Correction of altered noradrenaline reactivity in essential hypertension by indapamide

Alpha-Adrenergic Mechanisms in the Cardiovascular Hyperreactivity to Norepinephrine-Infusion in Essential Hypertension

AIMS

Essential hypertension (EHT) is characterized by cardiovascular hyperreactivity to stress but underlying mechanism are not fully understood. Here, we investigated the role of α-adrenergic receptors (α-AR) in the cardiovascular reactivity to a norepinephrine (NE)-stress reactivity-mimicking NE-infusion in essential hypertensive individuals (HT) as compared to normotensive individuals (NT).

METHODS

24 male HT and 24 male NT participated in three experimental trials on three separate days with a 1-min infusion followed by a 15-min infusion. Trials varied in infusion-substances: placebo saline (Sal)-infusions (trial-1:Sal+Sal), NE-infusion without (trial-2:Sal+NE) or with non-selective α-AR blockade by phentolamine (PHE) (trial-3:PHE+NE). NE-infusion dosage (5µg/ml/min) and duration were chosen to mimic duration and physiological effects of NE-release in reaction to established stress induction protocols. We repeatedly measured systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as well as heart rate before, during, and after infusions.

RESULTS

SBP and DBP reactivity to the three infusion-trials differed between HT and NT (p's≤.014). HT exhibited greater BP reactivity to NE-infusion alone compared to NT (trial-2-vs-trial-1: p's≤.033). Group differences in DBP reactivity to NE disappeared with prior PHE blockade (trial-3: p=.26), while SBP reactivity differences remained (trial-3: p=.016). Heart rate reactivity to infusion-trials did not differ between HT and NT (p=.73).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a mediating role of α-AR in DBP hyperreactivity to NE-infusion in EHT. However, in SBP hyperreactivity to NE-infusion in EHT, the functioning of α-AR seems impaired suggesting that the SBP hyperreactivity in hypertension is not mediated by α-AR.

Effect of diuretics on renal tubular transport of calcium and magnesium

Calcium (Ca2+) and Magnesium (Mg2+) reabsorption along the renal tubule is dependent on distinct trans- and paracellular pathways. Our understanding of the molecular machinery involved is increasing. Ca2+ and Mg2+ reclamation in kidney is dependent on a diverse array of proteins, which are important for both forming divalent cation-permeable pores and channels, but also for generating the necessary driving forces for Ca2+ and Mg2+ transport. Alterations in these molecular constituents can have profound effects on tubular Ca2+ and Mg2+ handling. Diuretics are used to treat a large range of clinical conditions, but most commonly for the management of blood pressure and fluid balance. The pharmacological targets of diuretics generally directly facilitate sodium (Na+) transport, but also indirectly affect renal Ca2+ and Mg2+ handling, i.e., by establishing a prerequisite electrochemical gradient. It is therefore not surprising that substantial alterations in divalent cation handling can be observed following diuretic treatment. The effects of diuretics on renal Ca2+ and Mg2+ handling are reviewed in the context of the present understanding of basal molecular mechanisms of Ca2+ and Mg2+ transport. Acetazolamide, osmotic diuretics, Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE3) inhibitors, and antidiabetic Na+/glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT) blocking compounds, target the proximal tubule, where paracellular Ca2+ transport predominates. Loop diuretics and renal outer medullary K+ (ROMK) inhibitors block thick ascending limb transport, a segment with significant paracellular Ca2+ and Mg2+ transport. Thiazides target the distal convoluted tubule; however, their effect on divalent cation transport is not limited to that segment. Finally, potassium-sparing diuretics, which inhibit electrogenic Na+ transport at distal sites, can also affect divalent cation transport.

Metabolic profile of indapamide sustained-release in patients with hypertension: data from three randomised double-blind studies

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of indapamide sustained-release (SR) 1.5 mg/day, a thiazide-related sulfonamide diuretic, on serum levels of lipids (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and triglycerides), glucose and uric acid, and renal function (serum urea and creatinine levels).

METHODS

Pooled data from three randomised, double-blind, controlled studies are analysed. Two of these studies were of short duration (2 and 3 months), one of which included a 9-month nonblind extension phase, and the third was a 12-month prospective study. Short- and long-term metabolic effects of the treatment could thus be analysed. All studies were conducted in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension; the total population randomised in these studies comprised 1195 patients, of whom 505 had left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).

