In vivo evidence for unidentified leptin-induced circulating factors that control white fat mass

Central activation of catecholamine-independent lipolysis drives the end-stage catabolism of all adipose tissues

Several adipose depots, including constitutive bone marrow adipose tissue (cBMAT), resist conventional lipolytic cues, making them metabolically non-responsive. However, under starvation, wasting, or cachexia, the body can eventually catabolize these stable adipocytes through unknown mechanisms. To study this, we developed a mouse model of brain-evoked depletion of all fat, including cBMAT, independent of food intake. Genetic, surgical, and chemical approaches demonstrated that depletion of stable fat required adipose triglyceride lipase-dependent lipolysis but was independent of local nerves, the sympathetic nervous system, and catecholamines. Instead, concurrent hypoglycemia and hypoinsulinemia activated a potent catabolic state by suppressing lipid storage and increasing catecholamine-independent lipolysis via downregulation of cell-autonomous lipolytic inhibitors Acvr1c, G0s2, and Npr3. This was also sufficient to delipidate classical adipose depots. Overall, this work defines unique adaptations of stable adipocytes to resist lipolysis in healthy states while isolating a potent in vivo neurosystemic pathway by which the body can rapidly catabolize all adipose tissues.

Low-dose peripheral leptin infusion produces selective activation of ventromedial hypothalamic and hindbrain STAT3

Previous studies have shown that very low dose, acute, single peripheral leptin injections fully activate arcuate nucleus signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), but ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) pSTAT3 continues to increase with higher doses of leptin that inhibit food intake. The lowest dose that inhibited intake increased circulating leptin 300-fold whereas food intake is inhibited by chronic peripheral leptin infusions that only double circulating leptin. This study examined whether the pattern of hypothalamic pSTAT3 was the same in leptin-infused rats as in leptin-injected rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received intraperitoneal infusions of 0, 5, 10, 20, or 40 µg leptin/day for 9 days. The highest dose of leptin increased serum leptin by 50-100%, inhibited food intake for 5 days, but inhibited weight gain and retroperitoneal fat mass for 9 days. Energy expenditure, respiratory exchange ratio, and brown fat temperature did not change. pSTAT3 was quantified in hypothalamic nuclei and the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) when food intake was inhibited and when it had returned to control levels. There was no effect of leptin on pSTAT3 in the medial or lateral arcuate nucleus or in the dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus. VMH pSTAT3 was increased only at day 4 when food intake was inhibited, but NTS pSTAT3 was increased at both 4 and 9 days of infusion. These results suggest that activation of leptin VMH receptors contributes to the suppression of food intake, but that hindbrain receptors contribute to a sustained change in metabolism that maintains a reduced weight and fat mass.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Low-dose, chronic peripheral infusions of leptin produced an initial, transient inhibition of food intake that correlated with signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activation in the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) and nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). When intake normalized, but weight remained suppressed, the NTS was the only area that remained activated. These data suggest that leptin's primary function is to reduce body fat, that hypophagia is a means of achieving this and that different areas of the brain are responsible for the progressive response.

Obesity: an evolutionary context

People completely lacking body fat (lipodystrophy/lipoatrophy) and those with severe obesity both show profound metabolic and other health issues. Regulating levels of body fat somewhere between these limits would, therefore, appear to be adaptive. Two different models might be contemplated. More traditional is a set point (SP) where the levels are regulated around a fixed level. Alternatively, dual-intervention point (DIP) is a system that tolerates fairly wide variation but is activated when critically high or low levels are breached. The DIP system seems to fit our experience much better than an SP, and models suggest that it is more likely to have evolved. A DIP system may have evolved because of two contrasting selection pressures. At the lower end, we may have been selected to avoid low levels of fat as a buffer against starvation, to avoid disease-induced anorexia, and to support reproduction. At the upper end, we may have been selected to avoid excess storage because of the elevated risks of predation. This upper limit of control seems to have malfunctioned because some of us deposit large fat stores, with important negative health effects. Why has evolution not protected us against this problem? One possibility is that the protective system slowly fell apart due to random mutations after we dramatically reduced the risk of being predated during our evolutionary history. By chance, it fell apart more in some people than others, and these people are now unable to effectively manage their weight in the face of the modern food glut. To understand the evolutionary context of obesity, it is important to separate the adaptive reason for storing some fat (i.e. the lower intervention point), from the nonadaptive reason for storing lots of fat (a broken upper intervention point). The DIP model has several consequences, showing how we understand the obesity problem and what happens when we attempt to treat it.

