Left ventricular pacing improves haemodynamic variables in patients with heart failure with a normal QRS duration

Effect of left ventricular pacing mode and site on hemodynamic, torsional and strain indices

INTRODUCTION

Several reports have indicated that left ventricular (LV) lead placement at an optimal pacing site is an important determinant of short- and long-term outcome. This study investigated the effect of pacing mode (atrioventricular [AV] or ventricular) and site (LV apical or lateral) outside the ischemic region on the LV hemodynamic, torsional and strain indices in the ischemic myocardium.

METHODS

Experiments were conducted in anesthetized open-chest pigs (n = 15) 30 min after LAD ligation to investigate the hemodynamic effects of temporary epicardial AV and ventricular LV pacing at the LV apical (outside the ischemic region) or lateral wall. LV hemodynamic data were recorded (ejection fraction, stroke volume, dP/dt_max, systolic pressure, cardiac output and e/e΄ ratio) and torsional (twist, rotation), as well as deformation (radial and circumferential strain), indices of LV function were assessed using two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging.

RESULTS

The LV function was highly dependent on the pacing mode and site. LV dP/dt_max, systolic pressure and twist decreased significantly during LV pacing in comparison to sinus rhythm (p = 0.004, p<0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). Torsion in sinus rhythm decreased significantly during AV-pacing at the lateral wall (0.11±0.04°/mm vs. 0.06±0.02°/mm, p = 0.005) but did not change significantly during AV-pacing at the apex (0.07±0.05°/mm).

CONCLUSIONS

LV pacing at the apical or lateral wall, in the ischemic myocardium, leads to a suboptimal response in comparison to sinus rhythm. LV pacing at the apex outside the ischemic area exhibits a better response than pacing at the lateral wall, possibly because pacing from this site leads to a more physiological propagation of electrical conduction.

Narrow QRS systolic heart failure: is there a target for cardiac resynchronization?

Cardiac resynchronization therapy has revolutionized the management of systolic heart failure in patients with prolonged QRS during the past 20 years. Initially, the use of this treatment in patients with shorter QRS durations showed promising results, which have since been opposed by larger randomized controlled trials. Despite this, some questions remain, such as, whether correction of mechanical dyssynchrony is the therapeutic target by which biventricular pacing may confer benefit in this group, or are there other mechanisms that need consideration? In addition, novel techniques of cardiac resynchronization therapy delivery such as endocardial and multisite pacing may reduce potential detrimental effects of biventricular pacing, thereby improving the benefit/harm balance of this therapy in some patients.

Cardiac responses to left ventricular pacing in hearts with normal electrical conduction: beneficial effect of improved filling is counteracted by dyssynchrony

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been proposed in heart failure patients with narrow QRS, but the mechanism of a potential beneficial effect is unknown. The present study investigated the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) pacing increases LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) by allowing the LV to start filling before the right ventricle (RV) during narrow QRS in an experimental model. LV and biventricular pacing were studied in six anesthetized dogs before and after the induction of LV failure. Function was evaluated by pressures and dimensions, and dyssynchrony was evaluated by electromyograms and deformation. In the nonfailing heart, LV pacing gave the LV a head start in filling relative to the RV (P < 0.05) and increased LVEDV (P < 0.05). The response was similar during LV failure when RV diastolic pressure was elevated. The pacing-induced increase in LVEDV was attributed to a rightward shift of the septum (P < 0.01) due to an increased left-to-right transseptal pressure gradient (P < 0.05). LV pacing, however, also induced dyssynchrony (P < 0.05) and therefore reduced LV stroke work (P < 0.05) during baseline, and similar results were seen in failing hearts. Biventricular pacing did not change LVEDV, but systolic function was impaired. This effect was less marked than with LV pacing. In conclusion, pacing of the LV lateral wall increased LVEDV by displacing the septum rightward, suggesting a mechanism for a favorable effect of CRT in narrow QRS. The pacing, however, induced dyssynchrony and therefore reduced LV systolic function. These observations suggest that detrimental effects should be considered when applying CRT in patients with narrow QRS.

