1
|
Lin J, Liu H, Liang S, Luo L, Guan S, Wu S, Liu Y, Xu S, Yan R, Xu E. Microwave ablation for colorectal liver metastases with ultrasound fusion imaging assistance: a stratified analysis study based on tumor size and location. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025; 50:400-408. [PMID: 39090260 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04508-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy of ultrasound fusion imaging-assisted microwave ablation (MWA) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) based on stratified analysis of tumor size and location. METHODS Patients with CRLM who underwent ultrasound fusion imaging-assisted MWA in our hospital between February 2020 and February 2023 were enrolled into this retrospective study. Ultrasound fusion imaging was used for detection, guidance, monitoring and immediate evaluation throughout the MWA procedures. Technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor progression (LTP), intrahepatic progression and overall survival (OS) were recorded and analyzed. The subgroup analysis of intrahepatic progression of MWA for CRLM was performed according to tumor size and location. RESULTS A total of 51 patients with 122 nodules were enrolled. Both technical success and technique efficacy were acquired in all nodules. In a median follow-up period of 19 months, 2.5% of the nodules (3/122) were observed LTP. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative intrahepatic progression rates were 38.7% and 52.1% respectively. Patients were divided into subgroups according to tumor size (≥ 30 mm, n = 13; < 30 mm, n = 38) and tumor location (perivascular, n = 20; non-perivascular, n = 31 and subcapsular, n = 36; non-subcapsular, n = 15). The cumulative intrahepatic progression rates were similar between the subgroups regarding tumor size and perivascular location, while significantly higher in the subcapsular group than in the non-subcapsular group (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION Ultrasound fusion imaging-assisted MWA exhibited satisfactory local efficacy for CRLM, especially for non-subcapsular tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Lin
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Huahui Liu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shuang Liang
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Liping Luo
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Sainan Guan
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shanshan Wu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shuxian Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ronghua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, NO.1120 Lianhua Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Erjiao Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, NO.3025 Shennan Middle Road, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bodard S, Guinebert S, Dimopoulos PM, Tacher V, Cornelis FH. Contribution and advances of robotics in percutaneous oncological interventional radiology. Bull Cancer 2024; 111:967-979. [PMID: 39198085 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
The advent of robotic systems in interventional radiology marks a significant evolution in minimally invasive medical procedures, offering enhanced precision, safety, and efficiency. This review comprehensively analyzes the current state and applications of robotic system usage in interventional radiology, which can be particularly helpful for complex procedures and in challenging anatomical regions. Robotic systems can improve the accuracy of interventions like microwave ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and irreversible electroporation. Indeed, studies have shown a notable decrease of an average 30% in the mean deviation of probes, and a 40% lesser need for adjustments during interventions carried out with robotic assistance. Moreover, this review highlights a 35% reduction in radiation dose and a stable-to-30% reduction in operating time associated with robot-assisted procedures compared to manual methods. Additionally, the potential of robotic systems to standardize procedures and minimize complications is discussed, along with the challenges they pose, such as setup duration, organ movement, and a lack of tactile feedback. Despite these advancements, the field still grapples with a dearth of randomized controlled trials, which underscores the need for more robust evidence to validate the efficacy and safety of robotic system usage in interventional radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvain Bodard
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Necker Hospital, University of Paris-Cité, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France; CNRS UMR 7371, Inserm U 1146, laboratoire d'imagerie biomédicale, Sorbonne University, 75006 Paris, France.
| | - Sylvain Guinebert
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Platon M Dimopoulos
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; Interventional Radiodolgy Dpt, University Hospital of Patras with memorial, 26504 Rio, Greece
| | - Vania Tacher
- Unité Inserm U955 n(o) 18, service d'imagerie médicale, hôpital Henri-Mondor, université Paris-Est, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Francois H Cornelis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France; Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pezzulla D, Chiloiro G, Lima EM, Macchia G, Romano C, Reina S, Panza G, Cilla S, Morganti AG, Cellini F, Gambacorta MA, Deodato F. Stereotactic radiotherapy for liver oligometastases: a pooled analysis following the estro/eortc consensus recommendations. Clin Exp Metastasis 2024; 41:667-678. [PMID: 39017807 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-024-10301-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
A large pooled analysis of liver oligometastases, classified accordingly to the ESTRO/EORTC recommendations, treated by stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) and Radiosurgery (SRS) was carried out. The clinical and dosimetric data of patients who underwent SBRT/SRS for liver metastases were analysed in terms of efficacy and toxicity profile. In particular, the Local Control (LC), the Distant Metastases Free Survival (DMFS), the Disease-Free Survival (DFS), the Overall Survival (OS), and the Next Systemic Therapy Free Survival (NEST-FS) rates were analysed. 113 patients (M/F: 49/64), accounting for a total of 150 hepatic lesions (March 2006-February 2023) in two Italian radiotherapy Institutions were evaluated. Median age was 67 years old (36-92) and 48 (42.5%) patients had at least one comorbidity. The majority of the lesions were induced (30.7%) or repeated oligoprogressive (12.7%) metastases. 98 lesions were treated with more than one daily fraction (mainly 50 Gy in 5 fractions), while 52 were radiosurgery treatments (mainly 32 Gy). The treatment response at 3-4 months was evaluable in 147 lesions: complete response was 32.0%, partial response 17.0%, and stable disease 32.0%. Actuarial LC, DMFS, DFS, OS, and NEST-FS at 1 year were 75.8%, 37.7%, 34.9%, 78.7%, and 59.4% respectively; while actuarial LC, DMFS, DFS, OS, and NEST-FS at 2 years were 52.1%, 24.9%, 21.9%, 51.3%, and 36.8%, respectively. The achievement of complete response, synchronous oligometastases, and no treatment interruptions correlated with a more favorable outcomes. As per the toxicity profile, we registered only two acute and one late toxicity cases higher than grade 2. Stereotactic treatment for liver metastases seems to be a safe and promising option in terms of local control. The best results in term of outcomes have been obtained in patients with complete response, synchronous oligometastases, favorable histology, and no treatment interruptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - G Chiloiro
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - E M Lima
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - G Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - C Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - S Reina
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - G Panza
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - S Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - A G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna - Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - F Cellini
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, Italy
| | - M A Gambacorta
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, Italy
| | - F Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chlorogiannis DD, Sotirchos VS, Sofocleous CT. Oncologic Outcomes after Percutaneous Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Updated Comprehensive Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1536. [PMID: 39336577 PMCID: PMC11433672 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60091536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2024] [Revised: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality, with liver metastases occurring in over a third of patients, and is correlated with poor prognosis. Despite surgical resection being the primary treatment option, only about 20% of patients qualify for surgery. Current guidelines recommend thermal ablation either alone or combined with surgery to treat limited hepatic metastases, provided that all visible disease can be effectively eradicated. Several ablation modalities, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, irreversible electroporation and histotripsy, are part of the percutaneous ablation armamentarium. Thermal ablation, including radiofrequency, microwave ablation and cryoablation, can offer local tumor control rates comparable to limited resection for selected tumors that can be ablated with margins. This review aims to encapsulate the current clinical evidence regarding the efficacy and oncologic outcomes after percutaneous ablation for the treatment of colorectal liver metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vlasios S Sotirchos
- Interventional Oncology/IR Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Interventional Oncology/IR Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pereira PL, Siemou P, Rempp HJ, Hoffmann R, Hoffmann RT, Kettenbach J, Clasen S, Helmberger T. CT versus MR guidance for radiofrequency ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a 10-year follow-up favors MR guidance. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:4663-4671. [PMID: 38041717 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10270-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the results of CT- vs MR-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer after 10 years of follow-up in an observational, retrospective, and multicentric study. METHODS A total of 238 patients with 496 LM were treated with RFA either with CT (CT group) or magnetic resonance (MR group) guidance. Every ablated LM was assessed and followed up with diagnostic MRI. Technical success, technique efficacy, predictive factors, recurrence rates, and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS The CT group comprised 143 patients and the MR group 77 patients. Eighteen patients underwent ablation with both modalities. Technical success per patient and per lesion was 88% and 93% for CT and 87% and 89.6% for MR, and technique efficacy was 97.1% and 98.6% for CT and 98.7% and 99.3% for MR respectively. Local recurrence following the first ablation (primary patency) occurred in 20.1% (CT) vs 4.6% (MR) (p < 0.001). Residual liver tumor, size of LM, and advanced N and M stage at initial diagnosis were independent predictors for overall survival in both groups. The median overall survival measured from first RFA treatment was 2.6 years. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival were 85.9%, 25.5%, and 19.1% respectively. CONCLUSIONS The MR group had significantly better local control compared to the CT group. There was no significant difference in patient survival between the two groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT MR-guided radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases is safe and effective, and offers better local control than CT-guided ablation. KEY POINTS • Imaging modality for radiofrequency ablation guidance is an independent predictor of local recurrence in colorectal liver metastases. • MR-guided radiofrequency ablation achieved better local control of liver metastases from colorectal cancer than CT-guided. • The number and size of liver metastases are, among others, independent predictors of survival. Radiofrequency ablation with MR guidance improved clinical outcome but does not affect survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Lucien Pereira
- Center for Radiology, Minimally-Invasive Therapies and Nuclear Medicine, SLK Kliniken GmbH Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany.