RESULTS

After 2 to 3 months' treatment with indapamide SR 1.5 mg/day, there was no significant change from baseline in serum lipid levels and glucose levels. This neutral effect was maintained after 9 and 12 months of treatment. Renal function was not affected by short- or long-term indapamide SR 1.5 mg/day therapy. Serum uric acid level was slightly increased after short-term therapy, but was restored to baseline values during long-term therapy with indapamide SR 1.5 mg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

Indapamide SR 1.5 mg/day has no deleterious effect on glucose metabolism, serum levels of lipids and uric acid, or renal function. This antihypertensive agent can be considered to be an attractive therapeutic choice for all patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, including the elderly and patients with increased cardiovascular risks, i.e. those with LVH.

Effects of indapamide in rats with pressure overload left ventricular hypertrophy

We studied the in vivo effects of the antihypertensive diuretic agent indapamide on left ventricular (LV) morphology in chronically pressure-overloaded rat hearts. LV pressure and subsequently LV mass were increased by banding the ascending aorta over a period of 6 weeks. Thereafter, animals were treated with low-dose (1 mg/kg/day, n = 9) or high-dose (10 mg/kg/day, n = 9) indapamide for another 6 weeks. Low-dose indapamide treatment reduced LV weights as compared with vehicle-treated controls (n = 9; -12%; p = 0.008). Furthermore, low-dose indapamide treatment resulted in a decrease of myocyte volume (59.0 +/- 10.6 vs. 79.0 +/- 9.8 m3 x 10(-27); p < 0.05) and an improvement of molecular markers of hypertrophy: a reduction of LV atrial natriuretic factor mRNA expression (-37%; p < 0.05), and an increase of the V1/V3 myosin ratio (+121%; p < 0.05). Low-dose indapamide also reduced significantly plasma (-65%) and LV angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activities (-74%) as well as LV mRNA levels (-24%). These changes were observed despite continued pressure overload of the LV and despite a lack of significant changes in sodium excretion with the prolonged administration of low-dose indapamide. High-dose indapamide treatment showed no significant effects on LV mass, structure, and gene expression. Furthermore, high-dose indapamide increased plasma renin activity substantially, whereas low-dose treatment was without effect on circulating renin. In conclusion, in rats with continuous LV pressure-overload low-dose treatment with indapamide leads to mild regression of cardiac hypertrophy, accompanied by a downregulation of components of the cardiac renin-angiotensin system. These effects may be mediated by mechanisms apart from the known diuretic and antihypertensive actions of indapamide, because sodium excretion and blood pressure were stable with long-term treatment and are unlikely to be related to LVH regression in this model.

Cardiovascular protective properties of indapamide

Although indapamide has been used for many years as a first-line treatment of hypertension, it is only recently that some of its activities on the changes of the cardiovascular system, brought on by age and high blood pressure, have been studied. Indapamide appears to reduce blood pressure by a combined diuretic and direct vascular activity reducing vascular reactivity and total peripheral resistance. In addition, it has discrete effects on a number of interrelated systems that may protect the cardiovascular system. Indapamide reduces intracellular calcium levels, maintains magnesium ions, but reduces phosphate ions that may be involved in arterial rigidity. Circulating catecholamines remain unchanged but there is a reduction in normetanephrine, suggesting a reduction in sympathetic tone. It stimulates prostacyclin synthesis, increases levels of circulating prostacyclin, reduces platelet aggregation and stimulates the vasodilation elicited by endothelium-derived relaxing factor in the presence of bradykinin. In addition, it inhibits the formation of the vasoconstrictor prostanoid, thromboxane A2. The free radical scavenging activity of indapamide could also protect the vascular smooth muscle from the reperfusion injury of cerebral and myocardial ischemia. Indapamide induces a reduction in cerebral ischemia after carotid ligation. Unlike some other antihypertensives, it does not upset the high-density/low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol balance, reducing the possible risk of atherosclerosis. Moreover, the combination of binding to elastin and reduction in uptake of calcium and phosphate into the smooth muscle could be a mechanism for reducing arterial rigidity seen in the elderly and hypertensive patient. In hypertensive patients, these properties induce an improvement in arterial compliance, and in the long term a reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy. These pharmacologic and clinical results, together with a good antihypertensive efficacy and acceptability, suggest that indapamide may be a preferential agent in the long-term cardiovascular protection of the hypertensive patient.

Cardiovascular regulation and lipoprotein profile during administration of co-dergocrine in essential hypertension

Co-dergocrine has recently been demonstrated acutely to lower plasma norepinephrine (NE) and blood pressure (BP) in patients with essential hypertension, and similar results have been obtained during chronic administration of co-dergocrine to healthy men. The present study investigated the effect of 3 weeks of treatment with co-dergocrine 4 mg/day on BP, plasma catecholamines, certain other BP-regulating factors and serum lipoproteins in patients with essential hypertension. Compared to placebo conditions, co-dergocrine decreased supine BP and heart rate by -7% and the upright plasma NE level by -24%. Supine plasma NE also fell (-24%). Total cholesterol and the LDL + VLDL-cholesterol lipoprotein fraction were lowered by -6%. No significant change was observed in plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, aldosterone and epinephrine levels, whole blood and plasma volume, exchangeable sodium, and the cardiovascular responsiveness to NE, angiotensin II and isoproterenol. The findings suggest that in patients with essential hypertension, chronic treatment with co-dergocrine may slightly decrease sympathetic outflow and, at least in the short-term, lower the potentially atherogenic serum LDL + VLDL - cholesterol fraction.

