1
|
Jiang SX, Shahidi N. Large non-pedunculated colorectal polyp management: The elephant in the room. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:3126-3131. [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i25.3126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive innovations have transformed coloproctology. Specific to colorectal cancer (CRC), there has been a shift towards less invasive surgical techniques and use of endoscopic resection as an alternative for low risk T1 CRC. The role of endoscopic resection is however much more extensive: It is now considered the first line management strategy for most large (≥ 20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, the majority of which are benign. This is due to the well-established efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic techniques compared to surgery. Multiple endoscopic modalities now exist with distinct risk-benefit profiles and their outcomes are further improved by site-specific technical modifications, auxiliary techniques, and adverse event mitigation strategies. Endoscopic capacity continues to evolve with emerging endoscopic techniques and expanding applications, particularly in the confines of a multi-disciplinary setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley X Jiang
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6Z 2K5, BC, Canada
| | - Neal Shahidi
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6Z 2K5, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, van Hattem WA, Mandarino FV, Gauci JL, Kerrison C, Whitfield A, Gupta S, Lee E, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Cold versus hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for large (≥15 mm) flat non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2024:gutjnl-2024-332807. [PMID: 38964854 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Conventional hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (H-EMR) is effective for the management of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colon polyps (LNPCPs) however, electrocautery-related complications may incur significant morbidity. With a superior safety profile, cold snare EMR (C-EMR) of LNPCPs is an attractive alternative however evidence is lacking. We conducted a randomised trial to compare the efficacy and safety of C-EMR to H-EMR. METHODS Flat, 15-50 mm adenomatous LNPCPs were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to C-EMR or H-EMR with margin thermal ablation at a single tertiary centre. The primary outcome was endoscopically visible and/or histologically confirmed recurrence at 6 months surveillance colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were clinically significant post-EMR bleeding (CSPEB), delayed perforation and technical success. RESULTS 177 LNPCPs in 177 patients were randomised to C-EMR arm (n=87) or H-EMR (n=90). Treatment groups were equivalent for technical success 86/87 (98.9%) C-EMR versus H-EMR 90/90 (100%); p=0.31. Recurrence was significantly greater in C-EMR (16/87, 18.4% vs 1/90, 1.1%; relative risk (RR) 16.6, 95% CI 2.24 to 122; p<0.001).Delayed perforation (1/90 (1.1%) vs 0; p=0.32) only occurred in the H-EMR group. CSPEB was significantly greater in the H-EMR arm (7/90 (7.8%) vs 1/87 (1.1%); RR 6.77, 95% CI 0.85 to 53.9; p=0.034). CONCLUSION Compared with H-EMR, C-EMR for flat, adenomatous LNPCPs, demonstrates superior safety with equivalent technical success. However, endoscopic recurrence is significantly greater for cold snare resection and is currently a limitation of the technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04138030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O'Sullivan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Oliver Cronin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - W Arnout van Hattem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Vito Mandarino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julia L Gauci
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Clarence Kerrison
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eric Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen J Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Masgnaux LJ, Grimaldi J, Jacques J, Rivory J, Pioche M. Technical Advances in Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Lower GI Malignancies. Visc Med 2024; 40:128-143. [PMID: 38873630 PMCID: PMC11166901 DOI: 10.1159/000538041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The management of bulky neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract has historically been a surgical pursuit. With advancements in endoscopic techniques, particularly endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a paradigm shift toward organ preservation has been initiated. These endoscopic methods, developed incrementally since the 1980s, have progressively enabled curative management of lesions with minimal morbidity, challenging the previously unchallenged domain of surgery. Summary This review traces the evolution of endoscopic resection from snare polypectomy and EMR to sophisticated ESD, highlighting the technological innovations that have expanded the scope of endoscopic resection. It discusses the intricacies of various EMR techniques like underwater EMR, anchoring EMR, and hybrid EMR, alongside traction-assisted methods and the use of viscous solutions for submucosal injection. Additionally, the manuscript delves into the advancements in ESD, emphasizing traction strategies, knife technology, and the optimization of endoscopes. The benefits of these advancements are weighed against the challenges in anatomopathological interpretation posed by piecemeal resections. Key Messages The continuous amelioration of endoscopic resection techniques has significantly improved the outcomes of digestive tract lesion management, particularly in achieving R0 resections and reducing recurrence rates. These advancements represent a monumental step toward minimizing the invasiveness of lesion management. However, despite the progress, the necessity for early follow-up post-EMR remains due to the non-negligible recurrence rates, underscoring the need for a rigorous postoperative surveillance regimen. Furthermore, our review suggests that while ESD has transformed the therapeutic landscape, its widespread adoption hinges on further simplification, safety enhancement, and acceleration of the procedure, possibly through innovations like adaptive traction devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Jean Masgnaux
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Grimaldi
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Jérôme Rivory
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Sullivan T, Craciun A, Byth K, Gupta S, Gauci JL, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Abuarisha M, Williams SJ, Lee EYT, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. A simplified algorithm to evaluate the risk of submucosal invasive cancer in large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colonic polyps. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38447957 DOI: 10.1055/a-2282-4794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recognition of submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) in large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colonic polyps (LNPCPs) informs selection of the optimal resection strategy. LNPCP location, morphology, and size influence the risk of SMIC; however, currently no meaningful application of this information has simplified the process to make it accessible and broadly applicable. We developed a decision-making algorithm to simplify the identification of LNPCP subtypes with increased risk of potential SMIC. METHODS Patients referred for LNPCP resection from September 2008 to November 2022 were enrolled. LNPCPs with SMIC were identified from endoscopic resection specimens, lesion biopsies, or surgical outcomes. Decision tree analysis of lesion characteristics identified in multivariable analysis was used to create a hierarchical classification of SMIC prevalence. RESULTS 2451 LNPCPs were analyzed: 1289 (52.6%) were flat, 1043 (42.6%) nodular, and 118 (4.8%) depressed. SMIC was confirmed in 273 of the LNPCPs (11.1%). It was associated with depressed and nodular vs. flat morphology (odds ratios [ORs] 35.7 [95%CI 22.6-56.5] and 3.5 [95%CI 2.6-4.9], respectively; P<0.001); rectosigmoid vs. proximal location (OR 3.2 [95%CI 2.5-4.1]; P<0.001); nongranular vs. granular appearance (OR 2.4 [95%CI 1.9-3.1]; P<0.001); and size (OR 1.12 per 10-mm increase [95%CI 1.05-1.19]; P<0.001). Decision tree analysis targeting SMIC identified eight terminal nodes: SMIC prevalence was 62% in depressed LNPCPs, 19% in nodular rectosigmoid LNPCPs, and 20% in nodular proximal colon nongranular LNPCPs. CONCLUSIONS This decision-making algorithm simplifies identification of LNPCPs with an increased risk of potential SMIC. When combined with surface optical evaluation, it facilitates accurate lesion characterization and resection choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O'Sullivan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ana Craciun
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Karen Byth
- Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- The NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Oliver Cronin
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Eric Yong Tat Lee
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Nicholas Graeme Burgess
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meulen LWT, Bogie RMM, Siersema PD, Winkens B, Vlug MS, Wolfhagen FHJ, Baven-Pronk M, van der Voorn M, Schwartz MP, Vogelaar L, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Seerden TCJ, Hazen WL, Schrauwen RWM, Alvarez Herrero L, Schreuder RMM, van Nunen AB, Stoop E, de Bruin GJ, Bos P, Marsman WA, Kuiper E, de Bièvre M, Alderlieste YA, Roomer R, Groen J, Bargeman M, van Leerdam ME, Roberts-Bos L, Boersma F, Thurnau K, de Vries RS, Ramaker JM, Vleggaar FP, de Ridder RJ, Pellisé M, Bourke MJ, Masclee AAM, Moons LMG. Standardised training for endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps to reduce recurrence (*STAR-LNPCP study): a multicentre cluster randomised trial. Gut 2024; 73:741-750. [PMID: 38216328 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the preferred treatment for non-invasive large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) but is associated with an early recurrence rate of up to 30%. We evaluated whether standardised EMR training could reduce recurrence rates in Dutch community hospitals. DESIGN In this multicentre cluster randomised trial, 59 endoscopists from 30 hospitals were randomly assigned to the intervention group (e-learning and 2-day training including hands-on session) or control group. From April 2019 to August 2021, all consecutive EMR-treated LNPCPs were included. Primary endpoint was recurrence rate after 6 months. RESULTS A total of 1412 LNPCPs were included; 699 in the intervention group and 713 in the control group (median size 30 mm vs 30 mm, 45% vs 52% size, morphology, site and access (SMSA) score IV, 64% vs 64% proximal location). Recurrence rates were lower in the intervention group compared with controls (13% vs 25%, OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.78; p=0.005) with similar complication rates (8% vs 9%, OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.36; p=0.720). Recurrences were more often unifocal in the intervention group (92% vs 76%; p=0.006). In sensitivity analysis, the benefit of the intervention on recurrence rate was only observed in the 20-40 mm LNPCPs (5% vs 20% in 20-29 mm, p=0.001; 10% vs 21% in 30-39 mm, p=0.013) but less evident in ≥40 mm LNPCPs (24% vs 31%; p=0.151). In a post hoc analysis, the training effect was maintained in the study group, while in the control group the recurrence rate remained high. CONCLUSION A compact standardised EMR training for LNPCPs significantly reduced recurrences in community hospitals. This strongly argues for a national dedicated training programme for endoscopists performing EMR of ≥20 mm LNPCPs. Interestingly, in sensitivity analysis, this benefit was limited for LNPCPs ≥40 mm. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR7477.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lonne W T Meulen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel M M Bogie
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije S Vlug
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dijklander Hospital, Hoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martine Baven-Pronk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - Michael van der Voorn
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Lauran Vogelaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud W M Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenza Alvarez Herrero
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Annick B van Nunen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Stoop
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs J de Bruin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Bos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A Marsman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Edith Kuiper
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc de Bièvre
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Yasser A Alderlieste
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rivas Zorggroep, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Roomer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes Bargeman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Roberts-Bos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Boersma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Karsten Thurnau
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Roland S de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Jos M Ramaker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier J de Ridder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - María Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ad A M Masclee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Justiniano CF, Ozgur I, Liska D, Valente MA, Steele SR, Gorgun E. The role of advanced endoscopy in appendiceal polyp management and outcomes. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2267-2272. [PMID: 38438673 PMCID: PMC10978627 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10726-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appendiceal orifice lesions are often managed operatively with limited or oncologic resections. The aim is to report the management of appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms using advanced endoscopic interventions. METHODS Patients with appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms who underwent advanced endoscopic resections between 2011 and 2021 with either endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD), hybrid ESD, or combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery (CELS) were included from a prospectively collected dataset. Patient and lesion details and procedure outcomes are reported. RESULTS Out of 1005 lesions resected with advanced endoscopic techniques, 41 patients (4%) underwent appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasm resection, including 39% by hybrid ESD, 34% by ESD, 15% by EMR, and 12% by CELS. The median age was 65, and 54% were male. The median lesion size was 20 mm. The dissection was completed piecemeal in 49% of patients. Post-procedure, one patient had a complication within 30 days and was admitted with post-polypectomy abdominal pain treated with observation for 2 days with no intervention. Pathology revealed 49% sessile-serrated lesions, 24% tubular adenomas, and 15% tubulovillous adenomas. Patients were followed up for a median of 8 (0-48) months. One patient with a sessile-serrated lesion experienced a recurrence after EMR which was re-resected with EMR. CONCLUSION Advanced endoscopic interventions for appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms can be performed with a low rate of complications and early recurrence. While conventionally lesions at the appendiceal orifice are often treated with surgical resection, advanced endoscopic interventions are an alternative approach with promising results which allow for cecal preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla F Justiniano
