Small pulmonary emboli: what do we know?

Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism

Subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) is increasingly diagnosed with the growing use and technological advancements of multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Its diagnosis is challenging, and some presumed SSPE may actually represent imaging artifacts. Indirect evidence and results from small observational studies suggest that SSPE may be more benign than more proximal pulmonary embolism, and may thus not always require treatment. Therefore, guidelines suggest to consider a management strategy without anticoagulation in selected patients with SSPE at low risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), in whom proximal deep vein thrombosis is excluded. Recently, a large prospective study among low-risk patients with SSPE who were left untreated showed a higher VTE recurrence risk than initially deemed acceptable by the investigators, and thus was prematurely interrupted after recruitment of 97% of the target population. However, the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulation for low-risk patients with SSPE remains unclear, and results from randomized trials are needed to answer the question about their optimal management.

The value of distinguishing patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism presenting to two tertiary hospitals in Australia: an observational study

Isolated-subsegmental-pulmonary-embolism (SSPE) is increasingly diagnosed with the use of computed-tomography-pulmonary-angiogram (CTPA). There remains clinical equipoise for management of SSPE with previous studies not accounting for frailty while determining clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes among patients with isolated SSPE were compared with those with a more proximal PE after accounting for frailty and other risk-factors. This study included all patients with a positive CTPA for pulmonary embolism (PE) admitted between 2017 and 2021 to two Australian-tertiary-hospitals. Frailty was determined by use of the hospital-frailty-risk-score (HFRS). Competing-risk-analysis and Cox-proportional hazard models determined the cumulative-risk of VTE and mortality within 3 months and 1 year of index PE event after adjustment for frailty and other variables. Of 334 patients with positive CTPA for PE, 111 (33.2%) had isolated-SSPE. The mean (SD) age was 64.3 (17.7) years, 50.9% were males and 9.6% were frail. The risk of recurrent VTE within 3-months (0.9% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.458) and within 1-year of follow-up (2.7% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.126) did not differ significantly between patients with isolated SSPE and those with more proximal PE. After adjusted analyses, the cumulative-incidence of recurrent VTE was not different among patients with isolated SSPE within 1 year of index event [subdistribution-hazard-ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.60]. Similarly, mortality within 1 year of index event was also not different between the two groups (aHR 1.72, 95% CI 0.92-3.23). The prevalence of SSPE was 33.2% and even after adjustment for frailty these patients had no different clinical outcomes than those with proximal PE.

Reproducibility of pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography in adults with muco-obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Recent studies support magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as a diagnostic tool for pulmonary arterial disease.

PURPOSE

To determine MRA image quality and reproducibility, and the dependence of MRA image quality and reproducibility on disease severity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cystic fibrosis (CF).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients with COPD (mean age 66.5 ± 8.9 years; FEV1% = 42.0 ± 13.3%) and 15 with CF (mean age 29.3 ± 9.3 years; FEV1% = 66.6 ± 15.8%) underwent morpho-functional chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including time-resolved MRA twice one month apart (MRI1, MRI2), and COPD patients underwent non-contrast computed tomography (CT). Image quality was assessed visually using standardized subjective 5-point scales. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured by regions of interest. Disease severity was determined by spirometry, a well-evaluated chest MRI score, and by computational CT emphysema index (EI) for COPD.

RESULTS

Subjective image quality was diagnostic for all MRA at MRI1 and MRI2 (mean score = 4.7 ± 0.6). CNR and SNR were 4 43.8 ± 8.7 and 50.5 ± 8.7, respectively. Neither image quality score nor CNR or SNR correlated with FEV1% or chest MRI score for COPD and CF (r = 0.239-0.248). CNR and SNR did not change from MRI1 to MRI2 (P = 0.434-0.995). Further, insignificant differences in CNR and SNR between MRA at MRI1 and MRI2 did not correlate with FEV1% nor chest MRI score in COPD and CF (r = -0.238-0.183), nor with EI in COPD (r = 0.100-0.111).

CONCLUSION

MRA achieved diagnostic quality in COPD and CF patients and was highly reproducible irrespective of disease severity. This supports MRA as a robust alternative to CT in patients with underlying muco-obstructive lung disease.

Clinical controversies in the management of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of four important but controversial aspects of acute pulmonary embolism management that are still subject of debate and research

INTRODUCTION

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a disease with a broad spectrum of clinical presentations. While some patients can be treated at home or may even be left untreated, other patients require an aggressive approach with reperfusion treatment.

AREAS COVERED

(1) Advanced reperfusion treatment in hemodynamically stable acute PE patients considered to be at high risk of decompensation and death, (2) the treatment of subsegmental pulmonary embolism, (3) outpatient treatment for hemodynamically stable PE patients with signs of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction, and (4) the optimal approach to identify and treatpost-PE syndrome.

