Alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in the treatment of hypertension

Carvedilol: molecular and cellular basis for its multifaceted therapeutic potential

Carvedilol is a unique cardiovascular drug of multifaceted therapeutic potential. Its major molecular targets recognized to date are membrane adrenoceptors (beta 1, beta 2, and alpha 1), reactive oxygen species, and ion channels (K+ and Ca2+). Carvedilol provides prominent hemodynamic benefits mainly through a balanced adrenoceptor blockade, which causes a reduction in cardiac work in association with peripheral vasodilation. This drug assures remarkable cardiovascular protection through its antiproliferative/atherogenic, antiischemic, antihypertrophic, and antiarrhythmic actions. These actions are a consequence of its potent antioxidant effects, amelioration of glucose/lipid metabolism, modulation of neurohumoral factors, and modulation of cardiac electrophysiologic properties. The usefulness of carvedilol in the treatment of hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and congestive heart failure is based on a combination of hemodynamic benefits and cardiovascular protection.

Effect of intravenous infusion of an alpha-adrenergic blocking agent on the haemodynamic changes in human masseter muscle induced by cold pressor stimulation

This study evaluated the effect of intravenous infusion of a non-selective alpha-adrenergic blocking agent on masseter muscle haemodynamics induced by 4 degrees C cold pressor stimulation (CPS) of the right foot and ankle, which reportedly evokes a rapidly increasing sympathetic nerve activity in human skeletal muscle. Nine healthy non-smoking males (mean age 23.7+/-2.1 year) with no history of chronic muscle pain or migraine participated. The haemoglobin (Hb) concentration in the right masseter was continuously recorded by non-invasive, near-infrared spectroscopy. Heart rate and blood pressure were also recorded. The experiment involved the following sequence: (1) a placebo (physiological saline) with a CPS trial; (2) a 30-sec maximal voluntary clenching (MVC)-only trial; and (3) an alpha-adrenergic blocking agent with a CPS trial. The saline and drug trials each involved continuous recording for 1 min before, 2 min during and 5 min after the CPS. Physiological saline (20 ml) or phentolamine mesylate (20 ml) were infused at the rate of 2 ml/min. This infusion was begun 15 min before baseline recording and participants were not aware which solution (saline or phentolamine) was being infused. For the MVC trial, each participant performed a 30-sec MVC of his jaw-closing muscles followed by a 15-min rest between each trial. The individual Hb data were adjusted so that the baseline at the beginning of the experiment was equal to zero and all data were normalized as a percentage of the individual's highest absolute Hb change seen after the MVC. The mean baseline Hb concentrations 1 min before CPS were significantly higher in the alpha-blocker trial (83.6%) than in the placebo saline trial (P < 0.001). The change in mean Hb concentration from baseline during CPS in the alpha-blocker trial was significantly less than in the placebo trial (P = 0.006). Mean heart rate before CPS was also significantly higher in the alpha-blocker trial (85.2 beats/min) than in the placebo trial (69.6 beats/min) (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures between the placebo and alpha-blocker trials in any time period. The results suggest that non-selective alpha-adrenoceptor blockade increases the blood volume in the masseter muscle. This change might be due to a combination of peripheral vasodilation and an increase in cardiac output.

Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of metoprolol and carvedilol in hypertensive patients

