Time course of response to prednisolone in chronic airflow obstruction

Evaluation of a novel method to assess corticosteroid responsiveness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND:

Some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may benefit from oral steroid therapy. These steroid-responsive patients are diagnosed based on laboratory spirometry. We hypothesize that daily, home-based spirometry is a better tool.

METHODS:

Thirty patients with COPD underwent a single-blinded study, with a crossover design. They received 2 weeks of placebo followed by 2 weeks of prednisone therapy (40 mg/day). Laboratory spirometry was done at the beginning and end of the study and daily home-based spirometry was done twice a day.

RESULTS:

Analysis of variance model was used. The variability of the median day-to-day forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) was 72.5 mL (25th percentile of 40 mL and 75th percentile of 130 mL). The daily FEV₁ variation was 70 mL (25th percentile of 50 mL and 75th percentile of 100 mL). The overall laboratory FEV₁ variability was larger after the steroid course (P < 0.001), but not clinically significant. The variability was not significant postplacebo treatment compared with the baseline values. For home-based spirometry, steroid treatment was not significantly different. The majority (97%) completed more than 80% of the measurements. Ninety percent of the performed tests were considered acceptable. Only 53% of the tests were considered accurate. Overall both laboratory and home-based measurements did not show significant association between airway responsiveness and dyspnea or exercise capacity.

CONCLUSION:

Twice-daily home measurements of FEV₁ might be better than the conventional approach to identify steroid responsive COPD patients. However, this finding was only statistically but not clinically significant. Therefore, we would not recommend this approach to identify COPD patients with steroid responsiveness.

Oral corticosteroids for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common chronic lung disorder, usually related to cigarette smoking, representing a major and increasing cause of morbidity and mortality. It is defined "as a disease state characterized by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. The airflow limitation is usually both progressive and associated with an abnormal inflammatory response of the lungs to noxious particles or gases". The use of corticosteroids for their anti-inflammatory effects has been suggested.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of oral corticosteroids on the health status of patients with stable COPD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches of the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register and MEDLINE were carried out in December 2003 and 2004. Review articles and bibliographies were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled prospective studies in adults with stable COPD ( post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% of predicted, FEV1/FVC <70%) and a history of smoking, excluding known asthmatics, in which oral steroid use was compared with placebo and use of co-interventions was matched in both groups.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted independently by two reviewers. All trials were combined using Review Manager (version 4.2.7).

MAIN RESULTS

From 459 titles 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. Treatment lasted three weeks or less in 19 studies, high dose oral steroid was used in 21 studies and subjects had moderate or severe COPD in 15 studies. There was a significant difference in FEV1 after two weeks treatment, WMD 53.30 ml; 95% confidence interval 22.21 to 84.39 favouring oral steroid use compared to placebo when 14 studies with available data (n=396) were combined, with no significant heterogeneity. There was a significant increase in odds for individual patient FEV1 response greater than 20% from baseline with high dose oral steroid treatment compared to placebo, OR 2.71; 95% CI 1.84 to 4.01 (9 studies) . It would be necessary to treat 7 patients (95% CI 5 to 12) with oral corticosteroids to achieve one extra case of increasing FEV1 by more than 20%, with a placebo group risk of 0.13. All differences in health-related quality of life were less than the minimum clinically important difference. There were small statistically significant advantages for functional capacity and respiratory symptom of wheeze with oral steroid treatment but no significant difference in risk of withdrawal from study due to an exacerbation or rate of serious exacerbations over 2 years with low dose oral steroid treatment. There was an increased risk of adverse effects, including increased blood glucose, adrenal suppression and reduced serum osteocalcin.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support the long-term use of oral steroids at doses less than 10-15 mg prednisolone though some evidence that higher doses (>/= 30 mg prednisolone) improve lung function over a short period. Potentially harmful adverse effects e.g.. diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis would prevent recommending long-term use at these high doses in most patients.

Comparison of Oral and Depot Intra‐muscular Steroids in Assessing Steroid‐Responsiveness in COPD

Non-compliance or euphoria may limit the usefulness of prednisolone tablets in assessing steroid-responsiveness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Depot intra-muscular methyl-prednisolone (imMP), producing a plateau steroid effect over two weeks, may be more reliable. Following two weeks of placebo, twenty-seven COPD patients (mean FEV 1 43% predicted) participated in a two-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design trial taking either 120 mg imMP with placebo tablets or placebo injection with prednisolone 30 mg daily. After each period, post-bronchodilator FEV 1, forced vital capacity (FVC), inspiratory capacity (IC) and six-minute walking distance (6MWD) were assessed and patients completed both quality-of-life scores (St. George's 30 and Short Form 36) and mood scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scores and Altman's Self-rating Mania Scale). There were no significant changes in 6MWD, quality of life or mood scores after either type of steroids and no change in lung function after imMP. By contrast, there were small mean improvements in lung function on oral prednisolone (mean FEV 1, FVC and IC increased by 100, 320 and 150 ml, respectively). Only the improvement in FVC was significantly greater after prednisolone compared with imMP. Single depot intra-muscular injections of steroids have no advantage over oral daily prednisolone in testing steroid-responsiveness in COPD patients.

