Both M1 and M3 receptors regulate exocrine secretion by mucous acini

Structural and functional analysis of salivary intercalated duct cells reveals a secretory phenotype

Currently, all salivary ducts (intercalated, striated and collecting) are assumed to function broadly in a similar manner, reclaiming ions that were secreted by the secretory acinar cells while preserving fluid volume and delivering saliva to the oral cavity. Nevertheless, there has been minimal investigation into the structural and functional differences between distinct types of salivary duct cells. Therefore, in this study, the expression profile of proteins involved in stimulus-secretion coupling, as well as the function of the intercalated duct (ID) and striated duct cells, was examined. Particular focus was placed on defining differences between distinct duct cell populations. To accomplish this, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization were utilized to examine the localization and expression of proteins involved in reabsorption and secretion of ions and fluid. Further, in vivo calcium imaging was employed to investigate cellular function. Based on the protein expression profile and functional data, marked differences between the IDs and striated ducts were observed. Specifically, the ID cells express proteins native to the secretory acinar cells while lacking proteins specifically expressed in the striated ducts. Further, the ID and striated duct cells display different calcium signalling characteristics, with the IDs responding to a neural stimulus in a manner similar to the acinar cells. Overall, our data suggest that the IDs have a distinct role in the secretory process, separate from the reabsorptive striated ducts. Instead, based on our evidence, the IDs express proteins found in secretory cells, generate calcium signals in a manner similar to acinar cells, and, therefore, are likely secretory cells. KEY POINTS: Current studies examining salivary intercalated duct cells are limited, with minimal documentation of the ion transport machinery and the overall role of the cells in fluid generation. Salivary intercalated duct cells are presumed to function in the same manner as other duct cells, reclaiming ions, maintaining fluid volume and delivering the final saliva to the oral cavity. Here we systematically examine the structure and function of the salivary intercalated duct cells using immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization and by monitoring in vivo Ca2+ dynamics. Structural data revealed that the intercalated duct cells lack proteins vital for reabsorption and express proteins necessary for secretion. Ca2+ dynamics in the intercalated duct cells were consistent with those observed in secretory cells and resulted from GPCR-mediated IP3 production.

Analysis of salivary flow rate, biochemical composition, and redox status in orchiectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the salivary flow rate, biochemical composition, and redox status in orchiectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) compared to normotensive Wistar rats.

DESIGN

Thirty-two young adult male SHR and Wistar (3-months-old) rats were randomly distributed into four groups; either castrated bilaterally (ORX) or underwent fictitious surgery (SHAM) as Wistar-SHAM, Wistar-ORX, SHR-SHAM, and SHR-ORX. Two months beyond castration, pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion was collected from 5-month-old rats to analyze salivary flow rate, pH, buffer capacity, total protein, amylase, calcium, phosphate, sodium, potassium, chloride, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARs), carbonyl protein, nitrite, and total antioxidant capacity.

RESULTS

The salivary flow rate was higher in the Wistar-ORX compared to the Wistar-SHAM group, while remaining similar between the SHR-SHAM and SHR-ORX groups. ORX did not affect pH and salivary buffer capacity in both strains. However, salivary total protein and amylase were significantly reduced in the Wistar-ORX and SHR-ORX compared to the respective SHAM groups. In both ORX groups, salivary total antioxidant capacity and carbonylated protein were increased, while lipid oxidative damage (TBARs) and nitrite concentration were higher only in the Wistar-ORX than in the Wistar-SHAM group. In the Wistar-ORX and SHR-ORX, the salivary calcium, phosphate, and chloride were increased while no change was detected in the SHAM groups. Only salivary buffering capacity, calcium, and chloride in the SHR-ORX adjusted to values similar to Wistar-SHAM group.

CONCLUSION

Hypertensive phenotype mitigated the orchiectomy-induced salivary dysfunction, since the disturbances were restricted to alterations in the salivary biochemical composition and redox state.

Anticholinergic medication: Related dry mouth and effects on the salivary glands

OBJECTIVE

Salivary glands are among the most sensitive target organs of medications with anticholinergic (AC) properties, interrupting the neural stimulation of saliva secretion and reducing saliva flow. Hyposalivation results in dry mouth, leading to dental caries, intraoral infection, orofacial pain, problems with speaking and swallowing, and diminished oral health--related quality of life. Current understanding of the pharmacokinetics of AC medications and their effect on muscarinic receptors in the salivary glands were reviewed to assist clinicians in predicting salivary damage in patients with AC medication-induced dry mouth.

STUDY DESIGN

We summarized the literature related to the mechanisms and properties of AC medications, anticholinergic adverse effects, and their effect on salivary function and management strategies to prevent oral health damage.

RESULTS

Although a large number of studies reported on the frequencies of medication-induced dry mouth, we found very limited data on predicting individual susceptibility to AC medication--caused hyposalivation and no prospective clinical studies addressing this issue.

CONCLUSION

Dry mouth is most frequently caused by medications with AC properties, which interrupt the neural stimulation of saliva secretion. Interdisciplinary care should guide pharmacotherapeutics and dental interventions should aim in preventing AC salivary adverse effects and reducing the oral health burden from AC medication-induced dry mouth.

