Moderate dose inhaled corticosteroids plus salmeterol versus higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids in symptomatic asthma

The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2024 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma 2024 (SINA-2024) is the sixth version of asthma guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma for adults and children that was developed by the SINA group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of the SINA is to have guidelines that are up-to-date, simple to understand, and easy to use by healthcare workers dealing with asthma patients. To facilitate achieving the goals of asthma management, the SINA Panel approach is mainly based on the assessment of symptom control and risk for both adults and children. The approach to asthma management is aligned for age groups: adults, adolescents, children aged 5-12 years, and children aged <5 years. SINA guidelines have focused more on personalized approaches reflecting a better understanding of disease heterogeneity with the integration of recommendations related to biologic agents, evidence-based updates on treatment, and the role of immunotherapy in management. The medication appendix has also been updated with the addition of recent evidence, new indications for existing medication, and new medications. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation at national and regional levels. There is also an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.

GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma

The Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma, better known by its acronym in Spanish GEMA, has been available for more than 20 years. Twenty-one scientific societies or related groups both from Spain and internationally have participated in the preparation and development of the updated edition of GEMA, which in fact has been currently positioned as the reference guide on asthma in the Spanish language worldwide. Its objective is to prevent and improve the clinical situation of people with asthma by increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals involved in their care. Its purpose is to convert scientific evidence into simple and easy-to-follow practical recommendations. Therefore, it is not a monograph that brings together all the scientific knowledge about the disease, but rather a brief document with the essentials, designed to be applied quickly in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are necessarily multidisciplinary, developed to be useful and an indispensable tool for physicians of different specialties, as well as nurses and pharmacists. Probably the most outstanding aspects of the guide are the recommendations to: establish the diagnosis of asthma using a sequential algorithm based on objective diagnostic tests; the follow-up of patients, preferably based on the strategy of achieving and maintaining control of the disease; treatment according to the level of severity of asthma, using six steps from least to greatest need of pharmaceutical drugs, and the treatment algorithm for the indication of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma based on phenotypes. And now, in addition to that, there is a novelty for easy use and follow-up through a computer application based on the chatbot-type conversational artificial intelligence (ia-GEMA).

Boxed Warnings and Off-Label Use of Allergy Medications: Risks, Benefits, and Shared Decision Making

The Food and Drug Administration is tasked with evaluating the efficacy and safety of a drug. Despite having a regimented appraisal process in place, safety evidence can emerge during clinical trials as well as from observations and studies conducted after the drug has been on the market, which might require a boxed warning. The boxed warning is the most severe warning that the Food and Drug Administration can give to an approved drug. It is commonly referred to as a Black Box Warning because it is outlined in the package insert by a thick black box to garner the attention of prescribers and patients. There are currently more than 400 medications that have boxed warnings, and the information addressing major risks associated with a particular drug may, appropriately or inappropriately, influence patient and clinician decision making. Health care professionals must use the best evidence and clinical judgment in determining whether to prescribe medications with these warnings. Use of an approved drug at dosages or for indications other than what it was originally licensed for is referred to as "off-label" and is legal, commonplace, and may be evidence-based. All drugs may expose patients to possible harm, so prescribers have an obligation to discuss the best available evidence regarding benefits and harms so that patients can participate in shared decision making.

Asthma and COVID-19: Emphasis on Adequate Asthma Control

Asthmatics are at an increased risk of developing exacerbations after being infected by respiratory viruses such as influenza virus, parainfluenza virus, and human and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses (SARS-CoV). Asthma, especially when poorly controlled, is an independent risk factor for developing pneumonia. A subset of asthmatics can have significant defects in their innate, humoral, and cell-mediated immunity arms, which may explain the increased susceptibility to infections. Adequate asthma control is associated with a significant decrease in episodes of exacerbation. Because of their wide availability and potency to promote adequate asthma control, glucocorticoids, especially inhaled ones, are the cornerstone of asthma management. The current COVID-19 pandemic affects millions of people worldwide and possesses mortality several times that of seasonal influenza; therefore, it is necessary to revisit this subject. The pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, can potentiate the development of acute asthmatic exacerbation with the potential to worsen the state of chronic airway inflammation. The relationship is evident from several studies that show asthmatics experiencing a more adverse clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection than nonasthmatics. Recent studies show that dexamethasone, a potent glucocorticoid, and other inhaled corticosteroids significantly reduce morbidity and mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Hence, while we are waiting for more studies with higher level of evidence that further narrate the association between COVID-19 and asthma, we advise clinicians to try to achieve adequate disease control in asthmatics as it may reduce incidences and severity of exacerbations especially from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Comparison of 12-Week Additional Effect Features of Formoterol Co-Inhalation and Tulobuterol Patch on Budesonide Inhalation in Elderly Patients With Asthma

Background

For asthma strategy, to avoid the aggravation of bronchial inflammation and contraction, the long acting beta agonist (LABA) addition on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has been recommended.

Objectives

To know whether there is any clinical difference between the additional efficacies of Formoterol (FOR) and Tulobuterol (TUL) onto Budesonide (BUD) may be useful for the elderly patients' asthma treatment strategy.

Methods

Eighteen outpatients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma with FEV1.0% < 80% treated by intermediate ICS dosages visited Respiratory Division of Nagasaki University Hospital or Isahaya General Hospital, Japan Community Health care Organization were subjected, and were randomly assigned (9 cases per group) to either the FBC group (BUD/FOR 160/4.5 µg, 2 inhalations twice daily) or BUD + TUL group (BUD 200 mcg: 2 inhalations twice daily + TUL 2 mg daily) and were compared in parallel with 2 arms for 12 weeks prospectively. Peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, impulse oscillometry (IOS), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), Asthma Control Questionnaire, mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ), and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared.

Results

The "Fres" of IOS was improved in FBC group (p = 0.03). The "emotion" domain of mini-AQLQ was improved in BUD + TUL group (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

By changing the drug formulation, the patch was superior in terms of satisfaction, but it was thought that the inhaled combination was superior in improving the respiratory function itself. It is necessary to pay attention to the characteristics of the patient when selecting treatment.

Tiotropium in asthma - perspectives for the primary care physician

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by airway inflammation resulting from complex interactions between multiple hosts as well as environmental factors. As a chronic respiratory condition, asthma exerts a significant impact on patients and the healthcare system. Per the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with/without long-acting beta₂-agonists (LABAs) should be used as the preferred controllers for the management of asthma. Despite a range of therapeutic options, many patients with asthma remain uncontrolled, resulting in an increased risk of hospitalization and emergency room visits and a worsened quality of life. Tiotropium (Spiriva®, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 1.25 µg, two puffs, once daily), delivered via the Respimat® inhaler (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), was the first long-acting muscarinic antagonist to be approved as an add-on maintenance treatment option for patients with asthma aged ≥6 years at GINA steps 4 and 5. By binding to the muscarinic receptors M1 and M3 in the bronchial airways, tiotropium antagonizes the action of acetylcholine, leading to smooth muscle relaxation and reduced mucus secretion.The efficacy and safety of tiotropium add-on to ICS±LABA maintenance treatment have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with a range of asthma severities (mild, moderate, and severe) and across age groups (children, adolescents, and adults). Add-on tiotropium was found to be well tolerated and efficacious in all RCTs. Moreover, the findings from real-world studies complement results from RCTs, showing beneficial effects of tiotropium in reducing exacerbations, hospitalization, emergency room visits, and asthma worsening.In this review article, we discuss the pathophysiology of asthma and the role of tiotropium in the management of asthma from the perspective of a primary care physician.

