1
|
Domaradzki J, Czekajewska J, Walkowiak D. Trust and Support for Cancer Research Biobanks: Insights from Cancer Patients in Poland. Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944263. [PMID: 38867418 PMCID: PMC11184987 DOI: 10.12659/msm.944263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biobanks are legally regulated entities that acquire, store, prepare, preserve, test, analyze, and distribute defined biological material and related information and data from human sources. This study aimed to evaluate trust, support and willingness to donate personal data and tissue samples for biobanking from cancer patients attending oncology departments in Poznań, Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study utilized data from questionnaire-based survey conducted from February to June 2023 among 548 patients from 2 Poznań hospitals equipped with oncology treatment units. The survey employed convenience sampling. Statistical analysis was carried out using JASP 0.18.3 and PQStat1.8.6., with significance levels set at 0.05. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were utilized to present the results. RESULTS 92.2% of cancer patients supported the establishment of cancer research biobank in Poland, and 93.1% declared the willingness to share their cancer tissues for research purposes. Patients' willingness to donate was associated with biomedical research conducted by biobanks and types of biobank institutions. Most patients were willing to donate for research on cancer, genetic and autoimmune diseases or dementia, but were reluctant to participate in research on sexual identity, intelligence, aggression and for-profit research. Patients were willing to donate to biobanks managed by medical universities, public institutions, clinical hospitals and national biobanks but not to foreign and private biobanks. CONCLUSIONS Although patients' support for cancer biobank is high it is not unconditional as their willingness to participate in cancer-related research is associated with types of biomedical research conducted by biobanks and different types of biobank institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Domaradzki
- Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Justyna Czekajewska
- Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Dariusz Walkowiak
- Department of Organization and Management in Health Care, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Staunton C, Shabani M, Mascalzoni D, Mežinska S, Slokenberga S. Ethical and social reflections on the proposed European Health Data Space. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:498-505. [PMID: 38355959 PMCID: PMC11061131 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01543-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the benefits of international data sharing. Data sharing enabled the health care policy makers to make decisions based on real-time data, it enabled the tracking of the virus, and importantly it enabled the development of vaccines that were crucial to mitigating the impact of the virus. This data sharing is not the norm as data sharing needs to navigate complex ethical and legal rules, and in particular, the fragmented application of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The introduction of the draft regulation for a European Health Data Space (EHDS) in May 2022 seeks to address some of these legal issues. If passed, it will create an obligation to share electronic health data for certain secondary purposes. While there is a clear need to address the legal complexities involved with data sharing, it is critical that any proposed reforms are in line with ethical principles and the expectations of the data subjects. In this paper we offer a critique of the EHDS and offer some recommendations for this evolving regulatory space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciara Staunton
- Institute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
- School of Law, University of Kwazulunatal, Durban, South Africa.
| | - Mahsa Shabani
- Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Deborah Mascalzoni
- Institute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
- Department of Public Health and Caring Science, Uppsala University, CRB, P.O. Box 256, 751 05, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Signe Mežinska
- Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lawson J, Rahimzadeh V, Baek J, Dove ES. Achieving Procedural Parity in Managing Access to Genomic and Related Health Data: A Global Survey of Data Access Committee Members. Biopreserv Biobank 2024; 22:123-129. [PMID: 37192473 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Data access committees (DACs) are critical players in the data sharing ecosystem. DACs review requests for access to data held in one or more repositories and where specific constraints determine how the data may be used and by whom. Our team surveyed DAC members affiliated with genomic data repositories worldwide to understand standard processes and procedures, operational metrics, bottlenecks, and efficiencies, as well as their perspectives on possible improvements to quality review. We found that DAC operations and systemic issues were common across repositories globally. In general, DAC members endeavored to achieve an appropriate balance of review efficiency, quality, and compliance. Our results suggest a similarly proportionate path forward that helps DACs pursue mutual improvements to efficiency and compliance without sacrificing review quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Lawson
- Data Sciences Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vasiliki Rahimzadeh
- Data Sciences Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jinyoung Baek
- Data Sciences Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edward S Dove
