Factors associated with anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae test positivity in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Trends in Chlamydia trachomatis Treatment Prescribing Practices in King County, Washington, 2010-2018

BACKGROUND

In 2021, national Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) treatment guidelines changed from recommending either azithromycin (1 g; single dose) or doxycycline (100 mg twice daily for 7 days) to recommending only doxycycline as first-line treatment. The distribution and trends in CT prescribing practices before the guidelines change is largely unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a trends analysis using Washington STD surveillance data. We included all female cases of urogenital CT 15 years or older who resided in King County and were diagnosed between 2010 and 2018. Surveillance data included information on demographics, sexual history, clinical features, diagnosing facility (eg, emergency department, family planning), and treatment regimen. We conducted descriptive analyses to examine trends in prescribing practices over time and by facility type. We used Poisson regression to examine the association between CT case characteristics and receipt of receipt of azithromycin.

RESULTS

There were 36,830 cases of female urogenital CT during the study period. The percent of cases receiving azithromycin increased significantly from 86% in 2010 to 94% in 2018; the percent receiving doxycycline decreased from 13% to 5%. Five of the 8 facility types prescribed azithromycin to >95% of CT cases by 2018. Cases who were younger or cases of color were more likely to receive azithromycin (versus doxycycline) compared with older and White cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial shift in CT prescribing practices will be needed to adhere to new CT treatment guidelines. Our findings highlight the need for targeted provider education and training to encourage the transition to doxycycline use.

Anorectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in women with and without reported anal sex and sex workers in sexual health centres in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Control of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection (gonorrhoea) depends on effective testing strategies. Anorectal testing in women is often done on indication of anal sex; however, anorectal infections are seen with and without anal exposure, possibly caused by autoinoculation. This study aims to enhance understanding of anorectal infections in women, by identifying risk factors for anorectal diagnosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study we used national surveillance data from Dutch sexual health centres from Jan 1, 2016, to Dec 31, 2021. We included cisgender women having sex with men who were tested urogenitally and anorectally for gonorrhoea. Due to different testing policies, we identified three groups: women who had not reported recent anal sex (in the past 6 months), women who had reported recent anal sex, and sex workers. Extracted data for analyses included demographics, sexual behaviour, and diagnosis of a sexually transmitted infection (STI). Per group, multivariable models using Firth's penalised maximum likelihood logistic regression were constructed, identifying determinants of anorectal gonorrhoea among all women and among gonorrhoea-positive women only. Variables included in model construction were age, education level, migration background, number of partners, condom use, partner notification, STI symptoms, having a partner who has sex with men (MSM) or a migrant partner, previous STI test, anal sex, and chlamydia and gonorrhoea diagnoses per anatomical location.

FINDINGS

In total, 117 693 women were included: 43 757 women without reported recent anal sex, 51 728 women with reported recent anal sex, and 22 208 sex workers. In all three groups, around 2% of women were gonorrhoea positive, and 70% or more of women had an anorectal infection. The strongest determinant of anorectal gonorrhoea was a concurrent urogenital gonorrhoea diagnosis (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 782 [95% CI 605-1018]) among women without reported recent anal sex (612 [490-768] among women with reported recent anal sex, and 464 [335-652] among sex workers). Among gonorrhoea-positive women, determinants of anorectal gonorrhoea were urogenital and anorectal chlamydia co-infection (aOR 2·03 [95% CI 1·38-3·02], for women without reported anal sex) and migration background (1·44 [1·02-2·06], for women with reported anal sex). Determinants among sex workers were condomless sex (2·43 [1·55-3·82]), anal sex (1·71 [1·10-2·66]), MSM or migrant partner (1·78 [1·13-2·79]), and urogenital and anorectal chlamydia co-infection (2·28 [1·11-5·14]).

INTERPRETATION

These findings support the possibility of an autoinoculation process from the urogenital to the anorectal location due to the very strong correlation between urogenital and anorectal gonorrhoea, and due to the similarity of results across all three groups. Current testing strategies could miss anorectal infections, which should be considered when developing gonorrhoea prevention and control guidelines.

