Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol compared with nonionic low-osmolar contrast media: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Acute Kidney Injury Management Strategies Peri-Cardiovascular Interventions

In many countries, the aging population and the higher incidence of comorbid conditions have resulted in an ever-growing need for cardiac interventions. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of these interventions, associated with higher mortalities, chronic or end-stage kidney disease, readmission rates, and hospital and post-discharge costs. The AKI pathophysiology includes contrast-associated AKI, hemodynamic changes, cardiorenal syndrome, and atheroembolism. Preventive measures include limiting contrast media dose, optimizing hemodynamic conditions, and limiting exposure to other nephrotoxins. This review article outlines the current state-of-art knowledge regarding AKI pathophysiology, risk factors, preventive measures, and management strategies in the peri-interventional period.

A Simplified Risk Score to Estimate the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy after Contrast Exposure

Introduction

Scores are available to predict the probability of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after cardiac interventions, but not many scores are available for non-cardiac interventions and there are none for intravenous exposure to contrast. We designed this study to develop a simplified score to determine the probability of developing CIN in patients exposed to the parenteral contrast medium.

Methods

This was a prospective study of patients who received parenteral contrast. Of 1300 patients, the first 1000 comprised the derivation cohort and the next 300 comprised the validation cohort. The patient variables in the development cohort were studied using univariate analysis. Statistically significant individual variables were used as independent variables, and CIN was used as the dependent variable in the final multivariate logistic regression model. Then, the risk score was obtained and validated.

Results

The incidence of CIN was 3.8%. The risk factors, namely the presence of diabetes mellitus, e-GFR, and route and volume of contrast material were significantly associated with the risk of CIN (P < 0.05). The developed risk score had a sensitivity of 90.4% and specificity of 98.78%. The overall accuracy was 97.8%. The values of AUC of ROC in the development and validation datasets were high. This indicated that the predicted CIN risk score correlated well with the calibration and discriminative characteristics.

Conclusions

The route and volume of contrast administered, low e-GFR, and diabetes mellitus were the significant risk factors. The developed risk score exhibited very good sensitivity and specificity and excellent accuracy in predicting the probability of CIN.

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Following Contrast-enhanced CT in a Cohort of 10 407 Children and Adolescents

Background Previous studies have challenged the concept of contrast material-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in adults; however, limited data exist for children and adolescents. Purpose To calculate the incidence and determine the risks of AKI in patients who received intravenous iodinated contrast media for CT. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was performed at a children's hospital from January 2008 to January 2018 and included patients aged 0-17 years in whom serum creatinine levels were measured within 48 hours before and after CT with or without contrast media. The incidence of AKI was measured according to the AKI Network guidelines. A subgroup analysis with propensity score matching of cases with control patients was performed. Differences before and after stratification based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were explored. Adjusted risk models were developed using log-binomial generalized estimating equations to estimate relative risk (RR). Results From a total of 54 000 CT scans, 19 377 scans from 10 407 patients (median age, 8.5 years; IQR, 3-14; 5869 boys, 4538 girls) were included in the analysis. Incidence rate of AKI for the entire sample was 1.5%; it was 1.4% (123 of 8844) in the group that underwent contrast-enhanced CT and 1.6% (171 of 10 533) in the group that did not (P = .18). In the contrast-enhanced CT group, AKI incidence was higher in the group with eGFR of at least 60 mL/min/1.73 m² and in the group with eGFR lower than 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (1.3% and 8.5%, respectively; P < .001) compared with the noncontrast group (0.1% and 2.7%, respectively; P < .001). Age was found to be a protective factor against AKI, with an RR of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.99; P = .01), and contrast media increased risk in the subgroup analysis, with an RR of 2.19 (95% CI: 1.11, 4.35; P = .02). Conclusion The overall incidence of acute kidney injury after contrast-enhanced CT in children and adolescents was very low, and exposure to contrast media did not increase the risk consistently for acute kidney injury among different groups and analyses. © RSNA, 2022 See also the editorial by McDonald in this issue.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Guidance on Contrast Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) is one of the most frequently administered pharmaceuticals. In Canada, over 5.4 million computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed in 2019, of which 50% were contrast enhanced. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring after ICM administration was historically considered a common iatrogenic complication which was managed by screening patients, prophylactic strategies, and follow up evaluation of renal function. The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) initially published guidelines on the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy in 2007, with an update in 2012. However, new developments in the field have led to the availability of safer contrast agents and changes in clinical practice, prompting a complete revision of the earlier recommendations. This revised guidance document was developed by a multidisciplinary CAR Working Group of radiologists and nephrologists, and summarizes changes in practice related to contrast administration, screening, and risk stratification since the last guideline. It reviews the scientific evidence for contrast associated AKI and provides consensus-based recommendations for its prevention and management in the Canadian healthcare context. This article is a joint publication in the Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal and Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, intended to inform both communities of practice.

Radiographic Contrast Media and the Kidney

AKI is a potential complication of intravascular iodinated contrast exposure. Contrast-associated AKI, which typically manifests as small and transient decrements in kidney function that develop within several days of contrast administration, is associated with serious adverse outcomes, including progressive kidney dysfunction and death. However, a causal link between the small increases in serum creatinine that characteristically occur with contrast-associated AKI and serious adverse outcomes remains unproven. This is important given mounting evidence that clinically indicated, potentially lifesaving radiographic procedures are underutilized in patients with CKD. This has been hypothesized to be related to provider concern about precipitating contrast-associated AKI. Intravascular gadolinium-based contrast, an alternative to iodinated contrast that is administered with magnetic resonance imaging, has also been linked with potential serious adverse events, notably the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with severe impairment in kidney function. Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit frequently have clinical indications for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that involve the intravascular administration of contrast media. Accordingly, critical care providers and others treating critically ill patients should possess a sound understanding of the risk factors for and incidence of such outcomes, the ability to perform evidence-based risk-benefit assessments regarding intravascular contrast administration, and knowledge of empirical data on the prevention of these iatrogenic complications.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Guidance on Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Purpose

Iodinated contrast media is one of the most frequently administered pharmaceuticals. In Canada, over 5.4 million computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed in 2019, of which 50% were contrast enhanced. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring after iodinated contrast administration was historically considered a common iatrogenic complication which was managed by screening patients, prophylactic strategies, and follow-up evaluation of renal function. The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) initially published guidelines on the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy in 2007, with an update in 2012. However, new developments in the field have led to the availability of safer contrast agents and changes in clinical practice, prompting a complete revision of the earlier recommendations.

Information sources

Published literature, including clinical trials, retrospective cohort series, review articles, and case reports, along with expert opinions from radiologists and nephrologists across Canada.

Methods

The leadership of the CAR formed a working group of radiologists and nephrologists with expertise in contrast administration and patient management related to contrast-associated AKI. We conducted a comprehensive review of the published literature to evaluate the evidence about contrast as a cause of AKI, and to inform evidence-based recommendations. Based on the available literature, the working group developed consensus recommendations.