Metoprolol and carvedilol are widely used in the treatment of hypertension, but no randomized comparison of their hemodynamic activity has been previously reported. Their comparative effects on heart rate, systemic blood pressure, and echocardiographically determined aortic and femoral artery blood flow were measured at rest and at 2 and 24 hours after the first dose of each drug, and again after 4 weeks of sustained monotherapy in 12 male and 12 female patients, aged 36-68 years with uncomplicated sustained hypertension according to a randomized single-blind protocol. Nine patients in each drug group achieved the target diastolic blood pressure of < 90 mmHg on the initial doses of each drug; this was achieved in the remainder following doubling of each dose. Neither drug occasioned withdrawal of any patient due to adverse reactions. Both drugs significantly reduced heart rate, although the reduction at 2 hours was significantly greater after metoprolol than after carvedilol. Both drugs reduced systolic pressure throughout the study; the reduction at 2 hours was significantly greater after carvedilol than after metoprolol. In contrast, the diastolic blood pressure was persistently reduced only by carvedilol. The cardiac output, determined as the aortic systolic blood flow, after carvedilol was not significantly different from pretreatment values throughout the study but was significantly reduced in the metoprolol-treated patients at each point of measurement. After metoprolol the systemic and femoral vascular resistances derived from conventional formulae were consistently and significantly increased over pretreatment values throughout the study and were significantly greater than in the carvedilol group at all measurement points. The hemodynamic differences between these two beta-blocking drugs may be explained by the additional vasodilator activity of carvedilol associated with its alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocking activity. The long-term clinical and prognostic implications of these pharmacodynamic differences between beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with and without additional vasodilator activity in the treatment of hypertensive patients remain to be determined.

Issues, goals, and guidelines in selecting first-line drug therapy for hypertension

Modern antihypertensive therapy is enriched by an explosion in drug development that makes available increasingly specific agents whose effects have advanced our understanding of pressor mechanisms. This and other research into hypertensive mechanisms has defined the clinical, pharmacological, and endocrinologic heterogeneity of human hypertension. The sum of these developments is a greatly enhanced ability to identify curable and definable causes of hypertension and to pathophysiologically stratify the remaining cases of essential hypertension. Modern treatment can be much more specific than before. When long-term drug therapy is indicated, the regimen is more likely to achieve a primary goal for each patient, that is, the fewest possible drugs in the smallest amount and in lowest frequency. Two clinically quantifiable mechanisms for long-term arteriolar vasoconstriction can be identified within the spectrum of human hypertension. The first, renin-mediated vasoconstriction, is directly related to the plasma renin level. The second, sodium-volume-related vasoconstriction, is marked by a reciprocally subnormal renin level and involves abnormal sodium retention and calcium transport. A baseline renin-sodium profile can identify the pressure of one of these two forms of vasoconstriction and therefore is the key for the diagnosis of the two curable disorders that fully express one of the two pressor mechanisms--renovascular hypertension and primary aldosteronism. Renovascular hypertension, more common than once thought, is often cured by angioplasty. It is important to diagnose these curable forms before beginning long-term drug therapy. The renin-sodium profile, used in conjunction with serum potassium and creatinine measurements, is valuable not only in screening patients for curable forms, but also for stratifying the remainder according to the pathophysiological vasoconstrictor mechanism that underlies the hypertension. Converting enzyme inhibitors or beta-blockers are, by themselves, often effective in correcting the hypertension of high- or medium-renin patients, whereas calcium antagonists, diuretic agents, or alpha-blockers alone are most effective against the low-renin form of vasoconstriction. In the large midzone of renin values, if monotherapy fails, a rational basis for combined antirenin-antisodium volume therapies can be developed.

Properties of labetalol, a combined alpha- and beta-blocking agent, relevant to the treatment of myocardial ischemia

Labetalol, a combined alpha-beta-adrenergic antagonist, is one of the new group of beta-adrenergic blockers reduces peripheral and coronary vascular resistances while preserving cardiac output. Unlike alpha-adrenergic blockers, labetalol tends to reduce heart rate during rest and exercise. The drug is a potent antihypertensive agent which has been used by mouth and by vein to treat mild, moderate, and severe hypertension, including hypertensive emergencies. Labetalol has a hemodynamic profile which makes it an attractive agent for treating myocardial ischemia. The drug reduces blood pressure, left ventricular wall tension, heart rate, and contractility while preserving or even augmenting coronary blood flow. Studies with labetalol in hypertensive patients with angina have shown it to be more effective than placebo in reducing angina attacks and blood pressure while improving exercise tolerance. The drug appears to have antianginal and antihypertensive effects comparable to atenolol and propranolol. Side effects of treatment are observed and most are related to alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade. Labetalol also appears to be effective for treatment of normotensive patients with angina and for silent myocardial ischemia. It has no apparent effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins. Labetalol appears to be a useful drug for treating the hypertensive heart and its many complications.

