[Autoantibody diagnostics in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy]

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) is a group of rare and heterogeneous systemic diseases that manifest not only in the muscles but also in the skin, joints, and lungs. Initial symptoms can be isolated and variable and thus the diagnosis poses challenges to various specialist groups. As autoantibodies are sometimes the only specific findings that lead to the diagnosis and appropriate treatment, basic knowledge of them is essential. This article explains the available test systems, names the clinical indications necessary for the initiation of autoantibody diagnostics, provides information on the etymology, antigens, synonyms, and first descriptors, describes indirect immunofluorescence on HEp‑2 cells induced by myositis antibodies, and provides clinical-serological associations. The comparison of the autoantibody findings with the clinical symptoms and laboratory findings enables the identification of false positive or false negative laboratory findings in the sense of a plausibility check.

Learning imaging in axial spondyloarthritis: more than just a matter of experience

OBJECTIVE

Reliable interpretation of imaging findings is essential for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and requires a high level of experience. We investigated experience-dependent differences in diagnostic accuracies using X-ray (XR), MRI and CT.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included 163 subjects with low back pain. Eighty-nine patients had axSpA, and 74 patients had other conditions (mechanical, degenerative or non-specific low back pain). Final diagnoses were established by an experienced rheumatologist before the reading sessions. Nine blinded readers (divided into three groups with different levels of experience) scored the XR, CT and MRI of the sacroiliac joints for the presence versus absence of axSpA. Parameters for diagnostic performance were calculated using contingency tables. Differences in diagnostic performance between the reader groups were assessed using the McNemar test. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss kappa.

RESULTS

Diagnostic performance was highest for the most experienced reader group, except for XR. In the inexperienced and semi-experienced group, diagnostic performance was highest for CT&MRI (78.5% and 85.3%, respectively). In the experienced group, MRI showed the highest performance (85.9%). The greatest difference in diagnostic performance was found for MRI between the inexperienced and experienced group (76.1% vs 85.9%, p=0.001). Inter-rater agreement was best for CT in the experienced group with κ=0.87.

CONCLUSION

Differences exist in the learnability of the imaging modalities for axSpA diagnosis. MRI requires more experience, while CT is more suitable for inexperienced radiologists. However, diagnosis relies on both clinical and imaging information.

Self-reported diagnostic confidence predicts diagnostic accuracy in axial spondyloarthritis imaging

OBJECTIVES

Reporting diagnostic confidence (DC) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) imaging is recommended by the ASAS guidelines. Our aim was to investigate whether self-reported DC predicts diagnostic accuracy in axSpA imaging using X-ray (XR), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis including 163 patients with low back pain (89 axSpA and 56 non-axSpA). Nine blinded readers with different experience levels (inexperienced (< 1 year), semi-experienced (3-8 years) and experienced (> 12 years)) scored the sacroiliac joint images for compatibility with axSpA. DC was reported on a scale from 1 (not sure) to 10 (very sure). Mean DC scores and standard deviations were calculated for correct and incorrect responses using XR, CT, MRI, XR+MRI and CT+MRI. Differences in DC were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

DC scores were higher for correct axSpA diagnoses and differed significantly between correct and incorrect responses for all modalities (p< 0.001), with a mean DC of 7.1 ± 2.1 and 6.3 ± 2.1 for XR, 8.3 ± 1.8 and 6.7 ± 2.0 for CT, 8.1 ± 1.9 and 6.2 ± 1.9 for MRI, 8.2 ± 1.8 and 6.7 ± 1.8 for XR+MRI and 8.4 ± 1.8 and 6.8 ± 1.8 for CT+MRI, respectively. This was also the case when looking at the results by experience group, except for XR in the inexperienced group.

CONCLUSION

Providing self-reported DC in radiological reports is useful information to predict diagnostic reliability in axSpA imaging.

Performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and Omicron BA.1 antibody assays compared with pseudovirus neutralization tests

BACKGROUND

Commercially available ELISA-based antibody tests are used to approximate vaccination success against SARS-CoV-2 in at-risk patients, but it is unclear whether they correlate with neutralization of the Omicron variant.

METHODS

269 serum samples of a cohort of 44 non-immunosuppressed participants and 65 MTX-treated rheumatic patients taken before and after COVID-19 booster vaccinations were measured using COVID-19 antibody testing systems with wild-type and Omicron BA.1 antigens developed by three different manufacturers (surrogate virus neutralization test cPass, and binding antibody tests QuantiVac and SeraSpot), as well as with a pseudovirus neutralization test (pVNT). The pVNT was considered the gold standard for determining the presence and level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

RESULTS

All three wild-type ELISAs showed excellent test performance compared with wild-type neutralization in pVNT. However, out of 56 samples without Omicron BA.1 neutralization in pVNT, 71.4% showed positive results in at least one and 28.6% in all three wild-type ELISAs at the manufacturer-defined cut-offs. Omicron ELISAs showed either decreased specificity (57.1% and 55.4% for binding ELISAs) or sensitivity (51.2% in cPass) compared to Omicron neutralization in pVNT. The proportion of any false positive results among all samples decreased from 26.5% before to 3.2% after booster vaccination, however binding antibody test specificities remained below 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a poorer test performance of new Omicron antibody test systems compared to wild-type tests in detecting neutralizing antibodies against the corresponding SARS-CoV-2 variants. Decisions for booster vaccination or passive immunization of at-risk patients should not be based solely on antibody test results.

2022 EULAR points to consider for the measurement, reporting and application of IFN-I pathway activation assays in clinical research and practice

BACKGROUND

Type I interferons (IFN-Is) play a role in a broad range of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), and compelling evidence suggests that their measurement could have clinical value, although testing has not progressed into clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence-based points to consider (PtC) for the measurement and reporting of IFN-I assays in clinical research and to determine their potential clinical utility.

METHODS

EULAR standardised operating procedures were followed. A task force including rheumatologists, immunologists, translational scientists and a patient partner was formed. Two systematic reviews were conducted to address methodological and clinical questions. PtC were formulated based on the retrieved evidence and expert opinion. Level of evidence and agreement was determined.

RESULTS

Two overarching principles and 11 PtC were defined. The first set (PtC 1-4) concerned terminology, assay characteristics and reporting practices to enable more consistent reporting and facilitate translation and collaborations. The second set (PtC 5-11) addressed clinical applications for diagnosis and outcome assessments, including disease activity, prognosis and prediction of treatment response. The mean level of agreement was generally high, mainly in the first PtC set and for clinical applications in systemic lupus erythematosus. Harmonisation of assay methodology and clinical validation were key points for the research agenda.

CONCLUSIONS

IFN-I assays have a high potential for implementation in the clinical management of RMDs. Uptake of these PtC will facilitate the progress of IFN-I assays into clinical practice and may be also of interest beyond rheumatology.

Type I interferon pathway assays in studies of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the literature for assay methods that aim to evaluate type I interferon (IFN-I) pathway activation and to harmonise-related terminology.

METHODS

Three databases were searched for reports of IFN-I and rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases. Information about the performance metrics of assays measuring IFN-I and measures of truth were extracted and summarised. A EULAR task force panel assessed feasibility and developed consensus terminology.

RESULTS

Of 10 037 abstracts, 276 fulfilled eligibility criteria for data extraction. Some reported more than one technique to measure IFN-I pathway activation. Hence, 276 papers generated data on 412 methods. IFN-I pathway activation was measured using: qPCR (n=121), immunoassays (n=101), microarray (n=69), reporter cell assay (n=38), DNA methylation (n=14), flow cytometry (n=14), cytopathic effect assay (n=11), RNA sequencing (n=9), plaque reduction assay (n=8), Nanostring (n=5), bisulphite sequencing (n=3). Principles of each assay are summarised for content validity. Concurrent validity (correlation with other IFN assays) was presented for n=150/412 assays. Reliability data were variable and provided for 13 assays. Gene expression and immunoassays were considered most feasible. Consensus terminology to define different aspects of IFN-I research and practice was produced.

CONCLUSIONS

Diverse methods have been reported as IFN-I assays and these differ in what elements or aspects of IFN-I pathway activation they measure and how. No 'gold standard' represents the entirety of the IFN pathway, some may not be specific for IFN-I. Data on reliability or comparing assays were limited, and feasibility is a challenge for many assays. Consensus terminology should improve consistency of reporting.

Association between type I interferon pathway activation and clinical outcomes in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

BACKGROUND

Type I interferons (IFN-I) contribute to a broad range of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Compelling evidence suggests that the measurement of IFN-I pathway activation may have clinical value. Although several IFN-I pathway assays have been proposed, the exact clinical applications are unclear. We summarise the evidence on the potential clinical utility of assays measuring IFN-I pathway activation.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted across three databases to evaluate the use of IFN-I assays in diagnosis and monitor disease activity, prognosis, response to treatment and responsiveness to change in several RMDs.

RESULTS

Of 366 screened, 276 studies were selected that reported the use of assays reflecting IFN-I pathway activation for disease diagnosis (n=188), assessment of disease activity (n=122), prognosis (n=20), response to treatment (n=23) and assay responsiveness (n=59). Immunoassays, quantitative PCR (qPCR) and microarrays were reported most frequently, while systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis, myositis, systemic sclerosis and primary Sjögren's syndrome were the most studied RMDs. The literature demonstrated significant heterogeneity in techniques, analytical conditions, risk of bias and application in diseases. Inadequate study designs and technical heterogeneity were the main limitations. IFN-I pathway activation was associated with disease activity and flare occurrence in SLE, but their incremental value was uncertain. IFN-I pathway activation may predict response to IFN-I targeting therapies and may predict response to different treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence indicates potential clinical value of assays measuring IFN-I pathway activation in several RMDs, but assay harmonisation and clinical validation are urged. This review informs the EULAR points to consider for the measurement and reporting of IFN-I pathway assays.

