1
|
Sobirey R, Matuschewski N, Gross M, Lin M, Kao T, Kasolowsky V, Strazzabosco M, Stein S, Savic LJ, Gebauer B, Jaffe A, Duncan J, Madoff DC, Chapiro J. Tumor response assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy: imaging biomarkers for clinical decision-making. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10955-6. [PMID: 39033181 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10955-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of 1D and 3D tumor response assessment for predicting median overall survival (mOS) in patients who underwent immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Patients with HCC who underwent immunotherapy between 2017 and 2023 and received multi-phasic contrast-enhanced MRIs pre- and post-treatment were included in this retrospective study. Tumor response was measured using 1D, RECIST 1.1, and mRECIST, and 3D, volumetric, and percentage quantitative EASL (vqEASL and %qEASL). Patients were grouped into disease control vs progression and responders vs non-responders. Kaplan-Meier curves analyzed with log-rank tests assessed the predictive value for mOS. Cox regression modeling evaluated the association of clinical baseline parameters with mOS. RESULTS This study included 37 patients (mean age, 69.1 years [SD, 8.0]; 33 men). The mOS was 16.9 months. 3D vqEASL and %qEASL successfully stratified patients into disease control and progression (vqEASL: HR 0.21, CI: 0.55-0.08, p < 0.001; %qEASL: HR 0.18, CI: 0.83-0.04, p = 0.013), as well as responder and nonresponder (vqEASL: HR 0.25, CI: 0.08-0.74, p = 0.007; %qEASL: HR 0.17, CI: 0.04-0.72, p = 0.007) for predicting mOS. The 1D criteria, mRECIST stratified into disease control and progression only (HR 0.24, CI: 0.65-0.09, p = 0.002), and RECIST 1.1 showed no predictive value in either stratification. Multivariate Cox regression identified alpha-fetoprotein > 500 ng/mL as a predictor for poor mOS (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION The 3D quantitative enhancement-based response assessment tool qEASL can predict overall survival in patients undergoing immunotherapy for HCC and could identify non-responders. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Using 3D quantitative enhancement-based tumor response criteria (qEASL), radiologists' predictions of tumor response in patients undergoing immunotherapy for HCC can be further improved. KEY POINTS MRI-based tumor response criteria predict immunotherapy survival benefits in HCC patients. 3D tumor response assessment methods surpass current evaluation criteria in predicting overall survival during HCC immunotherapy. Enhancement-based 3D tumor response criteria are robust prognosticators of survival for HCC patients on immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabea Sobirey
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nickolai Matuschewski
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Gross
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
| | - MingDe Lin
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Visage Imaging Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Tabea Kao
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
| | - Victor Kasolowsky
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mario Strazzabosco
- Department of Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Stacey Stein
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lynn Jeanette Savic
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ariel Jaffe
- Department of Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - James Duncan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David C Madoff
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Julius Chapiro
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roschelle M, Rabbani R, Gweon S, Kumar R, Vercruysse A, Cho NW, Spitzer MH, Niknejad AM, Stojanović VM, Anwar M. A Wireless, Multicolor Fluorescence Image Sensor Implant for Real-Time Monitoring in Cancer Therapy. ARXIV 2024:arXiv:2406.18881v1. [PMID: 38979489 PMCID: PMC11230517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
Real-time monitoring of dynamic biological processes in the body is critical to understanding disease progression and treatment response. This data, for instance, can help address the lower than 50% response rates to cancer immunotherapy. However, current clinical imaging modalities lack the molecular contrast, resolution, and chronic usability for rapid and accurate response assessments. Here, we present a fully wireless image sensor featuring a 2.5×5 mm2 CMOS integrated circuit for multicolor fluorescence imaging deep in tissue. The sensor operates wirelessly via ultrasound (US) at 5 cm depth in oil, harvesting energy with 221 mW/cm2 incident US power density (31% of FDA limits) and backscattering data at 13 kbps with a bit error rate <10-6. In-situ fluorescence excitation is provided by micro-laser diodes controlled with a programmable on-chip driver. An optical frontend combining a multi-bandpass interference filter and a fiber optic plate provides >6 OD excitation blocking and enables three-color imaging for detecting multiple cell types. A 36×40-pixel array captures images with <125 μm resolution. We demonstrate wireless, dual-color fluorescence imaging of both effector and suppressor immune cells in ex vivo mouse tumor samples with and without immunotherapy. These results show promise for providing rapid insight into therapeutic response and resistance, guiding personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah Roschelle
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720 USA
| | - Rozhan Rabbani
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720 USA
| | - Surin Gweon
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720 USA
| | - Rohan Kumar
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720 USA
| | - Alec Vercruysse
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720 USA
| | - Nam Woo Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology and the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Matthew H. Spitzer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Ali M. Niknejad
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720 USA
| | - Vladimir M. Stojanović
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720 USA
| | - Mekhail Anwar
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Y, Fan C, Hu Y, Zhang W, Li H, Wang Y, Xu Z. Multi-cohort validation: A comprehensive exploration of prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Int Immunopharmacol 2024; 135:112300. [PMID: 38781609 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common form of RCC. It is characterized by resistance to traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as an unfavorable clinical prognosis. Although TYMP is implicated in the advancement of tumor progression, the role of TYMP in ccRCC is still not understood. Heightened TYMP expression was identified in ccRCC through database mining and confirmed in RCC cell lines. Indeed, TYMP knockdown impacted RCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro. TYMP showed a positive correlation with clinicopathological parameters (histological grade, pathological stage). Moreover, patients with high TYMP expression were indicative of poor prognosis in TCGA-ccRCC and external cohorts. The results of single-cell analysis showed that the distribution of TYMP was predominantly observed in monocytes and macrophages. Furthermore, there is a significant association between TYMP and immune status. Methylation analysis further elucidated the relationship between TYMP expression and multiple methylation sites. Drug sensitivity analysis unveiled potential pharmaceutical options. Additionally, mutation analyses identified an association between TYMP and the ccRCC driver genes like BAP1 and ROS1. In summary, TYMP may serve as a reliable prognostic indicator for ccRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifei Li
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Cancer Biomarker Discovery and Translation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| | - Congcong Fan
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Cancer Biomarker Discovery and Translation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| | - Yuhang Hu
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Cancer Biomarker Discovery and Translation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| | - Weizhi Zhang
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Cancer Biomarker Discovery and Translation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| | - Hang Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| | - Yining Wang
- Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Cancer Biomarker Discovery and Translation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| | - Ziqiang Xu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chakrabarty N, Mahajan A, Basu S, D’Cruz AK. Comprehensive Review of the Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Thyroid Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2904. [PMID: 38792444 PMCID: PMC11122658 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Thyroid cancer is the most common head and neck cancer (HNC) in the world. In this article, we comprehensively cover baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up imaging recommendations for thyroid carcinomas along with the eighth edition of the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system proposed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). We include characterization and risk stratification of thyroid nodules on ultrasound (US) proposed by various international bodies. Management guidelines (depending upon the type of thyroid carcinoma) based on the international consensus recommendations (mainly by the American Thyroid Association) are also extensively covered in this article, including the role of a radioiodine scan. The management of recurrent disease is also briefly elucidated in this article. In addition, we cover the risk factors and etiopathogenesis of thyroid carcinoma along with the non-imaging diagnostic workup essential for thyroid carcinoma management, including the significance of genetic mutations. US is the diagnostic imaging modality of choice, with US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) being the procedure of choice for tissue diagnosis. The roles of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (FDG-PET/CT) in thyroid carcinoma staging are also specified. Through this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive reference guide for the radiologists and the clinicians in the pursuit of optimal care for patients with thyroid carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nivedita Chakrabarty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India;
| | - Abhishek Mahajan
- Department of Imaging, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, 65 Pembroke Place, Liverpool L7 8YA, UK
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
| | - Sandip Basu
- Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India;
| | - Anil K. D’Cruz
- Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai 400614, Maharashtra, India;
- Foundation of Head Neck Oncology, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
- Union International Cancer Control (UICC), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kazim M, Yoo E. Recent Advances in the Development of Non-Invasive Imaging Probes for Cancer Immunotherapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2024; 63:e202310694. [PMID: 37843426 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202310694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
The last two decades have witnessed a major revolution in the field of tumor immunology including clinical progress using various immunotherapy strategies. These advances have highlighted the potential for approaches that harness the power of the immune system to fight against cancer. While cancer immunotherapies have shown significant clinical successes, patient responses vary widely due to the complex and heterogeneous nature of tumors and immune responses, calling for reliable biomarkers and therapeutic strategies to maximize the benefits of immunotherapy. Especially, stratifying responding individuals from non-responders during the early stages of treatment could help avoid long-term damage and tailor personalized treatments. In efforts to develop non-invasive means for accurately evaluating and predicting tumor response to immunotherapy, multiple affinity-based agents targeting immune cell markers and checkpoint molecules have been developed and advanced to clinical trials. In addition, researchers have recently turned their attention to substrate and activity-based imaging probes that can provide real-time, functional assessment of immune response to treatment. Here, we highlight some of those recently designed probes that image functional proteases as biomarkers of cancer immunotherapy with a focus on their chemical design and detection modalities and discuss challenges and opportunities for the development of imaging tools utilized in cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Kazim
- Chemical Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Euna Yoo
