1
|
Selvadurai D, Coleshill MJ, Day RO, Briggs NE, Schulz M, Reath J, Aung E. Patient factors and health outcomes associated with illness perceptions in people with gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2024; 63:1927-1937. [PMID: 37769230 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Illness perceptions are views and beliefs formed in response to a health threat, and they may influence self-management behaviours and chronic disease outcomes. Despite effective medication, sub-optimal outcomes in gout are common. This study aimed to quantitatively investigate illness perceptions in gout to examine how illness perceptions relate to health outcomes. METHODS Data were obtained from a randomized controlled trial in which people with gout (n = 493) completed surveys measuring illness perceptions [Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ)], gout flares, medication adherence, health-related quality of life, health-care utilization, and productivity, alongside serum urate blood tests at baseline, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Multivariable linear regression identified patient factors independently associated with each B-IPQ item score. Logistic and linear regression, adjusted for age and sex, determined whether baseline B-IPQ items could predict current and future health outcomes. RESULTS Younger individuals and those with severe gout were more likely to experience pessimistic illness perceptions at baseline. Optimistic illness perceptions were associated with lower odds of having had at least one flare in the preceding 6 months. Every 1-point increase in B-IPQ treatment control, indicating an increasingly optimistic view that gout is treatable, decreased the odds of a recent flare prior to baseline by 33% [odds ratio (OR): 0.67; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.85; P < 0.001] and prior to the 12-month follow-up by 15% (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76,0.96; P = 0.01). Pessimistic illness perceptions also predicted poorer medication adherence, health-related quality of life, and productivity, but not serum urate levels. CONCLUSION Modifying pessimistic illness perceptions, including, but not limited to, patient education, may promote prudent self-management behaviours and better outcomes in gout. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; https://www.anzctr.org.au/, ACTRN12616000455460.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Selvadurai
- St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew J Coleshill
- Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia
- UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard O Day
- St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nancy E Briggs
- Stats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marcel Schulz
- St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jennifer Reath
- Department of General Practice, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eindra Aung
- St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Pain Management Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Negrón JB, Rodriguez-Malavé MJ, Camacho CO, Malavé CL, Rodríguez-Guzmán VM. The overturn of Roe v. Wade beyond abortion: a snapshot of methotrexate accessibility for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases-a mixed methods study using Twitter data. Rheumatol Int 2023; 43:2293-2301. [PMID: 37572172 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05407-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
In June 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States (US) overturned the right established in Roe v. Wade to terminate a pregnancy. Subsequently, some states passed abortion ban laws prohibiting the use of abortive methods, including methotrexate (MTX), which has been a cornerstone drug in rheumatology. We aimed to explore and analyze Twitter data to comprehend the short-term implications of the overturn on rheumatology care. We conducted a mixed methods study using social media (SoMe) data. Tweets publicly posted using "#Methotrexate or Methotrexate" were tracked. A combination of SoMe performance data with qualitative hashtag co-occurrence analysis and content analysis was conducted. A total of 5180 posts were generated and reached approximately 40 million users. Seventy-three percent of all publications came from the US. Females posted more than males. Additionally, the three pairs of hashtags with higher co-occurrence were: #roevswade, #abortionishealthcare, and #rheumatoidarthritis. From the content analysis, three main themes were generated: (i) violence against women, (ii) health policy without public health intelligence, and (iii) call for strategic alliances in favor of public health. The combination of biological sex and state of residence could condition the use of MTX. Men will be able to continue their treatment; however, women could lose continuity of it. Inequity in access to treatment is a political decision, just as it is to reproduce inequities and vulnerabilities through the actions taken. Not having access to MTX for rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) is a critical issue that endangers the physical and mental health of people with RMDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José B Negrón
- Instituto de Investigación Social y Sanitaria, Guayanilla, Puerto Rico.