Association of intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex

AIMS

current criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are restricted to patients with a wide QRS complex (>120 ms). Overall, only 30% of heart failure patients demonstrate a wide QRS complex, leaving the majority of heart failure patients without this treatment option. However, patients with a narrow QRS complex exhibit left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony, as assessed with echocardiography. To further elucidate the possible beneficial effect of CRT in heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex, this two-centre, non-randomized observational study focused on different echocardiographic parameters of LV mechanical dyssynchrony reflecting atrioventricular, interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony, and the response to CRT in these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

a total of 123 consecutive heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex (<120 ms) undergoing CRT was included at two centres. Several widely accepted measures of mechanical dyssynchrony were evaluated: LV filling ratio (LVFT/RR), LV pre-ejection time (LPEI), interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (IVMD), opposing wall delay (OWD), and anteroseptal posterior wall delay with speckle tracking (ASPWD). Response to CRT was defined as a reduction ≥15% in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months follow-up. Measures of dyssynchrony can frequently be observed in patients with a narrow QRS complex. Nonetheless, for LVFT/RR, LPEI, and IVMD, presence of predefined significant dyssynchrony is <20%. Significant intraventricular dyssynchrony is more widely observed in these patients. With receiver operator characteristic curve analyses, both OWD and ASPWD demonstrated usefulness in predicting response to CRT in narrow QRS patients with a cut-off value of 75 and 107 ms, respectively.

CONCLUSION

mechanical dyssynchrony can be widely observed in heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex. In particular, intraventricular measures of mechanical dyssynchrony may be useful in predicting LV reverse remodelling at 6 months follow-up in heart failure patients with a narrow QRS complex, but with more stringent cut-off values than currently used in 'wide' QRS patients.

Use of phase analysis of gated SPECT perfusion imaging to quantify dyssynchrony in patients with mild-to-moderate left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

CRT has been shown to be beneficial in the majority of patients with NYHA class III-IV symptoms, prolonged QRS duration, and an EF < or =35%. The use of imaging modalities to quantify dyssynchrony may help identify patients who may benefit from CRT, but do not meet current selection criteria. We hypothesize that patients with mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction have significant degrees of mechanical dyssynchrony.

METHODS

We compared phase analysis measures of mechanical dyssynchrony from gated SPECT imaging in patients with mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction (EF 35-50%, n = 93), with patients with severe LV dysfunction (EF < or = 35%, n = 167), and with normal controls (EF > or = 55%, n = 75). Furthermore, we evaluated the relationships between QRS duration and dyssynchrony and determined the prevalence of dyssynchrony in patients with mild-moderate LV dysfunction.

RESULTS

Patients with mild-moderate LV dysfunction have more dyssynchrony than normal controls (phase SD 37.7 degrees vs 8.8 degrees , P < .001 and bandwidth 113.5 degrees vs 28.7 degrees , P < .001), but less dyssynchrony than patients with severe LV dysfunction (phase SD 37.7 degrees vs 52.0 degrees , P < .001 and bandwidth 113.5 degrees vs 158.2 degrees , P < .001). In the cohort of patients with LV EF 35-50%, there were only weak correlations between QRS duration and dyssynchrony (phase SD, r = 0.28 and bandwidth, r = 0.20). There were 73 patients with LVEF 35-50% and QRS duration <120 milliseconds of which 21 (28.8%) had mechanical dyssynchrony. Overall, 37% of patients with mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction had significant degrees of mechanical dyssynchrony.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest reported study evaluating mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with mild-moderate LV dysfunction using phase analysis of gated SPECT imaging. In this study, approximately one-third of patients with mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction had significant LV mechanical dyssynchrony. With further study, phase analysis of gated SPECT imaging may help improve patient selection for CRT.

