Nasal effects of bradykinin and capsaicin: influence on plasma protein leakage and role of sensory neurons

Humoral First-Line Mucosal Innate Defence in vivo

Based on observations in vivo in guinea-pig and human airways, this review presents plasma exudation as non-sieved transmission of bulk plasma across an unperturbed mucosa that maintains its normal barrier functions. Several steps have led to the present understanding of plasma exudation as a non-injurious response to mucosal challenges. The implication of a swift appearance of all circulating multipotent protein systems (also including antimicrobial peptides that now are viewed as being exclusively produced by local cells) on challenged, but intact, mucosal surfaces cannot be trivial. Yet, involvement of early plasma exudation responses in innate mucosal immunology has dwelled below the radar. Admittedly, exploration of physiological plasma exudation mechanisms requires in vivo approaches beyond mouse studies. Plasma exudation also lacks the specificity that is a hallmark of biological revelations. These aspects separate plasma exudation from mainstream progress in immunology. The whole idea, presented here, thus competes with strong paradigms currently entertained in the accepted research front. The present focus on humoral innate immunity in vivo further deviates from most discussions, which concern cell-mediated innate defence. Indeed, plasma exudation has emerged as sole in vivo source of major mucosal defence proteins that now are viewed as local cell produce. In conclusion, this review highlights opportunities for complex actions and interactions provided by non-sieved plasma proteins/peptides on the surface of intact mucosal barriers in vivo.

Capsaicin-induced vasodilatation in human nasal vasculature is mediated by modulation of cyclooxygenase-2 activity and abrogated by sulprostone

Extensively based on evidence gained from experimental animal models, the transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor type 1 (TRPV1)-activator capsaicin is regarded as a valuable tool in the research on neurogenic inflammation. Although capsaicin-related drugs gained renewed interest as a therapeutic tool, there is also controversy as whether neurogenic inflammation actually takes place in humans. In this study, we verified the involvement of capsaicin in vascular responses that are regarded to be implicated in the cascade of neurogenic inflammatory mechanisms. By means of ex vivo functional experiments on human nasal mucosal vascular beds, the effect and mechanism of action of capsaicin was assessed in the absence and presence of various agents that interfere with potentially related transduction pathways. Ten micromolars of capsaicin induced vasodilatations that were reduced by the selective EP(1) prostanoid receptor antagonist SC19220 (10 μM) and almost abolished by the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS398 (1 μM) and the EP(1/3) receptor agonist sulprostone (0.1-10 nM), but not affected by the TRPV1-antagonists capsazepine (5 μM), the neurokinin NK(1) receptor antagonist GR20517A (1 μM), and the calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist CGRP8-37 (100 nM). Spontaneously released PGE(2) and PGD(2) levels were significantly reduced in the presence of capsaicin. In conclusion, capsaicin-at concentrations clinically applied or under investigation for diverse disease backgrounds-induces a vasodilatory response in human nasal mucosa via a mechanism involving TRPV1-independent reduction of PGE(2) production by modulation of COX-2 enzymatic activity. These vasodilatations can be suppressed by the EP(1/3) receptor agonist sulprostone at subnanomolar concentrations.

Histamine in allergic rhinitis

Histamine plays a major role in allergic rhinitis. In susceptible individuals, allergen induces nasal mast cell degranulation and the release of histamine into the nasal mucosa. Histamine has been detected after controlled challenges with allergen and, when administered into the nasal cavity, elicits signs and symptoms similar to those elicited by allergen. All four histamine receptors have been demonstrated in the nasal mucosa. The role of the four histamine receptors in the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis are discussed.

The pathophysiology, clinical impact, and management of nasal congestion in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Nasal congestion is a cardinal symptom of allergic rhinitis (AR). It is difficult to treat and is associated with decreased quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the clinical features of nasal congestion, its complex pathophysiology in the context of AR, its clinical impact, and the strengths and weaknesses of available treatments.