Pathogenetic and therapeutic relevance of cardiovascular pressor reactivity to norepinephrine in human hypertension

In normotensive humans with a positive family history of essential hypertension, blood pressure (BP) is often dysregulated. Body sodium, blood volume, plasma angiotensin II (AngII), epinephrine and norepinephrine (NE), their responses to changes in sodium intake or posture, as well as baroreflex function, beta-receptor-mediated cardiac responsiveness, and the responsiveness of BP to AngII appear to be largely unaltered. However, the responsiveness of BP to NE is commonly exaggerated. An increase in potassium intake may improve the NE hyperreactivity and concomitantly lower BP within the "normotensive" range. Therefore, a selective vascular NE hyperreactivity relative to existing sympathetic activity seems to be a common familial abnormality predisposing for the development of essential hypertension. In borderline or established essential hypertension, an inappropriate vascular reactivity relative to sympathetic activity probably complements other mechanisms contributing to the maintenance of hypertension. Various antihypertensive treatments may lower BP at least in part by improving cardiovascular NE (hyper)reactivity without provoking an equivalent rise in sympathetic activity. These include dietary potassium supplementation, thiazide-type agents, indapamide, calcium channel blockers, postsynaptic alpha 1-blockers, and AngII converting enzyme inhibitors.

Systemic and regional haemodynamic profile of diuretics and alpha- and beta-blockers. A review comparing acute and chronic effects

The influence of the acute and chronic administration of antihypertensive agents on blood flow to various organs which are known targets of hypertension is important in the determination of drug therapy for this disorder. In association with the frequently observed fall in cardiac output and increase in total peripheral resistance in response to acute administration, beta-blockers may induce a decrease in blood flow to the brain and kidney. However, during chronic treatment it has been widely shown that total peripheral resistance returns to pretreatment levels (except for labetalol, a beta-blocker with alpha-blocking properties) whilst renal and cerebral blood flows are unaffected. Although alpha-blockers acutely lower blood pressure and induce a baroreflex-mediated increase in heart rate and cardiac output while not affecting cerebral blood flow, during chronic treatment no change in systemic or cerebral or renal blood flow is observed. Diuretics and dietary sodium restriction, which are the most widely used therapeutic interventions, are usually well tolerated; however, in aged patients in whom renal adaptation to sodium depletion is impaired, deterioration of renal function may be observed.

Age, race, diagnosis, and sodium effects on the pressor response to infused norepinephrine

We studied the blood pressure responses to infused norepinephrine in 34 normotensive and 21 unmedicated subjects with essential hypertension. The two groups were similar in age, relative body weight, and urinary electrolyte excretion. Patients were studied on two extremes of dietary salt (200 mEq Na and 10 mEq Na per day). The dose-response curves were highly linear (p less than 0.00001) for both systolic and diastolic blood pressures. There was no evidence for an increased sensitivity to infused norepinephrine among the hypertensive subjects. On the other hand, older subjects had steeper slopes (p less than 0.005). Subjects on a high salt diet had steeper slopes than those on low salt diets (p less than 0.0025); this trend was especially apparent among blacks (p less than 0.005). Black and white hypertensive subjects responded to the high salt diet in opposite fashion: The blacks showed an increased pressor sensitivity (p less than 0.05), whereas the whites demonstrated a nonsignificant decreased pressor sensitivity. These results indicate that age, race, and salt effects must be meticulously controlled in studies of sympathetic nervous system physiology.

Potassium and norepinephrine- or angiotensin-mediated pressor control in pre-hypertension

Blood pressure (BP), plasma electrolytes, renin, aldosterone, angiotensin II (AII) or catecholamines, the chronotropic effects of intravenous isoproterenol, norepinephrine (NE) or AII, the pressor responses to NE or AII, and the relationship between plasma AII and aldosterone concentrations were studied before and after 10 days of dietary supplementation with potassium 100 mmol/day, in normotensive members of normotensive (N = 12) or hypertensive (N = 12) families, and 11 patients with borderline essential hypertension. Under control conditions, the pressor responsiveness to NE was significantly enhanced in normotensive with positive family history for hypertension and hypertensive subjects; the other variables were comparable in the groups. After potassium supplementation, plasma potassium, renin, aldosterone or AII, and the relationship between AII and aldosterone levels increased significantly, while body weight, plasma catecholamines, the chronotropic effects of isoproterenol, AII or NE, the pressor effects of AII and plasma clearance of AII or NE were unchanged in all groups. In normotensive members of hypertensive families and patients with hypertension, BP was decreased and the exaggerated pressor responsiveness to NE was normalized; these variables were not modified in normotensive members of normotensive families. These observations are consistent with a potassium-remediable disturbance in NE- but not AII-dependent regulation of BP in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension.