Key Findings

The working group developed 21 recommendations, on screening, choice of iodinated contrast media, prophylaxis, medication considerations, and post contrast administration management. The key changes from the 2012 guidelines were (1) Simplification of screening to a simple questionnaire, and not delaying emergent examinations due to a need for creatinine measurements (2) Prophylaxis considerations only for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (3) Not recommending the routine discontinuation of any drugs to decrease risk of AKI, except metformin when eGFR is less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and (4) Not requiring routine follow up serum creatinine measurements post iodinated contrast administration.

Limitations

We did not conduct a formal systematic review or meta-analysis. We did not evaluate our specific suggestions in the clinical environment.

Implications

Given the importance of iodinated contrast media use in diagnosis and management, and the low risk of AKI after contrast use, these guidelines aim to streamline the processes around iodinated contrast use in most clinical settings. As newer evidence arises that may change or add to the recommendations provided, the working group will revise these guidelines.

Low-Osmolar vs. Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media on the Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Propensity Score Matched Study

Objective:

Among the various risk factors associated with contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), the importance of osmolality and viscosity is emerging among the characteristics of contrast media (CM) itself. High osmolality CM (HOCM) is deprecated and low osmotic pressure (LOCM) and iso-osmotic pressure (IOCM) are mainly used in clinical situations where the results of studies on their effect on the development of CI-AKI are contradictory. We evaluated the association between the type of CM and the risk of CI-AKI.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study to analyze the effect of the type of CM on the development of CI-AKI. Using propensity score (PS) matching, 2,263 LOCM and IOCM groups were paired for analysis from 5,267 patients and fulfilled the inclusion criteria among 12,742 patients who underwent CAG between 1 January 2007, and 31 December 2016. LOCM included iopromide and iopamidol, IOCM was iodixanol. CI-AKI, which was the primary endpoint, was defined based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria within 48 h after exposure to the CM. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used in the unmatched and matched cohorts, respectively. In addition, a stratified model on clinically important variables, including a high Mehran score (≥ 6), was also used in the matched cohort.

Results

LOCM users showed an increased incidence of CI-AKI (11.7% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.006), but it lost statistical significance after PS matching (9.9% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.725). In multivariable analyses, the adjusted odds ratio for CI-AKI in the LOCM group were 1.059 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.875–1.282; p = 0.555] in unmatched cohort and 0.987 (95% CI = 0.803–1.214; p = 0.901) in matched cohort. These results were also consistent with the high-risk (high Mehran score) group.

Conclusions

Although the role of CM types in the development of CI-AKI has been debated, our observation shows that the selection between LOCM and IOCM during CAG has no influence on the incidence of CI-AKI.

A systematic review of the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions and post-contrast acute kidney injury after ioversol: part 2-intra-arterial administration

Objectives

To evaluate the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) and post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI), after intra-arterial (IA) administration of ioversol.

Methods and materials

A systematic literature search was performed (1980–2021) and studies documenting IA use of ioversol, and reporting safety outcomes were selected. Key information on study design, patients’ characteristics, indication, dose, and type of safety outcome were extracted.

Results

Twenty-eight studies (including two pediatric studies) with 8373 patients exposed to IA ioversol were selected. Studies were highly heterogenous in terms of design, PC-AKI definition, and studied population. PC-AKI incidence after coronary angiography was 7.5–21.9% in a general population, 4.0-26.4% in diabetic patients, and 5.5–28.9% in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). PC-AKI requiring dialysis was rare and reported mainly in patients with severe CKD. No significant differences in PC-AKI rates were shown in studies comparing different iodinated contrast media (ICM). Based on seven studies of ioversol clinical development, the overall ADR incidence was 1.6%, comparable to that reported with other non-ionic ICM. Pediatric data were scarce with only one study reporting on PC-AKI incidence (12%), and one reporting on ADR incidence (0.09%), both after coronary angiography.

Conclusions

After ioversol IA administration, PC-AKI incidence was highly variable between studies, likely reflecting the heterogeneity of the included study populations, and appeared comparable to that reported with other ICM. The rate of other ADRs appears to be low. Well-designed studies are needed for a better comparison with other ICM.

Key Points

• PC-AKI incidence after IA administration of ioversol appears to be comparable to that of other ICM, despite the high variability between studies.

• The need for dialysis after IA administration of ioversol is rare.

• No obvious difference was found regarding the safety profile of ioversol between IA and IV administration.

Fatores que Impactam a Decisão de Realizar Ventriculografia Esquerda em Doença Arterial Coronariana

Fundamento

A ventriculografia esquerda é um método invasivo para avaliar a função sistólica do ventrículo esquerdo. Depois do advento de métodos não invasivos, o seu uso tem sido questionado por resultar em algum risco para o paciente.

Objetivos

Avaliar quais fatores associam-se independentemente com a decisão de realizar ventriculografia em pacientes com doença arterial coronariana.

Métodos

Tratou-se de um estudo analítico, retrospectivo, avaliando prontuários eletrônicos e banco de dados e comparando 21 variáveis de interesse pré-definidas entre pacientes submetidos a cineangiocoronariografia. Foi considerado significante p < 0,05.

Resultados

Avaliamos 600 pacientes consecutivos, e a ventriculografia esquerda foi realizada na maioria dos pacientes submetidos a uma cineangiocoronariografia (54%). Depois da análise multivariada, os pacientes com síndromes coronarianas crônicas ( odds ratio [OR] 1,72; intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC 95%]: 1,20–2,46; p < 0,01) tiveram maior chance de serem submetidos ao procedimento. Os pacientes com função ventricular conhecida (OR = 0,58; IC 95%: 0,40–0,85; p < 0,01), os revascularizados (OR 0,31; IC 95% 0,14–0,69; p < 0,01), os hipertensos (OR 0,58; IC 95%: 0,36–0,94; p = 0,02) e aqueles com maiores valores de creatinina (OR 0,42; IC 95% 0,26–0,69; p < 0,01) tiveram maior chance de não realizar ventriculografia.

Conclusões

Nos pacientes submetidos a cineangiocoronariografia, o diagnóstico de síndrome coronariana crônica associou-se de modo independente com uma maior realização da técnica, enquanto ter a função ventricular previamente conhecida, ser hipertenso, ter sido submetido a revascularização cirúrgica prévia e ter valores de creatinina mais elevados associaram-se a uma maior chance de não realizar o método.

Renal Safety of Repeated Intravascular Administrations of Iodinated or Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media within a Short Interval

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate whether repeated intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media (ICM) or gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) within a short interval was associated with an increased risk of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 300 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 68.5 ± 8.1 years; 131 male and 169 female) who had undergone at least one ICM-enhanced perfusion brain CT scan, had their baseline and follow-up serum creatinine levels available, and had not undergone additional contrast-enhanced examinations 72 hours before and after a time window of interest were included. The study population was divided into three groups: single-dose group and groups of patients who had received multiple contrast administrations in the time window of interest with the minimum contrast repeat interval either within 4 hours (0-4-hour group) or between 4 to 48 hours (4-48-hour group). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between AKI and repeated ICM administrations. A similar supplementary analysis was performed including both ICM and GBCA.

