US Evaluation of Axillary Lymphadenopathy Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

Incidence, Timing, and Long-Term Outcomes of COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Lymphadenopathy on Screening Mammography

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence, timing, and long-term outcomes of unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy ipsilateral to vaccine site (UIAL) on screening mammography after COVID-19 vaccination.

METHODS

This retrospective, multisite study included consecutive patients undergoing screening mammography February 8, 2021, to January 31, 2022, with at least 1 year of follow-up. UIAL was typically considered benign (BI-RADS 1 or 2) in the setting of recent (≤6 weeks) vaccination or BI-RADS 0 (ultrasound recommended) when accompanied by a breast finding or identified >6 weeks postvaccination. Vaccination status and manufacturer were obtained from regional registries. Lymphadenopathy rates in vaccinated patients with and without UIAL were compared using Pearson's χ2 test.

RESULTS

There were 44,473 female patients (mean age 60.4 ± 11.4 years) who underwent screening mammography at five sites, and 40,029 (90.0%) received at least one vaccine dose. Ninety-four (0.2%) presented with UIAL, 1 to 191 days postvaccination (median 13.5 [interquartile range: 5.0-31.0]). Incidence declined from 2.1% to 0.9% to ≤0.5% after 1, 2, and 3 weeks and persisted up to 36 weeks (P < .001). UIAL did not vary across manufacturer (P = .15). Of 94, 77 (81.9%) were BI-RADS 1 or 2 at screening. None were diagnosed with malignancy at 1-year follow-up. Seventeen (18.1%) were BI-RADS 0 at screening. At diagnostic workup, 13 (76.5%) were BI-RADS 1 or 2, 2 (11.8%) were BI-RADS 3, and 2 (11.8%) were BI-RADS 4. Both BI-RADS 4 patients had malignant status and ipsilateral breast malignancies. Of BI-RADS 3 patients, at follow-up, one was biopsied yielding benign etiology, and one was downgraded to BI-RADS 2.

DISCUSSION

Isolated UIAL on screening mammography performed within 6 months of COVID-19 vaccination can be safely assessed as benign.

Distinguishing Axillary Lymphadenopathy after COVID-19 Vaccination from Malignant Lymphadenopathy

Objectives: To study the differences between malignant hypermetabolic axillary lymphadenopathy (MHL) and COVID-19 vaccine-associated axillary hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy (VAHL) using clinical imaging. Methods: A total of 1096 patients underwent Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) between 1 June 2021 and 30 April 2022 at Ehime University Hospital. In total, 188 patients with axillary lymphadenopathy after the COVID-19 vaccination were evaluated. The patients were classified into three groups such as VAHL (n = 27), MHL (n = 21), and equivocal hypermetabolic axillary lymphadenopathy (EqHL; n = 140). Differences in lymph node (LN) swellings were statistically analyzed using clinical imaging (echography, CT, and 18F-FDG PET). Results: MHL included a higher female population (90.5%) owing to a higher frequency of breast cancer (80.9%). Axillary LNs of MHL did not show any LN fatty hilums (0%); however, those of VAHL and EqHL did (15.8 and 36%, respectively). After the logistic regression analysis of the patients who had axillary lymphadenopathy without any LN fatty hilums, the minor axis length and ellipticity (minor axis/major axis) in the largest axillary LN, SUVmax, and Tissue-to-Background Ratio (TBR) were useful in distinguishing malignant lymphadenopathies. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that a cut-off value of ≥7.3 mm for the axillary LN minor axis (sensitivity: 0.714, specificity: 0.684) and of ≥0.671 for ellipticity (0.667 and 0.773, respectively) in the largest LN with the highest SUVmax and TBR were predictive of MHL. Conclusions: Axillary lymphadenopathy of the minor axis and ellipticity in LN without fatty hilums may be useful to be suspicious for malignancy, even in patients who have received COVID-19 vaccination. Further examinations, such as 18F-FDG PET, are recommended for such patients.

Reactive axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: comparison of mRNA vs. attenuated whole-virus vaccines

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence and natural course of reactive axillary lymph nodes (RAL) between mRNA and attenuated whole-virus vaccines using Deauville criteria.

METHODS

In this multi-institutional PET-CT study comprising multiple vaccine types (Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty, Moderna/Spikevax, Sinovac/CoronaVac and Janssen vaccines), we evaluated the incidence and natural course of RAL in a large cohort of oncological patients utilizing a standardized Deauville scaling system (n=522; 293 Female, Deauville 3-5 positive for RAL). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate the predictive value of clinical parameters (absolute neutrophil count [ANC], platelets, age, sex, tumor type, and vaccine-to-PET interval) for PET positivity.

RESULTS

Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty and Moderna vaccines revealed similar RAL incidences for the first 20 days after the second dose of vaccine administration (44% for the first 10 days for both groups, 26% vs. 20% for 10-20 days, respectively for Moderna and Pfizer). However, Moderna recipients revealed significantly higher incidences of RAL after 20 days compared to Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty, with nodal reactivity spanning up to the 9th week post-vaccination (15% vs. 4%, respectively P  < 0.001). No RAL was observed in patients who received either a single dose of J&J vaccine or two doses of CroronaVac. Younger patients showed increased likelihood of RAL, otherwise, clinical/demographic parameters were not predictive of RAL ( P  = 0.014 for age, P  > 0.05 for additional clinical/demographic parameters).