Prednisolone hastens recovery from histamine-induced bronchospasm in asthmatics

Short-term treatment with oral steroids is very effective in control ling symptoms and improving lung function in asthma but has not been shown unequivocally to reduce bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Recently it has been shown to increase the activities of sodium-potassium and calcium adenosine triphosphatases, enzymes that regulate intracellular calcium levels. This action may be expected to promote recovery of cells from an excitatory stimulus. The present study was carried out to determine how prednisolone modulates airway response to histamine, including recovery from induced bronchospasm in asthmatics. Spirometry and measurement of bronchial responsiveness (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV1] and concentration of histamine causing a 20% reduction FEV1 [PD20 FEV1]) to inhaled histamine were carried out in 10 clinically stable asthmatics. Subsequently, all of the patients were prescribed oral prednisolone, 0.6-0.75 mg/kg body weight for 1 week. At the end of 1 week, spirometry was repeated and bronchial reactivity was measured again. Comparison of PD20 FEV1 values before and after treatment (geometric means 0.66 and 0.81 mg/mL, respectively) for the whole group did not show any significant change. The mean +/- SD time for 95% recovery from histamine-induced bronchospasm was 33.00 +/- 19.47 min before treatment and decreased significantly to 18.00 +/- 7.88 min after treatment. It was concluded that short-term benefits from oral prednisolone do not result from changes in bronchial responsiveness. These benefits may be related to effects on mechanisms that lead to recovery from an excitatory stimulus.

Treatment of acute asthma. A new look at the old and at the new

beta-Agonists remain the mainstay of therapy for acute asthma and, for most patients, standard doses are acceptable. Although the onset of action of systemic steroids is still not clear, steroids promote recovery and should be given to patients with acute illness. Intravenous magnesium sulfate appears to improve pulmonary function in the most severely ill patients but is not useful in patients with more moderate episodes. Ipratropium bromide is a weak bronchodilator that still needs to be tested as an adjunct to standard treatment regimens before its role in adults with asthma can be determined; given its ease of use and favorable safety profile it could be considered for patients with more severe acute illness. Aminophylline has not been found by most studies to improve outcomes and the narrow therapeutic range and unfavorable safety profile relegate it to a last-line agent or no use at all. Helium-oxygen mixtures currently have no role in moderately ill patients but have a theoretical advantage as a temporizing measure in severely ill patients. Drugs used in the management of chronic asthma, such as inhaled steroids and leukotriene-modifying agents, are making their way into the acute treatment arena, and other newly developed specific mediator inhibitors or blockers deserve attention. The use of isomers of beta-agonists is another area that is attracting attention and study. Systemic steroids are used to prevent relapse after emergency department discharge and the addition of other agents such as leukotriene-modifying agents or inhaled steroids may further prevent the need for urgent visits or hospitalization. The search for optimal treatment strategies for acutely ill patients is challenging and exciting and, with more attention and resources being devoted to this area, newer treatments will be found that will eventually have a greater impact on the high morbidity associated with acute asthma.

Near-fatal asthma in South Australia: descriptive features and medication use

BACKGROUND

Self-reported prior morbidity levels and medication use among survivors of a near-fatal asthma attack (NFA) were studied.

AIMS

To identify deficiencies in asthma management and opportunities for intervention.

METHODS

A hundred and twenty-seven consecutive patients aged 15 years or more presenting with a NFA to accident and emergency departments of teaching hospitals were interviewed.

RESULTS

High levels of morbidity due to asthma were reported. Most cases (79%) reported symptoms occurring at least weekly in the three months before their NFA. A mean of 20.8 days was reportedly lost from work, school or other usual daily activity in the 12 months before these events. Regular use of beta agonist as nebuliser solution was reported by 27% of cases, increasing to 34.5% in response to increased symptoms, while 41% reported use of nebulised beta agonist in response to the NFA event. Less than half of all cases (46%) reported using an inhaled corticosteroid on a regular basis. Oral corticosteroids were used by 33% of cases at times of increased symptoms in the preceding 12 months. However, only 7% of cases reported initiating or increasing oral corticosteroids at the time of the NFA.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high levels of prior asthma morbidity, regular preventive inhaled corticosteroid use was not widespread in this series of NFA asthmatics. By comparison, over-reliance on regular beta agonist medication was common. Oral corticosteroids were rarely commenced in response to the NFA.

