Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography

Seven general radiography x-ray detectors with pixel sizes ranging from 175 to 76μm: technical evaluation with the focus on orthopaedic imaging

Aim. Flat panel detectors with small pixel sizes general can potentially improve imaging performance in radiography applications requiring fine detail resolution. This study evaluated the imaging performance of seven detectors, covering a wide range of pixel sizes, in the frame of orthopaedic applications.Material and methods. Pixel sizes ranged from 175 (detector A175) to 76μm (detector G76). Modulation transfer function (MTF) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) were measured using International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) RQA3 beam quality. Threshold contrast (CT) and a detectability index (d') were measured at three air kerma/image levels. Rabbit shoulder images acquired at 60 kV, over five air kerma levels, were evaluated in a visual grading study for anatomical sharpness, image noise and overall diagnostic image quality by four radiologists. The detectors were compared to detector E124.Results. The 10% point of the MTF ranged from 3.21 to 4.80 mm-1, in going from detector A175to detector G76. DQE(0.5 mm-1) measured at 2.38μGy/image was 0.50 ± 0.05 for six detectors, but was higher for F100at 0.62. High frequency DQE was superior for the smaller pixel detectors, howeverCTfor 0.25 mm discs correlated best with DQE(0.5 mm-1). Correlation betweenCTand the detectability model was good (R2= 0.964).CTfor 0.25 mm diameter discs was significantly higher for D150and F100compared to E124. The visual grading data revealed higher image quality ratings for detectors D125and F100compared to E124. An increase in air kerma was associated with improved perceived sharpness and overall quality score, independent of detector. Detectors B150, D125, F100and G76, performed well in specific tests, however only F100consistently outperformed the reference detector.Conclusion. Pixel size alone was not a reliable predictor of small detail detectability or even perceived sharpness in a visual grading analysis study.

Interobserver variability in quality assessment of magnetic resonance images

Background

The perceptual quality of magnetic resonance (MR) images influences diagnosis and may compromise the treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the image quality changes influence the interobserver variability of their assessment.

Methods

For the variability evaluation, a dataset containing distorted MRI images was prepared and then assessed by 31 experienced medical professionals (radiologists). Differences between observers were analyzed using the Fleiss’ kappa. However, since the kappa evaluates the agreement among radiologists taking into account aggregated decisions, a typically employed criterion of the image quality assessment (IQA) performance was used to provide a more thorough analysis. The IQA performance of radiologists was evaluated by comparing the Spearman correlation coefficients, ρ, between individual scores with the mean opinion scores (MOS) composed of the subjective opinions of the remaining professionals.

Results

The experiments show that there is a significant agreement among radiologists (κ=0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.118, 0.121; P<0.001) on the quality of the assessed images. The resulted κ is strongly affected by the subjectivity of the assigned scores, separately presenting close scores. Therefore, the ρ was used to identify poor performance cases and to confirm the consistency of the majority of collected scores (ρ_mean = 0.5706). The results for interns (ρ_mean = 0.6868) supports the finding that the quality assessment of MR images can be successfully taught.

Conclusions

The agreement observed among radiologists from different imaging centers confirms the subjectivity of the perception of MR images. It was shown that the image content and severity of distortions affect the IQA. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of the psychosomatic condition of the observers and their attitude.

[Bone infections]

Even in recent traumatology and orthopedic surgery infectious diseases of the bone (i.e. osteomyelitis) and it's surrounding tissues remain serious complications. The therapy is demanding and oftenly does not lead to a complete restitutio ad integrum. In order to create the optimal treatment one has to have a profound knowledge about the "state of the art" therapy of bone infections and the basic phases: Reassurance of the local infection (bone and surrounding tissues) and reconstruction of the bone and surrounding tissues. The local infection treatment is based on the consequent surgical eradication of infected tissue. In addition (as a supportive therapy) antibiotics have to be applied according to the local and systemic response of the patient to the infection. Also further supportive methods like hyperbaric oxygenation may be taken into consideration. The following paper provides an overview of diagnostic features and the different surgical procedures as well as the current literature in order to reach the above mentioned goals.

