Vertebral Body Compression Fractures and Bone Density: Automated Detection and Classification on CT Images

A deep learning pipeline for systematic and accurate vertebral fracture reporting in computed tomography

AIM

Spine fractures are a frequent and relevant diagnosis, but systematic documentation is time-consuming and sometimes overlooked. A deep learning pipeline for opportunistic fracture detection in computed tomography (CT) spine images of varying field-of-views is introduced.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study builds on 452 CTs of the lumbar/thoracolumbar spine. Patients were included based on the evidence of ≥1 vertebral body fracture and excluded in case of history of spinal surgery or pathologic fractures. The collective was split into training/validation (405) and test (47) sets. An open-source spine dataset was used to train a preliminary segmentation model, which was applied on the training set. The resulting segmentation was post-processed to remove posterior vertebral structures and if needed, manually refined by a radiologist. Using the refined version as new training data, a final segmentation nnU-net was trained. Sagittal slices from each vertebra were labelled individually with regard to fracture evidence. Slices without fracture were used as negative class. Twenty seven thousand nineteen slices (20,396 negative, 6,623 positive) trained a classification algorithm using resnet18. Two senior readers independently assessed fractures in the test set to obtain a consensual ground truth. The segmentation-classification pipeline was applied to the test set and compared with the ground truth.

RESULTS

The segmentation model correctly segmented 330/339 (97%) vertebrae. Considering every segmented vertebra, the classifier detected fractures with 88% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and 93% accuracy.

CONCLUSION

A deep learning pipeline was built and shown to accurately detect fractures on CT images. The final models as well as our code material are available at https://github.com/usb-radiology/VertebraeFx.

Automated vertebral compression fracture detection and quantification on opportunistic CT scans: a performance evaluation

AIM

Since the majority of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are asymptomatic, they often go undetected on opportunistic CT scans. To reduce rates of undiagnosed osteoporosis, we developed a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm using 2D/3D U-Nets convolutional neural networks to opportunistically screen for VCF on CT scans. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the algorithm using external real-world data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT scans acquired for various indications other than a suspicion of VCF from January 2019 to August 2020 were retrospectively and consecutively collected. The algorithm was designed to label each vertebra, detect VCF, measure vertebral height loss (VHL) and calculate mean Hounsfield Units (mean HU) for vertebral bone attenuation. For the ground truth, two board-certified radiologists defined if VCF was present and performed the measurements. The algorithm analyzed the scans and the results were compared to the experts' assessments.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (mean age: 76.6 years ± 10.1[SD], 72% women) were evaluated. The overall labeling agreement was 94.9% (95%CI: 93.7%-95.9%). Regarding VHL, the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between the algorithm and the radiologists was [-9.3, 8.6]; 94.1% of the differences lay within the radiologists' LoA and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.854 (95%CI: 0.822-0.881). For the mean HU, Pearson's correlation was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.84-0.92; p-value <0.0001). Finally, the algorithm's VCF screening sensitivity and specificity were 92.3% (95%CI: 81.5%-97.9%) and 91.7% (95%CI: 80.0%-97.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This automated tool for screening and quantification of opportunistic VCF demonstrated high reliability and performance that may facilitate radiologists' task and improve opportunistic osteoporosis assessments.

Multicenter study on predicting postoperative upper limb muscle strength improvement in cervical spinal cord injury patients using radiomics and deep learning

Cervical spinal cord injury is often catastrophic, frequently leading to irreversible impairment. MRI has become the gold standard for evaluating spinal cord injuries (SCI). Our study aimed to assess the accuracy of a radiomics approach, based on machine learning and utilizing conventional MRI, in predicting the prognosis of patients with SCI. In a retrospective analysis of 82 SCI patients from three hospitals, we categorized them into good (n = 49) and poor (n = 33) prognosis groups. Preoperative T2-weighted MRI images were segmented using 3D-Region of Interest (ROI) techniques, and both radiomic and deep transfer learning features were extracted. These features were normalized using Z-score and harmonized via ComBat. Feature selection was performed using a greedy algorithm and Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and others, followed by the calculation of radiomics scores through linear regression. Machine learning was then used to identify the most predictive radiomic features. Model performance was evaluated by analyzing the area under the curve (AUC) and other indicators.Univariate analysis indicated that the demographic characteristics of cervical spinal cord injury were not statistically significant. In the test dataset, the random forest (RF) combined with radiomics and ResNet34 demonstrated better performance, with an accuracy of 0.800 and an AUC of 0.893.Using MRI, deep learning-based radiomics signals show promise in evaluating and predicting the postoperative prognosis of these patients.

Surgical Stabilization of the Spine: A Clinical Review of Spinal Fractures, Spondylolisthesis, and Instrumentation Methods

The spine is a complex structure critical for stability, force transmission, and neural protection, with spinal fractures and spondylolisthesis posing significant challenges to its integrity and function. Spinal fractures arise from trauma, degenerative conditions, or osteoporosis, often affecting transitional zones like the thoracolumbar junction. Spondylolisthesis results from structural defects or degenerative changes, leading to vertebral displacement and potential neurological symptoms. Diagnostic and classification systems, such as AO Spine and TLICS, aid in evaluating instability and guiding treatment strategies. Advances in surgical techniques, including minimally invasive approaches, pedicle screws, interbody cages, and robotic-assisted systems, have improved precision and recovery while reducing morbidity. Vertebral augmentation techniques like vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty offer minimally invasive options for osteoporotic fractures. Despite these innovations, postoperative outcomes vary, with challenges such as persistent pain and hardware complications necessitating tailored interventions. Future directions emphasize predictive analytics and enhanced recovery strategies to optimize surgical outcomes and patient quality of life.

Validation of a Deep Learning Tool for Detection of Incidental Vertebral Compression Fractures

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the performance of a deep learning-based vertebral compression fracture (VCF) detection tool in patients with incidental VCF. The purpose of this study was to validate this tool across multiple sites and multiple vendors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter, multinational blinded study using anonymized chest and abdominal CT scans performed for indications other than VCF in patients ≥50 years old. Images were obtained from 2 teleradiology companies in France and United States and were processed by CINA-VCF v1.0, a deep learning algorithm designed for VCF detection. Ground truth was established by majority consensus across 3 board-certified radiologists. Overall performance of CINA-VCF was evaluated, as well as subset analyses based on imaging acquisition parameters, baseline patient characteristics, and VCF severity. A subgroup was also analyzed and compared with available clinical radiology reports.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-four CT scans were included in this study, comprising 166 (35.0%) positive and 308 (65.0%) negative VCF cases. CINA-VCF demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), accuracy of 93.7% (95% CI: 91.1%-95.7%), sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI: 90.7%-97.9%), and specificity of 92.9% (95% CI: 89.4%-96.5%). Subset analysis based on VCF severity resulted in a specificity of 94.2% (95% CI: 90.9%-96.6%) for grade 0 negative cases and a specificity of 64.3% (95% CI: 35.1%-87.2%) for grade 1 negative cases. For grades 2 and 3 positive cases, sensitivity was 89.7% (95% CI: 79.9%-95.8%) and 99.0% (95% CI: 94.4%-100.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CINA-VCF successfully detected incidental VCF and even outperformed clinical reports. The performance was consistent among all subgroups analyzed. Limitations of the tool included various confounding pathologies such as Schmorl's nodes and borderline cases. Despite these limitations, this study validates the applicability and generalizability of the tool in the clinical setting.

Enhanced Detection Performance of Acute Vertebral Compression Fractures Using a Hybrid Deep Learning and Traditional Quantitative Measurement Approach: Beyond the Limitations of Genant Classification

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the applicability of the classical method, height loss ratio (HLR), for identifying major acute compression fractures in clinical practice and compared its performance with deep learning (DL)-based VCF detection methods. Additionally, it examined whether combining the HLR with DL approaches could enhance performance, exploring the potential integration of classical and DL methodologies.

METHODS

End-to-End VCF Detection (EEVD), Two-Stage VCF Detection with Segmentation and Detection (TSVD_SD), and Two-Stage VCF Detection with Detection and Classification (TSVD_DC). The models were evaluated on a dataset of 589 patients, focusing on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision.

RESULTS

TSVD_SD outperformed all other methods, achieving the highest sensitivity (84.46%) and accuracy (95.05%), making it particularly effective for identifying true positives. The complementary use of DL methods with HLR further improved detection performance. For instance, combining HLR-negative cases with TSVD_SD increased sensitivity to 87.84%, reducing missed fractures, while combining HLR-positive cases with EEVD achieved the highest specificity (99.77%), minimizing false positives.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrated that DL-based approaches, particularly TSVD_SD, provided robust alternatives or complements to traditional methods, significantly enhancing diagnostic accuracy for acute VCFs in clinical practice.

