Histochemistry of mucin secreting components in mucoepidermoid and adenosquamous carcinoma of the oesophagus

Differential Expression of Mucin in Salivary Gland Tumours

Background and Objectives: Mucin has been implicated via various mechanisms in the development and growth of tumour cells. However, mucin expression studies in salivary gland tumours are limited, especially with samples from minor salivary glands. This study aims to investigate and compare mucin expression in benign and malignant salivary gland tumours of minor and major salivary gland origins. Materials and Methods: Special stains were used to stain neutral mucin (Periodic acid Schiff), sialomucin (Alcian Blue) and sulfomucin (Aldehyde Fuschin) within tissues from six normal salivary glands and 73 salivary gland tumours including 31 pleomorphic adenomas, 27 mucoepidermoid carcinomas, and 15 adenoid cystic carcinomas. A semi-quantitative approach was used to evaluate mucin expression within ductal lumens. Sialomucin was the most expressed mucin in all salivary gland tumours, regardless of origin. Results: A significant difference was observed in the mucin expression between benign and malignant salivary gland tumours, as pleomorphic adenoma showed three times significantly higher expression of sialomucin compared to mucoepidermoid carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma (p = 0.028). Pleomorphic adenomas of major glands showed 42 times significantly higher expression of sialomucin compared to those of minor glands (p = 0.000). Conclusions: Sialomucin content in pleomorphic adenomas of major glands was vastly increased compared to that in minor glands. Differential sialomucin expression in benign and malignant salivary gland tumours suggests a role in diagnosing of borderline salivary gland tumours.

Clinico-pathological study of esophageal mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a 10-year survival from a single center

BACKGROUND

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Esophagus (MECE) is a relatively rare tumor type, with most of the current data derived from case reports or small sample studies. This retrospective study reports on the 10-year survival data and detailed clinicopathological characteristics of 48 patients with esophageal MEC.

METHODS

Data were collected from 48 patients who underwent curative surgery for esophageal MEC at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. These were compared with contemporaneous cases of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC). Using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis, we investigated the clinicopathological factors affecting the survival of patients with MEC.

RESULTS

The incidence of MECE was predominantly higher in males, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 7:1. The mid-thoracic segment emerged as the most common site of occurrence. A mere 6.3% of cases were correctly diagnosed preoperatively. The lymph node metastasis rate stood at 35.4%. The overall 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates for all patients were 85.4%, 52.1%, 37.0%, and 31.0%, respectively. Post 1:1 propensity score matching, no significant statistical difference was observed in the Overall Survival (OS) between MEC patients and those with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC) (P = 0.119, P = 0.669). Univariate analysis indicated that T staging and N staging were the primary factors influencing the prognosis of esophageal MEC.

CONCLUSIONS

MECE occurs more frequently in males than females, with the mid-thoracic segment being the most common site of occurrence. The rate of accurate preoperative endoscopic diagnosis is low. The characteristic of having a short lesion length yet exhibiting significant extramural invasion may be a crucial clinicopathological feature of MECE. The OS of patients with MEC does not appear to significantly differ from those with esophageal squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Esophageal Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Review of 58 Cases

BACKGROUND

Esophageal mucoepidermoid carcinoma (EMEC) is a rare disease. The biological behavior and treatment of this malignancy are not well established.

METHODS

Data from 58 patients with EMEC who underwent esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 5028 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between clinicopathological factors and survival.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 36 males and 22 females with a median age of 59 years (range, 40-78 years). Of the 47 patients who underwent preoperative esophagoscopic biopsy, only 1 patient was diagnosed with EMEC. EMEC was more often found in female patients (39.7% versus 25.8%, P=0.036) and patients with EMEC had a significantly lower rate of lymph node metastasis (25.0% versus 49.4%, P<0.001) than patients with ESCC. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the 5-year overall survival rate of 55.2% for patients with EMEC was similar to that of 61.9% for patients with ESCC (P=0.399).

CONCLUSIONS

EMEC is a rare disease that more often affects females and these patients has less lymph node metastasis than patients with ESCC. Preoperative esophagoscopic biopsy has difficulty obtaining an accurate pathological diagnosis for EMEC patients. The prognosis for EMEC is similar to that for ESCC.

