A phase II study of oral etoposide in elderly patients with small cell lung cancer

Surfactant-based drug delivery systems for treating drug-resistant lung cancer

Among all cancers, lung cancer is the major cause of deaths. Lung cancer can be categorized into two classes for prognostic and treatment purposes: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Both categories of cancer are resistant to certain drugs. Various mechanisms behind drug resistance are over-expression of superficial membrane proteins [glycoprotein (P-gp)], lung resistance-associated proteins, aberration of the intracellular enzyme system, enhancement of the cell repair system and deregulation of cell apoptosis. Structure-performance relationships and chemical compatibility are consequently major fundamentals in surfactant-based formulations, with the intention that a great deal investigation is committed to this region. With the purpose to understand the potential of P-gp in transportation of anti-tumor drugs to cancer cells with much effectiveness and specificity, several surfactant-based delivery systems have been developed which may include microspheres, nanosized drug carriers (nanoparticles, nanoemulsions, stealth liposomes, nanogels, polymer-drug conjugates), novel powders, hydrogels and mixed micellar systems intended for systemic and/or localized delivery.

Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for extensive stage small celI lung cancer (SCLC) over the last 30 years, even though it only gives a short prolongation in median survival time. The main goal for these patients should be palliation with the aim of improving their quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of first-line chemotherapy versus placebo or best supportive care (BSC) in prolonging survival in patients with extensive SCLC at diagnosis and the effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy at relapse or progression after first-line chemotherapy compared with BSC or placebo in prolonging survival in patients with extensive SCLC; as well as to evaluate the adverse events of treatment and the quality of life of patients.

SEARCH METHODS

This is the second update of the review. MEDLINE (1966 to October 2013), EMBASE (1974 to October 2013), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2012, Issue 3) were searched. Experts in the field were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Phase III randomised controlled trials in which any chemotherapy treatment was compared with  placebo or BSC in patients with extensive SCLC, as first-line or second-line therapy at relapse.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. We resolved disagreements by discussion. Additional information was obtained from one study author.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies of unclear risk of bias were included for first-line chemotherapy. A total of 88 men under 70 years with good performance status were randomised to receive either supportive care, placebo infusion or ifosfamide. Ifosfamide gave an extra mean survival of 78.5 days compared with supportive care or placebo infusion. Partial tumour response was greater with the active treatment. Toxicity was only seen in the chemotherapy group and quality of life was only assessed at the beginning of treatment. The quality of the evidence for overall survival and adverse effects was very low.Three studies of moderate risk of bias were included for second-line chemotherapy at relapse (one identified in the last search). A total of 932 men and women under 75 years and any performance status were randomised to receive either methotrexate-doxorubicin, topotecan, or picoplatin versus symptomatic treatment or BSC. The methotrexate-doxorubicin treatment gave a median survival of 63 days longer than in the symptomatic-treatment group for patients allocated to receive four cycles of first-line chemotherapy, and 21 days longer for patients allocated to receive eight cycles of first-line chemotherapy.Treatment with topotecan gave a median survival of 84 days longer than in the BSC group (log-rank P = 0.01). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was 0.61 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.87). Treatment with picoplatin gave a median survival time of six days longer than BSC (HR 0.817, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03, P = 0.0895). A meta-analysis of topotecan and picoplatin gave a HR of 0.73 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.96, P = 0.03; low-quality evidence).Partial or complete response in the methotrexate-doxorubicin group was 22.3%. Five patients (7%, 95% CI 2.33 to 15.67) showed a partial response with topotecan. No data were provided about tumour response in the picoplatin study. Toxicity was worst in the chemotherapy group (moderate-quality evidence). Quality of life was better in the topotecan group and was not measured in the methotrexate-doxorubicin and picoplatin studies (low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Two small RCTs from the 1970s suggest that first-line chemotherapeutic treatment (based on ifosfamide) may provide a small survival benefit (less than three months) in comparison with supportive care or placebo infusion in patients with advanced SCLC. However platinum-based combination chemotherapy regimens have been shown to increase complete response rates when compared to non-platinum chemotherapy regimens with no significant difference in survival, and so these are currently the standard first-line treatment for patients with SCLC.Second-line chemotherapy at relapse or progression may prolong survival for some weeks in relation to BSC. Nevertheless, the impact of first-line chemotherapy on quality of life, older patients, women and patients with poor prognosis is unknown and the benefits of second-line chemotherapy are also unclear for older people. Globally, the evidence on which these conclusions are based is very scarce and of uncertain or low quality, which calls for well-designed, controlled trials to further evaluate the trade-offs between benefits and risks of different chemotherapeutic schedules in patients with advanced SCLC.

A stable and practical etoposide-containing intravenous long-/medium-chain triglycerides-based lipid emulsion formulation: pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, toxicity, and antitumor efficacy

OBJECTIVES

This work aimed to evaluate pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, toxicity, and antitumor activities of a highly stable long-/medium-chain triglycerides (LCT/MCT)-based etoposide parenteral emulsion (EPE) in comparison to etoposide parenteral solution (EPS).

METHODS

Using high-pressure homogenization method, EPE was prepared and sterilized at 121°C for 10 min by autoclaving. The biological samples were analyzed using the UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method.

RESULTS

Superior stability of EPE was verified with no significant changes in physicochemical properties in the accelerating and long-term stability tests. Similar pharmacokinetic behavior in beagle dogs was obtained and the AUC 0 - 12h values were 1196.73 ± 320.85 and 1505.56 ± 617.93 µg.h/L for EPE and EPS (p > 0.5), respectively. Likewise, no remarkable difference in biodistribution profiles in mice was found for both formulations. Safety assessment studies including hemolysis test, rabbit ear vein test and injection anaphylaxis were undertaken and the EPE was proven to be safe for intravenous administration. Specifically, after consecutive 12 weeks administration in rats, systematic and local toxicity induced by EPE were alleviated relative to that of EPS. Furthermore, significant and comparable antitumor activities to EPS were also demonstrated by EPE with tumor suppression rate (TSR) of 66.63, 55.94, and 60.16% against H460, Hep G2, and BCAP-37 human cancer cell lines in nude mice at the dose of 15 mg/kg, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that this LCT/MCT-based lipid emulsion is a promising alternative intravenous carrier for etoposide with high stability, improved convenience, alleviated toxicity, and noncompromised antitumor efficacy.

How do patient and hospital features influence outcomes in small-cell lung cancer in England?

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to systematically determine how features of patients and hospitals influence access to chemotherapy and survival for people with small-cell lung cancer in England.