METHODS

Primary studies and reviews in the peer-reviewed, English-language literature were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-2008) and the Cochrane Library (1996-2008) using the terms nasal congestion, allergic rhinitis, pathophysiology, quality of life, and burden. Additional references were obtained by searching the reference lists of the identified articles. Abstracts from the 2006 and 2007 meetings of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology were also searched. Pertinent articles were included in the review if they were recently published and patient-focused, and if their authors were recognized leaders in the field.

RESULTS

A survey of 2355 patients with AR or their guardians found that almost half of respondents rated nasal congestion the most bothersome symptom; in a survey of 2500 adults with AR, 78% rated nasal congestion either extremely or moderately bothersome. Histamine and leukotrienes are major mediators of the allergic inflammation associated with nasal congestion, as indicated by reductions in nasal cross-sectional area in response to histamine challenge (P<0.001) and increases in nasal airway resistance in response to leukotriene challenge (P<0.05).Therapy for nasal congestion in AR is often hampered by limitations associated with the individual agents; for example, decongestants are effective in the control of nasal congestion, but their use is restricted by their adverse-event profiles. A meta-analysis of 16 controlled studies involving 2267 patients with AR found that intranasal corticosteroids provided significantly greater relief of nasal congestion than oral antihistamines (95% CI for combined standardized mean difference, -0.73 to -0.53). The results of several clinical trials have suggested that leukotriene-receptor antagonists may be associated with reduced nasal congestion; however, no agents in this class are currently approved for the treatment of nasal congestion in AR.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for therapies that are well tolerated and effective in relieving nasal congestion in AR.

Challenge-induced plasma exudation and mucinous secretion in human airways

Secretion of mucins and exudation of plasma are distinct processes of importance to innate immunity and inflammatory disease. Yet, little is known about their relation in human airways. The objective of the present study was to use the human nasal airway to determine mucinous secretion and plasma exudation in response to common challenge agents and mediators. Ten healthy volunteers were subjected to nasal challenge-lavage procedures. Thus, the nasal mucosa was exposed to increasing doses of histamine (40 and 400 microg ml(-1)), methacholine (12.5 and 25 mg) and capsaicin (30 and 300 ng ml(-1)). Fucose was selected as a global marker of mucinous secretion and alpha(2)-macroglobulin as an index of exudation of bulk plasma. All challenge agents increased the mucosal output of fucose to about the same level (P<0.01-0.05). Once significant secretion had been induced the subsequently increased dose of the challenge agent, in the case of histamine and methacholine, failed to further increase the response. Only histamine increased the mucosal output of alpha(2)-macroglobulin (P<0.01). We conclude that prompt but potentially rapidly depleted mucinous secretion is common to different kinds of airway challenges, whereas inflammatory histamine-type mediators are required to produce plasma exudation. Along with the acknowledged secretion of mucins, a practically non-depletable, pluripotent mucosal output of plasma emerges as an important component of the innate immunity of human airways.

Role of tachykinins in asthma

The sensory neuropeptides substance P (SP) and neurokinin A (NKA) are localized to sensory airway nerves, from which they can be released by a variety of stimuli, including allergen, ozone, or inflammatory mediators. Sensory nerves containing these peptides are relatively scarce in human airways, but it is becoming increasingly evident that inflammatory cells such as eosinophils, macrophages, lymphocytes, and dendritic cells can produce the tachykinins SP and NKA. Moreover, immune stimuli can boost the production and secretion of SP and NKA. SP and NKA have potent effects on bronchomotor tone, airway secretions, and bronchial circulation (vasodilation and microvascular leakage) and on inflammatory and immune cells. Following their release, tachykinins are degraded by neutral endopeptidase (NEP) and angiotensin-converting enzyme. The airway effects of the tachykinins are largely mediated by tachykinin NK1 and NK2 receptors. Tachykinins contract smooth muscle mainly by interaction with NK2 receptors, while the vascular and proinflammatory effects are mediated by the NK1 receptor. In view of their potent effects on the airways, tachykinins have been put forward as possible mediators of asthma, and tachykinin receptor antagonists are a potential new class of antiasthmatic medication.