VIP and muscarinic synergistic mucin secretion by salivary mucous cells is mediated by enhanced PKC activity via VIP-induced release of an intracellular Ca2+ pool

Mucin secretion by salivary mucous glands is mediated predominantly by parasympathetic acetylcholine activation of cholinergic muscarinic receptors via increased intracellular free calcium ([Ca²⁺]_i) and activation of conventional protein kinase C isozymes (cPKC). However, the parasympathetic co-neurotransmitter, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), also initiates secretion, but to a lesser extent. In the present study, cross talk between VIP- and muscarinic-induced mucin secretion was investigated using isolated rat sublingual tubuloacini. VIP-induced secretion is mediated by cAMP-activated protein kinase A (PKA), independently of increased [Ca²⁺]_i. Synergistic secretion between VIP and the muscarinic agonist, carbachol, was demonstrated but only with submaximal carbachol. Carbachol has no effect on cAMP ± VIP. Instead, PKA activated by VIP releases Ca²⁺ from an intracellular pool maintained by the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺-ATPase pump. Calcium release was independent of phospholipase C activity. The resultant sustained [Ca²⁺]_i increase is additive to submaximal, but not maximal carbachol-induced [Ca²⁺]_i. Synergistic mucin secretion was mimicked by VIP plus either phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate or 0.01 μM thapsigargin, and blocked by the PKC inhibitor, Gö6976. VIP-induced Ca²⁺ release also promoted store-operated Ca²⁺ entry. Synergism is therefore driven by VIP-mediated [Ca²⁺]_i augmenting cPKC activity to enhance muscarinic mucin secretion. Additional data suggest ryanodine receptors control VIP/PKA-mediated Ca²⁺ release from a Ca²⁺ pool also responsive to maximal carbachol. A working model of muscarinic and VIP control of mucous cell exocrine secretion is presented. Results are discussed in relation to synergistic mechanisms in other secretory cells, and the physiological and therapeutic significance of VIP/muscarinic synergism controlling salivary mucous cell exocrine secretion.

Heterogeneous localization of muscarinic cholinoceptor M1 in the salivary ducts of adult mice

We hypothesize variation in expression and localization, along the course of the glandular tubule, of muscarinic cholinergic receptor M₁ which plays as a distinct contribution, though minor in comparison with M₃ receptor, in saliva secretion. Localization of the M₁ receptor was examined using immunohistochemistry in three major salivary glands. Although all glandular cells were more or less M₁-immunoreactive, acinar cells were weakly immunoreactive, while ductal cells exhibited substantial M₁-immunoreactivity. Many ductal cells exhibited clear polarity with higher immunoreactivity in their apical/supra-nuclear domain. However, some exhibited indistinct polarity because of additional higher immunoreactivity in their basal/infra-nuclear domain. A small group of cells with intense immunoreactivity was found, mostly located in the intercalated ducts or in portions of the striated ducts close to the intercalated ducts. In immuno-electron microscopy, the immunoreactive materials were mainly in the cytoplasm including various vesicles and vacuoles. Unexpectedly, distinct immunoreactivity on apical and basal plasma membranes was infrequent in most ductal cells. The heterogeneous localization of M₁-immunoreactivity along the gland tubular system is discussed in view of possible modulatory roles of the M₁ receptor in saliva secretion.

Evaluating the effect of three newly approved overactive bladder syndrome treating agents on parotid and submandibular salivary glands: Modulation of CXCL10 expression

BACKGROUND

Despite enormous progresses in understanding pathophysiology of the lower urinary tract, antimuscarinics remain the chief clinically well-established approach for improving symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB). Dry mouth on the other hand remains one of the most untolerated systemic side effects of these drugs that limits their uses and results in high discontinuation rate. Three novel drugs have been recently approved by US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of OAB: trospium, darifenacin, and solifenacin.

AIMS

This study has been conducted to provide clear head to head comparative studying of histological and ultrastructural effect of those newly emerging drugs on parotid and submandibular salivary glands and to demonstrate the differential expression of CXCL10 to make a cogent structural and molecular assessment of the relative tolerability of these drugs and the potential mechanisms of occurrence of dry mouth.

METHODS

Fifty male Sprague Dawley rats were equally divided into five groups: Group I (control), Group II (oxybutynin-treated), Group III (trospium-treated), Group IV (darifenacin-treated) and Group V (solifenacin-treated). Histological and ultrastructural studies were performed on parotid and submandibular glands. Measurement of salivary flow, PCR analysis and immunohistochemical assessment of CXCL10 expression have been carried-out.

RESULTS

Muscarinic receptor antagonists led to various histological, morphometric and ultrastructural changes together with diminished salivary secretion and up-regulation of CXCL10 expression with the mildest alterations observed with solifenacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Solifenacin has shown the least adverse effects to salivary glands. CXCL10 is involved in degenerative changes of salivary glands induced by muscarinic antagonists.

Tiotropium inhibits mucin production stimulated by neutrophil elastase but not by IL-13

Tiotropium, a muscarinic antagonist, is approved for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and poorly controlled asthma. Because mucus hypersecretion is characteristic of both of these diseases, and muscarinic agonists stimulate mucus secretion, we hypothesized that tiotropium would attenuate airway MUC5AC expression. We grew normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells to a goblet cell phenotype with 1 or 5 ng/mL of IL-13 and exposed these cells to 10 nM tiotropium or excipient for the full 14 days. Normally differentiated NHBE cells (without IL-13) were exposed to neutrophil elastase (NE) 1 × 10^-7 or 5 × 10^-7 M for 1 h. MUC5AC was measured by quantitative PCR and ELISA. Acetylcholine production by the epithelium was evaluated by quantitative PCR and by choline/acetylcholine quantification. Tiotropium had no effect on IL-13-stimulated MUC5AC, but attenuated MUC5AC stimulated by NE (p = 0.007 at 5 × 10^-7 M). IL-13 increased CarAT mRNA (p < 0.001 at 5 ng/mL) and acetylcholine concentration in the medium (p = 0.018 at 5 ng/mL), while NE had no effect. Tiotropium had no direct effect on IL-13 or NE-induced CarAT or acetylcholine concentration. Tiotropium decreased MUC5AC stimulated by NE, but had no effect on MUC5AC stimulated by IL-13. These results may be due to IL-13, but not NE, increasing acetylcholine production.

Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors and Drugs Acting on Muscarinic Receptors- Potential Crosstalk of Cholinergic Mechanisms During Pharmacological Treatment

BACKGROUND

Pharmaceuticals with targets in the cholinergic transmission have been used for decades and are still fundamental treatments in many diseases and conditions today. Both the transmission and the effects of the somatomotoric and the parasympathetic nervous systems may be targeted by such treatments. Irrespective of the knowledge that the effects of neuronal signalling in the nervous systems may include a number of different receptor subtypes of both the nicotinic and the muscarinic receptors, this complexity is generally overlooked when assessing the mechanisms of action of pharmaceuticals.

METHODS

We have search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature focused on the cholinergic system. Also, we have taken advantage of our expertise in this field to deduce the conclusions of this study.

RESULTS

Presently, the life cycle of acetylcholine, muscarinic receptors and their effects are reviewed in the major organ systems of the body. Neuronal and non-neuronal sources of acetylcholine are elucidated. Examples of pharmaceuticals, in particular cholinesterase inhibitors, affecting these systems are discussed. The review focuses on salivary glands, the respiratory tract and the lower urinary tract, since the complexity of the interplay of different muscarinic receptor subtypes is of significance for physiological, pharmacological and toxicological effects in these organs.

CONCLUSION

Most pharmaceuticals targeting muscarinic receptors are employed at such large doses that no selectivity can be expected. However, some differences in the adverse effect profile of muscarinic antagonists may still be explained by the variation of expression of muscarinic receptor subtypes in different organs. However, a complex pattern of interactions between muscarinic receptor subtypes occurs and needs to be considered when searching for selective pharmaceuticals. In the development of new entities for the treatment of for instance pesticide intoxication, the muscarinic receptor selectivity needs to be considered. Reactivators generally have a muscarinic M2 receptor acting profile. Such a blockade may engrave the situation since it may enlarge the effect of the muscarinic M3 receptor effect. This may explain why respiratory arrest is the major cause for deaths by esterase blocking.

Tissue distibution of murine Muc19/smgc gene products

The recently identified gene Muc19/Smgc encodes two diverse splice variants, Smgc (submandibular gland protein C) and Muc19 (mucin 19). Muc19 is a member of the large gel-forming mucin family and is an exocrine product of sublingual mucous salivary glands in mice. SMGC is a transiently expressed secretion product of developing rodent submandibular and sublingual glands. Little is known about the expression of Muc19/Smgc gene products in other murine salivary and non-salivary tissues containing the mucous cell phenotype. Muc19 expression was therefore initially assessed by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. As a complementary approach, we developed a knockin mouse model, Muc19-EGFP, in which mice express a fusion protein containing the first 69 residues of Muc19 followed by enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) as a marker of Muc19 expression. Results from both approaches are consistent, with preferential Muc19 expression in salivary major and minor mucous glands as well as submucosal glands of the tracheolarynx and bulbourethral glands. Evidence also indicates that individual mucous cells of minor salivary and bulbourethral glands produce another gel-forming mucin in addition to Muc19. We further find tissue expression of full-length Smgc transcripts, which encode for SMGC, and are restricted to neonatal tracheolarynx and all salivary tissues.

The sld genetic defect: two intronic CA repeats promote insertion of the subsequent intron and mRNA decay

The autosomal recessive mutation, sld, attenuates mucous cell expression in murine sublingual glands with corresponding effects on mucin 19 (Muc19). We conducted a systematic study including genetic mapping, sequencing, and functional analyses to elucidate a mutation to explain the sld phenotype in neonatal mice. Genetic mapping and gene expression analyses localized the sld mutation within the gene Muc19/Smgc, specifically attenuating Muc19 transcripts, and Muc19 knock-out mice mimic the sld phenotype in neonates. Muc19 transcription is unaffected in sld mice, whereas mRNA stability is markedly decreased. Decreased mRNA stability is not due to a defect in 3'-end processing nor to sequence differences in Muc19 transcripts. Comparative sequencing of the Muc19/Smgc gene identified four candidate intronic mutations within the Muc19 coding region. Minigene splicing assays revealed a novel splicing event in which insertion of two additional repeats within a CA repeat region of intron 53 of the sld genome enhances retention of intron 54, decreasing the levels of correctly spliced transcripts. Moreover, pateamine A, an inhibitor of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, inhibits degradation of aberrant Muc19 transcripts. The mutation in intron 53 thus enhances aberrant splicing leading to degradation of aberrant transcripts and decreased Muc19 message stability, consistent with the sld phenotype. We propose a working model of the unique splicing event enhanced by the mutation, as well as putative explanations for the gradual but limited increase in Muc19 glycoprotein expression and its restricted localization to subpopulations of mucous cells in sld mice during postnatal gland development.