RESULTS

When ICM was only considered ignoring GBCA, among 300 patients, 207 patients received a single dose of ICM, 58 had repeated doses within 4 hours (0-4-hour group), and 35 patients had repeated doses between 4 to 48 hours (4-48-hour group). Most patients (> 95%) had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m². AKI occurred in 7.2%, 13.8%, and 8.6% of patients in the single-dose, 0-4-hour, and 4-48-hour groups, respectively. In the 0-4-hour and 4-48-hour groups, additional exposure to ICM was not associated with AKI after adjusting for comorbidities and nephrotoxic drugs (all p values > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Repeated intravascular administrations of ICM within a short interval did not increase the risk of AKI in our study patients suspected of acute stroke with a baseline eGFR of ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m².

Preventing a nonexistent entity: the curious case of contrast and acute kidney injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, doubt has been cast on the existence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. The skepticism has stemmed from observational studies from large administrative healthcare databases. Although they correctly call that contrast-induced acute kidney injury is less common than previously thought, they cannot completely exclude selection bias.

RECENT FINDINGS

Though less common than previously thought, contrast-induced acute kidney injury still exists. The only prophylactic method that remains valid is that of isotonic volume expansion, which is still deemed beneficial in high-risk patients. N-acetylcysteine and sodium bicarbonate are ineffective and their use should be abandoned.

SUMMARY

Contrast-induced kidney injury should be defined based on clinical grounds, not merely on biochemical numbers. More research to validate a clinical definition is necessary in order to accurately re-examine its incidence.

Cumulative iodinated contrast exposure for computed tomography during acute kidney injury and major adverse kidney events

OBJECTIVES

To determine if contrast-enhanced CT imaging performed in patients during their episode of AKI contributes to major adverse kidney events (MAKE).

METHODS

A propensity score-matched analysis of 1127 patients with AKI defined by KDIGO criteria was done. Their mean age was 63 ± 16 years with 56% males. A total of 419 cases exposed to CT contrast peri-AKI were matched with 798 non-exposed controls for 14 covariates including comorbidities, acute illnesses, and initial AKI severity; outcomes including MAKE and renal recovery in hospital were compared using bivariate analysis and logistic regression. MAKE was a composite of mortality, renal replacement therapy, and doubling of serum creatinine on discharge over baseline; renal recovery was classified as early versus late based on a 7-day timeline from AKI onset to nadir creatinine or cessation of renal replacement therapy in survivors.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients received cumulatively > 100 mL of CT contrast, 143 patients had > 50-100 mL, and 214 patients had 50 mL or less; MAKE occurred in 34%, 17%, and 21%, respectively, as compared with 20% in non-exposed controls (p = 0.008 for patients with > 100 mL contrast versus none). More contrast-exposed patients experienced late renal recovery (27% versus 20%) and longer hospital days (median 10 versus 8) than non-exposed patients (all p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, cumulative CT contrast > 100 mL was independently associated with MAKE (odds ratio 2.39 versus non-contrast, adjusted for all confounders, p = 0.005); cumulative CT contrast under 100 mL was not associated with MAKE.

CONCLUSIONS

High cumulative volume of CT contrast administered to patients with AKI is associated with worse short-term renal outcomes and delayed renal recovery.

KEY POINTS

• Cumulative intravenous iodinated contrast for CT imaging of more than 100 mL, during an episode of acute kidney injury, was independently associated with worse renal outcomes and less renal recovery. • These adverse outcomes including renal replacement therapy were not more frequent in similar patients who received cumulatively 100 mL or less of CT contrast, compared with non-exposed patients. • More patients with CT contrast exposure during acute kidney injury experienced delayed renal recovery.

Preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) with herbal medicines: A review

OBJECTIVES

Currently, the use of iodinated contrast media in diagnostic imaging has been increased in clinical medicine. Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an important adverse effect of contrast media injection. According to the significant role of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of CIN, different herbal antioxidants have been used for the prevention of nephropathy in different studies. In this review, we discussed the preventive effects of herbal medicine and natural products against CIN.

METHODS

We searched the electronic databases or search engines including PubMed, Scopus, ISI, Google Scholar with search terms such as "Contrast-induced nephropathy" and "Herbal medicine," "Contrast acute kidney injury" AND "natural products" and similar headings such as plant and extract.

RESULTS

Known medicinal plants and active ingredients such as green tea, ginger, garlic, silymarin, curcumin, resveratrol, and thymoquinone have been examined for prophylactic effects or treatment of contrast media nephropathy.

CONCLUSION

Herbal medicines have promising effects in the laboratory-based studies for the prevention and/or treatment of CIN. However, more practical and completed clinical trials are needed to investigate the clinical benefits of natural products against CIN.

BiVO4@Bi2S3 Heterojunction Nanorods with Enhanced Charge Separation Efficiency for Multimodal Imaging and Synergy Therapy of Tumor

Despite malignant tumors being one of the most serious diseases threatening human health and living quality, exploring theranostic agents for highly effective tumor diagnosis and treatment is still full of challenges. Herein, we demonstrate the design and preparation of Tween-20-modified BiVO₄@Bi₂S₃ heterojunction nanorods (HNRs) for multimodal computed tomography (CT)/photoacoustic (PA) imaging and radiotherapy (RT)/radiodynamic therapy (RDT)/photothermal therapy (PTT) synergistic therapy. Benefiting from the high X-ray attenuation coefficient of Bi, BiVO₄@Bi₂S₃ HNRs exhibit a sensitive CT imaging capacity and radiation enhancement effect during RT. Meanwhile, the strong NIR absorption of Bi₂S₃ endows BiVO₄@Bi₂S₃ HNRs with an excellent PA imaging and photothermal transformation capacity. More importantly, by taking advantage of the type II band alignment between BiVO₄ and Bi₂S₃, an extra internal electric field is established to accelerate the separation of X-ray-induced electrons and holes in BiVO₄@Bi₂S₃ HNRs, resulting in the realization of highly effective X-ray-induced RDT. Because the in vitro and in vivo experiments have verified that the RT/RDT/PTT synergistic therapeutic efficacy is greatly superior to any single treatment, it is believed that our BiVO₄@Bi₂S₃ HNRs can be used as the multifunctional nanotheranostic platform for malignant tumor theranostics.

Current comments on contrast media administration in patients with renal insufficiency

Contrast media administration has been associated with complications such as nephropathy, cardiovascular morbidity, and neurovascular events, particularly in patients with renal insufficiency. This association has been questioned in recent studies. This review was performed to summarize the most current evidence on contrast induced nephropathy (CIN), contributing factors, and considerations in patients with renal insufficiency. The risk of CIN was over-estimated by the previous studies, due to a lack of control groups or presence of non-randomized control groups, which led to a selection bias. However, the thresholds associated with an increased risk of CIN are controversial and require risk-benefit analysis on an individual basis. Regarding the administration of contrast media (CM) in the emergency setting, the majority of studies suggested that CM exposure does not meaningfully increase the risk of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients (including trauma patients). Several strategies have been suggested to reduce the risk of CIN, including volume expansion to increase renal blood flow, sodium bicarbonate or N-acetylcysteine administration, and use of low-osmolal contrast media in end-stage renal disease.