FUNDING

None.

Emerging threat of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: pathogenesis, treatment challenges, and potential for vaccine development

The continuous rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious concern as it endangers the effectiveness of healthcare interventions that rely on antibiotics in the long run. The increasing resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the bacteria responsible for causing gonorrhea, to commonly used antimicrobial drugs, is a major concern. This has now become a critical global health crisis. In the coming years, there is a risk of a hidden epidemic caused by the emergence of gonococcal AMR. This will worsen the global situation. Infections caused by N. gonorrhoeae were once considered easily treatable. However, over time, they have become increasingly resistant to commonly used therapeutic medications, such as penicillin, ciprofloxacin, and azithromycin. As a result, this pathogen is developing into a true "superbug," which means that ceftriaxone is now the only available option for initial empirical treatment. Effective management strategies are urgently needed to prevent severe consequences, such as infertility and pelvic inflammatory disease, which can result from delayed intervention. This review provides a thorough analysis of the escalating problem of N. gonorrhoeae, including its pathogenesis, current treatment options, the emergence of drug-resistant mechanisms, and the potential for vaccine development. We aim to provide valuable insights for healthcare practitioners, policymakers, and researchers in their efforts to combat N. gonorrhoeae antibiotic resistance by elucidating the multifaceted aspects of this global challenge.

Update on the Epidemiology, Screening, and Management of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection

Chlamydia trachomatis infection ("chlamydia") is the most commonly diagnosed bacterial sexually transmitted infection globally, occurring in the genitals (urethra or vagina/cervix), rectum, or pharynx. If left untreated in women, genital chlamydia can ascend into the upper genital tract causing pelvic inflammatory disease, increasing their risk for ectopic pregnancy, infertility, and chronic pelvic pain. In men, chlamydia can cause epididymitis and proctitis. However, chlamydia is asymptomatic in over 80% of cases. This article provides an update on the epidemiology, natural history, and clinical manifestations of chlamydia in adults and discusses the current approaches to its management and control policy.

Optimisation of treatments for oral Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection: Pharmacokinetics Study (STI-PK project) - study protocol for non-randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections are common and incidence increasing. Oropharyngeal infections are associated with greater treatment failure compared with other sites and drive transmission to anogenital sites through saliva. Gonococcal resistance is increasing and new treatments are scarce, therefore, clinicians must optimise currently available and emerging treatments in order to have efficacious therapeutic options. This requires pharmacokinetic data from the oral cavity/oropharynx, however, availability of such information is currently limited.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Healthy male volunteers (participants) recruited into the study will receive single doses of either ceftriaxone 1 g, cefixime 400 mg or ceftriaxone 500 mg plus 2 g azithromycin. Participants will provide samples at 6-8 time points (treatment regimen dependent) from four oral sites, two oral fluids, one anorectal swab and blood. Participants will complete online questionnaires about their medical history, sexual practices and any side effects experienced up to days 5-7. Saliva/oral mucosal pH and oral microbiome analysis will be undertaken. Bioanalysis will be conducted by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Drug concentrations over time will be used to develop mathematical models for optimisation of drug dosing regimens and to estimate pharmacodynamic targets of efficacy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by Royal Melbourne Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (60370/MH-2021). The study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and reported at conferences. Summary results will be sent to participants requesting them. All data relevant to the study will be included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12621000339853.

High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: Cross-sectional study in general practice

BACKGROUND

Genital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis frequently present together in sexually transmitted infection clinics.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of co-occurrent genital and anorectal chlamydia infection, and to study whether sexual behavior is associated with anorectal infection.

DESIGN & SETTING

A cross-sectional study in general practices in the north of the Netherlands.

