1
|
Kouladouros K, Jakobs J, Stathopoulos P, Kähler G, Belle S, Denzer U. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of rectal lesions involving the dentate line. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:4485-4495. [PMID: 38914887 PMCID: PMC11289217 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10994-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ideal treatment of epithelial neoplastic rectal lesions involving the dentate line is a controversial issue. Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the most commonly used resection technique, but it is associated with high recurrence rates. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of rectal lesions, but evidence is lacking concerning its application close to the dentate line. The aim of our study is to compare ESD and EMR for the treatment of epithelial rectal lesions involving the dentate line. METHODS We identified all cases of endoscopic resections of rectal lesions involving the dentate line performed in two German high-volume centers between 2010 and 2022. Periinterventional and follow-up data were collected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS We identified 68 ESDs and 62 EMRs meeting our inclusion criteria. ESD showed a significant advantage in en bloc resection rates (89.7% vs. 9.7%; P = 0.001) and complete resection rates (72.1% vs. 9.7%; P = 0.001). The overall curative resection rate was similar between both groups (ESD: 92.6%, EMR: 83.9%; P = 0.324), whereas in the subgroup of low-risk adenocarcinomas ESD was curative in 100% of the cases vs. 14% in the EMR group (P = 0.002). There was one local recurrence after ESD (1,5%) vs. 16 (25.8%) after EMR (P < 0.0001), and the EMR patients required an average of three further interventions. CONCLUSION ESD is superior to EMR for the treatment of epithelial rectal lesions involving the dentate line and should be considered the treatment of choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Kouladouros
- Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Department, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
- Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Johanna Jakobs
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Clinical Infectiology, Marburg University Hospital, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Petros Stathopoulos
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Clinical Infectiology, Marburg University Hospital, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Georg Kähler
- Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Department, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sebastian Belle
- Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Department, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ulrike Denzer
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Clinical Infectiology, Marburg University Hospital, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O’Sullivan T, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic Resection of Neoplasia in the Lower GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm. Visc Med 2024; 40:217-227. [PMID: 39157731 PMCID: PMC11326768 DOI: 10.1159/000539219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer is a highly prevalent malignancy and a significant driver of cancer mortality and health-related expenditure worldwide. Polyp removal reduces the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. In 2024, endoscopists have an array of resection modalities at their disposal. Each technique requires a unique skillset and has individual advantages and limitations. Consequently, resection in the colorectum requires an evidence-based algorithm approach that considers these factors. Summary A literature review of endoscopic resection for colonic neoplasia was conducted. Best supporting scientific evidence was summarized for the endoscopic resection of diminutive polyps, large ≥20 mm lesions and polyps containing invasive cancer. Factors including resection modality, complications and lesion selection were explored to inform an algorithm approach to colorectal resection. Key Messages Endoscopic resection in the colorectum is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Detailed understanding of polyp size, location, morphology and predicted histology are critical factors that inform appropriate endoscopic resection practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O’Sullivan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael J. Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mandarino FV, Danese S, Uraoka T, Parra-Blanco A, Maeda Y, Saito Y, Kudo SE, Bourke MJ, Iacucci M. Precision endoscopy in colorectal polyps' characterization and planning of endoscopic therapy. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:761-777. [PMID: 37988279 DOI: 10.1111/den.14727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
Precision endoscopy in the management of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer has emerged as the standard of care. It includes optical characterization of polyps and estimation of submucosal invasion depth of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps to select the appropriate endoscopic resection modality. Over time, several imaging modalities have been implemented in endoscopic practice to improve optical performance. Among these, image-enhanced endoscopy systems and magnification endoscopy represent now well-established tools. New advanced technologies, such as endocytoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy, have recently shown promising results in predicting the histology of colorectal polyps. In recent years, artificial intelligence has continued to enhance endoscopic performance in the characterization of colorectal polyps, overcoming the limitations of other imaging modes. In this review we retrace the path of precision endoscopy, analyzing the yield of various endoscopic imaging techniques in personalizing management of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Vito Mandarino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, San Raffaele Hospital IRCSS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, San Raffaele Hospital IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Toshio Uraoka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gumma, Japan
| | - Adolfo Parra-Blanco
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Yasuharu Maeda
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin-Ei Kudo
