Complications to invasive epilepsy surgery workup with subdural and depth electrodes: a prospective population-based observational study

Augmented Reality in Extratemporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery

Background: Epilepsy surgery for extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE) is challenging, particularly when MRI findings are non-lesional and seizure patterns are complex. Invasive diagnostic techniques are crucial for accurately identifying the epileptogenic zone and its relationship with surrounding functional tissue. Microscope-based augmented reality (AR) support, combined with navigation, may enhance intraoperative orientation, particularly in cases involving subtle or indistinct lesions, thereby improving patient outcomes and safety (e.g., seizure freedom and preservation of neuronal integrity). Therefore, this study was conducted to prove the clinical advantages of microscope-based AR support in ETLE surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from ten patients with pharmacoresistant ETLE who underwent invasive diagnostics with depth and/or subdural grid electrodes, followed by resective surgery. AR support was provided via the head-up displays of the operative microscope, with navigation based on automatic intraoperative computed tomography (iCT)-based registration. The surgical plan included the suspected epileptogenic lesion, electrode positions, and relevant surrounding functional structures, all of which were visualized intraoperatively. Results: Six patients reported complete seizure freedom following surgery (ILAE 1), one patient was seizure-free at the 2-year follow-up, and one patient experienced only auras (ILAE 2). Two patients developed transient neurological deficits that resolved shortly after surgery. Conclusions: Microscope-based AR support enhanced intraoperative orientation in all cases, contributing to improved patient outcomes and safety. It was highly valued by experienced surgeons and as a training tool for less experienced practitioners.

"Mail-slot" Technique for Minimally Invasive Placement of Subdural Grid Electrodes: A Single-institution Experience

BACKGROUND

In the management of multi-drug-resistant focal epilepsies, intracranial electrode implantation is used for precise localization of the ictal onset zone. In select patients, subdural grid electrode implantation is utilized. Subdural grid placement traditionally requires large craniotomies to visualize the cortex prior to mapping. However, smaller craniotomies may enable shorter operations and reduced risks. We aimed to compare surgical outcomes between patients undergoing traditional large craniotomies with those undergoing tailored "mini" craniotomies (the "mail-slot" technique) for subdural grid placement.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 23 patients who underwent subdural electrode implantation for epilepsy monitoring between 2014 and 2020. Patients were categorized into mini-craniotomies (n = 9) and traditional large craniotomies (n = 14) groups. Demographics, operative details, and outcomes were reviewed. Craniotomy size and number of electrodes were determined via post hoc radiographs.

RESULTS

Of the 23 patients studied, the mini group had smaller craniotomy sizes (mean: 22.71 cm2 vs. 65.17 cm2, P < 0.001) and higher electrode-to-size ratios (mean: 4.25 vs. 1.71, P < 0.0001). The mini group had slightly fewer total electrodes (mean: 88.67 vs. 107.43, P = 0.047). No significant differences were found in operative duration, blood loss, invasive electroencephalography duration, complications, or Engel scores between the groups. One patient per group required further invasive epilepsy monitoring for localization; all patients underwent therapeutic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that mini-craniotomies for subdural grid placement in epilepsy monitoring offer significant advantages, including smaller craniotomy sizes and shorter operation durations, without compromising safety or efficacy. These results support the trend towards minimally invasive, patient-tailored surgical approaches in epilepsy treatment.

Clinical utility and safety of a trapezoid-shaped electrode placement for evaluating the mesio-basal temporal lobe during epilepsy surgery

A trapezoid-shaped electrode (TSE) is used for detecting epileptogenicity in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). However, the utility and safety associated with TSE placement have not been reported. In this study, we evaluated the safety and usefulness of TSE by analyzing the seizure detection, surgical outcomes and complications in patients with TLE who underwent intracranial electrodes (ICE) placement. Between April 2000 and August 2019, 50 patients with TLE who underwent 51 ICE placement procedures were examined. A TSE with eight contacts covering the parahippocampal gyrus and basal temporal lobe was used. Among the 37 patients who underwent TSE placement, 26 and 11 patients were diagnosed with mesial TLE (mTLE) and extra-mTLE, respectively. The 14 remaining patients without TSE placement were diagnosed with extra-mTLE. Seizure freedom was achieved in 73% (19/26) of mTLE patients detected by TSE and 50% (14/24) of extra-mTLE patients.Good seizure outcomes (Engel class I and II) were observed in 81% (21/26) patients with mTLE and 67% (16/24) patients with extra-mTLE. Radiographic complications were observed in 20% (10/50) patients who underwent ICE placement. Although 6% (3/50) patients showed transient neurological deficits, none were permanent. The electrodes responsible for the occurrence of complications included nine grid electrodes and one TSE. The complication rate after TSE placement was 3% (1/37). More than 64 electrode contacts and male sex, not TSE placement, were identified as significant risk factors for developing complications. This study demonstrated the usefulness and safety of TSE for evaluating mTLE in patients undergoing ICE placement.

Patient Safety in Canadian Epilepsy Monitoring Units: A Survey of Current Practices

BACKGROUND

Guidelines on epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) standards have been recently published. We aimed to survey Canadian EMUs to describe the landscape of safety practices and compare these to the recommendations from the new guidelines.

METHODS

A 34-item survey was created by compiling questions on EMU structure, patient monitoring, equipment, personnel, standardized protocol use, and use of injury prevention tools. The questionnaire was distributed online to 24 Canadian hospital centers performing video-EEG monitoring (VEM) in EMUs. Responses were tabulated and descriptively summarized.

RESULTS

In total, 26 EMUs responded (100% response rate), 50% of which were adult EMUs. EMUs were on average active for 23.4 years and had on average 3.6 beds. About 81% of respondents reported having a dedicated area for VEM, and 65% reported having designated EMU beds. Although a video monitoring station was available in 96% of EMUs, only 48% of EMUs provided continuous observation of patients (video and/or physical). A total of 65% of EMUs employed continuous heart monitoring. The technologist-to-patient ratio was 1:1-2 in 52% of EMUs during the day. No technologist supervision was most often reported in the evening and at night. Nurse-to-EMU-patient ratio was mostly 1:1-4 independent of the time of day. Consent forms were required before admission in 27% of EMUs.

CONCLUSION

Canadian EMUs performed decently in terms of there being dedicated space for VEM, continuous heart monitoring, and adequate nurse-to-patient ratios. Other practices were quite variable, and adjustments should be made on a case-by-case basis to adhere to the latest guidelines.

Ultraflexible endovascular probes for brain recording through micrometer-scale vasculature

Implantable neuroelectronic interfaces have enabled advances in both fundamental research and treatment of neurological diseases but traditional intracranial depth electrodes require invasive surgery to place and can disrupt neural networks during implantation. We developed an ultrasmall and flexible endovascular neural probe that can be implanted into sub-100-micrometer-scale blood vessels in the brains of rodents without damaging the brain or vasculature. In vivo electrophysiology recording of local field potentials and single-unit spikes have been selectively achieved in the cortex and olfactory bulb. Histology analysis of the tissue interface showed minimal immune response and long-term stability. This platform technology can be readily extended as both research tools and medical devices for the detection and intervention of neurological diseases.

Safety profile of subdural and depth electrode implantations in invasive EEG exploration of drug-resistant focal epilepsy

PURPOSE

To analyze the safety profile of subdural and depth electrode implantation in a large monocentric cohort of patients of all ages undergoing intracranial EEG exploration because of drug resistant focal epilepsy diagnosed and implanted by a constant team of epileptologists and neurosurgeons.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 452 implantations in 420 patients undergoing invasive presurgical evaluation at the Freiburg Epilepsy Center from 1999 to 2019 (n = 160 subdural electrodes, n = 156 depth electrodes and n = 136 combination of both approaches). Complications were classified as hemorrhage with or without clinical manifestations, infection-associated and other complications. Furthermore, possible risk factors (age, duration of invasive monitoring, number of electrode contacts used) and changes in complication rates during the study period were analyzed.

RESULTS

The most frequent complications in both implantation groups were hemorrhages. Subdural electrode explorations caused significantly more symptomatic hemorrhages and required more operative interventions (SDE 9.9%, DE 0.3%, p < 0.05). Hemorrhage risk was higher for grids with 64 contacts than for smaller grids (p < 0.05). The infection rate was very low (0,2%). A transient neurological deficit occurred in 8.8% of all implantations and persisted for at least 3 months in 1.3%. Transient, but not persistent neurological deficits were more common in patients with implanted subdural electrodes than in the depth electrode group.