Burden of Asthma and Role of 2.5 µg Tiotropium Respimat® as an Add-On Therapy: A Systematic Review of Phase 2/3 Trials

Introduction

Tiotropium, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, is approved for maintenance treatment of asthma in patients at least 6 years of age in the USA. We systematically reviewed published evidence on the efficacy and safety of 2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^® add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with or without additional controller medication(s) in children, adolescents, and adults with asthma.

Methods

We searched PubMed from inception until October 3, 2018, for phase 2 and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of 2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^® on lung function parameters in patients with asthma. We extracted adjusted mean differences for lung function data and adverse events (AEs) from relevant articles.

Results

Overall, 11 RCTs (three phase 2 and eight phase 3 studies) including 3244 patients (2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^®, n = 1642; placebo, n = 1602) met the predefined inclusion criteria. Once-daily 2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^® improved lung function parameters, including peak and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s and peak and trough forced vital capacity, versus placebo. Overall, the safety profile of 2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^® was comparable to that of placebo, with the most commonly reported AEs being asthma worsening, reduction in peak expiratory rate, nasopharyngitis, and respiratory tract infections.

Conclusion

On the basis of the results of phase 2 and 3 studies, 2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^® as add-on to ICS therapy was safe and associated with consistent improvements in lung function in patients with asthma of varying severities across different age groups.

Funding

Development of the manuscript was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01062-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2019 Update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children

This is the fourth version of the updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma, developed by the Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of the SINA is to have guidelines that are up to date, simple to understand, and easy to use by healthcare workers dealing with asthma patients. To facilitate achieving the goals of asthma management, the SINA panel approach is mainly based on the assessment of symptom control and risk for both adults and children. The approach to asthma management is now more aligned for different age groups. The guidelines have focused more on personalized approaches reflecting better understanding of disease heterogeneity with integration of recommendations related to biologic agents, evidence-based updates on treatment, and role of immunotherapy in management. The medication appendix has also been updated with the addition of recent evidence, new indications for existing medication, and new medications. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and current situation at national and regional levels. There is also an emphasis on patient–doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.

Evaluating the Impact and Benefits of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol in Individuals with Asthma or COPD: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Patient Experiences

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated patients' experiences with fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) combination therapy in UK patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

Participants aged ≥ 18 years, with self-reported, physician-diagnosed asthma or COPD (≥ 1 year) who had been receiving FF/VI (≥ 3 months) were recruited from UK primary care. This two-phase, mixed-methods study consisted of a semi-structured, telephone-interview phase (qualitative) and a self-completed online/paper-survey phase (quantitative).

RESULTS

The telephone-interview phase included 50 individuals [asthma, n = 25; COPD, n = 25; mean age (SD) 56.7 years (13.3); 50% female]. Of these, 21 with asthma reported that their condition was stable/well controlled and 13 with COPD felt their condition was manageable. Most participants found FF/VI easy to use (asthma, 25; COPD, 23), easy to integrate into their daily routine (asthma, 25; COPD, 24), and able to control symptoms for ≥ 24 h (asthma, 14; COPD, 16). During the survey phase, 199 individuals were recruited [asthma, n = 100; COPD, n = 99; mean age (SD) 63.6 years (15.1); 59.3% female]. Most participants were satisfied/very satisfied with the efficacy of FF/VI in terms of all-day symptom relief (asthma, 84%; COPD, 75%) and found FF/VI easy/very easy to fit into their daily routine (asthma, 99%; COPD, 96%), easy/very easy to use (asthma, 97%; COPD, 92%), and convenient/very convenient to take as instructed (asthma, 95%; COPD, 93%). Significantly more individuals with asthma (87% versus 46%, P < 0.001) and numerically more individuals with COPD (84% versus 76%, P = 0.055) were satisfied/very satisfied with FF/VI compared with their most recent previous maintenance medication.

CONCLUSION

The majority of individuals in this study had confidence in FF/VI and were satisfied or very satisfied with various key attributes of the treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

GSK study HO-15-15503/204888.

FUNDING

GSK.

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of single, high-strength doses of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol delivered via a novel multidose dry powder inhaler in adolescents and adults with persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

Characterize fluticasone propionate (Fp) and combination fluticasone propionate and salmeterol (FS) pharmacokinetic and safety profiles, delivered via a novel, inhalation-driven, multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI).

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, four-period crossover, single-dose study randomized patients aged ≥12 years with persistent asthma to Fp MDPI 200 mcg, FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg, Fp dry powder inhaler (DPI) 500 mcg (250 mcg × 2 inhalations), or FS DPI 500/50 mcg. Blood samples for determination of Fp and salmeterol pharmacokinetic parameters including C_max, AUC_0-t, AUC_0-inf, t_max, and t_½ were collected predose through 36 h postdose (14 time points). Safety assessments comprised adverse events, vital signs, and physical examinations. The institutional review board approved the study protocol.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic analysis set and safety population each included 40 patients. Fp systemic exposure (C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-inf) was highest for Fp DPI 500 mcg and similar for Fp MDPI 200 mcg, FS MDPI 200/12.5 mcg, and FS DPI 500/50 mcg. Fp geometric mean t_½ values were similar across treatments. Salmeterol C_max was 20% lower and AUC_0-t and AUC_0-inf were approximately 50% lower with FS MDPI versus FS DPI. Median t_max and geometric mean t_½ were similar between FS MDPI and FS DPI. Adverse events were similar across treatments with no relevant changes in vital signs, physical examinations, or hematology test results.

CONCLUSIONS

Fp MDPI and FS MDPI produced similar or lower systemic exposure to Fp and salmeterol, despite lower doses, versus conventional DPI devices, suggesting improved efficiency due to formulation and device differences.

Randomized, double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol delivered via multidose dry powder inhalers in patients with persistent asthma aged 12 years and older

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (Fp) and Fp/salmeterol (FS) administered via a novel multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) that is easy to use correctly in asthma patients.

METHODS

This phase-3, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study evaluated asthmatic patients (≥12 years of age) previously treated with either low- or mid-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) or ICS/long-acting beta agonists. After a 14- to 21-day run-in, patients were randomized to Fp MDPI 50 mcg, Fp MDPI 100 mcg, FS MDPI 50/12.5 mcg, FS MDPI 100/12.5 mcg, or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. Change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁; primary endpoint) was evaluated at week 12, and serial spirometry was collected at day 1 and week 12 (subset of patients). Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

The full analysis and serial spirometry subset included 640 and 312 patients, respectively. At week 12, FS MDPI significantly improved FEV₁ from baseline at each dose vs corresponding Fp MDPI doses (p < 0.05). Change from baseline in FEV₁ for active treatment groups was significantly greater vs placebo (p < 0.05). After 12 weeks, serial spirometry was significantly greater at all time points in the FS MDPI groups vs corresponding Fp MDPI groups (p < 0.05). Improvements in serial spirometry on day 1 were maintained through week 12. AEs were similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary function was significantly improved with Fp MDPI and FS MDPI vs placebo and FS MDPI vs Fp MDPI. Active treatments had a safety profile comparable to placebo.

