Ulcerative colitis: definition, historical background, aetiology, diagnosis, naturel history and local complications

Patient-Reported Outcome and Clinical Scores Are Equally Accurate in Predicting Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requires the accurate, objective assessment of disease activity.

AIMS

We aimed to determine how strong patient-reported outcomes, clinical scores and symptoms correlate with endoscopy and biomarkers for assessment of disease activity in patients with UC.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with UC followed at the McGill University IBD Center and referred for endoscopy (surveillance or flare) were included prospectively between September 2018 and August 2020. Patient-reported outcome (PRO2), partial Mayo, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) and Baron and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) scores were calculated. C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FCAL) were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients with UC [age: 49(IQR:38-61) years, female: 46.2%, 57.3% extensive disease, 42.7% on biologicals] were included prospectively. Rectal bleeding (RBS), stool frequency (SF) subscore of 0, or total PRO2 remission (RBS0 and SF ≤ 1), partial Mayo (≤ 2) and SCCAI (≤ 2.5) remission were similarly associated with mucosal healing defined by MES (0 or ≤ 1), Baron (0 or ≤ 1) or UCEIS (≤ 3) scores in ROC analysis (AUC:0.93-0.72). There was a moderate-to-strong agreement between MES Baron and UCEIS (K = 0.91-0.41). A UCEIS of ≤ 3 was identified as the best cutoff to clinical or endoscopic remission. Agreement between CRP and clinical remission or endoscopic healing (MES/Baron) was poor (K ~ 0.2), while agreement between FCAL and RBS-PRO2 or MES/Baron/UCEIS was moderate to strong (K = 0.44-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between RBS, SF, PRO2, partial Mayo and SCCAI in predicting endoscopic healing was moderate to strong, while no clinically meaningful difference was found in accuracy across the scores and definitions. FCAL, but not CRP, was associated to clinical and endoscopic remission.

Ulcerative Colitis-Induced Colorectal Carcinoma: A Deleterious Concatenation

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory gastrointestinal ailment that encompasses Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). UC is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory condition of the colonic mucosa that begins in the rectum and progresses proximally in a continuous way over a portion of the entire colon. Chronic inflammation is linked to cancer, and IBD-related chronic colonic inflammation raises the risk of colorectal cancer. Chronic inflammation has been linked to cancer, and chronic colonic inflammation caused by IBD increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). When CRC arises in people with IBD, unlike sporadic CRC, the lesions are difficult to identify due to mucosal alterations produced by inflammation. The total prevalence of IBD-associated CRC is increasing due to the rapidly increasing frequency of IBD. Screening and surveillance colonoscopy in IBD patients is considered to allow for the early diagnosis of dysplasia and cancer, improving the prognosis of IBD-related CRC by giving patients proactive therapy. This article has reviewed literature pertaining to the mechanisms related to CRC development in UC and its clinical and therapeutic implications.

Does perioperative biological therapy increase 30-day post-operative complication rates in inflammatory bowel disease patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Biopharmaceuticals revolutionised inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment. However, it is postulated they compromise immunity, collagen production and angiogenesis resulting in infective post-operative complications and altered wound/anastomotic healing. Research has failed to agree on risks associated with perioperative biologics therefore it was anticipated that a systematic review may provide a consensus and contribute recommendations for clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic review conducted as per PRISMA guidelines included a methodical search of PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE/Ovid and Cochrane Library using MeSH and/or keywords for papers published between 01/01/1998 and 04/02/2019.The population analysed included adult ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, Indeterminate Colitis or IBD unclassified patients. The intervention was intra-abdominal surgery in patients treated with biological therapy in the preceding 12 weeks compared to patients who had intra-abdominal surgery without biological therapy within the defined timeframe. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI) with secondary outcomes including wound dehiscence, intra-abdominal sepsis/abscess, systemic infection and anastomotic breakdown within 30 days post-procedure. Papers were evaluated by two independent reviewers and those included were assessed for quality/bias using the Newcastle-Ottowa scale.