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferreira MF, Marques M, Morais R, Lemmers A, Macedo G, Santos-Antunes J. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Is Safe and Effective for Lesions Located at the Anorectal Junction: Analysis from Two Referral European Centers. GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2024; 31:41-47. [PMID: 38476304 PMCID: PMC10928857 DOI: 10.1159/000528107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established resection technique for colorectal superficial tumors, but its role in the treatment of anorectal junction (ARJ) lesions still remains to be determined. With this study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of ESD for the resection of ARJ lesions, in comparison to more proximal rectal lesions. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data concerning all consecutive rectal ESD procedures performed in two European centers, from 2015 to 2021. Results A total of two hundred and fifty-two rectal lesions were included. Sixty (24%) were ARJ lesions, and the remaining 192 (76%) were located proximally. Technical success was achieved in 248 procedures (98%), and its rate was similar in both locations (p = 0.246). Most of the lesions presented high-grade dysplasia/Tis adenocarcinoma (54%); 36 (15%) had submucosal adenocarcinoma, including 20 superficial (sm1) and 16 deeply invasive (>SM1) T1 cancers. We found no differences between ARJ and rectal lesions in regard to en bloc resection rate (100% vs. 96%, p = 0.204), R0 resection rate (76% vs. 75%, p = 0.531), curative resection rate (70% vs. 70%, p = 0.920), procedures' median duration (120 min vs. 90 min, p = 0.072), ESD velocity (14 vs. 12 mm2/min, p = 0.415), histopathology result (p = 0.053), and the need for surgery due to a non-curative ESD (5% vs. 3%, p = 0.739). Also, there was no statistically significant difference that concerns delayed bleeding (7% vs. 8%, p = 0.709), perforation (0% vs. 5%, p = 0.075), or the need for readmission (2% vs. 2%, p = 0.939). Nevertheless, anorectal stenosis (5% vs. 0%, p = 0.003) and anorectal pain (9% vs. 1%, p = 0.002) were significantly more frequent in ARJ lesions. Conclusion ESD is a safe and efficient resection technique for the treatment of rectal lesions located in the ARJ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Margarida Marques
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Morais
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - João Santos-Antunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
- Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gupta S, Kurup R, Shahidi N, Vosko S, McKay O, Zahid S, Whitfield A, Lee EY, Williams SJ, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Safety and efficacy of physician-administered balanced-sedation for the endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E1-E10. [PMID: 38188923 PMCID: PMC10769574 DOI: 10.1055/a-2180-8880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Because of concerns about peri-procedural adverse events (AEs), guidelines recommend anesthetist-managed sedation (AMS) for long and complex endoscopic procedures. The safety and efficacy of physician-administered balanced sedation (PA-BS) for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) ≥20 mm is unknown. Patients and methods We compared PA-BS with AMS in a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients referred for management of LNPCPs (NCT01368289; NCT02000141). A per-patient propensity analysis was performed following a 1:2 nearest-neighbor (Greedy-type) match, based on age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, and lesion size. The primary outcome was any peri-procedural AE, which included hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, hypoxia, and new arrhythmia. Secondary outcomes were unplanned admissions, 28-day re-presentation, technical success, and recurrence. Results Between January 2016 and June 2020, 700 patients underwent EMR for LNPCPs, of whom 638 received PA-BS. Among them, the median age was 70 years (interquartile range [IQR] 62-76 years), size 35 mm (IQR 25-45 mm), and duration 35 minutes (IQR 25-60 minutes). Peri-procedural AEs occurred in 149 (23.4%), most commonly bradycardia (116; 18.2%). Only five (0.8%) required an unplanned sedation-related admission due to AEs (2 hypotension, 1 arrhythmia, 1 bradycardia, 1 hypoxia), with a median inpatient stay of 1 day (IQR 1-3 days). After propensity-score matching, there were no differences between PA-BS and AMS in peri-procedural AEs, unplanned admissions, 28-day re-presentation rates, technical success or recurrence. Conclusions Physician-administered balanced sedation for the EMR of LNPCPs is safe. Peri-procedural AEs are infrequent, transient, rarely require admission (<1%), and are experienced in similar frequencies to those receiving anesthetist-managed sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Gupta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Medicine, The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, Australia
| | - Rajiv Kurup
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Neal Shahidi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Medicine, The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, Australia
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sergei Vosko
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Owen McKay
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Simmi Zahid
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Medicine, The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, Australia
| | - Eric Y. Lee
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Medicine, The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, Australia
| | | | - Nicholas Graeme Burgess
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Medicine, The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, Australia
| | - Michael J. Bourke
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Medicine, The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Sullivan T, Sidhu M, Gupta S, Byth K, Elhindi J, Tate D, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Wang H, Lee E, Williams S, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. A novel tool for case selection in endoscopic mucosal resection training. Endoscopy 2023; 55:1095-1102. [PMID: 37391184 DOI: 10.1055/a-2121-1148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥ 20 mm) adenomatous nonpedunculated colonic polyps (LNPCPs) becomes widely practiced outside expert centers, appropriate training is necessary to avoid failed resection and inappropriate surgical referral. No EMR-specific tool guides case selection for endoscopists learning EMR. This study aimed to develop an EMR case selection score (EMR-CSS) to identify potentially challenging lesions for "EMR-naïve" endoscopists developing competency. METHODS Consecutive EMRs were recruited from a single center over 130 months. Lesion characteristics, intraprocedural data, and adverse events were recorded. Challenging lesions with intraprocedural bleeding (IPB), intraprocedural perforation (IPP), or unsuccessful resection were identified and predictive variables identified. Significant