| | | | - Christian O Camacho
- Instituto de Investigación Social y Sanitaria, Guayanilla, Puerto Rico
- Mayagüez Medical Center, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
| | - Carlos L Malavé
- Instituto de Investigación Social y Sanitaria, Guayanilla, Puerto Rico
| | - Von M Rodríguez-Guzmán
- Lifespan Physician Group, Inc, Providence, RI, USA
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guo H, Li L, Liu B, Lu P, Cao Z, Ji X, Li L, Ouyang G, Nie Z, Lyu A, Lu C. Inappropriate treatment response to DMARDs: A pathway to difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. Int Immunopharmacol 2023; 122:110655. [PMID: 37481847 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) has attracted significant attention from rheumatologists due to its poor treatment response and the persistent symptoms or signs experienced by patients. The therapeutic demands of patients with D2T RA are not properly met due to unclear pathogenic causes and a lack of high-quality data for current treatment options, creating considerable management difficulties with this patient population. This review describes the clinical challenges associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and explores contributing factors associated with inappropriate response to DMARDs that may lead to D2T RA and related immunological dysregulation. It is now understood that D2T RA is a highly heterogeneous pathological status that involves multiple factors. These factors include but are not limited to genetics, environment, immunogenicity, comorbidities, adverse drug reactions, inappropriate drug application, poor adherence, and socioeconomic status. Besides, these factors may manifest in the selection and utilization of specific DMARDs, either individually or in combination, thereby contributing to inadequate treatment response. Finding these variables may offer hints for enhancing DMARD therapy plans and bettering the condition of D2T RA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongtao Guo
- Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 16# Dongzhimen Nei Nan Xiao Jie, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China; Department of Rheumatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of TCM, Zhengzhou 450000, China
| | - Li Li
- Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 16# Dongzhimen Nei Nan Xiao Jie, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China
| | - Bin Liu
- Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 16# Dongzhimen Nei Nan Xiao Jie, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China
| | - Peipei Lu
- Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 16# Dongzhimen Nei Nan Xiao Jie, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China
| | - Zhiwen Cao
- Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 16# Dongzhimen Nei Nan Xiao Jie, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China
| | - Xinyu Ji
- Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 16# Dongzhimen Nei Nan Xiao Jie, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China
| | - Li Li
- Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 16# Dongzhimen Nei Nan Xiao Jie, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China
| | - Guilin Ouyang
- Shanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhixin Nie
- Shanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Aiping Lyu
- Shanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai, China; School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Cheng Lu
- Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 16# Dongzhimen Nei Nan Xiao Jie, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alt A, Luomajoki H, Lüdtke K. Strategies to facilitate and tools to measure non-specific low back pain patients' adherence to physiotherapy - A two-stage systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2023; 35:208-219. [PMID: 37330771 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.04.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sustainable management for non-specific low back pain relies on adherence. This requires effective strategies to facilitate but also tools to measure adherence to physiotherapy. OBJECTIVE This two-stage systematic review aims to identify (1) tools to measure non-specific back pain patients' adherence to physiotherapy and (2) the most effective strategy to facilitate patients' adherence to physiotherapy. METHOD PubMed, Cochrane, PEDro, and Web of Science were searched for English language studies measuring adherence in adults with low back pain. Following PRISMA recommendations, scoping review methods were used to identify measurement tools (stage 1). The effectiveness of interventions (stage 2), followed a predefined systematic search strategy. Two independent reviewers selected eligible studies (software Rayyan), analyzed these for risk of bias using the Downs and Black checklist. Data relevant to assess adherence were collected in a predesigned data extraction table. Results were heterogeneous and hence summarized narratively. RESULTS Twenty-one studies were included for stage 1 and 16 for stage 2. Identified were 6 different tools to measure adherence. The most used tool was an exercise diary; the most common more multidimensional tool was the Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale. Most included studies were not designed to improve or measure adherence but used adherence as a secondary outcome for new exercise programs. The most promising strategies for facilitating adherence were based on cognitive behavioral principles. CONCLUSION Future studies should focus on the development of multidimensional strategies to facilitate adherence to physiotherapy and appropriate tools to measure all aspects of adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Alt
- Universität zu Lübeck, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Germany.
| | - H Luomajoki
- Zürich University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Physiotherapy, Katharina Sulzer Platz 95, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - K Lüdtke
