Efficacy of Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:152852. [PMID: 26167173 PMCID: PMC4488176 DOI: 10.1155/2015/152852]

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery position statement on one-anastomosis gastric bypass

The following position statement is issued by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in response to inquiries made to the society by patients, physicians, society members, hospitals, health insurance payors, and others regarding one-anastomosis gastric bypass as a treatment for obesity and metabolic disease. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence available at this time. The statement may be revised in the future as more information becomes available.

Effect of different bariatric surgery methods on metabolic syndrome in patients with severe obesity

Bariatric surgery (BS) has been as a currently developed treatment of choice for metabolic syndrome (MetS). Which, in turn, is well-known as serious public health concern. Therefore, this study assessed the outcomes of different procedures of BS and possible predictors for improving MetS. This single-center retrospective cohort analysis included bariatric candidates between 2009 and 2017. The operational approach was chosen based on the patient's condition, as well as the patient's metabolic profile and the surgeon's experience. All desired information was evaluated at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months after the operation. Of the 1111 patients included, 918 (82.6%) were female. There was no considerable trend in the improvement of MetS over the follow-up period of each surgery group. After 6 to 24 months of follow-up, waist circumference reduction was significant in all three types of surgery, and sleeve gastrectomy resulted in the best (but not significant) improvement rates after 24 months (P = 0.079). One anastomosis gastric bypass had highest decrease in percentage of excess weight loss than other procedures (P < 0.001). Each year increase in age was associated with a 4% decrease in MetS remission. In addition, the male gender, was correlated with MetS improvement positively (P = 0.049). Each one-unit increase in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduced the MetS remission rate by 40%. All three methods of BS were similarly effective in MetS. Consider the predictive value of age, gender, and HbA1c before determining the optimum procedure for each patient is recommended.

Initial experience with laparoscopic gastric bypass in an Australian general foregut surgery unit

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) is an increasingly utilized approach to bariatric surgery in Australia. A high proportion of those procedures are revisional due to Australia's legacy of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), which is not the case internationally. The aim of this study was to compare post-operative outcomes in an Australian general foregut surgery unit against benchmarks published in the literature.

METHODS

This is retrospective cohort study of morbidly obese patients undergoing primary or revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with the two senior authors between 5 May 2015 and 27 June 2019. Perioperative data for the unit's first 100 cases were collected prospectively, stored on a unit database and analysed. Post-operative complications at 30 days, 90 days, mortality, length of hospital stay, and Defined Adverse Events were chosen as indicators of the perioperative outcome (as defined in the Monash Bariatric Surgery Registry).

RESULTS

In this cohort, 35% of procedures were RYGB and 65% were OAGB. The majority (58%) were revisional procedures. Most patients (74%) were female. The median age was 50. The comorbidity profile of the population was similar to those published internationally. The median hospital stay was 4 days. There was no mortality. Early complications occurred in 9% of patients, with 3% occurring late.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of our first 100 cases are comparable with those recorded in the literature, notwithstanding a much higher proportion of revisional cases. LGB can be safely introduced in Australian general foregut surgery units by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A long-lasting and efficient method of managing obesity and therapeutic associated comorbidities is bariatric surgery. However, a debated comparison between one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy is still essential (SG). The goal of this study is to evaluate outcomes using RCT and NRCT from 2015 to 2022.

METHODS

By contrasting the OAGB and SG for bariatric surgery from January 2015 to September 2022, an RCT and NRCT were prospectively gathered using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases of published research. This meta-statistical analysis was carried out in RevMan 5.4, and the best effect model was selected based on heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twelve retrospective studies describing 6344 patients (3725 OAGB and 2619 SG) satisfied the inclusion criteria. A statistically significant result was in %EWL first year (MD = 8.03, 95% CI: 4.54-11.52, P < 0.05), second year (MD = 8.94, 95% CI: 2.95-14.94, P < 0.05), third year (MD = 8.93, 95% CI: 5.75-12.10, P < 0.05), fourth year (MD = 15.09, 95% CI:0.87-29.31, P < 0.05), and fifth year (MD = 14.25, 95% CI: 5.34, P < 0.05). OAGB was associated with a lower rate of remission in dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hemorrhage. However, OAGB increased the incidence of GERD and leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of weight loss and comorbidity remission, OAGB is more effective than SG, although postoperative consequences are rather comparable between the two methods.

OAGB with shortened excluded ileal loop as an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the cases of Caucasian men and women with obesity of the first degree (BMI 30-35 kg/m2)

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study is to assess the effect of shortening the excluded loop of the small intestine to 150 cm on the effectiveness of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in remission of type 2 diabetes with Io obesity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 25 patients with a body mass index (BMI) 30-35 kg/m2, with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM), and undergoing OAGB with excluded 150 cm of the small intestine.

RESULTS

There were no deaths in the study group, bleeding during the postoperative period requiring reoperation, anastomotic leakage/leakage throught mechanical stitching. The mean a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) level 12 months after surgery was 6.16 ± 0.96%, corresponding to a 2.29 ± 3.3% decrease. In more than 85% of the patients taking insulin before surgery, the insulin was discontinued in the postoperative period. Additionally, the level of glycaemia was assessed in patients on the day of surgery (163 ± 58 mg/dl) and on the day of discharge from the hospital (4.7 ± 1.3 days)-it was lower by over 18% (133 ± 39.2 mg). Over the period of 12 months following OAGB, there was a reduction in the mean BMI value from 33.5 ± 2 to 25.5 ± 2.5 kg/m2 and improvement in lipid parameters and mean values of blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

OAGB with excluded 150 cm of the small intestine has beneficial effect on the remission of T2DM in patients with a BMI of 30-35kg/m2 and is associated with an acceptable level of complications. The achieved weight loss after surgery is satisfactory.

