Improvement in coronary haemodynamics after percutaneous coronary intervention: assessment using instantaneous wave-free ratio

Impact of Serial Coronary Stenoses on Various Coronary Physiologic Indices

BACKGROUND

Determining the functional significance of each individual coronary lesion in patients with serial coronary stenoses is challenging. It has been proposed that nonhyperemic pressure ratios, such as the instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) and the ratio of resting distal to proximal coronary pressure (Pd/Pa) are more accurate than fractional flow reserve (FFR) because autoregulation should maintain stable resting coronary flow and avoid hemodynamic interdependence (cross-talk) that occurs during hyperemia. This study aimed to measure the degree of hemodynamic interdependence of iFR, resting Pd/Pa, and FFR in a porcine model of serial coronary stenosis.

METHODS

In 6 anesthetized female swine, 381 serial coronary stenoses were created in the left anterior descending artery using 2 balloon catheters. The degree of hemodynamic interdependence was calculated by measuring the absolute changes in iFR, resting Pd/Pa, and FFR across the fixed stenosis as the severity of the other stenosis varied.

RESULTS

The hemodynamic interdependence of iFR, resting Pd/Pa, and FFR was 0.039±0.048, 0.021±0.026, and 0.034±0.034, respectively (all P<0.001). When the functional significance of serial stenoses was less severe (0.70-0.90 for each index), the hemodynamic interdependence was 0.009±0.020, 0.007±0.013, and 0.017±0.022 for iFR, resting Pd/Pa, and FFR, respectively (all P<0.001). However, in more severe serial coronary stenoses (<0.60 for each index), hemodynamic interdependence was 0.060±0.050, 0.037±0.030, and 0.051±0.037 for iFR, resting Pd/Pa, and FFR, respectively (all P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

When assessing serial coronary stenoses, nonhyperemic pressure ratios are affected by hemodynamic interdependence. When the functional significance of serial coronary stenoses is severe, the effect is similar to that which is seen with FFR.

Calculation of Intracoronary Pressure-Based Indexes with JLabChart

The Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) have been proposed and clinically validated to measure the pressure gradient across coronary stenoses. They provide quantitative information on stenosis severity. Both are used in coronary revascularization procedures to measure intracoronary pressure giving quantitative information to evaluate coronary diseases during angiographic procedures. We designed and implemented a tool able to acquire and measure iFR and FFR supporting the physicians studying and treating patients in interventional cardiology laboratories. We designed an extensive case study to assess the performance of the tool in (i) acquiring pressure signals from blood pressure measurement systems; (ii) calculating FFR and iFR; and (iii) filtering out extra-beats signals during realtime signal analysis phases. The tool, named JLabChart, is available online. We tested it on two sets of data for a total of 600 cycles from 201 pressure measurements performed on 65 patients, from the Interventional Cardiology Unit of Magna Graecia University. The recognition of cardiac cycles and keypoint of the pressure curve was effective in 100% of cases for proximal (aortic) pressure and in 99.2% for distal pressure. The FFR calculated by JLabChart had an excellent correlation (Rp=0.960; p<0.001) with the FFR values obtained through the commercial systems. Similar results were obtained with iFR (Rp=0.998; p<0.001). Finally, the tool measurement results were compared with a commercial tool proving JLabChart’s efficiency with real cases. It was also compared with measurements performed on synthetic vessels and stenosis designed using the Comsol commercial tool. JLabChart is able to provide reliable measurements of FFR and iFR indexes used to support decisions on interventional procedures. It represents a valuable open source support system that can be used in an interventional cardiology laboratory.

Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback predicts hemodynamic outcome in diffuse coronary artery disease

Background: Serial stenoses or diffuse vessel narrowing hamper pressure wire–guided management of coronary stenoses. Characterization of functional relevance of individual stenoses or narrowed segments constitutes an unmet need in ischemia-driven percutaneous revascularization. Aim of the Study: To perform hemodynamic mapping of the entire vessel using pullback technique of a pressure guidewire with continuous instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement compared coronary angiography aiming to minimize the procedure, decrease number and length of stents used. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 40 patients presented with diffuse coronary artery disease and undergoing elective PCI. Diagnostic coronary angiography using the routine angiographic projections was done with assessment of non-obstructive coronary lesions by 2D quantitative coronary angiography and iFR pullback measurement Results: Percentage of difference between probable sig lesions via pullback technique and No of actual sig lesions for studied group, was (59.5%). The difference was statistically highly significant p=0.0001. Conclusion: Compared with angiography alone, availability of iFR pullback data significantly decreased the number and length of hemodynamically significant lesions identified for revascularization.