EXPERT OPINION

Outside clinical trials, hemodynamically stable acute PE patients should not be treated with primary reperfusion therapy. Thrombolysis and/or catheter-directed therapy are only to be considered as rescue treatment. Subsegmental PE can be left untreated in selected low-risk patients, after proximal deep vein thrombosis has been ruled out. Patients with an sPESI or Hestia score of 0 criteria can be treated at home, independent of the presence of RV overload. Finally, health-care providers should be aware of post-PE syndrome and diagnose chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) as early as possible. Persistently symptomatic patients without CTEPD benefit from exercise training and cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

Influence of using recommended radiological criteria on MDCT-angiography diagnosis of single isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the rate of false-positive diagnoses of MDCT-pulmonary angiography (MDCT-A) in patients with single isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SISSPE).

METHODS

All patients who underwent MDCT-A between 2006 and 2017 for ruling out acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and received an initial diagnosis of SISSPE were included. The MDCT-A of these patients were reviewed retrospectively by four experienced thoracic radiologists, who applied radiological criteria recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Guidelines (ACCP 2016) for the diagnosis of SISSPE. Data extracted from medical records were history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), alternative diagnoses, other diagnostic studies for VTE, anticoagulation, bleeding complications, and VTE over the following 3 months.

RESULTS

Of 3839 patients undergoing MDCT-A, PE was found in 1021 (26.6%) and SISSPE in 59 (1.5% overall and 5.8% of all patients with PE). An alternative diagnosis to PE was made on the basis of CT in 33 (55.9%) patients. Forty-one (69.5%) patients received anticoagulants, and major life-threatening bleeding complications occurred in 2, with one death. Recurrent PE was not documented in any patient with SISSPE. In the retrospective assessment of the 59 cases of SISSPE, 21 were negative for PE, with a false-positive rate of 35.6% (21/59); so the percentage of SISSPE cases after the revision was 3.7% of all patients with PE; 11 of these 21 patients received anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiologists should be aware of the high rate of false-positives when making the diagnosis of SISSPE on MDCT-A without using strict diagnostic criteria. Misdiagnosis exposes patients to unnecessary anticoagulation.

KEY POINTS

• Radiologist should be aware of the high rate of false-positive diagnoses of single isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SISSPE) in MDCT-pulmonary angiography (MDCT-A) performed for ruling out pulmonary embolism. • Misdiagnosis of SISSPE in MDCT-A can be reduced by using strict diagnostic radiological criteria recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Guidelines. • Unnecessary anticoagulation therapy with potential severe bleeding complications may result from misdiagnosis of SISSPE.

Incidence of pulmonary embolism and impact on mortality in patients with malignant melanoma

PURPOSE

Pulmonary embolism (PE) occurs frequently in patients with malignant melanoma (MM). The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of PE in patients with MM and to assess the clinical characteristics and mortality of MM patients with PE.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical records from 381 MM patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography were evaluated. Imaging parameters including location of PE and measurements of right heart dysfunction and clinical parameters including D-Dimer levels, local and distant tumor stage and time of death were analyzed.

RESULTS

PE was found in 23/381 (6%) MM patients, whereby 17/23 (74%) were detected incidentally and only 6/23 (26%) were symptomatic. The presence of PE significantly correlated with elevated D-Dimers (p < 0.001), right ventricular dysfunction (p = 0.04), higher local tumor stage (≥T3) (p = 0.05), presence of visceral (p = 0.02) or cerebral metastases (p = 0.03) and increased mortality (p = 0.05). Further, patients with central PE showed an increased mortality compared to peripheral PE (p = 0.03), but no correlation was found between the localization of PE and the occurrence of clinical symptoms (p = 0.36).

CONCLUSION

PE in patients with MM often occurs without clinical symptoms and is indicative for advanced disease and a poorer prognosis.

Variabilities in Reference Standard by Radiologists and Performance Assessment in Detection of Pulmonary Embolism in CT Pulmonary Angiography

Annotating lesion locations by radiologists' manual marking is a key step to provide reference standard for the training and testing of a computer-aided detection system by supervised machine learning. Inter-reader variability is not uncommon in readings even by expert radiologists. This study evaluated the variability of the radiologist-identified pulmonary emboli (PEs) to demonstrate the importance of improving the reliability of the reference standard by a multi-step process for performance evaluation. In an initial reading of 40 CTPA PE cases, two experienced thoracic radiologists independently marked the PE locations. For markings from the two radiologists that did not agree, each radiologist re-read the cases independently to assess the discordant markings. Finally, for markings that still disagreed after the second reading, the two radiologists read together to reach a consensus. The variability of radiologists was evaluated by analyzing the agreement between two radiologists. For the 40 cases, 475 and 514 PEs were identified by radiologists R1 and R2 in the initial independent readings, respectively. For a total of 545 marks by the two radiologists, 81.5% (444/545) of the marks agreed but 101 marks in 36 cases differed. After consensus, 65 (64.4%) and 36 (35.6%) of the 101 marks were determined to be true PEs and false positives (FPs), respectively. Of these, 48 and 17 were false negatives (FNs) and 14 and 22 were FPs by R1 and R2, respectively. Our study demonstrated that there is substantial variability in reference standards provided by radiologists, which impacts the performance assessment of a lesion detection system. Combination of multiple radiologists' readings and consensus is needed to improve the reliability of a reference standard.