Re-Do Surgery after Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Single Center Comparison between Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

Introduction: According to the high rate of patients requiring a Re-Do surgery after a primary Sleeve Gastrectomy, due to failure on weight loss, this study proposes a comparison between RYGB and OAGB as a secondary intervention for morbidly obese patients. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent revisional surgery to convert SG to RYGB or OAGB at our institution from November 2011 to November 2019 was performed. Results: A subset of sixty-three patients with previous SG underwent revisional surgery due to failure of the primary intervention. The OAGB group (n = 17) had a mean BMI at the time of the sleeve of 62 kg/m2 and a mean BMI of 50.7 kg/m2, the length of the Omega was 139.35 cm. The RYGB (n = 46) group showed a mean BMI of 47 kg/m2 at the time of the sleeve and a BMI of 34.8 kg/m2 at the time of the revision. The RYGB was performed according to the 70/120 cm standard for all the patients. One patient also had a revision from secondary OAGB to RYGB due to persistent biliary reflux, in this case the biliary branch was settled at 150 cm and the alimentary at 50 cm. Conclusions: The outcomes in the OAGB group showed a 29%WL and a 47%EWL (out of a 17%WL and 28%EWL at the time of the sleeve), on the other side the RYGB group reached a 33%WL and 72%EWL (out of a 25%WL and a 54%EWL at the time of the sleeve). According to our data we assume that RYGB is more effective in terms of weight loss as a revisional surgery after sleeve

The many faces of diabetes. Is there a need for re-classification? A narrative review

The alarming rise in the worldwide prevalence of obesity and associated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have reached epidemic portions. Diabetes in its many forms and T2DM have different physiological backgrounds and are difficult to classify. Bariatric surgery (BS) is considered the most effective treatment for obesity in terms of weight loss and comorbidity resolution, improves diabetes, and has been proven superior to medical management for the treatment of diabetes. The term metabolic surgery (MS) describes bariatric surgical procedures used primarily to treat T2DM and related metabolic conditions. MS is the most effective means of obtaining substantial and durable weight loss in individuals with obesity. Originally, BS was used as an alternative weight-loss therapy for patients with severe obesity, but clinical data revealed its metabolic benefits in patients with T2DM. MS is more effective than lifestyle or medical management in achieving glycaemic control, sustained weight loss, and reducing diabetes comorbidities. New guidelines for T2DM expand the use of MS to patients with a lower body mass index.Evidence has shown that endocrine changes resulting from BS translate into metabolic benefits that improve the comorbid conditions associated with obesity, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and T2DM. Other changes include bacterial flora rearrangement, bile acids secretion, and adipose tissue effect.This review aims to examine the physiological mechanisms in diabetes, risks for complications, the effects of bariatric and metabolic surgery and will shed light on whether diabetes should be reclassified.

Sleeve gastrectomy versus mini-gastric bypass and their effects on type II diabetes mellitus and weight loss outcome

Bariatric surgeries such as sleeve gastrectomy; mini-gastric bypass surgery are successful weight reduction surgeries which significantly impact metabolic syndrome. The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of laparoscopy gastrectomy and mini-gastric bypasses on weight decrease and diabetes remission of diabetic mellitus type 2 through two years of monitoring. Furthermore, this study looked at the difference between the two procedures regarding their efficacy and identify which one is proper for patients according to their comorbidities. A prospective study was held in Al Sadder Medical City and Al-Gadeer private hospitals in Al-Najaf city, Iraq, from January 2016 to February 2018. The study included 35 obese and morbidly obese patients with a known history of diabetes mellitus type 2, diagnosed from at least two years before surgery. 15 patients undergo uneventful laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (6 females and 9 males). 20 patients underwent uneventful laparoscopic gastric mini bypass surgery (6 females and 14 males). In addition, the patients were followed in the short-term postoperatively (3, 6, 12, 24 months) by monitoring their BMI, weight loss, and HbA1c. There was a decrease in BMI of about 45% from the baseline BMI in sleeve gastrectomy surgery and a decrease in HbA1c of about 45%, less than 6%. In gastric mini-bypass surgery, there was a decrease in BMI of about 47% from the baseline BMI and a decrease in HbA1c of about 45% from the baseline less than 6%, during a 24-month monitoring. Both surgeries were fruitful and had efficient results on patients, but the gastric mini bypass was more efficient than sleeve gastrectomy in controlling and remission of DM type 2 without the need for medications. A long-term study should be performed to reveal their effect and benefits to the patients.

One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery

Background

Failure occurs in up to 60% of the patients that were treated with primary restrictive bariatric operations such as Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB), or restrictive/metabolic operations like Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). Insufficient weight loss and weight regain are the most commonly reported reasons of failure. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to compare One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) as a revisional procedure in terms of weight loss, procedure time, complication rate and morbidity.

Methods

491 patients operated on between 2012 and 2017 for failed restrictive surgery were included in this study (OAGB (n=185) or RYGB (n=306)). Failure was defined as total weight loss (TWL) less than 25%, excess weight loss (EWL) less than 50% and/or a remaining body mass index (BMI) larger than 40 kg/m2 at two years of follow up. Primary outcome measures were %TWL and % excess BMI loss (EBMIL) at 12, 24 and 36 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were procedure time, reduction of comorbidity, early and late complication rate, and mortality.

Results

%TWL was significantly larger in the OAGB group at 12 months (mean 24.1±9.8 vs. 21.9±9.7, p = 0.023) and 24 months (mean 23.9±11.7 vs. 20.5±11.2, p = 0.023) of follow-up. %EBMIL was significantly larger in the OAGB group at 12 months (mean 69.0±44.6 vs. 60.0±30.1, p = 0.014) and 24 months (mean 68.6±51.6 vs. 56.4±35.4, p = 0.025) of follow-up. Intra-abdominal complications (leakage, bleeding, intra-abdominal abscess and perforation) occurred less frequently after revisional OAGB (1.1% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.025). Surgical intervention for biliary reflux (5.4% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.001) was more prevalent in the OAGB group. Surgical intervention for internal herniation (0.0% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.002) was more prevalent in the RYGB group.

Conclusions

This study suggests that OAGB is superior to RYGB as a remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive surgery with more weight loss and a lower early complication rate. To substantiate these findings, further research from prospective randomized controlled trials is needed.

