Serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations are related to coronary disease progression without new myocardial infarction

Consensus document on Lipoprotein(a) from the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (SISA)

AIMS

In view of the consolidating evidence on the causal role of Lp(a) in cardiovascular disease, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (SISA) has assembled a consensus on Lp(a) genetics and epidemiology, together with recommendations for its measurement and current and emerging therapeutic approaches to reduce its plasma levels. Data on the Italian population are also provided.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Lp(a) is constituted by one apo(a) molecule and a lipoprotein closely resembling to a low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Its similarity with an LDL, together with its ability to carry oxidized phospholipids are considered the two main features making Lp(a) harmful for cardiovascular health. Plasma Lp(a) concentrations vary over about 1000 folds in humans and are genetically determined, thus they are quite stable in any individual. Mendelian Randomization studies have suggested a causal role of Lp(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis and observational studies indicate a linear direct correlation between cardiovascular disease and Lp(a) plasma levels. Lp(a) measurement is strongly recommended once in a patient's lifetime, particularly in FH subjects, but also as part of the initial lipid screening to assess cardiovascular risk. The apo(a) size polymorphism represents a challenge for Lp(a) measurement in plasma, but new strategies are overcoming these difficulties. A reduction of Lp(a) levels can be currently attained only by plasma apheresis and, moderately, with PCSK9 inhibitor treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Awaiting the approval of selective Lp(a)-lowering drugs, an intensive management of the other risk factors for individuals with elevated Lp(a) levels is strongly recommended.

Lipoprotein(a): An independent, genetic, and causal factor for cardiovascular disease and acute myocardial infarction

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a circulating lipoprotein, and its level is largely determined by variation in the Lp(a) gene (LPA) locus encoding apo(a). Genetic variation in the LPA gene that increases Lp(a) level also increases coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, suggesting that Lp(a) is a causal factor for CAD risk. Lp(a) is the preferential lipoprotein carrier for oxidized phospholipids (OxPL), a proatherogenic and proinflammatory biomarker. Lp(a) adversely affects endothelial function, inflammation, oxidative stress, fibrinolysis, and plaque stability, leading to accelerated atherothrombosis and premature CAD. The INTER-HEART Study has established the usefulness of Lp(a) in assessing the risk of acute myocardial infarction in ethnically diverse populations with South Asians having the highest risk and population attributable risk. The 2018 Cholesterol Clinical Practice Guideline have recognized elevated Lp(a) as an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk enhancer for initiating or intensifying statin therapy.

Lipoprotein(a) in cardiovascular diseases

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an LDL-like molecule consisting of an apolipoprotein B-100 (apo(B-100)) particle attached by a disulphide bridge to apo(a). Many observations have pointed out that Lp(a) levels may be a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Lp(a) inhibits the activation of transforming growth factor (TGF) and contributes to the growth of arterial atherosclerotic lesions by promoting the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells and the migration of smooth muscle cells to endothelial cells. Moreover Lp(a) inhibits plasminogen binding to the surfaces of endothelial cells and decreases the activity of fibrin-dependent tissue-type plasminogen activator. Lp(a) may act as a proinflammatory mediator that augments the lesion formation in atherosclerotic plaques. Elevated serum Lp(a) is an independent predictor of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. Furthermore, Lp(a) levels should be a marker of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, saphenous vein bypass graft atherosclerosis, and accelerated coronary atherosclerosis of cardiac transplantation. Finally, the possibility that Lp(a) may be a risk factor for ischemic stroke has been assessed in several studies. Recent findings suggest that Lp(a)-lowering therapy might be beneficial in patients with high Lp(a) levels. A future therapeutic approach could include apheresis in high-risk patients in order to reduce major coronary events.

Relation between lipoprotein(a) and fibrinogen and serial intravascular ultrasound plaque progression in left main coronary arteries

OBJECTIVES

Patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and fibrinogen levels have an increased risk of coronary heart disease and adverse cardiovascular events. There is evidence that coronary plaque progression is linked to a higher risk for future cardiovascular events.

BACKGROUND

There are no data demonstrating a relation between Lp(a), fibrinogen, and directly measured coronary plaque progression over time.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies of 60 left main stems (18 +/- 9 months apart) to evaluate plaque progression in relation to Lp(a) and fibrinogen levels and association with adverse cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

There was a positive correlation between Lp(a) (r = 0.58; p < 0.0001), fibrinogen (r = 0.48; p < 0.0001), and changes in plaque-plus-media area. Patients with plaque progression (n = 41) had higher Lp(a) (30 +/- 26 mg/dl vs. 14 +/- 9 mg/dl; p < 0.0012) and fibrinogen (295 +/- 88 mg/dl vs. 240 +/- 72 mg/dl; p = 0.019) levels than patients with plaque regression (n = 19). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed Log Lp(a) (regression coefficient = 9.45; p = 0.0008) but not fibrinogen to be independently associated with plaque progression. A total of 19 patients suffered from adverse cardiovascular events; they had higher Lp(a) (44 +/- 30 mg/dl vs. 16 +/- 12 mg/dl; p < 0.0001) and fibrinogen (342 +/- 73 mg/dl vs. 248 +/- 76 mg/dl; p < 0.0001) levels. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed Log Lp(a) (odds ratio 10.20, 95% confidence interval 2.36 to 44.13; p = 0.0019) and fibrinogen (odds ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.03; p = 0.018) were independently associated with adverse cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial IVUS showed a positive correlation between Lp(a) and fibrinogen levels and plaque progression. Lp(a), but not fibrinogen, remains independently associated with plaque progression. In addition, the present data suggest a considerable incremental value of Lp(a) in predicting cardiovascular risk.

