1
|
Han D, Carr CE. Auditory pathway for detection of vibration in the tokay gecko. Curr Biol 2024; 34:4908-4919.e3. [PMID: 39368471 PMCID: PMC11537832 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/07/2024]
Abstract
Otolithic endorgans such as the saccule were thought to be strictly vestibular in amniotes (reptiles, birds, and mammals), with little evidence supporting the auditory function found in fish and amphibians (frogs and salamanders). Here, we demonstrate an auditory role for the saccule in the tokay gecko (Gekko gecko). The nucleus vestibularis ovalis (VeO) in the hindbrain exclusively receives input from the saccule and projects to the auditory midbrain, the torus semicircularis, via an ascending pathway parallel to cochlear pathways. Single-unit recordings show that VeO is exquisitely sensitive to low-frequency vibrations. Moreover, VeO is present in other lepidosaurs, including snakes and Sphenodon. These findings indicate that the ancestral auditory function of the saccule is likely preserved at least in the lepidosaurian lineage of amniotes and mediates sensitive encoding of vibration. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawei Han
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Catherine E Carr
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Capshaw G, Brown AD, Peña JL, Carr CE, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Tollin DJ, Womack MC, McCullagh EA. The continued importance of comparative auditory research to modern scientific discovery. Hear Res 2023; 433:108766. [PMID: 37084504 PMCID: PMC10321136 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
A rich history of comparative research in the auditory field has afforded a synthetic view of sound information processing by ears and brains. Some organisms have proven to be powerful models for human hearing due to fundamental similarities (e.g., well-matched hearing ranges), while others feature intriguing differences (e.g., atympanic ears) that invite further study. Work across diverse "non-traditional" organisms, from small mammals to avians to amphibians and beyond, continues to propel auditory science forward, netting a variety of biomedical and technological advances along the way. In this brief review, limited primarily to tetrapod vertebrates, we discuss the continued importance of comparative studies in hearing research from the periphery to central nervous system with a focus on outstanding questions such as mechanisms for sound capture, peripheral and central processing of directional/spatial information, and non-canonical auditory processing, including efferent and hormonal effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Capshaw
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
| | - Andrew D Brown
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - José L Peña
- Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Catherine E Carr
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | | | - Daniel J Tollin
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Molly C Womack
- Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
| | - Elizabeth A McCullagh
- Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pulver CA, Celiker E, Woodrow C, Geipel I, Soulsbury CD, Cullen DA, Rogers SM, Veitch D, Montealegre-Z F. Ear pinnae in a neotropical katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) function as ultrasound guides for bat detection. eLife 2022; 11:77628. [PMID: 36170144 PMCID: PMC9519150 DOI: 10.7554/elife.77628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Early predator detection is a key component of the predator-prey arms race and has driven the evolution of multiple animal hearing systems. Katydids (Insecta) have sophisticated ears, each consisting of paired tympana on each foreleg that receive sound both externally, through the air, and internally via a narrowing ear canal running through the leg from an acoustic spiracle on the thorax. These ears are pressure-time difference receivers capable of sensitive and accurate directional hearing across a wide frequency range. Many katydid species have cuticular pinnae which form cavities around the outer tympanal surfaces, but their function is unknown. We investigated pinnal function in the katydid Copiphora gorgonensis by combining experimental biophysics and numerical modelling using 3D ear geometries. We found that the pinnae in C. gorgonensis do not assist in directional hearing for conspecific call frequencies, but instead act as ultrasound detectors. Pinnae induced large sound pressure gains (20–30 dB) that enhanced sound detection at high ultrasonic frequencies (>60 kHz), matching the echolocation range of co-occurring insectivorous gleaning bats. These findings were supported by behavioural and neural audiograms and pinnal cavity resonances from live specimens, and comparisons with the pinnal mechanics of sympatric katydid species, which together suggest that katydid pinnae primarily evolved for the enhanced detection of predatory bats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian A Pulver
- University of Lincoln, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Emine Celiker
- University of Lincoln, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Charlie Woodrow
- University of Lincoln, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Inga Geipel
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama.,CoSys Lab, Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Flanders Make Strategic Research Centre, Lommel, Belgium
| | - Carl D Soulsbury
- University of Lincoln, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Darron A Cullen
- University of Lincoln, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen M Rogers
- University of Lincoln, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Veitch
- University of Lincoln, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Fernando Montealegre-Z
- University of Lincoln, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|