- Chemical Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yirgin IK, Dogan I, Engin G, Vatansever S, Erturk SM. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: Assessment of the performance and the agreement of iRECIST, irRC, and irRECIST. J Cancer Res Ther 2024; 20:156-162. [PMID: 38554314 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1898_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immunotherapy has become more widely accepted and used by medical oncologists. Radiologists face challenges in assessing tumor response and becoming more involved in the management of treatment. We aimed to assess the agreement between immune-related response criteria (irRC), immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), and immune RECIST (iRECIST) to correlate the response measured by them with overall survival (OS), and to determine the confirmation rate of progressive disease (PD). METHODS A total of 43 patients (28 men, 15 women; average age = 54.6 ± 15.7 years) treated with immunotherapy were included in this study. Pairwise agreements between iRECIST, irRC, and irRECIST were calculated using Cohen's kappa statistics. The correlation of the criteria-based response and OS was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. A confirmation rate with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated in patients with PD. RESULTS The kappa values between iRECIST and irRC, iRECIST and irRECIST, and irRC and irRECIST were 0.961 (almost perfect; P < 0.001), 0.961 (almost perfect; P < 0.001), and 0.922 (almost perfect; P < 0.001), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test showed for each criterion a statistically significant correlation with OS (P < 0.05). The confirmation rates of PD for irRC, irRECIST, and iRECIST were 95% (19/20; 95% CI = 76.4-99.1%), 90% (18/20; 95% CI = 69.9-97.2%), and 90.5% (19/21; 95% CI = 71.1-97.4%), respectively. CONCLUSION There was an almost perfect and statistically significant agreement between iRECIST, irRC, and irRECIST. The measurements performed with them significantly correlated with the OS; their confirmation rates were similar. iRECIST and irRECIST might be favored over irRC because of their relative ease of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inci Kizildag Yirgin
- Department of Radiology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Izzet Dogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gulgun Engin
- Department of Radiology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sezai Vatansever
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sukru Mehmet Erturk
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang Q, Huang H, Zhang G, Weng N, Ou Z, Sun M, Luo H, Zhou X, Gao Y, Wu X. Contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomic analysis for determining the response to anti-programmed death-1 therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: A pilot study. Thorac Cancer 2023; 14:3266-3274. [PMID: 37743537 PMCID: PMC10665784 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In view of the fact that radiomics features have been reported as predictors of immunotherapy to various cancers, this study aimed to develop a prediction model to determine the response to anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients from contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) radiomics features. METHODS Radiomic analysis of images was performed retrospectively for image samples before and after anti-PD-1 treatment, and efficacy analysis was performed for the results of two different time node evaluations. A total of 68 image samples were included in this study. Quantitative radiomic features were extracted from the images, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was applied to select radiomic features. After obtaining selected features, three classification models were used to establish a radiomics model to predict the ESCC status and efficacy of therapy. A cross-validation strategy utilizing three folds was employed to train and test the model. Performance evaluation of the model was done using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity, specificity, and precision metric. RESULTS Wavelet and area of gray level change (log-sigma) were the most significant radiomic features for predicting therapy efficacy. Fifteen radiomic features from the whole tumor and peritumoral regions were selected and comprised of the fusion radiomics score. A radiomics classification was developed with AUC of 0.82 and 0.884 in the before and after-therapy cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The combined model incorporating radiomic features and clinical CECT predictors helps to predict the response to anti-PD-1therapy in patients with ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinzhu Yang
- School of Biomedical EngineeringShenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina
| | - Haofan Huang
- School of Biomedical EngineeringShenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong SARChina
| | - Guizhi Zhang
- Department of RadiologyThe Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen UniversityShenzhenChina
| | - Nuoqing Weng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated HospitalSun Yat‐sen UniversityShenzhenChina
| | - Zhenkai Ou
- School of Biomedical EngineeringShenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina
| | - Meili Sun
- Department of RadiologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Huixing Luo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated HospitalSun Yat‐sen UniversityShenzhenChina
| | - Xuhui Zhou
- Department of RadiologyThe Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen UniversityShenzhenChina
| | - Yi Gao
- School of Biomedical EngineeringShenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Hematological MalignanciesShenzhenChina
- Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical EngineeringShenzhenChina
| | - Xiaobin Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated HospitalSun Yat‐sen UniversityShenzhenChina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Granata V, Fusco R, De Muzio F, Brunese MC, Setola SV, Ottaiano A, Cardone C, Avallone A, Patrone R, Pradella S, Miele V, Tatangelo F, Cutolo C, Maggialetti N, Caruso D, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Radiomics and machine learning analysis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in colorectal liver metastases prognostic assessment. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023; 128:1310-1332. [PMID: 37697033 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01710-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was the evaluation radiomics analysis efficacy performed using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of colorectal liver metastases patterns linked to patient prognosis: tumor growth front; grade; tumor budding; mucinous type. Moreover, the prediction of liver recurrence was also evaluated. METHODS The retrospective study included an internal and validation dataset; the first was composed by 119 liver metastases from 49 patients while the second consisted to 28 patients with single lesion. Radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics. Univariate and multivariate approaches including machine learning algorithms were employed. RESULTS The best predictor to identify tumor growth was the Wavelet_HLH_glcm_MaximumProbability with an accuracy of 84% and to detect recurrence the best predictor was wavelet_HLH_ngtdm_Complexity with an accuracy of 90%, both extracted by T1-weigthed arterial phase sequence. The best predictor to detect tumor budding was the wavelet_LLH_glcm_Imc1 with an accuracy of 88% and to identify mucinous type was wavelet_LLH_glcm_JointEntropy with an accuracy of 92%, both calculated on T2-weigthed sequence. An increase statistically significant of accuracy (90%) was obtained using a linear weighted combination of 15 predictors extracted by T2-weigthed images to detect tumor front growth. An increase statistically significant of accuracy at 93% was obtained using a linear weighted combination of 11 predictors by the T1-weigthed arterial phase sequence to classify tumor budding. An increase statistically significant of accuracy at 97% was obtained using a linear weighted combination of 16 predictors extracted on CT to detect recurrence. An increase statistically significant of accuracy was obtained in the tumor budding identification considering a K-nearest neighbors and the 11 significant features extracted T1-weigthed arterial phase sequence. CONCLUSIONS The results confirmed the Radiomics capacity to recognize clinical and histopathological prognostic features that should influence the choice of treatments in colorectal liver metastases patients to obtain a more personalized therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
| | | | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- Clinical Experimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Cardone
- Clinical Experimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Clinical Experimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Patrone
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Silvia Pradella
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
- SIRM Foundation, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
- SIRM Foundation, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabiana Tatangelo
- Division of Pathological Anatomy and Cytopathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084, Salerno, Italy
| | - Nicola Maggialetti
- Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs (DSMBNOS), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Damiano Caruso
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Radiology Unit-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza-University of Rome, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Murphy PS, Galette P, van der Aart J, Janiczek RL, Patel N, Brown AP. The role of clinical imaging in oncology drug development: progress and new challenges. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20211126. [PMID: 37393537 PMCID: PMC10546429 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2008, the role of clinical imaging in oncology drug development was reviewed. The review outlined where imaging was being applied and considered the diverse demands across the phases of drug development. A limited set of imaging techniques was being used, largely based on structural measures of disease evaluated using established response criteria such as response evaluation criteria in solid tumours. Beyond structure, functional tissue imaging such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and metabolic measures using [18F]flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were being increasingly incorporated. Specific challenges related to the implementation of imaging were outlined including standardisation of scanning across study centres and consistency of analysis and reporting. More than a decade on the needs of modern drug development are reviewed, how imaging has evolved to support new drug development demands, the potential to translate state-of-the-art methods into routine tools and what is needed to enable the effective use of this broadening clinical trial toolset. In this review, we challenge the clinical and scientific imaging community to help refine existing clinical trial methods and innovate to deliver the next generation of techniques. Strong industry-academic partnerships and pre-competitive opportunities to co-ordinate efforts will ensure imaging technologies maintain a crucial role delivering innovative medicines to treat cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Galette
- Telix Pharmaceuticals (US) Inc, Fishers, United States
| | | | | | | | - Andrew P. Brown
- Vale Imaging Consultancy Solutions, Harston, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nishino M, Wang X, Ricciuti B, Tseng SC, Park H, Alessi JV, Vaz VR, Hatabu H, Lin X, Christiani DC, Awad MM. Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy: tumor response dynamics as a marker for survival. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:7284-7293. [PMID: 37099174 PMCID: PMC10896107 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09658-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study investigated tumor burden dynamics on computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, to provide imaging markers for overall survival (OS). METHODS The study included 133 patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Serial CT scans during therapy were assessed for tumor burden dynamics during therapy, which were studied for the association with OS. RESULTS There were 67 responders, with overall response rate of 50%. The tumor burden change at the best overall response ranged from - 100.0% to + 132.1% (median of - 30%). Higher response rates were associated with younger age (p < 0.001) and higher programmed cell death-1 (PD-L1) expression levels (p = 0.01). Eighty-three patients (62%) showed tumor burden below the baseline burden throughout therapy. Using an 8-week landmark analysis, OS was longer in patients with tumor burden below the baseline burden in the first 8 weeks than in those who experienced ≥ 0% increase (median OS: 26.8 vs. 7.6 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.36, p < 0.001). Tumor burden remained below their baseline throughout therapy was associated with significantly reduced hazards of death (HR: 0.72, p = 0.03) in the extended Cox models, after adjusting for other clinical variables. Pseudoprogression was noted in only one patient (0.8%). CONCLUSIONS Tumor burden staying below the baseline burden throughout the therapy was predictive of prolonged overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, and may be used as a practical marker for therapeutic decisions in this widely used combination regimen. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The analysis of tumor burden dynamics on serial CT scans in reference to the baseline burden can provide an additional objective guide for treatment decision making in patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for their advanced NSCLC. KEY POINTS • Tumor burden remaining below baseline burden during therapy predicted longer survival during first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. • Pseudoprogression was noted in 0.8%, demonstrating the rarity of the phenomenon. • Tumor burden dynamics may serve as an objective marker for treatment benefit to guide treatment decisions during first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizuki Nishino
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., MA, 02215, Boston, USA.