CONCLUSION

The use of subdural electrodes was associated with a higher risk of hemorrhage and transient neurological symptoms. However persistent deficits were rare with either approach, demonstrating that intracranial investigations using either subdural electrodes or depth electrodes carry acceptable risks in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Deep brain stimulation of thalamus for epilepsy

Neuromodulation (neurostimulation) is a relatively new and rapidly growing treatment for refractory epilepsy. Three varieties are approved in the US: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). This article reviews thalamic DBS for epilepsy. Among many thalamic sub-nuclei, DBS for epilepsy has been targeted to the anterior nucleus (ANT), centromedian nucleus (CM), dorsomedial nucleus (DM) and pulvinar (PULV). Only ANT is FDA-approved, based upon a controlled clinical trial. Bilateral stimulation of ANT reduced seizures by 40.5% at three months in the controlled phase (p = .038) and 75% by 5 years in the uncontrolled phase. Side effects related to paresthesias, acute hemorrhage, infection, occasional increased seizures, and usually transient effects on mood and memory. Efficacy was best documented for focal onset seizures in temporal or frontal lobe. CM stimulation may be useful for generalized or multifocal seizures and PULV for posterior limbic seizures. Mechanisms of DBS for epilepsy are largely unknown, but animal work points to changes in receptors, channels, neurotransmitters, synapses, network connectivity and neurogenesis. Personalization of therapies, in terms of connectivity of the seizure onset zone to the thalamic sub- nucleus and individual characteristics of the seizures, might lead to improved efficacy. Many questions remain about DBS, including the best candidates for different types of neuromodulation, the best targets, the best stimulation parameters, how to minimize side effects and how to deliver current noninvasively. Despite the questions, neuromodulation provides useful new opportunities to treat people with refractory seizures not responding to medicines and not amenable to resective surgery.

Ultra-flexible endovascular probes for brain recording through micron-scale vasculature

Implantable neuroelectronic interfaces have enabled significant advances in both fundamental research and treatment of neurological diseases, yet traditional intracranial depth electrodes require invasive surgery to place and can disrupt the neural networks during implantation. To address these limitations, we have developed an ultra-small and flexible endovascular neural probe that can be implanted into small 100-micron scale blood vessels in the brains of rodents without damaging the brain or vasculature. The structure and mechanical properties of the flexible probes were designed to meet the key constraints for implantation into tortuous blood vessels inaccessible with existing techniques. In vivo electrophysiology recording of local field potentials and single-unit spikes has been selectively achieved in the cortex and the olfactory bulb. Histology analysis of the tissue interface showed minimal immune response and long-term stability. This platform technology can be readily extended as both research tools and medical devices for the detection and intervention of neurological diseases.

Modern intracranial electroencephalography for epilepsy localization with combined subdural grid and depth electrodes with low and improved hemorrhagic complication rates

OBJECTIVE

Recent trends have moved from subdural grid electrocorticography (ECoG) recordings toward stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) depth electrodes for intracranial localization of seizures, in part because of perceived morbidity from subdural grid and strip electrodes. For invasive epilepsy monitoring, the authors describe the outcomes of a hybrid approach, whereby patients receive a combination of subdural grids, strips, and frameless stereotactic depth electrode implantations through a craniotomy. Evolution of surgical techniques was employed to reduce complications. In this study, the authors review the surgical hemorrhage and functional outcomes of this hybrid approach.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients who underwent hybrid implantation from July 2012 to May 2022 at an academic epilepsy center by a single surgeon. Outcomes included hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic complications, neurological deficits, length of monitoring, and number of electrodes.

RESULTS

A total of 137 consecutive procedures were performed; 113 procedures included both subdural and depth electrodes. The number of depth electrodes and electrode contacts did not increase the risk of hemorrhage. A mean of 1.9 ± 0.8 grid, 4.9 ± 2.1 strip, and 3.0 ± 1.9 depth electrodes were implanted, for a mean of 125.1 ± 32 electrode contacts per patient. The overall incidence of hematomas over the study period was 5.1% (7 patients) and decreased significantly with experience and the introduction of new surgical techniques. The incidence of hematomas in the last 4 years of the study period was 0% (55 patients). Symptomatic hematomas were all delayed and extra-axial. These patients required surgical evacuation, and there were no cases of hematoma recurrence. All neurological deficits related to hematomas were temporary and were resolved at hospital discharge. There were 2 nonhemorrhagic complications. The mean duration of monitoring was 7.3 ± 3.2 days. Seizures were localized in 95% of patients, with 77% of patients eventually undergoing resection and 17% undergoing responsive neurostimulation device implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the authors' institutional experience, craniotomy-based subdural and depth electrode implantation was associated with low hemorrhage rates and no permanent morbidity. The rate of hemorrhage can be nearly eliminated with surgical experience and specific techniques. The decision to use subdural electrodes or SEEG should be tailored to the patient's unique pathology and surgeon experience.

Assessment of Safety of a Fully Implanted Endovascular Brain-Computer Interface for Severe Paralysis in 4 Patients: The Stentrode With Thought-Controlled Digital Switch (SWITCH) Study

Importance

Brain-computer interface (BCI) implants have previously required craniotomy to deliver penetrating or surface electrodes to the brain. Whether a minimally invasive endovascular technique to deliver recording electrodes through the jugular vein to superior sagittal sinus is safe and feasible is unknown.

Objective

To assess the safety of an endovascular BCI and feasibility of using the system to control a computer by thought.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Stentrode With Thought-Controlled Digital Switch (SWITCH) study, a single-center, prospective, first in-human study, evaluated 5 patients with severe bilateral upper-limb paralysis, with a follow-up of 12 months. From a referred sample, 4 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and 1 with primary lateral sclerosis met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Surgical procedures and follow-up visits were performed at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia. Training sessions were performed at patients' homes and at a university clinic. The study start date was May 27, 2019, and final follow-up was completed January 9, 2022.

Interventions

Recording devices were delivered via catheter and connected to subcutaneous electronic units. Devices communicated wirelessly to an external device for personal computer control.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary safety end point was device-related serious adverse events resulting in death or permanent increased disability. Secondary end points were blood vessel occlusion and device migration. Exploratory end points were signal fidelity and stability over 12 months, number of distinct commands created by neuronal activity, and use of system for digital device control.

Results

Of 4 patients included in analyses, all were male, and the mean (SD) age was 61 (17) years. Patients with preserved motor cortex activity and suitable venous anatomy were implanted. Each completed 12-month follow-up with no serious adverse events and no vessel occlusion or device migration. Mean (SD) signal bandwidth was 233 (16) Hz and was stable throughout study in all 4 patients (SD range across all sessions, 7-32 Hz). At least 5 attempted movement types were decoded offline, and each patient successfully controlled a computer with the BCI.

Conclusions and Relevance

Endovascular access to the sensorimotor cortex is an alternative to placing BCI electrodes in or on the dura by open-brain surgery. These final safety and feasibility data from the first in-human SWITCH study indicate that it is possible to record neural signals from a blood vessel. The favorable safety profile could promote wider and more rapid translation of BCI to people with paralysis.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03834857.

Standardized reporting of complications of epilepsy surgery and invasive monitoring: A single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Monitoring adverse effects related to epilepsy surgery is essential for quality control and for counseling patients prior to the procedure. The aim of this study was to analyze the rates of complications related to epilepsy surgery following invasive monitoring and to classify them according to the recently proposed protocol by the E-pilepsy consortium.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of collected data extracted from our routinely updated epilepsy surgery database which consisted of 173 surgical procedures: 89 surgeries for insertion of subdural grids, strips, and/or depth electrodes, and 84 resective surgeries. According to the protocol, complications were defined as unexpected postoperative adverse events and were stratified into transient (lasting less than 6 months) and permanent deficits (lasting 6 months or longer). In addition, we reported patients with postoperative psychiatric disturbances and calculated the rates of transient and permanent postoperative sequelae which were defined as expected postoperative deficits deemed inherent to the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Six potentially life-threatening complications requiring acceleration of the planned resective surgery occurred during invasive monitoring. Following resective surgery, 12 transient sequelae (8 motor deficits, three language deficits, and one transient dyscalculia) and 10 permanent sequelae (5 mild memory disturbances, four visual field cuts, and one contralateral dysesthesia) occurred. In addition, 7 patients experienced transient motor complications. Four permanent postoperative neurological complications (4.8%) occurred: motor deficits in three patients and a partial peripheral facial palsy in one. Finally, five patients developed de novo psychiatric disturbances (transient in four and permanent in one).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to classify complications of epilepsy surgery according to the E-pilepsy consortium protocol. Our findings demonstrate that epilepsy surgery following invasive monitoring is safe and associated with low morbidity when performed in specialized centers. Monitoring these complications according to a unified definition and using a multidimensional protocol will allow for a direct comparison across epilepsy surgery centers, will provide the epileptologists and surgeons with objective percentages to share with their patients and will help in identifying risk factors and improving the safety of epilepsy surgery.