Comparison of flat-panel digital to conventional film-screen radiography in detection of experimentally created lesions of the equine third metacarpal bone

Radiographic diagnosis of equine bone disease using digital radiography is prevalent in veterinary practice. However, the diagnostic quality of digital vs. conventional radiography has not been compared systematically. We hypothesized that digital radiography would be superior to film-screen radiography for detection of subtle lesions of the equine third metacarpal bone. Twenty-four third metacarpal bones were collected from horses euthanized for reasons other than orthopedic disease. Bones were dissected free of soft tissue and computed tomography was performed to ensure that no osseous abnormalities were present. Subtle osseous lesions were produced in the dorsal cortex of the third metacarpal bones, and the bones were radiographed in a soft tissue phantom using indirect digital and conventional radiography at standard exposures. Digital radiographs were printed onto film. Three Diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Radiology evaluated the radiographs for the presence or absence of a lesion. Receiver operator characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under these curves were compared to assess the ability of the digital and film-screen radiographic systems to detect lesions. The area under the ROC curves for film-screen and digital radiography were 0.87 and 0.90, respectively (P = 0.59). We concluded that the digital radiographic system was comparable to the film-screen system for detection of subtle lesions of the equine third metacarpal bone.

Advances in Digital Radiography: Physical Principles and System Overview

During the past two decades, digital radiography has supplanted screen-film radiography in many radiology departments. Today, manufacturers provide a variety of digital imaging solutions based on various detector and readout technologies. Digital detectors allow implementation of a fully digital picture archiving and communication system, in which images are stored digitally and are available anytime. Image distribution in hospitals can now be achieved electronically by means of web-based technology with no risk of losing images. Other advantages of digital radiography include higher patient throughput, increased dose efficiency, and the greater dynamic range of digital detectors with possible reduction of radiation exposure to the patient. The future of radiography will be digital, and it behooves radiologists to be familiar with the technical principles, image quality criteria, and radiation exposure issues associated with the various digital radiography systems that are currently available.

Depiction of low-contrast detail in digital radiography: comparison of powder- and needle-structured storage phosphor systems

PURPOSE

We sought to evaluate the low-contrast performance of a newly developed needle image plate/line scanner (NIP) computed radiography system in comparison with a standard powder image plate/flying-spot scanner (PIP) system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 36 images of a CDRAD phantom, simulating low-contrast structures with different drill holes of different diameters, were obtained with both imaging systems using 9 different exposure variables. All images had window and level set to generate consistent density and contrast. In addition, multiscale contrast-dependent contrast amplification was applied to some of the images. All images obtained were printed and presented to a total of 10 observers (5 radiologists, 5 engineers/physicists), who were blinded to both the image plate and parameter setting used. The smallest detectable drill hole depth (= contrast) correctly identified was recorded for each diameter. The median values observed were calculated and tested for statistical differences between PIP and NIP using Student t test for matched pairs (level of significance P < or = 0.05).

RESULTS

At all but 2 settings of the variables, NIP images depicted significantly lower contrast levels (= lower depth of drill holes) compared with PIP images. The 2 settings also showed a trend towards better low contrast depiction with NIP. In no case was low contrast performance better using PIP images.

CONCLUSION

Images obtained with needle image plate/line scanner provide superior low contrast performance compared with the images obtained with powder image plate/flying-spot scanner.

Comparison of Different Radiography Systems in an Experimental Study for Detection of Forearm Fractures and Evaluation of the M??ller-AO and Frykman Classification for Distal Radius Fractures

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the diagnostic performance of screen-film radiography, storage-phosphor radiography, and a flat-panel detector system in detecting forearm fractures and to classify distal radius fractures according to the Müller-AO and Frykman classifications compared with the true extent, depicted by anatomic preparation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 71 cadaver arms were fractured in a material testing machine creating different fractures of the radius and ulna as well as of the carpal bones. Radiographs of the complete forearm were evaluated by 3 radiologists, and anatomic preparation was used as standard of reference in a receiver operating curve analysis.

RESULTS

The highest diagnostic performance was obtained for the detection of distal radius fractures with area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) values of 0.959 for screen-film radiography, 0.966 for storage-phosphor radiography, and 0.971 for the flat-panel detector system (P > 0.05). Exact classification was slightly better for the Frykman (kappa values of 0.457-0.478) compared with the Müller-AO classification (kappa values of 0.404-0.447), but agreement can be considered as moderate for both classifications.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 imaging systems showed a comparable diagnostic performance in detecting forearm fractures. A high diagnostic performance was demonstrated for distal radius fractures and conventional radiography can be routinely performed for fracture detection. However, compared with anatomic preparation, depiction of the true extent of distal radius fractures was limited and the severity of distal radius fractures tends to be underestimated.