- Universität zu Lübeck, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun K, Eudy AM, Rogers JL, Criscione-Schreiber LG, Sadun RE, Doss J, Maheswaranathan M, Barr AC, Eder L, Corneli AL, Bosworth HB, Clowse ME. Pilot Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using Pharmacy Refill Data. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:550-558. [PMID: 34739191 PMCID: PMC9068832 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite high rates of medication nonadherence among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), effective interventions to improve adherence in SLE are limited. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a pilot intervention and explore its effect on adherence. METHODS The intervention used pharmacy refill data to monitor nonadherence and prompt discussions surrounding SLE medications during clinic encounters. Over 12 weeks, the intervention was delivered through routine clinic visits by providers to patients with SLE who take SLE-specific medications. We measured acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility using provider surveys. We also measured acceptability by patient surveys and feasibility by medical record documentation. We explored change in adherence by comparing percent of patients with medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80% 3 months before and after the intervention visit using the McNemar's test. RESULTS Six rheumatologists participated; 130 patients were included in the analysis (median age 43, 95% female, and 59% racial and ethnic minorities). Implementation of the intervention was documented in 89% of clinic notes. Provider surveys showed high scores for feasibility (4.7/5), acceptability (4.4/5), and appropriateness (4.6/5). Among patient surveys, the most common reactions to the intervention visit were feeling determined (32%), empowered (32%), and proud (19%). Proportion of patients with MPR ≥80% increased from 48% to 58% (P = 0.03) after the intervention visit. CONCLUSION Our intervention showed feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness and led to a statistically significant improvement in adherence. Future work should refine the intervention, assess its efficacy in a controlled setting, and adapt its use among other clinic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Sun
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amanda M. Eudy
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Rogers
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Rebecca E. Sadun
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jayanth Doss
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mithu Maheswaranathan
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ann Cameron Barr
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lena Eder
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amy L. Corneli
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hayden B. Bosworth
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Megan E.B. Clowse
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
VALAAS HL, KLOKKERUD M, HILDESKÅR J, HAGLAND AS, KJØNLI E, MJØSUND K, ØIE L, WIGERS SH, EPPELAND SG, HØYSTAD TØ, KLOKKEIDE Å, LARSEN M, KJEKEN I. Associations Between Adherence to Self-Management Activities and Change in Function and Health Outcomes in the Rehabilitation of Patients with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases. J Rehabil Med 2023; 55:jrm00362. [PMID: 36633327 PMCID: PMC9847370 DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v55.2214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the content of, and adherence to, self-management activities reported by patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), and whether adherence to self-management activities is associated with changes in self-reported health and function over a 1-year period following rehabilitation in specialized healthcare. METHODS Participants (n = 523) reported function and health outcomes at admission, discharge, and 4, 8 and 12 months post-rehabilitation. Self-management activities reported at discharge were self-evaluated as adherence level at home. Self-management activity content was linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health coding system, and summarized as high or low adherence. Associations between adherence to self-management activities and change in outcomes were investigated using a linear mixed model approach with repeated measures. RESULTS Self-management activities focused mainly on enhanced physical health and managing everyday routines, and seldom addressed work participation. Adherence to self-management activities was challenging with regard to structure and daily life routines, mental health, and the application of knowledge and coping strategies. Adherence to self-management activities was significantly associated with improvements in all outcomes, except for mental health and activities of daily living. CONCLUSION Adherence to self-management activities, and creating structure and setting everyday routines at home, appear to be important for maintaining health and function over time. Rehabilitation should include a greater focus on mental health challenges and work participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene Lindtvedt VALAAS
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo
| | - Mari KLOKKERUD
- Regional Center for Knowledge Translation in Rehabilitation, Sunnaas Hospital, Bjørnemyr
| | | | | | | | | | - Lars ØIE
- North-Norway Rehabilitation Centre, Tromsø
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ingvild KJEKEN
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Digital Rehabilitation Programs Improve Therapeutic Exercise Adherence for Patients With Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022; 52:726-739. [PMID: 35960507 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2022.11384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of digital rehabilitation for improving adherence to therapeutic exercise in people with musculoskeletal conditions. DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: Five databases were searched from their inception to March 2022. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials evaluating digital rehabilitation programs to improve adherence to therapeutic exercise for people with musculoskeletal conditions. DATA SYNTHESIS: We calculated standardized mean differences (SMDs) or mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Eleven trials were included in the meta-analysis (n = 1144 participants). At short-term follow-up, digital rehabilitation was no better than nondigital rehabilitation (3 trials, adherence rate of prescribed exercise test SMD 0.50, 95% CI: -0.13, 1.13; 2 trials, self-reported exercise adherence test MD 1.07, 95% CI: 0.58, 1.56; 2 trials, assessor-reported exercise adherence test SMD -0.10, 95% CI: -0.56, 0.36). At intermediate-term follow-up, digital rehabilitation improved exercise adherence compared with nondigital rehabilitation (6 trials, adherence rate of prescribed exercise test SMD 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.70; 2 trials, self-reported exercise adherence test MD 1.50, 95% CI: 0.76, 2.25; 2 trials, Exercise Adherence Rating Scale test MD 5.86, 95% CI: 0.08, 11.65). At long-term follow-up, there was no clinically important difference between digital and nondigital rehabilitation (2 trials, adherence rate of prescribed exercise test SMD 0.28, 95% CI: -0.14, 0.70; 1 trial, self-reported exercise adherence test MD 0.20, 95% CI: -0.91, 1.31). CONCLUSION: Digital rehabilitation was effective at improving therapeutic exercise adherence in musculoskeletal conditions at mid-term follow-up, but not at short- and long-term follow-up. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(11):726-739. Epub: 12 August 2022. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.11384.