| | - Xinan Wang
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Biagio Ricciuti
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Shu-Chi Tseng
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., MA, 02215, Boston, USA
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hyesun Park
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., MA, 02215, Boston, USA
| | - Joao V Alessi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Victor R Vaz
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Hiroto Hatabu
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., MA, 02215, Boston, USA
| | - Xihong Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - David C Christiani
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Mark M Awad
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ansari G, Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari M, Mohseni A, Madani SP, Shahbazian H, Pawlik TM, Kamel IR. Response Assessment of Primary Liver Tumors to Novel Therapies: an Imaging Perspective. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2245-2259. [PMID: 37464140 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05762-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
The latest developments in cancer immunotherapy, namely the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, have led to a fundamental change in advanced cancer treatments. Imaging is crucial to identify tumor response accurately and delineate prognosis in immunotherapy-treated patients. Simultaneously, advances in image acquisition techniques, notably functional and molecular imaging, have facilitated more accurate pretreatment evaluation, assessment of response to therapy, and monitoring for tumor recurrence. Traditional approaches to assessing tumor progression, such as RECIST, rely on changes in tumor size, while new strategies for evaluating tumor response to therapy, such as the mRECIST and the EASL, rely on tumor enhancement. Moreover, the assessment of tumor volume, enhancement, cellularity, and perfusion are some novel techniques that have been investigated. Validation of these novel approaches should rely on comparing their results with those of standard evaluation methods (EASL, mRECIST) while considering the ultimate outcome, which is patient survival. More recently, immunotherapy has been used in the management of primary liver tumors. However, little is known about its efficacy. This article reviews imaging modalities and techniques for assessing tumor response and survival in immunotherapy-treated patients with primary hepatic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Golnoosh Ansari
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Alireza Mohseni
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Seyedeh Panid Madani
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Haneyeh Shahbazian
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ihab R Kamel
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Masuoka S, Hiyama T, Kuno H, Sasaki T, Oda S, Miyasaka Y, Yamaguchi M, Kobayashi T. Computed tomography findings of hepatobiliary systems in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:3012-3021. [PMID: 37294454 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03967-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced liver injury has increased recently; however, its imaging characteristics remain unclear. This study aimed to characterize the computed tomography (CT) findings of ICI-induced liver injury. METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with ICI-induced liver injury who underwent CT between January 2020 and December 2021. Two board-certified radiologists independently evaluated the CT findings of the patients before the start of ICI therapy (pre-CT) and at the onset of ICI-induced liver injury (post-CT) to determine the presence or absence of imaging findings suggestive of hepatitis and cholangitis. ICI-induced liver injury was classified into three categories based on the CT findings: hepatitis alone, cholangitis alone, and overlapped (cholangitis plus hepatitis). RESULTS A total of 19 patients were included in this study. Bile duct dilatation, bile duct wall thickening, non-edematous gallbladder wall thickening, hepatomegaly, periportal edema, and gallbladder wall edema were observed in the post-CT images of 12 (63.2%), 9 (60%), 11 (57.9%), 8 (42.1%), 6 (31.6%), and 2 (10.5%) patients, respectively. Wall thickening in the perihilar, distal, intrapancreatic bile duct and the cystic duct were observed in 53.3%, 60%, 46.7%, and 26.7% of the study population, respectively. Regarding the classification of ICI-induced liver injury, cholangitis alone was most common (36.8%), followed by overlapped (26.3%) and hepatitis alone (26.3%). CONCLUSIONS Patients with ICI-induced liver injury demonstrated a higher incidence of biliary abnormalities than hepatic abnormalities on CT images; nonetheless, future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sota Masuoka
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
- Department of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, 3311-1, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
| | - Takashi Hiyama
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kuno
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Sasaki
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Shioto Oda
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Yusuke Miyasaka
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Masayuki Yamaguchi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kobayashi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cufer T, Kosty MP. ESMO/ASCO Recommendations for a Global Curriculum in Medical Oncology Edition 2023. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2300277. [PMID: 37867478 PMCID: PMC10664856 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and ASCO are publishing a new edition of the ESMO/ASCO Global Curriculum (GC) with contributions from more than 150 authors. The purpose of the GC is to provide recommendations for the training of physicians in medical oncology and to establish a set of educational standards for trainees to qualify as medical oncologists. This edition builds on prior ones in 2004, 2010, and 2016 and incorporates scientific advances and input from an ESMO ASCO survey on GC adoption conducted in 2019, which revealed that GC has been adopted or adapted in as many as two thirds of the countries surveyed. To make GC even more useful and applicable, certain subchapters were rearranged into stand-alone chapters, that is, cancer epidemiology, diagnostics, and research. In line with recent progress in the field of multidisciplinary cancer care new (sub)chapters, such as image-guided therapy, cell-based therapy, and nutritional support, were added. Moreover, this edition includes an entirely new chapter dedicated to cancer control principles, aiming to ensure that medical oncologists are able to identify and implement sustainable and equitable cancer care, tailored to local needs and resources. Besides content renewal, modern didactic principles were introduced. GC content is presented using two chapter templates (cancer-specific and non-cancer-specific), with three didactic points (objectives, key concepts, and skills). The next step is promoting GC as a contemporary and comprehensive document applicable all over the world, particularly due to its capacity to harmonize education in medical oncology and, in so doing, help to reduce global disparities in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Cufer
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Michael P. Kosty
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khan F, Jones K, Lyon P. Immune checkpoint inhibition: a future guided by radiology. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220565. [PMID: 36752570 PMCID: PMC10321249 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The limitation of the function of antitumour immune cells is a common hallmark of cancers that enables their survival. As such, the potential of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) acts as a paradigm shift in the treatment of a range of cancers but has not yet been fully capitalised. Combining minimally and non-invasive locoregional therapies offered by radiologists with ICI is now an active field of research with the aim of furthering therapeutic capabilities in medical oncology. In parallel to this impending advancement, the "imaging toolbox" available to radiologists is also growing, enabling more refined tumour characterisation as well as greater accuracy in evaluating responses to therapy. Options range from metabolite labelling to cellular localisation to immune checkpoint screening. It is foreseeable that these novel imaging techniques will be integrated into personalised treatment algorithms. This growth in the field must include updating the current standardised imaging criteria to ensure they are fit for purpose. Such criteria is crucial to both appropriately guide clinical decision-making regarding next steps of treatment, but also provide reliable prognosis. Quantitative approaches to these novel imaging techniques are also already being investigated to further optimise personalised therapeutic decision-making. The therapeutic potential of specific ICIs and locoregional therapies could be determined before administration thus limiting unnecessary side-effects whilst maintaining efficacy. Several radiological aspects of oncological care are advancing simultaneously. Therefore, it is essential that each development is assessed for clinical use and optimised to ensure the best treatment decisions are being offered to the patient. In this review, we discuss state of the art advances in novel functional imaging techniques in the field of immuno-oncology both pre-clinically and clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faraaz Khan
- Foundation Doctor, Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
| | - Keaton Jones
- Academic Clinical Lecturer Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Lyon
- Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mönch S, Heimer MM, Winkelmann M, Guertler A, Schlaak M, Tufman A, Ben Khaled N, de Toni E, Westphalen CB, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Dinkel J, Kazmierczak PM, Ingrisch M, Mansour N, Unterrainer M, Heinzerling L, Ricke J, Kunz WG. Patterns of pseudoprogression across different cancer entities treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:58. [PMID: 37291665 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00580-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pseudoprogression (PsPD) is a rare response pattern to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in oncology. This study aims to reveal imaging features of PsPD, and their association to other relevant findings. METHODS Patients with PsPD who had at least three consecutive cross-sectional imaging studies at our comprehensive cancer center were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment response was assessed according to immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST). PsPD was defined as the occurrence of immune unconfirmed progressive disease (iUPD) without follow-up confirmation. Target lesions (TL), non-target lesions (NTL), new lesions (NL) were analyzed over time. Tumor markers and immune-related adverse events (irAE) were correlated. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were included (mean age: 66.7 ± 13.6 years, 21.9% female) with mean baseline STL of 69.7 mm ± 55.6 mm. PsPD was observed in twenty-six patients (81.3%) at FU1, and no cases occurred after FU4. Patients with iUPD exhibited the following: TL increase in twelve patients, (37.5%), NTL increase in seven patients (21.9%), NL appearance in six patients (18.8%), and combinations thereof in four patients (12.5%). The mean and maximum increase for first iUPD in sum of TL was 19.8 and 96.8 mm (+ 700.8%). The mean and maximum decrease in sum of TL between iUPD and consecutive follow-up was - 19.1 mm and - 114.8 mm (-60.9%) respectively. The mean and maximum sum of new TL at first iUPD timepoint were 7.6 and 82.0 mm respectively. In two patients (10.5%), tumor-specific serologic markers were elevated at first iUPD, while the rest were stable or decreased among the other PsPD cases (89.5%). In fourteen patients (43.8%), irAE were observed. CONCLUSIONS PsPD occurred most frequently at FU1 after initiation of ICI treatment. The two most prevalent reasons for PsPD were TL und NTL progression, with an increase in TL diameter commonly below + 100%. In few cases, PsPD was observed even if tumor markers were rising compared to baseline. Our findings also suggest a correlation between PsPD and irAE. These findings may guide decision-making of ICI continuation in suspected PsPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Mönch
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Maurice M Heimer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Michael Winkelmann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Anne Guertler
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München-LMU (CCCM LMU ), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München-LMU (CCCM LMU ), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité - University hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Department of Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München-LMU (CCCM LMU ), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Najib Ben Khaled
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München-LMU (CCCM LMU ), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Enrico de Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München-LMU (CCCM LMU ), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph B Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München-LMU (CCCM LMU ), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München-LMU (CCCM LMU ), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julien Dinkel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Philipp M Kazmierczak
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Michael Ingrisch
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany
- Clinical Data Science, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nabeel Mansour
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München-LMU (CCCM LMU ), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München-LMU (CCCM LMU ), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München-LMU (CCCM LMU ), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang K, Qi C, Cai K. Manganese-Based Tumor Immunotherapy. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2023; 35:e2205409. [PMID: 36121368 DOI: 10.1002/adma.202205409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
As an essential micronutrient, manganese (Mn) participates in various physiological processes and plays important roles in host immune system, hematopoiesis, endocrine function, and oxidative stress regulation. Mn-based nanoparticles are considered to be biocompatible and show versatile applications in nanomedicine, in particular utilized in tumor immunotherapy in the following ways: 1) acting as a biocompatible nanocarrier to deliver immunotherapeutic agents for tumor immunotherapy; 2) serving as an adjuvant to regulate tumor immune microenvironment and enhance immunotherapy; 3) activating host's immune system through the cGAS-STING pathway to trigger tumor immunotherapy; 4) real-time monitoring tumor immunotherapy effect by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) since Mn2+ ions are ideal MRI contrast agent which can significantly enhance the T1 -weighted MRI signal after binding to proteins. This comprehensive review focuses on the most recent progress of Mn-based nanoplatforms in tumor immunotherapy. The characteristics of Mn are first discussed to guide the design of Mn-based multifunctional nanoplatforms. Then the biomedical applications of Mn-based nanoplatforms, including immunotherapy alone, immunotherapy-involved multimodal synergistic therapy, and imaging-guided immunotherapy are discussed in detail. Finally, the challenges and future developments of Mn-based tumor immunotherapy are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China
| | - Chao Qi
- Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China
| | - Kaiyong Cai
- Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
He S, Cheng P, Pu K. Activatable near-infrared probes for the detection of specific populations of tumour-infiltrating leukocytes in vivo and in urine. Nat Biomed Eng 2023; 7:281-297. [PMID: 36941352 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-023-01009-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Tracking the immune microenvironment of tumours is essential for understanding the mechanisms behind the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapies. Molecular imaging of tumour-infiltrating leukocytes (TILs) can be used to non-invasively monitor the tumour immune microenvironment, but current imaging agents do not distinguish TILs from leukocytes resident in other tissues. Here we report a library of activatable molecular probes for the imaging, via near-infrared fluorescence, of specific TILs (including M1 macrophages, cytotoxic T lymphocytes and neutrophils) in vivo in real time and also via excreted urine, owing to the probes' renal clearance. The fluorescence of the probes is activated only in the presence of both tumour and leukocyte biomarkers, which allows for the imaging of populations of specific TILs in mouse models of cancers with sensitivities and specificities similar to those achieved via flow-cytometric analyses of biopsied tumour tissues. We also show that the probes enable the non-invasive evaluation of the immunogenicity of different tumours, the dynamic monitoring of responses to immunotherapies and the accurate prediction of tumour growth under various treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shasha He
- School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Penghui Cheng
- School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kanyi Pu
- School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Setola SV, Galdiero R, Maggialetti N, Patrone R, Ottaiano A, Nasti G, Silvestro L, Cassata A, Grassi F, Avallone A, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Colorectal liver metastases patients prognostic assessment: prospects and limits of radiomics and radiogenomics. Infect Agent Cancer 2023; 18:18. [PMID: 36927442 PMCID: PMC10018963 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-023-00495-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In this narrative review, we reported un up-to-date on the role of radiomics to assess prognostic features, which can impact on the liver metastases patient treatment choice. In the liver metastases patients, the possibility to assess mutational status (RAS or MSI), the tumor growth pattern and the histological subtype (NOS or mucinous) allows a better treatment selection to avoid unnecessary therapies. However, today, the detection of these features require an invasive approach. Recently, radiomics analysis application has improved rapidly, with a consequent growing interest in the oncological field. Radiomics analysis allows the textural characteristics assessment, which are correlated to biological data. This approach is captivating since it should allow to extract biological data from the radiological images, without invasive approach, so that to reduce costs and time, avoiding any risk for the patients. Several studies showed the ability of Radiomics to identify mutational status, tumor growth pattern and histological type in colorectal liver metastases. Although, radiomics analysis in a non-invasive and repeatable way, however features as the poor standardization and generalization of clinical studies results limit the translation of this analysis into clinical practice. Clear limits are data-quality control, reproducibility, repeatability, generalizability of results, and issues related to model overfitting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy.