variables were used to form a numerical score and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to generate cutoff values. RESULTS Of 1993 LNPCPs, 286 (14.4 %) were in challenging locations (anorectal junction, ileocecal valve, or appendiceal orifice), 368 (18.5 %) procedures were complicated by IPB and 77 (3.9 %) by IPP; 110 (5.5 %) procedures were unsuccessful. The composite end point of IPB, IPP, or unsuccessful EMR was present in 526 cases (26.4 %). Lesion size, challenging location, and sessile morphology were predictive of the composite outcome. A six-point score was generated with a cutoff value of 2 demonstrating 81 % sensitivity across the training and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The EMR-CSS is a novel case selection tool for conventional EMR training, which identifies a subset of adenomatous LNPCPs that can be successfully and safely attempted in early EMR training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O'Sullivan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Byth
- Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James Elhindi
- Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Oliver Cronin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hunter Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eric Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cronin O, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic Management of Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3805. [PMID: 37568621 PMCID: PMC10417738 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm (LNPCPs) comprise approximately 1% of all colorectal polyps. LNPCPs more commonly contain high-grade dysplasia, covert and overt cancer. These lesions can be resected using several means, including conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), cold-snare EMR (C-EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This review aimed to provide a comprehensive, critical and objective analysis of ER techniques. Evidence-based, selective resection algorithms should be used when choosing the most appropriate technique to ensure the safe and effective removal of LNPCPs. Due to its enhanced safety and comparable efficacy, there has been a paradigm shift towards cold-snare polypectomy (CSP) for the removal of small polyps (<10 mm). This technique is now being applied to the management of LNPCPs; however, further research is required to define the optimal LNPCP subtypes to target and the viable upper size limit. Adjuvant techniques, such as thermal ablation of the resection margin, significantly reduce recurrence risk. Bleeding risk can be mitigated using through-the-scope clips to close defects in the right colon. Endoscopic surveillance is important to detect recurrence and synchronous lesions. Recurrence can be readily managed using an endoscopic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Cronin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Michael J. Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moreira P, Cardoso PM, Macedo G, Santos-Antunes J. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, and Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Management of Rectal and Anorectal Lesions: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4777. [PMID: 37510892 PMCID: PMC10381236 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) are modern techniques that now play a crucial role in the treatment of colorectal lesions. ESD is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure that allows for the resection of lesions of any size in a single piece, with clear advantages regarding oncological outcomes and recurrences. However, it is a complex technique, requiring high endoscopic skills, expertise, and specialized training, with higher rates of adverse events expected compared with EMR. EMR is another endoscopic technique used to remove superficial gastrointestinal tumors, particularly those that are limited to the mucosal layer. It is a faster and more accessible procedure, with fewer adverse events, although it only allows for an en-bloc resection of lesions measuring 15-20 mm. TAMIS is a minimally invasive surgical technique used to remove rectal tumors, involving the insertion of a single-port device through the anus, allowing for a better visualization and removal of the tumor with minimal disruption. This article reviews the current applications and evidence regarding these techniques, in search for the most adequate treatment for the removal of lesions in the rectum and anorectal junction, as these locations possess distinct characteristics that demand a more specific approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Moreira
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Marílio Cardoso
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - João Santos-Antunes
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4099-030 Porto, Portugal
- IPATIMUP-Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tate DJ, Argenziano ME, Anderson J, Bhandari P, Boškoski I, Bugajski M, Desomer L, Heitman SJ, Kashida H, Kriazhov V, Lee RRT, Lyutakov I, Pimentel-Nunes P, Rivero-Sánchez L, Thomas-Gibson S, Thorlacius H, Bourke MJ, Tham TC, Bisschops R. Curriculum for training in endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2023. [PMID: 37285908 DOI: 10.1055/a-2077-0497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the standard of care for the complete removal of large (≥ 10 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). Increased detection of LNPCPs owing to screening colonoscopy, plus high observed rates of incomplete resection and need for surgery call for a standardized approach to training in EMR. 1 : Trainees in EMR should have achieved basic competence in diagnostic colonoscopy, < 10-mm polypectomy, pedunculated polypectomy, and common methods of gastrointestinal endoscopic hemostasis. The role of formal training courses is emphasized. Training may then commence in vivo under the direct supervision of a trainer. 2 : Endoscopy units training endoscopists in EMR should have specific processes in place to support and facilitate training. 3: A trained EMR practitioner should have mastered theoretical knowledge including how to assess an LNPCP for risk of submucosal invasion, how to interpret the potential difficulty of a particular EMR procedure, how to decide whether to remove a particular LNPCP en bloc or piecemeal, whether the risks of electrosurgical energy can be avoided for a particular LNPCP, the different devices required for EMR, management of adverse events, and interpretation of reports provided by histopathologists. 