1
|
Cruse D, Ragazinskaite K, Chinner A, Bareham C, Roberts N, Banner R, Chennu S, Villa D. Family caregivers' sense-making of the results of functional neurodiagnostics for patients with Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2024:1-22. [PMID: 38230516 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2023.2299448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Functional neuroimaging and electrophysiological assessments can identify evidence of residual consciousness and cognition in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) who are otherwise behaviourally unresponsive. These functional neurodiagnostics are increasingly available in clinical settings and are recommended by international clinical guidelines to reduce diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty, and thereby assist family caregivers in their best-interests decision-making. Nevertheless, little is known about how family caregivers make sense of the results of these state-of-the-art functional neurodiagnostics. By applying Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to interviews with family caregivers of patients with diagnoses of PDOC who had received a functional neurodiagnostic assessment, we identify three primary themes of sense-making: The special significance of "brain scans"; A dynamic sense-making process; Holding on to hope and holding on to the person. These themes highlight the challenges of helping family caregivers to balance the relative importance of functional neurodiagnostic results with other clinical assessments and identify an ability of family caregivers to hold a contradiction in which they hope for recovery but simultaneously express a rational understanding of evidence to the contrary. We offer several recommendations for the ways in which family caregivers can be better supported to make sense of the results of functional neurodiagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damian Cruse
- Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | | | - Amy Chinner
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | | | - Neil Roberts
- Sawbridgeworth Medical Services, Jacobs & Gardens Neuro Centres, Sawbridgeworth, UK
| | - Ruth Banner
- Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Srivas Chennu
- School of Computing, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Darrelle Villa
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- Centre for Applied Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arandjelović O. Resolving the ethical quagmire of the persistent vegetative state. J Eval Clin Pract 2023; 29:1108-1118. [PMID: 37157947 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A patient is diagnosed with the persistent vegetative state (PVS) when they show no evidence of the awareness of the self or the environment for an extended period of time. The chance of recovery of any mental function or the ability to interact in a meaningful way is low. Though rare, the condition, considering its nature as a state outwith the realm of the conscious, coupled with the trauma experienced by the patient's kin as well as health care staff confronted with painful decisions regarding the patient's care, has attracted a considerable amount of discussion within the bioethics community. AIMS At present, there is a wealth of literature that discusses the relevant neurology, that elucidates the plethora of ethical challenges in understanding and dealing with the condition, and that analyses the real-world cases which have prominently featured in the mainstream media as a result of emotionally charged, divergent views concerning the provision of care to the patient. However, there is scarcely anything in the published scholarly literature that proposes concrete and practically actionable solutions to the now widely recognized moral conundrums. The present article describes a step in that direction. MATERIALS & METHODS I start from the very foundations, laying out a sentientist approach which serves as the basis for the consequent moral decision-making, and then proceed to systematically identify and deconstruct the different cases of discord, using the aforementioned foundations as the basis for their resolution. RESULTS A major intellectual contribution concerns the fluidity of the duty of care which I argue is demanded by the sentientist focus. DISCUSSION The said duty is shown initially to have for its object the patient, which depending on the circumstances, can change to the patient's kin, or the health care staff themselves. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the proposed framework represents the first comprehensive proposal regarding the decision-making processes involved in the deliberation on the provision of life sustaining treatment to a patient in a PVS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ognjen Arandjelović
- School of Computer Science, North Haugh, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boegle K, Bassi M, Comanducci A, Kuehlmeyer K, Oehl P, Raiser T, Rosenfelder M, Sitt JD, Valota C, Willacker L, Bender A, Grill E. Informal Caregivers of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: a Qualitative Study of Communication Experiences and Information Needs with Physicians. NEUROETHICS-NETH 2022; 15:24. [PMID: 35912377 PMCID: PMC9307713 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09503-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
AbstractDue to improvements in medicine, the figures of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) are increasing. Diagnostics of DoC and prognostication of rehabilitation outcome is challenging but necessary to evaluate recovery potential and to decide on treatment options. Such decisions should be made by doctors and patients’ surrogates based on medico-ethical principles. Meeting information needs and communicating effectively with caregivers as the patients´ most common surrogate-decision makers is crucial, and challenging when novel tech-nologies are introduced. This qualitative study aims to explore information needs of informal DoC caregivers, how they manage the obtained information and their perceptions and experiences with caregiver-physician communication in facilities that implemented innovative neurodiagnostics studies. In 2021, we conducted semi-structured interviews with nine caregivers of clinically stable DoC patients in two rehabilitation centers in Italy and Germany. Participants were selected based on consecutive purposeful sampling. Caregivers were recruited at the facilities after written informed consent. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated. For analysis, we used reflexive thematic analysis according to Braun & Clarke (2006). Caregivers experienced the conversations emotionally, generally based on the value of the information provided. They reported to seek positive information, comfort and empathy with-in the communication of results of examinations. They needed detailed information to gain a deep understanding and a clear picture of their loved-one’s condition. The results suggest a mismatch between the perspectives of caregivers and the perspectives of medical profession-als, and stress the need for more elaborate approaches to the communication of results of neu-rodiagnostics studies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Young MJ, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials for Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sci 2022; 12:211. [PMID: 35203974 PMCID: PMC8870384 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
