Flow diverters: inter and intra-rater reliability of porosity and pore density measurements

Flow Diverter Performance Comparison of Different Wire Materials for Effective Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment

A flow diverter (FD) is an effective method for treating wide-necked intracranial aneurysms by inducing hemodynamic changes in aneurysms. However, the procedural technique remains challenging, and it is often not performed properly in many cases of deployment or placements. In this study, three types of FDs that changed the material of the wire were prepared within the same structure. Differences in physical properties, such as before and after delivery loading stent size, radial force, and radiopacity, were evaluated. The performances in terms of deployment and trackability force were also evaluated in a simulated model using these FDs. Furthermore, changes of deployment patterns when these FDs were applied to a 3D-printed aneurysm model were determined. The NiTi FD using only nitinol (NiTi) wire showed 100% size recovery and 42% to 45% metal coverage after loading. The low trackability force (10.9 to 22.9 gf) allows smooth movement within the delivery system. However, NiTi FD cannot be used in actual surgeries due to difficulties in X-ray identification. NiTi-Pt/W FD, a combination of NiTi wire and platinum/tungsten (Pt/W) wire, had the highest radiopacity and compression force (6.03 ± 0.29 gf) among the three FDs. However, it suffered from high trackability force (22.4 to 39.9 gf) and the end part braiding mesh tended to loosen easily, so the procedure became more challenging. The NiTi(Pt) FD using a platinum core nitinol (NiTi(Pt)) wire had similar trackability force (11.3 to 22.1 gf) to NiTi FD and uniform deployment, enhancing procedural convenience. However, concerns about low expansion force (1.79 ± 0.30 gf) and the potential for migration remained. This comparative analysis contributes to a comprehensive understanding of how different wire materials influence the performance of FDs. While this study is still in its early stages and requires further research, its development has the potential to guide clinicians and researchers in optimizing the selection and development of FDs for the effective treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

A realistic way to investigate the design, and mechanical properties of flow diverter stents

PURPOSE

Braided flow diverters (FD) are highly sophisticated, delicate, and intricate mechanical devices used to treat intracranial aneurysms. Testing such devices in vitro, however, remains an unsolved challenge. Here, we evaluate methods to measure flow, design and mechanical properties in vitro.

METHODS

Flow properties, cell porosity, pore density, and cell area were evaluated under geometrically realistic conditions by placing FDs in patient-derived, 3D-printed models of human vasculature. 4D flow MRI was used to measure fluid dynamics. Laser microscopy was used to measure the design properties of the FDs. New methods were developed to investigate the bending, circumferential, and longitudinal radial force of the FDs continuously over varying diameters.

RESULTS

The placement and flow properties of the FD in the vasculature models were successfully measured by MRI, although artifacts occurred. Likewise, the porosity, pore density, and cell area were successfully measured inside of the models using a laser microscope. The newly developed mechanical methods allowed to measure the indicated forces - to our knowledge for the first time - continuously.

CONCLUSION

Modern and specifically tailored techniques, some of which were presented here for the first time, allow detailed insights into the flow, design, and mechanical properties of braided flow diverter stents.

The new generation double layered flow diverters for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status of ongoing clinical uses

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of intracranial aneurysms has significantly evolved over the last decade with the advancement in endovascular techniques and devices. Flow diverters are the latest in the armamentarium for vascular reconstruction, aneurysm exclusion, and preservation of branch vessels. The possibility of treating various types of intracranial aneurysms, including those previously considered untreatable, has represented a new paradigm in the neurovascular era.

AREAS COVERED

This paper describes in detail the current status in the use of new generation double-layered Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED; MicroVention Terumo, Tustin, California). For this report, we reviewed the published literature for properties of the currently available FRED devices regarding safety, efficacy, and potential risks and complications associated with their use.