The association between computed tomography-based osteosarcopenia and osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a longitudinal study

PURPOSE

Osteoporosis and sarcopenia usually coexist in older population. The concept of osteosarcopenia has been proposed in recent years. However, studies on the relationship between osteosarcopenia and the risk of fracture are rare, and the association is unclear at present. This study aimed to investigate the association between osteosarcopenia evaluated based on chest computed tomography (CT) and osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF).

METHODS

This study recruited 7906 individuals aged 50 years and older who did not have OVFs and underwent chest CT for physical examination between July 2016 and September 2019. Subjects were followed up annually until June 2023. Osteosarcopenia was defined by a low muscle area of the erector spinae (< 25.4 cm2) and the bone attenuation (Hounsfield unit, HU < 135). Genant's grades were used to define OVFs. Control subjects were selected by Propensity Score Matching at a ratio 20:1. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the associations between osteosarcopenia and OVFs.

RESULTS

Of the 7906 participants included, 95 had a new OVF within a median follow-up of 3 years. A total of 1900 control subjects were matched. Individuals in the osteosarcopenia group had a higher prevalence of spinal fractures than those in normal group (16.4% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001). Osteosarcopenia was independently associated with OVF (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 12.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.79-42.40) and severe OVF (aHR = 14.07, 95% CI 1.84-107.66). Similar trends were observed in males, females and those subjects aged older than 60 years. Osteosarcopenia had good predictive efficacy for OVF (area under the curve = 0.836). A nomogram was also developed for clinical application.

CONCLUSION

Osteosarcopenia assessed based on chest CT was associated with OVF, and osteosarcopenia has good performance for vertebral fracture prediction.

Machine learning identifies clusters of the normal adolescent spine based on sagittal balance

PURPOSE

This study applied a machine learning semi-supervised clustering approach to radiographs of adolescent sagittal spines from a single pediatric institution to identify patterns of sagittal alignment in the normal adolescent spine. We sought to explore the inherent variability found in adolescent sagittal alignment using machine learning to remove bias and determine whether clusters of sagittal alignment exist.

METHODS

Multiple semi-supervised machine learning clustering algorithms were applied to 111 normal adolescent sagittal spines. Sagittal parameters for resultant clusters were determined.

RESULTS

Machine learning analysis found that the spines did cluster into distinct groups with an optimal number of clusters ranging from 3 to 5. We performed an analysis on both 3 and 5-cluster groups. The 3-cluster groups analysis found good consistency between methods with 96 of 111, while the analysis of 5-cluster groups found consistency with 105 of 111 spines. When assessing for differences in sagittal parameters between the groups for both analyses, there were differences in T4-12 TK, L1-S1 LL, SS, SVA, PI-LL mismatch, and TPA. However, the only parameter that was statistically different for all groups was SVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on machine learning, the adolescent sagittal spine alignments do cluster into distinct groups. While there were distinguishing features with TK and LL, the most important parameter distinguishing these groups was SVA. Further studies may help to understand these findings in relation to spinal deformities.

The Classification of Metastatic Spine Cancer and Spinal Compression Fractures by Using CNN and SVM Techniques

Metastatic spine cancer can cause pain and neurological issues, making it challenging to distinguish from spinal compression fractures using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To improve diagnostic accuracy, this study developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to differentiate between metastatic spine cancer and spinal compression fractures in MRI images. MRI data from Gyeongsang National University Hospital, collected from January 2019 to April 2022, were processed using Otsu's binarization and Canny edge detection algorithms. Using these preprocessed datasets, convolutional neural network (CNN) and support vector machine (SVM) models were built. The T1-weighted image-based CNN model demonstrated high sensitivity (1.00) and accuracy (0.98) in identifying metastatic spine cancer, particularly with data processed by Otsu's binarization and Canny edge detection, achieving exceptional performance in detecting cancerous cases. This approach highlights the potential of preprocessed MRI data for AI-assisted diagnosis, supporting clinical applications in distinguishing metastatic spine cancer from spinal compression fractures.

Machine learning value in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning (ML) in detecting vertebral fractures, considering varying fracture classifications, patient populations, and imaging approaches.

METHOD

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to December 31, 2023, for studies using ML for vertebral fracture diagnosis. Bias risk was assessed using QUADAS-2. A bivariate mixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were performed according to five task types (vertebral fractures, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures, differentiation of acute and chronic vertebral fractures, and prediction of vertebral fractures). Subgroup analyses were conducted by different ML models (including ML and DL) and modeling methods (including CT, X-ray, MRI, and clinical features).

RESULTS

Eighty-one studies were included. ML demonstrated a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.95 for vertebral fractures. Subgroup analysis showed that DL (SROC 0.98) and CT (SROC 0.98) performed best overall. For osteoporotic fractures, ML showed a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.96, with DL (SROC 0.99) and X-ray (SROC 0.99) performing better. For differentiating benign from malignant fractures, ML achieved a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93, with DL (SROC 0.96) and MRI (SROC 0.97) performing best. For differentiating acute from chronic vertebral fractures, ML showed a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93, with ML (SROC 0.96) and CT (SROC 0.97) performing best. For predicting vertebral fractures, ML had a sensitivity of 0.76 and specificity of 0.87, with ML (SROC 0.80) and clinical features (SROC 0.86) performing better.

CONCLUSIONS

ML, especially DL models applied to CT, MRI, and X-ray, shows high diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fractures. ML also effectively predicts osteoporotic vertebral fractures, aiding in tailored prevention strategies. Further research and validation are required to confirm ML's clinical efficacy.

Potential strength and weakness of artificial intelligence integration in emergency radiology: a review of diagnostic utilizations and applications in patient care optimization

Artificial intelligence (AI) and its recent increasing healthcare integration has created both new opportunities and challenges in the practice of radiology and medical imaging. Recent advancements in AI technology have allowed for more workplace efficiency, higher diagnostic accuracy, and overall improvements in patient care. Limitations of AI such as data imbalances, the unclear nature of AI algorithms, and the challenges in detecting certain diseases make it difficult for its widespread adoption. This review article presents cases involving the use of AI models to diagnose intracranial hemorrhage, spinal fractures, and rib fractures, while discussing how certain factors like, type, location, size, presence of artifacts, calcification, and post-surgical changes, affect AI model performance and accuracy. While the use of artificial intelligence has the potential to improve the practice of emergency radiology, it is important to address its limitations to maximize its advantages while ensuring the safety of patients overall.

Improved Detection Accuracy of Chronic Vertebral Compression Fractures by Integrating Height Loss Ratio and Deep Learning Approaches

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the limitations of the height loss ratio (HLR) method and introduce a new approach that integrates a deep learning (DL) model to enhance vertebral compression fracture (VCF) detection performance.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 589 patients with chronic VCFs. We compared four different methods: HLR-only, DL-only, a combination of HLR and DL for positive VCF, and a combination of HLR and DL for negative VCF. The models were evaluated using dice similarity coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

The combined method (HLR + DL, positive) demonstrated the best performance with an AUROC of 0.968, sensitivity (94.95%), and specificity (90.59%). The HLR-only and the HLR + DL (negative) also showed strong discriminatory power, with AUROCs of 0.948 and 0.947, respectively. The DL-only model achieved the highest specificity (95.92%) but exhibited lower sensitivity (82.83%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the limitations of the HLR method in detecting chronic VCFs and demonstrates the improved performance of combining HLR with DL models.

Development of a deep learning model for detecting lumbar vertebral fractures on CT images: An external validation

OBJECTIVE

To develop and externally validate a binary classification model for lumbar vertebral body fractures based on CT images using deep learning methods.

METHODS

This study involved data collection from two hospitals for AI model training and external validation. In Cohort A from Hospital 1, CT images from 248 patients, comprising 1508 vertebrae, revealed that 20.9% had fractures (315 vertebrae) and 79.1% were non-fractured (1193 vertebrae). In Cohort B from Hospital 2, CT images from 148 patients, comprising 887 vertebrae, indicated that 14.8% had fractures (131 vertebrae) and 85.2% were non-fractured (756 vertebrae). The AI model for lumbar spine fractures underwent two stages: vertebral body segmentation and fracture classification. The first stage utilized a 3D V-Net convolutional deep neural network, which produced a 3D segmentation map. From this map, region of each vertebra body were extracted and then input into the second stage of the algorithm. The second stage employed a 3D ResNet convolutional deep neural network to classify each proposed region as positive (fractured) or negative (not fractured).

RESULTS

The AI model's accuracy for detecting vertebral fractures in Cohort A's training set (n = 1199), validation set (n = 157), and test set (n = 152) was 100.0 %, 96.2 %, and 97.4 %, respectively. For Cohort B (n = 148), the accuracy was 96.3 %. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) values for the training, validation, and test sets of Cohort A, as well as Cohort B, and their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were as follows: 1.000 (1.000, 1.000), 0.978 (0.944, 1.000), 0.986 (0.969, 1.000), and 0.981 (0.970, 0.992). The area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR) values were 1.000 (0.996, 1.000), 0.964 (0.927, 0.985), 0.907 (0.924, 0.984), and 0.890 (0.846, 0.971), respectively. According to the DeLong test, there was no significant difference in the AUC-ROC values between the test set of Cohort A and Cohort B, both for the overall data and for each specific vertebral location (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The developed model demonstrates promising diagnostic accuracy and applicability for detecting lumbar vertebral fractures.