Intracranial 2D and 3D DSA with flat panel detector of the direct conversion type: initial experience

The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of two-dimensional (2D) digital subtraction angiography (DSA) between a flat panel detector (FPD) of the direct conversion type with low radiation dose and a conventional image intensifier (I.I.)-TV system, and to assess 3D DSA with the FPD system in the depiction of intracranial vessels. Fifteen consecutive patients (five men, ten women; age range: 18-82 years; mean age: 55.5 years) were prospectively included in this study. All patients underwent 2D DSA with both the FPD and I.I.-TV system in one projection. The radiation doses during angiography were evaluated using a phantom. The 3D DSA images were created from the rotational DSA data with the FPD system. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated 2D DSA with the FPD system and I.I.-TV system using a 5-point assessment scale (excellent to not visible) to assess the depiction of intracranial vessels. MIP and volume rendering (VR) images of 3D DSA with the FPD system were also evaluated using a 5-point scale (excellent to not visible). DSA and fluoroscopy dose measurements with the phantom showed a dose reduction of approximately 85% and 9% with the FPD system compared with the I.I.-TV system, respectively. For 2D DSA, the FPD system was significantly superior to the I.I.-TV system with respect to the visibility of the peripheral and perforating vessels (p<0.05). The peripheral and perforating vessels were also sufficiently visualized on MIP images of 3D DSA in all 15 cases. Our FPD system was found to be superior to the I.I.-TV system in visualizing small intracranial vessels combined with a significant reduction of radiation dose, and was able to create high-quality 3D DSA images on which high spatial resolution allowed precise visualization of small vessels such as perforating ones.

Skeletal Applications for Flat-Panel versus Storage-Phosphor Radiography: Effect of Exposure on Detection of Low-Contrast Details

PURPOSE

To compare exposure requirements for similar detection performance with flat-panel detectors and the most recent generation of storage-phosphor plates in the simulated scatter of typical skeletal radiographic examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A contrast-detail test object was covered with varying thicknesses of acrylic to simulate skeletal exposure conditions in the wrist, knee, and pelvis. Three series were obtained with increasing thicknesses of a simulated soft-tissue layer (5, 10, and 20 cm) and increasing tube voltage (50, 70, and 90 kVp). A fourth series was obtained with exposure conditions adapted to the phantom instructions (75 kVp). Images were acquired with a flat-panel detector (cesium iodide scintillator) and storage-phosphor plates at five exposure levels (speed class range, 100-1,600). Five readers evaluated 84 images to determine the threshold contrast of 12 lesion diameters (range, 0.25-11.1 mm). Statistical significance of differences between the two digital systems was assessed with two-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

A linear relationship was found between the number of detected lesions and the logarithm of exposure (R(2) > 0.98 for all series). On average, the flat-panel system required 45% less exposure than did the phosphor plates when 20-cm-thick acrylic was superimposed on the test object. Differences in exposure requirements were smaller with decreasing thicknesses of simulated soft-tissue layers and lower tube voltages (39% at 10 cm and 70 kVp, and 17% at 5 cm and 50 kVp). All differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Flat-panel radiography provides improved contrast detectability and a potential for exposure reduction compared with those with storage-phosphor radiography. The best performance was achieved with conditions comparable to those for radiography of the trunk and lowest for conditions that simulate radiography of the extremities.

Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature

The two most frequently performed diagnostic X-ray examinations are those of the extremities and of the chest. Thus, dose reduction in the field of conventional skeletal and chest radiography is an important issue and there is a need to reduce man-made ionizing radiation. The large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide provides a significant reduction of radiation dose in skeletal and chest radiography compared with traditional imaging systems. This article describes the technical background and basic image quality parameters of this 43 x 43-cm digital system, and summarizes the available literature (years 2000-2003) concerning dose reduction in experimental and clinical studies. Due to its high detective quantum efficiency and dynamic range compared with traditional screen-film systems, a dose reduction of up to 50% is possible without loss of image quality.

Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model

PURPOSE

To assess image quality and exposure dose requirements of a flat-panel detector system versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems for radiographic depiction of the lumbar spine in Cynomolgus monkeys as a pediatric model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty Cynomolgus monkeys underwent anteroposterior radiography of the lumbar spine. The size and weight of these monkeys are comparable to those of infants 3-4 months of age. Images were acquired with speed class 400 screen-film, flat-panel, and storage-phosphor systems with identical exposure dose. All other conditions were matched exactly. Additional images were acquired with the flat-panel and storage-phosphor systems at exposure doses equivalent to speed classes 800 and 1600. All images were obtained at 66 kVp without antiscatter grid. Images were assessed independently by three radiologists for visibility of 60 anatomic structures by using a five-point confidence scale. Scores were calculated for the seven combinations of imaging mode and exposure dose and were compared by using the Friedman test.

RESULTS

Scores were 1.70 (speed class 400), 1.97 (speed class 800), and 2.27 (speed class 1600) for the flat-panel system; 2.50 (speed class 400) for the screen-film system; and 2.58 (speed class 400), 2.77 (speed class 800), and 3.13 (speed class 1600) for the storage-phosphor system. Scores for the flat-panel system at speed classes 400 and 800 were significantly lower (indicating better visibility) than those of the screen-film and storage-phosphor systems (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

The flat-panel system is superior to screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in lumbar spine radiography in monkeys. With the flat-panel system, exposure dose can be reduced by 75% without loss in image quality.

Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate image quality of a large-area direct-readout flat-panel detector system in chest radiography, we conducted an observer preference study. A clinical comparative study was conducted of the flat-panel system versus the storage phosphor and standard film-screen systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Routine chest radiographs (posteroanterior) of 30 patients that were obtained using flat-panel, storage phosphor, and film screen systems were compared. The visibility of 10 anatomic regions and the overall image quality criteria were rated independently by three radiologists using a 5-point scale. The significance of the differences in diagnostic performance was tested with a Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Dose measurements for the three modalities were performed.

RESULTS

The flat-panel radiography system showed an improved visibility in most anatomic structures when compared with a state-of-the-art conventional film-screen system and an equal visibility when compared with a storage phosphor system. The flat-panel system showed the greatest enhancement in the depiction of small detailed structures (p < 0.05) and achieved this with a reduction in overall radiation dose of more than 50%.

CONCLUSION

The visibility of anatomic structures provided by this flat-panel detector system is as good as if not better than that provided by conventional or storage phosphor systems while emitting a reduced radiation dose.

Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography

The purpose of this study was to compare a large-area, direct-readout, flat-panel detector system with a conventional screen-film system, a storage-phosphor system, and a mammography screen-film system with regard to the detection of artificial bone erosions simulating rheumatoid disease, and to assess its diagnostic performance with decreasing exposure dose. Six hundred forty regions were defined in 160 metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint specimens from 20 monkey paws (4 regions per joint). Artificial bone erosions were created in 320 of these 640 regions. Specimens were enclosed in containers filled with water to obtain absorption and scatter radiation conditions similar to those of a human hand. Imaging was performed using a flat-panel system, a speed class 200 screen-film system, a mammography screen-film system, and a storage-phosphor system under exactly matched conditions. Different exposure doses equivalent to speed classes of S=100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 were used. In all images the presence or absence of a lesion was assessed by three radiologists using a five-level confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for a total of 21,120 observations (1920 for each imaging modality and exposure level) and diagnostic performance estimated by the area under the ROC curve (A(z)). The significance of differences in diagnostic performance was tested with analysis of variance. The ROC analysis showed A(z) values of 0.809 (S=200), 0.768 (S=400), 0.737 (S=800), 0.710 (S=1600), and 0.685 (S=3200) for the flat-panel system, 0.770 for the speed class 200 screen-film system, 0.781 (S=200), 0.739 (S=400), 0.724 (S=800), 0.680 (S=1600) for the storage-phosphor system, and 0.798 for the mammography screen-film system. Analysis of variance showed significant differences between different combinations of imaging modalities and exposure doses ( p<0.05). The diagnostic performance of the flat-panel detector system is superior to that of a screen-film system and a storage-phosphor system for the detection of erosive lesions at clinical exposure settings (S=200). Using the flat-panel system the exposure dose can be reduced by 50% to obtain a diagnostic performance comparable to a speed class 200 screen-film system.

Routine skeleton radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality and clinical acceptance at 50% dose reduction

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate image quality and clinical acceptance of a large-area, flat-panel X-ray detector for routine skeleton examinations at 50% dose reduction.