Early corticosteroid use in acute exacerbations of chronic airflow obstruction

To determine the benefit of early steroid use in acute exacerbations of chronic airflow obstruction in the ED, 113 patients with an average age of 66 years, acute or chronic dyspnea, an FEV1 of < 60% and FEV1/FVC ratio of < 60% were included in a randomized, double-blinded, interventional clinical trial. All patients received the same bronchodilator treatment. At 6 hours the steroid- treated group showed a 21.71 L/min improvement in PEFR (P < .05) and 0.14 L improvement in FEV1 (P < .05), while the nonsteroid group showed insignificant improvements of 5.52 L/min and 0.02 L, respectively. Of those patients receiving steroids, 22 achieved > 40% improvements in PEFR by 6 hours and 17 achieved similar results in FEV1, whereas of those not receiving steroids, 13 and 8, respectively, achieved improvements. Within 24 hours of observation in the ED, 16 patients receiving steroids were discharged and none relapsed within 2 weeks. Of those not receiving steroids, only 10 were discharged and 3 returned with exacerbations. Although early response to steroids in chronic airflow obstruction is variable, the overall medical and cost benefits justify their early use in acute exacerbations.

Effects of corticosteroids on bronchodilator action in chronic obstructive lung disease

BACKGROUND

Short term treatment with corticosteroids does not usually reduce airflow limitation and airway responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. We investigated whether corticosteroids modulate the effects of inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium bromide.

METHODS

Ten non-allergic subjects with stable disease were investigated; eight completed the randomised, double blind, three period cross over study. Treatment regimens consisted of 1.6 mg inhaled budesonide a day for three weeks, 40 mg oral prednisone a day for eight days, and placebo. After each period cumulative doubling doses of salbutamol, ipratropium, a combination of salbutamol and ipratropium, and placebo were administered on separate days until a plateau in FEV1 was reached. A histamine challenge was then performed.

RESULTS

At the end of placebo treatment mean FEV1 was 55.5% predicted after inhaled placebo, 67.9% predicted after salbutamol and 64.0% predicted after ipratropium. Compared with the results after the placebo period the FEV1 with salbutamol increased by 0.7% predicted after treatment with budesonide and by 0.7% predicted after treatment with prednisone; the FEV1 with ipratropium increased by 0.7% predicted after budesonide and by 4.8% predicted after prednisone; none of these changes was significant. After placebo treatment the geometric mean PC20 was 0.55 mg/ml after placebo, 1.71 mg/ml after salbutamol and 0.97 mg/ml after ipratropium. Compared with the placebo period the PC20 with salbutamol was increased by 0.86 doubling concentrations after treatment with budesonide, and by 0.67 doubling concentrations after prednisone; the PC20 with ipratropium increased by 0.03 and 0.34 doubling concentrations after budesonide and after prednisone respectively compared with placebo; none of these changes was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-allergic subjects with chronic obstructive lung disease short term treatment with high doses of inhaled or oral corticosteroids does not modify the bronchodilator response to salbutamol or ipratropium or the protection provided by either drug against histamine. Salbutamol produces greater protection from histamine induced bronchoconstriction than ipratropium.

Single-dose inhaled budesonide in subjects with chronic asthma

In 30 stable asthmatics, a comparison was made between the changes in pulmonary function (FEV1, FVC, PEF, MEF75, MEF50 and MEF25) hourly for 9 h after a single dose of inhaled budesonide 1,600 micrograms, and placebo. All subjects used inhaled steroids daily; this medication was, however, withheld 8 days prior to the study. For all parameters of pulmonary function, a significant difference in favour of budesonide was demonstrated. The effect tended to decrease after 9 h, and had abated within 24 h. FEV1 age, sex, smoking habits, or results of an inhaled beta 2-agonist reversibility test could not be demonstrated as predictors of those subjects to react with the most pronounced responses to budesonide. In conclusion, our results demonstrate an effect 3 h after administration of an inhaled glucocorticosteroid in adult outpatients with chronic asthma. These results parallel previous findings in highly selected asthmatics and after systemic administration of glucocorticosteroids. Single-dose administration and subsequent monitoring for 8-9 h may therefore prove valuable in evaluating new prophylactic agents for the treatment of asthma.

Steroid trials in the assessment of reversibility of air flow limitation: a survey of current clinical practice of chest physicians

To evaluate how steroid trials are currently used in the assessment of reversibility of air flow limitation, a postal questionnaire was sent to 355 consultant members of the British Thoracic Society working in England and Wales; 253 questionnaires were returned (71% response rate). Two respondents did not undertake steroid trials; of the remaining 251, 75% prescribed 30-40 mg oral prednisolone, with the commonest treatment period being 2 weeks. A high dose steroid inhaler was sometimes used as an alternative by 31% of respondents. Although 71% of respondents made lung function measurements on several occasions before starting steroids and 76% made measurements during treatment, 78% assessed patients on only one occasion at the end of the trials to ascertain its outcome. Weight, blood pressure and glycosuria were measured less frequently after the steroid treatment compared to the pre-trial period. Blood glucose and serum electrolytes were infrequently measured both before and after treatment. Wide variations exist in steroid trial regimens and current practice may neither provide definitive evidence of treatment benefit nor an adequate safeguard for patients against potential side-effects.

