One-year effects of glucocorticoids on bone density: a meta-analysis in cohorts on high and low-dose therapy

Bad to the bones: prescribing of drugs for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in patients on chronic glucocorticoids

Of patients prescribed systemic glucocorticoids, this study identifies the proportion prescribed osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment and associated characteristics. Overall, 13.2% of patients were prescribed osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment. Predictors included documented osteoporosis, past DXA or fracture, and provision of care within a department using embedded protocols, suggesting electronic medical record-based tools may be beneficial.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify a cohort of patients at risk for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis based on their prescribed glucocorticoid regimens and to quantify the proportion who were also prescribed osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment. The secondary objective was to recognize patient characteristics associated with receiving such treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective single-site cohort study used prescription order data to identify 7774 adults prescribed chronic glucocorticoids and measure the proportion also prescribed osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment.

RESULTS

Of the total cohort, 1026/7774 (13.2%) had osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment prescribed. Of the subgroups prescribed a prednisone-equivalent of 5, 10, or 20 mg per day or more for at least 180 days, 584/4262 (13.7%), 153/1048 (14.6%), and 47/344 (13.7%) had treatment prescribed. Factors independently associated with osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment initiation included having osteoporosis or osteopenia on the problem list (OR = 4.45, 95% CI 3.70-5.34), history of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening (OR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.82-2.62), history of fracture (OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.54-2.167), and longer duration of glucocorticoid use (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.59). The prescribing department was also a significant predictor of medication initiation, with cardiac transplant (OR = 6.04, 95% CI 3.97-9.17), oncology (OR = 4.11, OR 3.28-5.14), and lung transplant (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.08, 2.12) being positively correlated with this outcome, and nephrology (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.72) and kidney transplant (OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.37, 0.75) being negatively correlated.

CONCLUSION

Prescribing rate of osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment in patients using chronic glucocorticoids is low. Examining practices with higher prescribing rates may offer insight into improving protection against osteoporosis-induced fractures.

Optimising both disease control and glucocorticoid dosing is essential for bone protection in patients with rheumatic disease

OBJECTIVES

Inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs) are associated with increased systemic bone loss that is mediated by chronic inflammation, treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) and other factors. Our objective was to analyse the impact of variables that influence osteoporosis (OP) in patients with iRMD treated with GC.

METHODS

Rh-GIOP (acronyme) is a prospective observational cohort study investigating bone health in consecutive patients with iRMD and current or prior GC treatment. We present an analysis of the patients' baseline data here. Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry was the primary outcome. Multivariable linear regression models were performed to identify variables associated with BMD.

RESULTS

Data from 1066 patients with iRMD were analysed. GC doses of <5 mg prednisone equivalent per day, cumulative dose and duration of GC therapy were not associated with negative effects on BMD. Dosages of ≥5 mg/day lost their negative association with BMD after adjustment for confounders. When subanalysing patients with exactly 5 mg/day, no negative effect was seen. For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), GC doses of >7.5 mg/day showed a negative association with BMD overall, but this effect seemed to be specific only to patients with moderate or high disease activity (Disease Activity Score 28-C reactive protein >3.2).

CONCLUSIONS

GCs of ≤5 mg/day did not seem to be associated with a reduction of BMD in patients with iRMD and current or prior exposure to GC. This is most likely due to the dampening of inflammation by GC, which exerts a mitigating effect on the risk of OP. In RA, current GC doses of >7.5 mg/day were negatively associated with BMD, but only in patients with moderate to high disease activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02719314.

Glucocorticoids Are Not Associated with Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica, Giant Cell Arteritis and Other Vasculitides—Cross-Sectional Baseline Analysis of the Prospective Rh-GIOP Cohort