METHODS

We linked the National Lung Cancer Audit and Hospital Episode Statistics and used multiple logistic and Cox regression analyses to assess the influence of patient and hospital features on small-cell lung cancer outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 7845 patients with histologically proven small-cell lung cancer. Sixty-one percent (4820) of the patients received chemotherapy. Increasing age, worsening performance status, extensive stage and greater comorbidity all reduced the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. There was wide variation in access to chemotherapy between hospitals in general and patients first seen in centres with a strong interest in clinical trials had a higher odds of receiving chemotherapy (adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 1.90). Chemotherapy was associated with a lower mortality rate (adjusted hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.46, 0.56).

CONCLUSION

Patients first seen at a hospital with a keen interest in clinical trials are more likely to receive chemotherapy, and chemotherapy was associated with improved survival.

Toxicogenomics of nanoparticulate delivery of etoposide: potential impact on nanotechnology in retinoblastoma therapy

To develop a suitable formulation with high entrapment efficiency, etoposide-loaded poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles (NPs) were formulated by single emulsion-solvent evaporation method by changing different formulation parameters such as drug loading, choice of organic solvent and percentage of emulsifier polyvinyl alcohol. The NPs showed higher entrapment efficiency, ~86% (with 15% (w/w) drug loading). The physicochemical parameters revealed smooth topology with size range (240–320 nm), a negative zeta potential (~19 mV) and in vitro sustained-release activity (~60% drug release in 40 days). Greater anti-proliferative activity ~100 times was observed with NPs (IC₅₀ = 0.002 μg/ml) than that of native etoposide (IC₅₀ = 0.2 μg/ml) in retinoblastoma cell line (Y-79). These NPs demonstrated greater (G1/S) blocking and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential as measured by flow cytometry. There was upregulation of apoptotic gene activity in NPs than native etoposide, as revealed through microarray analysis. However, this is the first ever report demonstrating the intricate modulation of genetic network affected by NPs. Collectively, these results suggest that etoposide-loaded NPs could be potentially useful as a novel drug delivery system for retinoblastoma in the future.

Figure

Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for extensive stage small celI lung cancer (SCLC) over the last 30 years even though it only gives a short prolongation in median survival time. The main goal for these patients should be palliation with the aim of improving their quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of chemotherapy in extensive SCLC compared with best supportive care (BSC) or placebo treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE (1966 to July 2008), EMBASE (1974 to week 31, 2008), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2008). Experts in the field were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in which any chemotherapy treatment was compared with placebo or BSC in patients with extensive SCLC, as first or second therapy at relapse.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. We resolved disagreements by discussion. Additional information was obtained from one study author.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies were included for first-line chemotherapy. A total of 65 patients were randomised to receive either placebo or ifosfamide. Ifosfamide gave an extra mean survival of 78.5 days compared with placebo. Partial tumour response was greater with the active treatment. Toxicity was only seen in the chemotherapy group.Two studies were included for second-line chemotherapy at relapse. A total of 531 patients were randomised to receive either methotrexate-doxorubicin or symptomatic treatment, or to receive oral topotecan versus BSC. The methotrexate-doxorubicin treatment gave a median survival of 63 days longer than in the symptomatic treatment group, and 21 days longer for patients allocated to receive four or eight cycles of first-line chemotherapy, respectively.Treatment with topotecan gave a median survival of 84 days longer than in the BSC group (log-rank P = 0.01). The adjusted hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87). Partial or complete response in the methotrexate-doxorubicin group was 22.3%. Five patients (7%, 95% CI, 2.33 to 15.67) showed a partial response with topotecan. Toxicity was worst in the chemotherapy group. Quality of life was better in the topotecan group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapeutic treatment prolongs survival in comparison with placebo in patients with advanced SCLC. Nevertheless, the impact of first-line chemotherapy on quality of life and in patients with poor prognosis is unknown. Well-designed, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risks and benefits of different chemotherapeutic schedules in patients with advanced SCLC.

[Randomised phase II study evaluating oral combination chemotherapy (CCNU, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) and intravenous chemotherapy as second-line treatment for relapsed small cell bronchial carcinoma (Trial GFPC0501)]

BACKGROUND

There is no standard second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The prognosis of these patients is poor and special attention should be paid to both quality of life and economic factors.

METHODS

The aim of this phase II randomised trial (GFPC0501) is to compare, in patients with progressive SCLC after first-line platinum based chemotherapy, oral multi drug chemotherapy (CCNU, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) and classical intravenous chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine (CAV) in terms of tolerability, efficacy (response rate, median one year survival and overall survival), quality of life and consumption of health care resources. Based on a two-stage Bryant and Day approach, this study will require a total of 138 patients with an interim analysis of the first 38.

EXPECTED RESULTS

This trial will provide information on several aspects of second-line chemotherapy for patients with SCLC. Thirty six patients have been enrolled in 16 centres by December 2006 and the results of the interim analysis will be available in June 2007.

Tuftsin augments antitumor efficacy of liposomized etoposide against fibrosarcoma in Swiss albino mice

Anticancer drugs are generally plagued by toxic manifestations at doses necessary for control of various forms of cancer. Incorporating such drugs into liposomes not only reduces toxicity but also enhances the therapeutic index. Some antioxidants and potent immunomodulators have also been shown to impart significant antitumor activity presumably by nonspecific activation of the host immune system. In the present study, we evaluated augmentation of the antitumor activity of etoposide (ETP) by the immunomodulator tuftsin in Swiss albino mice with fibrosarcoma. The efficacies of the free form of ETP, liposomized ETP (Lip-ETP), and tuftsin-bearing liposomized ETP (Tuft-Lip-ETP) formulations were evaluated on the basis of tumor regression, effect on expression level of p53wt and p53mut, and survival of the treated animals. Tuft-Lip-ETP, when administered at a dosage of 10 mg/kg body weight/day for five days, significantly reduced tumor volume, delayed tumor growth, and also up-regulated the expression of p53wt. In contrast, although Lip-ETP delayed tumor growth, it did not decrease tumor size. The results of the present study suggest that tuftsin incorporation in drug-loaded liposomes is a promising treatment strategy for various forms of cancers, including fibrosarcoma.

Tuftsin augments antitumor efficacy of liposomized etoposide against fibrosarcoma in Swiss albino mice

Anticancer drugs are generally plagued by toxic manifestations at doses necessary for control of various forms of cancer. Incorporating such drugs into liposomes not only reduces toxicity but also enhances the therapeutic index. Some antioxidants and potent immunomodulators have also been shown to impart significant antitumor activity presumably by nonspecific activation of the host immune system. In the present study, we evaluated augmentation of the antitumor activity of etoposide (ETP) by the immunomodulator tuftsin in Swiss albino mice with fibrosarcoma. The efficacies of the free form of ETP, liposomized ETP (Lip-ETP), and tuftsin-bearing liposomized ETP (Tuft-Lip-ETP) formulations were evaluated on the basis of tumor regression, effect on expression level of p53wt and p53mut, and survival of the treated animals. Tuft-Lip-ETP, when administered at a dosage of 10 mg/kg body weight/day for five days, significantly reduced tumor volume, delayed tumor growth, and also up-regulated the expression of p53wt. In contrast, although Lip-ETP delayed tumor growth, it did not decrease tumor size. The results of the present study suggest that tuftsin incorporation in drug-loaded liposomes is a promising treatment strategy for various forms of cancers, including fibrosarcoma.