- Danube Private University (DPU), Krems, Austria.
| | - Panagiota Siemou
- Radiology Department, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Hans-Jörg Rempp
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Hoffmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ralf Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Carl-Gustav Carus University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Joachim Kettenbach
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Stephan Clasen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Clinic for Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Orsi F. Interventional oncology in breast cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:876-885. [PMID: 37964687 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer and one of the most important causes of death in women. Surgery is the standard therapy for breast cancer and in the last decades evolved towards a more conservative approach, with lumpectomy, followed by radiation therapy, the most common option. Unfortunately, up to 40% of women affected by BC will develop metastases and will receive systemic therapy, which improves survival and quality of life. Interventional oncology (IO), thanks to the improvement in technology and clinical experience, is gaining an important role in the field of breast cancer, both in treating the primary tumour and also in metastasis in well-selected cases. Percutaneous thermal ablation and more recently cryoablation are reported to achieve promising results in the radical treatment of small breast cancer, with optimal cosmetic outcome and a very high safety profile. Percutaneous ablation as well as intra-arterial therapies, such as chemoembolization and radioembolization, might also be indicated in metastatic BC patients. In advanced stage disease, breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) represent the main factor affecting the overall survival. Metastatic breast disease is a systemic disease, with tumour deposits potentially spread into different organs and tissues for which systemic therapy is the standard approach. Local therapies for liver metastases might have an important role in improving survival and quality of life in well-selected patients. Clinical and technical indications with their limitations, results and potential complications in local IO treatment for BCLM, will be also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Orsi
- IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bodard S, Guinebert S, N. Petre E, Marinelli B, Sarkar D, Barral M, H Cornelis F. Percutaneous liver interventions with robotic systems: a systematic review of available clinical solutions. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20230620. [PMID: 37873927 PMCID: PMC10646656 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Robotic-guided interventions are emerging techniques that are gradually becoming a common tool for performing biopsies and tumor ablations in liver. This systematic review aims to evaluate their advancements, challenges, and outcomes. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed database to identify relevant articles published between January 2000 and February 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies that assessed robotic systems for percutaneous liver biopsies and tumor ablations. Data extraction was performed to collect information on study characteristics; robotic systems; components and software; imaging modality; degree of freedom; and needle insertion methods. The outcome measures analyzed were procedure time, radiation dose, and accuracy. RESULTS 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. The robotic devices used included MAXIO, EPIONE, ROBIO-EX, AcuBot, and ACE robotic systems. The data set consisted of 429 percutaneous thermal ablations and 57 biopsies, both robot-guided. On average, the mean deviation of probes was reduced by 30% (from 1.6 vs 3.3 mm to 2.4 vs 3.9 mm (p < 0.001)), and 40% (p < 0.05) fewer readjustments were required during the robotic-assisted interventions. Moreover, robotic systems contributed to a reduction in operating time, ranging from 15% (18.3 vs 21.7 min, p < 0.001) to 25% (63.5 vs 87.4 min, p < 0.001). Finally, the radiation dose delivered to both the patient and the operator was decreased by an average of 50% (p < 0.05) compared to manual procedures. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Robotic systems could provide precise navigation and guidance during liver biopsies and percutaneous ablations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sylvain Guinebert
- Department of Radiology, University of Paris Cité, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Elena N. Petre
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Brett Marinelli
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Debkumar Sarkar
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Matthias Barral
- Department of Radiology, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dijkstra M, van der Lei S, Puijk RS, Schulz HH, Vos DJW, Timmer FEF, Scheffer HJ, Buffart TE, van den Tol MP, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Swijnenburg RJ, Versteeg KS, Meijerink MR. Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small-Size (0-3 cm) versus Intermediate-Size (3-5 cm) Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results from the Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE). Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4346. [PMID: 37686622 PMCID: PMC10487073 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Thermal ablation is widely recognized as the standard of care for small-size unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). For larger CRLM safety, local control and overall efficacy are not well established and insufficiently validated. The purpose of this comparative series was to analyze outcomes for intermediate-size versus small-size CRLM. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients treated with thermal ablation between December 2000 and November 2021 for small-size and intermediate-size CRLM were included. The primary endpoints were complication rate and local control (LC). Secondary endpoints included local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS In total, 59 patients were included in the intermediate-size (3-5 cm) group and 221 in the small-size (0-3 cm) group. Complications were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.546). No significant difference between the groups was found in an overall comparison of OS (HR 1.339; 95% CI 0.824-2.176; p = 0.239). LTPFS (HR 3.388; p < 0.001) and LC (HR 3.744; p = 0.004) were superior in the small-size group. Nevertheless, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year LC for intermediate-size CRLM was still 93.9%, 85.4%, and 81.5%, and technical efficacy improved over time. CONCLUSIONS Thermal ablation for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM is safe and induces long-term LC in the vast majority. The results of the COLLISION-XL trial (unresectable colorectal liver metastases: stereotactic body radiotherapy versus microwave ablation-a phase II randomized controlled trial for CRLM 3-5 cm) are required to provide further clarification of the role of local ablative methods for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelon Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Susan van der Lei
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Robbert S. Puijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Hannah H. Schulz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Danielle J. W. Vos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Florentine E. F. Timmer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Hester J. Scheffer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke E. Buffart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Birgit I. Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kathelijn S. Versteeg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn R. Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (M.R.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van der Lei S, Dijkstra M, Nieuwenhuizen S, Schulz HH, Vos DJW, Versteeg KS, Buffart TE, Swijnenburg RJ, de Vries JJJ, Bruynzeel AME, van den Tol MP, Scheffer HJ, Puijk RS, Haasbeek CJA, Meijerink MR. Unresectable Intermediate-Size (3-5 cm) Colorectal Liver Metastases: Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Versus Microwave Ablation (COLLISION-XL): Protocol of a Phase II/III Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00270-023-03498-8. [PMID: 37430016 PMCID: PMC10382334 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03498-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although microwave ablation (MWA) has a low complication rate and good efficacy for small-size (≤ 3 cm) colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), local control decreases with increasing size. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining interest as a potential means to treat intermediate-size CRLM and might be less susceptible to increasing volume. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of MWA to SBRT in patients with unresectable, intermediate-size (3-5 cm) CRLM. METHODS In this two-arm, multicentre phase II/ III randomized controlled trial, 68 patients with 1-3 unresectable, intermediate-size CRLM suitable for both MWA and SBRT, will be included. Patients will be treated with MWA or SBRT as randomised. The Primary endpoint is local tumour progression-free survival (LTPFS) at 1 year (intention-to-treat analysis). Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall and distant progression-free survival (DPFS), local control (LC) and procedural morbidity and mortality and assessment of pain and quality of life. DISCUSSION Current guidelines lack clear recommendations for the local treatment of liver only intermediate-size, unresectable CRLM and studies comparing curative intent SBRT and thermal ablation are scarce. Although safety and feasibility to eradicate tumours ≤ 5 cm have been established, both techniques suffer from lower LTPFS and LC rates for larger-size tumours. For the treatment of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM clinical equipoise has been reached. We have designed a two-armed phase II/ III randomized controlled trial directly comparing SBRT to MWA for unresectable CRLM 3-5 cm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 1, phase II/ III Randomized controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04081168, September 9th 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan van der Lei
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Madelon Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne Nieuwenhuizen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hannah H Schulz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle J W Vos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kathelijn S Versteeg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke E Buffart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan J J de Vries
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hester J Scheffer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, NWZ Hospital Group, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert S Puijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Haasbeek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang Y, Yin Z, Gao L, Ma B, Shi J, Chen H. Lipid Nanoparticles-Based Therapy in Liver Metastasis Management: From Tumor Cell-Directed Strategy to Liver Microenvironment-Directed Strategy. Int J Nanomedicine 2023; 18:2939-2954. [PMID: 37288351 PMCID: PMC10243353 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s402821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastasis to the liver, as one of the most frequent metastatic patterns, was associated with poor prognosis. Major drawbacks of conventional therapies in liver metastasis were the lack of metastatic-targeting ability, predominant systemic toxicities and incapability of tumor microenvironment modulations. Lipid nanoparticles-based strategies like galactosylated, lyso-thermosensitive or active-targeting chemotherapeutics liposomes have been explored in liver metastasis management. This review aimed to summarize the state-of-art lipid nanoparticles-based therapies in liver metastasis management. Clinical and translational studies on the lipid nanoparticles in treating liver metastasis were searched up to April, 2023 from online databases. This review focused not only on the updates in drug-encapsulated lipid nanoparticles directly targeting metastatic cancer cells in treating liver metastasis, but more importantly on research frontiers in drug-loading lipid nanoparticles targeting nonparenchymal liver tumor microenvironment components in treating liver metastasis, which showed promise for future clinical oncological practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhan Wang
- Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhenyu Yin
- Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lei Gao
- Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bin Ma
- Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianming Shi
- Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Key Laboratory of the Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu Province, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Predictive Factors of Local Recurrence after Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Thermal Ablation. J Imaging 2023; 9:jimaging9030066. [PMID: 36976117 PMCID: PMC10058972 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging9030066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Identify risk factors for local recurrence (LR) after radiofrequency (RFA) and microwave (MWA) thermoablations (TA) of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CCLM). Methods: Uni- (Pearson’s Chi2 test, Fisher’s exact test, Wilcoxon test) and multivariate analyses (LASSO logistic regressions) of every patient treated with MWA or RFA (percutaneously and surgically) from January 2015 to April 2021 in Centre Georges François Leclerc in Dijon, France. Results: Fifty-four patients were treated with TA for 177 CCLM (159 surgically, 18 percutaneously). LR rate was 17.5% of treated lesions. Univariate analyses by lesion showed factors associated with LR: sizes of the lesion (OR = 1.14), size of nearby vessel (OR = 1.27), treatment of a previous TA site LR (OR = 5.03), and non-ovoid TA site shape (OR = 4.25). Multivariate analyses showed that the size of the nearby vessel (OR = 1.17) and the lesion (OR = 1.09) remained significant risk factors of LR. Conclusions: The size of lesions to treat and vessel proximity are LR risk factors that need to be considered when making the decision of thermoablative treatments. TA of an LR on a previous TA site should be reserved to specific situations, as there is an important risk of another LR. An additional TA procedure can be discussed when TA site shape is non-ovoid on control imaging, given the risk of LR.