As the clinical trial landscape for patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) expands, consideration of associated ethical challenges and opportunities is of ever-increasing importance. Responsible conduct of research in the vulnerable population of persons with DoC, including those with coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS), minimally conscious state (MCS), covert cortical processing (CCP), and cognitive motor dissociation (CMD), demands proactive deliberation of unique ethical issues that may arise and the adoption of robust protections to safeguard patients, surrogates, and other key stakeholders. Here we identify and critically evaluate four central categories of ethical considerations in clinical trials involving participants with DoC: (1) autonomy, respect for persons and informed consent of individuals with liminal consciousness; (2) balancing unknown benefits and risks, especially considering the epistemological gap between behavior and consciousness that complicates ordinary ascription of subjective states; (3) disclosure to surrogates and clinical teams of investigational results pertaining to consciousness; and (4) justice considerations, including equitable access to clinical trial enrollment across communities and geographies. We outline guiding principles and research opportunities for clinicians, neuroethicists, and researchers engaged in DoC clinical trials to advance ethical study design and deployment in this complex yet crucial area of investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Young
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (B.L.E.)
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (B.L.E.)
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02114, USA
| | - Brian L. Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (B.L.E.)
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Graham M. Residual Cognitive Capacities in Patients With Cognitive Motor Dissociation, and Their Implications for Well-Being. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY 2021; 46:729-757. [PMID: 34655220 PMCID: PMC8643594 DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhab026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with severe disorders of consciousness are thought to be unaware of themselves or their environment. However, research suggests that a minority of patients diagnosed as having a disorder of consciousness remain aware. These patients, designated as having “cognitive motor dissociation” (CMD), can demonstrate awareness by imagining specific tasks, which generates brain activity detectable via functional neuroimaging. The discovery of consciousness in these patients raises difficult questions about their well-being, and it has been argued that it would be better for these patients if they were allowed to die. Conversely, I argue that CMD patients may have a much higher level of well-being than is generally acknowledged. It is far from clear that their lives are not worth living, because there are still significant gaps in our understanding of how these patients experience the world. I attempt to fill these gaps, by analyzing the neuroscientific research that has taken place with these patients to date. Having generated as comprehensive a picture as possible of the capacities of CMD patients, I examine this picture through the lens of traditional philosophical theories of well-being. I conclude that the presumption that CMD patients do not have lives worth living is not adequately supported.
Collapse
|
6
|
Peterson A, Webster F, Gonzalez-Lara LE, Munce S, Owen AM, Weijer C. Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:105. [PMID: 34320966 PMCID: PMC8320067 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00674-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability. Diagnosis and prognostication are difficult, and errors occur often. Novel neuroimaging methods can improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, especially in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDoC). Yet it is currently unknown how family caregivers understand this information, raising ethical concerns that disclosure of neuroimaging results could result in therapeutic misconception or false hope. Methods To examine these ethical concerns, we conducted semi-structured interviews with caregivers of patients with PDoC who were enrolled in a concurrent neuroimaging research program designed to detect covert consciousness following severe brain injury. Caregivers held surrogate decision-making status for a patient. Interviews were conducted at two time points for each caregiver. The first interview occurred before the disclosure of neuroimaging results. The second occurred after disclosure. Descriptive analysis was applied to the data of four interview topics: (1) expectations for neuroimaging; (2) reactions to evidence of preserved cognition; (3) reactions to null results; and (4) understanding of the results and study. Results Twelve caregivers participated in the study; two caregivers shared surrogate decision-making status for one patient with PDoC. Twenty-one interviews were completed; one caregiver declined to participate in the post-disclosure interview. Three patients with PDoC associated with the study displayed evidence of covert consciousness. Overall, caregivers understood the neuroimaging research and results. Caregivers who received results of covert consciousness were generally pleased. However, there was some variation in expectations and reactions to these data and null results. Conclusion This study, for the first time, reveals caregiver expectations for and reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with PDoC. Caregivers understood the neuroimaging research and results, casting doubt on speculative ethical concerns regarding therapeutic misconception and false hope. However, disclosure of neuroimaging result could be improved. Pre-disclosure consultations might assist professionals in shaping caregiver expectations. Standardization of disclosure might also improve comprehension of the results. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00674-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Peterson
- Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, USA.