Stability and degradation kinetics of etoposide‐loaded parenteral lipid emulsion

Etoposide was incorporated in lipid emulsion to develop an i.v. formulation, and improve its physical and chemical stability without addition of organic solvents, for use as a commercial formulation. High-pressure homogenization was used to prepare the lipid nanospheres and localize the drug at the surfactant layer. The particle size distribution and zeta potential were measured using photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS). Ultrafiltration was used to estimate the relative percentage of etoposide in each phase. The stability profile of etoposide in the lipid emulsion at various temperatures, pH values, and concentrations of drug was monitored by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The degradation pattern of etoposide in lipid emulsion followed pseudo-first-order kinetics. The shelf life (T(90%)) of etoposide in lipid emulsion was estimated to be 47 days at 25 degrees C and it would be stable when stored for 427 days at 4 degrees C, which is a significant improvement compared with a stability of 9.5 days in aqueous solution at 25 degrees C. Etoposide in lipid emulsion and aqueous solution were both most stable at pH 5.0 with a half-life of 54.7 h and 38.6 min at 80 degrees C, respectively. The hydrolysis kinetics of etoposide in lipid emulsion was also shown to be dependent on the drug concentration.

Phase II study of BBR 3464 as treatment in patients with sensitive or refractory small cell lung cancer

BBR 3464 is a novel triplatinum compound that has exhibited anti-tumor activity in both cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant, as well as in p53 mutant tumor models. In phase I testing, the dose-limiting toxicities have included myelosuppression and diarrhea. Both an intermittent (day 1 every 21-28 days) and a continuous (dailyx5 days) schedule have been studied, and the intermittent schedule has been chosen for further development. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of BBR 3464 administered at a dose of 0.9 mg/m i.v. over 1 h every 21 days in patients with small cell lung cancer who have progressed after first-line therapy. Pharmacokinetic analysis was also performed and will be reported. Patients were stratified based on prior response into resistant and sensitive (response duration 3 months or longer) subgroups. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled onto this multicenter study. The median number of cycles delivered was 2 in the resistant subgroup (range 1-12) and 3 in the sensitive subgroup (range 1-8). Most common grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (62%), febrile neutropenia (16%), anemia (10%), fatigue (5%) and hypokalemia (5%). Although no objective responses were seen in 34 evaluable patients, 11 patients (32%) had disease stabilization (four resistant/seven sensitive) with 23 patients (68%) experiencing continued disease progression (12 resistant/11 sensitive). Median time to progression was 53 days in the resistant subgroup [95% confidence interval (CI) 37-63] and 66 days in the sensitive subgroup (95% CI 51-136). The median and 1-year survival rate based on subgroup was 78 (resistant) (95% CI 56-165) versus 209 days (sensitive) (95% CI 83-296) and 6 (resistant) (95% CI 0-17) versus 20% (95% CI 2-38%), respectively. We conclude that the toxicity profile of BBR 3464 in this phase II trial is consistent with the phase I experience. The lack of activity in either patient subgroup, however, does not support further evaluation of this drug as a single agent in this disease.

Time and chemotherapy treatment trends in the treatment of elderly patients (age >/=70 years) with small cell lung cancer

Platinum-based treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been established since 1995. This study investigates treatment outcome of elderly patients (age ⩾70 years) with SCLC over the past 20 years in a large UK cancer centre. Comparison of all-cause survival was assessed in patients presenting between two predefined time periods: 1982–1994 and 1995–2003. All the survival analysis were adjusted for stage and performance status and age if appropriate. Survival between different chemotherapy treatment regimens was compared. A total of 322 elderly patients (31% of all) registered between 1982–2003 received chemotherapy for SCLC. Patients presenting in 1995–2003 had an overall better median survival (43 vs 25 weeks) and a 1-year survival (37 vs 14%) than patients presenting in 1982–1994 (P<0.001). This applied to patients with both limited and extensive stage disease and all age groups. There was a trend towards the use of more platinum-based treatments in the later cohort but the use of radiotherapy remained constant. Patients who received platinum combinations (Carboplatin or Cisplatin) had significantly improved survival over those who received single agents or other combinations (P<0.001) and there was no significant difference between carboplatin and cisplatin (P=0.7). The analysis demonstrates that there has been a significant improvement in survival for elderly patients with lung cancer treated by chemotherapy in the past 20 years despite more very elderly patients being treated with a poorer performance status. This change is probably multifactorial and may be due to the increased use of platinum-based treatment and improved supportive care.

Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of etoposide delivered in long circulating parenteral emulsion

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to ascertain the influence of pegylation of parenteral emulsion (PE) on their long circulating property.

METHODS

Etoposide encapsulated parenteral emulsion (EPE) was prepared using soybean oil, egg lecithin and cholesterol. Etoposide encapsulated long circulating parenteral emulsion (PEG-EPE) was prepared using PEG (2000)-DSPE as a stealth agent. The effect of monovalent and divalent electrolytes on the stability of EP was assessed by measuring the fixed aqueous layer thickness (FALT) and flocculation rate. Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution pattern of PE following i.v. (bolus) were assessed in Wistar rats and Swiss albino mice.

RESULTS

FALT of PEG-EPE was larger than that of EPE. In case of PEG-EPE, as the concentration of pegylated lipid (PEG) increased from 0.15 to 0.45% w/v the flocculation rate decreased asymptomatically in the presence of monovalent and divalent electrolytes. The increased circulation time of PEG-EPE (0.3%) after intravenous injection to rats confirms the presence of FALT around globules. PEG-EPE showed improved pharmacokinetic parameters with 5.5 times higher AUC than etoposide commercial formulation (ETP). Tissue distribution results show that etoposide levels in all tissues except in brain and heart were lower in case of PEG-EPE than ETP. The percentage of tumor growth suppression rate (%T/C) in Lewis lung carcinoma bearing mice was 63.23, 62.83 and 33.78% in EPE, PEG-EPE and ETP treated mice, respectively. The improved activity of PEG-EPE is due to enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR).

CONCLUSION

Encapsulation of etoposide in PEG-coated PE produced improved pharmacokinetic profile than that of EPE and ETP.