Collapse
|
12
|
A Multi-centre, Single Arm, Non-randomized, Prospective European Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the HistoSonics System in the Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Liver Cancers (#HOPE4LIVER). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46:259-267. [PMID: 36380155 PMCID: PMC9892119 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03309-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Image-guided thermal ablation are established treatment options for non-surgical patients with primary and metastatic liver cancers. However, there are limitations with nonuniformity of cancer tissue destruction, heat sink effect and the risk of thermal ablative injury. The current non-thermal ablative techniques have high risk of local recurrence and are not widely adopted. Histotripsy is a treatment technology that destroys targeted tissue under ultrasound visualization via mechanical destruction through the precise application of acoustic cavitation and can offer the potential of non-invasive, non-thermal and non-ionizing radiation cancer treatment. The aim of this multi-centre non-randomized phase I/II trial is to assess the initial safety and efficacy of the prototype investigational 'System' in the treatment of primary and metastatic liver cancers. METHODS/DESIGN All non-surgical patients with primary/metastatic liver cancers having had previous liver directed therapy, radiation therapy or image-guided ablation may be offered image-guided Histotripsy as per trial protocol. The co-primary endpoints are technical success and procedural safety. Technical success is determined, at ≤ 36 h post procedure, by evaluating the histotripsy treatment size and coverage. The procedural safety is defined by procedure related major complications, defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5) grade 3 or higher toxicities, up to 30 days post procedure. This phase I/II trial has intended to recruit up to 45 patients to show safety and efficacy of image-guided histotripsy in liver cancers. TRAIL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier-NCT04573881; NIHR CRN CPMS-ID 47572.
Collapse
|
13
|
Singh BS, Cazacu IM, Deza CA, Rigaud BS, Saftoiu A, Gruionu G, Guionu L, Brock KK, Koay EJ, Herman JM, Bhutani MS. Image Fusion Involving Real-Time Transabdominal or Endoscopic Ultrasound for Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Review of Current and Future Applications. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12123218. [PMID: 36553225 PMCID: PMC9777678 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12123218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Image fusion of CT, MRI, and PET with endoscopic ultrasound and transabdominal ultrasound can be promising for GI malignancies as it has the potential to allow for a more precise lesion characterization with higher accuracy in tumor detection, staging, and interventional/image guidance. We conducted a literature review to identify the current possibilities of real-time image fusion involving US with a focus on clinical applications in the management of GI malignancies. Liver applications have been the most extensively investigated, either in experimental or commercially available systems. Real-time US fusion imaging of the liver is gaining more acceptance as it enables further diagnosis and interventional therapy of focal liver lesions that are difficult to visualize using conventional B-mode ultrasound. Clinical studies on EUS guided image fusion, to date, are limited. EUS-CT image fusion allowed for easier navigation and profiling of the target tumor and/or surrounding anatomical structure. Image fusion techniques encompassing multiple imaging modalities appear to be feasible and have been observed to increase visualization accuracy during interventional and diagnostic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben S. Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Irina M. Cazacu
- Department of Oncology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Carlos A. Deza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Bastien S. Rigaud
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ponderas Academic Hospital, 014142 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gabriel Gruionu
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Lucian Guionu
- Department of Mechanics, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania
| | - Kristy K. Brock
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joseph M. Herman
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Zucher School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA
| | - Manoop S. Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Faber RA, Burghout KST, Bijlstra OD, Hendriks P, van Erp GCM, Broersen A, Dijkstra J, Vahrmeijer AL, Burgmans MC, Mieog JSD. Three-dimensional quantitative margin assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with percutaneous thermal ablation using semi-automatic rigid MRI/CECT-CECT co-registration. Eur J Radiol 2022; 156:110552. [PMID: 36228455 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the quantitative minimal ablation margin (MAM) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with percutaneous thermal ablation (TA) and correlate the quantitative MAM with local tumour recurrence (LTR). METHOD Thirty-nine of 143 patients with solitary or multiple CRLM who underwent a first percutaneous TA procedure between January 2011 and May 2020 were considered eligible for study enrolment. Image fusion of pre- and post-ablation scans and 3D quantitative MAM assessment was performed using the in-house developed semi-automatic rigid MRI/CECT-CECT co-registration software deLIVERed. The quantitative MAM was analysed and correlated with LTR. RESULTS Eighteen (46 %) patients were additionally excluded from further analyses due to suboptimal co-registration (quality co-registration score ≤ 3). The quality of co-registration was considered sufficient in 21 (54 %) patients with a total of 29 CRLM. LTR was found in 5 of 29 (17 %) TA-treated CRLM. In total, 12 (41 %) negative MAMs were measured (mean MAM -4.7 ± 2.7 mm). Negative MAMs were significantly more frequently seen in patients who developed LTR (100 %) compared to those without LTR (29 %; p = 0.003). The median MAM of patients who developed LTR (-6.6 mm (IQR -9.5 to -4.6)) was significantly smaller compared to the median MAM of patients without LTR (0.5 mm (IQR -1.8 to 3.0); p < 0.001). The ROC curve showed high accuracy in predicting LTR for the quantitative MAM (area under the curve of 0.975 ± 0.029). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the feasibility of 3D quantitative MAM assessment, using deLIVERed co-registration software, to assess technical success of TA in patients with CRLM and to predict LTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin A Faber
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Kimberly S T Burghout
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Okker D Bijlstra
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Pim Hendriks
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Gonnie C M van Erp
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander Broersen
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jouke Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sametova A, Kurmashev S, Ashikbayeva Z, Amantayeva A, Blanc W, Atabaev TS, Tosi D. Fiber-Optic Distributed Sensing Network for Thermal Mapping of Gold Nanoparticles-Mediated Radiofrequency Ablation. BIOSENSORS 2022; 12:352. [PMID: 35624653 PMCID: PMC9138323 DOI: 10.3390/bios12050352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
In this work, we report the design of an optical fiber distributed sensing network for the 2-dimensional (2D) in situ thermal mapping of advanced methods for radiofrequency thermal ablation. The sensing system is based on six high-scattering MgO-doped optical fibers, interleaved by a scattering-level spatial multiplexing approach that allows simultaneous detection of each fiber location, in a 40 × 20 mm grid (7.8 mm2 pixel size). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was performed on bovine phantom, using a pristine approach and methods mediated by agarose and gold nanoparticles in order to enhance the ablation properties. The 2D sensors allow the detection of spatiotemporal patterns, evaluating the heating properties and investigating the repeatability. We observe that agarose-based ablation yields the widest ablated area in the best-case scenario, while gold nanoparticles-mediated ablation provides the best trade-off between the ablated area (53.0-65.1 mm2, 61.5 mm2 mean value) and repeatability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akbota Sametova
- School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; (A.S.); (S.K.); (Z.A.); (A.A.)
| | - Sabit Kurmashev
- School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; (A.S.); (S.K.); (Z.A.); (A.A.)
| | - Zhannat Ashikbayeva
- School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; (A.S.); (S.K.); (Z.A.); (A.A.)
| | - Aida Amantayeva
- School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; (A.S.); (S.K.); (Z.A.); (A.A.)
| | - Wilfried Blanc
- Université Côte d’Azur, INPHYNI, CNRS UMR7010, Avenue Joseph Vallot, 06108 Nice, France;
| | - Timur Sh. Atabaev
- Department of Chemistry, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Avenue, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan;
| | - Daniele Tosi
- School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan; (A.S.); (S.K.); (Z.A.); (A.A.)
- National Laboratory Astana, Laboratory of Biosensors and Bioinstruments, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Microwave Ablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, Irreversible Electroporation, and Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Intermediate Size (3-5 cm) Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:793-808. [PMID: 35298796 PMCID: PMC9054902 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01248-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Based on good local control rates and an excellent safety profile, guidelines consider thermal ablation the gold standard to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, efficacy decreases exponentially with increasing tumour size. The preferred treatment for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare safety and efficacy of local ablative treatments for unresectable intermediate-size CRLM (3–5 cm). Recent Findings We systematically searched for publications reporting treatment outcomes of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM treated with thermal ablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE) or stereotactic ablative body-radiotherapy (SABR). No comparative studies or randomized trials were found. Literature to assess effectiveness was limited and there was substantial heterogeneity in outcomes and study populations. Per-patient local control ranged 22–90% for all techniques; 22–89% (8 series) for thermal ablation, 44% (1 series) for IRE, and 67–90% (1 series) for SABR depending on radiation dose. Summary Focal ablative therapy is safe and can induce long-term disease control, even for intermediate-size CRLM. Although SABR and tumuor-bracketing techniques such as IRE are suggested to be less susceptible to size, evidence to support any claims of superiority of one technique over the other is unsubstantiated by the available evidence. Future prospective comparative studies should address local-tumour-progression-free-survival, local control rate, overall survival, adverse events, and quality-of-life.