Improvement of humoral immunity by repeated dose-intensified COVID-19 vaccinations in primary non- to low-responders and B cell deficient rheumatic disease patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether repeated, dose-intensified mRNA vaccinations against COVID-19 increase humoral immunity in previously low-responding patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD), including rituximab-treated and B cell depleted patients.

METHODS

Of 308 AIRD patients receiving basic immunization, 98 had a low serological response against SARS-CoV-2 with a neutralizing capacity of < 70% using surrogate neutralization assay. 38 patients received a third vaccination with 30 μg BNT162b2 16 weeks after second vaccination. If neutralizing serum capacity was below 70% four weeks after the last vaccination, then the fourth vaccination (n = 19) and the fifth (n = 4) vaccination with 100 μg mRNA-1273 took place eight weeks after the last vaccination.

RESULTS

Each of the three booster vaccinations resulted in a significant increase of mean serum neutralizing capacity (3rd: Δ = 42%, p < 0.001; 4th: Δ = 19%, p = 0.049 and 5th: Δ = 51%, p = 0.043) and produced a significant proportion of high-responders (3rd: 34%; 4th: 32% and 5th: 75%). Low B cell counts (p = 0.047), lower previous antibody response (p < 0.001) and rituximab therapy (p = 0.021) were negatively associated with successful response to the third but not to the fourth vaccination. Remarkably, substantial increases in neutralization capacity of up to 99% were observed after repeated vaccinations in B cell depleted patients.

CONCLUSION

AIRD patients with low humoral response benefited from up to three repeated dose-intensified mRNA booster vaccinations - despite low B cell count and previous rituximab therapy. Each additional vaccination substantially reduced the number of low-responding, vulnerable patients.

Type of vaccine and immunosuppressive therapy but not diagnosis critically influence antibody response after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic disease

OBJECTIVE

The development of sufficient COVID-19 vaccines has been a big breakthrough in fighting the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, vaccination effectiveness can be reduced in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD). The aim of this study was to identify factors that lead to a diminished humoral vaccination response in patients with AIRD.

METHODS

Vaccination response was measured with a surrogate virus neutralisation test and by testing for antibodies directed against the receptor-binding-domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 in 308 fully vaccinated patients with AIRD. In addition, 296 immunocompetent participants were investigated as a control group. Statistical adjusted analysis included covariates with a possible influence on antibody response.

RESULTS

Patients with AIRD showed lower antibody responses compared with immunocompetent individuals (median neutralising capacity 90.8% vs 96.5%, p<0.001; median anti-RBD-IgG 5.6 S/CO vs 6.7 S/CO, p<0.001). Lower antibody response was significantly influenced by type of immunosuppressive therapy, but not by rheumatic diagnosis, with patients under rituximab therapy developing the lowest antibody levels. Patients receiving mycophenolate, methotrexate or janus kinase inhibitors also showed reduced vaccination responses. Additional negative influencing factors were vaccination with AZD1222, old age and shorter intervals between the first two vaccinations.

CONCLUSION

Certain immunosuppressive therapies are associated with lower antibody responses after vaccination. Additional factors such as vaccine type, age and vaccination interval should be taken into account. We recommend antibody testing in at-risk patients with AIRD and emphasise the importance of booster vaccinations in these patients.

Pausing methotrexate prevents impairment of Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 neutralisation after COVID-19 booster vaccination

OBJECTIVE

The level of neutralising capacity against Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 after third COVID-19 vaccination in patients on paused or continuous methotrexate (MTX) therapy is unclear.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, neutralising serum activity against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type (Wu01) and variant of concern Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 were assessed by pseudovirus neutralisation assay before, 4 and 12 weeks after mRNA booster immunisation in 50 rheumatic patients on MTX, 26 of whom paused the medication. 44 non-immunosuppressed persons (NIP) served as control group.

RESULTS

While the neutralising serum activity against SARS-CoV-2 Wu01 and Omicron variants increased 67-73 fold in the NIP after booster vaccination, the serum activity in patients receiving MTX increased only 20-23 fold. Patients who continued MTX treatment during vaccination had significantly lower neutralisation against all variants at weeks 4 and 12 compared with patients who paused MTX and the control group, except for BA.2 at week 12. Patients who paused MTX reached comparably high neutralising capacities as NIP, except for Wu01 at week 12. The duration of the MTX pause after-not before-was associated with a significantly higher neutralisation capacity against all three variants, with an optimal duration at 10 days after vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Patients pausing MTX after COVID-19 booster showed a similar vaccine response to NIP. Patients who continued MTX demonstrated an impaired response indicating a potentially beneficial second booster vaccination. Our data also suggest that a 1 week MTX break is sufficient if the last administration of MTX occurs 1-3 days before vaccination.

SIGLEC-1 in Systemic Sclerosis: A Useful Biomarker for Differential Diagnosis

Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is a clinically heterogeneous disease that includes an upregulation of type I interferons (IFNs). The aim of this observational study was to investigate the IFN-regulated protein Sialic Acid−Binding Ig-like Lectin 1 (SIGLEC-1) as a biomarker for disease phenotype, therapeutic response, and differential diagnosis in SSc. Levels of SIGLEC-1 expression on monocytes of 203 SSc patients were determined in a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis using multicolor flow cytometry, then compared to 119 patients with other rheumatic diseases and 13 healthy controls. SSc patients higher SIGLEC-1 expression on monocytes (2097.94 ± 2134.39) than HCs (1167.45 ± 380.93; p = 0.49), but significantly lower levels than SLE (8761.66 ± 8325.74; p < 0.001) and MCTD (6414.50 ± 1846.55; p < 0.001) patients. A positive SIGELC-1 signature was associated with reduced forced expiratory volume (p = 0.007); however, we were unable to find an association with fibrotic or vascular disease manifestations. SIGLEC-1 remained stable over time and was independent of changes in immunosuppressive therapy. However, SIGLEC-1 is suitable for differentiating SSc from other connective tissue diseases. SIGLEC-1 expression on monocytes can be useful in the differential diagnosis of connective tissue disease but not as a biomarker for SSc disease manifestations or activity.

Optimising both disease control and glucocorticoid dosing is essential for bone protection in patients with rheumatic disease

OBJECTIVES

Inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs) are associated with increased systemic bone loss that is mediated by chronic inflammation, treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) and other factors. Our objective was to analyse the impact of variables that influence osteoporosis (OP) in patients with iRMD treated with GC.

METHODS

Rh-GIOP (acronyme) is a prospective observational cohort study investigating bone health in consecutive patients with iRMD and current or prior GC treatment. We present an analysis of the patients' baseline data here. Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry was the primary outcome. Multivariable linear regression models were performed to identify variables associated with BMD.

RESULTS

Data from 1066 patients with iRMD were analysed. GC doses of <5 mg prednisone equivalent per day, cumulative dose and duration of GC therapy were not associated with negative effects on BMD. Dosages of ≥5 mg/day lost their negative association with BMD after adjustment for confounders. When subanalysing patients with exactly 5 mg/day, no negative effect was seen. For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), GC doses of >7.5 mg/day showed a negative association with BMD overall, but this effect seemed to be specific only to patients with moderate or high disease activity (Disease Activity Score 28-C reactive protein >3.2).

CONCLUSIONS

GCs of ≤5 mg/day did not seem to be associated with a reduction of BMD in patients with iRMD and current or prior exposure to GC. This is most likely due to the dampening of inflammation by GC, which exerts a mitigating effect on the risk of OP. In RA, current GC doses of >7.5 mg/day were negatively associated with BMD, but only in patients with moderate to high disease activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02719314.

Pausing methotrexate improves immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination in elderly patients with rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of methotrexate (MTX) and its discontinuation on the humoral immune response after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, neutralising SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured after second vaccination in 64 patients with AIRD on MTX therapy, 31 of whom temporarily paused medication without a fixed regimen. The control group consisted of 21 patients with AIRD without immunosuppressive medication.

RESULTS

Patients on MTX showed a significantly lower mean antibody response compared with patients with AIRD without immunosuppressive therapy (71.8% vs 92.4%, p<0.001). For patients taking MTX, age correlated negatively with immune response (r=-0.49; p<0.001). All nine patients with antibody levels below the cut-off were older than 60 years. Patients who held MTX during at least one vaccination showed significantly higher mean neutralising antibody levels after second vaccination, compared with patients who continued MTX therapy during both vaccinations (83.1% vs 61.2%, p=0.001). This effect was particularly pronounced in patients older than 60 years (80.8% vs 51.9%, p=0.001). The impact of the time period after vaccination was greater than of the time before vaccination with the critical cut-off being 10 days.

CONCLUSION

MTX reduces the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in an age-dependent manner. Our data further suggest that holding MTX for at least 10 days after vaccination significantly improves the antibody response in patients over 60 years of age.

AB1155 PAUSING METHOTREXATE IMPROVES IMMUNOGENICITY OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Background

Several research groups have recently described a reduced vaccination response to COVID-19 vaccination under methotrexate (MTX) (1,2). The increase in humoral immune response when pausing MTX two weeks after vaccination has already been described for influenza vaccination (3). However, data regarding MTX-hold during COVID-19 vaccination are still lacking.

Objectives

To study the effect of MTX and its discontinuation on the humoral immune response after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD).

