Cerebral infarction complicating intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in a patient with Miller Fisher syndrome

On the dark side of therapies with immunoglobulin concentrates: the adverse events

Therapy by human immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrates is a success story ongoing for decades with an ever increasing demand for this plasma product. The success of IgG concentrates on a clinical level is documented by the slowly increasing number of registered indication and the more rapid increase of the off-label uses, a topic dealt with in another contribution to this special issue of Frontiers in Immunology. A part of the success is the adverse event (AE) profile of IgG concentrates which is, even at life-long need for therapy, excellent. Transmission of pathogens in the last decade could be entirely controlled through the antecedent introduction by authorities of a regulatory network and installing quality standards by the plasma fractionation industry. The cornerstone of the regulatory network is current good manufacturing practice. Non-infectious AEs occur rarely and mainly are mild to moderate. However, in recent times, the increase in frequency of hemolytic and thrombotic AEs raised worrying questions on the possible background for these AEs. Below, we review elements of non-infectious AEs, and particularly focus on hemolysis and thrombosis. We discuss how the introduction of plasma fractionation by ion-exchange chromatography and polishing by immunoaffinity chromatographic steps might alter repertoire of specificities and influence AE profiles and efficacy of IgG concentrates.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in lupus panniculitis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a disease of unknown cause that may involve one or many organ or systems. Skin involvement is a major feature in this disease, and a wide variety of skin conditions may be present. Lupus erythematosus panniculitis (LEP) constitutes a rare form of cutaneous lupus characterized by recurrent nodular or plaque lesions that can vary from a benign and mild course to a more disfiguring disease. Initial therapy includes corticosteroids, antimalarials, and azathioprine and, in refractory cases, two antimalarials in association, mycophenolate mofetil, or other immunomodulators. Intravenous immuglobulin (IVIG) is used in many autoimmune disorders, like in SLE, although clinical trials have not yet taken place. In this report, we review skin manifestations of SLE and their treatment, IVIG, and finally a case of LEP successfully treated with IVIG when other therapy modalities failed.

Information for healthcare providers on general features of IGIV with emphasis on differences between commercially available products

OBJECTIVE

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IGIV) has provided an essential replacement therapy for primary and secondary immunodeficiencies patients and prophylaxis of infectious diseases in them. It is also used in several autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disorders. An overview of IGIV with information on several commercially available IGIV products is discussed.

DATA SOURCES

Medline databases and literature provided by the manufacturer for each product presented in the manuscript.

STUDY SELECTION

From the vast body of information on IGIV, only those studies were selected that were pertinent to general features of IGIV (as presented below) or information provided by the manufacturer that facilitated comparing one product to the other.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data was extracted on production, and purification procedures, removal of infectious agents, physical and biochemical properties and issues of safety. Data was extracted only for products available in the US.

DATA SYNTHESIS

IGIV is prepared using pooled plasma. The purification of IGIV is a complex and multi-step process. There is a reciprocal relationship between the purity of IgG in the product and the recovery rate from the total plasma. It is quite possible that some of the biological mediators of the inflammatory and immune systems may be present in trace amounts. Screening and removal of blood borne pathogens is necessary and there are several different techniques available. The specifics of the administration are often variable and no consistent pattern or protocol has been used. When limited dosages are required IGIV may be administered subcutaneously. The side effects associated with IGIV are usually mild and self-limiting.

CONCLUSION

There are differences in products produced by different manufacturers. The current data does not provide sufficient detail or information to be able to make specific recommendations for the use of a given commercial preparation in a specific disease state. The use of IGIV is associated with certain common and uncommon side effects. The identification of risk factors that might predispose a patient to developing them have been studied and reported. In choosing a IGIV preparation the user may avoid features that may predispose to certain side effects. Equally important is monitoring of patients during and after the IGIV therapy.