A Systematic Review of One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Metabolic Operation for Patients with Body Mass Index ≤ 35 kg/m2

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) is now an established bariatric procedure for patients suffering from obesity. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the role of this operation in patients with body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m².

METHODS

A literature review was performed as per preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

This review reports cumulative results of 376 OAGB-MGB procedures with a mean age of 44.28 years and mean BMI of 29.16 kg/m² (range 22-35). Females represented 67.67% of the patients. The leak rate was 0.27%. The mean follow-up was 32.6 months (6-84 months). The mean operative time was 89.45 min. The median limb length was 120 cm (range 100-200 cm). The mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) decreased from 196.97 to 103.28 mg/dL. The mean HbA1c came down from 9.13% preoperatively to 6.14% postoperatively. The total cholesterol levels came down from a mean of 197.8 mg/dL preoperatively to 120.6 mg/dL postoperatively. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglyceride levels came down from 127.7 and 209.3 mg/dL to 81 and 94.8 mg/dL, respectively. Mortality was 0%. Marginal ulceration rate of 6.3% and an anaemia rate of 4.7% were reported. Low albumin was reported in 1 (0.2%) patient. The mean BMI came down to 23.76 kg/m² at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is now satisfactory evidence to consider OAGB-MGB as a safe and effective metabolic procedure for diabetic patients with BMI ≤ 35 kg/m². Randomised studies comparing different bariatric procedures with longer term follow-up are needed.

Fasting Ghrelin and Postprandial GLP-1 Levels in Patients With Morbid Obesity and Medical Comorbidities After Sleeve Gastrectomy and One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are among the commonly performed bariatric procedures. This randomized study aimed to compare SG and OAGB in terms of weight loss, improvement in comorbidities, and change in serum ghrelin and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective randomized trial on patients with morbid obesity associated with medical comorbidities who were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 equal groups; group I underwent SG and group II underwent OAGB. Outcome measures were percent of excess weight loss (%EWL), improvement in comorbidities, change in the venous levels of fasting ghrelin and postprandial GLP-1 at 12 months after surgery, in addition to operation time and complications.

RESULTS

Forty patients (38 female) of a mean age of 33.8 years and mean body mass index of 48.6 kg/m2 were included. Operation time in group II was significantly longer than in group I (86 vs. 52.87 min; P<0.001). There were 6 recorded complications (1 in group I and 5 in group II, P=0.18). The %EWL, %total weight loss, and %excess body mass index loss at 6 and 12 months postoperatively were significantly higher in group II than in group I. Both groups had similar rates of improvement in comorbidities. Group I had significantly lower ghrelin and GLP-1 levels postoperatively at 6 and 12 months, respectively, as compared with group II.

CONCLUSIONS

OAGB was associated with significantly higher EWL than SG. The reduction in fasting ghrelin and postprandial GLP-1 serum levels at 12 months after SG was significantly higher than that after OAGB.

Should Surveillance Endoscopy Be Routine After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Detect Marginal Ulcers: Initial Outcomes in a Tertiary Referral Centre

PURPOSE

Encouraged by the excellent outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) reported by many authors, we added this procedure to our bariatric armamentarium in 2015. Here we present our initial experience of 68 cases and findings from routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at 1 year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of a single surgical unit in a tertiary referral centre. Patients undergoing OAGB from January 2015 to May 2019 were included. A fixed biliopancreatic (BP) limb length of 200 cm was used in all patients. Surveillance endoscopy was done at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients, of whom 67.6% were females, were analysed. Mean age was 40.8 ± 1 years. Mean preoperative weight and body mass index (BMI) were 131 ± 24.7 kg and 51 ± 7 kg/m², respectively. Median follow-up was 23 months (range 9-55 months), with 88% follow-up at 6 months and 1 year. At 1 year, mean total weight loss (TWL) and excess weight loss (EWL) were 35% and 71%, respectively. Endoscopy at 1 year revealed a 9.5% rate of marginal ulcers, majority of which healed with conservative treatment. Eighty-eight percent patients had complete remission of diabetes, and 94% had complete remission of hypertension. There was no 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

OAGB is a safe and effective bariatric procedure with excellent short-term outcomes in terms of weight loss, resolution of obesity-related co-morbidities and complications. Routine surveillance endoscopy at 1 year may detect asymptomatic marginal ulcers and, thus, prevent ulcer-related complications.

Clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) on bariatric surgery: update 2020 endorsed by IFSO-EC, EASO and ESPCOP

BACKGROUND

Surgery for obesity and metabolic diseases has been evolved in the light of new scientific evidence, long-term outcomes and accumulated experience. EAES has sponsored an update of previous guidelines on bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of bariatric surgeons, obesity physicians, nutritional experts, psychologists, anesthetists and a patient representative comprised the guideline development panel. Development and reporting conformed to GRADE guidelines and AGREE II standards.

RESULTS

Systematic review of databases, record selection, data extraction and synthesis, evidence appraisal and evidence-to-decision frameworks were developed for 42 key questions in the domains Indication; Preoperative work-up; Perioperative management; Non-bypass, bypass and one-anastomosis procedures; Revisional surgery; Postoperative care; and Investigational procedures. A total of 36 recommendations and position statements were formed through a modified Delphi procedure.

CONCLUSION

This document summarizes the latest evidence on bariatric surgery through state-of-the art guideline development, aiming to facilitate evidence-based clinical decisions.

The Edmonton Obesity Staging System Predicts Perioperative Complications and Procedure Choice in Obesity and Metabolic Surgery-a German Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study (StuDoQ|MBE)

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) and perioperative complications as well as surgical procedure.

