1
|
Blumenfeld A, Kudrow D, McAllister P, Boserup LP, Hirman J, Cady R. Long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in the treatment of patients with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache. Headache 2024; 64:738-749. [PMID: 38924044 DOI: 10.1111/head.14767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This post hoc analysis of the PREVAIL study explored the effectiveness of eptinezumab for up to 2 years of open-label treatment in the subgroup of patients with chronic migraine who had a confirmed diagnosis of medication-overuse headache (MOH) at screening. BACKGROUND MOH is a disabling and costly secondary headache disorder characterized by increased headache frequency and/or severity with increased acute headache medication use. Eptinezumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody, reduces headache frequency, severity, and associated disability and improves functioning and health-related quality of life as a preventive migraine therapy; short-term benefits in patients with concurrent MOH have also been reported. METHODS Participants received up to eight quarterly intravenous infusions of eptinezumab 300 mg in the phase 3, single-arm, open-label PREVAIL study. Safety and patient-reported outcome measures (Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS], 6-item Headache Impact Test [HIT-6], patient-identified most bothersome symptom [PI-MBS], Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC], and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36]) were conducted at predefined intervals. Patients were observed up to 20 weeks after their last infusion (Week 104). RESULTS A total of 49/128 (38.3%) patients enrolled in PREVAIL had an MOH diagnosis at screening. In the MOH subgroup, long-term eptinezumab treatment was associated with reductions in headache frequency (43/49 [87.8%] patients reported ≥50% reduction in MIDAS-derived headache days at ≥1 visit), severity (2.2-point reduction [on a 10-point scale]), disability (mean MIDAS total score reduction of 51.9 points), and impact (mean HIT-6 total score reduction of 9.7 points) at Week 104. Most patients described a "much improved" or "very much improved" status by Week 48 (PI-MBS, 31/46 [67.4%]) and Week 104 (PGIC, 31/36 [86.1%]). Health-related quality of life improvements in the SF-36 were also observed. CONCLUSION Eptinezumab preventive therapy in patients with chronic migraine showed benefits that extended to the subset of patients with concomitant MOH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Kudrow
- The Los Angeles Headache Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Peter McAllister
- New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Woodinville, Washington, USA
| | - Roger Cady
- RK Consults, Ozark, Missouri, USA
- Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri, USA
- Axon Therapeutics, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosignoli C, Caponnetto V, Onofri A, Trozzi V, Tartaglione L, Silvestro M, Russo A, Sacco S, Ornello R. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway improve the effectiveness of acute medication-a real-world study. Neurol Sci 2024; 45:3305-3312. [PMID: 38340218 PMCID: PMC11176241 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07380-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the aims of migraine prevention is to improve response to acute migraine treatments. The aim of the present study was to assess whether monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway (CGRP-mAbs) can improve the perceived efficacy of acute treatments. METHODS We included and followed up patients with chronic or episodic migraine from the Headache Centers of Avezzano-L'Aquila and Naples treated with CGRP-mAbs from March 2021 to December 2022. All patients filled out the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (MTOQ), the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and the Migraine Impact and Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) at baseline and 3-6 months after the start of treatment with CGRP-mAbs. RESULTS Sixty-five patients (81.3%) completed the 6-month follow-up. Most patients were female (55, 84.6%), with a median age of 46 years (IQR 39-56). Median MTOQ score increased from 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-13) at baseline to 15 (IQR 11-17) at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 16 (IQR 13-17) at the 6-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Median migraine days over 90-day periods decreased from 40 (IQR 24-60) to 24 (IQR 15-30) at 3 months (p < 0.001) and to 20 (IQR 12-24) at 6 months (p < 0.001). Median monthly intake of acute medication decreased from 55 doses (IQR 29-80.5) to 24 doses (IQR 15-40) at 3 months and 18 doses (IQR 11-30) at 6 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We showed that 6 months of preventive treatment with CGRP-mAbs led to a significantly better effectiveness of acute treatments, paralleled by decreased monthly migraine days and acute treatment intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Rosignoli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Valeria Caponnetto
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Agnese Onofri
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Vittorio Trozzi
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Tartaglione
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Silvestro