Clinical and immunological spectrum of the Miller Fisher syndrome

The Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS), characterized by ataxia, areflexia, and ophthalmoplegia, was first recognized as a distinct clinical entity in 1956. MFS is mostly an acute, self-limiting condition, but there is anecdotal evidence of benefit with immunotherapy. Pathological data remain scarce. MFS can be associated with infectious, autoimmune, and neoplastic disorders. Radiological findings have suggested both central and peripheral involvement. The anti-GQ1b IgG antibody titer is most commonly elevated in MFS, but may also be increased in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and Bickerstaff's brainstem encephalitis (BBE). Molecular mimicry, particularly in relation to antecedent Campylobacter jejuni and Hemophilus influenzae infections, is likely the predominant pathogenic mechanism, but the roles of other biological factors remain to be established. Recent studies have demonstrated the presence of neuromuscular transmission defects in association with anti-GQ1b IgG antibody, both in vitro and in vivo. Collective findings from clinical, radiological, immunological, and electrophysiological techniques have helped to define MFS, GBS, and BBE as major disorders within the proposed spectrum of anti-GQ1b IgG antibody syndrome.

Intravenous immunoglobulins contain naturally occurring antibodies that mimic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and activate neutrophils in a TNFα-dependent and Fc-receptor–independent way

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) preparations are increasingly used for therapy of several neuroimmunologic diseases. IVIg therapy is considered safe, although serious side effects like aseptic meningitis, cerebral vasospasm, or ischemic encephalopathy have been reported. These side effects are frequently associated with neutrophilic pleocytosis in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), suggesting a neutrophil-mediated mechanism. To elucidate the potential role of neutrophil activation, we analyzed IVIg preparations from 5 different commercial sources for the presence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–like immunoglobulins against ethanol-fixed peripheral-blood neutrophils, purified human antigens, and a panel of human and nonhuman tissues. All IVIg batches tested (n = 13) contained atypical ANCAs (IgG titer up to 1:2048, IgA up to 1:512). Moreover, all preparations were capable of inducing hydrogen peroxide production in TNFα-primed human neutrophils, with a significant correlation (P < .005) between atypical ANCA titers in IVIg preparations and neutrophil activation. Fc-mediated binding and activation was ruled out by the use of IVIg-F(ab′)2 fragments. Our findings strongly suggest that in vivo activation of TNFα-primed neutrophils by atypical ANCAs of IVIg may contribute to the side effects of IVIg therapy and for the first time demonstrate that the activation of neutrophil granulocytes by IVIg occurs in an Fc receptor (FcR)–independent, hence antigen-dependent, way.

Venous and arterial thrombosis following administration of intravenous immunoglobulins

Thrombotic events are an increasingly recognized complication of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). We aimed to define clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcome for venous thrombosis as opposed to arterial thrombosis following administration of IVIg. Six patients with post-IVIg venous thrombosis were identified at our institution. In addition, a review of the literature revealed 65 reported cases. Arterial thrombosis (stroke and myocardial infarction) was four times more common than venous thrombosis (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). The incidence rate was estimated at 0.15-1.2% per treatment course, but the large increase in reported cases in 2003 suggests that the true incidence may be significantly greater. The following differences were found between arterial and venous events: arterial thrombosis occurred early after IVIg administration (49% within 4 h, 77% within 24 h) and was associated with advanced age and atherosclerotic vascular disease; venous thrombosis occurred later (54% more than 24 h after IVIg administration) and was associated with factors contributing to venous stasis (obesity and immobility). Thirteen patients died (mortality 20%), 11 of whom had arterial thrombosis. In conclusion, IVIg-associated thrombosis is more common than previously recognized, and is associated with significant mortality. The different characteristics of arterial and venous events may reflect different pathophysiological mechanisms. A better understanding of these mechanisms should aid in defining a risk-benefit ratio for the individual patient.

Intravenous immunoglobulin-associated arterial and venous thrombosis; report of a series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

To date, the prevalence of intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg)-related thrombotic complications has not been evaluated in patients with autoimmune disorders followed up in Departments of Internal Medicine.