Nasal reactivity to capsaicin in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis during and after the pollen season

BACKGROUND

We aimed to study the participation of neurogenic mechanisms in nasal allergic inflammation by assessing the effect of neurogenic stimulation on the secretory and cellular responses of nasal mucosa in patients with allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

A group of patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis was challenged intranasally with incremental doses of capsaicin (0.3, 3, 12 microg) during and after the pollen season. Clinical symptoms after provocations were monitored, and unilateral nasal lavages were obtained. The nasal lavage fluid (NAL) was assayed for concentration of total protein, albumin, lactoferrin, and number of leukocytes, following by differential count.

RESULTS

Capsaicin challenge during the pollen season produced greater congestion (P < 0.01) and rhinorrhea (P < 0.05) than after the season. The intensity of burning sensation (pain) was similar on both occasions. Capsaicin failed to increase albumin content in NAL both during and after the season. Total protein was increased only after the highest dose of capsaicin (P < 0.03) after the season. The number of eosinophils in basal lavages was higher during the season. During the season, the total number of leukocytes at least doubled in 7/12 patients and the percentage of eosinophils increased in 6/12 patients after the capsaicin challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that during the symptomatic period the nasal mucosa of allergic patients is more susceptible to neurogenic stimulation, showing enhanced secretory and inflammatory (cellular) responses.

Does histamine stimulate trigeminal nasal afferents?

The response to histamine of nasal afferents has been studied in guinea pigs by recording the electrical activity of the whole ethmoidal nerve (EN) or that of single units. Guinea pigs were anaesthetized with urethane and breathed through a tracheostomy. Prior to intranasal instillation of histamine (1 x 10(-4)-10(-1) M), the nasal mucosa was treated with 20 microl of saline (0.9% NaCl) or HCl (pH = 2), and in some cases, H2SO4 (pH = 2). In other experiments, following HCl instillation animals were pretreated by tripelennamine (1 x 10(-2) M) and/or cimetidine (1 x 10(-2) M) in order to determine the histamine receptor type of sensory nerve endings. Whole EN activity was not stimulated even by the highest dose (1 x 10(-1) M) of histamine when the nose was pretreated with saline, but was substantially stimulated by histamine in a dose-response fashion (1 x 10(-2) M) after pretreatment with HCI or H2SO4. Pretreatment with tripelennamine and HCl prevented the effect of histamine on the afferent EN activity; but after cimetidine and HCl pretreatment histamine still had a marked stimulant effect. In the case of single unit activities, histamine with HCl pretreatment had a long-lasting stimulatory effect (110.2 +/- 26.6 sec). It is concluded that the EN in guinea pigs include histamine-sensitive fibers whose sensitivity is mediated by H1 receptors and can respond to histamine only under abnormal conditions of the nasal mucosa.

Nasal mucosal endorgan hyperresponsiveness

Nonspecific hyperresponsiveness of the upper and lower airways is a well-known characteristic of different inflammatory airway diseases but the underlying mechanisms have not yet been satisfactorily explained. In attempts to elucidate the relation of hyperresponsiveness to disease pathophysiology we have particularly examined the possibility that different airway endorgans may alter their function in allergic airway disease. The nose, in contrast to the bronchi, is an accessible part of the airways where in vivo studies of airway mucosal processes can be carried out in humans under controlled conditions. Different endorgans can be defined in the airway mucosa: subepithelial microvessels, epithelium, glands, and sensory nerves. Techniques may be applied further in the nose to determine selectively the responses/function of these endorgans. Topical challenge with methacholine will induce a glandular secretory response, and topical capsaicin activates sensory c-fibers and induces nasal smart. Topical histamine induces extravasation of plasma from the subepithelial microvessels. The plasma exudate first floods the lamina propria and then moves up between epithelial cells into the airway lumen. This occurs without any changes in the ultrastructure or barrier function of the epithelium. We have therefore forwarded the view of mucosal exudation of bulk plasma as a physiological airway tissue response with primarily a defense function. Since the exudation is specific to inflammation, we have also suggested mucosal exudation as a major inflammatory response among airway endorgan functions. Using a "nasal pool" device for concomitant provocation with histamine and lavage of the nasal mucosa we have assessed exudative responses by analyzing the levels of plasma proteins (e.g., albumin alpha 2-macroglobulin) in the returned lavage fluids. A secretory hyperresponsiveness occurs in both experimental and seasonal allergic rhinitis. This type of nasal hyperreactivity may develop already 30 minutes after allergen challenge. It is attenuated by topical steroids and oral antihistamines. We have demonstrated that exudative hyperresponsiveness develops in both seasonal allergic rhinitis and common cold, indicating significant changes of this important microvascular response in these diseases. An attractive hypothesis to explain airway hyperresponsiveness has been increased mucosal absorption permeability due to epithelial damage, possibly secondary to the release of eosinophil products. However, neither nonspecific nor specific endorgan hyperresponsiveness in allergic airways may be explained by epithelial fragility or damage since nasal absorption permeability (measured with 51CR-EDTA and dDAVP) was decreased or unchanged in our studies of allergic and virus-induced rhinitis, respectively. Thus, the absorption barrier of the airway mucosa may become functionally tighter in chronic eosinophilic inflammation.