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Ferrari MD, Da Silva Lima GP, Mondal S, Kalim J, Hasan F, Wen S, Arkuszewski M, Pandhi S, Stites T, Lanteri-Minet M. Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Participants With Episodic Migraine in Whom 2-4 Prior Preventive Treatments Had Failed: LIBERTY 3-Year Study. Neurology 2024; 102:e209349. [PMID: 38669638 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000209349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The LIBERTY study assessed the efficacy and safety of erenumab in participants with episodic migraine (EM) and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures. The results have been presented after 3 years of erenumab exposure in its open-label extension phase (OLEP). METHODS Participants completing the 12-week double-blind treatment phase (DBTP) of the LIBERTY study could enter the OLEP and receive 140 mg of erenumab once monthly for 3 years. The main outcomes included the proportion of participants achieving ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs), the mean MMD change from baseline, and tolerability and safety. RESULTS Overall, 240/246 (97.6%) participants entered the OLEP and 168/240 (70.0%) completed the study (85/118 continuing erenumab [n = 1 lost during follow-up]; 83/122 switching from placebo [n = 2 lost during follow-up]). In the overall population, 79/151 participants (52.3%) with valid data points achieved ≥50% reduction in MMDs at week 168 (i.e., responders). In the continuous erenumab group, 35/117 participants (29.9%) were ≥50% responders at week 12 of the DBTP and 26/35 (74.3%) remained ≥50% responders in at least half of OLEP visits. Of the 82/117 participants (70.1%) not achieving responder status at week 12 in the continuous erenumab group, 17/82 (20.7%) converted to ≥50% responders in at least half of OLEP visits. Of 103/120 participants (85.8%) not achieving responder status at week 12 in the placebo-erenumab group, 42/103 (40.8%) converted to ≥50% responders in at least half of OLEP visits after switching to erenumab. Overall, the mean (SD) MMD change from baseline showed sustained improvement over 3 years (-4.4 [3.9] days at week 168). The most common treatment-emergent AEs (per 100 person-years) were nasopharyngitis (28.8), influenza (7.5), and back pain (5.8). Overall, 9.6% (3.9 per 100 person-years) and 6.7% (2.7 per 100 person-years) of participants reported events of treatment-emergent hypertension and constipation, respectively. The safety and tolerability profile remained consistent with earlier studies. DISCUSSION Erenumab (140 mg) showed sustained efficacy over 3 years in participants with EM and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures. No new safety signals were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03096834.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Reuter
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Michel D Ferrari
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Gabriel Paiva Da Silva Lima
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Subhayan Mondal
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jawed Kalim
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Fatima Hasan
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Shihua Wen
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Michal Arkuszewski
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Shaloo Pandhi
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Tracy Stites
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Michel Lanteri-Minet
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Ashina M, Tepper SJ, Jensen S, Boserup LP, Josiassen MK, Sperling B. Eptinezumab Demonstrated Efficacy Regardless of Prior Preventive Migraine Treatment Failure Type: Post Hoc Analyses of the DELIVER Study. Neurol Ther 2024; 13:339-353. [PMID: 38236314 PMCID: PMC10951156 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00575-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the DELIVER study, eptinezumab reduced monthly migraine days (MMDs) more than placebo in patients with 2-4 prior preventive migraine treatment failures. This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of eptinezumab across the 24-week placebo-controlled period of the DELIVER study in subgroups defined by prior treatment failure type. METHODS DELIVER (NCT04418765) randomized adults with migraine to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo, administered intravenously every 12 weeks. Changes from baseline in MMDs and percentages of patients with ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MMDs (≥ 50% migraine responder rates [MRRs]) were summarized in subgroups of patients defined by prior treatment failure type. Subgroups were not mutually exclusive and included patients for whom topiramate, beta blockers (metoprolol, propranolol), amitriptyline, and/or flunarizine had failed. RESULTS Across Weeks 1-12 in all subgroups, patients treated with eptinezumab experienced greater reductions from baseline in MMDs than those receiving placebo (reductions ranged from 4.5-5.5 vs 1.6-2.4, respectively), with larger reductions over Weeks 13-24. Similarly, ≥ 50% MRRs were consistently higher with eptinezumab than placebo and increased following a second infusion. CONCLUSION In all subgroups, regardless of prior preventive treatment failure type, eptinezumab demonstrated greater reductions in MMDs and higher MRRs compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04418765).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache Research Group, Department of Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stewart J Tepper