Updates on World Health Organization classification and staging of esophageal tumors: implications for future clinical practice

The Fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of digestive system and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual contain substantial refinements of information for esophageal tumors. The epithelial tumors of esophagus are classified as benign, dysplasia, and malignant groups. Dysplasia is divided into Barrett dysplasia and squamous dysplasia and graded into either low-grade or high-grade. Malignant esophageal tumors are often adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. The main update in cancer staging in esophageal tumors is the subdivision of the prognostic staging into 3 groups; squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and carcinoma after adjuvant therapy. HER-2 amplification is recognized as a molecular target for therapy of esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The other esophageal tumors are adenoid cystic carcinoma, mucoepidermoid/adenosquamous carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasms. Overall, the incorporation of new data and definitions on histopathology, prognostic factors, and genetics are important for personalized management of patients with esophageal tumors.

Conjunctival 'mucoepidermoid carcinoma' revisited: a revision of terminology, based on morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular findings of 14 cases, and the 2018 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Eye

In 2018, the consensus meeting for the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Eye decided that conjunctival mucoepidermoid carcinoma should be reclassified as adenosquamous carcinoma, as this represented a better morphological fit. To examine the applicability of this terminology, we studied the clinical, histopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular pathology of 14 cases that were originally diagnosed as conjunctival mucoepidermoid carcinoma. There were 7 (50%) females and 7 (50%) males. The median age was 64 years. The left eye was affected in 8 and the right eye in 6 patients. In-situ carcinoma was present in 11/14 (79%) cases and comprised in-situ squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia with mucinous differentiation (CIN-Muc). Invasive carcinoma was present in 11/14 (79%) cases. Group 1 (1/11 cases, 9%) comprised invasive SCC only. Group 2 (6/11 cases, 55%) comprised SCC with mucinous differentiation, manifesting as scattered intracellular mucin, occasionally together with intercellular mucin, with no evidence of true glandular differentiation. Group 3 (3/11 cases. 27%) comprised true adenosquamous carcinoma. Group 4 (1/11 cases, 9%) comprised pure adenocarcinoma. Thirteen of 14 cases (93%) underwent FISH for MAML2 translocation and none were rearranged. Two cases harboured high-risk HPV (type 16 and 18). The combined findings confirm that all lesions in our study were not mucoepidermoid carcinoma, but represented predominantly SCC with mucinous differentiation and adenosquamous carcinoma. We, therefore, recommend future revision of the WHO classification to include SCC with mucinous differentiation alongside adenosquamous carcinoma.

Ceruminous Neoplasms of the Ear

Ceruminous glands are modified apocrine glands located in the external auditory canal (EAC). Neoplastic lesions arising from these glands are rare in humans and constitute a major differential diagnosis for glandular neoplasms of the EAC. Due to anatomic restrictions, benign and malignant neoplasms present with similar symptoms and to some extent even comparable radiologic features, particularly when the tumors are localized. Biopsies are frequently limited by small size, fragmentation and improper anatomic and architectural orientation, thereby hampering our ability to appreciate the relationship of peripheral edges of the tumor to the surrounding tissue. Benign and malignant tumors may also have overlapping histomorphologic features, which further magnifies the challenges in accurate diagnosis and management strategies. This article summarizes the salient clinical, radiologic and histologic features of common ceruminous gland tumors, in addition to discussing features that can aid in differentiating ceruminous tumors from other EAC tumors and to distinguish benign from malignant entities.

Analysis of stromal mucin in oral epithelial dysplasia & oral squamous cell carcinoma- A histochemical study

Background

Mucins are glycoproteins that act as a selective molecular barrier and its alterations usually accompany the carcinogenesis.

Aim

To evaluate the transition of mucins in the grades of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) using histochemical stains.

Materials & Method

A total of 66 samples of variable grades of OED and OSCC and each section was stained with PAS, Alcian blue- PAS (AB-PAS) and Aldehyde fuschin - Alcian blue (AF-AB). Mucins pattern and intensity were examined at 5 randomly selected fields on 10x magnification.