Utility of adding electrodes in patients undergoing invasive seizure localization: A case series

Introduction

Surgery can be an effective treatment for epilepsy if the seizure onset is adequately localized. Invasive monitoring is used if noninvasive methods are inconclusive. Initial invasive monitoring may fail if the pre-surgical hypothesis regarding location of epileptic foci is wrong. At this point, a decision must be made whether to remove all electrodes without a clearly defined location of onset or to implant additional electrodes with the aim of achieving localization by expanding coverage.

Methods

Electrodes were placed according to a hypothesis derived from noninvasive monitoring techniques in adult patients with long term epilepsy. Seizure onset was not clearly localized at the end of the invasive monitoring period in ten patients, and additional electrodes were placed based on a new hypothesis that incorporated data from the invasive monitoring period.

Results

Successful localization was achieved in nine patients. There were no complications with adding additional electrodes. At final follow up, four patients were seizure free while four others had at least a 50% reduction in seizures after undergoing surgical intervention.

Conclusion

Seizure foci were localized safely in 90% of adult patients with long term epilepsy after implanting additional electrodes and expanding coverage. Patients undergoing invasive monitoring without clear localization should have additional electrodes placed to expand monitoring coverage as it is safe and effective.

Epidural grid, a new methodology of invasive intracranial EEG monitoring: A technical note and experience of a single center

INTRODUCTION

Subdural grid monitoring (SDG) has the advantage to provide continuous coverage over a larger area of cortex, direct visualization of electrode location and functional mapping. However, SDG can cause direct irritation of the cortex or postoperative headaches due to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Epidural grid monitoring (EDG) without opening the dura is thought to reduce the possibility of these complications. We report our experience with EDG.

METHODS

We described our surgical technique of EDG in invasive intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) monitoring. A retrospective review of 30 patients who underwent grid placement of iEEG between March 2019 and December 2020 was performed to compare SDG and EDG.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients, 10 patients underwent SDG and 20 patients underwent EDG. There was no difference in age between SDG and EDG groups (p = 0.13). Also, there was no difference in the number of grid electrodes, craniotomy size, number of electrodes per craniotomy area and postoperative complication rate (p = 0.32, 0.84, 0.58 and 0.40). However, the maximum number of electrodes that have been undermined from the bone margin was much higher in SDG group (SDG 4.6 ± 2.2 vs. EDG 2.0 ± 0.9; p = 0.001). The demand for postoperative analgesics was significantly lower in EDG group (SDG 13.4 ± 9.1 vs. EDG 4.1 ± 4.3; p = 0.012); and the demand for postoperative antiemetics also tended to be low (SDG 4.6 ± 3.6 vs. EDG 1.8 ± 1.6; p = 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in craniotomy and electrode insertion between the two groups; however, the EDG group showed less postoperative headache and nausea. Though not in direct contact with the cortex, the quality of the electrophysiological signal received through the electrode in EDG is comparable to that of the SDG. The EDG enables to detect the onset of seizure and delineate the epileptogenic zone sufficiently. Moreover, functional mapping is possible with EDG. Therefore, EDG has the sufficient potential to replace SDG for monitoring of the lateral surface of brain.

Utilization of Epidural Electrodes as a Diagnostic Tool in Intractable Epilepsy—A Technical Note

The utilization of epidural electrodes in the preoperative evaluation of intractable epilepsy is a valuable but underrepresented tool. In recent years, we have adapted the use of cylindrical epidural 1-contact electrodes (1-CE) instead of Peg electrodes. 1-CEs are more versatile since their explantation is a possible bedside procedure. Here we report our experience with 1-CEs as well as associated technical nuances. This retrospective analysis included 56 patients with intractable epilepsy who underwent epidural electrode placement for presurgical evaluation at the Department of Neurosurgery at the Charité University Hospital from September 2011 to July 2021. The median age at surgery was 36.3 years (range: 18–87), with 30 (53.6%) female and 26 (46.4%) male patients. Overall, 507 electrodes were implanted: 93 Fo electrodes, 33 depth electrodes, and 381 epidural electrodes, with a mean total surgical time of 100.5 ± 38 min and 11.8 ± 5 min per electrode. There was a total number of 24 complications in 21 patients (8 Fo electrode dislocations, 6 CSF leaks, 6 epidural electrode dislocations or malfunction, 3 wound infections, and 2 hemorrhages); 11 of these required revision surgery. The relative electrode complication rates were 3/222 (1.4%) in Peg electrodes and 3/159 (1.9%) in 1-CE. In summary, epidural recording via 1-CE is technically feasible, harbours an acceptable complication rate, and adequately replaces Peg electrodes.

Minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring: A clinical practice guideline of the international league against epilepsy and international federation of clinical neurophysiology

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide recommendations on the indications and minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring (LTVEM). The Working Group of the International League Against Epilepsy and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology develop guidelines aligned with the Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force. We reviewed published evidence using The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. We found limited high-level evidence aimed at specific aspects of diagnosis for LTVEM performed to evaluate patients with seizures and nonepileptic events (see Table S1). For classification of evidence, we used the Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual of the American Academy of Neurology. We formulated recommendations for the indications, technical requirements, and essential practice elements of LTVEM to derive minimum standards used in the evaluation of patients with suspected epilepsy using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Further research is needed to obtain evidence about long-term outcome effects of LTVEM and establish its clinical utility.

Minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring: A clinical practice guideline of the International League Against Epilepsy and International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide recommendations on the indications and minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring (LTVEM). The Working Group of the International League Against Epilepsy and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology develop guidelines aligned with the Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force. We reviewed published evidence using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) statement. We found limited high-level evidence aimed at specific aspects of diagnosis for LTVEM performed to evaluate patients with seizures and nonepileptic events. For classification of evidence, we used the Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual of the American Academy of Neurology. We formulated recommendations for the indications, technical requirements, and essential practice elements of LTVEM to derive minimum standards used in the evaluation of patients with suspected epilepsy using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Further research is needed to obtain evidence about long-term outcome effects of LTVEM and to establish its clinical utility.

Understanding the nonlinear behavior of EEG with advanced machine learning in artifact elimination

Steady-state Visually Evoked Potential (SSVEP) based Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal is utilized in brain-computer interface paradigms, diagnosis of brain diseases, and measurement of the cognitive status of the human brain. However, various artifacts such as the Electrocardiogram (ECG), Electrooculogram (EOG), and Electromyogram (EMG) are present in the raw EEG signal, which adversely affect the EEG-based appliances. In this research, Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Interface Systems (ANFIS) and Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT) are primarily employed to remove the artifacts from EEG signals. This work proposes Adaptive Noise Cancellation (ANC) and ANFIS based methods for canceling EEG artifacts. A mathematical model of EEG with the aforementioned artifacts is determined to accomplish the research goal, and then those artifacts are eliminated based on their mathematical characteristics. ANC, ANFIS, and HHT algorithms are simulated on the MATLAB platform, and their performances are also justified by various error estimation criteria using hardware implementation.

Multicenter Validation of a Deep Learning Detection Algorithm for Focal Cortical Dysplasia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that a multicenter-validated computer deep learning algorithm detects MRI-negative focal cortical dysplasia (FCD).

METHODS

We used clinically acquired 3-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted and 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI of 148 patients (median age 23 years [range 2-55 years]; 47% female) with histologically verified FCD at 9 centers to train a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier. Images were initially deemed MRI-negative in 51% of patients, in whom intracranial EEG determined the focus. For risk stratification, the CNN incorporated bayesian uncertainty estimation as a measure of confidence. To evaluate performance, detection maps were compared to expert FCD manual labels. Sensitivity was tested in an independent cohort of 23 cases with FCD (13 ± 10 years). Applying the algorithm to 42 healthy controls and 89 controls with temporal lobe epilepsy disease tested specificity.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity was 93% (137 of 148 FCD detected) using a leave-one-site-out cross-validation, with an average of 6 false positives per patient. Sensitivity in MRI-negative FCD was 85%. In 73% of patients, the FCD was among the clusters with the highest confidence; in half, it ranked the highest. Sensitivity in the independent cohort was 83% (19 of 23; average of 5 false positives per patient). Specificity was 89% in healthy and disease controls.