OBJECTIVES

To assess prevalence and characteristics of IvIg-related thrombotic complications in patients with autoimmune disorders receiving IvIg therapy; to evaluate the predictive factors for onset of IvIg-related thrombotic manifestation in patients, and to detect patients at risk for these types of complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of 46 patients with autoimmune disorders who were given IvIg therapy at our Department of Internal Medicine between January 2002 and December 2004 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among the 46 patients, nine exhibited IvIg-associated severe complications (19.6%). Six patients (13%) developed IvIg-related thrombotic complications. Thrombotic complications frequently occurred during IvIg infusion (50%), although they were also observed within 1-8 days following IvIg infusion in other patients. IvIg-related thrombotic complications consisted of: deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (n = 3), myocardial infarction (n = 2) and stroke (n = 1). The outcome of thrombotic complications was favourable in all patients, after appropriate therapy institution. Older age, history of associated arterial hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia were more common in the group of patients with IvIg-related thrombotic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that IvIg-related thrombotic arterial/venous complications are not uncommon in patients with autoimmune disorders (13% of patients). Nevertheless, patients, who are followed up in Departments of Internal Medicine often have concomitant disorders placing them at increased risk to develop IvIg-related thrombotic complications; the latter may also explain the high rate of IvIg-related thrombosis in our cohort. Our series further indicates that patients should be monitored closely for these types of adverse events during the whole period of IvIg therapy, as thrombotic manifestations occurred in patients who had received multiple IvIg infusions without exhibiting complications. In addition, our results suggest that it is questionable to initiate IvIg therapy in patients presenting with predictive factors of thrombotic complications; in this subgroup of patients, IvIg should be prescribed cautiously, after re-weighing risk-benefit considerations.

Intravenous immunoglobulin: adverse effects and safe administration

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is administered for various indications and generally considered a safe therapy. Most of the adverse effects (AEs) associated with IVIg administration are mild and transient. The immediate AEs include headache, flushing, malaise, chest tightness, fever, chills, myalgia, fatigue, dyspnea, back pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, blood pressure changes, tachycardia, and anaphylactic reactions, especially in IgA-deficient patients. Late AEs are rare and include acute renal failure, thromboembolic events, aseptic meningitis, neutropenia, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia, skin reactions, and rare events of arthritis. Pseudohyponatremia following IVIg is important to be recognized. Renal failure, usually oliguric and transient, occurs mostly on using sucrose-containing products owing to osmotic injury. Among high-risk patients who have a previous renal disease, dehydration, diabetes mellitus, advanced age, hypertension, hyperviscosity, or are treated by other nephrotoxic medications, administration of a non-sucrose-containing IVIg product after accomplishing hydration, in a low concentration and a slow infusion rate while supervising urine output and kidney function, is recommended. Thromboembolic complications occur because of hyperviscosity especially in patients having risk factors including advanced age, previous thromboembolic diseases, being bedridden, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or those receiving high-dose IVIg in a rapid infusion rate. Immediate AEs can be treated by the slowing or temporary discontinuation of the infusion and symptomatic therapy with analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antihistamines, and glucocorticoids in more severe reactions. Slow infusion rate of low concentration of IVIg products and hydration, especially in high-risk patients, may prevent renal failure, thromboembolic events, and aseptic meningitis.

Review: intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and thromboembolic complications

Intravenous immunglobulin (IVIg) is used to treat a number of immune-deficiences and autoimmune diseases. Safety concerns related to a number of reported thromboembolic complications prompted us to review the literature. These complications happened mainly in individuals that had risk factors for thromboembolism, like advanced age, previous thromboembolic diseases, bed-ridden, and in individuals in which high doses or high infusion rates of IVIg were administered. The mechanism responsible for these events seems to be a rise in plasma viscosity that can trigger a thromboembolic event, especially in cases in which there is an underlying circulation impairment. Complications can be minimized by using IVIg only in clear-cut indications, weighting risk versus benefit in patients who are at high risk for thromboembolism and by sticking to carefully monitored slow infusion rates. IVIg for the treatment of autoimmune disorders should be administered as a five-day course of 2 g/kg of body weight. Each daily dose of 400 mg/kg should be given in not less than eight hours.