METHOD

Women attending general practice with an indication for genital chlamydia testing were included and asked to complete a structured questionnaire on sexual behaviour. Anorectal infection prevalence was compared according to testing indications: standard vs experimental (ie, based on questionnaire answers). Variables associated with anorectal chlamydia were analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Data could be analysed for 497 of 515 included women. Overall, 17.8% (87/490) were positive for C. trachomatis; of these, 72.4% (63/87) had co-occurrent genital and anorectal infection, 13.8% (12/87) had genital infection only, and 12.6% (11/87) had anorectal infection only. Rectal infection was missed in 69.3% of cases using the standard indication alone, while adding the sexual history still missed 20.0%. Age was the only variable significantly associated with anorectal infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of anorectal disease is high among women who visit their general practitioner with an indication for genital C. trachomatis testing. Many anorectal infections are missed despite taking comprehensive sexual histories, meaning that standard treatment of genital infection with azithromycin may result in rectal persistence. Performing anorectal testing in all women with an indication for genital C. trachomatis testing is therefore recommended.

Incident urogenital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the role of sexual exposure and autoinoculation: a multicentre observational study (FemCure)

BACKGROUND

Anorectal infections with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) are common in women visiting STI outpatient clinics. We here evaluated the risk posed by sexual exposure and by alternate anatomical site infection for incident anorectal and urogenital CT.

METHODS

Prospective multicentre cohort study, FemCure. Participants were treated for CT, and after 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks, they self-collected anorectal and urogenital samples (swabs) for CT-DNA testing. We calculated the proportion with incident CT, that is, CT incidence (at weeks 6-12) by 2-week time-periods. Compared with no exposure (A), we estimated the risk of incident CT for (B) sexual exposure, (C) alternate site anatomic site infection and (D) both, adjusted for confounders and expressed as adjusted ORs with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

We analysed data of 385 participants contributing 1540 2-week periods. The anorectal CT incidence was 2.9% (39/1343) (95 CI 1.8 to 3.6); 1.3% (A), 1.3% (B), 27.8% (C) and 36.7% (D). The ORs were: 0.91 (95% CI 0.32 to 2.60) (B), 26.0 (95% CI 7.16 to 94.34) (C), 44.26 (95% CI 14.38 to 136.21) (D).The urogenital CT incidence was 3.3% (47/1428) (95% CI 2.4 to 4.4); 0.7% (A), 1.9% (B), 13.9% (C) and 25.4% (D). The ORs were: 2.73 (95% CI 0.87 to 8.61) (B), 21.77 (95% CI 6.70 to 70 71) (C) and 49.66 (95% CI 15.37 to 160.41) (D).

CONCLUSIONS

After initial treatment, an alternate anatomical site CT infection increased the risk for an incident CT in women, especially when also sex was reported. This may suggest a key role for autoinoculation in the re-establishment or persistence of urogenital and anorectal chlamydia infections.

Oral, Vaginal and Anal Sexual Practices among Heterosexual Males and Females Attending a Sexual Health Clinic: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Melbourne, Australia

Sex practices among heterosexuals are not well studied. We aimed to explore sexual practices among heterosexuals attending a sexual health clinic. This cross-sectional survey was conducted at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between March and April 2019. Data were collected on kissing, oral sex (fellatio or cunnilingus), vaginal sex, anal sex and rimming in the previous 3 months. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between engaging in anal sex and other sex practices. There were 709 participants (333 men; 376 women) who were eligible and completed the survey (response rate was 24.6%). In the past 3 months, most participants had had vaginal sex (n = 677; 95.5%), with a mean of 3.0 (standard deviation (SD): 3.9) vaginal sex partners, and half reported engaging in condomless vaginal sex in the past 3 months (n = 358; 50.1%). A total of 135 (19.0%) participants had had anal sex, with a mean of 1.3 (SD: 1.0) anal sex partners, with 63.5% (n = 94) engaging in any condomless anal sex in the past 3 months. Most participants (n = 637, 89.8%) had received oral sex in the past 3 months; this proportion did not differ by age group or gender. Women (n = 351, 93.4%) were more likely to perform oral sex than men (n = 275; 82.6% men) (p < 0.001) and to have received rimming (26.6% women vs. 12.6% men; p < 0.001). Men were more likely to have performed rimming (25.5% men vs. 9.3% women; p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, number of partners and sexual practice, anal sex was associated with being ≥35 years (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2–4.2), receiving rimming (aOR: 3.8; 95% CI: 2.4–6.0) and performing rimming (aOR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.8–4.6). Rimming and anal sex are practiced by one-fifth or more of heterosexuals. Older heterosexuals were more likely to engage in anal sex and to perform rimming. Future research should consider the benefits of testing extragenital sites where appropriate.