Background: Glucocorticoids (GCs) can cause osteoporosis (OP). Prior observational research on bone density and the effects of GCs in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and vasculitides is scarce and inconclusive. Methods: Rh-GIOP is a prospective cohort study of bone health in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. In this cross-sectional baseline analysis, we focused on patients with PMR and different forms of vasculitides. Multivariable linear regression was used to model the effect of current and cumulative GC intake on the minimum T-score at any site (mTs; at either lumbar spine or hip), with comprehensive adjustment for confounders. In separate models, GCs were modelled both as continuous and categorical predictors. Sensitivity analyses, stratifying by measurement site and disease, were conducted. Results: A total of 198 patients, with a mean age of 67.7 ± 11.4 years and a mean disease duration of 5.3 ± 6.3 years, were included. Most patients suffered from PMR (36%), giant cell arteritis (26%) or granulomatosis with polyangiitis (17%). Women comprised 66.7% of the patients, and 87.4% were currently taking GCs. The mean CRP was 13.2 ± 26.1 mg/L. OP diagnosed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (T-score ≤ −2.5) was present in 19.7% of the patients. While 88% were taking vitamin D supplements, calcium supplementation (4%) and treatment with anti-resorptive agents (17%) were relatively infrequent. Only 7% had a vitamin D deficit. Neither current (β(continuous model) = −0.01, 97.5% CI –0.02 to 0.01; p(all models) ≥ 0.49) nor cumulative (β(continuous model) = 0.01, 97.5% CI −0.04 to 0.07; p(all models) ≥ 0.35) GC doses were associated with mTs in any model. CRP was not associated with mTs in any model (p(all models) ≥ 0.56), and no interaction between CRP and GC intake was observed (p for interaction(all models) ≥ 0.32). Across all analyses, lower body mass index (p(all models) ≤ 0.01), history of vertebral fractures (p(all models) ≤ 0.02) and proton-pump inhibitor intake (p(all models) ≤ 0.04) were associated with bone loss. Sensitivity analyses with femoral neck and lumbar spine T-scores as dependent variables led to similar results as the analysis that excluded patients with PMR. Conclusions: In this cohort of PMR and vasculitides, we found a similar prevalence of OP by DXA to the overall elderly German population. Vitamin D supplementation was very common, and vitamin D insufficiency was less frequent than expected in Germans. There was no association between current or cumulative GC intake, CRP and impaired bone density. Proton-pump inhibitors seem to be a major, but somewhat neglected, risk factor for OP and should be given more attention. Our findings require confirmation from longitudinal analyses of the Rh-GIOP and other cohorts.

Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Adults: Consensus Recommendations From the Belgian Bone Club

Glucocorticoids are effective immunomodulatory drugs used for many inflammatory disorders as well as in transplant recipients. However, both iatrogenic and endogenous glucocorticoid excess are also associated with several side effects including an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is a common secondary cause of osteoporosis in adults. Despite availability of clear evidence and international guidelines for the prevention of GIOP, a large treatment gap remains. In this narrative review, the Belgian Bone Club (BBC) updates its 2006 consensus recommendations for the prevention and treatment of GIOP in adults. The pathophysiology of GIOP is multifactorial. The BBC strongly advises non-pharmacological measures including physical exercise, smoking cessation and avoidance of alcohol abuse in all adults at risk for osteoporosis. Glucocorticoids are associated with impaired intestinal calcium absorption; the BBC therefore strongly recommend sufficient calcium intake and avoidance of vitamin D deficiency. We recommend assessment of fracture risk, taking age, sex, menopausal status, prior fractures, glucocorticoid dose, other clinical risk factors and bone mineral density into account. Placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate, denosumab and teriparatide in GIOP. We suggest monitoring by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and vertebral fracture identification one year after glucocorticoid initiation. The trabecular bone score might be considered during DXA monitoring. Extended femur scans might be considered at the time of DXA imaging in glucocorticoid users on long-term (≥ 3 years) antiresorptive therapy. Bone turnover markers may be considered for monitoring treatment with anti-resorptive or osteoanabolic drugs in GIOP. Although the pathophysiology of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-induced osteoporosis extends beyond GIOP alone, the BBC recommends similar evaluation, prevention, treatment and follow-up principles in these patients. Efforts to close the treatment gap in GIOP and implement available effective fracture prevention strategies into clinical practice in primary, secondary and tertiary care are urgently needed.

Long-term effects on bone mineral density after four years of treatment with two intensive combination strategies, including initially high-dose prednisolone, in early rheumatoid arthritis patients: the COBRA-light trial

In this study, no difference in bone loss was observed between patients with early RA initially treated with COmbinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis (COBRA) (including initially 60 mg/day prednisolone) and patients treated with COBRA-light (including initially 30 mg/day prednisolone) during 4-year observation.

PURPOSE

To assess changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after 4 years in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initially treated with COBRA-light or COBRA therapy.

METHODS

In a 1 year, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial, patients were assigned to COBRA-light (methotrexate 25 mg/week plus initially prednisolone 30 mg/day) or COBRA (methotrexate 7.5 mg/week, sulfasalazine 2 g/day plus initially prednisolone 60 mg/day) therapy. After 1 year, antirheumatic treatment was at the discretion of treating rheumatologists. BMD was measured at baseline and after 1, 2 and 4 years at hips and lumbar spine with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD changes between treatment strategies on average over time were compared with GEE analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 155 out of 162 patients could be analysed: 68% were female with a mean age of 52 (SD 13) years. Both COBRA-light and COBRA therapy showed declines in BMD at the total hip of -3.3% and -1.7%, respectively (p = 0.12), and the femoral neck, -3.7% and -3.0%, respectively (p = 0.95). At the lumbar spine, both treatment groups showed minor decline in BMD over 4 years: -0.5% and -1.0%, respectively (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSION

In a treat-to-target design in early RA, over 4 years, no differences between groups were found in change in BMD at total hip, femoral neck and the lumbar spine. At the hip, bone loss was around 3% in both groups, while mild bone loss was observed at lumbar spine, both in patients starting prednisolone 60 and 30 mg/day. These data suggest that the well-known negative effects of prednisolone can be modulated by modern treatment of RA.