Collapse
|
8
|
Badge H, Churches T, Naylor JM, Xuan W, Armstrong E, Gray L, Fletcher J, Gosbell I, Christine Lin CW, Harris IA. Association between VTE and antibiotic prophylaxis guideline compliance and patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: an observational study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:110. [PMID: 36224453 PMCID: PMC9556685 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00502-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site infection (SSI) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are associated with high burden and cost and are considered largely preventable following total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA, THA). The risk of developing VTE and SSI is reduced when prophylaxis is compliant with evidence-based clinical guidelines. However, the association between VTE and antibiotic prophylaxis clinical guideline compliance and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after THA/TKA is unknown. This study aims to explore whether care that is non-compliant with VTE and antibiotic guideline recommendations is associated with PROMs (Oxford Hip/Knee Score and EQ-5D Index scores) at 90- and 365-days after surgery. METHODS This prospective observational study included high-volume arthroplasty public and private sites and consenting eligible participants undergoing elective primary THA/TKA. We conducted multiple linear regression and linear mixed-effects modelling to explore the associations between non-compliance with VTE and antibiotic guidelines, and PROMs. RESULTS The sample included 1838 participants. Compliance with VTE and antibiotic guidelines was 35% and 13.2% respectively. In adjusted modelling, non-compliance with VTE guidelines was not associated with 90-day Oxford score (β = - 0.54, standard error [SE] = 0.34, p = 0.112) but was significantly associated with lower (worse) 365-day Oxford score (β = - 0.76, SE = 0.29, p = 0.009), lower EQ-5D Index scores at 90- (β = - 0.02 SE = 0.008, p = 0.011) and 365-days (β = - 0.03, SE = 0.008, p = 0.002).. The changes in Oxford and EQ-5D Index scores were not clinically important. Noncompliance with antibiotic guidelines was not associated with either PROM at 90- (Oxford: β = - 0.45, standard error [SE] = 0.47, p = 0.341; EQ-5D: β = - 0.001, SE = 0.011, p = 0.891) or 365-days (Oxford score: β = - 0.06, SE = 0.41, p = 0.880 EQ-5D: β = - 0.010, SE = 0.012, p = 0.383). Results were consistent when complications were included in the model and in linear mixed-effects modelling with the insurance sector as a random effect. CONCLUSIONS Non-compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines, but not antibiotic guidelines, is associated with statistically significant but not clinically meaningful differences in Oxford scores and EQ-5D Index scores at 365 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Badge
- Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW, 1 Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.429098.eIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.411958.00000 0001 2194 1270Australian Catholic University, 8-20 Napier Street, North Sydney, 2060 Australia
| | - Tim Churches
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW, 1 Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.429098.eIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia
| | - Justine M. Naylor
- Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW, 1 Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.429098.eIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia
| | - Wei Xuan
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW, 1 Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.429098.eIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia
| | - Elizabeth Armstrong
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432School of Population Health, The University of New South Wales, High St Kensington, Kensington, NSW 2052 Australia
| | - Leeanne Gray
- grid.410692.80000 0001 2105 7653South Western Sydney Local Health District, 1 Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia
| | - John Fletcher
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XUniversity of Sydney, Fisher Road, Camperdown, NSW 2006 Australia ,grid.413252.30000 0001 0180 6477Westmead Hospital, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW 2145 Australia
| | - Iain Gosbell
- grid.429098.eIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.1029.a0000 0000 9939 5719Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560 Australia
| | - Chung-Wei Christine Lin
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building (A27) Fisher Road, Camperdown, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Ian A. Harris
- Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW, 1 Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.429098.eIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia ,grid.410692.80000 0001 2105 7653South Western Sydney Local Health District, 1 Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, 2071 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bywall KS, Johansson JV, Erlandsson I, Heidenvall M, Lason M, Appel Esbensen B. Making space for patients' preferences in precision medicine: a qualitative study exploring perspectives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058303. [PMID: 35649604 PMCID: PMC9161063 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Precision medicine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) creates new opportunities to involve patients in early identification of accurate indicators of health trajectories. The aim of this study was to explore patient perspectives on patient-centredness in precision medicine for RA treatment. DESIGN Semistructured interviews were conducted to explore patients' perspectives on a new personalised approach to RA treatment. The interview guide was developed together with patient research partners and health care professionals. SETTING An invitation to the interviews was sent through a mobile application. The interviews were one-on-one, using an interview guide with open-ended questions. Interviews were conducted digitally (October 2020-February 2021) via Zoom or telephone, depending on each participant's preferences. PARTICIPANTS Patients with RA (N=12) were purposively recruited. Patients were eligible if they had an RA diagnosis, were aged 18-80 years, and understood and expressed themselves in Swedish. Participants and researchers did not know each other prior to the interviews. RESULTS Participants expressed desires and needs for patients to have an active role in precision medicine by making shared treatment decisions together with a healthcare professional. In order for that to work, patients need information on potential treatment options, an ability to express their preferences, an individual treatment plan and identification of personal treatment goals. Patients also identified two requirements of healthcare professional in precision medicine: a safe environment to express personal matters and two-way communication with healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION Communication between patients and healthcare professionals needs to be more focused on patients' individual treatment preferences and expressed needs, in order to increase patient-centredness in treatment decisions, so shared decision-making can become a reality. More research is needed to design multifaceted implementation strategies to support patients and healthcare professionals to increase patient-centredness throughout treatment personalisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Viberg Johansson
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden
- Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Bente Appel Esbensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chowdhury T, Dutta J, Noel P, Islam R, Gonzalez-Peltier G, Azad S, Shankar M, Rayapureddy AK, Deb Roy P, Gousy N, Hassan KN. An Overview on Causes of Nonadherence in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Its Effect on Mortality and Ways to Improve Adherence. Cureus 2022; 14:e24520. [PMID: 35651472 PMCID: PMC9136714 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorders that, when insufficiently treated, results in detrimental sequelae including joint damage and reduced quality of life. Poor patient adherence to medication is a significant blockade to effective management. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss the factors responsible for defiance of antirheumatic medication and ways to overcome these barriers. Education level, health literacy, cohabitation status, multi-morbidities, complicated drug regimen, intermittent co-payments, prescribed regimen adverse effects, and cognitive impairment are a few among many common barrier factors leading to poorer outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. While there is an abundance of inhibitory factors leading to worsening disease progression, they each can be easily dealt with an effective approach at the beginning or during the treatment course to ensure a better outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tutul Chowdhury
- Internal Medicine, One Brooklyn Health System, Brooklyn, USA
| | - Jui Dutta
- Medicine, Comilla Medical College, New York City, USA
| | - Pharlin Noel
- Surgery, Mount Sinai South Nassau Hospital, Oceanside, USA
| | - Ratul Islam
- Medicine, American University of Antigua, New York City, USA
| | | | - Samzorna Azad
- Medicine, American University of Antigua, New York City, USA
| | - Malavika Shankar
- Internal Medicine, One Brooklyn Health System, New York City, USA
| | | | | | - Nicole Gousy
- Medicine, American University of Antigua, New York City, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Emamikia S, Gentline C, Enman Y, Parodis I. How Can We Enhance Adherence to Medications in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus? Results from a Qualitative Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11071857. [PMID: 35407466 PMCID: PMC8999748 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Medication non-adherence is common among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and may lead to poor clinical outcomes. Our aim was to identify influenceable contributors to medication non-adherence and suggest interventions that could increase adherence. Patients with SLE from two Swedish tertiary referral centres (n = 205) participated in a survey assessing self-reported adherence to medications. Responses were used to select patients for qualitative interviews (n = 15). Verbatim interview transcripts were analysed by two researchers using content analysis methodology. The median age of the interviewees was 32 years, 87% were women, and their median SLE duration was nine years. Reasons for non-adherence were complex and multifaceted; we categorised them thematically into (i) patient-related (e.g., unintentional non-adherence due to forgetfulness or intentional non-adherence due to disbelief in medications); (ii) healthcare-related (e.g., untrustworthy relationship with the treating physician, authority fear, and poor information about the prescribed medications or the disease); (iii) medication-related (e.g., fear of side-effects); and (iv) disease-related reasons (e.g., lacking acceptance of a chronic illness or perceived disease quiescence). Interventions identified that healthcare could implement to improve patient adherence to medications included (i) increased communication between healthcare professionals and patients; (ii) patient education; (iii) accessible healthcare, preferably with the same personnel; (iv) well-coordinated transition from paediatric to adult care; (v) regularity in addressing adherence to medications; (vi) psychological support; and (vii) involvement of family members or people who are close to the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharzad Emamikia
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden; (C.G.); (Y.E.)
- Correspondence: (S.E.); (I.P.)
| | - Cidem Gentline
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden; (C.G.); (Y.E.)
| | - Yvonne Enman
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden; (C.G.); (Y.E.)
| | - Ioannis Parodis
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden; (C.G.); (Y.E.)
- Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182 Örebro, Sweden
- Correspondence: (S.E.); (I.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Effectiveness of Interventions Based on Pain Neuroscience Education on Pain and Psychosocial Variables for Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19052559. [PMID: 35270250 PMCID: PMC8909562 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint condition. It affects more than 300 million people worldwide, who suffer from pain and physical disability. Objective: To determine the results of cognitive educational interventions for pain management and psychosocial variables in adults with OA. Method: A systematic review was conducted based on searches in MEDLINE, OVID, LILACS, Scopus, PEDro, OTseeker, The Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and Google Scholar. The search strategy included the main terms neuroscience education and osteoarthritis, without any re-strictions with regard to dates or study type (PROSPERO register CRD42021222763). Results: We included four articles that implemented the intervention in 1–6 sessions, addressing concepts related to goal orientation and providing strategies for understanding pain. The results suggest that there is an improvement between the groups (PNE) when compared, but this cannot necessarily be attributed to pain neuroscience education (PNE), as small effect sizes for variables such as pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia were observed. The response in the modulation of acute pain following the surgical procedure may produce a variation in the responses and this may be mediated by medications. Conclusion: The study revealed an improvement in favor of the groups managed with PNE, although more studies documenting the topic are warranted.
Collapse
|
13
|
Treatment adherence in rheumatic diseases in the bDMARD era-are we underachieving? Z Rheumatol 2022; 81:245-246. [PMID: 35103803 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-022-01166-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
14
|
Comparison of 2 Postoperative Therapy Regimens After Trapeziectomy Due to Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47:120-129.e4. [PMID: 34649742 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The main aim of the present study was to evaluate whether early mobilization after trapeziectomy in the first carpometacarpal joint is noninferior to a postoperative regimen comprising the use of a rigid orthosis and mobilization after 6 weeks, with regards to patient-reported activity performance and the effect of surgery in patients with first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. METHODS In this prospective, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial, participants were assessed at baseline (before group allocation) and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The primary outcomes were activity performance, measured using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (1-10, where 1 = unable to perform), and the patient-reported effect of surgery on a 6-point scale ranging from "much worse" to "completely recovered." A change of 2.0 points in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was used as a noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included hand function (patient-reported in the Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand questionnaire), pain on a numeric rating scale, grip and pinch strengths, and joint mobility. We performed both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. RESULTS Of the 59 participants (88% women) with a mean age of 65 years, 55 (93%) completed all assessments. We found no differences between the groups in primary or secondary outcomes at any time point, except for more decreased pain at rest in the intervention group (n = 28) compared with the control group (n = 27) after 12 months. The per-protocol analyses did not change these results. Fifteen participants experienced 1 or more adverse events during the first 3 months, but the types and frequencies of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS A postoperative regimen with early mobilization after trapeziectomy is as safe and effective as a postoperative regimen with longer immobilization in patients with first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic II.