Pressor responses from noncardioselective beta-blockers

This study reviews more than fifty papers dealing with pressor responses from noncardioselective beta-blockers. It is concluded that the responses are usually mild. They occur mainly in situations of increased sympathetic activity. Therefore some patients seem to be at risk, eg, patients with unstable diabetes type 1, sportsmen performing isometric exercise, and heavy smokers. In orthostatic hypotension, noncardioselective beta-blockers may be beneficial. Cardiac output tends, however, to decrease, and patients with orthostatic hypotension will probably not benefit from this effect.

A comparison of labetalol and prazosin combined with atenolol in non-responders to atenolol plus hydrochlorothiazide in uncomplicated hypertension

After screening two local populations in the northern part of The Netherlands for hypertension, patients with a diastolic pressure (DP) between 95 and 120 mmHg were treated daily either with 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide or 100 mg atenolol. Nonresponders were given the combination and if necessary the dose of atenolol was increased to 200 mg. Non-responders to the latter combination were randomized and treated either with 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide and labetalol or with 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide, 200 mg atenolol and prazosin. If after 1 month a DP less than or equal to 90 mmHg had been reached the patient was reassessed after a further 3 months. If a DP greater than 90 mmHg was found the dose of labetalol or prazosin was increased and the patient was re-examined after 1 month. This protocol was followed until the maximum dose was reached or adverse reactions prevented a further increase in dosage. During 6 months of treatment there was a further drop in systolic and diastolic blood pressures under both regimens of, respectively, 8.6 and 2.4 mmHg for labetalol, and 7.7 and 5.0 mmHg for the prazosin group. At the end of the period the average daily doses of labetalol and prazosin were 1256 mg and 4.3 mg, respectively. There was no significant difference in the average number of complaints between the labetalol and the prazosin group.

Alpha and beta-blockade and beta-stimulation in Raynaud's syndrome: a double-blind, placebo controlled, single dose study

We examined in a double blind fashion and placebo controlled the effects of some alpha and beta adrenergic receptor agonists and antagonists on the recovery of finger skin temperature 12 min after finger cooling (5 min waterbath for both hands) in twelve patients with Raynaud's syndrome. A favourable effect was established on phenoxybenzamine 20 mg as compared to placebo. A significant but rather small effect on orciprenaline 10 mg. The beta-agonists prenalterol (10 mg) and terbutaline (5 mg) did not influence the recovery of finger skin temperature. The beneficial effect of phenoxybenzamine 20 mg was not influenced by the addition of beta-agonists (prenalterol 10 mg or terbutaline 5 mg) or a beta-blocker (propranolol 40 mg). The beta-agonists terbutaline and orciprenaline caused a fall in diastolic pressure and an increase in heart rate. These effects presumably were connected with one collapse and three near-collapses. On alpha- and beta-blocker (phenoxybenzamine and propranolol) a decrease in systolic pressure appeared, whereas diastolic pressure did not significantly differ from the placebo value. While physical exercise is considered to exacerbate the hypotensive effect of alpha-blockers, a fall in blood pressure during physical exercise could not be established in our experiments after the addition of propranolol to the alpha-blocker phenoxybenzamine. Our results suggest that an alpha-blocker is a good choice in Raynaud's syndrome, whereas the addition of a beta-blocker may have some advantages.