METHODS

A total of 153 examinations (307 images) of 100 consecutive patients were evaluated. The cesium iodide-amorphous silicon active-matrix imager had a panel size of 43 x 43 cm, a matrix of 3000 x 3000, and a pixel pitch of 143 microm. All images were obtained with a kilovoltage setting identical to conventional radiographies of speed class 400. The amperage values were reduced by 50% compared with standard dose. Images were presented to 3 radiologists, who subjectively rated image quality on a 4-point scale according to 5 criteria (bone cortex, bone trabecula, soft tissue, overall contrast, and overall impression). Three trauma surgeons rated the clinical acceptance on a 4-point scale. Clinical acceptance was defined as directly derived consequences or therapy based on the presented image quality. For both evaluations, 1 represented excellent, 2 represented good, 3 represented moderate, and 4 represented nondiagnostic image quality/clinical acceptance. Intermediate scores at 0.5 intervals were allowed.

RESULTS

The mean values for all 5 image quality criteria were rated good or excellent (< or = 2). A total of 4.2% (13 of 307) of the images were rated 2.5 to 3.5 concerning the overall impression. None of the imaging features was ranked more than 3.5 by any radiologist. The mean value of the clinical acceptance was between good and excellent (1.47). A total of 98.7% (151 of 153) of the examinations were rated < or = 2.5; 1.3% (2 of 153) of examinations were of moderate clinical acceptance (< or = 3.5). None of the examinations was of nondiagnostic image quality or clinical acceptance (>3.5); therefore, no study had to be repeated.

CONCLUSION

Routine skeleton images with 50% dose reduction yield good image quality and good clinical acceptance. In cases with abundant soft tissue, less dose reduction or standard dose is required.

Digital image composition in long-leg radiography with a flat-panel detector: first clinical experiences

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality of composed long-leg examinations with a large-area, flat-panel x-ray detector.

METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive patients were included in this study. All images were obtained with a kilovoltage setting identical with conventional radiographies of speed class 400; amperage values were reduced by 50% compared with standard dose. After acquisition, the images were transferred to a workstation where the whole image was reconstructed using a generalized correlation method. Images were presented to 3 observers. Examination quality was ranked on a 3-point scale: 1 = no manual adjustment necessary; 2 = composition required manual correction; 3 = no composition possible.

RESULTS

Patient rankings were 31/35 (88.6%) in category 1, 3/35 (8.6%) in category 2, and 1/35 (2.8%) in category 3 (primarily due to an application error).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the first clinical examinations of long-leg radiographies with a 43 cm x 43 cm flat-panel detector demonstrates very good reliability of the digital image composition.

Detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures in a porcine model: radiation dose requirement--digital flat-panel versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems

PURPOSE

To compare a large-area direct read-out flat-panel detector radiography system with screen-film and storage-phosphor systems with regard to detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures and to assess the diagnostic performance of the flat-panel system with decreasing exposure level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subtle fractures were created artificially in 100 of 200 porcine rib specimens. Specimens were enclosed in containers of water to generate absorption and scatter radiation conditions similar to those of a human chest wall. Imaging was performed with flat-panel, screen-film, and storage-phosphor systems with conditions that were exactly matched. Different exposure levels equivalent to speed classes (S) of 400, 800, 1,600, and 6,400 were used. All images were independently assessed for the presence of fracture by three radiologists with a five-level confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for a total of 4,200 observations (600 for each imaging system and exposure level). Diagnostic performance was estimated with area under the ROC curve (Az). Significance of differences in diagnostic performance was tested with analysis of variance.

RESULTS

ROC analysis yielded mean Az values for the flat-panel system of 0.879 (S = 400), 0.833 (S = 800), 0.765 (S = 1,600), and 0.576 (S = 6,400). Az values were 0.834 (S = 400) for the screen-film system and 0.789 (S = 400) and 0.729 (S = 800) for the storage-phosphor system. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences in diagnostic performance between various combinations of imaging system and exposure levels (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

The flat-panel system is superior to the screen-film and storage-phosphor systems for detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures at clinical exposure settings (eg, S = 400). With the flat-panel system, radiation dose can be reduced by 50% to achieve diagnostic performance comparable to that of a speed class 400 screen-film system.