Comparison of nasal mucosal responsiveness to neuronal stimulation in non-allergic and allergic rhinitis: effects of capsaicin nasal challenge

BACKGROUND

Neuronal involvement has been implicated in the pathophysiology of non-allergic and allergic rhinitis, contributing to the typical exacerbation of these conditions upon exposure to non-specific environmental irritants.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if non-allergic and allergic rhinitis are characterized by increased responsiveness of the nasal mucosa to sensorineural stimulation.

METHODS

Nasal challenges with capsaicin and its vehicle were performed in three groups of subjects -- non-allergic rhinitics, perennial allergic rhinitics, and healthy controls -- and resultant symptom scores, glandular secretion reflected by lactoferrin levels, and plasma extravasation reflected by albumin levels in nasal lavage fluid were compared.

RESULTS

Capsaicin-sensitive nerve stimulation produced increases in symptom scores and lactoferrin levels which were similar among the three groups of subjects. On the other hand, only the group of subjects with allergic rhinitis demonstrated a significant capsaicin-induced increase in albumin levels and a trend in total protein levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that non-allergic rhinitis is not characterized by increased responsiveness of capsaicin-sensitive nerve fibres; while allergic rhinitis is marked by hyperresponsiveness manifested as increased albumin leakage in nasal fluids. This may reflect the activity of an axonal reflex to sensorineural stimulation.

Effects of inhaled histamine, methacholine and capsaicin on sputum levels of alpha 2-macroglobulin

BACKGROUND

Plasma exudation-derived proteins and peptides contribute significantly to inflammation in the airway mucosa in vivo. In the guinea pig trachea both histamine and the neurogenic stimulant capsaicin produce acute mucosal tissue distribution and luminal entry of bulk plasma, whereas cholinergic agonists fail to produce this effect. Of these agents, only histamine induces mucosal exudation of plasma in human nasal airways. The exudative effect of the above agents on human bronchi remains unknown.

METHODS

The bronchial exudative responses to inhalation of histamine, methacholine, and capsaicin were examined in two groups of healthy volunteers. Sputum was induced on three occasions in each study group by inhalation of hypertonic saline (4.5%) given as an aerosol for 40 minutes using an ultrasonic nebuliser. The second and third occasions were preceded by histamine and capsaicin challenges in the first study group, and by histamine and methacholine challenges in the second study group. Histamine and methacholine were given in cumulative doses (total doses 3160 micrograms, respectively) or until a 20% reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was achieved. Cumulative doses of capsaicin were inhaled until coughing prevented the subjects from drawing a full breath. Sputum levels of alpha 2-macroglobulin (729 kDa) were measured as an index of mucosal exudation of bulk plasma.