Diuretic drugs. Progress in clinical pharmacology

Oral diuretics are amongst the most widely used drugs in clinical practice today. Their discovery close on thirty years ago remains a major milestone in therapeutic progress. Though originally designed for treating heart failure, diuretics are more commonly prescribed, worldwide, in hypertension than for relief of oedema. Since the introduction of chlorothiazide, diuretic development has passed through a series of distinct stages. The thiazide era was followed by the 'high-ceiling' diuretics, the antikaliuretics and, more recently, polyvalent agents that cause both saluresis and uricosuria. Alongside these synthetic achievements, major advances have occurred in the knowledge of nephron function and ion transport mechanisms. These have acted as stimulus to the design of novel categories of diuretics. The practising clinician thus has a wide range of available diuretics to choose from. The most appropriate choice of an agent aimed at the relief of symptoms with minimal adverse effects requires an understanding of where and how diuretics act within their primary target organ, the kidney. Whereas various procedures, ranging from micropuncture to the study of brush border membrane vesicles, have been utilised experimentally, investigation of the mode and sites of action of diuretics in man has largely depended on application of clearance methodology. Refinements in analytical chemistry have encouraged study of the pharmacokinetic and metabolic fate of diuretics. Taken together, available evidence shows that most diuretics exert their saluretic action from the intraluminal aspect of the renal tubules. The time-course of drug delivery, as well as total quantity of drug transported into the lumen determine the cumulative drug response. Exceptions are muzolimine and the aldosterone antagonists which act at the peritubular membrane. Distinctive stereospecific effects on luminal tubular ion transport occur with indacrinone and etozoline. The clinical use of diuretics often involves concurrent administration with other drugs. The mechanisms involved in a number of the resulting pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions have considerable relevance in patient management. Notable examples of these interactions are the blunting of diuretic action by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and the diuretic-induced diminution in the renal clearance of lithium salts.

Antihypertensive effect of indapamide given in conjunction with captopril in severe hypertension

The efficacy of captopril alone or in combination with indapamide was evaluated in 17 patients with severe hypertension (diastolic greater than 120 mmHg) previously treated with triple antihypertensive therapy, i.e. diuretic, beta-blocker and a vasodilator. After a wash-out period of 1 week, captopril was given initially as 75 mg/day for 2 weeks; at the end of this period, the dosage was doubled to 150 mg/day and continued at this level for a further 2 weeks. Indapamide (2.5 mg/day) was then added to the regimen and administered for 1 month. The results showed that captopril alone lowered, but did not normalize the blood pressure. The mean diastolic pressure was reduced to 117 and 103.8 mmHg after dosages of captopril of 75 mg and 150 mg, respectively. On the addition of indapamide, the blood pressure was normalized to 93.82 mmHg mean diastolic pressure. Systolic readings were similarly reduced. Two patients developed skin rashes while on captopril alone: no other treatment-related side-effects were reported once indapamide therapy had commenced.

Cardiovascular regulation during administration of co-dergocrine to normal subjects

Whether and to what extent activation of peripheral presynaptic dopamine2-receptors may modulate the release of norepinephrine (NE) and so affect blood pressure (BP) in normal or hypertensive man is not clear. The hydrogenated ergotoxine derivative, co-dergocrine, given in effective antihypertensive rather than excessive experimental doses, has recently been shown to act predominantly as a peripheral dopamine2-receptor agonist in several species. Accordingly, BP regulation assessed has been in 8 normal men on placebo and after 3 weeks on codergocrine 4 mg/day. Co-dergocrine significantly reduced urinary NE excretion from 43 to 33 micrograms/24 h, supine and upright plasma NE 21 to 16 and 49 to 36 ng/dl, respectively, heart rate (-8 and -5%, respectively) and upright systolic BP, 115 to 102 mm Hg; upright diastolic BP also tended to be lower. A standard pressor dose of infused NE was lowered from 131 to 102 ng/kg/min, and the relationship between NE-induced changes in BP and concomitant NE infusion rate or plasma NE concentration was displaced to the left. Exchangeable sodium and plasma volume tended to be slightly decreased. Plasma and urinary electrolytes and epinephrine, plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels, pressor responsiveness to angiotensin II, the chronotropic responses to isoproterenol, and the NE-induced rise in BP, plasma clearance of NE, glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow were not consistently modified. The findings are consistent with effective peripheral dopamine2-receptor agonism by co-dergocrine in humans. Peripheral presynaptic dopaminergic activation may modulate sympathetic activity and BP in normal man.