- New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen P, Karlsson MO, Ueckert S, Pritchard‐Bell A, Hsu C, Dutta S, Ahamadi M. Evaluation of the effect of erenumab on migraine-specific questionnaire in patients with chronic and episodic migraine. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2023; 12:1988-2000. [PMID: 37723849 PMCID: PMC10725274 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Erenumab is a fully human anti-canonical calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor monoclonal antibody approved for migraine prevention. The Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ) is a 14-item patient-reported outcome instrument that measures the impact of migraine on health-related quality of life. Erenumab data from four phase II/III clinical trials were used to develop an item response theory (IRT) model within a nonlinear mixed effects framework, (i) evaluate the MSQ item information with respect to patient disability, (ii) characterize the longitudinal progression of the MSQ, and (iii) quantify the effect of erenumab on the MSQ in patients with migraine. The majority (80%) of information was found to be contained in 9 out of 14 items, extending the current knowledge on the reliability of the MSQ as a psychometric tool. Simulations across three MSQ domains show significant improvement from baseline, exceeding minimally important differences. Overall, the IRT model platform developed herein allows for systematic quantification of the effect of erenumab on the MSQ in patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po‐Wei Chen
- Clinical Pharmacology Modeling and SimulationAmgen Inc.Thousand OaksCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | - Ari Pritchard‐Bell
- Clinical Pharmacology Modeling and SimulationAmgen Inc.Thousand OaksCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Sandeep Dutta
- Clinical Pharmacology Modeling and SimulationAmgen Inc.Thousand OaksCaliforniaUSA
| | - Malidi Ahamadi
- Clinical Pharmacology Modeling and SimulationAmgen Inc.Thousand OaksCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ashina M, Tepper SJ, Gendolla A, Sperling B, Ettrup A, Josiassen MK, Starling AJ. Long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures: extension of a randomized controlled trial. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:155. [PMID: 37985968 PMCID: PMC10662788 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01688-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eptinezumab demonstrated efficacy in adults with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures in the placebo-controlled phase of the DELIVER clinical trial; its long-term effectiveness in this population has not yet been reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in a migraine patient population during the 48-week extension phase of DELIVER. METHODS DELIVER was conducted June 1, 2020 to September 15, 2022. 865 adults with migraine, with documented evidence of 2-4 prior preventive migraine treatment failures and with completion of the 24-week placebo-controlled period of DELIVER received eptinezumab (100 or 300 mg) during the dose-blinded extension, either continuing their randomized dose or, if originally receiving placebo, were randomized 1:1 to an eptinezumab dose (100 or 300 mg). A mixed model for repeated measures was used to evaluate changes from baseline in the number of monthly migraine days (MMDs). RESULTS Of 865 patients entering the extension (eptinezumab 100 mg, n = 433; 300 mg, n = 432), 782 (90.4%) completed and 11 (1.3%) discontinued due to an adverse event. Eptinezumab was associated with early and sustained reductions in migraine frequency. Mean MMDs at baseline were approximately 14 days across groups. Mean (standard error) change from baseline in MMDs over the final dosing interval (weeks 61-72) was -6.4 (0.50) with placebo/eptinezumab 100 mg, -7.3 (0.49) with placebo/eptinezumab 300 mg, -7.1 (0.39) with eptinezumab 100 mg, and -7.0 (0.39) with eptinezumab 300 mg. During weeks 61-72, 63-70% of patients demonstrated ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs, and 36-45% demonstrated ≥ 75% reduction. Headache severity and acute medication use reductions, and patient-reported improvements in most bothersome symptom, disease status, quality of life, and work productivity, were observed. Adverse events were generally mild, transient, and similar in frequency/type to previous eptinezumab trials. CONCLUSIONS The long-term effectiveness and safety/tolerability of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures was demonstrated by high completion rates and migraine-preventive benefits sustained for up to 18 months, implying that eptinezumab is a viable long-term treatment option for patients still seeking successful migraine treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04418765; URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ct2/show/NCT04418765 ); EudraCT (Identifier: 2019-004497-25; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2019-004497-25 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Glostrup Valdemar Hansen Vej 5, Glostrup, DK-2600, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Stewart J Tepper
