and deserves further studies.

Helicobacter pylori and nonmalignant diseases

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori has lead to a significant decrease in the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease world-wide. Despite the fact that H. pylori eradication is the only way to cure peptic ulcer disease, a substantial number of patients still need antisecretory agents to be symptoms-free after eradication. During the past year several randomized controlled trials on H. pylori eradication in patients taking NSAIDs have been published but contradictory results have been obtained. In certain parts of the world, NSAIDs are becoming the main cause of peptic ulcer disease complications such as bleeding or perforation. Some patients with nonulcer dyspepsia do benefit from eradication of H. pylori as was shown in several studies. Long-term trials with cost/efficacy analysis are still needed to demonstrate the benefit of H. pylori eradication over acid inhibition in this group of patients. H. pylori prevalence is lower in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease, but according to recent systematic reviews it varies geographically. There are more data now to show that eradication of H. pylori in duodenal ulcer patients does not increase the incidence of GERD. The 'test and treat' strategy for patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia was strongly supported by both meta-analysis and the results of recent randomized controlled trials. Even in developed countries where the prevalence of H. pylori decreases, this strategy allows resolution of symptoms in a larger number of patients with dyspepsia compared to empirical treatment with proton pump inhibitors and reduces the endoscopic workload.

Diagnostic methods for Helicobacter pylori detection and eradication

Helicobacter pylori is the principal cause of peptic ulcer disease and an important risk factor for the development of gastric cancer. The efficacy of 1 week triple therapies, which often have eradication rates of>90%, is undermined by poor patient compliance and bacterial antimicrobial resistance. The development of new anti-H. pylori therapies presents enormous challenges to clinical pharmacologists, not only in the identification of novel targets, but also in ensuring adequate drug delivery to the unique gastric mucus niche of H. pylori. Animal models of H. pylori infection have been developed but their clinical validity has yet to be established. Vaccination, to prevent or treat infection, has been demonstrated in animal models, but human studies have not been so encouraging.

Gastrointestinal side effects of drugs

Drugs can have adverse effects on any part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract from mouth to colon. It is essential that a detailed and accurate drug history is taken in patients presenting with GI complaints. Many drug-induced effects will regress or heal on cessation of treatment. NSAIDs are usually associated with gastric and duodenal ulcers but are also recognised to cause lichen planus in the mouth, oesophageal inflammation and strictures, and small bowel and colonic ulcers and strictures. A newer class of anti-inflammatory drugs, the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-selective inhibitors, have been developed and have a more favourable GI safety profile than standard NSAIDs. Acute diarrhoea, relapse of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), microscopic colitis and acute pancreatitis are also induced by ingestion of standard NSAIDs. The calcium antagonists, phenytoin and cyclosporin, induce gum hyperplasia, particularly in patients with poor oral hygiene. Alendronate, a bisphosphonate, has been associated with development of oesophageal ulcers, and specific recommendations are now given to reduce this complication. Of the many different forms of colitis associated with drug ingestion, the most frequent is pseudomembranous colitis. This is a complication of antibiotics and is caused by the toxin produced by Clostridium difficile. Many drugs have been associated with the development of acute pancreatitis, although a definite cause and effect relationship has been shown for only a few drugs. These include didanosine, furosomide, corticosteroids, azathioprine and sodium valproate.

Relative contribution of mucosal injury and Helicobacter pylori in the development of gastroduodenal lesions in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A past history of peptic ulceration increases the risk of an ulcer developing during non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. Whether this is due to Helicobacter pylori infection or to reactivation of the original lesion is unclear.

METHODS

We used multivariate regression analyses of three large similar trials to identify factors that placed patients at high risk of ulcer development or relapse. We compared the efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg daily, misoprostol 200 micro g twice daily, and ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in preventing ulcers and erosions at different sites and in patients who were H pylori positive and negative.

RESULTS

Patients with endoscopic lesions (which healed) initially were significantly more likely than those without to develop further erosions or ulcers during treatment (rate ratio 2.12, 1.07-4.17). Risk mounted further with ulcers versus erosions, particularly those that had been slow to heal. There was a highly significant tendency for the relapse lesion to replicate the site and type of the original lesion (mean odds ratios ranging from 3 to 14). Treatment failure was significantly less likely with omeprazole than with placebo, misoprostol, or ranitidine. This advantage was especially evident in H pylori positive patients receiving acid suppression (5.7% v 16.6% for gastric ulcer with omeprazole).

CONCLUSIONS

Relapse of lesions in patients taking NSAIDs was highly site and type specific and not adversely affected by H pylori status. This strongly implies that local mucosal factors predispose to ulcer development in patients taking NSAIDs. Identification of the responsible mucosal changes would aid understanding and could promote better treatment.