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, Napoli, Italy.,Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Galdiero
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Maggialetti
- Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs (DSMBNOS), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, 70124, Italy
| | - Renato Patrone
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- Clinical Sperimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Nasti
- Clinical Sperimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Silvestro
- Clinical Sperimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Antonio Cassata
- Clinical Sperimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, "Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, 80138, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Clinical Sperimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Milanese G, Mazzaschi G, Ledda RE, Balbi M, Lamorte S, Caminiti C, Colombi D, Tiseo M, Silva M, Sverzellati N. The radiological appearances of lung cancer treated with immunotherapy. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20210270. [PMID: 36367539 PMCID: PMC10078868 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Therapy and prognosis of several solid and hematologic malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), have been favourably impacted by the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Their mechanism of action relies on the principle that some cancers can evade immune surveillance by expressing surface inhibitor molecules, known as "immune checkpoints". ICIs aim to conceal tumoural checkpoints on the cell surface and reinvigorate the ability of the host immune system to recognize tumour cells, triggering an antitumoural immune response.In this review, we will focus on the imaging patterns of different responses occurring in patients treated by ICIs. We will also discuss imaging findings of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), along with current and future perspectives of metabolic imaging. Finally, we will explore the role of radiomics in the setting of ICI-treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Milanese
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiological Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giulia Mazzaschi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Medical Oncology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Roberta Eufrasia Ledda
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiological Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Maurizio Balbi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiological Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sveva Lamorte
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiological Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Caterina Caminiti
- Unit of Research and Innovation, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Davide Colombi
- Department of Radiological Functions, Radiology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Marcello Tiseo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Medical Oncology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Mario Silva
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiological Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Nicola Sverzellati
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiological Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Russo GM, Russo A, Urraro F, Cioce F, Gallo L, Belfiore MP, Sangiovanni A, Napolitano S, Troiani T, Verolino P, Sica A, Brancaccio G, Briatico G, Nardone V, Reginelli A. Management of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Radiologists Challenging and Risk Assessment. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13040793. [PMID: 36832281 PMCID: PMC9955870 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma are the three main types of nonmelanoma skin cancers and their rates of occurrence and mortality have been steadily rising over the past few decades. For radiologists, it is still difficult to treat patients with advanced nonmelanoma skin cancer. Nonmelanoma skin cancer patients would benefit greatly from an improved diagnostic imaging-based risk stratification and staging method that takes into account patient characteristics. The risk is especially elevated among those who previously received systemic treatment or phototherapy. Systemic treatments, including biologic therapies and methotrexate (MTX), are effective in managing immune-mediated diseases; however, they may increase susceptibility to NMSC due to immunosuppression or other factors. Risk stratification and staging tools are crucial in treatment planning and prognostic evaluation. PET/CT appears more sensitive and superior to CT and MRI for nodal and distant metastasis as well as in surveillance after surgery. The patient treatment response improved with advent and utilization of immunotherapy and different immune-specific criteria are established to standardized evaluation criteria of clinical trials but none of them have been utilized routinely with immunotherapy. The advent of immunotherapy has also arisen new critical issues for radiologists, such as atypical response pattern, pseudo-progression, as well as immune-related adverse events that require early identification to optimize and improve patient prognosis and management. It is important for radiologists to have knowledge of the radiologic features site of the tumor, clinical stage, histological subtype, and any high-risk features to assess immunotherapy treatment response and immune-related adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Maria Russo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Anna Russo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Urraro
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Cioce
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Gallo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Belfiore
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Angelo Sangiovanni
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Stefania Napolitano
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Teresa Troiani
- Unit of Plastic Surgery, Multidisciplinary Department of Medical Surgical and Dental Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80120 Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Verolino
- Unit of Plastic Surgery, Multidisciplinary Department of Medical Surgical and Dental Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80120 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonello Sica
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Gabriella Brancaccio
- Unit of Dermatology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Giulia Briatico
- Unit of Dermatology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80123 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alì G, Poma AM, Di Stefano I, Zirafa CC, Lenzini A, Martinelli G, Romano G, Chella A, Baldini E, Melfi F, Fontanini G. Different pathological response and histological features following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1115156. [PMID: 36845706 PMCID: PMC9947557 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1115156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy has led to clinical benefits in resectable NSCLC in comparison to chemo-therapy alone. Major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) have been used as surrogates of neoadjuvant therapy response and clinical outcomes. However, the factors affecting the pathological response are still controversial. Therefore, in this study we retrospectively examined MPR and pCR in two different cohorts of NSCLC patients, 14 treated by chemotherapy and 12 by chemo-immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Methods In resected tumor specimens, different histological characteristics were evaluated: necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, presence of organizing pneumonia, granuloma, cholesterol cleft, and reactive epithelial alterations. In addition, we evaluated how MPR impacts on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). In a small group of patients treated by chemo-immunotherapy, a gene expression analysis of the Hippo pathway was performed both in preoperative biopsies and matched post-surgical specimens. Results We observed a better pathological response in the chemo-immunotherapy treated cohort: 6/12 patients (50.0%) achieved a MPR ≤10% and 1/12 (8.3%) achieved pCR both on primary tumor and on lymph nodes. On the contrary, no patient treated with chemotherapy alone achieved pCR or MPR ≤10%. A higher amount of stroma in the neoplastic bed was observed in patients treated with immuno-chemotherapy. Moreover, patients achieving better MPR (including pCR) had significantly improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). After neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, residual tumors showed a remarkable upregulation of genes consistent with the activation of YAP/TAZ. Also, alternative checkpoint, such as CTLA-4, were enhanced. Discussion Our findings showed that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy treatment improves MPR and pCR thus resulting in better EFS and OS. Moreover, a combined treatment could induce different morphological and molecular changes in comparison to chemotherapy alone, thus giving new insights in the assessment of pathological response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greta Alì
- Unit of Pathological Anatomy, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Anello Marcello Poma
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Iosè Di Stefano
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carmelina Cristina Zirafa
- Multispecialty Centre for Surgery, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Lenzini
- Multispecialty Centre for Surgery, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giulia Martinelli
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gaetano Romano
- Multispecialty Centre for Surgery, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Chella
- Unit of Pneumology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Franca Melfi
- Multispecialty Centre for Surgery, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gabriella Fontanini
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy,*Correspondence: Gabriella Fontanini,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ufuk F, Bayraktaroğlu S, Rüksan Ütebey A. Drug-induced lung disease: a brief update for radiologists. Diagn Interv Radiol 2023; 29:80-90. [PMID: 36960496 PMCID: PMC10679578 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2022.21614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Pulmonary adverse events and drug-induced lung disease (DILD) can occur when treating many conditions. The incidence of DILDs in clinical practice and the variety of radiological findings have increased, mainly due to the increased use of novel therapeutic agents. It is crucial to determine whether the newly emerging clinical and imaging findings in these patients are due to the progression of the underlying disease, infection, pulmonary edema, or drug use, as this will change the patient management. Although the diagnosis of DILD is usually obtained by excluding other possible causes, radiologists should be aware of the imaging findings of DILD. This article reviews the essential radiological results of DILD and summarizes the critical clinical and imaging findings with an emphasis on novel therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Furkan Ufuk
- Department of Radiology, Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey
| | | | - Ayşe Rüksan Ütebey
- Department of Radiology, Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Irodi A, Bhalla AS, Robinson Vimala L, Yadav T, Adithan S, Bhujade H, Sanghavi P, Kale A, Garg M, Jaykar David Livingstone YK, Das SK, H. GM, Sasidharan B, Thangakunam B, Pavamani S, Isiah R, Joel A, Bhat TA. Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Lung Cancer. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractGlobally and in India, lung cancer is one of the leading malignancies in terms of incidence and mortality. Smoking and environmental pollution are the common risk factors for developing lung cancer. Traditionally, lung cancer is divided into small cell and nonsmall cell types, with nonsmall cell carcinomas including squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma.In this review article, we describe the imaging recommendations and findings in the diagnosis, staging, and management of lung cancer, including the imaging of treatment-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aparna Irodi
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ashu Seith Bhalla
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Taruna Yadav
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Subathra Adithan
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Harish Bhujade
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Parang Sanghavi
- Department of Radiology, Picture this by Jankharia, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Alok Kale
- Radiology and Imaging Science Department, Apollo Main Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Mandeep Garg
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | - Geethi M. H.