Long-term management of reversible obstructive airways disease in adults

The goals of the long-term management of reversible obstructive airways disease (ROAD) are to find the minimum treatment that controls symptoms, allows resumption of normal life, prevents severe attack and death, and controls airflow obstruction. ROADs include asthma, chronic bronchitis, and emphysema. Although the differential diagnosis between these different entities may be difficult, they share the same possibilities of pharmacotherapy, including bronchodilator and antiinflammatory drugs. beta 2-agonists administered via inhaled route produce the best bronchodilator/side effects ratio, provided that the drugs reach the bronchi. This underlines the importance of a proper inhalation technique when using a metered-dose inhaler. In patients with hand-breath coordination problems, powder inhalers or spacer devices are useful to ameliorate the therapeutic efficacy of inhaled drugs. Anticholinergic agents are usually less potent bronchodilators than inhaled beta 2 agonists in asthma, but they may have additive effects when associated with beta 2 agonists. Only a therapeutic trial with peak-flow monitoring can demonstrate the efficacy of anticholinergic drugs in individuals. Theophylline's kinetics are characterized by a narrow therapeutic index with high inter- and intraindividual variabilities. Sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil sodium are antiallergic drugs, the efficacy of which has been demonstrated in controlled studies. Corticosteroids are the most efficient anti-asthma drugs. Inhaled corticosteroid dosing should be tailored to each individual. If inhaled corticosteroid therapy is used in an oral corticosparing attempt, patients should be followed-up during several months. The management of ROAD includes the diagnostic procedures, the identification of triggers and inducers of airways obstruction, the assessment of severity of the disease, and then the treatment and education of the patient. Strategy design to achieve proper use of drugs by patients is discussed.

Rationale and use of corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Several studies of corticosteroid efficacy in patients with COPD performed in the last decade have had stronger study designs and larger patient populations than most of the previously reported investigations. These studies have provided evidence of the objective benefit of corticosteroid therapy on pulmonary function in clinically stable COPD patients. These positive results are due to a relatively marked beneficial effect of corticosteroids in a minority of the subjects studied rather than a modest effect in the majority of subjects. A controlled randomized trial of intravenous corticosteroid administration in patients with COPD and acute respiratory failure admitted to the hospital showed improvement in pulmonary function from 12 hours following initial administration through the remainder of the 3 days of the study in the treatment group as compared to the control group. A greater percentage of patients showed a beneficial response to corticosteroids in this study of patients with acute exacerbations as compared to most of the studies of clinically stable COPD patients with beneficial effects. This suggests the possibility that some patients may show a beneficial response to corticosteroids during an acute exacerbation although they have not shown a response when clinically stable. The response to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COPD has not been studied as extensively as the response to oral corticosteroids. However, some studies have shown a beneficial response to inhaled corticosteroids, primarily but not exclusively, in individuals who have also shown a positive response to oral agents. Generally, the response in terms of improved pulmonary function has been less striking with the inhaled agent as compared to the oral drug, although higher relative doses of the oral drugs usually were studied. Several limitations of the currently available studies are evident. Most of the studies deal with the effects in clinically stable outpatients with COPD and no studies have dealt with maintenance therapy in patients who have responded to a 1 to 2 week course of 30 mg of prednisone or greater. Data on the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD patients are limited. No studies have investigated the role of corticosteroids in acute exacerbations in outpatients with COPD. Recommendations are given regarding use of corticosteroids in patients with COPD. A trial of corticosteroids is recommended at some point during a patient's course, while clinically stable. If a beneficial response is obtained in terms of improvement in airflow obstruction, then clinical judgment must be used regarding whether maintenance therapy is continued and, if so, at what dose and by what route.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Time course of response to oral and inhaled corticosteroids in non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction

One hundred and twenty one patients considered on clinical grounds to have non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction completed a double blind, crossover trial comparing oral prednisolone 40 mg per day with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 500 micrograms thrice daily, each given for 14 days, with a 14 day washout period between treatments. The time course of response was analysed for the 57 occasions where there was a significant increase in mean daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the treatment period. Mean daily PEF was still rising at day 14 on 12 occasions. After withdrawal of treatment mean daily PEF remained above pretreatments levels for more than two weeks in half the responses analysed. The peak response occurred earlier with inhaled beclomethasone (median 9.5 (range 3-14) days) than with oral prednisolone (median 12 (range 1-14) days), though both treatments produced a response that was sustained for a similar period. The results suggest that a trial of treatment with corticosteroids in this group of patients should last more than 14 days, and that in a study with a crossover design the washout period should be longer than two weeks.

Prevention of emphysema. Importance of early identification

If emphysema is identified early, much can be done to prevent or even reverse its progress. Smokers must be helped to stop smoking, and early, aggressive therapy with bronchodilators (plus corticosteroids, if needed) should be instituted. By preventing emphysema, the desperate cost of progressive respiratory insufficiency and curtailment of the pleasurable activities of daily living can be avoided.