Collapse
|
17
|
Schullian P, Laimer G, Johnston E, Putzer D, Eberle G, Scharll Y, Widmann G, Kolbitsch C, Bale R. Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:421-430. [PMID: 35227136 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2044522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the technical outcome and local tumor control of multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) in a large series of patients. Furthermore, to determine factors accounting for adverse outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2003 and 2018, 865 patients were treated by SRFA for 2653 primary and metastatic liver tumors with a median tumor size of 2.0 cm (0.5 - 19 cm). Primary technical efficacy (PTE) and local recurrence (LR) were evaluated, and possible predictors for adverse events analyzed using uni- and multi-variable binary logistic regression. RESULTS Overall, 2553 of 2653 tumors were successfully ablated at initial SRFA resulting in a PTE rate of 96.2%. Predictors of lower PTE rates were age > 70 years, tumor size > 5 cm, number of probes, location close to liver capsule/organs and segment II. LR occurred in 220 of 2653 tumors (8.3%) with the following predictors: age, tumor type/size, conglomerates, segments I/IVa/IVb, number of probes and location close to major vessels/bile duct. Multivariable analysis revealed tumor size > 5 cm (odds ratio [OR] 3.153), age > 70 years (OR 1.559), and location in segment II (OR 1.772) as independent prognostic factors for PTE, whereas tumor location close to major vessels (OR 1.653) and in segment IVb (OR 2.656) were identified as independent prognostic factors of LR. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic RFA is an attractive option in the management of primary or metastatic liver tumors with good local tumor control, even in large tumors. The presented prognostic factors for adverse local oncological outcome might help to stratify unfavorable tumors for ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schullian
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gregor Laimer
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Daniel Putzer
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gernot Eberle
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Yannick Scharll
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gerlig Widmann
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christian Kolbitsch
- Department of Anesthesia, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Reto Bale
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Geoghegan R, Ter Haar G, Nightingale K, Marks L, Natarajan S. Methods of monitoring thermal ablation of soft tissue tumors - A comprehensive review. Med Phys 2022; 49:769-791. [PMID: 34965307 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Thermal ablation is a form of hyperthermia in which oncologic control can be achieved by briefly inducing elevated temperatures, typically in the range 50-80°C, within a target tissue. Ablation modalities include high intensity focused ultrasound, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and laser interstitial thermal therapy which are all capable of generating confined zones of tissue destruction, resulting in fewer complications than conventional cancer therapies. Oncologic control is contingent upon achieving predefined coagulation zones; therefore, intraoperative assessment of treatment progress is highly desirable. Consequently, there is a growing interest in the development of ablation monitoring modalities. The first section of this review presents the mechanism of action and common applications of the primary ablation modalities. The following section outlines the state-of-the-art in thermal dosimetry which includes interstitial thermal probes and radiologic imaging. Both the physical mechanism of measurement and clinical or pre-clinical performance are discussed for each ablation modality. Thermal dosimetry must be coupled with a thermal damage model as outlined in Section 4. These models estimate cell death based on temperature-time history and are inherently tissue specific. In the absence of a reliable thermal model, the utility of thermal monitoring is greatly reduced. The final section of this review paper covers technologies that have been developed to directly assess tissue conditions. These approaches include visualization of non-perfused tissue with contrast-enhanced imaging, assessment of tissue mechanical properties using ultrasound and magnetic resonance elastography, and finally interrogation of tissue optical properties with interstitial probes. In summary, monitoring thermal ablation is critical for consistent clinical success and many promising technologies are under development but an optimal solution has yet to achieve widespread adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rory Geoghegan
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Gail Ter Haar
- Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research, University of London, Sutton, UK
| | - Kathryn Nightingale
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Leonard Marks
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shyam Natarajan
- Departments of Urology & Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shen Y, Chen L, Guan X, Han X, Bo X, Li S, Sun L, Chen Y, Yue W, Xu H. Tailoring Chemoimmunostimulant Bioscaffolds for Inhibiting Tumor Growth and Metastasis after Incomplete Microwave Ablation. ACS NANO 2021; 15:20414-20429. [PMID: 34881574 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c08826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Microwave ablation has attracted the most attention as a locoregional therapeutic method for solid neoplasms. However, the high incidence of incomplete ablation that could promote the rapid cancer progression still remains a challenge in clinic. Herein, we found that the high invasiveness of residual tumor following incomplete microwave ablation (iMWA) is mainly due to the myeloid cell-mediated immunosuppression. Accordingly, we develop a biohydrogel scaffold-enabled chemoimmunotherapeutic strategy by targeting myeloid cells with a phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ (PI3Kγ) inhibitor (IPI549) to synergize with immunostimulatory chemotherapy (Oxaliplatin, OX) for post-ablative cancer therapy. With several tumor mouse models, we reveal that OX&IPI549@Gel-based localized chemoimmunotherapy can substantially suppress the growth of tumor post-iMWA, simultaneously evoke robust systemic anticancer immunity to inhibit metastatic spread, and offer strong long-term immunological memory functions against tumor rechallenge. Besides, this work proposes a potential opportunity for precision medicine by utilizing a mechanism-based rationale to the adoption of our pre-existing arsenal of anticancer immunotherapeutic schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Shen
- Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital; Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
| | - Xin Guan
- Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital; Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
| | - Xiaoxia Han
- Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital; Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
| | - Xiaowan Bo
- Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital; Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
| | - Shaoyue Li
- Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital; Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
| | - Liping Sun
- Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital; Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
| | - Yu Chen
- Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital; Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, P. R. China
| | - Wenwen Yue
- Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital; Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
| | - Huixiong Xu
- Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital; Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ablation Techniques in Cancer Pain. Cancer Treat Res 2021; 182:157-174. [PMID: 34542882 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81526-4_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Painful bone metastases are a frequently encountered problem in oncology practice. The skeletal system is the third most common site of metastatic disease and up to 85% of patients with breast, prostate, and lung cancer may develop bone metastases during the course of their disease.
Collapse
|
21
|
Nieuwenhuizen S, Dijkstra M, Puijk RS, Timmer FEF, Nota IM, Opperman J, van den Bemd B, Geboers B, Ruarus AH, Schouten EAC, de Vries JJJ, Scheffer HJ, van Geel AM, van Waesberghe JHTM, Swijnenburg RJ, Versteeg KS, Lissenberg-Witte BI, van den Tol MP, Haasbeek CJA, Meijerink MR. Thermal Ablation versus Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy to Treat Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comparative Analysis from the Prospective Amsterdam CORE Registry. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4303. [PMID: 34503113 PMCID: PMC8428373 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Thermal ablation and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are techniques to eradicate colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study compares the safety, efficacy and long-term oncological outcomes of these treatment methods. All prospectively registered patients (AmCORE registry) treated with thermal ablation or SABR alone for unresectable CRLM between 2007 and 2020 were analyzed using multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression. In total 199 patients were included for analysis: 144 (400 CRLM) thermal ablation; 55 (69 CRLM) SABR. SABR patients were characterized by older age (p = 0.006), extrahepatic disease at diagnosis (p = 0.004) and larger tumors (p < 0.001). Thermal ablation patients were more likely to have synchronous disease, higher clinical risk scores (p = 0.030) and higher numbers of CRLMs treated (p < 0.001). Mortality was zero and morbidity low in both groups: no serious adverse events were recorded following SABR (n = 0/55) and nine (n = 9/144 [6.3%]; all CTCAE grade 3) after thermal ablation. SABR was associated with an inferior overall survival (OS) (median OS 53.0 months vs. 27.4 months; HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.49; p = 0.003), local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) per-tumor (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.52; p = 0.044) and local control per-patient (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.20-2.04; p = 0.001) and per-tumor (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.44-2.49; p < 0.001). In this study thermal ablation was superior to SABR with regard to OS, LTPFS and local control, albeit at the cost of a limited risk of serious adverse events. Further studies are required to assess whether the worse outcomes following SABR were the effect of true differences in ablative treatment or a result of residual confounding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Nieuwenhuizen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Madelon Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Robbert S. Puijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Florentine E. F. Timmer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Irene M. Nota
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Jip Opperman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands; (J.O.); (A.M.v.G.)
| | - Bente van den Bemd
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Bart Geboers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Alette H. Ruarus
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Evelien A. C. Schouten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Jan J. J. de Vries
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Hester J. Scheffer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Anne M. van Geel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands; (J.O.); (A.M.v.G.)
| | - Jan Hein T. M. van Waesberghe
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Kathelijn S. Versteeg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (K.S.V.); (M.P.v.d.T.)
| | - Birgit I. Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - M. Petrousjka van den Tol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (K.S.V.); (M.P.v.d.T.)