- Division of Radiation Oncology, RCC, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Balukrishna Sasidharan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ida B. Scudder Cancer Centre Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Simon Pavamani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ida B. Scudder Cancer Centre Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Rajesh Isiah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ida B. Scudder Cancer Centre Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Anjana Joel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Tameem Ahmad Bhat
- Radiology, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Jammu, India
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Setola SV, Simonetti I, Picone C, Simeone E, Festino L, Vanella V, Vitale MG, Montanino A, Morabito A, Izzo F, Ascierto PA, Petrillo A. Immunotherapy Assessment: A New Paradigm for Radiologists. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13020302. [PMID: 36673112 PMCID: PMC9857844 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13020302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy denotes an exemplar change in an oncological setting. Despite the effective application of these treatments across a broad range of tumors, only a minority of patients have beneficial effects. The efficacy of immunotherapy is affected by several factors, including human immunity, which is strongly correlated to genetic features, such as intra-tumor heterogeneity. Classic imaging assessment, based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is useful for conventional treatments, has a limited role in immunotherapy. The reason is due to different patterns of response and/or progression during this kind of treatment which differs from those seen during other treatments, such as the possibility to assess the wide spectrum of immunotherapy-correlated toxic effects (ir-AEs) as soon as possible. In addition, considering the unusual response patterns, the limits of conventional response criteria and the necessity of using related immune-response criteria are clear. Radiomics analysis is a recent field of great interest in a radiological setting and recently it has grown the idea that we could identify patients who will be fit for this treatment or who will develop ir-AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Carmine Picone
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Ester Simeone
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Lucia Festino
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vito Vanella
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Vitale
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Agnese Montanino
- Thoracic Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Morabito
- Thoracic Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Berz AM, Boughdad S, Vietti-Violi N, Digklia A, Dromain C, Dunet V, Duran R. Imaging assessment of toxicity related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1133207. [PMID: 36911692 PMCID: PMC9995973 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1133207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, a wide range of cancer immunotherapies have been developed and have become increasingly important in cancer treatment across multiple oncologic diseases. In particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer promising options to improve patient outcomes. However, a major limitation of these treatments consists in the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurring in potentially any organ system and affecting up to 76% of the patients. The most frequent toxicities involve the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and endocrine system. Although mostly manageable, potentially life-threatening events, particularly due to neuro-, cardiac, and pulmonary toxicity, occur in up to 30% and 55% of the patients treated with ICI-monotherapy or -combination therapy, respectively. Imaging, in particular computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT), plays an important role in the detection and characterization of these irAEs. In some patients, irAEs can even be detected on imaging before the onset of clinical symptoms. In this context, it is particularly important to distinguish irAEs from true disease progression and specific immunotherapy related response patterns, such as pseudoprogression. In addition, there are irAEs which might be easily confused with other pathologies such as infection or metastasis. However, many imaging findings, such as in immune-related pneumonitis, are nonspecific. Thus, accurate diagnosis may be delayed underling the importance for adequate imaging features characterization in the appropriate clinical setting in order to provide timely and efficient patient management. 18F-FDG-PET/CT and radiomics have demonstrated to reliably detect these toxicities and potentially have predictive value for identifying patients at risk of developing irAEs. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the main immunotherapy-related toxicities and discuss their characteristics on imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia M Berz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sarah Boughdad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Naïk Vietti-Violi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Antonia Digklia
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Clarisse Dromain
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Dunet
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Rafael Duran
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shi C, Zhang Q, Yao Y, Zeng F, Du C, Nijiati S, Wen X, Zhang X, Yang H, Chen H, Guo Z, Zhang X, Gao J, Guo W, Chen X, Zhou Z. Targeting the activity of T cells by membrane surface redox regulation for cancer theranostics. NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY 2023; 18:86-97. [PMID: 36536041 DOI: 10.1038/s41565-022-01261-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
T cells play a determining role in the immunomodulation and prognostic evaluation of cancer treatments relying on immune activation. While specific biomarkers determine the population and distribution of T cells in tumours, the in situ activity of T cells is less studied. Here we designed T-cell-targeting fusogenic liposomes to regulate and quantify the activity of T cells by exploiting their surface redox status as a chemical target. The T-cell-targeting fusogenic liposomes equipped with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) groups neutralize reactive oxygen species protecting T cells from oxidation-induced loss of activity. Meanwhile, the production of paramagnetic 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine 1-oxyl (TEMPO) radicals allows magnetic resonance imaging quantification of the T cell activity. In multiple mouse models, the T-cell-targeting fusogenic liposomes led to efficient tumour inhibition and to early prediction of radiotherapy outcomes. This study uses a chemical targeting strategy to measure the in situ activity of T cells for cancer theranostics and may provide further understanding on engineering T cells for cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changrong Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qianyu Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yuying Yao
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Biomedical Engineering & the Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fantian Zeng
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Chao Du
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Sureya Nijiati
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xuejun Wen
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xinyi Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Hongzhang Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Haoting Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Biomedical Engineering & the Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhide Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xianzhong Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jinhao Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces & The Key Laboratory for Chemical Biology of Fujian Province, Department of Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Weisheng Guo
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Biomedical Engineering & the Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Xiaoyuan Chen
- Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Zijian Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics & Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dercle L, Sun S, Seban RD, Mekki A, Sun R, Tselikas L, Hans S, Bernard-Tessier A, Mihoubi Bouvier F, Aide N, Vercellino L, Rivas A, Girard A, Mokrane FZ, Manson G, Houot R, Lopci E, Yeh R, Ammari S, Schwartz LH. Emerging and Evolving Concepts in Cancer Immunotherapy Imaging. Radiology 2023; 306:32-46. [PMID: 36472538 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.210518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Criteria based on measurements of lesion diameter at CT have guided treatment with historical therapies due to the strong association between tumor size and survival. Clinical experience with immune checkpoint modulators shows that editing immune system function can be effective in various solid tumors. Equally, novel immune-related phenomena accompany this novel therapeutic paradigm. These effects of immunotherapy challenge the association of tumor size with response or progression and include risks and adverse events that present new demands for imaging to guide treatment decisions. Emerging and evolving approaches to immunotherapy highlight further key issues for imaging evaluation, such as dissociated response following local administration of immune checkpoint modulators, pseudoprogression due to immune infiltration in the tumor environment, and premature death due to hyperprogression. Research that may offer tools for radiologists to meet these challenges is reviewed. Different modalities are discussed, including immuno-PET, as well as new applications of CT, MRI, and fluorodeoxyglucose PET, such as radiomics and imaging of hematopoietic tissues or anthropometric characteristics. Multilevel integration of imaging and other biomarkers may improve clinical guidance for immunotherapies and provide theranostic opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Dercle
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Shawn Sun
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Romain-David Seban
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Ahmed Mekki
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Roger Sun
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Lambros Tselikas
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Sophie Hans
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Alice Bernard-Tessier
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Fadila Mihoubi Bouvier
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Nicolas Aide
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Laetitia Vercellino
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Alexia Rivas
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Antoine Girard
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Fatima-Zohra Mokrane
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Guillaume Manson
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Roch Houot
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Egesta Lopci
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Randy Yeh
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Samy Ammari
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (L.D., S.S., L.H.S.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France (R.D.S.); DMU Smart Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Université Paris-Saclay, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France (A.M.); Gustave Roussy-Centrale Supélec-Therapanacea Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Radiomics Team, Molecular Radiation Therapy INSERM U1030, Paris-Sud University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (R.S.); Departments of Radiation Oncology (R.S.) and Interventional Radiology (L.T.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France (S.H.); Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France (A.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, France (F.M.B.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, INSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France (N.A.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (L.V., A.R.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France (A.G.); Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France (F.Z.M.); Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Rennes, U1236, INSERM, Rennes, France (G.M., R.H.); EANM Oncology Committee, Vienna, Austria (E.L.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy (E.L.); Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.Y.); and Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France (S.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Da Cunha T, Wu GY, Vaziri H. Immunotherapy-induced Hepatotoxicity: A Review. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2022; 10:1194-1204. [PMID: 36381098 PMCID: PMC9634765 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2022.00105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) suppress the function of immune checkpoints, which are involved in downregulating immune responses. These lead to an increased activation of the function of T cells, increased release of cytokines, and decreased activity of regulatory T cells. This allows for a more significant and less regulated immune response and subsequent enhanced cytotoxic activity against cancer cells. A number of cancers are now being treated with these agents and this increased use has resulted in more reports of toxicity. While almost every organ can be affected, the skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, and endocrine glands are most commonly involved. It is necessary that gastroenterologists and hepatologists familiarize themselves with diagnostic steps and management plan in patients with these undesirable outcomes. When assessing for possible ICIs induced hepatotoxicity, it is of utmost importance to use a formal scoring system such as the Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method (RUCAM) to assess for risk factors, alternative causes, and response to cessation and re-exposure of a given drug. While this review is based on studies with and without RUCAM, the conclusions were carefully established mainly from studies that used RUCAM. The aim of this review is to provide information on the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic tools, and management plan based on the most recent studies of immunotherapy-induced hepatotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Da Cunha
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - George Y. Wu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Haleh Vaziri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Early radiologic signal of responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade in microsatellite-stable/mismatch repair-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:2227-2233. [PMID: 36229579 PMCID: PMC9726864 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02004-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) results in radiologic tumour response dynamics that differ from chemotherapy efficacy measures and require an early signal of clinical utility. METHODS Previously untreated, unresectable microsatellite-stable (MSS)/mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were randomly assigned to the oxaliplatin-based Nordic FLOX regimen (control arm) or repeat sequential two FLOX cycles and two ICB cycles (experimental arm). The radiologic response was assessed every 8 weeks. In this post hoc analysis, we explored early target lesion (TL) dynamics as indicator of ICB responsiveness. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. RESULTS Using a landmark analysis approach, we categorised experimental-arm patients into ≥10% (N = 19) or <10% (N = 16) TL reduction at the first post-baseline response assessment. Median PFS for the groups was 16.0 (95% confidence interval (CI), 12.3-19.7) and 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.3-5.5), respectively, superior and inferior (both P < 0.01) to the median PFS of 9.8 months (95% CI, 4.9-14.7) for control arm patients (N = 31). CONCLUSIONS Radiologic TL reduction of ≥10% at the first post-baseline response assessment identified patients with ICB-responsive metastatic MSS/pMMR-CRC. This pragmatic measure may be used to monitor patients in investigational ICB schedules, enabling early treatment adaptation for unresponsive cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03388190 (02/01/2018).
Collapse
|
30
|
Park H, Tseng SC, Sholl LM, Hatabu H, Awad MM, Nishino M. Molecular Characterization and Therapeutic Approaches to Small Cell Lung Cancer: Imaging Implications. Radiology 2022; 305:512-525. [PMID: 36283111 PMCID: PMC9713457 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.220585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with exceptionally poor prognosis, comprising approximately 15% of lung cancers. Emerging knowledge of the molecular and genomic landscape of SCLC and recent successful clinical applications of new systemic agents have allowed for precision oncology treatment approaches. Imaging is essential for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment monitoring of patients with SCLC. The role of imaging is increasing with the approval of new treatment agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, which lead to novel imaging manifestations of response and toxicities. The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to provide the reader with the latest information about SCLC, focusing on the subtyping of this malignancy (molecular characterization) and the emerging systemic therapeutic approaches and their implications for imaging. The review will also discuss the future directions of SCLC imaging, radiomics and machine learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyesun Park
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.P., S.C.T., H.H., M.N.),
Pathology (L.M.S.), Medical Oncology (M.M.A.), and Medicine (M.M.A.),
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450
Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215
| | | | - Lynette M. Sholl
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.P., S.C.T., H.H., M.N.),
Pathology (L.M.S.), Medical Oncology (M.M.A.), and Medicine (M.M.A.),
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450
Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Hiroto Hatabu
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.P., S.C.T., H.H., M.N.),
Pathology (L.M.S.), Medical Oncology (M.M.A.), and Medicine (M.M.A.),
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450
Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Mark M. Awad
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.P., S.C.T., H.H., M.N.),
Pathology (L.M.S.), Medical Oncology (M.M.A.), and Medicine (M.M.A.),
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450
Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Mizuki Nishino
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.P., S.C.T., H.H., M.N.),
Pathology (L.M.S.), Medical Oncology (M.M.A.), and Medicine (M.M.A.),
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450
Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hata A, Hino T, Yanagawa M, Nishino M, Hida T, Hunninghake GM, Tomiyama N, Christiani DC, Hatabu H. Interstitial Lung Abnormalities at CT: Subtypes, Clinical Significance, and Associations with Lung Cancer. Radiographics 2022; 42:1925-1939. [PMID: 36083805 PMCID: PMC9630713 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) is defined as an interstitial change detected incidentally on CT images. It is seen in 4%-9% of smokers and 2%-7% of nonsmokers. ILA has a tendency to progress with time and is associated with respiratory symptoms, decreased exercise capability, reduced pulmonary function, and increased mortality. ILAs can be classified into three subcategories: nonsubpleural, subpleural nonfibrotic, and subpleural fibrotic. In cases of ILA, clinically significant interstitial lung disease should be identified and requires clinically driven management by a pulmonologist. Risk factors for the progression of ILA include clinical elements (ie, inhalation exposures, medication use, radiation therapy, thoracic surgery, physiologic findings, and gas exchange findings) and radiologic elements (ie, basal and peripheral predominance and fibrotic findings). It is recommended that individuals with one or more clinical or radiologic risk factors for progression of ILA be actively monitored with pulmonary function testing and CT. To avoid overcalling ILA at CT, radiologists must recognize the imaging pitfalls, including centrilobular nodularity, dependent abnormality, suboptimal inspiration, osteophyte-related lesions, apical cap and pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis-like lesions, aspiration, and infection. There is a close association between ILA and lung cancer, and many studies have reported an increased incidence of lung cancer, worse prognoses, and/or increased pulmonary complications in relation to cancer treatment in patients with ILA. ILA is considered to be an important comorbidity in patients with lung cancer. Accordingly, all radiologists involved with body CT must have sound knowledge of ILAs owing to the high prevalence and potential clinical significance of these anomalies. An overview of ILAs, including a literature review of the associations between ILAs and lung cancer, is presented. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akinori Hata
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,
Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka
5650871, Japan (A.H., M.Y., N.T.); Center for Pulmonary Functional Imaging,
Department of Radiology (A.H., T.H., M.N., G.M.H., H.H.) and Pulmonary and
Critical Care Division (G.M.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of
Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (T. Hino, T. Hida);
Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (M.N.); and
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health,
Boston, Mass (D.C.C.)