The efficacy of inhaled beclomethasone in chronic obstructive airway disease

The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of inhaled beclomethasone in the treatment of stable chronic obstructive airway disease (COAD). Eight patients completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of inhaled beclomethasone and oral prednisone. Each patient received 3 treatment regimens given for 14 days: inhaled beclomethasone, prednisone, and placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in pulmonary function tests, oxygen cost diagram, or 12-minute walking distance test among the regimens. The only improvement in arterial blood gasses was partial pressure of oxygen, which was negligibly increased during prednisone treatment compared with beclomethasone and with placebo (p less than 0.05). Evaluation of 95% confidence intervals indicated that clinically significant mean differences were unlikely with either beclomethasone or prednisone. Larger studies are required to determine if a responsive subgroup exists, and to determine if this form of therapy has a role in treatment of COAD.

High doses of inhaled corticosteroids in unstable chronic asthma. A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 1,500 micrograms/day was compared to placebo in 43 chronic asthmatic patients uncontrolled by inhaled salbutamol and oral theophylline. During the prestudy period, a test of maximal steroid reversibility with oral prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days was performed. The therapeutic response was measured over an 8-wk period as the ability to maintain the clinical improvement and the optimal pulmonary function induced by prednisolone. During the study, severe asthma exacerbation occurred in one (5%) of the 21 patients who received BDP and in 15 (78%) of the 22 patients who received placebo (p less than 0.001). In patients who received BDP, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow (PEF) remained above the optimal postprednisolone value, with a trend to improvement during the 8-wk study period. In patients who received placebo, FEV1 and PEF decreased and remained below the optimal value. We conclude that, in chronic asthma, inhaled BDP 1,500 micrograms/day maintains the optimal pulmonary function in addition to the clinical benefit induced by a short course of oral corticosteroids.

Comparison of PEFR and FEV1 in patients with varying degrees of airway obstruction. Effect of modest altitude

Measurements of FEV1 and PEFR performed on a Jones Pulmonor Spirometer (JPF) were compared with PEFR obtained with a mini-Wright peak flow meter (WPF) in 102 patients. Data were converted to percent predicted. Standard deviations of triplicate measurements were: FEV1, 3.01 percent; JPF, 7.22 percent; and WPF, 5.12 percent. Correlation of best of three measurements was FEV1-JPF r = .758; FEV1-WPF r = .744; and JPF-WPF r = .846. The mean percent predicted of the best of three values of FEV1 was 74.8 percent, JPF 91.4 percent, and WPF 94 percent. These higher values for percent predicted PEFR were obtained throughout the range of FEV1 values. Studies on nine normal volunteers in an atmospheric chamber suggested that higher altitudes may account for higher PEFR values. We conclude that PEFR, measured by either waterless spirometer or mini-Wright peak flow meter, has greater intrasubject variability than FEV1, and it tends to underestimate the degree of pulmonary impairment.

The use of high dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate as a means of assessing steroid responsiveness in obstructive airways disease

The use of high dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) as a means of assessing steroid responsiveness in chronic obstructive airways disease (COAD) was assessed in 22 patients in a study involving three consecutive 2-week periods of placebo, inhaled BDP (1500 micrograms daily), and oral prednisolone (30 mg daily). Five of the 22 patients were considered steroid responsive following the course of oral corticosteroids and in each case this responsiveness had been identified by inhaled BDP therapy. It is concluded that high dose inhaled BDP (1500 micrograms daily) may be used to assess corticosteroid responsiveness in COAD.

Corticosteroid therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Is it worth the risks?

The majority of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) do not appear to benefit from long-term corticosteroid therapy. Nevertheless, a small minority demonstrate a response to treatment that is so dramatic that it may be worth the risk of chronic corticosteroid use. A corticosteroid trial is indicated in the patient with COPD who remains symptomatic despite adequate and aggressive routine treatment. If substantial improvement is noted in pulmonary function, chronic corticosteroid treatment should be considered. In patients without an objective response, long-term corticosteroid therapy should not be continued.

Corticosteroids in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: reappraisal of efficacy

Although systemic corticosteroids are widely used in treating stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the evidence for their efficacy is still disputed. To reappraise this evidence, the authors used a new analytic strategy in which the 14 available randomized clinical trials were evaluated according to a methodologic "review of systems" and an examination of the statistical precision of the outcome results. Although none of the trials satisfied all of the methodologic criteria for both validity and clinical pertinence, the trials finding steroids efficacious were generally better designed and more statistically precise than trials failing to show efficacy. The authors propose a set of five main methodologic guidelines that require a stable baseline state, a crossover design with suitable washout, adequate doses of corticosteroids, pragmatic designs, and comprehensive choices of outcome events. Attention to these guidelines can help improve both design and evaluation for future trials of systemic steroids for stable COPD.