| | - Cornelis J. A. Haasbeek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Martijn R. Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.D.); (R.S.P.); (F.E.F.T.); (I.M.N.); (B.v.d.B.); (B.G.); (A.H.R.); (E.A.C.S.); (J.J.J.d.V.); (H.J.S.); (J.H.T.M.v.W.); (M.R.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lin YM, Paolucci I, Brock KK, Odisio BC. Image-Guided Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Principles, Current Evidence, and the Path Forward. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3926. [PMID: 34439081 PMCID: PMC8394430 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13163926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Image-guided ablation can provide effective local tumor control in selected patients with CLM. A randomized controlled trial suggested that radiofrequency ablation combined with systemic chemotherapy resulted in a survival benefit for patients with unresectable CLM, compared to systemic chemotherapy alone. For small tumors, ablation with adequate margins can be considered as an alternative to resection. The improvement of ablation technologies can allow the treatment of tumors close to major vascular structures or bile ducts, on which the applicability of thermal ablation modalities is challenging. Several factors affect the outcomes of ablation, including but not limited to tumor size, number, location, minimal ablation margin, RAS mutation status, prior hepatectomy, and extrahepatic disease. Further understanding of the impact of tumor biology and advanced imaging guidance on overall patient outcomes might help to tailor its application, and improve outcomes of image-guided ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Mao Lin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (Y.-M.L.); (I.P.)
| | - Iwan Paolucci
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (Y.-M.L.); (I.P.)
| | - Kristy K. Brock
- Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Bruno C. Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (Y.-M.L.); (I.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Oligometastatic Disease and Interventional Oncology: Rationale and Research Directions. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:166-173. [PMID: 32205542 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Oligometastatic disease (OMD) is generally defined as a stage of clinically or radiographically demonstrated metastatic disease limited in total disease burden and without rapid spread. Interventional oncology performs local therapies for primary and metastatic cancers, including OMD. Interventional oncology treatments can be pursued both as definitive therapy and for palliative purposes. Applied to OMD, these interventions can offer patients a decreasing overall tumor burden, minimizing cancer morbidity, and early evidence suggests a survival benefit. Here, we discuss the range of interventional oncology treatments, including ablation, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and irreversible electroporation. We describe the rationale for their application to OMD and discuss future directions for research.
Collapse
|
24
|
Long-Term Results of a Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Trial and Subsequent Institutional Experience of Single-Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1387-1395. [PMID: 33340601 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report long-term outcomes from our phase 1 dose-escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of single-fraction liver SABR pooled with our subsequent single institutional experience with patients treated postprotocol at the highest dose level (40 Gy) established from the phase 1 study. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with liver metastases from solid tumors located outside of the central liver zone were treated with single-fraction SABR on a phase 1 dose escalation trial. At least 700 cc of normal liver had to receive <9.1 Gy. Seven patients with 10 liver metastases received the initial prescription dose of 35 Gy, and dose was then escalated to 40 Gy for 7 more patients with 7 liver metastases. An additional 19 postprotocol patients with 22 liver metastases were treated to 40 Gy in a single fraction. Patients were followed for toxicity and underwent serial imaging to assess local control. RESULTS Median imaging follow-up for the combined cohort (n = 33, 39 lesions) was 25.9 months; 38.9 months for protocol patients and 20.2 months for postprotocol patients. Median lesion size was 2.0 cm (range, 0.5-5.0 cm). There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed for protocol patients, and only 3 grade 2 toxicities were observed in the entire cohort, with no grade ≥3 toxicities attributable to treatment. Four-year actuarial local control of irradiated lesions in the entire cohort was 96.6%, 100% in the protocol group and 92.9% in the subsequent patients. Two-year overall survival for all treated patients was 82.0%. CONCLUSIONS For selected patients with liver metastases, single-fraction SABR at doses of 35 and 40 Gy was safe and well-tolerated, and shows excellent local control with long-term follow-up; results in subsequent patients treated with single-fraction SABR doses of 40 Gy confirmed our earlier results.
Collapse
|
25
|
Schullian P, Johnston EW, Putzer D, Laimer G, Waroschitz G, Braunwarth E, Amann A, Maglione M, Bale R. Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatic resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:866-873. [PMID: 33032865 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall clinical outcome of multiprobe SRFA as a treatment for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatic resection (HR). METHODS A retrospective, single center study carried out between 2006 and 2018. 64 consecutive patients with recurrent or new CRLM after previous HR were treated by SRFA for 217 lesions (median size 2.7 cm, 1-7.5) in 103 ablation sessions. Endpoints consisted of i) technical efficacy ii) complication and mortality rates iii) local and distant recurrence, iv) disease free survival (DFS), and v) overall survival (OS). RESULTS 213/217 tumors were successfully ablated at initial SRFA (97.7% primary technical efficacy rate). Four tumors required repeat ablation, resulting in a secondary technical efficacy rate of 99.5% (216/217). Local recurrence developed in 25/217 lesions (11.5%). Major complication rate was 5.8% (6/103 sessions) and mortality rate was 1.0% (1/103 ablation sessions), respectively.1-, 3-, and 5- year OS rates from date of first SRFA were 90.1%, 46.2%, and 34.8% (median 33.1 months). DFS rates were 54.2%, 17.2%, and 17.2%, at 1-, 3- and 5- years, respectively (median 13.3 months). CONCLUSION SRFA is a safe, feasible and effective option for CRLM after HR with low morbidity levels and favorable clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schullian
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Edward W Johnston
- Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, Chelsea, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Daniel Putzer
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gregor Laimer
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gregor Waroschitz
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Eva Braunwarth
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Arno Amann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Manuel Maglione
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Reto Bale
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Computed Tomography Thermography for Ablation Zone Prediction in Microwave Ablation and Cryoablation: Advantages and Challenges in an Ex Vivo Porcine Liver Model. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2020; 44:744-749. [PMID: 32842063 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) for the prediction of ablation zones from microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation (CA) in an ex vivo porcine liver model. METHODS Sequential (30 seconds) CT scans were acquired during and after MWA and CA in an ex vivo porcine liver model. We generated 120-kVp equivalent reconstructions of generic dual-energy CT data sets, and comprehensive region-of-interest measurements were statistically correlated with invasive temperature monitoring using Pearson correlation coefficient. Binary logistic regression was performed for prediction of successful ablation. RESULTS With the use of pooled data from 6 lesions in 2 separate experiments, correlation analysis of attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU) and temperature yielded r = -0.79 [confidence interval (CI), -0.85 to -0.71] for MWA and r = 0.62 (CI, 0.55 to 0.67) for CA.For MWA, there was a linear association between attenuation and temperature up to 75°C; thus, linear regression yielded a slope of -2.00 HU/°C (95% CI, -1.58 to -2.41). For CA, a linear association between attenuation and temperature was observed in the cooling phase with a slope of 2.11 HU/°C (95% CI, 1.79 to 2.58). In MWA treatment, binary logistic regression separated less than 70°C and greater than 70°C with 89.2% accuracy. Within the ice ball, temperatures above and below -20°C were distinguished with 65.3% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Our experiments reveal several difficulties in predicting ablation zone temperature from CT attenuation. Microwave ablation leads to gas production in the tissue, which degrades the accuracy of noninvasive temperature measurement, especially at higher temperatures. In CA, CT thermometry is limited by ice ball formation, which leads to homogeneous attenuation, nearly independent of temperature. Further research is needed to define the role of CT thermography in ablation zone monitoring in liver malignancies.