Contrast Media-Different Types of Contrast Media, Their History, Chemical Properties, and Relative Nephrotoxicity

History of contrast dates back to the 1890s, with the invention of the radiograph. Nephrotoxicity has been a main limitation in ideal contrast media (CM). High-osmolar contrast media no longer are in clinical use due to overwhelming evidence supporting greater nephrotoxicity with these CM compared with current CM. Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) remains a common cause of in-hospital acute kidney injury. The choice contrast agent is determined mainly by cost and institution practice. This review focuses on the history, chemical properties, and experimental and clinical studies on the various groups of CM and their role in CIN.

Future of Diagnostic Computed Tomography: An Update on Physicochemical Properties, Safety, and Development of X-ray Contrast Media

Iodinated contrast media (CM) are utilized in approximately 40% of the 300 million computed tomography (CT) scans undertaken annually. This review focuses on the physicochemical properties and safety of iodinated CM, and the development of new x-ray CM, and it explores methods to optimize CT scanning parameters. It concludes that good x-ray CM should have high structural stability, hydrophilicity, and CT attenuation; low viscosity, osmolality, and protein binding; no metabolism and tissue accumulation; and a complete elimination.

Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in high-risk oncology patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT with a reduced dose of the iso-osmolar iodinated contrast medium iodixanol

Objectives

To determine the incidence of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) and presumed contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) following contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) with intravenous application of a reduced dose of the iso-osmolar contrast agent iodixanol in cancer patients with chronic kidney disease.

Methods

198 oncology patients with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60ml/min/1.73m² undergoing a total of 237 CECTs using a reduced dose of 60ml iodixanol were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed for the entire cohort and subgroups. The effect of additional risk factors on the occurrence of PC-AKI was evaluated.

Results

The overall PC-AKI incidence was 6.3%. Excluding patients with concurrent medical conditions known to directly and independently impact kidney function and patients with AKI preceding the CT-scan resulted in a presumed CI-AKI incidence of 3.8%. No permanent post-contrast worsening of renal function and no AKI treatment were required. Subgroups considering baseline eGFR yielded PC-AKI incidences of 4.6% (eGFR 45-60ml/min/1.73m², n = 130), 7.4% (eGFR 30-45ml/min/1.73m², n = 95) and 16.7% (eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m², n = 12). Additional patient related risk factors did not show any significant effect on the occurrence of PC-AKI.

Conclusions

Low incidences of PC-AKI/CI-AKI suggest that a reduced dose of an iso-osmolar contrast agent is safe in high-risk oncological patients with impaired renal function.

Acute kidney injury from contrast-enhanced CT procedures in patients with cancer: white paper to highlight its clinical relevance and discuss applicable preventive strategies

Patients with cancer are subjected to several imaging examinations which frequently require the administration of contrast medium (CM). However, it has been estimated that acute kidney injury (AKI) due to the injection of iodinated CM accounts for 11% of all cases of AKI, and it is reported in up to 2% of all CT examinations. Remarkably, the risks of developing AKI are increased in the elderly, in patients with chronic kidney disease or diabetes, and with dehydration or administration of nephrotoxic chemotherapeutics. Given the common occurrence of postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) in clinical practice, primary care physicians and all specialists involved in managing patients with cancer should be aware of the strategies to reduce the risk of this event. In 2018, a panel of four experts from the specialties of radiology, oncology and nephrology were speakers at the annual meeting of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica e Interventistica), with the aim of commenting on existing evidence and providing their experience on the incidence and management of PC-AKI in patients with cancer. The discussion represented the basis for this white paper, which is intended to be a practical guide organised by statements describing methods to reduce renal injury risks related to CM-enhanced CT examinations in patients with cancer.

Post-contrast acute kidney injury in a hospitalized population: short-, mid-, and long-term outcome and risk factors for adverse events

Objectives

To investigate the prognosis including major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE30) and 90-day and 1-year adverse outcome in hospitalized patients with post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) to identify high-risk factors.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 288 PC-AKI patients selected from 277,898 patients admitted to hospitals from January 2015 to December 2015. PC-AKI was defined according to the 2018 guideline of European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Multivariable Cox regression and logistic regression analyses were used to analyze main outcome and risk factors.

Results

PC-AKI patients with AKI stage ≥ 2 had much higher incidence of MAKE30 than those with AKI stage 1 (RR = 7.027, 95% CI 4.918–10.039). Persistent renal dysfunction, heart failure, central nervous system failure, baseline eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m², oliguria or anuria, blood urea nitrogen ≥ 7.14 mmol/L, respiratory failure, and shock were independent risk factors of 90-day or 1-year adverse prognosis (p < 0.05). Compared with transient renal dysfunction, PC-AKI patients with persistent renal dysfunction had a higher all-cause mortality rate (RR = 3.768, 95% CI 1.612–8.810; RR = 4.106, 95% CI 1.765–9.551) as well as combined endpoints of death, chronic kidney disease, or end-stage renal disease (OR = 3.685, 95% CI 1.628–8.340; OR = 5.209, 95% CI 1.730–15.681) within 90 days or 1 year.

Conclusions

PC-AKI is not always a transient, benign creatininopathy, but can result in adverse outcome. AKI stage is independently correlated to MAKE30 and persistent renal dysfunction may exaggerate the risk of long-term adverse events.

Key Points

• PC-AKI can result in adverse outcome such as persistent renal dysfunction, dialysis, chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or death.

• AKI stage is independently correlated to MAKE30.

• Persistent renal dysfunction may exaggerate the risk of long-term adverse events.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-06690-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Subclinical Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Computed Tomography

INTRODUCTION

The nephrotoxicity of modern contrast media remains controversial. Novel biomarkers of kidney damage may help in identifying a subclinical structural renal injury not revealed by widely used markers of kidney function.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate clinical (contrast-induced acute kidney injury [CI-AKI]) and subclinical CI-AKI (SCI-AKI) after intra-arterial administration of Iodixanol and Iopamidol in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational monocentric study. Urinary sample was collected at 4-8 h after contrast medium exposure to measure neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) and the product tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 ([TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7]), while blood samples were collected at 24 and 48 h after exposure to measure serum creatinine.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were enrolled, of whom 53 were exposed to Iodixanol and 47 to Iopamidol. Patients in Iodixanol and Iopamidol groups were comparable in terms of demographics, pre-procedural and procedural data. No patient developed CI-AKI according KDIGO criteria, while 13 patients reported SCI-AKI after exposure to iodine-based medium contrast (3 patients in Iodixanol group and 10 patients in Iopamidol group), defined by positive results of NGAL and/or [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7]. A positive correlation was found between NGAL and [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] in the analysed population (Spearman's rho 0.49, p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, Iopamidol exposure showed higher risk for SCI-AKI compared to Iodixanol (OR 4.5 [95% CI 1.16-17.52], p = 0.030), even after controlling for eGFR and volume of contrast medium used.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that intra-arterial modern contrast media administration may have a nephrotoxic effect in a population without pre-existing chronic kidney disease. Further investigations on larger scale are warranted to confirm if Iopamidol exposed patients to increased risk of SCI-AKI compared to Iodixanol.

