Biological activity of interferon betas in patients with multiple sclerosis is affected by treatment regimen and neutralising antibodies

Deimmunization of protein therapeutics - Recent advances in experimental and computational epitope prediction and deletion

Biotherapeutics, and antimicrobial proteins in particular, are of increasing interest for human medicine. An important challenge in the development of such therapeutics is their potential immunogenicity, which can induce production of anti-drug-antibodies, resulting in altered pharmacokinetics, reduced efficacy, and potentially severe anaphylactic or hypersensitivity reactions. For this reason, the development and application of effective deimmunization methods for protein drugs is of utmost importance. Deimmunization may be achieved by unspecific shielding approaches, which include PEGylation, fusion to polypeptides (e.g., XTEN or PAS), reductive methylation, glycosylation, and polysialylation. Alternatively, the identification of epitopes for T cells or B cells and their subsequent deletion through site-directed mutagenesis represent promising deimmunization strategies and can be accomplished through either experimental or computational approaches. This review highlights the most recent advances and current challenges in the deimmunization of protein therapeutics, with a special focus on computational epitope prediction and deletion tools.

Blood lymphocyte subsets identify optimal responders to IFN-beta in MS

Response to interferon-beta (IFN-beta) treatment is heterogeneous in multiple sclerosis (MS). We aimed to search for biomarkers predicting no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) status upon IFN-beta treatment in MS. 119 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) initiating IFN-beta treatment were included in the study, and followed prospectively for 2 years. Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were explored in serum samples obtained after 6 and 12 months of IFN-beta treatment. Soluble cytokines and blood lymphocytes were studied in basal samples by ELISA and flow cytometry, respectively. 9% of patients developed NAb. These antibodies were more frequent in patients receiving IFN-beta 1b than in those treated subcutaneous (p = 0.008) or intramuscular (p < 0.0001) IFN-beta 1a. No patient showing NAb remained NEDA during follow-up. Basal immunological variables are also associated with patient response. Percentages below 3% of CD19 + CD5 + cells (AUC 0.74, CI 0.63-0.84; OR 10.68, CI 3.55-32.15, p < 0.0001; Likelihood ratio 4.28) or above 2.6% of CD8 + perforin + T cells (AUC 0.79, CI 0.63-0.96; OR 6.11, CI 2.0-18.6, p = 0.0009; Likelihood ratio 5.47) increased the probability of achieving NEDA status during treatment. Basal blood immune cell subsets contribute to identify MS patients with a high probability of showing an optimal response to IFN-beta.

Real-time TaqMan assay for myxovirus resistance protein (MxA) mRNA: a robust marker of interferon beta bioactivity in patients with multiple sclerosis

For many patients suffering from MS, interferon beta (IFNβ) is an effective therapeutic option; however, some patients who receive long-term IFNβ therapy for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) develop neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) that affect IFNβ efficacy. It is therefore important to evaluate patients' therapeutic response to IFNβ over time. Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA), a surrogate marker of individual immunologic response to IFNβ, may be a useful tool for assessing IFNβ immunogenicity. The real-time TaqMan assay for MxA messenger RNA (mRNA) has several distinct advantages, including the ability to amplify and complete quantitative analyses in one step, a high degree of quality control and prior experience and confidence in the field of quantitative viral diagnostics. The real-time TaqMan assay for MxA mRNA can be incorporated as a component of IFNβ therapy to evaluate patients during the course of treatment. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: S49—S52. http://msj.sagepub.com

Comparative effectiveness of interferons in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis of real-world studies

BACKGROUND

Differences between interferons have been evaluated for over 20 years. While randomized controlled trial (RCT) data is mainly used for assessments and strong data for causal inferences, it does not necessarily reflect everyday practice. Real-world data may provide additional information.

PURPOSE

To assess the results, quality, and representativeness of observational studies directly comparing interferons (IFNs) in RRMS.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched for observational studies comparing IFN-beta-1a 30 mcg IM (Avonex ¹ ), IFN-beta-1a 44 mcg SC (Rebif ² ) and/or IFN-beta-1b 250 mcg SC (Betaseron ³ ). Outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR), proportions relapse free, confirmed progression free, treatment persistence, and neutralizing antibodies rates (NABs) measured up to 5 years of treatment. Data was combined using random effects meta-analyses. Categorical values were analyzed using chi-squared and Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies examining 32,026 patients (72.5% females, age = 39.2 ± 3.7 years, disease duration = 5.6 ± 2.0 years) were identified. Thirty-three studies investigated IFN-beta-1a IM (N = 11,925), 30 IFN-beta-1a SC (N = 10,684) and 34 IFN-beta-1b SC (N = 9417). Baseline ARRs were similar (1.37 ± 0.35, 1.51 ± 0.27 and 1.55 ± 0.23, respectively; P = .101) as were EDSS scores (2.24 ± 0.39, 2.33 ± 0.30, 2.55 ± 0.38; P = .070) and >75% were naïve to IFNs. On treatment, ARRs were comparable (IFN-beta-1a IM 0.52 ± 0.27, IFN-beta-1a SC 0.51 ± 0.24, IFN-beta-1b SC 0.55 ± 0.23; P = .595). Proportions of relapse-free patients were similar between drugs (P > .05 for all data points), except that IFN-beta-1a SC was superior to IFN-beta-1b SC in years 3-5 (all P ≤ .001). After 1 year, EDSS scores were comparable; after 2 years, IFN-beta-1a IM and IFN-beta-1a SC incurred less disease progression than IFN-beta-1b SC (P < .02). Confirmed progression-free rates and persistence were similar over 5 years. Fewer patients developed NABs with IFN-beta-1a IM (4.7 ± 1.5%) versus IFN-beta-1a SC (21.4 ± 2.8%) (P < 0.001) or IFN-beta-1b SC (32.2% ± 3.3%) (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this comprehensive meta-analysis of real-world studies in RRMS, IFN-beta-1a IM, IFN-beta-1a SC and IFN-beta-1b SC had similar clinical profiles. When selecting an IFN, practitioners should consider observational data in their decision making process.