PENet-a scalable deep-learning model for automated diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using volumetric CT imaging

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening clinical problem and computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for diagnosis. Prompt diagnosis and immediate treatment are critical to avoid high morbidity and mortality rates, yet PE remains among the diagnoses most frequently missed or delayed. In this study, we developed a deep learning model-PENet, to automatically detect PE on volumetric CTPA scans as an end-to-end solution for this purpose. The PENet is a 77-layer 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) pretrained on the Kinetics-600 dataset and fine-tuned on a retrospective CTPA dataset collected from a single academic institution. The PENet model performance was evaluated in detecting PE on data from two different institutions: one as a hold-out dataset from the same institution as the training data and a second collected from an external institution to evaluate model generalizability to an unrelated population dataset. PENet achieved an AUROC of 0.84 [0.82-0.87] on detecting PE on the hold out internal test set and 0.85 [0.81-0.88] on external dataset. PENet also outperformed current state-of-the-art 3D CNN models. The results represent successful application of an end-to-end 3D CNN model for the complex task of PE diagnosis without requiring computationally intensive and time consuming preprocessing and demonstrates sustained performance on data from an external institution. Our model could be applied as a triage tool to automatically identify clinically important PEs allowing for prioritization for diagnostic radiology interpretation and improved care pathways via more efficient diagnosis.

Anticoagulant treatment for subsegmental pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the cardiovascular diseases, after coronary artery disease and stroke. The advent of multi-detector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has allowed better assessment of PE regarding visualisation of the peripheral pulmonary arteries, increasing its rate of diagnosis. More cases of peripheral PEs, such as isolated subsegmental PE (SSPE) and incidental PE, have thereby been identified. These two conditions are usually found in patients with few or none of the classic PE symptoms such as haemoptysis or pleuritic pain, acute dyspnoea or circulatory collapse. However, in patients with reduced cardiopulmonary reserve, classic PE symptoms can be found with isolated SSPEs. Incidental SSPE is found casually in asymptomatic patients, usually by diagnostic imaging performed for other reasons (for example routine CT for cancer staging in oncology patients). Traditionally, all PEs are anticoagulated in a similar manner independent of their location, or number and size of the thrombi. It has been suggested that many patients with SSPE may be treated without benefit, increasing adverse events by a possible unnecessary use of anticoagulants. Patients with isolated SSPE, or incidental PE, may have a more benign clinical presentation compared to those with proximal PEs. However, the clinical significance in patients, and their prognosis, needs to be studied to evaluate whether anticoagulation therapy is required. This is the second update of the Cochrane systematic review published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and AMED databases and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 26 November 2019. We also undertook reference checking to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with SSPE or incidental SSPE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors inspected all citations identified to ensure reliable assessment. If relevant studies were identified, we planned for two review authors to independently extract data and to assess the methodological quality of identified trials using the criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any studies that met the inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials to assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE. Well-conducted research is required before informed practice decisions can be made.

The problem of under-diagnosis and over-diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is an increasingly recognised condition which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the better awareness of this serious condition, the diagnosis is still overlooked in many cases with sometimes fatal consequences. Under-diagnosis may be due to several reasons including reliance on non-specific 'classic' symptoms, belief that bedside measurements will likely be abnormal in the setting of acute PE, and confounding factors like co-existent cardiorespiratory diseases or being in an intensive care unit, where the diagnosis may not be considered. At the same time, incidental diagnosis of PE is occurring more often due to frequent use of imaging investigations alongside advancements in CT technology, and dilemma exists as to whether the chance finding of PE requires anticoagulation, especially when identified only at the subsegmental level. This article reviews these two issues of under-diagnosis and over-diagnosis of PE in the current era.

Overdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism: definition, causes and implications

Overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiography to diagnose pulmonary embolism in people who have only a low pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism has received significant attention in the past. The issue of overdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism, a potential consequence of overtesting, has been less explored. The term “overdiagnosis”, used in a narrow sense, describes a correct (true positive) diagnosis in a person but without any associated harm. The aim of this review is to summarise literature on the topic of overdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism and translate this epidemiological concept into the clinical practice of respiratory professionals. The review concludes that the location of pulmonary embolism at a subsegmental level, rather than whether a diagnosis was made incidentally or following an investigation for suspected pulmonary embolism, is the best predictor for situations in which anticoagulation may not be necessary. In the absence of strong evidence of the optimal management of subsegmental pulmonary embolism, treatment decisions should be made case by case, taking into account the patient's situation and preference.

A suggested definition of overdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism that, if left untreated, would not lead to more harm than if it were treated with anticoagulation therapy, independent of symptomshttp://ow.ly/wgAK30nr5IV

Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: New Imaging Tools and Modalities

Imaging continues to be the modality of choice for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolic disease, particularly when incorporated into diagnostic algorithms. Improvement in imaging techniques as well as new imaging modalities and processing methods have improved diagnostic accuracy and additionally are being leveraged in prognostication and decision making for choice of intervention. In this article, we review the role of imaging in diagnosis and prognostication of venous thromboembolism. We also discuss emerging imaging approaches that may in the near future find clinical usefulness in improving diagnosis and prognostication as well as differentiating disease phenotypes.