Serum osmolarity as a potential predictor for contrast-induced nephropathy following elective coronary angiography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a relatively common complication following primary coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in at-risk patients. The goal of this study is to evaluate the role of pre-procedural serum osmolarity as a risk factor for CIN in patients undergoing elective CAG for stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 356 stable CAD patients scheduled to undergo CAG or PCI were included in this two-center study. Serum osmolarity was calculated on admission. CIN was defined according to the KDIGO criteria.

RESULTS

There were 45 (12.6%) patients who developed CIN 48-72 h after CAG or PCI. CIN patients had a higher prevalence of diabetes (51.1% in those with CIN vs 24.4% in those without CIN, p < 0.001), higher serum glucose (129 mg/dL in those with CIN vs 108 mg/dL in those without CIN, p < 0.001), blood urea nitrogen (22.4 mg/dL in those with CIN vs 19.0 mg/dL in those without CIN, p = 0.01) and serum osmolarity (294.2 mOsm in those with CIN vs 290.1 mOsm in those without CIN, p < 0.001) levels, had received a higher dose of contrast (250 mL in those with CIN vs 200 mL in those without CIN, p = 0.03) but had lower hemoglobin (12.9 g/dL in those with CIN vs 13.6 g/dL in those without CIN, p = 0.04) level. In multivariate analysis, serum osmolarity [odds ratio (OR) 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.18 for each mOsm/L increase; p = 0.001], diabetes (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.26-4.71; p = 0.01), C-reactive protein (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08 for each mg/dL increase; p = 0.02) and contrast volume (OR 34.66, 95% CI 1.25-962.22 for each L increase; p = 0.04) remained as independent predictors of CIN. Serum sodium, glucose and blood urea nitrogen contributed to the excess serum osmolarity of CIN patients.

CONCLUSION

Serum osmolarity is a cheap and widely available marker that can reliably predict CIN after CAG or PCI. Future research should focus on determining a clinically optimal cutoff for serum osmolarity that would warrant preventive interventions. Furthermore, later research may investigate the role of serum osmolarity not only as a risk factor but also as a pathogenetic mechanism underlying CIN.

Comparative effect of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media on vascular attenuation, image quality, and heart rate changes in coronary CT angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Comparison of iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) and low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) for vascular attenuation, image quality, heart rate changes, and common patient discomfort symptoms.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). We included only randomized controlled trials. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were done by three independent authors. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Nine studies (n = 1831 participants) were found eligible and included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference between the both contrast media for vascular attenuation (mean difference = -21.31; 95% confidence interval -49.81 to 7.19; p = 0.14), image quality (standardized mean difference = 0.13; 95% confidence interval -0.07 to 0.33; p = 0.19), heart rate variability (standardized mean difference = -0.61; 95% confidence interval -1.30 to 0.09; p = 0.09), heat sensation (risk ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.11; p = 0.17), and nausea or vomiting (risk ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 1.28; p = 0.38). Moreover, IOCM resulted in a heart rate that was lower by 0.9 beat per minute (bpm) compared to LOCM (mean difference = -0.92; 95% confidence interval -1.81 to -0.03; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Both IOCM and LOCM have similar vascular enhancement, image quality, heart rate variability, and similar risk for patient discomfort. Furthermore, IOCM resulted in a slightly lower heart rate by 0.9 bpm.

Application of low-concentration contrast agents and low-tube-voltage computed tomography to chest enhancement examinations: A multicenter prospective study

To evaluate the influence of low-concentration contrast agents and low-tube-voltage computed tomography on chest enhancement examinations, we conducted a multicenter prospective study. A total of 216 inpatients enrolled from 12 different hospitals were randomly divided into four groups: A: voltage, 120 kVp; iohexol, 350 mgI/mL; B: voltage, 100 kVp, iohexol, 350 mgI/mL; C: voltage, 120 kVp, iodixanol, 270 mgI/mL; and D: voltage, 100 kVp, iodixanol, 270 mgI/mL. Subjective image quality was assessed by two radiologists and compared by weighted kappa test. The objective image scores, scanning radiation doses, and pathological coincidence rates were analyzed. There were no significant differences in gender, age, height, weight, and body mass index between the four groups (p > 0.05). The consistency of the radiologists' ratings were good, with kappa value ranging from 0.736 (95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.933) to 0.809 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.968), and there was no difference in subjective image score between the four groups. The computed tomography value of group D had no difference with group A. The volume computed tomography dose index, dose length product, and effective dose of group D (6.93 ± 3.03, 241.55 ± 104.75, and 3.38 ± 1.47, respectively) were all significantly lower than those of group A (10.30 ± 4.37, 359.70 ± 152.65, and 5.04 ± 2.14, respectively). There was no significant difference in the imaging diagnosis accuracy rate between the four groups (p > 0.05). The results indicated that low-concentration contrast agents (270 mgI/mL) and low-tube-voltage (100 kVp) computed tomography can not only decrease radiation dose but also guarantee the image quality and meet the needs of imaging diagnosis in chest enhancement examinations, which make it possible for its generalization and application.

Contrast-Induced Kidney Nephropathy in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A 2-Year Retrospective Study in 470 Patients

We identified changes in renal function in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and the factors that may influence renal function. Information on 470 consecutive patients was collected. Kidney function and contrast volume were recorded. Unpaired t test, Spearman correlation, and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. A Kaplan-Meier curve helped clarify our follow-up findings. Mean contrast volume was 90.5 ± 21.2 mL. The change in serum creatinine was significantly correlated with (1) preexisting renal pathology (P = .033) and (2) aortic dissection (AD) involving the renal arteries (P = .019). The change in serum urea nitrogen (ΔBUN) was only significantly correlated with AD involving the renal arteries (P = .0348). Contrast volume (P = .036, odds ratio = 1.010, 95% confidence interval: 1.001-1.019) was a risk factor for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after TEVAR. Survival rates and renal failure rates among no CIN, CIN, and CIN-acute kidney injury groups at longest 27 months follow-up were significantly different. Creatinine and BUN were generally elevated post-TEVAR. Contrast-induced nephropathy post-TEVAR may correlate with renal comorbidities and renal artery involvement. Contrast volume is risk factor for CIN after TEVAR. More attention needs to be paid to patient renal function during follow-up.

Radiological iodinated contrast-induced nephropathy

The use of iodinated contrast media can cause renal toxicity. Whether contrast media are exclusively responsible for kidney damage is currently the subject of debate, given that in most cases, other potential causes of the renal failure are present. With current low-osmolar and iso-osmolar contrast media, the incidence rate of contrast-induced nephropathy is estimated to be <1% in the low-risk population but can increase to 37% in patients who are administered contrast by an intra-arterial administration and/or who have renal failure with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30mL/min/1.73m². To minimize the risk of renal toxicity, the recommendation is to administer the least amount of contrast possible and ensure appropriate volume expansion by infusing 0.9% saline solution.

Could platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio be a predictor for contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is acute renal failure observed after administration of iodinated contrast media during angiographic or other medical procedures. In recent years, many studies have focused on biomarkers that recognize CIN and/or predict its development in advance. One of the many biomarkers studied is the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the correlation between PLR level and CIN.