- The New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Robblee J. Breaking the cycle: unraveling the diagnostic, pathophysiological and treatment challenges of refractory migraine. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1263535. [PMID: 37830088 PMCID: PMC10565861 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1263535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Refractory migraine is a poorly described complication of migraine in which migraine has chronified and become resistant to standard treatments. The true prevalence is unknown, but medication resistance is common in headache clinic patient populations. Given the lack of response to treatment, this patient population is extremely difficult to treat with limited guidance in the literature. Objective To review the diagnostic, pathophysiological, and management challenges in the refractory migraine population. Discussion There are no accepted, or even ICHD-3 appendix, diagnostic criteria for refractory migraine though several proposed criteria exist. Current proposed criteria often have low bars for refractoriness while also not meeting the needs of pediatrics, lower socioeconomic status, and developing nations. Pathophysiology is unknown but can be hypothesized as a persistent "on" state as a progression from chronic migraine with increasing central sensitization, but there may be heterogeneity in the underlying pathophysiology. No guidelines exist for treatment of refractory migraine; once all guideline-based treatments are tried, treatment consists of n-of-1 treatment trials paired with non-pharmacologic management. Conclusion Refractory migraine is poorly described diagnostically, its pathophysiology can only be guessed at by extension of chronic migraine, and treatment is more the art than science of medicine. Navigating care of this refractory population will require multidisciplinary care models and an emphasis on future research to answer these unknowns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Robblee
- Department of Neurology, Dignity Health, St Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Lewis Headache Clinic, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang YF, Wang SJ, Huang YH, Chen YT, Yen YC, Shia BC, Tsai CW, Chan HF, Panni T, Dell’Agnello G. Treatment pattern and health care resource utilization for Taiwanese patients with migraine: a population-based study. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1222912. [PMID: 37654430 PMCID: PMC10466390 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1222912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Given the substantial disease burden, appropriate and effective management of migraine is a public health priority. To gain insights into real-world migraine management practices in Taiwan, current treatment patterns, costs, and health care resource use were assessed. Methods This was a retrospective, longitudinal study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Included patients had an initial diagnosis of migraine (defined using International Classification of Diseases codes) between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017. Data analyzed included demographics; the use, number, and type of acute and preventive medications; and drug and medical services costs. Data were stratified according to migraine type (chronic [CM] or episodic [EM] migraine). Results A total of 312,718 patients were included in the analyses: 53,992 (17.3%) had CM and 258,726 (82.7%) had EM. Most patients (81.7%) had used acute and/or preventive medications; acute medications used more frequently than preventive medications (78.0% vs. 20.2%). Acute medications were used by 81.6 and 77.3% of patients with CM and EM, respectively. Commonly used acute medications were acetaminophen (68.8%), ergots (49.4%), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (38.4%); the use of triptans (6.0%), tramadol (3.1%), and other opioids (0.2%) was less common. A total of 28.6 and 18.5% of patients with CM and EM, respectively, used preventive medications. Flunarizine (68.9%), propranolol (40.7%), and topiramate (16.0%) were the most commonly used preventive medications. Most patients had used 1-2 acute or preventive medications, with the use of ≥3 acute or preventive medications more common in patients with CM than EM. Average total medical cost per annum was 4,169 New Taiwan Dollars (NTDs) per CM patient and 2,928 NTDs per EM patient, with CM patients having higher costs associated with medical service utilization and acute medication use. Conclusion These real-world data suggest unmet needs for Taiwanese patients with migraine, including under-utilization of preventive medications and greater costs and health care resource use for patients with CM versus EM. These findings provide important information on treatment patterns, cost, and health care resource use for patients with migraine in Taiwan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Feng Wang
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Nephrology, Taipei City Hospital Heping Fuyou Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chun Yen
- Clinical Information Department, Quality Management Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ben-Chang Shia
- Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Wen Tsai
- Health Data Analytics and Statistics Center, Office of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hoi-Fong Chan
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Tommaso Panni