| | - Fiona Webster
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Canada
| | | | - Sarah Munce
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronoto, Canada
| | - Adrian M Owen
- Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Charles Weijer
- Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Philosophy, Western University, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chinner A, Pauli R, Cruse D. The impact of prolonged disorders of consciousness on family caregivers' quality of life - A scoping review. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2021; 32:1643-1666. [PMID: 34085903 PMCID: PMC9487862 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1922463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Providing long-term care for a family member diagnosed with a Prolonged Disorder of Consciousness (PDoC) can have a significant impact on the lives of family caregivers. This scoping review aimed to explore the current literature investigating the impact of caring for a person in a PDoC on family caregivers’ Quality of Life (QOL), as categorized using the WHOQOL-BREF model. We observed that articles employing quantitative methodologies mostly reported QOL outcomes relating to negative feelings, thinking, learning, memory and concentration, and personal relationships. Articles employing qualitative methodologies mostly reported QOL outcomes relating to negative feelings, personal relationships, positive feelings, and health and social care accessibility and quality. A descriptive content analysis of the QOL outcomes highlighted the limitations of the current literature base in representing the complexities of the experiences of family members providing care for a person in a PDoC. To provide valuable and personalized support to caregivers, without pathologizing or medicalizing their distress, it is vital to characterize more accurately the contextual subtleties of each person’s situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Chinner
- School of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ruth Pauli
- School of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Damian Cruse
- School of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Developing the Disorders of Consciousness Guideline and Challenges of Integrating Shared Decision-Making Into Clinical Practice. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2020; 34:199-204. [PMID: 31058760 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review methodology informing evidence-based guideline development and integration of guidelines into clinical care through shared decision-making (SDM) and highlight challenges to SDM in disorders of consciousness. METHODS We describe guideline development strategies and implications for use, approaches to SDM generally and with surrogate decision makers, and considerations when implementing the prolonged disorders of consciousness guideline into clinical care. RESULTS Clinical practice guidelines aim to improve high-quality patient care and outcomes by assessing the best medical evidence and incorporating this into care recommendations. This is accomplished through transparent methodology and compliance with published standards. Guidelines support SDM with patients and surrogate decision makers. Effective SDM can be challenging in conditions such as prolonged disorders of consciousness where surrogates are required, but assessment of patient values and incorporation of these values into SDM is ethically critical. CONCLUSIONS Recently published disorders of consciousness guideline recommendations provide strategies for clinicians to enhance quality care for individuals with prolonged disorders of consciousness. They also provide details helping clinicians partner with individuals with disorders of consciousness and their surrogates. Further research is needed into many aspects of caring for individuals with disorders of consciousness and optimal strategies for partnering with surrogates in decision-making.
Collapse
|
9
|
From Awareness to Prognosis: Ethical Implications of Uncovering Hidden Awareness in Behaviorally Nonresponsive Patients. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2020; 28:616-631. [PMID: 31526429 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180119000550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Long-term patient outcomes after severe brain injury are highly variable, and reliable prognostic indicators are urgently needed to guide treatment decisions. Functional neuroimaging is a highly sensitive method of uncovering covert cognition and awareness in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness, and there has been increased interest in using it as a research tool in acutely brain injured patients. When covert awareness is detected in a research context, this may impact surrogate decisionmaking-including decisions about life-sustaining treatment-even though the prognostic value of covert consciousness is currently unknown. This paper provides guidance to clinicians and families in incorporating individual research results of unknown prognostic value into surrogate decisionmaking, focusing on three potential issues: (1) Surrogate decisionmakers may misinterpret results; (2) Results may create false hope about the prospects of recovery; (3) There may be disagreement about the meaningfulness or relevance of results, and appropriateness of continued care.
