Diagnostic value of transoesophageal echocardiography in suspected haemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism

Challenging in pulmonary thromboembolism diagnosis in patients with disproportionate pulmonary hypertension and severe mitral stenosis: Report of two cases

Key Clinical Message

Before valvular interventions, echocardiography, especially the TEE or the ventilation/perfusion scan, should be performed to detect silent PTE and set a more accurate treatment and surgical plan.

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive and critical disease that can be caused by mitral stenosis (MS). Some of these patients present with disproportionate PH, which is an uncommon phenomenon and is considered a challenging diagnostic and treatment process. In these patients, other causes may also play a role in developing PH. This report presented two cases with disproportionate PH and severe MS who were scheduled for percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV). The pre-procedural echocardiography revealed systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) of 90 and 120 mmHg, mitral valve area of 0.80 and 0.55 cm2 by three-dimensional (3D) planimetry, and diastolic pressure gradient (DPG) of 13 and 18.8 mmHg, respectively. Furthermore, in the first patient, 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed multiple saddle-type organized thrombi in the proximal parts of the right and left pulmonary arteries, extending to the distal branches. In the second patient, 3D TEE revealed a large, relatively fresh, flow-limiting thrombosis in the proximal part of the right pulmonary artery. The diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) in both patients was confirmed by CT angiography. In both patients, the valves were surgically repaired, while all thrombi were removed from the cardiac chambers and pulmonary vessels during surgery. In addition, patients underwent warfarin therapy orally. They were followed up 6 months after the intervention, and their clinical symptoms had improved significantly.

Saddle Pulmonary Embolism Detected by Transthoracic Echocardiography in a Patient With Suspected Myocardial Infarction

•PE is very rarely identified on TTE. •Saddle PE does not represent a higher-risk subset of PE. •Catheter-based therapies are becoming more commonplace in the management of acute PE.

Application of CT pulmonary angiography and echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism: A cross-sectional study

Background

Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is an acute and potentially fatal condition defined as the blockage of pulmonary arteries by an embolism that can be from various origins.

Objective

The present study aimed to investigate the findings of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and echocardiography in patients with acute PE.

Methods

The present cross-sectional study included some patients with clinical manifestations of PE who underwent CTPA and echocardiography. The radiologic findings, PE severity, and outcome of the patients were recorded. Moreover, echocardiography was performed by an expert cardiologist using a high-resolution device, while CTPA was performed by an expert radiologist using a 16-slice device and a two-step selective test bolus method.

Results

According to our findings, a total number of 147 patients were diagnosed with PE, including 44 (29.93%), 44 (29.93%), and 59 (40.14%) cases of mild, moderate, and severe PE, respectively. Moreover, 25 patients (17%) finally expired due to PE. Regarding the CTPA findings, 31 patients (21.1%) had septum flattening, while 35 (23.8%) had a septum deviation toward the left ventricle. Also, there were significant correlations between mortality and some CTPA findings, including severe PE (p < 0.001), the presence of septal deviation (p = 0.007), and higher diameters of the main pulmonary artery (p < 0.001) and right ventricle (p = 0.008).

Conclusion

CTPA is a valid and accessible modality for diagnosing and evaluating PE in suspected patients. Moreover, several findings in CTPA could predict adverse outcomes, such as death, in patients with PE.

Role of echocardiography in a patient with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: a case report

BACKGROUND

Approximately half of pulmonary embolism cases are diagnosed in an emergency context. The classic symptoms of pulmonary embolism are absent in intensive care unit patients who are under sedation and on mechanical ventilation. In this scenario, after the development of sudden, severe hypotension, pulmonary embolism must be considered and included in a differential diagnosis according to the cause of admission. Echocardiography may be of further help in a differential diagnosis of the cause of shock.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a 44-year-old Caucasian man who was admitted to the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia and respiratory failure and who required invasive mechanical ventilation. During admission, the patient developed sudden, severe hypotension that was refractory to treatment. An adequate diagnosis with transthoracic echocardiography was unachievable because of a poor echocardiographic window. However, the combined use of electrocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography established pulmonary embolism as a high-probability diagnosis based on findings of right ventricular pressure overload and right ventricular dysfunction. The unfavorable hemodynamic situation of the patient prevented his transfer to carry out other complementary tests that could confirm the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Fibrinolytic and anticoagulant therapies were administered immediately, and a favorable clinical outcome was achieved.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the fundamental role that echocardiography played in a patient in the intensive care unit who presented with shock secondary to pulmonary embolism with an unfavorable hemodynamic situation and in whom an unnecessary transfer to perform other complementary diagnostic tests was avoided. The combined use of electrocardiography and echocardiography provided a complete differential diagnosis, identifying the cause of shock and allowing the initiation of specific treatment without further delay. Knowledge of the echocardiographic results that are characteristic of pulmonary embolism can aid in the diagnosis.