Results

1. PAS stain - Predominantly OED and OSCC showed a diffuse pattern with a gradual decrease in intensity in OED and overall a weak intensity in OSCC. 2. AB-PAS stain - Neutral mucins showed gradual increase in its intensity in grades of OED and OSCC with no predominant pattern. The intensity for the acid mucins remains weak in all the grades of OED and OSCC with diffuse distribution, except in higher grades of OED and OSCC. 3. AF- AB stain - For sulphated mucins, in OED a focal and diffuse pattern was observed in OSCC with minimal intensity. The carboxylated mucin was absent in both.

Conclusion

Mucins undergo change in its pattern and intensity in varying grades of OED/OSCC. Although in GIT and other mucosa, the expression of altered mucin is a recognized factor, seldom research has been done in OED and OSCC. Thus, the present study could be the stepping stone in the exploration of mucinous alteration in OED and OSCC.

Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Literature Review

Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the esophagus is an uncommon type of esophageal cancer that contains both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma elements. Data on this biologically unique type of cancer are limited and mainly stem from case reports and small case series. We performed an audit of the available literature and synthesized a review on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, histopathology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of ASCs. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare type of esophageal cancer. Histological examination is necessary to confirm the diagnosis of ASC and patients usually receive multimodal treatment. Patient outcomes are not well defined and further research could help us better understand the pathophysiology and unique needs of patients with this rare malignancy.

Histopathological Assessment for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

In the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, adenocarcinoma of esophagus comprises preinvasive type (dysplasia), adenocarcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma. For adenocarcinoma, it is important to determine the grading of the cancer and histological variants such as signet ring adenocarcinoma. In the current day management of esophageal adenocarcinoma by neoadjuvant therapy, the histology of the cancer and the lymph nodal status may change after the therapy. Tumor regression grading systems could be used to assess the response to the neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma mimicking acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma

Herein is described a unique case of esophageal cancer mimicking acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The patient succumbed to the disease within one month of diagnosis. Autopsy revealed a 10-cm esophageal tumor, characterized by prominent acantholysis-like areas composed of discohesive cancer cells, along with nested growth of SCC. These discohesive cancer cells focally exhibited pagetoid extension into adjacent esophageal epithelium, comprised ~60% of the esophageal tumor volume and had widely metastasized to the lungs, chest wall, liver, spleen, right adrenal gland, bones and lymph nodes. No metastases of SCC were observed. SCC cells were immunohistochemically positive for keratin 5/6 and E-cadherin and were negative for mucin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). However, the discohesive cancer cells exhibited negativity for keratin 5/6, positivity for mucin and CEA, and diminished or no immunostaining for E-cadherin. Thus, these discohesive cells represented true adenocarcinomatous differentiation rather than acantholytic SCC cells. It was concluded that this tumor was an esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma with 'pseudo'-acantholytic adenocarcinoma components, which should be considered as a rare but distinctive type of aggressive cancer.

Primary adenosquamous carcinoma of the esophagus: an analysis of 39 cases

BACKGROUND

Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the esophagus is an uncommon type of malignant esophageal neoplasm containing both squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocacinoma (AC) components. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics and prognosis of esophageal ASC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of esophageal ASC patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy in our hospital from July 2007 to April 2014.

RESULTS

A total of 39 (1.0%) esophageal ASC patients among 3855 patients with esophageal cancers were collected to analyze. There were 34 men and 5 women with a median age of 61.0 years (range from 39-85). Median follow-up time was 30.0 months and median survival time was 44.4 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 82.1%, 51.6% and 37.5%, respectively. Compared to esophageal SCC and AC, there were no significant difference in survive time (P=0.616). Thirty five (92.1%) of the 38 patients who underwent preoperative endoscopic biopsy were misdiagnosed, mostly as SCC. Fifteen patients (38.5%) were found to have lymph node metastasis. Thirty two patients (82.1%) had a poorly differentiated or undifferentiated tumor. According to the 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, 3 patients were at Stage I, 21 patients at Stage II and 15 patients at Stage III. In univariate analysis, pT stage, lymph node metastasis and pTNM Stage significantly influenced survive time. In multivariate analysis, however, only lymph node metastasis (P=0.003; 95% CI: 1.626-10.972) was found to be the independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary ASC of the esophagus is a rare disease with difficultly to be histologically confirmed by endoscopic biopsy. The prognosis of esophageal ASC was no worse than esophageal SCC and AC. Lymph node metastasis is the most influent prognostic factor. The TNM staging system of esophageal SCC is applicable for esophageal ASC.