METHODS

Relevant studies were searched in PUBMED, EMBASE, and Web of Science until September 15, 2018. Case-control studies reporting admission PLR levels in CIN and non-CIN group in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were included. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated to assess the association between PLR level and CIN using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

Six relevant studies involving a total of 10452 ACS patients (9720 non-CIN controls and 732 CIN patients) met our inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of 6 case-control studies showed that PLR levels were significantly higher in CIN group than those in non-CIN group (WMD = 33.343, 95%CI = 18.863 to 47.823, P < .001, I = 88.0%).

CONCLUSION

For patients with ACS after contrast administration, our meta-analysis shows that on-admission PLR levels in CIN group are significantly higher than those of non-CIN group. However, large and matched cohort studies are needed to validate these findings and assess whether there is a real connection or just an association.

Kidney Injury after Intravenous versus Intra-arterial Contrast Agent in Patients Suspected of Having Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial

Background In the absence of randomized studies, it has been controversial whether the likelihood of acute kidney injury (AKI) differs between intravenous and intra-arterial contrast agent administration. Purpose To compare intravenous versus intra-arterial contrast agent administration in relationship to AKI and analyze the association between AKI and chronic kidney disease (defined as at least mildly decreased estimated glomerular filtration rates [eGFRs]). Materials and Methods This was a prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00844220) that involved randomizing participants with atypical chest pain and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) between February 2009 and August 2015 to undergo coronary CT angiography with intravenous contrast agent administration or cardiac catheterization angiography with intra-arterial contrast agent administration. This prespecified secondary analysis compared AKI (serum creatinine increase of ≥ 25% or 0.5 mg/dL after 18-24 or 46-50 hours) determined by blinded investigators using absolute differences and relative risks, including two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 320 participants (163 [50.9%] women; mean age, 60 years ± 11) were included. Baseline eGFR did not differ between the CT angiography group (84.3 mL/min/1.73 m² ± 17.2) and the catheterization group (87.1 mL/min/1.73 m² ± 16.7) (P = .14). AKI occurred in nine of 161 participants in the CT angiography group (5.6%; 95% CI: 3%, 10%) and in 21 of 159 participants in the catheterization group (13.2%; 95% CI: 9%,19%) (relative risk, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 5.0; P = .02). Also in the subgroup of participants without obstructive CAD, in those not requiring coronary interventions, AKI was more common in the catheterization group (11.9%; 95% CI: 8%, 19%) than in the CT angiography group (4.3% [95% CI: 2%, 9%]; difference, 7.7% [95% CI: 1.3%, 14.1%]; relative risk, 2.8 [95% CI: 1.1, 7.0]; P = .02). Obstructive CAD (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7 [95% CI: 1.1, 6.6]; P = .02), femoral catheter access (OR: 2.5 [95% CI: 1.1, 5.6]; P = .04), and cine ventriculography were associated with AKI (OR: 2.3 [95% CI: 1.0, 4.9]; P = .03). In multivariable analysis, the presence of postcontrast AKI was associated with chronic kidney disease (hazard ratio: 12.4 [95% CI: 4.5, 34.6]; P < .01). Conclusion Acute kidney injury was more common after cardiac catheterization than after CT angiography in this prospective randomized study of patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Einstein and Newhouse in this issue.

Recent use of NSAID and NOAC medications are associated with a positive CT arteriogram

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a diagnostic modality utilized in patients with suspected active lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. CTA use in clinical practice is limited by the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy, and the loss of patients from direct physician observation while undergoing the test. Identifying clinical predictors of a positive result would be useful in guiding physician utilization of CTA studies.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study to determine which clinical predictors are associated with a positive CTA. Binary logistical regression modeling was used to identify the independent predictors and the results were expressed as adjusted odds ratios with corresponding 95% CI .

RESULTS

262 patients met inclusion criteria and there were 61 (23.3%) positive CTA exams. In unadjusted analysis those who were CTA positive were more likely to require management in the intensive care unit (85.2% vs. 14.8%, p < 0.01) and being CTA positive was associated with a significantly increased in-hospital mortality (14.8% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.01). The use of a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) in the week prior to presentation was associated with a positive CTA after adjustment for confounders (adjusted odds ratio = 3.89; 95% CI 1.05-14.43). Similarly, the use of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was associated with a positive CTA (OR 2.36; 1.03-5.41). Only 8% of patients experienced contrast-induced nephropathy.

CONCLUSION

Use of either NOACs or NSAIDs in the previous week is independently associated with a positive CTA in the setting of acute lower GI bleeding. CTA exams appear to confer a low risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Comparative effect of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media on the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a major adverse effect caused by intravascular administration of iodinated contrast medium. Whether there is a difference in CI-AKI incidence between iso-osmolar (IOCM) and low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) among diabetic patients is controversial.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials comparing the nephrotoxic effects between IOCM and LOCM in diabetic patients with or without CKD (eGFR< 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) were included in the analysis. The incidence of CI-AKI was defined as an initial increase in serum creatinine (SCr) concentration of at least 0.5 mg/dl or a rise in creatinine of 25% from baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 2190 patients were included, among whom 1122 patients received IOCM and 1068 received LOCM. When compared to LOCM, IOCM had no significant benefit in preventing CI-AKI (OR = 1.66, [CI: 0.97-2.84], P = 0.06, I2 = 54%). However, the difference between IOCM and LOCM was found when CI-AKI was defined as an absolute SCr increase (≥0.5 mg/dl) rather than a relative SCr increase (≥25%). Further analysis showed that LOCM resulted in more adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Whether there is a difference of CI-AKI incidence between IOCM and LOCM in diabetic patients was related to the selected diagnostic criteria. The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower with IOCM when compared with LOCM. Therefore, we suggest that IOCM may be used in diabetic and CKD (eGFR< 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) patients.

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury: does it really exist, and if so, what to do about it?

For decades, when contrast agents are administrated, physicians have been concerned because of the risk of inducing acute kidney injury (AKI). Recent literature questions the existence of AKI induced by contrast, but animal studies clearly showed harmful effects. The occurrence of contrast-associated AKI was likely overestimated in the past because of confounders for AKI. Several strategies have been investigated to reduce contrast-associated AKI but even for the most important one, hydration, there are conflicting data. Even if the occurrence rate of contrast-associated AKI is low, AKI is related to worse outcomes. Therefore, besides limiting contrast agent usage, general AKI preventive measurements should be applied in at-risk patients.

Rate of major adverse renal or cardiac events with iohexol compared to other low osmolar contrast media during interventional cardiovascular procedures

Objective

This study assessed the rate of major adverse renal or cardiac events (MARCE) when iohexol is used during interventional cardiovascular procedures compared to other low osmolar contrast media (LOCMs).

Background

Interventional cardiovascular procedures are often essential for diagnosis and treatment, the risk of MARCE should be considered.

Methods

Data were derived from the Premier Hospital Database January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2015. Patient encounters with an inpatient primary interventional cardiovascular procedure with a single LOCM (iohexol, ioversol, ioxilan, ioxaglate, or iopamidol) were included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of MARCE, which included: renal failure with dialysis, acute kidney injury (AKI) with or without dialysis, contrast induced AKI, acute myocardial infarction, angina, stent occlusion/thrombosis, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or death. Multivariable regression analysis was performed using the hospital fixed‐effects specification to assess the relationship between MARCE and iohexol compared to other LOCMs, while controlling for patient demographics, comorbid conditions and reason for hospitalization. As a sensitivity analysis, direct comparisons of iohexol were made to other LOCMs.

