Sequential gating in the human heart K(+) channel Kv1.5 incorporates Q(1) and Q(2) charge components

Hysteretic hERG channel gating current recorded at physiological temperature

Cardiac hERG channels comprise at least two subunits, hERG 1a and hERG 1b, and drive cardiac action potential repolarization. hERG 1a subunits contain a cytoplasmic PAS domain that is absent in hERG 1b. The hERG 1a PAS domain regulates voltage sensor domain (VSD) movement, but hERG VSD behavior and its regulation by the hERG 1a PAS domain have not been studied at physiological temperatures. We recorded gating charge from homomeric hERG 1a and heteromeric hERG 1a/1b channels at near physiological temperatures (36 ± 1 °C) using pulse durations comparable in length to the human ventricular action potential. The voltage dependence of deactivation was hyperpolarized relative to activation, reflecting VSD relaxation at positive potentials. These data suggest that relaxation (hysteresis) works to delay pore closure during repolarization. Interestingly, hERG 1a VSD deactivation displayed a double Boltzmann distribution, but hERG 1a/1b deactivation displayed a single Boltzmann. Disabling the hERG 1a PAS domain using a PAS-targeting antibody similarly transformed hERG 1a deactivation from a double to a single Boltzmann, highlighting the contribution of the PAS in regulating VSD movement. These data represent, to our knowledge, the first recordings of hERG gating charge at physiological temperature and demonstrate that VSD relaxation (hysteresis) is present in hERG channels at physiological temperature.

The EAG Voltage-Dependent K+ Channel Subfamily: Similarities and Differences in Structural Organization and Gating

EAG (ether-à-go-go or KCNH) are a subfamily of the voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channels. Like for all potassium channels, opening of EAG channels drives the membrane potential toward its equilibrium value for potassium, thus setting the resting potential and repolarizing action potentials. As voltage-dependent channels, they switch between open and closed conformations (gating) when changes in membrane potential are sensed by a voltage sensing domain (VSD) which is functionally coupled to a pore domain (PD) containing the permeation pathway, the potassium selectivity filter, and the channel gate. All Kv channels are tetrameric, with four VSDs formed by the S1-S4 transmembrane segments of each subunit, surrounding a central PD with the four S5-S6 sections arranged in a square-shaped structure. Structural information, mutagenesis, and functional experiments, indicated that in "classical/Shaker-type" Kv channels voltage-triggered VSD reorganizations are transmitted to PD gating via the α-helical S4-S5 sequence that links both modules. Importantly, these Shaker-type channels share a domain-swapped VSD/PD organization, with each VSD contacting the PD of the adjacent subunit. In this case, the S4-S5 linker, acting as a rigid mechanical lever (electromechanical lever coupling), would lead to channel gate opening at the cytoplasmic S6 helices bundle. However, new functional data with EAG channels split between the VSD and PD modules indicate that, in some Kv channels, alternative VSD/PD coupling mechanisms do exist. Noticeably, recent elucidation of the architecture of some EAG channels, and other relatives, showed that their VSDs are non-domain swapped. Despite similarities in primary sequence and predicted structural organization for all EAG channels, they show marked kinetic differences whose molecular basis is not completely understood. Thus, while a common general architecture may establish the gating system used by the EAG channels and the physicochemical coupling of voltage sensing to gating, subtle changes in that common structure, and/or allosteric influences of protein domains relatively distant from the central gating machinery, can crucially influence the gating process. We consider here the latest advances on these issues provided by the elucidation of eag1 and erg1 three-dimensional structures, and by both classical and more recent functional studies with different members of the EAG subfamily.

Gating charge movement precedes ionic current activation in hERG channels

We recently reported gating currents recorded from hERG channels expressed in mammalian TSA cells and assessed the kinetics at different voltages. We detected 2 distinct components of charge movement with the bulk of the charge being carried by a slower component. Here we compare our findings in TSA cells with recordings made from oocytes using the Cut Open Vaseline Gap clamp (COVG) and go on to directly compare activation of gating charge and ionic currents at 0 and +60 mV. The data show that gating charge saturates and moves more rapidly than ionic current activates suggesting a transition downstream from the movement of the bulk of gating charge is rate limiting for channel opening.