Primary adenosquamous carcinoma of the esophagus

AIM: To investigate the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of primary adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the esophagus.

METHODS: A total of 4015 patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent surgical resection between January 1995 and June 2012 at the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College. In 37 cases, the histological diagnosis was primary ASC. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from these 37 patients, who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy. The χ² or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the clinicopathological features between patients with ASC and those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank methods were used to estimate and compare survival rates. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS: Primary esophageal ASC accounted for 0.92% of all primary esophageal carcinoma cases (37/4015). The clinical manifestations were identical to those of other types of esophageal cancer. All of the 24 patients who underwent preoperative endoscopic biopsy were misdiagnosed with SCC. The median survival time (MST) was 21.0 mo (95%CI: 12.6-29.4), and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 67.5%, 29.4%, and 22.9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only adjuvant radiotherapy (HR = 0.317, 95%CI: 0.114-0.885, P = 0.028) was found to be an independent prognostic factor. The MST for ASC patients was significantly lower than that for SCC patients [21.0 mo (95%CI: 12.6-29.4) vs 46.0 mo (95%CI: 40.8-51.2), P = 0.001]. In subgroup analyses, the MST for ASC patients was similar to that for poorly differentiated SCC patients.

CONCLUSION: Primary esophageal ASC is a rare disease that is prone to be misdiagnosed by endoscopic biopsy. The prognosis is poorer than esophageal SCC but similar to that for poorly differentiated SCC patients.

Adenosquamous carcinoma of the head and neck: report of 20 cases and review of the literature

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical profile and prognostic factors in patients with adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the head and neck treated by surgery and/or radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy.

METHODS

Data from 20 patients with stage I-II (n = 4), III (n = 5), or IVA (n = 11) head and neck ASC, treated between 1989 and 2010 were collected in a retrospective multicenter Rare Cancer Network study. Surgery was performed in 16 patients. Seventeen patients received combined modality treatment.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 15.5 months, 12 patients recurred. The 3-year and median overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and loco-regional control were 52% and 39 months, 32% and 12 months, and 47% and 33 months respectively. In multivariate analysis, DFS was negatively influenced by the presence of extracapsular extension and advanced stage.

CONCLUSION

Overall prognosis of locoregionally advanced ASC remains poor. However, early stage ASC patients managed with combined modality treatment may have prolonged DFS.

Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus

INTRODUCTION

Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the esophagus is an uncommon neoplasm characterized by a diffuse mixture of squamous and mucus-secreting glandular carcinoma cells. Its biological behavior and response to therapies have not been well studied. Surgical resection is still the primary treatment, but the prognosis is poor. This retrospective study was designed to investigate the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of primary esophageal MEC.

METHODS

Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from 36 patients with pathologically confirmed primary esophageal MEC who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy between January 1991 and June 2010 at the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College. There were 27 men and 9 women ranging in age from 40 to 78 years (median, 58 years). Twenty-six of the 36 patients were treated with surgery alone. The other 10 were treated with surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods were used to estimate and compare survival rates. Cox's hazard regression model was used to identify prognostic factors, with entry factors of gender, age (≤60 years versus >60 years), length of the primary lesion (≤5 cm versus >5 cm), location of the primary lesion, macroscopic tumor type, tumor cell differentiation, pT, pN, pTNM stage, operation type (radical/palliative), and radiotherapy (yes/no).