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Ilker Ozgur
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - David Liska
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Michael A Valente
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ali S, Khetpal N, Fatima M, Hussain S, Ali A, Khan MA, Childs C, Hasan MK. The Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy in Polyps 10-20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e58462. [PMID: 38765346 PMCID: PMC11100549 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy remains the primary method for preventing colorectal cancer. Traditionally, hot snare polypectomy (HSP) was the method of choice for removing polyps larger than 5 mm. Yet, for polyps smaller than 10 mm, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has become the favored approach. Lately, the use of CSP has expanded to include the removal of sessile polyps that are between 10 and 20 mm in size. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) compared to hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting polyps measuring 10-20 mm. We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane databases up to April 2020 to find studies that directly compared CSP to HSP for polyps larger than 10 mm. Our main focus was on assessing the risk of delayed bleeding after polypectomy; a secondary focus was the incidence of any adverse events that required medical intervention post procedure. Our search yielded three comparative studies, two observational studies, and one randomized controlled trial (RCT), together encompassing 1,193 polypectomy procedures. Of these, 485 were performed using CSP and 708 with HSP. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) was 0.36 (95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.02, 7.13), with a Cochran Q test P-value of 0.11 and an I2 of 53%. For the risk of any adverse events necessitating medical care, the pooled OR was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.01, 2.29), with a Cochran Q test P-value of 0.21 and an I2 of 35%. The quality of the two observational studies was deemed moderate, and the RCT was only available in abstract form, preventing quality assessment. Our analysis suggests that there is no significant difference in the incidence of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding or other adverse events requiring medical attention between CSP and HSP for polyps measuring 10-20 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed Ali
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Neelam Khetpal
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, USA
| | - Munazza Fatima
- Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Sana Hussain
- Department of Medicine, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Asad Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Muhammad Ali Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Christopher Childs
- Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
| | - Muhammad K Hasan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wehbe H, Gutta A, Gromski MA. Updates on the Prevention and Management of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding in the Colon. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2024; 34:363-381. [PMID: 38395489 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) remains a significant procedure-related complication, with multiple risk factors determining the risk including patient demographics, polyp characteristics, endoscopist expertise, and techniques of polypectomy. Immediate PPB is usually treated promptly, but management of delayed PPB can be challenging. Cold snare polypectomy is the optimal technique for small sessile polyps with hot snare polypectomy for pedunculated and large sessile polyps. Topical hemostatic powders and gels are being investigated for the prevention and management of PPB. Further studies are needed to compare these topical agents with conventional therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisham Wehbe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 University Boulevard, UH 3533, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Aditya Gutta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 North University Boulevard, Suite 4100 Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Mark A Gromski
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 North University Boulevard, Suite 4100 Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lima Capela T, Ferreira AI, Macedo Silva V, Cúrdia Gonçalves T, Dias de Castro F, Cotter J. Recurrence rate after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of <20 mm non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: should we worry about the risk? Scand J Gastroenterol 2024; 59:361-368. [PMID: 37970898 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2278425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is scarce data focused on recurrence neoplasia rate (RR) after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) of 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal lesions (NPL). We aimed to analyze the RR after pEMR of 10-19 mm NPL, identify risk factors for its development and compare it with RR after pEMR of ≥ 20 mm NPL. METHODS Retrospective cohort-study including all ≥10 mm NPL resected by pEMR in our center between 2018-2022 with an early repeat colonoscopy (ERC). RR was defined as recurrence neoplasia identified in the ERC EMR scar with virtual chromoendoscopy or histological confirmation. RESULTS A total of 444 NPL were assessed, 124 (27.9%) with 10-19 mm. In the ERC, performed a median of 6 months after pEMR, RR was significantly lower for 10-19 mm NPL compared to ≥ 20 mm NPL (13/124 vs 68/320, p = 0.005). In subgroup analysis, RR after pEMR of 15-19 mm NPL was significantly higher compared to 10-14 mm NPL (13/98 vs 0, p = 0.041) but not significantly different compared to ≥ 20 mm NPL (13/98 vs 68/320, p = 0.073). In multivariable analysis, size of NPL (HR 1.501, 95% CI 1.012-2.227, p = 0.044) was the only independent risk factor identified for RR for 10-19 mm NPL. CONCLUSION Although the early RR after pEMR of 10-19 mm NPL is significantly lower compared to ≥ 20 mm NPL, it is non-negligible (10.5%) and appears to be the highest among 15-19 mm NPL. The size of the lesion was the only independent risk factor for RR. Our findings should be accounted in the selection of the most appropriate post-polypectomy endoscopic surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago Lima Capela
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Ana Isabel Ferreira
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Vítor Macedo Silva
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Francisca Dias de Castro
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - José Cotter
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alali AA, Almadi MA, Barkun AN. Review article: Advances in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:632-644. [PMID: 38158721 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common emergency with substantial associated morbidity and mortality. Elective colonoscopy plays an essential role in management, with an even more important role for radiology in the acute setting. Recent advances in the management of patients with LGIB warrant review as the management has recently evolved. AIMS To provide a comprehensive and updated overview of advances in the approach to patients with LGIB METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search to examine the current data for this narrative review supplemented by expert opinion. RESULTS The incidence of LGIB is increasing worldwide, partly related to an ageing population and the increasing use of antithrombotics. Diverticulosis continues to be the most common aetiology of LGIB. Pre-endoscopic risk stratification tools, especially the Oakland score, can aid appropriate patient triage. Adequate resuscitation continues to form the basis of management, while appropriate management of antithrombotics is crucial to balance the risk of worsening bleeding against increased cardiovascular risk. Radiological imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis and treatment of acute LGIB, especially among unstable patients. Colonoscopy remains the gold-standard test for the elective management of stable patients. CONCLUSIONS The management of LGIB has evolved significantly in recent years, with a shift towards radiological interventions for unstable patients while reserving elective colonoscopy for stable patients. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to optimise the outcomes of patients with LGIB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali A Alali
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait
| | - Majid A Almadi
- Division of Gastroenterology, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Division of Gastroenterology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alan N Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dressler J, Njor SH, Rasmussen M, Jørgensen LN. Treatment of patients with screen-detected colorectal cancer is less strenuous: a nationwide cohort study with long-term follow-up. Public Health 2024; 227:169-175. [PMID: 38232565 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE During the last two decades, organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been widely implemented. It remains to be established if screen-detected CRC (SD-CRC) is associated with reduced long-term requirements for treatment as compared with patients with non-screen-detected CRC (NSD-CRC). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This nationwide cohort study evaluated differences in treatment and healthcare contacts from the date of diagnosis to two years after comparing patients with SD-CRC and NSD-CRC. Data were collected from national healthcare registers, including patients aged 50-75 years and diagnosed with CRC between January 1st 2014 and March 31st 2018. Analyses were stratified into UICC stages and adjusted for sex, 5-year age groups, type of cancer (colonic/rectal), and Charlson comorbidity index score to address healthy user bias. RESULTS In total, 12,040 patients were included, 4708 with SD-CRC and 7332 with NSD-CRC. In patients with SD-CRC, the duration of hospitalisation and rate of emergency surgery were reduced by 38 % (relative risk [RR] = 0.62) and 66 % (RR = 0.34), respectively. Moreover, this group was characterised by a 75 % reduction in oncological outpatient visits (RR = 0.35) and a reduced number of treatments with chemotherapy (RR = 0.57) and radiotherapy (RR = 0.50). There were no significant differences between the two populations in the rates of metastasectomy and the number of contacts with primary healthcare providers. CONCLUSION Compared to patients with NSD-CRC, patients with SD-CRC experience less hospitalisation and treatment within the first two years after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Dressler
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - S H Njor
- Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - M Rasmussen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - L N Jørgensen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
王 跃, 张 敬, 薛 福, 于 静, 李 小. [Risk factors for delayed bleeding after intestinal polypectomy in children]. ZHONGGUO DANG DAI ER KE ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PEDIATRICS 2024; 26:48-53. [PMID: 38269459 PMCID: PMC10817730 DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2306060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of delayed bleeding after intestinal polypectomy in children, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical surgical intervention of intestinal polyps. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 2 456 children with intestinal polyps who underwent endoscopic high-frequency electrocoagulation loop resection in the Endoscopy Center of Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University from January 2014 to December 2021. According to the presence or absence of delayed bleeding after surgery, they were divided into bleeding group with 79 children and non-bleeding group with 2 377 children. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the risk factors for delayed bleeding. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to investigate the value of various indicators in predicting delayed bleeding. RESULTS Of all 2 456 children, 79 (3.22%) experienced delayed bleeding, among whom 5 children with severe delayed bleeding underwent emergency colonoscopy for hemostasis and 74 received conservative treatment, and successful hemostasis was achieved for all children. There were significant differences between the bleeding and non-bleeding groups in age, body mass index, constipation rate, location of lesion, time of endoscopic procedure, resection method (P<0.05). Children with a diameter of polyps of 6-10 mm and >20 mm were more likely to develop delayed bleeding after resection (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that endoscopic operation time, polyp diameter, and resection method were significantly associated with delayed bleeding (P<0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the endoscopic operation time, polyp diameter, and resection method had a good value in predicting delayed bleeding after intestinal polypectomy, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.706, 0.688, and 0.627, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic high-frequency electrocoagulation loop resection has a lower incidence of delayed bleeding in children with intestinal polyps, and the endoscopic operation time, polyp diameter, and resection method are closely associated with the occurrence of postoperative delayed bleeding.