Rest and exercise hemodynamic effects of sequential alpha-1-adrenoceptor (trimazosin) and beta-adrenoceptor (propranolol) antagonism in essential hypertension

The efficacy of acute beta blockade in essential hypertension is limited by reflex vasoconstriction. The aim of this study was to determine whether the latter response was modified by prior selective alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. A single-blind, within-patient, placebo-controlled evaluation of the immediate hemodynamic effects of sequential alpha-1 (trimazosin)- and beta (propranolol)-adrenoceptor blockade was undertaken in 10 men (34 to 58 years) with previously untreated essential hypertension. The study commenced with a 4-minute control period of constant-load (600 to 900 kpm/min) upright bicycle exercise, and measurements were made before (control) and 30 minutes after intravenous trimazosin (2 mg/kg) and exercise was then repeated; measurements at rest were again made 4 minutes after intravenous propranolol (0.2 mg/kg) before a final exercise period. Trimazosin at rest reduced systolic and diastolic arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance without change in heart rate, cardiac output, or left ventricular (LV) filling pressure. During upright bicycle exercise the reductions in blood pressure were sustained without change in their rest-to-exercise increments. Other circulatory variables did not differ from control values. At rest the addition of propranolol further reduced systolic arterial pressure. Heart rate and cardiac output fell and systemic vascular resistance increased to its pretreatment control value. During exercise the changes at rest were sustained and the rest-to-exercise increments in blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output were reduced. LV filling pressure was significantly increased. In conclusion, alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade modified the adverse effects of acute beta blockade at rest but not during exercise.

Intrinsic sympathomimetic activity: clinical fact or fiction?

The therapeutic importance of the ancillary pharmacologic property of partial agonist activity, or intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), of a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist is controversial. Its pharmacologic definition and accepted physiologic potential are now joined by convincing evidence that ISA may have important therapeutic implications. The ability to support basal cardiac functions while preventing the potential hazards of random sympathetic stimulation is an important attribute of this property, particularly in the damaged heart. The beneficial effects of ISA on peripheral blood flow, systemic vascular resistance and left ventricular afterload are established. Although all beta-blocking drugs are contraindicated in patients with asthma, ISA appears to be at least as important as cardioselectivity in offsetting some of the increase in airway resistance that results from beta blockade alone both at rest and during exertion. These pharmacodynamic consequences of ISA may explain the lesser reduction in exercise tolerance afforded by beta-blocking drugs with ISA than by those without. ISA may also enhance the primary oxygen-sparing effects of beta blockade in the ischemic myocardium by reducing coronary resistance, enhancing coronary blood flow, and reducing anaerobic metabolism. The adverse effects of beta-blocking drugs on blood lipids and carbohydrate metabolism also appear to be largely negated in drugs with ISA. The risks of rebound effects from abrupt withdrawal are significantly less in drugs with ISA than in those without.

Comparison of labetalol, propranolol and hydralazine in hypertensive out-patients

In a randomized cross-over trial the combination labetalol/hydrochlorothiazide was compared with the combination of propranolol/hydralazine/hydrochlorothiazide in 34 uncomplicated hypertensive patients, who were not satisfactorily controlled with hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg alone. The elevated diastolic pressure (D.P.) in 27 patients responded satisfactorily to the labetalol schedule and in 28 patients to the propranolol/hydralazine schedule. No difference was found in the rate of decrease of D.P., nor in the disappearance of hypertension-related complaints. Although the duration of the washout between treatments was at least one month, treatment was significantly more efficacious during the second period. Labetalol pre-treatment especially seemed to enhance the effect of subsequent propranolol/hydralazine administration. Side effects due to therapy were rare and were not related to any particular treatment. The median daily dose of labetalol in responders was 600 mg and that of propranolol/hydralazine 120/60 mg (in both therapies hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg was given in addition). Patients showed a slight preference for the labetalol medication. It is concluded that labetalol/hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol/hydralazine/hydrochlorothiazide are equally satisfactory in the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension.