Collapse
|
15
|
Nagy G, Roodenrijs NMT, Welsing PMJ, Kedves M, Hamar A, van der Goes MC, Kent A, Bakkers M, Pchelnikova P, Blaas E, Senolt L, Szekanecz Z, Choy EH, Dougados M, Jacobs JW, Geenen R, Bijlsma JW, Zink A, Aletaha D, Schoneveld L, van Riel P, Dumas S, Prior Y, Nikiphorou E, Ferraccioli G, Schett G, Hyrich KL, Mueller-Ladner U, Buch MH, McInnes IB, van der Heijde D, van Laar JM. EULAR points to consider for the management of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2022; 81:20-33. [PMID: 34407926 PMCID: PMC8761998 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop evidence-based European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) points to consider (PtCs) for the management of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA). METHODS An EULAR Task Force was established comprising 34 individuals: 26 rheumatologists, patient partners and rheumatology experienced health professionals. Two systematic literature reviews addressed clinical questions around diagnostic challenges, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies in D2T RA. PtCs were formulated based on the identified evidence and expert opinion. Strength of recommendations (SoR, scale A-D: A typically consistent level 1 studies and D level 5 evidence or inconsistent studies) and level of agreement (LoA, scale 0-10: 0 completely disagree and 10 completely agree) of the PtCs were determined by the Task Force members. RESULTS Two overarching principles and 11 PtCs were defined concerning diagnostic confirmation of RA, evaluation of inflammatory disease activity, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, treatment adherence, functional disability, pain, fatigue, goal setting and self-efficacy and the impact of comorbidities. The SoR varied from level C to level D. The mean LoA with the overarching principles and PtCs was generally high (8.4-9.6). CONCLUSIONS These PtCs for D2T RA can serve as a clinical roadmap to support healthcare professionals and patients to deliver holistic management and more personalised pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies. High-quality evidence was scarce. A research agenda was created to guide future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- György Nagy
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Genetics, Cell and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Nadia M T Roodenrijs
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Melinda Kedves
- Bács-Kiskun County Hospital, Rheumatology Department, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | - Attila Hamar
- Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Marlies C van der Goes
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Alison Kent
- Salisbury Foundation Trust NHS Hospital, Wiltshire, UK
| | - Margot Bakkers
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Polina Pchelnikova
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Etienne Blaas
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ladislav Senolt
- Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Zoltan Szekanecz
- Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Ernest H Choy
- CREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Université de Paris Department of Rheumatology - Hôpital Cochin. Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris INSERM (U1153) Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Johannes Wg Jacobs
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rinie Geenen
- Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Wj Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Angela Zink
- Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Leonard Schoneveld
- Department of Rheumatology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | - Piet van Riel
- Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie Dumas
- Department of Pharmacy, Marin Hospital, Asisstance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hendaye, France
| | - Yeliz Prior
- School of Health and Society, Centre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
- Rheumatology Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Georg Schett
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ulf Mueller-Ladner
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Maya H Buch
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Iain B McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Jacob M van Laar
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Balsa A, García de Yébenes MJ, Carmona L. Multilevel factors predict medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-month cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 81:327-334. [PMID: 34844924 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Non-adherence challenges efficacy and costs of healthcare. Knowledge of the underlying factors is essential to design effective intervention strategies. OBJECTIVES To estimate the prevalence of treatment adherence in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to evaluate its predictors. METHODS A 6-month prospective cohort study of patients with RA selected by systematic stratified sampling (33% on first disease-modifying rheumatic drug (DMARD), 33% on second-line DMARD and 33% on biologics). The outcome measure was treatment adherence, defined by a score greater than 80% both in the Compliance Questionnaire in Rheumatology and the Reported Adherence to Medication scale, and was estimated with 95% CIs. Predictive factors included sociodemographic, psychological, clinical, drug-related, patient-doctor relationship related and logistic. Their effect on 6-month adherence was examined by multilevel logistic models adjusted for baseline covariates. RESULTS 180 patients were recruited (77% women, mean age 60.8). The prevalence of adherence was 59.1% (95% CI 48.1% to 71.8%). Patients on biologics showed higher adherence and perceived a higher medication need than the others; patients on second-line DMARDs had experienced more adverse events than the others. The variables explaining adherence in the final multivariate model were the type of treatment prescribed (second-line DMARDs OR=5.22, and biologics OR=3.76), agreement on treatment (OR=4.57), having received information on treatment adaptation (OR=1.42) and the physician perception of patient trust (OR=1.58). These effects were independent of disease activity. CONCLUSION Treatment adherence in RA is far from complete. Psychological, communicational and logistic factors influence treatment adherence in RA to a greater extent than sociodemographic or clinical factors.