Cardiovascular and metabolic profile during intervention with urapidil in humans

Increased sympathetic activity or vascular reactivity to norepinephrine or both may play a complementary role in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. Therefore, blood pressure regulation and metabolic correlates of cardiovascular risk were evaluated in 19 normal subjects and in 13 subjects with essential hypertension receiving placebo and after 4 weeks of intervention with urapidil, an agent that was found experimentally to exert a combined central sympathetic and peripheral alpha-adrenergic receptor inhibition. In hypertensive patients, urapidil normalized the initially low norepinephrine pressor dose (+ 106%), mildly increased basal plasma norepinephrine levels (+36%), and markedly shifted the plasma norepinephrine concentration-blood pressure response curve (p less than 0.01). Blood pressure was decreased (p less than 0.001). In normal subjects, urapidil produced only mild increases in norepinephrine plasma levels (+22%) and norepinephrine pressor dose (+38%) and no change in blood pressure. Body weight, exchangeable sodium, and blood volume were unaltered or increased slightly. Heart rate; plasma epinephrine, renin, angiotensin II, basal aldosterone, and electrolyte levels; plasma clearances of norepinephrine and angiotensin II; pressor effects of angiotensin II; chronotropic responses to isoproterenol or a norepinephrine-induced rise in blood pressure; and urinary prostaglandin F2 alpha excretion, as well as serum lipoprotein fractions and glucose, insulin, and uric acid levels, were not significantly modified by urapidil. Prostaglandin E2 excretion tended to be increased. Aldosterone responsiveness to angiotensin II was increased by urapidil in normal (p less than 0.05) but not in hypertensive subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A review of 10 years of experience with indapamide as an antihypertensive agent

Indapamide is an effective antihypertensive agent for which a dual mechanism of action has been put forward: a limited diuretic activity combined with antivasoconstrictive effects, resulting in decreased peripheral vascular resistance. Results from clinical trials show that 2.5 mg indapamide once daily effectively reduces arterial blood pressure in about two-thirds of patients with mild to moderate hypertension and that this reduction is related to the severity of the hypertension. As a rule, indapamide's blood pressure-reducing effect is rapid in onset (within 1 or 2 weeks) and by 1 month reaches 65% of its maximum, which occurs after 3 to 4 months of treatment. No tachyphylaxis has been observed during long-term treatment, nor has withdrawal syndrome at discontinuation of therapy. Indapamide has been successfully combined with beta blockers, methyldopa, and other antihypertensive agents, adding considerable effectiveness without noticeable increase in adverse reactions. In general, the drug is well tolerated and side effects are mild and rare. Possibly in relation to its limited diuretic activity at 2.5 mg daily, long-term treatment seldom elicits significant changes in electrolyte balance. In addition, indapamide does not induce deleterious effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Indapamide is an effective, well-tolerated, first-line antihypertensive agent. The fact that long-term administration does not induce biochemical abnormalities that constitute cardiovascular risk factors indicates another advantage of the drug.

Serum lipoproteins during treatment with the antihypertensive agent indapamide

Considering the documented, potentially undesirable influence of various thiazide-type or loop diuretics on serum lipoproteins, we prospectively investigated in 69 men (mean age +/- SEM, 32 +/- 1 years) the metabolic effects of the new diuretic-antihypertensive compound indapamide. Compared to placebo, indapamide (2.5 mg/day) given for 6 to 8 weeks lowered (p less than 0.02 to less than 0.001) blood pressure (supine values from 148/98 +/- 3/2 to 137/93 +/- 3/2) in 29 men with mild to moderate essential hypertension, but not in 40 healthy men. In both groups, significant (p less than 0.05 to less than 0.001) decreases in body weight (-0.8 kg) and plasma potassium (-0.6 mmol/L), and increases in plasma uric acid (+20%), renin activity (+200%), and aldosterone documented good compliance. There were no significant changes in total cholesterol (in all subjects, from 208 +/- 6 to 213 +/- 6 mg/dl), low- or very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (127 +/- 6 to 129 +/- 6 and 21 +/- 1 to 21 +/- 2 respectively), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (50 +/- 1 to 51 +/- 1 mg/dl), total triglycerides (Tg) (108 +/- 5 to 112 +/- 6 mg/dl), VLDL-Tg, apoproteins A1 and A2, plasma glucose, epinephrine, norepinephrine, sodium, calcium, magnesium, and creatinine; apoprotein B (84 +/- 2 to 88 +/- 3 mg/dl) and plasma insulin after glucose loading dose tended to be increased minimally. The absence of distinct lipoprotein alterations after short-term indapamide treatment may be of clinical and epidemiological interest.

