Excitatory effects of synchronized intestinal electrical stimulation on small intestinal motility in dogs

Intestinal Electrical Stimulation Synchronized With Intestinal Slow Wave Ameliorates Glucagon-Induced Hyperglycemia in Rats

BACKGROUND

Synchronized intestinal electrical stimulation (SIES), in which intestinal electrical stimulation (IES) is delivered in synchronization with the intrinsic slow wave of small intestine, was previously reported to be more potent in accelerating small intestine transit than IES delivered at fixed frequency and phase. We hypothesized that SIES is more potent in suppressing postprandial blood glucose by enhancing the release of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and insulin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats underwent long-term implant of two pairs of electrodes at the duodenum for IES and SIES, respectively. Acute hyperglycemia was induced with glucagon, and the oral glucose tolerance test was performed on separate days with IES, SIES, or sham (no stimulation).

RESULTS

1. Glucagon reduced the percentage of normal slow wave in sham (70.9% ± 4.1%) from (84.9% ± 2.6%, p = 0.006) of control, which was ameliorated by SIES (82.5% ± 3.3%, p = 0.031). 2. IES and SIES reduced glucagon-induced increase of blood glucose (192 mg/dl) at 30 minutes by 17% and 20%, respectively. SIES showed a further inhibitory effect at 60 minutes (147 vs 171 mg/dl, p = 0.003, vs sham). 3. Compared with sham (139 pg/ml), GLP-1 at 30 minutes was increased in both IES (158 pg/ml) and SIES (169 pg/ml). GLP-1 level was still high at 60 minutes in rats with SIES. 4. At 30 minutes, the plasma insulin level was increased by 18.8 μIU/ml with SIES, which was significantly higher than that with sham (7.1 μIU/ml, p < 0.001) and IES (13.2 μIU/ml, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

SIES is more effective than IES in reducing glucagon-induced acute hyperglycemia by enhancing the release of GLP-1 and insulin.

An efficient online peak detection algorithm for synchronized intestinal electrical stimulation and its application for treating diabetes

Obesity is one of leading risk factors for type 2 diabetes and other types of chronic diseases. Synchronized intestinal electrical stimulation (SIES) has been explored for treating obesity and diabetes. In SIES, electrical stimulation is delivered to the small intestine in synchronization with the intrinsic intestinal myoelectrical activity (its basic rhythm is called slow wave) and therefore, the accurate detection of intestinal slow waves is critically important for SIES. The aim of this study is to detect the peaks in intestinal slow waves in real-time based on the automatic multiscale peak detection (AMPD) method. In this paper, we introduce an efficient technique for real-time detection of peaks in intestinal slow waves. The presented method is based on peak estimation of a given quasi-periodic signal using the AMPD method. This method uses a multi-scale approach to identify the peaks of the intestinal slow waves with high detection accuracy and a minimal delay. Throughout the experiments, the multi-scale technique is used to estimate the quasi-periodic signals using different signal-to-noise ratio, λ (optimal scale), and the "lag" β (number of datapoints for right hand estimation) as important performance factors. The performance of the presented method is also calculated and utilized in the comparison process for 10 datasets of the intestinal slow waves from rats at λ = 150 ms and two values of β = 100 ms and 150 ms. The experimental results show that the presented method has good overall accuracy for online peak detection while maintaining low memory and computational complexity. Numerically, the overall accuracy is above 90%, and 98% for the rodent intestinal slow waves at a time-lag of 150 ms. The developed SIES system has been applied to successfully reduce postprandial blood glucose in a rodent model of hyperglycemia. In conclusion, the developed algorithm is adequate for on-line peak detection of the intestinal slow waves; the SIES method used the developed peak detection algorithm which is effective in reducing postprandial blood glucose in a rodent model of hyperglycemia.