Long-acting β2-agonists promote glucocorticoid-mediated repression of NF-κB by enhancing expression of the feedback regulator TNFAIP3

Glucocorticoids, or corticosteroids, are effective treatments for many chronic inflammatory diseases, and in mild/moderate asthma, long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) enhance the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) more than increasing the ICS dose. In human bronchial epithelial, BEAS-2B, cells, expression of TNFα-induced protein-3 (TNFAIP3), or A20, a dual-ubiquitin ligase that provides feedback inhibition of NF-κB, was induced by budesonide, an ICS, and formoterol, a LABA, and was further enhanced by budesonide-formoterol combination. The proinflammatory cytokine TNF induced TNFAIP3 and TNF expression. Whereas subsequent budesonide treatment enhanced TNF-induced TNFAIP3 and reduced TNF expression, formoterol amplified these differential effects. In primary human airway smooth muscle cells, TNFAIP3 expression was induced by TNF. This was largely unaffected by budesonide but was acutely enhanced by budesonide-formoterol combination. In BEAS-2B cells, TNF recruited RELA, the main NF-κB transactivating subunit, to a 3' region of the TNF gene. RELA binding was reduced by budesonide, was further reduced by formoterol cotreatment, and was associated with reduced RNA polymerase II recruitment to the TNF gene. This is consistent with reduced TNF expression. TNFAIP3 knockdown enhanced TNF expression in the presence of TNF, TNF plus budesonide, and TNF plus budesonide-formoterol combination and confirms feedback inhibition. A luciferase reporter containing the TNF 3' RELA binding region recapitulated TNF inducibility and was inhibited by an IκB kinase inhibitor and TNFAIP3 overexpression. Repression of reporter activity by budesonide was increased by formoterol and involved TNFAIP3. Thus LABAs may improve the anti-inflammatory properties of ICSs by augmenting TNFAIP3 expression to negatively regulate NF-κB.

Increased Dose of Inhaled Corticosteroid versus Add-On Long-acting β-Agonist for Step-Up Therapy in Asthma

RATIONALE

Guidelines advocate adding long-acting β-agonist (LABA) to inhaled corticosteroid as the preferred step-up therapy to increasing inhaled corticosteroid dose for patients with uncontrolled asthma on inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy. However, less than 5% of patients with asthma qualify for the randomized controlled trials on which guidelines are based. Thus, real-world data are needed to complement the results of randomized trials with narrow entry criteria.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of stepping up asthma therapy with an increased dose of various types of inhaled corticosteroid as compared with add-on LABA.

METHODS

We performed a historical matched cohort study using large primary care databases to compare asthma step-up therapy with small- and standard size-particle inhaled corticosteroid versus added LABA for patients 12-80 years old. As outcomes, we examined a composite of asthma control and rates of severe exacerbations.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The odds of asthma control and rates of severe exacerbations over one outcome year were comparable with increased inhaled corticosteroid dose versus added LABA. The adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for achieving asthma control with increased inhaled corticosteroid dose versus inhaled corticosteroid/LABA were 0.99 (0.88-1.12) for small-particle inhaled corticosteroid (n = 3,036 per cohort) and 0.85 (0.67-1.07) for standard size-particle inhaled corticosteroid (n = 809 per cohort). The adjusted rate ratios (95% confidence interval) for severe exacerbations, compared with inhaled corticosteroid/LABA combination inhaler, were 1.04 (0.91-1.20) and 1.18 (0.92-1.54), respectively. The results were not affected by smoking status.

CONCLUSIONS

When applied to a broad primary care population, antiinflammatory therapy using increased doses of small- or standard size-particle inhaled corticosteroid is as effective as adding LABA, as measured by outcomes important to both patients and providers. Real-world populations and outcomes need to be taken into consideration when formulating treatment recommendations.

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2016 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children

This is an updated guideline for the diagnosis and management of asthma, developed by the Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of SINA is to have guidelines that are up to date, simple to understand and easy to use by nonasthma specialists, including primary care and general practice physicians. SINA approach is mainly based on symptom control and assessment of risk as it is the ultimate goal of treatment. The new SINA guidelines include updates of acute and chronic asthma management, with more emphasis on the use of asthma control in the management of asthma in adults and children, inclusion of a new medication appendix, and keeping consistency on the management at different age groups. The section on asthma in children is rewritten and expanded where the approach is stratified based on the age. The guidelines are constructed based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation in Saudi Arabia. There is also an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan.

Pharmacogenomics of long-acting β2-agonists

INTRODUCTION

Long-acting β2-agonists are an effective class of drugs, when combined with inhaled corticosteroids, for reducing symptoms and exacerbations in patients with asthma that is not adequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids alone. However, because this class of drugs has been associated with severe adverse events, including hospitalization and death in small numbers of patients, efforts to identify a pharmacogenetic profile for patients at risk has been diligently investigated.

AREAS COVERED

The PubMed search engine of the National Library of Medicine was used to identify English-language and non-English language articles published from 1947 to March 2015 pertinent to asthma, pharmacogenomics, and long-acting β2-agonists. Keywords and topics included: asthma, asthma control, long-acting β2-agonists, salmeterol, formoterol, pharmacogenetics, and pharmacogenomics. This strategy was also used for the Cochrane Library Database and CINAHL. Reference types were randomized controlled trials, reviews, and editorials. Additional publications were culled from reference lists. The publications were reviewed by the authors and those most relevant were used to support the topics covered in this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Children, who carry the ADRB2 Arg16Arg genotype, may be at greater risk than adults for severe adverse events. Rare ADRB2 variants appear to provide better clues for identifying the at-risk population of asthmatics.

β2 adrenergic agonist attenuates house dust mite-induced allergic airway inflammation through dendritic cells

Background

Long-acting β2 adrenergic agonists (LABAs) are commonly used combined with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to treat asthmatic patients. Previous reports suggest that LABAs have an anti-inflammatory effect in bronchial asthma, and this should be further investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate whether LABAs inhibit allergic airway inflammation and how this occurs.

Results

We assessed the effect of the LABA formoterol (FORM) on inflammatory cell responses in airway, lung and regional lymph nodes, using an HDM-induced murine allergic asthma model in vivo. The effect of FORM on cytokine production from bone marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) stimulated with HDM was evaluated in vitro. Adoptive transfer of BMDCs pulsed with HDM in the presence or absence of FORM to naïve mice was performed and the inflammatory response to subsequent HDM challenge was analyzed. FORM treatment suppressed HDM-induced changes and caused an increase in the number of eosinophils and neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage. The concentration of IL-4 and IL-17 in lung tissue homogenate was elevated and led to an accumulation of IL-4, IL-13, IL-5 and IL-17 producing cells in regional lymph nodes. FORM inhibited the production of IL-6 and IL-23 from BMDCs stimulated with HDM in vitro, and enhanced IL-10 production. The BMDCs adoptive transfer experiment indicated that dendritic cells mediate the effect of FORM, since FORM treatment of BMDCs in vitro attenuated airway inflammation.

Conclusion

These results suggested that FORM modulates dendritic cell function and attenuates Th2 and Th17 responses induced by HDM. Thus, we propose that the clinical significance of LABAs should be re-investigated taking into account these immune-modulating effects.

Is the BTS/SIGN guideline confusing? A retrospective database analysis of asthma therapy

Background:

The British guideline on the management of asthma produced by the British Thoracic Society (BTS) and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) describes five steps for the management of chronic asthma. Combination therapy of a long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is recommended as first-line therapy at step 3, although the dose of ICS at which to add a LABA is subject to debate.

Aims:

To classify the inhaled therapy prescribed to patients with asthma in NHS Forth Valley according to two interpretations of the BTS/SIGN guideline and to evaluate the use of combination therapy in this population.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis including patients from 46 general practitioner surgeries was conducted. Patients with physician-diagnosed asthma were classified according to the BTS/SIGN guideline based on treatment prescribed during 2008. Patient characteristics were evaluated for the overall step classification, and specifically for therapy in step 3.

Results:

12,319 patients were included. Guideline interpretation resulted in a shift of 9.2% of patients (receiving medium-dose ICS alone) between steps 2 and 3. The largest proportion of patients (32.3%) was classified at step 4. Age, sex, smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease co-morbidity, and utilisation of short-acting β₂-agonists and oral corticosteroids all correlated with step; however, no differences in these characteristics were evident between low-dose combination therapy and medium-dose ICS alone at step 3.