Fast and slow voltage sensor rearrangements during activation gating in Kv1.2 channels detected using tetramethylrhodamine fluorescence

The Kv1.2 channel, with its high resolution crystal structure, provides an ideal model for investigating conformational changes associated with channel gating, and fluorescent probes attached at the extracellular end of S4 are a powerful way to gain a more complete understanding of the voltage-dependent activity of these dynamic proteins. Tetramethylrhodamine-5-maleimide (TMRM) attached at A291C reports two distinct rearrangements of the voltage sensor domains, and a comparative fluorescence scan of the S4 and S3-S4 linker residues in Shaker and Kv1.2 shows important differences in their emission at other homologous residues. Kv1.2 shows a rapid decrease in A291C emission with a time constant of 1.5 +/- 0.1 ms at 60 mV (n = 11) that correlates with gating currents and reports on translocation of the S4 and S3-S4 linker. However, unlike any Kv channel studied to date, this fast component is dwarfed by a larger, slower quenching of TMRM emission during depolarizations between -120 and -50 mV (tau = 21.4 +/- 2.1 ms at 60 mV, V(1/2) of -73.9 +/- 1.4 mV) that is not seen in either Shaker or Kv1.5 and that comprises >60% of the total signal at all activating potentials. The slow fluorescence relaxes after repolarization in a voltage-dependent manner that matches the time course of Kv1.2 ionic current deactivation. Fluorophores placed directly in S1 and S2 at I187 and T219 recapitulate the time course and voltage dependence of slow quenching. The slow component is lost when the extracellular S1-S2 linker of Kv1.2 is replaced with that of Kv1.5 or Shaker, suggesting that it arises from a continuous internal rearrangement within the voltage sensor, initiated at negative potentials but prevalent throughout the activation process, and which must be reversed for the channel to close.

Fluorescence-tracking of activation gating in human ERG channels reveals rapid S4 movement and slow pore opening

Background

hERG channels are physiologically important ion channels which mediate cardiac repolarization as a result of their unusual gating properties. These are very slow activation compared with other mammalian voltage-gated potassium channels, and extremely rapid inactivation. The mechanism of slow activation is not well understood and is investigated here using fluorescence as a direct measure of S4 movement and pore opening.

Methods and Findings

Tetramethylrhodamine-5-maleimide (TMRM) fluorescence at E519 has been used to track S4 voltage sensor movement, and channel opening and closing in hERG channels. Endogenous cysteines (C445 and C449) in the S1–S2 linker bound TMRM, which caused a 10 mV hyperpolarization of the V_½ of activation to −27.5±2.0 mV, and showed voltage-dependent fluorescence signals. Substitution of S1–S2 linker cysteines with valines allowed unobstructed recording of S3–S4 linker E519C and L520C emission signals. Depolarization of E519C channels caused rapid initial fluorescence quenching, fit with a double Boltzmann relationship, F-V_ON, with V_½,1 = −37.8±1.7 mV, and V_½,2 = 43.5±7.9 mV. The first phase, V_½,1, was ∼20 mV negative to the conductance-voltage relationship measured from ionic tail currents (G-V_½ = −18.3±1.2 mV), and relatively unchanged in a non-inactivating E519C:S620T mutant (V_½ = −34.4±1.5 mV), suggesting the fast initial fluorescence quenching tracked S4 voltage sensor movement. The second phase of rapid quenching was absent in the S620T mutant. The E519C fluorescence upon repolarization (V_½ = −20.6±1.2, k = 11.4 mV) and L520C quenching during depolarization (V_½ = −26.8±1.0, k = 13.3 mV) matched the respective voltage dependencies of hERG ionic tails, and deactivation time constants from −40 to −110 mV, suggesting they detected pore-S4 rearrangements related to ionic current flow during pore opening and closing.

Conclusion

The data indicate: 1) that rapid environmental changes occur at the outer end of S4 in hERG channels that underlie channel activation gating, and 2) that secondary slower changes reflect channel pore opening during sustained depolarizations, and channel closing upon repolarization. 3) No direct evidence was obtained of conformational changes related to inactivation from fluorophores attached at the outer end of S4.

