Efficacy of inhaled salmeterol in the management of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a single centre randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study

Emergency Department Visits Due to Dyspnea: Association with Inhalation Therapy in COPD and Cases with Adverse Drug Reactions

Purpose

Dyspnea is a leading symptom of COPD that causes presentations in emergency departments or negatively impacts on them. Guideline-based inhalation therapies are intended to reduce dyspnea in COPD patients. This study analyzed how common guideline recommended inhalation therapy regimens are occurring in clinical practice among COPD patients presenting to emergency departments due to adverse drug reactions in polytherapy using data of the German ADRED database.

Patients and Methods

In total, 269 COPD cases were identified. In a further analysis, all cases were analyzed for documented GOLD stage and guideline-recommended inhalation therapy for COPD. Dyspnea and other symptoms identified during ED presentation were analyzed and compared between patients who did and did not receive the guideline’s recommended inhalation therapy.

Results

In this observation, 41% (n = 46) of all 112 cases with a documented COPD and GOLD stage received an underdosed therapy according to current guidelines. Dyspnea was the most common identified symptom (32%, n = 36) in this cohort and occurred more often in patients who received an underdosage of inhalation therapy (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Patients with COPD presenting to ED with ADRs show a high rate of non-guideline-recommended inhalation therapy and present more often with dyspnea compared to those COPD patients who received an adequate dosing of inhalation therapy.

Daytime symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

There is no single source of compiled data on symptoms experienced by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when awake and active throughout the day. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence, variability, and burden (i.e., bothersomeness and/or intensity), and the impact of daytime COPD symptoms on other outcomes. The review also evaluated the impact of interventions and the measures/tools used to assess daytime COPD symptoms in patients. A systematic literature search was conducted using the primary search terms "COPD", "symptoms", and "daytime" in EMBASE®, MEDLINE®, MEDLINE® In-Process, and CENTRAL in 2016, followed by an additional search in 2018 to capture any new literature that was published since the last search. Fifty-six articles were included in the review. The accumulated evidence indicated that the symptomatic burden of COPD appears greatest in the morning, particularly upon waking, and that these morning symptoms have a substantial impact on patients' ability to function normally through the day; they also worsen quality of life. A wide variety of tools were used to evaluate symptoms across the studies. The literature also confirmed the importance of pharmacotherapy in the management of daytime COPD symptoms, and in helping normalize daily functioning. More research is needed to better understand how COPD symptoms impact daily functioning and to evaluate COPD symptoms at well-defined periods throughout the day, using validated and uniform measures/tools. This will help clinicians to better define patients' needs and take appropriate action.

Delivering drugs to the lungs: The history of repurposing in the treatment of respiratory diseases

The repurposing of drug delivery by the pulmonary route has been applied to treatment and prophylaxis of an increasingly wide range of respiratory diseases. Repurposing has been most successful for the delivery of inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Repurposing utilizes the advantages that the pulmonary route offers in terms of more targeted delivery to the site of action, the use of smaller doses, and a lower incidence of side-effects. Success has been more variable for other drugs and treatment indications. Pulmonary delivery is now well established for delivery of inhaled antibiotics in cystic fibrosis (CF), and in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Other inhaled treatments such as those for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), lung transplant rejection or tuberculosis may also become routine. Repurposing has progressed in parallel with the development of new drugs, inhaler devices and formulations.

Immediate salbutamol responsiveness does not predict long-term benefits of indacaterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between immediate responsiveness with the short-acting β2-agonist salbutamol and effects of treatment with the ultra-long-acting β2-agonist indacaterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

The REVERBREZ study was a phase IV, multicentre, open-label study in which patients with moderate-to-severe COPD received indacaterol 150 μg once-daily for 5 months. The primary endpoint was the correlation between immediate response of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) post-inhalation of salbutamol (400 μg) at study entry and the change from baseline in trough FEV1 after 1 month of indacaterol. Secondary endpoints included dyspnoea measured by the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade and health-related quality of life measured by the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ).

RESULTS

Of the 602 patients enrolled from 177 centres in France, 543 patients received at least one indacaterol dose, 512 patients completed 1 month of indacaterol treatment (primary endpoint), and 400 patients completed 5 months of treatment. At study entry, mean FEV1 values before and after salbutamol inhalation were 1.54 ± 0.50 L and 1.65 ± 0.53 L, respectively. Based on the magnitude of an immediate response of FEV1 after salbutamol inhalation at study entry, patients were classified into reversible (Rv, ≥12% and ≥200 mL from pre-salbutamol value; n = 106) and non-reversible (NRv, <12% or <200 mL from pre-salbutamol value; n = 431) groups. After 1 month of indacaterol treatment, mean absolute and relative difference in trough FEV1 were 100 mL and 9%, respectively. No significant correlation was found between the immediate FEV1 response to salbutamol at study entry and change from baseline in trough FEV1 after 1 month of indacaterol treatment (correlation coefficient = 0.056 [95% CI;-0.032, 0.144] for absolute response and 0.028 [95% CI;-0.06, 0.116] for relative response). At all subsequent visits, mMRC and CCQ scores, and FEV1 improved from baseline with no significant difference between the Rv and NRv groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate FEV1 response to salbutamol did not predict the long-term benefits observed with indacaterol treatment in patients with COPD. Patients considered reversible or non-reversible to salbutamol showed comparable improvements in lung function, dyspnoea and health-related quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01272362 . Date: January 5, 2011.

Outpatient Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management: Going for the GOLD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States with a burden of $50 billion in direct health care costs. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) defines airflow obstruction as spirometry where the ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity after bronchodilation is less than 0.70. The guidelines also provided graded recommendations on current therapy for COPD. Treatment can be guided based on severity of disease and severity of symptoms. We review the GOLD guidelines to provide an overview of treatment modalities aimed at improving lung function, reducing hospitalization, and reducing mortality.

Role of the fixed combination of fluticasone and salmeterol in adult Chinese patients with asthma and COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common airway disorders characterized by chronic airway inflammation and airflow obstruction, and are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the People's Republic of China. These two diseases pose a high economic burden on the family and the whole of society. Despite evidence-based Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease and Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines being available for the diagnosis and management of COPD and asthma, many of these patients are not properly diagnosed or managed in the People's Republic of China. The value of combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists has been established in the management of asthma and COPD globally. Combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists such as fluticasone and salmeterol, have been shown to be effective for improving symptoms, health status, and reducing exacerbations in both diseases. In this review, we discuss the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy from key studies, particularly in the People's Republic of China.

Effects of formoterol inhaled dry powder on exercise performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study

BACKGROUND

Inhaled bronchodilators commonly are used to reduce the work of breathing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The effects of bronchodilators are assessed in terms of symptom relief and/or improvements in spirometric indices. However, disability in COPD patients also is related to determinants such as exercise tolerance, which cannot be predicted on the basis of respiratory function. The effect of bronchodilators, such as inhaled beta2-agonists, on exercise performance of COPD patients needs to be tested.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effects of formoterol inhaled dry powder on exercise performance assessed using the shuttle walking test (SWT) in patients with mild to moderate COPD.