Assessing the Performance of Models from the 2022 RSNA Cervical Spine Fracture Detection Competition at a Level I Trauma Center

Purpose To evaluate the performance of the top models from the RSNA 2022 Cervical Spine Fracture Detection challenge on a clinical test dataset of both noncontrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans acquired at a level I trauma center. Materials and Methods Seven top-performing models in the RSNA 2022 Cervical Spine Fracture Detection challenge were retrospectively evaluated on a clinical test set of 1828 CT scans (from 1829 series: 130 positive for fracture, 1699 negative for fracture; 1308 noncontrast, 521 contrast enhanced) from 1779 patients (mean age, 55.8 years ± 22.1 [SD]; 1154 [64.9%] male patients). Scans were acquired without exclusion criteria over 1 year (January-December 2022) from the emergency department of a neurosurgical and level I trauma center. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. False-positive and false-negative cases were further analyzed by a neuroradiologist. Results Although all seven models showed decreased performance on the clinical test set compared with the challenge dataset, the models maintained high performances. On noncontrast CT scans, the models achieved a mean AUC of 0.89 (range: 0.79-0.92), sensitivity of 67.0% (range: 30.9%-80.0%), and specificity of 92.9% (range: 82.1%-99.0%). On contrast-enhanced CT scans, the models had a mean AUC of 0.88 (range: 0.76-0.94), sensitivity of 81.9% (range: 42.7%-100.0%), and specificity of 72.1% (range: 16.4%-92.8%). The models identified 10 fractures missed by radiologists. False-positive cases were more common in contrast-enhanced scans and observed in patients with degenerative changes on noncontrast scans, while false-negative cases were often associated with degenerative changes and osteopenia. Conclusion The winning models from the 2022 RSNA AI Challenge demonstrated a high performance for cervical spine fracture detection on a clinical test dataset, warranting further evaluation for their use as clinical support tools. Keywords: Feature Detection, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Genetic Algorithms, CT, Spine, Technology Assessment, Head/Neck Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024 See also commentary by Levi and Politi in this issue.

An Automated Vertebrae Localization, Segmentation, and Osteoporotic Compression Fracture Detection Pipeline for Computed Tomographic Imaging

Osteoporosis is the most common chronic metabolic bone disease worldwide. Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Approximately 700,000 osteoporotic VCFs are diagnosed annually in the USA alone, resulting in an annual economic burden of ~$13.8B. With an aging population, the rate of osteoporotic VCFs and their associated burdens are expected to rise. Those burdens include pain, functional impairment, and increased medical expenditure. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to develop an analytical tool to aid in the identification of VCFs. Computed Tomography (CT) imaging is commonly used to detect occult injuries. Unlike the existing VCF detection approaches based on CT, the standard clinical criteria for determining VCF relies on the shape of vertebrae, such as loss of vertebral body height. We developed a novel automated vertebrae localization, segmentation, and osteoporotic VCF detection pipeline for CT scans using state-of-the-art deep learning models to bridge this gap. To do so, we employed a publicly available dataset of spine CT scans with 325 scans annotated for segmentation, 126 of which also graded for VCF (81 with VCFs and 45 without VCFs). Our approach attained 96% sensitivity and 81% specificity in detecting VCF at the vertebral-level, and 100% accuracy at the subject-level, outperforming deep learning counterparts tested for VCF detection without segmentation. Crucially, we showed that adding predicted vertebrae segments as inputs significantly improved VCF detection at both vertebral and subject levels by up to 14% Sensitivity and 20% Specificity (p-value = 0.028).

Radiological Diagnosis and Advances in Imaging of Vertebral Compression Fractures

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) affect 1.4 million patients every year, especially among the globally aging population, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Often characterized with symptoms of sudden onset back pain, decreased vertebral height, progressive kyphosis, and limited mobility, VCFs can significantly impact a patient's quality of life and are a significant public health concern. Imaging modalities in radiology, including radiographs, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) studies and bone scans, play crucial and evolving roles in the diagnosis, assessment, and management of VCFs. An understanding of anatomy, and the extent to which each imaging modality serves to elucidate that anatomy, is crucial in understanding and providing guidance on fracture severity, classification, associated soft tissue injuries, underlying pathologies, and bone mineral density, ultimately guiding treatment decisions, monitoring treatment response, and predicting prognosis and long-term outcomes. This article thus explores the important role of radiology in illuminating the underlying anatomy and pathophysiology, classification, diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with VCFs. Continued research and advancements in imaging technologies will further enhance our understanding of VCFs and pave the way for personalized and effective management strategies.

Setrusumab for the treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta: 12-month results from the phase 2b asteroid study

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare genetic disorder commonly caused by variants of the type I collagen genes COL1A1 and COL1A2. OI is associated with increased bone fragility, bone deformities, bone pain, and reduced growth. Setrusumab, a neutralizing antibody to sclerostin, increased areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in a 21-week phase 2a dose escalation study. The phase 2b Asteroid (NCT03118570) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of setrusumab in adults. Adults with a clinical diagnosis of OI type I, III, or IV, a pathogenic variant in COL1A1/A2, and a recent fragility fracture were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive 2, 8, or 20 mg/kg setrusumab doses or placebo by monthly intravenous infusion during a 12-mo treatment period. Participants initially randomized to the placebo group were subsequently reassigned to receive setrusumab 20 mg/kg open label. Therefore, only results from the 2, 8, and 20 mg/kg double-blind groups are presented herein. The primary endpoint of Asteroid was change in distal radial trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) from baseline at month 12, supported by changes in high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography micro-finite element (microFE)-derived bone strength. A total of 110 adults were enrolled with similar baseline characteristics across treatment groups. At 12 mo, there was a significant increase in mean (SE) failure load in the 20 mg/kg group (3.17% [1.26%]) and stiffness in the 8 (3.06% [1.70%]) and 20 mg/kg (3.19% [1.29%]) groups from baseline. There were no changes in radial trabecula vBMD (p>05). Gains in failure load and stiffness were similar across OI types. There were no significant differences in annualized fracture rates between doses. Two adults in the 20 mg/kg group experienced related serious adverse reactions. Asteroid demonstrated a beneficial effect of setrusumab on estimates of bone strength across the different types of OI and provides the basis for additional phase 3 evaluation.

Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: realistic clinical applications in the next decade

This article will provide a perspective review of the most extensively investigated deep learning (DL) applications for musculoskeletal disease detection that have the best potential to translate into routine clinical practice over the next decade. Deep learning methods for detecting fractures, estimating pediatric bone age, calculating bone measurements such as lower extremity alignment and Cobb angle, and grading osteoarthritis on radiographs have been shown to have high diagnostic performance with many of these applications now commercially available for use in clinical practice. Many studies have also documented the feasibility of using DL methods for detecting joint pathology and characterizing bone tumors on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, musculoskeletal disease detection on MRI is difficult as it requires multi-task, multi-class detection of complex abnormalities on multiple image slices with different tissue contrasts. The generalizability of DL methods for musculoskeletal disease detection on MRI is also challenging due to fluctuations in image quality caused by the wide variety of scanners and pulse sequences used in routine MRI protocols. The diagnostic performance of current DL methods for musculoskeletal disease detection must be further evaluated in well-designed prospective studies using large image datasets acquired at different institutions with different imaging parameters and imaging hardware before they can be fully implemented in clinical practice. Future studies must also investigate the true clinical benefits of current DL methods and determine whether they could enhance quality, reduce error rates, improve workflow, and decrease radiologist fatigue and burnout with all of this weighed against the costs.

Development and validation of a radiomics-based model for predicting osteoporosis in patients with lumbar compression fractures

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis, a metabolic bone disorder, markedly elevates fracture risks, with vertebral compression fractures being predominant. Antiosteoporotic treatments for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) lessen both the occurrence of subsequent fractures and associated pain. Thus, diagnosing osteoporosis in OVCF patients is vital.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a predictive radiographic model using T1 sequence MRI images to accurately determine whether patients with lumbar spine compression fractures also have osteoporosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients over 45 years of age diagnosed with a fresh lumbar compression fracture.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnostic accuracy of the model (area under the ROC curve).