RESULTS

Histamine increased mean (SE) sputum levels of alpha 2-macroglobulin from 2.72 (1.01) micrograms/ml (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 4.94) to 18.38 (8.03) micrograms/ml (95% CI 0.49 to 36.27) in the first group, and from 1.66 (0.84) micrograms/ml (95% CI -0.18 to 3.49) to 9.43 (3.63) micrograms/ml (95% CI 1.59 to 17.27) in the second group. In contrast, capsaicin evoked no exudation (sputum levels of alpha 2-macroglobulin 1.21 (0.28) micrograms/ml (95% CI 0.59 to 1.83)) and methacholine produced a minor increase in sputum levels of alpha 2-macroglobulin (2.90 (0.92) micrograms/ml (95% CI 0.90 to 4.89)).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that histamine is a useful agent for studying bronchial exudative responsiveness in man and that exudative effects are only of marginal importance in the cough and bronchoconstriction produced by capsaicin and methacholine.

Challenge tests in nose and bronchi: pharmacological modulation of rhinitis and asthma

In order to study the pathophysiology of allergic airway disease and its response to pharmacotherapy, allergic and non-allergic provocation challenge techniques can be employed. Lower airway challenge has been used widely, but the use of nasal challenge is becoming more widespread as its advantages are realized. New measurement techniques are also being used (e.g. acoustic rhinometry), along with more classical methods such as spirometry, peak airflow rate and symptom scores, to determine the response to challenge. In the lungs, allergen challenge produces a biphasic response, which is less clearly defined in the nose. Topical histamine challenge closely resembles the effects of an allergic reaction and acts by stimulating sensory nerve endings. Methacholine is also often used for nasal challenge (often in addition to histamine), due to its effects on glandular sensitivity. Exercise induces bronchoconstriction in asthmatics and can be imitated by inhalation of cold, dry air. Cold air induces glandular hypersecretion and nasal discharge in normal subjects, which is increased in severity in rhinitic patients. Drug effect investigations using antihistamines have shown that histamine is important in producing the symptom of sneezing, whereas nasal blockage is due to vasodilatation rather than plasma exudation and oedema. Beta 2-agonists reduce allergen-induced symptoms by stabilizing mast cells, whereas cholinoceptor antagonists reduce watery nasal secretion. Increased responsiveness of sensory nerves and nasal glands is a characteristic clinical feature of asthma and rhinitis, which is responsible for the symptomatology. These effects can be reduced by topical corticosteroids.

Effect of an inhaled neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, phosphoramidon, on baseline airway calibre and bronchial responsiveness to bradykinin in asthma

BACKGROUND

Bradykinin is a potent vasoactive peptide which has been proposed as an important inflammatory mediator in asthma since it provokes potent bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects. Little is known at present about the potential role of lung peptidases in modulating bradykinin-induced airway dysfunction in vivo in man. The change in bronchial reactivity to bradykinin was therefore investigated after treatment with inhaled phosphoramidon, a potent neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitor, in a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised study of 10 asthmatic subjects.

METHODS

Subjects attended on six separate occasions at the same time of day during which concentration-response studies with inhaled bradykinin and histamine were carried out, without treatment and after each test drug. Subjects received nebulised phosphoramidon sodium salt (10(-5) M, 3 ml) or matched placebo for 5-7 minutes using an Inspiron Mini-neb nebuliser 5 minutes before the bronchoprovocation test with bradykinin or histamine. Agonists were administered in increasing concentrations as an aerosol generated from a starting volume of 3 ml in a nebuliser driven by compressed air at 8 1/min. Changes in airway calibre were measured as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and responsiveness as the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20).

RESULTS

Phosphoramidon administration caused a transient fall in FEV1 from baseline, FEV1 values decreasing 6.3% and 5.3% on the bradykinin and histamine study days, respectively. When compared with placebo, phosphoramidon elicited a small enhancement of the airways response to bradykinin, the geometric mean PC20 value (range) decreasing from 0.281 (0.015-5.575) to 0.136 (0.006-2.061) mg/ml. In contrast, NEP blockade failed to alter the airways response to a subsequent inhalation with histamine, the geometric mean (range) PC20 histamine value of 1.65 (0.17-10.52) mg/ml after placebo being no different from that of 1.58 (0.09-15.21) mg/ml obtained after phosphoramidon.