METHODS

Patients having COPD with mild to moderate airway obstruction performed a pulmonary function test and an SWT before and after inhalation, on 2 consecutive days, of formoterol 12 μg or placebo, given by dry powder inhaler, according to a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study design. Breathlessness was measured using the Borg scale (BS) and a visual analog scale at baseline and after an SWT.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (15 men, 5 women; mean [SD] age, 65.95 [8.32] years) were included in the study. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (P = 0.009), forced mid-expiratory flow (FEF25-75) (P = 0.011), and SWT (P = 0.005) improved significantly more with formoterol than placebo. Breathlessness decreased with formoterol, but the difference compared with placebo was statistically significant only when measured using the BS (P = 0.023). In the pooled placebo and formoterol tests, changes in the SWT were unrelated to changes in FEV1 (r = 0.18) and in FEF25-75 (r = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed that formoterol inhaled dry powder significantly improved exercise performance in patients with COPD and that this effect was at least partially independent of achieved bronchodilation. A larger cohort of patients should be studied and a more comprehensive protocol performed to verify whether the increase in exercise tolerance after administration of formoterol is related to a decrease in expiratory flow limitation during exercise and/or to systemic effects of the drug. Another issue to be clarified is whether the improvement in exercise capacity can significantly decrease disability in patients with severe COPD.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: the potential role of indacaterol

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is becoming a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in China, with tobacco smoking, biomass fuel use and genetic susceptibility being the major risk factors. COPD poses a high economic burden with the total expenditure per patient costing 40% and nearly one-third of an average family income in urban and rural areas of China, respectively. Despite the use of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy document being recommended for the diagnosis and management of COPD, the majority of patients with COPD go undiagnosed or are not managed appropriately by physicians. Long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) have long been used for symptomatic management of COPD, with salmeterol and formoterol being the commonly used twice-daily treatments. Indacaterol is the first once-daily LABA, approved at a dose of 150 µg once daily in China. Several phase III studies have shown that indacaterol 150 µg improves lung function, breathlessness, health status, exacerbations, rescue medication use and symptoms, as compared with placebo and other bronchodilators, in patients with COPD, with a rapid onset of action following first dose and a good safety and tolerability profile. In this review we elaborate on the efficacy and safety results from several such studies.

Aclidinium Bromide: Clinical Benefit in Patients with Moderate to Severe COPD

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Long-acting bronchodilators are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of inhaled aclidinium bromide, a novel long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator, for the treatment of COPD.

METHOD

This systematic review explored the efficacy and safety of aclidinium bromide in comparison with placebo and other long-acting bronchodilators for treatment of moderate to severe COPD. Randomised controlled trials were identified through systematic searches of different databases of published trials.

RESULTS

Ten trials (3.922 participants) were included. Aclidinium bromide appears to be a safe and well-tolerated long-acting anti-cholinergic bronchodilator with a relatively fast onset of action. Compared with other long-acting bronchodilators, including tiotropium bromide, aclidinium bromide leads to at least similar clinically important improvements in level of FEV(1), health status, use of rescue medication, and day-time dyspnea scores in patients suffering from moderate to severe COPD. With twice-daily dosing, aclidinium bromide may have clinically important effect on night-time symptom scores in COPD patients, but further studies are needed in order to permit valid conclusions with regard to this point. The effect of aclidinium bromide on exercise tolerance, as assessed by exercise endurance time, and dynamic hyperinflation in patients with moderate to severe COPD seems to be at least comparable to other long-acting bronchodilators, incl. tiotropium bromide and indacaterol. Aclidinium bromide might reduce the rate of exacerbations in COPD patients, but conclusions must await further long-term controlled trials.

CONCLUSION

Aclidinium bromide has effects on relevant COPD outcome measures, including level of FEV(1), similar to other long-acting bronchodilators, and therefore seems to have the potential for a significant role in the future management of moderate to severe COPD.

Once-daily glycopyrronium bromide, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review of clinical benefit

Background:

Long-acting bronchodilators are central in the pharmacological management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the studies evaluating the safety and clinical efficacy of inhaled glycopyrronium bromide, a novel long-acting muscarinic antagonist, in patients with COPD.

Methods:

This study was performed as a systematic literature review.

Results:

Inhaled glycopyrronium bromide seems to be a safe and well tolerated long-acting muscarinic antagonist with a fast onset of action. In patients suffering from moderate to severe COPD, glycopyrronium bromide has clinically important effects on level of forced expiratory volume in one second, use of relief medication, percentage of days with no use of rescue medication, daytime dyspnea scores, and probably also on health status. Furthermore, in this group of patients, glycopyrronium bromide has beneficial effects on dynamic hyperinflation and exercise tolerance. Glycopyrronium bromide has been shown to reduce the rate of exacerbations in patients with moderate to severe COPD, but long-term controlled trials with exacerbation rate as the primary outcome variable have not been published yet.

Conclusion:

Once-daily inhaled glycopyrronium bromide has characteristics important for use in COPD, including a fast onset of action, sustained 24-hour bronchodilatation, and improvement in exercise tolerance, and therefore appears to have the potential for a significant role in the future management of COPD.

24-hour bronchodilation following a single dose of the novel β(2)-agonist olodaterol in COPD

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend long-acting bronchodilators as maintenance therapy in COPD when symptoms are not adequately controlled with short-acting agents. Olodaterol is a novel long-acting β(2)-adrenoceptor agonist with a pre-clinical profile that suggests 24-h bronchodilation may be achieved with once-daily administration.

OBJECTIVE

To assess dose- and time-response in terms of bronchodilator efficacy, and to evaluate pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of single doses of olodaterol administered via Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ Inhaler in COPD patients.

METHODS

A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-way crossover study including 24-h spirometry (FEV(1), FVC), safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (in a subset of patients) following dosing of olodaterol 2 μg, 5 μg, 10 μg and 20 μg; the washout period between test-days was at least 14 days. Primary endpoint of the study was the 24-h post-dosing FEV(1). Patients participating in the pharmacokinetic assessments continued in an open-label extension phase to establish pharmacokinetics of olodaterol 40 μg.

RESULTS

36 patients were assigned to treatment; mean baseline prebronchodilator FEV(1) was 1.01 L (37% predicted normal). All doses of olodaterol provided significantly greater bronchodilation compared to placebo in 24-h FEV(1) post-dose (p < 0.001); a clear dose-response relationship was observed, with values ranging from 0.070 L for olodaterol 2 μg to 0.119 L for olodaterol 20 μg. Similarly, olodaterol was superior to placebo (p < 0.001) in peak FEV(1) (0.121 L to 0.213 L) and average FEV(1) both during the daytime (0-12 h; ranging from 0.099 L to 0.184 L) and night-time (12-24 h; ranging from 0.074 L to 0.141 L). FVC results were consistent with those observed for FEV(1). Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the peak plasma concentrations and renal excretion suggested no obvious deviation from dose-proportionality over the investigated dose range of 2 μg-40 μg; in most patients, no plasma levels could be detected following the 2 μg dose. All treatments were well tolerated with no apparent dose relation in terms of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Olodaterol appears to be a promising long-acting β(2)-adrenoceptor agonist,with bronchodilation maintained over 24 h that offers an opportunity for once-daily dosing in patients who require maintenance bronchodilator therapy for the management of COPD symptoms.