Incidental pulmonary emboli in stage IV melanoma patients: Prevalence in CT staging examinations and improved detection with vessel reconstructions based on dual energy CT

OBJECTIVES

Malignancy is the strongest predictor for venous thromboembolism. Dual energy CT (DECT) can support assessment of pulmonary emboli (PE) by providing vessel reconstructions (DECT-VR) and highlighting thrombi. Purpose was to determine prevalence and risk factors of PE in staging examinations of stage IV-melanoma patients and to evaluate the potential of DECT-VR to improve PE diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by IRB. Contrast-enhanced, conventional grey scale CT (cCT) and DECT-VR of 200 stage IV-melanoma patients were reviewed by three radiologists in consensus. Overall prevalence was determined. One-sided Wilcoxon-test was performed to compare the number of detected emboli between cCT and cCT with supplementary DECT-VR. Frequencies of risk factors were compared with χ2 test.

RESULTS

On cCT, 9 PE were detected (6 patients, correlating to 3% of the study population with 0.05 emboli per patient). With the supplementary DECT-VR, number of diagnosed emboli increased from 9 to 17 (p < 0.05) (in total 9 patients, correlating to 0.09 emboli per patient). Emboli on DECT-VR were mainly subsegmentally (7 of 8). There was no significant difference in the frequency of risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pulmonary emboli in our cohort of 200 stage IV melanoma patients was 5%. DECT-VR improved significantly diagnosis of PE, especially when located subsegmentally.

Magnetic resonance angiography for the primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A review from the international workshop for pulmonary functional imaging

Pulmonary contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is useful for the primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Many sites have chosen not to use CE-MRA as a first line of diagnostic tool for PE because of the speed and higher efficacy of computerized tomographic angiography (CTA). In this review, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of CE-MRA and the appropriate imaging scenarios for the primary diagnosis of PE derived from our unique multi-institutional experience in this area. The optimal patient for this test has a low to intermediate suspicion for PE based on clinical decision rules. Patients in extremis are not candidates for this test. Younger women (< 35 years of age) and patients with iodinated contrast allergies are best served by using this modality We discuss the history of the use of this test, recent technical innovations, artifacts, direct and indirect findings for PE, ancillary findings, and the effectiveness (patient outcomes) of CE-MRA for the exclusion of PE. Current outcomes data shows that CE-MRA and NM V/Q scans are effective alternative tests to CTA for the primary diagnosis of PE.

Primary Pulmonary Thrombus in Combat Casualties: Is Treatment Necessary?

The objective of this study was to describe the natural history of primary pulmonary thrombus (PPT) in combat casualties. This was a retrospective study of casualties treated at a major military treatment facility from 2010 to 2012. Patients with a downrange chest CTwere included. CTs were reviewed by two independent, blinded radiologists to confirm PPTon initial imaging. Follow-up CTs, if obtained, were also independently reviewed to determine the extent of clot burden. Two hundred and forty-nine casualties with a downrange, acceptable quality chest CT were included. 9 per cent (23/249) of patients sustained PPT. Thirty nine per cent (9/23) were initially treated with therapeutic anticoagulation (AC). Conversely, 61 per cent (14/23) arrived to our military treatment facility without AC. Seven arriving without AC-developed pulmonary symptoms during their hospitalization and had interval chest CTs. Of those, three had no evidence of pulmonary thrombus. The other four had subsegmental filling defects and three were started AC whereas one had an IVC (Inferior Vena Cava) filter inserted. In total, 11/23 (48%) PPT patients were managed without AC and discharged without complications. This is the first study attempting to look at PPT natural history. There were no adverse sequelae from managing PPT without AC. Further studies are warranted to further characterize PPT.

What are the incidence and risk factors of in-hospital mortality after venous thromboembolism events in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients?

Background

Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, together referred to as venous thromboembolism (VTE), are serious and potentially preventable complications after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of mortality after VTE events and assess the risk factors that are associated with it.

Methods

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to estimate the total number of total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, VTE events, and mortality using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure codes from 2003 to 2012. Patients' demographics, Elixhauser, and Charlson comorbidity indices were used to identify the risk factors associated with in-hospital VTEs and mortality.

Results

A total of 1,805,621 THAs and TKAs were included. The overall rate of VTE was 0.93%. The in-hospital mortality rate among patients with VTEs was 7.1% vs 0.30% in patients without VTEs (P-value < .0001). The risk factors for mortality after VTE events in descending order were as follows: hypercoagulable state (odds ratio [OR]: 5.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6-5.8), metastatic cancer (OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 3.3-5.6), myocardial infarction (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 2.3-4.7), peripheral vascular disease (OR: 3.6, 95% CI: 3.2-4.0), cardiac arrhythmias (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.6-4.3), advanced age (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 2.3-3.7), electrolyte disorders (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 2.2-3.6), pulmonary circulation disorders (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 2.6-3.3), depression (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.6-3.4), complicated diabetes (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 2.1-3.2), weight loss (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 2.2-3.3), renal failure (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.7-3.5), chronic pulmonary disease (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.3-3.1), valvular disease (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.8-2.7), liver disease (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-1.9), and obesity (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.5-1.9).

Conclusions

In-hospital VTE has a significant in-hospital mortality rate. Several of the identified risk factors in this study are modifiable preoperatively. We strongly urge the orthopaedic community to be cognizant of these risk factors and emphasize on optimizing patients' comorbidities before an elective arthroplasty.