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Silvestro M, Orologio I, Siciliano M, Trojsi F, Tessitore A, Tedeschi G, Russo A. Emerging drugs for the preventive treatment of migraine: a review of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants trials. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2023. [PMID: 37185047 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2023.2207819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is a leading cause of years lived with disability and preventive strategies represent a mainstay to reduce health-related disability and improve quality of life of migraine patients. Until a few years ago, migraine prevention was based on drugs developed for other clinical indications and relocated in the migraine therapeutic armamentarium, characterized by unfavourable tolerability profiles. The advent of monoclonal antibodies against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) and gepants, CGRP receptor antagonists, has been a turning point in migraine prevention owing to advantageous efficacy, safety and tolerability profiles.Nevertheless, while in an ideal scenario a drug characterized by significant greater efficacy and tolerability compared to existing therapeutic strategies should be adopted as a first-line treatment, cost-effectiveness analyses available for monoclonal antibodies against CGRP pathway tend to limit their administration to more severe migraine phenotypes. AREAS COVERED The present narrative review aim to provide a critical appraisal of phase II and III CGRP-mAbs and gepants trials to analyse their use in clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION Despite monoclonal antibodies against CGRP pathway and gepants can be undoubtedly considered top-of-the-range treatments, there are still issues deserving to be addressed in the coming years as the risk of off-target effects as well as their economic sustainability based on the considerable migraine burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Silvestro
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Ilaria Orologio
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Mattia Siciliano
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Francesca Trojsi
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Alessandro Tessitore
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bagherzadeh-Fard M, Amin Yazdanifar M, Sadeghalvad M, Rezaei N. Erenumab efficacy in migraine headache prophylaxis: A systematic review. Int Immunopharmacol 2023; 117:109366. [PMID: 37012858 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to show the efficiency of Erenumab in the preventive therapy of episodic and chronic migraine, which is still under research. BACKGROUND Migraine is a chronic neurovascular disorder that causes disability and a social burden. There are various medications used for migraine prevention regimens, most of which have unwanted side effects and aren't often quite effective. Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors and was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for migraine prevention. METHODS For this systematic review, we searched through Scopus and PubMed databases using "Erenumab" or "AMG 334" and "migraine" as keywords, and all the studies from 2016 to March 18, 2022, were included. Original English articles assessing any outcomes referring to the efficacy of Erenumab in migraine headache treatment were included in this study. RESULTS We found 53 out of 605 papers eligible to be investigated. Erenumab in both dosages of 70 mg and 140 mg could decrease the mean of monthly migraine days and monthly acute migraine-specific medication days. Erenumab also has a higher rate of ≥ 50 %, ≥ 75 %, and 100 % reduction in monthly migraine days from the baseline in different regions. The efficacy of Erenumab was initiated in the first week of administration and sustained throughout and after treatment. Erenumab was also potent in the treatment of migraine with allodynia, aura, prior preventive therapy failure, medication overuse headache, and menstrual migraine. Erenumab also had favorable outcomes in combination therapy with other preventive drugs like Onabotulinumtoxin-A. CONCLUSION Erenumab had remarkable efficacy in the short and long-term treatment of episodic and chronic migraine, notably the patients with difficult-to-treat migraine headaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Bagherzadeh-Fard
- Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Expert Group (SRMEG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Yazdanifar
- Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Expert Group (SRMEG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Mona Sadeghalvad
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Expert Group (SRMEG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran; Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nima Rezaei