Bronchodilator efficacy of single doses of indacaterol in Japanese patients with COPD: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Indacaterol is an investigational, novel, inhaled once-daily ultra-long-acting beta-2 agonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study evaluated the 24-h bronchodilatory efficacy and safety of indacaterol in Japanese patients with COPD.

METHODS

This Phase-II, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study comprised four double-blind, single-dose treatment periods (washout between periods: 14-28 days). Japanese patients aged 40-75 years with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomised to receive single doses of indacaterol (150, 300, or 600 microg) or placebo via a single-dose dry-powder inhaler. Efficacy (primary endpoint: standardised FEV(1)AUC(22-24h)) and safety were assessed for 24 h post-dose in each treatment period.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients randomised (92% male; mean age, 67.2 years), 45 completed the study. Standardised FEV(1)AUC(22-24h) was significantly higher for all indacaterol doses as compared with placebo, with clinically relevant differences of 130, 160, and 170 mL for 150, 300, and 600 microg, respectively (P < 0.001). The improvement in FEV(1) was seen as early as 5 min post-dose with indacaterol and sustained for 24 h (P < 0.001 vs placebo at all time points). All indacaterol doses were well tolerated and showed no clinically meaningful effect on pulse rate, blood pressure, QTc interval, and laboratory parameters when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Japanese COPD population studied, single doses of indacaterol (150, 300, and 600 microg) provided sustained 24-h bronchodilation, with onset of action within 5 min post-dose. All doses were well tolerated. These results are consistent with data from Caucasian populations.

Sustained 24-hour efficacy of once daily indacaterol (300 μg) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized, crossover study

PURPOSE

Indacaterol is a novel, once daily, inhaled ultra-long-acting β₂-agonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here we compared the 24-h spirometry profile of once daily indacaterol 300 μg with that of placebo and twice daily salmeterol 50 μg in patients with COPD.

METHODS

This randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, crossover study comprised three 14-day treatment periods (with 14-day washouts). Patients (male/female ≥ 40 years) with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized to receive double-blind indacaterol 300 μg or placebo once daily, or open-label salmeterol 50 μg twice daily. The primary outcome measure was 24-h post-dose (trough) FEV₁ (mean of FEV₁ at 23 h 10 min and 23 h 45 min post-indacaterol dose) after 14 days. FEV₁ was assessed at multiple time points on Days 1 and 14 of each treatment period. Safety and tolerability were also monitored.

RESULTS

Of 68 randomized patients, 61 completed. Trough FEV₁ (primary endpoint) on Day 14 for indacaterol was 200 mL higher than placebo (p < 0.001), exceeding the prespecified minimum clinically important difference (120 mL), and was 90 mL higher than for salmeterol (p = 0.011). After Day 1, trough FEV(1) for indacaterol was 150 mL higher than placebo (p < 0.001). Indacaterol provided superior bronchodilation compared with placebo (p < 0.001) across the full 24-h assessment period on Days 1 and 14. In addition, on both days, indacaterol provided superior FEV₁ compared with salmeterol (p < 0.05) at many post-baseline time points, including 5 min post-dose. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Once daily indacaterol 300 μg produced effective sustained 24-h bronchodilation from the first dose, an efficacy profile superior to placebo and twice daily salmeterol. Given its effective bronchodilation with once daily dosing, indacaterol is likely to be a useful treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.

Guideline-oriented perioperative management of patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Increased airway hyperresponsiveness is a major concern in the perioperative management of patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Guidelines using evidence-based medicine are continually being updated and published regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of these respiratory disorders. Perioperative management in these patients involves: (1) adequate control of airway hyperresponsiveness, including detection of purulent sputum and infection before surgery; (2) evidence-based control of anesthesia; and (3) the aggressive use of beta-2 adrenergic stimulants and the systemic administration of steroids for the treatment of acute attacks. Good preoperative control, including the use of leukotriene antagonists, can reduce the incidence of life-threatening perioperative complications. Awareness of recent guidelines is thus important in the management of patients with airway hyperresponsiveness. This review covers the most recent guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Potential adverse effects of bronchodilators in the treatment of airways obstruction in older people: recommendations for prescribing

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common disorders that are associated with increasing morbidity and mortality in older people. Bronchodilators are used widely in patients with these conditions, but even when used in inhaled form can have systemic as well as local effects. Older people experience more adverse drug effects because of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic changes and particularly drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. Cardiovascular disease is common in older people and beta-adrenoceptor agonists (beta-agonists) have inotropic and chronotropic effects that can increase arrhythmias and cardiomyopathy. They can also worsen or induce myocardial ischaemia and cause electrolyte disturbances that contribute to arrhythmias. Tremor is a well known distressing adverse effect of beta-agonist administration. Long-term beta-agonist use can be associated with tolerance, poor disease control, sudden life-threatening exacerbations and asthma-related deaths. Functional beta2-adrenoceptors are present in osteoblasts, and chronic use of beta-agonists has been implicated in osteoporosis. Inhaled anticholinergics are usually well tolerated but may cause dry mouth, which can be troublesome in older people. Pupillary dilatation, blurred vision and acute glaucoma can occur from escape of droplets from loosely fitting nebulizer masks. Although ECG changes have not been seen in randomized controlled trials of long-acting inhaled anticholinergics, supraventricular tachycardias have been observed in a 5-year randomized controlled trial of ipratropium bromide. Paradoxical bronchoconstriction can occur with inhaled anticholinergics as well as with beta-agonists, but tolerance has not been reported with anticholinergics. Anticholinergic drugs also cause central effects, most notably impairment of cognitive function, and these effects have been noted with inhaled agents. Use of theophylline is limited by its adverse effects, which range from commonly occurring gastrointestinal symptoms to palpitations, arrhythmias and reports of myocardial infarction. Seizures have been reported, but are rare. Theophylline is metabolized primarily by the liver, and commonly interacts with other medications. Its concentration in plasma should be monitored closely, especially in older people. Although many clinical trials have been conducted on bronchodilators in obstructive airways disease, the results of these clinical trials need to be interpreted with caution as older people are often under-represented and subjects with co-morbidities actively excluded from these trials.