Myxovirus Resistance Protein A mRNA Expression Kinetics in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with IFNβ

Introduction

Interferon-β (IFNß) is the first-line treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) is a marker of IFNß bioactivity, which may be reduced by neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against IFNß. The aim of the study was to analyze the kinetics of MxA mRNA expression during long-term IFNβ treatment and assess its predictive value.

Methods

A prospective, observational, open-label, non-randomized study was designed in multiple sclerosis patients starting IFNß treatment. MxA mRNA was assessed prior to initiation of IFNß therapy and every three months subsequently. NAbs were assessed every six months. Assessment of relapses was scheduled every three months during 24 months of follow up. The disease activity was correlated to the pretreatment baseline MxA mRNA value. In NAb negative patients, clinical status was correlated to MxA mRNA values.

Results

119 patients were consecutively enrolled and 107 were included in the final analysis. There was no correlation of MxA mRNA expression levels between baseline and month three. Using survival analysis, none of the selected baseline MxA mRNA cut off points allowed prediction of time to first relapse on the treatment. In NAb negative patients, mean MxA mRNA levels did not significantly differ in patients irrespective of relapse status.

Conclusion

Baseline MxA mRNA does not predict the response to IFNß treatment or the clinical status of the disease and the level of MxA mRNA does not correlate with disease activity in NAb negative patients.

Serum lipid profile changes predict neurodegeneration in interferon-β1a-treated multiple sclerosis patients

The purpose of this work was to determine whether changes in cholesterol profiles after interferon-β (IFN-β)1a treatment initiation following the first demyelinating event suggestive of multiple sclerosis are associated with clinical and MRI outcomes over 4 years. A group of 131 patients (age: 27.9 ± 7.8 years, 63% female) with serial 3-monthly clinical and 12-monthly MRI follow-ups over 4 years were investigated. Serum cholesterol profiles, including total cholesterol (TC), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) were obtained at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and every 6 months thereafter. IFN-β1a initiation caused rapid decreases in serum HDL-C, LDL-C, and TC within 1 month of IFN-β1a initiation (all P < 0.001) that returned slowly toward baseline. In predictive mixed model analyses, greater percent decreases in HDL-C after 3 months of IFN-β1a treatment initiation were associated with less brain atrophy over the 4 year time course, as assessed by percent brain volume change (P < 0.001), percent gray matter volume change (P < 0.001), and percent lateral ventricle volume change (P = 0.005). Decreases in cholesterol biomarkers following IFN-β1a treatment are associated with brain atrophy outcomes over 4 years. Pharmacological interventions targeting lipid homeostasis may be clinically beneficial for disrupting neurodegenerative processes.

Maillard reaction and immunogenicity of protein therapeutics

The recombinant DNA technology enabled the production of a variety of human therapeutic proteins. Accumulated clinical experience, however, indicates that the formation of antibodies against such proteins is a general phenomenon rather than an exception. The immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins results in inefficient therapy and in the development of undesired, sometimes life-threatening, side reactions. The human proteins, designed for clinical application, usually have the same amino acid sequence as their native prototypes and it is not yet fully clear what the reasons for their immunogenicity are. In previous studies we have demonstrated for the first time that interferon-β (IFN-β) pharmaceuticals, used for treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis, do contain advanced glycation end products (AGEs) that contribute to IFN-β immunogenicity. AGEs are the final products of a chemical reaction known as the Maillard reaction or glycation, which implication in protein drugs’ immunogenicity has been overlooked so far. Therefore, the aim of the present article is to provide a comprehensive overview on the Maillard reaction with emphasis on experimental data and theoretical consideration telling us why the Maillard reaction warrants special attention in the context of the well-documented protein drugs’ immunogenicity.

Standardizing terms, definitions and concepts for describing and interpreting unwanted immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals: recommendations of the Innovative Medicines Initiative ABIRISK consortium

Biopharmaceuticals (BPs) represent a rapidly growing class of approved and investigational drug therapies that is contributing significantly to advancing treatment in multiple disease areas, including inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, genetic deficiencies and cancer. Unfortunately, unwanted immunogenic responses to BPs, in particular those affecting clinical safety or efficacy, remain among the most common negative effects associated with this important class of drugs. To manage and reduce risk of unwanted immunogenicity, diverse communities of clinicians, pharmaceutical industry and academic scientists are involved in: interpretation and management of clinical and biological outcomes of BP immunogenicity, improvement of methods for describing, predicting and mitigating immunogenicity risk and elucidation of underlying causes. Collaboration and alignment of efforts across these communities is made difficult due to lack of agreement on concepts, practices and standardized terms and definitions related to immunogenicity. The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI; http://www.imi-europe.org), ABIRISK consortium [Anti-Biopharmaceutical (BP) Immunization Prediction and Clinical Relevance to Reduce the Risk; http://www.abirisk.eu] was formed by leading clinicians, academic scientists and EFPIA (European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations) members to elucidate underlying causes, improve methods for immunogenicity prediction and mitigation and establish common definitions around terms and concepts related to immunogenicity. These efforts are expected to facilitate broader collaborations and lead to new guidelines for managing immunogenicity. To support alignment, an overview of concepts behind the set of key terms and definitions adopted to date by ABIRISK is provided herein along with a link to access and download the ABIRISK terms and definitions and provide comments (http://www.abirisk.eu/index_t_and_d.asp).

Body fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis: how far we have come and how they could affect the clinic now and in the future

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, which affects over 2.5 million people worldwide. Although MS has been extensively studied, many challenges still remain in regards to treatment, diagnosis and prognosis. Typically, prognosis and individual responses to treatment are evaluated by clinical tests such as the expanded disability status scale, MRI and presence of oligoclonal bands in the cerebrospinal fluid. However, none of these measures correlates strongly with treatment efficacy or disease progression across heterogeneous patient populations and subtypes of MS. Numerous studies over the past decades have attempted to identify sensitive and specific biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment efficacy of MS. The objective of this article is to review and discuss the current literature on body fluid biomarkers in MS, including research on potential biomarker candidates in the areas of miRNA, mRNA, lipids and proteins.