METHODS

The study retrospectively collected clinical and imaging data (MRI and DEXA) from hospitalized lumbar compression fracture patients (L1-L4) aged 45 years or older between January 2021 and June 2023. Using the pyradiomics package in Python, features from the lumbar compression fracture vertebral region of interest (ROI) were extracted. Downscaling of the extracted features was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. Subsequently, six machine learning models (Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine [SVM], Decision Tree, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost], and Light Gradient Boosting Machine [LightGBM]) were employed to train and validate these features in predicting osteoporosis comorbidity in OVCF patients.

RESULTS

A total of 128 participants, 79 in the osteoporotic group and 49 in the nonosteoporotic group, met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria. From the T1 sequence MRI images, 1906 imaging features were extracted in both groups. Utilizing the Mann-Whitney U test, 365 radiologic features were selected out of the initial 1,906. Ultimately, the lasso algorithm identified 14 significant radiological features. These features, incorporated into six conventional machine learning algorithms, demonstrated successful prediction of osteoporosis in the validation set. The NaiveBayes model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84, sensitivity of 0.87, specificity of 0.70, and accuracy of 0.81.

CONCLUSIONS

A NaiveBayes machine learning algorithm can predict osteoporosis in OVCF patients using t1-sequence MRI images of lumbar compression fractures. This approach aims to obviate the necessity for further osteoporosis assessments, diminish patient exposure to radiation, and bolster the clinical care of patients with OVCF.

The Evolution of Risk Assessment in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment is critically important in elective and high-risk interventions, particularly spine surgery. This narrative review describes the evolution of risk assessment from the earliest instruments focused on general surgical risk stratification, to more accurate and spine-specific risk calculators that quantified risk, to the current era of big data.

METHODS

The PubMed and SCOPUS databases were queried on October 11, 2023 using search terms to identify risk assessment tools (RATs) in spine surgery. A total of 108 manuscripts were included after screening with full-text review using the following inclusion criteria: 1) study population of adult spine surgical patients, 2) studies describing validation and subsequent performance of preoperative RATs, and 3) studies published in English.

RESULTS

Early RATs provided stratified patients into broad categories and allowed for improved communication between physicians. Subsequent risk calculators attempted to quantify risk by estimating general outcomes such as mortality, but then evolved to estimate spine-specific surgical complications. The integration of novel concepts such as invasiveness, frailty, genetic biomarkers, and sarcopenia led to the development of more sophisticated predictive models that estimate the risk of spine-specific complications and long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

RATs have undergone a transformative shift from generalized risk stratification to quantitative predictive models. The next generation of tools will likely involve integration of radiographic and genetic biomarkers, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to improve the accuracy of these models and better inform patients, surgeons, and payers.

Weakly supervised deep learning for diagnosis of multiple vertebral compression fractures in CT

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop a weakly supervised deep learning (DL) model for vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture (VCF) classification using image-level labelled data.

METHODS

The training set included 815 patients with normal (n = 507, 62%) or VCFs (n = 308, 38%). Our proposed model was trained on image-level labelled data for vertebral-level classification. Another supervised DL model was trained with vertebral-level labelled data to compare the performance of the proposed model.

RESULTS

The test set included 227 patients with normal (n = 117, 52%) or VCFs (n = 110, 48%). For a fair comparison of the two models, we compared sensitivities with the same specificities of the proposed model and the vertebral-level supervised model. The specificity for overall L1-L5 performance was 0.981. The proposed model may outperform the vertebral-level supervised model with sensitivities of 0.770 vs 0.705 (p = 0.080), respectively. For vertebral-level analysis, the specificities for each L1-L5 were 0.974, 0.973, 0.970, 0.991, and 0.995, respectively. The proposed model yielded the same or better sensitivity than the vertebral-level supervised model in L1 (0.750 vs 0.694, p = 0.480), L3 (0.793 vs 0.586, p < 0.05), L4 (0.833 vs 0.667, p = 0.480), and L5 (0.600 vs 0.600, p = 1.000), respectively. The proposed model showed lower sensitivity than the vertebral-level supervised model for L2, but there was no significant difference (0.775 vs 0.825, p = 0.617).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model may have a comparable or better performance than the supervised model in vertebral-level VCF classification.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture classification aids in devising patient-specific treatment plans by identifying the precise vertebrae affected by compression fractures.

KEY POINTS

• Our proposed weakly supervised method may have comparable or better performance than the supervised method for vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture classification. • The weakly supervised model could have classified cases with multiple vertebral compression fractures at the vertebral-level, even if the model was trained with image-level labels. • Our proposed method could help reduce radiologists' labour because it enables vertebral-level classification from image-level labels.

Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Imaging and Patient Care: A Review of Recent Advances

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming spinal imaging and patient care through automated analysis and enhanced decision-making. This review presents a clinical task-based evaluation, highlighting the specific impact of AI techniques on different aspects of spinal imaging and patient care. We first discuss how AI can potentially improve image quality through techniques like denoising or artifact reduction. We then explore how AI enables efficient quantification of anatomical measurements, spinal curvature parameters, vertebral segmentation, and disc grading. This facilitates objective, accurate interpretation and diagnosis. AI models now reliably detect key spinal pathologies, achieving expert-level performance in tasks like identifying fractures, stenosis, infections, and tumors. Beyond diagnosis, AI also assists surgical planning via synthetic computed tomography generation, augmented reality systems, and robotic guidance. Furthermore, AI image analysis combined with clinical data enables personalized predictions to guide treatment decisions, such as forecasting spine surgery outcomes. However, challenges still need to be addressed in implementing AI clinically, including model interpretability, generalizability, and data limitations. Multicenter collaboration using large, diverse datasets is critical to advance the field further. While adoption barriers persist, AI presents a transformative opportunity to revolutionize spinal imaging workflows, empowering clinicians to translate data into actionable insights for improved patient care.

Chest CT-based automated vertebral fracture assessment using artificial intelligence and morphologic features

BACKGROUND

Spinal degeneration and vertebral compression fractures are common among the elderly that adversely affect their mobility, quality of life, lung function, and mortality. Assessment of vertebral fractures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is important due to the high prevalence of osteoporosis and associated vertebral fractures in COPD.

PURPOSE

We present new automated methods for (1) segmentation and labelling of individual vertebrae in chest computed tomography (CT) images using deep learning (DL), multi-parametric freeze-and-grow (FG) algorithm, and separation of apparently fused vertebrae using intensity autocorrelation and (2) vertebral deformity fracture detection using computed vertebral height features and parametric computational modelling of an established protocol outlined for trained human experts.

METHODS

A chest CT-based automated method was developed for quantitative deformity fracture assessment following the protocol by Genant et al. The computational method was accomplished in the following steps: (1) computation of a voxel-level vertebral body likelihood map from chest CT using a trained DL network; (2) delineation and labelling of individual vertebrae on the likelihood map using an iterative multi-parametric FG algorithm; (3) separation of apparently fused vertebrae in CT using intensity autocorrelation; (4) computation of vertebral heights using contour analysis on the central anterior-posterior (AP) plane of a vertebral body; (5) assessment of vertebral fracture status using ratio functions of vertebral heights and optimized thresholds. The method was applied to inspiratory or total lung capacity (TLC) chest scans from the multi-site Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00608764) study, and the performance was examined (n = 3231). One hundred and twenty scans randomly selected from this dataset were partitioned into training (n = 80) and validation (n = 40) datasets for the DL-based vertebral body classifier. Also, generalizability of the method to low dose CT imaging (n = 236) was evaluated.

RESULTS

The vertebral segmentation module achieved a Dice score of .984 as compared to manual outlining results as reference (n = 100); the segmentation performance was consistent across images with the minimum and maximum of Dice scores among images being .980 and .989, respectively. The vertebral labelling module achieved 100% accuracy (n = 100). For low dose CT, the segmentation module produced image-level minimum and maximum Dice scores of .995 and .999, respectively, as compared to standard dose CT as the reference; vertebral labelling at low dose CT was fully consistent with standard dose CT (n = 236). The fracture assessment method achieved overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 98.3%, 94.8%, and 98.5%, respectively, for 40,050 vertebrae from 3231 COPDGene participants. For generalizability experiments, fracture assessment from low dose CT was consistent with the reference standard dose CT results across all participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Our CT-based automated method for vertebral fracture assessment is accurate, and it offers a feasible alternative to manual expert reading, especially for large population-based studies, where automation is important for high efficiency. Generalizability of the method to low dose CT imaging further extends the scope of application of the method, particularly since the usage of low dose CT imaging in large population-based studies has increased to reduce cumulative radiation exposure.

Opportunistic Screening for Acute Vertebral Fractures on a Routine Abdominal or Chest Computed Tomography Scans Using an Automated Deep Learning Model

OBJECTIVES

To develop an opportunistic screening model based on a deep learning algorithm to detect recent vertebral fractures in abdominal or chest CTs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1309 coronal reformatted images (504 with a recent fracture from 119 patients, and 805 without fracture from 115 patients), from torso CTs, performed from September 2018 to April 2022, on patients who also had a spine MRI within two months, were included. Two readers participated in image selection and manually labeled the fractured segment on each selected image with Neuro-T (version 2.3.3; Neurocle Inc.) software. We split the images randomly into the training and internal test set (labeled: unlabeled = 480:700) and the secondary interval validation set (24:105). For the observer study, three radiologists reviewed the CT images in the external test set with and without deep learning assistance and scored the likelihood of an acute fracture in each image independently.