RESULTS

The clinical symptoms, radiological and endoscopic features of primary esophageal MEC were similar to those of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Of the 20 cases who underwent preoperative endoscopic biopsy, 18 cases were misdiagnosed as ESCC and 2 were misdiagnosed as esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma. The mean follow-up duration of this series was 38.8 months (range, 3-142 months). Twenty-two patients had died, 12 were still alive, and 2 were lost to follow-up. The median survival time of the 36 patients was 29.0 months (95% confidence interval = 20.0-38.0), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 80.6%, 57.1%, 34.4%, and 25.8%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate of 25.8% was lower than 5-year absolute survival rate of 39.2% for ESCC patients who had undergone surgical resection during the same period at our center. For patients who underwent a radical operation, the 5-year survival rate of 32.0% for MEC patients was also lower than that of 41.7% (908/2175) for ESCC patients. In univariate analysis, pN (pN0/pN1-3) (p = 0.003) and operation type (radical/palliative) (p = 0.006) significantly influenced the median survival time of MEC patients. In multivariate analysis, pN (pN0/pN1-3) (p = 0.002) and operation type (radical/palliative) (p = 0.004) were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary esophageal MEC is a rare disease and prone to be misdiagnosed. Lymph node metastasis and operation are independent prognostic factors. Surgical resection is the primary treatment, but the prognosis is poor.

Clinicopathological features of head and neck adenosquamous carcinoma

Adenosquamous carcinoma is a rare tumour which is characterized pathologically by the simultaneous presence of distinct areas of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The origin of adenosquamous carcinoma is controversial; however, it is generally considered to be aggressive and associated with a dismal prognosis. In the present study, the medical and pathological records of 4 patients with head and neck adenosquamous carcinoma are reviewed. In 1 patient, the tumour arose from an area of carcinoma in situ of surface epithelium. The origin from surface epithelium was not evident in any of the others. Perineural invasion was present in 3 patients. Three patients had evidence of cervical metastases. One patient died of postoperative complications, 1 suffered from local recurrence and developed distant metastases and 2 were alive with no evidence of disease over 30 months later. Adenosquamous carcinoma is an aggressive tumour; however, with appropriate treatment, some patients may remain well beyond 2 years.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus treated by endoscopic mucosal resection

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a mixed cell tumor with both adenocarcinomatous and squamous components. We report a rare case of superficial mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus with mucosal gastric cancer. Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed on a 67-year-old man with a slight but defined depressed lesion of the thoracic esophagus and two lesions of mucosal gastric cancer. Histological examination revealed that the lesion of the esophagus was a mucoepidermoid carcinoma and the two lesions of the stomach were well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Since the mucoepidermoid carcinoma had only slightly invaded the submucosal layer, it was thought to arise from the ductal epithelium of the esophageal gland or the stratified squamous epithelium of the esophagus. Radiation therapy with a total dose of 60 Gy was performed and there has been no recurrence or metastasis to other organs during 36 months of follow-up.

Paget's disease of the oesophagus associated with mucous gland carcinoma of the lower oesophagus

AIM

To report a rare case of oesophageal Paget's disease and its rarer combination with submucosal gland carcinoma of the lower oesophagus.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 74-year-old Saudi female was admitted with the complaint of dysphagia. Endoscopic examination showed an ulcerated tumour at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Initial biopsy showed an undifferentiated carcinoma with pagetoid spread in the oesophageal stratified squamous epithelium. Oesophago-gastrectomy specimen showed a lobulated, poorly differentiated mucous gland carcinoma at the gastro-oesophageal junction. The tumour showed focal acinar differentiation and obvious cancerization of the submucosal glands, somewhat similar to the breast lobular carcinoma in situ. One of the isolated and cancerized submucosal glands also showed carcinoma in situ of its duct. Oesophageal surface epithelium showed extensive pagetoid spread, both over and away from the main tumour. The pagetoid tumour cells showed selective positivity for cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin Cam 5.2, BerEP4 and to a lesser extent for CEA.

CONCLUSIONS

As far as we know, this is the fifth case report of oesophageal Paget's disease and the first report of its association with the underlying mucous gland carcinoma.