Short-term hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure, a narrow QRS duration, and no dyssynchrony

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy produces both short-term hemodynamic and long-term symptomatic/mortality benefits in symptomatic heart failure patients with a QRS duration >120 ms. This is conventionally believed to be due principally to relief of dyssynchrony, although we recently showed that relief of external constraint to left ventricular filling may also play a role. In this study, we evaluated the short-term hemodynamic effects in symptomatic patients with a QRS duration <120 ms and no evidence of dyssynchrony on conventional criteria and assessed the effects on contractility and external constraint.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty heart failure patients (New York Heart Association class III/IV) with a left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35% who were in sinus rhythm underwent pressure-volume studies at the time of pacemaker implantation. External constraint, left ventricular stroke work, dP/dtmax, and the slope of the preload recruitable stroke work relation were measured from the end-diastolic pressure-volume relation before and during delivery of biventricular and left ventricular pacing. The following changes were observed during delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy: Cardiac output increased by 25+/-5% (P<0.05), absolute left ventricular stroke work increased by 26+/-5% (P<0.05), the slope of the preload recruitable stroke work relation increased by 51+/-15% (P<0.05), and dP/dtmax increased by 9+/-2% (P<0.05). External constraint was present in 15 patients and was completely abolished by both biventricular and left ventricular pacing (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy results in an improvement in short-term hemodynamic variables in patients with a QRS <120 ms related to both contractile improvement and relief of external constraint. These findings provide a potential physiological basis for cardiac resynchronization therapy in this patient population.

Dynamic CO2 therapy in periodic breathing: a modeling study to determine optimal timing and dosage regimes

We examine the potential to treat unstable ventilatory control (seen in periodic breathing, Cheyne-Stokes respiration, and central sleep apnea) with carefully controlled dynamic administration of supplementary CO₂, aiming to reduce ventilatory oscillations with minimum increment in mean CO₂. We used a standard mathematical model to explore the consequences of phasic CO₂ administration, with different timing and dosing algorithms. We found an optimal time window within the ventilation cycle (covering ∼1/6 of the cycle) during which CO₂ delivery reduces ventilatory fluctuations by >95%. Outside that time, therapy is dramatically less effective: indeed, for more than two-thirds of the cycle, therapy increases ventilatory fluctuations >30%. Efficiency of stabilizing ventilation improved when the algorithm gave a graded increase in CO₂ dose (by controlling its duration or concentration) for more severe periodic breathing. Combining gradations of duration and concentration further increased efficiency of therapy by 22%. The (undesirable) increment in mean end-tidal CO₂ caused was 300 times smaller with dynamic therapy than with static therapy, to achieve the same degree of ventilatory stabilization (0.0005 vs. 0.1710 kPa). The increase in average ventilation was also much smaller with dynamic than static therapy (0.005 vs. 2.015 l/min). We conclude that, if administered dynamically, dramatically smaller quantities of CO₂ could be used to reduce periodic breathing, with minimal adverse effects. Algorithms adjusting both duration and concentration in real time would achieve this most efficiently. If developed clinically as a therapy for periodic breathing, this would minimize excess acidosis, hyperventilation, and sympathetic overactivation, compared with static treatment.

Symptomatic Relief: Left Ventricular Assist Devices Versus Resynchronization Therapy

In patients who have end-stage heart failure, medical therapy is of limited use, and heart transplantation is frequently not an option because of the shortage of donor hearts. Two new treatment options, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, can improve survival and quality of life in patients who have heart failure. Both types of devices are easy to implant. However, LVADs carry the risk of infection and mechanical failure, and CRT is ineffective in a substantial proportion of patients who have heart failure. Therefore, methods must be devised to identify patients who have heart failure who are likely to benefit from these devices. Data suggest that early LVAD implantation, before end-stage heart failure develops, is critical to slowing or reversing disease progression. Similarly, in indicated patients who have less advanced disease, CRT may be particularly beneficial.