Effects of combined alpha- and beta-blockade by labetalol in patients with coronary artery disease

1 The effect of labetalol 100 mg orally twice daily on exercise tolerance has been compared with placebo in 19 normotensive subjects with angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease. 2 Labetalol, at the same work load as during placebo exercise, significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures, as well as heart rate and rate-pressure product. 3 Similarly, ST segment depression was reduced by labetalol from 2.0 +/- 0.4 to 1.36 +/- 0.6 mm (P less than 0.001), thus enabling an increase in exercise tolerance from a control value of 83.7 +/- 18 to 95.3 +/- 19 W (P less than 0.005). 4 In seven other patients, also with coronary artery disease, the haemodynamic effects of a single 0.6 mg/kg intravenous dose of the drug was evaluated during exercise. 5 Compared with conditions during control exercise, labetalol induced a significant reduction in rate-pressure product from 17228 +/- 2375 to 13445 +/- 2404 mmHg/min (P less than 0.005) and in peripheral vascular resistance from 612.0 +/- 61.2 to 512.7 +/- 36.2 dyn cm-5 m-2 (P less than 0.0025). These events were not accompanied by any change in cardiac index and in dP/dT left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) ratio. 6 These data suggest that labetalol may induce reduction in myocardial oxygen consumption, thereby increasing exercise tolerance in patients with coronary artery disease, without impairment of left ventricular performance.

Antihypertensive and adrenoceptor blocking properties of new sulfonamide-substituted phenylethylamines

Studies on the structure-activity relationship using 9 new 3-sulfamoylphenylethylamines revealed that YM-09538, YM-09649 and YM-09686 were competitive antagonists at both beta- and post-synaptic alpha-receptors. The following order of adrenoceptor blocking activities was obtained : propranolol greater than labetalol greater than YM-09538 greater than YM-09649 greater than YM-09686 for beta-receptors and prazosin greater than YM-09686 greater than YM-09649 greater than YM-09538 greater than phentolamine greater than labetalol for postsynaptic alpha-receptors. In contrast to phentolamine, three YM-compounds showed low affinities for presynaptic alpha-receptors similar to prazosin and labetalol. These antagonists except propranolol effectively lowered blood pressure in conscious SHR and their relative effectiveness parallels the postsynaptic alpha-blocking activity. At hypotensive doses, phentolamine markedly and prazosin, YM-09686 and YM-09649 moderately increased heart rate, whereas YM-09538 and labetalol failed to increase the rate. These results indicate that the postsynaptic alpha-blocking activity of YM-compounds contributes to their hypotensive activities and that both beta-blocking and low presynaptic alpha-blocking activities contribute to attenuation of the tachycardia.

Comparison of labetalol and propranolol in hypertension

1 Labetalol has been compared with propranolol in a double-blind, double-dummy study of 24 patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension. 2 Two patients were unable to tolerate propranolol and five labetalol, because of symptom side effects; this difference was not significant (P greater than 0.1). 3 On a self-administered questionnaire, labetalol was associated with a greater number of side effects per patient than propranolol, but no individual side effect was significantly more common with either drug. 4 There was no difference in the number of spontaneously reported side effects between the two drugs. 5 Both drugs impaired pulmonary function, but propranolol caused a greater reduction than labetalol after 8 weeks of treatment. 6 We conclude that labetalol and propranolol are similarly effective and acceptable to the patient.

Haemodynamic interactions between alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in conscious or anaesthetized rats

1. The alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist, phentolamine, was administered intravenously, to conscious or anaesthetized rats, before or after the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, propanolol. 2. The bradycardia which followed the combined administration of propranolol and phentolamine exceeded that induced by propranolol alone, yet the hypotensive effect of phentolamine was attenuated by propranolol. 3. The results are compatible with the concept that a significant part of the hypotensive effect of phentolamine is mediated by stimulation of vascular beta-adrenoceptors.