RESULTS

For the training and internal test sets, the AI achieved a 99.86% test accuracy, 91.22% precision, and 89.18% F1 score for detection of recent fracture. Then, in the secondary internal validation set, it achieved 99.90%, 74.93%, and 78.30%, respectively. In the observer study, with the assistance of the deep learning algorithm, a significant improvement was observed in the radiology resident's accuracy, from 92.79% to 98.2% (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The model showed a high level of accuracy in the test set and also the internal validation set. If this algorithm is applied opportunistically to daily torso CT evaluation, it will be helpful for the early detection of fractures that require treatment.

Differentiation of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Comprehensive Review of Imaging Techniques and Future Applications

Native vertebral osteomyelitis, also termed spondylodiscitis, is an antibiotic-resistant disease that requires long-term treatment. Without proper treatment, NVO can lead to severe nerve damage or even death. Therefore, it is important to accurately diagnose the cause of NVO, especially in spontaneous cases. Infectious NVO is characterized by the involvement of 2 adjacent vertebrae and intervertebral discs, and common infectious agents include Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Brucella abortus, and fungi. Clinical symptoms are generally nonspecific, and early diagnosis and appropriate treatment can prevent irreversible sequelae. Advances in pathologic histologic imaging have led physicians to look more forward to being able to differentiate between tuberculous and septic spinal discitis. Therefore, research in identifying and differentiating the imaging features of these 4 common NVOs is essential. Due to the diagnostic difficulties, clinical and radiologic diagnosis is the mainstay of provisional diagnosis. With the advent of the big data era and the emergence of convolutional neural network algorithms for deep learning, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in orthopedic imaging diagnosis has gradually increased. AI can assist physicians in imaging review, effectively reduce the workload of physicians, and improve diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, it is necessary to present the latest clinical research on NVO and the outlook for future AI applications.

Practical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Imaging: A Review

Artificial intelligence (AI), a transformative technology with unprecedented potential in medical imaging, can be applied to various spinal pathologies. AI-based approaches may improve imaging efficiency, diagnostic accuracy, and interpretation, which is essential for positive patient outcomes. This review explores AI algorithms, techniques, and applications in spine imaging, highlighting diagnostic impact and challenges with future directions for integrating AI into spine imaging workflow.

Artificial intelligence diagnostic model for multi-site fracture X-ray images of extremities based on deep convolutional neural networks

Background

The rapid and accurate diagnosis of fractures is crucial for timely treatment of trauma patients. Deep learning, one of the most widely used forms of artificial intelligence (AI), is now commonly employed in medical imaging for fracture detection. This study aimed to construct a deep learning model using big data to recognize multiple-fracture X-ray images of extremity bones.

Methods

Radiographic imaging data of extremities were retrospectively collected from five hospitals between January 2017 and September 2020. The total number of people finally included was 25,635 and the total number of images included was 26,098. After labeling the lesions, the randomized method used 90% of the data as the training set to develop the fracture detection model, and the remaining 10% was used as the validation set to verify the model. The faster region convolutional neural networks (R-CNN) algorithm was adopted to construct diagnostic models for detection. The Dice coefficient was used to evaluate the image segmentation accuracy. The performances of detection models were evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

The free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve value was 0.886 and 0.843 for the detection of single and multiple fractures, respectively. Additionally, the effective identification AUC for all parts was higher than 0.920. Notably, the AUC for wrist fractures reached 0.952. The average accuracy in detecting bone fracture regions in the extremities was 0.865. When analyzing single and multiple lesions at the patient level, the sensitivity was 0.957 for patients with multiple lesions and 0.852 for those with single lesions. In the segmentation task, the training set (the data set used by the machine learning model to train and learn) and the validation set (the data set used to evaluate the performance of the model) reached 0.996 and 0.975, respectively.

Conclusions

The faster R-CNN training algorithm exhibits excellent performance in simultaneously identifying fractures in the hands, feet, wrists, ankles, radius and ulna, and tibia and fibula on X-ray images. It demonstrates high accuracy, low false-negative rates, and controllable false-positive rates. It can serve as a valuable screening tool.

Auto-CA: Automated Cobb Angle Measurement Based on Vertebrae Detection for Assessment of Spinal Curvature Deformity

An accurate identification and localization of vertebrae in X-ray images can assist doctors in measuring Cobb angles for treating patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. It is useful for clinical decision support systems for diagnosis, surgery planning, and spinal health analysis. Currently, publicly available annotated datasets on spinal vertebrae are small, making deep-learning-based detection methods that are highly data-dependent less accurate. In this article, we propose an algorithm based on convolutional neural networks that can be trained to detect vertebrae from a small set of images. This method can display critical information on a patient's spine, display vertebrae and their labels on the thoracic and lumbar, calculate the Cobb angle, and evaluate the severity of spinal deformities. The proposed achieved an average accuracy of 0.958 and 0.962 for classifying spinal deformities (i.e., C-shaped, S-shaped type 1, and S-shaped type 2) and severity of Cobb angle (i.e., normal, mild, moderate, and severe), respectively. The Cobb angle measurement had a median difference of less than 5° from the ground-truth with SMAPE of 5.27% and an error on landmark detection of 19.73. In addition, Lenke classification is used to analyze spinal deformities as types A, B, and C, which have an average accuracy of 0.924. Physicians can use the proposed system in clinical practice by providing X-ray images via the user interface.

Development of a Machine Learning Algorithm to Correlate Lumbar Disc Height on X-rays with Disc Bulging or Herniation

Lumbar disc bulging or herniation (LDBH) is one of the major causes of spinal stenosis and related nerve compression, and its severity is the major determinant for spine surgery. MRI of the spine is the most important diagnostic tool for evaluating the need for surgical intervention in patients with LDBH. However, MRI utilization is limited by its low accessibility. Spinal X-rays can rapidly provide information on the bony structure of the patient. Our study aimed to identify the factors associated with LDBH, including disc height, and establish a clinical diagnostic tool to support its diagnosis based on lumbar X-ray findings. In this study, a total of 458 patients were used for analysis and 13 clinical and imaging variables were collected. Five machine-learning (ML) methods, including LASSO regression, MARS, decision tree, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting, were applied and integrated to identify important variables for predicting LDBH from lumbar spine X-rays. The results showed L4-5 posterior disc height, age, and L1-2 anterior disc height to be the top predictors, and a decision tree algorithm was constructed to support clinical decision-making. Our study highlights the potential of ML-based decision tools for surgeons and emphasizes the importance of L1-2 disc height in relation to LDBH. Future research will expand on these findings to develop a more comprehensive decision-supporting model.

Artificial intelligence in fracture detection with different image modalities and data types: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Artificial Intelligence (AI), encompassing Machine Learning and Deep Learning, has increasingly been applied to fracture detection using diverse imaging modalities and data types. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of AI in detecting fractures through various imaging modalities and data types (image, tabular, or both) and to synthesize the existing evidence related to AI-based fracture detection. Peer-reviewed studies developing and validating AI for fracture detection were identified through searches in multiple electronic databases without time limitations. A hierarchical meta-analysis model was used to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity. A diagnostic accuracy quality assessment was performed to evaluate bias and applicability. Of the 66 eligible studies, 54 identified fractures using imaging-related data, nine using tabular data, and three using both. Vertebral fractures were the most common outcome (n = 20), followed by hip fractures (n = 18). Hip fractures exhibited the highest pooled sensitivity (92%; 95% CI: 87-96, p< 0.01) and specificity (90%; 95% CI: 85-93, p< 0.01). Pooled sensitivity and specificity using image data (92%; 95% CI: 90-94, p< 0.01; and 91%; 95% CI: 88-93, p < 0.01) were higher than those using tabular data (81%; 95% CI: 77-85, p< 0.01; and 83%; 95% CI: 76-88, p < 0.01), respectively. Radiographs demonstrated the highest pooled sensitivity (94%; 95% CI: 90-96, p < 0.01) and specificity (92%; 95% CI: 89-94, p< 0.01). Patient selection and reference standards were major concerns in assessing diagnostic accuracy for bias and applicability. AI displays high diagnostic accuracy for various fracture outcomes, indicating potential utility in healthcare systems for fracture diagnosis. However, enhanced transparency in reporting and adherence to standardized guidelines are necessary to improve the clinical applicability of AI. Review Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021240359).