Effect of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide on the response to pressor agents in hypertensives

The effect on arterial pressure of incremental doses of norepinephrine (2 to 10 micrograms/min) and angiotensin II (50 to 800 ng/min) administered over 10 min periods was studied in sodium-replete hypertensive patients after crossover oral treatments with placebo, captopril 50 mg in a single dose, captopril 50 mg three times daily for one week and hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg daily for a week. Neither captopril nor hydrochlorothiazide affected the dose response to infusions of angiotensin II. In comparison to placebo responses, however, both single and multiple-dose captopril therapy, and hydrochlorothiazide attenuated the pressor responses to infusions of norepinephrine. Captopril significantly depressed angiotensin converting enzyme activity from pre-dose levels and angiotensin II infusions significantly elevated plasma aldosterone concentrations. These results confirm findings reported for single dose captopril in normotensive volunteers and indicate that attenuation of the vascular responsiveness to sympathetic stimulation may contribute to the antihypertensive effects of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide therapy.

Indapamide. A review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension

Indapamide is an orally active sulphonamide diuretic agent. Although some evidence appears to indicate that the antihypertensive action of indapamide is primarily a result of its diuretic activity, only a limited diuresis occurs with the usual antihypertensive doses of 2.5 mg daily, and in vitro and in vivo data suggest that it may also reduce blood pressure by decreasing vascular reactivity and peripheral vascular resistance. In mild to moderate hypertension it is as effective as thiazide diuretics and beta-adrenergic blocking agents in lowering blood pressure when used as the sole treatment. Indapamide has been successfully combined with beta-adrenergic blocking agents, methyldopa, and other anti-hypertensive agents. While such findings need confirmation, it appears that indapamide shares the potential with other diuretic agents to induce electrolyte and other metabolic abnormalities, although it may do so with less frequency or severity. Thus, indapamide appears to offer a suitable alternative to more established drugs as a 'first-line' treatment in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Whether it differs significantly from other diuretics when used as antihypertensive therapy, either in its mode of action or its side effect profile, needs further clarification.

Effect of indapamide on renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate and arginine vasopressin in plasma in essential hypertension

Renal plasma flow (RPF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), arginine vasopressin in plasma (AVP), free water clearance (CH2O) and blood pressure (BP) were determined in 11 patients with essential hypertension at the end of 3 consecutive periods of observation each of 6 of weeks duration; indapamide 2.5 mg daily was given in period 2 and placebo in periods 1 and 3. RPF and GFR were reduced by 9% and BP by 9%/14% supine and 14%/12% standing during indapamide treatment. Changes in renal haemodynamics were not correlated with those in BP. AVP was not significantly altered by indapamide and was not correlated with BP. Indapamide reduced CH2O possibly due to the reduction in GFR. It is concluded that indapamide evidently induces redistribution of the cardiac output, with enhanced muscle blood flow and reduced renal perfusion, and that AVP does not seem to be involved in blood pressure regulation in mild to moderate essential hypertension under basal conditions.

Cardiovascular counterregulation during sympathetic inhibition in normal subjects and patients with mild hypertension

The influence of agents that inhibit sympathetic nerve activity on cardiovascular responsiveness as related to major pressor factors has been unclear. Therefore, these components were evaluated in 11 normal subjects and 13 patients with mild essential hypertension before and after 4 weeks of sympathetic neuron blockade with the agent debrisoquine. In these normal and mildly hypertensive subjects, sympathetic neuron blockade caused approximately similar decreases in urinary and supine or upright plasma norepinephrine (NE) levels (average changes in the two groups, -41% and -45%, respectively; p less than 0.05 to less than 0.005), the chronotropic dose of isoproterenol (-45% and -38%), and the NE pressor dose (-47% and -51%, p less than 0.01), while the relationship between NE-induced changes in blood pressure and concomitant plasma NE concentrations was displaced to the left (p less than 0.01). Supine heart rate was also lowered (-10% and -8%, p less than 0.05). Compared to the orthostatic variations during placebo conditions, mild postural decreases in blood pressure were apparent in both the normal and hypertensive groups (-8% and -7.5%). However, supine blood pressure was unchanged following debrisoquine treatment. Other parameters were also not consistently changed, such as total blood volume, exchangeable body sodium, urinary electrolytes, plasma epinephrine, renin, and angiotensin II (AII) levels, the pressor dose of infused AII, and the relationship between AII-induced changes in blood pressure and plasma AII measured before and during AII infusion. These findings demonstrate that the reduction in sympathetic outflow during sympathetic neuron blockade may elicit a hyperresponsiveness of alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors that is equal in normal subjects and patients with mild essential hypertension.