Topotecan in the treatment of elderly patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Almost 70% of all patients with lung cancer in the United States are>65 years of age, and the incidence of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) increases with age until the eighth decade of life. However, elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and are often suboptimally treated. The validity of age as a prognostic factor for toxicity or survival remains controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To investigate the safety and efficacy of topotecan (an approved treatment for relapsed SCLC) in older patients, we performed a retrospective analysis in patients >or= 65 years of age versus patients < 65 years of age from 5 large topotecan trials. In all 5 trials, patients received topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 per day via a 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 through 5 of a 21-day cycle. Efficacy and tolerability outcomes were assessed for both age groups.

RESULTS

Topotecan was similarly tolerated in both age groups, with generally manageable hematologic toxicity. The incidence, duration, and onset of severe hematologic toxicities did not vary significantly with age. In the<65 age group, grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported in 72% and 32% of patients, respectively; in the >or= 65 age group, grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported in 77% and 31% of patients, respectively. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was less common in the<65 age group. Nonhematologic toxicities, median time to progression, and overall survival were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first demonstration of the safety and efficacy of topotecan in older patients with recurrent SCLC. Future studies are needed to fully characterize the role of topotecan in the treatment of older patients.

Randomized phase III intergroup trial of etoposide and cisplatin with or without paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9732

PURPOSE

To determine, in a randomized comparison, whether the addition of paclitaxel to etoposide and cisplatin improves the time to progression and overall survival in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) compared with standard etoposide and cisplatin and to compare the regimens' toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients (N=587) with untreated extensive SCLC were randomly assigned to receive either cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and etoposide 80 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3 administered every 3 weeks for six cycles (EP) or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 4 hours on day 1, and etoposide 80 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 followed by recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on days 4 to 18 administered every 3 weeks for six cycles (PET).

RESULTS

Reporting of demographics, response, and survival included 565 patients, of whom 282 were randomly assigned to receive EP and 283 were assigned to receive PET. Overall response rates were 68% for the EP arm and 75% for the PET arm. Median failure-free survival time was 5.9 months for the EP arm and 6 months for the PET arm (P = .179). Median overall survival time was 9.9 months for patients on EP and 10.6 months for patients on PET (P = .169). Toxic deaths occurred in 2.4% of the patients on EP and 6.5% of patients on PET.

CONCLUSION

PET did not improve the time to progression or survival in patients with extensive SCLC compared with EP alone and was associated with unacceptable toxicity.

Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of lung carcinomas. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for SCLC. In limited disease, the median survival time is about 12-16 months, with a 4%-5% long-term survival rate; in extensive disease the median survival time is 7-11 months. More than 50% of lung cancer patients are diagnosed when they are over the age of 65, and about 30% are over 70. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared with their younger counterparts, because of age-related progressive reductions in organ function and comorbidities. The standard therapy for limited disease is combined chemoradiotherapy, followed by prophylactic brain irradiation for patients achieving complete responses. In the elderly, the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy must be carefully evaluated, considering the slight survival benefit and potential for substantial toxicity incurred with this treatment. The best approach is to design clinical trials that specifically include geriatric assessment to develop active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimens for elderly SCLC patients. Survival improvement for SCLC patients requires a better understanding of tumor biology and the subsequent development of novel therapeutic strategies. Several targeted agents have been introduced into clinical trials in SCLC, but a minority of these new agents offers a promise of improved outcomes, and negative results are reported more commonly than positive ones. This review focuses on the main issues in the treatment of elderly SCLC patients.

Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution of Etoposide Delivered in Parenteral Emulsion

Etoposide was incorporated in an injectable parenteral emulsion, in an attempt to alter its pharmacokinetics and improve anticancer activity. Parenteral emulsion of etoposide (EPE), which remained stable over 6 months' storage, was prepared (under optimal experimental conditions) using soybean oil and phosphatidylcholine as emulsifier. The particle size distribution and zeta potential were measured using photon correlation spectroscopy. The pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of EPE and commercial etoposide injectable solution (ETP) were studied in Swiss albino mice. The antitumor activity was performed on BDF1 mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma. The particle size distribution with polydispersity indices, zeta potential, entrapment efficacy, and assay of EPE were found to be 218.7 +/- 4.7 (0.14 +/- 0.0) nm, -53.5 +/- 0.2 mV, 75 +/- 2.1%, and 0.85 +/- 0.1 mg/mL, respectively. The EPE was stable for >6 months and drug leaching was 5.8 +/- 1.5%. The pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of EPE was significantly different than that of ETP. The EPE showed high AUC(0-alpha), MRT (mean residence time), and lower clearance than that of ETP. It was found that etoposide concentration was higher in liver, spleen, and lung after ETP administration when compared with EPE; however, in heart and brain, etoposide was more after EPE than that of ETP. The EPE showed lower reticuloendothelial system (liver and spleen) tissue uptake. The anticancer activity of EPE was higher in Lewis lung carcinoma-bearing mice. On the fifteenth day of transplantation, the percentage of tumor growth suppression rate was 63.23% in EPE-treated mice and 33.78% in ETP-treated mice.

Treatment of lung cancer in elderly part II: small cell lung cancer

There is a general trend worldwide of an increasing incidence of elderly population. Age is the greatest risk factor for cancer; therefore, this demographic shift is a main reason for an increase of cancer incidence. Lung cancer is a typical disease of the elderly patients. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancer cases. This review summarises the issues of treatment of SCLC in elderly. The number of randomised phase III trials concerning treatment of SCLC in elderly patients are very limited. Although currently most treatment decisions are based on lower grades of evidence, some conclusions can be drawn from the current studies. Age alone is a very uncertain prognostic criteria for outcome or tolerability of treatment. Much more important is the geriatric assessment of each individual patient. Current treatment standards for limited disease (LD)-SCLC (polychemotherapy plus local thoracic irradiation and additional prophylactic cranial irradiation in case of complete remission) seems to be also feasible for 'fit' elderly (>70 years) LD-SCLC patients with a good performance and full functional capacities. There are preliminary data indicating that a similar outcome in elderly patients can probably be achieved a with reduced number of treatment schedules (e.g. 2 instead of 4 cycles in combination with radiotherapy. Surgical resection is also feasible in selected elderly patients with very early stage SCLC, where this maybe an appropriate approach, although no phase III data are available, which demonstrated the benefit of additional surgery compared to chemotherapy alone in early stage SCLC. In patients with extensive disease-SCLC age alone does not necessarily restrict the use of multiagent regimen, although the risk of haematological toxicity seems to be higher than in the younger patients. When standard treatment is not feasible due to co-morbidity or loss of functional capacity, several alternative combination regimens are available, which appear to be slightly superior to single agent treatment, although randomised data for elderly on that issue are sparse. Carboplatin and etoposide seems currently the most appropriate two-drug combination in elderly patients, but there are a variety of active and low toxic third generation agents like taxanes, gemcitabine and vinorelbine which are active in both, non-small cell lung cancer and SCLC. For the comparison of trials in elderly patients it will be of key importance to include a comprehensive and standardised geriatric assessment in such studies.

Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) over the last 25 years even though it only gives a short prolongation in median survival time. The main goal for these patients, if their survival prognosis is limited, should be adequate palliation with the aim of improving their quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of chemotherapy in extensive SCLC compared with best supportive care (BSC) or placebo treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Medline (1966-Jan 2003), Embase (1974-Jan 2003), Cancerlit (1993-Jan 2003) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 4, 2002) were searched. In addition experts in the field were contacted to identify further studies not found by electronic searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in which any chemotherapy treatment was compared with a placebo group or best supportive care in patients with extensive stage SCLC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken independently by two reviewers and disagreements were resolved by a third author. Additional information on the included studies was obtained from the author of the original studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Only two studies (the first published in 1977 and the second in 1982) met the inclusion criteria of the review. A total of 65 patients with extensive disease (33 in the first study and 32 in the second) were randomised to received either placebo treatment or ifosfamide. In the second study a third arm of comparison included ifosfamide plus CCNU. Ifosfamide gave an extra 78.5 days survival (mean survival time) compared with the placebo group. Partial tumour response was greater with the active treatment. Toxicity was only seen in the chemotherapy group. Pooled analysis was not possible because only mean survival time was reported in both studies for patients with extensive disease.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapeutic treatment prolongs survival in comparison with placebo in patients with advanced SCLC. Nevertheless the impact of chemotherapy on quality of life and in patients with poor prognosis is unknown. Well-designed, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risks and benefits of different chemotherapeutic schedules in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer in the elderly: current and future chemotherapeutic options

Lung cancer is a prevalent malignancy disproportionately affecting the elderly, and in our aging societies will only increase in magnitude. Physicians typically assume that elderly lung cancer patients will have poorer prognoses. This belief is in part based on certain physiological changes of aging affecting the kidneys, liver, and bone marrow. However, there are no data to clearly support or refute increased toxicity from chemotherapy or a lessened therapeutic effect in the elderly based on these changes, although it is a field worthy of further study. Retrospective studies of treatment of elderly non-small cell and small cell lung cancer patients do not suggest a worse prognosis based on advanced age alone. Clinicians are hampered by the lack of clinical trials focusing on or even including the elderly, despite the increased incidence of lung cancer in the elderly. Phase II studies in elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients concentrate on newer agents (vinorelbine and gemcitabine) alone or combined with platinum compounds in hopes of more favourable toxicity profiles. Phase III trials have demonstrated survival benefits, quality of life improvements, and acceptable toxicity profiles for vinorelbine compared to best supportive care alone and the combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine compared to vinorelbine alone. Data are also sparse for elderly small cell lung cancer patients. Phase II studies focused on single agent oral etoposide also in hopes of lessening toxicity. However, phase III trials have shown improvement in survival and quality of life for multiagent intravenous chemotherapy compared to oral etoposide. Given the existing data, altering therapy for lung cancer patients based on age alone would not be warranted. Given the prevalence of the disease, future studies need to include an appropriate number of elderly patients with continued emphasis on quality of life in addition to survival.

Carboplatin plus vinorelbine plus G-CSF in elderly patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a poorly tolerated regimen. Results of a multicentre phase II study

PURPOSE AND METHODS

A multicentre phase II trial (single-stage design) was undertaken to test the activity and toxicity of carboplatin (AUC 5 according to Calvert, day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8) with lenograstim support, every 3 weeks in the first line treatment of elderly patients, aged 65 or more, affected by extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The primary end-point of the trial was the objective response rate. Twenty-three responses among 37 patients were considered necessary to proceed to a phase III trial.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were enrolled (median age 70 years). Treatment was remarkably toxic. Three patients died while on treatment. Eleven patients (39.3%, 95% exact confidence interval (CI): 21.5-59.4) had an objective response, that was complete in 2 cases. Median time to progression was 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.3-6.7). Median survival was 7.9 months (95% CI: 4.8-14.4).

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin plus vinorelbine is poorly tolerated and not sufficiently active to warrant phase III comparison with standard chemotherapy regimens in elderly patients with extensive SCLC.

Management of small-cell lung cancer in the elderly

More than 50% of lung cancer patients are diagnosed over the age of 65 and about 30% over 70. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20-25% of lung carcinomas. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for SCLC. Usually in the elderly it is difficult to administer the same chemotherapy administered to younger patients because elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly. The empirical reduction of drug doses may be criticized. The best approach is to design specific trials in order to develop active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimens for SCLC elderly patients. The standard therapy in limited disease is combined chemo-radiotherapy followed by prophylactic brain irradiation for patients achieving a complete response. In the elderly, the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy must be accurately evaluated, considering the slight survival improvement and the potential relevant toxicity.

Carboplatin-etoposide combination in small cell lung cancer patients older than 70 years: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

No standard treatment is defined for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Carboplatin and etoposide are highly active agents against SCLC. In this study, we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a combination of these two agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four untreated patients with limited or extensive SCLC and median age of 73.9 years entered the study. Chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin i.v. on day 1 (AUC 5 using Calvert's formula) and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) given orally on days 1-5, every 4 weeks, and thoracic irradiation was given to limited disease patients after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The overall response rates was 59% (95% CI: 43-76). The median survival for all patients was 37 weeks (range 3-76 weeks). The toxicity was mainly haematological with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 59% of courses, febrile neutropenia in 15% of courses, and toxic death in 9% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The results of this regimen are disappointing with worse response and survival, and more haematological toxicity than expected and previously reported, despite the use of Calvert's formula. Possible explanations are the use of etoposide per os rather than i.v., the frequent comorbidities of older patients and the inclusion of patients with poor prognosis factors.

Etoposide phosphate with carboplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Although the average age of lung cancer patients is increasing, many elderly patients remain undertreated, mainly because of the fear of higher treatment toxicity in this category of patients. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a combination therapy with carboplatin (C) and etoposide phosphate (EP) in elderly patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated patients older than 70 years with stage IIIB/IV SCLC received a combination of EP (100 mg/m2 D1, D2, D3) and C (D1, dose calculated according to the Calvert formula). Response rate, survival and toxicity were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (mean age 76 years, range 70-88 years) received a total of 162 cycles. Eighteen patients (47%) received the six scheduled cycles. Thirty patients were evaluable for efficacy (2 CR and 20 PR). The median survival was 237 days and the one-year probability of survival was 26%. The most common adverse effect was transient grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, observed during 57% of evaluable cycles, while five episodes of febrile neutropenia also occurred, with one fatal (bacteremia). It is noteworthy that no renal or liver toxicity was observed, and no mucitis was noted. Unfortunately, a relatively high proportion of patients died shortly after the start of the study. Although most deaths seemed unrelated to the treatment, the possibility of its exacerbatory effect on comorbidities, especially cardiovascular, cannot be excluded.