Conclusions:

Further studies are needed to evaluate prescribing decisions in asthma. Guideline recommendations regarding the use of ICS dose escalation versus combination therapy need to be clarified relative to the published evidence.

Efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol compared with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination in adult and adolescent patients with persistent asthma: a randomized trial

Background:

The combination of fluticasone furoate (FF), a novel inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and vilanterol (VI), a long-acting β₂ agonist, is under development as a once-daily treatment of asthma and COPD. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of FF/VI with fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol (SAL) in patients with persistent asthma uncontrolled on a medium dose of ICS.

Methods:

In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study, 806 patients received FF/VI (100/25 μg, n = 403) once daily in the evening delivered through ELLIPTA (GlaxoSmithKline) dry powder inhaler, or FP/SAL (250/50 μg, n = 403) bid through DISKUS/ACCUHALER (GlaxoSmithKline). The primary efficacy measure was 0- to 24-h serial weighted mean (wm) FEV₁ after 24 weeks of treatment.

Results:

Improvements from baseline in 0- to 24-h wmFEV₁ were observed with both FF/VI (341 mL) and FP/SAL (377 mL); the adjusted mean treatment difference was not statistically significant (−37 mL; 95% CI, −88 to 15, P = 0.162). There were no differences between 0- to 4-h serial wmFEV₁, trough FEV₁, and asthma control and quality-of-life questionnaire scores. There was no difference in reported exacerbations between treatments. Both treatments were well tolerated, with no clinically relevant effect on urinary cortisol excretion or vital signs and no treatment-related serious adverse events.

Conclusions:

The efficacy of once-daily FF/VI was similar to bid FP/SAL in improving lung function in patients with persistent asthma. No safety issues were identified.

Trial registry:

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01147848; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov

Management of asthma: the current US and European guidelines

Asthma management guidelines aim to improve the implementation of current knowledge into daily clinical practice by establishing a consensus of scientific practices for the management of asthma. Initial guidelines were based on consensus of expert opinion in order to employ a severity-based classification system as a guide to treatment. However, advances in asthma research led to the development of evidence-based guidelines and a major paradigm shift to control-based asthma management. Control-based management is central to the published guidelines developed by The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), and The British Thoracic Society (BTS), each one using the same volume of evidence but emphasizing aspects particular to their specific patient populations and socioeconomic needs. This chapter summarizes the evolution of these guidelines and summarizes the key points and evidence used in the recommendations for the assessment, monitoring, and management of asthma in all ages, with particular emphasis on the NHLBI guidelines.

Once-daily fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol reduces risk of severe exacerbations in asthma versus FF alone

Background

Combination therapy with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting β₂ agonist (LABA) is recommended for patients with asthma symptomatic on ICS alone. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the risk-benefit ratio of using LABA in asthma.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of the addition of a novel LABA, vilanterol (VI), to a once-daily ICS, fluticasone furoate (FF), on the risk of severe asthma exacerbations in patients with uncontrolled asthma.

Methods

This randomised double-blind comparative study of variable duration (≥24–78 weeks) was designed to finish after 330 events (each patient's first on-treatment severe asthma exacerbation). 2019 patients with asthma aged ≥12 years with ≥1 recorded exacerbation within 1 year were randomised and received FF/VI 100/25 μg or FF 100 μg, administered once daily in the evening. The primary endpoint was time to first severe exacerbation; secondary endpoints were rate of severe asthma exacerbations per patient per year and change in trough evening forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) from baseline.

Results

Compared with FF, FF/VI delayed the time to first severe exacerbation (HR 0.795, 95% CI 0.642 to 0.985) and reduced the annualised rate of severe exacerbations (rate reduction 25%, 95% CI 5% to 40%). Significantly greater improvements in trough FEV₁ (p<0.001) were observed with FF/VI than with FF at weeks 12, 36, 52 and at endpoint. Both treatments were well tolerated with similar rates of treatment-related adverse events and on-treatment serious adverse events.

Conclusions

Once-daily FF/VI reduced the risk of severe asthma exacerbations and improved lung function compared with FF alone, with good tolerability and safety profile in adolescents and adults with asthma currently receiving ICS.

ClinicalTrials.gov No

NCT01086384

Risk of asthma exacerbation, asthma-related health care utilization and costs, and adherence to controller therapy in patients with asthma receiving fluticasone propionate/salmeterol inhalation powder 100 μg/50 μg versus mometasone furoate inhalation powder

OBJECTIVE

National asthma treatment guidelines recommend low/medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) as initial therapy in mild asthma patients. However, low doses of a fixed-dose combination of ICS and long-acting β-agonists are sometimes used. This study compares asthma-related outcomes and health care utilization and costs in clinical practice in patients starting fluticasone propionate 100 μg and salmeterol 50 μg via Diskus (FSC) or mometasone furoate (MF).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare asthma-related outcomes in asthma patients who received FSC or MF, using a large health insurance claims dataset spanning January 2004-December 2008. Patients with ≥1 claim with an asthma ICD-9-CM diagnosis code and ≥2 FSC or MF prescriptions were included, stratified into FSC or MF groups by study drug received first and matched using propensity score.

RESULTS

A total of 18,283 patients met inclusion criteria (14,044 FSC and 4239 MF); 3799 matched pairs were identified (mean follow-up: FSC 548 days, MF 537 days). FSC patients had lower risk of asthma-related exacerbation (Hazard ratio = 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.95, p = .002), defined as either asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits/hospitalizations or receipt of systemic corticosteroids (SCSs); fewer SCS claims (mean 0.28 vs. 0.33, p = .021); and fewer asthma-related physician office (PO) and hospital outpatient (HO) visits (mean 1.17 vs. 1.63, p < .001). However, asthma-related ED visits were higher with FSC (p = .004), and FSC patients had higher total costs of asthma-related health care ($953 vs. $862, p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

In asthma patients initiating ICS therapy, MF had lower asthma-related ED visits. However, FSC may reduce the use of SCS and asthma-related PO/HO visits.

Effect of combination fluticasone propionate and salmeterol or inhaled corticosteroids on asthma-related outcomes in a Medicare-eligible population

BACKGROUND

National asthma treatment guidelines recommend either the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or ICS in combination with a long-acting bronchodilator for the treatment of moderate to severe asthma. Even though asthma is common among older adults, few studies have assessed the differences in effectiveness between these two recommended therapies in patients over 65 years of age.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the association of the fluticasone-salmeterol combination (FSC) or ICS initiation on asthma-related events in Medicare-eligible asthma patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study using a large health claims database (July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2008). Subjects 65 to 79 years of age with 12-month preindex and 3- to 12-month postindex eligibility, an asthma diagnosis (ICD-493.xx), and with 1 or more FSC or ICS claims at index were included. Subjects with an FSC or ICS claim in the preindex and any claim for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. Subjects were observed until they had an event (emergency department [ED] inpatient hospitalization [IP], combined IP/ED or oral corticosteroid [OCS] use) or were no longer eligible in the database, whichever came first. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess risk of an asthma-related event (IP, ED, or IP/ED). Baseline characteristics (age, sex, region, index season, comorbidities, preindex use of short-acting β-agonists, OCS, other asthma controllers, and asthma-related ED/IP visits) were independent covariates in the model.