Imaging techniques in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is a high cost therapeutic option with proven efficacy on improving symptoms of ventricular failure and for reducing both hospitalization and mortality. However, a significant number of patients do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy that is due to various reasons. Identification of the optimal pacing site is crucial to obtain the best therapeutic result that necessitates careful patient selection. Currently, using echocardiography for mechanical dyssynchrony assessment performs patient selection. Multi-Detector-Row Computed Tomography (MDCT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are new imaging techniques that may assist the cardiologist in patient selection. These new imaging techniques have the potential to improve the success rate of cardiac resynchronization therapy, due to pre-interventional evaluation of the venous coronary anatomy, to evaluation of the presence of scar tissue, and to improved evaluation of mechanical dyssynchrony. In conclusion, clinical issues associated with heart failure in potential candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy, and the information regarding this therapy that can be provided by the imaging techniques echocardiography, MDCT, and MRI, are reviewed.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With a Narrow QRS Complex

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with narrow QRS complex (<120 ms) and evidence of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony on tissue Doppler imaging (TDI).

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is beneficial in selected heart failure patients with wide QRS complex (> or =120 ms). Patients with narrow QRS complex are currently not eligible for CRT, and the potential effects of CRT are not well studied.

METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive patients with narrow QRS complex and 33 consecutive patients with wide QRS complex (control group) were prospectively included. All patients needed to have LV dyssynchrony > or =65 ms on TDI, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV heart failure, and LV ejection fraction < or =35%.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, particularly LV dyssynchrony, were comparable between patients with narrow and wide QRS complex (110 +/- 8 ms vs. 175 +/- 22 ms; p = NS). No significant relationship was observed between baseline QRS duration and LV dyssynchrony (r = 0.21; p = NS). The improvement in clinical symptoms and LV reverse remodeling was comparable between patients with narrow and wide QRS complex (mean NYHA functional class reduction 0.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.6 [p = NS] and mean LV end-systolic volume reduction 39 +/- 34 ml vs. 44 +/- 46 ml [p = NS]).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy appears to be beneficial in patients with narrow QRS complex and severe LV dyssynchrony on TDI, with similar improvement in symptoms and comparable LV reverse remodeling to patients with wide QRS complex. The current results need confirmation in larger patient cohorts.

Development of respiratory control instability in heart failure: a novel approach to dissect the pathophysiological mechanisms

Observational data suggest that periodic breathing is more common in subjects with low F(ETCO(2)), high apnoeic thresholds or high chemoreflex sensitivity. It is, however, difficult to determine the individual effect of each variable because they are intrinsically related. To distinguish the effect of isolated changes in chemoreflex sensitivity, mean F(ETCO(2)) and apnoeic threshold, we employed a modelling approach to break their obligatory in vivo interrelationship. We found that a change in mean CO(2) fraction from 0.035 to 0.045 increased loop gain by 70 +/- 0.083% (P < 0.0001), irrespective of chemoreflex gain or apnoea threshold. A 100% increase in the chemoreflex gain (from 800 l min(-1) (fraction CO(2))(-1)) resulted in an increase in loop gain of 275 +/- 6% (P < 0.0001) across a wide range of values of steady state CO(2) and apnoea thresholds. Increasing the apnoea threshold F(ETCO(2)) from 0.02 to 0.03 had no effect on system stability. Therefore, of the three variables the only two destabilizing factors were high gain and high mean CO(2); the apnoea threshold did not independently influence system stability. Although our results support the idea that high chemoreflex gain destabilizes ventilatory control, there are two additional potentially controversial findings. First, it is high (rather than low) mean CO(2) that favours instability. Second, high apnoea threshold itself does not create instability. Clinically the apnoea threshold appears important only because of its associations with the true determinants of stability: chemoreflex gain and mean CO(2).

The deleterious consequences of right ventricular apical pacing: time to seek alternate site pacing

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this article is to critically review the data accumulated to date from studies evaluating the hemodynamic and clinical effects of right ventricular apical pacing during conventional permanent cardiac pacing. The data from studies comparing the effects of right ventricular apical pacing and alternate site ventricular pacing are also reviewed.

METHODS

We conducted a MEDLINE and journal search of English-language reports published in the last decade and searched relevant papers.