DISCUSSION

This first multicenter-validated deep learning detection algorithm yields the highest sensitivity to date in MRI-negative FCD. By pairing predictions with risk stratification, this classifier may assist clinicians in adjusting hypotheses relative to other tests, increasing diagnostic confidence. Moreover, generalizability across age and MRI hardware makes this approach ideal for presurgical evaluation of MRI-negative epilepsy.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that deep learning on multimodal MRI accurately identifies FCD in patients with epilepsy initially diagnosed as MRI negative.

Classification of complications of epilepsy surgery and invasive diagnostic procedures: A proposed protocol and feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

In epilepsy surgery, which aims to treat seizures and thereby to improve the lives of persons with drug-resistant epilepsy, the chances of attaining seizure relief must be carefully weighed against the risks of complications and expected adverse events. The interpretation of data regarding complications of epilepsy surgery and invasive diagnostic procedures is hampered by a lack of uniform definitions and method of data collection.

METHODS

Based on a review of previous definitions and classifications of complications, we developed a proposal for a new classification. This proposal was then subject to revisions after expert opinion within E-pilepsy, an EU-funded European pilot network of reference centers in refractory epilepsy and epilepsy surgery, later incorporated into the ERN (European Reference Network) EpiCARE. This version was discussed with recognized experts, and a final protocol was agreed to after further revision. The final protocol was evaluated in practical use over 1 year in three of the participating centers. One hundred seventy-four consecutive procedures were included with 35 reported complications.

RESULTS

This report presents a multidimensional classification of complications in epilepsy surgery and invasive diagnostic procedures, where complications are characterized in terms of their immediate effects, resulting permanent symptoms, and consequences on activities of daily living.

SIGNIFICANCE

We propose that the protocol will be helpful in the work to promote safety in epilepsy surgery and for future studies designed to identify risk factors for complications. Further work is needed to address the reporting of outcomes as regards neuropsychological function, activities of daily living, and quality of life.

The potential of closed-loop endovascular neurostimulation as a viable therapeutic approach for drug-resistant epilepsy: A critical review

Over the last few decades, biomedical implants have successfully delivered therapeutic electrical stimulation to reduce the frequency and severity of seizures in people with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, neurostimulation approaches require invasive surgery to implant stimulating electrodes, and surgical, medical, and hardware complications are not uncommon. An endovascular approach provides a potentially safer and less invasive surgical alternative. This article critically evaluates the feasibility of endovascular closed-loop neuromodulation for the treatment of epilepsy. By reviewing literature that reported the impact of direct electrical stimulation to reduce the frequency of epileptic seizures, we identified clinically validated extracranial, cortical, and deep cortical neural targets. We identified veins in close proximity to these targets and evaluated the potential of delivering an endovascular implant to these veins based on their diameter. We then compared the risks and benefits of existing technology to describe a benchmark of clinical safety and efficacy that would need to be achieved for endovascular neuromodulation to provide therapeutic benefit. For the majority of brain regions that have been clinically demonstrated to reduce seizure occurrence in response to delivered electrical stimulation, vessels of appropriate diameter for delivery of an endovascular electrode to these regions could be achieved. This includes delivery to the vagus nerve via the 13.2 ± 0.9 mm diameter internal jugular vein, the motor cortex via the 6.5 ± 1.7 mm diameter superior sagittal sinus, and the cerebellum via the 7.7 ± 1.4 mm diameter sigmoid sinus or 6.2 ± 1.4 mm diameter transverse sinus. Deep cerebral targets can also be accessed with an endovascular approach, with the 1.9 ± 0.5 mm diameter internal cerebral vein and 1.2-mm-diameter thalamostriate vein lying in close proximity to the anterior and centromedian nuclei of the thalamus, respectively. This work identified numerous veins that are in close proximity to conventional stimulation targets that are of a diameter large enough for delivery and deployment of an endovascular electrode array, supporting future work to assess clinical efficacy and chronic safety of an endovascular approach to deliver therapeutic neurostimulation.

Responsive manipulation of neural circuit pathology by fully implantable, front-end multiplexed embedded neuroelectronics

Responsive neurostimulation is increasingly required to probe neural circuit function and treat neuropsychiatric disorders. We introduce a multiplex-then-amplify (MTA) scheme that, in contrast to current approaches (which necessitate an equal number of amplifiers as number of channels), only requires one amplifier per multiplexer, significantly reducing the number of components and the size of electronics in multichannel acquisition systems. It also enables simultaneous stimulation of arbitrary waveforms on multiple independent channels. We validated the function of MTA by developing a fully implantable, responsive embedded system that merges the ability to acquire individual neural action potentials using conformable conducting polymer-based electrodes with real-time onboard processing, low-latency arbitrary waveform stimulation, and local data storage within a miniaturized physical footprint. We verified established responsive neurostimulation protocols and developed a network intervention to suppress pathological coupling between the hippocampus and cortex during interictal epileptiform discharges. The MTA design enables effective, self-contained, chronic neural network manipulation with translational relevance to the treatment of neuropsychiatric disease.

Single-Institutional Experience of Chronic Intracranial Electroencephalography Based on the Combined Usage of Subdural and Depth Electrodes

Implantation of subdural electrodes on the brain surface is still widely performed as one of the “gold standard methods” for the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Stereotactic insertion of depth electrodes to the brain can be added to detect brain activities in deep-seated lesions to which surface electrodes are insensitive. This study tried to clarify the efficacy and limitations of combined implantation of subdural and depth electrodes in intractable epilepsy patients. Fifty-three patients with drug-resistant epilepsy underwent combined implantation of subdural and depth electrodes for long-term intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) before epilepsy surgery. The detectability of early ictal iEEG change (EIIC) were compared between the subdural and depth electrodes. We also examined clinical factors including resection of MRI lesion and EIIC with seizure freedom. Detectability of EIIC showed no significant difference between subdural and depth electrodes. However, the additional depth electrode was useful for detecting EIIC from apparently deep locations, such as the insula and mesial temporal structures, but not in detecting EIIC in patients with ulegyria (glial scar). Total removal of MRI lesion was associated with seizure freedom. Depth electrodes should be carefully used after consideration of the suspected etiology to avoid injudicious usage.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of invasive EEG monitoring in drug-resistant epilepsy

PURPOSE

Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of two intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) interventions: 1) stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and 2) placement of subdural grid electrodes (SDGs) both followed by resective surgery in patients with drug-resistant, partial-onset epilepsy, compared with medical management (MM) in Hungary from payer's perspective.

METHODS

The incremental health gains and costs of iEEG interventions have been determined with a combination of a decision tree and prevalence Markov process model over a 30-year time horizon in a cost-utility analysis (CUA). To address the effect of parameter uncertainty on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Our results showed that both SEEG and SDG interventions represent a more expensive but more effective strategy than MM representing the current standard of care. The total discounted cost of SEEG and SDG were € 32,760 and € 25,028 representing € 18,108 and € 10,375 additional cost compared with MM, respectively. However, they provide an additional 3.931 (in SEEG group) and 3.444 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs; in SDG group), correspondingly. Thus, the ICER of SEEG is € 4607 per QALY gain, while the ICER for SDG is € 3013 per QALY gain, compared with MM. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of € 41,058 per QALY in Hungary, both subtypes of iEEG interventions are cost-effective and provide good value for money.

SIGNIFICANCE

Because of the high cost of implanting electrodes and monitoring, the invasive EEG for patients with refractory epilepsy is currently not available in the Hungarian national healthcare system. Our study demonstrated that these procedures in Hungary are cost-effective compared with the MM. As a result, the introduction of iEEG interventions to the reimbursement list of the National Health Insurance Fund Administration was initiated.

Linear oblique craniectomy: A novel method of minimally invasive subdural grid insertion

Background:

Many countries rely upon subdural grid electroencephalography in the planning of epilepsy surgeries. However, craniotomy for subdural grid implantation is known to result in a variety of complications and requires diligence from the surgical team. We describe a minimally invasive method of subdural grid insertion, termed the linear oblique craniectomy, designed to mitigate complications and increase ease of subdural grid insertion.