Methods

In this retrospective study, neutralising SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured after second vaccination in 64 rheumatic patients on methotrexate therapy, 31 of whom temporarily paused medication without a fixed regimen. The control group consisted of 21 AIRD patients without immunosuppressive medication.

Results

MTX patients showed a significantly lower mean antibody response compared to AIRD patients without immunosuppressive therapy (71.8 % vs 92.4 %, p<0.001). For patients taking MTX, age correlated negatively with immune response (r=-0.49; p<0.001). All nine patients with antibody levels below the cut-off were older than 60 years. Patients who held MTX during at least one vaccination showed significantly higher mean neutralising antibody levels after second vaccination, compared to patients who continued MTX therapy during both vaccinations (83.1 % vs 61.2 %, p=0.001). This effect was particularly pronounced in patients older than 60 years (80.8 % vs 51.9 %, p=0.001). The impact of the time period after vaccination was greater than of the time before vaccination with the critical cut-off being 10 days.

Conclusion

MTX reduces the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in an age-dependent manner. Our data further suggest that holding MTX for at least 10 days after vaccination significantly improves the antibody response in patients over 60 years of age.

References

[1]Haberman RH, Herati R, Simon D, et al. Methotrexate hampers immunogenicity to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2021

[2]Mahil SK, Bechman K, Raharja A, et al. The effect of methotrexate and targeted immunosuppression on humoral and cellular immune responses to the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2: a cohort study. The Lancet Rheumatology 2021;3(9):e627-e37.

[3]Park JK, Choi Y, Winthrop KL, et al. Optimal time between the last methotrexate administration and seasonal influenza vaccination in rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of a randomised clinical trial. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2019;78(9):1283-84.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Tanja Braun and Vera Höhne-Zimmer for their

support in obtaining the ethics vote and for their organisational support.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

OP0078 ALTERED IMMUNOLOGICAL CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS AND THE EFFECT OF TREATMENT WITH GLUCOCORTICOIDS ON CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS OF IMMUNE CELLS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: BRING BACK THE RHYTHM

Background

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), pain, joint swelling, and stiffness follow a clear circadian pattern. Most of these symptoms are most pronounced in the early morning and primarily attributed to elevated levels of the key proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNFα, which usually peak before clinical symptoms worsen (1). Synthetic glucocorticoids (GCs) are among the most prescribed drugs in the management of patients with RA. GCs have effects on almost every immune cell. GCs suppress expression of various cytokines, including IL-1β, TNFα, IL-6, and GM-CSF. Moreover, circadian rhythms of immune cells are known to be influenced by GCs. For example, GCs govern in part the rhythm of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

Objectives

To identify circadian patterns for optimization of diagnosis and treatment strategies, we conducted a clinical study comparing healthy donors (HD) and patients with RA in terms of circadian rhythms. We examined the effect of treatment with GCs on circadian immune rhythms in patients with RA.

Methods

We recruited 12 HD and 13 patients with active RA (DAS28≥4.0) who either were (n=8) or, for comparison, were not (n=5) under current treatment with GCs. Their biological clock was synchronized for a week before the study day by a scheduled sleep and mealtime regimen. On the study day, participants were provided with regular meals, allowed to eat snacks ad libitum and carry passive activities. We collected blood samples every two hours over a period of 24 hours. The absolute number of circulating immune cells, clock gene expression, and serum cytokine levels were measured with TruCount, qPCR, and multiplex suspension assay, respectively.

Results

Peripheral regulatory T cells are circadian in HD and RA, but the number was notably reduced in RA (Table 1). CD8+ T cells, CD14+ monocytes, and CD19+ B cells lost their circadian rhythms in RA, but these rhythms were restored with GC treatment. Circulating NK and NK T cells, which are not diurnal in HD, exhibited circadian fluctuations in RA. GC treatment suppressed diurnal pathological circulation rhythms of NK and NK T cells by reducing the amplitude by half. In monocytes, BMAL1, PER1, PER2, and REVERBA are only circadian in HD. GC restored the rhythms of PER2 and REVERBA. CRY1 expression showed diurnal variation in RA, but not in HD. IL-6 exhibited a circadian pattern in both groups, and GC treatment showed no significant effects on IL-6. Serum IL-4, IL-5, and MIP3α showed circadian variation in HD only. The following cytokines were notably elevated in RA-patients: IFNγ, MIP1α, MIP1β, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-17A, and IL-21. GC reduced the expression of IL-10 significantly in RA.

Table 1.

Circadian rhythms in the cellular, gene, and protein levels in HD, RA, and RA with ongoing GC treatment

ComparisonCircadian / GC impactCirculating immune cellsClock genes in monocytesSerum cytokinesHD vs. RANon-circadian in HD and RA-CLOCK, CRY2, DBP, RORAFractaline, IFNγ, CXCL11, GM-CSF, MIP1α, MIP1β, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-21, IL-23Circadian in HD and RACD3+, CD4+, regulatory T cellsPER3IL-6Circadian in HDCD8+ T cells, CD14+ monocytes, CD19+ B cellsBMAL1,PER1, PER2, REVERBAIL-4, IL-5, MIP3αCircadian in RANK cells, NK T cellsCRY1-RA vs. GCs-treated RARestorative effect by GCCD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cellsPER2, REVERBA-Enhancing effect by GCregulatory T cellsPER3, CRY1-Dampening effect by GCNK T cells, NK cells--

Conclusion

In patients with RA, we found a certain loss of circadian rhythms and the establishment of “inflammatory” rhythms. GC treatment in patients with RA resulted in three different types of effects on circadian rhythms at immune cell level: restoration, amplification, and attenuation. In conclusion, these findings provide new insights into the pathophysiology of circadian rhythms in RA that could be used to optimize diagnosis and treatment.

References

[1]Clocking in: chronobiology in rheumatoid arthritis.Buttgereit, Frank, et al. 2015, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, Vol. 11, pp. 349–356.

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants for their contribution. We thank our clinical study team: Manuela Jakstadt, Lisa Ehlers, Alexandra Damerau, Annamarie Lang, Moritz Pfeiffenberger, Gabriela May, and Pierre-Louis Krauß.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared.

SIGLEC1 enables straightforward assessment of type I interferon activity in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Objective

To evaluate sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 1 (SIGLEC1) expression on monocytes by flow cytometry as a type I interferon biomarker in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of adult and paediatric patients with the diagnosis of IIM. SIGLEC1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry and was compared with Physician Global Assessment or Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale disease activity scores. Mann Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic curves were used for cross-sectional data analysis (n=96), two-level mixed-effects linear regression model for longitudinal analyses (n=26, 110 visits). Response to treatment was analysed in 14 patients within 12 months, using Wilcoxon test. SIGLEC1 was compared with interferon-stimulated gene 15/MxA status by immunohistochemical staining of muscle biopsies (n=17).

Results

96 patients with adult (a) and juvenile (j) dermatomyositis (DM, n=38), antisynthetase syndrome (AS, n=19), immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM, n=8), inclusion body myositis (IBM, n=9) and overlap myositis (n=22) were included. SIGLEC1 distinguished significantly between active and inactive disease with an area under the curve of 0.92 (95% CI 0.83 to 1) in DM and correlated with disease activity longitudinally (aDM: standardised beta=0.54, p<0.001; jDM: standardised beta=−0.70, p<0.001). Response to treatment in DM was associated with a decreasing SIGLEC1 (p<0.01, Wilcoxon test). SIGLEC1 was found upregulated in 8 of 19 patients with AS, 2 of 9 patients with IBM but not in IMNM.

Conclusion

SIGLEC1 is a candidate biomarker to assess type I interferon activity in IIM and proved useful for monitoring disease activity and response to treatment in juvenile and adult DM.

Evaluation of SIGLEC1 in the diagnosis of suspected systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of SIGLEC1, a surrogate marker of type I IFN, with established biomarkers in an inception cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

SIGLEC1 was analyzed by flow cytometry in 232 patients referred to our institution with suspected SLE between October 2015 and September 2020.

RESULTS

SLE was confirmed in 76 of 232 patients (32.8%) according to the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria and their SIGLEC1 values were significantly higher compared with patients without SLE (p< 0.0001). A sensitivity of 98.7%, a specificity of 82.1%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.2% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.8% were calculated for SIGLEC1. Adjusted to the highest reported prevalence of SLE, the NPV and PPV were > 99.9% and 0.1%, respectively. Using ROC analysis and Delong testing, the area under the curve (AUC) for SIGLEC1 (AUC = 0.95) was significantly higher than for ANA (AUC = 0.88, p= 0.031), C3 (AUC = 0.83, p= 0.001) and C4 (AUC = 0.83, p= 0.002) but not for anti-dsDNA antibodies (AUC = 0.90, p= 0.163).

CONCLUSION

IFN-I pathway activation is detectable in almost all newly diagnosed SLE patients. Thus, a negative test result for SIGLEC1 is powerful to exclude SLE in suspected cases.

Quantification of morning stiffness to assess disease activity and treatment effects in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The clinical parameter of morning stiffness is widely used to assess the status of RA, but its accurate quantitative assessment in a clinical setting has not yet been successful. This lack of individual quantification limits both personalized medication and efficacy evaluation in the treatment of RA.

METHODS

We developed a novel technology to assess passive resistance of the MCP III joint (stiffness) and its passive range of motion (PRoM). Within this pilot study, 19 female postmenopausal RA patients and 9 healthy controls were examined in the evening as well as the morning of the following day. To verify the specificity of the biomechanical quantification, 11 patients with RA were assessed both prior to and ∼3 h after glucocorticoid therapy.