Canadian Thoracic Society recommendations for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - 2007 update

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major respiratory illness in Canada that is both preventable and treatable. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of this complex condition continues to grow and our ability to offer effective treatment to those who suffer from it has improved considerably. The purpose of the present educational initiative of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) is to provide up to date information on new developments in the field so that patients with this condition will receive optimal care that is firmly based on scientific evidence. Since the previous CTS management recommendations were published in 2003, a wealth of new scientific information has become available. The implications of this new knowledge with respect to optimal clinical care have been carefully considered by the CTS Panel and the conclusions are presented in the current document. Highlights of this update include new epidemiological information on mortality and prevalence of COPD, which charts its emergence as a major health problem for women; a new section on common comorbidities in COPD; an increased emphasis on the meaningful benefits of combined pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies; and a new discussion on the prevention of acute exacerbations. A revised stratification system for severity of airway obstruction is proposed, together with other suggestions on how best to clinically evaluate individual patients with this complex disease. The results of the largest randomized clinical trial ever undertaken in COPD have recently been published, enabling the Panel to make evidence-based recommendations on the role of modern pharmacotherapy. The Panel hopes that these new practice guidelines, which reflect a rigorous analysis of the recent literature, will assist caregivers in the diagnosis and management of this common condition.

Inhaled therapy for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Bronchodilators (anticholinergic drugs and beta2-agonist drugs) represent the mainstay of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment and can be combined with inhaled corticosteroids for greater efficacy. This review examines the role of short- and long-acting cholinergic drugs, together with that of short- and long-acting beta2-agonist drugs. A brief analysis of the long-term use of corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is made, with a review of the safety and possible side effects. Combination therapy is more frequently used due to its practicality and capacity to enhance compliance. The main studies on treatment combinations are also analyzed in this paper.

New Modalities of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Pulmonary rehabilitation has been shown to be an important part of the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Exercise training is the corner stone of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD and has been shown to improve health-related quality of life and exercise capacity. Nevertheless, not every COPD patient responds well to pulmonary rehabilitation. Future trials should focus on new additions to conventional pulmonary rehabilitation programmes to optimise its effects on health-related quality of life, exercise capacity, body composition and muscle function in patients with COPD. Therefore, a patient-tailored approach is inevitable. Advantages and disadvantages of new modalities of pulmonary rehabilitation will be outlined in detail, including the following: endurance training and long-acting bronchodilatators; endurance training and technical modalities (inspiratory pressure support and inspiratory muscle training); interval training; resistance training; transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation; and exercise training and supplements (oxygen, oral creatine, anabolic steroids and polyunsaturated fatty acids). Based on well defined baseline characteristics, patients should most probably be individually selected. At present, these new modalities of pulmonary rehabilitation have been shown to improve body composition, skeletal muscle function and sometimes also exercise capacity. However, the translation to an improved health-related quality of life is mostly lacking, and cost effectiveness and long-term effects have not been studied. Moreover, future trials should study the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in elderly patients with restrictive pulmonary diseases.

Investigation of barriers to clinical practice guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy in the treatment of COPD

BACKGROUND

The adoption of clinical practice guideline recommendations for COPD is suboptimal. Determining the barriers to the implementation of these practice guidelines may help improve patient care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether barriers to the use of pharmacotherapy according to practice guidelines are related primarily to patient or prescriber factors.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. Members of a health maintenance organization identified as having spirometry-defined COPD ranging from stage II to IV. Electronic medical records were reviewed for documentation of the following: 1) patient affordability issues, 2) history of an adverse drug reaction, 3) history of inefficacy to therapy, and 4) prescription history.

RESULTS

A total of 111 medical records were reviewed. There were 51% of patients who had not filled medications that had been prescribed in accordance with guidelines and 43% did not have the guideline recommended medications prescribed in the previous year. Only 4% and 2% of patients had documented inefficacy and affordability issues, respectively. There were no reported cases of adverse drug reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight to the acceptance of COPD treatment recommendations by patients and providers. Further research is needed to design interventions to reduce barriers and optimize COPD treatment.

Ipratropium bromide versus long-acting beta-2 agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a condition associated with high morbidity, mortality and cost to the community. Patients often report symptomatic improvement with long acting beta-2 agonists (LABAs) and anticholinergic bronchodilator medications, both of which are recommended in COPD guidelines. These medications have different mechanisms of action and therefore theoretically could have an additive effect when combined. As these medications are prescribed in COPD as long term therapy, it is important to assemble reliable evidence on their relative and additive effects.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative efficacy and safety of regular long term use (at least four weeks) of ipratropium bromide and LABA in patients with stable COPD. Comparisons were made between single agents and in combination versus LABAs alone.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials (August 2005) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted drug companies for relevant trial data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing treatment for at least four weeks with an anticholinergic agent (ipratropium bromide) alone or in combination with LABA versus LABA alone, delivered via metered dose inhaler or nebuliser, in non-asthmatic adult subjects with stable COPD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently performed data extraction and study quality assessment. We contacted study authors and pharmaceutical companies for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria of the review (2652 participants). Monotherapy comparison (six studies): There was a significantly greater change in favour of salmeterol in morning PEF and FEV1. There were no significant differences in quality of life, exacerbations, or symptoms. Formoterol appeared to confer some benefits over ipratropium treatment in terms of morning peak flow. Combination comparison (three studies): There was a significant improvement in post-bronchodilator lung function, supplemental short-acting beta-agonist use and HRQL in favour of combination therapy compared with salmeterol alone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available data from the trials suggest that there is little difference between regular long term use of IpB alone and salmeterol if the aim is to improve COPD symptoms and exercise tolerance. However, salmeterol was more effective in improving lung function variables. In terms of post-bronchodilator lung function, combination therapy conferred modest benefits and a significant improvement in HRQL, and reduced supplemental short-acting beta-agonist requirement, although this effect was not consistent. Additional studies are needed to assess the relative effects of combining therapies, using validated subjective measurements, and should consider concordance and the convenience of people having to use different inhaler devices.

Long-acting beta2-agonists for poorly reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by partially reversible airflow limitation. Many patients have little reversibility to short acting bronchodilators, but long acting bronchodilators are frequently advocated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of long acting beta-2 adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) in COPD patients demonstrating poor reversibility to short-acting bronchodilators.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register was searched ('all years' to 2005) along with the reference lists from identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs comparing inhaled LABAs (salmeterol or formoterol) with placebo in the treatment of patients with stable, poorly reversible COPD. Studies were a minimum of four weeks in duration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently performed data extraction and study quality assessment. If we required additional data, we contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies sponsoring the identified RCTs.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-three published and unpublished studies (6061 participants) were included in the review. There was a significant change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in favour of salmeterol 50 mcg twice daily (BID) of 51 mls (95% confidence intervals (CI) 32 to 70), end of study morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 14.89 L/min (95% CI 10.86 to 18.91). Supplemental short-acting bronchodilator usage was reduced by just under one puff per day. There were significant differences in the total, activity and impact domain scores of the St George's respiratory questionnaire in favour of salmeterol 50 mcg BID. Findings from other health status measurements and symptom scores were conflicting. There was no significant difference in exercise tolerance. The number of participants experiencing exacerbations was significantly reduced with salmeterol 50 mcg treatment compared with placebo (numbers needed to treat to benefit 21).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that the treatment of patients with COPD with salmeterol 50 mcg produces modest increases in lung function. There were varying effects for other important outcomes such as health related quality of life or reduction in symptoms. However, there was a consistent reduction in exacerbations which may help people with COPD who suffer frequent deterioration of symptoms prompting healthcare utilisation. The strength of evidence for the use of salmeterol 100 mcg, formoterol 12 mcg, 18 mcg, 24 mcg was insufficient to provide clear indications for practice.