Collapse
|
10
|
Peterson A. How Will Families React to Evidence of Covert Consciousness in Brain-Injured Patients? NEUROETHICS-NETH 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12152-019-09428-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
11
|
A Critical Analysis of Joseph Fins' Mosaic Decisionmaking: A Response to "Mosaic Decisionmaking and Reemergent Agency after Severe Brain Injury" (CQ 27 (1)). Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2019; 28:725-736. [PMID: 31526420 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180119000665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, the author argues that Joseph Fins' mosaic decisionmaking model for brain-injured patients is untenable. He supports this claim by identifying three problems with mosaic decisionmaking. First, that it is unclear whether a mosaic is a conceptually adequate metaphor for a decisionmaking process that is intended to promote patient autonomy. Second, that the proposed legal framework for mosaic decisionmaking is inappropriate. Third, that it is unclear how we ought to select patients for participation in mosaic decisionmaking.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bodien YG, Giacino JT. Challenges and Pitfalls Associated with Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications of Functional Neuroimaging in Disorders of Consciousness. Open Neuroimag J 2016; 10:23-31. [PMID: 27347262 PMCID: PMC4894860 DOI: 10.2174/1874440001610010023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2016] [Revised: 04/06/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The diagnostic assessment of patients with disorder of consciousness is currently based on clinical testing at the bedside and prone to a high error rate in the assessment of the degree of conscious awareness. Investigation of more objective assessment strategies, such as the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to detect conscious awareness, are becoming increasingly popular in the research community. However, inherent challenges to the use of fMRI threaten its validity as a diagnostic tool and will need to be resolved prior to its integration into the clinical setting. These challenges, which range from the heterogeneity of the patient sample to factors influencing data acquisition and biases in interpretation strategies, are discussed below. Recommendations aimed at mitigating some of the limitations are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Weijer C, Bruni T, Gofton T, Young GB, Norton L, Peterson A, Owen AM. Ethical considerations in functional magnetic resonance imaging research in acutely comatose patients. Brain 2015; 139:292-9. [PMID: 26373606 PMCID: PMC5839553 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
10.1093/brain/awv272_video_abstractawv272_video_abstract
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Weijer
- 1 Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B8, Canada 2 Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada
| | - Tommaso Bruni
- 1 Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B8, Canada 2 Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada
| | - Teneille Gofton
- 3 Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - G Bryan Young
- 3 Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Loretta Norton
- 2 Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada 3 Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Andrew Peterson
- 1 Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B8, Canada 2 Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada
| | - Adrian M Owen
- 1 Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B8, Canada 2 Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Peterson A, Cruse D, Naci L, Weijer C, Owen AM. Risk, diagnostic error, and the clinical science of consciousness. Neuroimage Clin 2015; 7:588-97. [PMID: 25844313 PMCID: PMC4375779 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Revised: 01/14/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, a number of new neuroimaging techniques have detected covert awareness in some patients previously thought to be in a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. This raises worries for patients, families, and physicians, as it indicates that the existing diagnostic error rate in this patient group is higher than assumed. Recent research on a subset of these techniques, called active paradigms, suggests that false positive and false negative findings may result from applying different statistical methods to patient data. Due to the nature of this research, these errors may be unavoidable, and may draw into question the use of active paradigms in the clinical setting. We argue that false positive and false negative findings carry particular moral risks, which may bear on investigators' decisions to use certain methods when independent means for estimating their clinical utility are absent. We review and critically analyze this methodological problem as it relates to both fMRI and EEG active paradigms. We conclude by drawing attention to three common clinical scenarios where the risk of diagnostic error may be most pronounced in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Peterson
- Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, Natural Sciences Centre, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada ; Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, Stevenson Hall, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
| | - Damian Cruse
- Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, Natural Sciences Centre, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
| | - Lorina Naci
- Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, Natural Sciences Centre, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
| | - Charles Weijer
- Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, Natural Sciences Centre, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada ; Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, Stevenson Hall, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada ; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, Kresge Building, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
| | - Adrian M Owen
- Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, Natural Sciences Centre, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada ; Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, Stevenson Hall, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|