Esophageal mucoepidermoid carcinoma containing signet-ring cells: three case reports and a literature review

We report 3 cases of esophageal signet-ring cell carcinoma which were found in a set of 505 resected esophageal tumors. The incidence of esophageal signet-ring cell carcinoma was 0.6%. All of the signet-ring cell carcinomas were histologically mixed with squamous cell carcinoma (mucoepidermoid carcinoma). The signet-ring cells had intracellular mucin, which was positive for both periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and alcian blue at pH 2.5. At the time of presentation, extensive extraesophageal tumor spread and local extension were found in all cases. All of the patients died within 2 years after the esophagectomy irrespective of whether they received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Our results, and those previously reported, suggest that most esophageal carcinomas containing signet-ring cell carcinoma are aggressive neoplasms associated with a poor prognosis after esophagectomy.

Adenosquamous carcinoma: a case report with immunohistochemical evaluation

The histogenetic origin of adenosquamous carcinoma, a high-grade variant of malignant epithelial neoplasm, has long been debated. We report a case that clearly demonstrated a mucosal surface epithelial origin. This concept was supported through histologic analysis of hematoxylin- and eosin-stained sections, as well as by the pattern of immunohistochemical reactivity with antibodies directed against low and high molecular weight cytokeratins, cell adhesion molecules (CAM 5.2), and carcinoembryonic antigens. The histologic differential diagnosis, biological behavior, and prognosis of adenosquamous carcinoma are also examined.

Measurement of extent of spread of oesophageal squamous carcinoma by serial sectioning

OBJECTIVES

(1) To examine the prevalence and extent of intramural metastasis in squamous cell carcinomas of the oesophagus so as to delineate the resection margins for these tumours; (2) to devise an appropriate method for measurement of these lesions which takes into account of the contraction of the specimens after resection.

METHODS

Oesophagectomy specimens were prospectively collected from 96 patients (87 males, nine females) with primary oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma over a two year period. The sizes of the tumours were measured in situ, after resection and after application of muscle relaxant (to regain their in situ length). The specimens were then serially sectioned for histological examination.

RESULTS

The sizes of the tumours measured after application of muscle relaxant roughly corresponded to those measured in situ. Intramural metastasis was observed in 26% of the cases. Sixty four per cent (16 cases) of these were on the oral side, 72% (18 cases) on the gastric side, and 25% (nine cases) on both sides of the tumours. The most distant extent of intramural metastasis from the primary tumour was from 0.5 cm to 7.7 cm (mean = 3.4 cm) on the oral side, and 0.5 to 9.5 cm (mean 4 cm) on the gastric aspect of the tumour. Intramural metastasis was seen only in patients in whom the primary cancer had deep muscle infiltration. Multiple neoplastic lesions could be detected in 33% of the patients. Both intramural metastasis and multiple neoplastic lesions were associated with extensive lymph node infiltration. However, they had different histological features and extent of infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramural metastasis was frequently observed in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This implies that excision with wide margins should be considered for local control of the disease.

Cytokeratin expression in non-neoplastic oesophageal epithelium and squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

The expression of cytokeratins (CK) 19, 8, 18, 13, 10 and 7 was examined in 35 cases of squamous cell carcinomas of the oesophagus (10 well-differentiated, 13 moderately-differentiated, and 12 poorly-differentiated) and the adjacent mucosa by means of a panel of monoclonal antibodies on frozen sections. The study was undertaken to assess the pattern of expression of these keratins in oesophageal tumours and its relation to the degree of differentiation. The normal oesophageal epithelia expressed CK19 in 86%, CK18 in 17% and CK13 in 14% of cases. CK8, CK10 and CK7 immunoreactivity was not observed. The tumours expressed CK19 in 86%, CK8 in 46%, CK18 in 97%, CK13 in 83%, CK10 in 34% and CK7 in 29% of cases. Thus, the so-called simple epithelial markers CK18 and CK19 occurred in the majority of oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas. CK13 (the so-called non-keratinizing squamous epithelial marker) was only infrequently demonstrated in the non-neoplastic oesophageal mucosa, and its expression was more frequent in carcinomas. CK10 was not demonstrated in non-neoplastic mucosa, but was mostly associated with well-differentiated carcinomas. We therefore conclude that the pattern of expression of cytokeratins in oesophageal carcinomas is different from that in normal oesophageal epithelia and varies with differentiation.