4: Trained EMR practitioners should be familiar with the patient consent process for EMR. 5: The development of endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) and team interaction are important for trainees in EMR. 6: Differences in recommended technique exist between EMR performed with and without electrosurgical energy. Common to both is a standardized technique based upon dynamic injection, controlled and precise snare placement, safety checks prior to the application of tissue transection (cold snare) or electrosurgical energy (hot snare), and interpretation of the post-EMR resection defect. 7: A trained EMR practitioner must be able to manage adverse events associated with EMR including intraprocedural bleeding and perforation, and post-procedural bleeding. Delayed perforation should be avoided by correct interpretation of the post-EMR defect and treatment of deep mural injury. 8: A trained EMR practitioner must be able to communicate EMR procedural findings to patients and provide them with a plan in case of adverse events after discharge and a follow-up plan. 9: A trained EMR practitioner must be able to detect and interrogate a post-endoscopic resection scar for residual or recurrent adenoma and apply treatment if necessary. 10: Prior to independent practice, a minimum of 30 EMR procedures should be performed, culminating in a trainer-guided assessment of competency using a validated assessment tool, taking account of procedural difficulty (e. g. using the SMSA polyp score). 11: Trained practitioners should log their key performance indicators (KPIs) of polypectomy during independent practice. A guide for target KPIs is provided in this document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maria Eva Argenziano
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Emergency Digestive Endoscopy, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - John Anderson
- Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Endoscopy Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Ivo Boškoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marek Bugajski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Luxmed Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lobke Desomer
- AZ Delta Roeselare, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Steven J Heitman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Hiroshi Kashida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Vladimir Kriazhov
- Endoscopy Department, Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Center, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia Federation
| | - Ralph R T Lee
- The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Ivan Lyutakov
- University Hospital Tsaritsa Yoanna-ISUL, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Surgery and Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Liseth Rivero-Sánchez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tony C Tham
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nader SM, Lahr RE, Rex DK. Impact of margin thermal treatment after EMR of giant (≥40 mm) colorectal lateral spreading lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:544-548. [PMID: 36306831 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Increasing lesion size is a risk factor for recurrence after piecemeal EMR (pEMR). Snare-tip soft coagulation (STSC) treatment of the normal-appearing margin after pEMR of lesions ≥ 20 mm has been shown to reduce recurrence rates by 75% to 80%. We sought to evaluate the impact of STSC on giant (≥ 40 mm) lateral spreading lesions treated by pEMR. We describe the relative risk and absolute risks of recurrence with and without STSC margin treatment after EMR of ≥ 40-mm lesions. METHODS We performed a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected database on large lesions describing lesion size, location, and methods of resection. We excluded lesions < 40 mm in maximum dimension, those that did not undergo follow-up care at our center, and those in which argon plasma coagulation was used for either ablative treatment of residual polyp or margin treatment. Propensity score analysis was used to account for potential differences between patients treated with and without STSC. RESULTS There were 68 lesions ≥ 40 mm removed by pEMR without STSC treatment and 133 removed and treated with STSC. There were no differences between groups in demographics, polyp size, location, histologic features, and mean follow-up time. The recurrence rate in the no-treatment group was 35% versus 9% with STSC (P < .00001 by direct comparison and P = .008 by using the propensity score analysis). CONCLUSION STSC treatment after pEMR of large lateral spreading lesions in the colorectum reduced recurrences by 75%. However, the absolute recurrence rate of 9% remained clinically significant in the STSC-treated group. Short-term follow-up care after STSC of lesions ≥ 40 mm is still warranted, and additional study of technical factors that eliminate recurrence after pEMR of giant lateral spreading lesions is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel E Lahr
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
A Rectum-Specific Selective Resection Algorithm Optimizes Oncologic Outcomes for Large Nonpedunculated Rectal Polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:72-80.e2. [PMID: 35526795 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are complementary techniques for large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated rectal polyps (LNPRPs). A mechanism for appropriate technique selection has not been described. METHODS We evaluated the performance of a selective resection algorithm (SRA) (August 2017 to April 2021) compared with a universal EMR algorithm (UEA) (July 2008 to July 2017) for LNPRPs within a prospective observational study. In the SRA, LNPRPs with features of superficial submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) (<1000 μm; Kudo pit pattern Vi), or with an increased risk of SMIC (Paris 0-Is or 0-IIa+Is nongranular, 0-IIa+Is granular with a dominant nodule ≥10 mm) underwent ESD. The remaining LNPRPs underwent EMR. Algorithm performance was evaluated by SMIC identified after EMR, curative oncologic resection (R0 resection, superficial SMIC, absence of negative histologic features), technical success, adverse events, and recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy. RESULTS A total of 480 LNPRPs were evaluated (290 UEA, 190 SRA). Median lesion size was 40 (interquartile range, 30-60) mm. SMIC was identified in 56 (11.7%) LNPRPs. Significant differences in SMIC after EMR (SRA 1 [1.0%] vs UEA 35 [12.1%]; P = .001) and curative oncologic resection (SRA n = 7 [33.3%] vs UEA n = 2 [5.7%]; P = .010) were identified. No significant differences in technical success or adverse events were identified (all P > .137). Among LNPRPs with SMIC amenable to curative oncologic resection and which underwent ESD, 100% (n = 7 of 7) were cured. CONCLUSIONS A rectum-specific SRA optimizes oncologic outcomes for LNPRPs and mitigates the risk of piecemeal resection of cancers.