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran,Iran; Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee MJ, Al-Karagholi MAM, Reuter U. New migraine prophylactic drugs: Current evidence and practical suggestions for non-responders to prior therapy. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024221146315. [PMID: 36759320 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221146315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs) and small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) are new mechanism-based prophylactic drugs developed to address the unmet needs of pre-existing migraine prophylactic medications. However, several uncertainties remain in their real-world applications. METHODS This is a narrative review of the literature on the use of CGRP-targeting novel therapeutics in specific situations, including non-responders to prior therapy, combination therapy, switching, and treatment termination. In the case of lack of available literature, we made suggestions based on clinical reasoning. RESULTS High-quality evidence supports the use of all available anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab) in non-responders to prior therapy. There is insufficient evidence to support or reject the efficacy of combining CGRP(-R) mAbs or gepants with oral migraine prophylactic agents or botulinum toxin A. Switching from one CGRP(-R) mAb to another might benefit a fraction of patients. Currently, treatment termination depends on reimbursement policies, and the optimal mode of termination is discussed. CONCLUSIONS New prophylactic drugs that target the CGRP pathway are promising treatment options for patients with difficult-to-treat migraine. Individualized approaches using a combination of new substances with oral prophylactic drugs or botulinum toxin A, switching between new drugs, and adjusting treatment duration could enhance excellence in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mohammad Al-Mahdi Al-Karagholi
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Greifswald, Germany.,Board of Directors, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Raffaelli B, De Icco R, Corrado M, Terhart M, Ailani J. Open-label trials for CGRP-targeted drugs in migraine prevention: A narrative review. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024221137091. [PMID: 36718044 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221137091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted drugs have proven safe and effective for migraine prevention in large randomized-controlled, double-blind trials with an average duration of six months. Open-label studies may provide additional information on the long-term safety and efficacy of these substances. METHODS We searched PubMed for open-label trials with calcitonin gene-related peptide(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies and calcitonin gene-related peptide-receptor antagonists. We summarized and critically analyzed the literature in a narrative way. RESULTS Overall, 13 open-label trials were included in this review (n = 4 for erenumab, n = 4 for galcanezumab, n = 3 for fremanezumab, n = 1 for eptinezumab, n = 1 for atogepant). Open-label trial duration ranged between 12 and 264 weeks. No safety concerns emerged, and the adverse events profile was similar to the double-blind study phase. Discontinuation rates were generally low with >75% of patients remaining in the trials after one year. Efficacy data showed a sustained reduction of migraine frequency throughout the trials, along with a lasting improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS The open-label study program for calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted migraine preventives confirms the favorable safety and efficacy profile of these drugs over time. Treatment adherence appears higher than with previous unspecific migraine preventives. Real-world data and post-marketing surveillance studies may corroborate and complement open-label results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roberto De Icco
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michele Corrado
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Terhart
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jessica Ailani
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Erenumab in Patients with Migraine: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-analysis. Clin Drug Investig 2023; 43:45-59. [PMID: 36482037 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-022-01230-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Several studies on use of erenumab for migraine treatment have been published over recent years. However, its long-term safety and effectiveness have not been consistently established in the literature yet. We aimed to perform a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the long-term safety and effectiveness of erenumab for the treatment of migraine headaches. METHODS Long-term follow-up was defined as ≥ 1 year. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to 14 June 2022 for studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Fourteen studies, comprising 3574 patients, were included. The total follow-up period ranged from 48 to 268 weeks (i.e., 1 year to 5.6 years). Pooled estimate rates for all adverse events (AEs) were 63% (95% CI 46-78); for serious AEs, 3% (95% CI 1-7); and for AEs leading to discontinuation of erenumab, 3% (95% CI 2-5). Reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) was -6.98 (95% CI -8.90 to -5.05) and in migraine-specific medication days (MSMDs) was - 6.09 (95% CI - 9.43 to - 2.75). More than half (57%; 95% CI 51-63) and around one-third (35%; 95% CI 28-42) of patients presented with reductions of ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% in MMDs, respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score was decreased by -9.68 points (95% CI - 12.03 to - 7.34). Nine studies were considered of poor methodological quality and five of fair quality. CONCLUSIONS Erenumab has a favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of serious AEs, and sustained efficacy over ≥1 year of follow-up in the treatment of migraine.