BACKGROUND

The application of EOSS for the selection of patients with obesity is a more comprehensive measure of obesity-related diseases and a predictor of mortality than body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

This was a nationwide cohort study using prospectively inserted data from the German register for obesity and metabolic surgery StuDoQ|MBE. All patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) between February 2015 and July 2017 as a primary treatment for severe obesity were included. Data included gender, age, BMI, ASA score, EOSS, early postoperative complications next to the Clavien-Dindo grading system, readmission, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 9437 patients were included. The mean BMI was 49.5 kg/m² ± 7.8 (range 35-103.5). The total postoperative complication rate was 5.3%, with the highest rate in EOSS 3 (7.8%) and 4 (6.8%). Thirty-day mortality was 0.2% with the highest mortality after SG in EOSS 3 (1.16%) and EOSS 4 (0.92%) (p = 0.0068). Crosstabs showed a prevalence of Clavien-Dindo III and IV complications of 3.4% (SG), 3.6% (RYGB), and 1.6% (OAGB) in EOSS 2 (p = 0.0032) and 3.5% (SG), 5.1% (RYGB), and 5.6% (OAGB) in EOSS 3.

CONCLUSION

The highest postoperative complications and mortality occurred in patients with EOSS ≥ 3. SG and OAGB could be the procedure of choice to reduce perioperative morbidity; nevertheless, it has to be in mind that in EOSS ≥ 3, SG has the highest mortality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03556059.

Randomized Controlled Trial of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: Comparison of the YOMEGA and Taiwan Studies

BACKGROUND

The YOMEGA study (Y-study) was a randomized trial comparing one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Here, we aim to compare the Y-study and our pioneer trial from Taiwan (T-study).

METHODS

Data from the Y-study and the T-study were collected and compared.

RESULTS

The Y-study recruited 234 patients with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 43.9 and age of 43.5 years. The T-study recruited 80 patients with a similar mean BMI of 44.3 and mean age of 31.4 years. The studies had similar findings including (1) OAGB is easier and possibly safer procedure than RYGB. Both studies showed that OAGB had a shorter operation time than RYGB, but a lower surgical complication rate was only demonstrated in T-study. (2) Both procedures have similar weight loss but OAGB features better glycemic control than RYGB. Weight loss at 2 years after surgery was similar between two procedures, but OAGB reduced HbA1c to a greater degree than RYGB at 2 years in Y-study (- 2.3% vs. - 1.3%; p = 0.025). The resolution of the metabolic syndrome was 100% for both groups in the T-study. (3) OAGB carried a higher risk of malnutrition. OAGB had more malabsorptive problems with a lower hemoglobin level than RYGB at 2 years after surgery. Adverse malnutrition events occurred in nine (7.8%) OAGB patients in the Y-study. Four (3.4%) patients of OAGB received revision surgery in Y-study but none in T-study. (4) Bile reflux was noted in OAGB patients but did not influence quality of life or revision rate. Y-study found that bile in the gastric pouch was present in 16% of patients in the OAGB group versus none in the RYGB, but no inter-group difference in quality of life was detected. There was a trend for RYGB patients to experience more abdominal pain than OAGB.

CONCLUSIONS

Both studies showed that OAGB is a technically easier procedure and features better glycemic control than RYGB, but has a mal-absorptive effect. However, the bile reflux and abdominal pain controversies persisted.

Long-term consequences of one anastomosis gastric bypass on esogastric mucosa in a preclinical rat model

Although bariatric surgery is proven to sustain weight loss in morbidly obese patients, long-term adverse effects have yet to be fully characterized. This study compared the long-term consequences of two common forms of bariatric surgery: one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) in a preclinical rat model. We evaluated the influence of biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length, malabsorption, and bile acid (BA) reflux on esogastric mucosa. After 30 weeks of follow-up, Wistar rats operated on RYGB, OAGB with a short BPL (15 cm, OAGB-15), or a long BPL (35 cm, OAGB-35), and unoperated rats exhibit no cases of esogastric cancer, metaplasia, dysplasia, or Barrett’s esophagus. Compared to RYGB, OAGB-35 rats presented higher rate of esophagitis, fundic gastritis and perianastomotic foveolar hyperplasia. OAGB-35 rats also revealed the greatest weight loss and malabsorption. On the contrary, BA concentrations were the highest in the residual gastric pouch of OAGB-15 rats. Yet, no association could be established between the esogastric lesions and malabsorption, weight loss, or gastric bile acid concentrations. In conclusion, RYGB results in a better long-term outcome than OAGB, as chronic signs of biliary reflux or reactional gastritis were reported post-OAGB even after reducing the BPL length in a preclinical rat model.

Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass

The single-anastomosis gastric bypass has been proposed as a simpler and efficient weight loss reducing surgery. Postoperative outcomes are comparable to those of contemporary popular procedures. There are, however, controversies regarding the efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). The purpose of this review is to define the role of OAGB in metabolic surgery via its operative outcomes. A review of English language literature was performed using the PubMed database, basing the search on the following keywords: “one-anastomosis gastric bypass” AND “outcomes”. A total of 238 articles were considered for review. Following thorough screening and selection criteria, 7 articles were considered sufficient for assessment. The nature of the available evidence of this technique poses a challenge to OAGB in its establishment as a standard of care procedure. The anatomical configuration following surgery, as well as the metabolic implications of its hypo-absorptive nature, raises controversial and ongoing concerns that are yet to be addressed. Hence, prospective studies with long-term follow-up (>5 years) can bypass these concerns and allow the progression of the clinical practice of OAGB.

Weight loss after one-anastomosis/mini-gastric bypass - The impact of biliopancreatic limb: A retrospective cohort study

Background

One-anastomosis/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB), as a popular bariatric surgery method, has many advantages; however, the biliopancreatic limb length (BPL) in this surgery is under debate. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of BPL on weight-loss outcome after OAGB/MGB.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed on 653 patients who underwent OAGB/MGB with adjusted BPL based on preoperative body mass index (BMI) and patient's age, between 2010 and 2015 with 12-month follow-ups. Weight-loss outcomes and complications were analyzed in these patients, considering BPL.

Results

Weight, age, sex, and type 2 diabetes mellitus were the most contributory predictors as independent predictors of 12-month excess weight loss, respectively, and BPL was the least contributory predictor.

Conclusion

Tailoring BPL in OAGB/MGB based on patient's age and preoperative BMI seems to have acceptable results.

Short- and Mid-term Outcomes of 527 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) Operations: Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis gastric bypass/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is considered an alternative option in metabolic and bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and postoperative challenges of OAGB/MGB as a new procedure.