Serum lipoprotein(a) level and clinical coronary stenosis progression in patients with myocardial infarction: re-revascularization rate is high in patients with high-Lp(a)

BACKGROUND

High serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels are associated with coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The serum Lp(a) levels of 130 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent direct percutaneous coronary intervention were investigated. On the basis of Lp(a) level at 1 month after the onset of AMI, the patients were classified into 2 groups (high-Lp(a) (> or =30 mg/dl) and low-Lp(a) (< 30 mg/dl)) for evaluation of the clinical coronary stenosis progression (CCSP) rate. CCSP is defined as either target lesion revascularization (TLR) or new lesion revascularization (NLR). The CCSP rate was significantly higher in the high-Lp(a) group than in the low-Lp(a) group (65.8% vs 29.3%, p<0.01). In patients who had coronary stents in the acute phase (n=79), the CCSP and NLR rates were significantly higher in the high-Lp(a) group than in the low-Lp(a) group (45.0% vs 20.3%, p<0.05; 35.0% vs 6.8%, p<0.01), but there was no significant difference in TLR rate between the 2 groups (10.0% vs 13.6%, p=0.858).

CONCLUSIONS

High serum Lp(a) level is a significant risk factor for CCSP, but does not influence restenosis after stenting.

Electrophoretic measurement of lipoprotein(a) cholesterol in plasma with and without ultracentrifugation: comparison with an immunoturbidimetric lipoprotein(a) method

OBJECTIVES

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a significant risk factor for vascular disease. Standardization of Lp(a) mass measurement is complicated by the heterogeneity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. We investigated whether Lp(a) cholesterol measurement, which is not influenced by apo(a) size, is a viable alternative to measuring Lp(a) mass.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Plasma Lp(a) cholesterol was measured electrophoretically, with and without ultracentrifugation, and results were compared to each other and to immunoturbidimetrically measured Lp(a) mass in 470 subjects.

RESULTS

Ultracentrifuged and whole plasma Lp(a) cholesterol levels demonstrated high correlation (R = 0.964). All samples with detectable (>/=2.0 mg/dl) Lp(a) cholesterol had Lp(a) mass >30 mg/dl (the clinically relevant cutpoint), while 59 samples with Lp(a) mass >30 mg/dl did not have detectable Lp(a) cholesterol.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) cholesterol can be measured in whole plasma without interference from VLDL lipoproteins. The relative clinical merits of measuring Lp(a) cholesterol vs. Lp(a) mass or both in combination deserves investigation.

Is lipoprotein(a) a predictor for survival in patients with established coronary artery disease? Results from a prospective patient cohort study in northern Sweden

OBJECTIVES

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a known risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis. The aim of the present study was to test the importance of Lp(a) as a predictor for the further prognosis in patients with established coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

A prospective patient cohort study was carried out.

SETTING AND SUBJECTS

The cohort consists of 1216 patients who were examined with coronary angiography at the University Hospital in Umeå, Sweden, because of stable effort angina.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Lipids, Lp(a), fibrinogen, antithrombin III (AT III), sedimentation rate and clinical data were registered at angiography. After a mean follow-up time of 6.7 years information on survival was collected from the municipal census lists and death certificates were examined. Total mortality and mortality because of cardiovascular disease were both used as outcome variables in the survival analyses. RESULTS. The total mortality in the patient cohort was 16.4%. An Lp(a) level of 300 mg L-1 or more was found in 30% of the study population and was found to be an independent predictor for death. A high fibrinogen, a low AT III level, a depressed left ventricular function and a high coronary obstruction score were other significant independent predictors of death. Total cholesterol, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol were not related to survival in this study, but a substantial proportion of the population probably received lipid-lowering agents during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

An Lp(a) level exceeding 300 mg L-1 indicates a poor further prognosis and may help to identify patients who probably need powerful secondary prevention programmes to improve their prognosis.