Collapse
|
12
|
Meulen LW, Bogie RM, Winkens B, Masclee AA, Moons LM. Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins to prevent local recurrence of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1127-E1135. [PMID: 36247075 PMCID: PMC9554920 DOI: 10.1055/a-1869-2446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps is characterized by a high risk of recurrence. Thermal ablation of the mucosal defect margins may reduce recurrence in these lesions, but a systematic overview of the current evidence is lacking. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane until July 2021, for studies on thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Main goal of this meta-analysis was to identify pooled risk difference of recurrence between thermal ablation vs. no adjuvant treatment. Secondary goal was to identify pooled recurrence rate after snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) and argon plasma coagulation (APC). Results Ten studies on thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins were included, with three studies on argon plasma coagulation, six studies on snare tip soft coagulation and one study comparing both treatment modalities, representing a total of 316 APC cases and 1598 STSC cases. Overall pooled risk difference of recurrence was -0.17 (95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.22 to -0.12) as compared to no adjuvant treatment. Pooled risk difference was -0.16 (95 % CI -0.19 to -0.14) for STSC and -0.26 (95 % CI -0.80 to 0.28) for APC. Pooled recurrence rate was 4 % (95 % CI 2 % to 8 %) for STSC and 9 % (95 % CI 4 % to 19 %) for APC. Conclusions Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins significantly reduces recurrence rate in large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions compared to no adjuvant treatment. While no evidence for superiority exists, STSC may be preferred over APC, because this method is the most evidence-based, and cost-effective modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lonne W.T. Meulen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel M.M. Bogie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ad A.M. Masclee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,NUTRIM, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M.G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cronin O, Sidhu M, Shahidi N, Gupta S, O'Sullivan T, Whitfield A, Wang H, Kumar P, Hourigan LF, Byth K, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Comparison of the morphology and histopathology of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps in the rectum and colon: implications for endoscopic treatment. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:118-124. [PMID: 35219724 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The risk of cancer in large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm (LNPCPs) in the rectum relative to the remainder of the colon is unknown. We aimed to describe differences between rectal and colonic LNPCPs to better inform treatment decisions. METHODS Patients with LNPCPs referred to tertiary centers for endoscopic resection within a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort were evaluated. Data recorded were participant demographics, LNPCP location, morphology, resection modality, and histopathologic data. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify those variables independently associated with rectal versus nonrectal location in the colon. RESULTS Patients with LNPCPs referred for endoscopic resection between July 2008 and July 2021 were included. Rectal LNPCPs (n = 618) were larger (median size, 40 mm vs 30 mm; P < .001) and more likely to be granular (79% vs 50%, P < .001) with a nodular component (53% vs 17%, P < .001) compared with nonrectal LNPCPs (n = 2787). Rectal LNPCPs were more likely to have tubulovillous histopathology (72% vs 47%, P < .001) and contain cancer (15% vs 6%, P < .001). After adjusting for the other features independently associated with location, cancer was more common in the rectum compared with the colon (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.53). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that compared with LNPCPs in the rest of the colon, rectal LNPCPs are more likely to be larger and contain more advanced pathology. These findings have implications for curative endoscopic resection techniques particularly where early cancer is present. (Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT01368289 and NCT02000141.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Cronin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Neal Shahidi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Timothy O'Sullivan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hunter Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Puja Kumar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke F Hourigan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Karen Byth
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shahidi N, Rex DK. Defining Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in 2021: A Burning Issue. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:1776-1777. [PMID: 34499914 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Shahidi
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dolan RD, Bazarbashi AN, McCarty TR, Thompson CC, Aihara H. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:216-224.e18. [PMID: 34627794 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a novel endoscopic technique for the resection of GI lesions not amenable to standard endoscopic therapy. The primary aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate EFTR for the resection of colorectal lesions. METHODS Individualized searches were developed through October 2020 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Random-effects models were used to determine pooled technical success, margin-negative (R0) resection, adverse events, procedure duration, and rate of recurrence at follow-up. Subgroup analysis was used to assess the impact of specific procedure techniques and regression analyses to determine influence of lesion size. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics and publication bias by funnel plots using Egger and Begg tests. RESULTS Fourteen studies (1936 subjects; 39.6% women) were included. Most EFTR lesions were located in the colon (75.8%) with the remaining in the rectum. Mean procedure duration was 45.4 ± 11.4 minutes. Pooled technical success was 87.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.1-89.8; I2 = 33), R0 resection rate was 78.8% (95% CI, 75.7-81.5; I2 = 33), procedure-associated adverse events occurred in 12.2% (95% CI, 9.3-15.9; I2 = 61), and recurrence rate was 12.6% (95% CI, 11.1-14.4; I2 = 0) over an average weighted follow-up of 20.1 ± 3.8 weeks. Regression analyses revealed significantly lower R0 resection (odds ratio, .3; 95% CI, .2-.6; I2 = 61; P = .0003) and higher overall procedure-associated adverse event rates (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.8-7.2; I2 = 55; P = .0004) for lesions >20 mm. CONCLUSIONS EFTR overall appears to be an effective modality with high technical success and R0 resection rate with a relatively low risk of adverse events and recurrence, with greatest success when lesions are <20 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell D Dolan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas R McCarty