Collapse
|
13
|
O'Sullivan T, Sidhu M, Gupta S, Byth K, Elhindi J, Tate D, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Wang H, Lee E, Williams S, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. A novel tool for case selection in endoscopic mucosal resection training. Endoscopy 2023; 55:1095-1102. [PMID: 37391184 DOI: 10.1055/a-2121-1148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥ 20 mm) adenomatous nonpedunculated colonic polyps (LNPCPs) becomes widely practiced outside expert centers, appropriate training is necessary to avoid failed resection and inappropriate surgical referral. No EMR-specific tool guides case selection for endoscopists learning EMR. This study aimed to develop an EMR case selection score (EMR-CSS) to identify potentially challenging lesions for "EMR-naïve" endoscopists developing competency. METHODS Consecutive EMRs were recruited from a single center over 130 months. Lesion characteristics, intraprocedural data, and adverse events were recorded. Challenging lesions with intraprocedural bleeding (IPB), intraprocedural perforation (IPP), or unsuccessful resection were identified and predictive variables identified. Significant variables were used to form a numerical score and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to generate cutoff values. RESULTS Of 1993 LNPCPs, 286 (14.4 %) were in challenging locations (anorectal junction, ileocecal valve, or appendiceal orifice), 368 (18.5 %) procedures were complicated by IPB and 77 (3.9 %) by IPP; 110 (5.5 %) procedures were unsuccessful. The composite end point of IPB, IPP, or unsuccessful EMR was present in 526 cases (26.4 %). Lesion size, challenging location, and sessile morphology were predictive of the composite outcome. A six-point score was generated with a cutoff value of 2 demonstrating 81 % sensitivity across the training and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The EMR-CSS is a novel case selection tool for conventional EMR training, which identifies a subset of adenomatous LNPCPs that can be successfully and safely attempted in early EMR training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O'Sullivan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Byth
- Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James Elhindi
- Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Oliver Cronin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hunter Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eric Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mandarino FV, Danese S, Uraoka T, Parra-Blanco A, Maeda Y, Saito Y, Kudo SE, Bourke MJ, Iacucci M. Precision endoscopy in colorectal polyps' characterization and planning of endoscopic therapy. Dig Endosc 2023. [PMID: 37988279 DOI: 10.1111/den.14727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
Precision endoscopy in the management of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer has emerged as the standard of care. It includes optical characterization of polyps and estimation of submucosal invasion depth of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps to select the appropriate endoscopic resection modality. Over time, several imaging modalities have been implemented in endoscopic practice to improve optical performance. Among these, image-enhanced endoscopy systems and magnification endoscopy represent now well-established tools. New advanced technologies, such as endocytoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy, have recently shown promising results in predicting the histology of colorectal polyps. In recent years, artificial intelligence has continued to enhance endoscopic performance in the characterization of colorectal polyps, overcoming the limitations of other imaging modes. In this review we retrace the path of precision endoscopy, analyzing the yield of various endoscopic imaging techniques in personalizing management of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Vito Mandarino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, San Raffaele Hospital IRCSS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, San Raffaele Hospital IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Toshio Uraoka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gumma, Japan
| | - Adolfo Parra-Blanco
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Yasuharu Maeda
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin-Ei Kudo
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dressler J, Njor SH, Jørgensen LN, Rasmussen M. Less Invasive Primary Treatment for Colorectal Cancer After Implementation of National Screening: A Nationwide Cohort Study. World J Surg 2023; 47:2877-2887. [PMID: 37610467 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07142-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening on type of primary treatment remains sparsely investigated. This study evaluated the difference in primary treatment strategy between patients diagnosed with screen-detected (SD-CRC) and non-screen-detected colorectal cancer (NSD-CRC) in a national CRC screening program. METHODS This was a retrospective national register-based cohort study. Data on patients aged between 50 and 75 years and diagnosed with SD-CRC or NSD-CRC were retrieved from the national colorectal cancer screening database and the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database. Outcomes related to surgical invasiveness were compared between the two cohorts. Differences were expressed as relative risks using log-binomial generalized linear regression models. UICC stage IV specific outcomes were analyzed using the same method. All analyses were adjusted for sex, age, type of cancer (colonic/rectal), and Charlson comorbidity index. RESULTS The study included 4707 patients with SD-CRC and 7328 with NSD-CRC. Therapeutic flexible endoscopy (SD-CRC: n = 636 vs. NSD-CRC: n = 334, RR: 2.50, P < 0.001), (robotic-assisted) laparoscopic resection ((n = 616 vs. n = 773, RR: 1.27, P < 0.001), n = 2759 vs. n = 3471, RR: 1.11, P < 0.001), and radical resection (n = 3890 vs. n = 4834, RR: 1.02, P = 0.002) were significantly more frequent in the SD-CRC group. The rates of emergency priority (n = 32 vs. n = 562, RR: 0.09, P < 0.001), open surgery (n = 391 vs. n = 1410, RR: 0.53, P < 0.001), supplementary organ resection (n = 259 vs. n = 860, RR: 0.56, P < 0.001), and stoma formation (n = 526 vs. n = 1040, RR: 0.89, P = 0.007) were significantly lower in the SD-CRC group. The rate of patients undergoing surgery with UICC stage IV disease was significantly higher in the SD-CRC group (SD-CRC: n = 262, NSD-CRC: n = 994, RR: 1.43, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION SD-CRC remained associated with less invasive primary surgical treatment following adjustment for potential healthy user bias. UICC stage IV disease may be less advanced in patients with SD-CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannie Dressler
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Nielsine Nielsens Vej 11, Entrance 8, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
| | - Sisse H Njor
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars N Jørgensen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Nielsine Nielsens Vej 11, Entrance 8, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Rasmussen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Nielsine Nielsens Vej 11, Entrance 8, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hanevelt J, Leicher LW, Moons LMG, Vleggaar FP, Huisman JF, van Westreenen HL, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH. Colonoscopic-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection versus segmental colon resection for benign colonic polyps: a comparative cost analysis. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:2147-2154. [PMID: 37814456 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
AIM The colonoscopic-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection (CAL-WR) is proven to be an effective and safe alternative to a segmental colon resection (SCR) for large or complex benign colonic polyps that are not eligible for endoscopic removal. This analysis aimed to evaluate the costs of CAL-WR and compare them to the costs of an SCR. METHOD A single-centre 90-day 'in-hospital' comparative cost analysis was performed on patients undergoing CAL-WR or SCR for complex benign polyps between 2016 and 2020. The CAL-WR group consisted of 44 patients who participated in a prospective multicentre study (LIMERIC study). Inclusion criteria were (1) endoscopically unresectable benign polyps; (2) residual or recurrence after previous polypectomy; or (3) irradically resected low risk pT1 colon carcinoma. The comparison group, which was retrospectively identified, included 32 patients who underwent an elective SCR in the same period. RESULTS Colonoscopic-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection was associated with significantly fewer complications (7% in the CAL-WR group vs. 45% in the SCR group, P < 0.001), shorter operation time (50 min in the CAL-WR group vs. 119 min in the SCR group, P < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (median length of stay 2 days in the CAL-WR group vs. 4 days in the SCR group, P < 0.001) and less use of surgical resources (reduction in costs of 32% per patient), resulting in a cost savings of €2372 (£2099 GBP) per patient (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Given the clinical and financial benefits, CAL-WR should be recommended for complex benign polyps that are not eligible for endoscopic resection before major surgery is considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Hanevelt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Laura W Leicher
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle F Huisman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Singh RR, Nanavati J, Gopakumar H, Kumta NA. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E1082-E1091. [PMID: 38026781 PMCID: PMC10681808 DOI: 10.1055/a-2181-5929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) over endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal neoplasms are well established; however, the technical challenges and lack of adequate training in ESD limit its widespread adoption in Western countries. Methods A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies conducted in non-Asian countries evaluating the effectiveness of colorectal ESD. A random effects model was used to obtain pooled en bloc, R0 resection rates, and adverse events (AEs). Results Thirty-three studies comprising 3,958 ESD procedures met the inclusion criteria. Of the polyps, 96.7% (2,817 of 2913) were ≥ 2 cm. Pooled en bloc resection (31 studies), R0 resection (29 studies), and curative resection rates were 84.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] [83.3%-85.9%]), 75.6% (95% CI [74.1%-77.0%]), and 81.9% (95% CI [78.6%-84.9%]), respectively. Surgery for invasive cancer was performed in 4.8% (23 studies). ESD-related perforation (25 studies) was observed in 5.5% and bleeding in 4.1% (delayed bleeding 3.4%). 1.8% of patients underwent surgery for procedure-related complications. A high degree of heterogeneity was observed for en bloc resection, R0 resection, and curative resection. Heterogeneity for AEs (perforation [I 2 13%], delayed bleeding [I 2 30%], and overall bleeding [I 2 49%]) was low to moderate. Conclusions The effectiveness of colorectal ESD for large colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancers is improving in Western countries, and recent resection rates are comparable to that seen in Asia. Colorectal perforation is still observed in about 5% of ESD; however, < 2% of patients need emergency surgery for AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu Raj Singh
- Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
| | - Julie Nanavati
- Library, Johns Hopkins Welch Medical Library, Baltimore, United States
| | - Harishankar Gopakumar
- Gastroenterology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, United States
| | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yzet C, Le Baleur Y, Albouys J, Jacques J, Doumbe-Mandengue P, Barret M, Abou Ali E, Schaefer M, Chevaux JB, Leblanc S, Lepillez V, Privat J, Degand T, Wallenhorst T, Rivory J, Chaput U, Berger A, Aziz K, Rahmi G, Coron E, Kull E, Caillo L, Vanbiervliet G, Koch S, Subtil F, Pioche M. Use of endoscopic submucosal dissection or full-thickness resection device to treat residual colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection: a multicenter historical cohort study. Endoscopy 2023; 55:1002-1009. [PMID: 37500072 DOI: 10.1055/a-2116-9930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : Residual colorectal neoplasia (RCN) after previous endoscopic mucosal resection is a frequent challenge. Different management techniques are feasible including endoscopic full-thickness resection using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) system and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two techniques for the treatment of such lesions. METHODS : All consecutive patients with RCN treated either using the FTRD or by ESD were retrospectively included in this multicenter study. The primary outcome was the R0 resection rate, defined as an en bloc resection with histologically tumor-free lateral and deep margins. RESULTS : 275 patients (median age 70 years; 160 men) who underwent 177 ESD and 98 FTRD procedures for RCN were included. R0 resection was achieved in 83.3 % and 77.6 % for ESD and FTRD, respectively (P = 0.25). Lesions treated by ESD were however larger than those treated by FTRD (P < 0.001). The R0 rates for lesions of 20-30 mm were 83.9 % and 57.1 % in the ESD and FTRD groups, respectively, and for lesions of 30-40 mm were 93.6 % and 33.3 %, respectively. On multivariable analysis, ESD procedures were associated with statistically higher en bloc and R0 resection rates after adjustment for lesion size (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively). The adverse event rate was higher in the ESD group (16.3 % vs. 5.1 %), mostly owing to intraoperative perforations. CONCLUSION: ESD is effective in achieving R0 resection for RCN whatever the size and location of the lesions. When residual lesions are smaller than 20 mm, the FTRD is an effective alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Yzet
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Yann Le Baleur
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie Albouys
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Paul Doumbe-Mandengue
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Einas Abou Ali
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Marion Schaefer
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | | | - Sarah Leblanc
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Vincent Lepillez
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Jocelyn Privat
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Vichy Hospital, Vichy, France
| | - Thibault Degand
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Timothée Wallenhorst
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Jérôme Rivory
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Ulriikka Chaput
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Arthur Berger
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Karim Aziz
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Saint Brieuc Hospital, Saint Brieuc, France
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Geneva (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
- Digestive Diseases Institute, University Hospital Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Eric Kull
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Metz Hospital, Metz, France
| | - Ludovic Caillo
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France
| | | | - Stéphane Koch
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Fabien Subtil
- Biostatistics Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, and Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sakowitz S, Bakhtiyar SS, Mallick S, Khoraminejad B, Olmedo M, Croman M, Benharash P, Lee H. Decreasing rates of colectomy for benign neoplasms: A nationwide analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293389. [PMID: 37878628 PMCID: PMC10599571 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in endoscopic techniques for management of benign colonic neoplasms, a rise in rates of surgical treatment has been reported. We used a nationally representative cohort to characterize temporal trends, patient characteristics, and outcomes associated with colectomy for colonic neoplasms. METHODS All patients undergoing elective partial colectomy for benign or malignant colonic neoplasms were identified using the 2012-2019 National Inpatient Sample. Those presenting with inflammatory bowel disease, or experiencing intestinal perforation were excluded. Patients with benign neoplasms were classified as the Benign cohort (others: Malignant). Trends, characteristics, and outcomes were assessed between groups. RESULTS Of 569,280 colectomy procedures included for analysis, 153,435 (27.0%) were performed for benign lesions. The proportion of Benign operations decreased from 28.6% in 2012 to 23.7% in 2019 (P for trend<0.001). While overall national incidence of colectomy for benign neoplasms decreased from 2012 to 2019 (IRD -1.19, 95%CI -1.20- -1.19), Black patients demonstrated an incremental increase (IRD +0.04, 95%CI +0.02-0.06). On average, Benign was younger (66 [57-72] vs 68 years [58-77], P<0.001), and demonstrated a lower Elixhauser comorbidity index (2 [1-3] vs 3 [2-4], P<0.001), relative to Malignancy. Following adjustment, Benign demonstrated lower odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.61, 95%CI 0.50-0.74; P<0.001), stoma creation (AOR 0.46, 95%CI 0.43-0.50; P<0.001), and infectious complications (AOR 0.68, 95%CI 0.63-0.73; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The present national study identifies a decrease in colectomy for benign polyps from 2012-2019. Future investigations should identify patients who would most benefit from surgical resection and address persistent inequities in access to screening and treatment for colonic neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Sakowitz