Artificial intelligence applications in bone fractures: A bibliometric and science mapping analysis

Background

Bone fractures are a common medical issue worldwide, causing a serious economic burden on society. In recent years, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of fracture has developed rapidly, especially in fracture diagnosis, where AI has shown significant capabilities comparable to those of professional orthopedic surgeons. This study aimed to review the development process and applications of AI in the field of fracture using bibliometric analysis, while analyzing the research hotspots and future trends in the field.

Materials and methods

Studies on AI and fracture were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collections since 1990, a retrospective bibliometric and visualized study of the filtered data was conducted through CiteSpace and Bibliometrix R package.

Results

A total of 1063 publications were included in the analysis, with the annual publication rapidly growing since 2017. China had the most publications, and the United States had the most citations. Technical University of Munich, Germany, had the most publications. Doornberg JN was the most productive author. Most research in this field was published in Scientific Reports. Doi K's 2007 review in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics was the most influential paper.

Conclusion

AI application in fracture has achieved outstanding results and will continue to progress. In this study, we used a bibliometric analysis to assist researchers in understanding the basic knowledge structure, research hotspots, and future trends in this field, to further promote the development of AI applications in fracture.

Machine Learning in Neurosurgery: Toward Complex Inputs, Actionable Predictions, and Generalizable Translations

Machine learning can predict neurosurgical diagnosis and outcomes, power imaging analysis, and perform robotic navigation and tumor labeling. State-of-the-art models can reconstruct and generate images, predict surgical events from video, and assist in intraoperative decision-making. In this review, we will detail the neurosurgical applications of machine learning, ranging from simple to advanced models, and their potential to transform patient care. As machine learning techniques, outputs, and methods become increasingly complex, their performance is often more impactful yet increasingly difficult to evaluate. We aim to introduce these advancements to the neurosurgical audience while suggesting major potential roadblocks to their safe and effective translation. Unlike the previous generation of machine learning in neurosurgery, the safe translation of recent advancements will be contingent on neurosurgeons' involvement in model development and validation.

Accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for detecting moderate-to-severe vertebral compression fractures on abdominal and thoracic computed tomography scans

Objective

To describe the accuracy of HealthVCF, a software product that uses artificial intelligence, in the detection of incidental moderate-to-severe vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) on chest and abdominal computed tomography scans.

Materials and Methods

We included a consecutive sample of 899 chest and abdominal computed tomography scans of patients 51-99 years of age. Scans were retrospectively evaluated by the software and by two specialists in musculoskeletal imaging for the presence of VCFs with vertebral body height loss > 25%. We compared the software analysis with that of a general radiologist, using the evaluation of the two specialists as the reference.

Results

The software showed a diagnostic accuracy of 89.6% (95% CI: 87.4-91.5%) for moderate-to-severe VCFs, with a sensitivity of 73.8%, a specificity of 92.7%, and a negative predictive value of 94.8%. Among the 145 positive scans detected by the software, the general radiologist failed to report the fractures in 62 (42.8%), and the algorithm detected additional fractures in 38 of those scans.

Conclusion

The software has good accuracy for the detection of moderate-to-severe VCFs, with high specificity, and can increase the opportunistic detection rate of VCFs by radiologists who do not specialize in musculoskeletal imaging.

External validation of a convolutional neural network algorithm for opportunistically detecting vertebral fractures in routine CT scans

The Convolutional Neural Network algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 93% in identifying scans with vertebral fractures (VFs). The external validation results suggest that the algorithm provides an opportunity to aid radiologists with the early identification of VFs in routine CT scans of abdomen and chest.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of a previously trained Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model to automatically detect vertebral fractures (VFs) in CT scans in an external validation cohort.

METHODS

Two Chinese studies and clinical data were used to retrospectively select CT scans of the chest, abdomen and thoracolumbar spine in men and women aged ≥50 years. The CT scans were assessed using the semiquantitative (SQ) Genant classification for prevalent VFs in a process blinded to clinical information. The performance of the CNN model was evaluated against reference standard readings by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), accuracy, Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

A total of 4,810 subjects were included, with a median age of 62 years (IQR 56-67), of which 2,654 (55.2%) were females. The scans were acquired between January 2013 and January 2019 on 16 different CT scanners from three different manufacturers. 2,773 (57.7%) were abdominal CTs. A total of 628 scans (13.1%) had ≥1 VF (grade 2-3), representing 899 fractured vertebrae out of a total of 48,584 (1.9%) visualized vertebral bodies. The CNN's performance in identifying scans with ≥1 moderate or severe fractures achieved an AUROC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95), accuracy of 93% (95% CI: 93%-94%), kappa of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72-0.77), a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI: 92-96%) and a specificity of 93% (95% CI: 93-94%).

CONCLUSION

The algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in the identification of vertebral fractures in a cohort of chest and abdominal CT scans of Chinese patients ≥50 years.

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Detection of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures on Lateral Chest Radiographs in Post-Menopausal Women

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are often not reported by radiologists on routine chest radiographs. This study aims to investigate the clinical value of a newly developed artificial intelligence (AI) tool, Ofeye 1.0, for automated detection of OVFs on lateral chest radiographs in post-menopausal women (>60 years) who were referred to undergo chest x-rays for other reasons. A total of 510 de-identified lateral chest radiographs from three clinical sites were retrieved and analysed using the Ofeye 1.0 tool. These images were then reviewed by a consultant radiologist with findings serving as the reference standard for determining the diagnostic performance of the AI tool for the detection of OVFs. Of all the original radiologist reports, missed OVFs were found in 28.8% of images but were detected using the AI tool. The AI tool demonstrated high specificity of 92.8% (95% CI: 89.6, 95.2%), moderate accuracy of 80.3% (95% CI: 76.3, 80.4%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 73.7% (95% CI: 65.2, 80.8%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 81.5% (95% CI: 79, 83.8%), but low sensitivity of 49% (95% CI: 40.7, 57.3%). The AI tool showed improved sensitivity compared with the original radiologist reports, which was 20.8% (95% CI: 14.5, 28.4). The new AI tool can be used as a complementary tool in routine diagnostic reports for the reduction in missed OVFs in elderly women.

Towards Improved Identification of Vertebral Fractures in Routine Computed Tomography (CT) Scans: Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm

Vertebral fractures (VFs) are the hallmark of osteoporosis, being one of the most frequent types of fragility fracture and an early sign of the disease. They are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. VFs are incidentally found in one out of five imaging studies, however, more than half of the VFs are not identified nor reported in patient computed tomography (CT) scans. Our study aimed to develop a machine learning algorithm to identify VFs in abdominal/chest CT scans and evaluate its performance. We acquired two independent data sets of routine abdominal/chest CT scans of patients aged 50 years or older: a training set of 1011 scans from a non-interventional, prospective proof-of-concept study at the Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Brussel and a validation set of 2000 subjects from an observational cohort study at the Hospital of Holbaek. Both data sets were externally reevaluated to identify reference standard VF readings using the Genant semiquantitative (SQ) grading. Four independent models have been trained in a cross-validation experiment using the training set and an ensemble of four models has been applied to the external validation set. The validation set contained 15.3% scans with one or more VF (SQ2-3), whereas 663 of 24,930 evaluable vertebrae (2.7%) were fractured (SQ2-3) as per reference standard readings. Comparison of the ensemble model with the reference standard readings in identifying subjects with one or more moderate or severe VF resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.90), accuracy of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.91-0.93), kappa of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.67-0.76), sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85), and specificity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96). We demonstrated that a machine learning algorithm trained for VF detection achieved strong performance on an external validation set. It has the potential to support healthcare professionals with the early identification of VFs and prevention of future fragility fractures. © 2023 UCB S.A. and The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

DRCM: a disentangled representation network based on coordinate and multimodal attention for medical image fusion

Recent studies on medical image fusion based on deep learning have made remarkable progress, but the common and exclusive features of different modalities, especially their subsequent feature enhancement, are ignored. Since medical images of different modalities have unique information, special learning of exclusive features should be designed to express the unique information of different modalities so as to obtain a medical fusion image with more information and details. Therefore, we propose an attention mechanism-based disentangled representation network for medical image fusion, which designs coordinate attention and multimodal attention to extract and strengthen common and exclusive features. First, the common and exclusive features of each modality were obtained by the cross mutual information and adversarial objective methods, respectively. Then, coordinate attention is focused on the enhancement of the common and exclusive features of different modalities, and the exclusive features are weighted by multimodal attention. Finally, these two kinds of features are fused. The effectiveness of the three innovation modules is verified by ablation experiments. Furthermore, eight comparison methods are selected for qualitative analysis, and four metrics are used for quantitative comparison. The values of the four metrics demonstrate the effect of the DRCM. Furthermore, the DRCM achieved better results on SCD, Nabf, and MS-SSIM metrics, which indicates that the DRCM achieved the goal of further improving the visual quality of the fused image with more information from source images and less noise. Through the comprehensive comparison and analysis of the experimental results, it was found that the DRCM outperforms the comparison method.