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher C Thompson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Outcomes of Deep Mural Injury After Endoscopic Resection: An International Cohort of 3717 Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:e139-e147. [PMID: 33422686 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Although perforation is the most feared adverse event associated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), limited data exists concerning its management. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of intra-procedural deep mural injury (DMI) in an international multi-center observational cohort of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent EMR for a LNPCP ≥20 mm were evaluated. Significant DMI (S-DMI) was defined as Sydney DMI Classification type III (muscularis propria injury, target sign) or type IV/V (perforation without or with contamination, respectively). The primary outcome was successful S-DMI defect closure. Secondary outcomes included technical success (removal of all visible polypoid tissue during index EMR), surgical referral and recurrence at first surveillance colonscopy (SC1). RESULTS Between July 2008 to May 2020, 3717 LNPCPs underwent EMR. Median lesion size was 35mm (interquartile range (IQR) 25 to 45mm). Significant DMI was identified in 101 cases (2.7%), with successful defect closure in 98 (97.0%) using a median of 4 through-the-scope clips (TTSCs; IQR 3 to 6 TTSCs). Three (3.0%) patients underwent S-DMI-related urgent surgery. Technical success was achieved in 94 (93.1%) patients, with 46 (45.5%) admitted to hospital (median duration 1 day; IQR 1 to 2 days). Comparing LNPCPs with and without S-DMI, no differences in technical success (94 (93.1%) vs 3316 (91.7%); P = .62) or SC1 recurrence (12 (20.0%) vs 363 (13.6%); P = .15) were identified. CONCLUSIONS Significant DMI is readily managed endoscopically and does not appear to affect technical success or recurrence.
Collapse
|
17
|
Vosko S, Shahidi N, Sidhu M, van Hattem WA, Bar-Yishay I, Schoeman S, Tate DJ, Hourigan LF, Singh R, Moss A, Byth K, Lee EYT, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Optical Evaluation for Predicting Cancer in Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps Is Accurate for Flat Lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:2425-2434.e4. [PMID: 33992780 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The ability of optical evaluation to diagnose submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) prior to endoscopic resection of large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) is critical to inform therapeutic decisions. Prior studies suggest that it is insufficiently accurate to detect SMIC. It is unknown whether lesion morphology influences optical evaluation performance. METHODS LNPCPs ≥20 mm referred for endoscopic resection within a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort were evaluated. Optical evaluation was performed prior to endoscopic resection with the optical prediction of SMIC based on established features (Kudo V pit pattern, depressed morphology, rigidity/fixation, ulceration). Optical evaluation performance outcomes were calculated. Outcomes were reported by dominant morphology: nodular (Paris 0-Is/0-IIa+Is) vs flat (Paris 0-IIa/0-IIb) morphology. RESULTS From July 2013 to July 2019, 1583 LNPCPs (median size 35 [interquartile range, 25-50] mm; 855 flat, 728 nodular) were assessed. SMIC was identified in 146 (9.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9%-10.8%). Overall sensitivity and specificity were 67.1% (95% CI, 59.2%-74.2%) and 95.1% (95% CI, 93.9%-96.1%), respectively. The overall SMIC miss rate was 3.0% (95% CI, 2.3%-4.0%). Significant differences in sensitivity (90.9% vs 52.7%), specificity (96.3% vs 93.7%), and SMIC miss rate (0.6% vs 5.9%) between flat and nodular LNPCPs were identified (all P < .027). Multiple logistic regression identified size ≥40 mm (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-3.8), rectosigmoid location (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7), and nodular morphology (OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 2.8-18.9) as predictors of missed SMIC (all P < .039). CONCLUSIONS Optical evaluation performance is dependent on lesion morphology. In the absence of features suggestive of SMIC, flat lesions can be presumed benign and be managed accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Vosko
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Neal Shahidi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - W Arnout van Hattem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Iddo Bar-Yishay
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Scott Schoeman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David J Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Luke F Hourigan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lyell McEwan Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Endoscopic Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen Byth
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; WSLHD Research and Education Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eric Y T Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vosko S, Gupta S, Shahidi N, van Hattem WA, Zahid S, McKay O, Whitfield A, Sidhu M, Tate DJ, Lee EYT, Byth K, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Impact of technical innovations in EMR in the treatment of large nonpedunculated polyps involving the ileocecal valve (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:959-968.e2. [PMID: 33989645 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The endoscopic management of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps involving the ileocecal valve (ICV-LNPCPs) remains challenging because of its unique anatomic features, with long-term outcomes inferior to LNPCPs not involving the ICV. We sought to evaluate the impact of technical innovations and advances in the EMR of ICV-LNPCPs. METHODS The performance of EMR for ICV-LNPCPs was retrospectively evaluated in a prospective observational cohort of LNPCPs ≥20 mm. Efficacy was measured by clinical success (removal of all polypoid tissue during index EMR and avoidance of surgery) and recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy. Accounting for the adoption of technical innovations, comparisons were made between an historical cohort (September 2008 to April 2016) and contemporary cohort (May 2016 to October 2020). Safety was evaluated by documenting the frequencies of intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding, deep mural injury, and delayed perforation. RESULTS Between September 2008 to October 2020, 142 ICV-LNPCPs were referred for EMR. Median ICV-LNPCP size was 35 mm (interquartile range, 25-50 mm). When comparing the contemporary (n = 66) and historical cohorts (n = 76) of ICV-LNPCPs, there were significant differences in clinical success (93.9% vs 77.6%, P = .006) and recurrence (4.6% vs 21.0%, P = .019). CONCLUSIONS With technical advances, ICV-LNPCPs can be effectively and safely managed by EMR, independent of lesion complexity. Most patients experience excellent outcomes and avoid surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Vosko
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Neal Shahidi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - W Arnout van Hattem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simmi Zahid
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Owen McKay