Implants with Sensing Capabilities

Because of the aging human population and increased numbers of surgical procedures being performed, there is a growing number of biomedical devices being implanted each year. Although the benefits of implants are significant, there are risks to having foreign materials in the body that may lead to complications that may remain undetectable until a time at which the damage done becomes irreversible. To address this challenge, advances in implantable sensors may enable early detection of even minor changes in the implants or the surrounding tissues and provide early cues for intervention. Therefore, integrating sensors with implants will enable real-time monitoring and lead to improvements in implant function. Sensor integration has been mostly applied to cardiovascular, neural, and orthopedic implants, and advances in combined implant-sensor devices have been significant, yet there are needs still to be addressed. Sensor-integrating implants are still in their infancy; however, some have already made it to the clinic. With an interdisciplinary approach, these sensor-integrating devices will become more efficient, providing clear paths to clinical translation in the future.

Use of Bioelectronics in the Gastrointestinal Tract

Gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders are major contributing factors to functional GI diseases that account for >40% of patients seen in gastroenterology clinics and affect >20% of the general population. The autonomic and enteric nervous systems and the muscles within the luminal GI tract have key roles in motility. In health, this complex integrated system works seamlessly to transport liquid, solid, and gas through the GI tract. However, major and minor motility disorders occur when these systems fail. Common functional GI motility disorders include dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, functional dyspepsia, gastroparesis, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, postoperative ileus, irritable bowel syndrome, functional diarrhea, functional constipation, and fecal incontinence. Although still in its infancy, bioelectronic therapy in the GI tract holds great promise through the targeted stimulation of nerves and muscles.

Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Glycemic Control in a Rodent Model of Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has been reported to reduce body weight and improve sympathovagal imbalance in both basic and clinical studies. Its effects on glycemic control were however unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of VNS with various parameters on blood glucose and its possible mechanisms in rats.

METHODS

A hyperglycemic rodent model induced by glucagon was used initially to optimize the VNS parameters; then, a type 2 diabetic rodent model induced by high-fat diet combined with streptozotocin was used to validate the VNS method. The VNS electrodes were implanted at the dorsal subdiaphragmatic vagus; three subcutaneous electrodes were implanted at the chest area for recording electrocardiogram in rats induced by glucagon.

RESULTS

(1) VNS with short pulse width of 0.3 ms but not 3 ms reduced blood glucose during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), with a 38.4% reduction at 15 min and 26.9% at 30 min (P < 0.05, vs. sham-VNS respectively). (2) VNS at low frequency of 5 Hz but not 14 Hz or 40 Hz reduced blood glucose during the OGTT (P < 0.05, vs. sham-VNS). (3) Intermittent VNS was more potent than continuous VNS (P < 0.01). (4) No difference was found between unilateral VNS and bilateral VNS. (5) VNS enhanced vagal activity (P = 0.005). (6) The hypoglycemic effect of VNS was blocked by glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) antagonist exendin-4.

CONCLUSIONS

VNS at 5 Hz reduces blood glucose in diabetic rats by enhancing vagal efferent activity and the release of GLP-1.

A Wireless Implantable System for Facilitating Gastrointestinal Motility

Gastrointestinal (GI) electrical stimulation has been shown in several studies to be a potential treatment option for GI motility disorders. Despite the promising preliminary research progress, however, its clinical applicability and usability are still unknown and limited due to the lack of a miniaturized versatile implantable stimulator supporting the investigation of effective stimulation patterns for facilitating GI dysmotility. In this paper, we present a wireless implantable GI modulation system to fill this technology gap. The system consists of a wireless extraluminal gastrointestinal modulation device (EGMD) performing GI electrical stimulation, and a rendezvous device (RD) and a custom-made graphical user interface (GUI) outside the body to wirelessly power and configure the EGMD to provide the desired stimuli for modulating GI smooth muscle activities. The system prototype was validated in bench-top and in vivo tests. The GI modulation system demonstrated its potential for facilitating intestinal transit in the preliminary in vivo chronic study using porcine models.

Intestinal Electrical Stimulation to Increase the Rate of Peristalsis

BACKGROUND

Pediatric gastrointestinal motility disorders are a large and broad group. Some of these disorders have been effectively treated with electrical stimulation. The goal of our present study is to determine whether the rate of intestinal peristalsis can be increased with electrical stimulation.

METHODS

Juvenile mini-Yucatan pigs were placed under general anesthesia and a short segment of the jejunum was transected. Ultrasound gel was placed inside the segment. The segment of the jejunum was first monitored for 20 min under no stimulation, followed by direct electrical stimulation using a planar electrode. The gel extruded out of the intestine via peristalsis was collected and weighed for each 20-min time interval.

RESULTS

Effective delivery of the current to the intestine was confirmed via direct measurements. When there was no direct intestinal electrical stimulation, an average of 0.40 g of gel was expelled in 20 min, compared to 1.57 g of gel expelled during direct electrical stimulation (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Direct intestinal electrical stimulation accelerates the transit of gastrointestinal contents. This approach may be useful in the treatment of a range of pediatric motility disorders.

The Effect of Gastric Electrical Stimulation on Small Bowel Motility in Patients With Gastroparesis and Concomitant Pancreatic and Small Bowel Dysfunction: From Animal Model to Human Application

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with gastroparesis often have biliary/pancreatic and small bowel symptoms but the effects of gastric electrical stimulation on small bowel electrical activity of the mid-gut have not been studied. Animal model aim: Establish gastric and upper small bowel/biliary slow wave activity relationships with electrical stimulation. Human study aim: Demonstrate improvement in symptoms associated with proximal small bowel dysmotility in gastric stimulated patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal model: In vivo evoked responses of duodenal and Sphincter of Oddi measures recorded during gastric electrical stimulation in a nonsurvival swine model (N = 3). High-resolution electrical slow wave mapping of frequency, amplitude, and their ratio, for duodenal and Sphincter of Oddi electrical activity were recorded. Human study: Patients (N = 8) underwent temporary gastric stimulation with small bowel electrodes. Subjective and objective data was collected before and after temporary gastric stimulation. Symptom scores, gastric emptying times, and mucosal electrograms via low-resolution mapping were recorded.

RESULTS

Animal gastric stimulation resulted in some changes in electrical activity parameters, especially with the highest energies delivered but the changes were not statistically significant. Human study revealed improvement in symptom and illness severity scores, and changes in small bowel mucosal slow wave activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric electrical stimulation in an animal model seems to show nonsignificant effects small bowel slow wave activity and myoelectric signaling, suggesting the existence of intrinsic neural connections. Human data shows more significance, with possible potential for therapeutic use of electrical stimulation in patients with gastroparesis and pancreato-biliary and small bowel symptoms of the mid-gut. This study was limited by the nonsurvival pig model, small sample size, and open label human study.

Study on effects of electrical stimulation on rabbit esophageal body motility in vivo

Electric stimulation (ES) could induce contraction of intestinal smooth muscle. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of ES on esophageal motility and the underlying mechanism in vivo. Twenty-eight rabbits were equipped with a pair of subserosa electrodes (connected to an electrical stimulator) in the lower segment of the esophagus. The ES signal consisted of bipolar rectangular pulse trains, lasting for 3 s, with different amplitudes (1 mA, 3 mA, 5 mA and 10 mA), and frequencies (10 Hz, 20 Hz and 50 Hz). The amplitude of the contraction was recognized by high-resolution manometry. The effect of ES was tested under anesthesia and following administration of atropine, phentolamine or L-NAME. ES induced esophageal contraction at the stimulated site. A statistically significant increase in esophageal pressure was observed when the stimulation amplitude was above 3 mA. The increase in esophageal pressure was associated with the amplitude of stimulus as well as the frequency. During stimulation, atropine, phentolamine and L-NAME had no effect on the increase of esophageal pressure induced by ES. These findings implied that ES induced esophageal contraction were not mediated via the NANC, adrenergic or cholinergic pathway. The amplitude of esophageal contraction was current and frequency dependent.

A Wireless Implant for Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders

Implantable functional electrical stimulation (IFES) has demonstrated its effectiveness as an alternative treatment option for diseases incurable pharmaceutically (e.g., retinal prosthesis, cochlear implant, spinal cord implant for pain relief). However, the development of IFES for gastrointestinal (GI) tract modulation is still limited due to the poorly understood GI neural network (gut⁻brain axis) and the fundamental difference among activating/monitoring smooth muscles, skeletal muscles and neurons. This inevitably imposes different design specifications for GI implants. This paper thus addresses the design requirements for an implant to treat GI dysmotility and presents a miniaturized wireless implant capable of modulating and recording GI motility. This implant incorporates a custom-made system-on-a-chip (SoC) and a heterogeneous system-in-a-package (SiP) for device miniaturization and integration. An in vivo experiment using both rodent and porcine models is further conducted to validate the effectiveness of the implant.

Electrical therapies for gastrointestinal motility disorders

Gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders are common in clinical settings, including esophageal motility disorders, gastroesophageal reflux disease, functional dyspepsia, gastroparesis, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, post-operative ileus, irritable bowel syndrome, diarrhea and constipation. While a number of drugs have been developed for treating GI motility disorders, few are currently available. Emerging electrical stimulation methods may provide new treatment options for these GI motility disorders. Areas covered: This review gives an overview of electrical therapies that have been, and are being developed for GI motility disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux, functional dyspepsia, gastroparesis, intestinal motility disorders and constipation. Various methods of gastrointestinal electrical stimulation are introduced. A few methods of nerve stimulation have also been described, including spinal cord stimulation and sacral nerve stimulation. Potentials of electrical therapies for obesity are also discussed. PubMed was searched using keywords and their combinations: electrical stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, sacral nerve stimulation, gastrointestinal motility and functional gastrointestinal diseases. Expert commentary: Electrical stimulation is an area of great interest and has potential for treating GI motility disorders. However, further development in technologies (devices suitable for GI stimulation) and extensive clinical research are needed to advance the field and bring electrical therapies to bedside.

Acceleration of small bowel transit in a canine hypermotility model with intestinal electrical stimulation

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have been performed on the effect of intestinal electrical stimulation (IES) on intestinal dysmotility. This study aimed to investigate the small intestine transit (SIT) in a canine model of intestinal hypermotility when applying IES.

METHOD

Six hound bitches were surgically prepared with two chronic intestinal fistulas, intestinal serosal electrodes of which the proximal pair was used for serosal IES. Pacing wires were attached to a manometric catheter for mucosal IES. A nitrogen oxide synthase inhibitor, Nω-nitro-L-arginine (LNNA) was used to induce intestinal motility. SIT was measured during IES. The study consisted of four randomized sessions: session 1 (LNNA), session 2 (LNNA plus serosal IES), session 3 (LNNA plus mucosal IES) and session 4 (control).

RESULTS

The intestine transit was slowed down from 31.7 ± 6.1 min in the control session to 49.0 ± 6.2 min after using LNNA (P = 0.003). Both mucosal and serosal IES accelerated SIT compared with the LNNA session. The SIT time was reduced to 17.7 ± 3.4 min in the mucosal IES session (P = 0.006 vs. LNNA) and 27.5 ± 6.3 min in the serosal IES session (P = 0.020 vs. LNNA). No difference was noted in the SIT time between mucosal and serosal IES (P = 0.128).

CONCLUSION

IES significantly accelerates delayed SIT in a hypermotility model and intraluminal stimulation is as effective as a serosal one for IES, suggesting that IES may have a therapeutic potential for improving intestinal motility.

Acute and chronic effects of desvenlafaxine on gastrointestinal transit and motility in dogs

BACKGROUND

Antidepressants are commonly used for treating functional gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. However, little is known whether antidepressants improve or impair GI motility. This study aimed at exploring possible effects of a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, desvenlafaxine succinate (DVS), on GI motility in dogs.

METHODS

Eight dogs chronically implanted with a duodenal cannula and a colon cannula were used in the study. Experiments were performed to assess the effects of a single dose of DVS (50 or 100 mg) and DVS given 50 mg once a day for 2 weeks on gastric emptying of solid, small intestinal transit, and colon transit and contractions.

KEY RESULTS

(1) DVS significantly delayed gastric emptying of solid at a single dose of 50 or 100 mg. The inhibitory effect on gastric emptying was completely blocked by guanethidine (an adrenergic blocking agent). (2) DVS at a single dose of 50 or 100 mg accelerated colon transit, but showed no effects on small bowel transit. (3) DVS at a single dose of 50 mg enhanced colon contractions and guanethidine blocked the effect. (4) Surprisingly, DVS given at 50 mg once daily for 2 weeks did not alter gastric emptying, small bowel transit or colon transit.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Acute DVS delays gastric emptying of solid and enhances the contractions of the colon, which may be mediated via the sympathetic mechanism. Acute DVS promotes the transit of the colon but not the small intestine. However, chronic administration of DVS does not seem to alter GI motility.

Colonic electrical stimulation: potential use for treatment of delayed colonic transit

AIM

Recently there has been an increased interest in using electrical stimulation to regulate gut motility generally and particularly for the treatment of slow-transit constipation. In this preliminary canine study, we aimed to study the effects of colonic electrical stimulation (CES) on colonic motility and transit.

METHOD

Nine dogs, each equipped with a pair of serosal colon electrodes and a proximal colon cannula were randomized to receive: (i) sham-CES, (ii) long pulse CES (20 cpm, 300 ms, 6 mA) or (iii) pulse train CES (40 Hz, 6 ms, 6 mA). Animals underwent assessment of colonic contractions via manometry, and of colonic transit by inserting 24 radiopaque markers via the colonic cannula and radiographically monitoring the markers at 2, 4 and 6 h following their insertion. The colonic transit was assessed by the geometric centre.

RESULTS

We found that, compared with sham-CES, pulse train CES, but not long pulse CES, significantly increased the overall colonic motility index twofold and accelerated the colonic transit by 104% at 2 h, by 60% at 4 h and by 31% at 6 h (P = 0.01, P = 0.02 and P = 0.03 vs sham-CES at 2, 4 and 6 h, respectively). The accelerating effect of pulse train CES was found to be mediated via both cholinergic and nitrergic pathways.

CONCLUSION

CES with pulse trains has prokinetic effects on colonic contractions and transit in healthy dogs, mediated via the cholinergic and nitrergic pathways. Further clinical studies are warranted to explore the therapeutic potential of CES for slow colonic transit constipation.

Recent advances in small bowel diseases: Part II

As is the case in all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology, in 2009 and 2010 there were many advances in our knowledge and understanding of small intestinal diseases. Over 1000 publications were reviewed, and the important advances in basic science as well as clinical applications were considered. In Part II we review six topics: absorption, short bowel syndrome, smooth muscle function and intestinal motility, tumors, diagnostic imaging, and cystic fibrosis.

Colon electrical stimulation: potential use for treatment of obesity

Obesity is one of the most prevalent health problems in the United States. Current therapeutic strategies for the treatment of obesity are unsatisfactory. We hypothesized the use of colon electrical stimulation (CES) to treat obesity by inhibiting upper gastrointestinal motility. In this preliminary study, we aimed at studying the effects of CES on gastric emptying of solid, intestinal motility, and food intake in dogs. Six dogs, equipped with serosal colon electrodes and a jejunal cannula, were randomly assigned to receive sham-CES or CES during the assessment of: (i) gastric emptying of solids, (ii) postprandial intestinal motility, (iii) autonomic functions, and (iv) food intake. We found that (i) CES delayed gastric emptying of solids by 77%. Guanethidine partially blocked the inhibitory effect of CES on solid gastric emptying; (ii) CES significantly reduced intestinal contractility and the effect lasted throughout the recovery period; (iii) CES decreased vagal activity in both fasting and fed states, increased the sympathovagal balance and marginally increased sympathetic activity in the fasting state; (iv) CES resulted in a reduction of 61% in food intake. CES reduces food intake in healthy dogs and the anorexigenic effect may be attributed to its inhibitory effects on gastric emptying and intestinal motility, mediated via the autonomic mechanisms. Further studies are warranted to investigate the therapeutic potential of CES for obesity.

Duodenum electrical stimulation delays gastric emptying, reduces food intake and accelerates small bowel transit in pigs

Duodenum electrical stimulation (DES) has been shown to delay gastric emptying and reduce food intake in dogs. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of DES on gastric emptying, small bowel transit and food intake in pigs, a large animal model of obesity. The study consisted of three experiments (gastric emptying, small bowel transit, and food intake) in pigs implanted with internal duodenal electrodes for DES and one or two duodenal cannulas for gastric emptying and small bowel transit. We found that (i) gastric emptying was dose-dependently delayed by DES of different stimulation parameters; (ii) small bowel transit was significantly accelerated with continuous DES in proximal intestine but not with intermittent DES; (iii) DES significantly reduced body weight gain with 100% duty cycle (DC), but not with DES with 40% DC. A marginal difference was noted in food intake among 100% DC session, 40% DC session, and control session. DES with long pulses energy-dependently inhibits gastric emptying in pigs. DES with appropriate parameters accelerates proximal small bowel transit in pigs. DES reduces body weight gain in obese pigs, and this therapeutic effect on obesity is mediated by inhibiting gastric emptying and food intake, and may also possibly by accelerating intestinal transit. DES may have a potential application to treat patients with obesity.

Mechanisms and potential applications of intestinal electrical stimulation

PURPOSE

Electrical stimulation of the gut has recently been under intensive investigation and various studies have revealed therapeutic potentials of gastrointestinal electrical stimulation for gastrointestinal motility disorders and obesity. While there have been a number of reviews on gastric electrical stimulation, there is a lack of systematic reviews on intestinal electrical stimulation. The aim of this review is to provide an overview on the effects, mechanisms, and applications of intestinal electrical stimulation.

RESULTS

We evaluated published data on intestinal electrophysiology, pathophysiology, and different methodologies on intestinal electrical stimulation and its possible mechanisms in both research and clinical settings using the MEDLINE database for English articles from 1963 to 2008. Based on this systematic review, intestinal electrical stimulation has been reported to alter intestinal slow waves, contractions and transit; the effects were mediated via both vagal and adrenergic pathways. Intestinal electrical stimulation has been reported to have potentials for treating various intestinal motility disorders and obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that intestinal electrical stimulation may have promising applications for treating motility disorders associated with altered intestinal contractile activity. The most recent studies have revealed possible applications of intestinal electrical stimulation for the treatment of obesity. Basic research results are promising; however, further clinical studies are needed to bring IES from bench to bedside.

Effects and mechanisms of electrical stimulation of the stomach, duodenum, ileum, and colon on gastric tone in dogs

Previous studies have shown that gastric tone is inhibited by the electrical stimulation of some parts of the gut. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of gastric electrical stimulation (GES), duodenal electrical stimulation (DES), ileal electrical stimulation (IES), and colonic electrical stimulation (CES) on gastric tone and the possible mechanism of electrical stimulation on gastric tone. Experiments were performed to study: (1) the effects of the four stimulations (GES, DES, IES, CES) on gastric tone; (2) the role of the nitrergic pathway's involvement in the effect of IES on gastric tone. Each dog was implanted with one pair of gastric, duodenal, ileal, and colonic electrodes and a gastric cannula. A computerized barostat was used to assess gastric tone by measuring the gastric intra-balloon volume. We found that: (1) all methods of stimulation significantly inhibited gastric tone; (2) the percentage of increase in gastric volume was highest with CES and lowest with DES; however, there was no significant difference in the percentage of inhibition among the four stimulations; (3) the inhibitory effect of IES on gastric tone was abolished by intravenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor. It was concluded that electrical stimulation of the stomach, intestine, or colon with long pulses has an inhibitory effect on gastric tone, and the most effective stimulation is CES. The inhibitory effect is not organ-specific and is unrelated to the distance between the stimulation site and the affected organ. The inhibitory effect of IES on gastric tone is mediated by the nitrergic pathway.

Central neuronal mechanisms of intestinal electrical stimulation: effects on duodenum distention-responsive (DD-R) neurons in the VMH of rats

Intestinal electrical stimulation (IES) has been shown to produce inhibitory effects on gastric contractions, gastric emptying, food intake and body weight in rats and dogs, suggesting a therapeutic potential for obesity. The aims of this study were (1) to test the hypothesis that the neurons in the VMH are involved in the central mechanisms of IES treatment for obesity; (2) to compare the effects of IES at the duodenum and IES at the ileum on neuronal activities of the VMH; (3) to better understand if the neuronal activity modulated by IES was mediated via the vagal pathway. Extracellular potentials of neurons in the VMH were recorded in 18 anesthetized rats. IES at the duodenum or ileum was performed in duodenal-distention responsive (DD-R) neurons with 3 sets of parameters (IES-1 with trains of short-pulses: 4mA, 2s-on, 3s-off, 2ms, 20Hz; IES-2 with long-pulses: 6mA, 20cpm, 100ms; IES-3, same as IES-1 but 40Hz). IES-1 at the duodenum and the ileum activated 70.6% and 73.3% of the DD-R neurons, respectively. Similar percentages of the neurons were activated with IES-3 at the duodenum and the ileum (70.6% vs. 66.7%, P=0.91), respectively. IES-2 at these locations activated only 25% and 46.2% of the DD-R neurons, respectively (P>0.05). IES at the duodenum with parameter set, IES-1 or IES-3 was significantly more potent than the parameter set, IES-2 (neuronal activation: 70.6% vs. 25%, P<0.05). Bilateral vagotomy only partially blocked the effects of IES on the neuronal activity in the VMH, indicating that extra-vagal pathways can mediate these effects. IES with different parameters activates 25-70.6% of the VMH neurons responsive to DD, and IES with trains of short-pulses seems more effective than IES with long-pulses. The vagal pathway and extra-vagal pathways are involved in the modulatory effects of IES on the central neurons in the satiety center.

Synchronized gastric electrical stimulation improves vagotomy-induced impairment in gastric accommodation via the nitrergic pathway in dogs

Impaired gastric accommodation and gastric dysrhythmia are common in gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia. Recent studies have shown that synchronized gastric electrical stimulation (SGES) accelerates gastric emptying and enhances antral contractions in dogs. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects and mechanism of SGES on gastric accommodation and slow waves impaired by vagotomy in dogs. Gastric tone, compliance, and accommodation as well as slow waves with and without SGES were assessed in seven female regular dogs and seven dogs with bilateral truncal vagotomy, chronically implanted with gastric serosal electrodes and a gastric cannula. We found that 1) vagotomy impaired gastric accommodation that was normalized by SGES. The postprandial increase in gastric volume was 283.5 +/- 50.6 ml in the controlled dogs, 155.2 +/- 49.2 ml in the vagotomized dogs, and 304.0 +/- 57.8 ml in the vagotomized dogs with SGES. The ameliorating effect of SGES was no longer observed after application of N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA); 2) vagotomy did not alter gastric compliance whereas SGES improved gastric compliance in the vagotomized dogs, and the improvement was also blocked by L-NNA; and 3) vagotomy impaired antral slow wave rhythmicity in both fasting and fed states. SGES at the proximal stomach enhanced the postprandial rhythmicity and amplitude (dominant power) of the gastric slow waves in the antrum. In conclusion, SGES with appropriate parameters restores gastric accommodation and improves gastric slow waves impaired by vagotomy. The improvement in gastric accommodation with SGES is mediated via the nitrergic pathway. Combined with previously reported findings (enhanced antral contractions and accelerated gastric emptying) and findings in this study (improved gastric accommodation and slow waves), SGES may be a viable therapy for gastroparesis.