Ipratropium bromide versus short acting beta-2 agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a condition associated with high morbidity, mortality and cost to the community. Patients often report symptomatic improvement with short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) and anticholinergic bronchodilator medications, and both are recommended in COPD guidelines. These medications have different mechanisms of action and therefore could have an additive effect when combined.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative efficacy and safety of regular long term use (at least four weeks) of ipratropium bromide and short- acting beta-2 agonist therapy in patients with stable COPD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials was searched. Bibliographies were checked to identify relevant cross-references. Drug companies were contacted for relevant trial data. The searches are current to August 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing at least 4 weeks of treatment with an anticholinergic agent (ipratropium bromide) alone or in combination with a beta-2 agonist (short acting) versus the beta-2 agonist alone, delivered via metered dose inhaler or nebuliser, in non-asthmatic adult subjects with stable COPD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and study quality assessment was performed independently by three reviewers. Authors of studies and relevant manufacturers were contacted if data were missing.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies (3912 participants) met the inclusion criteria of the review. Small benefits of ipratropium over a short-acting beta-2 agonist were demonstrated on lung function outcomes. There were small benefits in favour of ipratropium on quality of life (HRQL), as well as a reduction in the requirement for oral steroids. Combination therapy with ipratropium plus a short-acting beta-2 agonist conferred benefits over a short-acting beta-2 agonist alone in terms of post-bronchodilator lung function. There was no significant benefit of combination therapy in subjective improvements in HRQL, but again there was a reduction in the requirement for oral steroids.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available data from the trials included in this review suggest that the advantage of regular long term use of ipratropium alone or in combination with a short-acting beta-2 agonist or over a beta-2 agonist alone are small, if the aim is to improve lung function, symptoms and exercise tolerance. Until further data are available, the strategy of providing a short-acting beta-2 agonist on a PRN basis, and then either continuing with the short-acting beta-2 agonist regularly or conducting an "n of 1" trial of regular beta-2 agonist or regular anticholinergic to determine the treatment that gives the best relief of symptoms (and continuing with it), would seem cost effective. This strategy does need formal evaluation. Patient preference is also important, as is the relative importance of avoiding the use of systemic corticosteroids.

Effects of Tiotropium With and Without Formoterol on Airflow Obstruction and Resting Hyperinflation in Patients With COPD

BACKGROUND

The combination of short-acting beta(2)-agonists and anticholinergics in the treatment of COPD has been well documented, but data on combination of long-acting agents are lacking.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study was conducted comparing 2-week treatment periods of tiotropium alone to tiotropium plus formoterol once or twice daily following a 2-week pretreatment period with tiotropium. Lung function (FEV(1), FVC, and resting inspiratory capacity [IC]) serially over 24 h was measured in 95 patients with stable COPD at baseline and after 2 weeks of each treatment.

RESULTS

Mean baseline FEV(1) was 1.05 L (38% of predicted). There was a circadian variation in FEV(1), FVC, and IC at baseline that was maintained during all treatment periods. Average FEV(1) (0 to 24 h) improved by 0.08 L with tiotropium, by 0.16 L with tiotropium plus formoterol once daily, and by 0.20 L with tiotropium plus formoterol twice daily (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Compared with tiotropium alone, add-on formoterol in the morning produced improvement in FEV(1), FVC, and IC for > 12 h. The second add-on dose of formoterol in the evening caused further improvement in FEV(1) for 12 h, but in FVC and IC for < 12 h. Peak increase in FEV(1) was 0.23 L (22% of baseline) with tiotropium and 0.39 L (37% of baseline) with tiotropium plus formoterol (p < 0.0001). Compared with tiotropium alone, add-on formoterol once and twice daily reduced the use of rescue salbutamol during the daytime (p < 0.01) and with add-on formoterol twice daily also during the nighttime (p < 0.05). The combination of tiotropium and formoterol was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of COPD, there is benefit from adding formoterol once or twice daily to tiotropium once daily in terms of improvement in airflow obstruction, resting hyperinflation, and the use of rescue salbutamol.

Pharmacological treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

None of the drugs currently available for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are able to reduce the progressive decline in lung function which is the hallmark of this disease. Smoking cessation is the only intervention that has proved effective. The current pharmacological treatment of COPD is symptomatic and is mainly based on bronchodilators, such as selective beta2-adrenergic agonists (short- and long-acting), anticholinergics, theophylline, or a combination of these drugs. Glucocorticoids are not generally recommended for patients with stable mild to moderate COPD due to their lack of efficacy, side effects, and high costs. However, glucocorticoids are recommended for severe COPD and frequent exacerbations of COPD. New pharmacological strategies for COPD need to be developed because the current treatment is inadequate.

Eformoterol n-of-1 trials in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease poorly reversible to salbutamol

AIMS

Benefits of long acting beta 2 agonists are unclear for severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with poor response to short acting bronchodilators. We aimed to evaluate 1) effects of eformoterol in such patients using a 'n-of-1' double crossover study design, and 2) aggregate data as a double-blind, double crossover randomized control trial.

METHODS

Subjects with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) < 60% predicted, and poor response to short acting bronchodilators were studied six times over 18 weeks. During that time they were prescribed four weeks of either eformoterol or placebo, followed by the alternate, and then a second crossover. Four-weekly measures included six minute walk distance (6MWD), FEV1, previous two weeks of symptoms, and chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ) including treatment goal items.

RESULTS

Of 27 original subjects (21 male, mean age of 70 years, five smokers, mean prebronchodilator FEV1 36% predicted), one subject had clinically significant concordant improvement in the CRQ dyspnoea domain and 6MWD (by 51 metres), but not for other outcomes. There were no concordant improvements in any other subjects. Aggregate double crossover data analysis demonstrated no improvement in any outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'n-of-1' study design and aggregate data analysis demonstrated lack of benefit from eformoterol in COPD patients with poor response to short acting bronchodilators.

Early onset of effect of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Combined treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long acting beta2 agonists is approved for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but little is known about the onset of effect of the combination.

METHODS

Data were used from 1465 patients with COPD entered into a large 1 year double blind trial with daily measurements of peak expiratory flow (PEF) and symptom scores.

RESULTS

PEF was significantly higher after 1 day in patients treated with salmeterol 50 microg twice daily or the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination 50/500 microg twice daily than placebo. In patients treated with fluticasone propionate 500 microg twice daily alone, PEF differed from placebo after 2 days. The differences after 2 weeks compared with placebo were 16 l/min (95% confidence interval (CI) 11 to 21), 11 l/min (95% CI 6 to 16), and 27 l/min (95% CI 22 to 33) for salmeterol, fluticasone propionate, and the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination, respectively. For all treatments the effect on PEF after 2 weeks was comparable to that seen at the end of the study. The difference between the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination and placebo after 2 weeks as a percentage of baseline was similar for PEF and clinic forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Differences in breathlessness scores were statistically significant after 1 day for the group treated with salmeterol alone and after 2 days for the combination group. The 2 week change in FEV1 was only partly indicative of a long term response in individual patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate, alone or in combination, on PEF and breathlessness are seen within days and most of the obtainable effect on these parameters is reached within 2 weeks.