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Eric Y T Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Byth
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; WSLHD Research and Education Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen J Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Santos-Antunes J, Marques M, Morais R, Carneiro F, Macedo G. Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Western Center: Analysis of Outcomes and Safety Profile. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 28:319-327. [PMID: 34604463 DOI: 10.1159/000514797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established endoscopic technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal lesions. Colorectal ESD outcomes are less reported in the Western literature, and Portuguese data are still very scarce. Our aim was to describe our experience on colorectal ESD regarding its outcomes and safety profile. Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of recorded data on ESDs performed between 2015 and 2020. Only ESDs performed on epithelial neoplastic lesions were selected for further analysis. Results Of a total of 167 colorectal ESDs, 153 were included. Technical success was achieved in 147 procedures (96%). The lesions were located in the colon (n = 24) and rectum (n = 123). The en bloc resection rate was 92% and 97%, the R0 resection rate was 83% and 82%, and the curative resection rate was 79% and 78% for the colon and the rectum, respectively. The need for a hybrid technique was the only risk factor for piecemeal or R1 resection. We report a perforation rate of 3.4% and a 4.1% rate of delayed bleeding; all the adverse events were manageable endoscopically, without the need of blood transfusions or surgery. Most of the lesions were laterally spreading tumours of the granular mixed type (70%), and 20% of the lesions were malignant (12% submucosal and 8% intramucosal cancer). Conclusion Our series on colorectal ESD reports a very good efficacy and safety profile. This technique can be applied by endoscopists experienced in ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Santos-Antunes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.,Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Margarida Marques
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Morais
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fátima Carneiro
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.,Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sidhu M, Shahidi N, Gupta S, Desomer L, Vosko S, Arnout van Hattem W, Hourigan LF, Lee EYT, Moss A, Raftopoulos S, Heitman SJ, Williams SJ, Zanati S, Tate DJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Outcomes of Thermal Ablation of the Mucosal Defect Margin After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Prospective, International, Multicenter Trial of 1000 Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:163-170.e3. [PMID: 33798525 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.03.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Thermal ablation of the defect margin after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-T) for treating large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) has shown efficacy in a randomized trial, with a 4-fold reduction, in residual or recurrent adenoma (RRA) at first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1). The clinical effectiveness of this treatment, in the real world, remains unknown. METHODS We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of EMR-T in an international multicenter prospective trial (NCT02957058). The primary endpoint was the frequency of RRA at SC1. Detailed demographic, procedural, and outcome data were recorded. Exclusion criteria were LNPCPs involving the ileo-caecal valve, the appendiceal orifice, and circumferential LNPCPs. RESULTS During 51 months (May 2016-August 2020) 1049 LNPCPs in 1049 patients (median size, 35 mm; interquartile range, 25-45 mm; right colon location, 53.5%) were enrolled. Uniform completeness of EMR-T was achieved in 989 LNPCPs (95.4%). In this study, 755/803 (94.0%) eligible LNPCPs underwent SC1 (median time to SC1, 6 months; interquartile range, 5-7 months). For LNPCPs that underwent complete EMR-T, the frequency of RRA at SC1 was 1.4% (10/707). CONCLUSIONS In clinical practice, EMR-T is a simple, inexpensive, and highly effective auxiliary technique that is likely to significantly reduce RRA at first surveillance. It should be universally used for the management of LNPCPs after EMR. https://clinicaltrials.gov; Clinical Trial Number, NCT02957058.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Neal Shahidi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lobke Desomer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; AZ Delta Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Roeselare, Belgium
| | - Sergei Vosko
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - W Arnout van Hattem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke F Hourigan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Gallipoli Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Eric Y T Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Footscray Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Spiro Raftopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Steven J Heitman
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stephen J Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon Zanati
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Footscray Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicholas Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Outcomes of thermal ablation of the defect margin after duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:1373-1380. [PMID: 33285144 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) in the duodenum are conventionally treated by EMR. Recurrence is commonly encountered and can be difficult to treat safely due to the unique anatomic characteristics of the duodenum. Auxiliary techniques designed to prevent recurrence have not been described. METHODS We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of thermal ablation of the defect margin after EMR (EMR-T) in reducing recurrence at first surveillance endoscopy (SE1, scheduled at 6 months) in a single tertiary referral center. All duodenal LSLs ≥10 mm referred for EMR were eligible. After successful EMR, thermal ablation was performed using snare-tip soft coagulation around the entire circumference of the resection defect. The primary outcome was the frequency of recurrence at SE1. A previous, well-characterized, prospective cohort of duodenal LSLs ≥10 mm treated by conventional EMR was the comparator. RESULTS Over 43 months up to October 2019, 54 LSLs underwent EMR-T. One hundred twenty-five LSLs underwent conventional EMR in the comparator group. Patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. Recurrence was significantly lower in the EMR-T group compared with the conventional EMR group (1 of 49 [2.3%] vs 19 of 108 [17.6%]; P = .01). No difference in technical success, EMR-related adverse outcomes, or referral to surgery were identified between the groups. CONCLUSIONS EMR-T significantly reduces the frequency of recurrence for duodenal LSLs. This technique is safe in the duodenum and has the potential to significantly improve the effectiveness of duodenal EMR. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02306603.).