RESULTS

A total of 10,837 met the criteria (4843 ICS and 5994 FSC). Age (70.4 and 70.5 years, respectively) and the percentage of female subjects (65.5% and 64.8%, respectively) were similar. Asthma-related events were also similar at baseline. Postindex unadjusted rates occurring after >30 days were ED (1.8% vs 1.5%, P = 0.18), IP (2.7% vs 1.7%, P < 0.001), and ED/IP (4.1% vs 2.8%, P < 0.001) for ICS and FSC, respectively. Subjects who received FSC were associated with a 32% (adjusted HR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91) lower risk of experiencing an IP visit and a 22% (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98) lower risk of experiencing an ED/IP visit. No differences were observed for ED visits (HR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.68-1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In Medicare-eligible asthma patients, FSC use was associated with lower rates of asthma-related serious exacerbations compared with ICS.

The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2012 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children

This an updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma, developed by the Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group, a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society. The main objective of SINA is to have updated guidelines, which are simple to understand and easy to use by non-asthma specialists, including primary care and general practice physicians. This new version includes updates of acute and chronic asthma management, with more emphasis on the use of Asthma Control Test in the management of asthma, and a new section on "difficult-to-treat asthma." Further, the section on asthma in children was re-written to cover different aspects in this age group. The SINA panel is a group of Saudi experts with well-respected academic backgrounds and experience in the field of asthma. The guidelines are formatted based on the available evidence, local literature, and the current situation in Saudi Arabia. There was an emphasis on patient-doctor partnership in the management that also includes a self-management plan. The approach adopted by the SINA group is mainly based on disease control as it is the ultimate goal of treatment.

The role of tiotropium in the management of asthma

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease characterized by reversible airway obstruction that is secondary to an allergic inflammation and excessive smooth muscle contraction. Cholinergic signals were known to contribute significantly to the pathophysiology of asthma. However, the use of anti-cholinergic agents in asthma has been justified only in acute asthma exacerbations, until tiotropium bromide, a long-acting anti-cholinergic agent was introduced. Recent reports showing a promising role of tiotropium in the treatment of asthma have aroused interest of the use of anti-cholinergic agent for the management of asthma. This report describes pharmacological characteristics, potential effects on inflammatory cells, and the current status of tiotropium in the treatment of asthma.

Efficacy and optimal dosing interval of the long-acting beta₂ agonist, vilanterol, in persistent asthma: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Vilanterol (VI) is a novel once-daily long-acting beta₂ agonist with inherent 24-h activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of three once-daily doses and one twice-daily dose of VI used concurrently with ICS in adult patients (≥18 years) with persistent asthma. Safety was also assessed.

METHODS

Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, five-period crossover study consisting of 7-day treatment periods separated by 7-day wash-out periods. Seventy-five patients, maintained on ICS, received VI 6.25, 12.5 and 25 mcg once-daily (evening), VI 6.25 mcg twice-daily (morning/evening), and placebo. The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (mean of 23 h and 24 h post evening dose) on Day 7; secondary endpoint was weighted mean 24-h serial FEV(1) on Day 7.

RESULTS

All VI groups demonstrated statistically significant increases in trough FEV(1) versus placebo (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant increase in weighted mean 24-h FEV(1) for each VI group versus placebo (p < 0.001). The effects of once-daily VI on trough FEV(1) and weighted mean 24-h FEV(1) were dose dependent. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was low in each VI treatment group and was not dose dependent (5-9%; placebo = 18%); no drug-related AEs or serious AEs were reported.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily treatment with VI was well tolerated and associated with improvements in lung function. The VI 6.25 mcg twice-daily dose showed the greatest change in trough FEV(1), however, similar changes in weighted mean 24-h FEV(1) with VI 12.5 mcg once-daily were observed. Although our study was not powered to demonstrate non-inferiority of once- versus twice-daily dosing of VI, the data suggest no advantage over a 24-h period of twice-daily over once-daily dosing for the same total daily dose. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00980200.

Drug prescription pattern for asthma among nigerian doctors in general practice: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

A wide range of medications are now available for the treatment of asthma and selection of the optimal treatment combination of agents is essential.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate a self-reported drug prescribing pattern for asthma among Nigerian doctors in general practice.

METHODS

It was a cross-sectional survey conducted among general practitioners in six states of Nigeria.

RESULTS

For acute severe asthma, 75.9% of the doctors prescribed intravenous methylxanthines, which was combined with oral or inhaled short-acting β(2) agonists (SABA) by 56.3% of them. Systemic steroids were prescribed mainly via the intravenous route by 58.8% of them. Aberrant drugs such as antibiotics, antihistamines, and mucolytics were prescribed by 25.6% of them. For long-term, follow-up treatment of asthma, oral steroids, and oral SABA were commonly prescribed, while inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and ICS/LABA (long acting beta agonists) were infrequently prescribed. Aberrant drugs such as analgesics, antimalaria, and antihistamines were prescribed by 22.8% of them. About 48% of the doctors had never attended any form of update training on asthma management, whereas, only 16.3% attended update training on asthma within the last year preceding this study. Awareness of international guidelines on asthma treatment was poor among them with only 16.4% being able to mention any correct guideline on asthma management.

CONCLUSION

The poor anti-asthma prescribing behavior among these doctors is associated with a low level of participation at update training on asthma management and poor awareness of asthma guidelines. The Nigerian Medical Association and the Nigerian Thoracic Society should urgently address these problems.

Canadian Thoracic Society 2012 guideline update: diagnosis and management of asthma in preschoolers, children and adults

BACKGROUND

In 2010, the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) published a Consensus Summary for the diagnosis and management of asthma in children six years of age and older, and adults, including an updated Asthma Management Continuum. The CTS Asthma Clinical Assembly subsequently began a formal clinical practice guideline update process, focusing, in this first iteration, on topics of controversy and⁄or gaps in the previous guidelines.

METHODS

Four clinical questions were identified as a focus for the updated guideline: the role of noninvasive measurements of airway inflammation for the adjustment of anti-inflammatory therapy; the initiation of adjunct therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for uncontrolled asthma; the role of a single inhaler of an ICS⁄long-acting beta(2)-agonist combination as a reliever, and as a reliever and a controller; and the escalation of controller medication for acute loss of asthma control as part of a self-management action plan. The expert panel followed an adaptation process to identify and appraise existing guidelines on the specified topics. In addition, literature searches were performed to identify relevant systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. The panel formally assessed and graded the evidence, and made 34 recommendations.

RESULTS

The updated guideline recommendations outline a role for inclusion of assessment of sputum eosinophils, in addition to standard measures of asthma control, to guide adjustment of controller therapy in adults with moderate to severe asthma. Appraisal of the evidence regarding which adjunct controller therapy to add to ICS and at what ICS dose to begin adjunct therapy in children and adults with poor asthma control supported the 2010 CTS Consensus Summary recommendations. New recommendations for the adjustment of controller medication within written action plans are provided. Finally, priority areas for future research were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The present clinical practice guideline is the first update of the CTS Asthma Guidelines following the Canadian Respiratory Guidelines Committee's new guideline development process. Tools and strategies to support guideline implementation will be developed and the CTS will continue to regularly provide updates reflecting new evidence.

The relationship between combination inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β-agonist use and severe asthma exacerbations in a diverse population

BACKGROUND

Safety concerns surround the use of long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) for the treatment of asthma, even in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and particularly in high-risk subgroups.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of ICS therapy and fixed-dose ICS/LABA combination therapy on severe asthma exacerbations in a racially diverse population.

METHODS

ICS and ICS/LABA exposure was estimated from pharmacy data for patients with asthma aged 12 to 56 years who were members of a large health maintenance organization. ICS and ICS/LABA use was estimated for each day of follow-up to create a moving window of exposure. Proportional hazard models were used to assess the relationship between ICS and ICS/LABA combination therapy and severe asthma exacerbations (ie, use of oral corticosteroids, asthma-related emergency department visit, or asthma-related hospitalization).