The Rationale for Pharmacologic Therapy in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

The structural changes in airways and alveoli that characterize chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) result from an abnormal and persistent inflammatory reaction to inhaled noxious particles or gases, notably tobacco smoke. This remodeling of the lung leads to irreversible airflow obstruction. However, COPD should be viewed by clinicians as a treatable condition, since most patients with COPD have an additional reversible component related to increased bronchomotor tone. The use of bronchodilators, especially anticholinergics and beta2-agonists, results in a reduction in airway smooth muscle tone and airflow resistance; this translates into marked improvement in significant clinical outcomes such as dyspnea, quality of life, and exercise capacity. An increasing amount of evidence supports the idea that long-acting agents have more significant impact in these parameters than the short-acting preparations.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Tulobuterol in the Treatment of Stable COPD: An Open-Label Comparison with Inhaled Salmeterol

BACKGROUND

Long-acting bronchodilators are recommended for the management of stable COPD to relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. The tulobuterol patch (Hokunalin) is a transdermal patch preparation of the beta2-adrenoceptor agonist (beta2-agonist) tulobuterol designed to yield sustained beta(2)-agonistic effects for 24 hours when applied once daily.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of tulobuterol patch and inhaled salmeterol (Serevent Diskus) in the treatment of stable COPD.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinically stable COPD patients (age > or = 40 years, postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC <70%, and postbronchodilator FEV1 <80% predicted) were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label randomized study. After a 2-week run-in period, patients were administered either tulobuterol (2mg once-daily applied as a patch) or salmeterol (50 microg per inhalation, twice a day) for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Data for 92 patients (46 each for each treatment group) were analyzed. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics in the tulobuterol versus salmeterol groups: age, 69.2 +/- 7.4 vs 71.6 +/- 7.3 years; male, 91% versus 96%; and patients with stage II (III) COPD, 32.6% (67.4%) versus 50% (50%). FEV1, FVC, and PEF improved during treatment in both groups compared with baseline, with no significant between group differences. The total St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score was significantly improved relative to baseline in the tulobuterol group at 8 weeks (-4.7 units [U]), but not in the salmeterol group at all timepoints. Domain analysis of the SGRQ scores revealed significant improvement in the symptom score relative to baseline in the tulobuterol group at weeks 4 (-6.9U), 8 (-12.0U), and 12 (-11.7U), but not in the salmeterol group in any of the domains tested. Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score improved during treatment in both groups, with no significant differences between groups. Compliance with the treatment regimen was significantly better in the tulobuterol than in the salmeterol group (98.5% vs 94.1%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that once-daily transdermal sustained-release tulobuterol is as effective or better than the inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol in the management of stable COPD, with significant effects on quality of life.

Measuring symptom response to pharmacological interventions in patients with COPD: a review of instruments used in clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

To identify and evaluate the instruments used to measure the effect of pharmacological intervention on symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in clinical trials.

DESIGN

An extensive literature search was conducted for articles published in English in a peer-reviewed journal from 1995 to March 2002 which described a randomised controlled clinical trial measuring symptoms of COPD in response to pharmacological interventions.

PATIENTS

Patients with any severity of COPD.

INTERVENTIONS

Any pharmacological intervention for treatment of COPD.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

A total of 43 eligible articles were identified. The individual symptoms most frequently measured were dyspnoea/breathlessness, chest tightness or discomfort and exacerbations. There was considerable variability in the methods, terminology and symptom measurement instruments used. The most widely used instruments for measuring dyspnoea were the Borg scale, the Baseline Dyspnoea Index and the Transitional Dyspnoea Index. None of the instruments used had published evidence of rigorous psychometric testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous methods have been employed to assess the symptoms of COPD in clinical trials, making it difficult to compare the results of different trials. No single measurement instrument predominates, and none of the measures identified in the review have undergone rigorous psychometric testing in this patient population. There is a clear need for a fully developed and validated tool for measuring the effects of therapeutic interventions on symptoms in COPD in clinical trials.

A benefit-risk assessment of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists in the management of obstructive pulmonary disease

The two inhaled long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, have been studied extensively since their introduction in the early 1990s. In this review we consider the evidence for their efficacy and safety in adults with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), by reviewing long-term prospective studies in which these drugs have been compared with placebo or an alternative bronchodilator. We have also assessed safety, including data from postmarketing surveillance studies and case-control studies using large databases. In patients with asthma, salmeterol and formoterol increase lung function, reduce asthmatic symptoms and improve quality of life when compared with placebo. Both drugs protect against exercise-induced asthma, although some tolerance develops with regular use. Tolerance to the bronchodilator effects of formoterol has also been seen, although this is small and most of the beneficial effects are maintained long-term. Both drugs have been shown to reduce asthma exacerbations but only in studies in which most patients were taking an inhaled corticosteroid. Adding a long-acting beta2-agonist provided better control than increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroid in several studies. Long-acting beta2-agonists also provide better asthma control than use of regular short-acting beta2-agonists and theophylline. Their relative efficacy compared with leukotriene antagonists is uncertain as yet. Formoterol appears to be at least as safe and effective as a short-acting beta2-agonist when used on an 'as required' basis. In patients with COPD, both salmeterol and formoterol offer improved lung function and reduced COPD symptoms compared with placebo, and quality of life has been improved in some studies. Some tolerance to the bronchodilating effect of salmeterol was seen in one study. Most studies have not found a significant reduction in exacerbations in COPD. Both drugs have provided greater benefit than ipratropium bromide or theophylline; there are limited data on tiotropium bromide. The long-acting beta2-agonists cause predictable adverse effects including headache, tremor, palpitations, muscle cramps and a fall in serum potassium concentration. Salmeterol can also cause paradoxical bronchospasm. There is some evidence that serious adverse events including dysrhythmias and life-threatening asthma episodes can occur; however, the incidence of such events is very low but may be increased in patients not taking an inhaled corticosteroid. Salmeterol 50 microg twice daily and formoterol 12 microg twice daily are effective and safe in treating patients with asthma and COPD. Higher doses cause more adverse effects, although serious adverse events are rare.

Management of severe COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and the burden of the disorder will continue to increase over the next 20 years despite medical intervention. Apart from smoking cessation, no approach or agent affects the rate of decline in lung function and progression of the disease. Especially in the later phase, COPD is a multicomponent disorder, and various integrated intervention strategies are needed as part of the optimum management programme. This seminar describes largely non-pharmacological interventions aimed at improving health status and function of disabled patients. Exacerbations become progressively more troublesome as baseline lung function declines, commonly necessitating hospital admission and associated with the development of acute respiratory failure.