Adverse events associated with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy

In addition to its U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved conditions, immune globulin intravenous (IGIV) is now being used to treat a vast array of autoimmune disorders. Some of the reasons for this overall increase in the use of IGIV include its effectiveness and safety. Despite many years of safe use, side effects and adverse reactions still occur. Common and mild side effects associated with IGIV include: headache, malaise, nausea, low-grade fever, urticaria, arthralgias, and myalgia. These symptoms typically resolve within a few days after their onset. Although rare, the serious and potentially fatal side effects include: anaphylactic reactions, aseptic meningitis, acute renal failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, and other thrombotic complications. Many of these side effects have occurred in patients who have significant, underlying risk factors for the development of the event. Thus, it is vitally important that a thorough and comprehensive medical evaluation be performed on every patient who is being evaluated for potential IGIV therapy. This evaluation can, to some extent, significantly minimize the risk of these side effects. Careful, constant, and close monitoring by trained personnel during the infusion can also result in early detection of such events. Physicians should thoroughly discuss the risks and benefits of IGIV with patients who are being considered for this therapy.

Myocardial infarction associated with intravenous immune globulin

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of acute myocardial infarction (MI) experienced by a patient receiving intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and review other published cases of MI associated with IVIG.

CASE SUMMARY

An 81-year-old Vietnamese man was prescribed IVIG for treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis secondary to allopurinol. Thirty minutes following the start of the IVIG infusion, the patient developed crushing retrosternal chest pain and shortness of breath. The pain improved upon discontinuation of IVIG infusion but recurred when IVIG was restarted. The troponin level reached 140 microg/L, and a persantine sestamibi stress test (MIBI) indicated anterolateral ischemia. The patient was diagnos ed with non-ST-elevation MI. An objective causality assessment using the Naranjo probability scale revealed a probable association between this adverse reaction and IVIG treatment.

DISCUSSION

Although an association between IVIG administration and MI has not been demonstrated in clinical trials, accumulating clinical experience suggests that a relationship between IVIG and myocardial ischemia exists. Twenty published case reports were identified. Risk of acute MI seems to be increased with use of high-dose IVIG and in older individuals, especially those with at least one cardiovascular risk factor, such as ischemic heart disease or hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Case reports suggest a causal relationship between the use of IVIG and MI and other thrombotic events. While cardiovascular disease is not considered an absolute contraindication to therapy, expanding indications and subsequent use of IVIG merit that clinicians be aware of patient characteristics that may increase the risk for adverse reactions and recognize early signs of infarction.

[Cortical blindness associated with Guillain-Barre syndrome: a complication of dysautonomia?]

INTRODUCTION

We report a case of a Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) with subarachnoid hemorrhage and regressive occipital white matter lesions.

OBSERVATION

A 62-year-old woman developed ascendant progressive paresthesia and weakness of arms and legs, 48 hours after enteritis infection. Neurological examination showed tetraparesia with loss of deep tendon reflexes and alteration of proprioception tests. Nerve conduction studies revealed polyradiculoneuritis. Then she presented an acute blindness and hypertension. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed bilateral occipital lesions and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis revealed an elevated protein level (1.54 g/l) and red blood cells without meningitis. Brain arteriography was normal. Intravenous immunoglobulins improved neurological symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Posterior localisation of reversible white matter lesions evoked a reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. The implication of arterial hypertension caused by dysautonomia during GBS could be suspected.

Strokes after intravenous gamma globulin: thrombotic phenomenon in patients with risk factors or just coincidence?