Value of Transoesophageal Echocardiography for Diagnosis of Intraoperative Tumour Embolization

Malignant neoplasms such as renal cell carcinoma may invade the inferior vena cava leading to a risk of pulmonary tumour embolization during surgical excision. Although massive pulmonary tumour embolism occurs relatively rarely, it can have catastrophic consequences. We report the case of an acute intraoperative pulmonary tumour embolism during resection of a renal cell carcinoma. The use of transoesophageal echocardiography allowed the immediate diagnosis and appropriate management of the underlying cause of acute haemodynamic instability. The role of transoesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is discussed.

Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: an update

Imaging plays an important role in the evaluation and management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the current standard of care and provides accurate diagnosis with rapid turnaround time. CT also provides information on other potential causes of acute chest pain. With dual-energy CT, lung perfusion abnormalities can also be detected and quantified. Chest radiograph has limited utility, occasionally showing findings of PE or infarction, but is useful in evaluating other potential causes of chest pain. Ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scan demonstrates ventilation-perfusion mismatches in these patients, with several classification schemes, typically ranging from normal to high. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also provides accurate diagnosis, but is available in only specialized centers and requires higher levels of expertise. Catheter pulmonary angiography is no longer used for diagnosis and is used only for interventional management. Echocardiography is used for risk stratification of these patients. In this article, we review the role of imaging in the evaluation of acute PE.

Intracardiac tromboembolism during liver transplantation

We describe a case of intraoperative cardiac trombosis during orthotopic liver transplant surgery that resulted in intraoperative death. By using transesophageal echocardiography, the cause of the descompensation of the patient could be determined and the mechanism of trombus migration from thrombi from the venous circulation to the left heart was accurately observed.

Cardiovascular ultrasonography detection of embolic sources in trauma

Venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and bone cement implantation syndrome are major sources of embolic events in trauma patients. In these patients, embolic events due to venous thromboembolism and bone cement implantation syndrome have been detected with cardiac and vascular ultrasonography in the emergency setting, during the perioperative period, and in the intensive care unit. This article discusses the ultrasonography modalities and imaging findings of embolic events related to venous thromboembolism and bone cement implantation syndrome. The aim is to present a short review with exceptional illustrations that can enable physicians to identify sources of emboli in trauma patients with cardiovascular ultrasonography.

RVAD Support in the Setting of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism

Patients with submassive pulmonary embolism (PE), although normotensive, are characterized by right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and elevated levels of biomarkers of cardiac damage. The best treatment option in these cases is still a subject of debate and the use of thrombolysis in submassive PE remains controversial. A 57-year-old Caucasian male with unprovoked PE, normal blood pressure, and elevated troponin I values was referred to the cardiovascular department. In view of the presence of a right atrium thrombus, the patient underwent surgical embolectomy under extracorporeal circulation, with the extraction of a huge thrombus together with fragmented thrombi from both pulmonary arteries. The patient developed an acute right heart failure solved with a temporary RV assist device (RVAD) support. The RV recovery was observed after 72 hours following the implantation. RVAD placement should be considered in the management of PE in case of acute right heart failure after reperfusion therapy since it can bring the patient out of a death spiral.

The role of cardiovascular ultrasound in diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism

The diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the most important problems in medical emergencies. Commonly accepted criterion for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis is the lack of vein compressibility assessed by Compression UltraSonography. Echocardiography represents an easily available and reliable imaging technique in the clinical setting of hemodynamic instability and in the direct visualization of thromboembolic masses in the right heart chambers. Moreover, echocardiography is useful for prognostic stratification after acute PE as right ventricular dysfunction is the most important predictor of mortality in this context. This review aims to highlight usefulness, potentialities and perspectives of standard and advanced echocardiography in evaluating patients affected by PE.