Extrarenal contributions to indapamide's antihypertensive mechanism of action

Autonomic responses in heart rate and blood pressure to Valsalva maneuvers and changes in vascular reactivity to pressor doses of phenylephrine and angiotensin II were studied before and after treatment with indapamide, a new antihypertensive diuretic. Six healthy male volunteers, placed on a daily diet consisting of 100 mEq of sodium, 80 mEq of potassium, and a fluid intake of 2500 ml, participated in this single-blind, placebo-controlled study. During active treatment, 5 mg of indapamide was administered once daily for 14 days. On the mornings of hemodynamic testing, samples of blood, 24-hour urine, and plasma were obtained and analyzed for hematocrit, catecholamines and their metabolites, plasma renin activity, and aldosterone levels. Since each subject served as his own control, the results were analyzed by the paired t-test method. Plasma renin activity and 24-hour urinary aldosterone levels increased (p less than 0.05), and serum potassium and chloride levels decreased (p less than 0.05). No other significant laboratory changes were noted after treatment, including changes in the plasma and urinary catecholamine levels. Following treatment, responses in heart rate and blood pressure to Valsalva maneuvers were unaltered. During the control period the doses of phenylephrine and angiotensin II required to raise the systolic pressure 25 to 35 mm Hg and the diastolic pressure 20 to 30 mm Hg were 5.03 +/- 0.72 micrograms/kg and 16.7 +/- 2.1 ng/kg, respectively. After treatment, the doses of phenylephrine and angiotensin II were significantly (p less than 0.05) greater: 10.72 +/- 1.02 micrograms/kg and 31.7 +/- 4.8 ng/kg, respectively. Dose-response relationships to these pressor agents were shifted in parallel to the right after treatment. A small but significant decrease in body weight, which may have reflected a decrease in plasma volume, was observed. However, no orthostatic changes between the supine and erect mean arterial blood pressures or incremental increases in heart rates were noted between the two periods. An increase in hematocrit and blunting of the diastolic overshoot during the Valsalva maneuvers that were used as indexes of plasma volume contraction were also not observed. In summary, our results indicate that changes in vascular responsiveness occurred by mechanisms independent of changes in the autonomic nervous system, since plasma norepinephrine levels did not change and responsiveness to Valsalva maneuvers was unaltered. Furthermore, it appears that this effect on the vasculature was probably not related to changes in plasma volume.

Antihypertensive mechanism of diuretic treatment with chlorthalidone. Complementary roles of sympathetic axis and sodium

Twenty-three patients with untreated mild to moderate essential hypertension had on the average an abnormally increased cardiovascular pressor responsiveness to exogenous norepinephrine (NE), while plasma and urinary NE, exchangeable body sodium and blood volume were normal. An increased pressor responsiveness to angiotensin II in these patients was associated with a tendency for low plasma renin activity (PRA). Compared to placebo conditions, treatment with chlorthalidone, 100 mg/day, for 6 weeks significantly decreased blood pressure and exchangeable sodium in these hypertensive patients but not in ten normal subjects; blood volume and heart rate were unchanged in both groups. Chlorthalidone induced a marked increase in PRA, but only a mild increase in angiotensin II pressor dose. In contrast, the diuretic caused a greater increase in NE pressor dose than in plasma NE in the hypertensive group, thus improving the disturbed relationship between plasma NE and NE responsiveness in these patients. No significant modification of plasma NE and NE responsiveness occurred in diuretic-treated normal subjects. In addition to sodium and the renin-angiotensin system, the sympathetic regulatory axis seems to be involved in the antihypertensive mechanism of chlorthalidone. Thiazide-like diuretics may decrease blood pressure in essential hypertension in part by lowering an abnormally high cardiovascular NE responsiveness without causing an equivalent increase in circulating NE.

Long-term effectiveness of indapamide in hypertension: neural, renin and metabolic responses

Indapamide conferred effective blood pressure control over the six-month period of study. Blood sugar was elevated slightly in some patients. Hypokalemia occurred commonly within four to six weeks of initiating therapy and was corrected with oral potassium supplementation. There were no changes in cholesterol or triglyceride. There was an increase in plasma renin activity, probably diuretic induced. The antihypertensive efficacy and the low side effect profile may both be related in part to the observed net reduction in neural tone.