Rectal Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Narrative Review of the State of the Science and Research Priorities

ABSTRACT

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most commonly reported infection in the United States. Most chlamydial research to date has focused on urogenital infection, but a growing body of research has demonstrated that rectal chlamydia is a relatively common infection among clinic-attending men and women. We know that most rectal CT infections are asymptomatic, but the health implications of these infections, particularly for women, are unclear. In addition, there are key knowledge gaps related to the epidemiologic parameters of rectal chlamydia, the routes of acquisition, the duration of infection, and the clinical significance of a positive rectal CT test result. This lack of information has led to a blind spot in the potential role of rectal chlamydia in sustaining high levels of CT transmission in the United States. Furthermore, recent findings from animal models suggest that the immune response generated from gastrointestinal chlamydial infection can protect against urogenital infection; however, it remains to be determined whether rectal chlamydia similarly modulates anti-CT immunity in humans. This is a critical question in the context of ongoing efforts to develop a CT vaccine. In this narrative review, we summarize the state of the science for rectal chlamydia and discuss the key outstanding questions and research priorities in this neglected area of sexual health research.

Treatment efficacy for rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Rectal gonorrhoea is a common sexually transmitted infection with increasing antimicrobial resistance requiring optimization of available treatments.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of current treatments, previously trialled treatments and new emerging treatments for rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG).

METHODS

Online bibliographic databases were search from 1 January 1946 to 14 August 2020. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with rectal NG data among participants aged 15 years or above and published in English were included. Random effects meta-analyses were used to estimate overall treatment efficacy, defined as microbiological cure. Sub-group analyses included stratifying by diagnostic assay, by dual versus monotherapy, and by currently recommended treatments (e.g. ceftriaxone ± azithromycin) versus previously trialled but not recommended treatments (e.g. amoxicillin) versus emerging treatments (e.g. zoliflodacin). The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020202998).

RESULTS

54 studies including 1813 participants and 44 treatment regimens were identified. The overall summary treatment efficacy for rectal NG was 100.0% (95% CI: 99.9%-100.0%; I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.86). Efficacy estimates for monotherapies (100.0%; 95% CI: 99.88%-100.0%; I2 = 0.00%; P = 0.97) and dual therapies (100.0%; 95% CI: 97.65%-100.0%; I2 = 56.24%; P = 0.03) were similar. Efficacy was highest for current treatments (100.00%; 95% CI: 99.96%-100.00%; I2 = 0.00%; P = 0.98) versus emerging treatments (97.16%; 95% CI: 86.79%-100.00%; I2 = 0.00%; P = 0.84). There were no trials exclusively investigating rectal NG and small sample size was a limitation in most trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently recommended treatments containing ceftriaxone, as mono or dual therapy, are effective. Emerging drugs such as zoliflodacin may be potentially useful for rectal NG but further data are needed.

Increased risk of subsequent chlamydia infection among women not tested at the anorectal anatomical location

BACKGROUND

Universal anorectal testing for Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) among women is not recommended in many countries, while anorectal chlamydia infections are common. Missed anorectal infections might cause sequelae at the genital site if autoinoculation from the anorectum is possible, but evidence is limited. This study investigates the association between potentially missed anorectal infections and subsequent genital chlamydia infections in women, using not being tested at the anorectal site as a proxy for having a potentially missed anorectal infection.

METHODS

We included all women with a repeat chlamydia test within 1 year (with at least a genital test) from the Dutch sexual health centre surveillance between 2014 and 2019. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to identify determinants of genital chlamydia infection at the repeat test, with anorectal testing at the previous chlamydia test as the main determinant.