EXPERT OPINION

FRED and FRED Jr are the new flow diverter devices for which the existing data suggest that they are safe and efficient in addressing the treatment issues with giant, wide-necked saccular and fusiform aneurysms and those with perforators and branch vessels at high risk of occlusion with surgical clipping. Evidence is mounting on their long-term durability which increases the confidence of both the endovascular surgeon in prescribing and the patient side in accepting these FDs as treatment option for intracranial aneurysms.

Ostium Ratio and Neck Ratio Could Predict the Outcome of Sidewall Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow Diverters

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Incompletely occluded flow diverter treated aneurysms remain at risk of rupture and thromboembolic complications. Our aim was to identify the potential for incomplete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverters. We investigated whether aneurysm ostium size in relation to parent artery size affects angiographic outcomes of flow diverter-treated sidewall aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Flow diverter-treated sidewall aneurysms were divided into "occluded" and "residual" (incomplete occlusion) groups based on 6-month angiographic follow-up. We calculated the ostium ratio, a new parameter defined as the aneurysm ostium surface area versus the circumferential surface area of the parent artery. We also calculated the neck ratio, defined as clinical aneurysm neck diameter versus parent artery diameter from pretreatment 2D DSA, as a 2D surrogate. We compared the performance of these ratios with existing aneurysm morphometrics (size, neck diameter, volume, aspect ratio, size ratio, undulation index, nonsphericity index, ellipticity index, bottleneck factor, aneurysm angle, and parent vessel angle) and flow diverter-related parameters (metal coverage rate and pore density). Statistical tests and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to identify significantly different parameters between the 2 groups and test their predictive performances.

RESULTS

We included 63 flow diverter-treated aneurysms, 46 occluded and 17 residual. The ostium ratio and neck ratio were significantly higher in the residual group than in the occluded group (P < .001 and P = .02, respectively), whereas all other parameters showed no statistical difference. As discriminating parameters for occlusion, ostium ratio and neck ratio achieved areas under the curve of 0.912 (95% CI, 0.838-0.985) and 0.707 (95% CI, 0.558-0.856), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

High ostium ratios and neck ratios could predict incomplete occlusion of flow diverter-treated sidewall aneurysms. Neck ratio can be easily calculated by interventionists to predict flow-diverter treatment outcomes.

Re-treatment of residual aneurysms after flow diversion: An experimental study

Aim Flow diverters are increasingly used to treat aneurysms, but treatment is not always effective. The management of aneurysms that fail to occlude following flow diversion is problematic. We aimed to reproduce failures in an animal model and study re-treatment with additional flow diverters alone or with flow diverters and liquid embolic agent. Material and methods Twenty wide-necked aneurysms were created at the carotid-lingual bifurcation in 10 dogs, and were treated with flow diverters 4-6 weeks later. Follow-up angiography was performed at three months. Suitable residual aneurysms were randomly allocated: re-treatment with flow diverters alone ( n = 6), or with the injection of liquid embolic between two layers of flow diverters ( n = 4) or no re-treatment ( n = 2). Angiography was repeated three months later, followed by euthanasia, photography and pathology. Results Patent wide-necked aneurysms were produced in 17/20 attempts (85%); three months after flow diversion there were 15/17 (88%) residual aneurysms. In three cases, re-treatment was not possible because the flow diverter had prolapsed into the aneurysm, leaving 12 aneurysms to study. Re-treated aneurysms showed improved angiographic results at six months (median score of 2; P = 0.03), but residual aneurysms were present in all cases. Parent artery occlusion occurred in two aneurysms treated with flow diverter plus liquid embolic. At pathology, aneurysms were only partially filled with thrombus; leaks through the flow diverters were found in the neointima connecting the arterial lumen to residual aneurysms. Conclusion Re-treatment of residual flow-diverted experimental aneurysms with additional flow diverters did not lead to aneurysm occlusion.