| | - Takuya Hino
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,
Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka
5650871, Japan (A.H., M.Y., N.T.); Center for Pulmonary Functional Imaging,
Department of Radiology (A.H., T.H., M.N., G.M.H., H.H.) and Pulmonary and
Critical Care Division (G.M.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of
Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (T. Hino, T. Hida);
Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (M.N.); and
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health,
Boston, Mass (D.C.C.)
| | - Masahiro Yanagawa
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,
Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka
5650871, Japan (A.H., M.Y., N.T.); Center for Pulmonary Functional Imaging,
Department of Radiology (A.H., T.H., M.N., G.M.H., H.H.) and Pulmonary and
Critical Care Division (G.M.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of
Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (T. Hino, T. Hida);
Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (M.N.); and
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health,
Boston, Mass (D.C.C.)
| | - Mizuki Nishino
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,
Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka
5650871, Japan (A.H., M.Y., N.T.); Center for Pulmonary Functional Imaging,
Department of Radiology (A.H., T.H., M.N., G.M.H., H.H.) and Pulmonary and
Critical Care Division (G.M.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of
Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (T. Hino, T. Hida);
Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (M.N.); and
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health,
Boston, Mass (D.C.C.)
| | - Tomoyuki Hida
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,
Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka
5650871, Japan (A.H., M.Y., N.T.); Center for Pulmonary Functional Imaging,
Department of Radiology (A.H., T.H., M.N., G.M.H., H.H.) and Pulmonary and
Critical Care Division (G.M.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of
Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (T. Hino, T. Hida);
Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (M.N.); and
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health,
Boston, Mass (D.C.C.)
| | - Gary M. Hunninghake
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,
Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka
5650871, Japan (A.H., M.Y., N.T.); Center for Pulmonary Functional Imaging,
Department of Radiology (A.H., T.H., M.N., G.M.H., H.H.) and Pulmonary and
Critical Care Division (G.M.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of
Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (T. Hino, T. Hida);
Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (M.N.); and
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health,
Boston, Mass (D.C.C.)
| | - Noriyuki Tomiyama
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,
Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka
5650871, Japan (A.H., M.Y., N.T.); Center for Pulmonary Functional Imaging,
Department of Radiology (A.H., T.H., M.N., G.M.H., H.H.) and Pulmonary and
Critical Care Division (G.M.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of
Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (T. Hino, T. Hida);
Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (M.N.); and
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health,
Boston, Mass (D.C.C.)
| | - David C. Christiani
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,
Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka
5650871, Japan (A.H., M.Y., N.T.); Center for Pulmonary Functional Imaging,
Department of Radiology (A.H., T.H., M.N., G.M.H., H.H.) and Pulmonary and
Critical Care Division (G.M.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of
Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (T. Hino, T. Hida);
Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (M.N.); and
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health,
Boston, Mass (D.C.C.)
| | - Hiroto Hatabu
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,
Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka
5650871, Japan (A.H., M.Y., N.T.); Center for Pulmonary Functional Imaging,
Department of Radiology (A.H., T.H., M.N., G.M.H., H.H.) and Pulmonary and
Critical Care Division (G.M.H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of
Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (T. Hino, T. Hida);
Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (M.N.); and
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health,
Boston, Mass (D.C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lee SY. Considerations on The Effect of Clinical History on Diagnostic Imaging Interpretation. Acad Radiol 2022; 29:1768. [PMID: 35314098 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Y Lee
- Department of Radiology (S.Y.L.), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (S.Y.L.), Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shroff GS, Strange CD, Ahuja J, Altan M, Sheshadri A, Unlu E, Truong MT, Vlahos I. Imaging of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Radiographics 2022; 42:1956-1974. [PMID: 36240075 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The normal immune system identifies and eliminates precancerous and cancerous cells. However, tumors can develop immune resistance mechanisms, one of which involves the exploitation of pathways, termed immune checkpoints, that normally suppress T-cell function. The goal of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy is to boost T-cell-mediated immunity to mount a more effective attack on cancer cells. ICIs have changed the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and numerous ICIs have now been approved as first-line treatments for NSCLC by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. ICIs can cause atypical response patterns such as pseudoprogression, whereby the tumor burden initially increases but then decreases. Therefore, response criteria have been developed specifically for patients receiving immunotherapy. Because ICIs activate the immune system, they can lead to inflammatory side effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Usually occurring within weeks to months after the start of therapy, irAEs range from asymptomatic abnormal laboratory results to life-threatening conditions such as encephalitis, pneumonitis, myocarditis, hepatitis, and colitis. It is important to be aware of the imaging appearances of the various irAEs to avoid misinterpreting them as metastatic disease, progressive disease, or infection. The basic principles of ICI therapy; indications for ICI therapy in the setting of NSCLC; response assessment and atypical response patterns of ICI therapy, as compared with conventional chemotherapy; and the spectrum of irAEs seen at imaging are reviewed. An invited commentary by Nishino is available online. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Girish S Shroff
- From the Departments of Thoracic Imaging (G.S.S., C.D.S., J.A., E.U., M.T.T., I.V.), Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology (M.A.), and Pulmonary Medicine (A.S.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1478, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Chad D Strange
- From the Departments of Thoracic Imaging (G.S.S., C.D.S., J.A., E.U., M.T.T., I.V.), Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology (M.A.), and Pulmonary Medicine (A.S.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1478, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Jitesh Ahuja
- From the Departments of Thoracic Imaging (G.S.S., C.D.S., J.A., E.U., M.T.T., I.V.), Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology (M.A.), and Pulmonary Medicine (A.S.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1478, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Mehmet Altan
- From the Departments of Thoracic Imaging (G.S.S., C.D.S., J.A., E.U., M.T.T., I.V.), Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology (M.A.), and Pulmonary Medicine (A.S.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1478, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Ajay Sheshadri
- From the Departments of Thoracic Imaging (G.S.S., C.D.S., J.A., E.U., M.T.T., I.V.), Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology (M.A.), and Pulmonary Medicine (A.S.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1478, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Ebru Unlu
- From the Departments of Thoracic Imaging (G.S.S., C.D.S., J.A., E.U., M.T.T., I.V.), Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology (M.A.), and Pulmonary Medicine (A.S.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1478, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Mylene T Truong
- From the Departments of Thoracic Imaging (G.S.S., C.D.S., J.A., E.U., M.T.T., I.V.), Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology (M.A.), and Pulmonary Medicine (A.S.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1478, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Ioannis Vlahos
- From the Departments of Thoracic Imaging (G.S.S., C.D.S., J.A., E.U., M.T.T., I.V.), Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology (M.A.), and Pulmonary Medicine (A.S.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1478, Houston, TX 77030
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Granata V, Simonetti I, Fusco R, Setola SV, Izzo F, Scarpato L, Vanella V, Festino L, Simeone E, Ascierto PA, Petrillo A. Management of cutaneous melanoma: radiologists challenging and risk assessment. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2022; 127:899-911. [PMID: 35834109 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01522-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Melanoma patient remains a challenging for the radiologist, due to the difficulty related to the management of a patient more often in an advanced stage of the disease. It is necessary to determine a stratification of risk, optimizing the means, with diagnostic tools that should be optimized in relation to the type of patient, and improving knowledge. Staging and risk assessment procedures are determined by disease presentation at diagnosis. Melanoma staging is a critical tool to assist clinical decision-making and prognostic assessment. It is used for clinical trial design, eligibility, stratification, and analysis. The current standard for regional lymph nodes staging is represented by the sentinel lymph node excision biopsy procedure. For staging of distant metastases, PET-CT has the highest sensitivity and diagnostic odds ratio. Similar trend is observed during melanoma surveillance. The advent of immunotherapy, which has improved patient outcome, however, has determined new issues for radiologists, partly due to atypical response patterns, partly due to adverse reactions that must be identified as soon as possible for the correct management of the patient. The main objectives of the new ir-criteria are to standardize the assessment between different trials. However, these ir-criteria do not take into account all cases of atypical response patterns, as hyperprogression or dissociated responses. None of these criteria has actually been uniformly adopted in routine. The immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can involve various organs from head to toe. It is crucial for radiologists to know the imaging appearances of this condition, to exclude recurrent or progressive disease and for pneumonitis, since it could be potentially life-threatening toxicity, resulting in pneumonitis-related deaths in early phase trials, to allow a proper patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italia", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Radiology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italia", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Radiology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italia", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italia",, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Scarpato
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Vito Vanella
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Lucia Festino
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Ester Simeone
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italia", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hughes DJ, Subesinghe M, Taylor B, Bille A, Spicer J, Papa S, Goh V, Cook GJR. 18F FDG PET/CT and Novel Molecular Imaging for Directing Immunotherapy in Cancer. Radiology 2022; 304:246-264. [PMID: 35762888 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.212481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape of many cancers, with durable responses in disease previously associated with a poor prognosis. Patient selection remains a challenge, with predictive biomarkers an urgent unmet clinical need. Current predictive biomarkers, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (measured with immunohistochemistry), are imperfect. Promising biomarkers, including tumor mutation burden and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte density, fail to consistently predict response and have yet to translate to routine clinical practice. Heterogeneity of immune response within and between lesions presents a further challenge where fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT has a potential role in assessing response, stratifying treatment, and detecting and monitoring immune-related toxicities. Novel radiopharmaceuticals also present a unique opportunity to define the immune tumor microenvironment to better predict which patients may respond to therapy, for example by means of in vivo whole-body PD-L1 and CD8+ T cell expression imaging. In addition, longitudinal molecular imaging may help further define dynamic changes, particularly in cases of immunotherapy resistance, helping to direct a more personalized therapeutic approach. This review highlights current and emerging applications of molecular imaging to stratify, predict, and monitor molecular dynamics and treatment response in areas of clinical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Hughes
- From the Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK (D.J.H., M.S., V.G., G.J.R.C.); King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK (D.J.H., M.S., G.J.R.C.); Comprehensive Cancer Centre (B.T., A.B.), Department of Thoracic Surgery (A.B.), and Department of Radiology (V.G.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK (J.S., S.P.)