CONCLUSION

RAL based on strict PET criteria was observed with mRNA but not with attenuated whole-virus vaccines, in line with higher immunogenicity and stronger protection offered by mRNA vaccines.

Arm lymphedema after vascularized lymph node harvest following Covid-19 vaccination

There is evidence that COVID-19 vaccines may affect the lymphatic system. We report a case of a 40-year-old female who had undergone lymph node transfer for treating primary lymphedema of the legs. Six months later, the patient developed lymphedema of the right arm closely related to mRNA vaccination against COVID-19.

Axillary lymph nodes enlargement after Sars-CoV-2 vaccine in patients undergoing breast examination: a single-centre experience in 285 women

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of axillary lymphadenopathy over established time ranges after COVID-19 vaccination and lymph node pathologic features (i.e. size increase and qualitative characteristics) in subjects undergoing axillary evaluation during a breast imaging examination.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The institutional review board approved this prospective study.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

women undergoing mammography and breast ultrasound between July and October 2021; information about the COVID-19 vaccine and infection, if any.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

known metastatic lymphadenopathy. Participants were divided into 5 subgroups according to time between vaccine and imaging: < 6 weeks; 7-8 weeks; 9-10 weeks; 11-12 weeks; > 12 weeks. Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes was performed with ultrasound. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 285 women were included. Most of the patients underwent Moderna vaccine (n = 175, 61.4%). 63/285 patients had a previous history of breast cancer (22.1%). 13/17 (76.5%) patients with previous COVID-19 infection had no previous history of cancer, whereas 4/17 had a previous history of cancer (p < .001). 41/285 (14.4%) women showed lymphadenopathy, and they were significantly younger (46.9 ± 11.6 years) than women with borderline (54.0 ± 11.9 years) or no lymphadenopathy (57.3 ± 11.9 years) (p < .001). Lymphadenopathy and borderline lymphadenopathy were more frequently observed in the Moderna-vaccinated women and in the subgroup of patients evaluated < 6 weeks after vaccination (p < 0.001). The most common pathologic feature was cortical thickening, followed by complete or partial effacement of fatty hilum.

CONCLUSION

A lymphadenopathy within 12 weeks after vaccination is a common finding particularly in younger women and after Moderna vaccine and no further assessment should be required.

European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) guidelines on the management of axillary lymphadenopathy after COVID-19 vaccination: 2023 revision

Axillary lymphadenopathy is a common side effect of COVID-19 vaccination, leading to increased imaging-detected asymptomatic and symptomatic unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy. This has threatened to negatively impact the workflow of breast imaging services, leading to the release of ten recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) in August 2021. Considering the rapidly changing scenario and data scarcity, these initial recommendations kept a highly conservative approach. As of 2023, according to newly acquired evidence, EUSOBI proposes the following updates, in order to reduce unnecessary examinations and avoid delaying necessary examinations. First, recommendation n. 3 has been revised to state that breast examinations should not be delayed or rescheduled because of COVID-19 vaccination, as evidence from the first pandemic waves highlights how delayed or missed screening tests have a negative effect on breast cancer morbidity and mortality, and that there is a near-zero risk of subsequent malignant findings in asymptomatic patients who have unilateral lymphadenopathy and no suspicious breast findings. Second, recommendation n. 7 has been revised to simplify follow-up strategies: in patients without breast cancer history and no imaging findings suspicious for cancer, symptomatic and asymptomatic imaging-detected unilateral lymphadenopathy on the same side of recent COVID-19 vaccination (within 12 weeks) should be classified as a benign finding (BI-RADS 2) and no further work-up should be pursued. All other recommendations issued by EUSOBI in 2021 remain valid.

Ipsilateral Upper-Limb Lymphedema After COVID-19 Vaccine Booster

ABSTRACT

Recent data suggest that protective immunity from COVID-19 vaccine may wane after a period, with booster doses becoming increasingly deployed in many countries. An 84-year-old woman presents with a 6-month history of left upper-limb swelling; the only history of note was an intramuscular Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine booster in the ipsilateral deltoid just 1 week before the onset of the swelling. Upper-extremity lymphoscintigraphy after the administration of 99m Tc-nanocolloid into the interstitial space of the hands showed left upper-limb lymphatic dysfunction.

Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on ultrasound findings of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-related lymphadenopathy

BACKGROUND

Previous studies reported axillary lymphadenopathy (LAP) as a side effect of the anti-COVID-19 vaccine. However, the effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)s on mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-related LAP have not been investigated.

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the effects of NSAIDs on temporal changes in sonographic findings of COVID-19 vaccine-associated LAP.