RESULTS

Although intraventricular conduction delay in the form of left bundle branch block (LBBB) has traditionally been viewed as an electrophysiologic abnormality, it has now become abundantly clear that it has profound hemodynamic effects due to ventricular dyssynchrony, especially in patients with heart failure. These deleterious effects can be significantly ameliorated by cardiac resynchronization therapy effected by biventricular or left ventricular pacing. However, not only is spontaneous LBBB harmful, but the iatrogenic variety produced by right ventricular apical pacing in patients with permanent pacemakers may be equally deleterious. In this review new evidence from recent studies is presented, which strongly suggests a harmful effect of our long-standing practice of producing an iatrogenic LBBB by conventional right ventricular apical pacing in patients receiving permanent pacemakers. This emerging strong new evidence about the adverse hemodynamic and clinical effects of right ventricular apical pacing would dictate a reassessment of our traditional approach to permanent cardiac pacing and direct our attention to alternate sites of pacing, such as the left ventricle and/or the right ventricular outflow tract or septum, if not for all patients, at least for those with left ventricular dysfunction. Indeed, current convincing data on alternate site ventricular pacing are encouraging and this approach should be actively pursued and further investigated in future studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only is spontaneous permanent LBBB harmful to our patients, but the iatrogenic variety produced by right ventricular apical pacing during conventional permanent pacing may also be deleterious to some patients. The compelling evidence presented herein cannot be ignored; it may dictate a change of attitude toward right ventricular apical pacing directing our attention to alternate sites of ventricular pacing and avoidance of the right ventricular apex.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy for heart failure

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) reduces symptoms and improves left ventricular function in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and prolonged QRS duration. Recent studies have demonstrated a reduction in mortality associated with CRT. When combined with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduction in mortality is likely to reduce further. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy is well tolerated and free from compliance issues and therefore should be considered for all suitable patients. Identifying patients who will derive maximum benefit requires further study and has health economic implications. We review here the CRT trial evidence as well as the implantation technique and complications. We also describe a case report where an intra-aortic balloon pump was used successfully as a bridge to CRT to treat a patient with end-stage heart failure.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: redefining the role of device therapy in heart failure

That cardiac dyssynchrony can contribute to a decline in cardiac efficiency has been recognized in one form or another for at least 50 years. Although revascularization and beta-blockers can improve cardiac synchrony, there was little interest in or awareness of this clinical entity until the advent of specific, highly effective therapy using atriobiventricular pacing, often described as cardiac resynchronization therapy. Over the last few years, significant advances in cardiac resynchronization therapy technology and the publication of large-scale clinical trials using cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in patients with heart failure have led to the widespread use of these devices. This review will briefly describe the complex nature of cardiac dyssynchrony, what is known about its epidemiology, the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy, appropriate patient selection, practical aspects, such as implantation and monitoring, and some still unanswered questions.

Role of resynchronisation therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in heart failure

The worldwide prevalence of heart failure is increasing in part because of an aging population. In the developed world, heart failure affects 1%-2% of the general population, accounting for 5% of adult hospital admissions. There is now convincing evidence supporting the beneficial effects of cardiac resynchronisation therapy for the treatment of heart failure. Numerous observational studies, as well as a series of randomised controlled trials, have shown the safety, efficacy, and long term benefits for patients with chronic systolic heart failure who have broad QRS complexes and refractory symptoms despite optimal medical therapy. These studies have consistently found statistically significant improvements in quality of life, New York Heart Association functional class, exercise tolerance, and left ventricular reverse remodelling. Recent evidence suggests that the benefit may at least in part be because of a reduction in mechanical dysynchrony.