RESULTS

A total of 40 217 women were included in the analyses, of whom 15.4% tested chlamydia-positive genitally at their second test. Not being tested anorectally at the first test was an independent risk factor for genital chlamydia infection at the repeat test (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.33). This association was in the same range as most other significant risk factors in the model: low education level, no condom use, STI symptoms and previous STI diagnosis. Young age (<20 years) (2.67, 2.39-2.98) and those who received partner notification (3.11, 2.91-3.31) showed stronger associations. The findings were robust; correcting for interactions and a sensitivity analysis stratifying by chlamydia infection at first visit did not show significant differences in the adjusted OR of not being tested anorectally at first test.

CONCLUSION

The results are suggestive of an autoinoculation process from the anorectal to the genital anatomical site in women. To enhance chlamydia control, future studies on the role of extragenital testing and autoinoculation in chlamydia transmission are needed.

Azithromycin or Doxycycline for Asymptomatic Rectal Chlamydia trachomatis

BACKGROUND

Rectal chlamydia is a common bacterial sexually transmissible infection among men who have sex with men. Data from randomized, controlled trials are needed to guide treatment.

METHODS

In this double-blind trial conducted at five sexual health clinics in Australia, we randomly assigned men who have sex with men and who had asymptomatic rectal chlamydia to receive doxycycline (100 mg twice daily for 7 days) or azithromycin (1-g single dose). Asymptomatic chlamydia was selected as the trial focus because more than 85% of men with rectal chlamydia infection are asymptomatic, and clinical guidelines recommend a longer treatment course for symptomatic infection. The primary outcome was a negative nucleic acid amplification test for rectal chlamydia (microbiologic cure) at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

From August 2016 through August 2019, we enrolled 625 men (314 in the doxycycline group and 311 in the azithromycin group). Primary outcome data were available for 290 men (92.4%) in the doxycycline group and 297 (95.5%) in the azithromycin group. In the modified intention-to-treat population, a microbiologic cure occurred in 281 of 290 men (96.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 94.9 to 98.9) in the doxycycline group and in 227 of 297 (76.4%; 95% CI, 73.8 to 79.1) in the azithromycin group, for an adjusted risk difference of 19.9 percentage points (95% CI, 14.6 to 25.3; P<0.001). Adverse events that included nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting were reported in 98 men (33.8%) in the doxycycline group and in 134 (45.1%) in the azithromycin group (risk difference, -11.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -19.5 to -3.2).

CONCLUSIONS

A 7-day course of doxycycline was superior to single-dose azithromycin in the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection among men who have sex with men. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council; RTS Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12614001125617.).

Chlamydia Screening Among Women Aged 15 to 44 Years Who Reported Anal Sex During the Past 12 Months in the United States, 2013 to 2017

ABSTRACT

Using the 2013-2017 National Survey of Family Growth, 37.6% of women with ≥1 anal sex partner in the last 12 months reported chlamydia testing at unspecified anatomic sites in the past 12 months. Women whose medical provider asked about type of sex (i.e., vaginal, oral, anal), compared with those whose provider did not, reported higher chlamydia testing.

High Prevalence of Vaginal and Rectal Mycoplasma genitalium Macrolide Resistance Among Female Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic Patients in Seattle, Washington

BACKGROUND

Rectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) are increasingly recognized as common infections among women. Little is known about the prevalence of rectal Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), rectal MG/CT/GC coinfection, or MG antimicrobial resistance patterns among women.

METHODS

In 2017 to 2018, we recruited women at high risk for CT from Seattle's municipal sexually transmitted disease clinic. Participants self-collected vaginal and rectal specimens for CT/GC nucleic acid amplification testing. We retrospectively tested samples for vaginal and rectal MG using nucleic acid amplification testing and tested MG-positive specimens for macrolide resistance-mediating mutations (MRM) and ParC quinolone resistance-associated mutations (QRAMs).