Collapse
|
14
|
Paez-Mayorga J, Campa-Carranza JN, Capuani S, Hernandez N, Liu HC, Chua CYX, Pons-Faudoa FP, Malgir G, Alvarez B, Niles JA, Argueta LB, Shelton KA, Kezar S, Nehete PN, Berman DM, Willman MA, Li XC, Ricordi C, Nichols JE, Gaber AO, Kenyon NS, Grattoni A. Implantable niche with local immunosuppression for islet allotransplantation achieves type 1 diabetes reversal in rats. Nat Commun 2022; 13:7951. [PMID: 36572684 PMCID: PMC9792517 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35629-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic islet transplantation efficacy for type 1 diabetes (T1D) management is limited by hypoxia-related graft attrition and need for systemic immunosuppression. To overcome these challenges, we developed the Neovascularized Implantable Cell Homing and Encapsulation (NICHE) device, which integrates direct vascularization for facile mass transfer and localized immunosuppressant delivery for islet rejection prophylaxis. Here, we investigated NICHE efficacy for allogeneic islet transplantation and long-term diabetes reversal in an immunocompetent, male rat model. We demonstrated that allogeneic islets transplanted within pre-vascularized NICHE were engrafted, revascularized, and functional, reverting diabetes in rats for over 150 days. Notably, we confirmed that localized immunosuppression prevented islet rejection without inducing toxicity or systemic immunosuppression. Moreover, for translatability efforts, we showed NICHE biocompatibility and feasibility of deployment as well as short-term allogeneic islet engraftment in an MHC-mismatched nonhuman primate model. In sum, the NICHE holds promise as a viable approach for safe and effective islet transplantation and long-term T1D management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesus Paez-Mayorga
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA ,grid.419886.a0000 0001 2203 4701School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL Mexico
| | - Jocelyn Nikita Campa-Carranza
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA ,grid.419886.a0000 0001 2203 4701School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL Mexico
| | - Simone Capuani
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Shijingshan, Beijing, China
| | - Nathanael Hernandez
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA
| | - Hsuan-Chen Liu
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA
| | - Corrine Ying Xuan Chua
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA
| | - Fernanda Paola Pons-Faudoa
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA
| | - Gulsah Malgir
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA
| | - Bella Alvarez
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA ,grid.419886.a0000 0001 2203 4701School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL Mexico
| | - Jean A. Niles
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Center for Tissue Engineering, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA
| | - Lissenya B. Argueta
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Center for Tissue Engineering, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA
| | - Kathryn A. Shelton
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Comparative Medicine, Michael E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX USA
| | - Sarah Kezar
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Comparative Medicine, Michael E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX USA
| | - Pramod N. Nehete
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Comparative Medicine, Michael E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX USA ,grid.267308.80000 0000 9206 2401The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, TX USA
| | - Dora M. Berman
- grid.26790.3a0000 0004 1936 8606Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA ,grid.26790.3a0000 0004 1936 8606Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA
| | - Melissa A. Willman
- grid.26790.3a0000 0004 1936 8606Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA
| | - Xian C. Li
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX USA ,grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Immunobiology and Transplant Science Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX USA
| | - Camillo Ricordi
- grid.26790.3a0000 0004 1936 8606Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA
| | - Joan E. Nichols
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Center for Tissue Engineering, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA ,grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX USA
| | - A. Osama Gaber
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX USA
| | - Norma S. Kenyon
- grid.26790.3a0000 0004 1936 8606Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA ,grid.26790.3a0000 0004 1936 8606Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA ,grid.26790.3a0000 0004 1936 8606Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA ,grid.26790.3a0000 0004 1936 8606Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA ,grid.26790.3a0000 0004 1936 8606Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA
| | - Alessandro Grattoni
- grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX USA ,grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX USA ,grid.26790.3a0000 0004 1936 8606Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA ,grid.63368.380000 0004 0445 0041Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Andreou AP, Fuccaro M, Hill B, Murphy M, Caponnetto V, Kilner R, Lambru G. Two-year effectiveness of erenumab in resistant chronic migraine: a prospective real-world analysis. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:139. [PMID: 36333710 PMCID: PMC9635079 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01507-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Controlled and real-world evidence have demonstrated the efficacy of calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MABs) in migraine. However, data on the over-one-year sustained effectiveness of CGRP MABs in resistant chronic migraine (CM) is sparse. Methods This is a two-year real-world prospective analysis of an ongoing single centre audit conducted in patients with resistant CM. Patients received monthly erenumab for six months before assessing its effectiveness. Responders were considered those who achieved at least 30% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) by month 6, compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes were also analysed, including changes of the Headache Impact Test version 6 (HIT-6). Results One hundred sixty-four patients [135 (82.3%) females; mean age 46 SD 14) years] were included in the audit and 160 patients analysed. Patients had failed a mean of 8.4 preventive treatments at baseline. At month 6, 76 patients (48%) were 30% responders to erenumab, 50 patients (31%) were 50% responders and 25 (15%) were 75% responders. The mean reduction in MMD at month 6 was 7.5 days compared to baseline (P < 0.001). At month 12 and month 18, 61 patients (38%) and 52 patients (33%) remained 30% responders respectively. At month 24, 36 patients (23%) remained 30% responders, 25 patients (16%) and 13 patients (8%) were respectively 50% and 75% responders. Compared to 95% of patients at baseline, at months 6, 12 and 24, 46%, 29% and 16% of responders respectively had severe disability. At least one adverse event at month 6, 12, 18 and 24 was reported by 49%, 19%, 11% and 3% of patients. By month 6, 13% of patients discontinued the treatment because of side effects, often constipation. Conclusions Long-term sustained effectiveness of erenumab was reported only by a minority of resistant CM patients. Although more research in resistant migraine is needed, Erenumab can provide long-term meaningful reduction in migraine load and migraine-related disability in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna P. Andreou
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Headache Research-Wolfson CARD, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Matteo Fuccaro
- grid.420545.20000 0004 0489 3985Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bethany Hill
- grid.420545.20000 0004 0489 3985Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Madeleine Murphy
- grid.420545.20000 0004 0489 3985Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Valeria Caponnetto
- grid.158820.60000 0004 1757 2611Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Rachael Kilner
- grid.420545.20000 0004 0489 3985Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Giorgio Lambru
- grid.420545.20000 0004 0489 3985Headache and Facial Pain Service, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shen Q, Jin Y, Di X, Hu C, Liu R, Wang Y, Qi X, Wang Y, Wang Z. Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Erenumab after a Single Subcutaneous Injection Dose in Healthy Chinese Subjects. Clin Drug Investig 2022; 42:623-630. [PMID: 35727536 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-022-01171-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Erenumab is the first-in-class, selective, and competitive human monoclonal antibody antagonist of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor that has been shown to be effective and well-tolerated in the preventive therapy of episodic and chronic migraine. The pharmacokinetics of erenumab may be affected by differences in race and ethnicity, which can lead to suboptimal outcomes. The present study was conducted to assess the single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of erenumab in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS This was an open-label, randomized, parallel group, non-confirmatory, single-dose study in healthy Chinese subjects. A total of 24 healthy Chinese subjects of both sexes aged between 14 and 45 years were administered a single subcutaneous injection of erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg. The serum concentration of erenumab was quantified using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using non-compartmental models. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS A total of 55 subjects were screened for eligibility and 25 subjects were randomized to receive study treatments (12 subjects to the 70-mg erenumab group and 13 subjects to the 140-mg erenumab group). Erenumab was absorbed slowly with maximum serum concentration (Cmax) occurring 3-11 days after administration. The mean Cmax and area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time 0 to infinity with extrapolation of the terminal phase (AUC0-∞) were 9.20 µg/mL and 296 day·µg/mL for the 70 mg dose group, and 15.6 µg/mL and 569 day·µg/mL for the 140 mg dose group, respectively. Serum concentrations of erenumab exhibited low to high variability, with variable coefficients ranging from 17.1 to 72.2% for the 70-mg dose and 32.5 to 88.5% for the 140-mg dose. All adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity, and all resolved without intervention. CONCLUSIONS Erenumab was safe and well tolerated after a single subcutaneous injection in healthy Chinese subjects. The systemic exposure in Chinese subjects in terms of AUC0-∞ was 70% higher than that in White subjects as previously reported. CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NO ChiCTR2000032435.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Shen
- Clinical Trial Center/NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No.5 Telecom Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Ying Jin
- Clinical Trial Center/NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No.5 Telecom Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xiangjie Di
- Clinical Trial Center/NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No.5 Telecom Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Chao Hu
- Clinical Trial Center/NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No.5 Telecom Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Runhan Liu
- Clinical Trial Center/NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No.5 Telecom Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Clinical Trial Center/NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No.5 Telecom Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xiaohui Qi
- Clinical Trial Center/NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No.5 Telecom Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Yongsheng Wang
- Clinical Trial Center/NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No.5 Telecom Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Zhenlei Wang
- Clinical Trial Center/NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No.5 Telecom Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|