Designing effective graphs to get your message across

Research is of little use if its results are not effectively communicated. Data visualised in graphs (and tables) are key components in any scientific report, but their design leaves much to be desired. This viewpoint focuses on graph design, following two general principles: clear vision and clear understanding. Clear vision is achieved by maximising the signal to noise ratio. In a graph, the signal is the data in the form of symbols, lines or other graphic elements, and the noise is the support structure necessary to interpret the data. Clear understanding is achieved when the story in the data is told effectively, through organisation of the data and use of text. These principles are illustrated by original and improved graphs from recent publications, completed by tutorial material online (appendices, web pages and film clips). The popular matrix form (multiple graphs in one frame) is discussed as a special case. Differences between publication (including the proofing stage) and presentation are outlined. Suggestions are made for better peer review and processing of graphs in the publication stage.

Denosumab Versus Risedronate in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: Final Results of a Twenty-Four-Month Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial

Objective

Clinical trial results have shown that, in glucocorticoid‐treated patients, treatment with denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously once every 6 months (Q6M) increased spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) at month 12 significantly more than treatment with risedronate 5 mg orally once daily (QD). The present analysis was performed to compare efficacy and characterize safety through month 24.

Methods

This phase III study enrolled men and women ≥18 years old who had received ≥7.5 mg daily prednisone or equivalent for <3 months (glucocorticoid‐initiating) or for ≥3 months (glucocorticoid‐continuing) before screening. All patients <50 years old had a history of osteoporotic fracture. Glucocorticoid‐continuing patients ≥50 years old had T scores of −2.0 or less (or −1.0 or less with fracture history). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously Q6M or risedronate 5 mg orally QD for 24 months, with daily calcium and vitamin D.

Results

Of 795 patients, 590 (74.2%) completed the study (in the glucocorticoid‐initiating group, 109 of 145 patients treated with denosumab and 117 of 145 patients treated with risedronate; in the glucocorticoid‐continuing group, 186 of 253 patients treated with denosumab and 178 of 252 patients treated with risedronate). Denosumab was superior to risedronate in increasing lumbar spine and total hip BMD at all time points assessed, among glucocorticoid‐initiating patients (24‐month lumbar spine: BMD increase of 6.2% versus 1.7%, respectively [P < 0.001]; 24‐month total hip: BMD increase of 3.1% versus 0.0% [P < 0.001]) and among glucocorticoid‐continuing patients (24‐month lumbar spine: BMD increase of 6.4% versus 3.2% [P < 0.001]; 24‐month total hip: BMD increase of 2.9% versus 0.5% [P < 0.001]). Adverse events, serious adverse events (including infections), and fractures were similar between treatment groups.

Conclusion

Denosumab was superior to risedronate in terms of increases in spine and hip BMD through month 24, and the safety profile was similar between treatment groups. Denosumab may offer a new osteoporosis treatment option for glucocorticoid‐treated patients.

An updated review of glucocorticoid-related adverse events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoids represent a cornerstone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Their effect as a disease-modifying treatment in rheumatoid arthritis is well established. Despite this, the risk of adverse events of glucocorticoids, especially in high doses and over a long time, is constantly highlighted. Data on the prevalence and impact of glucocorticoid-related adverse effects in rheumatoid arthritis is needed, therefore, to be regularly revisited.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, our primary aim was to provide an update of evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies on the safety of glucocorticoid treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Our secondary aim was to provide a critical overview of the concerns raised with both study designs - randomized clinical trials versus nonrandomized observational studies - regarding the assessment of the safety of glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis.

EXPERT OPINION

In the meantime, adherence to recommendations and consensus on standardized methodologies for monitoring and reporting adverse events is essential to improve our knowledge and competence in the best management of glucocorticoids.

Osteoimmunology: Effects of Standard Orthopaedic Interventions on Inflammatory Response and Early Fracture Healing

Achieving fracture union is highly dependent on the initial inflammatory phase of fracture healing, which is influenced by both the local and systemic inflammatory environments. The rapidly emerging field of osteoimmunology involves the study of the interactions between the immune system and the skeletal system. Recent research has advanced the current state of knowledge regarding the effects of the surrounding soft-tissue injury, fracture hematoma, and the method of fracture fixation on the inflammatory phase of fracture healing. Acute systemic inflammation, as seen in patients with polytrauma, and chronic systemic inflammation, as seen in patients with diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis, affects the inflammatory phase of fracture healing. The use of NSAIDs can influence early fracture healing. Understanding the effects of standard orthopaedic interventions on the local and systemic inflammatory responses and early fracture healing is important for optimizing fracture union.