Efficacy of two opportunistic methods for screening osteoporosis in lumbar spine surgery patients

PURPOSE

Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements and vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores are opportunistic screening methods for evaluating bone quality. Since studies comparing the efficacies of the two methods are rare, this retrospective study aimed to examine the efficacy of VBQ scores compared with that of HU measurements for diagnosing osteoporosis in lumbar spine surgery patients.

METHODS

We selected patients who had undergone spinal surgery between January 2020 and May 2022 from our database. The VBQ scores based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and HU measurements based on computed tomography (CT) were calculated. Correlation analysis of the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T score and study parameters was performed. The Delong test and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to compare the efficacies of the two methods.

RESULTS

We included 118 consecutive patients who underwent selective spinal surgery. The VBQ score and HU measurement were significantly correlated with the DEXA T score. Based on the Delong test, HU measurement predicted osteoporosis more effectively than the VBQ score did. The DCA revealed that the VBQ score performed better than the HU measurement did.

CONCLUSIONS

The calculation of VBQ scores is a novel opportunistic screening method for diagnosing osteoporosis; however, CT-based HU measurements outperform MRI-based VBQ scores. HU measurements can be used as a screening method when pre-operative CT scans are available.

Lumbar Spinal Canal Segmentation in Cases with Lumbar Stenosis Using Deep-U-Net Ensembles

BACKGROUND

Narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal, or lumbar stenosis (LS), may cause debilitating radicular pain or muscle weakness. It is the most frequent indication for spinal surgery in the elderly population. Modern diagnosis relies on magnetic resonance imaging and its inherently subjective interpretation. Diagnostic rigor, accuracy, and speed may be improved by automation. In this work, we aimed to determine whether a deep-U-Net ensemble trained to segment spinal canals on a heterogeneous mix of clinical data is comparable to radiologists' segmentation of these canals in patients with LS.

METHODS

The deep U-nets were trained on spinal canals segmented by physicians on 100 axial T2 lumbar magnetic resonance imaging selected randomly from our institutional database. Test data included a total of 279 elderly patients with LS that were separate from the training set.

RESULTS

Machine-generated segmentations (MA) were qualitatively similar to expert-generated segmentations (ME1, ME2). Machine- and expert-generated segmentations were quantitatively similar, as evidenced by Dice scores (MA vs. ME1: 0.88 ± 0.04, MA vs. ME2: 0.89 ± 0.04), the Hausdorff distance (MA vs. ME1: 11.7 mm ± 13.8, MA vs. ME2: 13.1 mm ± 16.3), and average surface distance (MAvs. ME1: 0.18 mm ± 0.13, MA vs. ME2 0.18 mm ± 0.16) metrics. These metrics are comparable to inter-rater variation (ME1 vs. ME2 Dice scores: 0.94 ± 0.02, the Hausdorff distances: 9.3 mm ± 15.6, average surface distances: 0.08 mm ± 0.09).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that machine learning algorithms can segment lumbar spinal canals in LS patients, and automatic delineations are both qualitatively and quantitatively comparable to expert-generated segmentations.

Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery

This literature review sought to identify and evaluate the current applications of artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) in spine surgery that can effectively guide clinical decision-making and surgical planning. By using specific keywords to maximize search sensitivity, a thorough literature research was conducted in several online databases: Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, and the findings were filtered according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 46 studies met the requirements and were included in this review. According to this study, AI/ML models were sufficiently accurate with a mean overall value of 74.9%, and performed best at preoperative patient selection, cost prediction, and length of stay. Performance was also good at predicting functional outcomes and postoperative mortality. Regression analysis was the most frequently utilized application whereas deep learning/artificial neural networks had the highest sensitivity score (81.5%). Despite the relatively brief history of engagement with AI/ML, as evidenced by the fact that 77.5% of studies were published after 2018, the outcomes have been promising. In light of the Big Data era, the increasing prevalence of National Registries, and the wide-ranging applications of AI, such as exemplified by ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, California), it is highly likely that the field of spine surgery will gradually adopt and integrate AI/ML into its clinical practices. Consequently, it is of great significance for spine surgeons to acquaint themselves with the fundamental principles of AI/ML, as these technologies hold the potential for substantial improvements in overall patient care.

Using Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures on Plain Radiographs

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is a risk factor for morbidity and mortality in elderly population, and accurate diagnosis is important for improving treatment outcomes. OVF diagnosis suffers from high misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis rates, as well as high workload. Deep learning methods applied to plain radiographs, a simple, fast, and inexpensive examination, might solve this problem. We developed and validated a deep-learning-based vertebral fracture diagnostic system using area loss ratio, which assisted a multitasking network to perform skeletal position detection and segmentation and identify and grade vertebral fractures. As the training set and internal validation set, we used 11,397 plain radiographs from six community centers in Shanghai. For the external validation set, 1276 participants were recruited from the outpatient clinic of the Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (1276 plain radiographs). Radiologists performed all X-ray images and used the Genant semiquantitative tool for fracture diagnosis and grading as the ground truth data. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were used to evaluate diagnostic performance. The AI_OVF_SH system demonstrated high accuracy and computational speed in skeletal position detection and segmentation. In the internal validation set, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with the AI_OVF_SH model were 97.41%, 84.08%, and 97.25%, respectively, for all fractures. The sensitivity and specificity for moderate fractures were 88.55% and 99.74%, respectively, and for severe fractures, they were 92.30% and 99.92%. In the external validation set, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for all fractures were 96.85%, 83.35%, and 94.70%, respectively. For moderate fractures, the sensitivity and specificity were 85.61% and 99.85%, respectively, and 93.46% and 99.92% for severe fractures. Therefore, the AI_OVF_SH system is an efficient tool to assist radiologists and clinicians to improve the diagnosing of vertebral fractures. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: A Review of Current Topics and Competition Challenges

There is an expanding body of literature that describes the application of deep learning and other machine learning and artificial intelligence methods with potential relevance to neuroradiology practice. In this article, we performed a literature review to identify recent developments on the topics of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology, with particular emphasis on large datasets and large-scale algorithm assessments, such as those used in imaging AI competition challenges. Numerous applications relevant to ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, brain tumors, demyelinating disease, and neurodegenerative/neurocognitive disorders were discussed. The potential applications of these methods to spinal fractures, scoliosis grading, head and neck oncology, and vascular imaging were also reviewed. The AI applications examined perform a variety of tasks, including localization, segmentation, longitudinal monitoring, diagnostic classification, and prognostication. While research on this topic is ongoing, several applications have been cleared for clinical use and have the potential to augment the accuracy or efficiency of neuroradiologists.

Opportunistic Computed Tomography Screening for Osteoporosis and Fracture

Osteoporosis is underdiagnosed and undertreated, leading to loss of treatment for the patient and high costs for the health care system. Routine thoracic and/or abdominal computed tomography (CT) performed for other indications can screen opportunistically for osteoporosis with no extra cost, time, or irradiation. Various methods can quantify fracture risk on opportunistic clinical CT: vertebral Hounsfield unit bone mineral density (BMD), usually of L1; BMD measurement with asynchronous or internal calibration; quantitative CT; bone texture assessment; and finite element analysis. Screening for osteoporosis and vertebral fractures on opportunistic CT is a promising approach, providing automated fracture risk scores by means of artificial intelligence, thus enabling earlier management.

Opportunistic CT Screening-Machine Learning Algorithm Identifies Majority of Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Cohort Study

Vertebral compression fractures (VCF) are common in patients older than 50 years but are often undiagnosed. Zebra Medical Imaging developed a VCF detection algorithm, with machine learning, to detect VCFs from CT images of the chest and/or abdomen/pelvis. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the algorithm in identifying VCF. We conducted a blinded validation study to estimate the operating characteristics of the algorithm in identifying VCFs using previously completed CT scans from 1200 women and men aged 50 years and older at a tertiary-care center. Each scan was independently evaluated by two of three neuroradiologists to identify and grade VCF. Disagreements were resolved by a senior neuroradiologist. The algorithm evaluated the CT scans in a separate workstream. The VCF algorithm was not able to evaluate CT scans for 113 participants. Of the remaining 1087 study participants, 588 (54%) were women. Median age was 73 years (range 51-102 years; interquartile range 66-81). For the 1087 algorithm-evaluated participants, the sensitivity and specificity of the VCF algorithm in diagnosing any VCF were 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.72) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.92), respectively, and for diagnosing moderate/severe VCF were 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.85) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89), respectively. Implementing this VCF algorithm within radiology systems may help to identify patients at increased fracture risk and could support the diagnosis of osteoporosis and facilitate appropriate therapy. © 2023 Amgen, Inc. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Fatty Degeneration of the Autochthonous Muscles Is Significantly Associated with Incidental Non-Traumatic Vertebral Body Fractures of the Lower Thoracic Spine in Elderly Patients