[Echocardiographic evaluation to select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy]

Wide QRS complex and asynchronous myocardial contraction in heart failure are associated with poor prognosis. Resynchronization can be achieved by biventricular pacing (BVP), which leads to hemodynamic and clinical improvement and reverse remodeling, and may improve survival. However, there is a substantial subset of patients with wide QRS complexes in the electrocardiogram who does not improve despite BVP, and there are findings which suggest that resynchronization therapy may be also beneficial for heart failure patients with normal QRS duration. QRS width predicts the benefit of BVP only with limitation and only correlates weakly with echocardiographically determined myocardial asynchrony. Determination of asynchrony by tissue Doppler echocardiography seems to be the best predictor for improvement after BVP, although no consensus on the optimal method to assess asynchrony has yet been achieved. To date, most studies evaluating tissue Doppler echo in BVP were performed retrospectively and only one prospective study with patient selection for BVP according to echocardiography and electrocardiography criteria of asynchrony has been published. These new echocardiographic tools will help to prospectively select patients for BVP, help to guide implantation and to optimize device programming.

Selecting patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy: electrical or mechanical dyssynchrony?

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) markedly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure and prolonged QRS duration. Landmark trials have included over 4000 patients based on their electrocardiogram. A few small, observational, non-randomized, single centre studies of short duration have suggested that echocardiographic measurement of mechanical dyssynchrony may better identify patients likely to benefit from CRT. We objectively review the meaning and measurement of electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony, the strengths and weaknesses of echocardiographic indices of dyssynchrony, and the controversial issue of predicting response to treatment. We conclude that proposals to alter current guidelines for patient selection, and include echocardiography, are misguided. Echocardiographic assessment will only become credible and applicable to clinical practice once used to select patients for large prospective randomized trials which show an improvement in clinical outcome.

Significance of QRS complex duration in patients with heart failure

Prolongation of QRS (> or =120 ms) occurs in 14% to 47% of heart failure (HF) patients. Left bundle branch block is far more common than right bundle branch block. Left-sided intraventricular conduction delay is associated with more advanced myocardial disease, worse left ventricular (LV) function, poorer prognosis, and a higher all-cause mortality rate compared with narrow QRS complex. It also predisposes heart failure patients to an increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but the incidence of cardiac or sudden death remains unclear because of limited observations. A progressive increase in QRS duration worsens the prognosis. No electrocardiographic measure is specific enough to provide subgroup risk categorization for excluding or selecting HF patients for prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. In ICD patients with HF, a wide underlying QRS complex more than doubles the cardiac mortality compared with a narrow QRS complex. There is a high incidence of an elevated defibrillation threshold at the time of ICD implantation in patients with QRS > or =200 ms. Mechanical LV dyssynchrony potentially treatable by ventricular resynchronization occurs in about 70% of HF patients with left-sided intraventricular conduction delay, a fact that would explain the lack of therapeutic response in about 30% of patients subjected to ventricular resynchronization according to standard criteria relying on QRS duration. The duration of the basal QRS complex does not reliably predict the clinical response to ventricular resynchronization, and QRS narrowing after cardiac resynchronization therapy does not correlate with hemodynamic and clinical improvement. Mechanical LV dyssynchrony is best shown by evolving echocardiographic techniques (predominantly tissue Doppler imaging) currently in the process of standardization.

Left Ventricular Pacing Minimizes Diastolic Ventricular Interaction, Allowing Improved Preload-Dependent Systolic Performance

Background— Left ventricular (LV) pacing improves hemodynamics in patients with heart failure. We hypothesized that at least part of this benefit occurs by minimization of external constraint to LV filling from ventricular interaction.

Methods and Results— We present median values (interquartile ranges) for 13 heart failure patients with LV pacing systems implanted for New York Heart Association class III/IV limitation. We used the conductance catheter method to measure LV pressure and volume simultaneously. External constraint was measured from the end-diastolic pressure-volume relation recorded during inferior vena caval occlusion, during LV pacing, and while pacing was suspended. External constraint to LV filling was reduced by 3.0 (4.6 to 0.6) mm Hg from 4.8 (0.6 to 7.5) mm Hg ( P <0.01) in response to LV pacing; effective filling pressure (LV end-diastolic pressure minus external constraint) increased by 4.0 (2.2 to 5.8) mm Hg from 17.7 (13.3 to 22.6; P <0.01). LV end-diastolic volume increased by 10 (3 to 11) mL from 238 (169 to 295) mL ( P =0.01), whereas LV end-systolic volume did not change significantly (−1 [−2 to 3] mL from 180 [124 to 236] mL, P =0.97), which resulted in an increase in stroke volume of 11 (5 to 13) mL from 49 (38 to 59) mL ( P <0.01). LV stroke work increased by 720 (550 to 1180) mL · mm Hg from 3400 (2110 to 4480) mL · mm Hg ( P =0.01), and maximum dP/dt increased by 120 (2 to 161) mm Hg/s from 635 (521 to 767) mm Hg/s ( P =0.03).