We report the case of an 82-year-old woman with a diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) for more than 10 years, who developed an ischemic stroke during infusion of immunoglobulin (IVIG). She had received IVIG intermittently for several years, and the previous 86 doses were well tolerated. Thromboembolism was suspected based on magnetic resonance angiogram and on further extension of the deficit after 4 days of evolution. Strokes were associated with the use of IVIG in different clinical circumstances. Pre-existing thrombogenic risk factors should be carefully considered for patients undergoing treatment with IVIG. Clinical evaluation, with attention to history, a focused vascular work-up, and looking for markers of dehydration, can identify the high-risk patient for whom a careful analysis of the risk/benefit ratio is warranted.

Thromboembolic events as an emerging adverse effect during high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in elderly patients: a case report and discussion of the relevant literature

A case of an 82-year-old man who suffered an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction while receiving treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for thrombocytopenia is discussed. A total of 29 other cases of thromboembolism related to IVIg therapy have been reported, and the incidence seems to be especially high in elderly patients with cerebrovascular risk factors and also in patients with paraproteinemias. Possible mechanisms to account for this complication may include some of the following: platelet activation, increased blood viscosity, contamination of IVIg with activated coagulation factors, induced arterial vasospasm, production of vasoconstrictive cytokines, and vasculitis. Ten patients out of the 29 reported patients died from this serious complication. In our patient, spontaneous reperfusion occurred without any treatment and he had an uneventful outcome.

Thrombosis complicating high dose intravenous immunoglobulin: report of three cases and review of the literature

High dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVG) is increasingly used in a broad range of immune mediated diseases. Thrombosis was exceptionally reported as a complication of this therapy. We describe three cases of thrombotic complications during or soon after IVIG treatment: myocardial infarction in a man and cerebral infarctions in an elderly man, associated with peripheral ischemia in a woman. In addition we review the published cases in the literature and discuss the possible etiologic factors.

A child with Miller Fisher syndrome

We describe the case of a six-year-old girl who presented with a 3-day history of diplopia and gait disturbance following a febrile flu-like illness. On examination she was found to have ataxia, areflexia and ophthalmoplegia, and a diagnosis of Miller Fisher syndrome was made after the exclusion of other conditions. This report outlines the frequency of Miller Fisher syndrome and lists the differential diagnoses that should be considered in Australia. In addition, the occurrence of pupillary dysfunction is discussed.

Cerebral infarction following intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for Guillain-Barre syndrome

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy is used increasingly for different immune-mediated diseases, such as the Guillain-Barre syndrome. We report the case of a 55-year-old man who developed a cerebral infarction 2 days after completion of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barre syndrome.

Novel therapeutic approaches to Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome is an autoimmune disease which occurs throughout the world. Whilst the majority of patients can expect a reasonable recovery, about 10% die and 10% are left disabled with current therapy. The standard treatment is a five day course of iv. immunoglobulin, given at a dose of 0.4 g/kg/day, with plasma exchange as an equally efficacious alternative. Steroids are ineffective in Guillain-Barré syndrome. All new potential therapeutic agents need to be tested in addition to the standard agents available. Future potential therapies are suggested by the study of the animal model experimental autoimmune neuritis in the Lewis rat. Whilst in theory it is possible to target the different stages of the immune response, in practice not all of the steps at which experimental autoimmune neuritis can be prevented will be translatable to human Guillain-Barré syndrome. This is because Guillain-Barré syndrome probably presents after the immune reaction has been ongoing for some time and therefore early aspects of the immune response cannot be prevented. Many of the possible measures would have widespread immunosuppressive effects which would be unacceptable to patients. Interfering with the immune response by attempting to block antigen binding or inducing tolerance may not be practical, owing to the possibility of exacerbating disease. Once we have a more thorough understanding of the pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome, then immune-specific therapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome may become a possibility, rather than general immunosuppressive measures. Trials of beta-interferon and of a combination of steroid and i.v. immunoglobulin are underway. A trial of a second course of i.v. immunoglobulin is planned.