PURPOSE

We investigated loco-regional degenerative changes' association with incidentally found non-traumatic vertebral body fractures of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in older patients. Methods: The patient collective included patients in the age range of 50 to 90 years. Vertebral bodies from T7 to L5 were included. Vertebral body fractures were classified according to Genant. The following loco-regional osseous and extra-osseous degenerative changes were included: osteochondrosis, spondylarthritis, facet joint asymmetries, spondylolisthesis, scoliosis as well as fatty degeneration and asymmetry of the autochthonous back muscles. Patients with traumatic and tumor-related vertebral body fractures were excluded. Non-traumatic fractures of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine were evaluated separately. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used, and relative risks (RRs) were calculated for statistics. Pearson's correlations (Rs) were used to correlate grades of degenerative changes and fracture severities. Results: 105 patients were included. Fatty deposits in the autochthonous muscles of the lower thoracic and the lumbar spine were associated with non-traumatic vertebral body fractures in the lower thoracic spine (p = 0.005, RR = 4.92). In contrast, muscle fatness of the autochthonous muscles was not a risk factor for lumbar spine fractures (p = 0.157, RR = 2.04). Additionally, we found a moderate correlation between fatty degeneration of the autochthonous muscles and the severity of fractures in the lower thoracic spine (RR = 0.34, p < 0.001). The other degenerative changes did not present any significant difference or correlation between the evaluated groups. Conclusions: Fatty degeneration of the autochthonous spinal musculature is associated with incidentally found non-traumatic fractures of the lower thoracic spine.

Benign vs malignant vertebral compression fractures with MRI: a comparison between automatic deep learning network and radiologist's assessment

OBJECTIVE

To test the diagnostic performance of a deep-learning Two-Stream Compare and Contrast Network (TSCCN) model for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) based on MRI.

METHODS

We tested a deep-learning system in 123 benign and 86 malignant VCFs. The median sagittal T1-weighted images (T1WI), T2-weighted images with fat suppression (T2WI-FS), and a combination of both (thereafter, T1WI/T2WI-FS) were used to validate TSCCN. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was analyzed to evaluate the performance of TSCCN. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of TSCCN in differentiating benign and malignant VCFs were calculated and compared with radiologists' assessments. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were tested to find intra- and inter-observer agreement of radiologists in differentiating malignant from benign VCFs.

RESULTS

The AUC of the ROC plots of TSCCN according to T1WI, T2WI-FS, and T1WI/T2WI-FS images were 99.2%, 91.7%, and 98.2%, respectively. The accuracy of T1W, T2WI-FS, and T1W/T2WI-FS based on TSCCN was 95.2%, 90.4%, and 96.2%, respectively, greater than that achieved by radiologists. Further, the specificity of T1W, T2WI-FS, and T1W/T2WI-FS based on TSCCN was higher at 98.4%, 94.3%, and 99.2% than that achieved by radiologists. The intra- and inter-observer agreements of radiologists were 0.79-0.85 and 0.79-0.80 for T1WI, 0.65-0.72 and 0.70-0.74 for T2WI-FS, and 0.83-0.88 and 0.83-0.84 for T1WI/T2WI-FS.

CONCLUSION

The TSCCN model showed better diagnostic performance than radiologists for automatically identifying benign or malignant VCFs, and is a potentially helpful tool for future clinical application.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

TSCCN-assisted MRI has shown superior performance in distinguishing benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures compared to radiologists. This technology has the value to enhance diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Further integration into clinical practice is required to optimize patient management.

KEY POINTS

• The Two-Stream Compare and Contrast Network (TSCCN) model showed better diagnostic performance than radiologists for identifying benign vs malignant vertebral compression fractures. • The processing of TSCCN is fast and stable, better than the subjective evaluation by radiologists in diagnosing vertebral compression fractures. • The TSCCN model provides options for developing a fully automated, streamlined artificial intelligence diagnostic tool.

Efficacy and confounding factors of CT attenuation value differences in distinguishing acute and old vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of various factors on CT attenuation values (HUs) of acute and old fracture vertebra, and to determine the efficacy of HU differences (△HUs) in the differentiation of the two type of fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 113 acute and 71 old fracture vertebrae confirmed by MRI were included. Four HUs measured at the mid-sagittal, upper 1/3 axial, mid-axial, and lower 1/3 axial planes of each vertebra were obtained. The △HUs between fracture vertebra and its control counterpart was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used and the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of HUs and △HUs. To evaluate the effect of height reduction, region, age and gender on HUs and △HUs, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis and t-test were used.

RESULTS

The HUs and △HUs at the upper 1/3 axial plane achieved the highest AUCs of 0.801 and 0.839, respectively. The HUs decreased gradually from Thoracic to Lumbar in control group of acute fracture. While no significant differences were found in the HUs among the 3 localizations in both fracture groups (all P > 0.05). The HUs were negatively correlated with age in all groups. The HUs of male were significantly higher than female patients in all groups (all P < 0.05). While △HU was not significantly different between males and females (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The vertebral HUs at the upper 1/3 axial plane are more likely to identify acute fractures. △HUs were beneficial in eliminating interfering factors.

The role of Artificial intelligence in the assessment of the spine and spinal cord

Artificial intelligence (AI) application development is underway in all areas of radiology where many promising tools are focused on the spine and spinal cord. In the past decade, multiple spine AI algorithms have been created based on radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. These algorithms have wide-ranging purposes including automatic labeling of vertebral levels, automated description of disc degenerative changes, detection and classification of spine trauma, identification of osseous lesions, and the assessment of cord pathology. The overarching goals for these algorithms include improved patient throughput, reducing radiologist workload burden, and improving diagnostic accuracy. There are several pre-requisite tasks required in order to achieve these goals, such as automatic image segmentation, facilitating image acquisition and postprocessing. In this narrative review, we discuss some of the important imaging AI solutions that have been developed for the assessment of the spine and spinal cord. We focus on their practical applications and briefly discuss some key requirements for the successful integration of these tools into practice. The potential impact of AI in the imaging assessment of the spine and cord is vast and promises to provide broad reaching improvements for clinicians, radiologists, and patients alike.

Can an artificial intelligence powered software reliably assess pelvic radiographs?

PURPOSE

Despite advances of three-dimensional imaging pelvic radiographs remain the cornerstone in the evaluation of the hip joint. However, large inter- and intra-rater variabilities were reported due to subjective landmark setting. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software applications could improve the reproducibility of pelvic radiograph evaluation by providing standardized measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and agreement of a newly developed AI algorithm for the evaluation of pelvic radiographs.

METHODS

Three-hundred pelvic radiographs from 280 patients with different degrees of acetabular coverage and osteoarthritis (Tönnis Grade 0 to 3) were evaluated. Reliability and agreement between manual measurements and the outputs of the AI software were assessed for the lateral-center-edge (LCE) angle, neck-shaft angle, sharp angle, acetabular index, as well as the femoral head extrusion index.

RESULTS

The AI software provided reliable results in 94.3% (283/300). The ICC values ranged between 0.73 for the Acetabular Index to 0.80 for the LCE Angle. Agreement between readers and AI outputs, given by the standard error of measurement (SEM), was good for hips with normal coverage (LCE-SEM: 3.4°) and no osteoarthritis (LCE-SEM: 3.3°) and worse for hips with undercoverage (LCE-SEM: 5.2°) or severe osteoarthritis (LCE-SEM: 5.1°).

CONCLUSION

AI-powered applications are a reliable alternative to manual evaluation of pelvic radiographs. While being accurate for patients with normal acetabular coverage and mild signs of osteoarthritis, it needs improvement in the evaluation of patients with hip dysplasia and severe osteoarthritis.

Automatic vertebral fracture and three-column injury diagnosis with fracture visualization by a multi-scale attention-guided network

Deep learning methods have the potential to improve the efficiency of diagnosis for vertebral fractures with computed tomography (CT) images. Most existing intelligent vertebral fracture diagnosis methods only provide dichotomized results at a patient level. However, a fine-grained and more nuanced outcome is clinically needed. This study proposed a novel network, a multi-scale attention-guided network (MAGNet), to diagnose vertebral fractures and three-column injuries with fracture visualization at a vertebra level. By imposing attention constraints through a disease attention map (DAM), a fusion of multi-scale spatial attention maps, the MAGNet can get task highly relevant features and localize fractures. A total of 989 vertebrae were studied here. After four-fold cross-validation, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of our model for vertebral fracture dichotomized diagnosis and three-column injury diagnosis was 0.884 ± 0.015 and 0.920 ± 0.104, respectively. The overall performance of our model outperformed classical classification models, attention models, visual explanation methods, and attention-guided methods based on class activation mapping. Our work can promote the clinical application of deep learning to diagnose vertebral fractures and provide a way to visualize and improve the diagnosis results with attention constraints.