Objective:

To demonstrate feasibility of minimally invasive subdural grid insertion utilizing skull anatomy.

Methods:

Three fresh frozen and embalmed human cadavers underwent surface landmarking and craniectomy to introduce a 4 × 5 cm2 subdural grid over the Sylvian fissure. Anteroposterior lens-shaped craniectomy measured 5 cm in length with 1 cm maximal width. The dura mater was longitudinally incised, and subdural grids were introduced over the Sylvian fissure.

Results:

The total area of the craniectomy created by the linear oblique approach consists of only approximately 20% of the total area removed by the traditional approach to access the Sylvian fissure for mesial temporal epilepsy monitoring/preoperative planning. The locations of the grids were evaluated by MRI and computed tomography scans postoperatively to ensure accurate alignment with the Sylvian fissure.

Conclusion:

In this cadaveric study, we demonstrate the linear oblique craniectomy procedure that provides an alternative approach to subdural grid implantation with significantly decreased invasiveness. This surgical approach has the potential of reducing complication rates of subdural grid insertion for surface monitoring of the brain activity and/or neuromachine interface analysis and is associated with significant reduction of surgical time.

[Surgical treatment of epilepsy in children with focal cortical dysplasia]

OBJECTIVE

Surgery is the first-line treatment option in children with FCD and refractory epilepsy, but the rate of success and patient numbers who became free of seizures vary widely from series to series.

STUDY AIMS

To elicit variables affecting the outcome and predicting achievement of the long-term seizure-free status.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-nine children with cortical dysplasia and DR-epilepsy underwent surgery Preoperative evaluation included prolonged video-EEG and MRI (in all patients) and neuropsychological testing when possible. Fourteen patients underwent invasive EEG, fMRI and MEG were used also in some cases. Including 27 repeat procedures the list of overall 196 surgeries performed consists of: cortectomy (lesionectomy with or without adjacent epileptogenic cortices) – in 116 cases; lobectomy – in 46; and various disconnective procedures – in 34 patients. Almost routinely employed intraoperative ECOG (134 surgeries) was combined with stimulation and/or SSEP in 47 cases to map eloquent cortex (with CST-tracking in some). A new permanent and not anticipated neurological deficit developed post-surgery in 5 cases (2,5%). Patients were follow-upped using video-EEG and MRI and FU which lasts more than 2 years (median – 3 years) is known in 56 cases. Thirty-two children were free of seizures at the last check (57,2% rate of Engel IA). A list of variables regarding patients’ demography, seizure type, lesion pathology and localization, and those related to surgery and its extent were evaluated to figure out anyone associated with favorable outcome.

RESULTS

Both Type II FCDs and their anatomically complete excision are positive predictors for favorable outcome and achievement of SF-status (p<0,05). Residual epileptic activity on immediate post-resection ECOG do not affect the outcome.

CONCLUSION

Patients with Type II FCD, particularly with Type IIb malformations are the best candidates for curative surgery, including cases with lesions in brain eloquent areas. Kids with Type I FCD have much less chances to become free of seizures when attempting focal cortectomy. However, some of them with early onset catastrophic epilepsies may benefit from larger surgeries using lobectomy or various disconnections.

Epilepsy surgery in children: what the radiologist needs to know

This review updates the radiologist on current epilepsy surgery practice in children, with a specific focus on the role of imaging in pre-surgical work-up, current and novel surgical techniques, expected post-surgical imaging appearances and important post-operative complications. A comprehensive review of the current and emerging international practices in paediatric epilepsy surgical planning and post-operative imaging is provided with details on case-based radiological findings. A detailed discussion of the pathophysiology and imaging features of different epileptogenic lesions will not be discussed as this is not the objective of this paper. Epilepsy surgery can be an effective method to control seizures in certain children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Early surgery in selected appropriate cases can lead to improved cognitive and developmental outcome. Advances in neurosurgical techniques, imaging and neuroanaesthesia have driven a parallel expansion in the array of epilepsy conditions which are potentially treatable with surgery. The range of surgical options is now wide, including minimally invasive ablative procedures for small lesions such as hypothalamic hamartomata, resections for focal lesions like hippocampal sclerosis and complex disconnective surgeries for multilobar conditions like Sturge Weber Syndrome and diffuse cortical malformations. An awareness of the surgical thinking when planning epilepsy surgery in children, and the practical knowledge of the operative steps involved will promote more accurate radiology reporting of the post-operative scan.

Stereoelectroencephalography Versus Subdural Strip Electrode Implantations: Feasibility, Complications, and Outcomes in 500 Intracranial Monitoring Cases for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Both stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural strip electrodes (SSE) are used for intracranial electroencephalographic recordings in the invasive investigation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare SEEG and SSE with respect to feasibility, complications, and outcome in this single-center study.

METHODS

Patient characteristics, periprocedural parameters, complications, and outcome were acquired from a pro- and retrospectively managed databank to compare SEEG and SSE cases.

RESULTS

A total of 500 intracranial electroencephalographic monitoring cases in 450 patients were analyzed (145 SEEG and 355 SSE). Both groups were of similar age, gender distribution, and duration of epilepsy. Implantation of each SEEG electrode took 13.9 ± 7.6 min (20 ± 12 min for each SSE; P &lt; .01). Radiation exposure to the patient was 4.3 ± 7.7 s to a dose area product of 14.6 ± 27.9 rad*cm2 for SEEG and 9.4 ± 8.9 s with 21 ± 22.4 rad*cm2 for SSE (P &lt; .01). There was no difference in the length of stay (12.2 ± 7.2 and 12 ± 6.3 d). The complication rate was low in both groups. No infections were seen in SEEG cases (2.3% after SSE). The rate of hemorrhage was 2.8% for SEEG and 1.4% for SSE. Surgical outcome was similar.

CONCLUSION

SEEG allows targeting deeply situated foci with a non-inferior safety profile to SSE and seizure outcome comparable to SSE.

Analysis of Morbidity and Outcomes Associated With Use of Subdural Grids vs Stereoelectroencephalography in Patients With Intractable Epilepsy

Importance

A major change has occurred in the evaluation of epilepsy with the availability of robotic stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) for seizure localization. However, the comparative morbidity and outcomes of this minimally invasive procedure relative to traditional subdural electrode (SDE) implantation are unknown.

Objective

To perform a comparative analysis of the relative efficacy, procedural morbidity, and epilepsy outcomes consequent to SEEG and SDE in similar patient populations and performed by a single surgeon at 1 center.

Design, Setting and Participants

Overall, 239 patients with medically intractable epilepsy underwent 260 consecutive intracranial electroencephalographic procedures to localize their epilepsy. Procedures were performed from November 1, 2004, through June 30, 2017, and data were analyzed in June 2017 and August 2018.

Interventions

Implantation of SDE using standard techniques vs SEEG using a stereotactic robot, followed by resection or laser ablation of the seizure focus.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Length of surgical procedure, surgical complications, opiate use, and seizure outcomes using the Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale.

Results

Of the 260 cases included in the study (54.6% female; mean [SD] age at evaluation, 30.3 [13.1] years), the SEEG (n = 121) and SDE (n = 139) groups were similar in age (mean [SD], 30.1 [12.2] vs 30.6 [13.8] years), sex (47.1% vs 43.9% male), numbers of failed anticonvulsants (mean [SD], 5.7 [2.5] vs 5.6 [2.5]), and duration of epilepsy (mean [SD], 16.4 [12.0] vs17.2 [12.1] years). A much greater proportion of SDE vs SEEG cases were lesional (99 [71.2%] vs 53 [43.8%]; P < .001). Seven symptomatic hemorrhagic sequelae (1 with permanent neurological deficit) and 3 infections occurred in the SDE cohort with no clinically relevant complications in the SEEG cohort, a marked difference in complication rates (P = .003). A greater proportion of SDE cases resulted in resection or ablation compared with SEEG cases (127 [91.4%] vs 90 [74.4%]; P < .001). Favorable epilepsy outcomes (Engel class I [free of disabling seizures] or II [rare disabling seizures]) were observed in 57 of 75 SEEG cases (76.0%) and 59 of 108 SDE cases (54.6%; P = .003) amongst patients undergoing resection or ablation, at 1 year. An analysis of only nonlesional cases revealed good outcomes in 27 of 39 cases (69.2%) vs 9 of 26 cases (34.6%) at 12 months in SEEG and SDE cohorts, respectively (P = .006). When considering all patients undergoing evaluation, not just those undergoing definitive procedures, favorable outcomes (Engel class I or II) for SEEG compared with SDE were similar (57 of 121 [47.1%] vs 59 of 139 [42.4%] at 1 year; P = .45).