CONCLUSIONS

The small increase in bronchial reactivity to bradykinin after phosphoramidon exposure suggests that endogenous airway NEP may play a modulatory role in the airways response to inflammatory peptides in human asthma.

Contralateral differences among biomarkers determined by a modified nasal lavage technique after unilateral antigen challenge

The concentration of biomarkers from vessels and inflammatory cells in nasal lavage fluid reflects the degree of hyperresponsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis. The lavage has usually been performed of both nasal cavities together after prewashings and administration of decongestants. To improve the technique, we introduced a modification involving lavage of the nasal cavities separately without any prewashings or decongestants. We challenged 20 rhinitic subjects sensitive to timothy unilaterally with timothy extract. In nasal lavages performed before, immediately after, and 6 h after the challenge, we determined the concentrations of albumin, histamine, bradykinin, TAME (N-alpha-tosyl-L-arginine methyl ester)-esterase, and leukotriene C4 (LTC4). In eight subjects, the procedure was repeated 1 and 2 weeks later. After the challenge, albumin, bradykinin, TAME-esterase, and LTC4 in the nasal lavage fluid increased on the ipsilateral side but not on the contralateral side. Histamine did not increase after antigen challenge. After 6 h, the biomarkers were not increased. The concentrations of biomarkers did not differ between sides before the challenge and not between visits. Thus, the modified nasal lavage technique is reliable and improved compared to previous methods because it involves reproducible determinations of different biomarkers, and it is simple and easy to perform.

Nonallergic rhinitis. Pathophysiology and models for study

Nonallergic rhinitis is a diagnosis of exclusion which is given to patients who suffer perennial nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and/or sneezing with no identifiable allergic etiology. Because there is still no clear understanding of the pathophysiology, it is possible that a number of different disease processes may be included within this clinically defined entity. This report does not attempt to present an overall discussion of the clinical approaches to patients with nonallergic rhinitis. Instead, an outline is presented of various research approaches which may be used in its study. A number of nasal provocation models using nonallergic stimuli are available for application in the laboratory. These include intranasal methacholine challenges, intranasal histamine challenges, nasal inhalation of cold dry air, and intranasal capsaicin challenges. These models provide certain insights into mechanisms of nonallergic hyper-responsiveness. An additional approach to the study of nonallergic rhinitis is to examine available therapies, allowing the clinician to evaluate various pathways of importance in the disease process. These approaches provide a certain understanding of this common but perplexing entity, although further study is still required.

The human nasal response to capsaicin

Airway sensory nerves play a role in reactions to inhaled allergens, irritants, and physical stimuli. Capsaicin, the pungent principle of hot peppers, stimulates a subcategory of sensory nerves. To study the consequences of selective activation of airway sensory nerves in the human nose, we administered capsaicin nasal challenges to eight volunteers (four normal subjects and four subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis). Capsaicin (20 mumol/L), when sprayed into the nose, induced burning, rhinorrhea, and lacrimation. Capsaicin also induced a significant increase in total protein content of nasal lavage fluid after challenge compared with vehicle (increase from before challenge to 1 minute after challenge, 172 +/- 55 vs 46 +/- 29 micrograms/ml, p < 0.001). In contrast to many animal studies, capsaicin did not increase vascular permeability in the airway, because albumin content of nasal lavage fluid was not increased (p = 0.86). On the other hand, lactoferrin, a marker of glandular secretion, was increased (p < 0.005). Repetitive capsaicin challenge every 10 minutes led to tachyphylaxis of symptoms, total protein secretion, and lactoferrin secretion. Compared with vehicle, unilateral capsaicin (6 mmol/L) disk challenge induced significant secretion both ipsilateral (21.3 +/- 4.2 vs 4.9 +/- 2.1 mg, p < 0.01) and contralateral (18.2 +/- 4.4 vs 7.4 +/- 1.9 mg, p < 0.04) to challenge. Thus we have shown that capsaicin challenge to the human nose leads to airway sensory nerve activation. Further, we have demonstrated that capsaicin stimulates a predominantly central neuronal response and that the induced secretory response is of glandular rather than vascular origin.