The Clinical Severity of Patients Diagnosed With an In-Hospital Pulmonary Embolism Following Modern, Elective Joint Arthroplasty Is Unrelated to the Location of Emboli in the Pulmonary Vasculature

BACKGROUND

In the event of a postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE), it is generally believed that patients with centrally located emboli will have worse clinical symptoms than those with segmental or subsegmental ones. We studied if a relationship exists between the clinical severity at the time of PE diagnosis and the location of the emboli within the pulmonary vasculature.

METHODS

All 269 patients who developed an in-hospital, computed tomography pulmonary angiography-proved, PE following elective total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty in our institution were studied. The clinical severity of the PE was calculated using the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) that classifies patients in 5 classes (class 5: most severe). All computed tomography pulmonary angiographies were re-reviewed to determine the location of the emboli within the pulmonary vasculature (central, segmental, or subsegmental-unilateral or bilateral). The association between PESI and the PE location was examined.

RESULTS

The most proximal location of the emboli was central in 62, segmental in 139, and subsegmental in 68. There were 180 unilateral and 89 bilateral PE patients. There was no association between the PESI and the location of the emboli within the pulmonary vasculature (P = .32). Patients with bilateral or unilateral lung involvement had similar PESI (P = .78).

CONCLUSION

The PESI, a recognized, validated predictor of mortality after PE was similar in patients with central, segmental, or subsegmental PE; and in patients with unilateral or bilateral lung involvement. The present study may aid clinicians while assessing and discussing the severity of PE symptoms with patients at the time of diagnosis.

Detection of pulmonary embolism using repeated MRI acquisitions without respiratory gating: a preliminary study

Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a severe medical condition with non-specific clinical findings. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) using iodinated contrast agents is the golden standard for diagnosis, but many patients have contraindications for CTA. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of repeated acquisitions of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), without respiratory gating or breath holding, in diagnosing PE using CTA as the reference standard. Material and Methods Thirty-three patients with clinically suspected PE underwent MRI within 48 h after diagnostic CTA. A control group of 37 healthy participants underwent MRI and was matched with an equal number of negative CTA exams. The MRI protocol was based on free-breathing steady-state free precession producing 4.5 mm slices in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. Instead of respiratory or cardiac gating five repetitive slices were obtained in each anatomical position to compensate for movement and artifacts. Clinical assessment including d-dimer and Well's score was performed prior to imaging. One radiologist reviewed the CTA exams and two radiologists reviewed the MRI scans. Results All 70 MRI exams were of diagnostic quality and the total acquisition time for each MRI scan was 9 min 34 s. On CTA, 29 patients were diagnosed with PE and the MRI readers detected 26 and 27 of those, respectively. Specificity was 100% for both readers. Sensitivity was 90% and 93%, respectively. Inter-reader agreement using Cohen's kappa was 0.97. Conclusion Our unenhanced MRI protocol shows a high sensitivity and specificity for PE, but further studies are required before considering it as a safe diagnostic test.

Developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious and costly disease for patients and healthcare systems. Guidelines emphasise the importance of differentiating between patients who are at high risk of mortality (those with shock and/or hypotension), who may be candidates for thrombolytic therapy or surgery, and those with less severe presentations. Recent clinical studies and guidelines have focused particularly on risk stratification of intermediate-risk patients. Although the use of thrombolysis has been investigated in these patients, anticoagulation remains the standard treatment approach. Individual risk stratification directs initial treatment. Rates of recurrence differ between subgroups of patients with PE; therefore, a review of provoking factors, along with the risks of morbidity and bleeding, guides the duration of ongoing anticoagulation. The direct oral anticoagulants have shown similar efficacy and, in some cases, reduced major bleeding compared with standard approaches for acute treatment. They also offer the potential to reduce the burden on patients and outpatient services in the post-hospital phase. Rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban have been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism versus placebo, when given for >12 months. Patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants do not require regular coagulation monitoring, but follow-up, ideally in a specialist PE clinic in consultation with primary care providers, is recommended.

Direct oral anticoagulants have the potential to improve management of patients with pulmonary embolismhttp://ow.ly/NV7K6

Historical Evolution of Imaging Techniques for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism

As we celebrate the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), it seems fitting to look back at the major accomplishments of the radiology community in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Few diseases have so consistently captured the attention of the medical community. Since the first description of pulmonary embolism by Virchow in the 1850s, clinicians have struggled to reach a timely diagnosis of this common condition because of its nonspecific and often confusing clinical picture. As imaging tests started to gain importance in the 1900s, the approach to diagnosing pulmonary embolism also began to change. Rapid improvements in angiography, ventilation-perfusion imaging, and cross-sectional imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging have constantly forced health care professionals to rethink how they diagnose pulmonary embolism. Needless to say, the way pulmonary embolism is diagnosed today is distinctly different from how it was diagnosed in Virchow's era; and imaging, particularly CT, now forms the cornerstone of diagnostic evaluation. Currently, radiology offers a variety of tests that are fast and accurate and can provide anatomic and functional information, thus allowing early diagnosis and triage of cases. This review provides a historical journey into the evolution of these imaging tests and highlights some of the major breakthroughs achieved by the radiology community and RSNA in this process. Also highlighted are areas of ongoing research and development in this field of imaging as radiologists seek to combat some of the newer challenges faced by modern medicine, such as rising health care costs and radiation dose hazards.