Gating currents from a Kv3 subfamily potassium channel: charge movement and modification by BDS-II toxin

Kv3 channels have a major role in determining neuronal excitability, and are characterized by ultra-rapid kinetics of gating and a high activation threshold. However, the gating currents, which occur as a result of positional changes of the charged elements in the channel structure during activation, are not well understood. Here we report a study of gating currents from wild-type Kv3.2b channels, expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells to facilitate high time-resolution recording. On-gating currents (I(g,on)) had extremely rapid kinetics such that at +80 mV, the time constant for the decay of I(g,on) was only approximately 0.3 ms. Decay of I(g,on) appeared mono-exponential at all potentials studied, and in support of this, the charge-voltage (Q-V) relationship was fitted with a single Boltzmann function, supporting the idea that only one charge system is required to account for the time course of I(g,on) and the voltage dependence of Q(on). The voltage (V((1/2))) for half movement of gating charge was -8.4 +/- 4.0 mV (n = 6), which closely matches the voltage dependence of activation of Kv3.2b ionic currents reported before. Depolarizations to more positive potentials than 0 mV decreased the amplitude and slowed the decay of the off-gating currents (I(g,off)), suggesting that a rate-limiting step in opening was present in Kv3 channels as in Shaker and other Kv channels. Return of charge was negatively shifted along the potential axis with a V((1/2)) of Q(off) of -80.9 +/- 0.8 mV (n = 3), which allowed approximately 90% charge return upon repolarization to -100 mV. BDS-II toxin apparently reduced I(g,on), and greatly slowed the kinetics of I(g,on), while shifting the Q-V relationship in the depolarizing direction. However, the Q-V relationship remained well fitted by a single Boltzmann function. These data provide the first description of Kv3 gating currents and give further insight into the interaction of BDS toxins and Kv3 channels.

The external K+ concentration and mutations in the outer pore mouth affect the inhibition of kv1.5 current by Ni2+

By examining the consequences both of changes of [K+]o and of point mutations in the outer pore mouth, our goal was to determine if the mechanism of the block of Kv1.5 ionic currents by external Ni2+ is similar to that for proton block. Ni2+ block is inhibited by increasing [K+]o, by mutating a histidine residue in the pore turret (H463Q) or by mutating a residue near the pore mouth (R487V) that is the homolog of Shaker T449. Aside from a slight rightward shift of the Q-V curve, Ni2+ had no effect on gating currents. We propose that, as with Ho+, Ni2+ binding to H463 facilitates an outer pore inactivation process that is antagonized by Ko+ and that requires R487. However, whereas Ho+ substantially accelerates inactivation of residual currents, Ni2+ is much less potent, indicating incomplete overlap of the profiles of these two metal ions. Analyses with Co2+ and Mn2+, together with previous results, indicate that for the first-row transition metals the rank order for the inhibition of Kv1.5 in 0 mM Ko+ is Zn2+ (KD approximately 0.07 mM) > or = Ni2+) (KD approximately 0.15 mM) > Co2+ (KD approximately 1.4 mM) > Mn2+ (KD > 10 mM).

Molecular determinants of the inhibition of human Kv1.5 potassium currents by external protons and Zn(2+)

Using human Kv1.5 channels expressed in HEK293 cells we assessed the ability of H+o to mimic the previously reported action of Zn(2+) to inhibit macroscopic hKv1.5 currents, and using site-directed mutagenesis, we addressed the mechanistic basis for the inhibitory effects of H(+)(o) and Zn(2+). As with Zn(2+), H(+)(o) caused a concentration-dependent, K(+)(o)-sensitive and reversible reduction of the maximum conductance (g(max)). With zero, 5 and 140 mM K(+)(o) the pK(H) for this decrease of g(max) was 6.8, 6.2 and 6.0, respectively. The concentration dependence of the block relief caused by increasing [K(+)](o) was well fitted by a non-competitive interaction between H(+)(o) and K(+)(o), for which the K(D) for the K(+) binding site was 0.5-1.0 mM. Additionally, gating current analysis in the non-conducting mutant hKv1.5 W472F showed that changing from pH 7.4 to pH 5.4 did not affect Q(max) and that charge immobilization, presumed to be due to C-type inactivation, was preserved at pH 5.4. Inhibition of hKv1.5 currents by H+o or Zn(2+) was substantially reduced by a mutation either in the channel turret (H463Q) or near the pore mouth (R487V). In light of the requirement for R487, the homologue of Shaker T449, as well as the block-relieving action of K(+)(o), we propose that H(+) or Zn(2+) binding to histidine residues in the pore turret stabilizes a channel conformation that is most likely an inactivated state.