The place of indapamide in the treatment of arterial hypertension

Clinical efficacy is not the sole criterion today in the drug treatment of hypertension, a condition which is so often asymptomatic and one which demands prolonged, usually lifetime, management of the patient. Patient compliance with treatment is essential and the practical usefulness of a drug can be determined by its side-effect liability, convenience and simplicity of administration and low possible long-term risk potential. There is growing experimental and clinical evidence that indapamide, an antihypertensive agent with only limited diuretic activity at low dosage (2.5 mg as a single dose per day), is proving to be a consistently effective and well-tolerated alternative to the thiazides and beta-blockers as a first-line treatment, and a useful addition in multi-drug regimens. Some of the recent data, particularly from U.S. and Canadian studies, are briefly reviewed.

Antihypertensive effect of indapamide with special emphasis on renal prostaglandin production

A study was undertaken in 19 patients with benign to moderate essential hypertension to verify the effect of indapamide alone or combined with a beta-blocker on plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone, serum potassium and urinary prostaglandins PGE2 and PGF2a. Blood pressure was normalized in 11 (58%) patients with 2.5 mg indapamide/day. In the remaining 8 patients, the addition of pindolol resulted in blood pressure control. Under indapamide, a 70% increase in plasma renin activity and 81% (p less than 0.01) in plasma aldosterone was observed, whereas there was an 18% (p less than 0.001) decrease in potassium. Simultaneously, an increase in urinary PGE2 and PGF2a was observed; these values were significant for PGE2 (p less than 0.025). The addition of pindolol did not produce significant change in the biochemical parameters measured. The increase in the excretion rate of primary prostaglandins could play a role in the mode of action of indapamide.

Indapamide for out-patient treatment of hypertension: modifications in serum catecholamine levels

A study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of indapamide in the treatment of 20 patients with mild hypertension and to determine whether a favourable response to treatment was related to initial hyperadrenergic status, to changes in serum catecholamine levels or modified by orthostatic stress. After 4 weeks on placebo, patients received 2.5 mg indapamide per day for 4 weeks and, if diastolic pressure was controlled below 100 mmHg, this regimen was continued for a further 8 weeks. Those not adequately controlled with indapamide alone were treated additionally with nadolol (mean dose 140 mg per day) for a period of 12 weeks. The results showed that indapamide alone produced a significant reduction in blood pressure both in the recumbent and upright position in 12 (60%) of the patients and that addition of the beta-blocker augmented the antihypertensive effect. No relationship was demonstrated between initial high serum catecholamine levels and a favourable response to indapamide. Recumbent serum norepinephrine levels after indapamide alone or with nadolol for 4 to 8 weeks remained comparable with placebo levels. However; the amplitude of the norepinephrine increase due to orthostatic stress was significantly reduced after 8 weeks of indapamide treatment. Possible explanations for this are discussed.

Indapamide in hypertension: results of a French multi-centre study in ambulant subjects

The antihypertensive effect of indapamide (2.5 mg/day) was evaluated in 2184 patients with essential hypertension by 300 French general practitioners over a period of treatment of 3 months. Indapamide produced a significant reduction in blood pressure, the amplitude of which was directly related to pre-treatment blood pressure levels; normalization of blood pressure was achieved in approximately 66% of patients. Addition of a beta-blocker to the treatment regimen on the second month was required in only 10% of patients. No severe side-effect was reported, although a significant reduction in kalaemia was noted in less than 5% of patients.

Antihypertensive mechanism of the diuretic muzolimine in mild renal failure. Roles of sodium and cardiovascular norepinephrine responsiveness

Eighteen patients with mild impairment of renal function (glomerular filtration rate 65 +/- 5 ml/min:m +/- SEM) and hypertension (168/105 +/- 6/3 mmHg) were shown on average to have abnormally increased cardiovascular pressor responsiveness to infused norepinephrine (NE; p less than 0.05), whereas plasma and urinary NE, exchangeable body sodium and blood-volume did not differ significantly from normal. A slightly increased pressor responsiveness to angiotensin II was associated with a tendency to low plasma renin activity (PRA). Compared to placebo conditions, treatment with the loop-diuretic muzolimine in a mean dose of 35 +/- 2 mg/day for six weeks decreased blood-pressure and exchangeable sodium (p less than 0.05), and NE pressor responsiveness was restored to normal values, whilst plasma and urinary NE were not significantly changed. This was consistent with improvement of the initially abnormal relationship between NE levels and NE responsiveness factors. In contrast, the pressor dose of angiotensin II and PRA were increased to an approximatively similar extent during muzolimine treatment. These observations suggest that removal of body sodium and a decrease in NE reactivity without an equivalent increase in sympathetic nervous activity may be important complementary factors in the antihypertensive mechanisms of diuretic treatment in patients with mild renal functional impairment.