[Acute combined alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade in essential hypertension: effects on blood pressure, renal function, renin, and aldosterone]

In seven patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension the effects of an acute alpha-adrenergic blockade, alone and combined with a chronic beta-adrenergic blockade, on blood pressure, renal function as measured by standard clearance methods, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone were evaluated. Acute alpha-adrenergic blockade with phentolamine (20 mg by intravenous infusion) significantly enhanced the antihypertensive effect of chronic beta-adrenergic blockade with slow-oxprenolol (160 mg/ day X 14 days) (- 14.5% verus - 7.4% for pulse pressure, - 12.4% versus - 6.0% for diastolic pressure, 2 alpha less than 0.05). Under combined adrenergic blockade renal plasma flow increased, glomerular filtration rate and filtration fraction decreased (2 alpha less than 0.05 each), whereas the fractional clearances of sodium, potassium, free water, and solute load remained unchanged. The activation of the renin-angiotensin-axis, elicited by alpha-adrenergic blockade alone, was suppressed by the preceding beta-adrenergic blockade. These findings demonstrate a favourable antihypertensive action of a combined blockade of alpha- und beta-adrenergic receptor sites without untoward side effects on renal function or the renin-angiotensin-axis.

Clinical pharmacology of labetalol

1 The clinical pharmacology of labetalol has been evaluated using pharmacological and physiological test methods.

2 Labetalol displaces the log dose-response curves to the right of isoprenaline-induced increases in heart rate, cardiac output and decreases in diastolic BP. The similarity in the displacements of these curves suggests labetalol has non-selective β-adrenoceptor-blocking properties.

3 Labetalol inhibits exercise-induced increases in heart rate and systolic BP, inhibits tilt tachycardia and that associated with Valsalva's manoeuvre.

4 Direct comparison with propranolol using the methods above have shown that the β-adrenoceptor-blocking effect of labetalol is qualitatively similar to that of propranolol but that propranolol is more potent weight for weight to the order of 4 to 6:1 propranolol:labetalol. In respect of their effects on respiratory function, labetalol and propranolol are qualitatively different; whereas propranolol increases airways resistance in equipotent β-adrenoceptor-blocking doses, labetalol does not.

5 Labetalol displaces the log dose-response curves of phenylephrine and noradrenaline-induced increases in systolic and diastolic BPs to the right consistent with an α-adrenoceptor-blocking action.

6 Labetalol inhibits increases in BP due to a cold stimulus, whereas propranolol does not.

7 The combined α- and β-adrenoceptor-blocking effect of labetalol after acute and chronic administration leads to reductions in BP and peripheral resistance but little change in heart rate or cardiac output at rest. During exercise, increases in BP and heart rate are attenuated but cardiac output increases are only significantly diminished at high levels of exercise.

8 Labetalol is less lipophylic than propranolol, with a partition coefficient of 1.2. It is almost completely metabolized being extensively conjugated.

Labetalol, a cross-over double blind controlled trial

20 patients (12 female) with moderately severe essential hypertension [blood pressure during placebo treatment 181 +/- 6 (systolic), 107 +/- 3 (diastolic)] completed a double-blind, cross-over dose-titrated comparison of labetalol and methyldopa. Both drugs reduced lying and standing arterial blood pressure to a similar extent, although only labetalol reduced heart rate. Compliance was high (greater than 95%) with both drugs, and the incidence of subjective adverse effects was similar.

Circulatory and alpha-adrenoceptor blocking effects of phentolamine

1 Intravenously administered phentolamine provoked immediate decreases in diastolic blood pressure but increases in heart rate and cardiac output. 2 These immediate circulatory effects had largely disappeared twenty minutes after administration and at this time phentolamine did not inhibit increases in blood pressure which were provoked during hand immersion in ice-cold water. 3 Log dose-response curves of noradrenaline induced increases in systolic and diastolic pressure 20 min after intravenous phentolamine were shifted to the right in a parallel manner compared with the curves before phentolamine administration. 4 It was concluded that the immediate and short acting effects induced by phentolamine are due to a non-specific vasodilator effect but in addition phentolamine causes a longer acting alpha-adrenoceptor blockade at vascular adrenoceptor sites. However, by producing both pre- and post-synaptic alpha-adrenoceptor blockade this may explain why this drug exerts only a weak antihypertensive effect.