Modulation of Kv1.5 potassium channel gating by extracellular zinc

Zinc ions are known to induce a variable depolarizing shift of the ionic current half-activation potential and substantially slow the activation kinetics of most K(+) channels. In Kv1.5, Zn(2+) also reduces ionic current, and this is relieved by increasing the external K(+) or Cs(+) concentration. Here we have investigated the actions of Zn(2+) on the gating currents of Kv1.5 channels expressed in HEK cells. Zn(2+) shifted the midpoint of the charge-voltage (Q-V) curve substantially more (approximately 2 times) than it shifted the V(1/2) of the g-V curve, and this amounted to +60 mV at 1 mM Zn(2+). Both Q1 and Q2 activation charge components were similarly affected by Zn(2+), which indicated free access of Zn(2+) to channel closed states. The maximal charge movement was also reduced by 1 mM Zn(2+) by approximately 15%, from 1.6 +/- 0.5 to 1.4 +/- 0.47 pC (n = 4). Addition of external K(+) or Cs(+), which relieved the Zn(2+)-induced ionic current reduction, decreased the extent of the Zn(2+)-induced Q-V shift. In 135 mM extracellular Cs(+), 200 microM Zn(2+) reduced ionic current by only 8 +/- 1%, compared with 71% reduction in 0 mM extracellular Cs(+), and caused a comparable shift in both the g-V and Q-V relations (17.9 +/- 0.6 mV vs. 20.8 +/- 2.1 mV, n = 6). Our results confirm the presence of two independent binding sites involved in the Zn(2+) actions. Whereas binding to one site accounts for reduction of current and binding to the other site accounts for the gating shift in ionic current recordings, both sites contribute to the Zn(2+)-induced Q-V shift.

Influence of permeating ions on Kv1.5 channel block by nifedipine

Nifedipine can block K(+) currents through Kv1.5 channels in an open-channel manner (32). Replacement of internal and external K(+) with equimolar Rb(+) or Cs(+) reduced the potency of nifedipine block of Kv1.5 from an IC(50) of 7.3 microM (K(+)) to 16.0 microM (Rb(+)) and 26.9 microM (Cs(+)). The voltage dependence of block was unaffected, and a single binding site block model was used to describe block for all three ions. By varying ion species at the intra- and extracellular mouth of the channel and by using a nonconducting W472F-Kv1.5 mutant, we demonstrated that block was conditioned by the ion permeating the pore and, to a lesser extent, by the extracellular ion species alone. In Kv1.5, the outer pore mutations R487V and R487Y reduced nifedipine potency close to that of Kv4.2 and other Kv channels with an equivalent valine. Although changing this residue can affect C-type inactivation of Kv channels, the normalized reduction and time course of currents blocked by nifedipine in 5, 135, and 300 mM extracellular K(+) concentration was the same. Similarly, a mean recovery time constant from nifedipine block of 316 ms was unchanged (332 ms) after 5-s prepulses to allow C-type inactivation. This is consistent with the conclusion that nifedipine block and C-type inactivation in the Kv1.5 channel can coexist but are mediated by distinct mechanisms coordinated by outer pore conformation.

A high-Na(+) conduction state during recovery from inactivation in the K(+) channel Kv1.5

Na(+) conductance through cloned K(+) channels has previously allowed characterization of inactivation and K(+) binding within the pore, and here we have used Na(+) permeation to study recovery from C-type inactivation in human Kv1.5 channels. Replacing K(+) in the solutions with Na(+) allows complete Kv1.5 inactivation and alters the recovery. The inactivated state is nonconducting for K(+) but has a Na(+) conductance of 13% of the open state. During recovery, inactivated channels progress to a higher Na(+) conductance state (R) in a voltage-dependent manner before deactivating to closed-inactivated states. Channels finally recover from inactivation in the closed configuration. In the R state channels can be reactivated and exhibit supernormal Na(+) currents with a slow biexponential inactivation. Results suggest two pathways for entry to the inactivated state and a pore conformation, perhaps with a higher Na(+) affinity than the open state. The rate of recovery from inactivation is modulated by Na(+)(o) such that 135 mM Na(+)(o) promotes the recovery to normal closed, rather than closed-inactivated states. A kinetic model of recovery that assumes a highly Na(+)-permeable state and deactivation to closed-inactivated and normal closed states at negative voltages can account for the results. Thus these data offer insight into how Kv1. 5 channels recover their resting conformation after inactivation and how ionic conditions can modify recovery rates and pathways.