METHODS

We performed 519 primary MGBs and 8 additional second-stage MGBs during 2014-2018. The data were collected from patients' notes as well as the surgeons' prospective data sheets. Two senior surgeons performed the operations. The ultimate primary measures were assessment of the safety and management of the complications. The secondary outcomes were excess weight loss and resolution of the comorbidities.

RESULTS

The type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission rate was 83% and 70% over 1 and 3 years, respectively (HBA1C < 6.5%). Weight loss was 28-152 kg (SD 23.11). Excess weight loss ranged from 41 to 125%. Hypertension resolution was 61%, 58% and 58% in the first, second and third years, respectively. Ninety-nine per cent of sleep apnoea patients improved symptomatically and went off the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine. Two (0.37%) patients developed diarrhoea, cured by shortening the afferent biliopancreatic limb (BPL). Eight (1.5%) stomal ulcers were reported. Two patients (0.37%) developed deranged liver function, revised by shortening the BPL in one patient and a reversal in the second patient. The mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Mortality was zero.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest UK OAGB/MGB study to date showing safety and acceptable results for metabolic syndrome and obesity problems. OAGB/MGB revisional options are rectifying the morbidity and no mortality.

Clinical Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are popular bariatric surgeries for morbid obesity. Reports on the safety and effectiveness of SG and OAGB are inconsistent. This meta-analysis investigated the clinical outcomes of SG versus those of OAGB for morbid obesity.

METHODS

Based on PRISMA guidelines, we searched the published articles in English from Scopus, PubMed (Medline), Central (Cochrane), and Embase databases. Articles were retrieved from the start date of each database to February 13, 2019. Statistical analysis of this meta-analysis was conducted in Stata 14.0, and the most appropriate effect model was chosen based on heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 20 articles examining 4064 OAGB patients and 3733 SG patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with SG, OAGB showed a higher percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) at 6 months (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 11.32; 95% CI 6.00-16.64), 12 months (WMD = 8.22; 95% CI 3.78-12.66), 24 months (WMD = 10.19; 95% CI 0.88-21.25), 36 months (WMD = 7.93; 95% CI 3.37-12.48), 48 months (WMD = 17.22; 95% CI 7.37-27.06), and 60 months (WMD = 16.43; 95% CI 8.96-23.90). In addition, OAGB was associated with a lower rate of postoperative leak, gastroesophageal reflux disease, revisions, mortality, and dyslipidemia remission rates. However, OAGB increased the incidence of ulcers, malnutrition, and bile reflux.

CONCLUSION

OAGB is more effective for %EWL and dyslipidemia remission than SG. In addition, OAGB may lower the risk of postoperative leak, gastroesophageal reflux disease, revision, and mortality. Further comparisons of the clinical outcomes of OAGB versus SG for morbid obesity would benefit from more high-quality controlled studies.

LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 Year Follow-up Data: a Randomised Control Trial

AIM

The objective of this study is to compare 3-year follow-up results of one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in terms of weight loss, complications, resolution of comorbidities and quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective randomised study of results between 100 LSG patients and 101 MGB-OAGB patients was done from 2012 to 2015. The results were compared regarding operative outcomes, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), complications, resolution of comorbidities and quality of life (BAROS score) at 3 years follow-up.

RESULTS

Follow-up was achieved in 93 MGB-OAGB vs 92 LSG patients for 3-year period. The average %EWL for MGB-OAGB vs LSG was 66.48 vs 61.15% at the end of 3 years respectively, which was statistically insignificant. Diabetes remission was seen in 89.13% of MGB-OAGB patients and 81.82% of LSG patients. Remission of hypertension was seen in 74% of MGB-OAGB patients and 72.22% of LSG patients. Bariatric analysis reporting and outcome system (BAROS) with comorbidity in LSG patients and MGB-OAGB patients was 6.03 and 6.96 respectively, whereas in patients without comorbidity, BAROS score was 3.86 in LSG group and 4.34 in MGB-OAGB group.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, at 36 months follow up, there was no significant difference between LSG and MGB-OAGB in %EWL and remission of HTN. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission rates were higher after MGB-OAGB as compared to LSG but the difference was statistically insignificant. MGB-OAGB patients with comorbidities have a better quality of life and BAROS score compared to LSG patients.

Retrospective cohort study of 925 OAGB procedures. The UK MGB/OAGB collaborative group

BACKGROUND

Mini-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass is a new operation that provides comparable outcomes to the common bariatric procedures. Revisional surgery is still needed after a number of MGB-OAGB procedures. The aim of this study is to report the causes and management of these revisions.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2018, 925 MGB-OAGB operations were performed at 7 bariatric units across the United Kingdom and included in this retrospective cohort study. The data was retrospectively collected and analysed. The primary end point was the identification of the causes and management of revisions. Follow up ranged from 6 months to 3 years.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients [2.3%] required revisional surgery after MGB-OAGB. Five patients [0.5%] developed severe diarrhoea managed by shortening the bilio-pancreatic limb to 150 cm. Four patients [0.4%] developed afferent loop syndrome and bile reflux was reported in another 3 [0.3%] cases; all were managed by either conversion to Roux en Y Gastric Bypass or a Braun anastomosis. Postoperative bleeding was controlled laparoscopically in 3 patients [0.3%]. Liver decompensation that was reported in 2 patients [0.2%] was treated by shortening the BPL in one patient and a reversal to normal anatomy in another. The liver failure resolved in both patients. Other indications for revision included two gastro-jejunal stenosis [0.2%], one perforated ulcer [0.1%], one patient [0.1%] with excessive weight loss and one case [0.1%] of protein malnutrition. None of the 22 patients undergoing revisional surgery after MGB-OAGB died. Lost to follow up rate was 0.2%.

CONCLUSION

Complications requiring revisional surgery after MGB-OAGB are uncommon [2.3%] and the majority can be managed by bilio-pancreatic limb shortening, the addition of a Braun side-to-side anastomosis or conversion to RYGB. Bilio-pancreatic limb length of 200 cm or more resulted in serious complications of liver failure, protein malnutrition, excessive weight loss and diarrhoea.