The second Lilly Prize Lecture, University of Newcastle, July 1977. beta-Adrenergic receptor blockade in hypertension, past, present and future

All beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs that have been described share the common property of being competitive inhibitors. They differ in their associated properties, the presence or absence of cardioselectivity, membrane stabilizing activity, and partial agonist activity. Recently some beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs have been reported which also possess alpha-adrenoceptor blocking activity. The associated properties have been used as a basis for classifying beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs (Fitzgerald, 1969, 1972). The presence or absence of cardioselectivity is most useful for dividing beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. The non-selective drugs (Division I) can be further divided according to the presence or absence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) and membrane stabilizing activity (Fitzgerald's groups I-IV). Group I possess both membrane activity and ISA, e.g. alprenolol, oxprenolol, group II just membrane action, e.g. propanolol, group III ISA but no membrane action, e.g. pindolol. Fitzgerald placed pindolol in group I but should be placed in group III as it possesses a high degree of beta-adrenoceptor blocking potency in relation to its membrane activity (Prichard, 1974). Finally drugs in group IV have neither ISA nor membrane action, e.g. sotalol, timolol. The cardioselective drugs (Division II) can be similarly sub-divided into groups I-IV according to the presence or absence of ISA or membrane action (Fitzgerald grouped all these together as group V). Lastly there are new beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs which in addition have alpha- adrenergic receptor blocking properties (Division III).

Labetalol in the treatment of hypertensive renal patients

The efficacy of labetalol in lowering blood pressure was assessed in 18 patients with chronic renal failure and hypertension. Before the start of labetalol therapy, all patients were receiving combined antihypertensive therapy, the most common being a beta-blocker and hydrallazine. Over the period of about four weeks labetalol was substituted for the prior therapy. 51Cr edetic acid (EDTA) estimations of glomerular filtration rate were performed before labetalol therapy, and then again after one and six months. Before the therapy with labetalol, 12 of the 18 patients had supine diastolic blood pressures of 100 mm Hg or more. At six months, 14 patients remained in the trial and, of these, only four had a supine diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more. In the supine position there was a significant reduction of systolic, but not of diastolic, blood pressure. However, in the erect position there was a significant reduction both in systolic and in diastolic blood presure. Pulse rate did not vary significantly. Few side effects were encountered, transient postural dizziness being the most common side effect. Labetalol seems to be an effective substitute for the beta-blocker plus hydrallazine therapy. However, it is not as potent as minoxidil.

Acute hemodynamic effects of an alpha- and beta-receptor blocking agent (AH 5158) on the systemic and pulmonary circulation at rest and during exercise in hypertensive patients

The acute hemodynamic effects of 50 mg. of the alpha- and beta-receptor blocking agent AH 5158, administered intravenously, on the systemic and pulmonary circulation were studied in 13 hypertensive patients at rest in the supine and erect positions, and during exercise, with right heart and brachial artery catheterization. AH 5158 induced a significant fall of systemic blooc pressures under all conditions, whereas the pulmonary systolic and mean pressures were lower at rest and unaltered during exercise. The left ventricular filling pressure largely remained unchanged. Blood pressure was lowered predominantly by a reduction in systemic vascular resistance together with a reduction in cardiac output. These effects were particularly pronounced in the erect position and during exercise. Cardiac output was lowered solely by the reduction of heart rate; stroke volume was unchanged or even increased. The arterial-mixed venous oxygen difference increased in the erect position and during exercise. The pattern of AH 5158-induced hemodynamic adaptation comprising a reduction of both vascular resistance and cardiac output, without evidence of significant negative inotropic action, offers a novel basis for treating hypertension with a single drug. Its pharmacological and hemodynamic profile suggests considerable potential in the treatment of hypertensive patients.

An approach to the treatment of essential hypertension

The efficacy and side effects of the combined administration of propranolol and phenoxybenzamine were examined in 19 patients with moderate and moderately severe essential hypertension. By titrating the dosage of both drugs against pulse rate and blood pressure response, propranolol was given between 80 and 160 mg. and phenoxybenzamine between 20 and 50 mg. per day in divided doses. There was a substantial reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in both recumbent and upright positions without orthostatic hypotension. Normal blood pressure (140/90 mm. Hg or less) or near normal (150/100 mm. Hg or less) was attained in 14 of the patients in the recumbent and 17 in the upright position. Pulse rate also decreased significantly, whereas body weight increased but not significantly so. Except for a reduction of ejaculation in three out of six male subjects, no symptomatic side effects were detected, and no changes in the liver or renal function or in blood count were observed. Despite the short duration of therapy, 3 to 10 weeks, this study clearly demonstrates that propranolol and phenoxybenzamine given together in individualized doses are very effective in lowering arterial blood pressure with minimal side effects.