One-Year All-Cause Mortality of Patients Diagnosed as Having In-Hospital Pulmonary Embolism After Modern Elective Joint Arthroplasty Is Low And Unaffected By Radiologic Severity

BACKGROUND

We studied the 1-year complication rate of patients diagnosed as having a pulmonary embolism (PE) after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery and the distribution of emboli in the pulmonary circulation, and determined if a relationship exists between the location of the PE and age, gender, body mass index, preoperative predisposing factors, American Society of Anesthesiology classification, type of surgery, prophylaxis, hospital stay, transfer to a higher level of care, and mortality.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-nine patients who developed an in-hospital PE proved by computed tomography pulmonary angiography after elective THA or TKA between 2005 and 2012 were studied.

RESULTS

The most proximal location of the emboli was central in 62, segmental in 139, and subsegmental in 68. Nineteen patients (7%) developed a bleeding complication during PE treatment. Twenty-nine patients (11%) were readmitted during the first year. Two patients (0.74%) died: one had a segmental PE after TKA. He died 11 months after surgery due to an autopsy-proven sepsis. The second patient developed a segmental PE after THA. She was anticoagulated, developed an intracranial bleed, and died 8 months after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that demographic variables, American Society of Anesthesiology class, preoperative comorbidities (with the exception of arrhythmia), and the presence of preoperative predisposing factors had no effect in the location of the PE.

CONCLUSION

The 1-year mortality rate of these patients is low. Death can be caused by bleeding complications secondary to anticoagulation or by unrelated conditions. This information may aid clinicians while counseling patients who developed a PE after surgery, particularly those with small subsegmental emboli.

Anticoagulant treatment for subsegmental pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the cardiovascular diseases, after coronary artery disease and stroke.The advent of multi-detector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has allowed better assessment of PE regarding visualisation of the peripheral pulmonary arteries, increasing its rate of diagnosis. More cases of peripheral PEs, such as isolated subsegmental PE (SSPE) and incidental PE, have thereby been identified. These two conditions are usually found in patients with few or none of the classic PE symptoms such as haemoptysis or pleuritic pain, acute dyspnoea or circulatory collapse. However, in patients with reduced cardio-pulmonary (C/P) reserve the classic PE symptoms can be found with isolated SSPEs. Incidental SSPE is found casually in asymptomatic patients, usually by diagnostic imaging performed for other reasons (for example routine CT for cancer staging in oncologic patients).Traditionally, all PEs are anticoagulated in a similar manner independent of the location, number and size of the thrombi. It has been suggested that many patients with SSPE may be treated without benefit, increasing adverse events by possible unnecessary use of anticoagulants.Patients with isolated SSPE or incidental PE may have a more benign clinical presentation compared with those with proximal PEs. However, the clinical significance in patients and their prognosis have to be studied to evaluate whether anticoagulation therapy is required.This review is an update of a Cochrane systematic review first published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched December 2015) and CENTRAL (2015, Issue 11). MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and clinical trials databases were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with SSPE or incidental SSPE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors inspected all citations to ensure reliable selection. We planned for two review authors to independently extract data and to assess the methodological quality of identified trials using the criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no randomised controlled trial evidence for the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE, and therefore we can not draw any conclusions. Well-conducted research is required before informed practice decisions can be made.

Subsegmental pulmonary embolism: A narrative review

Through the introduction of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for diagnosis of the pulmonary embolism (PE), the high sensitivity of this diagnostic tool led to detecting peripheral filling defects as small as 2-3mm, termed as subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE). However, despite these substantial increases in diagnosis of small pulmonary embolism, there are minimal changes in mortality. Moreover, SSPE patients generally are hemodynamically stable with mild clinical presentation, lower serum level of biomarkers, lower incidence of associated proximal DVTs and less frequent echocardiographic changes compared to the patients with emboli located in more central pulmonary arteries. However, the pros and cons of anticoagulant therapy versus non-treating, monitoring protocol and exact long term outcome of these patients are still unclear. In this article we review existing evidence and provide an overview of what is known about the diagnosis and management of subsegmental pulmonary embolism.

Classification of CT pulmonary angiography reports by presence, chronicity, and location of pulmonary embolism with natural language processing

In this paper we describe an efficient tool based on natural language processing for classifying the detail state of pulmonary embolism (PE) recorded in CT pulmonary angiography reports. The classification tasks include: PE present vs. absent, acute PE vs. others, central PE vs. others, and subsegmental PE vs. others. Statistical learning algorithms were trained with features extracted using the NLP tool and gold standard labels obtained via chart review from two radiologists. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for the four tasks were 0.998, 0.945, 0.987, and 0.986, respectively. We compared our classifiers with bag-of-words Naive Bayes classifiers, a standard text mining technology, which gave AUC 0.942, 0.765, 0.766, and 0.712, respectively.