Collapse
|
27
|
de la Peña C, Gonzalez MF, González C, Salazar JM, Cruz B. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases: Clinical outcomes and literature review. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:637-642. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
28
|
Wang LJ, Yan XL, Li J, Wang K, Xing BC. Indocyanine Green Clearance Test for the Preoperative Assessment of Chemotherapy-Related Hepatic Injury in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:3237-3245. [PMID: 32440220 PMCID: PMC7217306 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s252693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the present study was to determine the value of the indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test in the preoperative assessment of chemotherapy-related hepatic injury in patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. Methods A total of 218 patients who underwent hepatic dissection due to colorectal cancer liver metastasis at the Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively evaluated; 179 patients who received chemotherapy prior to hepatic resection were further examined. Patient- and chemotherapy-related factors were analyzed in both groups with normal and abnormal ICG retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15), and their intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared. Results The chemotherapy group had a higher mean ICG-R15 value and a higher number of patients who exhibited abnormal ICG-R15, compared with the no-chemotherapy group. Under the guidance of ICG test, no patients experienced severe complications in the abnormal ICG-R15 group compared with the normal ICG-R15 group, and the overall morbidity was also not significantly different between the two groups. However, the incidence of severe complications was higher in patients who underwent major resection with a normal ICG-R15 value compared with patients with an abnormal ICG-R15 value who underwent minor resection (P<0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that body mass index (BMI) ≥28 and oxaliplatin use were independent predictors of abnormal ICG-R15. The ICG-R15 value was significantly higher in the two-risk factors group compared with the no-risk factor group (P=0.012), but not statistically different compared with the one risk factor group. Conclusion Screening of patients with chemotherapy-associated liver injury using the IGC test may help in performing safe hepatectomy by avoiding major resection. BMI ≥28 and oxaliplatin use were independent preoperative predictors of abnormal ICG-R15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Jun Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Luan Yan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Juan Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Kun Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Bao-Cai Xing
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wang K, Zhang X, Wei J, Xu Y, Liu Q, Xie J, Yuan L, Sun Z, Tan S, Zhang L, Liu B, Yang Y. Hepatic Arterial Infusion Oxaliplatin Plus Oral S-1 Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer with Unresectable Liver Metastases: A Case Series and Literature Review. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:863-870. [PMID: 32104068 PMCID: PMC7012222 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s233123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The use of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) as a regional therapy against liver metastasis has rarely been reported in gastric cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HAI oxaliplatin plus oral S-1 chemotherapy in first-line palliative therapy for gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases (GCLM). Methods We reviewed the records of five patients with GCLM who received HAI oxaliplatin (70–80 mg/m2 2 hrs d1,15) administered via a port-catheter system and S-1 with oral (35–40 mg/m2 twice daily for d1-14, 28 days for one cycle). Follow-up examination and efficacy evaluation were executed periodically. Results Until the 4th cycle response evaluation, the local effective rate and control rate were 40% and 80%, respectively; only one patient developed progression. HAI chemotherapy had a better local control against liver metastases (median progression-free survival: hepatic, 8.8 months vs. extrahepatic, 6.2 months), accompanied by less systemic toxicity, decreased tumour markers and symptomatic relief. Conclusion HAI oxaliplatin plus oral S-1 chemotherapy can be considered as a new choice of first-line treatment for GCLM, which is also a good approach for controlling extrahepatic lesions with less adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kangxin Wang
- The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Nanjing Pukou Central Hospital, Nanjing 211800, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuebin Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia Wei
- The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Yiwen Xu
- The First Medical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, People's Republic of China
| | - Qin Liu
- The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiaqi Xie
- The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Lihua Yuan
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhichen Sun
- The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Siyi Tan
- The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Lianru Zhang
- The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Baorui Liu
- The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Yang
- The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cacciola A, Parisi S, Tamburella C, Lillo S, Ferini G, Molino L, Iatì G, Pontoriero A, Bottari A, Mazziotti S, Cicero G, Minutoli F, Blandino A, Pergolizzi S. Stereotactic body radiation therapy and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of liver metastases: How and when? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:299-306. [PMID: 32194349 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Limited liver metastases represent a clinical challenge. Surgical approach is the most frequently reported treatment option, however, some patients are not eligible for surgical interventions. Relatively recent technologic advances have permitted the safe use of ablative techniques employed in the cure of hepatic metastases. Among these, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have emerged as valid treatments in a significant proportion of patients with intrahepatic oligometastatic disease. This review offers an up-to-date of current available literature on this issue focusing on the use and outcomes of RFA and SBRT, according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Cacciola
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Silvana Parisi
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Consuelo Tamburella
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Sara Lillo
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ferini
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Laura Molino
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Iatì
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Pontoriero
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Bottari
- Radiology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Silvio Mazziotti
- Radiology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cicero
- Radiology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Fabio Minutoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Alfredo Blandino
- Radiology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Stefano Pergolizzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Acetic acid versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020; 101:101-110. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
32
|
Camacho JC, Petre EN, Sofocleous CT. Thermal Ablation of Metastatic Colon Cancer to the Liver. Semin Intervent Radiol 2019; 36:310-318. [PMID: 31680722 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is responsible for approximately 10% of cancer-related deaths in the Western world. Liver metastases are frequently seen at the time of diagnosis and throughout the course of the disease. Surgical resection is often considered as it provides long-term survival; however, few patients are candidates for resection. Percutaneous ablative therapies are also used in the management of this patient population. Different thermal ablation (TA) technologies are available including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation (MWA), laser, and cryoablation. There is growing evidence about the role of interventional oncology and image-guided percutaneous ablation in the management of metastatic colorectal liver disease. This article aims to outline the technical considerations, outcomes, and rational of TA in the management of patients with CRC liver metastases, focusing on the emerging role of MWA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Camacho
- Department of Radiology, Weill-Cornell Medical College, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elena N Petre
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Department of Radiology, Weill-Cornell Medical College, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kron P, Linecker M, Jones RP, Toogood GJ, Clavien PA, Lodge JPA. Ablation or Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1052. [PMID: 31750233 PMCID: PMC6843026 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Successful use of ablation for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) has led to interest in the role of ablation for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, there remains a lack of clarity about the use of ablation for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), specifically its efficacy compared with hepatic resection. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on ablation or resection of colorectal liver metastases was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase until December 2018. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence for ablation vs. resection in the treatment of CRLM. Results: This review identified 1,773 studies of which 18 were eligible for inclusion. In the majority of the studies, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly higher and local recurrence (LR) rates were significantly lower in the resection groups. On subgroup analysis of solitary CRLM, resection was associated with improved OS, DFS, and reduced LR. Three series assessed the outcome of resection vs. ablation for technically resectable CRLM, and showed improved outcome in the resection group. In fact, there were no studies showing a survival advantage of ablation compared to resection in the treatment of CRLM. Conclusions: Resection remains the "gold standard" in the treatment of CRLM and should not be replaced by ablation at present. This review supports the use of ablation only as an adjunct to resection and as a single treatment option when resection is not safely possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Kron
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Linecker
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB and Transplant Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert P Jones
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Giles J Toogood
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB and Transplant Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J P A Lodge
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bale R, Putzer D, Schullian P. Local Treatment of Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11091341. [PMID: 31514362 PMCID: PMC6770644 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer represents a leading cause of death worldwide. Despite the advances in systemic therapies, the prognosis for patients with breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) remains poor. Especially in case of failure or cessation of systemic treatments, surgical resection for BCLMs has been considered as the treatment standard despite a lack of robust evidence of benefit. However, due to the extent and location of disease and physical condition, the number of patients with BCLM who are eligible for surgery is limited. Palliative locoregional treatments of liver metastases (LM) include transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Percutaneous thermal ablation methods, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), are considered potentially curative local treatment options. They are less invasive, less expensive and have fewer contraindications and complication rates than surgery. Because conventional ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided single-probe thermal ablation is limited by tumor size, multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) with intraoperative image fusion for immediate, reliable judgment has been developed in order to treat large and multiple tumors within one session. This review focuses on the different minimally invasive local and locoregional treatment options for BCLM and attempts to describe their current and future role in the multidisciplinary treatment setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reto Bale
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Daniel Putzer
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Peter Schullian
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Celik H, Wakim P, Pritchard WF, Castro M, Leonard S, Karanian JW, Dewhirst MW, Lencioni R, Wood BJ. Radiofrequency Ablation Duration per Tumor Volume May Correlate with Overall Survival in Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubicin. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30:1908-1914. [PMID: 31409568 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether burn time per tumor volume (BPV) (min/mL), where burn time is the total time during which radiofrequency (RF) energy is being applied, is correlated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment outcomes using RF ablation and lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin (LTLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS The HEAT study was a double-blind, randomized controlled phase III trial of RF ablation only versus RF ablation + LTLD in patients with HCCs 3-7 cm in diameter. Effect of BPV on progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) was analyzed. RESULTS BPV demonstrated statistically significant differences between study groups for OS (P = .038, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85), but not for progression-free survival (P = .389, HR = 1.059). In a separate analysis, treatment groups were independently analyzed to determine the effect of BPV within each individual group. OS improved as BPV increased for patients receiving RF ablation + LTLD (P = .017, HR = 0.836, confidence interval [0.722, 0.968]). This same association was not observed in patients receiving RF ablation only (P = .57, HR = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS BPV may be a useful metric for RF ablation + LTLD combination therapy for solitary HCC. The analysis suggested that the burn time for the tumor needs to be adjusted depending on the tumor volume. Because this is a post hoc study, the results are only suggestive and need to be confirmed with prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haydar Celik
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 3N320, Bethesda, MD 20892.
| | - Paul Wakim
- Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Service, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 3N320, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - William F Pritchard
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 3N320, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Meryll Castro
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 3N320, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Shelby Leonard
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 3N320, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - John W Karanian
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 3N320, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Mark W Dewhirst
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Riccardo Lencioni
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Pisa University School of Medicine, Pisa, Italy
| | - Bradford J Wood
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 3N320, Bethesda, MD 20892
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jelbuldina M, Korganbayev S, Korobeinyk AV, Inglezakis VJ, Tosi D. Temperature Profiling of ex-vivo Organs during Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles-Enhanced Radiofrequency Ablation by Fiber Bragg Grating Arrays. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2019; 2018:1-4. [PMID: 30440308 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2018.8513227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, we present real-time profiles of temperature during a ferromagnetic nanoparticles (NPs)enhanced radiofrequency ablation (RFA). A minimally invasive RFA setup has been prepared and applied ex vivo on a liver phantom; NPs (with concentration of 5 mg/mL) have been synthetized and injected within the tissue prior to perform the ablation, in order to facilitate the heat distribution to the peripheral sides of the ablated tissue. Temperature detection has been realized in situ with a network of 15 fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors in order to highlight the impact of the NPs on the RFA mechanism. Obtained temperature profiles and thermal maps confirm that nanoparticles injection ensures better heat penetration than in case of pristine RFA procedure. The results show that adding NPs solution leads to extending the successfully ablated area achieving a double-sized lesion.