Collapse
|
17
|
Roodenrijs NMT, van der Goes MC, Welsing PMJ, van Oorschot EPC, Nikiphorou E, Nijhof NC, Tekstra J, Lafeber FPJG, Jacobs JWG, van Laar JM, Geenen R. Non-adherence in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis from the perspectives of patients and rheumatologists: a concept mapping study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:5105-5116. [PMID: 33560301 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Treatment non-adherence is more frequent among difficult-to-treat (D2T) than among non-D2T RA patients. Perceptions of non-adherence may differ. We aimed to thematically structure and prioritize barriers to (i.e. causes and reasons for non-adherence) and facilitators of optimal adherence from the patients' and rheumatologists' perspectives. METHODS Patients' perceptions were identified in semi-structured in-depth interviews. Experts selected representative statements regarding 40 barriers and 40 facilitators. Twenty D2T and 20 non-D2T RA patients sorted these statements during two card-sorting tasks: first, by order of content similarity and, second, content applicability. Additionally, 20 rheumatologists sorted the statements by order of content applicability to the general RA population. The similarity sorting was used as input for hierarchical cluster analysis. The applicability sorting was analysed using descriptive statistics, prioritized and the results compared between D2T RA patients, non-D2T RA patients and rheumatologists. RESULTS Nine clusters of barriers were identified, related to the healthcare system, treatment safety/efficacy, treatment regimen and patient behaviour. D2T RA patients prioritized adverse events and doubts about effectiveness as the most important barriers. Doubts about effectiveness were more important to D2T than to non-D2T RA patients (P = 0.02). Seven clusters of facilitators were identified, related to the healthcare system and directly to the patient. All RA patients and rheumatologists prioritized a good relationship with the healthcare professional and treatment information as the most helpful facilitators. CONCLUSIONS D2T RA patients, non-D2T RA patients and rheumatologists prioritized perceptions of non-adherence largely similarly. The structured overviews of barriers and facilitators provided in this study may guide improvement of adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia M T Roodenrijs
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht
| | - Marlies C van der Goes
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht.,Department of Rheumatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht
| | - Eline P C van Oorschot
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London and Department of Rheumatology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nienke C Nijhof
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht
| | - Janneke Tekstra
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht
| | - Floris P J G Lafeber
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht
| | - Johannes W G Jacobs
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht
| | - Jacob M van Laar
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht
| | - Rinie Geenen
- Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ritschl V, Ferreira RJO, Santos EJF, Fernandes R, Juutila E, Mosor E, Santos-Costa P, Fligelstone K, Schraven L, Stummvoll G, Salvador M, Poole JL, van den Ende C, Boström C, Stamm TA. Suitability for e-health of non-pharmacological interventions in connective tissue diseases: scoping review with a descriptive analysis. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2021-001710. [PMID: 34326205 PMCID: PMC8323400 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Non-pharmacological interventions support patients with connective tissue diseases to better cope with and self-manage their diseases. This study aimed to map existing evidence on non-pharmacological interventions in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc) and mixed connective tissue diseases regarding content, feasibility and potential suitability in an e-health setting. Methods A literature search was performed in eight different databases in July 2020. The intervention’s content was extracted using the ‘Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide’. A Sankey diagram and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data and illustrate the relationships between the interventions. Results Of 8198 identified records, 119 papers were eligible. One hundred and four of them (87.4%) were conducted between 2000 and 2020, mainly in the USA (SLE n=24 (21.2%), SSc n=16 (14.2%)), Brazil (SLE n=8 (7.1%), SSc n=5 (4.4%)) and Italy (SLE n=0 (0%), SSc n=12 (10.6%)). Fifty-two studies (SLE n=24 (21.2%), SSc n=28 (24.8%)) used multicomponent interventions. The single interventions were physical exercises (SLE n=16 (14.2%), SSc n=17 (15.0%)), coaching/counselling (SLE n=11 (18.0%), SSc n=0 (0%)) and education (SLE n=2 (1.8%), SSc n=3 (2.7%)). Primary outcomes focused on physical function (SLE n=1 (0.9%), SSc n=15 (13.3%)), mouth opening in SSc (n=4 (5.9%)) and physical capacity (SLE n=2 (1.8%), SSc n=1 (0.9%)). No interventions for mixed connective tissue disease were found. Conclusion There was a great variety in the intervention’s content due to differences in body structure, activity limitations and participation restrictions in SLE and SSc. These results highlight the need for personalised, multicomponent, non-pharmacological interventions, which could be delivered as e-health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Ritschl
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ricardo J O Ferreira
- Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal.,Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Eduardo José Ferreira Santos
- Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal.,Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rúben Fernandes
- Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Essi Juutila
- Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Erika Mosor
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paulo Santos-Costa
- Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Linda Schraven
- Federation of European Scleroderma Associations, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maria Salvador
- Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Janet L Poole
- Occupational Therapy Graduate Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | | - Carina Boström