Immunogenicity of protein therapeutics: The key causes, consequences and challenges

The immunogenicity of protein therapeutics has so far proven to be difficult to predict in patients, with many biologics inducing undesirable immune responses directed towards the therapeutic resulting in reduced efficacy, anaphylaxis and occasionally life threatening autoimmunity. The most common effect of administrating an immunogenic protein therapeutic is the development of a high affinity anti-therapeutic antibody response. Furthermore, it is clear from clinical studies that protein therapeutics derived from endogenous human proteins are capable of stimulating undesirable immune responses in patients, and as a consequence, the prediction and reduction of immunogenicity has been the focus of intense research. This review will outline the principle causes of the immunogenicity in protein therapeutics, and describe the development of pre-clinical models that can be used to aid in the prediction of the immunogenic potential of novel protein therapeutics prior to administration in man.

BAb and MxA as functional biomarkers in routine clinical laboratories for the determination of anti-IFN-beta antibodies and their bioactivity levels in multiple sclerosis patients

In MS patients under IFNβ treatment to seek alternative treatments timely is important that anti-IFNβ antibodies and/or in vivo biologic activity loss detection in these. The most common diagnostic markers used for this purpose are BAb, Nab, and MxA. In this article, we aimed to establish the availability and feasibility of the correlation between BAb and MxA gene expression (mRNA) levels using evaluation of responses to IFNβ treatment for MS patients with a routine laboratory follow-up strategy in a major Turkish MS center. Bab seropositivity was determined in blood samples of 218 MS patients treated with different IFNβ preparations and MxA mRNA levels were measured in 128 patients among the total population. BAb seropositivity ratios to im INF-β 1a, scINF-β 1a, and sc INF-β 1b were 21.4%, 28.6%, and 70.4%, respectively (total 40%), and total loss of bioactivity (MxA mRNA) were 9.3%, 9.5%, and 11.6%, respectively (total 10.2%). The correlation between high BAb titers and low MxA mRNA levels was highly significant (P = 0.00003). Our data indicate that there is a good correlation between especially high BAbs levels and diminished MxA mRNA levels.

Immunoproteomics: current technology and applications

The varied landscape of the adaptive immune response is determined by the peptides presented by immune cells, derived from viral or microbial pathogens or cancerous cells. The study of immune biomarkers or antigens is not new and classical methods such as agglutination, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, or Western blotting have been used for many years to study the immune response to vaccination or disease. However, in many of these traditional techniques, protein or peptide identification has often been the bottleneck. Recent advances in genomics and proteomics, has led to many of the rapid advances in proteomics approaches. Immunoproteomics describes a rapidly growing collection of approaches that have the common goal of identifying and measuring antigenic peptides or proteins. This includes gel based, array based, mass spectrometry, DNA based, or in silico approaches. Immunoproteomics is yielding an understanding of disease and disease progression, vaccine candidates, and biomarkers. This review gives an overview of immunoproteomics and closely related technologies that are used to define the full set of antigens targeted by the immune system during disease.

The genetics of multiple sclerosis: an up-to-date review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that often leads to disability in young adults. Treatment options are limited and often only partly effective. The disease is likely caused by a complex interaction between multiple genes and environmental factors, leading to inflammatory-mediated central nervous system deterioration. A series of genomic studies have confirmed a central role for the immune system in the development of MS, including genetic association studies that have now dramatically expanded the roster of MS susceptibility genes beyond the longstanding human leukocyte antigen (HLA) association in MS first identified nearly 40 years ago. Advances in technology together with novel models for collaboration across research groups have enabled the discovery of more than 50 non-HLA genetic risk factors associated with MS. However, with a large proportion of the disease heritability still unaccounted for, current studies are now geared towards identification of causal alleles, associated pathways, epigenetic mechanisms, and gene-environment interactions. This article reviews recent efforts in addressing the genetics of MS and the challenges posed by an ever increasing amount of analyzable data, which is spearheading development of novel statistical methods necessary to cope with such complexity.

MHC2TA mRNA levels and human herpesvirus 6 in multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta along two-year follow-up

Background

In previous studies we found that MHC2TA +1614 genotype frequency was very different when MS patients with and without human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) in serum samples were compared; a different clinical behavior was also described. The purpose of the study was: 1. To evaluate if MHC2TA expression in MS patients was influenced by interferon beta (IFN-beta) treatment. 2. To study MHC2TA expression in MS patients with and without minor allele C. 3. To analyze the relation between MHC2TA mRNA levels and HHV-6 active infection in MS patients.

Methods

Blood and serum samples of 154 MS patients were collected in five programmed visits: basal (prior to beginning IFN-beta treatment), six, twelve, eighteen and twenty-four months later. HHV-6 in serum and MHC2TA mRNA levels were evaluated by PCR and RT-PCR, respectively. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against IFN-beta were analyzed by the cytopathic effect assay.

Results

We found that MHC2TA mRNA levels were significantly lower among MS patients with HHV-6 active infection at the basal visit (without treatment) than in those MS patients without HHV-6 active infection at the basal visit (p = 0.012); in all the positive samples we only found variant A. Furthermore, 58/99 (58.6%) MS patients without HHV-6 along the five programmed visits and an increase of MHC2TA expression after two-years of IFN-beta treatment were clinical responders vs. 5/21 (23.8%) among those MS patients with HHV-6 and a decrease of MHC2TA mRNA levels along the two-years with IFN-beta treatment (p = 0.004); no differences were found between patients with and without NAbs.

Conclusions

MHC2TA mRNA levels could be decreased by the active replication of HHV-6; the absence of HHV-6 in serum and the increase of MHC2TA expression could be further studied as markers of good clinical response to IFN-beta treatment.

Immunogenicity to biologics: mechanisms, prediction and reduction

Currently, there is a significant rise in the development and clinical use of a unique class of pharmaceuticals termed as Biopharmaceuticals or Biologics, in the management of a range of disease conditions with, remarkable therapeutic benefits. However, there is an equally growing concern regarding development of adverse effects like immunogenicity in the form of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) production and hypersensitivity. Immunogenicity to biologics represents a significant hurdle in the continuing therapy of patients in a number of disease settings. Efforts focussed on the identification of factors that contribute towards the onset of immunogenic response to biologics have led to reductions in the incidence of immunogenicity. An in-depth understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanism underpinning immunogenic responses will likely improve the safety profile of biologics. This review addresses the mechanistic basis of ADA generation to biologics, with emphasis on the role of antigen processing and presentation in this process. The article also addresses the potential contribution of complement system in augmenting or modulating this response. Identifying specific factors that influences processing and presentation of biologic-derived antigens in different genotype and disease background may offer additional options for intervention in the immunogenic process and consequently, the management of immunogenicity to biologics.