The unidentified hormonal defense against weight gain

Human biology has evolved to keep body fat within a range that supports survival. During the last 25 years, obesity biologists have uncovered key aspects of physiology that prevent fat mass from becoming too low. In contrast, the mechanisms that counteract excessive adipose expansion are largely unknown. Evidence dating back to the 1950s suggests the existence of a blood-borne molecule that defends against weight gain. In this article, we discuss the research supporting an "unidentified factor of overfeeding" and models that explain its role in body weight control. If it exists, revealing the identity of this factor could end a long-lasting enigma of energy balance regulation and facilitate a much-needed breakthrough in the pharmacological treatment of obesity.

A Systematic Scoping Review of Surgically Manipulated Adipose Tissue and the Regulation of Energetics and Body Fat in Animals

OBJECTIVE

Surgical manipulations of adipose tissue by removal, or partial lipectomy, have demonstrated body fat compensation and recovered body weight, suggesting that the body is able to resist changes to body composition. However, the mechanisms underlying these observations are not well understood. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an update on what is currently known about the regulation of energetics and body fat after surgical manipulations of adipose tissue in small mammals.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus were searched to identify 64 eligible studies. Outcome measures included body fat, body weight, food intake, and circulating biomarkers.

RESULTS

Surgeries performed included lipectomy (72%) or transplantation (12%) in mice (35%), rats (35%), and other small mammals. Findings suggested that lipectomy did not have consistent long-term effects on reducing body weight and fat because regain occurred within 12 to 14 weeks post surgery. Hence, biological feedback mechanisms act to resist long-term changes of body weight or fat. Furthermore, whether this weight and fat regain occurred because of "passive" and "active" regulation under the "set point" or "settling point" theories cannot fully be discerned because of limitations in study designs and data collected.

CONCLUSIONS

The regulation of energetics and body fat are complex and dynamic processes that require further studies of the interplay of genetic, physiological, and behavioral factors.

Fourth-ventricle leptin infusions dose-dependently activate hypothalamic signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

Previous studies have shown that very low-dose infusions of leptin into the third or the fourth ventricle alone have little effect on energy balance, but simultaneous low-dose infusions cause rapid weight loss and increased phosphorylation of STAT3 (p-STAT3) in hypothalamic sites that express leptin receptors. Other studies show that injecting high doses of leptin into the fourth ventricle inhibits food intake and weight gain. Therefore, we tested whether fourth-ventricle leptin infusions that cause weight loss are associated with increased leptin signaling in the hypothalamus. In a dose response study 14-day infusions of increasing doses of leptin showed significant hypophagia, weight loss, and increased hypothalamic p-STAT3 in rats receiving at least 0.9 μg leptin/day. In a second study 0.6 μg leptin/day transiently inhibited food intake and reduced carcass fat, but had no significant effect on energy expenditure. In a final study, we identified the localization of STAT3 activation in the hypothalamus of rats receiving 0, 0.3, or 1.2 μg leptin/day. The high dose of leptin, which caused weight loss in the first experiment, increased p-STAT3 in the ventromedial, dorsomedial, and arcuate nuclei of the hypothalamus. The low dose that increased brown fat UCP1 but did not affect body composition in the first experiment had little effect on hypothalamic p-STAT3. We propose that hindbrain leptin increases the precision of control of energy balance by lowering the threshold for leptin signaling in the forebrain. Further studies are needed to directly test this hypothesis.