A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study

Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≥0.90 confers an improved cardiac prognosis. There are currently limited data available to determine how often it is possible to improve an angiographically acceptable but physiologically suboptimal result. A physiology-guided optimization strategy can achieve a clinically meaningful increase in the proportion of patients achieving a final post-PCI FFR ≥0.90 compared to standard care. Following angiographically successful PCI procedures, 260 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive either a physiology-guided incremental optimization strategy (intervention group) or blinded post-PCI coronary physiology measurements (control group). Patients undergoing successful, standard-of-care PCI for either stable angina or non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who meet the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria will be eligible for randomization. The primary endpoint is defined as the proportion of patients with a final post-PCI FFR result ≥0.90. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire and EQ-5D-5L scores at 3 months and the rate of target vessel failure and its components (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned rehospitalization with target vessel revascularization) at 3 months and 1 year. 260 individual patients were successfully randomized between March 2018 and November 2019. Key baseline demographics of the study population are reported within. TARGET FFR is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial of an FFR-guided PCI optimization strategy. The study has completed recruitment and is now in clinical follow-up. It is anticipated that primary results will be presented in Autumn 2020. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03259815. [Correction added on Apr 3 2020, after first online publication: Clinical Trials identifier added.].

Diagnostic performance of a vessel-length-based method to compute the instantaneous wave-free ratio in coronary arteries

The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is a recently introduced vasodilator-free index to assess the functional severity of coronary stenosis in the resting state, while fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard index in hyperemia. The computed instantaneous wave-free ratio (CT-iFR) is a noninvasive method to estimate iFR using computer simulations. Here, we developed a vessel-length-based CT-iFR method in patient-specific models of coronary arteries. This method was implemented by coupling a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model with a lumped parameter model (LPM) of coronary circulation in a non-hyperemic resting state. A time-varying resistance in the LPM was used for the iFR simulation. In total, 50 coronary vessels of 32 patients were computed, and their CT-iFR values were compared with clinically measured iFRs to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the present CT-iFR method. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of CT-iFR validation was 0.93. In diagnostic performances of CT-iFR, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 86%, 83.3%, and 86.8%, respectively. These results indicate that this CT-iFR method can be used as a pre-operative aid to establish a percutaneous coronary intervention strategy as a noninvasive alternative to iFR.

Fractional flow reserve to guide surgical coronary revascularization

Coronary angiography has traditionally been used as the final diagnostic tool in the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, conventional angiography identifies anatomically obstructive coronary disease, but it is limited in its ability to identify hemodynamically significant lesions. The emergence of fractional flow reserve (FFR) technology, in conjunction with angiography, offers a functional, as well as anatomic, assessment of epicardial coronary obstructions. Several pivotal studies have demonstrated that FFR-guided coronary revascularization is a safe and effective in patients with single and multivessel CAD. There are emerging data to suggest that FFR may also play an integral role in planning surgical revascularization and in the evaluation of post-coronary artery bypass patients and their graft patency. This review will explore the physiologic underpinnings of FFR methodology, its clinical value and limitations, and its applications in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.

Practical Considerations of Fractional Flow Reserve Utilization to Guide Revascularization

OPINION STATEMENT

Invasive angiography has long been the gold standard for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the relationship between angiographic measures of stenosis and coronary blood flow is complex, and there is frequent discordance between the visual assessment of a stenotic lesion and its effect on myocardial perfusion. Fractional flow reserve is a rapidly emerging invasive means of assessing the physiologic significance of an epicardial stenosis. This review provides a pragmatic understanding of the physiologic principles that guide fractional flow reserve (FFR), sheds light on its nuances, and explores the most landmark investigations. We will also discuss how the measurement of FFR can be helpful or limiting in several common clinical situations.

Quantification of the Effect of Pressure Wire Drift on the Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Whole-Cycle Pd/Pa

Background—

Small drifts in intracoronary pressure measurements (±2 mm Hg) can affect stenosis categorization using pressure indices. This has not previously been assessed for fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and whole-cycle distal pressure/proximal pressure (Pd/Pa) indices.