Role of calcium and PKC in salivary mucous cell exocrine secretion

Fluid and exocrine secretion of mucins by salivary mucous glands is regulated predominantly by parasympathetic activation of muscarinic receptors. A direct role for subsequent putative signaling steps, phospholipase C (PLC), increased intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)), and isoforms of protein kinase C (PKC) in mediating muscarinic exocrine secretion has not been elucidated, and these are potential therapeutic targets to enhance mucin secretion in hyposalivary patients. We found that muscarinic-induced mucin secretion by rat sublingual tubulo-acini was dependent upon PLC activation and the subsequent increase in [Ca(2+)](i), and further identified a transient PKC-independent component of secretion dependent upon Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores, whereas sustained secretion required entry of extracellular Ca(2+). Interactions among carbachol, PKC inhibitors, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, and thapsigargin to modulate [Ca(2+)](i) implicated conventional PKC isoforms in mediating sustained secretion. With increasing times during carbachol perfusion of glands, in situ, PKC-α redistributed across glandular membrane compartments and underwent a rapid and persistent accumulation near the luminal borders of mucous cells. PKC-β1 displayed transient localization near luminal borders, whereas the novel PKCs, PKC-δ or PKC-ε, displayed little or no redistribution in mucous cells. Collective results implicate synergistic interactions between diacylglycerol (DAG) and increasing [Ca(2+)](i) levels to activate cPKCs in mediating sustained muscarinic-induced secretion.

Expression of muscarinic receptor subtypes in salivary glands of rats, sheep and man

In rat parotid, submandibular and sublingual glands and in ovine parotid and in human labial glands, the expression of muscarinic receptor subtypes was examined by immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry. Functional correlates were searched for in rat salivary glands. In the rat submandibular and sublingual glandular tissues clear signals of muscarinic M1 and M5 receptors could be detected in the immunoblotting and vague bands for muscarinic M3 and, in particular for, M4 receptors. The rat parotid gland differed. In this gland, the signal was less obvious for the muscarinic M1 receptor, and further, muscarinic M4 receptors appeared more strongly marked than in the submandibular glands. The results from the immunohistochemistry could be interpreted as the muscarinic M4 receptors are located on nerve fibres, since the outer layer of lobuli were densely stained. Intraglandular vessels in the rat submandibular and parotid glands showed expression of M3 receptors. In contrast to the parotid gland, the submandibular vessels also expressed M1 and M2 receptors. Occasionally M5 receptors appeared in the arteries and veins also. The functional studies in the rat confirmed muscarinic M1 receptor mediated secretion in the submandibular gland. Since the M1 receptor blockade did not affect submandibular blood flow, indirect vascular effects could not in total explain the secretory inhibition. Also in the human labial glands, muscarinic M1, M3 and M5 receptors occurred. No or low amounts of muscarinic M2 and M4 receptors could be detected. In patients with Sjögren-like symptoms an up-regulation of M3, M4 and M5 receptors was apparent in the labial glands. In ovine parotid glands all receptors could be detected, but constantly with vague bands for muscarinic M2 receptors. In conclusion, muscarinic M1 receptors seem to be expressed in seromucous/mucous glands. A secretory effect by muscarinic M5 receptors is not to be excluded, since they were expressed in all the glands examined. However, other functions, such as promotion of inflammation, cell growth and proliferation are possible as well.

Regulation of salivary gland function by autonomic nerves

Oral homeostasis is dependent upon saliva and its content of proteins. Reflex salivary flow occurs at a low 'resting' rate and for short periods of the day more intense taste or chewing stimuli evoke up to ten fold increases in salivation. The secretion of salivary fluid and proteins is controlled by autonomic nerves. All salivary glands are supplied by cholinergic parasympathetic nerves which release acetylcholine that binds to M3 and (to a lesser extent) M1 muscarinic receptors, evoking the secretion of saliva by acinar cells in the endpieces of the salivary gland ductal tree. Most salivary glands also receive a variable innervation from sympathetic nerves which released noradrenaline from which tends to evoke greater release of stored proteins, mostly from acinar cells but also ductal cells. There is some 'cross-talk' between the calcium and cyclic AMP intracellular pathways coupling autonomic stimulation to secretion and salivary protein secretion is augmented during combined stimulation. Other non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic neuropeptides released from autonomic nerves evoke salivary gland secretion and parasympathetically derived vasointestinal peptide, acting through endothelial cell derived nitric oxide, plays a role in the reflex vasodilatation that accompanies secretion. Neuronal type, calcium-activated, soluble nitric oxide within salivary cells appears to play a role in mediating salivary protein secretion in response to autonomimetics. Fluid secretion by salivary glands involves aquaporin 5 and the extent to which the expression of aquaporin 5 on apical acinar cell membranes is upregulated by cholinomimetics remains uncertain. Extended periods of autonomic denervation, liquid diet feeding (reduced reflex stimulation) or duct ligation cause salivary gland atrophy. The latter two are reversible, demonstrating that glands can regenerate provided that the autonomic innervation remains intact. The mechanisms by which nerves integrate with salivary cells during regeneration or during salivary gland development remain to be elucidated.

Darifenacin: Pharmacology and Clinical Usage

Darifenacin is one of several recently approved antimuscarinics for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) and urge urinary incontinence. Darifenacin is an effective drug for the treatment of OAB and is tolerated by patients. Darifenacin's M3 selectivity is unique among antimuscarinics. This M3 selectivity could confer advantages in patients who have cardiovascular side effects (tachycardia), impaired cognition, complaints of dizziness, or sleep disturbances. In some studies, darifenacin caused less dry mouth than oxybutynin. Rates of constipation, although significant, are tolerated and rarely a cause for discontinuation in clinical trials. This review describes the role of M3 receptors and covers the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy safety and tolerability, drug interactions, and dosing guidelines for darifenacin.