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Saad Mallick
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Baran Khoraminejad
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Manuel Olmedo
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Millicent Croman
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Stojic V, Zdravkovic N, Nikolic-Turnic T, Zdravkovic N, Dimitrijevic J, Misic A, Jovanovic K, Milojevic S, Zivic J. Using of endoscopic polypectomy in patients with diagnosed malignant colorectal polyp - The cross-sectional clinical study. Open Med (Wars) 2023; 18:20230811. [PMID: 37873541 PMCID: PMC10590616 DOI: 10.1515/med-2023-0811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic polypectomy as a therapeutic treatment for malignant alteration of colorectal polyps. In a 5-year research, 89 patients were included, who were tested and treated at the University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia, with the confirmed presence of malignant alteration polyps of the colon by colonoscopy, which were removed using the method of endoscopic polypectomy and confirmed by the histopathological examination of the entire polyp. After that, the same group of patients was monitored endoscopically within a certain period, controlling polypectomy locations and the occurrence of a possible remnant of the polyp, in the period of up to 2 years of polypectomy. We observed that, with an increasing size of polyps, there is also an increase in the percentage of the complexity of endoscopic resection and the appearance of remnant with histological characteristics of the invasive cancer. The highest percentage of incomplete endoscopic resection and the appearance of remnant with histological characteristics of the invasive cancer were shown at malignant altered polyps in the field of tubulovillous adenoma. Eighteen patients in total underwent the surgical intervention. In conclusion, our data support the high efficacy of endoscopic polypectomy for the removal of the altered malignant polyp.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladislava Stojic
- Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Natasa Zdravkovic
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Tamara Nikolic-Turnic
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Nebojsa Zdravkovic
- Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Jelena Dimitrijevic
- Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Aleksandra Misic
- Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Kristijan Jovanovic
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Stefan Milojevic
- Faculty of Business Economics, EDUCONS University, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Jelena Zivic
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shi K, Yang Z, Leng K. Treatment for T1 colorectal cancers substratified by site and size: "horses for courses". Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1230844. [PMID: 37901402 PMCID: PMC10602675 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1230844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Owing to advances in diagnostic technology, the diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancers (CRCs) continues to increase. However, the optimal management of T1 CRCs in the Western Hemisphere remains unclear due to limited population-based data directly comparing the efficacy of endoscopic therapy (ET) and surgical resection (SR). The purpose of this study was to report outcome data from a large Western cohort of patients who underwent ET or SR for early CRCs. Methods The SEER-18 database was used to identify patients with T1 CRCs diagnosed from 2004 to 2018 treated with ET or SR. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to identify variables related to lymph node metastasis (LNM). Rates of ET and 1-year relative survival were calculated for each year. Effect of ET or SR on overall survival and cancer-specific survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier method stratified by tumor size and site. Results A total of 28,430 T1 CRCs patients were identified from 2004 to 2018 in US, with 22.7% undergoing ET and 77.3% undergoing SR. The incidence of T1 CRCs was 6.15 per 100,000 person-years, with male patients having a higher incidence. Left-sided colon was the most frequent location of tumors. The utilization of ET increased significantly from 2004 to 2018, with no significant change in 1-year relative survival rate. Predictors of LNM were age at diagnosis, sex, race, tumor size, histology, grade, and location. The 5-year relative survival rates were 91.4 and 95.4% for ET and SR, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that OS and CSS were similar between ET and SR in T1N0M0 left-sided colon cancers with tumors 2 cm or less and in rectal cancers with tumors 1 cm or less. Conclusion Our study showed that ET was feasible and safe for patients with left-sided T1N0M0 colon cancers and tumors of 2 cm or less, as well as T1N0M0 rectal cancers and tumors of 1 cm or less. Therefore, the over- and under-use of ET should be avoided by carefully selecting patients based on tumor size and site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kexin Shi
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Zhen Yang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, China
| | - Kaiming Leng
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Blasberg T, Hochberger J, Meiborg M, Jung C, Weber M, Brunk T, Leifeld L, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Wedi E. Prophylactic clipping using the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system after complex ESD and EMR of large colon polyps. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7520-7529. [PMID: 37418148 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10235-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed bleeding is the most frequent complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colon polyps. Today, prophylactic clipping with through-the-scope clips (TTSCs) is commonly used to reduce the risk of bleeding. However, the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system might be superior to TTSCs in achieving hemostasis. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic clipping using the OTSC system after ESD or EMR of large colon polyps. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective collected database from 2009 until 2021 of three endoscopic centers. Patients with large (≥ 20 mm) colon polyps were enrolled. All polyps were removed by either ESD or EMR. After the resection, OTSCs were prophylactically applied on parts of the mucosal defect with a high risk of delayed bleeding or/and perforation. The main outcome measurement was delayed bleeding. RESULTS A total of 75 patients underwent ESD (67%, 50/75) or EMR (33%, 25/75) in the colorectum. The mean resected specimen diameter was 57 mm ± 24.1 (range 22-98 mm). The mean number of OTSCs placed on the mucosal defect was 2 (range 1-5). None of the mucosal defects were completely closed. Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 5.3% (ESD 2.0% vs. EMR 12.0%; P = 0.105), and intraprocedural perforation occurred in 6.7% (ESD 8% vs. EMR 4%; P = 0.659) of the patients. Hemostasis was achieved in 100% of cases of intraprocedural bleeding, whereas two patients required surgical conversion due to intraprocedural perforation. Among the remaining 73 patients who received prosphylactic clipping, delayed bleeding occurred in 1.4% (ESD 0% vs. EMR 4.2%; P = 0.329), and delayed perforation occurred in 0%. CONCLUSIONS The prophylactic partial closure of large post-ESD/EMR mucosal defects using OTSCs could serve as an effective strategy to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding and perforation. The prophylactic partial closure of large complex post-ESD/EMR mucosal defects using OTSCs could serve as an effective strategy to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding and perforation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Blasberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
| | - J Hochberger
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vivantes Hospital Friedrichshain Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Meiborg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
| | - C Jung
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - M Weber
- Division of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
| | - T Brunk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vivantes Hospital Friedrichshain Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - L Leifeld
- Department of Internal Medicine III, St. Bernward Hospital, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - A Seif Amir Hosseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - E Wedi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ahmed Z, Ramai D, Merza N, Badal J, Iqbal U, Arif SF, Al-Hillan A, Varughese T, Lee-Smith W, Nawras A, Alastal Y, Khara HS, Confer BD, Diehl DL, Adler DG. Safety and Efficacy of Powered Non-Thermal Endoscopic Resection Device for Removal of Colonic Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology Res 2023; 16:254-261. [PMID: 37937229 PMCID: PMC10627355 DOI: 10.14740/gr1638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic mucosal resection is a frequently employed method for removing colonic polyps. Nonetheless, the recurrence of these polyps over a healed submucosal base can complicate the extraction of leftover lesions through standard procedures. EndoRotor®, a non-thermal device specifically designed for endoscopic mucosal resection, has recently been assessed for its utility in removing colonic polyps, non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus, and pancreatic necrosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the safety and efficacy of EndoRotor® in resecting scared or recurrence colonic polyps. Methods We conducted an exhaustive review of existing literature using databases such as Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until January 2023. Our aim was to find all studies that assessed the safety of non-thermal endoscopic resection devices in removing colonic polyps. The primary outcome we focused on was the rate of technical success. Secondary outcomes that we considered included the frequency of remaining lesions and instances of adverse events. To analyze these data, we used comprehensive meta-analysis software. Results Our analysis incorporated three studies comprising 54 patients who underwent resection of 60 lesions. The combined technical success rate was 93.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 77.7-98.6%, I2 = 25.5%). In patients who had another endoscopic examination, 20 were found to have a residual lesion. After the initial session, the combined rate of remaining lesions was 39.8% (95% CI: 15.3-70.8%, I2 = 74.5%). There were eight occurrences of intraoperative bleeding and four instances of bleeding post-procedure. The combined rate of intraoperative bleeding was 13.2% (95% CI: 6.7-24.3%, I2 = 0%), and post-procedure bleeding stood at 8.5% (95% CI: 3.4-19.8%, I2 = 0%). Only one major bleeding event was recorded, and no cases of perforation were reported. Conclusion Our research indicates that the EndoRotor® effectively removes scarred colonic polyps, though the rate of remaining lesions is significant, potentially necessitating several sessions for a thorough removal. There is a need for broader prospective studies, mainly randomized controlled trials, to further assess EndoRotor®'s efficiency and safety in eliminating colonic polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zohaib Ahmed
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nooraldin Merza
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Joyce Badal
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Umair Iqbal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | - Alsadiq Al-Hillan
- Gastroenterology Department, Corewell Health/Willam Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Tony Varughese
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Wade Lee-Smith
- University of Toledo Libraries, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Ali Nawras
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Yaseen Alastal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Harshit S. Khara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Bradley D. Confer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - David L. Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Douglas G. Adler
- Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Porter Adventist Hospital, Centura Health, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Giugliano DN, Feinberg AE, Sapci I, Ozgur I, Valente MA, Steele SR, Gorgun E. The Learning Curve for Advanced Endoscopy for Colorectal Lesions: A Surgeon's Experience at a High-Volume Center. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:1383-1391. [PMID: 36876964 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced endoscopy can be used for the complete removal of large colorectal polyps. To date, few surgeons perform advanced endoscopy, and it is unknown how many procedures are needed to reach proficiency. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the learning curve for colorectal advanced endoscopy. DESIGN Retrospective. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS We queried a prospectively maintained institutional database of advanced endoscopy performed by a high-volume colorectal surgeon between 2011 and 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Advanced endoscopy characteristics were compared for 6 chronological intervals. Primary end points were the rates of complications and polyp recurrence. Secondary end point was the change in polyp removal rate (mm/h) over time. RESULTS A total of 207 patients underwent advanced endoscopy for a single colorectal polyp. The median polyp size was 30 (4-70) mm, 61.5% were located in the right colon, and 8.8% were malignant. The mean procedure time was 77 (range, 16-320) minutes. Immediate colon resection occurred in 25 patients because of suspicion of cancer or concern for perforation and was excluded from the learning curve analysis. The remaining 182 advanced endoscopy procedures were divided into intervals of 30 procedures. The median removal rate was highest in the last interval and in the endoscopy suite. A removal rate of 30 mm/h was achieved after performing 100 cases. The complication rate (bleeding or return to operating room) was 12.1% and was similar across intervals. The readmission rate was 11.5%, and 6.6% of 6-month follow-up colonoscopies showed polyp recurrence at the resection site. LIMITATIONS Retrospective design and single surgeon. CONCLUSION The learning curve for achieving proficiency with advanced endoscopy in the colon and rectum required a minimum of 100 cases with a low complication rate, low polyp recurrence rate, high en bloc resection rate, and a polyp removal rate of 30 mm/h. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C162 .LA CURVA DE APRENDIZAJE DE LA ENDOSCOPIA AVANZADA PARA LESIONES COLORRECTALES: LA EXPERIENCIA DE UN CIRUJANO EN UN CENTRO DE ALTO VOLUMENANTECEDENTES:La endoscopia avanzada se puede utilizar para la extirpación completa de pólipos colorrectales grandes. Hasta la fecha, pocos cirujanos realizan endoscopia avanzada y se desconoce cuántos procedimientos se necesitan para alcanzar la competencia.OBJETIVO:Determinar la curva de aprendizaje de la endoscopia colorrectal avanzada.DISEÑO:Retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Consultamos una base de datos institucional mantenida prospectivamente de endoscopia avanzada realizada por un cirujano colorrectal de alto volumen entre 2011 y 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se compararon las características de la endoscopia avanzada en seis intervalos cronológicos. Los puntos finales primarios fueron las tasas de complicaciones y recurrencia de pólipos. El criterio de valoración secundario fue el cambio en la tasa de eliminación de pólipos (mm/h) a lo largo del tiempo.RESULTADOS:Un total de 207 pacientes se sometieron a una endoscopia avanzada por un solo pólipo colorrectal. La mediana del tamaño de los pólipos fue de 30 (4-70) mm, el 61,5% se ubicaron en el colon derecho y el 8,8% fueron malignos. El tiempo medio del procedimiento fue de 77 (rango: 16-320) minutos. La resección inmediata del colon ocurrió en 25 pacientes debido a la sospecha de cáncer o preocupación por la perforación y fueron excluidos del análisis de la curva de aprendizaje. Los restantes 182 procedimientos de endoscopia avanzada se dividieron en intervalos de 30 procedimientos. La mediana de la tasa de extirpación fue más alta en el último intervalo y en la sala de endoscopia. Se logró una tasa de extirpación de 30 mm/hr después de realizar 100 casos. La tasa de complicaciones (sangrado o retorno al quirófano) fue del 12,1% y fue similar en todos los intervalos. La tasa de reingreso fue del 11,5% y el 6,6% de las colonoscopias de seguimiento a los 6 meses mostraron recurrencia de pólipos en el sitio de la resección.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, cirujano único.CONCLUSIÓN:La curva de aprendizaje para lograr el dominio de la endoscopia avanzada en el colon y el recto requiere un mínimo de 100 casos con una baja tasa de complicaciones, baja tasa de recurrencia de pólipos, alta tasa de resección en bloque y una tasa de eliminación de pólipos de 30 mm/h. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C162 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia.Rojas-Khalil ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danica N Giugliano