Value of serial peak expiratory flow measurements in assessing treatment response in chronic airflow limitation

A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of prednisolone (40 mg/day for 14 days) was carried out in 33 patients with chronic airflow limitation (mean age 62 years, mean FEV1 1.01 litres, mean FEV1/FVC ratio 44%), to assess the value of serial peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, taken five times daily in evaluating treatment response by comparison with other objective measurements and with measurements of symptoms. The mean serial PEF after a one week run in period was 189 1 min-1, during the second week of placebo 193 1 min-1, and during the second week on prednisolone 231 1 min-1. The difference in mean PEF values between placebo and prednisolone was significant (p less than 0.01). With regard to the response to steroids of the individual patients, 13 of the 33 had a detectable trend of improvement on visual inspection of serial PEF measurements during prednisolone treatment but only one during placebo administration. Of all the objective measurements made after the run in and after each treatment phase (12 minute walking distance, FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), serial PEF), the serial PEF chart provided the best discrimination between placebo and prednisolone treatment. There was no statistically significant association between steroid induced improvement in serial PEF measurements and in breathlessness, partly because of placebo improvements in symptoms in those who had no improvement in serial PEF values. This study indicates the importance of making objective measurements to identify a genuine steroid response rather than relying on symptomatic improvement alone. The best simple measurement to make is serial PEF during steroid trials. This is more sensitive in detecting a steroid response than are the 12 minute walking distance, FEV1, or FVC, and is also less likely than these measurements to show spurious placebo responses.

Rate of improvement of pulmonary function in sarcoidosis during treatment with corticosteroids

Serial measurements of vital capacity were obtained in 11 patients with impaired pulmonary function due to sarcoidosis during 12 courses of corticosteroid treatment. Vital capacity improved promptly and approached a maximum value in about three weeks. A three week trial is probably sufficient to show whether or not corticosteroids are effective in a patient with sarcoidosis.

Diurnal variation of dynamic compliance, resistance and viscous work of breathing in normal horses and horses with lung disorders

Dynamic compliance, airway resistance, viscous work and respiratory frequency were measured at intervals in horses over 12 h periods. Variation, daily averages and circadian patterns were recorded. Examinations were performed on 24 horses. They were divided into three groups: Normal horses, horses with chronic latent bronchitis and horses with manifest chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Significant differences were found between the daily averages and the fluctuations when the normal group and the COPD group were compared. In most cases differences between all three groups were significant. A significant circadian rhythm for airway resistance was detected in diseased horses. It was also established that single measurements give an incomplete picture of lung function. As has been established in humans, analysis of fluctuations in respiratory mechanics may be of diagnostic value. The above results should be taken into account particularly in trials with bronchodilators in horses with COPD.

Dose response of patients to oral corticosteroid treatment during exacerbations of asthma

Ten patients with asthma were treated with different doses of oral corticosteroids during three separate exacerbations. Prednisolone was given in doses of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mg/kg body weight daily for two weeks in a double blind randomised order (equivalent to 14, 28, and 42 mg of prednisolone daily in a person weighing 70 kg). Patients developing an exacerbation recorded peak expiratory flow rate twice daily for two days before starting and two weeks during treatment. A dose response was shown that was significant for the difference between the peak flows, low dose less than medium dose (p less than 0.005), medium dose less than high dose (p less than 0.001) at the end of treatment. These results confirm the value of treatment with oral corticosteroids in exacerbations of asthma not requiring admission to hospital and indicate that a short high dose course of corticosteroids should consist of a minimum dose of 0.6 ng prednisolone/kg body weight for a period up to two weeks.

The diagnosis and treatment of adults with obstructive airways disease in general practice

Two hundred and one patients diagnosed by their general practitioners as having asthma and 113 as having chronic bronchitis were compared by symptomatology and airways reversibility. Though the majority of patients given these two diagnoses could be separated by symptom complex, in about one-third such differentiation was difficult. There was no significant difference in bronchodilator reversibility between the asthmatics and chronic bronchitics. Nine out of 15 (60%) asthmatics and four out of 18 (22%) chronic bronchitics responded by 15% or more to a course of oral corticosteroid drugs. The majority of corticosteroid responders had been undertreated. The problems arising from the poor correlation between airways reversibility and symptomatic diagnosis are discussed.

Overview of corticosteroid therapy

Corticosteroids have been recognized as useful in the management of asthma for the past 35 years. Controversy remains as to their precise indications, dosage, and optimal methods of administration. Only recently has objective evidence been presented confirming their usefulness in acute severe attacks and status asthmaticus. In the treatment of the latter, high doses of methylprednisolone (125 mg every 6 hours) has been shown to be more effective than lower doses. The corticosteroids are also useful diagnostically to determine reversibility of airway obstruction in the bronchitis-emphysema syndrome. To prevent adrenal insufficiency, they are mandatory for patients previously receiving long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy who are undergoing stress (e.g., surgery). Indications for chronic severe asthma are the least well established. Patients with severe incapacitating asthma uncontrolled by bronchodilators or cromolyn should be considered candidates for corticosteroid therapy. When long-term therapy is necessary, aerosolized corticosteroids or alternate-day therapy are preferable to daily dosing. Regardless of the route used, it is advisable to limit the use of these agents to patients who clearly require them and to take all precautions to minimize side effects. Neither method, especially when higher doses are used, obviates possible development of serious complications.