Methods and Results—Four hundred forty-seven

stenoses were assessed with FFR, iFR, and whole-cycle Pd/Pa. Cut point values for significance were predefined as ≤0.8, <0.90, and <0.93, respectively. Pressure wire drift was simulated by offsetting the distal coronary pressure trace by ±2 mm Hg. FFR, iFR, and whole-cycle Pd/Pa indices were recalculated and stenosis misclassification quantified. Median (±median absolute deviation) values for FFR, iFR, and whole-cycle Pd/Pa were 0.81 (±0.11), 0.90 (±0.07), and 0.93 (±0.06), respectively. For the cut point of FFR, iFR, and whole-cycle Pd/Pa, 34.6% (155), 50.1% (224), and 62.2% (278) of values, respectively, lay within ±0.05 U. With ±2 mm Hg pressure wire drift, 21% (94), 25% (110), and 33% (148) of the study population were misclassified with FFR, iFR, and whole-cycle Pd/Pa, respectively. Both FFR and iFR had significantly lower misclassification than whole-cycle Pd/Pa (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the diagnostic performance of FFR and iFR (P=0.125).

Conclusions—

In a substantial proportion of cases, small amounts of pressure wire drift are enough to cause stenoses to change classification. Whole-cycle Pd/Pa is more vulnerable to such reclassification than FFR and iFR.

Invasive FFR — Current Applications and New Developments

Myocardial ischemia caused by coronary atherosclerosis is the main cause of cardiovascular mortality, which is the first cause of death in developed countries. Inducible myocardial ischemia is a negative prognostic factor for coronary artery disease patients, and it represents a major risk stratification marker for predicting mortality. The evolution of these patients depends largely on the extension of the ischemic myocardial mass and the severity of the inducible ischemia. Most patients do not show angiographically significant coronary stenosis. Therefore, such patients do not undergo coronary revascularization therapies, even though they present functional stenoses that trigger myocardial ischemia under stress conditions, which subsequently lead to a high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. We performed a review that aims to pinpoint invasive techniques used for evaluating the functional impact of a coronary lesion that is considered non-significant upon angiographic examination, but which triggers episodes of myocardial ischemia under stress conditions, and to describe the functional markers that show the highest specificity for predicting ischemic risk, in order to recommend invasive coronary revascularization.

Change in coronary blood flow after percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to baseline lesion physiology: results of the JUSTIFY-PCI study

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) aims to increase coronary blood flow by relieving epicardial obstruction. However, no study has objectively confirmed this and assessed changes in flow over different phases of the cardiac cycle. We quantified the change in resting and hyperemic flow velocity after PCI in stenoses defined physiologically by fractional flow reserve and other parameters.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-five stenoses (67 patients) underwent paired flow velocity assessment before and after PCI. Flow velocity was measured over the whole cardiac cycle and the wave-free period. Mean fractional flow reserve was 0.68±0.02. Pre-PCI, hyperemic flow velocity is diminished in stenoses classed as physiologically significant compared with those classed nonsignificant (P<0.001). In significant stenoses, flow velocity over the resting wave-free period and hyperemic flow velocity did not differ statistically. After PCI, resting flow velocity over the wave-free period increased little (5.6±1.6 cm/s) and significantly less than hyperemic flow velocity (21.2±3 cm/s; P<0.01). The greatest increase in hyperemic flow velocity was observed when treating stenoses below physiological cut points; treating stenoses with fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 gained Δ28.5±3.8 cm/s, whereas those fractional flow reserve >0.80 had a significantly smaller gain (Δ4.6±2.3 cm/s; P<0.001). The change in pressure-only physiological indices demonstrated a curvilinear relationship to the change in hyperemic flow velocity but was flat for resting flow velocity.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-PCI physiology is strongly associated with post-PCI increase in hyperemic coronary flow velocity. Hyperemic flow velocity increases 6-fold more when stenoses classed as physiologically significant undergo PCI than when nonsignificant stenoses are treated. Resting flow velocity measured over the wave-free period changes at least 4-fold less than hyperemic flow velocity after PCI.

Current developments and future applications of intracoronary hemodynamics

Intracoronary hemodynamic assessment of the physiologic significance of coronary lesions improves clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Coronary flow velocity reserve, fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and index of microcirculatory resistance utilize sensor-mounted guidewires to approximate coronary flow. Coronary flow velocity reserve and fractional flow reserve rely on pharmacologic administration of adenosine to achieve hyperemia and diagnose epicardial lesion severity. As an adenosine-free index, the instantaneous wave-free ratio utilizes a wave-free period in the mid-late diastole during which resistance is constant and low to assess lesion significance. The index of microcirculatory resistance combines hyperemic pressure measurements with thermodilution to quantify microvascular resistance. We review the physiology, clinical trials, and clinical applications of these invasive hemodynamic assessments.