Conclusions and Relevance

This direct comparison of large matched cohorts undergoing SEEG and SDE implantation reveals distinctly better procedural morbidity favoring SEEG. These modalities intrinsically evaluate somewhat different populations, with SEEG being more versatile and applicable to a range of scenarios, including nonlesional and bilateral cases, than SDE. The significantly favorable adverse effect profile of SEEG should factor into decision making when patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy are considered for intracranial evaluations.

Method of invasive monitoring in epilepsy surgery and seizure freedom and morbidity: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Invasive monitoring is sometimes necessary to guide resective surgery in epilepsy patients, but the ideal method is unknown. In this systematic review, we assess the association of postresection seizure freedom and adverse events in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural electrodes (SDE).

METHODS

We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials]) from their inception to January 2018 with the keywords "electroencephalography," "intracranial grid," and "epilepsy." Studies that presented primary quantitative patient data for postresection seizure freedom with at least 1 year of follow-up or complication rates of SEEG- or SDE-monitored patients were included. Two trained investigators independently collected data from eligible studies. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used as a measure of the association of SEEG or SDE with seizure freedom and with adverse event outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 11 462 screened records, 48 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies reported on 1973 SEEG patients and 2036 SDE patients. Our systematic review revealed SEEG was associated with 61.0% and SDE was associated with 56.4% seizure freedom after resection (WMD = +5.8%, 95% CI = 4.7-6.9%, P = .001). Furthermore, SEEG was associated with 4.8% and SDE was associated with 15.5% morbidity (WMD = -10.6%, 95% CI = -11.6 to -9.6%, P = .001). SEEG was associated with 0.2% mortality and SDE was associated with 0.4% mortality (WMD = -0.2%, 95% CI = -0.3 to -0.1%, P = .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

In this systematic review of SEEG and SDE invasive monitoring techniques, SEEG was associated with fewer surgical resections yet better seizure freedom outcomes in those undergoing resections. SEEG was also associated with lower mortality and morbidity than SDE. Clinical studies directly comparing these modalities are necessary to understand the relative rates of seizure freedom, morbidity, and mortality associated with these techniques.

The Potential for a Speech Brain-Computer Interface Using Chronic Electrocorticography

A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a technology that uses neural features to restore or augment the capabilities of its user. A BCI for speech would enable communication in real time via neural correlates of attempted or imagined speech. Such a technology would potentially restore communication and improve quality of life for locked-in patients and other patients with severe communication disorders. There have been many recent developments in neural decoders, neural feature extraction, and brain recording modalities facilitating BCI for the control of prosthetics and in automatic speech recognition (ASR). Indeed, ASR and related fields have developed significantly over the past years, and many lend many insights into the requirements, goals, and strategies for speech BCI. Neural speech decoding is a comparatively new field but has shown much promise with recent studies demonstrating semantic, auditory, and articulatory decoding using electrocorticography (ECoG) and other neural recording modalities. Because the neural representations for speech and language are widely distributed over cortical regions spanning the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes, the mesoscopic scale of population activity captured by ECoG surface electrode arrays may have distinct advantages for speech BCI, in contrast to the advantages of microelectrode arrays for upper-limb BCI. Nevertheless, there remain many challenges for the translation of speech BCIs to clinical populations. This review discusses and outlines the current state-of-the-art for speech BCI and explores what a speech BCI using chronic ECoG might entail.

Neuroimaging methods in Epilepsy of Temporal Origin

Background:

Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) comprises the most common form of symptomatic refractory focal epilepsy in adults. Accurate lateralization and localization of the epileptogenic focus are a significant prerequisite for determining surgical candidacy once the patient has been deemed medically intractable. Structural MR imaging, clinical, electrophysiological, and neurophysiological data have an established role in the localization of the epileptogenic foci. Nevertheless, hippocampal sclerosis cannot be detected on MR images in more than 30% of patients with TLE, and the presurgical assessment remains controversial. </P><P> Discussion: In the last years, advanced MR imaging techniques, such as 1H-MRS, DWI, DTI, DSCI, and fMRI, may provide valuable additional information regarding the physiological and metabolic characterization of brain tissue. MR imaging has shifted towards functional and molecular imaging, thus, promising to improve the accuracy regarding the lateralization and the localization of the epileptogenic focus. Additionally, nuclear medicine studies, such as SPECT and PET imaging modalities, have become an asset for the decoding of brain function and activity, and can be diagnostically helpful as well, since they provide valuable data regarding the altered metabolic activity of the seizure foci.

Conclusion:

Overall, advanced MRI, SPECT, and PET imaging techniques are increasingly becoming an essential part of TLE diagnostics, when the epileptogenic area is not identified on structural MRI or when structural MRI, clinical, and electrophysiological findings are not in concordance.

Safety and Utility of Hybrid Depth Electrodes for Seizure Localization and Single-Unit Neuronal Recording

BACKGROUND

Invasive electrode monitoring provides more precise localization of epileptogenic foci in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. The use of hybrid depth electrodes that include microwires for simultaneous single-neuron monitoring is becoming more widespread.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and utility of hybrid depth electrodes for intracranial monitoring of medically refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical charts of 53 cases of medically refractory epilepsy operated on from 2006 to 2017, where both non-hybrid and hybrid microwire depth electrodes were used for intracranial monitoring. We assessed the localization accuracy and complications that arose to assess the relative safety and utility of hybrid depth electrodes compared with standard electrodes.

RESULTS

A total of 555 electrodes were implanted in 52 patients. The overall per-electrode complication rate was 2.3%, with a per-case complication rate of 20.8%. There were no infections or deaths. Serious or hemorrhagic complications occurred in 2 patients (0.4% per-electrode risk). Complications did not correlate with the use of any particular electrode type, and hybrids were equally as reliable as standard electrodes in localizing seizure onset zones.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid depth electrodes appear to be as safe and effective as standard depth electrodes for intracranial monitoring and provide unique opportunities to study the human brain at single-neuron resolution.

Neurosurgical Patients as Human Research Subjects: Ethical Considerations in Intracranial Electrophysiology Research

Intracranial electrical recordings and stimulation of neurosurgical patients have been central to the advancement of human neuroscience. The use of these methods has rapidly expanded over the last decade due to theoretical and technical advances, as well as the growing number of neurosurgical patients undergoing functional procedures for indications such as epilepsy, tumor resection, and movement disorders. These methods pose the potential for ethical conflict, as they involve basic neuroscientific research utilizing invasive procedures in human patients undergoing treatment for neurological illnesses. This review addresses technical aspects, clinical contexts, and issues of ethical concern, utilizing a framework that is informed by, but also departs from, existing bioethical literature on matters in clinical research. We conclude with proposals for improving informed consent processes to address potential problems specific to intracranial electrophysiology research, a general schema for scrutinizing research-related risk associated with different methods, and a call for the development of consensus to ensure continuing scientific progress alongside crucial patient protections in this promising area of human neuroscience.

Investigation of subdural electrode displacement in invasive epilepsy surgery workup using neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI

OBJECTIVES

One of the main obstacles of electrode implantation in epilepsy surgery is the electrode shift between implantation and the day of explantation. We evaluated this possible electrode displacement using intraoperative MRI (iopMRI) data and CT/MRI reconstruction.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (nine female, four male, median age 26 ± 9.4 years) suffering from drug-resistant epilepsy were examined. After implantation, the position of subdural electrodes was evaluated by 3.0 T-MRI and thin-slice CCT for 3D reconstruction. Localization of electrodes was performed with the volume-rendering technique. Post-implantation and pre-explantation 1.5 T-iopMRI scans were coregistered with the 3D reconstructions to determine the extent of electrode dislocation.

RESULTS

Intraoperative MRI at the time of explantation revealed a relevant electrode shift in one patient (8%) of 10 mm. Median electrode displacement was 1.7 ± 2.6 mm with a coregistration error of 1.9 ± 0.7 mm. The median accuracy of the neuronavigation system was 2.2 ± 0.9 mm. Six of twelve patients undergoing resective surgery were seizure free (Engel class 1A, median follow-up 37.5 ± 11.8 months).