Pulmonary embolism: current and new treatment options

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) can be a life-threatening emergency. Accurate diagnostic techniques and patient-specific management strategies are necessary to ensure favorable clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Relevant guidelines, articles, reviews, and abstracts were identified using a narrative approach in PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov and nice.org.uk. English-language articles published in 2000-2014 were initially identified using the search terms: novel OAC, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, diagnosis, treatment, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban. The initial literature search was supported by a 'snowballing' style literature search, and relevant articles were included based on a professional judgment of relevance.

SCOPE

We discuss the diagnosis of PE and the categorization of risk for subgroups, which may assist with making treatment decisions. We review current guidance on acute and long-term treatment, possible limitations of traditional anticoagulant therapy, and the development of direct oral anticoagulants, which may significantly alter the management of patients with PE. Finally, we discuss special considerations in high-risk and hard-to-treat subpopulations that may benefit from the improved benefit-risk profile offered by these newer agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The direct oral anticoagulants may overcome several of the limitations associated with traditional anticoagulant therapy, potentially improving the standard of care for PE patients, including high-risk and hard-to-manage subgroups.

Anticoagulant treatment for subsegmental pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the cardiovascular diseases, after coronary artery disease and stroke.The advent of multi-detector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has allowed better assessment of PE regarding visualisation of the peripheral pulmonary arteries, increasing its rate of diagnosis. More cases of peripheral PEs, such as isolated subsegmental PE (SSPE) and incidental PE, have thereby been identified. These two conditions are usually found in patients with few or none of the classic PE symptoms such as haemoptysis or pleuritic pain, acute dyspnoea or circulatory collapse. However, in patients with reduced cardio-pulmonary (C/P) reserve the classic PE symptoms can be found with isolated SSPEs. Incidental SSPE is found casually in asymptomatic patients, usually by diagnostic imaging performed for other reasons (for example routine CT for cancer staging in oncologic patients).Traditionally, all PEs are anticoagulated in a similar manner independent of the location, number and size of the thrombi. It has been suggested that many patients with SSPE may be treated without benefit, increasing adverse events by possible unnecessary use of anticoagulants.Patients with isolated SSPE or incidental PE may have a more benign clinical presentation compared with those with proximal PEs. However, the clinical significance in patients and their prognosis have to be studied to evaluate whether anticoagulation therapy is required.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched October 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 9). MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and clinical trials databases were also searched (October 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with SSPE or incidental SSPE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors inspected all citations to ensure reliable selection. We planned for two review authors to independently extract data and to assess the methodological quality of identified trials using the criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no randomised controlled trial evidence for the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE, and therefore we can not draw any conclusions. Well-conducted research is required before informed practice decisions can be made.

Pulmonary embolism in oncologic patients: frequency and embolus burden of symptomatic and unsuspected events

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in oncologic patients. Furthermore, PE is an unsuspected finding in many cases.

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency and embolus burden of PE in a consecutive oncologic patient group including symptomatic as well as incidental and initially unreported events.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective, single-center study from June 2005 to January 2010 all patients with an oncologic disease (ICD-10 code C00 to C96) that received at least one contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examination of the chest were reviewed. The study group included 3270 patients with 6780 examinations. A validated pulmonary artery obstruction index (Mastora score) was used to assess embolus burden.

RESULTS

PE was found in 240 of 3270 (7.3%) oncologic patients. The frequency was highly variable among different malignancies ranging from 0% to 25%. In the present study about half of all PE were unsuspected. The mean embolus burden was significantly higher in symptomatic PE than in unsuspected PE (P <0.001). The risk of developing a PE was 1.5 times higher in patients with metastases compared to patients without metastases (P <0.005). Age and sex had no influence on PE risk and embolus burden.

CONCLUSION

PE is a frequent unsuspected finding in staging examinations: particularly in patients with malignancies of the ovary, brain, and pancreas, and in patients with metastases. Therefore, the status of the pulmonary vasculature should be assessed in every staging examination that includes the chest. The effect of therapeutic actions on PE events and the unsuspected finding of PE in follow-up CT examinations require further prospective studies.

Treatment of single peripheral pulmonary emboli: patient outcomes and factors associated with decision to treat

BACKGROUND

Increasing use of computed tomography pulmonary angiography together with higher-resolution scanners has increased the detection of peripheral filling defects. Physicians face the dilemma of whether to treat patients with these findings, especially single defects. The aims of this study were to compare the outcomes of treated and untreated patients with single peripheral filling defects (SPFD) and identify factors associated with treatment.

METHODS

All cases with SPFDs over 66 months in a single institution were identified. Patient and treatment information were abstracted and data on 90-day mortality and postdischarge venous thromboembolism (VTE) were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 4906 computed tomography pulmonary angiograms were reviewed. A SPFD was identified in 3.1% (n = 153). Of the 153 patients, 134 met criteria for study inclusion. In 99 of 134 (73.9%) studies, the defect was called a pulmonary embolus (PE) by the initial radiologist. Treatment was administered to 61 of 134 (45.5%) patients; 5 patients died in each group. Postdischarge VTE occurred in 3 treated and 2 untreated patients. In 52 of 153 cases, an additional study was performed. None of the patients with normal ventilation perfusion scan and compression ultrasound received treatment. Immobility (odds ratio [OR]: 3.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-10.60), previous VTE (OR: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.18-11.70), and determination of PE by the radiologist (OR: 24.68, 95% CI: 5.40-112.90) were associated with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in 90-day mortality or recurrence between treated and untreated patients. The most influential factor associated with treatment was the radiologist's interpretation. When secondary lung imaging studies were negative, no patient received treatment.