CONCLUSION

The two-drug regimen of carboplatin and etoposide phosphate is feasible in most elderly patients with an acceptable toxicity, and the overall results suggest that patients even older than 70 years may benefit from full treatment. Therefore, consideration should be given to offering active treatment to most patients with SCLC, regardless of age but with special attention paid to comorbidities.

Gemcitabine plus etoposide in chemonaive extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: a multi-centre phase II study

BACKGROUND

Both gemcitabine and etoposide are active in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and are characterised by mild toxicity profiles. The combination of both drugs was found to be feasible and active in a phase I dose-finding study in solid tumours. Therefore, a phase II trial was initiated to examine the activity and toxicity of this schedule in extensive disease SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two chemo-naïve extensive disease SCLC patients were enrolled to receive gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8 and 15, and etoposide 80 mg/m2, days 8, 9 and 10 of a 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for efficacy (five received less than one cycle). No complete responses were observed, but partial responses were seen in 17 patients, yielding an overall response rate of 46%. The median duration of response was 5.8 months. Disease stabilisation was obtained in another 10 patients (27%). The median survival of the 37 protocol-qualified patients was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.5-12.0). The levels of WHO grade 3 and 4 toxicities were low and clinically manageable.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with standard platinum-based regimens, this combination of gemcitabine and etoposide resulted in a somewhat lower response rate, but a similar median survival time. Haematological toxicity was more pronounced than expected from the toxicity data of each agent individually. However, because of its mild non-haematological toxicity, and its ability to be administered in an outpatient setting, this combination provides a reasonable palliative option for patients with extensive disease SCLC.

Etoposide encapsulated in positively charged liposomes: pharmacokinetic studies in mice and formulation stability studies

Etoposide is an antineoplastic agent which acts by forming a ternary complex with topoisomerase II and DNA, causing DNA breaks and cell death. In recent studies we have demonstrated that encapsulation in liposomes increases the antitumour efficacy and reduces the adverse effects associated with etoposide. The present study was thus conducted to evaluate whether encapsulation in cationic liposomes altered the pharmacokinetics of etoposide and to study the effect of cholesterol incorporation on the stability of the liposomes. Etoposide-encapsulated unilammellar liposomes were synthesized by thin film hydration followed by extrusion. The drug was administered to Swiss albino mice at a dose of 10 mg kg(-1). The concentration of the drug in plasma was analysed at different time points till 360 min after injection, using a h.p.l.c. method. The terbium chloride-dipicolinic acid interaction method was applied to study the stability of the formulation in mouse serum and also following storage at 0( composite function)C over a period of time. The effect of the free and liposomal drug on myelosuppression was evaluated at 10 mg m(-2)and 40 mg m(-2)dose levels by quantifying blood cell counts on day 15 and day 21 following a 5 day course of therapy. Encapsulation in cationic liposomes increased the area under the concentration vs time curve to 42.98 microghml(-1)from 24.18 microghml(-1)in the case of the free drug. Half-life (beta) was 58. 62 and 186 min in the case of free and liposomal etoposide, respectively. In the stability studies, incorporation of cholesterol progressively stabilized the formulation in serum. The use of sucrose at increasing concentrations as a cryoprotectant also increased the shelf stability of the formulation at 0( composite function)C. Toxicity studies using a dose of pure drug revealed that though myelosuppression was evident in both liposomal- and free drug-treated groups on day 15 it was reversed by day 21 following initiation of therapy. The present findings suggest that liposomes could serve as an alternative mode of delivery for etoposide.

Treatment and outcomes for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer

It is estimated that approximately half of the 500 000 people diagnosed with lung cancer worldwide every year are aged >70 years. Thus, this disease represents a major problem in the elderly and one that will indeed increase as the median age of the population increases. For small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which accounts for approximately 20% of cases of lung cancer, the primary treatment is chemotherapy and in the majority of cases the primary aim is to control the disease which generally would have spread beyond the lungs at the time of presentation. A small number of 'standard' chemotherapy regimens (combined with radiotherapy for patients with limited disease) have been shown to improve survival and quality of life and are widely used. Much of the work investigating the relationship between age and treatment outcomes has been based on clinical trial data and may itself be inherently biased due to trial eligibility criteria excluding elderly patients. However, there is no good evidence that elderly patients fare worse with treatment than their younger counterparts in terms of response rates and survival. Nevertheless with increasing age comes increasing concomitant illnesses which may account for the widely observed increases in drug toxicity, and this may be the primary consideration in selecting the treatment option. Thus for many elderly patients, carboplatin/ etoposide may be the treatment of choice because it is perhaps the least toxic of the standard regimens. Whatever regimen is chosen, the key to treatment effectiveness seems to be to deliver the first 3 or 4 cycles without delay or dosage reduction. Although palliation of symptoms remains a major goal in the treatment of all patients with SCLC there is a dearth of data on whether elderly patients are equally well palliated as their younger counterparts. There is no good evidence that age per se should be a factor in deciding whether patients should receive standard treatment rather than a more gentle approach, and more elderly patients should be included in clinical trials. The key areas where more information is required regarding the treatment and outcomes of elderly patients with SCLC are the assessment of palliation, and comprehensive reviews of all patients diagnosed with the disease, not just those included in trials.

Phase II study of oral platinum drug JM216 as first-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This multicenter phase II trial was performed to determine tumor efficacy and tolerance of the oral platinum drug JM216 in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with SCLC limited disease unfit for intensive chemotherapy or those with extensive disease received JM216 120 mg/m(2)/d for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Individual dose escalation to 140 mg/m(2)/d was allowed if toxicity was </= grade 2 according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Tumor response was evaluated according to World Health Organization criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were assessable for toxicity and 26 for tumor response. Eighty-eight cycles were administered. Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia in 15.9% and 3.7%, lymphocytopenia in 47.6% and 17.1%, and thrombocytopenia in 19.5% and 10.3% of cycles, respectively. One patient suffered from neutropenic fever. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were the most common nonhematologic toxicities. Except for grade 4 diarrhea in one patient, no grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed. No severe neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity was observed. Tumor response rate was 10 of 26 (38%; 95% confidence interval, 19% to 58%), excluding five unconfirmed partial responses. No complete responses were observed. Median overall time to progression was 110 days (range, 5 to 624 days). Median overall survival time was 210 days (range, 5 to 624 days).

CONCLUSION

Oral JM216 is active in previously untreated patients with SCLC and shows mild toxicities.