The genetics of multiple sclerosis: an up-to-date review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that often leads to disability in young adults. Treatment options are limited and often only partly effective. The disease is likely caused by a complex interaction between multiple genes and environmental factors, leading to inflammatory-mediated central nervous system deterioration. A series of genomic studies have confirmed a central role for the immune system in the development of MS, including genetic association studies that have now dramatically expanded the roster of MS susceptibility genes beyond the longstanding human leukocyte antigen (HLA) association in MS first identified nearly 40 years ago. Advances in technology together with novel models for collaboration across research groups have enabled the discovery of more than 50 non-HLA genetic risk factors associated with MS. However, with a large proportion of the disease heritability still unaccounted for, current studies are now geared towards identification of causal alleles, associated pathways, epigenetic mechanisms, and gene-environment interactions. This article reviews recent efforts in addressing the genetics of MS and the challenges posed by an ever increasing amount of analyzable data, which is spearheading development of novel statistical methods necessary to cope with such complexity.

Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment

AIMS

Antibody formation to therapeutic peptides is common. This analysis characterizes the time-course and cross-reactivity of anti-exenatide antibodies and potential effects on efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Data from intent-to-treat patients in 12 controlled (n = 2225,12-52 weeks) and 5 uncontrolled (n = 1538, up to 3 years) exenatide twice-daily (BID) trials and 4 controlled (n = 653,24-30 weeks) exenatide once weekly (QW) trials with 1 uncontrolled period (n = 128,52 weeks) were analysed.

RESULTS

Mean titres peaked early (6-22 weeks) and subsequently declined. At 30 weeks, 36.7% of exenatide BID patients were antibody-positive; 31.7% exhibited low titres (≤125) and 5.0% had higher titres (≥625). Antibody incidence declined to 16.9% (1.4% higher titre) at 3 years. Similarly, 56.8% of exenatide QW patients were antibody-positive (45.0% low/11.8% higher titre) at 24-30 weeks, declining to 45.4% positive (9.2% higher titre) at 52 weeks. Treatment-emergent anti-exenatide antibodies from a subset of patients tested did not cross-react with human GLP-1 or glucagon. Other than injection-site reactions, adverse event rates in antibody-positive and antibody-negative patients were similar. Efficacy was robust in both antibody-negative and antibody-positive patients (mean HbA1c change: -1.0 and -0.9%, respectively, exenatide BID; -1.6% and -1.3% exenatide QW). No correlation between change in HbA1c and titre was observed for exenatide BID, although mean reductions were attenuated in the small subset of patients (5%) with higher titres. A significant correlation was observed for exenatide QW with no difference between antibody-negative and low-titre patients, but an attenuated mean reduction in the subset of patients (12%) with higher titres.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-titre anti-exenatide antibodies were common with exenatide treatment (32% exenatide BID, 45% exenatide QW patients), but had no apparent effect on efficacy. Higher-titre antibodies were less common (5% exenatide BID, 12% exenatide QW) and within that titre group, increasing antibody titre was associated with reduced average efficacy that was statistically significant for exenatide QW. Other than injection-site reactions, anti-exenatide antibodies did not impact the safety of exenatide.

Data integration and systems biology approaches for biomarker discovery: challenges and opportunities for multiple sclerosis

New "omic" technologies and their application to systems biology approaches offer new opportunities for biomarker discovery in complex disorders, including multiple sclerosis (MS). Recent studies using massive genotyping, DNA arrays, antibody arrays, proteomics, glycomics, and metabolomics from different tissues (blood, cerebrospinal fluid, brain) have identified many molecules associated with MS, defining both susceptibility and functional targets (e.g., biomarkers). Such discoveries involve many different levels in the complex organizational hierarchy of humans (DNA, RNA, protein, etc.), and integrating these datasets into a coherent model with regard to MS pathogenesis would be a significant step forward. Given the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of MS, validating biomarkers is mandatory. To develop accurate markers of disease prognosis or therapeutic response that are clinically useful, combining molecular, clinical, and imaging data is necessary. Such an integrative approach would pave the way towards better patient care and more effective clinical trials that test new therapies, thus bringing the paradigm of personalized medicine in MS one step closer.

Quantitative differences in the immunomodulatory effects of Rebif and Avonex in IFN-β 1a treated multiple sclerosis patients

Interferon-β (IFN-β) is a current effective treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) and exerts its therapeutic effects by down-modulating the systemic immune response and cytokine signaling. In clinical practice there are several formulations of interferon including a low dose of IFN-β 1a formulation of 30 μg IM once weekly (Avonex) and a high dose formulation of 44 μg SC three times weekly (Rebif). Recent studies suggest that Rebif is more efficacious compared to Avonex in preventing relapses and decreasing MRI activity in relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients. This study examines whether there are quantitative gene expression changes in interferon-treated RRMS patients that can explain the difference in efficacy and side effects between Rebif and Avonex. Herein, RRMS patients were treated for three months with IFN-β 1a and the levels of plasma cytokines and gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were examined. Thirty-two normal subjects were compared to thirty-two RRMS patients, of which ten were treated with Rebif and ten with Avonex. Rebif and Avonex both significantly and equally suppressed plasma TNF-α and IL-6 levels. Rebif suppressed IL-13 significantly more than Avonex. Rebif also significantly suppressed the levels of the chemokines CCL17 and RANTES, the protease ADAM8, and COX-2 at a higher degree compared to Avonex. The STAT1-inducible genes IP-10 and caspase 1 were significantly increased with Rebif compared to Avonex. In conclusion, the higher dosed, more frequently administered IFN-β 1a Rebif when compared to IFN-β 1a Avonex has more potent immunomodulatory effects. These quantitative results might relate to efficacy and side-effect profile of the two IFN-β 1a formulations and provide prospective practical clinical tools to monitor treatment and adjust dosage.