RESULTS

Of 50 enrolled women, 13 (26%) tested positive for MG, including 10 (20%) with vaginal MG and 11 (22%) with rectal MG; 8 (62%) had concurrent vaginal/rectal MG. Five (38%) were coinfected with CT, none with GC. Only 2 of 11 women with rectal MG reported anal sex in the prior year. Of MG-positive specimens, 100% of rectal and 89% of vaginal specimens had an MRM. There were no vaginal or rectal MG-positive specimens with ParC QRAMs previously associated with quinolone failure. Five MG-infected women received azithromycin for vaginal CT, 4 of whom had a MG MRM detected in their vaginal and/or rectal specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a high prevalence of macrolide-resistant vaginal and rectal MG among a population of women at high risk for CT. This study highlights how the use of antimicrobials designed to treat an identified infection-in this case, CT-could influence treatment outcomes and antimicrobial susceptibility in other unidentified infections.

Evidence supporting the standardisation of extragenital gonorrhoea and chlamydia screenings for women

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines for women do not include extragenital screening for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and do not mention anal sex behaviour. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to determine the number of potentially missed CT and NG cases by relying on urogenital screening and self-reported anal sex behaviour among women.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data of 4658 women attending a community health centre in Los Angeles, California, USA from 2015 to 2018 were examined. CT and NG were detected using nucleic acid amplification test (APTIMA Combo 2, Hologic Gen-Probe, San Diego, California). Demographic and behavioural factors were also examined to assess potentially missed NG/CT cases. Multivariable regression analyses were used to determine whether reported anal sex behaviour predicts NG/CT rectal infection.

RESULTS

A total of 193 NG cases and 552 CT cases were identified; however, 53.9% of NG cases and 25.5% of CT cases were identified exclusively through extragenital screening. Of all positive cases of rectal CT, 87.0% did not report anal sex without a condom and 91.3% did not report any anal sex with their last sexual partner. Of all positive cases of rectal NG, 78.9% did not report anal sex without a condom and 76.3% did not report any anal sex with their last sexual partner. Anal sex with last partner was not predictive of NG/CT rectal infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Relying solely on urogenital screening and reported behaviour misses NG/CT cases. Extragenital NG/CT screening should be conducted in all women regardless of reported anal sex behaviour.

Oropharyngeal and Genital Gonorrhea Infections Among Women and Heterosexual Men Reporting Sexual Contact With Partners With Gonorrhea: Implication for Oropharyngeal Testing of Heterosexual Gonorrhea Contacts

BACKGROUND

There have been very limited studies of oropharyngeal gonorrhea in heterosexuals. Routine screening of oropharyngeal gonorrhea is not recommended in heterosexual contacts of gonorrhea. This study aimed to examine oropharyngeal gonorrhea positivity among heterosexuals reporting contact with a partner with gonorrhea.

METHODS

At the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC), all heterosexual individuals reporting contact with sexual partners with gonorrhea are tested for genital gonorrhea. In May 2017, MSHC also included screening for oropharyngeal gonorrhea in heterosexual contacts of gonorrhea. All contacts of gonorrhea among women and heterosexual men between May 2017 and November 2018 were reviewed. Site-specific gonorrhea positivity was also calculated.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-one gonorrhea contacts (102 heterosexual men and 89 women) were reviewed. The median age was 28 (interquartile range, 24-33) years. The gonorrhea positivity in males was significantly higher at the oropharynx compared with urethra (18%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11% to 26% vs 2%; 95% CI, 0% to 7%; P < 0.001); and higher at the oropharynx compared with cervicovaginal site in women (46%; 95% CI, 35% to 57% vs 36%; 95% CI, 26% to 47%; P = 0.056). Of the 100 men who did not have genital gonorrhea, 17 (18%; 95% CI, 10% to 26%) tested positive at the oropharynx. Of the 55 women who did not have genital gonorrhea, 21 (24%; 95% CI, 15% to 34%) tested positive at the oropharynx. Infection at both the oropharynx and genital sites was not associated with sex worker status in women. Overall, 89% and 40% of gonorrhea in heterosexual men and women were only in the oropharynx, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Oropharyngeal gonorrhea testing among heterosexual contacts of gonorrhea may be indicated given a substantial proportion of gonorrhea contacts are only infected at this site.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, May 2020

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes a discussion of a new National Academy of Medicine report on planned place of birth and implications during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and commentaries on reviews focused on anorectal sexually transmitted infections and feeding methods following cleft lip repair in infants.