Do nasal mast cells release histamine on stimulation with substance P in allergic rhinitis?

The effects of nasal administration of increasing doses of exogenous substance P have been studied in patients with allergic rhinitis treated with placebo or with the H1 antagonist cetirizine (10 mg twice daily for 3 days). Responses to substance P were assessed by posterior rhinomanometry (measuring nasal airway resistance) and by measure of histamine, protein and albumin production and cell recovery in nasal lavage fluids before and after challenge. Substance P induced a dose-dependent increase in nasal airway resistance which was similar after treatment with either cetirizine or placebo (maximal increase in nasal airway resistance was 4.2-fold greater than the baseline with the placebo and 4.7-fold greater than the baseline with cetirizine). No histamine release was observed. Similar increases in protein and albumin production were observed after stimulation with substance P along with the placebo (protein: from 0.35 +/- 0.11 to 3.31 +/- 0.62 mg and albumin: from 0.09 +/- 0.04 to 2.08 +/- 0.39 mg) and when combined with cetirizine treatment (proteins: from 0.42 +/- 0.09 to 3.62 +/- 0.77 and albumin: from 0.17 +/- 0.04 to 2.19 +/- 0.51 mg). After stimulation with substance P, percentages of neutrophils recovered in nasal fluids increased from 26.2 +/- 11.5 to 54.5 +/- 9.5 with the placebo and from 35.5 +/- 11.0 to 53.6 +/- 9.5 with cetirizine. Eosinophils were inconsistently found after substance P stimulation during both treatments. In conclusion, nasal response to substance P is not modified by cetirizine which suggests that the effect of substance P is not secondary to histamine release in the nose in man.

Effects of ipratropium bromide on bradykinin nasal provocation in chronic allergic rhinitis

Bradykinin (BK) induces albumin exudation and glandular secretion in chronic allergic rhinitis subjects. Since bradykinin may stimulate nociceptive sensory nerves, neural reflex arcs could contribute to the secretion process. Six chronic allergic rhinitis subjects received 1000 nM bradykinin by unilateral nasal provocation using the method of Raphael et al. This dose induces optimal contralateral glandular secretion. Ipratropium bromide (80 micrograms) or saline were applied topically before the challenges. Total protein, albumin, glycoconjugate, and lysozyme were measured in lavage fluids. On the ipsilateral side, bradykinin induced significant total protein, glycoconjugate, and albumin secretion. None of these were affected by ipratropium. On the contralateral side, total protein and glycoconjugates were increased by bradykinin, while albumin and lysozyme were not significantly affected. Ipratropium bromide completely ablated total protein and glycoconjugate secretion on the contralateral side indicating that cholinergic reflexes mediated the glandular secretion. In chronic allergic rhinitis, bradykinin directly stimulated albumin secretion, but also stimulates nociceptive neuron--parasympathetic nerve reflexes to induce glandular secretion. The reflex loop was apparent on the contralateral side to the unilateral bradykinin challenge. This loop induced mucoglycoconjugate, but not serous cell, secretion in chronic allergic rhinitis subjects and can be inhibited by iptratropium bromide.

The effect of terfenadine on unilateral nasal challenge with allergen

To investigate the role of H1 receptor-mediated effects in allergic rhinitis, we challenged 12 allergic volunteers with allergen 2 hours after administration of either placebo or 60 mg of terfenadine. Filter paper discs were used for the unilateral administration of allergen and the collection of nasal secretions. Secretion weights, levels of histamine in recovered nasal secretions, and nasal airway resistance (NAR) were measured for each nostril separately, and the number of sneezes was counted. After placebo treatment, allergen challenge led to significant increases in ipsilateral and contralateral secretion weights, ipsilateral histamine levels, ipsilateral NAR, and sneezing. Contralateral histamine levels were not elevated. H1 antagonism with terfenadine markedly reduced the number of sneezes and partially decreased ipsilateral and contralateral secretion weights, without affecting the increase in NAR. Terfenadine premedication also lowered the amount of histamine in ipsilateral secretions after allergen challenge. Performing identical nasal challenges with a 10-fold lower dose of antigen produced similar results. Previous studies showed that terfenadine had no effect on methacholine provocation and completely abolished ipsilateral and contralateral secretion weights after histamine challenge. We conclude that sneezing after allergen challenge is caused almost exclusively by a reflex initiated through H1 receptors and that H1 antagonism has no influence on allergen-induced increases in NAR. Unilateral allergen challenge leads to bilateral increases in secretion weights, which are only partially inhibited by terfenadine, suggesting the involvement of mediators other than histamine in the nasonasal reflex. As reported earlier, terfenadine also decreases allergen-induced histamine release after challenge with the highest dose of antigen.

