Efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the treatment of acute pain after orthopedic trauma: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and the Orthopedic Trauma Association

Perioperative Pain Management in Patients Being Treated for Opioid Use Disorder: The Orthopaedic Surgeon's Role and Strategies for Comprehensive Care

Approximately 280,000 deaths in this country were attributed to opioid overdose between 1999 and 2021, increasing fivefold within this period. Orthopaedic surgeons have had a large contribution to this epidemic; they have been found to be the third highest prescribers of opioid medications. Multiple pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment options for opioid use disorder (OUD) have been developed. The three most commonly used medications are methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. In part owing to the use of these medications, states such as Oregon have seen a 20% decrease in opioid abuse and a 30% decrease in fatal overdoses. Historically, orthopaedic surgeons receive minimal formal training on managing postoperative pain in patients with OUD. Patients with OUD may experience neuroplastic changes from long-term exposure to opioids, which, in turn, diminish the analgesic effect of opioid medications in the acute postoperative period. Patients become more sensitive to painful stimuli, ultimately leading to loss of opioid efficacy. Undertreating pain may contribute to unnecessary patient suffering and can lead to mistrust within the patient-physician relationship. Overtreating pain may have catastrophic consequences such as disruption of sobriety, respiratory compromise, and death. It is recommended to include a pain management specialist or service during the perioperative period, if possible. This article clarifies the orthopaedic surgeon's role in the perioperative care of this patient population by providing an overview of medications used to treat OUD, pain control strategies, psychosocial concerns, and legal considerations, with the goal of streamlining care to improve patient safety and outcomes.

Exploring take-home opioid stewardship (ETHOS) in UK postoperative patients

Background

Surgery is one of the most common indications for a patient's first opioid prescription, with some patients progressing to unintended long-term use. There is no current data from the United Kingdom on how much patients use of the opioid medication dispensed at discharge from hospital. This study investigates discharge opioid prescribing and usage following common surgical procedures.

Methods

This cohort study was conducted at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and involved 20 of the most commonly performed adult surgical procedures. At least 20 patients per procedure were surveyed using a standardised telephone questionnaire 6-8 days after discharge to establish the amount of used and unused opioids. Opioid doses were converted to oral morphine equivalent (OME) for analysis.

Results

The amount of opioid given to patients after all types of surgery far exceeded requirement, with often large variations in prescribing practices for the same procedures, most notably in trauma and orthopaedics.For the cohort of 426 patients, a total of 55 080 mg OME was dispensed on discharge, with only 34.4% actually used by patients, leaving a total of 36 108.5 mg OME unused in the community, risking inappropriate opioid use, overdose, or diversion.

Conclusions

Opioid overprescribing is common after surgery and represents waste, expense, and risk to patients. There is a clear need to develop a procedure-specific evidence-base for discharge opioid prescribing, adopting an "enough but not too much" approach to ensure that patients have adequate analgesia to facilitate functional surgical recovery, but not more than is needed.

The use of pain killers (NSAIDs) in athletes: How large is the risk?

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is prevalent in sport however the risk associated with their use in athletes is not well-understood. This review discusses the pharmacology of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the prevalence of their use in different sports and factors driving this. Use is very high in sports such as professional football and is sometimes by routine without indication and without medical supervision. However there is a paucity of evidence in other sports. There is good evidence for use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs following an acute injury but they may prevent normal tissue healing and remodelling if used longer term for musculoskeletal injuries. There are well-known risks of cardiac, gastrointestinal and renal side effects but little specific data for athletes. Renal events are discussed in detail including the cumulative effect that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, dehydration and concurrent illness can have to produce significant renal and systemic insult. We then discuss a pragmatic prescribing model enabling clinicians to utilise the beneficial effects of these medications whilst minimising risks.

Short-Term Celecoxib Promotes Bone Formation without Compromising Cefazolin Efficacy in an Early Orthopaedic Device-Related Infection: Evidence from a Rat Model

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are crucial components of multimodal analgesia for musculoskeletal injuries, targeting cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes (COX-1 and/or COX-2 isoenzymes). Concerns exist regarding their potential interference with bone healing and orthopaedic device-related infections (ODRI), where data are limited. This study aimed to investigate whether the COX-selectivity of NSAIDs interfered with antibiotic efficacy and bone changes in the setting of an ODRI. In vitro testing demonstrated that combining celecoxib (a COX-2 inhibitor) with cefazolin significantly enhanced antibacterial efficacy compared to cefazolin alone (p < 0.0001). In vivo experiments were performed using Staphylococcus epidermidis in the rat proximal tibia of an ODRI model. Long and short durations of celecoxib treatment in combination with antibiotics were compared to a control group receiving an antibiotic only. The long celecoxib treatment group showed impaired infection clearance, while the short celecoxib treatment showed increased bone formation (day 6, p < 0.0001), lower bone resorption (day 6, p < 0.0001), and lower osteolysis (day 6, BV/TV: p < 0.0001; BIC: p = 0.0005) compared to the control group, without impairing antibiotic efficacy (p > 0.9999). Given the use of NSAIDs as part of multimodal analgesia, and considering these findings, short-term use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs like celecoxib not only aids pain management but also promotes favorable bone changes during ODRI.