Long acting beta2 agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with poor reversibility: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Background

The long acting β2-agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, have been recommended, by some, as first line treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We reviewed evidence of efficacy and safety when compared with placebo or anticholinergic agents in patients with poorly reversible COPD.

Methods

After searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, BIOSIS Previews, PASCAL, ToxFile, SciSearch, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed, as well as Web sites, selected journals, reference lists, and contacting drug manufacturers, two reviewers independently screened reports of randomised controlled trials of parallel or crossover design lasting four weeks or longer and including patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ≤ 75% of predicted, a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) ≤ 88% of predicted, and < 15% improvement from baseline FEV1 after a dose of a β2 agonist. We included trials comparing salmeterol or formoterol with placebo or with ipratropium bromide and reporting one of these outcomes: lung function; exercise capacity; quality of life scores; dyspnea; exacerbations; rescue inhaler use; incidence of tachycardia, hypokalemia, or dry mouth. Two reviewers assessed the quality of included reports using the Jadad scale and allocation concealment, and abstracted data.

Results

Twelve trials satisfied our inclusion criteria; eight were high quality (Jadad score >2) and four were low quality (≤ 2). The adequacy of allocation concealment was unclear in all of them. We did not perform a meta-analysis due to differences in trial design and how outcomes were reported.

Two trials comparing salmeterol with ipratropium did not detect differences; one trial comparing formoterol and ipratropium described greater improvement with formoterol in morning PEFR (15.3 versus 7.1 l/min, p = 0.040).

Of twelve trials comparing long acting β2 agonists with placebo, six reported no improvement in exercise capacity, eleven reported improvements in FEV1 lung function (one reported no improvement), six reported less rescue inhaler usage (one reported no difference) and five reported improved dyspnea scores (two reported no improvement). Differences in quality of life were detected in one salmeterol trial ; however, two salmeterol, and one formoterol trial reported no differences. Adverse effects of interest were not reported.

Conclusion

In terms of clinical outcomes and safety, we could not find convincing evidence that salmeterol and formoterol have demonstrated advantages to ipratropium, a less expensive drug, for patients with stable COPD and poor reversibility. Compared to placebo, we found evidence of reduced rescue inhaler usage and improved spirometric outcomes without a significant impact on quality of life or exercise capacity.

Co-morbidity and acute decompensations of COPD requiring non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and the impact of chronic and/or acute non-respiratory co-morbidity on short and longer-term outcome of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in acute decompensations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF).

DESIGN AND SETTING

An observational study in a three-bed respiratory monitoring unit in a respiratory ward of a non-university hospital.

PATIENTS

We grouped 120 consecutive COPD patients requiring NIPPV for AHRF (pH 7.28+/-0.05, PaO2/FIO2 ratio 192+/-63, PaCO2 78.3+/-12.3 mmHg) according to whether NIPPV succeeded (n=98) or failed (n=22) in avoiding the need for endotracheal intubation and whether alive (n=77) or dead (n=42) at 6 months.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The prevalence of chronic and acute co-morbidity was, respectively, 20% and 41.7%; most of the cases were cardiovascular. In-hospital NIPPV failure was greater in patients with than in those without chronic (33.3% vs. 14.6%) or acute co-morbidity (32% vs. 8.6%). Six-month mortality was worse in patients with than in those without chronic (54.2% vs. 30.5%) or more than one acute co-morbidity (66.7% vs. 30.8%). Multiple regression analysis predicted in-hospital NIPPV failure by acute co-morbidity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s, while death at 6 months was predicted by having more than one acute co-morbidity, non-cardiovascular chronic co-morbidity and Activities of Daily Living score.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic and acute co-morbidities are common in COPD patients with AHRF needing NIPPV and their presence influences short and longer-term outcome.

[Bronchodilators in COPD: latest recommendations, recent data and perspectives]

DEMONSTRATED EFFICACY: Inhaled bronchodilators improve the quality of life of COPD patients by reducing dyspnea and exacerbation frequency. There is no data supporting the superiority of one of the families of inhaled bronchodilators (i.e. beta 2 agonists and anticholinergic agents) over the other. Thus, the choice has to be based on the individual symptomatic response. These agents can be combined. OTHER POSSIBILITIES: Long-acting beta 2 agonists are already available and long-acting anticholinergics should be marketed soon. Theophylline has a lower efficacy/tolerance ratio than inhaled bronchodilators but can provide additional benefits when associated with the latter in some patients. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors with both bronchodilating and anti-inflammatory effect are being developed. THE BENEFITS OF CORTICOSTEROIDS: Finally, in symptomatic patients with FEV1<50% predicted and repeated exacerbations despite bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids can be added.

Advances in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive and irreversible airflow limitation with extreme economic and social burden. It is estimated that over the next two decades, it will become the 5(th) most prevalent disease and the 3(rd) most common cause of death in the world. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of airway inflammation and alveolar destruction allows for the development of new therapeutic targets. Tobacco smoking is the most important risk factor in the development of COPD, thus making smoking cessation of the outermost importance. This article provides a critical review of present therapy for COPD. In addition to conventional treatment (bronchodilators, corticosteroids and antibiotics) and smoking cessation therapies, novel approaches with potential benefit are discussed.

Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in older patients: a practical guide

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disability, largely encountered in the elderly population, in whom it causes significant morbidity and mortality. The general perception of health professionals is that COPD is often a self-inflicted disorder affecting the more socio-economically disadvantaged segment of the population with significant comorbidity. COPD is the least funded in terms of research in relation to illness burden compared with other chronic diseases. However, recently published guidelines of both the British Thoracic Society and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease have highlighted best management strategies both of chronic symptoms and acute exacerbations in this patient group. The chronic management of COPD should, like asthma, involve a stepwise approach with smoking cessation being pivotal for all severities of COPD, regardless of patient age. The mainstay of therapeutic treatment remains regular bronchodilators, both beta(2)-adrenoreceptor agonists and anticholinergic agents. Current evidence suggests that long-acting beta(2)-adrenoreceptor agonists such as salmeterol and the new long-acting anticholinergic agent tiotropium bromide are more efficacious than their shorter acting equivalents such as salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in terms of bronchodilation, improved well-being and a reduction in acute exacerbation rates. Additionally since they are taken once or twice daily compliance should be improved. The role of long-term inhaled corticosteroids in the chronic management of COPD is contentious. Only those patients with COPD who have been shown to respond to a formal corticosteroid trial, preferably with a 2-week course of oral corticosteroid, should receive long-term inhaled corticosteroids. In the management of acute exacerbations in acidotic patients nasal ventilation is the treatment of choice in addition to conventional treatment with bronchodilators and oral corticosteroids. Antibacterials need not be prescribed universally in all exacerbations of COPD. Pulmonary rehabilitation classes either individually or in groups have been shown to be beneficial in the management of patients with COPD and their use in secondary care is to be encouraged. Most treatment modalities do not improve pulmonary function in patients with severe COPD. Therefore, pulmonary function including spirometry should be used to make the diagnosis of COPD but not as a monitor of efficacy of treatment. Assessment of severity of COPD and improvement with treatment modalities is best done with dynamic exercise testing such as 6-minute walk tests and incremental shuttle walk tests or with the administration of disease-specific physical disability and quality-of-life questionnaires. Most COPD research does not specifically target the older COPD patients and these patients may merit special consideration for their optimum assessment and management.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . 7: Management of COPD

A review of the management of COPD is presented, with particular emphasis on the effect on the approach to management of new information which has become available in the 5 years since the BTS guidelines on COPD were published. A major problem is the effective implementation of what is already known, and allocation of the resources necessary to make this available to all who might benefit.