Budesonide inhibits plasma extravasation induced by capsaicin and by substance P in the rat nasal mucosa

We studied the effect of the locally administered glucocorticoid budesonide on plasma extravasation induced by capsaicin and by substance P (SP) in the nasal mucosa of pathogen-free rats. Using Evans blue dye as a tracer, we measured plasma extravasation induced by capsaicin (150 micrograms kg-1 i.v.) or SP (0.5 and 2.5 micrograms kg-1 i.v.) in the rat naso- and maxilloturbinates after pretreatment with budesonide (0.1-50 micrograms twice/day for 2 days in the right nostril; 50 micrograms only for SP) or its vehicle. We found that budesonide inhibits plasma extravasation induced by capsaicin in a dose-dependent fashion in the nasal cavity. After the highest dose (50 micrograms) of budesonide, the values of Evans blue in the nasal mucosa were not different from the values observed after capsaicin vehicle alone. Budesonide also reduced plasma extravasation induced by capsaicin in the trachea and the urinary bladder of the rats in a dose-dependent fashion. Budesonide (50 micrograms) delivered to the nose inhibited the plasma extravasation caused by 0.5 but not by 2.5 micrograms SP kg-1 in the nasal mucosa. We conclude that the postjunctional part of the neurogenic pathway is a target for glucocorticoid antiinflammatory action in the nasal mucosa, at least of the rat. Budesonide's effect on organs other than the nose can be explained by systemic absorption.

Sensory neuropeptide release by bradykinin: mechanisms and pathophysiological implications

Bradykinin (BK) and related kinins excite primary sensory neurons, thus leading to the activation of sensory impulses. More recently, both functional and neurochemical evidence have been accumulated that BK evokes release of neuropeptides, including calcitonin gene-related peptide and the tachykinins substance P and neurokinin A, from peripheral terminals of capsaicin-sensitive primary afferents. The present article will review the mechanisms and the pathophysiological implications of the ability of BK to release sensory neuropeptides at the peripheral level. An account of the clinical studies performed on this subject will be also given.

Acute effect of inhaled bradykinin on tracheobronchial clearance in normal humans

BACKGROUND

Bradykinin, a nonapeptide that contributes as a mediator to the pathogenesis of asthma, may affect lung mucociliary clearance, as it has been shown to be a potent secretagogue in canine airways and in human nasal mucosa in vivo. To evaluate this possibility the effect of inhaled bradykinin on mucociliary clearance has been studied in 10 healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Subjects attended the laboratory on two occasions to take part in tracheobronchial clearance studies using a non-invasive radioisotopic technique. Inhalation of radioaerosol was followed 30 minutes later by inhalation of either bradykinin (8 mg/ml) or vehicle placebo in a randomised, double blind fashion. After each inhalation the number of coughs was recorded. Whole lung radioactivity was measured every half hour for six hours with two collimated scintillation counters, and a tracheobronchial clearance curve was plotted for each subject on each occasion.

RESULTS

Mucociliary clearance, expressed as the area under the tracheobronchial radioaerosol retention curve calculated for the first six hours (AUC0-6h), was greater in nine out of 10 subjects after inhalation of bradykinin than after placebo. The median values (range) for AUC0-6h were significantly reduced from 126% (78-232%)/h with placebo to 87% (51-133%)/h with bradykinin.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that acute exposure to inhaled bradykinin accelerates tracheobronchial clearance in normal human airways.