A New Physiologic Mouse Model of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a modern metabolic operation that has been demonstrated to be a rapid, safe, and effective procedure. As for other bariatric operations, the mechanisms and long-term effects of this procedure remain largely unknown and are difficult to address in human studies. Here, we present a new physiologic mouse model for mechanistic and long-term investigations.

METHODS

Six-week-old C57Bl/6 mice were fed a high-fat diet for 12 weeks and scheduled for OAGB or sham operation. Mice were observed for 2 weeks after the operation, and weight and metabolic condition were monitored.

RESULTS

Six mice were used to adapt the surgical technique. Afterwards, another 7 mice were scheduled for OAGB without further complications. The newly established OAGB procedure resulted in significant weight loss and improvement of glucose metabolism 2 weeks after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The operation presented here is an easy-to-learn and physiologic mouse model of OAGB that can be used for further studies in mice.

From diabetes remedy to diabetes remission; could single-anastomosis gastric bypass be a safe bridge to reach target in non-obese patients?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is considered a chronic progressive incurable metabolic disease. Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB) has proved to be effective in obese patients, yet its impact on non-obese diabetics is not extensively studied. The aim is to determine the anthropometric and glycemic outcomes of SAGB as a proposed line of treatment for T2DM patients with body mass index (BMI) 25-30 kg/m².

METHODS

From November 2013 to March 2016, a prospective study has been conducted at Ain-Shams University Hospitals on 17 consecutive patients who have undergone SAGB. The demographic and anthropometric data, as well as the relevant laboratory results, were reported. Complete T2DM remission is considered if glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <6 % for at least 1 year without medication, whereas partial remission is considered if HbA1c<6.5%.

RESULTS

The mean age was 42.6 ±13.8 years, mean BMI was 26.7 ± 2.3 kg/m² and mean duration of DM was 6.3 ± 2.7 years. The mean baseline values of HbA1c, FPG (fasting plasma glucose), and 2-hours postprandial glucose (2-H PPG) were 9.9%, 176.3 mg/dl, and 310.3 mg/dl respectively. These values significantly dropped at the 18^th month to reach 5.8%, 93.4 mg/dl, and 156.2 mg/dl, with 13/17 patients became off-treatment (complete remission rate 76.4%).

CONCLUSION

T2DM patients with BMI 25-30 kg/m² are considered the most controversial group. SAGB is an efficient metabolic procedure and could be integrated into the treatment algorithm of T2DM. Such line of treatment opens new horizons to change the concept of treatment from diabetes remedy to diabetes remission.

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery review of the literature on one-anastomosis gastric bypass

The following review is being published by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in response to numerous inquiries made to the Society by patients, physicians, society members, hospitals, and others regarding one-anastomosis gastric bypass as a primary treatment for obesity or metabolic disease. The review is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence available at this time. The review is not intended as, and should not be construed as, stating or establishing a local, regional, or national standard of care.

Can bariatric surgery delay the need for knee replacement in morbidly obese osteoarthritis patients

Objective:

The objective of the study was to find the weight reduction pattern and its outcome on knee pain and function in osteoarthritis (OA) morbidly obese patients’ post-bariatric surgery with dietary and exercise changes.

Methodology:

Thirty morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] >40 kg/m²) OA patients gave consent for bariatric surgery. Despite wearisome lifestyle modifications for weight loss and knee pain, satisfactory results were not retrieved. We took consent from all the patients predetermined for knee replacement in future because of pain and disability as recommended by knee replacement surgeon. The dietary and exercise protocol was standardised for all patients for bariatrics. Data for weight loss, change in BMI and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score consisting of pain, stiffness and activities of daily livings (ADLs) scores were documented at baseline, 3 months and 6 months post-bariatric surgery.

Results

The male-to-female ratio was 1:2. Mean age of the patients was 49.8 ± 8.6 years. Significant changes in pain (P < 0.001), stiffness (P < 0.001) and ADLs (P < 0.001) were found postoperatively at 3 and 6 months. Positive correlation of percentage change of BMI was seen with percentage change in pain (r = 0.479, P = 0.007) and ADLs (r = 0.414, P = 0.023) after 6 months of bariatric surgery. Most of the patients were inclined to delay the knee replacement further by the end of 6 months post-bariatric surgery.

Conclusion:

Bariatric surgery when combined with dietary and exercise changes gave significant results in terms of weight loss, knee pain and function. It is an approach that tackles both obesity and OA. It is a major step forward in stemming the global epidemic of these two interlinked conditions.

Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass

Background:

One anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass (OAGB) is believed to be more malabsorptive than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A number of patients undergoing this procedure suffer from severe protein–calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery. The purpose of this study was to find the magnitude of severe protein–calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after OAGB and any potential relationship with biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length.

Methods:

A questionnaire-based survey was carried out on the surgeons performing OAGB. Data were further corroborated with the published scientific literature.

Results:

A total of 118 surgeons from thirty countries reported experience with 47,364 OAGB procedures. Overall, 0.37% (138/36,952) of patients needed revisional surgery for malnutrition. The highest percentage of 0.51% (120/23,277) was recorded with formulae using >200 cm of BPL for some patients, and lowest rate of 0% was seen with 150 cm BPL. These data were corroborated by published scientific literature, which has a record of 50 (0.56%) patients needing surgical revision for severe malnutrition after OAGB.

Conclusions:

A very small number of OAGB patients need surgical correction for severe protein–calorie malnutrition. Highest rates of 0.6% were seen in the hands of surgeons using BPL length of >250 cm for some of their patients, and the lowest rate of 0% was seen with BPL of 150 cm. Future studies are needed to examine the efficacy of a standardised BPL length of 150 cm with OAGB.

Laparoscopic Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to a Standard Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

INTRODUCTION

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) demonstrated results similar to traditional Roux-en-Y procedures [1-3], in terms of weight loss and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities. The main controversy regarding OAGB is the concern for an association between biliary alkaline gastritis and esophageal or gastric cancer raised by some studies [4].