Psychological changes and improvement in chronic airflow limitation after corticosteroid treatment

Corticosteroids may produce mood changes. This could account for improvement in patients with chronic airflow limitation following trials of oral corticosteroid treatment as mood elevation might improve performance in objective measurements. This proposition was tested in 21 patients with chronic airflow limitation, who underwent detailed psychological assessment during a randomised controlled double blind crossover trial of the effect of prednisolone 40 mg daily compared with that of a placebo. Self rating visual analogue scales for various qualities of mood were completed before the study and after each phase in addition to depression and psychological symptom questionnaires. After treatment with the placebo, patients showed increases in cheerfulness (p less than 0.01) and sociability (p less than 0.01) and a decrease in depression (p less than 0.01). After treatment with prednisolone there were increases in cheerfulness (p less than 0.01), optimism (p less than 0.01), activity (p less than 0.05), and sociability (p less than 0.02) and there was a decrease in depression (p less than 0.01). When placebo and prednisolone values were compared, however, there were no significant differences. Some patients showed improvements (greater than 20%) in peak expiratory flow, FEV1 or forced vital capacity (FVC) after prednisolone, but nearly all had improvements in at least one psychological test. There were no detectable associations between changes in objective measurements and changes in psychological test ratings. This study suggests that in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease significant psychological changes are no more likely to follow treatment with a corticosteroid than treatment with a placebo and that physiological improvement after corticosteroid treatment is not tied to psychological changes.

Effects of prednisolone in chronic airflow limitation

A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of prednisolone (40 mg daily for 14 days) was carried out in 43 patients with chronic airflow limitation (mean age 60 years, mean FEV1 1.02 litres, FEV1/FVC ratio 43.7%). Several subjective and objective variables for response were measured. Significant improvements occurred with prednisolone in most variables measured, but improvements also occurred with placebo in some variables. The improvements with prednisolone in general wellbeing, 12 min walk distance, peak expiratory flow, FEV1, and relaxed vital capacity were significantly greater than those with placebo. Clinical assessment and assessment of atopic status did not reveal any feature of major predictive value for steroid responsiveness. A proportion of patients with chronic airflow limitation do improve on oral corticosteroids and the continued use of such trials in clinical practice is justified, though a placebo period should be included, and several variables for response should be measured.

Asthma and irreversible airflow obstruction

To determine whether asthma alone can cause irreversible airflow obstruction 42 men and 47 women with chronic asthma (mean duration 22 (SD 13) years) without evidence of other disease likely to cause irreversible airflow obstruction were treated with theophylline orally and a beta agonist both orally and by inhalation for four weeks. After two weeks of treatment the FEV1 was less than 85% of the predicted normal value (%P) in 48 patients and these individuals then received prednisolone 0.6 mg/kg/day for two weeks. Duration and severity of asthma and smoking history were quantified by questionnaire; 38 patients were current smokers or ex-smokers. FEV1 was measured at 0, 2, and 4 weeks. The mean difference between the best FEV1 during the study and the predicted normal value was 0.29 l (p less than 0.001); FEV1 %P decreased with age (r = -0.30, p less than 0.01) and with the duration (r = -0.47, p less than 0.001) and severity (r = -0.55, p less than 0.001) of asthma. Similar findings were noted when the results for non-smokers and those whose asthma started in adult life were analysed separately. We conclude that asthma alone can cause irreversible airflow obstruction and that the degree of obstruction is a function of the duration and severity of previous asthma. The results suggest the possibility that irreversible airflow obstruction in asthma may be preventable by minimising the degree of persistent asthma.

Effect of oral prednisolone on response to salbutamol and ipratropium bromide aerosols in patients with chronic airflow obstruction

We examined the bronchodilator responses to inhalation of salbutamol (200 micrograms) and of ipratropium bromide (40 micrograms) in the morning and in the afternoon before and during a course of oral prednisolone (40 mg daily) in 15 patients with chronic, partly reversible airflow obstruction. Bronchodilatation was assessed by measuring serial peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) for six hours after aerosol drug administration and calculating the area under the time-response curves. Eleven patients were found to be corticosteroid resistant in not attaining a baseline bronchodilatation of at least 25% during corticosteroid treatment. These patients also failed to show any enhancement of their bronchodilator responses to either salbutamol or ipratropium bromide during prednisolone administration. We therefore conclude that there is no rationale for giving or continuing corticosteroid treatment in known steroid-resistant patients in the hope of nevertheless potentiating their bronchodilator responses to salbutamol or ipratropium bromide.