| | - Manil Subesinghe
- From the Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK (D.J.H., M.S., V.G., G.J.R.C.); King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK (D.J.H., M.S., G.J.R.C.); Comprehensive Cancer Centre (B.T., A.B.), Department of Thoracic Surgery (A.B.), and Department of Radiology (V.G.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK (J.S., S.P.)
| | - Benjamin Taylor
- From the Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK (D.J.H., M.S., V.G., G.J.R.C.); King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK (D.J.H., M.S., G.J.R.C.); Comprehensive Cancer Centre (B.T., A.B.), Department of Thoracic Surgery (A.B.), and Department of Radiology (V.G.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK (J.S., S.P.)
| | - Andrea Bille
- From the Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK (D.J.H., M.S., V.G., G.J.R.C.); King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK (D.J.H., M.S., G.J.R.C.); Comprehensive Cancer Centre (B.T., A.B.), Department of Thoracic Surgery (A.B.), and Department of Radiology (V.G.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK (J.S., S.P.)
| | - James Spicer
- From the Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK (D.J.H., M.S., V.G., G.J.R.C.); King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK (D.J.H., M.S., G.J.R.C.); Comprehensive Cancer Centre (B.T., A.B.), Department of Thoracic Surgery (A.B.), and Department of Radiology (V.G.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK (J.S., S.P.)
| | - Sophie Papa
- From the Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK (D.J.H., M.S., V.G., G.J.R.C.); King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK (D.J.H., M.S., G.J.R.C.); Comprehensive Cancer Centre (B.T., A.B.), Department of Thoracic Surgery (A.B.), and Department of Radiology (V.G.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK (J.S., S.P.)
| | - Vicky Goh
- From the Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK (D.J.H., M.S., V.G., G.J.R.C.); King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK (D.J.H., M.S., G.J.R.C.); Comprehensive Cancer Centre (B.T., A.B.), Department of Thoracic Surgery (A.B.), and Department of Radiology (V.G.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK (J.S., S.P.)
| | - Gary J R Cook
- From the Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, London SE1 7EH, UK (D.J.H., M.S., V.G., G.J.R.C.); King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK (D.J.H., M.S., G.J.R.C.); Comprehensive Cancer Centre (B.T., A.B.), Department of Thoracic Surgery (A.B.), and Department of Radiology (V.G.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK (J.S., S.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ma VT, Chamila Perera AA, Sun Y, Sitto M, Waninger JJ, Warrier G, Green MD, Fecher LA, Lao CD. Early Response Assessment in Advanced Stage Melanoma Treated with Combination Ipilimumab/Nivolumab. Front Immunol 2022; 13:860421. [PMID: 35874737 PMCID: PMC9296775 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.860421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Standard combination ipilimumab/nivolumab (I/N) is given as 4 induction doses for advanced stage melanoma followed by nivolumab single-agent maintenance therapy. While many patients receive less than 4 doses due to immune-related toxicities, it is unclear if fewer doses of I/N may still provide long term clinical benefit. Our aim is to determine if response assessment after 1 or 2 doses of I/N can predict long-term survival and assess if fewer doses of I/N can lead to similar survival outcomes. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis on a cohort of patients with advanced melanoma who w0ere treated with standard I/N. Cox regression of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) models were performed to assess the relationship between response after 1 or 2 doses of I/N and risk of progression and/or death. Clinical benefit response (CBR) was assessed, defined as SD (stable disease) + PR (partial response) + CR (complete response) by imaging. Among patients who achieved a CBR after 1 or 2 doses of I/N, a multivariable Cox regression of survival was used to compare 1 or 2 vs 3 or 4 doses of I/N adjusted by known prognostic variables in advanced melanoma. Results 199 patients were evaluated. Patients with CBR after 1 dose of I/N had improved PFS (HR: 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.33; p<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.12, 0.05-0.32; p<0.001) compared to progressive disease (PD). Patients with CBR (vs PD) after 2 doses of I/N also had improved PFS (HR: 0.09, 0.05-0.16; p<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.07, 0.03-0.14; p<0.001). There was no survival risk difference comparing 1 or 2 vs 3 or 4 doses of I/N for PFS (HR: 0.95, 0.37-2.48; p=0.921) and OS (HR: 1.04, 0.22-4.78; p=0.965). Conclusions Early interval imaging with response during induction with I/N may be predictive of long-term survival in advanced stage melanoma. CBR after 1 or 2 doses of I/N is associated with favorable survival outcomes, even in the setting of fewer I/N doses received. Further studies are warranted to evaluate if electively administering fewer combination I/N doses despite tolerance in select patients may balance the benefits of therapy while decreasing toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent T. Ma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- *Correspondence: Vincent T. Ma,
| | | | - Yilun Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Merna Sitto
- Department of Medical Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jessica J. Waninger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Medical Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Govind Warrier
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Michael D. Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veteran Affairs Ann Arbor Hospital System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Leslie A. Fecher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Christopher D. Lao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Liao CY, Li CC, Chen LK, Li MF. Cavitary pulmonary appearance of metastatic rectal cancer after oncolytic virotherapy. Asian J Surg 2022; 45:2502-2503. [PMID: 35697609 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.05.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chien-Yang Liao
- Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Cheng Li
- Center of Stem Cell & Precision Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taiwan
| | - Li-Kuang Chen
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Feng Li
- Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiology, Shu-Zen Junior College of Medicine and Management, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
When artificial intelligence meets PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: Population screening, response prediction and efficacy evaluation. Comput Biol Med 2022; 145:105499. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
39
|
Wu C, Lorenzo G, Hormuth DA, Lima EABF, Slavkova KP, DiCarlo JC, Virostko J, Phillips CM, Patt D, Chung C, Yankeelov TE. Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology. BIOPHYSICS REVIEWS 2022; 3:021304. [PMID: 35602761 PMCID: PMC9119003 DOI: 10.1063/5.0086789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Digital twins employ mathematical and computational models to virtually represent a physical object (e.g., planes and human organs), predict the behavior of the object, and enable decision-making to optimize the future behavior of the object. While digital twins have been widely used in engineering for decades, their applications to oncology are only just emerging. Due to advances in experimental techniques quantitatively characterizing cancer, as well as advances in the mathematical and computational sciences, the notion of building and applying digital twins to understand tumor dynamics and personalize the care of cancer patients has been increasingly appreciated. In this review, we present the opportunities and challenges of applying digital twins in clinical oncology, with a particular focus on integrating medical imaging with mechanism-based, tissue-scale mathematical modeling. Specifically, we first introduce the general digital twin framework and then illustrate existing applications of image-guided digital twins in healthcare. Next, we detail both the imaging and modeling techniques that provide practical opportunities to build patient-specific digital twins for oncology. We then describe the current challenges and limitations in developing image-guided, mechanism-based digital twins for oncology along with potential solutions. We conclude by outlining five fundamental questions that can serve as a roadmap when designing and building a practical digital twin for oncology and attempt to provide answers for a specific application to brain cancer. We hope that this contribution provides motivation for the imaging science, oncology, and computational communities to develop practical digital twin technologies to improve the care of patients battling cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengyue Wu
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kalina P. Slavkova
- Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | | | | | - Caleb M. Phillips
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - Debra Patt
- Texas Oncology, Austin, Texas 78731, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Aguado C, Chara L, Antoñanzas M, Matilla Gonzalez JM, Jiménez U, Hernanz R, Mielgo-Rubio X, Trujillo-Reyes JC, Couñago F. Neoadjuvant treatment in non-small cell lung cancer: New perspectives with the incorporation of immunotherapy. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:314-322. [PMID: 35662985 PMCID: PMC9153074 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i5.314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of neoadjuvant treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is to eliminate micrometastatic disease to facilitate surgical resection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) in localised NSCLC has numerous advantages over other therapeutic modalities and is considered standard treatment in resectable disease. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improves long-term survival in advanced disease and has a better toxicity profile than conventional therapies. These immunotherapy agents (anti-PD1/PD-L1), administered with or without ChT, are currently being evaluated in the preoperative setting, with initial results showing better pathological response rates and more long-term benefits. Importantly, these drugs do not appear to increase the rate of severe adverse effects and/or postoperative complications. However, several questions still need to be resolved, including the identification of predictive biomarkers; comparative studies of immunotherapy alone vs combined treatment with ChT and/or radiotherapy; the optimal duration of treatment; the timing of surgery; the need for adjuvant treatment; appropriate radiologic evaluation and mediastinal staging; and the correlation between pathological response and survival outcomes. Here we review the current evidence for immunotherapy from a multidisciplinary perspective and discuss current and future controversies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Aguado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Luis Chara
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 19002, Spain
| | - Mónica Antoñanzas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | | | - Unai Jiménez
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Bizkaia 48903, Basque Country, Spain
| | - Raul Hernanz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Xabier Mielgo-Rubio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón 28922, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Trujillo-Reyes
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona 08029, Catalonia, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08029, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón 28223, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid 28003, Spain
- Medicine Department, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón 28670, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Immunotherapy-Based Treatments of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 219:533-546. [PMID: 35506555 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.27633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The advent of immunotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed the treatment landscape and conferred survival benefit for patients with advanced HCC who typically have a very poor prognosis. The most pronounced improvements in response, as documented by standardized response criteria based on CT or MRI, have been achieved when immunotherapy is combined with other systemic or locoregional therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments result in unique patterns on CT and MRI that challenge the application of conventional response criteria such as RECIST, modified RECIST, and European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria. Thus, newer criteria have been developed to gauge therapy response or disease progression for patients on immunotherapy, including immune-related RECIST (iRECIST) and immune-modified RECIST (imRECIST), though these remain unvalidated. In this review, we describe the current landscape of immunotherapeutic agents used for HCC, summarize results of published studies, review pathobiological mechanisms that provide a rationale for the use of these agents, and report on the status of response assessment for immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with other treatment options. Finally, consensus statements are provided to inform radiologists on essential considerations in the era of a rapidly changing treatment paradigm for patients with HCC.