Collapse
|
37
|
Winkelmann MT, Clasen S, Pereira PL, Hoffmann R. Local treatment of oligometastatic disease: current role. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180835. [PMID: 31124700 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of distant metastases has long been a predictor of poor outcome in solid cancer. However, in an oncologic situation called oligometastatic disease (OMD), multiple studies have revealed a survival benefit with aggressive treatment of these metastases. Besides surgery and radiation therapy, local thermal therapies have developed into a treatment option for OMD. Most studies concerning local therapy of OMD are available for colorectal cancer, which is therefore the focus of this article. Furthermore, this review gives a basic overview of the most popular ablation techniques for treatment of OMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz T Winkelmann
- 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Clasen
- 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Philippe L Pereira
- 2 Department of Radiology, SLK-Hospital Heilbronn GmbH, Am Gesundbrunnen, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Hoffmann
- 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Collins JA, Heiselman JS, Clements LW, Brown DB, Miga MI. Multiphysics modeling toward enhanced guidance in hepatic microwave ablation: a preliminary framework. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2019; 6:025007. [PMID: 31131291 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.6.2.025007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
We compare a surface-driven, model-based deformation correction method to a clinically relevant rigid registration approach within the application of image-guided microwave ablation for the purpose of demonstrating improved localization and antenna placement in a deformable hepatic phantom. Furthermore, we present preliminary computational modeling of microwave ablation integrated within the navigational environment to lay the groundwork for a more comprehensive procedural planning and guidance framework. To achieve this, we employ a simple, retrospective model of microwave ablation after registration, which allows a preliminary evaluation of the combined therapeutic and navigational framework. When driving registrations with full organ surface data (i.e., as could be available in a percutaneous procedure suite), the deformation correction method improved average ablation antenna registration error by 58.9% compared to rigid registration (i.e., 2.5 ± 1.1 mm , 5.6 ± 2.3 mm of average target error for corrected and rigid registration, respectively) and on average improved volumetric overlap between the modeled and ground-truth ablation zones from 67.0 ± 11.8 % to 85.6 ± 5.0 % for rigid and corrected, respectively. Furthermore, when using sparse-surface data (i.e., as is available in an open surgical procedure), the deformation correction improved registration error by 38.3% and volumetric overlap from 64.8 ± 12.4 % to 77.1 ± 8.0 % for rigid and corrected, respectively. We demonstrate, in an initial phantom experiment, enhanced navigation in image-guided hepatic ablation procedures and identify a clear multiphysics pathway toward a more comprehensive thermal dose planning and deformation-corrected guidance framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarrod A Collins
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Jon S Heiselman
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Logan W Clements
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Daniel B Brown
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Michael I Miga
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.,Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sotirchos VS, Fujisawa S, Vakiani E, Solomon SB, Manova-Todorova KO, Sofocleous CT. Fluorescent Tissue Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Ablation Zone: A Potential Real-Time Biomarker of Complete Tumor Ablation. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1833-1840. [PMID: 30830537 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-07133-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate whether rapid fluorescent tissue examination immediately after colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CLM) ablation correlates with standard pathologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) assessments. METHODS This prospective, National Institutes of Health-supported study enrolled 34 consecutive patients with 53 CLMs ablated between January 2011 and December 2014. Immediately after ablation, core needle sampling of the ablation zone was performed. Tissue samples were evaluated with fluorescent viability (MitoTracker Red) and nuclear (Hoechst) stains. Confocal microscope imaging was performed within 30 min after ablation. The same samples were subsequently fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Identified tumor cells underwent IHC staining for proliferation (Ki67) and viability (OxPhos). The study pathologist, blinded to the H&E and IHC assessment, evaluated the fluorescent images separately to detect viable tumor cells. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall concordance of the fluorescent versus H&E and IHC assessments were calculated. RESULTS A total of 63 tissue samples were collected and processed. The overall concordance rate between the immediate fluorescent and the subsequent H&E and IHC assessments was 94% (59/63). The fluorescent assessment sensitivity and specificity for the identification of tumor cells were respectively 100% (18/18) and 91% (41/45). CONCLUSIONS The study showed a high concordance rate between the immediate fluorescent assessment and the standard H&E and IHC assessment of the ablation zone. Given the documented prognostic value of ablation zone tissue characteristics for outcomes after ablation of CLM, the fluorescent assessment offers a potential intra-procedural biomarker of complete tumor ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlasios S Sotirchos
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Sho Fujisawa
- Molecular Cytology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Efsevia Vakiani
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Civelek Ş, Sayín İ, Ercan İ, Çakír BÖ, Turgut S. Bipolar Radiofrequency-Induced Interstitial Thermoablation for Oral Cavity Vascular Malformations: Preliminary Results in a series of 5 Children. EAR, NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL 2019; 91:488-92. [DOI: 10.1177/014556131209101111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Şenol Civelek
- 1st ENT Clinic, Şişsli Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, İstanbul
| | - İbrahim Sayín
- ENT Clinic, Bakirköy Teaching and Research Hospital, İstanbul
| | - İbrahim Ercan
- 1st ENT Clinic, Şişsli Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, İstanbul
| | - Burak Ömür Çakír
- 1st ENT Clinic, Şişsli Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, İstanbul
| | - Suat Turgut
- 1st ENT Clinic, Şişsli Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, İstanbul
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
White SB, Zhang Z, Chen J, Gogineni VR, Larson AC. Early Immunologic Response of Irreversible Electroporation versus Cryoablation in a Rodent Model of Pancreatic Cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29:1764-1769. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2017] [Revised: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
42
|
Ou S, Xu R, Li K, Chen Y, Kong Y, Liu H, Li J, Ouyang Y, Yu X. Radiofrequency ablation with systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a 10-year single-center study. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:5227-5237. [PMID: 30464620 PMCID: PMC6217171 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s170160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To retrospectively evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with systemic chemotherapy (CT) in treatment of solitary liver metastasis after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods This single-center study was conducted at the Hunan Provincial Cancer Hospital from June 2006 to December 2015 with median follow-up time of 26 months. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided RFA was carried out on eligible patients with solitary liver metastasis after surgery for CRC. After a week, ablation status was confirmed by MRI. Post MRI, all patients received systemic CT with or without molecular-targeted therapy. Survival rate was evaluated and survival curve was constructed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log-rank test and Cox regression model were used for univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively, to determine the independent prognostic factors for survival rate. Results A total of 109 eligible patients (mean age, 53.84±11.71; mean tumor mass diameter, 3.4+2.01 cm) were enrolled in this 10-year study. After RFA, 95 patients achieved complete ablation, and 14 patients achieved partial ablation, with median ablation time of 26 minutes (range: 12-120 minutes). The median survival time required for achieving complete and partial ablation was 56.0 and 19.0 months, respectively (P<.01). After RFA and adjuvant systemic CT, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 92.3%, 50.7%, and 41.6%, respectively, with the median (mean) survival time of 39.0 (56.5) months. Age was the only significant independent prognostic factor with better survival rate observed in patients aged ≥50 years than those aged <50 years (P<0.05). The incidence of complications was minimal (1.8%) with only two cases: one biliary fistula and one liver hemorrhage. Conclusion RFA combination with systemic CT was safe; it showed long-term efficacy in patients with solitary liver metastasis after surgery for CRC and can be a preferred treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuangyan Ou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China,
| | - Ruocai Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China,
| | - Ke Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China,
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China,
| | - Yi Kong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China,
| | - Hanchun Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China,
| | - Jianliang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China,
| | - Yongzhong Ouyang
- Department of Gastroduodenal Surgery, Hunan Provincial Cancer Hospital, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
| | - Xiaoping Yu
- Department of Radiology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wang LJ, Zhang ZY, Yan XL, Yang W, Yan K, Xing BC. Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for technically resectable colorectal liver metastasis: a propensity score analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2018; 16:207. [PMID: 30322402 PMCID: PMC6190664 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1494-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection is the first-line treatment for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be used for small unresectable CRLM because of disease extent, poor anatomical location, or comorbidities. However, the long-term outcomes are unclear for RFA treatment in resectable CRLM. This study aimed to compare the recurrence rates and prognosis between resectable CRLM patients receiving either liver resection or RFA. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent RFA or hepatic resection from November 2010 to December 2015 were assigned in this retrospective study. Propensity score analysis was used to eliminate baseline differences between groups. Survival and recurrence rates were compared between patients receiving liver resection and RFA. RESULTS With 1:2 ratio of propensity scoring, 46 patients in the RFA group and 92 in the resection group were successfully matched. Overall survival was similar between the two groups, but the resection group had a higher disease-free survival (median, 22 months vs. 14 months). Whereas among patients with a tumor size of ≤ 3 cm, disease-free survival was similar in the two groups (median, 24 months vs. 21 months). Compared to the resection group, the RFA group had a higher rate of intrahepatic recurrence (34.8% vs. 12.0%) and a shorter recurrence free period. The local and systemic recurrence rate and recurrence-free period for the same were insignificant in the two groups. Poor disease-free survival was associated with RFA, T4, tumor diameter > 3 cm, and lymph node positivity. CONCLUSION Among patients with technically resectable CRLM, resection provided greater disease-free survival, although both treatment modalities provided similar overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Jun Wang
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Zhong-Yi Zhang
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Xiao-Luan Yan
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Wei Yang
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Kun Yan
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Bao-Cai Xing
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Stewart CL, Warner S, Ito K, Raoof M, Wu GX, Kessler J, Kim JY, Fong Y. Cytoreduction for colorectal metastases: liver, lung, peritoneum, lymph nodes, bone, brain. When does it palliate, prolong survival, and potentially cure? Curr Probl Surg 2018; 55:330-379. [PMID: 30526930 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2018.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Camille L Stewart
- Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Susanne Warner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Kaori Ito
- Department of Surgery, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Geena X Wu
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Jonathan Kessler