CONCLUSION

Comparison of pre-explantation and post-implantation iopMRI scans with CT/MRI data using the volume-rendering technique resulted in an accurate placement of electrodes. In one patient with a considerable electrode dislocation, the surgical approach and extent was changed due to the detected electrode shift.

ABBREVIATIONS

ECoG: electrocorticography; EZ: epileptogenic zone; iEEG: invasive EEG; iopMRI: intraoperative MRI; MEG: magnetoencephalography; PET: positron emission tomography; SPECT: single photon emission computed tomography; 3D: three-dimensional.

Stable long-term BCI-enabled communication in ALS and locked-in syndrome using LFP signals

Restoring communication for people with locked-in syndrome remains a challenging clinical problem without a reliable solution. Recent studies have shown that people with paralysis can use brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on intracortical spiking activity to efficiently type messages. However, due to neuronal signal instability, most intracortical BCIs have required frequent calibration and continuous assistance of skilled engineers to maintain performance. Here, an individual with locked-in syndrome due to brain stem stroke and an individual with tetraplegia secondary to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) used a simple communication BCI based on intracortical local field potentials (LFPs) for 76 and 138 days, respectively, without recalibration and without significant loss of performance. BCI spelling rates of 3.07 and 6.88 correct characters/minute allowed the participants to type messages and write emails. Our results indicate that people with locked-in syndrome could soon use a slow but reliable LFP-based BCI for everyday communication without ongoing intervention from a technician or caregiver. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study demonstrates, for the first time, stable repeated use of an intracortical brain-computer interface by people with tetraplegia over up to four and a half months. The approach uses local field potentials (LFPs), signals that may be more stable than neuronal action potentials, to decode participants' commands. Throughout the several months of evaluation, the decoder remained unchanged; thus no technical interventions were required to maintain consistent brain-computer interface operation.

Verbal memory decline from hippocampal depth electrodes in temporal lobe surgery for epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether patients with refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy risk aggravated verbal memory loss from intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) recording with longitudinal hippocampal electrodes in the language-dominant hemisphere.

METHODS

A long-term neuropsychological follow-up (mean 61.5 months, range 22-111 months) was performed in 40 patients after ictal registration with left hippocampal depth electrodes (study group, n = 16) or no invasive EEG, only extracranial registration (reference group, n = 24). The groups were equal with respect to education, age at seizure onset, epilepsy duration, and prevalence of pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE; 75%) versus seizure freedom (25%). Retrospective neuropsychological data from preoperative surgical workup (T1) and prospective follow-up neuropsychological data (T2) were compared. A ≥1 SD intrapatient decline was considered as clinically relevant deterioration of verbal memory.

RESULTS

Significant decline in verbal memory was seen in 56% of the patients in the study group compared to 21% in the reference group. At T1, there were no statistical between-group differences in memory performance. At T2, between-group comparison showed significantly greater verbal memory decline for the study group (Claeson Dahl Learning and Retention Test, Verbal Learning: p = 0.05; Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Total Learning: p = 0.04; Claeson Dahl Learning and Retention Test, Verbal Retention: p = 0.04). An odds ratio (OR) of 7.1 (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-37.7) for verbal memory decline was seen if right temporal lobe resection (R TLR) had been performed between T1 and T2. The difference between groups remained unchanged when patients who had undergone R TLR were excluded from the analysis, with a remaining aggravated significant decline in verbal memory performance for the study group compared to the reference group.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results suggest a risk of verbal memory deterioration after the use of depth electrodes along the longitudinal axis of the hippocampus. Until this issue is further investigated, caution regarding depth electrodes in the language-dominant hemisphere hippocampus seems advisable.

Applications of a robotic stereotactic arm for pediatric epilepsy and neurooncology surgery

OBJECTIVE The ROSA device is a robotic stereotactic arm that uses a laser system to register the patient's head or spine with MR or CT images. In this study, the authors analyze their experience with this system in pediatric neurosurgical applications and present selected cases that exemplify the usefulness of this system. METHODS The authors reviewed all cases that utilized the ROSA system at their institution. Patient demographics, pathology, complications, electrode placement, laser ablation, and biopsy accuracy were analyzed. Patient disposition and condition at follow-up were also analyzed. RESULTS Seventeen patients underwent 23 procedures using the ROSA system. A total of 87 electroencephalography electrodes were placed, with 13% deviating more than 3 mm from target. Six patients underwent stereotactic needle biopsy, and 9 underwent laser interstitial thermotherapy (LITT). One patient who underwent LITT required a subsequent craniotomy for tumor resection. Another patient experienced an asymptomatic extraaxial hematoma that spontaneously resolved. No patient suffered neurological complications during follow-up. Follow-up from the last procedure averaged 180 days in epilepsy patients and 309 days in oncology patients. CONCLUSIONS The precision, ease of use, and versatility of the ROSA system make it well suited for pediatric neurosurgical practice. Further work, including long-term analysis of results and cost-effectiveness, will help determine the utility of this system and if its applications can be expanded.

Methodology, outcome, safety and in vivo accuracy in traditional frame-based stereoelectroencephalography

Background

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an established diagnostic technique for the localization of the epileptogenic zone in drug-resistant epilepsy. In vivo accuracy of SEEG electrode positioning is of paramount importance since higher accuracy may lead to more precise resective surgery, better seizure outcome and reduction of complications.

Objective

To describe experiences with the SEEG technique in our comprehensive epilepsy center, to illustrate surgical methodology, to evaluate in vivo application accuracy and to consider the diagnostic yield of SEEG implantations.

Methods

All patients who underwent SEEG implantations between September 2008 and April 2016 were analyzed. Planned electrode trajectories were compared with post-implantation trajectories after fusion of pre- and postoperative imaging. Quantitative analysis of deviation using Euclidean distance and directional errors was performed. Explanatory variables for electrode accuracy were analyzed using linear regression modeling. The surgical methodology, procedure-related complications and diagnostic yield were reported.

Results

Seventy-six implantations were performed in 71 patients, and a total of 902 electrodes were implanted. Median entry and target point deviations were 1.54 mm and 2.93 mm. Several factors that predicted entry and target point accuracy were identified. The rate of major complications was 2.6%. SEEG led to surgical therapy of various modalities in 53 patients (69.7%).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that entry and target point localization errors can be predicted by linear regression models, which can aid in identification of high-risk electrode trajectories and further enhancement of accuracy. SEEG is a reliable technique, as demonstrated by the high accuracy of conventional frame-based implantation methodology and the good diagnostic yield.

[Invasive stimulation procedures and EEG diagnostics in epilepsy]

Stimulation has been performed experimentally and in small case series to treat epilepsy since the 1970s. Since the introduction of vagus nerve stimulation in 1997 and intracranial stimulation methods in 2011 into patient care, invasive stimulation has become a rapidly developing but infrequently used therapeutic option in Europe. Whereas vagus nerve stimulation is frequently used, particularly in the USA, intracranial stimulation differs in its regional availability. In order to improve the efficacy of stimulation, develop criteria for its use and assure low complication rates, a concentration on experienced centers and multicenter data acquisition and sharing are needed.Invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with subdural electrodes and especially with stereotactically implanted depth electrodes have been used increasingly more often for presurgical evaluation in recent years. They are applied when non-invasive diagnostics show insufficient results to exactly identify the location and extent of the epileptogenic zone or cannot be adequately distinguished from eloquent cortex areas. Complications include intracranial hemorrhage, infections and increased intracranial pressure but lasting deficits or even death are rare (≤2 %). The outcome of invasive monitoring is inferior to non-invasive monitoring because of the higher degree of complexity of the cases; however, it is far superior to the seizure-free rates achieved by anticonvulsant drug treatment alone.