Opioid and non-opioid analgesic regimens after fracture and risk of serious opioid-related events

Background

Non-opioid analgesics are prescribed in combination with opioids among patients with long bone fracture to reduce opioid prescribing needs, yet evidence is limited on whether they reduce the risk of serious opioid-related events (SOREs). We compared the risk of SOREs among hospitalized patients with long bone fracture discharged with filled opioid prescriptions, with and without non-opioid analgesics.

Design

We identified a retrospective cohort of analgesic-naïve adult patients with a long bone fracture hospitalization using the Merative MarketScan Commercial Database (2013-2020). The exposure was opioid and non-opioid analgesic (gabapentinoids, muscle relaxants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen) prescriptions filled in the 3 days before through 42 days after discharge. The outcome was the development of new persistent opioid use or opioid use disorder during follow-up (day 43 through day 408 after discharge). We used Cox proportional hazards regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting with overlap trimming to compare outcomes among those that filled an opioid and a non-opioid analgesic to those that filled only an opioid analgesic. In secondary analyses, we used separate models to compare those that filled a prescription for each specific non-opioid analgesic type with opioids to those that filled only opioids.

Results

Of 29 489 patients, most filled an opioid prescription alone (58.4%) or an opioid and non-opioid (22.0%). In the weighted proportional hazards regression model accounting for relevant covariates and total MME, filling both a non-opioid analgesic and an opioid analgesic was associated with 1.63 times increased risk of SOREs compared with filling an opioid analgesic only (95% CI 1.41 to 1.89). Filling a gabapentin prescription in combination with an opioid was associated with an increased risk of SOREs compared with those that filled an opioid only (adjusted HR: 1.84 (95% CI1.48 to 2.27)).

Conclusions

Filling a non-opioid analgesic in combination with an opioid was associated with an increased risk of SOREs after long bone fracture.

Level of evidence

Level III, prognostic/epidemiological.

Study type

Retrospective cohort study.

Prediction of Osteoporotic Hip Fracture Outcome: Comparative Accuracy of 27 Immune-Inflammatory-Metabolic Markers and Related Conceptual Issues

Objectives: This study, based on the concept of immuno-inflammatory-metabolic (IIM) dysregulation, investigated and compared the prognostic impact of 27 indices at admission for prediction of postoperative myocardial injury (PMI) and/or hospital death in hip fracture (HF) patients. Methods: In consecutive HF patient (n = 1273, mean age 82.9 ± 8.7 years, 73.5% females) demographics, medical history, laboratory parameters, and outcomes were recorded prospectively. Multiple logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic analyses (the area under the curve, AUC) were used to establish the predictive role for each biomarker. Results: Among 27 IIM biomarkers, 10 indices were significantly associated with development of PMI and 16 were indicative of a fatal outcome; in the subset of patients aged >80 years with ischaemic heart disease (IHD, the highest risk group: 90.2% of all deaths), the corresponding figures were 26 and 20. In the latter group, the five strongest preoperative predictors for PMI were anaemia (AUC 0.7879), monocyte/eosinophil ratio > 13.0 (AUC 0.7814), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio > 7.5 (AUC 0.7784), eosinophil count < 1.1 × 109/L (AUC 0.7780), and neutrophil/albumin × 10 > 2.4 (AUC 0.7732); additionally, sensitivity was 83.1-75.4% and specificity was 82.1-75.0%. The highest predictors of in-hospital death were platelet/lymphocyte ratio > 280.0 (AUC 0.8390), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio < 1.1 (AUC 0.8375), albumin < 33 g/L (AUC 0.7889), red cell distribution width > 14.5% (AUC 0.7739), and anaemia (AUC 0.7604), sensitivity 88.2% and above, and specificity 85.1-79.3%. Internal validation confirmed the predictive value of the models. Conclusions: Comparison of 27 IIM indices in HF patients identified several simple, widely available, and inexpensive parameters highly predictive for PMI and/or in-hospital death. The applicability of IIM biomarkers to diagnose and predict risks for chronic diseases, including OP/OF, in the preclinical stages is discussed.