METHODS

We present the case of a 51-year-old woman with a BMI of 41 kg/m2 who underwent a laparoscopic OAGB in 2014. One year later, she consulted for recurrent heartburns. An upper GI endoscopy showed pouchitis and bile reflux in the esophagus. Medical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease was ineffective. We decided to convert the OAGB to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

RESULTS

In this video, we show how to revise an OAGB to treat chronic bile reflux, by converting the procedure to a standard RYGB. The intervention starts by restoring the normal anatomy of the small bowel, with the resection of the gastrojejunal anastomosis, which was located at 250-cm du Treitz's ligament. Then, the gastric pouch is created. A standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The resection of the gastrojejunal anastomosis allows fashioning the Roux-en-Y limb with the classical measures. This technique allows a conversion to a standard RYGB and is effective in treating the biliary reflux.

Comparison of safety and effectiveness between laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass is a newly emerged surgical procedure in recent years. Owe to safe and simple process and effective outcomes, laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass has quickly become one of the most popular procedures in some countries. The safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy remain unclear.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library from inception to May 20, 2017. The methodological quality of Randomized Controlled Trials and non-Randomized Controlled Trials were, respectively, assessed by Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias and Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Patients receiving mini-gastric bypass had a lot of advantageous indexes than patients receiving sleeve gastrectomy, such as higher 1-year EWL% (excess weight loss), higher 5-year EWL%, higher T2DM remission rate, higher hypertension remission rate, higher obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remission rate, lower osteoarthritis remission rate, lower leakage rate, lower overall late complications rate, higher ulcer rate, lower gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) rate, shorter hospital stay and lower revision rate. No significant statistical difference was observed on overall early complications rate, bleed rate, vomiting rate, anemia rate, and operation time between mini-gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Mini-gastric bypass is a simpler, safer, and more effective bariatric procedure than laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Due to the biased data, small sample size and short follow-up time, our results may be unreliable. Large sample and multicenter RCT is needed to compare the effectiveness and safety between mini-gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Future study should also focus on bile reflux, remnant gastric cancer, and long term effectiveness of mini-gastric bypass.

A New Concept in Bariatric Surgery. Single Anastomosis Gastro-Ileal (SAGI): Technical Details and Preliminary Results

BACKGROUND

In one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), the measurement of the afferent limb starting at the angle of Treitz may result in insufficient absorptive surface of the intestine of the remaining efferent limb. To address this concern, we recently modified the technique of OAGB by constructing the gastrointestinal anastomosis at a fixed distance from the ileocecal valve (i.e., 300 cm). We adopted the new concept and named it the single anastomosis gastro-ileal bypass (SAGI).

METHODS

Seven consecutive patients with morbid obesity underwent the SAGI procedure.

RESULTS

There were no intraoperative complications and there were no deaths. The mean excess weight (EW) loss was 55.1 % at 3 months and 82.1 % at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAGI procedure may constitute a safer alternative to the conventional OAGB.

Is Mini-Gastric Bypass a Rational Approach for Type-2 Diabetes?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Morbid obesity and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are both major public health problems. Bariatric surgery is a proven and effective treatment for these conditions; laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is currently the gold-standard treatment. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is described as a simpler, safer, and non-inferior alternative to RYGB to treat morbid obesity. Concerning T2DM, experts of the OAGB procedure report promising metabolic results with good long-term remission of T2DM; however, heterogeneity within the literature prompted us to analyze this issue.

RECENT FINDINGS

OAGB has gained popularity given its safety and long-term efficacy. Concerning the effect of OAGB for the treatment of T2DM, most reports involve non-controlled single-arm studies with heterogeneous methodologies and a few randomized controlled trials. However, this available literature supports the efficacy of OAGB for remission of T2DM in obese and non-obese patients. Two years after OAGB, the T2DM remission and improvement rate increased from 67 to 100%. The results were improved and stable in the long term. The 5-year T2DM remission rate increased from 82 to 84.4%. OAGB is non-inferior compared with RYGB and even superior to other accepted bariatric procedures, such as sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. OAGB is an efficient, safe, simple, and reversible procedure to treat T2DM. The literature reveals interesting results for T2DM remission in non-obese patients. High-level comparative studies are required to support these data.

Seven Years of Mini-Gastric Bypass in Type II Diabetes Patients with a Body Mass Index <35 kg/m(2)

BACKGROUND

Mini-gastric bypass (MGB) is a safe, effective, and reversible procedure for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and morbid obesity. Less is known, however, about its long-term effects in patients with a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m(2).

METHODS

From February 2007 to February 2014, 1468 patients underwent MGB at our institution, including 983 with T2DM. Of these, 128 (82 women), of mean age 41.6 ± 10.2 years, had a BMI of 30-35 kg/m(2). Prospectively collected data were analyzed retrospectively. Factors assessed included disease duration, family history, medication use, remission, and biochemical indicators, including fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum insulin, and C-peptide concentrations. Remission of T2DM was defined as HbA1c <6.0 % without medication.

RESULTS

Prior to surgery, patients had a mean BMI of 33.4 ± 3.3 kg/m(2), mean waist circumference of 104.5 ± 8.2 cm, mean C-peptide concentration of 3.4 ± 1.2 ng/ml, and mean T2DM duration of 6.5 ± 3.1 years. Within 6 months of MGB, 95 % of these patients had attained HbA1c <7 %. Complete remission rates at 1, 2, and 7 years were 64, 66, and 53 %, respectively. Mean HbA1c decreased from 10.7 ± 1.5 % at baseline to 6.2 ± 0.5% at 1 year, 5.4 ± 1.2 % at 3 years, and 5.7 ± 1.8 % at 7 years. No deaths occurred, but two (1.6 %) patients experienced major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

MGB provides good, long-term control of T2DM in patients with class I obesity. Early intervention results in higher remission rates.

Changes of Ghrelin/GOAT axis and mTOR pathway in the hypothalamus after sleeve gastrectomy in obese type-2 diabetes rats

AIM

To examine the changes of the ghrelin/ghrelin O-acyltransferase (GOAT) axis and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway in the hypothalamus after sleeve gastrectomy.