- School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leung T, Verheij RA, Francke AL, Tomassen M, Houtzager M, Joling KJ, Oosterveld-Vlug MG. Setting up a Governance Framework for Secondary Use of Routine Health Data in Nursing Homes: Development Study Using Qualitative Interviews. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e38929. [PMID: 36696162 PMCID: PMC9909520 DOI: 10.2196/38929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the nursing home sector, reusing routinely recorded data from electronic health records (EHRs) for knowledge development and quality improvement is still in its infancy. Trust in appropriate and responsible reuse is crucial for patients and nursing homes deciding whether to share EHR data for these purposes. A data governance framework determines who may access the data, under what conditions, and for what purposes. This can help obtain that trust. Although increasing attention is being paid to data governance in the health care sector, little guidance is available on development and implementation of a data governance framework in practice. OBJECTIVE This study aims to describe the development process of a governance framework for the "Registry Learning from Data in Nursing Homes," a national registry for EHR data on care delivered by nursing home physicians (in Dutch: specialist ouderengeneeskunde) in Dutch nursing homes-to allow data reusage for research and quality improvement of care. METHODS Relevant stakeholders representing practices, policies, and research in the nursing home sector were identified. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 people from 14 stakeholder organizations. The main aim of the interviews was to explore stakeholders' perspectives regarding the Registry's aim, data access criteria, and governing bodies' tasks and composition. Interview topics and analyses were guided by 8 principles regarding governance for reusing health data, as described in the literature. Interview results, together with legal advice and consensus discussions by the Registry's consortium partners, were used to shape the rules, regulations, and governing bodies of the governance framework. RESULTS Stakeholders valued the involvement of nursing home residents and their representatives, nursing home physicians, nursing homes' boards of directors, and scientists and saw this as a prerequisite for a trustworthy data governance framework. For the Registry, involvement of these groups can be achieved through a procedure in which residents can provide their consent or objection to the reuse of the data, transparency about the decisions made, and providing them a position in a governing body. In addition, a data request approval procedure based on predefined assessment criteria indicates that data reuse by third parties aligns with the aims of the Registry, benefits the nursing home sector, and protects the privacy of data subjects. CONCLUSIONS The stakeholders' views, expertise, and knowledge of other frameworks and relevant legislation serve to inform the application of governance principles to the contexts of both the nursing home sector and the Netherlands. Many different stakeholders were involved in the development of the Registry Learning from Data in Nursing Homes' governance framework and will continue to be involved. Engagement of the full range of stakeholders in an early stage of governance framework development is important to generate trust in appropriate and responsible data reuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert A Verheij
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Tranzo, School of Social Sciences and Behavioural Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Anneke L Francke
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Public and Occupational Health, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marit Tomassen
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Max Houtzager
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karlijn J Joling
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hammack-Aviran C, Eilmus A, Diehl C, Gottlieb KG, Gonzales G, Davis LK, Clayton EW. LGBTQ+ Perspectives on Conducting Genomic Research on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Behav Genet 2022; 52:246-267. [PMID: 35614288 PMCID: PMC9132750 DOI: 10.1007/s10519-022-10105-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with LGBTQ+-identified individuals (n = 31) to explore the range of LGBTQ+ perspectives on genomic research using either sexual orientation or gender identity (SOGI) data. Most interviewees presumed that research would confirm genetic contributions to sexual orientation and gender identity. Primary hopes for such confirmation included validating LGBTQ+ identities, improved access to and quality of healthcare and other resources, and increased acceptance in familial, socio-cultural, and political environments. Areas of concern included threats of pathologizing and medicalizing LGBTQ+ identities and experiences, undermining reproductive rights, gatekeeping of health or social systems, and malicious testing or misuse of genetic results, particularly for LGBTQ+ youth. Overall, interviewees were divided on the acceptability of genomic research investigating genetic contributions to sexual orientation and gender identity. Participants emphasized researchers' ethical obligations to LGBTQ+ individuals and endorsed engagement with LGBTQ+ communities throughout all aspects of genomic research using SOGI data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Hammack-Aviran
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave., Suite 400, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA
| | - Ayden Eilmus
- College of Arts and Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Carolyn Diehl
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave., Suite 400, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA
| | | | - Gilbert Gonzales
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lea K Davis
- Department of Medicine, Health and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ellen Wright Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave., Suite 400, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- Brian D Earp
- Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brewer S, Pearson S, Maull R, Godsiff P, Frey JG, Zisman A, Parr G, McMillan A, Cameron S, Blackmore H, Manning L, Bidaut L. A trust framework for digital food systems. NATURE FOOD 2021; 2:543-545. [PMID: 37118166 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00346-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Brewer
- Lincoln Institute for Agri-Food Technology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| | - Simon Pearson
- Lincoln Institute for Agri-Food Technology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
| | - Roger Maull
- University of Exeter, Business School, Exeter, UK
| | - Phil Godsiff
- University of Exeter, Business School, Exeter, UK
| | - Jeremy G Frey
- Department of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrea Zisman
- Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Gerard Parr
- University of East Anglia, School of Computing Sciences, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Luc Bidaut
- School of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| |
Collapse
|