Results

A total of 458,091 inpatient encounters met inclusion criteria of which 26% used iohexol and 74% used other LOCMs. Results of multivariable modeling revealed no differences in MARCE rates between iohexol and other LOCMs. When direct comparisons of iohexol vs. ioversol and iopamidol were modeled, no differences in MARCE nor the renal component of MARCE were found.

Conclusions

In this retrospective multicenter study, there were no differences in MARCE events with iohexol compared to other LOCMs during inpatient interventional cardiovascular procedures.

Is the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy a real contraindication to perform intravenous contrast enhanced Computed Tomography for non-traumatic acute abdomen in Emergency Surgery Department?

BACKGROUND

Contrast enhanced Computed Tomography (CCT) is the most used imaging test to investigate acute abdominal clinical conditions, because of its high sensitivity and specificity. It is mandatory to make a correct and prompt diagnosis when life threatening abdominal diseases as mesenteric ischemia are suspected. Contrast medium administration was linked to acute renal failure, therefore radiologist often prefer to perform CCT without contrast in patients needing to undergo the exam with increased serum creatinine.  The aim of the review was to focus on the incidence of contrast induced nephropathy in patients presenting non-traumatic acute abdominal clinical conditions, who underwent CCT with intravenous contrast agent administration in emergency setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The systematic review protocol was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P). Quality of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

RESULTS

The strongest currently available evidence on the incidence of post-contrast acute kidney injury (AKI) following intravenous contrast agent administration consists in a meta-analysis of observational studies. Data extracted from meta-analyses demonstrate that, compared with non-contrast CT, CCT was not significantly associated with AKI. Moreover, the risk of AKI (RR=0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 1.02; P=.07), death (RR=0.95; 95% CI: 0.55, 1.67; P=.87), and dialysis (RR=0.88; 95% CI: 0.23, 3.43; P=.85) is similar, compared with the risk of AKI in the non-contrast medium group. Furthermore, intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material is a nephrotoxic risk factor, but not in patients with a stable SCr level less than 1.5 mg/dL, therefore many factors other than contrast material could affect PC-AKI rates.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of diagnostic information gained from contrast enhanced TC in assessing AA are fundamental in some clinical scenarios. The risk of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is negligible in patients with normal renal function but the incidence appears to rise to as high as 25% in patients with pre-existing renal impairment or in the presence of risk factors such as diabetes, advanced age, vascular disease and use of certain concurrent medications. The incidence of CIN/AKI after intravenous contrast administration is very low in general population. Radiologists and referring physicians should be familiar with the risk factors for renal disease, CIN and preventing measures.

Emergency Department Use of Contrast Computed Tomography in Patients With Renal Dysfunction

The Research to Practice Column is designed to improve translational research critique skills of advanced practice nurses. In this issue, the article "Risk of Acute Kidney Injury After Intravenous Contrast Media Administration" () is discussed in the context of a patient presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. The study was designed to assess the risk of acute kidney injury and adverse clinical outcomes in patients receiving intravenous contrast for computed tomography. Advanced practice nurses need to be aware of advances in types of intravenous contrast and current recommendations for administration of intravenous contrast for diagnostic purposes in patients at risk for acute kidney injury to facilitate making timely and accurate diagnoses.

Contrast enhancement efficacy of iodinated contrast media: Effect of molecular structure on contrast enhancement

Purpose

To investigate the contrast enhancement in DSA images based on the X-ray absorption characteristics of iodinated contrast media.

Methods

We have derived a new formula of predicting the pixel value ratio of two different contrast media and designate it as "Contrast Enhancement Ratio (CER)". In order to evaluate the accuracy of CER, we have evaluated the relationship between CER and pixel value ratio for all combinations of eleven iodinated contrast media. The non-ionic iodinated contrast media, iopamidol, iomeprol, iopromide, ioversol, iohexol, and iodixanol, were evaluated in this study. Each contrast medium was filled in the simulated blood vessel in our constructed anthropomorphic phantom, and DSA images were obtained using an angiographic imaging system. To evaluate the contrast enhancement of the contrast medium, the mean pixel value was calculated from all pixel values in the vascular image.

Results

CER was indicated to agree well with the pixel value ratio of two different contrast medium solutions and showed a good accuracy. CER was also shown to have a good linear relation to the pixel value ratio when the iodine concentration was constant. This means that the molecular structure of the contrast media affects contrast enhancement efficacy. Furthermore, in evaluation of contrast enhancement of iodinated contrast media by using the weight factor (that is a key factor in CER) ratio, Iodixanol, and iopamidol, and iomeprol have the same ability of contrast enhancement in DSA images, and iohexol shows the lowest ability.

Conclusions

We have derived a new formula (CER) of predicting the pixel value ratio of two different contrast medium solutions, and shown that CER agreed well with the pixel value ratio for blood vessel filled with eleven contrast media.

Maximum allowable contrast dose and prevention of acute kidney injury following cardiovascular procedures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a serious complication. Although nonmodifiable and modifiable risk factors have been thoroughly characterized, the utility of the maximal allowable contrast dose (MACD) has not received adequate attention. The focus of this review is to provide a critical appraisal of this modifiable risk factor.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several retrospective and prospective cohort studies have demonstrated that the incidence of CI-AKI among patients receiving contrast media in volumes exceeding the MACD is consistently higher compared with those who do not exceed the MACD (an average of 24 vs. 6%). Furthermore, the MACD is independent predictor of CI-AKI and other adverse events. A two-step algorithm incorporating the determination of the MACD and the contrast volume to eGFR ratio prior to a planned cardiovascular procedure is a sound approach to minimize contrast volume and prevent CI-AKI.

SUMMARY

Prevention of CI-AKI must remain a clinical priority. Intraprocedural preventive measures should include a priori calculation of the MACD and contrast volume to eGFR ratio to limit contrast volume. Other measures may include the adoption of the transradial approach, the use of automated contrast injectors and small catheters to limit contrast volume, the use of low-osmolar contrast agents, and if necessary the use of staged procedures. We call for the system-wide implementation of evidence-based care bundles to prevent CI-AKI.

Iodixanol versus iopromide in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography with or without PCI

BACKGROUND

The use of contrast agents during coronary angiography can result in contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), particularly in patients with renal dysfunction. On the contrary, different contrast agents can induce different degree of changes in cardiac function. The objective of our meta-analysis was to compare the clinical safety of iso-osmolar contrast medium iodixanol to low-osmolar contrast medium iopromide in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and reference lists to identify randomized controlled trials that compared iodixanol to iopromide with the incidence of CIN as an endpoint in renal impaired patients undergoing coronary angiography. Outcome measures were the incidence of CIN, absolute peak serum creatinine (Scr) increase from baseline and a composite of cardiovascular adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 8 trials with 3532 patients were pooled; 1759 patients received iodixanol and 1773 patients received iopromide. There was no significant difference in the incidence of CIN (summary odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-1.35, P = .17) and peak Scr increase (mean difference -0.01 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.05, P = .69) when iodixanol was compared with iopromide. But iodixanol was associated with a statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular adverse events when compared with iopromide (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.73, P = .0009).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of pooled data from 8 randomized controlled trials of iodixanol against iopromide in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography with or without PCI showed that iodixanol nonsignificantly reduced the incidence of CIN, but was associated with a significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular adverse events when compared with iopromide.