Conclusions— This study suggests a potentially important mechanism by which LV pacing may produce hemodynamic benefit. LV pacing minimizes external constraint to LV filling, resulting in an increase in effective filling pressure; the consequent increase in LV end-diastolic volume increases stroke volume via the Starling mechanism.

Advances in pediatric electrophysiology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The pediatric electrophysiology literature during the past year has addressed several topics that are particularly relevant for children and other patients with congenital heart disease. This paper reviews selected studies germane to physicians and health care personnel who treat pediatric and adult congenital heart patients with arrhythmias and electrophysiologic disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in arrhythmia diagnostics have been reported in pediatrics using loop monitoring, both external and implanted. Diagnostic criteria and risk stratification strategies have been refined for the congenital and inherited rhythm disorders such as cardiomyopathies and long QT syndrome. The use of therapeutic procedures such as catheter ablation for complex arrhythmias in congenital heart disease is discussed. Finally, a summary of articles on implanted devices in pediatrics and congenital heart disease is reviewed, including implantable defibrillators, atrial antitachycardia pacemakers, and cardiac resynchronization therapy in pediatrics.

SUMMARY

Pediatric electrophysiology is a rapidly changing field, with advances seen in diagnostic evaluation of arrhythmia, refinement of risk-stratification testing, and therapeutic options such as catheter ablation and cardiac rhythm management devices. The evolution of pediatric electrophysiology from a diagnostic specialty into a therapeutic and interventional subspecialty has advanced the treatment options for children with cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disorders.

Electrical and Mechanical Components of Dyssynchrony in Heart Failure Patients With Normal QRS Duration and Left Bundle-Branch Block

Background— Resynchronization pacing is an effective symptomatic treatment for heart failure patients with prolongation of the QRS duration (QRSd). Dyssynchronous contraction of the left ventricle is also observed with normal QRSd. We set out to determine how electrical activation of the left ventricular (LV) free wall differed between patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB) and normal QRSd and if synchrony improved during pacing in patients with normal QRSd.

Methods and Results— Twenty-two patients were implanted with resynchronization pacemakers, 13 with LBBB (mean QRS, 171 ms) and 9 with normal QRSd <120 ms (mean, 100 ms). LV lead electrograms and surface ECGs in sinus rhythm (unpaced) were recorded. Conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography were performed without pacing, with LV and biventricular pacing at optimal atrioventricular delay. Lead electrograms from the LV free wall were later in the LBBB patients in absolute terms (155 ms [SD 23] versus 65.5 ms [SD 25]; P =0.05) and also relative to the surface QRS (90.5% [SD 8] versus 65.5% [SD 24]). Improved synchrony of the left and right ventricles (interventricular synchrony) and of the LV myocardial segments (intraventricular synchrony) was observed for patients with LBBB and normal QRSd. Baseline LV synchrony correlated with timing of LV free-wall electrical activation. Improved intraventricular synchrony during pacing also correlated with LV free-wall electrical activation time.

Conclusions— Resynchronization of systole can be achieved for patients with normal QRSd and LBBB during biventricular and LV pacing. The timing of LV free-wall electrical activation correlated with the improvement in synchrony.

Beyond the measurement of QRS complex toward mechanical dyssynchrony: cardiac resynchronisation therapy in heart failure patients with a normal QRS duration

Mechanical systolic dyssynchrony exists in many patients with heart failure, irrespective of QRS duration, and so more patients may derive benefit from cardiac resynchronisation therapy than previously considered.