Phase II trial of carboplatin plus oral etoposide for elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer

A phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the Egorin's carboplatin dosing formula with 14-day oral etoposide in 38 elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The overall response rate was 81%. Median survival times were 15.1 months for 16 limited-disease (LD) and 8.6 months for 22 extensive-disease (ED) patients. Myelosuppression was the principal side-effect. This regimen is an active regimen in the treatment of elderly SCLC patients.

Five-day oral etoposide treatment for advanced small-cell lung cancer: randomized comparison with intravenous chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral etoposide is an active single agent in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and is widely prescribed as first-line treatment as an alternative to intravenous combination chemotherapy in patients with extensive disease.

PURPOSE

The intention of this study was to determine if the effects of oral etoposide therapy on survival and quality of life are equivalent to those of intravenous chemotherapy.

METHODS

In a randomized trial of palliative treatment in advanced SCLC, oral etoposide (100 mg given twice daily for 5 days) was compared with intravenous chemotherapy consisting of alternating cycles of cisplatin and etoposide (PE) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV). Six cycles of chemotherapy were administered every 21 days in both regimens. Symptom control and quality of life were measured with the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist and a daily diary card. In January 1996, after 155 patients had been randomly assigned from a projected intake of 365 patients, an independent Data Monitoring Committee examined the interim results. Survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the logrank test was used to compare treatments. For quality-of-life comparisons, average scores were calculated for each time point. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine any significant overall differences between treatments. For the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, separate analyses were done for each subset (psychological well-being, physical symptoms, lung cancer symptoms, treatment symptoms, activity, and quality of life). Response rates and toxicity scores were compared by using chi2. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Survival was inferior at 1 year in the oral etoposide group compared with intravenous therapy (9.8% for oral versus 19.3% for intravenous; difference = 9.5%; 95% confidence interval of difference = 0.3%-18.7%; P<.05), and there was a trend toward inferior overall survival. Median survival was 4.8 months for oral treatment and 5.9 months for intravenous therapy. Progression-free survival was worse in the oral etoposide arm (median = 3.6 months versus 5.6 months; P<.001), as well as overall response rate (32.9% versus 46.3%; P<.01). With the exception of acute nausea and vomiting associated with intravenous chemotherapy, all aspects of symptom control and quality of life were either the same or worse in the oral etoposide group. Study closure was recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

These interim results show that this schedule of oral etoposide is inferior to intravenous chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced SCLC and should not be used as first-line treatment of this disease.

Small cell carcinoma of the lung: an "updated" overview

OBJECTIVES

To review the current status and recent advances, and ongoing research efforts related to the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

DATA SOURCES

Review articles, book chapters, research studies, and abstracts relating to SCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

SCLC is the most aggressive type of lung cancer with many patients having widespread disease at the time of diagnosis. It is the most treatment responsive lung cancer to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with aggressive chemotherapy the cornerstone of treatment. Yet, the survival rate is limited. Several new drugs have been found to be active and it is hoped that they will lead to improved results.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

An understanding of the prognostic factors, staging, treatment modalities, and new therapies for SCLC will help nurses assist patients to make educated decisions about the potential risks and benefits of their therapeutic options.

Age and the treatment of lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The average age of patients with lung cancer is increasing and there are large numbers of elderly symptomatic patients with this common disease. However, there are few data on how the treatment of this group differs from that of younger patients.

METHODS

From 1 January 1990 information was collected for the Southend Lung Cancer Registry on all patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer in a geographically well defined health district of the UK with a population of 325,000. Every effort was made to find new cases from all departments of the hospital, including all clinical diagnoses, histopathological and cytological reports, and necropsies. All death certificates in the district were examined, irrespective of age, for any diagnosis of lung cancer. This therefore included any patient not seen by the hospital services. The differences in initial treatment have been analysed for three age groups: under 65, 65-74 years, and over 75.

RESULTS

The 563 cases of lung cancer diagnosed during a 30 month period were included in the study, of whom 240 (43%) were aged over 75 years. The overall mean age was 71 years (range 31-95). The incidence of lung cancer in the general population was 69 per 100,000, but in men over 75 years of age it rose to 751 per 100,000. For all patients the active treatment rate (chemotherapy, surgery, or radiotherapy) was 49%, but for patients not reviewed by a chest physician (n = 86) it was only 21%. There were large differences in initial treatment between age groups. For patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) reviewed by a chest physician, surgery was undertaken in 18% of those under 65, 12% of the 65-74 age group, and 2.1% of those over 75. For patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) reviewed by a chest physician, 79% of those aged under 65, 64% of the 65-74 age group, and 41% of patients aged over 75 received chemotherapy. In patients with NSCLC reviewed by a chest physician, chemotherapy was given to 21% under 65, 6.4% in the 65-74 age group, and none over 75. If no histological diagnosis was made 37% of patients aged under 75 and only 5.4% of those over 75 received either surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. Patients not reviewed by a chest physician were less likely to have had a histological diagnosis. Differences in treatment rates with age persisted even after allowing for performance score status at presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer is a common disease in the elderly and, in our district, 43% of patients were aged 75 or over at presentation. Age alone appeared to be a major factor in influencing treatment choices, and treatment was more likely if histological confirmation was obtained. Further detailed analysis of the reasons for the differences is needed. Patients referred to chest physicians were more likely to have both histological confirmation and active treatment. This study supports the contention that all patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer, irrespective of age or condition, should be assessed by an accredited chest physician.

Treatment of small cell lung carcinoma in the elderly

BACKGROUND

The number of elderly people with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is increasing and currently nearly 25% are older than 70 years. Elderly patients may not tolerate intensive therapy and, therefore, often do not receive such treatment. Additionally, age may be an independent predictor for response and survival. We compared the investigation, staging procedure, and management of patients less than 60 years, 60 to 69, and older than 70 years who were diagnosed with SCLC between 1985 and 1991. We hypothesized that elderly patients were investigated and treated less aggressively, and that their outcome was poorer than that of younger patients with SCLC.

METHODS

Information on weight loss, performance status, coexisting disease, staging investigations, and treatment was recorded. Treatment was categorized as optimal or suboptimal using predetermined criteria, and correlated with patient age. Toxicity grade, response to treatment, and survival were noted.

RESULTS

There were no differences among the 3 age groups with respect to disease stage, and weight loss, although poorer performance status and comorbidity were more common in those patients older than 70 years. Elderly patients were investigated and treated less aggressively than the 2 younger patient groups. The oldest group received smaller chemotherapy dosage, fewer cycles, and had more dose reductions compared to the younger patients. Only 1 of 81 elderly patients was enrolled on an experimental protocol as compared with 19% and 28% of the younger patient groups. Furthermore, elderly patients had the highest frequency of supportive care alone. There was a significant relationship between advanced age and suboptimal treatment, with those older than 70 years having an odds ratio (OR) of 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.61), for having received optimal treatment. Despite this, survival was similar for younger and older groups of patients (OR 0.89, CI 0.6-1.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients had poorer pre-treatment performance status, greater comorbidity, were more likely to have suboptimal therapy and were almost never entered into clinical trials. Despite this their survival did not differ from that of younger patients with SCLC. Randomized trials of treatment, with assessment of quality of life, are necessary to determine the effect of modified regimens for elderly patients with SCLC.