One-year evaluation of factors affecting the biological activity of interferon beta in multiple sclerosis patients

MxA is an antiviral protein induced by type I interferons (IFN) and some viruses; MxA gene expression is an appropriate marker for measuring biologic activity of exogenous IFNβ, as its induction indicates IFNAR receptor stimulation. A recent study has shown that measurement of MxA mRNA, after 1 year of treatment, predicts clinical responsiveness to IFNβ therapy. Loss of IFNβ bioactivity is mostly due to anti-IFNβ antibodies (both neutralizing and binding), non-compliance and receptor saturation. The aim of this study was to evaluate all possible causes of loss of IFNβ bioactivity after 1 year in treated patients. One hundred sixty-seven multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were included. One year after beginning IFNβ therapy, each patient underwent a blood test; MxA gene expression was measured by real time PCR, antiviral CPE assay to detect neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), and capture-ELISA (cELISA) to measure binding antibodies (BAbs). For MxA an upper normal threshold of 87 (RE) was considered, 20 TRU/mL was the threshold for NAbs, and 1 U for BAbs positivity. Thirty-seven out of 167 patients (22%) were MxA-negative; of these, 22 were both BAbs and NAbs+, whereas 12 were BAbs+ but Nabs-, and three were both BAbs and NAbs-. The following conclusions were drawn from the study: (1) MxA mRNA should be measured after 1 year of IFNβ therapy; (2) after 1 year of IFNβ treatment, absence of IFNβ bioactivity was detected in 22% of the patients; (3) different biological phenomena and reduced compliance explain this absence; (4) identification of the reason for absence of IFN bioactivity improves patients' management.

Recommendations for clinical use of data on neutralising antibodies to interferon-beta therapy in multiple sclerosis

The identification of factors that can affect the efficacy of immunomodulatory drugs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) is important. For the available interferon-beta products, neutralising antibodies (NAb) have been shown to affect treatment efficacy. In June, 2009, a panel of experts in MS and NAbs to interferon-beta therapy convened in Amsterdam, Netherlands, under the auspices of the Neutralizing Antibodies on Interferon beta in Multiple Sclerosis consortium, a European-based project of the 6th Framework Programme of the European Commission, to review and discuss data on NAbs and their practical consequences for the treatment of patients with MS on interferon beta. The panel believed that information about NAbs and other markers of biological activity of interferons (ie, myxovirus resistance protein A [MxA]) can be integrated with clinical and imaging indicators to guide individual treatment decisions. In cases of sustained high-titre NAb positivity and/or lack of MxA bioactivity, a switch to a non-interferon-beta therapy should be considered. In patients who are doing poorly clinically, therapy should be switched irrespective of NAb or MxA bioactivity.

BAFF is a biological response marker to IFN-beta treatment in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of the myelin sheath of neurons. Interferon beta (IFN-beta) is currently the major drug used to treat MS. Some patients fail to respond to this treatment, in some cases due to the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to IFN-beta. We used microarray analysis and RT-PCR to measure gene expression in whole blood, 9-15 h postinjection, in patients with and without NAbs to IFN-beta. The canonical marker of biological response to IFN-beta, myxovirus resistance protein A, was upregulated in all NAb- patients while remaining unchanged in NAb+ patients. Genes functioning in immune response pathways were dominant in the set of differentially expressed genes: 73 immune response genes were identified as upregulated and 29 genes were identified as downregulated. B-cell activating factor (BAFF) is a strong candidate marker for biological and clinical response as well as for predisposition to NAb development. We demonstrate that it is responsive to IFN-beta in vitro and in vivo, and that its soluble form is elevated in serum from NAb- but not NAb+ patients. We conclude BAFF is a good biomarker for IFN-beta response, and requires further studies to determine its value as a marker for clinical response and NAb predisposition.

Severe dermatomyositis triggered by interferon beta-1a therapy and associated with enhanced type I interferon signaling

BACKGROUND

Type I interferons (IFNs) are common therapeutics for several diseases, including viral infections and multiple sclerosis (MS). Although numerous studies have implicated type I INFs with the production of autoantibodies and the development of certain autoimmune disorders, interferon beta has not previously been described in association with dermatomyositis, to our knowledge. Previous microarray studies of muscle biopsy specimens from patients with dermatomyositis disclosed a type I IFN-induced gene expression profile. The central role of plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors, together with increased type I IFN production, suggests a pivotal role for type I IFNs in dermatomyositis. We report a case of dermatomyositis exacerbated or induced by interferon beta therapy for MS and provide evidence that demonstrates enhanced type I IFN signaling in this patient.

OBSERVATIONS

We observed new-onset dermatomyositis in a 57-year-old patient treated with interferon beta for MS. His symptoms were exacerbated temporally by interferon beta injections. Immunohistochemical staining of skin biopsy specimens for myxovirus-resistance protein A (a surrogate marker for cutaneous type I IFN signaling) showed increased staining that correlated temporally with interferon beta treatment and subsequent disease activity. In vitro treatment with interferon beta of peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from our patient revealed enhanced type I IFN signaling assessed by interferon-induced gene expression profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first description of dermatomyositis exacerbated or induced by interferon beta treatment. Our results demonstrate enhanced type I IFN signaling following interferon beta treatment in our patient with dermatomyositis.

Interferon-beta bioactivity measurement in multiple sclerosis: feasibility for routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Neutralising antibodies (NAb) to interferon beta (IFN beta) are associated with a reduced bioactivity and efficacy of IFN beta in multiple sclerosis (MS). Unclear is how to apply IFN beta bioactivity measurements (quantification of Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) mRNA) in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate value and feasibility of IFN beta bioactivity measurement with a single MxA mRNA measurement for screening and a second measurement before and after IFN beta administration for definite confirmation of IFN beta bioactivity status.