RESULTS

Among the 1828 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 37% were African American, 46% were treated with ICS therapy alone, and 54% were treated with an ICS/LABA combination. Models assessing the risk of severe asthma exacerbations among individuals using ICS treatment alone and ICS/LABA combination therapy suggested that the overall protective effect was as good or better for ICS/LABA combination therapy when compared with ICS treatment alone (hazard ratio, 0.65 vs 0.72, respectively). Analyses in several subgroups, including African American patients, showed a similar statistically significant protective association for combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ICS/LABA fixed-dose combination therapy appeared to perform as well as or better than ICS treatment alone in reducing severe asthma exacerbations; this included multiple high-risk subgroups.

Controversies regarding long-acting β2-agonists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines the literature regarding the efficacy and safety of long-acting β2-agonists as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2009 guidelines and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 2007 asthma guidelines recommend adding long-acting β2-agonists to patients inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids. These recommendations must be balanced against published data which demonstrate a signal of increased morbidity and mortality with use of long-acting β2-agonists. These conflicting data raise the question of whether or not there may be genotypic or phenotypic discriminators leading to disparate responses to long-acting β2-agonists.

SUMMARY

The combination of long-acting β2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids demonstrates improvement in asthma control and exacerbation rates; however, long-acting β2-agonists are not recommended for use as monotherapy or without optimization of inhaled corticosteroid dose. Although the majority of asthmatic patients appear to benefit from the addition of long-acting β2-agonists, there are concerns that a small proportion of patients, including steroid-naïve patients and African Americans, may not obtain such benefits. Thus far, studies have not clearly demonstrated genotypic or phenotypic differences explaining the variability in response.

Retrospective comparison of early versus late treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol after an asthma exacerbation

BACKGROUND

The benefits of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma are well established. Early use of inhaled anti-inflammatories following and exacerbation could be beneficial.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study compared the risk of asthma-related exacerbations [hospitalization, emergency department visit, and/or treatment with systemic corticosteroid] in patients receiving treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in a single inhaler (FSC) within 90 days following an initial asthma-related exacerbation (early treatment) versus patients receiving the treatment subsequently (late treatment). Data were from a large health insurance claims database spanning from January 1998 to April 2008. Subjects included patients with ≥1 prescription for FSC ≤ 1 year after first asthma-related exacerbation. Patients with early treatment were matched to those with late treatment by propensity score and compared in terms of healthcare utilization and costs after initiation of FSC.

RESULTS

A total of 14,861 patients met study inclusion criteria, including 10,793 early and 4068 late treatment patients. After matching, 3555 pairs were well matched on all pretreatment characteristics and duration of follow-up (mean 722 vs. 717 days, p = .634). Early versus late treatment was associated with longer time to first asthma-related exacerbation (hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.88, p < .001), fewer short-acting β-agonists prescriptions (3.3 vs. 3.6, p = .031), higher outpatient yearly per patient pharmacy costs ($1320 vs. $1163, p = .008), and lower yearly per patient asthma-related emergency department visit costs ($80 vs. $105, p = .032). Total yearly per patient asthma-related costs were similar ($2197 vs. $2064, p = .203).

CONCLUSIONS

Earlier use of FSC following an asthma exacerbation was associated with reduced risk of future asthma-related exacerbation and lower use of rescue medications.

Inhaled corticosteroid dosing: double for nothing?

Two recent trials from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's asthma clinical trials networks raise a concern about using double the dose of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as a positive control arm in clinical trials of add-on therapy. The literature evaluating the response to doubling the dose of an ICS is briefly reviewed. The vast majority of studies do not demonstrate a significant positive benefit from doubling the dose of an ICS but do show improvement with 4-fold increases that is equal to or greater than that of add-on long-acting bronchodilators. It is recommended that doubling the dose of an ICS no longer be considered a positive comparator arm in clinical trials, although it might be beneficial in individual patients.

Comparative resource utilization in medicaid-eligible patients with asthma treated with fixed-dose fluticasone propionate/salmeterol or fluticasone propionate monotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to compare rates of asthma-related health service utilization for Medicaid-eligible pediatric and adult patients with asthma treated with fixed-dose fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC) or fluticasone propionate (FP) monotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational claims analysis was conducted with Medicaid enrollees aged ≥4 years with ≥1 diagnosis code for asthma and a prescription fill for FSC or FP between January 1, 2002, and November 1, 2005. The end date allowed a follow-up period of ≥60 days; Medicaid data were available through December 31, 2005, and were obtained from 2 sources: a large US-managed Medicaid provider affiliated with i3 Innovus, and the Thomson Medstat Marketscan (Ann Arbor, Michigan) Medicaid claims database. Patients were new or continuing users of asthma controllers, but were new users of FSC or FP. Outcome measures included postindex use of systemic corticosteroid drugs and short-acting β-agonists (SABAs), asthma-related utilization, and costs. Descriptive and multivariate techniques were used, adjusting for differences in baseline demographics and length of follow-up time in the study population. Patients were grouped into cohorts according to age: 4 to 17 or ≥18 years.

RESULTS

The final study population was 50,428 patients, including 30,071 patients (59.6%) aged <18 years and 20,357 patients (40.4%) aged ≥18 years. Mean number of days of follow-up was 290.4, and 55.1% of patients (n = 27,793) were followed for ≥1 year after the index date. Among those aged <18 years, FSC treatment was associated with decreased adjusted risk of asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.917; 95% CI, 0.855-0.984) and combined ED/inpatient (IP) visits (HR = 0.922; 95% CI, 0.860-0.988). Among those aged ≥18 years, FSC treatment was associated with decreased adjusted risk of asthma-related ED visits (HR = 0.907; 95% CI, 0.849-0.969) and combined ED/IP visits (HR = 0.907; 95% CI, 0.850-0.968). FSC treatment was also associated with significantly fewer prescription fills for SABAs compared with FP treatment in both age groups (aged <18 years: incident rate ratio [IRR] = 0.960 [95% CI, 0.929-0.992]; aged ≥18 years: IRR = 0.950 [95% CI, 0.905-0.998]). Total mean (SD) unadjusted asthma costs were $579 ($2429) for FSC and $551 ($3151) for FP in the <18-year age group and were $1764 ($10,006) for FSC and $1512 ($5543) for FP in the ≥18-year age group.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective database analysis, Medicaid-eligible patients who initiated FSC therapy experienced better asthma control compared with patients who initiated FP monotherapy, as measured by asthma-related ED/IP visits and use of SABAs.

Systemic bioavailability of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of fluticasone/salmeterol in healthy volunteers via pMDI alone and spacer

AIM

To compare a test version of HFA fluticasone/salmeterol (FP/SM) combination inhaler (Neolab, UK) with the reference product Seretide (GlaxoSmithKline, UK).

METHODS

An in vitro Anderson cascade impactor was used to compare the fine particle dose (<4.7 microm). Two separate randomized cross-over studies were performed to compare the systemic bioavailability of test vs. reference (T vs. R) formulations of FP/SM 250/25 microg pMDI in healthy volunteers. In study 1 blood pharmacokinetic analysis using oral charcoal block was performed over 24 h following a single dose of four puffs via pMDI alone. In study 2 systemic bioactivity was measured following single doses of four and eight puffs via a spacer device: serum potassium (K(+)) to reflect SM, and overnight urinary cortisol : creatinine (OUCC) for FP. An early pharmacokinetic profile was also assessed over 120 min.