In vitro digital subtraction angiographic evaluation of flow diverters in a patient-specific aneurysm

Background The importance of both porosity and pore density of a flow diverter is well recognized in treatment of intracranial aneurysms; however, understanding of the effect of individual wire (wire number and size) is critical in improving device design and use. Methods A total of 10 multi-layered flow diverters with different wire numbers (32, 48, 56, and 72) and sizes (30, 35, and 40 µm) were implanted into identical patient-specific middle cerebral artery aneurysm models. Digital subtraction angiography was acquired at 30 f/s and X-ray signals at three selected regions of interest were compared to determine the amount of intra-aneurysmal flow. Results Flow reduction ranged from 19% for a high porosity (82%) and low pore density (5 pores/mm²) to nearly 80% for a low porosity (49%) and high pore density (36 pores/mm²). An increase in the wire number from 32 to 72 lowers intra-aneurysmal flow and redirects the flow jet; however, the effect of wire size is not observed. Conclusions In our in vitro angiographic study, flow jet is influenced by the wire number in a device qualitatively; quantitatively, intra-aneurysmal flow is affected by both the porosity and pore density. A 2.5 mm device performs better in flow diversion of a middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm than a 3 mm device with the same wire size and wire number, but thicker wires do not lead to better flow diversion.

The pressure reduction coefficient: A new parameter to assess aneurysmal blood stasis induced by flow diverters/disruptors

Background and purpose Pore density (PD), surface metal coverage (SMC) and the number of wires are all different parameters which can influence the efficacy of a flow disruptor/diverter. Nevertheless, the relative importance of a parameter to induce intra-aneurysmal blood stasis is still poorly evaluated. Therefore, comparison between devices based on a unique value is not reliable. The aim of this study was to propose a new bench top parameter (the pressure reduction coefficient (PRC; ξ)) in order to assess the global haemodynamic effect of each flow diverter/disruptor to slow flow. Methods Eight devices were tested in vitro during three different flow conditions. For the eight devices, the PRC was computed at different volumetric flow rates to characterise flow reduction. Comparison was made with SMC, PD and the number of wires. Results The PRC obtained for flow disruptors was on average 1.5 times more efficient in reducing flow compared to flow diverters. PD (mm²) ranged from 24 to 38 for flow diverters and did not independently correlate with the PRC. The SMC of flow diverters ranged from 25% to 70%, and ranged from 20% to 100% for flow disruptors, without independent correlation to the PRC. The number of wires ranged from 48 to 96 for the flow diverters and did not correlate independently to the PRC. Conclusion There were no direct correlations between individual device characteristics and the PRC, suggesting a multifaceted and interrelating association of the overall design of each implant. Hence, the PRC could be used as a simple, reliable parameter to assess the overall capacity of flow disruptors/diverters to induce intra-aneurysmal blood stasis.

Smaller but denser: postmortem changes alter the CT characteristics of subdural hematomas

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate if (1) the volume of subdural hematomas (SDH), midline shift, and CT density of subdural hematomas are altered by postmortem changes and (2) if these changes are dependent on the postmortem interval (PMI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ante mortem computed tomography (AMCT) of the head was compared to corresponding postmortem CT (PMCT) in 19 adults with SDH. SDH volume, midline shift, and hematoma density were measured on both AMCT and PMCT and their differences assessed using Wilcoxon-Signed Rank Test. Spearman's Rho Test was used to assess significant correlations between the PMI and the alterations of SDH volume, midline shift, and hematoma density.

RESULTS

Mean time between last AMCT and PMCT was 109 h, mean PMI was 35 h. On PMCT mean midline displacement was decreased by 57% (p < 0.001); mean SDH volume was decreased by 38% (p < 0.001); and mean hematoma density was increased by 18% (p < 0.001) in comparison to AMCT. There was no correlation between the PMI and the normalization of the midline shift (p = 0.706), the reduction of SDH volume (p = 0.366), or the increase of hematoma density (p = 0.140).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that normal postmortem changes significantly affect the extent and imaging characteristics of subdural hematoma and may therefore affect the interpretation of these findings on PMCT. Radiologists and forensic pathologists who use PMCT must be aware of these phenomena in order to correctly interpret PMCT findings in cases of subdural hemorrhages.