Muscarinic receptors: their distribution and function in body systems, and the implications for treating overactive bladder

1. The effectiveness of antimuscarinic agents in the treatment of the overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is thought to arise through blockade of bladder muscarinic receptors located on detrusor smooth muscle cells, as well as on nondetrusor structures. 2. Muscarinic M3 receptors are primarily responsible for detrusor contraction. Limited evidence exists to suggest that M2 receptors may have a role in mediating indirect contractions and/or inhibition of detrusor relaxation. In addition, there is evidence that muscarinic receptors located in the urothelium/suburothelium and on afferent nerves may contribute to the pathophysiology of OAB. Blockade of these receptors may also contribute to the clinical efficacy of antimuscarinic agents. 3. Although the role of muscarinic receptors in the bladder, other than M3 receptors, remains unclear, their role in other body systems is becoming increasingly well established, with emerging evidence supporting a wide range of diverse functions. Blockade of these functions by muscarinic receptor antagonists can lead to similarly diverse adverse effects associated with antimuscarinic treatment, with the range of effects observed varying according to the different receptor subtypes affected. 4. This review explores the evolving understanding of muscarinic receptor functions throughout the body, with particular focus on the bladder, gastrointestinal tract, eye, heart, brain and salivary glands, and the implications for drugs used to treat OAB. The key factors that might determine the ideal antimuscarinic drug for treatment of OAB are also discussed. Further research is needed to show whether the M3 selective receptor antagonists have any advantage over less selective drugs, in leading to fewer adverse events.

Distribution and function of muscarinic receptor subtypes in the ovine submandibular gland

The effects of muscarinic receptor antagonists on responses to electrical stimulation of the chorda-lingual nerve were determined in pentobarbitone-anesthetized sheep and correlated to the morphology of tissue specimens. Stimulation at 2 Hz continuously, or in bursts of 1 s at 20 Hz every 10 s, for 10 min induced similar submandibular fluid responses (19 ± 3 vs. 21 ± 3 μl·min−1·g gland−1), whereas vasodilatation was greater during stimulation in bursts (−52 ± 4 vs. −43 ± 5%; P < 0.01). Continuous stimulation at 8 Hz induced substantially greater responses (66 ± 9 μl·min−1·g gland−1 and −77 ± 3%). While atropine (0.5 mg/kg iv) abolished the secretory response at 2 and 20 Hz (1:10 s), a small response persisted at 8 Hz (<5%). The “M1-selective” antagonist pirenzepine (40 μg/kg iv) reduced the fluid response at all frequencies tested ( P < 0.05–0.01), most conspicuously at 2 Hz (reduced by 69%). Methoctramine (“M2/M4-selective”; 100 μg/kg iv; n = 5) had no effect on fluid or the vascular responses but increased the protein output at 2 (+90%, P < 0.05) and 8 Hz (+45%, P < 0.05). The immunoblotting showed distinct bands for muscarinic M1, M3, M4, and M5 receptors, and immunohistochemistry showed muscarinic M1 and M3 receptors to occur in the parenchyma. Thus muscarinic M1 receptors contribute to the secretory response to parasympathetic stimulation but have little effect on the vasodilatation in the ovine submandibular gland. Increased transmitter release caused by blockade of neuronal inhibitory receptors of the M4 subtype would explain the increase in protein output.

A mouse caries model and evaluation of aqp5-/- knockout mice

Current techniques to alter gene expression in mice allow direct analysis of the net role of a host factor in caries development. Towards this goal we first established protocols to induce and score caries in NFS/N mice and determined caries susceptibility in mice with targeted deletion of the gene encoding aquaporin-5 (Aqp5-/-), a water channel involved in the production of saliva. In the NFS/N strain of mice total sulcal caries and severity scores were consistent between experiments, whereas smooth surface caries scores were lower, more variable but distributed fairly evenly among the buccal, lingual and sulcal surfaces. In Black Swiss/129SvJ mice (genetic background of Aqp5-/- mice) caries scores were 50-75% lower compared to NFS/N mice, suggesting strain variation in caries susceptibility under our experimental conditions. In Aqp5-/- mice, in which the volume of total salivary secretion is reduced by 60-65%, there was a significant increase in caries, primarily on the buccal and sulcal surfaces. Results indicate that caries susceptibility increases with a reduced salivary flow that is associated with decreased water content of saliva.

Comparison of darifenacin and oxybutynin in patients with overactive bladder: assessment of ambulatory urodynamics and impact on salivary flow

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of darifenacin, an M3 selective receptor antagonist, compared with oxybutynin, on ambulatory urodynamics, salivary flow, heart rate and visual nearpoint in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, crossover study (n=65) with three treatment cohorts: darifenacin immediate release (IR) 2.5 mg three times a day (t.i.d.) or oxybutynin 2.5 mg t.i.d.; darifenacin controlled release (CR) 15 mg once daily (q.d.) or oxybutynin 5 mg t.i.d.; darifenacin CR 30 mg q.d. or oxybutynin 5 mg t.i.d. Within cohorts, patients received 7 days' treatment with each agent separated by 14 days' washout.

RESULTS

All active treatments improved urodynamic parameters. Both darifenacin CR doses had significantly less effect on salivary flow than oxybutynin. Effects on urodynamic parameters, heart rate and visual nearpoint were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory urodynamics appears to be an innovative and potentially useful investigative tool in the evaluation of the efficacy of new therapeutic agents. Darifenacin CR is an efficacious therapy for OAB with comparable effects on urodynamic parameters but producing significantly less dry mouth than oxybutynin.