Phase II study of oral etoposide for patients with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to define the activity and toxicity of etoposide for patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Thirty patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer who progressed after prior chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or both, either as adjuvant therapy or for metastatic disease, were enrolled. There were 26 patients evaluable for response and 30 evaluable for toxicity. Treatment consisted of oral etoposide at a dose of 50 mg/m2/day administered for 21 consecutive days. Doses were modified depending on toxicity. Patients were evaluable for response after at least one cycle of therapy.

RESULTS

One complete response and four partial responses were observed. The overall objective response rate was 19% (5/26). Six patients had stable disease. Toxicity consisted mainly of Grade 4 neutropenia for 24% and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for 13% of patients. There was one death due to neutropenic sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Oral etoposide is an effective, easily administered outpatient regimen with minimal toxicities. Etoposide is effective for patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Fatal pulmonary toxicity following oral etoposide therapy

Oral etoposide has considerable activity in small cell lung cancer and the low risk of toxicity has resulted in the frequent prescription of this agent in elderly or infirmed patients. We describe a case of fatal pulmonary toxicity following the administration of oral etoposide. This is the first report of biopsy-proven pulmonary toxicity associated with this agent.

Weekly carboplatin and VM-26 for elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients are excluded from chemotherapy trials, even though they represent 25% of those with small cell lung cancer. An effective chemotherapy regimen with limited toxicity should be developed with the aim not only of increasing the survival of these patients, but also of improving their quality of life and their independence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients with a median age of 72 years and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were included in the trial. Chemotherapy consisted of a weekly intravenous regimen of Carboplatin 80 mg/m2 and Teniposide 80 mg/m2 administered on an outpatient basis.

RESULTS

Eight patients had limited and 16 extensive disease. After a median of 12 chemotherapy courses (2-31) the overall response rate was 66.7% (95% Cl: 44.7-84.4), with 5 patients in complete and 11 in partial remission. The median overall survival was 33 weeks, with 4 patients alive at more than one year. Improvement of symptoms occurred in 86% of patients. Toxicity, mainly hematological, was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly Carboplatin and VM-26 is an effective and non-toxic regimen for elderly patients, leading to results similar to those obtained with a more intensive regimen in a younger age group.

Schedule-dependent topoisomerase II-inhibiting drugs

A number of topoisomerase II-acting drugs have been described, but few demonstrate schedule-dependent anti-tumour activity. The activity of the epipodophyllotoxins etoposide and teniposide and the acridine dye derivative amsacrine is clearly schedule-dependent, and this related not only to the observation that the activity of topoisomerase II varies throughout the cell cycle but also to the finding that these drugs are rapidly cleared from the cell following exposure, permitting DNA repair. Etoposide has been most clearly shown to be schedule dependent in clinical studies. The response rates of patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving a 24-h infusion was only 10% as compared with 89% when the same dose was given over 5 days. Pharmacokinetic studies performed in these patients demonstrated that although the total systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve, AUC) was the same in both arms of the study, the duration of exposure to low levels of drug (> 1 microgram/ml) was doubled in the 5-day arm. Haematological toxicity was the same in both arms of the study, as was the duration of exposure to higher plasma levels (> 5 micrograms/ml), suggesting that this toxicity may be associated with higher plasma concentrations, whereas anti-tumour activity is related to prolonged exposure to low levels of drug. This was confirmed in a subsequent study, where prolongation of treatment to 8 days compared to 5 days resulted in a similar exposure to low plasma concentrations and no difference in response rates or survival. Haematological toxicity in this study was worse in the 5-day arm, which also had an increase exposure to high levels of drug (> 5 micrograms/ml). More recently, interest has focused on even more prolonged etoposide administration, typically involving small daily doses repeated for 14-21 days. Although this schedule shows high activity in relapsed small-cell lung cancer and lymphoma, it is associated with significant toxicity (around one-third of patients experience grade III/IV leukopenia or neutropenia), which may be related to the observation that the etoposide dose delivered per course in these studies is higher than that obtained with standard dosing over 3-5 days. Further randomised studies are required to determine the optimal dose and schedule of etoposide.

Etoposide: current status and future perspectives in the management of malignant neoplasms

Etoposide has demonstrated highly significant clinical activity against a wide variety of neoplasms, including germ-cell malignancies, small-cell lung cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, leukemias, Kaposi's sarcoma, neuroblastoma, and soft-tissue sarcomas. It is also one of the important agents in the preparatory regimens given prior to bone marrow and peripheral stem-cell rescue. Despite its high degree of efficacy in a number of malignancies, the optimal dose, schedule, and dosing form remain to be defined. It is possible that continuous or prolonged inhibition of the substrate, i. e., topoisomerase II, may be the key factor for the cytotoxic effects of etoposide. Clinical studies have shown the activity of etoposide to be schedule-dependent, with prolonged dosing, best accomplished by the oral dosing form, offering a therapeutic advantage. This benefit awaits validation by prospective randomized studies, some of which are in progress. Recent clinical investigations have focused on the use of etoposide in combination with (a) cytokines to ameliorate myelosuppression, the dose-limiting toxicity of etoposide; (b) agents such as cyclosporin A and verapamil to alter the p-glycoprotein (mdr1) function; and (c) topoisomerase I inhibitors to modulate the substrate upon which it acts. There is continued interest in the development of etoposide to its maximal clinical dimensions and in the examination of alternative biochemical and mechanistic approaches to further our understanding of this highly active agent.

The aged patient with lung cancer. Management recommendations

Elderly patients with lung cancer have not benefited from the therapeutic improvements obtained during the 1980s with younger adults. Potentially operable non-small-cell lung cancers are more common in elderly patients, who are more likely to have localized disease at diagnosis. Even so, elderly patients are rarely treated with surgery. Radiotherapy remains the most frequently adopted tool to treat non-small-cell lung cancer in this age group. Epipodophyllotoxin derivatives constitute the best option for chemotherapy of elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer. When used as single agent regimens, these drugs show the same overall response rate as combination chemotherapy, but with reduced toxicity. Haematopoietic growth factors are used to reduce bone marrow damage following cytotoxic chemotherapy, and may be a promising tool in elderly patients. Special attention should be given to increasing the number of elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer enrolled in phase I and II studies to investigate new agents for the treatment of this tumour.