METHODS

In 79 MS patients MxA mRNA expression was determined 4 hours after IFN beta administration. If inadequate, MxA mRNA expression testing was repeated 3 months afterwards, comparing post- and pre injection samples to determine whether IFNb bioactivity was persistently lacking. MxA mRNA expression was compared to NA beta titres, determined by the cytopathic effect assay (CPE).

RESULTS

NAb titres correlated significantly with MxA mRNA expression and MxA mRNA induction. Of all screened patients, only one patient had adequate MxA mRNA expression and high NAb titres simultaneously. Of the biological non-responders at second measurement (21/55), 17 (81%) were high-titre NAb positive, 1 (5%) was low-titre NAb positive and 3 (14%) were NAb negative. Without considering the pre-injection measurement, two more NAb negative patients would have tested negative for IFN beta bioactivity, emphasizing the need of a pre-injection sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that for IFN beta bioactivity screening a single post-injection measurement seems reasonable. However, MxA induction measurement based on both pre- and post-IFN beta injection samples at second measurement is somewhat more precise in determining ultimate IFN beta bioactivity status.

MxA protein assay for optimal monitoring of IFN-beta bioactivity in the treatment of MS patients

OBJECTIVES

Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) can be used as a marker of the bioactivity of interferon-beta (IFN-beta) therapy. Two to forty per cent of IFN-beta-treated multiple sclerosis (MS) patients develop IFN-beta-neutralizing antibodies (NAb) with subsequent attenuation of MxA protein induction. The aim of this study was to set up a simple MxA enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the measurement of MxA protein and to evaluate the EIA test by comparing the results with flow cytometric analysis and the measurement of NAb.

METHODS

total of 51 IFN-beta-treated relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients were tested for MxA protein expression by using both MxA EIA assay and flow cytometric analysis. Thirteen patients were confirmed to be NAb-positive.

RESULTS

The correlation between EIA and flow cytometric analysis was significant with a wider range of measured levels in the EIA. Patients with NAb had low MxA levels, but in some patients, remaining MxA induction could be detected despite NAb.

CONCLUSIONS

The MxA EIA assay seems to be a practical method for large-scale analysis of the bioactivity of IFN-beta treatment.

Is the treatment effect of IFN-β restored after the disappearance of neutralizing antibodies?

Objective

To establish whether multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, who have lost the therapeutic effect of interferon-beta (IFN-β) owing to neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and subsequently revert from a NAb-positive to a NAb-negative state under continued IFN-β-1b therapy, regain clinical effect after reversion.

Background

Several studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients treated with IFN-β develop NAbs that hamper or abolish the therapeutic effect of IFN-β. However, some patients, who become NAb-positive under treatment with IFN-β-1b, may revert to a NAb-negative state under continuous treatment.

Methods

We identified 40 patients from the Danish IFN protocol, who fulfilled the criteria: NAb-positive status for at least 12 months followed by reversion to NAb-negative state for at least 12 months. For comparison, we included 64 matching cases that had remained NAb-negative during an observation time of at least 36 months. The two groups were clinically and demographically alike. We measured NAb-neutralizing capacity using a clinically validated cytopathic effect assay. A blood sample with a neutralizing capacity of 20% or more was considered as NAb-positive. A patient was defined as NAb-positive after two consecutive blood tests separated by at least 6 months. Reversion to a NAb-negative state required at least two consecutive negative tests. To allow for the confounding effect of time we employed a mixed Poisson model.

Results

Patients who had been NAb-positive and reverted to a NAb-negative state regained treatment effect with the relapse rate as before the NAb-positive period adjusting for the effect of time, and the relapse rate was the same as in the permanently NAb-negative patients in corresponding time periods. The relapse rate ratio comparing the NAb-positive with the NAb-negative periods was 1.98 (95% confidence interval: 1.32–2.97).

Conclusion

Under NAb-positive periods, the clinical effect of IFN-β was abolished. When NAbs disappeared spontaneously under continued treatment, patients regained the full effect of INF-β-1b therapy with no negative carry-over effect from the previous NAb-positive period.

Development of a bioassay for quantification of neutralising antibodies against human interferon-beta in mouse sera

Therapeutic proteins like recombinant human interferon-beta (rhIFNbeta) may induce neutralising antibodies (NABs), which inhibit their efficacy. Hence, there is a great need for strategies to predict whether a formulation will induce an immune response. Immune tolerant transgenic animals are important tools to study this phenomenon. This article describes a bioassay for NABs detection in mouse sera. The bioassay corresponds to the MxA Gene expression Assay (MGA) for human sera and measures the inhibition by mouse serum of the IFNbeta induced MxA mRNA. Samples from 6 non-immunised and 14 IFNbeta-immunised mice were tested for both binding antibodies (BABs) and NABs using the bioassay. All 16 mouse sera tested positive for NABs were also positive for BABs; BAB and NAB levels were correlated with a coefficient of 0.62 (p=0.0186). The intra-assay variations ranged from 1.38% to 5.26% (mean 3.03%). Effects of cytotoxicity against A549 cells were slightly evident at low serum dilutions (i.e. 1/10, 1/20), but levels of damaged cells were easily evaluated based on the threshold cycle (Ct) values of the housekeeping gene 18SrRNA. The possibility of measuring NABs, in addition to BABs, in mouse sera increases the usefulness of the animal model, in studying the many factors influencing the immunogenicity of rhIFNbeta.

Anti-interferon-beta neutralising activity is not entirely mediated by antibodies

Many multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon-beta (IFNbeta) develop anti-IFNbeta antibodies (BAbs), which can interfere with both in vitro and in vivo bioactivity of the injected cytokine. Objective of this study was to correlate these measures. Among the 256 enrolled patients, 11 (4.3%) showed a significant inhibition of the IFNbeta activity in vitro, but no measurable BAbs. As a whole, in vivo bioactivity was inhibited in 9/11 (82%) of these patients. A minority of IFNbeta treated patients have a non-antibody mediated neutralising activity, which competitively inhibits the bioactivity both in vitro and in vivo.