A 6-month, placebo-controlled study comparing lung function and health status changes in COPD patients treated with tiotropium or salmeterol

BACKGROUND

Tiotropium, a once-daily anticholinergic, and salmeterol represent two inhaled, long-acting bronchodilators from different pharmacologic classes. A trial was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of both compounds with multiple outcome measures, including lung function, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with COPD.

METHODS

A 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study of tiotropium, 18 microg once daily via dry-powder inhaler, compared with salmeterol, 50 microg bid via metered-dose inhaler, was conducted in patients with COPD. Efficacy was assessed by 12-h monitoring of spirometry, transition dyspnea index (TDI), and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).

RESULTS

A total of 623 patients participated (tiotropium, n= 209; salmeterol, n = 213; and placebo, n = 201). The groups were similar in age (mean, 65 years), gender (75% men), and baseline FEV(1) (mean, 1.08 +/- 0.37 L; percent predicted, 40 +/- 12% [+/- SD]). Compared with placebo treatment, the mean predose morning FEV(1) following 6 months of therapy increased significantly more for the tiotropium group (0.14 L) than the salmeterol group (0.09 L; p < 0.01). The average FEV(1) (0 to 12 h) for tiotropium was statistically superior to salmeterol (difference, 0.08 L; p < 0.001). Tiotropium improved TDI focal score by 1.02 U compared with placebo (p = 0.01), whereas there was no significant change in TDI focal score with salmeterol (0.24 U). Tiotropium was superior to salmeterol in improving TDI focal score (p < 0.05). At 6 months, the mean improvement in SGRQ total score vs baseline was tiotropium, - 5.14 U (p < 0.05 vs placebo); salmeterol, - 3.54 U (p = 0.4 vs placebo); and placebo, - 2.43 U. A statistically higher proportion of patients receiving tiotropium achieved at least a 4-U change in SGRQ score compared to patients receiving placebo. Both active drugs reduced the need for rescue albuterol (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tiotropium once daily produces superior bronchodilation, improvements in dyspnea, and proportion of patients achieving meaningful changes in HRQoL compared to twice-daily salmeterol in patients with COPD.

Seretide for obstructive lung disease

Seretide (Advair [North America], GlaxoSmithKline) is an inhaler combination formulation intended for the maintenance therapy of obstructive airways disease. Seretide was developed and made available initially as three multi-dose, dry powder inhaler formulations delivering 50 microg/puff of the long acting beta(2) agonist salmeterol and either 100, 250 or 500 microg/puff of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate. In addition to the initial multi-dose dry powder inhaler system (Diskus or Accuhaler), a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free pressurised aerosol formulation has become available. Studied mostly extensively as a maintenance therapy for patients with persistent asthma, the combination inhaler is at least equivalent to its components administered separately and is superior to monotherapy with salmeterol or inhaled corticosteroid in both paediatric and adult populations. The combination has a logical role in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma, offering the advantage of increased convenience and possibly improved compliance. In addition to improvements in lung function, symptom scores and quality of life, the combination therapy reduces exacerbation rates, an outcome that contributes to favourable cost-effectiveness. A role as initial maintenance therapy in all forms of persistent asthma is also plausible but there are fewer data concerning the impact of Seretide in milder forms of persistent asthma. Clinical trials are underway to examine the potential role of Seretide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Salmeterol has been shown to be an effective first-line bronchodilator in COPD and fluticasone has been shown to reduce the frequency and or severity of exacerbations in COPD patients in two key trials. At a time when the prevalence of both asthma and COPD is increasing, Seretide is a valuable step in the management of these common obstructive lung diseases.

Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with poorly reversible airflow limitation

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by partially reversible airflow limitation. Many patients have little reversibility to short acting bronchodilators, but long acting bronchodilators are frequently advocated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of long acting beta-2 adrenoceptor agonists in COPD patients with low reversibility to short-acting bronchodilators.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group register was searched. Bibliographies of identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were also searched. Authors of identified RCTs were contacted for other published and unpublished studies and unpublished studies were obtained from pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs over four weeks in duration comparing treatment with long-acting beta-2 adrenoceptor agonists (salmeterol or formoterol) with placebo in patients with stable poorly-reversible COPD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and study quality assessment was performed independently by two reviewers. Where further or missing data were required, authors of studies were contacted.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria review. Six were parallel group studies of 12-16 weeks in duration and two were cross-over studies with four week treatment arms. All eight assessed the efficacy of salmeterol in COPD compared to placebo. Few of the results could be combined in meta-analyses because of differences in methods of reporting data. Isolated trials reported an improvement in one or other outcome in favour of salmeterol, but the only possible meta-analysis of FEV1 showed no overall benefit (Standardised mean difference 0.14 (95% Confidence Interval -0.16, 0.44, n=4). There was no consistent effect on Health Related Quality of LIfe or symptoms scores. Overall, breathlessness was not reduced, but in one study more subjects in the salmeterol group had low Borg dyspnoea scores compared to placebo (Peto Odds Ratio = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40; 0.88). There was no effect on COPD exacerbations over the short period of the studies.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

In the few studies that could be included in this review, treatment of patients with COPD with long acting beta-2 agonists produces only small increases in FEV1. The improvement in airways function does not seem to be associated with a consistent effect on other outcomes such as health related quality of life or reductions in breathlessness.

Inhaled formoterol dry powder versus ipratropium bromide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

We compared the effectiveness of inhaled formoterol with that of ipratropium in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). After a 2-wk run-in period, 780 patients with COPD were randomized to receive for 12 wk formoterol dry powder 12 or 24 microg twice daily, ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily, or placebo in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) measured over 12 h after 12 wk of treatment. Secondary variables included diary symptoms and quality of life. Both doses of formoterol and ipratropium significantly increased the area under the curve for FEV(1) in comparison with placebo (all p < 0.001). Both doses of formoterol were also significantly superior to ipratropium (all p < 0.025). Compared with placebo, both doses of formoterol significantly improved symptoms (all p < or = 0.007) and quality of life (p < 0.01 for total scores) whereas ipratropium did not show significant effects (all p > or = 0.3). All study treatments exhibited a similar safety profile. We conclude that formoterol is more effective than ipratropium bromide in the treatment of COPD, as the efficacy of ipratropium on airflow obstruction does not translate into a clinical benefit that patients can perceive.