RESULTS

While the healthy controls showed only minor changes between afternoon and morning, in RA patients the mean PRoM decreased significantly by 18% (s.d. 22) and stiffness increased significantly by 20% (s.d. 18) in the morning compared with the previous afternoon. We found a significant positive correlation between RA activity and biomechanical measures. Glucocorticoids significantly increased the mean PRoM by 16% (s.d. 11) and reduced the mean stiffness by 23% (s.d. 22).

CONCLUSION

This technology allowed mechanical stiffness to be quantified in MCP joints and demonstrated high sensitivity with respect to disease status as well as medication effect in RA patients. Such non-invasive, low-risk and rapid assessment of biomechanical joint stiffness opens a novel avenue for judging therapy efficacy in patients with RA and potentially also in other non-RA inflammatory joint diseases.

Refractory mixed proliferative and membranous lupus nephritis treated with the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan as add-on therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effects of irinotecan, an inhibitor of topoisomerase I, on refractory lupus nephritis.

METHOD

A patient with refractory lupus nephritis under medication with mycophenolic acid, prednisolone, and hydroxychloroquine was treated with add-on low-dose irinotecan. Irinotecan was applied every fourth week at a dose of 50 mg/m² for four cycles followed by 100 mg/m² for another eight cycles. Renal function and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies as well as blood count for evaluation of side effects were assessed during the treatment with irinotecan.

RESULTS

Before starting the treatment with irinotecan, a urine protein/creatinine ratio of 1298 mg/g was determined. This declined to 613 mg/g after four cycles with 50 mg/m² irinotecan and was further reduced to 198 mg/g when using the higher dose of irinotecan. Kidney function remained stable, with creatinine levels of 1.66 mg/dL at the beginning and 1.76 mg/dL at the end of treatment with irinotecan. Importantly, no side effects, such as diarrhoea or neutropenia, were observed during the entire course of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Administration of low-dose irinotecan as add-on medication for the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis was shown to be safe. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether irinotecan can improve kidney function and the outcome of patients with refractory lupus nephritis.

OP0256 CHOOSE WISELY: IMAGING FOR DIAGNOSIS OF AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

Background:

To date, the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) guidelines recommend X-ray (XR) as first line imaging in axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MR) if the diagnosis cannot be established by XR and clinical features. However, much knowledge has been gained recently strengthening the applicability of MR for the detection of structural lesions and raising the question, whether XR is still necessary. Also, several publications used low-dose computed tomography (CT) as reference standard and imaging test.

Objectives:

In light of this complex diagnostic situation, the aim of this study was to compare the three major modalities, XR, MR and CT of SIJ, in their diagnostic performance of axSpA and differential diagnosis in a cohort of patients with low back pain using the final judgment of the rheumatologist as standard of reference.

Methods:

163 patients (89 with axSpA; 74 with degenerative diseases) underwent XR, CT and MR. Three blinded experts categorized the imaging into axSpA, other diseases or normal in 5 separate reading rounds (XR, CT, MR, XR+MR, CT+MR, respectively). The results were compared to the clinical diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity values for axSpA and interrater reliability were compared.

Results:

XR showed lower sensitivity and specificity (66.3%/67.6% respectively) compared to MR (82.0%/86.5%) and CT (77.5%/97.3%). Sensitivity and specificity of XR+MR was similar to MR alone (77.5% / 87.8%). However, CT+MR was superior to MR alone (75.6% / 97.3%) (see Figure). CT had the best interrater reliability (kappa = 0.875) followed by MR (0.665) and XR (0.517). CR+MR reliability was similar (0.662) compared to MR alone, while CT+MR reliability (0.732) was superior.

Figure 1.

Frequency of positive and negative findings in radiography (XR), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MR) and combinations and resulting diagnostic accuracy values. SE: Sensitivity, SP: Specificity, LR-/+: negative/positive likelihood ratio.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, XR is inferior to cross-sectional imaging and should be replaced by MR or CT for differential diagnosis. While MR is the most sensitive imaging technique, it lacks specificity when compared to CT. CT alone has high diagnostic accuracy, despite being insensitive to bone marrow lesions such as fatty metaplasia or osteitis. Adding CT to MR leads to an increase in specificity at a minor expense of sensitivity.

References:

[1]Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68 Suppl 2:ii1-44.

[2]Mandl P, Navarro-Compán V, Terslev L, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(7):1327-39.

[3]Diekhoff T, Hermann KA, Greese J, et al. Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: results from the SIMACT study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017.

[4]Diekhoff T, Greese J, Sieper J, Poddubnyy D, Hamm B, Hermann KA. Improved detection of erosions in the sacroiliac joints on MRI with volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE): results from the SIMACT study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(11):1585-89.

[5]Baraliakos X, Hoffmann F, Deng X, Wang YY, Huang F, Braun J. Detection of Erosions in Sacroiliac Joints of Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Using the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination. The Journal of rheumatology. 2019;46(11):1445-49.

[6]Wu H, Zhang G, Shi L, et al. Axial Spondyloarthritis: Dual-Energy Virtual Noncalcium CT in the Detection of Bone Marrow Edema in the Sacroiliac Joints. Radiology. 2019;290(1):157-64.

Disclosure of Interests:

Torsten Diekhoff Speakers bureau: Canon MS, Roche, Novartis, MSD, Grant/research support from: Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society, Iris Eshed: None declared, Felix Radny: None declared, Katharina Ziegeler: None declared, Fabian Proft: None declared, Juliane Greese: None declared, Dominik Deppe: None declared, Robert Biesen: None declared, Kay-Geert Hermann: None declared, Denis Poddubnyy: None declared

POS0744 A NEGATIVE INTERFERON BIOMARKER CD169 / SIGLEC-1 RULES OUT SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Background:

While there have been advances in the therapy of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in recent years, there have been no major new findings in SLE biomarkers [1, 2]. Type I interferon (IFN) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of SLE [3]. In 2008, we first described CD169 / SIGLEC-1 (sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin-1), an interferon-induced adhesion molecule on monocytes in SLE patients [4]. For over five years SIGLEC-1 has been routinely assessed in our clinic.

Objectives:

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic utility of the type I IFN induced SIGLEC-1 with established biomarkers in the initial diagnosis of the disease.

Methods:

We analyzed retrospectively 232 patients who were on suspicion of SLE at Charité University Hospital Berlin between October 2015 and September 2020. Patients underwent full clinical characterization, and biomarkers were determined in the routine laboratory. Based on the final diagnosis, we divided patients into two groups: A) initial diagnosis of SLE and B) Non-SLE mimicking condition.

Results:

In 76 patients (32.3 %) SLE was confirmed by fulfilling the EULAR / ACR 2019 classification criteria [5]. SIGLEC-1 was dramatically increased in patients with an initial diagnosis of SLE compared to patients without SLE (p<0.0001). For a threshold of 2500 molecule per monocyte, a sensitivity of 98.7 %, a specificity of 82.1 %, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.2 %, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.8 % were calculated for SIGLEC-1. Adjusted to the prevalence of SLE in Germany (36.7 per 100,000 inhabitants [6]) NPV and PPV turned out to > 99.9 % and 0.2 %. We further aimed to compare not only the performance of the tests at a given cutoff but also across all possible measured values. Therefore, we conducted ROC curves analyses (see figure 1). The area under the curve (AUC) of SIGLEC-1 test was significantly higher than that of ANA test (AUC=0.88, p=0.031), C3 (AUC = 0.83, p=0.001), C4 (AUC=0.83, p=0.002), but not than that of the Anti-dsDNA ELISA (AUC=0.90, p=0.163).

Conclusion:

Our study shows that IFN activity is a hallmark at the onset of the disease and that the interferon biomarker SIGLEC-1 is valuable to rule out SLE in suspected cases.

References:

[1]Ostendorf L, Burns M, Durek P, Heinz GA, Heinrich F, Garantziotis P, Enghard P, Richter U, Biesen R, Schneider U et al: Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab in Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2020, 383(12):1149-1155.

[2]Furie R, Rovin BH, Houssiau F, Malvar A, Teng YKO, Contreras G, Amoura Z, Yu X, Mok CC, Santiago MB et al: Two-Year, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Belimumab in Lupus Nephritis. N Engl J Med 2020, 383(12):1117-1128.

[3]Ronnblom L, Leonard D: Interferon pathway in SLE: one key to unlocking the mystery of the disease. Lupus Sci Med 2019, 6(1):e000270.

[4]Biesen R, Demir C, Barkhudarova F, Grun JR, Steinbrich-Zollner M, Backhaus M, Haupl T, Rudwaleit M, Riemekasten G, Radbruch A et al: Sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin 1 expression in inflammatory and resident monocytes is a potential biomarker for monitoring disease activity and success of therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2008, 58(4):1136-1145.

[5]Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, Brinks R, Mosca M, Ramsey-Goldman R, Smolen JS, Wofsy D, Boumpas DT, Kamen DL et al: 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2019, 78(9):1151-1159.

[6]Brinks R, Fischer-Betz R, Sander O, Richter JG, Chehab G, Schneider M: Age-specific prevalence of diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus in Germany 2002 and projection to 2030. Lupus 2014, 23(13):1407-1411.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0370 TYPE I INTERFERON PATHWAY ASSAYS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES - SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (SLR) AND DEVELOPMENT OF CONSENSUS TERMINOLOGY FROM A EULAR TASKFORCE

Background:

The interferon (IFN) pathway is a complex system with multiple proteins and diverse downstream effects on gene and protein expression. IFNs have been implicated in multiple RMDs. Despite significant potential, IFN assays have not progressed into clinical practice.

Objectives:

To perform a SLR on IFN assays in RMDs and propose a consensus terminology.