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Jae Y Kim
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Seidensticker R, Damm R, Enge J, Seidensticker M, Mohnike K, Pech M, Hass P, Amthauer H, Ricke J. Local ablation or radioembolization of colorectal cancer metastases: comorbidities or older age do not affect overall survival. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:882. [PMID: 30200921 PMCID: PMC6131876 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4784-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Local ablative techniques are emerging in patients with oligometastatic disease from colorectal carcinoma, commonly described as less invasive than surgical methods. This single arm cohort seeks to determine whether such methods are suitable in patients with comorbidities or higher age. Methods Two hundred sixty-six patients received radiofrequency ablation (RFA), CT-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) or Y90-radioembolization (Y90-RE) during treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This cohort comprised of patients with heterogenous disease stages from single liver lesions to multiple organ systems involvement commonly following multiple chemotherapy lines. Data was reviewed retrospectively for patient demographics, previous therapies, initial or disease stages at first intervention, comorbidities and mortality. Comorbidity was measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and age-adjusted Charlson Index (CACI) excluding mCRC as the index disease. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were used for statistical analysis. Results Overall median survival of 266 patients was 14 months. Age ≥ 70 years did not influence survival after local therapies. Similarly, CCI or CACI did not affect the patients prognoses in multivariate analyses. Moderate or severe renal insufficiency (n = 12; p = 0.005) was the only single comorbidity identified to negatively affect the outcome after local therapy. Conclusion Interventional procedures for mCRC may be performed safely even in elderly and comorbid patients. In severe renal insufficiency, the use of invasive techniques should be limited to selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricarda Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie e.V, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Robert Damm
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Julia Enge
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie e.V, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Konrad Mohnike
- Diagnostic and Treatment Center Frankfurter Tor, Berlin, Germany.,Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie e.V, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie e.V, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter Hass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charite, Berlin, Germany.,Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie e.V, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie e.V, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cihan YB. Which is more effective in the treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: SBRT or RFA? Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:822-823. [PMID: 29924499 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Y B Cihan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kayseri Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Herrmann E, Terribilini D, Manser P, Fix MK, Toporek G, Candinas D, Weber S, Aebersold DM, Loessl K. Accuracy assessment of a potential clinical use of navigation-guided intra-operative liver metastasis brachytherapy-a planning study. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 194:1030-1038. [PMID: 30022277 PMCID: PMC6208950 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1334-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
For patients with inoperable liver metastases, intra-operative liver high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is a promising technology enabling delivery of a high radiation dose to the tumor, while sparing healthy tissue. Liver brachytherapy has been described in the literature as safe and effective for the treatment of primary or secondary hepatic malignancies. It is preferred over other ablative techniques for lesions that are either larger than 4 cm or located in close proximity to large vessels or the common bile duct. In contrast to external beam radiation techniques, organ movements do not affect the size of the irradiated volume in intra-operative HDR-BT and new technical solutions exist to support image guidance for intra-operative HDR-BT. We have retrospectively analyzed anonymized CT datasets of 5 patients who underwent open liver surgery (resection and/or ablation) in order to test whether the accuracy of a new image-guidance method specifically adapted for intra-operative HDR-BT is high enough to use it in similar situations and whether patients could potentially benefit from navigation-guided intra-operative needle placement for liver HDR-BT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Herrmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr., 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - D Terribilini
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - M K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - G Toporek
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Candinas
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Berne University Hospital, University of Berne, Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Weber
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr., 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - K Loessl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr., 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lee DH, Lee JM. Recent Advances in the Image-Guided Tumor Ablation of Liver Malignancies: Radiofrequency Ablation with Multiple Electrodes, Real-Time Multimodality Fusion Imaging, and New Energy Sources. Korean J Radiol 2018; 19:545-559. [PMID: 29962861 PMCID: PMC6005950 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as an effective loco-regional treatment modality for malignant hepatic tumors. Indeed, studies have demonstrated that RFA of early stage hepatocellular carcinomas can provide comparable overall survival to surgical resection. However, the incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) after RFA is significantly higher than that of surgical resection. Thus, to overcome this limitation, multiple electrode radiofrequency (RF) systems that use a multi-channel RF generator have been developed, and they demonstrate better efficiency in creating larger ablation zones than that using the conventional RFA with a single electrode. Furthermore, RFA with multiple electrodes can allow the “no-touch” ablation technique which may also help to reduce LTP. Another technique that would be helpful in this regard is multi-modality-ultrasound fusion imaging, which helps to not only more accurately determine the target lesion by enabling the RFA of small, poorly visible or invisible tumors, but also improve the monitoring of procedures and determine the appropriateness of the ablation margin. In addition, new energy sources, including microwave and cryoablation, have been introduced in imaging-guided tumor ablation. In this review, these recently introduced ablation techniques and the results of the most current animal and clinical studies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul 03080, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation Compared to Systemic Chemotherapy and to Partial Hepatectomy in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41:1189-1204. [PMID: 29666906 PMCID: PMC6021475 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-018-1959-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To assess safety and outcome of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) as compared to systemic chemotherapy and partial hepatectomy (PH) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Methods MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized trials and comparative observational studies with multivariate analysis and/or matching were included. Guidelines from National Guideline Clearinghouse and Guidelines International Network were assessed using the AGREE II instrument. Results The search revealed 3530 records; 328 were selected for full-text review; 48 were included: 8 systematic reviews, 2 randomized studies, 26 comparative observational studies, 2 guideline-articles and 10 case series; in addition 13 guidelines were evaluated. Literature to assess the effectiveness of ablation was limited. RFA + systemic chemotherapy was superior to chemotherapy alone. PH was superior to RFA alone but not to RFA + PH or to MWA. Compared to PH, RFA showed fewer complications, MWA did not. Outcomes were subject to residual confounding since ablation was only employed for unresectable disease. Conclusion The results from the EORTC-CLOCC trial, the comparable survival for ablation + PH versus PH alone, the potential to induce long-term disease control and the low complication rate argue in favour of ablation over chemotherapy alone. Further randomized comparisons of ablation to current-day chemotherapy alone should therefore be considered unethical. Hence, the highest achievable level of evidence for unresectable CRLM seems reached. The apparent selection bias from previous studies and the superior safety profile mandate the setup of randomized controlled trials comparing ablation to surgery. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00270-018-1959-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
50
|
Melancon MP, Appleton Figueira T, Fuentes DT, Tian L, Qiao Y, Gu J, Gagea M, Ensor JE, Muñoz NM, Maldonado KL, Dixon K, McWatters A, Mitchell J, McArthur M, Gupta S, Tam AL. Development of an Electroporation and Nanoparticle-based Therapeutic Platform for Bone Metastases. Radiology 2018; 286:149-157. [PMID: 28825892 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To assess for nanopore formation in bone marrow cells after irreversible electroporation (IRE) and to evaluate the antitumoral effect of IRE, used alone or in combination with doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles (SPIO-DOX), in a VX2 rabbit tibial tumor model. Materials and Methods All experiments were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. Five porcine vertebral bodies in one pig underwent intervention (IRE electrode placement without ablation [n = 1], nanoparticle injection only [n = 1], and nanoparticle injection followed by IRE [n = 3]). The animal was euthanized and the vertebrae were harvested and evaluated with scanning electron microscopy. Twelve rabbit VX2 tibial tumors were treated, three with IRE, three with SPIO-DOX, and six with SPIO-DOX plus IRE; five rabbit VX2 tibial tumors were untreated (control group). Dynamic T2*-weighted 4.7-T magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained 9 days after inoculation and 2 hours and 5 days after treatment. Antitumor effect was expressed as the tumor growth ratio at T2*-weighted MR imaging and percentage necrosis at histologic examination. Mixed-effects linear models were used to analyze the data. Results Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated nanopores in bone marrow cells only after IRE (P , .01). Average volume of total tumor before treatment (503.1 mm3 ± 204.6) was not significantly different from those after treatment (P = .7). SPIO-DOX was identified as a reduction in signal intensity within the tumor on T2*-weighted images for up to 5 days after treatment and was related to the presence of iron. Average tumor growth ratios were 103.0% ± 75.8 with control treatment, 154.3% ± 79.7 with SPIO-DOX, 77% ± 30.8 with IRE, and -38.5% ± 24.8 with a combination of SPIO-DOX and IRE (P = .02). The percentage residual viable tumor in bone was significantly less for combination therapy compared with control (P = .02), SPIO-DOX (P , .001), and IRE (P = .03) treatment. The percentage residual viable tumor in soft tissue was significantly less with IRE (P = .005) and SPIO-DOX plus IRE (P = .005) than with SPIO-DOX. Conclusion IRE can induce nanopore formation in bone marrow cells. Tibial VX2 tumors treated with a combination of SPIO-DOX and IRE demonstrate enhanced antitumor effect as compared with individual treatments alone. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marites P Melancon
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Tomas Appleton Figueira
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - David T Fuentes
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Li Tian
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Yang Qiao
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Jianhua Gu
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Mihai Gagea
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Joe E Ensor
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Nina M Muñoz
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Kiersten L Maldonado
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Katherine Dixon
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Amanda McWatters
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Jennifer Mitchell
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Mark McArthur
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Sanjay Gupta
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| | - Alda L Tam
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (M.P.M., T.A.F., L.T., Y.Q., N.M.M., K.D., A.M., S.G., A.L.T.), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (M.G., J.M., M.M.), and Imaging Physics (D.T.F., K.L.M.), the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301402, Unit 1471; Houston, TX 77230-1402; and Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Tex (J.G., J.E.E.)
| |
Collapse
|