Response to oral corticosteroids in chronic airflow obstruction

Sixteen Chinese patients with chronic fixed airflow obstruction (mean age 62.5 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 0.85 litres, and mean ratio FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) of 0.45) entered a randomized double-blind crossover trial comparing prednisolone 40 mg orally daily for 2 weeks with placebo. Nine of the 16 patients (56%) had an increase in FEV1 of 15% or more after prednisolone. Compared with placebo, prednisolone significantly improved objective measurements (mean FEV1 by 21.4%, mean FVC by 11.9%, mean daily peak expiratory flow rate by 22.6%), subjective measurement (mean dyspnoea score by 16%) and exercise performance assessed by the distance walked in 12 minutes (12MD, by 5.5%). Objective improvements in FEV1 and PEFR were correlated with subjective upgrading of the dyspnoea score, but were not paralleled by an improvement in 12MD. Changes in FVC correlated with neither. FEV1 was thus the best index of objective measurement. The following characteristics were examined for reliability in predicting steroid responsiveness: variability of symptoms, wheezing score, prick skin test positivity, initial bronchodilator response, peripheral blood and sputum eosinophilia, and serum and sputum immunoglobulin E (IgE) level. None was found to be useful. A therapeutic trial of oral corticosteroid should be considered in patients with chronic fixed airflow obstruction on an individual basis.

The use of the 12 minute walking test in assessing the effect of oral steroid therapy in patients with chronic airways obstruction

The reproducibility of the 12 minute walking distance (12 MD) was assessed in ten men with chronic airways obstruction, and the 12 MD was used, together with spirometry, transfer factor and three subjective assessments of breathlessness to evaluate the effects on respiratory function of prednisone 30 mg daily given orally in double-blind placebo-controlled fashion for two weeks. Like others, we found the 12 MD reproducible on a single day with a mean variation of 3.1%. Tests performed two weeks apart showed greater variability ranging from 0.2% to 30.9%, (mean 9.1%). During placebo and prednisone therapy the 12 MD and assessments of breathlessness correlated significantly with each other and with TLCO, but not with spirometry. Following steroid therapy there was a significant increase in mean TLCO but no significant change in 12 MD, spirometry or subjective assessments. Changes in 12 MD and TLCO correlated significantly with each other and with changes in subjective assessments. Changes in FEV1 correlated with changes in breathlessness, and also with variability in FEV1 while receiving placebo. Individuals with the greatest changes in 12 MD and FEV1 were those with the greatest variability on placebo. The variability of the 12 MD and FEV1 should be measured in individuals before using these tests to assess response to steroid therapy.

Effect of corticosteroids on sputum sol-phase protease inhibitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Corticosteroids caused a reduction in the ratio of sol-phase sputum concentration to serum concentration of albumin in 12 patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis, suggesting a reduction in protein transudation. Alpha-1-antitrypsin values followed the same pattern as those of albumin in both the control and treatment periods, confirming the similar behaviour of the two proteins. The alpha 1-antichymotrypsin ratios were on average three times higher than those of albumin in the control period, confirming the presence of local mechanisms in the lung for preferentially concentrating this protein. The sputum-to-serum ratio of alpha 1-antichymotrypsin, however, rose during steroid treatment with the result that there was a selective increase in this protease inhibitor, which may be of potential benefit to such patients.

Assessment of steroid responsiveness in patients with chronic airflow obstruction

A simple steroid trial was conducted to assess whether 31 patients with chronic airflow obstruction would benefit from oral steroid therapy. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1), and ratio of FEV1, to forced vital capacity (FVC) were monitored during a 6-month period (when patients were on maximum bronchodilator therapy), after 2 weeks on placebo and after 2 weeks on prednisolone 30 mg daily. Patients also measured that PEF at home thrice daily. None had a significant degree of steroid reversible airflow obstruction. The preliminary observation period (of at least 3 months) is important to prevent an improvement being attributed to steroids, when it has in fact occurred spontaneously or is the result of bronchodilator therapy or cessation of smoking.

Pocket-sized device for measuring forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity

An inexpensive pocket-sized instrument--the turbine spirometer--has been developed that measures and gives a direct digital display of the forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity. The instrument is as accurate as and considerably cheaper than spirometers in general use. Condensation does not affect the calibration. The turbine spirometer will enable spirometry to be easily monitored in hospital wards and general practice and by patients at home.

Recovery of plasma corticotrophin and cortisol levels after three-week course of prednisolone

Patients with chronic airflow obstruction were given a three-week course of prednisolone 40 mg per day. The basal plasma cortisol level and response to tetracosactrin were depressed after such a course. Basal plasma cortisol and corticotrophin (ACTH) levels were measured on five consecutive days after three weeks of treatment with prednisolone and were found to rise simultaneously to control levels within three days. Pituitary and adrenal functions were depressed for four days after short high dose courses of corticosteroids and patients may be at risk if they encounter stress during this time.