Early detection of a cavopulmonary tumor embolus with the use of transesophageal echocardiography

Pulmonary tumor embolization from renal cell carcinoma is associated with severe cardiopulmonary morbidity and high perioperative mortality rates. We report the case of a 71-year-old woman who presented with right-sided abdominal pain. Magnetic resonance images revealed a mass originating from the upper pole of the right kidney and extending into the infrahepatic portion of the inferior vena cava. Transesophageal echocardiography was continuously used to monitor the mass during intended radical nephrectomy and tumor resection. When the right kidney was mobilized, intracaval thrombus detached and migrated to the patient's right atrium, causing severe hemodynamic instability. After emergent sternotomy and during the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, the mass was no longer echocardiographically detectable in the heart; it was soon removed completely from the left pulmonary artery. The mass was a renal cell carcinoma. We recommend the use of transesophageal echocardiography as an efficient diagnostic tool in the early detection of pulmonary tumor embolization during the resection of renal cell carcinoma that involves the inferior vena cava.

Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism

Massive pulmonary embolism has a high mortality rate despite advances in diagnosis and therapy. This article attempts to review the evidence-based risk stratification, diagnosis, initial stabilization, and management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism.

Thrombolytic treatment (alteplase; rt-Pa) in acute massive pulmonary embolism and cardiopulmonary arrest

Patients with pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) often decompensate suddenly, and once hemodynamic compromise has developed, mortality is extremely high. Currently, thrombolytic therapy for PE is still controversial. We retrospectively evaluated 34 patients with PE between January 2010 and December 2013 in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medical Park Samsun Hospital, Samsun, Turkey. The demographic and disease characteristics of patients who received thrombolytic treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The female to male ratio was 19/15 and the mean age was 63.1±13.2 years. PE diagnosis was made using echocardiography (64.7%) or contrast-enhanced thorax computed tomography with echocardiography (32.4%). Twenty-two (64.7%) patients went into the cardiopulmonary arrest due to massive PE and 17 (50%) patients recovered without sequelae. Eleven (32.4%) patients were diagnosed with massive PE during cardiopulmonary arrest with clinical and echocardiographic findings. Alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator [rt-PA]) was administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and four (36.3%) patients responded and survived without sequelae. The complications of rt-PA treatment were hemorrhage in five (14.7%) patients and allergic reactions in two (5.9%) patients. There was no mortality due to rt-PA treatment complications. In conclusion, mortality due to massive PE is much more than estimated and alteplase can be used safely in patients with massive PE. This thrombolytic treatment was not associated with any fatal hemorrhage complication. If there is any sign of acute PE, echocardiography should be used during cardiopulmonary arrest/instability. Alteplase should be given to patients with suspected massive PE.

Isolated central venous pressure elevation caused by hematoma formation compressing the superior vena cava following a Bentall operation: a case report

We present a case of a patient exhibiting isolated elevation of the central venous pressure with minimal hemodynamic deterioration in an immediate postoperative period after Bentall operation requiring re-exploration. Isolated elevation of the central venous pressure usually alerts physicians of a volume overload or right ventricular dysfunction. However, even in the absence of significant hemodynamic deterioration, the development of loculated hematoma that compresses the superior vena cava should be ruled out, as it can be life-threatening through the formation of cerebral and laryngeal edema, similar to superior vena cava syndrome. This case emphasizes the importance of a prompt differential diagnosis of the isolated central venous pressure elevation after cardiac surgery with transesophageal echocardiography for the administration of appropriate treatment.

Focused critical care echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

Portable ultrasound is now used routinely in many ICUs for various clinical applications. Echocardiography performed by noncardiologists, both transesophageal and transthoracic, has evolved to broad applications in diagnosis, monitoring, and management of critically ill patients. This review provides a current update on focused critical care echocardiography for the management of critically ill patients.

METHOD

Source data were obtained from a PubMed search of the medical literature, including the PubMed "related articles" search methodology.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Although studies demonstrating improved clinical outcomes for critically ill patients managed by focused critical care echocardiography are generally lacking, there is evidence to suggest that some intermediate outcomes are improved. Furthermore, noncardiologists can learn focused critical care echocardiography and adequately interpret the information obtained. Noncardiologists can also successfully incorporate focused critical care echocardiography into advanced cardiopulmonary life support. Formal training and proctoring are important for safe application of focused critical care echocardiography in clinical practice. Further outcomes-based research is urgently needed to evaluate the efficacy of focused critical care echocardiography.