Advances in coronary physiology

Pressure-wire technology, most typically fractional flow reserve (FFR), has provided interventional cardiologists with a means of determining the physiological importance of a stenosis during angiography. There has been renewed interest in coronary physiology in the light of guideline recognition, ongoing clinical research and new technologies changing the paradigm of how assessment is performed in the catheter laboratory. We reflect on FFR, with regards the potential effects of changing hemodynamics on FFR and the latest evidence with regards to outcomes. We also review the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), a new pressure-only index, measured at rest, that is under active evaluation in several international randomized controlled trials. We review the accumulated evidence and discuss the important physiological concepts between pressure and flow that underlie the approach to using resting indices. Finally we investigate future developments, including physiological mapping with iFR-Pullback and the potential to predict the hemodynamic effect of stenting.

The Instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) pullback: a novel innovation using baseline physiology to optimise coronary angioplasty in tandem lesions

Coronary intervention is increasingly performed in complex disease with tandem and diffuse disease. Pressure wires enable detailed assessment of the physiological significance of a stenosis but in the presence of tandem disease, predicting the impact of a stenting a given stenosis can be difficult and is impeded by flow interaction between stenoses under hyperemia. In this review, we consider the physiological difficulties posed by flow interaction under hyperemia and consider alternative approaches such as assessment under baseline conditions. Specifically we consider the potential value of the iFR-Pullback approach and its capacity to enable Virtual-PCI, which may assist in planning intervention.

Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback provides virtual intervention and predicts hemodynamic outcome for serial lesions and diffuse coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to perform hemodynamic mapping of the entire vessel using motorized pullback of a pressure guidewire with continuous instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement.

BACKGROUND

Serial stenoses or diffuse vessel narrowing hamper pressure wire-guided management of coronary stenoses. Characterization of functional relevance of individual stenoses or narrowed segments constitutes an unmet need in ischemia-driven percutaneous revascularization.

METHODS

The study was performed in 32 coronary arteries with tandem and/or diffusely diseased vessels. An automated iFR physiological map, integrating pullback speed and physiological information, was built using dedicated software to calculate physiological stenosis severity, length, and intensity (ΔiFR/mm). This map was used to predict the best-case post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) iFR (iFRexp) according to the stented location, and this was compared with the observed iFR post-PCI (iFRobs).

RESULTS

After successful PCI, the mean difference between iFRexp and iFRobs was small (mean difference: 0.016 ± 0.004) with a strong relationship between ΔiFRexp and ΔiFRobs (r = 0.97, p < 0.001). By identifying differing iFR intensities, it was possible to identify functional stenosis length and quantify the contribution of each individual stenosis or narrowed segment to overall vessel stenotic burden. Physiological lesion length was shorter than anatomic length (12.6 ± 1.5 vs. 23.3 ± 1.3, p < 0.001), and targeting regions with the highest iFR intensity predicted significant improvement post-PCI (r = 0.86, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

iFR measurements during continuous resting pressure wire pullback provide a physiological map of the entire coronary vessel. Before a PCI, the iFR pullback can predict the hemodynamic consequences of stenting specific stenoses and thereby may facilitate the intervention and stenting strategy.

Fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes: A review

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment provides anatomical and physiological information that is often used to tailor treatment strategies in coronary artery disease. Whilst robust data validates FFR use in stable ischaemic heart disease, its use in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is less well investigated. We critically review the current data surrounding FFR use across the spectrum of ACS including culprit and non-culprit artery analysis. With adenosine being conventionally used to induce maximal hyperaemia during FFR assessment, co-existent clinical conditions may preclude its use during acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, we include a current review of instantaneous wave free ratio as a novel vasodilator independent method of assessing lesion severity as an alternative strategy to guide revascularisation in ACS.

•

Small studies support the use of FFR in non-culprit vessels during ACS.

•

FFR demonstrates diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in AMI, particularly in intermediate lesions.

•

Microvascular dysfunction observed from earlier work does not appear to hinder FFR calculation, but further studies are required for validation.

•

Vasodilator independent assessment of coronary stenoses has some preliminary data supporting its use in non culprit arteries during ACS, but ongoing trial results are awaited regarding clinical outcomes.