Collapse
|
42
|
Cheng Z, Du Y, Yu L, Yuan Z, Tian J. Application of Noninvasive Imaging to Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Breast Cancer: Facts and Future. Mol Imaging Biol 2022; 24:264-279. [PMID: 35102468 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01688-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
With the application of mono-immunotherapy in cancer, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, improved outcomes have been achieved. However, there are several limitations to immunotherapy, such as a poor response to the drugs, immune resistance, and immune-related adverse events. In recent years, studies of preclinical animal models and clinical trials have demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors for breast cancer can significantly prolong the overall survival and quality of patients' lives. Meanwhile, combined immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment has attracted researchers' attention and showed great potential in the comprehensive treatment of breast cancer patients. Additionally, noninvasive imaging enables physicians to predict response to combined immunotherapeutic drugs, achieve treatment efficacy, and lead to better clinical management. Herein, we review the background of combined immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and summarize its targeted imaging as well as progress in noninvasive imaging aimed at evaluating therapeutic outcomes. Finally, we describe several factors that may influence the outcome of this combined immunotherapy, the future direction of medical imaging, and the potential application of artificial intelligence in breast cancer. With further development of noninvasive imaging for the guidance of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors, cures for this disease may be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongquan Cheng
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100050, China
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, The State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex System, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, BeijingBeijing, 100190, China
| | - Yang Du
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, The State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex System, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, BeijingBeijing, 100190, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100080, China.
| | - Leyi Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Zhu Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100050, China.
| | - Jie Tian
- CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, The State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex System, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, BeijingBeijing, 100190, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100080, China.
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710071, China.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
The Role of Radiomics in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A New Protagonist in the Jungle of Response Criteria. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061740. [PMID: 35330068 PMCID: PMC8948743 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has represented a milestone in cancer treatment. Despite PD-L1 expression being the standard biomarker used before the start of therapy, there is still a strict need to identify complementary non-invasive biomarkers in order to better select patients. In this context, radiomics is an emerging approach for examining medical images and clinical data by capturing multiple features hidden from human eye and is potentially able to predict response assessment and survival in the course of immunotherapy. We reviewed the available studies investigating the role of radiomics in cancer patients, focusing on non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Although preliminary research shows encouraging results, different issues need to be solved before radiomics can enter into clinical practice. Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated encouraging results in terms of durable clinical benefit and survival in several malignancies. Nevertheless, the search to identify an “ideal” biomarker for predicting response to ICI is still far from over. Radiomics is a new translational field of study aiming to extract, by dedicated software, several features from a given medical image, ranging from intensity distribution and spatial heterogeneity to higher-order statistical parameters. Based on these premises, our review aims to summarize the current status of radiomics as a potential predictor of clinical response following immunotherapy treatment. A comprehensive search of PubMed results was conducted. All studies published in English up to and including December 2021 were selected, comprising those that explored computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) for radiomic analyses in the setting of ICI. Several studies have demonstrated the potential applicability of radiomic features in the monitoring of the therapeutic response beyond the traditional morphologic and metabolic criteria, as well as in the prediction of survival or non-invasive assessment of the tumor microenvironment. Nevertheless, important limitations emerge from our review in terms of standardization in feature selection, data sharing, and methods, as well as in external validation. Additionally, there is still need for prospective clinical trials to confirm the potential significant role of radiomics during immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
44
|
Noë G, Cardin A, Lasocki A. Part 1: Imaging findings of common immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse effects. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:495-501. [PMID: 35244329 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Over the last decade or so, immunotherapy and in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors have become common in the treatment of numerous cancers and have revolutionised oncology. The unique mechanisms of these agents has resulted in novel tumour response patterns and also new drug-related toxicities, both of which can have specific findings on imaging. The widespread and increasing use of these agents means these findings are now encountered across many radiology practices beyond just specialist oncology units. This pictorial essay aims to describe and illustrate imaging findings associated with common and important immune-related adverse events as a result of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geertje Noë
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony Cardin
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arian Lasocki
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Radiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sheikhbahaei S, Subramaniam RM, Solnes LB. 2-Deoxy-2-[18F] Fluoro-d-Glucose PET/Computed Tomography. PET Clin 2022; 17:307-317. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
46
|
Noë G, Cardin A, Lasocki A. Part 2: Imaging findings of uncommon but important immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse effects. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:502-507. [PMID: 35233953 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Oncology care has significantly changed with the emergence of immunotherapy agents, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This has had an immediate effect on imaging, with different radiological tumour responses to treatment compared with conventional chemotherapies, and novel imaging findings due to complications caused by these agents (referred to as immune-related adverse effects, irAEs). Some of the more common irAEs may be familiar, but as the use of ICIs increases to a wider variety of cancers, these complications, and in particular, the less common irAEs, will be encountered more frequently on imaging. It will be increasingly important to be familiar with these uncommon irAEs, particularly since they can be difficult to recognise and distinguish from metastatic disease. The aim of this pictorial essay was to describe and illustrate imaging findings that may be encountered related to uncommon but important irAEs as a result of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geertje Noë
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony Cardin
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arian Lasocki
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Radiology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
The Diagnosis and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Cardiovascular Toxicity: Myocarditis and Beyond. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10020304. [PMID: 35214762 PMCID: PMC8879796 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent years have brought major advancements in the use of immune therapy and specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients, with expanding indications for various malignancies resulting in the treatment of a large and increasing number of patients. While this therapy significantly improves outcomes in a variety of hematologic and solid tumors, the use of ICIs is associated with a substantial risk of immune-related adverse events. Cardiovascular toxicity, while not the most common side effect of ICIs, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is therefore crucial for oncologists and cardiologists, as well as internists and emergency room physicians, to have a good understanding of this increasingly common clinical problem. In the present review, we discuss the cardiac aspects of ICI therapy with special emphasis on the clinical manifestations of their cardiovascular toxicity, diagnostic approaches, treatment and suggested surveillance.
Collapse
|
48
|
Chakrabarty N, Mahajan A, Baheti AD, Choudhari A, Patil V, Popat P, Unde H. A Radiologist's Perspective on Treatment-Related Pseudoprogression: Clues and Hues. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractPseudoprogression refers to the initial apparent increase in tumor burden observed on imaging after cancer therapy, with subsequent delayed response to the same treatment, thus giving a false initial appearance of disease progression. It is essential to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression to prevent the patients from getting deprived of the benefits of their ongoing cancer therapy owing to their early withdrawal. It also affects their recruitment for clinical trials. Pseudoprogression, albeit uncommon, has been observed after various types of cancer therapy; however, this phenomenon has gained momentum of late due to the emergence of immunotherapy for the treatment of various malignancies. Besides immunotherapy, pseudoprogression has predominantly been of concern in a few patients after radiation therapy for brain tumors and metastasis, after molecular targeted therapy for a variety of tumors, and after chemotherapy in metastatic bone lesions. This article reviews the available data on imaging of pseudoprogression from various types of cancer therapies, highlighting ways to suspect or identify it on imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nivedita Chakrabarty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Abhishek Mahajan
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Akshay D. Baheti
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit Choudhari
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vasundhara Patil
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Palak Popat
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Himangi Unde
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wu M, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Chen F, Luo Y, He S, Liu Y, Yang Q, Li Y, Wei H, Zhang H, Lu N, Wang S, Guo Y, Ye Z, Liu Y. A Combined-Radiomics Approach of CT Images to Predict Response to Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in NSCLC: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Front Oncol 2022; 11:688679. [PMID: 35083133 PMCID: PMC8784873 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.688679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Based on non-contrast-enhanced (NCE)/contrast-enhanced (CE) computed tomography (CT) images, we try to identify a combined-radiomics model and evaluate its predictive capacity regarding response to anti-PD1 immunotherapy of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS 131 patients with NSCLC undergoing anti-PD1 immunotherapy were retrospectively enrolled from 7 institutions. Using largest lesion (LL) and target lesions (TL) approaches, we performed a radiomics analysis based on pretreatment NCE-CT (NCE-radiomics) and CE-CT images (CE-radiomics), respectively. Meanwhile, a combined-radiomics model based on NCE-CT and CE-CT images was constructed. Finally, we developed their corresponding nomograms incorporating clinical factors. ROC was used to evaluate models' predictive performance in the training and testing set, and a DeLong test was employed to compare the differences between different models. RESULTS For TL approach, both NCE-radiomics and CE-radiomics performed poorly in predicting response to immunotherapy. For LL approach, NCE-radiomics nomograms and CE-radiomics nomograms incorporating with clinical factor of distant metastasis all showed satisfactory results, reflected by the AUCs in the training (AUC=0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.92; AUC=0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.87) and test sets (AUC=0.78, 95% CI: 0.64-0.92, AUC=0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.88), respectively. Compared with the NCE-radiomics nomograms, the combined-radiomics nomogram showed incremental predictive capacity in the training set (AUC=0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.92) and test set (AUC=0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.94), respectively, but no statistical difference (P=0.86, P=0.79). CONCLUSION Compared with radiomics based on single NCE or CE-CT images, the combined-radiomics model has potential advantages to identify patients with NSCLC most likely to benefit from immunotherapy, and may effectively improve more precise and individualized decision support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minghao Wu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yanyan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jianing Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuwei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yina Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, 1st Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Radiology, 1st Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yahong Luo
- Department of Medical Imaging, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Shuai He
- Department of Medical Imaging, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Yulin Liu
- Department of Radiology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qian Yang
- Department of Radiology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yanying Li
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Wei
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Nian Lu
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sicong Wang
- Prognostic Diagnosis, GE Healthcare China, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Guo
- Prognostic Diagnosis, GE Healthcare China, Beijing, China
| | - Zhaoxiang Ye
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ruchalski K, Dewan R, Sai V, McIntosh LJ, Braschi-Amirfarzan M. Imaging response assessment for oncology: An algorithmic approach. Eur J Radiol Open 2022; 9:100426. [PMID: 35693043 PMCID: PMC9184854 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment response assessment by imaging plays a vital role in evaluating changes in solid tumors during oncology therapeutic clinical trials. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 is the reference standard imaging response criteria and provides details regarding image acquisition, image interpretation and categorical response classification. While RECIST 1.1 is applied for the majority of clinical trials in solid tumors, other criteria and modifications have been introduced when RECIST 1.1 outcomes may be incomplete. Available criteria beyond RECIST 1.1 can be explored in an algorithmic fashion dependent on imaging modality, tumor type and method of treatment. Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) is available for use with PET/CT. Modifications to RECIST 1.1 can be tumor specific, including mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma and mesothelioma. Choi criteria for gastrointestinal stromal tumors incorporate tumor density with alterations to categorical response thresholds. Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) imaging criteria combine RECIST 1.1 findings with those of bone scans. In addition, multiple response criteria have been created to address atypical imaging responses in immunotherapy.
Collapse
|