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brunori A, Daca-Alvarez M, Pellisé M. pT1 colorectal cancer: A treatment dilemma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 66:101854. [PMID: 37852711 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
The implementation of population screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) has led to a considerable increase in the prevalence pT1-CRC originating on polyps amenable by local treatments. However, a high proportion of patients are referred for unnecessary oncological surgeries without a clear benefit in terms of survival. Selecting the appropriate endoscopic resection technique in the moment of diagnosis becomes crucial to provide the best treatment alternative to each individual polyp and patient. For this, it is imperative to increase the optical diagnostic skill for differentiating pT1-CRCs and decide the appropriate initial therapy. En bloc resection is crucial to obtain an adequate histological specimen that might allow organ preserving therapeutic management. In this review, we address key challenges in T1 CRC management, explore the efficacy and safety of the available diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and shed light on upcoming advances in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Brunori
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy
| | - Maria Daca-Alvarez
- Department of Gastroenterology Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de EnfermedadesHepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Spain
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de InvestigaciónBiomé, dica en Red de EnfermedadesHepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Okimoto K, Matsumura T, Matsusaka K, Inaba Y, Ishikawa T, Akizue N, Kaneko T, Ota M, Ohta Y, Taida T, Saito K, Ogasawara S, Maruoka D, Kato J, Ikeda JI, Kato N. Outcomes for Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of 21-30-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Feasible Study. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3963-3973. [PMID: 37658209 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08093-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of 21-30 mm colonic polyps. METHOD We conducted a single-center RCT. Patients diagnosed with suspected colorectal intramucosal carcinoma (21-30 mm and adaptable for both UEMR and ESD) were randomly assigned to the UEMR and ESD groups at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. We independently performed one-sample tests against the set threshold for each treatment. The significance level was set at p = 0.224. RESULT Eleven polyps each in the UEMR and ESD groups, respectively, were analyzed. The R0 resection rate (%) was 36 (95% confidence interval 11-69) and 100 (72-100) for UEMR and ESD, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.002). The p-value against the set threshold for UEMR was 0.743, whereas that for ESD was < 0.001 (one-sample binomial test). The en bloc resection rates (%) were 82 (48-97) and 100 (72-100) for UEMR and ESD, respectively; however, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.167). The mean treatment time (min) was significantly shorter in the UEMR group (8 ± 6) than in the ESD group (48 ± 29) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION ESD could achieve a high R0 resection rate, while the en bloc resection rate was comparable between the two treatment techniques with less burden on patients undergoing UEMR for 21-30-mm colorectal polyps. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trial as jRCT1030210015 and jRCT1030210177.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichiro Okimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
| | - Tomoaki Matsumura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | | | - Yosuke Inaba
- Biostatistics Section, Chiba University Hospital Clinical Research Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tsubasa Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Naoki Akizue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Kaneko
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ota
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Ohta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Takashi Taida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Keiko Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Sadahisa Ogasawara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Daisuke Maruoka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
- Kameido Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Jun-Ichiro Ikeda
- Department of Pathology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoya Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tate DJ, Desomer L, Argenziano ME, Mahajan N, Sidhu M, Vosko S, Shahidi N, Lee E, Williams SJ, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Treatment of adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut 2023; 72:1875-1886. [PMID: 37414440 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Residual or recurrent adenoma (RRA) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) of ≥20 mm is a major limitation. Data on outcomes of the endoscopic treatment of recurrence are scarce, and no evidence-based standard exists. We investigated the efficacy of endoscopic retreatment over time in a large prospective cohort. DESIGN Over 139 months, detailed morphological and histological data on consecutive RRA detected after EMR for single LNPCPs at one tertiary endoscopy centre were prospectively recorded during structured surveillance colonoscopy. Endoscopic retreatment was performed on cases with evidence of RRA and was performed predominantly using hot snare resection, cold avulsion forceps with adjuvant snare tip soft coagulation or a combination of the two. RESULTS 213 (14.6%) patients had RRA (168 (78.9%) at first surveillance and 45 (21.1%) thereafter). RRA was commonly 2.5-5.0 mm (48.0%) and unifocal (78.7%). Of 202 (94.8%) cases which had macroscopic evidence of RRA, 194 (96.0%) underwent successful endoscopic therapy and 161 (83.4%) had a subsequent follow-up colonoscopy. Of the latter, endoscopic therapy of recurrence was successful in 149 (92.5%) of 161 in the per-protocol analysis, and 149 (73.8%) of 202 in the intention-to-treat analysis, with a mean of 1.15 (SD 0.36) retreatment sessions. No adverse events were directly attributable to endoscopic therapy. Further RRA after endoscopic therapy was endoscopically treatable in most cases. Overall, only 9 (4.2%, 95% CI 2.2% to 7.8%) of 213 patients with RRA required surgery.Thus 159 (98.8%, 95% CI 95.1% to 99.8%) of 161 cases with initially successful endoscopic treatment of RRA and follow-up remained surgery-free for a median of 13 months (IQR 25.0) of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS RRA after EMR of LNPCPs can be effectively treated using simple endoscopic techniques with long-term adenoma remission of >90%; only 16% required retreatment. Therefore, more technically complex, morbid and resource-intensive endoscopic or surgical techniques are required only in selected cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS NCT01368289 and NCT02000141.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Gent, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lobke Desomer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maria Eva Argenziano
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Neha Mahajan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sergei Vosko
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Neal Shahidi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eric Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen J Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dang H, Dekkers N, Steyerberg EW, Baldaque-Silva F, Omae M, Haasnoot KJ, van Tilburg L, Nobbenhuis K, van der Kraan J, Langers AM, van Hooft JE, de Graaf W, Koch AD, Didden P, Moons LM, Hardwick JC, Boonstra JJ. Predicting procedure duration of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection at Western endoscopy centers. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E724-E732. [PMID: 37941732 PMCID: PMC10629487 DOI: 10.1055/a-2122-0419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Overcoming logistical obstacles for the implementation of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) requires accurate prediction of procedure times. We aimed to evaluate existing and new prediction models for ESD duration. Patients and methods Records of all consecutive patients who underwent single, non-hybrid colorectal ESDs before 2020 at three Dutch centers were reviewed. The performance of an Eastern prediction model [GIE 2021;94(1):133-144] was assessed in the Dutch cohort. A prediction model for procedure duration was built using multivariable linear regression. The model's performance was validated using internal validation by bootstrap resampling, internal-external cross-validation and external validation in an independent Swedish ESD cohort. Results A total of 435 colorectal ESDs were analyzed (92% en bloc resections, mean duration 139 minutes, mean tumor size 39 mm). The performance of current unstandardized time scheduling practice was suboptimal (explained variance: R 2 =27%). We successfully validated the Eastern prediction model for colorectal ESD duration <60 minutes (c-statistic 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.77), but this model was limited due to dichotomization of the outcome and a relatively low frequency (14%) of ESDs completed <60 minutes in the Dutch centers. The model was more useful with a dichotomization cut-off of 120 minutes (c-statistic: 0.75; 88% and 17% of "easy" and "very difficult" ESDs completed <120 minutes, respectively). To predict ESD duration as continuous outcome, we developed and validated the six-variable cESD-TIME formula ( https://cesdtimeformula.shinyapps.io/calculator/ ; optimism-corrected R 2 =61%; R 2 =66% after recalibration of the slope). Conclusions We provided two useful tools for predicting colorectal ESD duration at Western centers. Further improvements and validations are encouraged with potential local adaptation to optimize time planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Dang
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Nik Dekkers
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Ewout W. Steyerberg
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Francisco Baldaque-Silva
- Endoscopy Unit, Center for Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Advanced Endoscopy Center Carlos Moreira da Silva, Pedro Hispano Hospital, Matosinhos, Portugal
| | - Masami Omae
- Endoscopy Unit, Center for Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Krijn J.C. Haasnoot
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Kate Nobbenhuis
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jolein van der Kraan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Jeanin E. van Hooft
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Wilmar de Graaf
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arjun D. Koch
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leon M.G. Moons
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - James C.H. Hardwick
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J. Boonstra
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mun EJ, Wagh MS. Recent advances and current challenges in endoscopic resection with the full-thickness resection device. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:4009-4020. [PMID: 37476589 PMCID: PMC10354579 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i25.4009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has emerged as a viable technique in the management of mucosal and subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) not amenable to conventional therapeutic approaches. While various devices and techniques have been described for EFTR, a single, combined full-thickness resection and closure device (full-thickness resection device, FTRD system, Ovesco Endoscopy AG, Tuebingen, Germany) has become commercially available in recent years. Initially, the FTRD system was limited to use in the colorectum only. Recently, a modified version of the FTRD has been released for EFTR in the upper GIT as well. This review provides a broad summary of the FTRD, highlighting recent advances and current challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elijah J Mun
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Mihir S Wagh
- Interventional Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bi D, Zhang LY, Alqaisieh M, Shrigiriwar A, Farha J, Mahmoud T, Akiki K, Almario JA, Shah-Khan SM, Gordon SR, Adler JM, Radetic M, Draganov PV, David YN, Shinn B, Mohammed Z, Schlachterman A, Yuen S, Al-Taee A, Yunseok N, Trasolini R, Bejjani M, Ghandour B, Ramberan H, Canakis A, Ngamruengphong S, Storm AC, Singh S, Pohl H, Bucobo JC, Buscaglia JM, D'Souza LS, Qumseya B, Kumta NA, Kumar A, Haber GB, Aihara H, Sawhney M, Kim R, Berzin TM, Khashab MA. Novel through-the-scope suture closure of colonic EMR defects (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:122-129. [PMID: 36889364 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Large colon polyps removed by EMR can be complicated by delayed bleeding. Prophylactic defect clip closure can reduce post-EMR bleeding. Larger defects can be challenging to close using through-the-scope clips (TTSCs), and proximal defects are difficult to reach using over-the-scope techniques. A novel, through-the-scope suturing (TTSS) device allows direct closure of mucosal defects without scope withdrawal. The goal of this study was to evaluate the rate of delayed bleeding after the closure of large colon polyp EMR sites with TTSS. METHODS A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed involving 13 centers. All defect closure by TTSS after EMR of colon polyps ≥2 cm from January 2021 to February 2022 were included. The primary outcome was rate of delayed bleeding. RESULTS A total of 94 patients (52% female; mean age, 65 years) underwent EMR of predominantly right-sided (n = 62 [66%]) colon polyps (median size, 35 mm; interquartile range, 30-40 mm) followed by defect closure with TTSS during the study period. All defects were successfully closed with TTSS alone (n = 62 [66%]) or with TTSS and TTSCs (n = 32 [34%]), using a median of 1 (interquartile range, 1-1) TTSS system. Delayed bleeding occurred in 3 patients (3.2%), with 2 requiring repeated endoscopic evaluation/treatment (moderate). CONCLUSION TTSS alone or with TTSCs was effective in achieving complete closure of all post-EMR defects, despite a large lesion size. After TTSS closure with or without adjunctive devices, delayed bleeding was seen in 3.2% of cases. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before wider adoption of TTSS for large polypectomy closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danse Bi
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jad Farha
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tala Mahmoud
- Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Karl Akiki
- Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | - Stuart R Gordon
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Adler
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Mark Radetic
- University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Brianna Shinn
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zahraa Mohammed
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Sofia Yuen
- NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anand Kumar
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Mandeep Sawhney
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raymond Kim
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tyler M Berzin