Massive pulmonary embolism

Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially lethal condition, with death usually caused by right ventricular (RV) failure and cardiogenic shock. Systemic thrombolysis (unless contraindicated) is recommended as the first-line treatment of massive PE to decrease the thromboembolic burden on the RV and increase pulmonary perfusion. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy or catheter-directed thrombectomy should be considered in patients with contraindications to fibrinolysis, or those with persistent hemodynamic compromise or RV dysfunction despite fibrinolytic therapy. Critical care management predominantly involves supporting the RV, by optimizing preload, RV contractility, and coronary perfusion pressure and minimizing afterload. Despite these interventions, mortality remains high.

Pulmonary Embolism in the Mechanically-Ventilated Critically Ill Patient: Is it Different?

Pulmonary embolism (PE) confers significant in-hospital morbidity and mortality, and critically ill patients remain at risk for venous thromboembolism despite thromboprophylaxis. Recognition of the clinical manifestations and immediate management of PE are of paramount importance. Despite diagnostic advances, PE is often undiagnosed and untreated in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, as these patients do not exhibit the common clinical features of the condition, making the diagnosis very challenging. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography is probably the reference standard for the diagnosis of acute PE in the haemodynamically stable, ventilated patient. In the setting of circulatory collapse, bedside echocardiography may be used to risk stratify these patients, based on the presence or absence of right ventricular dysfunction, and guide further management. Treatment options include anticoagulation alone, anticoagulation plus thrombolysis, surgical or catheter embolectomy. Inotropes, vasopressors and pulmonary artery vasodilators may be considered after initial resuscitation of the right ventricle. Few studies have focused on estimating the prevalence of PE among mechanically-ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients and there is notable lack of data assessing predictive factors, prevention, diagnostic strategy and management of PE in the ICU setting.

Pulmonary embolism, part II: Management

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) bears a significant burden on health and survival. Rapid and accurate risk stratification and management are of paramount importance to ensure the highest quality of care. This present article summarizes currently available and emerging management strategies for the disease. The authors not only review current evidence regarding early therapy of acute PE, including supportive care, anticoagulation, thrombolysis, surgical and catheter-based treatment, but also the possible role of mechanical circulatory support in PE. The authors also discuss complications related to PE and its management.

Management of massive and nonmassive pulmonary embolism

Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is characterized by systemic hypotension (defined as a systolic arterial pressure < 90 mm Hg or a drop in systolic arterial pressure of at least 40 mm Hg for at least 15 min which is not caused by new onset arrhythmias) or shock (manifested by evidence of tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia, including an altered level of consciousness, oliguria, or cool, clammy extremities). Massive pulmonary embolism has a high mortality rate despite advances in diagnosis and therapy. A subgroup of patients with nonmassive PE who are hemodynamically stable but with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction or hypokinesis confirmed by echocardiography is classified as submassive PE. Their prognosis is different from that of others with non-massive PE and normal RV function. This article attempts to review the evidence-based risk stratification, diagnosis, initial stabilization, and management of massive and nonmassive pulmonary embolism.