Methods:

OvidMedline, Embase and Web of Science were searched for reports of IFN and RMDs up to October 2019. Information about the properties of assays measuring type I IFN and measures of truth were extracted and summarised. Terminology was agreed through an interactive consensus process with reference to the existing evidence.

Results:

10037 abstracts were identified. 275 fulfilled eligibility criteria, and were used for data extraction. Some used more than one technique to measure IFN-I pathway activation. Hence, 275 papers generated data on 393 methods. There was great heterogeneity in the methods used and presentation of results. IFN-I pathway activation was measured using: qPCR (n=121), immunoassays (n=101), microarray (n=69), reporter cell assay (n=38), DNA methylation (n=14), flow cytometry (n=14), cytopathic effect assay (n=11), RNA sequencing (n=9), Plaque reduction assay (n=8), Nanostring (n=5), bisulphite sequencing (n=3). All papers fulfilled Face Validity. Due to lack of gold standard for IFN-I pathway activation, evidence of criterion validity was variable. Concurrent validity was presented for n=150 assays. The terminology used to describe aspects of type I IFN pathway activation was not consistent, so a consensus terminology for IFN research (Table 1) was proposed by the taskforce.

Table 1.

Consensus terminology

TermAbbreviationDefinitionInterferonIFNProteins with anti-viral activity; IFNs are mediators of an anti-viral response. They belong to the Type I, Type II and Type III IFN families.Type I interferonIFN-IThe IFNs alpha, beta, omega, kappa, epsilon, secreted by any nucleated cell, and binding to the IFNAR, which is expressed on any nucleated cell.Type II interferonIFN-IIIFN gamma, mostly secreted by T cells, binding to the IFNGR, which is expressed on most leucocytes.Type III interferonIFN-IIIIFN lambda, which are structurally more similar to IL-10 but share downstream signalling and gene expression with IFN-I.Interferon-stimulated genesISGsGenes whose expression is known to be upregulated by any kind of IFN. Individual ISGs may not exclusively represent Type I IFN pathway activation.Type I Interferon pathway activationAny evidence for function of the components of the Type I IFN pathway. This includes: secretion of a Type I IFN protein, binding to the IFNAR, initiation of JAK/STAT signalling pathways, expression of IFN-stimulated genes, expression of IFN-stimulated proteins.Type I interferon pathway assayAn assay measuring one or more components of the Type I IFN pathway at a molecular or functional level.Interferon stimulated gene expression signatureA qualitative description of coordinated expression of a set of ISGs that is indicative of Type I IFN pathway activation.Interferon stimulated gene expression scoreA quantitative variable derived from expression of a defined set of ISGs that is indicative of Type I IFN pathway activation.Interferon stimulated protein scoreA variable derived from expression of a defined set of soluble biomarkers known to be upregulated by IFN, although not specific for Type I IFN.InterferonopathyMonogenic diseases in which there is constitutive Type I IFN pathway activation with a causal role in pathology. The clinical picture may resemble rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases. However, most diseases with IFN pathway activation are not Interferonopathies.

Conclusion:

Diverse methods have been reported as IFN assays and these differ in what elements of type IFN-I pathway activation they measure. The taskforce consensus terminology on type I IFN reporting should be considered for research and clinical applications.

Disclosure of Interests:

Agata Burska: None declared, Javier Rodriguez Carrio: None declared, Philip G Conaghan: None declared, Willem A Dik: None declared, Robert Biesen: None declared, Maija-leena Eloranta: None declared, Giulio Cavalli: None declared, Marianne Visser: None declared, Dimitrios Boumpas: None declared, George Bertsias: None declared, Marie Wahren-Herlenius: None declared, Jan Rehwinkel: None declared, Marie-Louise Frémond: None declared, Mary K. Crow Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Lilly, Shannon Pharmaceuticals, Grant/research support from: Gilead, Lars Ronnblom Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Edward Vital Speakers bureau: GSK, Consultant of: AURINIA, SANDOZ, GSK, AstraZeneca, Roche, Modus, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Marjan Versnel: None declared

POS0183 SIGLEC1 AS A TYPE I INTERFERON BIOMARKER IN IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES

Background:

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are autoimmune diseases that mainly affect skeletal muscle, lung, skin and joints. IIM can be separated into dermatomyositis (DM), inclusion body myositis (IBM), antisynthetase syndrome (AS) and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). Type I interferons (IFN) are known to play a crucial role in the etiopathogenesis of some of these entities such as DM.[1] Sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 1 (SIGLEC1, CD169) is part of the type I IFN signature found in SLE and DM and is expressed on the cell surface of monocytes. Thus, analysis of SIGLEC1 expression by flow cytometry enables a straightforward assessment of the type I IFN signature. Its utility has been shown for juvenile and adult SLE and other rheumatic diseases but not in IIM.[2,3] The assessment of the type I IFN system in clinical practice is an unmet need and, in this context, SIGLEC1 might be useful.

Objectives:

To assess SIGLEC1 expression on monocytes by flow cytometry as a type I IFN biomarker in IIM

Methods:

Pediatric and adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of DM, AS, IMNM and IBM and at least one measurement of SIGLEC1 who have been treated at the Department of Rheumatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin between 2015 and 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Control groups of healthy individuals (n=19) and SLE patients (n=30) were included. Disease activity was assessed by Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS). SIGLEC1 expression on monocytes was analyzed by flow cytometry. Cross-sectional analyses (n=74) were performed using Mann Whitney-U test (MWU) and two-level mixed-effects linear regression model was used for longitudinal analyses (n=26, 110 visits). This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Results:

74 patients (adult/juvenile DM: n=21/n=17; AS: n=19; IMNM: n=8; IBM: n=9) were included. In cross-sectional analysis, SIGLEC1 expression was significantly upregulated in adult and juvenile DM patients with moderate to severe disease activity (PGA≥5) compared with adult/juvenile DM patients with no to moderate disease activity (PGA<5) (both p<0.001). In longitudinal analyses, SIGLEC1 correlated with disease activity in juvenile DM (SIGLEC1 vs. CMAS: betaST=-0.65; p<0.001) and adult DM (SIGLEC1 vs. PGA: betaST=0.52; p<0.001), better than Creatine Kinase (CK) (juvenile DM, CK vs. CMAS: betaST=-0.50; p<0.001; adult DM, CK vs PGA: betaST=0.17; p=0.149). In AS 42,1% of the patients showed elevated SIGLEC1 expression, while it was not upregulated in IMNM and only in two patients with IBM, who were concurrently positive for autoantibodies that affect the type I IFN system (see Figure 1).

Conclusion:

SIGLEC1 is a useful biomarker to identify an activated type I IFN system in IIM. Flow cytometry is used widely in laboratory medicine, which could facilitate the implementation of SIGLEC1 into clinical routine.

References:

[1]Gallay L, Mouchiroud G, Chazaud B. Interferon-signature in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Current Opinion in Rheumatology 2019;31:634–42. doi:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000653

[2]Rose T, Grutzkau A, Hirseland H, et al. IFNalpha and its response proteins, IP-10 and SIGLEC-1, are biomarkers of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1639–45. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201586

[3]Stuckrad SL von, Klotsche J, Biesen R, et al. SIGLEC1 (CD169) is a sensitive biomarker for the deterioration of the clinical course in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2020;:961203320965699. doi:10.1177/0961203320965699

Figure 1.

SIGLEC1 expression on monocytes in IIM subgroups and control groups; in IIM subgroups, patients with low disease activity (PGA<5) are marked in blue, patients with high disease activity (PGA≥5) are marked in red; mAb/cell, monoclonal antibodies bound per cell

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Choose wisely: imaging for diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis

Objective

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of radiography (X-ray, XR), CT and MRI of the sacroiliac joints for diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods

163 patients (89 with axSpA; 74 with degenerative conditions) underwent XR, CT and MR. Three blinded experts categorised the imaging findings into axSpA, other diseases or normal in five separate reading rounds (XR, CT, MR, XR +MR, CT +MR). The clinical diagnosis served as reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity for axSpA and inter-rater reliability were compared.

Results

XR showed lower sensitivity (66.3%) than MR (82.0%) and CT (76.4%) and also an inferior specificity of 67.6% vs 86.5% (MR) and 97.3% (CT). XR +MR was similar to MR alone (sensitivity 77.5 %/specificity 87.8%) while CT+MR was superior (75.3 %/97.3%). CT had the best inter-rater reliability (kappa=0.875), followed by MR (0.665) and XR (0.517). XR +MR was similar (0.662) and CT+MR (0.732) superior to MR alone.

Conclusions

XR had inferior diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability compared with cross-sectional imaging. MR alone was similar in diagnostic performance to XR+MR. CT had the best accuracy, strengthening the importance of structural lesions for the differential diagnosis in axSpA.

SIGLEC1 (CD169) is a sensitive biomarker for the deterioration of the clinical course in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus

Background

To analyse the validity of membrane-bound SIGLEC1 (CD169) as a sensitive biomarker for monitoring disease activity in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

27 children and adolescents with SLE were followed for a mean of 13.5 months. During consecutive routine visits SLEDAI-2k, C3, C4 and ds-DNA values were determined. Additionally, expression of SIGLEC1 on monocytes was determined by flow cytometry. The amount of PE-labelled CD169 mAb bound per monocyte was analyzed using QuantiBRITE™ PE tubes. Associations between biomarkers and the clinical course were investigated by regression analysis.