Prevalence of sexually transmissible infections and HIV in men attending sex-on-premises venues in Australia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Background In Australia, men who have sex with men (MSM) have high rates sexually transmissible infections (STIs) and sex-on-premises venue (SOPV) patrons are at risk. This paper assesses Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), syphilis and HIV prevalence in men tested at Australian SOPVs and describes testing services.

METHODS

EMBASE, Medline, PubMed and international conference proceedings were searched for articles reporting on-site SOPV testing between 1 January 2000 and 31 January 2017. Meta-analysis calculated pooled prevalence estimates of STIs by anatomical site.

RESULTS

Twelve cross-sectional studies were identified. Most (8/12) were local sexual health clinics (SHC) outreach services. Participants' mean age was 41.1 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 37.0-43.3; range 17 to 84 years). Testing included CT and NG (9/12), HIV (8/12) and syphilis (5/12). CT and NG prevalence overall summary estimates were 3.4% (95% CI 1.9-5.2%, I2 = 88.7%, P < 0.01) and 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-2.2%, I2 = 75.5%, P < 0.01) respectively. CT and NG prevalence was highest in the ano-rectum and oro-pharynx respectively. The HIV and syphilis pooled estimates were 2.3% (95% CI 1.6-2.9%, I2 = 93.1%, P < 0.01) and 3.2% (95% CI 1.8-4.6%, I2 = 72.8%, P < 0.01) respectively. Participation rate varied.

CONCLUSION

This review examines HIV and STI testing in Australian SOPVs before HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Findings indicate a high prevalence of STIs. PrEP use and resultant condomless sex may influence STI prevalence. Further research is required to determine the effect of PrEP on the STI prevalence among SOPV patrons.

Chlamydiae from Down Under: The Curious Cases of Chlamydial Infections in Australia

In Australia, the most researched and perhaps the most successful chlamydial species are the human pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis, animal pathogens Chlamydia pecorum and Chlamydia psittaci. C. trachomatis remains the leading cause of sexually transmitted infections in Australians and trachoma in Australian Indigenous populations. C. pecorum is globally recognised as the infamous koala and widespread livestock pathogen, whilst the avian C. psittaci is emerging as a horse pathogen posing zoonotic risks to humans. Certainly not innocuous, the human infections with Chlamydia pneumoniae seem to be less prevalent that other human chlamydial pathogens (namely C. trachomatis). Interestingly, the complete host range for C. pecorum and C. psittaci remains unknown, and infections by other chlamydial organisms in Australian domesticated and wildlife animals are understudied. Considering that chlamydial organisms can be encountered by either host at the human/animal interface, I review the most recent findings of chlamydial organisms infecting Australians, domesticated animals and native wildlife. Furthermore, I also provide commentary from leading Australian Chlamydia experts on challenges and future directions in the Chlamydia research field.

The role of saliva in gonorrhoea and chlamydia transmission to extragenital sites among men who have sex with men: new insights into transmission

INTRODUCTION

Gonorrhoea and chlamydia cases have been rising among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM) over the last decade. The majority of cases are extragenital and occur at the oropharynx and anorectum. The aim of this narrative review was to review the risk factors and mode of transmission for gonorrhoea and chlamydia at the oropharynx and anorectum among MSM.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

New evidence suggests that oropharyngeal gonorrhoea can be transmitted by kissing in addition to through the established route of condomless oral sex; and anorectal gonorrhoea can be acquired when saliva is used as a lubricant for anal sex and rimming in addition to the established route of condomless penile-anal sex in MSM. In contrast, condomless penile-anal sex remains the major route for chlamydia transmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial transmission of gonorrhoea may occur with practices other than the established routes of condomless oral and/or anal sex and hence condoms may not be effective in preventing gonorrhoea transmission to extragenital sites. In contrast, condoms are effective for chlamydia control because it is mainly transmitted through condomless penile-anal sex. Novel interventions for gonorrhoea that reduce the risk of transmission at extragenital site are required.