Effects of first and second generation antihistamines on muscarinic induced mucus gland cell ion transport

Background

The first generation antihistamines, such as diphenhydramine, are fairly potent muscarinic antagonists in addition to being H1 selective antihistamines. The antimuscarinic action is often not desirable since it is in part responsible for the drying of secretions in the airways and the sedative effect. We therefore examined a number of antihistamines for antimuscarinic effects on ion transport by mucus gland cells isolated from the airways of swine. Enzymatically isolated airway mucus gland cells were purified utilizing density gradients and grown in culture on porous inserts (Millicell HA™) at an air interface. Cells grown in this manner maintain phenotype and polarity. Transport of ions, as short-circuit current measured under voltage-clamp, was measured in response to acetylcholine (ACh) or histamine applied to the serosal side of the gland cell layers. Concentration-response relationships for ACh or histamine were generated in the presence and absence of various drugs. The potencies against muscarinic receptor activation were estimated using the dose-ratio method of Schild.

Results

Three known muscarinic antagonists were used to validate the system. Atropine had a pA₂ of 9.4 ± 0.1 (n = 9). 4-DAMP and methoctramine had pA₂ values of 8.6 ± 0.1 and 5.6 ± 0.1, respectively (n = 12, 11) all consistent with inhibition of an M3 subtype muscarinic receptor. The rank order of potency of the antihistamines against the inhibition of M3 receptors was desloratadine = diphenhydramine > hydroxyzine (pA₂; 6.4, 6.2, 4.8, respectively). pA₂ values for fexofenadine, loratadine and cetirizine were not determined since they had no effect on the cholinergic response at the highest drug concentrations tested (10, 10 and 100 μM, respectively). The pA₂ values for the antihistamines against the histamine response could not be calculated, but the estimates of the rank order of potency were estimated to be desloratadine> cetirizine ≈ hydroxyzine > fexofenadine > loratadine > diphenhydramine.

Conclusion

The rank order of selectivity for histamine receptors over muscarinic receptors was estimated to be cetirizine ≈ fexofenadine > loratadine > desloratadine ≥ hydroxyzine ≥ diphenhydramine.

The pharmacological action of MT-7

The mamba toxin MT-7 is the most selective ligand currently available for the muscarinic M1 receptor subtype. The toxin binds stably to the receptor and blocks the agonist-induced activation non-competitively. Although its mode of action on M1 receptors is not yet fully understood, some of the toxin properties support an allosteric mechanism. Thus, the toxin fails to elicit a complete inhibition of the binding of either the muscarinic antagonist [3H]N-methyl-scopolamine ([3H]NMS) or the agonist [3H]acetylcholine ([3H]ACh). When added to ligand-occupied M1 receptors, the toxin slows the dissociation rate of [3H]NMS and increases that of [3H]ACh. Site-directed mutagenesis studies have provided important information about the toxin amino acid residues which are critical for the stable binding to the receptor and for the allosteric modulation of antagonist dissociation. In vivo studies have shown that the intracerebral injection of MT-7 causes a long-lasting blockade of M1 receptor, thus providing a tool for the characterization of the functional role of this receptor subtype in discrete brain areas.

Darifenacin, an M3 selective receptor antagonist, is an effective and well-tolerated once-daily treatment for overactive bladder

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of darifenacin, a once-daily M3) selective receptor antagonist (M3 SRA), in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

This multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study enrolled 561 patients (19-88 years; 85% female) with OAB symptoms for >6 months, and included some patients with prior exposure to antimuscarinic agents. After washout and a 2-week placebo run-in, patients were randomised (1:4:2:3) to once-daily oral darifenacin controlled-release tablets (3.75 mg [n=53], 7.5 mg [229] or 15 mg [n=115]) or matching placebo (n=164) for 12 weeks. Patients recorded daily incontinence episodes, micturition frequency, bladder capacity (mean volume voided), frequency of urgency, severity of urgency, incontinence episodes resulting in change of clothing or pads and nocturnal awakenings due to OAB using an electronic diary during weeks 2, 6 and 12 (directly preceding clinic visits). Tolerability data were evaluated from adverse event reports.

RESULTS

Darifenacin 7.5 mg and 15 mg had a rapid onset of effect, with significant improvement compared with placebo being seen for most parameters at the first clinic visit (week 2). This effect was sustained through week 12. At this time the number of incontinence episodes per week was reduced from baseline by 67.7% with darifenacin 7.5 mg and 72.8% with darifenacin 15 mg compared with 55.9% with placebo (p=0.010 and p=0.017, respectively, versus placebo). The 3.75 mg group (null dose arm) was included for proof of concept of dose flexibility, therefore formal sample sizing and statistical analysis were not performed for this group. Darifenacin 7.5 mg and 15 mg, respectively, were significantly superior to placebo for improvements in micturition frequency (p<0.001, p<0.001), bladder capacity (p<0.040, p<0.001), frequency of urgency (p<0.001, p=0.005), severity of urgency (p<0.001, p=0.002) and number of incontinence episodes leading to a change in clothing or pads (p<0.001, p=0.002). There was no significant reduction in nocturnal awakenings due to OAB. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate dry mouth and constipation. However, no patients withdrew from the study as a result of dry mouth and discontinuation related to constipation was rare (0.6% placebo versus 0.9% darifenacin). In addition, there was a low need for laxative use, with no difference between the darifenacin groups and those taking placebo. There were no reports of blurred vision and the CNS and cardiac safety profile was comparable to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Darifenacin significantly improves the major symptoms of OAB. No significant CNS (primarily M1-receptor mediated) adverse events or cardiac (primarily M2-receptor mediated) adverse events were identified in this study, as may be predicted from the M3 selective receptor profile of darifenacin.