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tate DJ, Argenziano ME, Anderson J, Bhandari P, Boškoski I, Bugajski M, Desomer L, Heitman SJ, Kashida H, Kriazhov V, Lee RRT, Lyutakov I, Pimentel-Nunes P, Rivero-Sánchez L, Thomas-Gibson S, Thorlacius H, Bourke MJ, Tham TC, Bisschops R. Curriculum for training in endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2023. [PMID: 37285908 DOI: 10.1055/a-2077-0497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the standard of care for the complete removal of large (≥ 10 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). Increased detection of LNPCPs owing to screening colonoscopy, plus high observed rates of incomplete resection and need for surgery call for a standardized approach to training in EMR. 1 : Trainees in EMR should have achieved basic competence in diagnostic colonoscopy, < 10-mm polypectomy, pedunculated polypectomy, and common methods of gastrointestinal endoscopic hemostasis. The role of formal training courses is emphasized. Training may then commence in vivo under the direct supervision of a trainer. 2 : Endoscopy units training endoscopists in EMR should have specific processes in place to support and facilitate training. 3: A trained EMR practitioner should have mastered theoretical knowledge including how to assess an LNPCP for risk of submucosal invasion, how to interpret the potential difficulty of a particular EMR procedure, how to decide whether to remove a particular LNPCP en bloc or piecemeal, whether the risks of electrosurgical energy can be avoided for a particular LNPCP, the different devices required for EMR, management of adverse events, and interpretation of reports provided by histopathologists. 4: Trained EMR practitioners should be familiar with the patient consent process for EMR. 5: The development of endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) and team interaction are important for trainees in EMR. 6: Differences in recommended technique exist between EMR performed with and without electrosurgical energy. Common to both is a standardized technique based upon dynamic injection, controlled and precise snare placement, safety checks prior to the application of tissue transection (cold snare) or electrosurgical energy (hot snare), and interpretation of the post-EMR resection defect. 7: A trained EMR practitioner must be able to manage adverse events associated with EMR including intraprocedural bleeding and perforation, and post-procedural bleeding. Delayed perforation should be avoided by correct interpretation of the post-EMR defect and treatment of deep mural injury. 8: A trained EMR practitioner must be able to communicate EMR procedural findings to patients and provide them with a plan in case of adverse events after discharge and a follow-up plan. 9: A trained EMR practitioner must be able to detect and interrogate a post-endoscopic resection scar for residual or recurrent adenoma and apply treatment if necessary. 10: Prior to independent practice, a minimum of 30 EMR procedures should be performed, culminating in a trainer-guided assessment of competency using a validated assessment tool, taking account of procedural difficulty (e. g. using the SMSA polyp score). 11: Trained practitioners should log their key performance indicators (KPIs) of polypectomy during independent practice. A guide for target KPIs is provided in this document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maria Eva Argenziano
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Emergency Digestive Endoscopy, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - John Anderson
- Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Endoscopy Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Ivo Boškoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marek Bugajski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Luxmed Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lobke Desomer
- AZ Delta Roeselare, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Steven J Heitman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Hiroshi Kashida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Vladimir Kriazhov
- Endoscopy Department, Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Center, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia Federation
| | - Ralph R T Lee
- The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Ivan Lyutakov
- University Hospital Tsaritsa Yoanna-ISUL, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Surgery and Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Liseth Rivero-Sánchez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tony C Tham
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Keating E, Bennett G, Murray MA, Ryan S, Aird J, O'Connor DB, O'Toole D, Lahiff C. Rectal neuroendocrine tumours and the role of emerging endoscopic techniques. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 15:368-375. [PMID: 37274556 PMCID: PMC10236980 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Rectal neuroendocrine tumours represent a rare colorectal tumour with a 10 fold increased prevalence due to incidental detection in the era of colorectal screening. Patient outcomes with early diagnosis are excellent. However endoscopic recognition of this lesion is variable and misdiagnosis can result in suboptimal endoscopic resection with subsequent uncertainty in relation to optimal long-term management. Endoscopic techniques have shown particular utility in managing this under-recognized neuroendocrine tumour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoin Keating
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Gayle Bennett
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Michelle A Murray
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
- National Lung Transplant Unit, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - Sinead Ryan
- Department of Pathology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - John Aird
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
- Department of Pathology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - Donal B O'Connor
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Dermot O'Toole
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Gastroenterology, St. James Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Conor Lahiff
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rodríguez Sánchez J, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Pellisé M, Coto-Ugarte D, Uchima H, Aranda-Hernández J, Santiago García J, Marín-Gabriel JC, Riu Pons F, Nogales O, Carreño Macian R, Herreros-de-Tejada A, Hernández L, Patrón GO, Rodriguez-Tellez M, Redondo-Cerezo E, Sánchez Alonso M, Daca M, Valdivielso-Cortazar E, Álvarez Delgado A, Enguita M, Montori S, Albéniz E. Underwater versus conventional EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:941-951.e2. [PMID: 36572129 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an alternative procedure to conventional EMR (CEMR) to treat large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (LNPCLs). In this multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of UEMR versus CEMR on LNPCLs. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial from February 2018 to February 2020 in 11 hospitals in Spain. A total of 298 patients (311 lesions) were randomized to the UEMR (n = 149) and CEMR (n = 162) groups. The main outcome was the lesion recurrence rate in at least 1 follow-up colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included technical aspects, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rates, and adverse events, among others. RESULTS There were no differences in the overall recurrence rate (9.5% UEMR vs 11.7% CEMR; absolute risk difference, -2.2%; 95% CI, -9.4 to 4.9). However, considering polyp sizes between 20 and 30 mm, the recurrence rate was lower for UEMR (3.4% UEMR vs 13.1% CEMR; absolute risk difference, -9.7%; 95% CI, -19.4 to 0). The R0 resection showed the same tendency, with significant differences favoring UEMR only for polyps between 20 and 30 mm. Overall, UEMR was faster and easier to perform than CEMR. Importantly, the techniques were equally safe. CONCLUSIONS UEMR is a valid alternative to CEMR for treating LNPCLs and could be considered the first option of treatment for lesions between 20 and 30 mm due to its higher en bloc and R0 resection rates. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03567746.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaquín Rodríguez Sánchez
- Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain.
| | - Marco A Alvarez-Gonzalez
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital del Mar, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Pellisé
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Coto-Ugarte
- Cruces University Hospital Endoscopy Unit Barakaldo, Basque Country, Spain
| | - Hugo Uchima
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Aranda-Hernández
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Santiago García
- Gastroenterology Department, Research Institute Segovia de Arana, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Carlos Marín-Gabriel
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, "i+12 Research Institute," Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fausto Riu Pons
- Gastroenterology Department, Endoscopy Unit, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oscar Nogales
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada
- Gastroenterology Department, Research Institute Segovia de Arana, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - G Oliver Patrón
- Hospital Manacor and Hospital Parque Llevant, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, "Virgen de Las Nieves" University Hospital, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Maria Daca
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Mónica Enguita
- Methodology Unit,. Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Sheyla Montori
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Unit, Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Navarrabiomed, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lv XH, Lu Q, Yang JL. Underwater EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:811. [PMID: 36958924 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Xiu-He Lv
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Sichuan University-Oxford University Huaxi Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qing Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Sichuan University-Oxford University Huaxi Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jin-Lin Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Sichuan University-Oxford University Huaxi Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zwager LW, Mueller J, Stritzke B, Montazeri NSM, Caca K, Dekker E, Fockens P, Schmidt A, Bastiaansen BAJ. Adverse events of endoscopic full-thickness resection: results from the German and Dutch nationwide colorectal FTRD registry. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:780-789.e4. [PMID: 36410447 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery for complex colorectal lesions. Previous studies have demonstrated favorable safety results; however, large studies representing a generalizable estimation of adverse events (AEs) are lacking. Our aim was to provide further insight in AEs after eFTR. METHODS Data from all registered eFTR procedures in the German and Dutch colorectal full-thickness resection device registries between July 2015 and March 2021 were collected. Safety outcomes included immediate and late AEs. RESULTS Of 1892 procedures, the overall AE rate was 11.3% (213/1892). No AE-related mortality occurred. Perforations occurred in 2.5% (47/1892) of all AEs, 57.4% (27/47) of immediate AEs, and 42.6% (20/47) of delayed AEs. Successful endoscopic closure was achieved in 29.8% of cases (13 immediate and 1 delayed), and antibiotic treatment was sufficient in 4.3% (2 delayed). The appendicitis rate for appendiceal lesions was 9.9% (13/131), and 46.2% (6/13) could be treated conservatively. The severe AE rate requiring surgery was 2.2% (42/1892), including delayed perforations in .9% (17/1892) and immediate perforations in .7% (13/1892). Delayed perforations occurred between days 1 and 10 (median, 2) after eFTR, and 58.8% (10/17) were located on the left side. Other severe AEs were appendicitis (.4%, 7/1892), luminal stenosis (.1%, 2/1892), delayed bleeding (.1%, 1/1892), pain after eFTR close to the dentate line (.1%, 1/1892), and grasper entrapment in the clip (.1%, 1/1892). CONCLUSIONS Colorectal eFTR is a safe procedure with a low risk for severe AEs in everyday practice and without AE-related mortality. These results further support the position of eFTR as an established minimally invasive technique for complex colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liselotte W Zwager
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julius Mueller
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Nahid S M Montazeri
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karel Caca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Barbara A J Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gomez Cifuentes JD, Berger S, Caskey K, Jove A, Sealock RJ, Hair C, Velez M, Jarbrink-Sehgal M, Thrift AP, da Costa W, Gyanprakash K. Evolution of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique and the reduced recurrence of large colonic polyps from 2012 to 2020. Scand J Gastroenterol 2023; 58:435-440. [PMID: 36254785 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2134734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective method for removing non-pedunculated polyps ≥ 20 mm. We aimed to examine changes in EMR techniques over a 9-year period and evaluate frequency of histologic-confirmed recurrence. METHODS We identified patients who underwent EMR of non-pedunculated polyps ≥ 20 mm at a safety net and the Veteran's Affairs (VA) hospital in Houston, Texas between 2012 and 2020. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations with recurrence risk were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS 461 unique patients were included. The histologic-confirmed recurrence was 29.0% at 15.6 months median follow up (IQR 12.3 - 17.4). Polyps removed between 2018 and 2020 had a 0.43 decreased odds of recurrence vs. polyps removed between 2012 and 2014. The use of viscous lifting agents increased over time (from 0 to 54%), and the use of saline was associated with increased risk of recurrence (OR 2.28 [CI 1.33 - 3.31]). CONCLUSIONS Histologic-confirmed recurrence after EMR for non-pedunculated polyps ≥ 20 mm decreased over the seven year-period. Saline was associated with a higher risk of recurrence and the use of more viscous agents increased over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Scott Berger
- Internal Medicine Department, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Andre Jove
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert J Sealock
- Gastroenterology Department, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clark Hair
- Gastroenterology Department, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria Velez
- Gastroenterology Department, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Aaron P Thrift
- Department of Medicine, Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wilson da Costa
- Department of Medicine, Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Zachou M, Varytimiadis K, Androutsakos T, Katsaras G, Zoumpouli C, Lalla E, Nifora M, Karantanos P, Nikiteas N, Sougioultzis S, Kalaitzakis E, Kykalos S. Protocol design for randomized clinical trial to compare underwater cold snare polypectomy to conventional cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated colon polyps of size 5-10 mm (COLDWATER study). Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:325-333. [PMID: 36399201 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02731-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is internationally the third leading cause of death from a malignant disease. The aim of screening colonoscopy in adults > 45 years of age is early diagnosis and treatment of precancerous polyps. Endoscopic polyp removal (polypectomy) can be achieved with various techniques depending on the size, morphology, and location of the polyp. According to current guidelines, small non-pedunculated polyps should be removed with a cold snare after the colorectal lumen has been insufflated with air (conventional cold snare polypectomy).In recent years, several studies have described the benefits of water aided colonoscopy, as well as the safety and efficacy of underwater cold snare polypectomy for large colon polyps. However, there are insufficient data on conventional and underwater techniques for small polyps, the most commonly diagnosed colorectal polyps. METHODS We have designed a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of conventional and underwater cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated polyps 5-10 mm in size. A total of 398 polyps will be randomized. Randomization will be carried out using the random numbers method of Microsoft Excel 2016. The primary endpoint is the muscularis mucosa resection rate. Secondary endpoints are the depth and percentage of R0 excisions, complications, and the recurrence rate at follow-up endoscopy 6-12 months after polypectomy. DISCUSSION We hypothesize underwater polypectomy will result in a higher muscularis mucosa resection rate. The results of our study will provide useful data for the development of guidelines in polypectomy techniques for non-pedunculated polyps 5-10 mm in size. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05273697.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Zachou
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. .,Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - K Varytimiadis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - T Androutsakos
- Department of Pathophysiology, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - G Katsaras
- Second Neonatal Department and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Medical School, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Paediatric Department, General Hospital of Pella-Hospital Unit of Edessa, Edessa, Greece