Diagnosis and management of life-threatening pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolus (PE) is estimated to cause 200 000 to 300 000 deaths annually. Many deaths occur in hemodynamically unstable patients and the estimated mortality for inpatients with hemodynamic instability is between 15% and 25%. The diagnosis of PE in the critically ill is often challenging because the presentation is nonspecific. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography appears to be the most useful study for diagnosis of PE in the critically ill. For patients with renal insufficiency and contrast allergy, the ventilation perfusion scan provides an alternative. For patients too unstable to travel, echocardiography (especially transesophageal echocardiography) is another option. A positive result on lower extremity Doppler ultrasound can also aid in the decision to treat. The choice of treatment in PE depends on the estimated risk of poor outcome. The presence of hypotension is the most significant predictor of poor outcome and defines those with massive PE. Normotensive patients with evidence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, as assessed by echocardiography, comprise the sub-massive category and are at intermediate risk of poor outcomes. Clinically, those with sub-massive PE are difficult to distinguish from those with low-risk PE. Cardiac troponin, brain natriuretic peptide, and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography can raise the suspicion that a patient has sub-massive PE, but the echocardiogram remains the primary means of identifying RV dysfunction. The initial therapy for patients with PE is anticoagulation. Use of vasopressors, inotropes, pulmonary artery (PA) vasodilators and mechanical ventilation can stabilize critically ill patients. The recommended definitive treatment for patients with massive PE is thrombolysis (in addition to anticoagulation). In massive PE, thrombolytics reduce the risk of recurrent PE, cause rapid improvement in hemodynamics, and probably reduce mortality compared with anticoagulation alone. For patients with a contraindication to anticoagulation and thrombolytic therapy, surgical embolectomy and catheter-based therapies are options. Thrombolytic therapy in sub-massive PE results in improved pulmonary perfusion, reduced PA pressures, and a less complicated hospital course. No survival benefit has been documented, however. If one is considering the use of thrombolytic therapy in sub-massive PE, the limited documented benefit must be weighed against the increased risk of life-threatening hemorrhage. The role of surgical embolectomy and catheter-based therapies in this population is unclear. Evidence suggests that sub-massive PE is a heterogeneous group with respect to risk. It is possible that those at highest risk may benefit from thrombolysis, but existing studies do not identify subgroups within the sub-massive category. The role of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, catheter-based interventions, and surgical embolectomy in life-threatening PE has yet to be completely defined.

Pulmonary thromboembolic disease. Clinical management of acute and chronic disease

Pulmonary thromboembolism falls between the areas of pulmonology and cardiology, internal medicine and intensive care, radiology and nuclear medicine, and hematology and cardiothoracic surgery. Depending on their clinical background, physicians faced with a patient with a pulmonary thromboembolism may speak different languages and adopt different treatment approaches. Now, however, there is an opportunity to end the Tower of Babel surrounding pulmonary thromboembolism. There is a growing acknowledgement that the key clinical problems in both acute pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension are linked to right ventricular pressure overload and right ventricular failure. As a result, cardiologists and cardiac intensive care specialists are taking an increasing interest in understanding and combating these conditions. The European Society of Cardiology was the first to elaborate comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary thromboembolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The task forces involved in producing these guidelines included radiologists, pulmonologists, hematologists, intensive care physicians and surgeons, which ensured that the final document was universally acceptable. The aim of this article was to provide an overview of the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and prevention of acute pulmonary thromboembolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, while taking into account European Society of Cardiology guidelines and incorporating new evidence where necessary.

Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Non-thrombotic PE does not represent a distinct clinical syndrome. It may be due to a variety of embolic materials and result in a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, making the diagnosis difficult. With the exception of severe air and fat embolism, the haemodynamic consequences of non-thrombotic emboli are usually mild. Treatment is mostly supportive but may differ according to the type of embolic material and clinical severity.

Echocardiography for management of hypotension in the intensive care unit

Hypotension is a common problem in critically ill patients. Rapid diagnosis and intervention may prevent this deterioration and improve eventual outcome. Echocardiography may make a critical difference in the rapid diagnosis of both common and uncommon but important causes of hypotension, such as pericardial tamponade. The differential diagnosis for hypotension differs between acutely admitted septic or trauma patients and the chronic patient in the intensive care unit. A better approach to patient evaluation is the performance of a comprehensive evaluation on every patient. A comprehensive examination is less likely to miss an unexpected diagnosis. With practice, a complete examination may be performed in minutes. Preload, contractility, systolic function (global and focal), and assessment of diastolic dysfunction (common cause of congestive heart failure) can be performed quickly. Specific situations like pericardial tamponade, pulmonary embolism, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, unexplained hypoxemia, and aortic dissection, among others, can all be reliably performed using transesophageal echocardiography. Appropriate training and utilization of this technology will essentially help better manage hypotension in critically ill patients and thereby may improve their outcome. An algorithm to this effect has been suggested, although the same results can be achieved with different algorithms or approaches.

Evaluation of hypoxemic patients with transesophageal echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the use of transesophageal echocardiography when investigating hypoxemic patients in the intensive care unit, to assess its risks and benefits, and to evaluate which diseases of the cardiopulmonary system, mediastinum, and thorax it will help to guide therapeutic decisions.

DESIGN

A review of current literature and practice guidelines was performed.