Cholinergic Stimulation of Salivary Secretion Studied with M1 and M3 Muscarinic Receptor Single- and Double-Knockout Mice

Identification of the specific muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtypes mediating stimulation of salivary secretion is of considerable clinical interest. Recent pharmacological and molecular genetic studies have yielded somewhat confusing and partially contradictory results regarding the involvement of individual mAChRs in this activity. In the present study, we re-examined the roles of M(1) and M(3) mAChRs in muscarinic agonist-mediated stimulation of salivary secretion by using M(1) and M(3) receptor single-knockout (KO) mice and newly generated M(1)/M(3) receptor double-KO mice. When applied at a low dose (1 mg/kg, s.c.), the muscarinic agonist pilocarpine showed significantly reduced secretory activity in both M(1) and M(3) receptor single-KO mice. However, when applied at higher doses, pilocarpine induced only modestly reduced (5 mg/kg, s.c.) or unchanged (15 mg/kg, s.c.) salivation responses, respectively, in M(1) and M(3) receptor single-KO mice, indicating that the presence of either M(1) or M(3) receptors is sufficient to mediate robust salivary output. Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction studies with salivary gland tissue showed that the inactivation of the M(1) or M(3) mAChR genes did not lead to significantly altered mRNA levels of the remaining mAChR subtypes. Strikingly, the sialagogue activity of pilocarpine was abolished in M(1)/M(3) receptor double-KO mice. However, salivary glands from M(1)/M(3) receptor double-KO mice remained responsive to stimulation by the beta-adrenergic receptor agonist, (S)-isoproterenol. Taken together these studies support the concept that a mixture of M(1) and M(3) receptors mediates cholinergic stimulation of salivary flow.

Antimuscarinics for treatment of overactive bladder

For many years, antimuscarinic drugs have been the first-line pharmacological treatment for urgency, frequency, and urge incontinence, all symptoms of the disorder termed overactive bladder. Antimuscarinic treatment is not always effective and is associated with side-effects that limit its clinical use. The clinical significance of the effects of antimuscarinic drugs has been questioned lately. In this review, the rationale for the use of these drugs in the management of overactive bladder is re-examined and the results of treatment are discussed. I conclude that these drugs are the only treatment with undisputed effectiveness in the treatment of overactive bladder. They may not be the perfect treatment for all patients with this disorder, but their value for individual patients should not be underestimated. Further clinical trials with improvement in quality of life as the primary endpoint are needed and may give a fair reflection of the clinical value of antimuscarinic drugs.

Muscarinic receptors: What we know

An understanding of muscarinic receptors is tantamount to an understanding of overactive bladder. The M(3) muscarinic receptor subtype is responsible for detrusor smooth muscle contraction and it exerts an exocrine function in the salivary glands. Alterations in the receptor's response to acetylcholine as a result of injury may lead to hypersensitivity and overactivity. The M(2) receptor subtype, which is mainly responsible for cardiac function, is the muscarinic receptor of highest proportion in the detrusor. M(2) also may play a role in detrusor contraction in injury and pathologic states. Muscarinic antagonists are the mainstay of pharmacotherapy for overactive bladder, but those that are available are not tissue specific. Growing knowledge of the nuances of receptor-ligand behavior and interaction between muscarinic receptors subtypes may provide novel targets for future drug development, improve efficacy, and reduce bothersome side effects.

Studies of muscarinic receptor subtypes in salivary gland function in anaesthetized rats

The in vivo study aimed to examine whether muscarinic receptor subtypes other than muscarinic M3 receptors exert exocrine functional roles in the rat salivary glands. The effects of pirenzepine, methoctramine and 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide (4-DAMP) were examined on secretion from the major salivary glands evoked by acetylcholine (0.001-10 micromol kg(-1) i.v.) in pentobarbitone-anaesthetized rats. Observations were occasionally made on glandular blood flow. 4-DAMP (0.1-100 nmol kg(-1) i.v.) markedly and equipotently inhibited the acetylcholine-evoked fluid responses in all glands. Pirenzepine (0.1 micromol kg(-1) i.v.-10 mmol kg(-1) i.v.) showed significantly lower inhibitory potency than 4-DAMP, most conspicuously in the parotid, while methoctramine (0.1 micromol kg(-1) i.v.-10 mmol kg(-1) i.v.) exerted an even lesser inhibitory effect. Also against acetylcholine-evoked blood flow increases, 4-DAMP showed a conspicuous potency. At 1 and 10 micromol kg(-1) i.v. of pirenzepine, the antagonist reduced the protein concentration in the submandibular saliva, but not in the parotid saliva. While 4-DAMP (1 and 10 nmol kg(-1) i.v.) significantly inhibited acetylcholine-evoked protein secretory responses in the submandibular glands, methoctramine (below 10 micromol kg(-1) i.v.) affected the responses in neither gland. The reduction of the protein concentration in submandibular saliva caused by 4-DAMP and pirenzepine was inhibited by N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 30 mg kg(-1) i.p.), while L-NAME had no or only minute effects on the parotid protein secretion. Thus, in addition to muscarinic M3 receptors, other muscarinic receptors contribute to in vivo functional responses in rat submandibular and sublingual glands. While these other receptors are muscarinic M1 receptors in the sublingual gland, they may be a different subtype, possibly muscarinic M5 receptors, in the submandibular gland. However, muscarinic M1 receptors may induce indirect effects via nitric oxide in the submandibular gland.

Gene transfer to salivary glands

This article provides a review of the application of gene transfer technology to studies of salivary glands. Salivary glands provide an uncommon target site for gene transfer but offer many experimental situations likely of interest to the cell biologist. The reader is provided with a concise overview of salivary biology, along with a general discussion of the strategies available for gene transfer to any tissue. In particular, adenoviral vectors have been useful for proof of concept studies with salivary glands. Several examples are given, using adenoviral-mediated gene transfer, for addressing both biological and clinical questions. Additionally, benefits and shortcomings affecting the utility of this technology are discussed.

Use of muscarinic agonists in the treatment of Sjögren's syndrome

Two muscarinic agonists (pilocarpine and cevimeline) have recently been approved for the treatment of symptoms of xerostomia in Sjögren's syndrome (SS). These agents stimulate the M1 and M3 receptors present on salivary glands, leading to increased secretory function. The use of these agents emphasizes the importance of neuroendocrine mechanisms in SS, which is considered an autoimmune disorder. We review recent studies on the release of cytokines and metalloproteinases in SS-affected glands and their influence on the release of and response to neurotransmitters. Also, we review the structure and function of muscarinic receptors as they may relate to SS and the potential use of novel muscarinic agonists in SS.

G protein coupling to M1 and M3 muscarinic receptors in sublingual glands

Rat sublingual gland M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors each directly activate exocrine secretion. To investigate the functional role of coreceptor expression, we determined receptor-G protein coupling. Although membrane proteins of 40 and 41 kDa are ADP-ribosylated by pertussis toxin (PTX), and 44 kDa proteins by cholera toxin (CTX), both carbachol-stimulated high-affinity GTPase activity and the GTP-induced shift in agonist binding are insensitive to CTX or PTX. Carbachol enhances photoaffinity labeling ([alpha-(32)P]GTP-azidoaniline) of only 42-kDa proteins that are subsequently tractable to immunoprecipitation by antibodies specific for Galpha(q) or Galpha(11) but not Galpha(12) or Galpha(13). Carbachol-stimulated photoaffinity labeling as well as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) hydrolysis is reduced 55% and 60%, respectively, by M1 receptor blockade with m1-toxin. Galpha(q/11)-specific antibody blocks carbachol-stimulated PIP2 hydrolysis. We also provide estimates of the molar ratios of receptors to Galpha(q) and Galpha(11). Although simultaneous activation of M1 and M3 receptors is required for a maximal response, both receptor subtypes are coupled to Galpha(q) and Galpha(11) to stimulate exocrine secretion via redundant mechanisms.

Chloride channels and salivary gland function

Fluid and electrolyte transport is driven by transepithelial Cl- movement. The opening of Cl- channels in the apical membrane of salivary gland acinar cells initiates the fluid secretion process, whereas the activation of Cl- channels in both the apical and the basolateral membranes of ductal cells is thought to be necessary for NaCl re-absorption. Saliva formation can be evoked by sympathetic and parasympathetic stimulation. The composition and flow rate vary greatly, depending on the type of stimulation. As many as five classes of Cl- channels with distinct gating mechanisms have been identified in salivary cells. One of these Cl- channels is activated by intracellular Ca2+, while another is gated by cAMP. An increase in the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration is the dominant mechanism triggering fluid secretion from acinar cells, while cAMP may be required for efficient NaCl re-absorption in many ductal cells. In addition to cAMP- and Ca(2+)-gated Cl- channels, agonist-induced changes in membrane potential and cell volume activate different Cl- channels that likely play a role in modulating fluid and electrolyte movement. In this review, the properties of the different types of Cl- currents expressed in salivary gland cells are described, and functions are proposed based on the unique properties of these channels.

Regulation of calcium in salivary gland secretion

Neurotransmitter-regulation of fluid secretion in the salivary glands is achieved by a coordinated sequence of intracellular signaling events, including the activation of membrane receptors, generation of the intracellular second messenger, inositol 1,4,5, trisphosphate, internal Ca2+ release, and Ca2+ influx. The resulting increase in cytosolic [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]i) regulates a number of ion transporters, e.g., Ca2+-activated K+ channel, Na+/K+/2Cl- co-transporter in the basolateral membrane, and the Ca2+-activated Cl- channel in the luminal membrane, which are intricately involved in fluid secretion. Thus, regulation of [Ca2+]i is central to the regulation of salivary acinar cell function and is achieved by the concerted activities of several ion channels and Ca2+-pumps localized in various cellular membranes. Ca2+ pumps, present in the endoplasmic reticulum and the plasma membrane, serve to remove Ca2+ from the cytosol. Ca2+ channels present in the endoplasmic reticulum and the plasma membrane facilitate rapid influx of Ca2+ into the cytosol from the internal Ca2+ stores and from the external medium, respectively. It is well-established that prolonged fluid secretion is regulated via a sustained elevation in [Ca2+]i that is primarily achieved by the influx of Ca2+ into the cell from the external medium. This Ca2+ influx occurs via a putative plasma-membrane-store-operated Ca2+ channel which has not yet been identified in any non-excitable cell type. Understanding the molecular nature of this Ca2+ influx mechanism is critical to our understanding of Ca2+ signaling in salivary gland cells. This review focuses on the various active and passive Ca2+ transport mechanisms in salivary gland cells--their localization, regulation, and role in neurotransmitter-regulation of fluid secretion. In addition to a historical perspective of Ca2+ signaling, recent findings and challenging problems facing this field are highlighted.