Collapse
|
22
|
Shahidi N, Vosko S, Bourke MJ. Authors' response - Delineating a rectum-specific selective resection algorithm: the time is now! Gut 2021; 70:1201-1202. [PMID: 32839199 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Shahidi
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada .,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sergei Vosko
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Shahidi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Division of Gastroenterology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Santos-Antunes J, Marques M, Carneiro F, Macedo G. Choosing the best approach for laterally spreading lesions at the anorectal junction. Gut 2021; 70:1003-1004. [PMID: 32737062 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- João Santos-Antunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar S João, Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal .,IPATIMUP/ i3S, Porto, Portugal
| | - Margarida Marques
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar S João, Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fátima Carneiro
- IPATIMUP/ i3S, Porto, Portugal.,Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar S João, Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar S João, Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Previously Attempted Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps Are Effectively Managed by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:958-966. [PMID: 33625125 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective therapy for naive large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (N-LNPCPs). The best approach for the treatment of previously attempted LNPCPs (PA-LNPCPs) is undetermined. METHODS EMR performance for PA-LNPCPs was evaluated in a prospective observational cohort of LNPCPs ≥20 mm. Efficacy was measured by technical success (removal of all visible polypoid tissue during index EMR) and recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1). Safety was assessed by clinically significant intraprocedural bleeding, deep mural injury types III-V, clinically significant post-EMR bleeding, and delayed perforation. RESULTS From January 2012 to October 2019, 158 PA-LNPCPs and 1,134 N-LNPCPs underwent EMR. Median PA-LNPCP size was 30 mm (interquartile range 25-46 mm). Technical success was 93.0% and increased to 95.6% after adjusting for 2-stage EMR. Cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare-tip soft coagulation (CAST) was required for nonlifting polypoid tissue in 73 (46.2%). Median time to SC1 was 6 months (interquartile range 5-7 months). Recurrence occurred in 9 (7.8%). No recurrence was identified among 65 PA-LNPCPs which underwent margin thermal ablation at SC1 vs 9 (18.0%; P < 0.001) which did not. There were significant differences in resection duration (35 vs 25 minutes; P < 0.001), technical success (93.0% vs 96.6%; P = 0.026), and use of CAST (46.2% vs 7.6%; P < 0.001), between PA-LNPCPs and N-LNPCPs. When adjusting for 2-stage EMR, no difference in technical success was identified (95.6% vs 97.8%; P = 0.100). No differences in adverse events or recurrence were identified. DISCUSSION EMR, using auxillary techniques where necessary, can achieve high technical success and low recurrence frequencies for PA-LNPCPs.
Collapse
|
26
|
McKay O, Shahidi N, Gupta S, van Hattem WA, El-Khoury T, Bourke MJ. Is it time to consider prophylactic appendectomy in patients with serrated polyposis syndrome undergoing surveillance? Gut 2021; 70:231-233. [PMID: 32694174 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Owen McKay
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Neal Shahidi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - W Arnout van Hattem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Toufic El-Khoury
- Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Notre Dame Australia, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia .,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shahidi N, Vosko S, van Hattem WA, Sidhu M, Bourke MJ. Optical evaluation: the crux for effective management of colorectal neoplasia. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13:1756284820922746. [PMID: 32523625 PMCID: PMC7235649 DOI: 10.1177/1756284820922746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in minimally invasive tissue resection techniques now allow for the majority of early colorectal neoplasia to be managed endoscopically. To optimize their respective risk-benefit profiles, and, therefore, appropriately select between endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and surgery, the endoscopist must accurately predict the risk of submucosal invasive cancer and estimate depth of invasion. Herein, we discuss the evidence and our approach for optical evaluation of large (⩾ 20 mm) colorectal laterally spreading lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Shahidi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sergei Vosko
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - W. Arnout van Hattem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|