METHODS

Our single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted between October 2021 and April 2022. We included patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who applied with complaints of swelling in the ipsilateral axillary region after the COVID-19 vaccine and had axillary region ultrasound (US) scans in electronic medical records within 30 days pre-vaccination. The serial US was performed on the third, 10th, and 30th days post-vaccination.

RESULTS

Our study included 38 patients with a median age of 36 (IQR, 32-43) years. In 18 (47.4%) patients used NSAIDs in the early post-vaccination period. Measurements of LAPs on ultrasound scans increased at day 3 post-vaccination compared with pre-vaccination both in NSAID users and non-users. On the 10th day, a statistically insignificant decrease in LAP diameters and cortical thickness was observed in NSAID users compared to non-users. On the post-vaccination 30th day, axillary LAPs regressed similarly in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In our study, post-vaccine NSAID use had no statistically significant effect on the course of axillary LAPs.

Ultrasound during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global Approach

SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2) rapidly spread worldwide as COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019), causing a costly and deadly pandemic. Different pulmonary manifestations represent this syndrome's most common clinical manifestations, together with the cardiovascular complications frequently observed in these patients. Ultrasound (US) evaluations of the lungs, heart, and lower limbs may be helpful in the diagnosis, follow-up, and prognosis of patients with COVID-19. Moreover, POCUS (point-of-care ultrasound) protocols are particularly useful for patients admitted to intensive care units. The present review aimed to highlight the clinical conditions during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in which the US represents a crucial diagnostic tool.

Hypermetabolic Ipsilateral Supraclavicular and Axillary Lymphadenopathy: Optimal Time Point for Performing an 18F-FDG PET/CT after COVID-19 Vaccination

Background: We aimed to evaluate the incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type-2 (SARS-CoV2) vaccine-related hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy (HLA) and evaluate which time point produces the least number of false-positive findings in an 18F-2-Fluor-2-desoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Methods: For this retrospective, multi-center imaging study, patients with any form of SARS-CoV2 vaccination prior to an 18F-FDG-PET/CT were included between January 2021 and December 2021. Patients were divided into six groups according to the time point of vaccination prior to their 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging, e.g., group one (0−6 days) and group six (35−80 days). As the reference standards, the SUVmax of the mediastinal blood pool (MBP) and the SUVmax contralateral reference lymph node (RL) were determined. (A) The absolute SUVmax of HLA, (B) the ratio of SUVmaxHLA/SUVmax mediastinal blood pool (rHLA/MBP), (C) the ratio SUVmax HLA vs. SUVmax contralateral reference lymph node (rHLA/RL), (D) and the incidence of HLA defined as rHLA/MBP > 1.5 were assessed. Results: Group one (days 0−6) showed the highest incidence of HLA 16/23 (70%) and rHLA/MBP (2.58 ± 2.1). All three parameters for HLA reduced statistically significantly in the comparison of Groups 1−3 (days 0−20) versus Groups 4−6 (days 21−80) (p-values < 0.001). Conclusions: If feasible, an FDG PET should be postponed by at least 3 weeks after SARS-CoV2 vaccination, especially if an accurate evaluation of axillary status is required.

The lymphatic system and COVID-19 vaccines

Understanding the precise mechanism of vaccine-induced protection and the immune correlates of protection against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is crucially important for developing next-generation vaccines that confer durable and protective immunity against COVID-19. Similar factors are also important for other infectious diseases. Here, I briefly summarize the mechanism of action of the currently used COVID-19 mRNA vaccines from the viewpoint of the function of the lymphatic system.

Axillary adenopathy detected on breast MRI following COVID-19 vaccination: outcomes and follow-up recommendations

This retrospective study presents 110 patients with suspected COVID-19 vaccine-related axillary adenopathy on breast MRI. Our study aimed to assess the outcomes of axillary adenopathy detected on breast MRI performed within one year after COVID-19 vaccination. The median time between the COVID-19 vaccine and breast MRI was shorter in patients with detected adenopathy compared to patients without detected adenopathy (6 weeks [2–17] versus 15 [7–24] weeks, p < 0.001). Unilateral axillary adenopathy detected on breast MRI had a low malignancy rate (3.3%), and no cases of malignant axillary adenopathy were diagnosed without a known breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast. Our findings suggest that unilateral axillary adenopathy identified on breast MRI ipsilateral to a recent COVID-19 vaccination can be considered benign in the absence of a suspicious breast finding or known breast cancer. Regardless of vaccine status and timing, unilateral axillary adenopathy detected on MRI evaluation with a known malignancy or suspicious breast finding should be considered suspicious. This will avoid unnecessary scheduling constraints, patient anxiety, and cost, without delaying diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer.

Manifestation of Subclinical Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis after COVID-19 Vaccination as Supraclavicular Lymphadenopathy

Lymphadenopathy after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is a common side effect that usually resolves within several days to weeks, and only observation is recommended. However, for prolonged lymphadenopathy, other possibilities, including malignancy or other lymphoproliferative diseases, may be considered. Herein, we report the case of a 66-year-old woman who experienced prolonged ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node enlargement after the second dose of the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) COVID-19 vaccine, which was eventually diagnosed as extrapulmonary tuberculosis.