METHODS

A total of 30 obese type-2 diabetes Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, 6 wk of age, fed with high-sugar and high-fat fodder for 2 mo plus intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin were randomly divided into three groups: non-operation group (S0 group, n = 10), sham operation group (Sh group, n = 10) and sleeve gastrectomy group (SG group, n = 10). Data of body mass, food intake, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), acylated ghrelin (AG) and total ghrelin (TG) were collected and measured at the first day (when the rats were 6 wk old), preoperative day 3 and postoperative week 8. The mRNA expression of preproghrelin, GOAT and neuropeptide Y (NPY), and protein expression of ghrelin, GOAT, GHSR and the mTOR pathway (p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-S6) were measured in the hypothalamus.

RESULTS

SG can significantly improve metabolic symptoms by reducing body mass and food intake. The obese rats showed lower serum TG levels and no change in AG, but the ratio of AG/TG was increased. When compared with the S0 and Sh groups, the SG group showed decreased TG (1482.03 ± 26.55, 1481.49 ± 23.30 and 1206.63 ± 52.02 ng/L, respectively, P < 0.05), but unchanged AG (153.06 ± 13.74, 155.37 ± 19.30 and 144.44 ± 16.689 ng/L, respectively, P > 0.05). As a result, the ratio of AG/TG further increased in the SG group (0.103 ± 0.009, 0.105 ± 0.013 and 0.12 ± 0.016, respectively, P < 0.05). When compared with the S0 group, SG suppressed mRNA and protein levels of preproghrelin (0.63 ± 0.12 vs 0.5 ± 0.11, P < 0.05) and GOAT (0.96 ± 0.09 vs 0.87 ± 0.08, P < 0.05), but did not change NPY mRNA expression (0.61 ± 0.04 vs 0.65 ± 0.07, P > 0.05) in the hypothalamus. The protein levels of p-Akt, p-mTOR and p-S6 were higher in the SG group, which indicated that the hypothalamic mTOR pathway was activated after SG at the postoperative week 8.

CONCLUSION

The reduction of ghrelin expression and activation of the mTOR pathway might have opposite effects on food intake, as SG improves obesity and T2DM.

Malabsorption and intestinal adaptation after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in rats

The technically easier one-anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass (MGB) is associated with similar metabolic improvements and weight loss as the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, MGB is controversial and suspected to result in greater malabsorption than RYGB. In this study, we compared macronutrient absorption and intestinal adaptation after MGB or RYGB in rats. Body weight and food intake were monitored and glucose tolerance tests were performed in rats subjected to MGB, RYGB, or sham surgery. Carbohydrate, protein, and lipid absorption was determined by fecal analyses. Intestinal remodeling was evaluated by histology and immunohistochemistry. Peptide and amino acid transporter mRNA levels were measured in the remodeled intestinal mucosa and those of anorexigenic and orexigenic peptides in the hypothalamus. The MGB and RYGB surgeries both resulted in a reduction of body weight and an improvement of glucose tolerance relative to sham rats. Hypothalamic orexigenic neuropeptide gene expression was higher in MGB rats than in RYGB or sham rats. Fecal losses of calories and proteins were greater after MGB than RYGB or sham surgery. Intestinal hyperplasia occurred after MGB and RYGB with increased jejunum diameter, higher villi, and deeper crypts than in sham rats. Peptidase and peptide or amino acid transporter genes were overexpressed in jejunal mucosa from MGB rats but not RYGB rats. In rats, MGB led to greater protein malabsorption and energy loss than RYGB. This malabsorption was not compensated by intestinal overgrowth and increased expression of peptide transporters in the jejunum.

The Use of Rat and Mouse Models in Bariatric Surgery Experiments

Animal models have been proven to be a crucial tool for investigating the physiological mechanisms underlying bariatric surgery in general and individual techniques in particular. By using a translational approach, most of these studies have been performed in rodents and have helped to understand how bariatric surgery may or may not work. However, data from studies using animal models should always be critically evaluated for their transferability to the human physiology. It is, therefore, the aim of this review to summarize both advantages and limitations of data generated by animal based experiments designed to investigate and understand the physiological mechanisms at the root of bariatric surgery.

The future of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Archaic surgical procedures such as the jejunoileal bypass, vertical banded gastroplasty and duodenal switch have contributed to the current best practice of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure for the treatment of obesity and its consequences. Despite this, RYGB has been blighted with late occurring adverse events such as severe malnutrition, marginal ulcer and reactive hypoglycemia. Despite this, RYGB has given us an opportunity to examine the effect of surgery on gut hormones and the impact on metabolic syndrome which in turn has allowed us to carry out a lower impact but equally, if not more effective, procedure - the vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG). We examine the benefits of sleeve gastrectomy from the less challenging technical aspect to the effect on obesity and its metabolic syndrome long-term and have concluded that sleeve gastrectomy is possibly the next current best practice.

Changes of Regulatory T Cells and of Proinflammatory and Immunosuppressive Cytokines in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes of regulatory T cells (Treg), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods. We performed a comprehensive search up to July 2016 for all clinical studies about the changes of Treg, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, TGF-β, and TNF-α in T2DM patients versus healthy controls. Results. A total of 91 articles (5642 cases and 7378 controls) were included for this meta-analysis. Compared with the controls (all p < 0.001), the patients had increased serum levels of IL-6, TGF-β, and TNF-α but decreased the percentage of peripheral CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺Treg and serum IL-10 level. Furthermore, the percentage of peripheral CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺Treg (p < 0.001) and serum IL-10 level (p = 0.033) were significantly lower in the patients with complication and in the patients without complication, respectively. No significant changes about the percentage of CD4⁺CD25⁺Treg (p = 0.360) and serum IL-17 level (p = 0.459) were found in T2DM patients. Conclusions. T2DM patients have decreased the percentage of peripheral CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺Treg and levels of serum IL-10 but elevated serum levels of IL-6, TGF-β, and TNF-α. Presence of diabetic complications further lowers the peripheral CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺Treg number.