Proposed mechanisms of hypertension and risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in LGBT communities

Metabolic and cardiovascular risks of hormone treatment for transgender individuals

Identifying metabolic and cardiovascular risks of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is challenging due to other confounding variables that affect patient outcomes and the diversity of treatment regimes. Masculinising hormone therapy produces atherogenic lipid profiles, while effects on other metabolic parameters are not consistent. There is insufficient evidence to conclude if cardiovascular disease risk among transmen is increased. The effects of feminising hormone therapy on metabolic parameters do not demonstrate a consistent pattern in the available literature. However, the risk of venous thromboembolism is greater in transwomen than in cis-gender men and women with a possible increase in cardiovascular disease risk. It is recommended to discuss the potential effects of GAHT on cardiovascular health and encourage patients seeking GAHT to adopt a healthy lifestyle. Performing baseline and periodic assessments of cardiovascular risk factors would enable early identification and interventions. In high-risk individuals, the cardiovascular effects of hormonal regimes might impact the treatment decision.

LGBTQ+ cardiovascular health equity: a brief review

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Data shows that social drivers of health (SDOH), including economic stability, racial/cultural identity, and community, have a significant impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other gender and sexual minority) patients face a variety of unique health risk factors and bear a disproportionate burden of CVD compared to cis-gender, heterosexual peers. There is a paucity of research assessing the etiologies of CVD health disparities within the LGBTQ+ community. Herein, we seek to explore existing literature on LGBTQ+ health disparities with a focus on cardiovascular disease, examine trends impacting LGBTQ+ health equity, and identify strategies and interventions that aim to promote LGBTQ+ cardiovascular health equity on a regional and national level.

Sex as a biological variable for cardiovascular physiology

There have been ongoing efforts by federal agencies and scientific communities since the early 1990s to incorporate sex and/or gender in all aspects of cardiovascular research. Scientific journals provide a critical function as change agents to influence transformation by encouraging submissions for topic areas, and by setting standards and expectations for articles submitted to the journal. As part of ongoing efforts to advance sex and gender in cardiovascular physiology research, the American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology recently launched a call for papers on Considering Sex as a Biological Variable. This call was an overwhelming success, resulting in 78 articles published in this collection. This review summarizes the major themes of the collection, including Sex as a Biological Variable Within: Endothelial Cell and Vascular Physiology, Cardiovascular Immunity and Inflammation, Metabolism and Mitochondrial Energy, Extracellular Matrix Turnover and Fibrosis, Neurohormonal Signaling, and Cardiovascular Clinical and Epidemiology Assessments. Several articles also focused on establishing rigor and reproducibility of key physiological measurements involved in cardiovascular health and disease, as well as recommendations and considerations for study design. Combined, these articles summarize our current understanding of sex and gender influences on cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology and provide insight into future directions needed to further expand our knowledge.