Consumer awareness and knowledge regarding use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in a metropolitan area

Background

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have well-known adverse effects, and numerous studies have shown inappropriate behaviors regarding their use. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding the use of NSAIDs simultaneously in one of the largest and most populated areas of Italy, Naples.

Methods

From 2021 December 14th to 2022 January 4th, a cross-sectional survey study was conducted among community centers, working places, and universities using a snowball sampling method. For inclusion in the study, the participants were required to be at least 18 years old and residents in the metropolitan area of Naples. Three multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA) models were developed by including variables that could potentially be associated with the following outcomes of interest: knowledge (Model I), attitudes (Model II), and behavior (Model III) regarding the use of NSAIDs.

Results

Data were acquired from 1,012 questionnaires administered to subjects evenly divided by gender with an average age of 36.8 years and revealed that only 7.9% of the participants self-admittedly did not take NSAIDs, while approximately half the participants (50%) admitted to occasionally using them. The results showed a statistically significant correlation between attitudes regarding the appropriate use of NSAIDs and less knowledge. The regression analyses indicated that behaviors regarding the appropriate use of NSAIDs were statistically significant in younger respondents, non-smokers, and those without children. These interesting results showed that behaviors regarding the appropriate use of NSAIDs were significantly higher among respondents with less knowledge and more positive attitudes.

Conclusion

According to the collected data and statistical analysis results, it is possible to identify factors that can greatly affect inappropriate behaviors regarding the use of NSAIDs and establish targeted prevention programs.

Implementation Requires Evaluation of Adoption: Lessons From a Multimodal Pain Regimen Order Set

INTRODUCTION

Multimodal pain regimen (MMPR) protocols are the standard of care per the 2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program guidelines. MMPR implementation methodology in trauma services has not been reported. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the adoption of an MMPR order set at a level 1 trauma center and to describe its implementation. We hypothesized that order set utilization would be about 50%, and barriers to adoption would be related to personal biases.

METHODS

This was a mixed-methods study at a level 1 trauma center. We retrospectively evaluated MMPR utilization from July 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022. Agile implementation was the method used to implement a clinical decision support tool for the MMPR: a flow chart order set in the electronic medical record. This methodology utilizes short experiment sprints during which data are collected to guide the next iterations. During this process quantitative as well as qualitative data were collected. This included end user testing of the order set and a survey distributed to surgical residents about the order set. Manual thematic network analysis was employed to identify basic and organizing themes from the survey responses.

RESULTS

A total of 587 trauma patients were admitted during the study period and 95 patients (16.2%) had MMPR ordered through the order set. The survey response rate was 19% (13/68). We identified ease of use, desire for options, inadequate education, and assumption of personal expertise as the four basic themes from the survey. These basic themes were further analyzed to two organizing themes: heuristics and overconfidence bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The MMPR order set was easy to use but had low adoption at our center in the first 8 months of implementation. Agile implementation methodology provided an ideal framework to identify reasons for low adoption and guide the next sprint to address personal biases, improve heuristics, and provide effective education and dissemination. Evaluation of utilization and qualitative analysis are key components to ensuring clinical decision support tool adoption.

Novel Techniques for Musculoskeletal Pain Management after Orthopedic Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review

Effective postoperative pain management is critical for recovery after orthopedic surgery, but often remains inadequate despite multimodal analgesia. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on innovative modalities for enhancing pain control following major orthopedic procedures. Fifteen randomized controlled trials and comparative studies evaluating peripheral nerve blocks, local anesthetic infiltration, cryotherapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, adjunct medications, and other techniques are included. Thematic analysis reveals that peripheral nerve blocks and local anesthetic infiltration consistently demonstrate reduced pain scores, opioid consumption, and side effects versus conventional analgesia alone. Oral multimodal medications also show promise as part of opioid-sparing regimens. Adjunctive approaches like cryotherapy, music, and dexmedetomidine require further research to optimize protocols. Despite promising innovations, critical knowledge gaps persist regarding comparative effectiveness, optimal interventions and dosing, combination strategies, cost-effectiveness, and implementation. High-quality randomized controlled trials using standardized protocols are essential to guide the translation of enhanced multimodal regimens into clinical practice. This review provides a framework for pursuing research priorities and advancing evidence-based postoperative pain management across orthopedic surgeries.

Comparison of Acute Pain Syndrome after Surgical Interventions in the Nasal Cavity and Rhinoplasty

Comparison of acute pain syndrome after septoplasty, rhinoplasty, and rhinoseptoplasty was carried out. It is shown that the intensity of acute pain is higher in patients after rhinoseptoplasty in the first 3-6 h after surgery.