Results

In general, SIGLEC1 expression is high on SLE-derived monocytes (mean 6 359 (SD 6 056) molecules/monocyte, cut-off 2 500 molecules/monocyte), all patients with newly diagnosed SLE exhibit elevated expression (mean 13366 (SD 7 750) molecules/monocyte). Changes (Δ) in SIGLEC1 levels during the clinical course is the only biomarker that significantly correlates with the change in SLEDAI-2k (beta_ST = 0.28, p = 0.001). At follow-up visit, a clinically important worsening was experienced by 47.6% of patients with a Δ SIGLEC1 > 2 151 molecules/cell (OR 5.31) and 72.4% with a Δ SIGLEC1 > 756 molecules/cell (OR 8.90). Conversely, 36.4% of patients with a Δ SIGLEC1 < -2 818 molecules/cell (OR 4.16, percentiles as cut-off criteria) and 50.0% of patients with a Δ SIGLEC1 < -1 370 molecules/cell (OR 3.55, application of Youden index) showed clinical improvement. SIGLEC1 expression correlates inversely with the amount of therapeutically applied hydroxychloroquine (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

SIGLEC1 expression on monocytes is a sensitive biomarker for adjusting disease activity in childhood SLE and represents a promising and easily applicable tool for disease monitoring.

Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab in Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Daratumumab, a human monoclonal antibody that targets CD38, depletes plasma cells and is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Long-lived plasma cells are implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus because they secrete autoantibodies, but they are unresponsive to standard immunosuppression. We describe the use of daratumumab that induced substantial clinical responses in two patients with life-threatening lupus, with the clinical responses sustained by maintenance therapy with belimumab, an antibody to B-cell activating factor. Significant depletion of long-lived plasma cells, reduction of interferon type I activity, and down-regulation of T-cell transcripts associated with chronic inflammation were documented. (Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and others.).

Nuclear antigen-reactive CD4+ T cells expand in active systemic lupus erythematosus, produce effector cytokines, and invade the kidneys

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a systemic and chronic autoimmune disease characterized by loss of tolerance towards nuclear antigens with autoreactive CD4⁺ T cells implicated in disease pathogenesis. However, very little is known about their receptor specificity since the detection of human autoantigen specific CD4⁺ T cells has been extremely challenging. Here we present an analysis of CD4⁺ T cells reactive to nuclear antigens using two complementary methods: T cell libraries and antigen-reactive T cell enrichment. The frequencies of nuclear antigen specific CD4⁺ T cells correlated with disease severity. These autoreactive T cells produce effector cytokines such as interferon-γ, interleukin-17, and interleukin-10. Compared to blood, these cells were enriched in the urine of patients with active lupus nephritis, suggesting an infiltration of the inflamed kidneys. Thus, these previously unrecognized characteristics support a role for nuclear antigen-specific CD4⁺ T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OP0300 A CROSS-SECTIONAL, MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS OF ACPA POSITIVE AND ACPA NEGATIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS COMPARING THE PREVALENCE OF OSTEOPOROSIS, FRAGILITY FRACTURES AND UNDERLYING RISK FACTORS

Background:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased systemic bone loss, leading to a high risk for fragility fractures. Especially anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity is considered a risk factor for local bone erosions and systemic bone loss1.

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to compare ACPA positive versus ACPA negative RA patients in terms of the prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility fractures and to identify differences in underlying risk factors that influence bone health.

Methods:

Rh-GIOP is an ongoing prospective observational study collecting and analyzing disease- and bone-related data from patients with chronic rheumatic diseases or psoriasis treated with glucocorticoids (GC). In this cross-sectional analysis, we performed a matched-pair analysis, matching 114 ACPA positive to 114 ACPA negative RA patients according to age (5-year-steps), sex, and body mass index (BMI, 2-unit-steps). Descriptive analyses were performed, with values displayed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. Non-parametric tests were used at a two-sided significance level of 5% to compare differences in underlying and potential risk factors without adjustment for multiple testing.

Results:

At same mean age (63.9 ±10.2 years) and BMI (27.9 ±5.6kg/m2), the matched groups had a female proportion of 82.5%. APCA positive patients had a significantly longer mean disease duration (13.9 vs 9.9 years, p<0.001), a higher mean cumulative GC-dose (22.3 vs 13.2g, p<0.01) and mean duration of GC therapy (10.1 vs 6.6 years, p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of osteoporosis as defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (18.4 vs 20.2%), nor in the prevalence of vertebral (7.0 vs 5.3%) or non-vertebral fractures (31.6 vs 29.8%). C-reactive protein levels as a marker of disease activity were significantly higher in ACPA positive patients (mean: 8.8 vs 4.3mg/l, p= 0.02), while mean disease activity score (DAS)28 levels were slightly lower in ACPA positive patients (2.4 vs 2.7, p= 0.05). No difference in health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score was found. RA-specific treatments were similar, especially concerning current mean daily GC-dose (6.7 vs 4.9mg/day), except for Rituximab and targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) which were more commonly used in ACPA positive patients (9.6 vs 2.6%, p=0.05) and (5.3 vs 0%, p=0.029), respectively. ACPA positive patients did not differ significantly from ACPA negative patients in specific anti-osteoporotic treatment, nor in the prevalence of comorbidities or concomitant medication. There were no significant differences in bone-specific laboratory parameters.

Conclusion:

In a cross-sectional analysis of our cohort, the prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility fractures was similar between ACPA positive and ACPA negative RA patients, despite longer disease duration and GC-treatment in ACPA positive patients. This is remarkable since it implies that ACPA negative patients are at a similar risk for osteoporosis and associated fractures. Optimal management of disease activity with or without GCs may represent a mainstay in preventing disease-related comorbidities such as osteoporosis.

References:

[1]Steffen, U., Schett, G., & Bozec, A. (2019). How Autoantibodies Regulate Osteoclast Induced Bone Loss in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Frontiers in immunology, 10, 1483. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01483

Disclosure of Interests:

Edgar Wiebe: None declared, Desiree Freier: None declared, Dörte Huscher: None declared, gloria dallagiacoma: None declared, Robert Biesen: None declared, Sandra Hermann: None declared, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Consultant of: AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Frank Buttgereit Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Generic Assays, GSK, Hexal, Horizon, Lilly, medac, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi.

AB0767 PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS HAVE A LOWER BONE DENSITY THAN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background:

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease characterized by the loss of bone density resulting in an increased fracture risk. Female sex, advanced age, Caucasian ancestry, previous history of fractures, menopause and certain genetic factors predispose for osteoporosis. In addition, recent studies could prove that chronic inflammatory diseases such as Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and long-term treatment with higher doses of glucocorticoids (GCs) represent independent risk factors for the development of osteoporosis. On the other hand, the intake of vitamin D, a calcium-rich diet and physical exercise can be protective. Data describing the prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with other rheumatic diseases like psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are lacking.

Objectives:

We compared the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients with RA and PsA, respectively, based on data obtained from our ongoing prospective monocentric study Rh-GIOP investigating glucocorticoid (GC)-induced osteoporosis in patients with different rheumatic diseases (NCT02719314).

Methods:

Bone mineral density data measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in patients with PsA (n=92) were compared with data measured in 92 age- and gender-matched patients with RA. The results were analysed with respect to clinical and laboratory parameters such as data on GC treatment (frequency, duration defined as start of treatment until timepoint of measurement, actual and cumulative dose), csDMARD and bDMARD (including as well tsDMARDs) therapy, serological parameters (Vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, inflammatory markers and rheumatoid factor) and functional status (e.g. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), sporting activities). Statistical analyses were performed descriptively using mean and standard deviation, t-tests for metric variables, and chi-square tests for nominal variables. For subgroup analyses with less than 30 patients per group, tests for non-normally distributed data were used due to the lower test power.

Results:

RA patients showed significantly lower means of bone density values (minimal T-score, p=0.03) than PsA patients leading to a higher frequency of osteopenic bone densities (p<0.005). However, no differences in the frequency of osteoporotic bone densities could be detected. PsA patients reported a significantly longer disease duration and a higher current GC dosage. In contrast, the frequency of current GC intake was higher in RA patients. Although the calcium intake was higher in the RA group, neither blood levels of calcium and vitamin D, nor the cumulative GC dose (GCCD) or duration of GC therapy could indicate a causal relationship for the differences observed in bone density values between the two groups. The frequency of csDMARD therapy did not differ significantly between PsA and RA patients while the frequency of bDMARD therapy was higher in the PsA group (p=0.04).

Conclusion:

The lower bone density in RA patients seems not to be fully explained by higher GCCD, disease duration or higher levels of inflammation. However, RA patients had a higher frequency of current GC intake. Additionally, differences in bone density between the two groups could be related to the higher number of bDMARD therapies in PsA patients, but further investigations like multivariate analyses with higher numbers of patients are necessary. Furthermore there is more need for research on possible molecular and genetic factors in PsA, which are protecting from low bone density.

Disclosure of Interests:

Desiree Freier: None declared, Edgar Wiebe: None declared, Robert Biesen: None declared, Thomas Buttgereit: None declared, Sandra Hermann: None declared, Timo Gaber: None declared, Frank Buttgereit Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Generic Assays, GSK, Hexal, Horizon, Lilly, medac, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi.

SAT0450 GLUCOCORTICOID-INDUCED OSTEOPOROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES: A MULTIVARIATE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS IDENTIFYING PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR LOW BONE MASS

Background:

Rheumatic diseases are associated with increased systemic bone loss and fracture risk related to chronic inflammation, disease-specific, general and demographic risk factors as well as treatment with glucocorticoids (GC). Yet, there is evidence that GCs may, by adequately suppressing systemic inflammation, also have a positive effect on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk1.