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria .,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Otón T, Carmona L, Andreu JL. Patient's experiences of the barriers and facilitators to Methotrexate. Musculoskeletal Care 2021; 20:158-166. [PMID: 34236743 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the barriers and facilitators of adherence to methotrexate (MTX) in people with rheumatic diseases and to explore the experience of shared decision-making. METHODS A qualitative study was carried out. People diagnosed with inflammatory arthritides or systemic autoimmune diseases and who were treated with MTX were invited to participate in focus groups. The discourse was coded and synthesised with a content analysis approach. RESULTS The groups included 12 representative patients (rheumatoid arthritis, spondylarthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus, taking either oral or subcutaneous MTX). Four main themes were identified: (1) drug-related aspects (package insert, adverse events, administration, and difficulties with treatment); (2) patient-physician relationship; (3) social environment (lack of visibility of rheumatic diseases and the support of patient associations); and (4) medication and medical care practicalities (information, reliable sources, and expanding knowledge in other health areas). CONCLUSIONS Aspects identified might help improve adherence, including quality information, especially on adverse events, the role of the setting, and shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Otón
- InMusc, Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética, Madrid, Spain
| | - Loreto Carmona
- InMusc, Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Andreu
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro- Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview of the recent research publications on educational needs of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and the associated challenges. RECENT FINDINGS The rate of good treatment adherence in PsA can be as low as 57.7% and successful patient education can help improve treatment adherence. Also, 78.7% of patients who stopped their disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic did so without the advice of their clinician. In delivering educational needs, the aspects of disease process, treatment, self-help measures, managing pain, movement, psychological and social needs should all be addressed, whilst at the same time, recognising that PsA patients with multidomain disease, are likely to be dealing with more than just pain. Arthritis self-care management education is potentially beneficial, but up to 11% of educational YouTube videos may contain misleading patient opinion and many existing apps do not meet the needs of the patients with PsA. SUMMARY Significant room for improvement exists in treatment adherence in PsA and patient education addressing the relevant educational needs could assist with this issue. However, patients should be advised to be wary of internet videos and other educational aids that were not created by health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adewale O Adebajo
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ritschl V, Stamm TA, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JWJ, Böhm P, Dragoi RG, Dures E, Estévez-López F, Gossec L, Iagnocco A, Marques A, Moholt E, Nudel M, van den Bemt BJF, Viktil K, Voshaar M, de Thurah A, Carmona L. 2020 EULAR points to consider for the prevention, screening, assessment and management of non-adherence to treatment in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases for use in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 80:707-713. [PMID: 33355152 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-adherence to treatment could preclude reaching an optimal outcome. Thirty to 80% of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) do not adhere to the agreed treatment. OBJECTIVES The objective was to establish points to consider (PtCs) for the prevention, screening, assessment and management of non-adherence to (non-)pharmacological treatments in people with RMDs. METHODS An EULAR task force (TF) was established, and the EULAR standardised operating procedures for the development of PtCs were followed. The TF included healthcare providers (HCPs), comprising rheumatologists, nurses, pharmacists, psychologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and patient-representatives from 12 European countries. A review of systematic reviews was conducted in advance to support the TF in formulating the PtCs. The level of agreement among the TF was established by anonymous online voting. RESULTS Four overarching principles and nine PtCs were formulated. The PtCs reflect the phases of action on non-adherence. HCPs should assess and discuss adherence with patients on a regular basis and support patients to treatment adherence. As adherence is an agreed behaviour, the treatment has to be tailored to the patients' needs. The level of agreement ranged from 9.5 to 9.9 out of 10. CONCLUSIONS These PtCs can help HCPs to support people with RMDs to be more adherent to the agreed treatment plan. The basic scheme being prevent non-adherence by bonding with the patient and building trust, overcoming structural barriers, assessing in a blame-free environment and tailoring the solution to the problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Ritschl
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Wien, Austria
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Wien, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Peter Böhm
- Deutsche Rheuma-Liga Bundesverband e.V, Bonn, Germany
| | - Razvan Gabriel Dragoi
- Rehabilitation, Physical Medicine and Rheumatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Victor Babes Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Emma Dures
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of England, Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
| | - Fernando Estévez-López
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laure Gossec
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
- APHP, Rheumatology Department, Hopital Universitaire Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
| | - Annamaria Iagnocco
- Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Andrea Marques
- Rheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Ellen Moholt
- Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Univiersity Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Viktil
- Hospital Pharmacy, Diakonhjemmet Hospital Pharmacy, Oslo, Norway
- School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marieke Voshaar
- Department Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Loreto Carmona
- Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética (INMUSC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|