RESULTS

The in vitro fine particle dose was similar for test vs. reference pMDI alone and via spacer. The results of both studies were consistent: No significant differences between formulations were seen in terms of FP kinetics. Analysis of SM kinetics revealed superiority of the test product. No significant dose-response or difference in T : R ratio was noted for OUCC. Fall in K(+) revealed a significant dose-response with a non-significant T : R ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

The in vitro fine particle dose may not predict pharmacokinetic and systemic pharmacodynamic outcomes. Single dosing studies with fluticasone/salmeterol 250/25 microg via pMDI or with spacer showed pharmacokinetic equivalence with FP, but not SM. No significant difference between formulations was seen with either adrenal suppression or hypokalaemia.

[Adult asthma exacerbations in questions]

In this article a French working party critically review the international literature to revise the definition, pathophysiology, treatment and cost of exacerbations of adult asthma. The various guidelines do not always provide a consistent definition of exacerbations of asthma. An exacerbation can be defined as deterioration of clinical and/or functional parameters lasting more than 24 hours, without return to baseline, requiring a change of treatment. No single clinical or functional criterion can be used as an early marker of an exacerbation. Innate and acquired immune mechanisms, modified by contact with infectious, irritant or allergenic agents, participate in the pathogenesis of exacerbations, which are accompanied by bronchial inflammation. In 2010, mortality is related to progression of exacerbations, often occurring before the patient seeks medical attention. The objective of treatment is to control asthma and prevent exacerbations. However, many factors can trigger exacerbations and often cannot be controlled. The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids has been demonstrated on reduction of the number of exacerbations and the number of asthma-related deaths. This treatment is cost-effective, especially in terms of reduction of exacerbations.

Combination therapy salmeterol/fluticasone versus doubling dose of fluticasone in children with asthma

RATIONALE

For children with symptomatic asthma despite low to moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids, evidence is still lacking whether to add a long-acting bronchodilator or to increase the dose of inhaled corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFP), 50/100 μg twice a day, is noninferior regarding symptom control compared with fluticasone propionate (FP), 200 μg twice a day Diskus in children with symptomatic asthma.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study was performed comparing SFP and FP treatment during 26 weeks on asthma control and lung function.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 158 children, 6-16 years old, still symptomatic on FP, 100 μg twice a day, during a 4-week run-in period, were included. Percentage of symptom-free days during the last 10 weeks of the treatment period did not differ between treatment groups (per protocol analysis: adjusted mean difference [FP minus SFP] 2.6%; 95% confidence interval, -8.1 to 13.4). Both groups showed substantial improvements of about 25 percent points in symptom-free days (both P < 0.001 from baseline). Lung function measurements (FEV(1), FVC, PEF rate, and maximal expiratory flow) did not differ between groups except for a slight advantage in maximal expiratory flow in the SFP group at 1 week. No differences were found between FP and SFP regarding exacerbation rates, adverse events, or growth.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study the efficacy on symptom control and lung function of the combination of a long-acting bronchodilator with inhaled corticosteroid is equal to doubling the dose of the inhaled corticosteroid in children still symptomatic on a moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroid.

Use of long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled steroids in asthma: meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Current asthma guidelines recommend the use of long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) for long-term control and prevention of symptoms in persistent asthma. Data on the risk of asthma exacerbations of LABAs in combination with ICSs, as prescribed in typical clinical practice, are very scarce.

METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies to examine the risk of asthma exacerbations, measured as asthma-related hospitalization and/or asthma-related emergency room (ER) visits, in adults receiving LABAs plus ICSs in a fixed-dose combination compared with patients receiving ICSs alone.

RESULTS

Seven studies, all retrospective cohort studies conducted in the United States, representing approximately 96,000 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found that the use of ICSs plus LABAs was associated with a lower risk of asthma-related hospitalizations and/or ER visits than ICSs alone (odds ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.94). Sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity of endpoint definition, duration of follow-up, and patient characteristics did not significantly alter the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this systematic meta-analysis suggests that patients in clinical practice treated with a single inhaler containing ICSs plus LABAs experience fewer asthma exacerbations than similar patients treated with ICSs alone.

Effects of asthma treatment: the present and future

The increasing burden of asthma in both primary and secondary care has led to extensive research into its genetics, pathophysiology and treatment over the past few decades. Inhaled corticosteroids remain an integral component in all but the mildest disease, although despite a low-to-moderate dose, many individuals remain symptomatic. In patients with persistent symptoms despite inhaled corticosteroids, a variety of different nonsteroidal second-line therapies are available as add-on therapy. In this review, existing and potential future pharmacological strategies involved in the management of asthma will be highlighted.

Use and safety of long-acting β2-agonists for pediatric asthma

Asthma guidelines recommend the use of long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) as the preferred add-on therapy for adults and children over 5 years of age when asthma is inadequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids alone. It has been suggested that LABA use may be associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality; however, this view is controversial since study findings have been inconsistent. While the safety profile of LABA monotherapy has been questioned, the value of concomitant inhaled corticosteroids to eliminate possible risks remains unproven. There is a paucity of efficacy and safety data for LABA use in children, and existing evidence is not sufficiently convincing to demonstrate a clear position for LABAs in the management of childhood asthma. The main aims of this article are to place LABAs in context in the management of childhood asthma and evaluate the current evidence for safety and efficacy.

Controller medications and their effects on asthma exacerbations temporally associated with upper respiratory infections

BACKGROUND

Exacerbations are a major risk and a cause of asthma morbidity and healthcare utilization. Viral-induced upper respiratory tract infections are the most frequent trigger of asthma-related exacerbations. Studies have traditionally assessed exacerbations without documentation regarding exacerbation etiology. Therefore, it remains unknown whether asthma medications can alter exacerbation susceptibility based on a specific etiology.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether treatment with inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting beta(2)-agonists reduced the number of exacerbations associated with upper respiratory tract infections versus inhaled corticosteroids alone.

METHODS

Two large datasets comparing treatment with fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol were analyzed, including the number of clinically reported upper respiratory tract infections, asthma-related exacerbations, and the presence of an exacerbation and concurrent report of an upper respiratory tract infection.

RESULTS

Both treatment groups had similar incidences of upper respiratory tract infections. Of those reporting an upper respiratory tract infection, statistically significantly fewer reported an asthma-related exacerbation comparing fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol with fluticasone propionate (p=0.0057).

DISCUSSION

This retrospective analysis suggests that therapy with fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol provides protection against asthma exacerbations temporally associated with upper respiratory tract infections. This retrospective analysis supports the hypothesis that specific therapeutic approaches to mitigate virus-associated exacerbations may benefit asthma care. Well-controlled prospective studies are warranted.

Long-term maintenance of pediatric asthma: focus on budesonide/formoterol inhalation aerosol

Current national and international asthma guidelines recommend treatment of children with asthma towards achieving and maintaining asthma control. These guidelines provide more stringent recommendations to increase therapy for patients with uncontrolled asthma in order to reduce asthma-related morbidity and mortality. Newer combination agents such as budesonide and formoterol have been shown to be safe and effective in treatment of asthma in children. Use of long-term controller agents like this in combination with improved compliance and treatment of co-morbid conditions have been successful in this endeavor. This review discusses control of pediatric asthma with focus on the use of budesonide in combination with formoterol.

Section 1. EPR-3 versus GINA 2008 Guidelines - Asthma Control and Step 3 Care: Highlights of the Asthma Summit 2009: Beyond the Guidelines

Recent updates to asthma guidelines from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (Expert Panel Report 3, EPR-3) share many similarities, reflecting a focus on asthma control based on clinical manifestations of disease and responsiveness to therapy. Both documents build upon the recommendations of former guidelines utilizing evidence-based review of the published literature to revise algorithms for practice. A major difference between the 2 reports is the preferred treatment at Step 3. The GINA guidelines recommend a combination of low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus long-acting β-agonist (LABA), whereas the EPR-3 advises either monotherapy with medium-dose ICS or the low-dose ICS + LABA combination. Both approaches are supported by clinical experience and Level A evidence. The option of personalized therapy is a point of discussion for future guidelines.