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and to analyze the impact that treatment with GCs, other known risk factors and preventive measures have on bone health in these patients.

Methods:

Rh-GIOP is an ongoing prospective observational study collecting and analyzing disease- and bone-related data from patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases and psoriasis treated with GCs. In this cross-sectional analysis, we evaluated the initial visit of 1091 patients. A multivariate linear regression model with known or potentially influential factors adjusted for age and sex was used to identify predictors of BMD as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Multiple imputation was applied for missing baseline covariate data.

Results:

In the total cohort of 1091 patients (75% female of which 87.5% were postmenopausal) with a mean age of 62.1 (±13.2) years, the prevalence of osteoporosis by DXA was 21.7%, while fragility fractures have occurred in 31.2% of the study population (6.7% vertebral, 27.7% non-vertebral). Current GC therapy was common (64.9%), with a median daily dose of 5.0mg [0.0;7.5], a mean life-time total GC dose of 17.7g (±24.6), and a mean GC therapy duration of 7.8 years (±8.5). Bisphosphonates were the most commonly used anti-osteoporotic drug (12.6%).

Multivariate analysis showed that BMD as expressed by the minimum T-Score at all measured sites was negatively associated with higher age, female sex and menopause as well as Denosumab and Bisphosphonate treatment. A positive association with BMD was found for body mass index as well as current and life-time (cumulative) GC dose. While comedication with proton-pump-inhibitors significantly predicted low bone mass, concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs showed a positive association with BMD. Of the measured bone-specific laboratory parameters, higher alkaline phosphatase levels were determinants of low DXA-values, while the association was positive for gamma-glutamyltransferase.

BMD was neither predicted by duration of GC treatment nor by treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Predictive variables for BMD differed at the respective anatomical site. While treatment with Denosumab predicted low bone mass at the lumbar spine and not at the femoral neck, the opposite was true for health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score. Current and life-time GC-dose as well as direct sun-exposure of more than 30 minutes daily were positively associated with bone mass at the femoral sites only.

Conclusion:

This cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study quantified the prevalence of osteoporosis and identified predictive variables of BMD in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Multivariate analyses corroborated low BMD to be predicted by traditional factors like age, female sex and menopause but showed current and well as life-time GC dose to be positively associated with BMD in our cohort of patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This suggests that optimal management of disease activity with GCs might be beneficial in order to avoid bone loss due to inflammation.

References:

[1]Güler-Yüksel et al. “Glucocorticoids, Inflammation and Bone.” Calcified Tissue International (January 08 2018).

Disclosure of Interests:

Edgar Wiebe: None declared, Desiree Freier: None declared, Dörte Huscher: None declared, Robert Biesen: None declared, Sandra Hermann: None declared, Frank Buttgereit Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Generic Assays, GSK, Hexal, Horizon, Lilly, medac, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi.

SAT0372 PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS SHOW HIGHER BONE DENSITY COMPARED TO AGE AND GENDER MATCHED PATIENTS WITH ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS

Background:

The prevalence of osteoporosis in inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has not been sufficiently clarified yet, and the data in the literature are heterogeneous. In addition, it is still unclear to what extent patients with PsA differ in terms of bone density from patients with other forms of spondyloarthritis such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Objectives:

In an interim analysis of the Rh-GIOP Study (ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT02719314), we observed that PsA patients demonstrated more frequently normal bone density than any other patient group analyzed (suffering from e.g. rheumatoid arthritis or systemic sclerosis). The main objective of this investigation was to compare bone density data from patients with PsA and AS, as both diseases belong to the spondyloarthritis group. 1100 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases provided the basis of Rh-GIOP, a prospective study monitoring glucocorticoid (GC)-induced osteoporosis in patients with rheumatic diseases. Rh-GIOP was established in 2015 at the Charité University Hospital. Bone mineral density data were measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Methods:

92 patients with PsA (65% female) were compared with 51 patients suffering from AS (35% female). Potential risk and protective factors (e.g. data on GC treatment, anti-rheumatic therapy), laboratory parameters (e.g. Vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase, calcium and inflammatory markers) and functional status (e.g. Health Assessment Questionnaire, sporting activities, back pain) were compared between these groups. Statistical analysis was performed descriptively using mean and standard deviation, t-tests for metric variables, and chi-square tests for nominal variables. Due to the heterogeneous gender distribution, an additional statistical matching was performed to compare patients matched by age and gender.

Results:

Patients with PsA displayed significantly higher minimal T-scores than patients with AS (p=0.003) even though patients with AS were younger and more often male (p<0.001). AS patients showed a higher frequency of osteopenic bone densities (p<0.05), however, no differences in the frequency of osteoporotic bone densities were found. Body-mass-index (BMI) was significantly higher (p<0.001) in PsA patients. PsA patients demonstrated a higher frequency of csDMARD use (p<0.001). Additional analyses among PsA patients with and without csDMARDs revealed also significantly higher minimal T-scores in PsA patients taking csDMARDs (90% Methotrexate), and both groups showed the same average of age and gender distribution. Furthermore, AS patients complained significantly more often of back pain (96 % vs. 74%, p=0.001) than PsA patients. No differences in GC use or cumulative GC dose were found. All results could be confirmed when groups were matched by age and gender.

Conclusion:

Our results demonstrate that patients with PsA display higher bone density compared to age and gender matched patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Possible influencing factors could be the higher frequency of csDMARD use, higher BMI or the lower frequency of back pain in PsA patients. Multivariate tests and additional biomarker investigations in larger cohorts are necessary to corroborate these findings and to identify underlying pathogenic differences which could serve for an explanation.

Disclosure of Interests:

Desiree Freier: None declared, Edgar Wiebe: None declared, Robert Biesen: None declared, Thomas Buttgereit: None declared, Sandra Hermann: None declared, Timo Gaber: None declared, Frank Buttgereit Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Generic Assays, GSK, Hexal, Horizon, Lilly, medac, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi.

Ultra-low-dose CT detects synovitis in patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

To prove the feasibility and measure the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT) for the depiction of inflammatory soft-tissue changes (synovitis, tenosynovitis and peritendonitis) in patients with arthritis of the hand.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved study, 36 consecutive patients over the age of 50 with suspected rheumatoid arthritis underwent ULD-CT (estimated radiation exposure <0.01  mSv) and MRI of the hand with weight-adapted intravenous contrast administration. ULD-CT subtraction and MR images were assessed for synovitis, tenosynovitis and peritendonitis by three readers using a modified Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Score (RAMRIS). Patients were asked which modality they would prefer for future examinations. Sensitivity and specificity of ULD-CT for detection of inflammatory changes were calculated using MRI as standard of reference. The sum scores were correlated using Pearson's r.

RESULTS

All 36 patients showed synovitis in MRI. ULD-CT had 69% sensitivity on the patient level and 65% on the joint level with 87% specificity. Sensitivity was higher in patients with more severe inflammation (80% for MRI RAMRIS >1). There was almost perfect correlation between the modified RAMRIS sum scores of ULD-CT and MRI (Pearson's r=0.94). Regarding preferences for future examinations, 85% preferred ULD-CT over MRI. ULD-CT detected more differential diagnoses than MRI (8 vs 2/12).

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced ULD-CT of the hand allows for depiction of soft-tissue inflammation at the hand and can be achieved using very low radiation exposure (<0.01 mSv). ULD-CT may evolve to a fast and comfortable alternative to MRI, although it is not as sensitive as MRI for detecting mild disease.

Observational study and brief analysis of diagnostic criteria in relapsing polychondritis

Observational study of patients with relapsing polychondritis (RPC) and brief evaluation of widely used diagnostic criteria. A retrospective analysis of 18 patients with RPC treated in the past 15 years at the Charté-Universitätsmedizin Berlin was performed. Three different diagnostic criteria were applied to our cohort. Sensitivities of diagnostic criteria of McAdam et al., Damiani and Levine and Michet et al. were calculated as well as the 5- and 10-year survival. Analysis of diagnostic criteria revealed a sensitivity of 88.9% using Damiani and Levine criteria, 66.7% for Michet et al. and 50% for McAdam et al., respectively. Modifying the criteria of Michet et al. increases the sensitivity to 88.9%. The 5- and 10-year survival were 100 and 90.9%, respectively. Current diagnostic criteria in RPC should be reappraised covering the diversity of clinical findings with the aim to improve clinical care and research in RPC.

Proteasome inhibition with bortezomib induces a therapeutically relevant depletion of plasma cells in SLE but does not target their precursors

Long-lived plasma cells (PCs) not only provide protective humoral immunity, they are also an essential component of the autoreactive immunologic memory that may drive chronic immune responses in systemic autoimmunity, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The therapeutic relevance of their targeting has been demonstrated in preclinical models and severe, treatment-refractory cases of autoimmune diseases using the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Herein, we describe in detail the dynamic serologic changes and effects on immune effector cells in eight SLE patients receiving a median two cycles of 1.3 mg/m² intravenous bortezomib. Upon proteasome inhibition, immunoglobulin levels gradually declined by ∼30%, associated with a significant reduction of autoantibodies, and serum complement whereas B-cell activation factor levels increased. While proteasome inhibition was associated with a significant depletion of short- and long-lived PCs in peripheral blood and bone marrow by ∼50%, including those with a distinctly mature CD19^- phenotype, their precursor B cells and T cells largely remained unaffected, resulting in a rapid repopulation of short-lived PCs after bortezomib withdrawal, accompanied by increasing autoantibody levels. Collectively, these findings identify proteasome inhibitors as a promising treatment option for refractory SLE, but also indicate that PC depletion needs to be combined with targeted B-cell therapies for sustained responses in systemic autoimmunity.