| | - C Zoumpouli
- Department of Pathology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - E Lalla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - M Nifora
- Department of Pathology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - P Karantanos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - N Nikiteas
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S Sougioultzis
- Department of Pathophysiology, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - E Kalaitzakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - S Kykalos
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bak MTJ, Albéniz E, East JE, Coelho-Prabhu N, Suzuki N, Saito Y, Matsumoto T, Banerjee R, Kaminski MF, Kiesslich R, Coron E, de Vries AC, van der Woude CJ, Bisschops R, Hart AL, Itzkowitz SH, Pioche M, Moons LMG, Oldenburg B. Endoscopic management of patients with high-risk colorectal colitis-associated neoplasia: a Delphi study. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:767-779.e6. [PMID: 36509111 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Current guidelines recommend endoscopic resection of visible and endoscopically resectable colorectal colitis-associated neoplasia (CAN) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, patients with high-risk CAN (HR-CAN) are often not amenable to conventional resection techniques, and a consensus approach for the endoscopic management of these lesions is presently lacking. This Delphi study aims to reach consensus among experts on the endoscopic management of these lesions. METHODS A 3-round modified Delphi process was conducted to reach consensus among worldwide IBD and/or endoscopy experts (n = 18) from 3 continents. Consensus was considered if ≥75% agreed or disagreed. Quality of evidence was assessed by the criteria of the Cochrane Collaboration group. RESULTS Consensus was reached on all statements (n = 14). Experts agreed on a definition for CAN and HR-CAN. Consensus was reached on the examination of the colon with enhanced endoscopic imaging before resection, the endoscopic resectability of an HR-CAN lesion, and endoscopic assessment and standard report of CAN lesions. In addition, experts agreed on type of resections of HR-CAN (< 20 mm, >20 mm, with or without good lifting), endoscopic success (technical success and outcomes), histologic assessment, and follow-up in HR-CAN. CONCLUSIONS This is the first step in developing international consensus-based recommendations for endoscopic management of CAN and HR-CAN. Although the quality of available evidence was considered low, consensus was reached on several aspects of the management of CAN and HR-CAN. The present work and proposed standardization might benefit future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel T J Bak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra Navarrabiomed, Universidad Pública de Navarra, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Healthcare, London, UK
| | | | - Noriko Suzuki
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsumoto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
| | - Rupa Banerjee
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ralf Kiesslich
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Helios Clinic Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Janneke van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Steven H Itzkowitz
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B, Bisschops R, Bourke MJ, Deprez PH, Esposito G, Lemmers A, Leclercq P, Maselli R, Messmann H, Pech O, Pioche M, Vieth M, Weusten BLAM, Fuccio L, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2023; 55:361-389. [PMID: 36882090 DOI: 10.1055/a-2031-0874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
ESGE suggests conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; marking and mucosal incision followed by circumferential incision and stepwise submucosal dissection) for most esophageal and gastric lesions. ESGE suggests tunneling ESD for esophageal lesions involving more than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference. ESGE recommends the pocket-creation method for colorectal ESD, at least if traction devices are not used. The use of dedicated ESD knives with size adequate to the location/thickness of the gastrointestinal wall is recommended. It is suggested that isotonic saline or viscous solutions can be used for submucosal injection. ESGE recommends traction methods in esophageal and colorectal ESD and in selected gastric lesions. After gastric ESD, coagulation of visible vessels is recommended, and post-procedural high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (or vonoprazan). ESGE recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD. ESGE recommends corticosteroids after resection of > 50 % of the esophageal circumference. The use of carbon dioxide when performing ESD is recommended. ESGE recommends against the performance of second-look endoscopy after ESD. ESGE recommends endoscopy/colonoscopy in the case of significant bleeding (hemodynamic instability, drop in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL, severe ongoing bleeding) to perform endoscopic hemostasis with thermal methods or clipping; hemostatic powders represent rescue therapies. ESGE recommends closure of immediate perforations with clips (through-the-scope or cap-mounted, depending on the size and shape of the perforation), as soon as possible but ideally after securing a good plane for further dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, FMUP, Porto, Portugal.,Gastroenterology, Unilabs, Portugal
| | - Barbara Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Western Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gianluca Esposito
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Leclercq
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, Germany
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ozgur I, Yilmaz S, Bhatt A, Holubar SD, Steele SR, Gorgun E. Endoluminal management of colon perforations during advanced endoscopic procedures. Surgery 2023; 173:687-692. [PMID: 36266121 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.07.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced endoscopic procedures are gaining attraction despite a steep learning curve, need for high dexterity, and potential complications. Colonic perforation is the most concerning adverse event during advanced endoscopic procedures. This study presents our experience on endoluminal management of iatrogenic colonic perforations. METHODS Patients who underwent advanced endoscopic procedures at a quaternary center from 2016 to 2021 were identified. Patients who had colonic perforations during advanced procedures and treated with endoscopic closure/clipping were included. Retrospective chart review was performed. Figures represent frequency (proportion) or median (interquartile range/range). RESULTS There were 22 (2.3%) immediate colonic perforations treated with endoscopic clipping out of 964 advanced endoscopic resections. The median age was 64 (interquartile range = 57-71) years and 50% of the patients were female; 16 (73%) resections were proximal to the splenic flexure. Median polyp size was 36 (20-55) mm. Closure was performed with endoscopic clips in 18 (82%) patients, and over-the-scope clips in 4 patients. Median hospital stay was 0.8 (0-4) days, and 13 (59%) patients were discharged the same day; 2 patients were admitted to the emergency department ≤24 hours of procedure. They underwent subsequent laparoscopic suture repair the same day. No one had segmental colon resection, and there were no complications within postoperative 30 days. Pathology revealed 9 (41%) tubular adenomas, 7 (32%) tubulovillous adenomas, 6 (27%) sessile serrated lesions, and no adenocarcinoma. No recurrence was observed with median follow-up of 24 months (range = 0-90 months). CONCLUSION Endoscopic management is an effective treatment approach for the management of iatrogenic colonic perforations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilker Ozgur
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sumeyye Yilmaz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Amit Bhatt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abu Arisha M, Scapa E, Wishahi E, Korytny A, Gorelik Y, Mazzawi F, Khader M, Muaalem R, Bana S, Awadie H, Bourke MJ, Klein A. Impact of margin ablation after EMR of large nonpedunculated colonic polyps in routine clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:559-567. [PMID: 36328207 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Owing to its simplicity, effectiveness, and safety, EMR is the preferred treatment for the majority of large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colonic polyps (LNPCPs); however, residual and recurrent adenomas (RRAs) encountered during surveillance constitute a major limitation. Thermal ablation of the post-EMR mucosal defect margin has been shown to be highly efficacious in reducing RRA in a randomized trial setting, but data on effectiveness in clinical practice are scarce. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of this technique for reducing RRAs in routine clinical practice. METHODS We analyzed data collected in 3 hospitals in Israel: Prospective data were available in 2 hospitals where margin thermal ablation with snare-tip soft coagulation (STSC) is routinely performed after EMR of LNPCP (TA-EMR). Only retrospective data were available from the third center, which exclusively did not perform STSC (standard EMR] [S-EMR]), during the study period. Surveillance was performed 4 to 6 months after resection. RRA was assessed endoscopically with high-definition white light and optical chromoendoscopy. The primary endpoint was RRA at first surveillance colonoscopy. RESULTS Data from 764 patients with 824 LNPCPs were analyzed. The patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. Four hundred sixty-four LNPCPs were treated by TA-EMR and 360 LNPCPs by S-EMR. RRA at first surveillance colonoscopy was detected in 14 (3.6%) of lesions in the TA-EMR group compared with 96 (31.6%) in the S-EMR group (P < .001; RR = .14; 95% CI, .07-.29). Adverse events were comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION TA-EMR leads to a significant reduction in post-EMR recurrence in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Abu Arisha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Department of Internal Medicine D, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Erez Scapa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Efad Wishahi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Alexander Korytny
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Yuri Gorelik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Fares Mazzawi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Department of Internal Medicine D, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Majd Khader
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel
| | - Rawia Muaalem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
| | - Suzan Bana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
| | - Halim Awadie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, and Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amir Klein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lenz L, Martins B, Andrade de Paulo G, Kawaguti FS, Baba ER, Uemura RS, Gusmon CC, Geiger SN, Moura RN, Pennacchi C, Simas de Lima M, Safatle-Ribeiro AV, Hashimoto CL, Ribeiro U, Maluf-Filho F. Underwater versus conventional EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:549-558. [PMID: 36309072 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) is the standard modality for removing nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has emerged as an alternative method. There are few comparative studies between these techniques, especially evaluating recurrence. Therefore, the purpose of this trial was to compare CEMR and UEMR for the resection of colorectal lesions with respect to efficacy, safety, and recurrence rate. METHODS This was a randomized controlled trial of UEMR versus CEMR for naïve and nonpedunculated lesions measuring between 10 and 40 mm. The primary outcome was adenoma recurrence at 6 months after the resection. Secondary outcomes were rates of technical success, en bloc resection, and adverse events. Block randomization was used to assign patients. Tattooing was performed to facilitate localization of the scars and eventual recurrences. Endoscopic follow-up was scheduled at 6 months after the procedure. The sites of resections were examined with white-light imaging, narrow-band imaging (NBI), and conventional chromoscopy with indigo carmine followed by biopsies. RESULTS One hundred five patients with 120 lesions were included, with a mean size of 17.5 ± 7.1 (SD) mm. Sixty-one lesions were resected by UEMR and 59 by CEMR. The groups were similar at baseline regarding age, sex, average size, and histologic type. Lesions in the proximal colon in the CEMR group corresponded to 83% and in the UEMR group to 67.8% (P = .073). There was no difference between groups regarding success rate (1 failure in each group) and en bloc resection rate (60.6% UEMR vs 54.2% CEMR, P = .48). Intraprocedural bleeding was observed in 5 CEMRs (8.5%) and 2 UEMRs (3.3%) (P = .27). There was no perforation or delayed hemorrhage in either groups. Recurrence rate was higher in the CEMR arm (15%) than in the UEMR arm (2%) (P = .031). Therefore, the relative risk of 6-month recurrence rate in the CEMR group was 7.5-fold higher (95% CI, 0.98-58.20), with a number needed to treat of 7.7 (95% CI, 40.33-4.22). The higher recurrence rate in the CEMR group persisted only for lesions measuring 21 to 40 mm (35.7% vs 0%; P = .04). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that UEMR was associated with a lower adenoma recurrence rate than was CEMR. Both endoscopic techniques were effective and had similar rates of adverse events for the treatment of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Lenz
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Fleury Medicina e Saude, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Bruno Martins
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Fleury Medicina e Saude, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Fleury Medicina e Saude, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Centro de Diagnóstico em Gastroenterologia, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Ulysses Ribeiro
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Centro de Diagnóstico em Gastroenterologia, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fauze Maluf-Filho
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Centro de Diagnóstico em Gastroenterologia, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lau LHS, Jiang W, Guo CLT, Lui RN, Tang RSY, Chan FKL. Effectiveness of prophylactic clipping in preventing postpolypectomy bleeding in aspirin users: a propensity-score analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:517-527.e1. [PMID: 36209766 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Antithrombotic use is a significant risk factor of postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB). Evidence of prophylactic clipping is only available for proximal and large colonic lesions in the general population. Dedicated studies to examine the benefit of prophylactic clipping in patients on aspirin remain scarce. METHODS A propensity score-weighted retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary referral center from January 2018 to September 2021. Patients who received aspirin and underwent colonoscopic polypectomy, EMR, or endoscopic submucosal dissection were included. Data on baseline demographics, medications, and endoscopic factors (polyp number, size, location, and morphology; resection method; and prophylactic clipping) were captured. Propensity score-weighted models were developed between prophylactic clipping and no clipping groups. The primary outcome was delayed PPB within 30 days, with a composite endpoint consisting of repeated colonoscopy for hemostasis, requirement of blood transfusion, or hemoglobin drop >2 g/dL. RESULTS A total of 1373 patients with 3952 polyps were included. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 groups. In the multivariate analysis, the largest polyp size was a significant risk factor for PPB (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.11; P = .002). Prophylactic clipping was not associated with a reduced risk of PPB (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, .83-2.18; P = .240) and did not show any risk reduction in subgroups with different polyp sizes and locations and endoscopic resection techniques. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic clipping was not associated with a lower risk of PPB in aspirin users after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps. Aspirin use should not be regarded as the only factor for the routine use of prophylactic clips.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis H S Lau
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Wei Jiang
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Cosmos L T Guo
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Rashid N Lui
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Raymond S Y Tang
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Francis K L Chan
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