Somatic complications of epilepsy surgery over 25 years at a single center

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy surgery is an effective treatment for refractory focal epilepsy. Risks of surgery need to be considered when advising individuals of treatment options. We describe the frequency and nature of physical adverse events associated with epilepsy surgery in a single center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed the prospectively maintained records of adults who underwent epilepsy surgery at our center between 1990 and 2014 to identify peri/postsurgical adverse events. These were categorized into neurological deficits and those related to surgery (e.g. wound infections). Neurological deficits were categorized as expected or unexpected and into transient (≤3 months) or persistent (>3 months), RESULTS: There were 911 procedures with no peri-operative deaths. Persistent neurological adverse events were seen following 157 (17.2%) procedures. The most common persistent expected complication was quadrantanopia after temporal lobe resections (72/764, 9.4%). Unexpected persistent neurological complications occurred in 20 procedures (2.2%) and included: quadrantanopia (6, 0.7%); hemianopia (2, 0.2%); hemi/mono-paresis/sensory loss (9, 1%); dysphasia (10, 1%); frontalis muscle weakness (2, 0.2%); and oculomotor weakness (1, 0.1%). 106 surgery related adverse events occurred in 83 procedures, with severe infections requiring bone-flap removal in 24 (2.6%) procedures and intracranial infections in 8 (0.9%). The risk of post-resective severe infection increased by 4 fold (OR 4.32, 95% CI 2.1-8.9, p<0.001) with use of subdural EEG monitoring prior to resection. In consequence, in August 2011 we introduced antibiotic coverage in all individuals undergoing intracranial monitoring. Also, after August 2011 there was greater use of Stereo-EEG (SEEG) than subdural (OR 9.0 CI 0.36-224.2, p=0.18ns). One complicated by severe infection. Other surgical complications included haematoma (0.3%), hydrocephalus (0.3%) and CSF leak (1.2%). None had permanent complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse event rates are similar to other series. Epilepsy surgery carries well defined surgical and neurological risks. The risks of somatic adverse events, in addition to neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological complications need to be made clear to individuals considering this treatment option.

Epileptic Seizures in Patients Following Surgical Treatment of Acute Subdural Hematoma-Incidence, Risk Factors, Patient Outcome, and Development of New Scoring System for Prophylactic Antiepileptic Treatment (GATE-24 score)

OBJECT

Clinically evident or subclinical seizures are common manifestations in acute subdural hematoma (aSDH); however, there is a paucity of research investigating the relationship between seizures and aSDH. The purpose of this study is 2-fold: determine incidence and predictors of seizures and then establish a guideline in patients with aSDH to standardize the decision for prophylactic antiepileptic treatment.

METHOD

The author analyzed 139 patients with aSDH treated from 2007 until 2015. Baseline characteristics and clinical findings including Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at admission, 24 hours after operation, timing of operation, anticoagulation, and Glasgow Outcome Scale at hospital discharge and after 3 months were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to detect independent predictors of seizures, and a scoring system was developed.

RESULTS

Of 139 patients, overall incidence of seizures was 38%, preoperatively 16% and postoperatively 24%. Ninety percent of patients with preoperative seizures were seizure free after operation for 3 months. Independent predictors of seizures were GCS <9 (odds ratio [OR] 3.3), operation after 24 hours (OR 2.0), and anticoagulation (OR 2.2). Patients with seizures had a significantly higher rate of unfavorable outcome at hospital discharge (P = 0.001) and in 3-month follow-up (P = 0.002). Furthermore, a score system (GATE-24) was developed. In patients with GCS <14, anticoagulation, or surgical treatment 24 hours after onset, a prophylactic antiepileptic treatment is recommended.

CONCLUSION

Occurrence of seizures affected severity and outcomes after surgical treatment of aSDH. Therefore seizure prophylaxis should be considered in high-risk patients on the basis of the GATE-24 score to promote better clinical outcome.

Invasive epilepsy surgery evaluation

Intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings are widely used for the work up of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Different iEEG recording techniques namely subdural grids, strips, depth electrodes and stereoencephalography (SEEG) are available with distinct limitations and advantages. Epilepsy centres mastering multiple techniques apply them in an individualised patient approach. These tools are used to map the seizure onset zone which is pivotal in approximating the epileptogenic zone, i.e. the zone which is indispensable for the generation of seizures and when resected will render the patient seizure free. Besides, the implanted electrodes can be used to define eloquent cortex through direct cortical stimulation. Different clinical scenarios exist which favour one iEEG recording technique over the other. Proximity of the presumed epileptogenic zone to eloquent cortex, for example, is a clinical scenario which may favour grid electrodes over SEEG. We here review the indication for iEEG for the work-up of patients suffering from pharmacoresistant epilepsy. In addition, we provide a description of the recording techniques focussing on the main techniques used: grid electrodes, depth electrodes and stereoencephalography. We then outline different clinical scenarios and the preferred technical approach for intracranial recordings in these scenarios. Finally, we highlight which advances have been made in the field of iEEG and which advances are in the pipeline waiting to be established for clinical use. This review provides the clinician with an update on the diagnostic use of intracranial EEG for epilepsy surgery and thus aids in understanding patient selection for this technique which may ultimately improve referral patterns.

Current practices in long-term video-EEG monitoring services: A survey among partners of the E-PILEPSY pilot network of reference for refractory epilepsy and epilepsy surgery

PURPOSE

The European Union-funded E-PILEPSY network aims to improve awareness of, and accessibility to, epilepsy surgery across Europe. In this study we assessed current clinical practices in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) in the participating centers.

METHOD

A 60-item web-based survey was distributed to 25 centers (27 EMUs) of the E-PILEPSY network across 22 European countries. The questionnaire was designed to evaluate the characteristics of EMUs, including organizational aspects, admission, and observation of patients, procedures performed, safety issues, cost, and reimbursement.

RESULTS

Complete responses were received from all (100%) EMUs surveyed. Continuous observation of patients was performed in 22 (81%) EMUs during regular working hours, and in 17 EMUs (63%) outside of regular working hours. Fifteen (56%) EMUs requested a signed informed consent before admission. All EMUs performed tapering/withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs, 14 (52%) prior to admission to an EMU. Specific protocols on antiepileptic drugs (AED) tapering were available in four (15%) EMUs. Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) for the treatment of seizure clusters and status epilepticus were available in 16 (59%). Safety measures implemented by EMUs were: alarm seizure buttons in 21 (78%), restricted patient's ambulation in 19 (70%), guard rails in 16 (59%), and specially designated bathrooms in 7 (26%). Average costs for one inpatient day in EMU ranged between 100 and 2200 Euros.

CONCLUSION

This study shows a considerable diversity in the organization and practice patterns across European epilepsy monitoring units. The collected data may contribute to the development and implementation of evidence-based recommended practices in LTM services across Europe.

Contributions of Subsurface Cortical Modulations to Discrimination of Executed and Imagined Grasp Forces through Stereoelectroencephalography

Stereoelectroencephalographic (SEEG) depth electrodes have the potential to record neural activity from deep brain structures not easily reached with other intracranial recording technologies. SEEG electrodes were placed through deep cortical structures including central sulcus and insular cortex. In order to observe changes in frequency band modulation, participants performed force matching trials at three distinct force levels using two different grasp configurations: a power grasp and a lateral pinch. Signals from these deeper structures were found to contain information useful for distinguishing force from rest trials as well as different force levels in some participants. High frequency components along with alpha and beta bands recorded from electrodes located near the primary motor cortex wall of central sulcus and electrodes passing through sensory cortex were found to be the most useful for classification of force versus rest although one participant did have significant modulation in the insular cortex. This study electrophysiologically corroborates with previous imaging studies that show force-related modulation occurs inside of central sulcus and insular cortex. The results of this work suggest that depth electrodes could be useful tools for investigating the functions of deeper brain structures as well as showing that central sulcus and insular cortex may contain neural signals that could be used for control of a grasp force BMI.

Outcomes of Subdural Grid Electrode Monitoring in the Stereoelectroencephalography Era

BACKGROUND

Subdural grid (SDG) electrodes have been the gold standard of invasive monitoring in medically refractory epilepsy; however, in some centers, application of SDGs has been reduced by the progressive application of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). This study reviews the efficacy of SDG electrode monitoring after the incorporation of the SEEG methodology at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 102 patients undergoing intracranial monitoring via SDG electrodes during the years 2010-2013 at our institution. The series includes all patients who underwent SDG placement after the incorporation of SEEG in our extraoperative invasive monitoring armamentarium.

RESULTS

Average patient age was 29.9 years old; the series included 31 pediatric patients. There were 49 male patients and 53 female patients. The mean length of follow-up was 21.5 months. The epileptogenic zone was localized in 99 (97%) patients. Surgical resection was performed in 84 patients, and 70% experienced Engel class I freedom from seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive monitoring via SDG electrodes continues to be an efficacious option for select patients with medically refractory epilepsy, mainly when the hypothetical epileptogenic zone is anatomically restricted to superficial cortical areas and in close relation with eloquent cortex. This is the first report of epilepsy outcomes after SDG monitoring at a center that also performs SEEG monitoring. Our results suggest a complementary benefit of performing both techniques at 1 institution.