Antibodies against chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CXCR4 predict progressive deterioration of lung function in patients with systemic sclerosis

Background

The chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CXCR4 are involved in the pathogenesis of fibrosis, a key feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc). It is hypothesized that immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibodies (abs) against these two receptors are present in patients with SSc and are associated with clinical findings.

Methods

Anti-CXCR3 and anti-CXCR4 ab levels were measured in 449 sera from 327 SSc patients and in 234 sera from healthy donors (HD) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In SSc, ab levels were compared with clinical data in a cross-sectional and longitudinal setting. Protein expression of CXCR3 and CXCR4 on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was analyzed in 17 SSc patients and 8 HD by flow cytometry.

Results

Anti-CXCR3 and anti-CXCR4 ab levels were different among SSc subgroups compared with HD and were highest in diffuse SSc patients. The ab levels strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.85). Patients with SSc-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) exhibited higher ab levels which negatively correlated with lung function parameters (e.g., r = −0.5 and r = −0.43 for predicted vital capacity, respectively). However, patients with deterioration of lung function showed lower anti-CXCR3/4 ab levels compared with those with stable disease. Frequencies and median fluorescence intensities (MFI) of CXCR3⁺ and CXCR4⁺ PBMCs were lower in SSc patients compared with HD and correlated with the severity of skin and lung fibrosis. They correlated with the severity of skin and lung fibrosis.

Conclusions

Anti-CXCR3/4 abs and their corresponding receptors are linked with the severity of SSc-ILD. Antibody levels discriminate patients with stable or decreasing lung function and could be used for risk stratification.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1545-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

What is the clinical significance of anti-Sm antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus? A comparison with anti-dsDNA antibodies and C3

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical value of anti-Sm antibodies in diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and their ability to predict lupus flares compared with that of anti-dsDNA antibody and complement (C3) assays.

METHODS

Autoantibodies against Smith antigen (Sm) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in sera from SLE (n=232), myositis (n=26), systemic sclerosis (n=81), Sjögren's syndrome (n=88), and rheumatoid arthritis patients (n=165) and healthy donors (n=400) were determined by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (both from Euroimmun). New thresholds for both autoantibodies were calculated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. Cross-sectional, longitudinal and predictive analyses of anti-Sm and disease activity were also performed.

RESULTS

Sensitivities of 25.9% for anti-Sm (cut-off: 3.6 relative units/ml) and 30.2% for anti-dsDNA (cut-off 157.4 international units/ml) were obtained at a specificity of 99%. 14.8% of anti-dsDNA-negative patients were positive for anti-Sm, and more than half (51.4%) of anti-dsDNA-positive patients were also positive for anti-Sm. Anti-Sm antibodies were associated with age (p=0.0174), the number of ACR criteria (p=0.0242), the ACR criteria renal (p=0.0350) and neurologic disorder (p=0.0239), the BILAG category constitutional symptoms (p=0.0227), fatigue (p=0.0311) and cross-sectional disease activity (r=0.2519, p=0.0224). Although no correlations with lupus activity were observed in the longitudinal and predictive analysis, a remarkable association was found between anti-Sm and proteinuria.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-Sm antibodies are essential for diagnosis of SLE, especially in anti-dsDNA-negative patients. However, our data suggest that anti-Sm monitoring is only helpful in SLE patients with active lupus nephritis.

Type I interferon as a biomarker in autoimmunity and viral infection: a leukocyte subset-specific analysis unveils hidden diagnostic options

Interferon alpha and its surrogates, including IP-10 and SIGLEC1, paralleled changes of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the whole blood interferon signature (WBIFNS)-the current standard for type I IFN assessment in SLE-does not correlate with SLE disease activity in individual patients over time. The underlying causes for this apparent contradiction have not been convincingly demonstrated. Using a multicenter dataset of gene expression data from leukocyte subsets in SLE, we identify distinctive subset-specific contributions to the WBIFNS. In a subsequent analysis, the effects of type I interferon on cellular blood composition in patients with SLE and hepatitis B were also studied over time. We found that type I interferon mediates significant alterations in whole blood composition, including a neutropenia and relative lymphocytosis. Given different effects of type 1 interferon on different leukocyte subsets, these shifts confound measurement of a type 1 interferon signature in whole blood. To minimize and overcome these limitations of the WBIFNS, we suggest to measure IFN-induced transcripts or proteins in a specific leukocyte subset to improve clinical impact of interferon biomarkers.

KEY MESSAGES

Myeloid cells contribute more to the WBIFNS in SLE than their lymphocytic counterpart. Very similar leukocyte subsets reveal distinctive IFN signatures. IFN alpha mixes up composition of blood and leads to a preferential neutropenia, yielding relative lymphocytosis.

SIGLEC1 is a biomarker of disease activity and indicates extraglandular manifestation in primary Sjögren's syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the interferon (IFN) biomarkers sialic acid binding Ig like lectin 1 (SIGLEC1, CD169) and IFN-γ-inducible protein-10 (IP-10) in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS).

METHODS

31 patients fulfilling the American-European criteria for pSS were included. Disease activity was obtained by EULAR Sjögren's syndrome disease activity index (ESSDAI). SIGLEC1 expression on monocytes was analysed using flow cytometry. IP-10 concentrations were determined using Bioplex human Cytokine 27-plex kit. Spearman rank test (SRT) was used for correlation analysis and Mann-Whitney U (MWU) to test for differences between glandular and extraglandular manifestations.

RESULTS

An activated IFN system was detected by an upregulation of SIGLEC1 expression in 64.5% and by elevated serum level of IP-10 in 78.9% of our patients with pSS. In a subsequent analysis SIGLEC1 expression was found to be upregulated more frequently in patients with extraglandular manifestations (16/16, 100%) compared to patients with exclusively glandular involvement (4/15, 27%). SIGLEC1 expression could significantly discriminate between these two disease subgroups (p=0.0001, MWU) with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 80% for extraglandular disease. Moreover, the expression correlated with disease activity (p=0.005, r=0.54, SRT). Serum IP-10 levels neither differed significantly between glandular and extraglandular disease nor correlated with ESSDAI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that increased SIGLEC1 expression characterises patients with systemic involvement and high disease activity. Therefore, SIGLEC1 determination might be of value for subset definition, risk stratification and differential therapeutic considerations in pSS.

Autoantibodies, complement and type I interferon as biomarkers for personalized medicine in SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be a mysterious disease, presenting with extremely divergent clinical phenotypes. Already, biomarkers are very helpful tools for diagnosis, assessment and monitoring of disease activity, differential diagnosis of clinical manifestations, prediction of the disease course and stratified therapy, and they hold the key to personalized medicine in SLE. We summarize the clinical information that can only be supplied by autoantibodies, complement components and interferon biomarkers in this diverse disease.

Serum antibodies to human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-E, HLA-F and HLA-G in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) during disease flares: Clinical relevance of HLA-F autoantibodies

T lymphocyte hyperactivity and progressive inflammation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients results in over-expression of human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-Ib on the surface of lymphocytes. These are shed into the circulation upon inflammation, and may augment production of antibodies promoting pathogenicity of the disease. The objective was to evaluate the association of HLA-Ib (HLA-E, HLA-F and HLA-G) antibodies to the disease activity of SLE. The immunoglobulin (Ig)G/IgM reactivity to HLA-Ib and β2m in the sera of 69 German, 29 Mexican female SLE patients and 17 German female controls was measured by multiplex Luminex(®)-based flow cytometry. The values were expressed as mean flourescence intensity (MFI). Only the German SLE cohort was analysed in relation to the clinical disease activity. In the controls, anti-HLA-G IgG predominated over other HLA-Ib antibodies, whereas SLE patients had a preponderance of anti-HLA-F IgG over the other HLA-Ib antibodies. The disease activity index, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-2000, was reflected only in the levels of anti-HLA-F IgG. Anti-HLA-F IgG with MFI level of 500-1999 was associated with active SLE, whereas inactive SLE revealed higher MFI (>2000). When anti-HLA-F IgG were cross-reactive with other HLA-Ib alleles, their reactivity was reflected in the levels of anti-HLA-E and -G IgG. The prevalence of HLA-F-monospecific antibodies in SLE patients was also associated with the clinical disease activity. Anti-HLA-F IgG is possibly involved in the clearance of HLA-F shed from lymphocytes and inflamed tissues to lessen the disease's severity, and thus emerges as a beneficial immune biomarker. Therefore, anti-HLA-Ib IgG should be considered as a biomarker in standard SLE diagnostics.

Siglec-1-positive plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) in human peripheral blood: A semi-mature and myeloid-like subset imbalanced during protective and autoimmune responses

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) play a central role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as IFN-α producers and promoters of T-cell activation or tolerance. Here, we demonstrated by flow-cytometry and confocal microscopy that Siglec-1, a molecule involved in the regulation of adaptive immunoresponses, is expressed in a subset of semi-mature, myeloid-like pDCs in human blood. These pDCs express lower BDCA-2 and CD123 and higher HLA-DR and CD11c than Siglec-1-negative pDCs and do not produce IFN-α via TLR7/TLR9 engagement. In vitro, Siglec-1 expression was induced in Siglec-1-negative pDCs by influenza virus. Proportions of Siglec-1-positive/Siglec-1-negative pDCs were higher in SLE than in healthy controls and correlated with disease activity. Healthy donors immunized with yellow fever vaccine YFV-17D displayed different kinetics of the two pDC subsets during protective immune response. PDCs can be subdivided into two subsets according to Siglec-1 expression. These subsets may play specific roles in (auto)immune responses.