O'Sullivan T, Tate D, Sidhu M, Gupta S, Elhindi J, Byth K, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Craciun A, Singh R, Brown G, Raftopoulos S, Hourigan L, Moss A, Klein A, Heitman S, Williams S, Lee E, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. The Surface Morphology of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Polyps Predicts Synchronous Large Lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023:S1542-3565(23)00101-5. [PMID: 36787836 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) may have synchronous LNPCPs in up to 18% of cases. The nature of this relationship has not been investigated. We aimed to examine the relationship between individual LNPCP characteristics and synchronous colonic LNPCPs. METHODS Consecutive patients referred for resection of LNPCPs over 130 months until March 2022 were enrolled. Serrated lesions and mixed granularity LNPCPs were excluded from analysis. Patients with multiple LNPCPs resected were identified, and the largest was labelled as dominant. The primary outcome was the identification of individual lesion characteristics associated with the presence of synchronous LNPCPs. RESULTS There were 3149 of 3381 patients (93.1%) who had a single LNPCP. In 232 (6.9%) a synchronous lesion was detected. Solitary lesions had a median size of 35 mm with a predominant Paris 0-IIa morphology (42.9%) and right colon location (59.5%). In patients with ≥2 LNPCPs, the dominant lesion had a median size of 40 mm, Paris 0-IIa (47.6%) morphology, and right colon location (65.9%). In this group, 35.8% of dominant LNPCPs were non-granular compared with 18.7% in the solitary LNPCP cohort. Non-granular (NG)-LNPCPs were more likely to demonstrate synchronous disease, with left colon NG-LNPCPs demonstrating greater risk (odds ratio, 4.78; 95% confidence interval, 2.95-7.73) than right colon NG-LNPCPs (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-2.86). CONCLUSIONS We found that 6.9% of LNPCPs have synchronous disease, with NG-LNPCPs demonstrating a greater than 4-fold increased risk. With post-colonoscopy interval cancers exceeding 5%, endoscopists must be cognizant of an individual's LNPCP phenotype when examining the colon at both index procedure and surveillance. CLINICALTRIALS gov, NCT01368289; NCT02000141; NCT02198729.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O'Sullivan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James Elhindi
- WSLHD Research and Education Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Byth
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; WSLHD Research and Education Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Oliver Cronin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ana Craciun
- Departamento de Gastrenterologia e Hepatologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitario Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lyell McEwan Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gregor Brown
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Spiro Raftopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Luke Hourigan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Endoscopic Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amir Klein
- Ambam Heath Care Campus, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Steven Heitman
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Forzani & MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Stephen Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eric Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mueller J, Kuellmer A, Schiemer M, Thimme R, Schmidt A. Current status of endoscopic full-thickness resection with the full-thickness resection device. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:232-242. [PMID: 35997598 DOI: 10.1111/den.14425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) is an integral part of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy. Since its market launch in Europe in 2014, its safety and effectiveness have been proven in numerous studies. Adaptations in design as well as new techniques, such as hybrid EFTR, expand the spectrum of the FTRD system. The following review is intended to provide an overview of the clinical application and current evidence of EFTR with the FTRD system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius Mueller
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Armin Kuellmer
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Schiemer
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Robert Thimme
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Haji A. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Colon and Rectum: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:83-97. [PMID: 36375889 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Multimodal assessment of colorectal polyps is needed before decision-making for endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Assessment should include morphology according to Paris classification, magnification endoscopy for vascular pattern, and Kudo pit pattern analysis. ESD should be offered to patients that have Vi pit pattern, lateral spreading tumors (LST) granular multinodular and LST nongranular, lesions with fibrosis and those in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A defined strategy for resection and planning is crucial for successful and efficient resection with a clear audit of outcomes aiming for a perforation and bleeding rate of less than 1% and R0 resection greater than 90%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amyn Haji
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bustamante-Balén M. How to avoid overtreatment of benign colorectal lesions: Rationale for an evidence-based management. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:6619-6631. [PMID: 36620344 PMCID: PMC9813935 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementing population-based screening programs for colorectal cancer has led to an increase in the detection of large but benign histological lesions. Currently, endoscopic mucosal resection can be considered the standard technique for the removal of benign lesions of the colon due to its excellent safety profile and good clinical results. However, several studies from different geographic areas agree that many benign colon lesions are still referred for surgery. Moreover, the referral rate to surgery is not decreasing over the years, despite the theoretical improvement of endoscopic resection techniques. This article will review the leading causes for benign colorectal lesions to be referred for surgery and the influence of the endoscopist experience on the referral rate. It will also describe how to categorize a polyp as complex for resection and consider an endoscopist as an expert in endoscopic resection. And finally, we will propose a framework for the accurate and evidence-based treatment of complex benign colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bustamante-Balén
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Group, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IISLaFe), Valencia 46026, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Forbes N, Gupta S, Frehlich L, Meng ZW, Ruan Y, Montori S, Chebaa BR, Dunbar KB, Heitman SJ, Feagins LA, Albéniz E, Pohl H, Bourke MJ. Clip closure to prevent adverse events after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:721-731.e2. [PMID: 35667388 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS After EMR, prophylactic clipping is often performed to prevent clinically significant post-EMR bleeding (CSPEB) and other adverse events (AEs). Prior evidence syntheses have lacked sufficient power to assess clipping in relevant subgroups or in nonbleeding AEs. We performed a meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) from randomized trials assessing the efficacy of clipping to prevent AEs after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) ≥20 mm. METHODS We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and PubMed from inception to May 19, 2021. Two reviewers screened citations in duplicate. Corresponding authors of eligible studies were invited to contribute IPD. A random-effects 1-stage model was specified for estimating pooled effects, adjusting for patient sex and age and for lesion location and size, whereas a fixed-effects model was used for traditional meta-analyses. RESULTS From 3145 citations, 4 trials were included, representing 1248 patients with proximal LNPCPs. The overall rate of CSPEB was 3.5% and 9.0% in clipped and unclipped patients, respectively. IPD were available for 1150 patients, in which prophylactic clipping prevented CSPEB with an odds ratio (OR) of .31 (95% confidence interval [CI], .17-.54). Clipping was not associated with perforation or abdominal pain, with ORs of .78 (95% CI, .17-3.54) and .67 (95% CI, .20-2.22), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic clipping is efficacious in preventing CSPEB after EMR of proximal LNPCPs. Therefore, clip closure should be considered a standard component of EMR of LNPCPs in the proximal colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nauzer Forbes
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Levi Frehlich
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zhao Wu Meng
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yibing Ruan
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sheyla Montori
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Unit, Navarrabiomed Biomedical Research Center, UPNA, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Benjamin R Chebaa
- Department of Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Kerry B Dunbar
- Department of Medicine, VA North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, Texas, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Steven J Heitman
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Linda A Feagins
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Unit, Navarrabiomed Biomedical Research Center, UPNA, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain; Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ohata K, Kobayashi N, Sakai E, Takeuchi Y, Chino A, Takamaru H, Kodashima S, Hotta K, Harada K, Ikematsu H, Uraoka T, Murakami T, Tsuji S, Abe T, Katagiri A, Hori S, Michida T, Suzuki T, Fukuzawa M, Kiriyama S, Fukase K, Murakami Y, Ishikawa H, Saito Y. Long-term Outcomes After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Trial From Japan. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:1423-1434.e2. [PMID: 35810779 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS To determine the long-term outcomes after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), we conducted a large, multicenter, prospective cohort trial with a 5-year observation period. METHODS Between February 2013 and January 2015, we consecutively enrolled 1740 patients with 1814 colorectal epithelial neoplasms ≥20 mm who underwent ESD. Patients with noncurative resection (non-CR) lesions underwent additional radical surgery, as needed. After the initial treatment, intensive 5-year follow-up with planned multiple colonoscopies was conducted to identify metastatic and/or local recurrences. Primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-specific survival, and intestinal preservation rates. The rates of local recurrence and metachronous invasive cancer were evaluated as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, and intestinal preservation rates were 93.6%, 99.6%, and 88.6%, respectively. Patients with CR lesions had no metastatic occurrence, and patients with non-CR lesions had 4 metastatic occurrences. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that overall survival and disease-specific survival rates were significantly higher in patients with CR lesions than in those with non-CR lesions (P > .001 and P = .009, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in only 8 lesions (0.5%), which were successfully resected by subsequent endoscopic treatment. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that piecemeal resection (hazard ratio, 8.19; 95% CI, 1.47-45.7; P = .02) and margin-positive resection (hazard ratio, 8.06; 95% CI, 1.76-37.0; P = .007) were significant independent predictors of local recurrence after colorectal ESD. Fifteen metachronous invasive cancers (1.0%) were identified during surveillance colonoscopy, most of which required surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS A favorable long-term prognosis indicates that ESD can be the standard treatment for large colorectal epithelial neoplasms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UMIN000010136.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Ohata
- Department of Gastroenterology, NTT Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nozomu Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Sakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, NTT Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoji Takeuchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akiko Chino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Shinya Kodashima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kinichi Hotta
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Keita Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ikematsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Toshio Uraoka
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Takashi Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigetsugu Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Takashi Abe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Takarazuka Municipal Hospital, Hyogo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Hanwa Sumiyoshi General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Katagiri
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Hori
- Department of Endoscopy, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime, Japan; Department of Gastrointestinal Medicine, Japan Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Japan
| | - Tomoki Michida
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan; Department of Internal Medicine, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuto Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masakatsu Fukuzawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kazutoshi Fukase
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan; Department of Internal Medicine, Yamagata Prefectural Kahoku Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | | | - Hideki Ishikawa
- Department of Molecular-Targeting Prevention, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kandel P, Hussain M, Yadav D, Dhungana SK, Brahmbhatt B, Raimondo M, Lukens FJ, Bachuwa G, Wallace MB. Post-EMR for colorectal polyps, thermal ablation of defects reduces adenoma recurrence: A meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1399-E1405. [PMID: 36262518 PMCID: PMC9576327 DOI: 10.1055/a-1922-7646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Adenoma recurrence is one of the key limitations of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), which occurs in 15 % to 30 % of cases during first surveillance colonoscopy. The main hypothesis behind adenoma recurrence is leftover micro-adenomas at the margins of post-EMR defects. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the efficacy of snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) at the margins of mucosal defects to reduce adenoma recurrence and bleeding complications. Methods Electronic databases such as PubMed and the Cochrane library were used for systematic literature search. Studies with polyps only resected by piecemeal EMR and active treatment: with STSC, comparator: non-STSC were included. A random effects model was used to calculate the summary of risk ratio and 95 % confidence intervals. The main outcome of the study was to compare the effect of STSC versus non-STSC with respect to adenoma recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy after thermal ablation of post-EMR defects. Results Five studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The total number patients who completed first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1) in the STSC group was 534 and in the non-STSC group was 514. The pooled adenoma recurrence rate was 6 % (37 of 534 cases) in the STSC arm and 22 % (115 of 514 cases) in the non-STSC arm, (odds ratio [OR] 0.26, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.41, P = 0.001). The pooled delayed post-EMR bleeding rate 19 % (67 of 343) in the STSC arm and 22 % (78 of 341) in the non-STSC arm (OR 0.82, 95 %CI, 0.57-1.18). Conclusions Thermal ablation of post-EMR defects significantly reduces adenoma recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pujan Kandel
- Michigan State University/Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | - Murtaza Hussain
- Michigan State University/Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | - Deepesh Yadav
- Michigan State University/Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | - Santosh K. Dhungana
- Michigan State University/Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | | | - Massimo Raimondo
- Mayo Clinic's Campus in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Frank J. Lukens
- Mayo Clinic's Campus in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Ghassan Bachuwa
- Michigan State University/Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | - Michael B. Wallace
- Mayo Clinic's Campus in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| |
Collapse
|