Adherence to interferon-beta treatment and results of therapy switching

Adherence to long-term therapy has always been a problem in all fields of medicine. In multiple sclerosis (MS), treatment consists of parenteral administration of immune-modulating drugs once or several times weekly for an as yet undetermined length of time. Different studies on the MS patients' compliance showed that the most frequent cause of stopping treatment is the perceived lack of efficacy and that most treatment withdrawals occur during the first year of treatment. A trial aimed to identify the minimum effective IFNbeta dose showed that some patients had disease activity after switching to a lower IFNbeta dose. OPTIMS (OPTimization of Interferon dose for MS study) was a multicenter study, involving 24 Italian MS centers, 216 patients, aimed to identify a treatment response indicator allowing the early identification of poorly responding patients. A single active scan during the first 6 months of IFN treatment had a significant positive predictability of 59% (95% confidence interval, 41-76; p=0.05) on the presence of clinical signs of disease activity during the further 2-year follow-up.

Development and validation of a real time PCR-based bioassay for quantification of neutralizing antibodies against human interferon-beta

There are two commonly employed types of bioassays for the detection of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against interferon-beta (IFNbeta): the cytopatic effect assay (CPE), and the MxA (myxovirus resistance protein A) protein assay (MPA). This article describes a bioassay based on the real time PCR measurement of mRNA that results from the induction, in cultured human cells, of the MxA gene by IFNbeta. Serum samples from 104 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with IFNbeta were tested for NAbs using our real time PCR bioassay. NAbs also were measured in the same specimens by the MPA assay and CPE assay. The calibration range of the real time PCR bioassay is 0.125-30 LU/mL. The range of the intra- and inter-assay variations (coefficients of variation in log(10)) were 4.05% (range 0.88%-7.90%) and 4.42% (range 0.31%-9.15%), respectively. Samples of the three commercial preparations of IFNbeta-1a and -1b were measured showing dose-response curves parallel to that of the NIH reference IFNbeta (mean SD at the midpoint of the dose-response curve=5%). In addition, the assay was robust with respect to number of cells plated (i.e., increasing cell densities from 12x10(3)/well to 384x10(3)/well resulted in 3.03% variability in MxA expression normalized with glyceraldehyde-3 phosphate dehydrogenase). NAbs titers measured were closely comparable to those obtained by the MPA [r(spearman)=0.899; 89% of observed agreements; K=0.779] and the CPE [r(spearman)=0.7899); 86%; K=0.729] assays. Despite the obvious disadvantage of cost, when carried out according to quality assurance guidelines for molecular diagnostics the new MxA gene-expression assay (MGA) has significant advantages over the other methods for testing NAbs: it has excellent reliability and reproducibility, and utilizes equipment and methodologies already accessible in many clinical laboratories.

Mx1 and IP-10: biomarkers to measure IFN-beta activity in mice following gene-based delivery

Recombinant interferon-beta (IFN-beta) protein is used successfully for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Gene therapy might be an alternative approach to overcome drawbacks occurring with IFN-beta protein therapy. A critical issue in developing a new approach is detection of biologically active IFN-beta in preclinical models. The goal of the present study was to determine if Mx1 and IP-10, which are known to be activated after IFN-beta treatment in humans, can be used as biomarkers in mice. In three in vivo experiments, the correlation between different methods of murine IFN-beta (MuIFN-beta) delivery and biomarker induction was studied: (1) bolus protein delivery by intravenous (i.v.) or intramuscular (i.m.) injection, (2) gene-based delivery of IFN- beta by i.m. injection of plasmid DNA, followed by electroporation, and (3) gene-based delivery of IFN-beta by i.m. injection of adenovirus-associated type 1 (AAV1). Short-term induction of Mx1 mRNA and IP-10 was observed after treatment with bolus MuIFN-beta protein. Long-term induction of both biomarkers was observed after IFN-beta plasmid DNA delivery or when AAV1 was used as the vector. The experiments demonstrate that gene-based delivery provides sustained levels of IFN-beta compared with bolus protein injection and that Mx1 RNA and IP-10 can be used to monitor biologically active circulating plasma MuIFN-beta protein in mice.

Biological markers of interferon-beta therapy: comparison among interferon-stimulated genes MxA, TRAIL and XAF-1

Biological activity of interferon-beta (IFNbeta) can be assessed by measuring IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). Among them, myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) appears to have the highest specificity, but it has no role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). To investigate the reliability of MxA as a biomarker, we compared its expression to that of two other ISGs: TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis factor-1 (XAF-1). Both were shown to be involved in immunoregulatory mechanisms and might play a role in MS. Quantitative-PCR measurements were performed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 73 MS patients after short-term and long-term treatment with IFNbeta. A time-dependent response for multiple ISGs was observed in all patients after short-term treatment. In contrast, long-term treatment induced concurrent inhibition of ISGs in 12.3% (9/73) of patients, in whom neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were detectable. Besides, 22% (16/73) of chronically treated patients showed a non-NAbs-related abrogation of TRAIL expression. In summary, 1) MxA expression was significantly higher than both TRAIL and XAF-1, and 2) MxA was the most sensitive gene to detect decreased bioavailability due to NAbs. These findings identify MxA as an appropriate biomarker for IFNbeta, although there is no evidence for a functional role of it in MS.

The importance of measuring IFNbeta bioactivity: monitoring in MS patients and the effect of anti-IFNbeta antibodies

Many multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with IFNbeta develop anti-IFNbeta antibodies, which can interfere with the bioactivity of the injected cytokine, i.e., antibody-mediated decreased bioactivity (ADB). The precise levels of anti-IFNbeta antibodies inducing decreased bioactivity is unknown. We repeatedly used a bioactivity measure, gene expression of MxA or GEM, and correlated bioactivity with measures of binding and neutralizing antibodies. The binding antibody assay was a capture ELISA, and the neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay was a cytopathic effect (CPE) assay. 27% (17/64) of patients repeatedly sampled developed critical ADB. Bioactivity as determined by GEM correlated negatively with NAb titer, and bioactivity that had been lost with the development of NAbs returned if NAb levels diminished. These data reveal that the GEM assay is a useful adjunct in the management of MS patients treated with IFNbeta, and that lost bioactivity returns when anti-IFNbeta antibody levels diminish.