[Diagnosis and treatment guidelines for difficult-to-control asthma in children]

Children suffering from difficult-to-control asthma (DCA) require frequent appointments with their physician, complex treatment regimes and often admissions to hospital. Less than 5% of the asthmatic population suffer this condition. DCA must be correctly characterised to rule out false causes of DCA and requires making a differential diagnosis from pathologies that mimic asthma, comorbidity, environmental and psychological factors, and analysing the factors to determine poor treatment compliance. In true DCA cases, inflammation studies (exhaled nitric oxide, induced sputum, broncho-alveolar lavage and bronchial biopsy), pulmonary function and other clinical aspects can classify DCA into different phenotypes which could make therapeutic decision-making easier.

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma

The Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) provides up-to-date guidelines for healthcare workers managing patients with asthma. SINA was developed by a panel of Saudi experts with respectable academic backgrounds and long-standing experience in the field. SINA is founded on the latest available evidence, local literature, and knowledge of the current setting in Saudi Arabia. Emphasis is placed on understanding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, medications, and clinical presentation. SINA elaborates on the development of patient-doctor partnership, self-management, and control of precipitating factors. Approaches to asthma treatment in SINA are based on disease control by the utilization of Asthma Control Test for the initiation and adjustment of asthma treatment. This guideline is established for the treatment of asthma in both children and adults, with special attention to children 5 years and younger. It is expected that the implementation of these guidelines for treating asthma will lead to better asthma control and decrease patient utilization of the health care system.

Pharmacotherapy of asthma: regular treatment or on demand?

Some studies have raised the question of the need for chronic controller therapy in mild persistent asthma as suggested by international guidelines. Although the Improving Asthma Control (IMPACT) and Beclomethasone plus Salbutamol (BEST) studies suggest that on-demand therapy in some patients with mild persistent asthma achieves a similar degree of asthma control based on symptoms and functional outcomes, the IMPACT study indicates that regular and on-demand therapy is not equivalent for controlling airway inflammation. Persistent airway inflammation might lead to airway remodelling with onset or worsening of symptoms, deterioration in lung function, and reduced response to pharmacological therapy. However, the relationships between chronic airway inflammation and airway remodelling need to be clarified. Choosing the 'right' pharmacological strategy (regular versus on-demand treatment) for asthma control is currently difficult due to the fact that (1) inflammatory outcome measures were not generally incorporated into asthma clinical trials; (2) the relationships between chronic airway inflammation and airway remodelling are largely unknown; (3) current clinical asthma trials that are generally based on symptomatic and functional outcome measures are too short to assess the impact of regular anti-inflammatory therapy on natural history of asthma; (4) asthma is an heterogeneous disease and different phenotypes of asthma patients likely requiring a different therapeutic approach can be identified, even in the same class of asthma severity. Guidelines for asthma management are valuable tools, although they are necessarily based on a strategy directed to the best outcome in a group of patients. Asthma phenotyping is becoming central for asthma management. The issue of regular versus on-demand treatment of intermittent and mild persistent asthma would be better addressed if considered within an individualized approach to asthma management and assessment. Identification of clinical, functional, morphological and biochemical phenotypes of patients with asthma and its clinical implications is likely to lead to a tailored, individualized, pharmacological therapy and asthma management.

A novel breath-actuated integrated vortex spacer device increases relative lung bioavailability of fluticasone/salmeterol in combination

BACKGROUND

Spacer devices facilitate respirable drug delivery. A novel breath-actuated antistatic spacer with integrated vortex chamber (Synchro-Breathe) device has been developed, which is compact,portable and user friendly as compared to conventional spacers which are bulky and cumbersome. The relative bioavailability to the lung of inhaled fluticasone and salmeterol combination is primarily dependent on respirable dose delivery and can be reliably quantified using adrenal suppression and early fall in serum potassium (marker of systemic beta-2 adrenoreceptor response) as surrogate markers for delivered lung dose.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the in vivo relative bioavailability to the lung of Hydrofluoroalkane(HFA) Seretide delivered via Synchro-Breathe (SB); an optimally prepared 750 ml large volume plastic spacer, Volumatic (VM); and conventional Evohaler pMDI (EH).

METHODS

Nineteen healthy volunteers completed the study using a randomised double blind, double dummy crossover design. Single doses of placebo or Seretide HFA 250 (total dose ex-valve: fluticasone 2000 mcg/salmeterol 200 mcg) were administered via SB, VM and EH. Overnight urinary cortisol creatinine (OUCC) and serum potassium (K) were measured at baseline and after each dose as systemic surrogates of relative respirable dose delivery for the fluticasone and salmeterol moieties, respectively.

RESULTS

Significant suppression of OUCC and K occurred from baseline with SB and VM but not EH devices(geometric mean fold suppression, 95% CI, p and arithmetic mean fall mmol/L, 95% CI, respectively); EH:1.51(0.43-1.01), p 1/4 0.06; VM: 2.52(1.57-4.04), p < 0.001; SB: 2.66(1.57-4.49), p < 0.001(equating to 33.8%,60.2% and 62.3% falls, respectively). For K, the falls for EH were 0.09(0.25 to 0.07), p 1/4 0.69; VM: 0.27(0.46 to 0.08), p 1/4 0.003; SB: 0.32(0.53 to 0.11), p 1/4 0.002 (equating to 2.2%, 6.8%, and 8.06% fall,respectively). There were no significant differences between SB and VM.

CONCLUSION

The breath-actuated Synchro-Breathe device was comparable to an optimally prepared Volumatic spacer, and resulted in commensurate improvement in relative lung bioavailability for both fluticasone and salmeterol moieties compared to pMDI.

Association between adherence with fixed dose combination fluticasone propionate/salmeterol on asthma outcomes and costs*

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between adherence with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination (FSC) product in a single inhaler and asthma care utilization and costs in asthma patients in typical US clinical practice.

METHODS

Retrospective longitudinal analysis using linked medical and pharmacy claims from a managed care database representing >70 US health plans. Subjects included those with two prescriptions for FSC after January 1, 2000 (first prescription = 'index date') and diagnosis of asthma. Follow-up was defined as time from index date to disenrollment or discontinuation of FSC (180 days without supply), receipt of different controller, or 24 months post-index. Patients were excluded if: <12 months continuous enrollment pre-index, <12 months of follow-up, diagnoses of COPD or respiratory cancer, use of ipratropium, or age <12 years. Effect of FSC adherence on asthma-related outcomes (short-acting beta-agonist use (SABA), corticosteroid use (CS), emergency department (ED) visit/hospitalizations) and asthma-related health plan costs during each quarter post-index and FSC adherence in prior quarter controlling for demographics, time since index, season, comorbidities, pre-index medications, utilization, and cost.

RESULTS

12 907 patients were identified: mean age, 40 years; mean follow-up, 20 months; mean quarterly FSC adherence, 54%; mean quarterly incidence of asthma-related ED visit/hospitalization, 1.12%. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, each 25% improvement in adherence was associated with a 10% reduction in the odds of asthma-related ED visit or hospitalization (p < 0.001), a 10% reduction in the odds of receiving SABA (p < 0.001), a 3% reduction in the odds of receiving a CS (p = 0.027). However, total asthma-related costs also increased 23% for each 25% increase in the use of FSC.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limitations of the study, this analysis shows that improving compliance with an asthma controller medication such as FSC may help reduce the burden of asthma.