In search of venous thromboembolism: the first 2913 years

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolism was first described in India around 600-900 BC. It was not until the 17th through 19th centuries that Western researchers began to understand the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Roentgen's discovery of x-rays in 1895 led to the first objective imaging.

CONCLUSION

Currently, scintigraphy, helical CT, MRI, and sonography provide accurate in vivo images. These high-quality images have forced clinicians to reevaluate many preimaging assumptions about and treatments for venous thromboembolism.

Pulmonary embolism: role of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy

The evaluation for pulmonary embolism in the emergency setting has many challenges. Patients often present with symptoms that are nonspecific. Emergency Department physicians utilize their own subjective judgment or objective clinical algorithms, such as the Wells Score to assess the likelihood of the patient having PE. Other techniques, such as D-dimer assays and Doppler ultrasound leg studies for deep venous thrombosis are very useful, as well. Ventilation-perfusion lung scans and computed tomography pulmonary angiography are both available in most institutions. However, factors such as sensitivity or specificity, overnight availability, radiation exposure, and comfort with interpretation criteria play a role in deciding which procedure should be used. Relative merits of both the procedures will be discussed.

V/Q scanning using SPECT and SPECT/CT

Planar ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning is often used to investigate pulmonary embolism; however, it has well-recognized limitations. SPECT overcomes many of these through its ability to generate 3-dimensional imaging data. V/Q SPECT has higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy than planar imaging and a lower indeterminate rate. SPECT allows for new ways to display and analyze data, such as parametric V/Q ratio images. Compared with CT pulmonary angiography, SPECT has higher sensitivity, a lower radiation dose, fewer technically suboptimal studies, and no contrast-related complications. Any nuclear medicine department equipped with a modern hybrid scanner can now perform combined V/Q SPECT with CT (using low-dose protocols) to further enhance diagnostic accuracy. V/Q SPECT (with or without CT) has application in other pulmonary conditions and in research.

CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended and commonly used for extended treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), but its superiority over warfarin has been demonstrated in only one randomised study. We report here the rationale, design and a priori analysis plans of Comparison of Acute Treatments in Cancer Haemostasis (CATCH; NCT01130025), a multinational, Phase III, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing tinzaparin with warfarin for extended treatment of CAT.

METHODS/DESIGN

The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of tinzaparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer and acute, symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. The secondary objectives are to determine: safety of tinzaparin given over 6 months; clinical and laboratory markers for recurrent VTE and/or major bleeding; 6-month overall mortality; incidence and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome; patient-reported quality of life; and healthcare resource utilisation. Nine hundred patients are randomised to receive tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 6 months or initial tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 5-10 days and dose-adjusted warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) for 6 months. The primary composite outcome is time to recurrent VTE, including incidental VTE and fatal pulmonary embolism. All patients are followed up to 6 months or death, whichever comes sooner. Blinded adjudication will be performed for all reported VTE, bleeding events and causes of death. Efficacy will be analysed using centrally adjudicated results of all patients according to intention-to-treat analysis. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board is reviewing data at regular intervals and an interim analysis is planned after 450 patients have completed the study.

DISCUSSION

The results will add significantly to the knowledge of the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of tinzaparin in the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer and thrombosis. Prospective data will emerge on the clinical significance of incidental VTE and risk stratification in patients with CAT. Results on post-thrombotic syndrome, quality of life and healthcare resource utilisation will inform decision makers on how to secure better patient care. If tinzaparin is shown to be more effective than warfarin, CATCH will provide valuable confirmatory data to support the use of the LMWH tinzaparin for extended treatment of CAT.

Risk profile and clinical outcome of symptomatic subsegmental acute pulmonary embolism

The clinical significance of subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) remains to be determined. This study aimed to investigate whether SSPE forms a distinct subset of thromboembolic disease compared with more proximally located pulmonary embolism (PE). We analyzed 3728 consecutive patients with clinically suspected PE. SSPE patients were contrasted to patients with more proximal PE and to patients in whom suspected PE was ruled out, in regards of the prevalence of thromboembolic risk factors and the 3-month risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and mortality. PE was confirmed in 748 patients, of whom 116 (16%) had SSPE; PE was ruled out in 2980 patients. No differences were seen in the prevalence of VTE risk factors, the 3-month risk of recurrent VTE (3.6% vs 2.5%; P = .42), and mortality (10.7% vs 6.5%; P = .17) between patients with SSPE and those with more proximal PE. When compared with patients without PE, aged >60 years, recent surgery, estrogen use, and male gender were found to be independent predictors for SSPE, and patients with SSPE were at an increased risk of VTE during follow-up (hazard ratio: 3.8; 95% CI: 1.3-11.1). This study indicates that patients with SSPE mimic those with more proximally located PE in regards to their risk profile and clinical outcome.