RESULTS

2064 UC, Crohn's and IC patients were analysed across 8 included studies. Several studies' multivariate analyses demonstrated corticosteroids to be independent predictors of morbidity. There are no increased complications associated with anti-TNFα exposure while vedolizumab increased SSI and small bowel obstruction.

CONCLUSION

Prospective studies and randomised control trials are required to clarify study outcomes and recommendations published to date. Presently, biologics should continue to be used and considered beneficial in this population.

Positioning of old and new biologicals and small molecules in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases

The past decade has brought substantial advances in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The introduction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, evidence for the value of combination therapy, the recognition of targeting lymphocyte trafficking and activation as a viable treatment, and the need for early treatment of high-risk patients are all fundamental concepts for current modern IBD treatment algorithms. In this article, authors review the existing data on approved biologicals and small molecules as well as provide insight on the current positioning of approved therapies. Patient stratification for the selection of specific therapies, therapeutic targets and patient monitoring will be discussed as well. The therapeutic armamentarium for IBD is expanding as novel and more targeted therapies become available. In the absence of comparative trials, positioning these agents is becoming difficult. Emerging concepts for the future will include an emphasis on the development of algorithms which will facilitate a greater understanding of the positioning of novel biological drugs and small molecules in order to best tailor therapy to the patient. In the interim, anti-TNF therapy remains an important component of IBD therapy with the most real-life evidence and should be considered as first-line therapy in patients with complicated Crohn’s disease and in acute-severe ulcerative colitis. The safety and efficacy of these ‘older’ anti-TNF therapies can be optimized by adhering to therapeutic algorithms which combine clinical and objective markers of disease severity and response to therapy.

Clinical trials in ulcerative colitis: a historical perspective

The clinical trial landscape in ulcerative colitis has evolved significantly in recent decades. Study endpoints have been shifting from mere clinical response to mucosal healing. It has become clear that the choice of combined clinical and endoscopic outcome criteria leads to a reduction in placebo responses, especially when central reading of the endoscopic images is performed. Accumulating evidence suggests that histological remission yields better long-term outcomes for ulcerative colitis patients than mucosal healing alone, and clinical trials with prolonged follow-up will have to address whether histological remission should be the ultimate treatment goal in ulcerative colitis. In recent years there has also been increasing interest in the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice and research, and the regulatory authorities have set up guidelines for the development of such outcomes. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of historical aspects of clinical trials in ulcerative colitis and to discuss challenges and perspectives for clinical trials in the near future. A thorough analysis of all available landmark literature (both original papers and reviews) on clinical trials in ulcerative colitis was performed.

Etiology of inflammatory bowel disease: a unified hypothesis

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), emerged and dramatically increased for about a century. Despite extensive research, its cause remains regarded as unknown. About a decade ago, a series of findings made me suspect that saccharin may be a key causative factor for IBD, through its inhibition on gut bacteria and the resultant impaired inactivation of digestive proteases and over digestion of the mucus layer and gut barrier (the Bacteria-Protease-Mucus-Barrier hypothesis). It explained many puzzles in IBD such as its emergence and temporal changes in last century. Recently I further found evidence suggesting sucralose may be also linked to IBD through a similar mechanism as saccharin and have contributed to the recent worldwide increase of IBD. This new hypothesis suggests that UC and CD are just two symptoms of the same morbidity, rather than two different diseases. They are both caused by a weakening in gut barrier and only differ in that UC is mainly due to increased infiltration of gut bacteria and the resultant recruitment of neutrophils and formation of crypt abscess, while CD is mainly due to increased infiltration of antigens and particles from gut lumen and the resultant recruitment of macrophages and formation of granulomas. It explained the delayed appearance but accelerated increase of CD over UC and many other phenomena. This paper aims to provide a detailed description of a unified hypothesis regarding the etiology of IBD, including the cause and mechanism of IBD, as well as the relationship between UC and CD.