The effect of major adverse renal cardiovascular event (MARCE) incidence, procedure volume, and unit cost on the hospital savings resulting from contrast media use in inpatient angioplasty

OBJECTIVE

To determine the net economic impact of switching from low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) to iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM; iodixanol) in patients undergoing inpatient coronary or peripheral angioplasty in the United States (US).

METHODS

A budget impact model (BIM) was developed from a hospital perspective. Nationally representative procedural and contrast media prevalence rates, along with MARCE (major adverse renal cardiovascular event) incidence and episode-related cost data were derived from Premier Hospital Data (October 2014 to September 2015). A previously estimated relative risk reduction in MARCE associated with IOCM usage (9.3%) was applied. The higher cost of IOCM was included when calculating the net impact estimates at the aggregate, hospital type, and per hospital levels. One-way (±25%) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses identified the model's most important inputs.

RESULTS

Based on weighted analysis, 513,882 US inpatient angioplasties and 35,610 MARCE cases were estimated annually. Switching to an "IOCM only" strategy from a "LOCM only" strategy increases contrast media cost, but prevents 2,900 MARCE events. The annual budget impact was an estimated saving of $30.71 million, aggregated across all US hospitals, $6,316 per hospital, or $60 per procedure. Net savings were maintained across all univariate sensitivity analyses. While MARCE/event-free cost differential was the most important factor driving total net savings for hospitals in the Northeast and West, procedural volume was important in the Midwest and rural locations.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to an "IOCM only" strategy from a "LOCM only" approach yields substantial net global savings to hospitals, both at the national level and within hospital sub-groups. Hospital administrators should maintain awareness of the factors that are likely to be more influential for their hospital and recognize that purchasing on the basis of lower contrast media cost may result in higher overall costs for patients undergoing inpatient angioplasty.

Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus between iso- and low-osmolar contrast media: A meta-analysis of full-text prospective, randomized controlled trials

Purpose

This study was conducted to compare iso-osmolar contrast medium, iodixanol, with low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) for assessing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) incidence, exclusively in the diabetic population.

Method

A systematic search was conducted for full-text, prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was incidence of CIN. Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other sources were searched until May 31, 2017.

Results

Twelve RCTs finally met the search criteria. Iodixanol did not significantly reduce the risk of CIN (risk ratio [RR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.49, 1.04], p = 0.08). However, there was significantly reduced risk of CIN when iodixanol was compared to a LOCM agent iohexol (RR: 0.32, 95% CI [0.12, 0.89]). There were no differences between iodixanol and the other non-iohexol LOCM (RR: 0.92, 95% CI [0.68, 1.25]).

Conclusion

In diabetic populations, iodixanol is not associated with a significant reduction of CIN risk. Iodixanol is associated with a reduced risk of CIN compared with iohexol, whereas no significant difference between iodixanol and other LOCM could be found.

Magnetic iodixanol - a novel contrast agent and its early characterization

AIMS

Contrast-induced nephropathy is a commonly encountered problem in clinical practice. The purpose of the study was to design and develop a novel contrast agent, which could be used to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in the future.

METHODS

In total, 20-220nm magnetic nanoparticles were conjugated with iodixanol, and their radio-opacity and magnetic properties were assessed thereafter. Scanning electron microscopy pictures were acquired. Thereafter, the nanoparticles conjugate was tested in cell culture (HUVEC cells), and Quantibody^® assay was studied after cell treatment in 1:5 dilutions for 48h, compared with control.

RESULTS

The conjugate preparation had an adequate radio-opacity. A 4mm magnetic bubble was attached to a bar magnet and the properties were studied. The magnetic bubble maintained its structural integrity in all angles including antigravity position. Scanning electron microscopy showed magnetic nanoparticles in all pictures and the particles are of 100-400nm agglomerates with primary particle sizes of roughly 20nm. 1:5 diluted particles had no effect on secretion of IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13 and TNFa. Particles increased secretion of IL-8 from 24h and 48h. Secretion of IFNg was also increased when particles were added to the cells as early as 1h. Likewise, IL-6 was strongly secreted by HUVEC treated with particles from 24h incubation time. In contrast, the secretion of MCP-1 was slightly reduced on HUVEC treated with particles.

CONCLUSION

There is potential for a novel iodixanol-magnetic nanoparticle conjugate to be used in cineradiography. Further investigations need to be performed to study its performance in vitro and in vivo.

Post-contrast acute kidney injury - Part 1: Definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors : Recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines

Purpose

The Contrast Media Safety Committee (CMSC) of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) has updated its 2011 guidelines on the prevention of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI). The results of the literature review and the recommendations based on it, which were used to prepare the new guidelines, are presented in two papers.

Areas covered in part 1

Topics reviewed include the terminology used, the best way to measure eGFR, the definition of PC-AKI, and the risk factors for PC-AKI, including whether the risk with intravenous and intra-arterial contrast medium differs.

Key Points

• PC-AKI is the preferred term for renal function deterioration after contrast medium.

• PC-AKI has many possible causes.

• The risk of AKI caused by intravascular contrast medium has been overstated.

• Important patient risk factors for PC-AKI are CKD and dehydration.

Contrast-Induced Nephropathy and Oxygen Pretreatment in Patients With Impaired Renal Function

INTRODUCTION

Contrast-induced nephropathy is a complication following coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Because contrast-induced nephropathy is a predictor of long-term mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, preventive strategies are required. We assessed the effects of periprocedural oxygenation on contrast-induced nephropathy among patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction.

METHODS

A total of 200 consecutive patients with impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration < 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) undergoing elective cardiovascular angiography were randomly assigned to an oxygenation treatment (n = 100) or control group (n = 100). In oxygenation treatment, pure oxygen (2 L/min) was administered for 10 minutes before exposure to contrast medium. The primary endpoint was the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy, defined as a ≥ 25% increase in serum creatinine levels from baseline within 48 hours of exposure.

RESULTS

In the oxygenation treatment group, partial pressure of arterial oxygen was higher (135 ± 25 mm Hg vs. 84 ± 10 mm Hg, P < 0.001); contrast-induced nephropathy incidence was lower (1% vs. 8%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.95, P = 0.02); and partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide and bicarbonate base lactate levels were similar compared with those in the control group. Upon univariate analysis, excess and absence of oxygenation treatment (OR = 9.18, CI = 1.13-74.86, P = 0.03) and anemia (OR = 4.30, CI = 1.04-17.78, P = 0.04) were shown to be associated with contrast-induced nephropathy incidence.

CONCLUSION

Oxygenation, a simple, nonpharmacological strategy, may be beneficial when using contrast media in patients with impaired renal function from noninvasive angiography to emergency catheterization.