Lipoprotein(a) interactions with lipid and non-lipid risk factors in patients with early onset coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI Family Heart Study

BACKGROUND

A positive interaction between high plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and unfavorable plasma lipid levels has been reported to result in very high risk for premature coronary artery disease (CAD). We further examined this issue for men and women with early onset CAD. We also examined potential interactions between Lp(a) and non-lipid risk factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 338 men and women with early onset CAD (most with a positive family history of early CAD) and 480 general population controls, we measured Lp(a), lipids and other risk factors. In univariate analysis, relative odds for CAD was 1.7 (P = 0.002) for plasma Lp(a) >50 mg/dl. Elevated Lp(a) level was found to interact with adjusted plasma total/high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol such that when Lp(a) was over 50 mg/dl and adjusted plasma total/HDL cholesterol >5.8, relative odds for CAD were 8.0-9.6 (P<0.0001) in multiple logistic regression. Non-lipid risk factors were generally found to multiply the risk associated with Lp(a) (as predicted by logistic regression) without evidence for interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

We find evidence that Lp(a) does interact positively with adjusted plasma total/HDL cholesterol ratio. Aggressive risk factor intervention, especially for lipids, in those with elevated Lp(a) therefore appears indicated.

Is lipoprotein(a) an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease in men? The Quebec Cardiovascular Study

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to determine whether lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD) and to establish the relation of Lp(a) to the other lipid fractions.

BACKGROUND

Several, but not all, studies have shown that elevated Lp(a) concentrations may be associated with IHD; very few have been prospective.

METHODS

A 5-year prospective follow-up study was conducted in 2,156 French Canadian men 47 to 76 years old, without clinical evidence of IHD. Lipid measurements obtained at baseline included total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apoprotein B and Lp(a). During the follow-up period, there were 116 first IHD events (myocardial infarction, angina, death). Adjusted proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk for the different variables. The cohort was also classified according to Lp(a) levels and other lipid risk factor tertiles to evaluate the relation of elevated Lp(a) levels to these risk factors. A cutoff value of 30 mg/dl was used for Lp(a). Risk ratios were calculated using the group with low Lp(a) levels and the first tertile of lipid measures as a reference.

RESULTS

Lp(a) was not an independent risk factor for IHD but seemed to increase the deleterious effects of mildly elevated LDL cholesterol and elevated total cholesterol and apoprotein B levels and seemed to counteract the beneficial effects associated with elevated HDL cholesterol levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, Lp(a) was not an independent risk factor for IHD but appeared to increase the risk associated with other lipid risk factors.

Lipoprotein(a) interactions with lipid and nonlipid risk factors in early familial coronary artery disease

An interaction between high plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], unfavorable plasma lipids, and other risk factors may lead to very high risk for premature CAD. Plasma Lp(a), lipids, and other coronary risk factors were examined in 170 cases with early familial CAD and 165 control subjects to test this hypothesis. In univariate analysis, relative odds for CAD were 2.95 (P < .001) for plasma Lp(a) above 40 mg/dL. Nearly all the risk associated with elevated Lp(a) was found to be restricted to persons with historically elevated plasma total cholesterol (6.72 mmol/L [260 mg/dL] or higher) or with a total/HDL cholesterol ratio > 5.8. Nonlipid risk factors were also found to at least multiply the risk associated with Lp(a). When Lp(a) was over 40 mg/dL and plasma total/HDL cholesterol > 5.8, relative odds for CAD were 25 (P = .0001) in multiple logistic regression. If two or more nonlipid risk factors were also present (including hypertension, diabetes, cigarette smoking, high total homocysteine, or low serum bilirubin), relative odds were 122 (P < 1 x 10(-12)). The ability of nonlipid risk factors to increase risk associated with Lp(a) was dependent on at least a mildly elevated total/HDL cholesterol ratio. In conclusion, high Lp(a) was found to greatly increase risk only if the total/HDL cholesterol ratio was at least mildly elevated, an effect exaggerated by other risk factors. Aggressive lipid lowering in those with elevated Lp(a) therefore appears indicated.

Serum Lp(a) lipoprotein concentration is not associated with clinical and angiographic outcome five years after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between serum Lp(a) lipoprotein concentration and clinical and angiographic outcomes five years after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

SETTING

A regional cardiothoracic centre, Freeman Hospital, and the University Clinical Investigation Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

353 consecutive patients (56 female, 297 male, mean age 57-2 years) undergoing first time CABG surgery for stable angina were studied prospectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Late cardiac death (beyond 30 days) and non-fatal myocardial infarction; prevalence of angina five years after surgery in 291 (94%) survivors and vein graft patency (evaluated by patient) in 118 survivors five years after surgery. Serum Lp(a) concentration and lipid profiles were measured before operation, and 3, 6, 12, and 60 months after surgery. Lipid profiles were also measured 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Weighted Lp(a) concentration (by tertile) was not associated with late cardiac death or with the combination of late cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction, with the presence of angina, or with vein graft occlusion. The association remained non-significant if analysis was restricted to the upper tertile of LDL cholesterol (> 4.1 mmol/l) or to patients under the age of 55 years at the time of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum Lp(a) concentration did not predict late cardiac death, the combination of late cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction, or the prevalence of angina or vein graft occlusion five years after CABG surgery.