RESULTS

Hypoxemia, due to a number of different reasons, is common in critically ill patients. Many diagnoses and therapeutic decisions have to rely on good-quality imaging. However, transthoracic echocardiography often produces poor-quality pictures; other imaging modalities involve transferring unstable patients to the imaging suite. Transesophageal echocardiography can safely be performed at the bedside and generates excellent image quality.

CONCLUSION

Transesophageal echocardiography is a safe procedure that can be performed at the bedside and that produces high-quality images of the heart, its related structures, and its function. It helps detect extracardiac pathology leading to hypoxemia and may be used to guide fluid resuscitation and optimize tissue oxygenation.

Extracorporeal Life Support for Massive Pulmonary Embolism

BACKGROUND

Massive pulmonary embolism is frequently lethal because of acute irreversible pulmonary and cardiac failure. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has been used for cardiopulmonary failure in our institution since 1988, and we reviewed our experience with its use in the management of massive pulmonary emboli.

METHODS

We reviewed our complete experience with ECLS for massive pulmonary emboli from January 1992 through December 2005. The records of 21 patients were examined and data extracted.

RESULTS

During the study period, 21 patients received ECLS for massive pulmonary emboli. All patients were on vasoactive drugs, acidemic, and hypoxic at the time of institution of ECLS. Eight were in active cardiac arrest. Five were trauma patients, eight had recently undergone an operation, and six had a hypercoagulable disorder. Nineteen of the 21 patients were cannulated for venoarterial bypass and two were placed on venovenous bypass. The average duration of support for survivors was 5.4 days, ranging from 5 hours to 12.5 days. Emboli resolved with anticoagulation in 10 of 13 survivors and 4 of 13 survivors underwent surgical pulmonary embolectomy. Catastrophic neurologic events were the most common cause of mortality in our series; four patients died from intracranial hemorrhage. The overall survival rate was 62% (13/21).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that emergent ECLS provides an opportunity to improve the prognosis of an otherwise near-fatal condition, and should be considered in the algorithm for management of a massive pulmonary embolism in an unstable patient.

Pulmonary Embolectomy for Acute Massive Pulmonary Embolism

BACKGROUND

Acute massive pulmonary embolism usually results in death if not diagnosed early and treated aggressively. Thrombolytic therapy and catheter embolectomy are increasingly used as definitive management. Emergent open embolectomy is often reserved as a last resort when less invasive methods have failed or the patient is in cardiopulmonary arrest.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience with early open pulmonary embolectomy in patients with acute massive pulmonary embolism from January 1998 to February 2004.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent early pulmonary embolectomy. Five (45%) patients were men, and the average age was 48 years. In 4 (36%) patients, a massive pulmonary embolism occurred after a surgical procedure or trauma. The remaining 7 patients had chronic medical diseases. The diagnosis was established primarily by clinical findings along with spiral computerized tomography or transesophageal echocardiography. Eight (73%) patients survived and were discharged from the hospital. The 3 patients who died suffered cardiac arrest preoperatively and were taken to the operating room with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in progress. Only 1 patient survived after preoperative cardiac arrest.

CONCLUSIONS

Early open pulmonary embolectomy using cardiopulmonary bypass is an effective form of treatment for acute massive pulmonary embolism with excellent long-term results. Preoperative cardiac arrest is associated with a high mortality. Spiral computerized tomography and transesophageal echocardiography are important diagnostic tools.

Diagnosing pulmonary embolism

Objective testing for pulmonary embolism is necessary, because clinical assessment alone is unreliable and the consequences of misdiagnosis are serious. No single test has ideal properties (100% sensitivity and specificity, no risk, low cost). Pulmonary angiography is regarded as the final arbiter but is ill suited for diagnosing a disease present in only a third of patients in whom it is suspected. Some tests are good for confirmation and some for exclusion of embolism; others are able to do both but are often non-diagnostic. For optimal efficiency, choice of the initial test should be guided by clinical assessment of the likelihood of embolism and by patient characteristics that may influence test accuracy. Standardised clinical estimates can be used to give a pre-test probability to assess, after appropriate objective testing, the post-test probability of embolism. Multidetector computed tomography can replace both scintigraphy and angiography for the exclusion and diagnosis of this disease and should now be considered the central imaging investigation in suspected pulmonary embolism.