Immunoadsorption patients with multiple sclerosis: an open-label pilot study

BACKGROUND

Immunoadsorption (IA) is occasionally applied in patients with acute relapses of multiple sclerosis (MS). This pilot study was undertaken to determine whether IA might help in secondary progressive and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

DESIGN

IA was performed at 1-week intervals in 12 patients with secondary progressive or relapsing-remitting MS. These patients had an extended disability status scale (EDSS) score of 4.5-7 and an EDSS increase of 0.5 within 6 months before inclusion in the study despite conventional drug therapy. The change in the EDSS and that in the MS functional composite (MSFC) score, which consisted of quantitative tests of arm function, ambulation, visual acuity and cognition, served as the primary outcome variables, which were measured at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Changes in quality of life and cerebral lesions by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were also assessed at baseline and after the last immunoadsorption (month 3).

RESULTS

A significant reduction of the median EDSS change was observed after the treatment period, which reversed 3 months after the immunoadsorptions had been stopped. Ten of 12 patients remained stable during the first year of follow-up with no significant changes of the MSFC scores. No significant changes in magnetic resonance imaging T2-hyperintense brain lesions or in the number of gadolinium-positive lesions and in the patients' quality of life were observed. Western blot analyses demonstrated a reduction of serum myelin-specific antibodies, which were collected in the adsorber eluates.

CONCLUSIONS

Removal of immunoglobulins, including myelin-specific antibodies by immunoadsorption, seems to delay disease progression as defined by EDSS, MSFC and MRI, while the patients' quality of life did not deteriorate.

Comparison of three PCR assays for the evaluation of interferon-beta biological activity in patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The gene expression of the myxovirus-resistant protein A (MxA) gene is a sensitive measure of the biological response of therapeutically applied interferon-beta (IFNbeta) and of its reduced bioavailability due to inhibiting factors such as IFNbeta-induced neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).

METHODS

We compared three methods for MxA mRNA quantification in 826 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples obtained from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MxA mRNA measurements were performed using quantitative-competitive (qc)-PCR, real time-PCR, and the new semi-quantitative (sq)-PCR assay (MxA IBRIDOGEN).

RESULTS

According to the treatment status (untreated samples versus NAb-negative treated samples), real time-PCR gave the highest specificity (93%). Slightly lower specificities were obtained with qc-PCR and sq-PCR (both 91%). qc-PCR showed the highest sensitivity (97%) compared with both real time-PCR (94%) and sq-PCR (95%). A positive correlation was found between qc-PCR and real time-PCR measurements (rspearman=0.776; p<0.0001), which also showed 90% agreement based on a statistically calculated threshold. Likewise, sq-PCR evaluations showed 84% and 79% agreement with qc-PCR and real time-PCR measurements, respectively. In addition, we showed a concordance of 89% between three sq-PCR kits.

CONCLUSIONS

All three methods displayed high specificity for MxA gene expression analysis, allowing the detection of patients in whom IFNbeta did not have any biological action. qc-PCR and real time-PCR are both useful during clinical trials demanding quantitative data of biological activity, whereas sq-PCR could prove useful for routine screening purposes because it is easy to perform and can be done in not specialized laboratories.

Current trials in multiple sclerosis: established evidence and future hopes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of the present report is to briefly review multiple sclerosis therapeutic trials published or presented in 2004 to provide an up-to-date overview of the established evidence and new insights.

RECENT FINDINGS

New data have come available that help us understand how currently approved disease modifying drugs can best be used. Nonetheless, their limited effectiveness - especially in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis - as well as the inconvenience and toxicity associated with their use, emphasize the need for new treatment strategies. A substantial number of reports on new emerging treatment modalities were published in 2004, and one of these modalities was newly approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.

SUMMARY

Further advances have been made in the treatment of multiple sclerosis patients. On the one hand, we know better how and in whom to use existing medications. On the other hand, it is exciting to witness how increased insight in the pathophysiology of the disease and its symptoms has led to a series of new, innovative treatment modalities.

Interferon-beta-1a induces increases in vascular cell adhesion molecule: implications for its mode of action in multiple sclerosis

We investigated soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM) levels and MRI lesions over 24 weeks in 15 Relapsing Remitting MS (RRMS) patients randomized prospectively to receive once-weekly (qw) IFN-beta-1a 30 mug intramuscularly (IM) (Group I, 8 patients) or three-times-weekly (tiw) IFN-beta-1a 44 mug subcutaneously (SC) (Group II, 7 patients). Both groups demonstrated a significant increase in sVCAM during treatment when compared to pre-treatment levels. Patients on IFN-beta-1a 44 mug SC tiw had a significant (p<0.0001) mean increase in sVCAM of 321.9 ng/ml which was significantly greater (p<0.0001) than with IFN-beta-1a 30 mug IM qw (68.6 ng/ml). There was a negative correlation between combined unique (CU) MRI lesions and sVCAM levels within the IFN-beta-1a 44 mug SC tiw group (slope=-0.00106, p=0.009). We postulate that the mode of action of IFN-beta therapy in MS may involve the induction of an increase in sVCAM. sVCAM could bind VLA-4 on T-cells and intercept their adhesion to the blood brain barrier (BBB). This mechanism is consistent with the observed clinical effect of IFN-beta in reducing MRI contrast enhancing lesions.

Biological responsiveness to first injections of interferon-beta in patients with multiple sclerosis

This study is the first to evaluate biological response to first injections of interferon-beta (IFNbeta) in patients with multiple sclerosis. MxA mRNA was measured in 96 patients receiving IFNbeta-1a (Avonex, n=32), IFNbeta-1b (Betaferon, n=19), IFNbeta-1a (Rebif) 22 microg (n=30), or IFNbeta-1a 44 microg (n=15). Patients were analysed before, 3 and 24 h after the first injection, and 12 h after the second administration. Results showed that up-regulation was evident within 3 h of IFNbeta injection, peaked 12 h after injection, and progressively declined 24 h after administration. The cumulative responses were similar after a single administration, regardless of product/dose. Moreover, data indicate that the abolition of the biological activity detected during IFNbeta therapy is due to underlying phenomena (e.g., neutralizing antibodies), because all patients were constitutively responders to IFNbeta at treatment initiation.