Assessment of alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor blocking actions of labetalol

Isoprenaline dose-response curves plotting increases in heart rate before and after labetalol are suggestive of competitive antagonism at beta-adrenoceptor sites. Phenylephrine dose-response curves using increases in systolic pressure before and after labetalol are suggestive of competitive antagonism at alpha-adrenoceptor sites. The ratio of alpha:beta-adrenoceptor antagonism induced by labetalol is approximately 1:3. Peak pharmacological responses after a single oral dose of labetalol (400 mg) occurred between 90-120 min after administration.

Hydrallazine or phentolamine as adjuncts to beta-adrenoceptor blockade/thiazide therapy in hypertension

Ten patients not maximally controlled on an oxprenolo/cyclopenthiazide regimen for moderately severe hypertension were treated in a double blind crossover trial with either hydrallazine (75-150 mg/day) or phentolamine (60-120 mg/day) or placebo in addition to their other therapy. Additional phentolamine therapy did not lower blood pressure significantly when compared with placebo. Additional hydrallazine (75-150 mg/day) produced an approximate 10 mm, Hg fall in diastolic blood pressure, but no significant fall in systolic blood pressure. Pulse rates did not alter with the addition of hydrallazine or phentolamine. In patients who fail to attain optimal blood pressure response to beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs it is suggested that the addition of hydrallazine is a useful measure.

Alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agents combined with a diuretic in the treatment of essential hypertension

The antihypertensive efficacy and side effects of the combined therapy with propranolol, phenoxybenzamine, and hydrochlorothiazide were examined in 17 patients with moderate and moderately severe hypertension. Following a control period two to three weeks' duration, propranolol was started in nine patients as the sole antihypertensive agent and together with phenoxybenzamine, in eight. By titrating the dosage against pulse rate and blood pressure response, propranolol was given, in divided doses, from 80 to 160 mg and phenoxybenzamine, from 20 to 50 mg per day. When propranolol was given alone in nine patients, for four to 12 weeks, normal blood pressure was not attained in any patients. During three to ten weeks of combined propranolol and phenoxybenzamine therapy in 17 patients, normal blood pressure (150/90 mm Hg or less) or near-normal pressure (150/100 or less) was attained in 12 patients in the recumbent position and in 15 patients in the upright position, while orthostatic hypotension was not observed. Except for a reduction of ejaculation in three out of six male patients, no other side effects were encountered. The addition of hydrochlorothiazide diuretic in all of the above 17 patients, at a dose of 50-100 mg per day with a concomitant decrease in the dose of phenoxybenzamine, produced a further reduction in blood pressure, and normal or near-normal blood pressure was attained in all subjects. Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension, observed in two patients, was treated by a further readjustment of the dose of phenoxybenzamine, while inhibition of ejaculation was persistent in only one patient. It is concluded that the combined administration of propranolol, phenoxybenzamine, and hydrochlorothiazide in individualized doses is very effective in lowering the blood pressure with minimal side effects.

The transient anti-hypertensive effect of phentolamine in patients receiving beta-blocker treatment

In seven hypertensives receiving beta-blocker drugs, and additional reduction in standing blood pressure occurred between 60 and 90 minutes after 40 mg phentolamine by mouth. The occurrence of the postural hypotensive effect was delayed in relation to the reported time of peak plasma concentration of unchanged phentolamine. Supine blood pressure and heart rate were unaffected. Phentolamine has no clinically useful anti-hypertensive effect in conjunction with beta-blockers in patients with essential hypertension.